From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 00:18:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] New: Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Summary: Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emaldona at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softkn.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Network Security Services Cryptographic Module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 00:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010026.n710Qx2n007875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #1 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-07-31 20:26:58 EDT --- nss-softkn is one of two packages, nss-util being the other, that are being proposed as spin-off of the full NSS package. nss-softkn requires nss-util and they in turn will be required by nss. Please hold-off reviewing them until I fix some problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 02:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010200.n7120XTW022344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |515034 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 02:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010202.n7122AMY022480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:02:09 EDT --- What's your ID in the Fedora account system? A search didn't turn anything up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 02:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010200.n7120W8B022319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515032 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 02:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010219.n712J26T017287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:19:00 EDT --- Wow, that didn't exactly work. Tom, is the above package still what you'd like to have reviewed? (Probably not, over 13 months later.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 02:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459872] Review Request: asn1c - Free, open source compiler of ASN.1 specifications into C source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010230.n712UGKO019766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459872 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:30:14 EDT --- Just going back over some of these older tickets. I wonder it is permissible for us to distribute the sources of those sample files that you have to explicitly not include in the package due to licensing restrictions. In other words, don't they need to be removed from the source tarball completely? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code Otherwise, we still ship them in the source package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 02:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462176] Review Request: hybserv - Hybrid IRC Services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010243.n712hE7K022357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462176 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:43:12 EDT --- No response in two months. Given the description above, I'll mark this as not being ready; clear the whiteboard if you have something ready for review. Ray, honestly I'd say that if you have a package that's actually ready for review, just submit it and close this ticket as a duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 02:41:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:41:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010241.n712f7i9022063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:41:04 EDT --- What's the status of this ticket? Given comment #11, I'm not sure if this is ready for review, but I built the package from comment #4 on rawhide and it seems to at least build and install OK. (I've zero idea how to test it.) One thing I noticed is that the %pre scriptlet references %contentdir, which isn't defined so it gets inserted literally into the scriptlet which almost certainly doesn't do what's expected, and also causes: ocsigen.x86_64: W: percent-in-%pre There's also ocsigen.x86_64: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/lib64/ocsigen/extensions/ocsidbm ocsigen.x86_64: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/bin/ocsigen which I've not seen before. rpmlint says that nothing should build with ocamlc -custom. I don't see '-custom' anywhere in the build log so I'm not sure what's up there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 02:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010254.n712sr9X024542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:54:52 EDT --- Wow, this is an old one. I know nothing of drupal and there are no specific packaging guidelines to go by, but I suppose I could look at existing approved packages for guidance. However: The currently recommended version seems to be 1.4 rc1 or somesuch. (Not unexpected since this ticket is 10.5 months old.) Should it be updated before review? Where do you see that the license is restricted to GPLv2 only? I just see a copy of the GPL with no statement of the version in use, which would imply GPL+. Is there a more explicit indication of the license that I'm missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 02:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010258.n712wBIY001552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:58:10 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 03:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010300.n7130l1a002249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Bug 478372 depends on bug 513744, which changed state. Bug 513744 Summary: Swig update required https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513744 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Resolution|ERRATA | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 03:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010331.n713VgIE007027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 23:31:40 EDT --- Setting the fedora-review flag as that seems to have been overlooked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 03:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010330.n713UwiE006943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 23:30:55 EDT --- Setting the fedora-review flag as that seems to have been overlooked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 03:29:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503298] Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010329.n713TRqE006374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 23:29:26 EDT --- Sorry nobody's taken a look at this yet; we have far more submissions than reviewers. Honestly I don't know much about vim plugins; I don't even know how to test this. (I use vim for quick edits but I spend most of my time in emacs. Somehow using both at the same time fails to melt my brain.) I did build it on rawhide without incident; the only rpmlint complaint is: vim-bash-support.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/bash-support/templates/bash-file-header 0644 /bin/bash which is obviously bogus as that's a template file, not an actual script. It just happens to start with "#!/bin/bash". If you're still interested in getting your packages into Fedora and you drop some hints as to how to test them, I'll try to take a look in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 03:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010341.n713f8OU008647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #7 from Tom Lane 2009-07-31 23:41:06 EDT --- I haven't looked at this since it was submitted, so problems don't surprise me ... what didn't work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 03:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010346.n713kiHH032738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 23:46:43 EDT --- Sorry, what didn't work was Devrim's offer to review in comment #5. I haven't even tried to build the package; just wanted to check to see if you still wanted the original version reviewed or if an updated package would be necessary before a review could start. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 03:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515040] New: Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515040 Summary: Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtogami at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/spamassassin-plugin-ixhash.spec SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/spamassassin-plugin-ixhash-1.5.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: iXhash is a plugin for the popular spam filter SpamAssassin. It computes MD5 checksums of fragments of the body of an e-mail and compares them to those of know spam. As such it works similar to the now standard plugins that use the Pyzor, Razor and DCC software packages from within SpamAssassin. NOTE: This RPM defaults to 1 point per hit instead of upstream's 0.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 03:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010356.n713uHj3010961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #9 from Tom Lane 2009-07-31 23:56:16 EDT --- As I said in an earlier comment, I'd prefer to get this split out of the postgresql SRPM first, and then worry about version updates. postgresql is still building, so I *think* this ought to still work, if I didn't blow it too badly in constructing the new specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 04:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 00:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010408.n7148xjn012941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 00:08:58 EDT --- Well, sure. What I'm asking is if the version originally posted actually matches what you want reviewed. I have no idea if the postgreql package that this is split from has actually changed in the 13 months since the PyGreSQL package was generated, but I'm assuming that it has. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 04:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 00:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010431.n714V3sc007483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #11 from Tom Lane 2009-08-01 00:31:02 EDT --- Postgresql has changed. And there is a new version of PyGreSQL, as noted in comment #1. What has not changed in awhile is the version of PyGreSQL we are (improperly) embedding in the postgresql SRPM. I would like to get that fixed before there is any discussion of version updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 04:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 00:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010452.n714qVuB010747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 00:52:30 EDT --- Let me ask in a different manner. Is this what you want reviewed: Spec URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/PyGreSQL.spec SRPM URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/PyGreSQL-3.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm ? That's all I've been trying to ascertain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 05:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 01:01:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510864] Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010501.n71510Wi021356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510864 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 01:00:59 EDT --- I think that the package simply shouldn't have a URL if the URL isn't valid or doesn't have anything to do with the package. You can include a comment referring to the archived site, or even refer to the archived site directly if you like. Of course, the state of the web site begs a more important question: is upstream still around, and if not then are you sure you want to package undeveloped software? Who will handle the bugs? Are you prepared to fork and maintain this software yourself. (Yes, it's just a log colorizer, but someone still has to maintain it.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 05:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 01:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010507.n7157Ghp013269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #13 from Tom Lane 2009-08-01 01:07:14 EDT --- Yes, please; I don't know of a reason why that shouldn't still work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 05:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 01:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010516.n715GCBx023881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-01 01:16:11 EDT --- Off course! Many time ago I was try build it, but it is impossible due bug: http://trac.qutim.org/task/258 I directly speak with maintainer, and problem occurred in directly patching bundled copy of gloox library. This way is unacceptable for Fedora. So, waiting until bug resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 05:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 01:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510864] Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010558.n715wYxL030173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510864 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-01 01:58:34 EDT --- Jason Tibbitts, yes, I'm plan handle bugs himself. If there will be necessity, I "fork" project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 06:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 02:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010636.n716akVc003776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Devrim G??nd??z changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |devrim at gunduz.org --- Comment #14 from Devrim G??nd??z 2009-08-01 02:36:45 EDT --- Tom, 4.0 was released -- maybe it is the right time to push that version instead of 3.8.1 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 06:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 02:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010635.n716ZTcM026803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #25 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-01 02:35:27 EDT --- Awesome! Thank you, Jason Tibbitts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 06:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 02:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010639.n716dTKq027173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-01 02:39:28 EDT --- Ok, understood. Until then, I'm adding NotReady keyword to the whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 06:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 02:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010647.n716lVbW028491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 02:47:30 EDT --- Panini-0.71.103-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Panini-0.71.103-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 06:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 02:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010656.n716uQP5030018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 02:56:24 EDT --- Panini-0.71.103-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Panini-0.71.103-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 07:08:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 03:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010708.n7178UHc031773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli 2009-08-01 03:07:56 EDT --- License fixed by upstream(In reply to comment #2) > Needs work: > - sane provides/requires Hopefully fixed. > - license ok License fixed by upstream Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/f11/perl-Flickr-API.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/f11/perl-Flickr-API-1.02-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 07:09:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 03:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010709.n7179o7s008415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 --- Comment #4 from Michal Ingeli 2009-08-01 03:09:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Needs work: > - sane provides/requires Fixed > - license ok Corrected by upstream Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/f11/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/f11/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-0.09-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 07:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 03:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010716.n717GUHr009731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet 2009-08-01 03:16:29 EDT --- @Gianluca can you try mantis with this package ? (glpi works fine with it) @Patrick First, sorry for the long delay.. > "Provide: php-runtime" I really think than requiring php-common is enough for most libraires. This package will be required by web apps (mantis, glpi, ...) which will requires more stuff (apache, ...) if needed. Requiring too much things is more an issue than not requiring such "trivial" and optional package. And a lot of users want to use lighthttp rather than apache. I think description can be improved, for example with the upstream one ------ Full Featured Email Transfer Class for PHP. PHPMailer features: * Supports emails digitally signed with S/MIME encryption! * Supports emails with multiple TOs, CCs, BCCs and REPLY-TOs * Works on any platform. * Supports Text & HTML emails. * Embedded image support. * Multipart/alternative emails for mail clients that do not read HTML email. * Flexible debugging. * Custom mail headers. * Redundant SMTP servers. * Support for 8bit, base64, binary, and quoted-printable encoding. * Word wrap. * Multiple fs, string, and binary attachments (those from database, string, etc). * SMTP authentication. * Tested on multiple SMTP servers: Sendmail, qmail, Postfix, Gmail, Imail, Exchange, etc. * Good documentation, many examples included in download. * It's swift, small, and simple. ------ REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent php-PHPMailer.src: I: checking php-PHPMailer.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package must meet the Packaging Guidelines + Fedora approved license (LGPLv2+) + match the actual license + license included + spec file written in American English and legible (well don't think #---- are usefull) + sources match the upstream 2f7296bb63e863c5528c2d591e38f4e5 PHPMailer_v5.0.2.tar.gz + rpmbuild ok (F11.x86_64) + mock ok (F11.i386) + BuildRequires ok - Requires (see above) php >= 5.0.0 + locales handled properly + no .so + own all directories that it creates + %defattr ok + %clean ok + %install start with rm -rf... + consistently use macro + contain code + no large documentation and not affect the runtime of the application + no gui + not own files or directories already owned by other packages + valid UTF-8 + install and works finr (tested with glpi) Should fix URL and description Must fix php-mbstring dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 07:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 03:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010730.n717UNo8011876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-01 03:30:22 EDT --- Perfect. Thanks! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 07:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 03:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010730.n717U5ZI011730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-01 03:30:04 EDT --- Seems fine now. Thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 08:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515044] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515044 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: reidrac at usebox.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjmartinez.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree.spec SRPM URL: http://jjmartinez.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-0.09-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a singleton class for parsing XML into a tree structure using XML::Parser::Lite, which is a pure perl XML parser. Using this module you can tree-ify simple XML without having to compile any C. This is my first package for fedora and I need someone to sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 08:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515045] New: Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Perl interface to the Flickr API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Perl interface to the Flickr API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515045 Summary: Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Perl interface to the Flickr API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: reidrac at usebox.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjmartinez.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/perl-Flickr-API.spec SRPM URL: http://jjmartinez.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/perl-Flickr-API-1.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a simple interface for using the Flickr API. Flickr::API is a subclass of LWP::UserAgent, so all of the various proxy, request limits, caching, etc are available. This is my first package for fedora and I need someone to sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 08:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515045] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Perl interface to the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010812.n718C1g4010261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515045 Juanjo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515044 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 08:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515044] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010812.n718C0oa010240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515044 Juanjo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |515045 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 08:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515044] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010814.n718EZDa019580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515044 Juanjo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |515046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 08:14:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010814.n718EYUS019559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Juanjo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515044 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 08:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: reidrac at usebox.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjmartinez.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath.spec SRPM URL: http://jjmartinez.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath-0.22-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a pure-Perl implementation of XPath as complement to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree, a pure-Perl XML tree parser and builder. It aims to implement 100% of the W3C XPath specification. This is my first package for fedora and I need someone to sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 08:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 04:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514351] Review Request: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin - Stopwatch plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010829.n718Tq4a022325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se --- Comment #1 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-08-01 04:29:51 EDT --- I'm not qualified to do a review but here are some informal comments: 1: The Source0 URL got me a 404, but I found a link to http://archive.xfce.org/src/panel-plugins/xfce4-stopwatch-plugin/0.2/xfce4-stopwatch-plugin-0.2.0.tar.bz2 on the website. The difference is ".x". Has the URL changed? 2: desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate must be used. (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage) Do you have a very good reason not to do this? 3: RPMlint says: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7.2-1 ['0.2.0-1.fc11', '0.2.0-1'] The spec in the source RPM has the wrong version number in the changelog. In the separate spec it's correct. 4: It's not exactly a serious problem but there's a typo in the changelog. It says "Fedpra". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 09:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 05:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] New: Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Summary: Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.gieseking at uos.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm.spec SRPM URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: dvisvgm is a command line utility that converts DVI files, as created by TeX/LaTeX, to the XML-based scalable vector graphics format SVG. Besides the basic DVI command set, dvisvgm also supports various special sets, like color, PostScript and TPIC. Fonts that are only available as Metafont source are automatically vectorized so that the generated SVG is freely scalable without loss of quality. Note: I created the package for upstream and would be happy if it could be properly added to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 09:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 05:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010929.n719TSxu001359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 srinivas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from srinivas 2009-08-01 05:29:26 EDT --- Review approved. Changing the flag to fedora-review "+" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 09:43:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 05:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010943.n719h0Y8004278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 --- Comment #12 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-08-01 05:42:58 EDT --- The spec-file at the URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/rakudo/rakudo.spec it updated. The SRPM according to this spec has the URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/rakudo/SRPMS/rakudo-2009.07-3.fc11.src.rpm Successful scratch builds for F11 and F12 are at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1571582 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1571566 [gz016 at vgerd2 beide]$ rpmlint rakudo.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [gz016 at vgerd2 beide]$ [gz016 at vgerd2 beide]$ rpmlint /home/gz016/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rakudo-2009.07-3.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [gz016 at vgerd2 beide]$ [gz016 at vgerd2 beide]$ rpmlint /home/gz016/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/rakudo-2009.07-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [gz016 at vgerd2 beide]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 09:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 05:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908010954.n719sX5V006628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 --- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-01 05:54:32 EDT --- oups sorry I forgot to check for a newer version There it is: Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-AnnotationDbi.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 10:10:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 06:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514351] Review Request: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin - Stopwatch plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011010.n71AAUp7010080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-01 06:10:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm not qualified to do a review but here are some informal comments: > > 1: The Source0 URL got me a 404, but I found a link to > http://archive.xfce.org/src/panel-plugins/xfce4-stopwatch-plugin/0.2/xfce4-stopwatch-plugin-0.2.0.tar.bz2 > on the website. The difference is ".x". Has the URL changed? Yes, this was a bug in the goodies release manager webapp, that Jannis fixed after I rolled this package. > 2: desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate must be used. > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage) > Do you have a very good reason not to do this? Yes. All the xfce4-panel plugins have Type=X-XFCE-PanelPlugin instead of Type=Application Although this is a valid extension of the freedesktop.org specs, desktop-file-utils refuse to install or verify the files. > 3: RPMlint says: > xfce4-stopwatch-plugin.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7.2-1 > ['0.2.0-1.fc11', '0.2.0-1'] > The spec in the source RPM has the wrong version number in the changelog. In > the separate spec it's correct. > > 4: It's not exactly a serious problem but there's a typo in the changelog. It > says "Fedpra". Thanks for catching these. Updated files: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-stopwatch-plugin.spec http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-stopwatch-plugin-0.2.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 11:19:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 07:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513774] Review Request: python-firkin - A python module to convert between different measurement units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011119.n71BJIVW020723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513774 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 07:19:17 EDT --- python-firkin-0.02-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-firkin-0.02-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 11:19:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 07:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513774] Review Request: python-firkin - A python module to convert between different measurement units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011119.n71BJMPS020752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513774 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 07:19:22 EDT --- python-firkin-0.02-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-firkin-0.02-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 11:43:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 07:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515053] New: Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 Summary: Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-getiabooks.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-getiabooks-2-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/Get_Internet_Archive_Books Description: This Activity will use the Advanced Search capabilities of the Internet Archive website to enable browsing the website's catalog, getting information on the books therein, and downloading these books to the Journal. Its user interface is similar to the offline catalog search of Read Etexts, but where that Activity is used for both getting books and reading them this one will concern itself only with getting the books, so they may be read with the Read Activity. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1571774 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-getiabooks-2-1.fc11.src.rpm sugar-getiabooks.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop09 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-getiabooks-2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm sugar-getiabooks.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 11:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 07:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011157.n71BvW5d019231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #14 from St?phane Glondu 2009-08-01 07:57:30 EDT --- Comment #11 is obsolete with OCaml 3.11.1. The "ocaml-mixed-executable" shouldn't be there whith latest ocsigen (1.2) and ocaml-ssl with the following patch: http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/ocaml-ssl/0.4.3-2/makefile (committed in rev. 6455 of upstream SVN). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 12:09:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 08:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011209.n71C9Bfg030266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-01 08:09:09 EDT --- Let's see what we've got: OK - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are used OK - SourceURLs are correct OK - Versioning is correct One thing is left: make spectest is not running correctly, but this is something that you and upstream can work on once the package is in the repo. The Makefile also could need some changes, but for now the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 13:11:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011311.n71DBARL010585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 13:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011333.n71DX04Z005091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Bug 507849 depends on bug 507837, which changed state. Bug 507837 Summary: patch to allow for support of anjal mail client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507837 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 13:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514351] Review Request: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin - Stopwatch plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011355.n71DtVOk018471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351 --- Comment #3 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-08-01 09:55:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > 2: desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate must be used. > > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage) > > Do you have a very good reason not to do this? > > Yes. All the xfce4-panel plugins have > Type=X-XFCE-PanelPlugin > instead of > Type=Application > Although this is a valid extension of the freedesktop.org specs, > desktop-file-utils refuse to install or verify the files. OK. I suppose XFCE packagers know this already but for the rest of us a comment explaining that would be nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 13:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514699] Review Request: jemmy - Java UI testing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011358.n71Dw2Uc009330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699 --- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-01 09:58:01 EDT --- Hello Victor, * your specfile still has a %define; it would also be nice to move all other %global to file start. -- * In the procedure to build the source tarball, use export instead of checkout; that way md5sum of the tarball matches against the file included in the srpms -- * question: is there a particular reason you need ant >= 1.6.5, or can the version be omitted? cheers, Guido -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 14:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512164] Review Request: olpc-update - OLPC system update tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011405.n71E5rhA010757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512164 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 10:05:52 EDT --- olpc-update-2.20-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/olpc-update-2.20-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 14:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514351] Review Request: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin - Stopwatch plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011411.n71EBB15011989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-01 10:11:10 EDT --- I will try to keep that in mind next time. I could argue that the desktop file guidelines do not apply to these desktop files at all, because a GUI app is defined as "any application which draws an X window and runs from within that window". Panel plugins are not running from their own windows but from the panel. We also have desktop files in /usr/share/xsessions, which can not be installed with desktop-file-utils ether. Maybe someone needs to update the packaging guidelines to make the difference more obvious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 14:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510788] Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011438.n71EcGQV016587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510788 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 10:38:15 EDT --- WebShell-0.9.6-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/WebShell-0.9.6-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 14:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 10:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510788] Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011445.n71EjA5j027114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510788 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 10:45:09 EDT --- WebShell-0.9.6-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/WebShell-0.9.6-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 15:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011505.n71F5U24022100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #3 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-01 11:05:29 EDT --- My ID is emaldonado. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 15:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011519.n71FJrIh000958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 11:19:52 EDT --- I don't know how many times he can say that he doesn't want to worry about updating things until after this package is split out. This does still build fine; here's the rpmlint output: PyGreSQL.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/PyGreSQL-3.8.1/tutorial/basics.py PyGreSQL.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/PyGreSQL-3.8.1/tutorial/advanced.py PyGreSQL.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/PyGreSQL-3.8.1/tutorial/basics.py /usr/bin/env PyGreSQL.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/PyGreSQL-3.8.1/tutorial/advanced.py /usr/bin/env Generally documentation is not made executable. If there's something that people need to be able to execute, it should be installed in the usual location for binaries. If it's just there to look at, there's no reason for it to be executable. It doesn't really hurt anything as long as it doesn't add dependencies that aren't present in the rest of the package, but in this case it does. Of course, that dependency is in coreutils, so it's still not a huge idea, but I'd fix it. PyGreSQL.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/pg.py 0644 /usr/bin/env PyGreSQL.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages /pgdb.py 0644 /usr/bin/env For whatever reason, python programmers like to put #! lines even in files that aren't intended to be run. Some people like to fix these up; I don't particularly care. You indicate License: BSD, and docs/readme.txt says "BSD license", but setup.py says license = "Python" and the only license text I can find in the package is actually the MIT license (specifically http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer_4). pgdb.py says "See package documentation for further information on copyright." pg.py has no licensing information. I believe the situation is sufficiently confusing that upstream should be consulted. Perhaps the license on the new version is clearer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 15:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011524.n71FOR9Z025227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-01 11:24:26 EDT --- * Sat Aug 01 2009 Fabian Affolter - 8-2 - Added pygame as a requirement (as mentioned in #508441) Updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-view-slides.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-view-slides-8-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 15:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011522.n71FMZIH025055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 11:22:34 EDT --- Unfortunately that package doesn't build for me. + make -C doc/doxygen make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/maloc/doc/doxygen' doxygen maloc.dox make: execvp: doxygen: Permission denied That's kind of odd, but the package doesn't seem to have any build dependency on doxygen, so most likely it's simply not there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 15:43:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011543.n71FhdAj028426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |reidrac at usebox.net --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 11:43:38 EDT --- *** Bug 515044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 15:43:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515045] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Perl interface to the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011543.n71FheiS028447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515045 Bug 515045 depends on bug 515044, which changed state. Bug 515044 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515044 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 15:43:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011543.n71Fhf4D028467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Bug 515046 depends on bug 515044, which changed state. Bug 515044 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515044 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 15:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515044] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011543.n71FhcXr028393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515044 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 11:43:37 EDT --- This package was already under review and was approved about an hour before you opened this ticket. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 507801 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 15:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515044] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011548.n71Fmdsi006710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515044 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 11:48:38 EDT --- In fact, it looks like someone else is already working on the perl-Flickr stuff. See Could you do some searches and perhaps work with the other submitter to avoid duplication? See, for example, bug 507801 and bug 507805. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 15:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 11:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011556.n71Fu9X8008137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 11:56:08 EDT --- Ah, I searched for Batiz. Looks like you're set there. However, since you've asked that this not be reviewed yet, I'll indicate that it's not ready. Please clear the whiteboard when you'd like for someone to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 16:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 12:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011600.n71G0xKf009000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 12:00:57 EDT --- Note that we haven't used "Cvsextras Commits" for quite some time now. Otherwise, CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 16:17:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 12:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514931] Please build ruby-RMagick for EPEL 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011617.n71GH8wg001767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-01 12:17:07 EDT --- Well, * ruby(abi) - All ruby related packages must have "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" ( And I usually recomend to add also "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" for consistency ). * ImageMagick Dependency - Due to bug 500565 (i.e due to the function static void test_Magick_version(void) in ext/RMagick/rmmain.c), when ruby-RMagick is rebuilt with ImageMagick 6.2.8.0, RMagick will require ImageMagick 6.2.8.X ( i.e. even if the soname of the library in ImageMagick won't change between 6.2.8.X and 6.2.9.Y, RMagick rebuilt with ImageMagick 6.2.8.X won't work with ImageMagick 6.2.9.Y (by default) ). * htmldoc - Would you explain why you pass "--disable-htmldoc" to configure? ( By the way it seems that creating html documents also fixes shebangs automatically ) ! By the way as far as I am correct "BR: libwmf" is needed when creating html documents, would you check that? * configure v.s. setup.rb - Well, I think if "configure -> make" is used to compile RMagick, "make install" or so should be used to install files. If you use "ruby setup.rb install", perhaps "ruby setup.rb config/setup" or so is preferable instead of "configure -> make". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 17:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 13:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] New: Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model/perl-Config-Model.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model/perl-Config-Model-0.638-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Using Config::Model, a typical configuration validation tool will be made of 3 parts : 1. The user interface 2. The validation engine which is in charge of validating all the configuration information provided by the user. 3. The storage facility that store the configuration information -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 17:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 13:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] New: Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Summary: Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingou at pingoured.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-preprocessCore.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A library of core preprocessing routines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:04:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515045] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Perl interface to the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011804.n71I4rp9028588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515045 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|515044 |507801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515044] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011804.n71I4xmN028720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515044 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|515046 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515044] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011804.n71I4sXQ028646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515044 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|515045 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011804.n71I4srf028625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |515045 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011804.n71I4xij028699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |515046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011804.n71I4wFJ028667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|515044 |507801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488618] Review Request: Likewise Open - Likewise Active Directory Authentication Services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011809.n71I91ke019399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(krishnag at likewise | |.com) | --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 14:08:58 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] New: Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Summary: Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingou at pingoured.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-affy.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-affy-1.22.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The package contains functions for exploratory oligonucleotide array analysis. The dependance to tkWidgets only concerns few convenience functions. 'affy' is fully functional without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011819.n71IJrfb021126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Bug 499959 depends on bug 507762, which changed state. Bug 507762 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gravatar - Gravatar is a class to represent GRAVATAR[http://gravatar.com] avatars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507762 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507762] Review Request: rubygem-gravatar - Gravatar is a class to represent GRAVATAR[http://gravatar.com] avatars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011819.n71IJqvI021094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507762 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-01 14:19:50 EDT --- I'm sorry, this is my mistake, wrong package, seems that there is too many gravatar ruby libs/gems and I choosed wrong one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507762] Review Request: rubygem-gravatar - Gravatar is a class to represent GRAVATAR[http://gravatar.com] avatars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011822.n71IMxRO021804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507762 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011824.n71IOcYb032023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 14:24:37 EDT --- What should happen to this package now that the gravatar review won't be finished? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011833.n71IX6YE000940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515045] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Perl interface to the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011832.n71IWuCS023352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515045 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:31:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011831.n71IV68N023175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 14:31:05 EDT --- That's better. Builds fine, rpmlint has only the usual two complaints. There's a stray space in your description. (Minor, I know.) I agree about the disabling of the check section; it would require build dependencies on a significant number of packages, most of which don't seem to be part of Fedora and almost all of which look to be large. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 80939b4fee2e5cc91186f67e878160be7dee199ab9e6a3fed5fb275d5acb0991 AnnotationDbi_1.6.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: R-AnnotationDbi = 1.6.1-1.fc12 = /bin/sh R R >= 2.9.0 R-Biobase R-DBI R-RSQLite R-methods R-utils * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (R package registration) * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011839.n71IdASw001829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 14:39:09 EDT --- This fails to build for me in rawhide: RPM build errors: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/perl-Config-Model-0.638-1.fc12.x86_64/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.10.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Config I'm on x86_64, so I doubt i386-linux-thread-multi is going to be the proper directory, but then this is supposed to be a noarch package so why does it put anything in an arch-specific directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011845.n71IjDX1025623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-01 14:45:13 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-AnnotationDbi Short Description: Annotation Database Interface Owners: pingou Branches: F-10, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011845.n71Ij1v2025368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 14:45:00 EDT --- Oh, and I didn't even notice the /usr/local. No Fedora package can ever put anything there. Glancing at the spec, there are various other significant issues. Is there any specific reason not to just use cpanspec to autogenerate a package? The package it generates needs slight editing (check the License:, tweak the %description) but otherwise would lead to a quick approval. If you really want to roll your own, I recommend at least looking to the cpanspec-generated spec or the specfile templates in the packaging guidelines for an idea of how to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011845.n71IjXkb003096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514931] Please build ruby-RMagick for EPEL 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011850.n71IoqYk004039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Component|Package Review |ruby-RMagick -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 18:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011851.n71IpdxC004128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 14:51:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:19:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011919.n71JJHF5008366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(oglesbyzm at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 15:19:16 EDT --- Anything happening here? It's been a month since the last comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502537] Review Request: vrrpd - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (Daemon only) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011921.n71JLg4J008938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502537 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 15:21:41 EDT --- If you have legal questions you should make the ticket block FE-Legal so that the folks who understand such things can take a look. I'll do that now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226568] Merge Review: xmlto In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011926.n71JQCNw032024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226568 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-08-01 15:26:08 EDT --- Thanks for review! Patches removed, preserving timestamps added, noarch subpackages done and one wrong changelog entry fixed (just forgot to write version there ;) ) - built as xmlto-0.0.22-3.fc12. Closing RAWHIDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515090] New: Review Request: moblin-menus - Moblin config and data file for desktop menus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-menus - Moblin config and data file for desktop menus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515090 Summary: Review Request: moblin-menus - Moblin config and data file for desktop menus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-menus.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-menus-0.1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Moblin config and data file for desktop menus koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1572737 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011936.n71Ja2h4011278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou at pingoured.fr AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pingou at pingoured.fr Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011936.n71JaYu6001239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-01 15:36:33 EDT --- Hi, I'm going to do the review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011936.n71Jac51001263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011937.n71Jb8YQ001328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011939.n71Jdf3A001676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-01 15:39:40 EDT --- rpmlint must be run on every package. - OK [makerpm at kokain result]$ rpmlint ripmime-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . - OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - OK The spec file must be written in American English. - OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - OK If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, ... - OK All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - OK, no shared library If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - OK A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. - OK A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. - OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK Each package must consistently use macros. - OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - OK Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - OK Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK Conclusion: Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011940.n71Jencu012153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-01 15:40:48 EDT --- Are you already sponsored and part of the packager group ? I cannot find you. If you are not you have to add a FE-NEEDSPONSOR in the blocks part as described there: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011950.n71Jo1Zs003634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #5 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-01 15:50:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) Changed the source rpm to SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util-3.12.3.99.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:52:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011952.n71JqJkv013883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #2 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-01 15:52:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) Changed to source rpm to SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011953.n71Jr5fj004256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: nss-softokn |Review Request: nss-softokn |- Cryptographinc Module of |- Cryptographic Module of |NSS |NSS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011954.n71JsRaf004446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-01 15:54:26 EDT --- Oh, sorry. I indeed forgot to mention that this is actually my first package submitted here. So I'm looking for a sponsor (block field has been updated). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011957.n71JvIqV014732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:59:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513898] Review Request: keychecker - Generate list of installed packages sorted by GPG key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011959.n71JxBcf005394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513898 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 15:59:10 EDT --- keychecker-0.1-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/keychecker-0.1-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011956.n71JuHmc005090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-01 15:56:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ripmime Short Description: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011959.n71Jx64V005345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-01 15:59:05 EDT --- I still do the review: + rpmlint silent: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok ! License should be GPLv2+ as it seems to fit best the source code and the README file. You might want to contact upstream to ask him to correct the tag on the website. ! source0 is not correct, please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL + package compiles on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1572748 + BuildRequires are ok + No translation available + Package owns its files + No duplicated files listed + Permissions ok + %clean present + Package code not content + No large documentation + No headers nor static + No pkgconfig files + No .so files + No .la files + No GUI available + Clean at the beginning of %install - The license file being not present in the sources you might want to ask upstream to include one - Worked on the .dvi I used This package is for sure quite clean, few minor issues that we can easily fix. I unfortunately cannot sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513898] Review Request: keychecker - Generate list of installed packages sorted by GPG key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012000.n71K0Bkw015388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513898 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 16:00:10 EDT --- keychecker-0.1-3.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/keychecker-0.1-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513898] Review Request: keychecker - Generate list of installed packages sorted by GPG key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012000.n71K0oLK015574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513898 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 16:00:49 EDT --- keychecker-0.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/keychecker-0.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 19:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 15:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908011959.n71JxRpR014996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pingou at pingoured.fr |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:01:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513898] Review Request: keychecker - Generate list of installed packages sorted by GPG key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012001.n71K1Piw006067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513898 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 16:01:24 EDT --- keychecker-0.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/keychecker-0.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012004.n71K4qJ9006390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 16:04:51 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012006.n71K6GK5016587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Michal Ingeli 2009-08-01 16:06:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Flickr-API Short Description: Flickr API interface Owners: ksyz Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012008.n71K8r7V007307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 16:08:52 EDT --- R packaging is getting to be as automatic as Perl package, and about as boring to review. And, as with Perl, the biggest problem is licensing. Note several of the C files in src are GPLv2+, not LGPLv2+, unless that's a typo. This would seem to contradict the DESCRIPTION file. This should be clarified with the upstream developers. In addition to the usual one-line-command-in-* complaints, rpmlint says: R-preprocessCore-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib R-preprocessCore-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation which are both OK; R needs to find the headers in its namespace under _libdir. Your %descriptions (both of them) are missing periods. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 630b5fa4c98492eb4a189dfafb68213b51af88da928fa4fc90aae6e544811a31 preprocessCore_1.6.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (could use periods). * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not seem to match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm preprocessCore.so()(64bit) R-preprocessCore = 1.6.0-1.fc12 R-preprocessCore(x86-64) = 1.6.0-1.fc12 = /bin/sh R R-methods libR.so()(64bit) libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit) libgfortran.so.3()(64bit) R-preprocessCore-devel-1.6.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm R-preprocessCore-devel = 1.6.0-1.fc12 R-preprocessCore-devel(x86-64) = 1.6.0-1.fc12 = R-preprocessCore = 1.6.0 * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (R package registration). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. Unfortunately I cannot approve this due to the licensing issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:09:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012009.n71K9nmR016922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-01 16:09:48 EDT --- Thanks for your immediate review. Since I'm the developer of dvisvgm I will directly update all items you mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515044] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - A lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012016.n71KGqZ7008796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515044 --- Comment #3 from Juanjo 2009-08-01 16:16:51 EDT --- Sorry about that. I asked the author to change the license to comply with Fedroa licensing guidelines, so I supposed (wrongly) that I wasn't packaged yet. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:15:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012015.n71KFiW4008625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 16:15:43 EDT --- This one doesn't build for me: gcc -m64 -std=gnu99 -I/usr/include/R -DHAVE_ZLIB=1 -I/usr/local/include -fpic -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c rma2.c -o rma2.o rma2.c:109:29: error: rma_background4.h: No such file or directory rma2.c:120:45: error: preprocessCore_background_stubs.c: No such file or directory rma2.c:121:48: error: preprocessCore_normalization_stubs.c: No such file or directory rma2.c:122:48: error: preprocessCore_summarization_stubs.c: No such file or directory rma2.c:124:31: error: R_subColSummarize.h: No such file or directory rma2.c:125:37: error: R_subColSummarize_stubs.c: No such file or directory rma2.c: In function 'do_RMA2': rma2.c:134: warning: implicit declaration of function 'R_subColSummarize_medianpolish_log' rma2.c:134: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast rma2.c: In function 'rma_c_call': rma2.c:186: warning: implicit declaration of function 'qnorm_c' rma2.c: In function 'rma_c_complete': rma2.c:247: warning: implicit declaration of function 'rma_bg_correct' make: *** [rma2.o] Error 1 ERROR: compilation failed for package 'affy' A scratch build is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1572805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012018.n71KIuZH018476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-01 16:18:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > R packaging is getting to be as automatic as Perl package, and about as boring > to review. And, as with Perl, the biggest problem is licensing. I really sorry about that :-) > Note several of the C files in src are GPLv2+, not LGPLv2+, unless that's a > typo. This would seem to contradict the DESCRIPTION file. This should be > clarified with the upstream developers. I will contact upstream and let you know > Your %descriptions (both of them) are missing periods. I'll take care of that Thanks for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515045] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Perl interface to the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012024.n71KO6pk009691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515045 Juanjo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Juanjo 2009-08-01 16:24:06 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 507804 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012024.n71KO7LJ009724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 Juanjo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |reidrac at usebox.net --- Comment #6 from Juanjo 2009-08-01 16:24:06 EDT --- *** Bug 515045 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514452] Review Request: trac-agilo-plugin - a trac plugin to support the Scrum process. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012023.n71KNXVw019242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514452 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:25:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012025.n71KPtEk010251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 16:25:54 EDT --- I'm also concerned that this has the same licensing issue as preprocessCore. Only src/rma2.c carries any license information, and it says GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012025.n71KPYmf010178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #7 from Juanjo 2009-08-01 16:25:33 EDT --- I asked upstream to change the license, but I didn't realize the work being done here, so I marked Bug 515045 as duplicated of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:25:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515040] Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012025.n71KPf2i010216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515040 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-01 16:25:40 EDT --- I'll go ahead and review this. Look for a full review here in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:28:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012028.n71KSjPI020073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-01 16:28:44 EDT --- Please note as well that some C files have their header as GPL without specifying the version. It might be nice to be consistent on them :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012029.n71KTlgK020165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 16:29:46 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012030.n71KUP8n020662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-01 16:30:24 EDT --- This one need R-preprocessCore to build (and I am seing that both R-affyio and R-preprocessCore are not listed while they should...) There are the updated version: Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-affy.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-affy-1.22.0-2.fc11.src.rpm I will also contact upstream for this library then. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012037.n71KbRDJ021709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 16:37:26 EDT --- R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012037.n71KbVTI012023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 16:37:30 EDT --- R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012041.n71KfRZ4022549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Michal Ingeli 2009-08-01 16:41:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree Short Description: Lightweight XML tree builder Owners: ksyz Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012042.n71KgZwo012793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 16:42:34 EDT --- We like it when upstream maintainers are involved with Fedora. Once you've made those changes, please put together a new package and post the links here. I'll take a quick look and if everything goes OK I'll get you set up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 20:44:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 16:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515040] Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012044.n71KiBUJ012958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515040 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-01 16:44:10 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 891a85984bb44b12431f5998a05fe2ff iXhash-1.5.5.tgz 891a85984bb44b12431f5998a05fe2ff iXhash-1.5.5.tgz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. rpmlint says: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin spamassassin-plugin-ixhash.src: W: summary-not-capitalized iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin Can be ignored, but iXhash doesn't mean much to most people I suspect. You could just drop that and cap the F in fuzzy? spamassassin-plugin-ixhash.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/spamassassin-plugin-ixhash-1.5.5/CHANGELOG spamassassin-plugin-ixhash.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/spamassassin-plugin-ixhash-1.5.5/CHANGELOG Suggest: dos2unix them? Not a big deal, but easy to do. None of those are blockers, so this package is APPROVED. Please look at tweaking those on import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 21:00:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012100.n71L02PV025365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-01 16:59:59 EDT --- Closing due to inactive submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 21:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012118.n71LI0BE028229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 17:17:59 EDT --- ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 21:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012118.n71LIVqW018531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 17:18:31 EDT --- ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 21:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012116.n71LGHi7018344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 17:16:16 EDT --- Builds fine; rpmlint says: pyhunspell.x86_64: W: no-documentation which is fine, since there isn't any. I'm unsure of the name. The upstream site calls itself "pyhunspell" but the tarball and the module are called hunspell. The guidelines only say "when in doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script", which would be "hunspell" (and to prepend "python-" if "py" isn't in the name). Not really sure what's correct here. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 %description could use a period. I note that the compiler flags all appear twice; I think setup.py build gets them right without having them passed, but I'm not certain of it. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: ec1bfa633f937b67f6b2a7134ee2600aecf704a62042e2dc9f0eb4a2ec18c67d hunspell-0.1.tar.gz ? unsure of the package name. * specfile is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (could use a period). * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: hunspell.so()(64bit) pyhunspell = 0.1-1.fc12 pyhunspell(x86-64) = 0.1-1.fc12 = libhunspell-1.2.so.0()(64bit) libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 21:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012119.n71LJhca028422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 21:20:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012120.n71LKYsw028939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 17:20:33 EDT --- ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 21:18:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012118.n71LIt3T028357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 17:18:54 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 21:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012126.n71LQdH4019957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-01 17:26:38 EDT --- I sent an email to upstream there his is (complete !) answer "The licence in the DESCRIPTION is the intended licence" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 22:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 18:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012231.n71MVo3U030107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-01 18:31:49 EDT --- Updated to latest version SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-icon-theme-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1572941 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012352.n71NqPS7019468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:52:24 EDT --- axel-2.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:52:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012352.n71Nqbip019569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:52:36 EDT --- perl-Config-JFDI-0.063-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012352.n71NqUt5019534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.4-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012354.n71Nsdd7010578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:54:39 EDT --- axel-2.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510428] Review Request: axel - Accelerated download client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012354.n71NsiBG010623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510428 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.4-1.fc10 |2.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012355.n71NtGL3020770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:55:14 EDT --- nurbs++-3.0.11-6.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012357.n71NvKTt021359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #86 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:57:16 EDT --- armadillo-0.6.12-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012356.n71Nu2KJ021005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.1.1-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012355.n71NtMUo020839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.0.11-6.fc10.1 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507089] Review Request: olpc-powerd - power management for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012358.n71NwNY8021666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507089 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |9-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012357.n71NvQpX021416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.12-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510788] Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012355.n71NtYId020911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510788 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:55:33 EDT --- WebShell-0.9.6-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update WebShell'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012358.n71NwC5B021622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:58:11 EDT --- ccrypt-1.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ccrypt'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8200 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:58:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507089] Review Request: olpc-powerd - power management for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012358.n71NwIwh011852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507089 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:58:17 EDT --- olpc-powerd-9-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:56:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012356.n71Nub0w011507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:56:37 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Javascript-1.1.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012355.n71Ntwn7011312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:55:57 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Javascript-1.1.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012356.n71NugtW011537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.1-3.fc11 |1.1.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012358.n71NwiPt011927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.1.6-2.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012358.n71NwwJh012022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:58:57 EDT --- Panini-0.71.103-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update Panini'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8203 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020001.n72017qQ023211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 20:01:07 EDT --- sipcalc-1.1.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:58:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012358.n71Nwddn022110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:58:38 EDT --- php-pear-Auth_HTTP-2.1.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020002.n72026bN023384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.4-3.fc10 |1.1.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020002.n7202H94023458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 20:02:16 EDT --- php-pear-Auth_HTTP-2.1.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020002.n7202LYr023488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1.6-2.fc11 |2.1.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012359.n71NxuC5022503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:59:55 EDT --- ccrypt-1.8-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ccrypt'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8209 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513774] Review Request: python-firkin - A python module to convert between different measurement units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020001.n7201qeI023318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513774 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 20:01:52 EDT --- python-firkin-0.02-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-firkin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8213 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:01:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513191] Review Request: php-facedetect - PHP extension to access the OpenCV library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020001.n7201vMQ023349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513191 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 20:01:56 EDT --- php-facedetect-1.0.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-facedetect'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8214 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 1 23:58:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513191] Review Request: php-facedetect - PHP extension to access the OpenCV library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908012358.n71NwqUM022251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513191 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 19:58:51 EDT --- php-facedetect-1.0.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-facedetect'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8202 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020002.n72021fC013237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 20:02:01 EDT --- sipcalc-1.1.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020001.n7201CMd013032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.4-3.el5 |1.1.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020001.n7201J5T013081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #87 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 20:01:18 EDT --- armadillo-0.6.12-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020001.n7201RW2013124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6.12-2.fc10 |0.6.12-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:02:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510788] Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020002.n7202ZdH013345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510788 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 20:02:34 EDT --- WebShell-0.9.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update WebShell'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8219 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020000.n7200pCK012862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 20:00:50 EDT --- Panini-0.71.103-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update Panini'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8211 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513774] Review Request: python-firkin - A python module to convert between different measurement units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020000.n7200kiv012811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513774 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 20:00:45 EDT --- python-firkin-0.02-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-firkin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8217 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020007.n7207Pt9024749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se --- Comment #2 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-08-01 20:07:24 EDT --- 1: The license tag is wrong. It says "GPLv3+", but in hunspell.c it says "the GNU Library General Public License [...] either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version". Although it's officially "Lesser", not "Library", it's still clearly LGPLv3+. It also says "GNU Lesser General Public License" on the website. 2: There is no license file. Have you asked upstream to include a copy of the LGPL version 3 in the tarball? (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 00:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 20:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233588] Review Request: perl-Graph - A Perl module for dealing with graphs, the abstract data structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020013.n720DmgH015444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233588 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 20:13:45 EDT --- perl-Graph-0.84-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Graph-0.84-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 04:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 00:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020443.n724hFv5023674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-02 00:43:14 EDT --- Bjorn's right about the licence; I grepped for lesser as usual and of course didn't find it. You can bug upstream for a copy of the license text if you like; that's your business. I don't find it productive to say that for well over half of the packages I see which don't bother to include license text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 05:09:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 01:09:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] New: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Class-TimeStamp/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Works in conjunction with InflateColumn::DateTime to automatically set update and create date and time based fields in a table. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1573263 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 05:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 01:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020511.n725BGsa028315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jacek.radzikowski at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-02 01:11:14 EDT --- *** Bug 515082 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 05:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 01:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020518.n725Iqmw029436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-02 01:18:51 EDT --- I will review this shortly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 05:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 01:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020529.n725T0nK030979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-02 01:29:00 EDT --- How did you determine that the license is CC-By-SA? The COPYING file is empty. Where does create-icon-theme.sh come from? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 06:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 02:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020619.n726JP7p016503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-02 02:19:24 EDT --- You should also drop the explicit requires on gtk2. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 06:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 02:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020629.n726TWkS007839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-02 02:29:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > How did you determine that the license is CC-By-SA? The COPYING file is empty. > Where does create-icon-theme.sh come from? There are a couple of different COPYING files. The one in the root of the tarball that is installed in the 0.7 version is as follows: # more /usr/share/doc/moblin-icon-theme-0.7/COPYING Copyright (C) 2009 Intel Corporation This work is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA. The create-icon-theme.sh is also in the root of the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 06:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 02:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020637.n726bVLV019188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-02 02:37:31 EDT --- Ah, I just realized I had downloaded the previous source instead of the latest. Sorry for the confusion. You are APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 06:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 02:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020637.n726bmQV019237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 06:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 02:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020635.n726ZdAq008970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-02 02:35:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > You should also drop the explicit requires on gtk2. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires The reason I added it because the rpm itself doesn't have libraries in it that can be used for determining requirements but the pre/post scripts use gtk-update-icon-cache which requires gtk2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 06:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 02:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020642.n726gDME009828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-02 02:42:12 EDT --- Thanks :-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-icon-theme Short Description: Moblin icon theme Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 06:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 02:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020649.n726nVmt010677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #34 from Vivek Shah 2009-08-02 02:49:27 EDT --- Updated the spec and srpm Please find it here: Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/mausezahn.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/mausezahn-0.34.8-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 06:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 02:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020648.n726mf10020682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-02 02:48:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > will check this package this week Hi Parag, have you had a chance to check this further? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 06:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 02:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020659.n726xNf5012125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-02 02:59:22 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm.spec SRPM URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for all your comments and support. I've updated the spec file and added the GPL v2 LICENSE file to the tarball. However, I'm not quite sure about the license constraints because the sources contain some unmodified, third-party files that are licensed under GPL v2+. Even if I'd like to publish my own code under GPL v3, do the bundled files affect the license of the complete package, e.g. force it to be GPL v2+ too (which wouldn't be a problem for me)? For now, I stay with GPL v2+. I didn't change the headers of the third-party files, so some of them still don't mention their GPL version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 08:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020854.n728sgOD000781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #4 from Till Maas 2009-08-02 04:54:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I'm unsure of the name. The upstream site calls itself "pyhunspell" but the > tarball and the module are called hunspell. The guidelines only say "when in > doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script", > which would be "hunspell" (and to prepend "python-" if "py" isn't in the name). > Not really sure what's correct here. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 Imho pyhunspell is ok here, because the project calls itself pyhunspell. But I asked the packaging list to be sure: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-August/msg00002.html > %description could use a period. But it is not a complete sentence. > I note that the compiler flags all appear twice; I think setup.py build gets > them right without having them passed, but I'm not certain of it. They come from rpmdev-newspec -t python, maybe they are needed for EPEL. (In reply to comment #3) > Bjorn's right about the licence; I grepped for lesser as usual and of course > didn't find it. You can bug upstream for a copy of the license text if you > like; that's your business. I don't find it productive to say that for well > over half of the packages I see which don't bother to include license text. I will the change the license tag in the spec before importing it. Here is a ticket to include the license text in the tarball and handle the other issues: http://code.google.com/p/pyhunspell/issues/detail?id=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 08:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020855.n728th18011199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-02 04:55:42 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.4.20090713git.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bios_extract-0-0.4.20090713git.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 08:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020855.n728tmLc011233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-02 04:55:48 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.4.20090713git.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bios_extract-0-0.4.20090713git.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 09:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 05:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020908.n7298g01013291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #20 from D Haley 2009-08-02 05:08:37 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-3.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-3.fc10.src.rpm Koji: F10: Unable to run, dep errors from blocking bug (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1573375&name=root.log) F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1573383 $cat files Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mathgl-1.9-3.fc10.src.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-1.9-3.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-devel-1.9-3.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mathgl-doc-1.9-3.fc10.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-debuginfo-1.9-3.fc10.i386.rpm $ rpmlint `cat files | sed 's/Wrote: //' | tr '\n' '\ '` mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 mathgl-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > * you're running autoreconf, so --disable-rpath to configure should work. Didn't work, complains its an unknown option. However the libtool hack works after an autoreconf. So this is Done. > Usually we don't fix SMP make (at least when it requires regenerating > autotools). Just send the patches upstream, drop Patch1 and its BRs and comment > the %{?_smp_mflags} part with a note that it doesn't work in 1.9. Not Done. I think we should keep it, especially seeing as we are 'reconfing anyway. I will notify upstream however. Packages with functional SMP builds are a lot easier to maintain, even with an autoreconf. >Drop the definition of octtype as you're not using it, and change the %define's into %global's. >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define Fixed >and run the following commands to regenerate the octave package database: Fixed. > drop the octave site stuff Not done, as that breaks the oct file finding. This needs to work without user intervention. So you still need something to help octave find mathgl.oct, even with the pkg('rebuild'). A dirty test indicates: *pkg('rebuild') only searches the search paths of octave (this is in the manual as well), *The rebuild is not persistent at finding the oct file between sessions if path changes: So either a symlink or the plugin proper must be in one of these, or we must modify this permanently After rpm installation (w/o symlink): -- [makerpm at spiderbox mathgl-1.9]$ sudo octave -q octave:1> mathgl error: `mathgl' undefined near line 1 column 1 octave:1> addpath('/usr/libexec/octave/plugins/mathgl/i386-redhat-linux-gnu-api-v32/') octave:2> pkg('rebuild') octave:3> mathgl octave:4> quit [makerpm at spiderbox mathgl-1.9]$ sudo octave -q octave:1> mathgl error: `mathgl' undefined near line 1 column 1 octave:1> -- By default: --- octave:1> path Octave's search path contains the following directories: . /usr/libexec/octave/3.0.3/site/oct/i386-redhat-linux-gnu /usr/libexec/octave/site/oct/api-v32/i386-redhat-linux-gnu /usr/libexec/octave/site/oct/i386-redhat-linux-gnu /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/site/m Octave's search path contains the following directories: . /usr/libexec/octave/3.0.3/site/oct/i386-redhat-linux-gnu /usr/libexec/octave/site/oct/api-v32/i386-redhat-linux-gnu /usr/libexec/octave/site/oct/i386-redhat-linux-gnu /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/site/m /usr/share/octave/site/api-v32/m /usr/share/octave/site/m /usr/share/octave/site/m/startup /usr/libexec/octave/3.0.3/oct/i386-redhat-linux-gnu /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/plot /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/special-matrix /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/finance /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/optimization /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/quaternion /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/testfun /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/path /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/linear-algebra /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/statistics /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/statistics/models /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/statistics/distributions /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/statistics/tests /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/statistics/base /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/time /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/elfun /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/deprecated /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/control /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/control/hinf /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/control/obsolete /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/control/util /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/control/base /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/control/system /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/pkg /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/audio /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/geometry /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/set /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/sparse /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/image /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/signal /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/polynomial /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/startup /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/miscellaneous /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/general /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/io /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/specfun /usr/share/octave/3.0.3/m/strings --- >Remove the documentation 'make install' installs in %{_docdir}/%{name} with >rm -rf %{_docdir}/%{name} >instead just list the necessary files in the %doc of the -doc subpackage Done. >Put the info files in the main package. Fixed > You need to regenerate the info database as well: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo Fixed >You might not want to remove the zero-length files as if some of them are >missing the program might not work. Best to ask upstream to remove the empty >files from the distribution. There are exactly 2 files that are zero-length, one is the INDEX file for octave (which is an optional file), and the second is the all.png file, which is being used as a faux target in the makefile, as far as i can tell. I have simply rm'd them instead of using the catchall, so this is Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 09:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 05:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908020957.n729v1mf012576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-02 05:57:00 EDT --- There is the answer from upstream to my email: > Pierre, > > It should all be LGPL. Do you need me to go in and change it or is this > email enough? > > Good luck! > -r -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 10:14:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 06:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021014.n72AEUt6015675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-02 06:14:28 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 10:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 06:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021047.n72AlvFD031687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 Juha Tuomala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Juha Tuomala 2009-08-02 06:47:56 EDT --- % fedora-cvs python-utmp Checking out python-utmp from fedora CVS as tuju: cvs server: cannot find module `python-utmp' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 11:00:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 07:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021100.n72B0V79023812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-02 07:00:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Implicitly we agreed (i.e. I > wrote it, you had no comment) on the following lines (lines 27-28): > # libgnomeui gets pulled in by gnome-panel-devel > #BuildRequires: libgnomeui-devel Sorry, I did't recall this detail. You are right. > Nevertheless OK: Since it is a BuildRequires and not a Requires, you could > leave it as it is according to the motivation below. My personal preference is > to keep the explicit (Build)Requires as clean as possible, but it seems the > Guidelines give a little leeway on this point. I agree with you that mentioning libgnomeui-devel doesn't add any value. Let's remove it from both our specs next build. Would you like to support me with this package and co-maintain it? If so, I'll add you to the persons with commit access, so you can do updates or rebuilds when necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 11:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 07:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021119.n72BJCIa026832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #4 from C?dric OLIVIER 2009-08-02 07:19:11 EDT --- Hello, Thanks for your review, I am updating this rpm with all your comments. following rpmlint traces : rpmlint SPECS/josm.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint RPMS/noarch/josm-0-1788svn.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint RPMS/noarch/josm-javadoc-0-1788svn.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint SRPMS/josm-0-1788svn.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-1788/josm.spec http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-1788/josm-0-1788svn.fc11.src.rpm Not yet realized : * remove .svn file and other uneeded stuff. * bash script for generating tarball from the subversion repository * package manual (I don't actually know how to do it) jfcUnit seems to not be used in josm, I have asked the josm-dev list to confirm it. I am packaging gettext-commons, I will submit soon a review for it. Bests regards. C?dric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 11:50:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 07:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021150.n72Bo4SR032531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 --- Comment #11 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-08-02 07:50:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I agree with you that mentioning libgnomeui-devel doesn't add any value. Let's > remove it from both our specs next build. Ok, done. Mine was already gone before the review. > Would you like to support me with this package and co-maintain it? If so, I'll > add you to the persons with commit access, so you can do updates or rebuilds > when necessary. Yes, I would like to support you as co-maintainer. Perhaps you could return the favour for gnome-applet-bubblemon since the packages are so similar. This way, we can keep a feeling for both and keep them pretty identical. Both are low-maintenance type of packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 12:18:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 08:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021218.n72CIlJl014413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-02 08:18:45 EDT --- I have applied for gnome-applet-bubblemon in PKGDB. As a proven packager I don't really need this, I could touch your package whenever I wanted. And as your sponsor I always have an eye on you. ;) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-applet-cpufire Short Description: GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire Owners: cwickert edwintb Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 12:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 08:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021240.n72CeeNB017940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-02 08:40:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > >and run the following commands to regenerate the octave package database: > Fixed. > > > drop the octave site stuff > Not done, as that breaks the oct file finding. This needs to work without user > intervention. So you still need something to help octave find mathgl.oct, even > with the pkg('rebuild'). > > A dirty test indicates: > *pkg('rebuild') only searches the search paths of octave (this is in the manual > as well), > *The rebuild is not persistent at finding the oct file between sessions if path > changes: > > So either a symlink or the plugin proper must be in one of these, or we must > modify this permanently No, this is a dirty hack. For a good model on how to do it properly, look at Octave Forge, the package containing additional tools for Octave: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/octave-forge/F-11/octave-forge.spec?view=markup The architecture dependent packages are installed in /usr/libexec/octave/packages/ and noarch packages in /usr/share/octave/packages. ** Use %{!?octave_api:%global octave_api %(octave-config -p API_VERSION || echo 0)} to get the Octave api version, then you can Requires: octave(api) = %{octave_api} (plplot uses this version) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 12:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 08:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514931] Please build ruby-RMagick for EPEL 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021245.n72CjlJu018751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-02 08:45:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * ruby(abi) > - All ruby related packages must have "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" > ( And I usually recomend to add also "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" > for consistency ). Well, that doesn't work on EPEL 5, because there's no ruby(abi) provided. $ rpm -q ruby ruby-1.8.5-5.el5_3.7 $ $ rpm -q --provides ruby | grep "ruby(abi)" $ As the ruby ABI anyway won't change on RHEL 5 during its lifetime, I don't see a need for this. If it makes you happy, I can add a "ruby = 1.8.5" as a hard requirement, but seems to be unnecessary. > * ImageMagick Dependency > - Due to bug 500565 (i.e due to the function > static void test_Magick_version(void) in ext/RMagick/rmmain.c), > when ruby-RMagick is rebuilt with ImageMagick 6.2.8.0, RMagick > will require ImageMagick 6.2.8.X > > ( i.e. even if the soname of the library in ImageMagick won't change > between 6.2.8.X and 6.2.9.Y, RMagick rebuilt with ImageMagick > 6.2.8.X won't work with ImageMagick 6.2.9.Y (by default) ). Well, ImageMagick is from RHEL thus never will get incompatible upgraded and there never will be a version upgrade, just security backports. If ImageMagick would get upgraded on RHEL, that would anyway break many things. I can add a hard dependency to "ImageMagick = 6.2.8.0", if that makes you happy. Next RHEL will anyway need ruby-RMagick 2.x. > * htmldoc > - Would you explain why you pass "--disable-htmldoc" to configure? > ( By the way it seems that creating html documents also fixes > shebangs automatically ) > ! By the way as far as I am correct "BR: libwmf" is needed when creating > html documents, would you check that? Building documentation fails, that verdana.ttf or arial.ttf is required but not available on the system. It's looking for /usr/share/fonts/defaults/ TrueType/, if I remember the path correctly. Nothing at Fedora is seemingly providing that. > * configure v.s. setup.rb > - Well, I think if "configure -> make" is used to compile RMagick, > "make install" or so should be used to install files. > > If you use "ruby setup.rb install", perhaps "ruby setup.rb config/setup" > or so is preferable instead of "configure -> make". Maybe I did something wrong, but that way I was not able to build the package. There's a *.h.in and another *.in for example which only gets handled by the ./configure, otherwise the build poorly failed for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 12:50:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 08:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021250.n72CoP5g010435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-02 08:50:24 EDT --- Ugh, I think if you look at the CVS request you made you'll see the problem: you asked for "phython-utmp" and I didn't catch it. Please double-check your CVS requests. Your module should be there now; I'll get the bad one cleaned up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 12:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 08:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021249.n72Cn6H6009962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #19 from Simon Wesp 2009-08-02 08:49:03 EDT --- > pluginmgr.py(529): Could not import the bauble.plugins.picasa module. > Any idea ? python-gdata.noarch : A Python module for accessing online Google services "Requires: python-gdata" is missing, but it works without it, so i can't understand why it should crash. > connmgr.py(633): KeyError: 'default' > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/connmgr.py:642: GtkWarning: > gdk_x11_atom_to_xatom_for_display: assertion `atom != GDK_NONE' failed > r = d.run() > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/connmgr.py", line 643, in > on_activate_browse_button > self.file_entry.set_text(d.get_filename()) > TypeError: GtkEntry.set_text() argument 1 must be string, not None CLOSED WORKSFORME :-) > I think some patch are still needed :-) really??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 13:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021308.n72D82HH013730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 --- Comment #19 from Juha Tuomala 2009-08-02 09:08:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Ugh, I think if you look at the CVS request you made you'll see the problem: > you asked for "phython-utmp" and I didn't catch it. Please double-check your > CVS requests. No, I actually asked "pyhton-utmp", not "phython-utmp" nor "python-utmp". Yeah, that was the problem anyway. Works now great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 13:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021322.n72DMSmT016336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-02 09:22:26 EDT --- I had a glance and I found the following issues: * Release tag is still wrong. It should be 0.X.1788svn%{?dist} and not 1788svn%{?dist}. The first 0 indicate that this is a pre-release version. The X is an incremented number (start at 1) you should bump at *each* new release. 1788svn is the svn version of the checkout you used. * This is still wrong: find -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; It should be: find \( -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' \) -exec rm -f '{}' \; Or: find . -name '*.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \; find . -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; Therefore system jars are still not used, but I think you already knew this. * Please don't use %{_builddir}/%{buildsubdir}. You already are in %{_builddir}/%{buildsubdir}, so there is no need to specify it. * And you should install the icon under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps and not under %{_datadir}/pixmaps/ You must also add the following to require the related file system package: Requires: hicolor-icon-theme * There is no useful documentation in javadoc files you generate. * There is a duplicate BR: BuildRequires: java-devel You already have: BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 * Another package you should make is bzip2 library: http://www.kohsuke.org/bzip2/ You should not use the local copy. * Please remove double spaces from summary and description. HTH, Andrea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 13:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021324.n72DO070025369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 --- Comment #25 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-02 09:23:58 EDT --- After the rebuild of the source RPM rpmlint says: [fab at laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint cpulimit* cpulimit.i586: W: no-documentation cpulimit-debuginfo.i586: E: debuginfo-without-sources 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. For it seems that the compiler flags aren't honored. Comment #19 said what to do ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 13:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021345.n72DjG4B020743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #6 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-02 09:45:14 EDT --- I just noticed that Debian has a new version of JOSM in unstable: http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/josm You may want to check what they are doing and if there are any useful patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 13:50:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021350.n72DoTi2030824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-02 09:50:27 EDT --- * Sun Aug 02 2009 Fabian Affolter - 1.3-2 - Removed all icons and desktop stuff Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bournal.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bournal-1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 13:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 09:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021353.n72Driin022287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 --- Comment #26 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-02 09:53:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > After the rebuild of the source RPM rpmlint says: > > [fab at laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint cpulimit* > cpulimit.i586: W: no-documentation > cpulimit-debuginfo.i586: E: debuginfo-without-sources > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. > > For it seems that the compiler flags aren't honored. Comment #19 said what to > do ;-) i.e. you need make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" instead of make %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 14:39:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515136] New: Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136 Summary: Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musuruan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/gettext-commons.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/gettext-commons-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Gettext Commons project provides Java classes for internationalization (i18n) through GNU gettext. The lightweight library combines the power of the unix-style gettext tools with the widely used Java ResourceBundles. This makes it possible to use the original text instead of arbitrary property keys, which is less cumbersome and makes programs easier to read. Rpmlint output is clean. Please note that this is my first JAVA package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 14:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515136] Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021441.n72Ef1JM031763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508351 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 14:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021441.n72Ef01Q031739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515136 --- Comment #7 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-02 10:40:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I am packaging gettext-commons, I will submit soon a review for it. I already had a more or less working package for gettext-commons, so I cleaned it up with the help of the Debian package and put it up for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 14:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021454.n72Es7bM001481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #22 from D Haley 2009-08-02 10:54:06 EDT --- Just quickly: >Requires: octave(api) = %{octave_api} Is considered to be an error (E) by rpmlint, as macros are not allowed, however I was unable to locate the rationale behind this. I am reticent to do something that RPMlint considers to be an error unless I know why I am doing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 15:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021526.n72FQLGt015560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-02 11:26:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Just quickly: > >Requires: octave(api) = %{octave_api} > Is considered to be an error (E) by rpmlint, as macros are not allowed, however > I was unable to locate the rationale behind this. I am reticent to do something > that RPMlint considers to be an error unless I know why I am doing this. What's the error? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 15:40:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021540.n72Fe4Rk010114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #24 from D Haley 2009-08-02 11:40:03 EDT --- I'm not at my build box atm. However I have copied it from http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1370 as noted in the spec. > What's the error? This rpm has a dependency whose version part contains the '%' character. It could be an unexpanded macro, please double check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 16:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021607.n72G7XRP014347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #3 from David Hannequin 2009-08-02 12:07:32 EDT --- Hi, Thank you for the review and tool cpanspec. Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model/perl-Config-Model.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model/perl-Config-Model-0.638-2.fc10.src.rpm Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 16:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] New: Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Summary: Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: daniel at rindt.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.rindt.name/fileadmin/rpmbuild/SPECS/mtkbabel.spec SRPM URL: http://www.rindt.name/fileadmin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mtkbabel-0.8-0.1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MTKBabel is a Perl program to operate the i-Blue 747 GPS data logger. It should work also with other GPS devices based on the MediaTek MTK chipset. It is free software released under the GPL license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 16:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514931] Please build ruby-RMagick for EPEL 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021626.n72GQLBs025535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-02 12:26:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > * ruby(abi) > > - All ruby related packages must have "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" > > ( And I usually recomend to add also "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" > > for consistency ). > > Well, that doesn't work on EPEL 5, because there's no ruby(abi) provided. > > $ rpm -q ruby > ruby-1.8.5-5.el5_3.7 > $ > > $ rpm -q --provides ruby | grep "ruby(abi)" > $ Well, $ rpm -qp --provides ruby-libs-1.8.5-5.el5_2.6.i386.rpm 2>/dev/null | grep abi ruby(abi) = 1.8 > > * ImageMagick Dependency > > - Due to bug 500565 (i.e due to the function > > static void test_Magick_version(void) in ext/RMagick/rmmain.c), > > when ruby-RMagick is rebuilt with ImageMagick 6.2.8.0, RMagick > > will require ImageMagick 6.2.8.X > > > > ( i.e. even if the soname of the library in ImageMagick won't change > > between 6.2.8.X and 6.2.9.Y, RMagick rebuilt with ImageMagick > > 6.2.8.X won't work with ImageMagick 6.2.9.Y (by default) ). > > Well, ImageMagick is from RHEL thus never will get incompatible upgraded and > there never will be a version upgrade, just security backports. If ImageMagick > would get upgraded on RHEL, that would anyway break many things. I can add a > hard dependency to "ImageMagick = 6.2.8.0", if that makes you happy. Next RHEL > will anyway need ruby-RMagick 2.x. Well, actually I don't know well about RHEL's policy (I don't have RHEL or CentOS), however for this I will leave it to you. > > > * htmldoc > > - Would you explain why you pass "--disable-htmldoc" to configure? > > ( By the way it seems that creating html documents also fixes > > shebangs automatically ) > > ! By the way as far as I am correct "BR: libwmf" is needed when creating > > html documents, would you check that? > > Building documentation fails, that verdana.ttf or arial.ttf is required but > not available on the system. It's looking for /usr/share/fonts/defaults/ > TrueType/, if I remember the path correctly. Nothing at Fedora is > seemingly providing that. Ah, actually this is a bug in RHEL ImageMagick (6.2.8.0-4.el5_1.1), /usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.2.8/config/type.xml contains , this is the culprit. (I just remembered that with Fedora 7 or 8 ImageMagick ruby-RMagick htmldoc didn't build due to the same reason...) Perhaps RHEL won't update ImageMagick due to this reason, so for now I will accept --without-htmldoc > > > * configure v.s. setup.rb > > - Well, I think if "configure -> make" is used to compile RMagick, > > "make install" or so should be used to install files. > > > > If you use "ruby setup.rb install", perhaps "ruby setup.rb config/setup" > > or so is preferable instead of "configure -> make". > > Maybe I did something wrong, but that way I was not able to build the package. > There's a *.h.in and another *.in for example which only gets handled by the > ./configure, otherwise the build poorly failed for me. Okay. Please add ruby(abi) dependency. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (ruby-RMagick) for EL-5 is approved by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 16:43:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021643.n72GheLs021028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-02 12:43:39 EDT --- What's your ID in the Fedora account system? A search didn't turn anything up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 16:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514931] Please build ruby-RMagick for EPEL 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021645.n72Gj9eo028435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-02 12:45:07 EDT --- Thank you very much for the review. I'll add ruby(abi) after the import. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ruby-RMagick New Branches: EL-5 Owners: robert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 16:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021653.n72Gr5Si029942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-02 12:53:04 EDT --- Notes: * Url should point to its new home, at SF. * Ver. 0.8 is out. Please, update. * Field "Release" must not contain .fc10 postfix. Use %{?dist} macro instead. * No such group "Hardware/Mobile". Take a look at the "/usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS" for the ull list of allowed values. * Use full path to the source. * Field "License" should contain GPLv2+ Other things looks sane. Please update your srpm, and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 16:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021654.n72GsesT030301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-02 12:54:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > What's your ID in the Fedora account system? A search didn't turn anything up. drindt , I suppose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 16:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514931] Please build ruby-RMagick for EPEL 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021656.n72Guf0j023167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-02 12:56:40 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 17:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021701.n72H17S2031589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Linuxguy123 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |linuxguy123 at gmail.com --- Comment #23 from Linuxguy123 2009-08-02 13:01:04 EDT --- I'd just like to say that I too would like to see Navit on Fedora via rpms. I am sure many other people will use navit on Fedora once they realize its available. Thank you to those that are working on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 17:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021702.n72H2rkV024045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-02 13:02:53 EDT --- For some reason a search still doesn't find that for me. However, directly quering shows that drindt needs a sponsor. Setting that now. Daniel, please read through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers if you haven't. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 17:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021715.n72HF7ib001524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kalev at smartlink.ee Alias|cppunit |mingw32-cppunit Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-02 13:15:06 EDT --- Taking for review. Some initial notes: ! Building the package fails in mock because of missing BuildRequires mingw32-gcc-c++ ! If doxygen is present in build host, building fails with: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/cppunit/FAQ /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/cppunit/_additional_message_8cpp.html /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc/cppunit/_additional_message_8cpp__incl.map Please use explicit --disable-doxygen configure option to prevent that. ! cppunit-config.1 duplicates documentation of native cppunit package. As per Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines[1], those man pages that are duplicates of the ones found in native packages should be removed. ! rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw32-cppunit-1.12.1-1.fc12.src.rpm mingw32-cppunit-1.12.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm mingw32-cppunit.noarch: W: manpage-not-compressed-with-gzip /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1/cppunit-config.1 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. That warning will go away if you remove cppunit-config.1 man page as discussed above. ! All DLLs in %files section should be listed separately as per Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines ! Fedora Packaging Guidelines prefer %global macro instead of %define. [2] ! description says: MinGW Windows cppunit compression library. It's not really a compression library, is it? Also consider changing description from: C++ unit testing framework to: MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework to better match other Fedora MinGW packages. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 17:23:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] New: Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Summary: Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/vifir.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/vifir-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://vifir.sourceforge.net/ Description: Vifir processes and displays electronic aviation charts (currenty VFR Sectional Charts) produced by the U.S. National Aeronautical Charting Office in a similar way to an Electronic Flight Bag. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1573767 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint vifir-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint vifir* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 17:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:25:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021725.n72HPQ8F003278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-02 13:25:25 EDT --- New upstream release. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-sound-theme-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1573792 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 17:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514931] Please build ruby-RMagick for EPEL 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021724.n72HOnQd002811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-02 13:24:49 EDT --- ruby-RMagick-1.15.17-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ruby-RMagick-1.15.17-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 17:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514931] Please build ruby-RMagick for EPEL 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021724.n72HOIWL002748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-02 13:24:17 EDT --- Package: ruby-RMagick-1.15.17-2.el5 Tag: dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 17:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021741.n72Hfm28030852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #25 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-02 13:41:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > I'm not at my build box atm. However I have copied it from > http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1370 > as noted in the spec. > > > What's the error? > This rpm has a dependency whose version part contains the '%' character. It > could be an unexpanded macro, please double check. Key word: unexpanded macro. If you have defined the macro correctly, it is expanded and you don't get such an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 18:09:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514548] Review Request: rubygem-flexmock - Mock object library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021809.n72I96uM002497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514548 --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-02 14:09:05 EDT --- rpmlint is complaining: ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: no-documentation ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/validators.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/validators.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock.rb ../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/argument_matchers.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/argument_matchers.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/argument_types.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/argument_types.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/ordering.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/ordering.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/expectation.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/expectation.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/noop.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/noop.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/partial_mock.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/partial_mock.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/test_unit.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/test_unit.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/core_class_methods.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/core_class_methods.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/recorder.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/recorder.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/base.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/base.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/errors.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/errors.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/expectation_director.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/expectation_director.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/rails/view_mocking.rb ../../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/rails/view_mocking.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/core.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/core.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/default_framework_adapter.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/default_framework_adapter.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/mock_container.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/mock_container.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/composite.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/composite.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/rspec.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/rspec.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/deprecated_methods.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/deprecated_methods.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/undefined.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/undefined.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/rails.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/rails.rb ruby-flexmock.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/flexmock/test_unit_integration.rb ../../../gems/1.8/gems/flexmock-0.8.6/lib/flexmock/test_unit_integration.rb rubygem-flexmock-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation are you able to fix it somehow? other checks: -source url ok -legible spec file -ruby specific guidelines & packaging guidelines ok -md5sum for source gem ok -build ok -requires/BR ok -licence ok -macros ok -name ok -directory/file owner - ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 18:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515147] New: Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp-server - A rtsp streaming server using gstreamer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp-server - A rtsp streaming server using gstreamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515147 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp-server - A rtsp streaming server using gstreamer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer-rtsp-server.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer-rtsp-server-0.10.3-1.fc11.src.rpm A rtsp streaming server using gstreamer koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1573867 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 18:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514548] Review Request: rubygem-flexmock - Mock object library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021834.n72IYOJt006390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514548 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-02 14:34:23 EDT --- Well, For ruby-flexmock: - no-documentation rpmlint can be ignored because this requires rubygem-flexmock and all needed documents are there. - dangling-relative-symlinks are really be resolved by installing rubygem-flexmock which ruby-flexmock requires correctly. And rubygem-flexmock-"doc" is for documents so I don't think I should mark files in this -doc subpackage as %doc explicitly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 18:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021838.n72IcbKL007115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-02 14:38:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Also consider changing description from: > C++ unit testing framework > to: > MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework > to better match other Fedora MinGW packages. Oops, I meant summary line here, not description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 18:50:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021850.n72IocCT009082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 --- Comment #5 from Michal Ingeli 2009-08-02 14:50:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Given that this provides a user executable script, may I suggest splitting it > into a subpackage "flickr-upload"? This will help indicate to the user that > there is an enduser tool here, not just a Perl library. I have reconsidered the sub-packaging flickr_upload script. When a basic user searches for, lets say "flickr", yum will find a lot of tools and perl-Upload-Flickr. Basic user probably won't think of this package as a perl library, but as an "application that uploads". Every other user can read the description, that reads "flickr upload tool and perl library". Maybe rather than sub-packaging, we should come up with a more descriptive summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 19:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021917.n72JHSun020194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #14 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-02 15:17:26 EDT --- seems fine, however i will give final approval when dependencies are pushed as I want to test it before (even when it is not in "must") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 19:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021922.n72JMViS014030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #18 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-02 15:22:29 EDT --- david, did you put bug # in update request? if not, please close this manually -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 19:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021928.n72JSkeP014866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-02 15:28:44 EDT --- any response from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 19:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908021944.n72Ji6PR017333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-02 15:44:05 EDT --- 1] use global instead of define 2] summary should not start with name of application/library and there is missing subject of that sentence. better summary would be "Library for ..." and specifying what this library does. does it parse csv files? or ... ? 3] %if 0%{?rhel}%{?fedora} > 5 Requires: ruby(abi) = %{ruby_abiver} %endif it has to require ruby(abi) = 1.8 otherwise it conflict with ruby packaging guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby 4] multiple listed files warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fastercsv-1.5.0/AUTHORS warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fastercsv-1.5.0/CHANGELOG warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fastercsv-1.5.0/COPYING warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fastercsv-1.5.0/LICENSE warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fastercsv-1.5.0/README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 20:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022000.n72K0jZp027393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 20:06:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022006.n72K6d1n021433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #25 from Chess Griffin 2009-08-02 16:06:36 EDT --- Jussi, I plan to have another submission in the next day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 20:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022009.n72K9cxQ021714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-02 16:09:37 EDT --- Gerd, just setting fedora-cvs? is not enough, you also need to fill out the template from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure#New_Packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 20:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022016.n72KGpDl023133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 --- Comment #15 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-08-02 16:16:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rakudo Short Description: A Perl compiler for Parrot Owners: gerd Branches: F-11 InitialCC: gerd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 20:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022028.n72KSBQt031416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #19 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-02 16:28:09 EDT --- gravatar: 1] I have packaged wrong gravatar library which is not ok for redmine 2] i don't have time nowadays to package correct library Redmine: And this package have still pending dependencies (listed in my previous comments) where somebody (reporter, or anybody else) should create package for each redmine dependency, and still there is no owner of rubygem-actionwebservice which is needed for redmine [1]. As I have this already stated here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959#c12 [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-devel-list at redhat.com/msg01788.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 20:32:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514548] Review Request: rubygem-flexmock - Mock object library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022032.n72KW06w032067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514548 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-02 16:31:59 EDT --- yeah, have same opinion on it. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 20:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022036.n72KaM4w000325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-02 16:36:21 EDT --- fails during test in my mock for F11 PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'inc', 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/02pod.t t/03podcoverage.t t/04basic.t t/05datetime.t t/06timestamp.t t/07date.t t/08noclobber.t t/02pod.t .......... ok t/03podcoverage.t .. ok t/04basic.t ........ skipped: needs DBD::SQLite for testing Bailout called. Further testing stopped: DBD::SQLite not installed FAILED--Further testing stopped: DBD::SQLite not installed RPM build errors: make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hzjbzo (%check) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hzjbzo (%check) Child returncode was: 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 20:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490352] Review Request: emacs-cedet - modules for GNU Emacs text editor: semantic, speedbar, eieio, ede In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022054.n72KstqM002875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490352 Alan Dunn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |amdunn at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Alan Dunn 2009-08-02 16:54:54 EDT --- I found this package when going through the review queue - both the links seem to be broken. I can't be your sponsor, but I could at least look through your package and potentially review it if I can get to the contents of those links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 21:39:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500931] Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022139.n72LdtNH009960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500931 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-02 17:39:54 EDT --- emacs-verilog-mode-528-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-verilog-mode-528-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 21:40:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022140.n72LejnD003108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-02 17:40:44 EDT --- Anyone willing to do the review for me ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 22:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022227.n72MRBlm010520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-02 18:27:09 EDT --- This was APPROVED. Please proceed filing a CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 23:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022332.n72NWArX027547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-02 19:32:08 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 2 23:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 19:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908022334.n72NYscK020685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-02 19:34:53 EDT --- Since this can't be reviewed until its dependencies are packaged, I'll indicate that it's not ready for review. Please clear the whiteboard if this becomes reviewable in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 00:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 20:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514699] Review Request: jemmy - Java UI testing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030025.n730P0dO028539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699 --- Comment #6 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2009-08-02 20:24:59 EDT --- Hi Guido, (In reply to comment #5) > * question: is there a particular reason you need ant >= 1.6.5, or can the > version be omitted? The ant 1.6.5 is a significant update with a lot of features that are widely used in the NetBeans software. Previous ant versions are not applicable for it. Jemmy is a satellite project for the NetBeans, and it has never been built with previous ant versions. I think, to reduce risks of the build errors (including for the future Jemmy versions) we need have a specification of the lowest version of ant that is applicable with guaranties. Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/jemmy.spec SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/jemmy-2.3.0.0-4.fc12.src.rpm Changes: - %global is used instead of the %define in all cases - all macro defs are placed at the top of the spec file - the sources was pulled via the svn export The rpmlint tool shows 0 errors, 0 warnings against both SRPM and all RPMs (i.e. jemmy RPM and jemmy-javadoc RPM). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 00:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 20:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030038.n730clMW030719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-02 20:38:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > The reason I added it because the rpm itself doesn't have libraries in it that > can be used for determining requirements but the pre/post scripts use > gtk-update-icon-cache which requires gtk2. "Note that no dependencies should be added for this. If gtk-update-icon-cache is not available, there's nothing that would be needing the cache update, ..." Read the whole paragraph at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache BTW: You are not preserving timestamps while copying the files, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps I'd rather use install instead of cp to make sure permissions are correct. If you want to use cp, please use %attr to verify the permissions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 00:43:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 20:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] New: Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 Summary: Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: henriquecsj at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/gnomenu/1.9.9/gnomenu.spec SRPM URL: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/gnomenu/1.9.9/gnomenu-1.9.9-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: GnoMenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's. Fully functional menu , supports themes , for a composited or non composited desktop. It can emulate the look and feel of the most beautiful menus of most modern desktops, and it can also use custom menus, due to its powerful theme XML engine. This package use translations, but this translations are in xml files. What is the correct approach in this case? There are some rpmlint's complains... I'll need some hints about them. =( rpmlint gnomenu-1.9.9-1.fc11.src.rpm gnomenu.src: W: non-standard-group Graphical desktop/GNOME gnomenu.src:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gnomenu/GnoMenu.py gnomenu.src:62: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/bonobo/servers/*.server gnomenu.src:63: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/%{name}/* rpmlint gnomenu-1.9.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib gnomenu.noarch: W: non-standard-group Graphical desktop/GNOME gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/locale/Settings_LangPack_en.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Button/Gnome/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/backup/settings-window.gladep gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/Slab/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/gnomenu/Panel_Top.py 0644 /usr/bin/env gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Button/Arch/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Button/Glow/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/locale/Settings_LangPack_es.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/locale/Settings_LangPack_en_US.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/globalkeybinding.py gnomenu.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gnomenu/prefix gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/locale/Settings_LangPack_pt.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/Kore/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Icon/BW/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Button/UbuntuLogo/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/backup/Settings_default.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/menuiconcachetemplate.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/Blue/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/BlackXP/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/gnomenu/Menu_Items.py 0644 /usr/bin/env gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/locale/Settings_LangPack_pt_BR.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Icon/Vista/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/Kde/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/Vista/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/Glass/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/Glow/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Icon/Newstyles/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Button/Iniciar/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/gnomenu/Panel_Object.py 0644 /usr/bin/env gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/backup/error-message.glade gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Button/Ubuntu/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Button/GnomeButton/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Button/XP/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/locale/Settings_LangPack_pt_PT.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/gnomenu/Menu_Main.py 0644 /usr/bin/env gnomenu.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/Short/.png gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/backup/GNOME_VistaMenu.server gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/SilverXP/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/locale/Settings_LangPack_fr.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/backup/settings-window.glade gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/locale/Settings_LangPack_cs.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Button/UbuntuOrb/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Button/GnoBlue/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/gnomenu/geany_run_script.sh 0644 /bin/sh gnomenu.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Icon/BW/.png gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/BlackVista/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/XP/themedata.xml gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/gnomenu/translators.txt 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 46 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 00:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 20:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515090] Review Request: moblin-menus - Moblin config and data file for desktop menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030053.n730rHT9007604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515090 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-02 20:53:16 EDT --- Why are you running /sbin/ldconfig in %post and %postun? This package conflicts with redhat-menus. You should prefix the files with "moblin-" to avoid this. Forgive me this question, buf is this package really needed? Why not stick with redhat-menus and have a consistent menu layout through all desktops? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 03:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 23:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030339.n733dlnn027625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-02 23:39:46 EDT --- That looks to be a packaging error in perl-DBIx-Class-0.08012 in F11. The 0.08108 version in rawhide (and in F11 updates-testing) properly requires perl(DBD::SQLite). Until the updated version makes its way to stable, either mock build for rawhide, or enable the testing repository for F11 to get a working build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 04:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030420.n734K2fs009832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Stanley 2009-08-03 00:20:01 EDT --- Some problems: * Fix the version to match upstream, and require the explicit version * This package owns /usr/lib64/znc, yet Requires znc, which also provides that (as well as /usr/share/znc, /usr/share/znc/webadmin, and /usr/share/znc/webadmin/skins). See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership * Include blank lines between changelog entries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 04:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030426.n734Q7CW003667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #24 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-03 00:26:05 EDT --- I'm hoping to have a polished, review-ready package submitted as soon as the new freetype build hits rawhide (actually it may have done already, I'll check and work on this on Tuesday; I'm off Monday, it's a public holiday here). -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 04:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030435.n734Z8B2005224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout 2009-08-03 00:35:07 EDT --- SPEC: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-extra.spec SRPM: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-extra-0.072-2.fc11.src.rpm I believe this fixes the problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 05:02:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 01:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030502.n7352ean009524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 --- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout 2009-08-03 01:02:39 EDT --- SPEC: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-extra.spec SRPM: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-extra-0.072-3.fc11.src.rpm This re-adds BuildRequires: openssl-devel >= 0.9.8 as noted on IRC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 06:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514548] Review Request: rubygem-flexmock - Mock object library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030605.n7365pLY028209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514548 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-03 02:05:50 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-flexmock Short Description: Mock object library for ruby Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 06:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030618.n736IhJ3022811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-03 02:18:39 EDT --- Sorry for delay, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 06:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030630.n736U37u025162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 02:30:02 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 06:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030631.n736VIsK000318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 02:31:17 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 06:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030630.n736UUFi025272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 06:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514548] Review Request: rubygem-flexmock - Mock object library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030631.n736VruS025521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514548 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 02:31:52 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 06:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515090] Review Request: moblin-menus - Moblin config and data file for desktop menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030638.n736cebN026599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515090 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 02:38:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why are you running /sbin/ldconfig in %post and %postun? > > This package conflicts with redhat-menus. You should prefix the files with > "moblin-" to avoid this. > > Forgive me this question, buf is this package really needed? Why not stick with > redhat-menus and have a consistent menu layout through all desktops? I'll review the differences and re-assess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 06:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030650.n736oQbm003535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #11 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-03 02:50:24 EDT --- Peter Robinson, Please fix the issues noted by Christopher Wickert and then import -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 06:48:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 02:48:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030648.n736mXKK002909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #30 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-03 02:48:31 EDT --- Just missed one point ... do clean the SPEC file before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 07:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 03:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030755.n737tOwh017522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 03:55:21 EDT --- > Please fix the issues noted by Christopher Wickert and then import I will when I actually get the time to read what's written :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 08:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 04:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030823.n738Nxph025569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #20 from Michal Nowak 2009-08-03 04:23:57 EDT --- Updated to r6834: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/fltk2-2.0.x-0.14.r6834.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 08:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 04:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514548] Review Request: rubygem-flexmock - Mock object library for ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030826.n738QZoG019625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514548 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-03 04:26:34 EDT --- Rebuild done, push request submitted on bodhi, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515147] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp-server - A rtsp streaming server using gstreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030915.n739F9tP032470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515147 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 05:15:07 EDT --- Excellent! I did a quick search but obv not quite good enough :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515147] Review Request: gstreamer-rtsp-server - A rtsp streaming server using gstreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030913.n739DPSd004669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515147 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-03 05:13:24 EDT --- Already included https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/gstreamer-rtsp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030915.n739Fdld000364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030921.n739LFZP001546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-03 05:17:16 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030932.n739W92M004669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #61 from Michal Nowak 2009-08-03 05:32:04 EDT --- Ben: Correct awesome-2 does not need XCB aware cairo. 2.3 was released 14 months ago, but having small fixes till now, and is called deprecated in favor of v3. Problem with your approach is that awesome v2 is really old, upstream support might end anytime, and thus is far from Fedora's close-to-upstream. Note that cairo-xcb is far from being soon-supported upstream (still experimental), that means we would have awesome-2 for months, if not even years. That's waste of time, from my POV. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030940.n739essh013092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-03 05:40:52 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec . + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum vifir-0.4.tar.gz* 340db9360c8f3710192fd8b773736e11c992cd3dad855ba848887a15f7d06607 vifir-0.4.tar.gz 340db9360c8f3710192fd8b773736e11c992cd3dad855ba848887a15f7d06607 vifir-0.4.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See link above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code or permissible content. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The packages includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 Don't forget to add it to the list of GIS-related applications on the dedicated wiki-page. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030945.n739jDS4007878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-03 05:45:12 EDT --- Thanks for the update. 1)I think we should rename file ayttm_streamer_wrapper.sh to ayttm_streamer_wrapper This can be done in %install as mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ayttm_streamer_wrapper.sh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ayttm_streamer_wrapper 2)To use webcam we need Requires: xawtv as /usr/bin/webcam path used in above script is provided by xawtv package 3) You can remove BuildRequires: libtool-ltdl 4) should follow only one type of macros either use everywhere $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030952.n739qhT5016533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-03 05:52:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vifir Short Description: A viewer for electronic aviation charts units Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:50:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030950.n739owCh010131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-03 05:50:56 EDT --- Thanks Peter for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030951.n739pUSK010423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-03 05:51:28 EDT --- I think that we may close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 09:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 05:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514150] Review Request: ibus-qt - The qt support tools for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908030954.n739sPVv010959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514150 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031024.n73AOTQi020496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 06:24:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Spec URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm.spec > SRPM URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm > > Thanks for all your comments and support. > > I've updated the spec file and added the GPL v2 LICENSE file to the tarball. > However, I'm not quite sure about the license constraints because the sources > contain some unmodified, third-party files that are licensed under GPL v2+. > Even if I'd like to publish my own code under GPL v3, do the bundled files > affect the license of the complete package, e.g. force it to be GPL v2+ too > (which wouldn't be a problem for me)? For now, I stay with GPL v2+. You can license your own files as GPLv3+. Then the binary will be formed out of GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ parts, so the License: tag would be either "GPLv2+ and GPLv3+" or just "GPLv3+" since that's the license of the binary that's produced. > I didn't change the headers of the third-party files, so some of them still > don't mention their GPL version. If they don't mention a version, they're GPL+. ** Drop gzip -9 ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_mandir}/*/* as RPM will do this for you automatically. ** I am willing to sponsor you if you show me your knowing of the Fedora guidelines, most importantly http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets This you can do by making at least one other submission and performing a couple of informal reviews of packages of other people. Please review only packages *not* marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR, as I will have to do the full formal review after you to check that you have got everything correctly. Once I have sponsored you you will be able to do formal reviews of your own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031035.n73AZ57L022989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 06:35:04 EDT --- I've updated the spec file using 'cp -p' as per the above guidelines it looks like from my reading and testing install is only usable for individual files rather than directory structure like in an icon theme. I've also removed the Makefile.am files that are copied as well. A side point I'm not sure how this script from the packaging guidelines works %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null gtk-update-icon-cache %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || : fi As post uninstall the theme.index wouldn't exist. I think it needs a -t option. Thanks for the pointers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:36:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031036.n73AawLk028192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 06:36:58 EDT --- > As post uninstall the theme.index wouldn't exist. I think it needs a -t option. I meant index.theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031038.n73Acc3R028553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-03 06:38:37 EDT --- BTW, your spec file is hard to read because it doesn't follow the 'standard' conventions. Of course, is your way not wrong, just unusual. Most packager follows more or less the template that can be created with 'rpmdev-newspec blablabla' (looks a bit like this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Creating_a_blank_spec_file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462176] Review Request: hybserv - Hybrid IRC Services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031043.n73AhOm0024695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462176 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(mmahut at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2009-08-03 06:43:22 EDT --- Sorry, I don't wish to maintain this package anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031045.n73AjJLg030291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 06:45:17 EDT --- Also, you are using the potrace library which needs to be packaged separately. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031044.n73AihF1029825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nphilipp at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514699] Review Request: jemmy - Java UI testing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031049.n73An6rW025845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031052.n73Aqv7Y031676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-03 06:52:56 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575074 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514699] Review Request: jemmy - Java UI testing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031051.n73Ap6ht026477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699 --- Comment #7 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-03 06:51:04 EDT --- ok then, i'm working on the package review right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 10:57:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 06:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031057.n73AvLW1027786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 06:57:20 EDT --- Thanks :-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jana Short Description: An interface library for time-related PIM Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031103.n73B35ln001255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515206 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] New: Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Summary: Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace-1.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://potrace.sourceforge.net Description: Potrace(TM) is a utility for tracing a bitmap, which means, transforming a bitmap into a smooth, scalable image. The input is a bitmap (PBM, PGM, PPM, or BMP format), and the default output is an encapsulated PostScript file (EPS). A typical use is to create EPS files from scanned data, such as company or university logos, handwritten notes, etc. The resulting image is not "jaggy" like a bitmap, but smooth. It can then be rendered at any resolution. Potrace can currently produce the following output formats: EPS, PostScript, PDF, SVG (scalable vector graphics), Xfig, Gimppath, and PGM (for easy antialiasing). Additional backends might be added in the future. Mkbitmap is a program distributed with Potrace which can be used to pre-process the input for better tracing behavior on greyscale and color images. See the mkbitmap examples page. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:03:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031103.n73B3Pj2028958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |dvisvgm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502699] Review Request: crosstool-ng - A toolchain building utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031101.n73B1RhS028647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502699 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-03 07:01:25 EDT --- Version 1.4.1 was released a while ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031103.n73B35E2028900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cbalint at redhat.com Blocks| |515049 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 07:02:52 EDT --- *** Bug 251710 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251710] Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031103.n73B34J7028878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251710 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 07:02:52 EDT --- This bug hasn't moved in almost a year. Repackaged at bug #515206. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 515206 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031104.n73B4RoF029092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Rindt 2009-08-03 07:04:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Notes: > > * Url should point to its new home, at SF. > * Ver. 0.8 is out. Please, update. > * Field "Release" must not contain .fc10 postfix. Use %{?dist} macro instead. > * No such group "Hardware/Mobile". Take a look at the > "/usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS" for the ull list of allowed values. > * Use full path to the source. > * Field "License" should contain GPLv2+ > > Other things looks sane. Please update your srpm, and I'll continue. Please recheck it at: http://www.rindt.name/fileadmin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm http://www.rindt.name/fileadmin/rpmbuild/SPECS/mtkbabel.spec changes executed as you mentioned. the 0.8 is the latest release peter. My ID is "drindt" yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:05:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031105.n73B5KCw002049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |potrace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031104.n73B48cc001513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |131850 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:07:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031107.n73B7DpO002417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 07:07:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Also, you are using the potrace library which needs to be packaged separately. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries I have packaged potrace in bug #515206, you need to make this package use that version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031107.n73B7eO1030254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-03 07:07:38 EDT --- Some comment after a quick look at your spec file. - Don't mix '$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' and '%{buildroot}' http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS - README is missing in %doc - Is there any note about the license in the source? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:21:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031121.n73BLpMI005771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-03 07:21:50 EDT --- Hello Jussi, you specfile seems to be in a very good shape; you only need to adjust main package comment: Packagers should be careful how they use trademarks in Summary or Description. There are a few rules to follow: * Never use "(TM)" or "(R)" (or the unicode equivalents, ?/?). It is incredibly complicated to use these properly, so it is actually safer for us to not use them at all. Maybe the last line about examples page could go away too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031135.n73BZl4f003702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-03 07:35:46 EDT --- I just found some more issues - seems, that these are the last remaining issues: * You don't need to explicitly add "Requires: perl-Some-Extension" since rpmbuild can find them automatically (it scans sources for "use Some::Thing" directives and for shebangs, and adds them as "Requires: perl(Some::Thing). So, I advise you to remove all explicit Requires directives. * No need to add perl as BuildRequires. * Please, don't mark man-files ad %doc, e.g. remove %doc directive before %{_mandir}/man1/*.* in the %files section. * Blocker issue. You must add "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" to the head of your install section. * I advice you to shorten %install section by exploiting the magic power of "install" utility - it can create necessary directories by user's demand, while installing. E.g. instead of install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir} install mtkbabel $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/ install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1 install -m0644 mtkbabel.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/ you may simply write (note -D switch added): install -D -m 0755 mtkbabel $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/mtkbabel install -D -m 0644 mtkbabel.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/mtkbabel.1 I'm sorry, for not to pointing you to all these issues before - seems that I looked to your first srpm very inattentively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031139.n73Bd3M5004207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #5 from Tim Waugh 2009-08-03 07:39:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - you can drop setting the CFLAGS for the "make" commands in %build, there is > no C/C++ code built, if I see it right Yep. > - are the INSTALLSITELIB and INSTALLSITEARCH really required for the "make" > commands in %install? They looks like some pythonic paths. No, removed. > - what is the upstream versioning scheme? Does the version in the included > archive mean that it is a snapshot made 20081124 after the 3.0 release? Then > you should apply "post-release package guideline" - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages > (version=3.0, release=1.20081124) It's daily snapshots and very infrequent version releases. I've switch to the post-release scheme now. > - according to the README in foomatic-db, there should be files licensed under > MIT too, please recheck and update the License tag to "GPLv2+ and MIT" Fixed (new sub-package carries MIT license). > - using only "rm -rf %{buildroot}" is sufficient for the %clean section Fixed. > - is the database useful for other purpose then for cups? No. I've updated the package to match the current devel foomatic package (newer snapshot, oki4linux obsoleted, etc), and also split out a 'ppds' sub-package for bug #461234. Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db-4.0-1.20090702.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:40:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031140.n73Beh4U009704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 07:40:42 EDT --- Right, thanks. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace-1.8-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 11:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031154.n73BsfZI012812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Nils Philippsen 2009-08-03 07:54:38 EDT --- Items marked "GOOD" or "PASS" fulfil the guidelines or they don't apply to this package. Items marked "CHECK" aren't covered by the guidelines but you should check and fix them anyway in my opinion. Items marked "BAD" violate the guidelines in some point and need to be fixed. - GOOD: rpmlint run on vacation-1.2.7.0-5.fc11.src.rpm doesn't flag errors/warnings - GOOD: package name according to guidelines - GOOD: spec file named properly - BAD: package doesn't meet packaging guidelines: the source URL is wrong, it should be "downloads.sourceforge.net/..." (just verified it with spectool) - GOOD: licensed according to licensing guidelines (be it GPLv2 or GPLv2+, see below). - BAD: license in spec file doesn't match license in package, as the licensing in the source tarball isn't really clear: the README file states that it's "under the GPL (see file COPYING in the directory)" which could be construed as "GPLv2 only" (as that is the version shipped) but also "GPLv2+" (as they didn't specify a specific version). Please consult upstream about this, they really should clarify if they mean GPLv2 or GPLv2+ and state it in the source files themselves. BTW, Comment #6 isn't really correct about the original source being incompatible with the GPL as the source files are really under BSD without advertising clause (or MIT), i.e. there is no issue with this being licensed incompatibly, just that we can't be quite sure what license this is under. You can flag it as "GPLv2" in the meantime, just to stay on the safe side. If upstream tells you that it really is "GPLv2+" (as I assume), then include documentation that they did tell you that (e.g. a copy of the mail) in the package documentation when changing it in this version in a future release (this is not necessary if they clarify it in the shipped sources themselves in a future version). - GOOD: license shipped as documentation - GOOD: the spec file is written in American English - GOOD: the spec file is legible - GOOD: sources used to build the package match upstream source - GOOD: builds in mock for x86_64/Rawhide - GOOD: all build dependencies listed - PASS: doesn't ship locale files - PASS: no libraries shipped - GOOD: package is not relocatable - GOOD: all shipped directories owned by package, direct dependency or filesystem - GOOD: no duplicates in %files - GOOD: permissions on files are set properly - GOOD: package has a %clean section - GOOD: package uses macros consistently - GOOD: the package contains code, not content - PASS: no large documentation files - GOOD: %doc doesn't affect runtime - PASS: no header files - PASS: no static libraries - PASS: no pkgconfig files - PASS: no libraries included - PASS: no devel package - GOOD: no *.la libtool archives - PASS: no desktop file - GOOD: doesn't own files or directories owned by other packages - GOOD: build root is cleaned at the beginning of %install - GOOD: all file names are valid UTF-8 - CHECK: from now on, please state in the changelog what you changed (e.g. "- changed license to GPLv2 until licensing is clarified with upstream (#474802)"), just referring to a BZ ticket number doesn't explain it sufficiently. This package is APPROVED, provided that you fix the license tag to "GPLv2" (temporarily, until this is clarified with upstream) and the source URL before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 12:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031205.n73C5grj015651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Rindt 2009-08-03 08:05:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I'm sorry, for not to pointing you to all these issues before - seems that I > looked to your first srpm very inattentively. It's no problem. The files are updated for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 12:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031217.n73CHw8P013867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 08:17:56 EDT --- Fabian, is there a status update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 12:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031224.n73COY8G019131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-03 08:24:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm.spec SRPM URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for your comments and for providing the potrace-devel package. I've removed the gzip line from the spec file and added a patch that changes the Makefile to link the separately packaged potrace library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 12:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031228.n73CSeAP020244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 08:28:38 EDT --- $ licensecheck.pl -r vacation-1.2.7.0/ vacation-1.2.7.0/tzfile.h: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/rfc822.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN vacation-1.2.7.0/html2man.pl: UNKNOWN vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcpy.c: ISC vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.c: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.h: BSD (3 clause) vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcat.c: ISC rfc822.c is under MIT license. Only the man page has any mention of a GPL (GPLv2+) license. Please ask upstream to clarify this. ** The current GPLv2+ license marking is correct: if the source code or COPYING doesn't specify a version ("released under GPL"), then the license tag is GPL+. The same is used if the COPYING is some version of the GPL without a specification what license the program is under. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 12:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031254.n73CsOQu023116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 12:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031254.n73CsCC2023070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-03 08:54:11 EDT --- I "sponsored" you. Don't hesitate to contact me directly via xmpp or email ( lemenkov at gmail.com ) for any question regarding rules of slightly complex role-playing game, named "Fedora package maintainership" REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent [petro at Workplace Desktop]$ rpmlint mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Workplace Desktop]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec . + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum mtkbabel-0.8.tar.gz* 591597c0787822c9fd56c7a3da214e81edd3c98f32d16858221e02dfc0f63779 mtkbabel-0.8.tar.gz 591597c0787822c9fd56c7a3da214e81edd3c98f32d16858221e02dfc0f63779 mtkbabel-0.8.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575556 + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - The package must consistently use macros. So, I advice you to change "rm -rf %{buildroot}" to "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in the %install section. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Please make a last change mentioned above regarding simultaneous using of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT (easyfix). Fix it and proceed with the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests Please, also use This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 12:58:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:58:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031258.n73CwL9Y024070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 David Sommerseth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 12:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515230] New: Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 Summary: Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davids at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is my first Fedora package, so I presume I'll need a sponsor for this package Spec URL: http://projects.autonomy.net.au/python-dmidecode/export/392a9976b14d558d4b2f331b5a44ee97912fc5e3/contrib/python-dmidecode.spec SRPM URL: http://src.autonomy.net.au/python-dmidecode/python-dmidecode-3.10.6-6.fc11.src.rpm Description: python-dmidecode is a python extension module that uses the code-base of the 'dmidecode' utility, and presents the data as python data structures or as XML data using libxml2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 13:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031300.n73D0lFC027751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #10 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-08-03 09:00:45 EDT --- Many thanks for the review, Remi. New SRPM: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Fixes URL, description and dependency rpmlint silent koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575575 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 13:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031318.n73DI6eF029115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #21 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-03 09:18:01 EDT --- Hey Emily, Could you please find time to make the above suggested changes? Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 13:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031331.n73DVDrp032308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 13:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031337.n73DbHac005092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #9 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-03 09:37:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name:sblim-indication_helper Short Description: libraries for writing CMPI providers Owners: praveenp,srini Branches:F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mdomsch,srini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 13:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031333.n73DXxqR004103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #14 from Nils Philippsen 2009-08-03 09:33:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > $ licensecheck.pl -r vacation-1.2.7.0/ > vacation-1.2.7.0/tzfile.h: BSD (3 clause) > vacation-1.2.7.0/rfc822.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN > vacation-1.2.7.0/html2man.pl: UNKNOWN > vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcpy.c: ISC > vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.c: BSD (3 clause) > vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.h: BSD (3 clause) > vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcat.c: ISC Neato. Where do I find this? > rfc822.c is under MIT license. Only the man page has any mention of a GPL > (GPLv2+) license. Please ask upstream to clarify this. > > ** > > The current GPLv2+ license marking is correct: if the source code or COPYING > doesn't specify a version ("released under GPL"), then the license tag is GPL+. > The same is used if the COPYING is some version of the GPL without a > specification what license the program is under. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F Only that the README doesn't say "under the GPL", but "under the GPL (see file COPYING in the directory)" which could be interpreted as "under the GPL as found in the file COPYING" (which would be specifying a version as this is exactly version 2 and nothing else). IANAL and all that stuff, but IMO better be safe than sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 13:39:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479763] Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031339.n73Dd9k7001623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479763 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-03 09:39:08 EDT --- I will take a new look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 13:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031340.n73Dexpw002219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #10 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-03 09:40:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name:sblim-indication_helper Short Description: libraries for writing CMPI providers Owners: praveenp Branches:F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mdomsch srini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 13:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031342.n73Dgb0H002792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #15 from Till Bubeck 2009-08-03 09:42:35 EDT --- Again, thanks for the comments. changelog: - changed license to GPLv2 until licensing is clarified with upstream - changed source URL from "download..." to "downloads...". I've uploaded again an updated SPEC/SRPMs to: Spec URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation-1.2.7.0-6.fc11.src.rpm Please review, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 13:43:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031343.n73DhoXi006766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Michal Ingeli 2009-08-03 09:43:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Flickr-Upload Short Description: Flickr upload tool Owners: ksyz Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 13:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031352.n73DqI8V009037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 09:52:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > $ licensecheck.pl -r vacation-1.2.7.0/ > > vacation-1.2.7.0/tzfile.h: BSD (3 clause) > > vacation-1.2.7.0/rfc822.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN > > vacation-1.2.7.0/html2man.pl: UNKNOWN > > vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcpy.c: ISC > > vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.c: BSD (3 clause) > > vacation-1.2.7.0/vacation.h: BSD (3 clause) > > vacation-1.2.7.0/strlcat.c: ISC > > Neato. Where do I find this? It's a Debian utility, e.g. http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/devscripts It's going to be in the next rpmdevtools release: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031404.n73E49rj012053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Bug 478372 depends on bug 513744, which changed state. Bug 513744 Summary: Swig update required https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513744 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:04:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515247] New: Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 Summary: Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chess at chessgriffin.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tint2/tint2.spec SRPM URL: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tint2/tint2-0.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: tint2 is a simple X11 desktop panel and taskbar intentionally made for Openbox3, but that should work with other window managers. tint2 is intended to be unintrusive and light in resource utilization, while following freedestkop specifications. Home page: http://code.google.com/p/tint2 This is my second submission. Rpmlint -vi is clean on spec, SRPM, and RPM. Builds cleanly in mock. Built cleanly on koji scratch build for f11 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1575660) and f12 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576012). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031411.n73EBT68013988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031432.n73EWRF0015658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 10:32:26 EDT --- I suggest that you drop --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} and just run rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_docdir} explicitly at the end of install, since rpm anyway removes the documentation directory. ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK - You may want to change %{_mandir}/man1/tint2.1.gz to %{_mandir}/man1/tint2.1.* in case the man page compression format changes in the future. MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add COPYING to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK ** You still need to do the informal reviews. Please review only bugs not marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031437.n73Eb8s1021197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady |Ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031437.n73EbXOT017906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |Ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031436.n73Ea4iR017540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #6 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-03 10:36:04 EDT --- Since this is for Fedora 12 a more adequate source rpm would be http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util-3.12.3.99.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031436.n73EagOa017735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031445.n73EjXlM023894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #3 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-03 10:45:32 EDT --- Given that it is for f12 this one would be more appropriate http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031445.n73EjPNc023854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #17 from Nils Philippsen 2009-08-03 10:45:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Again, thanks for the comments. > > changelog: > - changed license to GPLv2 until licensing is clarified with upstream > - changed source URL from "download..." to "downloads...". > > I've uploaded again an updated SPEC/SRPMs to: > Spec URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation.spec That is actually the -5 release ;-)... > SRPM URL: > http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation-1.2.7.0-6.fc11.src.rpm the spec file in the SRPM contains the changes. > Please review, thanks! You wouldn't have had to put these up for review again, it would have been okay if you just requested CVS for your package and fixed these items in there. Anyway (and again): APPROVED. Now go, make your CVS request ;-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031451.n73EpgSN025661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 10:51:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356041) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356041) updated spec to incorporate all changes from comment # 15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031450.n73EoeEt025526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 10:50:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > I've updated the spec file using 'cp -p' as per the above guidelines it looks > like from my reading and testing install is only usable for individual files > rather than directory structure like in an icon theme. This is correct. Just stick with cp, create-icon-theme.sh takes care of the permissions. Sorry for the noise. > As post uninstall the theme.index wouldn't exist. I think it needs a -t option. No, if index.theme doesn't exist, gtk-update-icon-cache is not run - this is what we want. It will complain about the missing dir, but this is why we have " &>/dev/null || :" at the end. (Well, at least we *should* have this at the end, you only have "|| :" because your scriptlets are outdated. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache for the most recent version.) BTW: icon-theme.cache is not part of this package, so it wont get removed when the package uninstalled. You need to touch %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/moblin/icon-theme.cache during install and include it ghosted in the files section. Another thing I realized while looking at the source: You are not creating any symlinks for the icons, so many apps will have no stock icons. Add the following to your spec at the end of %install, when the Makefile.am files are already removed: # create symlinks for gtk stock icons, these are not really 'legacy' # this uses the legacy-icon-mapping.xml file cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/icons/moblin for size in 16x16 24x24 48x48; do ( cd $size for context in *; do if [ -d $context ]; then ( cd $context INU_DATA_DIR=%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} /usr/bin/icon-name-mapping -c $context ) fi done ) done Voila, now the icon theme contains more than 3 times more files. Last but not least create-icon-theme.sh should be running during %build. Not that it makes a difference, I'm just pedantic. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 14:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 10:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031454.n73EsViY026422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 10:54:29 EDT --- Well, all changes except preserving the timestamps. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:07:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031507.n73F7IHX030728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2009-08-03 11:07:17 EDT --- No, there isn't, I flubbed that. :) Here's the new version: SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-workspace/drupal-workspace-6.x.1.4-0.rc1.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/drupal-workspace/drupal-workspace.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 355981] Review Request: poker3d-data - Data files for the poker3d package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031511.n73FBaXa031819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=355981 Miroslav Grepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |faithinfamilies at yahoo.com --- Comment #14 from Miroslav Grepl 2009-08-03 11:11:33 EDT --- *** Bug 515188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:21:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031521.n73FL6mj003922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 11:21:04 EDT --- Excellent, I'll have a look a this shortly. Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] New: Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Summary: Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/gnome-colors-icon-theme/gnome-colors-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/gnome-colors-icon-theme/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The GNOME-Colors is a project that aims to make the GNOME desktop as elegant, consistent and colorful as possible. The current goal is to allow full color customization of themes, icons, GDM logins and splash screens. There are already seven full color-schemes available; Brave (Blue), Human (Orange), Wine (Red), Noble (Purple), Wise (Green), Dust (Chocolate) and Illustrious (Pink). An unlimited amount of color variations can be rebuilt and recolored from source, so users need not stick to the officially supported color palettes. GNOME-Colors is mostly inspired/based on Tango, GNOME, Elementary, Tango-Generator and many other open-source projects. More information can be found in the AUTHORS file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511966] Review Request: zbar - bar code reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031524.n73FOkM2005314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511966 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-03 11:24:44 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031523.n73FNZt9004811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak 2009-08-03 11:23:34 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576200 newman at dhcp-lab-124 SPECS $ rpmlint /home/newman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031507.n73F7PpX029547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(zdzichu at irc.pl) --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-03 11:07:22 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031529.n73FTLZx006740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |gnome-colors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031532.n73FWnYb007672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 --- Comment #27 from Ashay 2009-08-03 11:32:48 EDT --- Ok, I added that: http://ashay.info/rpm/cpulimit.spec http://ashay.info/rpm/cpulimit-1.1-8.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:37:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505354] Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031537.n73FbTAg009204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-08-03 11:37:28 EDT --- New SRPM: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-captchaphp-2.0-4.fc10.src.rpm PHP requirements minimized. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576229 Rpmlint silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031534.n73FYQnU008035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2009-08-03 11:34:25 EDT --- Meh, looks like upstream intentions are to continue bundling the fonts, which makes me think that simply doing all this inside of the existing lyx pkg is preferable. Closing->NOTABUG (Unless anyone feels strongly otherwise, speak up!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031559.n73FxFsM016926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 15:46:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 11:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031546.n73FklH7016083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-03 11:46:43 EDT --- Well, (In reply to comment #34) > Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/mausezahn.spec > SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/mausezahn-0.34.8-1.fc9.src.rpm This does not build (at least) on x86_64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576215 >From diff: -------------------------------------------------------------- diff -uNr mausezahn-0.34.6-2.fc9.src/mz-0.34.6/CMakeLists.txt mausezahn-0.34.8-1.fc9.src/mz-0.34.8/CMakeLists.txt --- mausezahn-0.34.6-2.fc9.src/mz-0.34.6/CMakeLists.txt 2008-09-05 17:16:54.000000000 +0900 +++ mausezahn-0.34.8-1.fc9.src/mz-0.34.8/CMakeLists.txt 2009-07-30 01:33:28.000000000 +0900 @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ cmake_policy(SET CMP0003 NEW) endif(COMMAND cmake_policy) +SET(CMAKE_C_FLAGS "-Wall -O2 -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic - fasynchronous-unwind-tables") + ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET(uninstall COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} -E echo Use 'xargs rm < install_manifest.txt' to uninstall this program ) @@ -13,3 +15,6 @@ add_subdirectory (src) add_subdirectory (doc) + + + --------------------------------------------------------------------- Well, this CMAKE_C_FLAGS is wrong on x86_64, and on rawhide even on "i686" (on rawhide build target is for i686, x86_64, ppc, ppc64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:07:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031607.n73G7xsp025550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-08-03 12:07:58 EDT --- then the changes will be done in lyx pkg? (just asking, I'm multitasking badly while packing for summer vacations) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:12:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031612.n73GCQwb021519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-08-03 12:12:24 EDT --- Yes, that's my tentative plan at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031614.n73GEZTN022032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2009-08-03 12:14:34 EDT --- fair nuff, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:29:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031629.n73GTTso026756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-03 12:29:29 EDT --- Yep, zlib-devel seems to be enough -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031628.n73GSx6j026634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-03 12:28:58 EDT --- Hello Jussi, build in koji fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576283 You need at least to include zlib-devel in BRs guido -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:29:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031629.n73GTAX6026674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Remi Collet 2009-08-03 12:29:09 EDT --- + Home page change : ok + Package description from new home page. : OK + Requires php-mbstring : OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031641.n73GfrgE030462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031641.n73Gfdhr002908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 12:41:38 EDT --- Ugh, and I thought I had checked out the mock build. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace-1.8-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:45:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031645.n73Gj533031297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:44:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031644.n73GimdO030950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 12:44:47 EDT --- Stas tuned for a complete review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 16:44:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] New: Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 Summary: Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/usbmuxd.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/usbmuxd-0.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: usbmuxd is a daemon used for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone devices. It allows multiple services on the device to be accessed simultaneously. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576424 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 17:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031715.n73HFxtt010729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 13:15:58 EDT --- OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/moblin-sound-theme-0.3-1.fc12.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: CC-BY-SA OK - MUST: license field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: source matches upstream source by MD5 9f8866cd02f9aa3a0eec659a8ea78e75 OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 (Note: noarch package) OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang OK - MUST: not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains permissable content OK - MUST: no large docs OK - MUST: files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application OK - MUST: package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: package compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. OK - SHOULD: scriptlets are sane. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - Source0 valid Issues: - add NEWS to %doc (README is currently not worth adding) - preserve timestamps during install (similar to #507480) - use install rather than cp, e. g.: install -pm 0644 index.theme %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/sounds/moblin/ for file in stereo/{*.wav,*.ogg}; do install -pm 0644 $file %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/sounds/moblin/stereo/ done - Don't add dependencies on /bin/touch: "... ditto if "touch" is not available, there's nothing that would benefit from icon cache updates installed yet either." Source: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache If you really think you should require something, use the cureutils package instead of a file based dep. Fix the issues and consider this package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 17:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031739.n73HdJxu015639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #6 from Tim Waugh 2009-08-03 13:39:17 EDT --- Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db-4.0-2.20090702.fc11.src.rpm A few more changes: * Mon Aug 3 2009 Tim Waugh 4.0-2.20090702 - Move foomatic-db-ppds symlink to ppds sub-package. - Use sed instead of perl in raster PPDs (bug #512739). - Removed code to convert old-style printer IDs (there are none). - Ship README file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 17:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031747.n73HlKEN013962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-03 13:47:19 EDT --- A few issues to begin with * The package contains searchd which is a server daemon (http://sphinxsearch.com/docs/current.html#ref-searchd) so the package should contain an init script for managing the service. * The *.conf.dist files installed in /etc/sphinx could be installed as doc's as they are not really required for the program to function. * The sample sql file should not be placed in /etc, better installed as part of the doc's * Consider packaging libsphinxclient as a sub package as we will need this to package the PHP PEAR package for sphinx http://pecl.php.net/package/sphinx * Need to create a data directory where the index is stored, since this is data that changes it cannot be stored in /etc where the default configuration is configured to store it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 17:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031753.n73Hrf3h018881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #19 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 13:53:40 EDT --- One more thing: Please don't use a disttag here. This is a noarch theme with no dependencies, so it is not necessary to update it during an release upgrade. As the package was already built today, you should untag the old version: $ koji untag-pkg dist-f12 moblin-icon-theme-0.7-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 17:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031757.n73HvXol016221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bnocera at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera 2009-08-03 13:57:32 EDT --- The udev rules don't work. I sent patches for them on the mailing-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 17:56:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031756.n73Hu458019705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #25 from Linuxguy123 2009-08-03 13:56:01 EDT --- Will navit build against F11 ? Any chance that it could be submitted to F11/unstable or testing for those of us not working with F12 ? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 18:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514699] Review Request: jemmy - Java UI testing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031813.n73IDlQ9022948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-03 14:13:45 EDT --- OK - rpmlint output 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is good: CDDL) NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1576387 OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. NA - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL (Sources exported from svn as described in spec file) NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros OK - The package must contain code, or permissible content (no content) NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc sub-package (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files must be in a -devel package (no devel package) NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file (no gui) OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release OK - Java BuildRequires and Requires OK - No pre-built JAR files / other bundled software OK - No javadoc scriptlets This package is hereby APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514699] Review Request: jemmy - Java UI testing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031908.n73J8F9Z004795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2009-08-03 15:08:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jemmy Short Description: Java UI testing library Owners: victorv Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:21:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506954] Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031921.n73JLtS9004789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:21:54 EDT --- uberftp-2.4-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:23:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031923.n73JNNTv005191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:23:22 EDT --- munge-0.5.8-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:21:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513898] Review Request: keychecker - Generate list of installed packages sorted by GPG key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031921.n73JL2e8004573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513898 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:21:01 EDT --- keychecker-0.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031922.n73JMSFJ004882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.4.0.9-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031922.n73JM4fC008490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:22:03 EDT --- munge-0.5.8-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031925.n73JP1Cu008969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:25:00 EDT --- ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031922.n73JMNG7008543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:22:22 EDT --- ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031925.n73JP5EL009305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.0.9-2.fc10 |1.4.0.9-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:21:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513898] Review Request: keychecker - Generate list of installed packages sorted by GPG key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031921.n73JL76r008187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513898 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506954] Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031925.n73JPBjI006075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:25:11 EDT --- uberftp-2.4-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031924.n73JOltR005590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:24:46 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.4.20090713git.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bios_extract'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8246 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031926.n73JQZpG006418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:26:35 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.4.20090713git.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bios_extract'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8250 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513898] Review Request: keychecker - Generate list of installed packages sorted by GPG key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031926.n73JQNPu009888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513898 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-3.fc10 |0.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513898] Review Request: keychecker - Generate list of installed packages sorted by GPG key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031926.n73JQJwr009850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513898 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:26:18 EDT --- keychecker-0.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031927.n73JR3pG010110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:27:03 EDT --- R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-AnnotationDbi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8253 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031926.n73JQmPs010028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 15:26:47 EDT --- R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-AnnotationDbi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031947.n73JlAij011240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #26 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-03 15:47:09 EDT --- actually the freetype fix was submitted to f11 before it went to rawhide, so f11 is ahead there. If you're really impatient to just get it working, you can grab the .src.rpm from comment #17 and build it. It should work fine. You may need freetype from updates-testing, not sure if it was pushed to stable yet. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031958.n73JwD93017272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 15:58:12 EDT --- Thanks. Will update the points above before committing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-sound-theme Short Description: Moblin sound theme Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:59:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:59:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031959.n73Jx7ls014287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #20 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 15:59:06 EDT --- Package updated. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1577021 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 20:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032003.n73K35Er016324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 16:03:04 EDT --- One more thing: Don't use a disttag here. This is a noarch theme with no dependencies, so it is not necessary to update it during an release upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 20:07:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032007.n73K7DQW018088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 16:07:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > One more thing: Don't use a disttag here. This is a noarch theme with no > dependencies, so it is not necessary to update it during an release upgrade. Actually already fixed in my local copy :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 20:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032013.n73KD0WS019944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 John (J5) Palmieri changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johnp at redhat.com --- Comment #21 from John (J5) Palmieri 2009-08-03 16:12:58 EDT --- Lightwindow is MIT licensed, uses prototype + Scriptaculous and can do all the fancy media types. It is a bit hefty of a library compared to other lightboxes though (61k). http://stickmanlabs.com/lightwindow -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 20:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032020.n73KKR6m024264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 --- Comment #22 from John (J5) Palmieri 2009-08-03 16:20:26 EDT --- BTW the lightboxXL author can not change the license by himself. Looking at the code it looks like this is a modification lightbox++ which itself is a modification of lightbox2 both of which are cc-by 2.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 20:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032017.n73KH9sV023128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-03 16:17:08 EDT --- For upstream maintainers I am willing to make exceptions - you don't need to make another submission, you only need to do the informal reviews. They shouldn't take too much time, as it's mostly just going through the review checklist. For instance bug #510865 and bug #514634 should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 20:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515351] New: Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515351 Summary: Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/vdr-epgsearch.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/vdr-epgsearch-0.9.25-0.3.beta14.fc10.src.rpm This plugin provides a powerful a replacement for VDR's default schedules menu entry. It looks like the standard schedules menu, but adds several functions, such as additional commands for EPG entries, reusable queries which can be used as dynamic "search timers" etc. All patches except the Fedora specific one sent and reportedly applied upstream for the next release, rpmlint shows only expected warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 20:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032022.n73KMnkC024960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 16:22:48 EDT --- New upstream release with new udev patches http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/usbmuxd-0.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 19:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908031958.n73JwSH6014173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #13 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-03 15:58:27 EDT --- Hi Jason and Jussi, thanks for willing to sponsor me. I really appreciate that. Since I'm primarily the upstream maintainer of dvisvgm and probably won't have much time to help reviewing many other packages, I'm currently uncertain what to do now. If it's a prerequisite to do some reviews and provide further packages before getting sponsored, I'll try do that in the following weeks (I'm pretty busy at the moment). However, if there is another possibility for developers to get their utilities added to Fedora I would prefer that. Maybe it's also possible someone else takes over this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 20:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032040.n73KePmb028450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|matt_domsch at dell.com |praveen_paladugu at dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 20:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032047.n73Kl5sl027247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Tomasz Torcz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(zdzichu at irc.pl) | --- Comment #12 from Tomasz Torcz 2009-08-03 16:47:02 EDT --- I'm still here, sorry for delay. Combination of holiday season and some of work issues made me slacking lately. I haven't pre-reviewied any requests yet, but I'm going to. I'm still interested in becoming part of Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 20:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032057.n73KvSub031904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 16:57:26 EDT --- OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/moblin-cursor-theme-0.3-1.fc12.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: CC-BY-SA OK - MUST: license field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible FAIL - MUST: source does not matche upstream source by MD5 Upstream: 4e88ee79b4aafc08e4dc6defc3dadf7d Package: 676eef435c190168bf05b51a24f46772 This is most likely because it's a git snapshot, please use the tarball instead OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 (noarch package) OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires (none!) N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang OK - MUST: not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. FAIL - MUST: macro usage not consistent: you are using both %{buildroot}/ and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK - MUST: package contains permissable content OK - MUST: no large docs OK - MUST: files included as %doc do not affect the runtime OK - MUST: does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. In fact it does own %{_datadir}/icons/moblin/ which is already owned by moblin-icon-theme, but since none of the packages requires the other this is ok. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: package compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: scriptlets are sane (no scriptlets used) N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version Issues: - Summary: 'Moblin X cursors icon theme' should be just 'Moblin X cursors theme', because cursors are no icons. On the other hand %decription could be more elaborate, e. g.: 'This package contains the Moblin X cursors theme.' or similar. - don't use a disttag. This is a noarch theme with no dependencies, so it is not necessary to update it during an release upgrade. - add NEWS to %doc (README is currently not worth adding) - '%{__mkdir_p} -p' is a duplication. Please don't use macros for simple things like %{__cp} or %{__mkdir_p}. You never know if/how these macros are defined. - use install rather than cp to make sure permissions are correct and to preserve timestamps - don't hardcode /usr/share in %install, use %{_datadir} - Provide the full URL of Source0 and remove the comment on generation of the tarball. This will also fix the wrong MD5, but the tarball needs to be build and we can't use 'make dist' here. Instead, we do a few steps manually: %build cd pngs ./make.sh %install rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/moblin/cursors for file in xcursors/*; do install -pm 0644 $file %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/moblin/cursors done Note that you'll also need BuildRequires: xorg-x11-apps because it provides xcursorgen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032101.n73L19LC032699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:11:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032111.n73LB5GA031818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 John (J5) Palmieri changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johnp at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from John (J5) Palmieri 2009-08-03 17:11:04 EDT --- The tango icon theme is public domain -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] New: Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 Summary: Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smilner at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/pipestat.spec SRPM URL: http://stevemilner.org/images/pipestat-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Simple python scripts to watch data flowing over an anonymous pipe on shell consoles http://code.google.com/p/pipestat/ [steve at arc pipestat-0.2]$ rpmlint pipestat.spec ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/pipestat-0.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [steve at arc pipestat-0.2]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032116.n73LG6W1000306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 17:16:05 EDT --- python-sprox-0.6.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sprox-0.6.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032121.n73LLipR004574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #21 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 17:21:43 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. I just saw your commit in moblin's git. I didn't know that you are involved upstream. Sorry if I tried to explain you things you already know. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032125.n73LPhcv001981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 17:25:42 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032126.n73LQZuG005451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 17:26:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032130.n73LUFVQ006037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 17:30:14 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514699] Review Request: jemmy - Java UI testing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032133.n73LX5Nd003200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 17:33:04 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032129.n73LTWjl002345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 17:29:31 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032133.n73LX8SK003235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 --- Comment #22 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 17:33:07 EDT --- > I just saw your commit in moblin's git. I didn't know that you are involved > upstream. Sorry if I tried to explain you things you already know. ;) I'm not involved :-). I'm packaging it up for Fedora and send patches for things that I find so I assume they use the git feature to assign the credit when they apply the patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:33:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032133.n73LXwOK006560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 17:33:56 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 21:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 17:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251710] Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032136.n73LaTlt007252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251710 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032202.n73M2TgZ008864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 257761] Review Request: g2lib - GRIB2 encoder/decoder and search/indexing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032201.n73M1aD9008619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=257761 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032202.n73M2HUE008798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438808] Review Request: php-pear-DB-ldap - A DB compliant interface to LDAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032202.n73M27cc008743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438808 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438806] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Header - OO interface to modify and handle HTTP headers and status codes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032201.n73M1lG2008681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438806 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510573] Review Request: olpc-bootanim - OLPC XO boot animation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032202.n73M2qS7012115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510573 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507649] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032204.n73M4nJw012523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507649 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032203.n73M3YmZ012249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032200.n73M0gUP011703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #31 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 18:00:36 EDT --- I'm going to go ahead and close this out. I no longer have any need for this package and haven't the will to actually get it to work properly outside of the limited use case I originally had. The links should work for some time in case anyone decides they'd like to take my spec and improve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:08:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032208.n73M8Nas010329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 18:08:22 EDT --- Fixes applied and now built in koji here. Thanks! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1577414 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:30:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032230.n73MUdVe014797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032231.n73MV8OM014882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 18:31:07 EDT --- Built and on its way to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:31:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032231.n73MVTpZ014932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 18:31:28 EDT --- Built and on its way to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:29:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032229.n73MTplq014284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 18:29:50 EDT --- > FAIL - MUST: source does not matche upstream source by MD5 > Upstream: 4e88ee79b4aafc08e4dc6defc3dadf7d > Package: 676eef435c190168bf05b51a24f46772 No its not. Read the note at the top of the spec file about how to recreate the tarball. > FAIL - MUST: macro usage not consistent: you are using both %{buildroot}/ and > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Fixed. > Issues: > - Summary: 'Moblin X cursors icon theme' should be just 'Moblin X cursors > theme', because cursors are no icons. On the other hand %decription could be > more elaborate, e. g.: 'This package contains the Moblin X cursors theme.' or > similar. > - don't use a disttag. This is a noarch theme with no dependencies, so it is > not necessary to update it during an release upgrade. Fixed > - add NEWS to %doc (README is currently not worth adding) There is no NEWS file :-) > - '%{__mkdir_p} -p' is a duplication. Please don't use macros for simple things > like %{__cp} or %{__mkdir_p}. You never know if/how these macros are defined. Fixed > - use install rather than cp to make sure permissions are correct and to > preserve timestamps Used "cp -p" to preserve as its a directory of multiple as per Packaging Guidelines. > - don't hardcode /usr/share in %install, use %{_datadir} Fixed > - Provide the full URL of Source0 and remove the comment on generation of the > tarball. This will also fix the wrong MD5, but the tarball needs to be build > and we can't use 'make dist' here. Instead, we do a few steps manually: Updated the source url. I'll update the spec file with the procedure mentioned above. Actually just wish moblin would actually fix their 'make dist' > %build > cd pngs > ./make.sh > > %install > rm -rf %{buildroot} > mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/moblin/cursors > for file in xcursors/*; do > install -pm 0644 $file %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/moblin/cursors > done > > Note that you'll also need > BuildRequires: xorg-x11-apps > because it provides xcursorgen Added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032246.n73MkPAk020736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #40 from Christian Krause 2009-08-03 18:46:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #23) > > But IMHO it looks bad for nearly all people since most others use tabwidth = 8. > > Just try to click on the link in your browser and the the lines will look > > somehow displaced. I suggest to convert it to spaces since that's a good > > compromise and it will look good for all people. ;-) > It is more useful when standard size - you always see where tab used, and where > not. I suggest you change settings. I think it is easy in any editor. The spec file should be easily readable without any specific tab width settings. Please use either a standard tab width or convert it to spaces. > > No, it's just a convenience / some kind of standard in Fedora. > Can I read about similar things anywhere? I'm not aware of any explicit documentation which requires "Source0", however this is also some kind of standard in all Fedora packages. E.g. see the examples here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > > I've asked on #fedora-devel and I got the impression that file based build > > requires are strongly discouraged. The main reason is the increased build time. > > I think we must not only consider the increased build time for single > > developers but also the increased load on the koji machines. > This issue discussed many times in ml, f.e. > https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/pipermail/rpm-devel/2004-October/000097.html but > there no 1 thing. > > So, *correct* way in this case libXi-devel should provide xorg-x11-proto-devel > as it is replaced them. Other is hacks. File-based BuildRequire is semed more > beautiful and preferred for me. > And, I believe what increased build time is very small to count it... Since this seems to be discouraged in Fedora, please don't do it. The guidelines don't explicitly forbid this, but at least for the Requires field it is discouraged: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires > > Use the macros consistently - one plain "rm" leaked in although you've used > > "%{__rm}" in all other places... > Ok. There is one missing where your removed the prebuilt clients. Some more remarks: Would it be possible to link it against the regular liblzo even for the Fedora package? This would save us one condition. Additional if it would be possible to create a patch which would make this a compile option to switch between minilzo (which is designed to be internal) and external lzo then this patch would be hopefully acceptable for upstream. The part of the %prep section which changes the encoding is not correctly indented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032251.n73MpfVl021878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 18:51:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > FAIL - MUST: source does not matche upstream source by MD5 > > Upstream: 4e88ee79b4aafc08e4dc6defc3dadf7d > > Package: 676eef435c190168bf05b51a24f46772 > > No its not. Read the note at the top of the spec file about how to recreate the > tarball. Yeah, but as I wrote I prefer using one of upstreams tarballs instead of the snapshot. Whatever can happen in the buildsys should happen there without manunally generating a tarball with an unpredictable md5sum. > > - add NEWS to %doc (README is currently not worth adding) > > There is no NEWS file :-) Oops, I got confused by the different packages. > Used "cp -p" to preserve as its a directory of multiple as per Packaging > Guidelines. So, where are the files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032255.n73MtLLY022519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #41 from Christian Krause 2009-08-03 18:55:20 EDT --- @FE-LEGAL There are 2 legal issues with this package: 1. pre-compiled binaries The upstream tarball [1] contains a bunch of pre-compiled java binaries: ./classes/ssl/VncViewer.jar ./classes/ssl/UltraViewerSSL.jar ./classes/ssl/src/VncViewer.jar ./classes/ssl/src/UltraViewerSSL.jar ./classes/ssl/src/SignedVncViewer.jar ./classes/ssl/src/VncViewerNOSSL.jar ./classes/ssl/src/SignedUltraViewerSSL.jar ./classes/ssl/SignedVncViewer.jar ./classes/ssl/VncViewerNOSSL.jar ./classes/ssl/SignedUltraViewerSSL.jar ./classes/VncViewer.jar ./classes/UltraViewerSSL.jar ./classes/SignedVncViewer.jar ./classes/VncViewerNOSSL.jar ./classes/SignedUltraViewerSSL.jar and ./ssl/src/tight/*.class ./ssl/src/ultra/*.class The binary package will contain neither pre-compiled nor newly-compiled java tools. The complete classes/ directory is deleted in the spec file in the %install section. Please advice, whether the pre-compiled java binaries can be distributed via the src.rpm or whether the upstream tarball should be re-packaged without these files. 2. License: Although the COPYING files indicates GPLv2+, there are a couple of source files which explicitly state GPLv2. Most of these files are in the unused libvncserver/ directory, so they can be ignored. However, the file x11vnc/x11vnc.c which used to build /usr/bin/x11vnc (included in the binary RPM) is licensed under GPLv2. This would lead to the conclusion that the whole package should be GPLv2. Please can you confirm this? Thank you very much in advance! [1] http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libvncserver/x11vnc-0.9.8.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032257.n73Mvmlo019054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 18:57:47 EDT --- In that case what I'd do is to include that email (including the headers and such) in a README.License file and also indicate in that file that the license statements in the various pieces of code do not apply. Honestly I'd make a note of the license blocks in each source file so that it's easy to see what is being overridden by that statement by upstream. It might also be a good idea to double check that there's no code there which is obviously taken from some other source, as it would not be possible for a simple statement like the above to override the license on such code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 22:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032256.n73Mu7ih022786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 18:56:06 EDT --- > So, where are the files? Getting there.... just doing some testing :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 23:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032310.n73NAHjs025069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 19:10:16 EDT --- > Yeah, but as I wrote I prefer using one of upstreams tarballs instead of the > snapshot. Whatever can happen in the buildsys should happen there without > manunally generating a tarball with an unpredictable md5sum. Fixed. When I looked closer most of the Makefile was pointless! Also from this: > - Summary: 'Moblin X cursors icon theme' should be just 'Moblin X cursors > theme', because cursors are no icons. On the other hand %decription could be > more elaborate, e. g.: 'This package contains the Moblin X cursors theme.' or > similar. >From memory of a discussion on fedora-devel the package descriptions shouldn't contain things like "This package contains" as by definition its a package (and you shouldn't mention the package name in the summary) so I've left it as is for the moment (except the removal of the word 'icon') due to lack of any current inspiration on how to describe cursors :) So I think all should be addressed here: SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-cursor-theme.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-cursor-theme-0.3-2.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1577625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 23:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032336.n73Nao56025338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) | --- Comment #7 from Xavier Lamien 2009-08-03 19:36:48 EDT --- here the new package: Spec URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ruby-json/rubygem-json.spec SRPM URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ruby-json/rubygem-json-1.1.7-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 23:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032340.n73NepcA026059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 19:40:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > From memory of a discussion on fedora-devel the package descriptions shouldn't > contain things like "This package contains" as by definition its a package (and > you shouldn't mention the package name in the summary) so I've left it as is > for the moment (except the removal of the word 'icon') due to lack of any > current inspiration on how to describe cursors :) I recall this discussion. Summary should be short, only keywords instead of "foo is a bar...". %description in the other hand can be longer and should contain complete sentences. > SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-cursor-theme.spec > SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-cursor-theme-0.3-2.src.rpm Let's see what we have: OK - Summary and description (I still would like the description a little more elaborate, but this is up to you.) OK - no more disttag. OK - '%{__mkdir_p} -p' and %{cp} replacve with simple commands (no blocker anyway) OK - /usr/share no longer hardcoded OK - Full URL of Source0 provided OK - Sources match by md5 4e88ee79b4aafc08e4dc6defc3dadf7d I still would prefer install over cp, but as the cursors are now being generated during build, their permissions will be fine anyway. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 23:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032346.n73Nkm3Y026847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-03 19:46:47 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-cursor-theme Short Description: Moblin X cursors theme Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 3 23:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908032349.n73NnZMn027078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 19:49:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 00:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 20:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040003.n7403FiB029338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-03 20:03:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I talked upstream and I am now kind of upstream^^ Congratulations. > Project moved to: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/gbirthday.git Wouldn't it be better to continue at sf.net? I mean: I welcome every package at fedorahosted.org, but this should be documented at the sf page. Stay tunes for a formal review, I will also sponsor you. In the meantime you can participate in other reviews to prove that you understood the guidelines. Please CC me when you make your comments. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored for more info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 00:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 20:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040046.n740kWE1003866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 20:46:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Imho pyhunspell is ok here, because the project calls itself pyhunspell. But I > asked the packaging list to be sure: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-August/msg00002.html I happen to disagree, but it isn't a big deal. Actually I disagree with the whole "py" exception, but I guess it's too late to change that now. FPC can talk about it on Wednesday. > But it is not a complete sentence. That suggests a fix. %description should be a paragraph describing the package, or a sentence at minimum. > They come from rpmdev-newspec -t python, maybe they are needed for EPEL. They aren't. That's just a template; you should change it to suit the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 01:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040101.n7411YiP006534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #8 from Mark Goodwin 2009-08-03 21:01:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5 and comment #6) > Ok a few more comments, sorry for being iterative. thanks for the review/update Eric, much appreciated, sorry I didn't get back to this yesterday .. those pesky customers again :) > > Naming the spec "pcp_fedora.spec" threw me off, not sure if it's kosher or not. I just checked it into (my) pcp git tree, mainly for safe-keeping, but also for easier future reconcilliation with the upstream spec, which is now quite different. I think it would also be reasonable to check-in the SLES spec as well, since it's different too. > Keeping a fedora spec upstream probably just makes it harder to keep things in > sync; fedora cvs should be pretty capable of keeping track of the fedora pcp > specfile. yeah, once it's reconciled and checked into cvs, then maybe it can be removed from the tree (or that commit can be revoked). > %if %{have_ibdev} > %define ib_prereqs libibmad libibumad libibcommon > %define ib_build_prereqs %{ib_prereqs} libibmad-devel libibumad-devel > libibcommon-devel > %endif > > %ifarch ia64 > Requires: libunwind > %endif > > I think the ib_prereqs can be completely dropped; they're all libraries, and if > configured to use it (?) rpm will work that out. So I'd just drop > %{_ib_prereqs} altogether. yes they're all libraries, but no they can't be dropped. When Max wrote the infiniband PMDA, he needed to change the IB libs. Those IB changes are upstream now, but not (yet) available in any standard RH or FC build AFAIK. So the build and run-time prereqs will need versioning added .. which I'll add once I figure out what it is :) For now, %{have_ibdev} should stay and be false. FWIW, having IB monitoring is important for most HPC users, so we really do want to revisit this. > Same goes for the libunwind stuff on ia64 most likely? Or is it explicitly > needed for some reason? If so I'd add a comment. I'd add a comment if I could remember the context for needing the prereq. Another one lost in the depths of antiquity, probably an SGI-only thing? Maybe we can drop it, run qa and see what breaks on ia64 > BuildRequires: gcc-c++ libstdc++-devel procps autoconf bison flex ncurses-devel > %{?ib_build_prereqs} > > as per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > > There's no need for gcc-c++ or libstdc++-devel (as gcc-c++ requires this) yep ok thanks > However, doing a clean build fails due to missing BuildReqs: > > checking if ExtUtils::MakeMaker is installed... no > FATAL ERROR: Perl ExtUtils::MakeMaker module missing. > > so add: > > BuildRequires: perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker ok thanks, added. > Ok and some comments on some of the warnings & errors > > > * pcp-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpcp_pmda.so.3 > > Nothing can really be done about this - the exit() context is well > > known and understood. > > By the pcp folks I guess? It's expected that the library exits, not the > application? yes that's correct. the error is basically fatal for a daemon PMDA and is a known way for a daemon PMDA to terminate. (and the exit() is not in the code-path for a DSO PMDA). > > * pcp.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share > > Several demo binaries are being installed in /usr/share/pcp/demo. > > I can move these elsewhere, if requested. These binaries are not > > used by the PCP core functionality. > > Maybe don't build but just ship the c files? As a hack, if you don't want to > change the upstream build, you could rm them post-%install. A better longer term plan would be separate packages for PMDAs, which could also have -devel variants too. > > * pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > > Several headers and some 'C' files in PCP are actually configuration > > files. Discussed with the PCP community and they agree to leave these > > as-is. > > Maybe a comment in the %files section would help the next reviewer :) yep ok, added the following : # Note: there are some headers (e.g. domain.h) and in a few cases some # C source files, that match the following pattern. rpmlint complains # about this, but note: these are not devel files, but rather they are # (slightly obscure) PMDA config files. %{_localstatedir}/lib/pcp/pmdas/*/* > > * pcp.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/pcp > > Well, it actually isn't a config file - we want it unconditionally > > updated after an upgrade. Same for /etc/pcp.env > > hah, well: > > # rpmlint rpmlint > rpmlint.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/rpmlint > > so I suppose it'll be hard to argue too much :) yep, so we'll ignore that one :) Note that rpmlint also installs %dir /etc/bash_completion.d :) > > But I think if you mark it as %config, it will still be unconditionally updated > on an upgrade, but if it's edited, the edited one will go to .rpmsave. ok I've marked it %config, can't hurt > > * pcp.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pcp > > PCP has it's own log management system, see pmlogger_daily(1) > > Just to be a pain; is that necessary? If logrotate is available, can it not be > used so as not to surprise the admin? Or is there a requirement for a special > homegrown tool? the special homegrown tool is integral to the whole PCP logging infrastructure. I can't change that without major architectural changes ... which I'm not willing to undertake at this point! > > * pcp.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod > > * pcp.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm > > This could be avoided with %ghost directive, if needed. > > just out of curiosity are the chmod's actually needed? they're there for safety, I think because we weren't sure what umask is prevailing > > Looking at the scriptlets, I have to say that the .rpmsave & .rpmnew > manipulation kinda bugs me. Those are supposed to be left for the admin to > deal with. If it really has to be there can you add a comment? well that stuff was put there many moons ago because the default action on an upgrade were NOT what (SGI) customers wanted - they complained. I'll remove them for Fedora, for now, but they might come back oneday. > Also just thinking aloud; the scripts source /etc/pcp.env but that's not > expected to change, right; would it make any more sense to drop that and just > use the same rpm path macros as you installed to? /etc/pcp.conf sources /etc/pcp.conf, which may or may not get edited after install. That breaks the consistency of the whole rpm macro / /etc/pcp.conf variable sync-up. I don't know what to do about that. For now, yes let's got for the simple case and remove the crud. > > IOW could you just do: > > %preun > if [ "$1" -eq 0 ] > then > # > # Stop daemons before erasing the package > # > /sbin/service pcp stop >/dev/null 2>&1 > /sbin/service pmie stop >/dev/null 2>&1 > /sbin/service pmproxy stop >/dev/null 2>&1 > > /sbin/chkconfig --del pcp >/dev/null 2>&1 > /sbin/chkconfig --del pmie >/dev/null 2>&1 > /sbin/chkconfig --del pmproxy >/dev/null 2>&1 > > rm -f %{_datadir}/pcp/lib/.NeedRebuild > fi > exit 0 > > and similar for the creation of the .NeedRebuild stuff. It just seems simpler > to me, but just a suggestion. ok, let's go simple and standard, for now. The crud might come back oneday though ... > > Also on the root.saved stuff - I can't find anything in scripts or source that > creates this. I see root.prev though. I'll dig further for this one .. antiquity again. I think it has something to do with the XFS NULL files bug, and the need to preserve a safe copy of a critically important PCP config file. New spec copied up to same place on OSS in a few mins (and checked into my git tree too). I'll attach the new version to this BZ too. Cheers and thanks -- Mark -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 01:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040118.n741Ih97009702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-08-03 21:18:42 EDT --- Builds in mock without any problems and rpmlint warnings. One problem I see is that the icon themes inherit the gnome icon them, therefore you should probably add a Requires: gnome-icon-theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 01:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040124.n741OOjK010649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley 2009-08-03 21:24:23 EDT --- Soruces match upstream: [jds2001 at rugrat znc-extras]$ sha1sum znc-upstream.tar.gz new/znc-extra-0.072.tar.gz 14136cdff5df809301fd0db6daabd9c74a4e0c4c znc-upstream.tar.gz 14136cdff5df809301fd0db6daabd9c74a4e0c4c new/znc-extra-0.072.tar.gz rpmlint clean: [jds2001 at rugrat result]$ rpmlint *.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Provides and requires are sane. Package doesn't own any directories belonging to other packages. debuginfo generated APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 01:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487080] Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040134.n741YJ3F012526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 21:34:18 EDT --- So what's the status here? The last comment makes it seem as if there are problems with this package, but I don't know enough about ocaml to know for sure. Is there something that needs to be fixed before this package can be reviewed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 01:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040140.n741eSi9017281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 21:40:23 EDT --- Still no spec and srpm and nobody edited the blocker, so it's probably safe to assume that nobody cares about this package. I guess I'll close this ticket soon if nothing appears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 01:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040142.n741gfCZ017652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 21:42:38 EDT --- Richard, did you want to update the package and post fresh links here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040227.n742RuYq024922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.11-4.fc10 |0.11-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040228.n742SATZ027515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 22:28:07 EDT --- mcu8051ide-1.1-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040227.n742R3sh027172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 22:27:02 EDT --- php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040228.n742SEhI027557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-4.fc10 |1.1-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040227.n742RpS2027406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 22:27:50 EDT --- libpuzzle-0.11-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040228.n742SODX027604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 22:28:23 EDT --- php-pecl-geoip-1.0.7-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:28:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040228.n742SjHP027773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 22:28:44 EDT --- supybot-meetbot-0.1.2-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040227.n742RBTu027225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5.2-3.fc11 |1.5.2-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:28:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040228.n742SYfj027678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 22:28:33 EDT --- unetbootin-0-6.356bzr.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040228.n742SS4A027637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.7-2.fc11 |1.0.7-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040228.n742SeUX027735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-6.356bzr.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:27:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500931] Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040227.n742RMJf027277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500931 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 22:27:21 EDT --- emacs-verilog-mode-528-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs-verilog-mode'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0176 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040228.n742SvJe025135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-03 22:28:55 EDT --- efte-1.0-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040229.n742T1rx025177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-5.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040228.n742SoFp025096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.1.2-1.el5 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:33:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040233.n742XMkx029076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 22:33:21 EDT --- This package claims to be public domain, but I don't see any mention of that in the source. The upstream web site says LICENCE: all the source code provided by AOP Alliance is Public Domain. but my understanding is that you have to explicitly disclaim your copyright (if you are even legally allowed to do so) and I see no such disclaimer anywhere. Many of the contributors are French (according to http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/members.html), and I've seen it said before that EU citizens may not have the legal right to place works in the public domain. Blocking FE-Legal (again, sorry spot) for an opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 02:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040245.n742jeUV031981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #30 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-03 22:45:38 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mydns New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: itamarjp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 03:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 23:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040300.n7430F77002580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #39 from Feng Yu 2009-08-03 23:00:09 EDT --- OMG! The notification was buried in the sea of junk mails. I am happy if we co-maintain the package. I can't guarantee if I will be able to maintain other packages in Fedora -- I am getting busier next semester. In any cases I am interested in participating the process. Let's begin with this one. What should I do if there for a 0.7.6.1(or 0.7.6a) update? I am planning to replace the hasty 0.7.6 very soon. It wasn't a good tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 03:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 23:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040334.n743Yp2A008266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #31 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-03 23:34:50 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 03:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 23:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040345.n743jvEh010302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #355832|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 04:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040410.n744Akgo011323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Nick Bebout 2009-08-04 00:10:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: znc-extra Short Description: Extra modules for ZNC - an IRC bouncer Owners: nb Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: nb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 04:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040414.n744EV4P011814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Nick Bebout 2009-08-04 00:14:29 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: znc New Branches: EL-4 Owners: nb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 06:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 02:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040633.n746XXpn005329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 06:53:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 02:53:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040653.n746rD3c012511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-04 02:53:12 EDT --- I have ask upstream if he can do the change on the cvs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 07:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 03:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040729.n747TMLV021031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Rindt 2009-08-04 03:29:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mtkbabel Short Description: Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger Owners: drindt Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 07:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 03:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040736.n747aYx1019600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Daniel Rindt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 07:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 03:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040746.n747khG4021718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 03:46:41 EDT --- I'd like to do the (informal) review, but the above linked SRPM is not available. Also, the URL of the source tarball given in the spec file is dead. Due to the lack of the sources, I'm unable to build the package. Concerning the spec file, you should correct BuildRoot. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag it must contain name, version and revision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 08:02:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040802.n7482Yxi028288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 --- Comment #3 from Michal Nowak 2009-08-04 04:02:33 EDT --- Thanks. Fixed and also updated to v5.3: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/gnome-colors-icon-theme/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 08:09:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040809.n74894Fc026982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 08:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512500] Review Request: multimedia-menus - Categorization for the GNOME/KDE Audio&Video/Multimedia menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040811.n748BFpo030614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512500 --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-08-04 04:11:13 EDT --- Sorry, I didn't have time to come back to this. I sent an email to xdg list and suggested the inclusion of new categories: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2009-August/010861.html I will try to decrease the number of extended "X-..." categories we used in this proposal but there are certain ones which *have* to stay, like X-Synthesis, X-Notation, ... I will import the package soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 08:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508352] Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040823.n748NvOB001068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508352 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 04:23:55 EDT --- Just do the informal reviews and I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 08:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040824.n748Of7g001196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 04:24:40 EDT --- It seems the SRPM url is now http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ccze/ccze-0.2.1-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 08:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040824.n748ONpb032513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 04:24:21 EDT --- I'm going to do an informal review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 08:40:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040840.n748eON9004707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #5 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-04 04:40:23 EDT --- cvs has been updated: https://hedgehog.fhcrc.org/bioconductor/trunk/madman/Rpacks/affy/src/rma2.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 08:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040845.n748jE7E005614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-08-04 04:45:13 EDT --- Thanks for your help, Remi. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-PHPMailer Short Description: PHP email transport class with a lot of features Owners: monnerat Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: Many thanks in advance for CVS action -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 08:52:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040852.n748qwmf006257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-04 04:52:56 EDT --- Built and in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 09:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040900.n7490QMR008619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #42 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-04 05:00:24 EDT --- Christian Krause, 1) before you Juha Tuomala already pointed me what I forgot delete prebuilt binaries, and I was already remove that. So, nothing there, as you can see: $ rpm -qlp x11vnc-0.9.8-6.fc11.i686.rpm | grep -i jar $ 2) Ok, You are right, if main file x11vnc.c under GPLv2, all package must be under GPLv2. I change package license. BTW it is only review moment, not subject FE-legal, because both licenses is freedom and acceptable for Fedora! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 09:11:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040911.n749BCvo011066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 05:11:10 EDT --- + package name: ok + spec file name: ok + valid license: ok + license tag: ok + used sources matches upstream (MD5: ee2ad8c9918f817c445ed799d5c1dd2b) + BuildRequire tags seem to be complete + usage of locales: ok + no duplicated files listed + files section and permissions: ok + package owns its files + no development files (headers, libraries) + no large documentation + no sub-packages + no pkgconfig files + install section: ok + scriptlets (post, postun, posttrans) are sane and valid This package looks pretty clean to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 09:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040919.n749JhNN012838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 09:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040921.n749L4pA012677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-04 05:21:03 EDT --- Please note you should not set the review flag since you are the submitter of the bug. I am going to do the review for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 09:43:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514150] Review Request: ibus-qt - The qt support tools for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040943.n749hSIU017742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514150 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-04 05:43:26 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1578478 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. - source files match upstream url 161ab8ff00361d010624933d6d430746d3a55348 ibus-qt-1.2.0.20090728-Source.tar.gz b3ed5e0bcbab7c88f9745e8fc83ac10d684ed9ce ../SOURCES/ibus-qt-1.2.0.20090728-Source.tar.gz please update new SRPM with correct source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 09:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Media Player written in pygtk that uses GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040956.n749ul08021360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Bastien Nocera 2009-08-04 05:56:45 EDT --- And you can remove the mention of "Totem" (wrongly capitalised) in the summary as well, seeing that the author's description is factually wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 09:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908040955.n749tdaq021285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-04 05:55:38 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. sha1sum ./AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1.tgz ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1.tgz 221dcfcf0f1bac1c5b8fb7386344609e114efe06 ./AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1.tgz 221dcfcf0f1bac1c5b8fb7386344609e114efe06 /home/builder/rpmbuild/SOURCES/AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1.tgz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1579536 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 10:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041008.n74A8XBc024042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-04 06:08:32 EDT --- Hi, You can use following SRPM to update fontconfig file in cvs. http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/saab-fonts-0.91-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 10:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041029.n74ATqOU028692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 06:29:51 EDT --- rpmlint SRPMS/ccze-0.2.1-4.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint RPMS/i586/ccze-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name: ok + spec file name: ok + valid license: ok + license tag: ok - source tarball not available upstream - BuildRoot doesn't comply with packaging guidelines (see comment #5) + BuildRequire tags seem to be complete - you should add %{?_smp_mflags} to the make statement + no locales available + no duplicate files listed + files section and permissions: ok + package owns its files + no development files (headers, libraries) + no large documentation + no sub-packages + no pkgconfig files + install section: ok + no scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 10:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041040.n74AeSqo031150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera 2009-08-04 06:40:27 EDT --- X source files doesn't match upstream. sha256sum: ada66b3f8dd297c8b3e97666240672194e46b409f7ecd4676bdd75fe67ae431f usbmuxd-0.1.2.tar.gz 2d7092588dcb69b3f96133fc8a39c9668a82e54c4ea4c4de9e9a061802fd972e usbmuxd-0.1.2.tar.gz should be fixed by using 0.1.3 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. Some files are missing any license information, src/usbmux.h is under the LGPL, would be better if upstream added a COPYING.LIB as well and a mention of which licenses which parts of the code have (LGPL for libs, and GPL for the daemon I would guess) * license is open source-compatible. X latest version is being packaged. Need to package 0.1.3, best wait until udev startup problems are solved. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in koji. * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane. * %check is not present; included test suite can't be run at build time. * shared libraries installed: ldconfig is called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig files are in the -devel package, with pkgconfig dependency. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. Please fix the license problems, udev integration, and package up the latest version before committing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 10:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041038.n74AcUgJ030657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #43 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-04 06:38:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > The spec file should be easily readable without any specific tab width > settings. Please use either a standard tab width or convert it to spaces. You are first reviewer what don't accept that. File is easy readable. This style of formating not covered any guidelines, as I can understand (kick me, if I wrong) and I want leave it as it is. > I'm not aware of any explicit documentation which requires "Source0", however > this is also some kind of standard in all Fedora packages. E.g. see the > examples here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Only examples? I'm make decision what this is some kind of maintainer preferables only such as using $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}, rm or %{__rm} etc... > Since this seems to be discouraged in Fedora, please don't do it. The > guidelines don't explicitly forbid this, but at least for the Requires field it > is discouraged: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires This covered small later: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Dependencies Cite from it: Rpm gives you the ability to depend on files instead of packages. Whenever possible you should avoid file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin. Using file dependencies outside of those directories requires yum (and other depsolvers using the repomd format) to download and parse a large xml file looking for the dependency. Helping the depsolvers avoid this processing by depending on the package instead of the file saves our end users a lot of time. =====/ End cite ==== So, key there "end users". Small later in this guidelines you can also find useful example when it is preferable. Nothing there about BuildRequires! So I don't see what it would be discouraged. > > > Use the macros consistently - one plain "rm" leaked in although you've used > > > "%{__rm}" in all other places... > > Ok. > > There is one missing where your removed the prebuilt clients. Upps. Sorry, I just don't update spec. Now I also replace by macroses other things like mv, sed, ln... > > Some more remarks: > > Would it be possible to link it against the regular liblzo even for the Fedora > package? This would save us one condition. It is possible - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1579635 But it some sort of hack. Are you sure what we should do it? > Additional if it would be possible to create a patch which would make this a > compile option to switch between minilzo (which is designed to be internal) and > external lzo then this patch would be hopefully acceptable for upstream. There I agree with you - such option would be appreciated. But it requires some additional times, and I wasn't planing do that. May be in the future. > The part of the %prep section which changes the encoding is not correctly > indented. Hm... What exactly? Everything seems correctly intended for me. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-7.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 10:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041040.n74Ae8Fd031727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 06:40:06 EDT --- I'm going to sponsor Martin, doing full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 10:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041041.n74Afw1f032114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #20 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-04 06:41:55 EDT --- after yum install python-gdata I got a new bug: $ bauble connmgr.py(633): KeyError: 'default' WARNING: EmptyDatabaseError Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/bauble", line 24, in bauble.main() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/__init__.py", line 249, in main pluginmgr.load() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/pluginmgr.py", line 104, in load found, errors = _find_plugins(path) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/pluginmgr.py", line 537, in _find_plugins mod_plugin = mod.plugin() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/plugins/report/__init__.py", line 625, in plugin from bauble.plugins.report.template import TemplateFormatterPlugin File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/plugins/report/template/__init__.py", line 8, in from mako.template import Template ImportError: No module named mako.template Still when I try to create the database using "Use default filename" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 10:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041049.n74AnlDn001245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-04 06:49:46 EDT --- Martin Gieseking, thank you. All fixed. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1579720 http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ccze/ccze-0.2.1-5.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/ccze/ccze.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 10:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041051.n74ApntF001864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 06:51:48 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - If you use tabbing, do it properly: remove the extra space from Summary, Version, Release and so on. - There is no comment on what patch0 does. - Fix the buildroot as per comment #5. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ?? - Upstream website is down. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK - Man page is generated, so no need to preserve time stamp in install. - Header file time stamp should be preserved, but it is not included in the tarball. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 10:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 06:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041053.n74Arkoj002268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #15 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 06:53:44 EDT --- Great, thanks for that. I've looked over bug #510865 and bug #514634 and added comments according to the review guidelines. Hopefully, they are complete and correct. I just found an unsubmitted Fedora package of cxxtest (a junit-like tool for C++) that I privately built few month ago. cxxtest is not yet part of Fedora. Maybe I could upload a cleaned version of this package as my second submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:01:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041101.n74B1tDY004376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 07:01:54 EDT --- Taking over review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:01:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041101.n74B15jM003977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041125.n74BPmI7010482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #9 from Mark Goodwin 2009-08-04 07:25:46 EDT --- Eric, didn't quite get to finish this off this arvo - still want to add %docs and also resolve the rc script issues with /var/run/*.pid and rpmlint. I have both figured out, but haven't finished building & QA'ing .. tomorrow. Cheers -- Mark -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:28:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041128.n74BSUIj010381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-04 07:28:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a > duplicate. OK > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. NEEDSWORK > - If you use tabbing, do it properly: remove the extra space from Summary, > Version, Release and so on. There only tabs. On case mixing it, rpmlint comply it. > - There is no comment on what patch0 does. Ok. I comment it. > - Fix the buildroot as per comment #5. It was already done. > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. ?? > - Upstream website is down. I known. :( What you can suggest do with that? Must I "fork" project to continue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041130.n74BUM6d010844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-04 07:30:21 EDT --- > Please fix the license problems, udev integration, and package up the latest > version before committing. License updated to "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" and updated to the current 0.1.3 version. udev should be fixed in 0.1.4 and I'll update the package again once that is released. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/usbmuxd-0.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041132.n74BWlOG011708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #24 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-04 07:32:45 EDT --- Built and now in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Media Player written in pygtk that uses GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041134.n74BY4dL011655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-04 07:34:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > And you can remove the mention of "Totem" (wrongly capitalised) in the summary > as well, Ok, I will remove totem, but where is it capitalized? > seeing that the author's description is factually wrong. Erm, sorry, I don't understand. What's wrong with it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041132.n74BWxgV011367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-04 07:32:58 EDT --- Built and now in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041133.n74BXDSG011459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-04 07:33:12 EDT --- Built and now in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041133.n74BXFqE011526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Bug 513452 depends on bug 507377, which changed state. Bug 507377 Summary: Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:48:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:48:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041148.n74BmMd2014637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #4 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-08-04 07:48:20 EDT --- Sorry for the wait, guys. I've been on vacation. As far as I have figured out for now ( I've got tons of e-mail to go through :/ ), this is still an upstream issue and under discussion for the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 11:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041152.n74BqOdG015719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 07:52:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a > > duplicate. OK > > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > > consistently. NEEDSWORK > > - If you use tabbing, do it properly: remove the extra space from Summary, > > Version, Release and so on. > There only tabs. On case mixing it, rpmlint comply it. That was a general expression - remove the extra tabs. > > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > > provided in the spec URL. ?? > > - Upstream website is down. > I known. :( > What you can suggest do with that? Must I "fork" project to continue? I guess we just have to live with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 12:07:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041207.n74C7wuK019103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 08:07:57 EDT --- Package does not build in mock: checking for intltool >= 0.21... ./configure: line 11364: intltool-update: command not found found configure: error: Your intltool is too old. You need intltool 0.21 or later. RPM build errors: ** After adding BR: intltool checking for modules... configure: error: Package requirements ( gtk+-2.0 >= 2.16 champlain-gtk-0.3 >= 0.3.3 champlain-0.3 >= 0.3.3 gmodule-2.0 libxml-2.0 ) were not met: No package 'libxml-2.0' found BR: libxml-devel should be libxml2-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 12:17:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041217.n74CHjmc021182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 08:17:44 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK - hicolor-icon-theme is necessary for dir ownership. MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. NEEDSWORK - Add the missing BRs as per comment #4. ** Fix the BR issue before CVS import. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 12:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041219.n74CJFgY021686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 08:19:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > This package looks pretty clean to me. You didn't check the desktop file installation (which was OK). I recommend using mock to do reviews, not only since it keeps your RPM build directory a lot cleaner, but also since it helps you pick up necessary requirements :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 12:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041224.n74COX9r022412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 08:24:32 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 12:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041229.n74CTF5V023409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 08:29:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I recommend using mock to do reviews, not only since it keeps your RPM build > directory a lot cleaner, but also since it helps you pick up necessary > requirements :) Ok, thanks for the hint. I'm just installing mock and will have a look at it tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 12:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] New: Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ Alias: cxxtest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Summary: Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: noarch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.gieseking at uos.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec Url: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/cxxtest.spec SRPM Url: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/cxxtest-3.10.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: cxxtest is a JUnit-like testing framework for C++. Its advantages over existing alternatives are that it: - doesn't require RTTI - doesn't require member template functions - doesn't require exception handling - doesn't require any external libraries (including memory management, file/console I/O, graphics libraries) % rpmlint RPMS/noarch/cxxtest-* cxxtest-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. % rpmlint SRPMS/cxxtest-3.10.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 12:32:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041232.n74CWBgI024398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #16 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 08:32:10 EDT --- Ok, package cxxtest submitted: bug #515463 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 12:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041243.n74ChBs3026863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-04 08:43:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > That was a general expression - remove the extra tabs. There is not extra tabs! I think this misunderstood because I use tab with in 5 space (this is cose t easy distinguish tabs and space aligments). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 12:49:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041249.n74CnQ6M028229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 08:49:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > That was a general expression - remove the extra tabs. > There is not extra tabs! I think this misunderstood because I use tab with in 5 > space (this is cose t easy distinguish tabs and space aligments). Summary: A robust log colorizer Summary(ru): ?????? ???????????? ????? Name: ccze Version: 0.2.1 Release: 5%{?dist} # http://web.archive.org/web/20040803024236/bonehunter.rulez.org/CCZE.phtml URL: http://bonehunter.rulez.org/CCZE.html License: GPLv2+ Group: Applications/Text This is ugly. What it should look like is Summary: A robust log colorizer Summary(ru): ?????? ???????????? ????? Name: ccze Version: 0.2.1 Release: 5%{?dist} # http://web.archive.org/web/20040803024236/bonehunter.rulez.org/CCZE.phtml URL: http://bonehunter.rulez.org/CCZE.html License: GPLv2+ You have one tab too much in some lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 12:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041253.n74CrIBf029040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 13:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041302.n74D2gVb032054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 13:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041319.n74DJCHC003267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-04 09:19:11 EDT --- >You have one tab too much in some lines. Again - ONLY if as you, expand tab to 8 spaces! If you expand its in 5, all indentation seems ok. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 13:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041318.n74DICGN003122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 09:18:11 EDT --- - There's no need to Requires: python, RPM picks it up automatically. Drop it. - The package contains python parts, so it's best to BuildRequires: python-devel. Extract from build log: + exit 0 /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found ** As this is inherently a development package, I think the headers should go into the main package. The split is OK if you can use the files in the main package without the -devel package being installed. ** rpmlint output: cxxtest-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This is expected. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK - To be clearer I recommend changing %{_includedir}/* to %{_includedir}/cxxtest/ MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - Source code contains no headers. - README states cxxtest is under LGPL (no version stated), thus license tag is LPGLv2+. (Since there was no LGPLv2; in case of GPL this would be GPL+.) MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. ? - This is a development package, so the headers should probably be in the main package. MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 13:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041325.n74DPTmx005372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-04 09:25:27 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-ezc-Feed-1.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/php-ezc-Feed.spec ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/php-ezc-Feed-1.2.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK: The spec file must be written in American English OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. sha1sum ./Feed-1.2.1.tgz ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Feed-1.2.1.tgz aa3376b4959b7c9ff259a37dcd4ed6c07523d6c2 ./Feed-1.2.1.tgz aa3376b4959b7c9ff259a37dcd4ed6c07523d6c2 /home/builder/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Feed-1.2.1.tgz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1580007 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 13:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041332.n74DWFsO009227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 09:32:14 EDT --- To make sure the package doesn't use the bundled potracelib, remove the directory in %prep with %prep %setup -q %patch0 -p 1 -b .orig # Remove bundled potracelib rm -rf potracelib ** You haven't updated the SRPM to the newest spec. Also, whenever you make changes to the spec you must bump the release tag and make a comment in the changelog. Otherwise it's very hard for others to keep track. To my count the releases so far have been: 1: initial release 2: rebase to upstream with added tarball (btw, you should have made a point release upstream :P) 3: don't use bundled potrace so the next release should be 4. Add the missing entries to the changelog. ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK - All files are generated in %build, no need to preserve time stamps upon install. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add LICENSE to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK ** Fix the issues. You can apply for packager group membership in FAS now and I'll sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 13:36:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Media Player written in pygtk that uses GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041336.n74Da7o8010386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera 2009-08-04 09:36:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > And you can remove the mention of "Totem" (wrongly capitalised) in the summary > > as well, > > Ok, I will remove totem, but where is it capitalized? It's not, which is why it's wrong. > > seeing that the author's description is factually wrong. > > Erm, sorry, I don't understand. What's wrong with it? "similar to totem but without any GNOME dependencies"? It's not anything like Totem in terms of features, and the only somewhat GNOME-y dependency is GConf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 13:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041336.n74DarJ2008896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 09:36:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > >You have one tab too much in some lines. > Again - ONLY if as you, expand tab to 8 spaces! If you expand its in 5, all > indentation seems ok. :) The tab '\t' is not expanded to ' 's. The spec file is messy in Firefox, Chromium, vim, emacs and nano. Just remove the extra tabs, OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 13:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041343.n74DhTFs012906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #15 from Thibault North 2009-08-04 09:43:28 EDT --- Sorry, quite busy ATM. No news from upstream, I need to ping him again. BTW, if you feel like giving help in fixing the remaning stuff, you are welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 13:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Media Player written in pygtk that uses GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041354.n74DsWYW015891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-04 09:54:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > It's not, which is why it's wrong. I see. I don't want to argue, but both the tarball and the package are not capitalized ether. > It's not anything like Totem in terms of features, Agreed > and the only somewhat GNOME-y dependency is GConf. Please don't forget gnome-themes (why?) and control-center and evolution-data server (through totem-pl-parser) plus all their deps. Totem's dependency chain is rather long, at least in Fedora. I will change summary and description as soon as somebody picks up this review. P.S.: Bastien, would you mind replying to bug 488558, which is in NEEDINFO for 6 more than 6 weeks now? TIA! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248067] Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041420.n74EKqMe019519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #9 from Felix Kaechele 2009-08-04 10:20:50 EDT --- Upstream seems dead as well since their website doesn't work anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:27:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041427.n74ERZHt025234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 10:27:34 EDT --- Spec Url: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/cxxtest.spec SRPM Url: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/cxxtest-3.10.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for the review. Your annotations have been applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041426.n74EQPvL025085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sebastian at when.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-04 10:26:24 EDT --- So I'm going to take on this one... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041427.n74ERlHQ021277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041427.n74ERHCc021166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041428.n74ESiI1021479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041435.n74EZ9fL027453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-04 10:35:08 EDT --- Thanks Martin and Jussi for the review. I will fix the BR before cvs import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041436.n74Eaot2027820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-04 10:36:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpxviewer Short Description: A simple gpx viewer Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041438.n74Ec4Bd024041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-04 10:38:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356180) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356180) Kwrite with tab with=5 space There are NO EXTRA TABS! Please see screenshot in Kwrite and console mcedit. What tabs there "extra"?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041439.n74EdrA0024246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-04 10:39:51 EDT --- Sorry again. libchamplain < 0.3.5 will not be available for F-10. This branch is not needed. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpxviewer Short Description: A simple gpx viewer Owners: fab Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:36:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041436.n74EaUJ5023780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 10:36:28 EDT --- $ rpmlint cxxtest-* cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/SelfTest.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/YesNoRunner.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/RealDescriptions.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/RealDescriptions.cpp cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/Mock.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/DummyDescriptions.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/GlobalFixture.cpp cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/ErrorPrinter.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/Gui.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/LinkedList.cpp cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/GlobalFixture.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/TestSuite.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/TestListener.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/StdioPrinter.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/StdioFilePrinter.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/ParenPrinter.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/X11Gui.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/LinkedList.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/DummyDescriptions.cpp cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/Win32Gui.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/TeeListener.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/StdValueTraits.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/Root.cpp cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/Flags.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/ValueTraits.cpp cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/TestTracker.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/TestTracker.cpp cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/TestRunner.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/Descriptions.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/TestSuite.cpp cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/QtGui.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/ErrorFormatter.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/ValueTraits.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/StdHeaders.h cxxtest.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/cxxtest/Descriptions.cpp 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 35 warnings. Once again, these don't have to be cared about, as this is a development package. ** The package has been APPROVED. ** PS. If you're going to build for F-10 or EPEL, you need to remove the Python bytecode files in %{_bindir} by either %if 0%{?fedora}<11 || 0%{?rhel} == 4 || 0%{?rhel} == 5 %exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyc %exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyo %endif in %files, or %if 0%{?fedora}<11 || 0%{?rhel} == 4 || 0%{?rhel} == 5 rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/*.py{o,c} %endif at the end of %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041439.n74Ed15e028279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #18 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-04 10:39:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356181) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356181) Mcedit screenshot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Media Player written in pygtk that uses GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041447.n74ElZ4S030983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 --- Comment #9 from Bastien Nocera 2009-08-04 10:47:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > It's not, which is why it's wrong. > > I see. I don't want to argue, but both the tarball and the package are not > capitalized ether. No, and that's expected. > > It's not anything like Totem in terms of features, > > Agreed > > > and the only somewhat GNOME-y dependency is GConf. > > Please don't forget gnome-themes (why?) Because nobody bothered to file a bug, should really be gnome-icon-theme. Fixed in rawhide. > and control-center It doesn't. > and evolution-data > server (through totem-pl-parser) It doesn't either. > plus all their deps. Totem's dependency chain > is rather long, at least in Fedora. > > I will change summary and description as soon as somebody picks up this review. > > P.S.: Bastien, would you mind replying to bug 488558, which is in NEEDINFO for > 6 more than 6 weeks now? TIA! Answered there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 14:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041449.n74EnYuK031512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 --- Comment #12 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-04 10:49:32 EDT --- Okay, here we go! * The version number in the changelog looks like a typo. * I guess the %description could be a little bit expanded... ;) * Upstream is apparently at version 0.0.20 right now, please update! Otherwise, looks good to me. Please address the points and I'll approve the package. --- MUST Items: FAILED - ?MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [sebastian at localhost ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/anerley-*.rpm anerley.i586: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.17-1 ['0.0.18-1.fc12', '0.0.18-1'] anerley-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] OK - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] OK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] OK - MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] N/A - MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] OK - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] OK - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] OK - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] OK - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] OK - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [28] OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] OK - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [21] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 15:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041501.n74F1SjY030830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 11:01:27 EDT --- Okay. I tested with Chromium, Firefox, Emacs, Vim and Nano and all of them displayed the spec file otherwise. 8 character tabbing is the standard, and you should use it. ** The package has been APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 15:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514540] Review Request: papyon - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041506.n74F6Mgn004491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514540 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 15:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041506.n74F6tk6004726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-04 11:06:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Okay, here we go! > > * The version number in the changelog looks like a typo. Yes, copy and paste error in the 0.0.18 entry. Fixed. > * I guess the %description could be a little bit expanded... ;) I've expanded it a little bit, suggestions welcome. > * Upstream is apparently at version 0.0.20 right now, please update! Updated. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/anerley-0.0.20-1.fc11.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 15:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041506.n74F6a5L032294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 11:06:35 EDT --- You can do that if you like, but for Fedora's purposes the email is sufficient. It just needs to be stuck in a file that's included in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 15:08:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514540] Review Request: papyon - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041508.n74F81PQ032529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514540 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-04 11:08:00 EDT --- The simple things first: * The url should be http://telepathy.freedesktop.org/wiki/Papyon * rpmlint not silent. rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/papyon.spec rpmbuild/SPECS/papyon.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 16) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 15:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041521.n74FLYOe010042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 --- Comment #14 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-04 11:21:33 EDT --- Building this fails right now in Rawhide due to dependency issues with nbtk-devel, but once this is fixed, I'll approve it. --Sebastian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 15:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041522.n74FMAnp004365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-04 11:22:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 2: Don't you think the package name should be "ARAnyM" rather than "aranym"? > The Naming Guidelines say: ?If they refer to their application as "ORBit", you > should use "ORBit" as the package name, and not "orbit".? > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity) > The website of the project seems to use "ARAnyM" consistently. IMHO it is fine the actual package name. "When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came. In some cases, this naming choice may be more complicated. If this package has been packaged by other distributions/packagers in the past, then you should try to match their name for consistency. In any case, try to use your best judgement, and other developers will help in the final decision." (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming) Please note that upstream called its RPMs aranym-0.x.y-z.i386.rpm. > (RPMlint also says: > aranym.spec:62: W: configure-without-libdir-spec > aranym.spec:69: W: configure-without-libdir-spec > aranym.spec:73: W: configure-without-libdir-spec > I can't really comment on that as I can't see the configure script.) This is usually given because you invoke configure directly and not the %configure macro. Is there any reason in not using the macro? HTH, Andrea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 15:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041552.n74FqrxS012165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-04 11:52:52 EDT --- * I think that you should install the icons under %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps and use the following snipplets: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache and require: Requires: hicolor-icon-theme * The release number is not right according to the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Version * I couldn't see a MimeType key in the desktop entry. Therefore there should be no need for the following scriptlet: %post update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : %postun update-mime-database %{_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : * This is not required Requires: desktop-file-utils * gcc-c++ is not BR. It is always included. * SDL-devel is not BR. It is already pulled in by SDL_image-devel. There could probabily be more devel pacakges like this. I didn't check them all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 15:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041559.n74FxSlu013458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #18 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 11:59:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm.spec SRPM URL: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/dvisvgm-0.8.1-4.fc11.src.rpm Issues hopefully fixed. (In reply to comment #17) > (btw, you should have made a point > release upstream :P) Yeah, you're right. I just added the license file upstream and was too lazy to make a separate release for that. :) > You can apply for packager group membership in FAS now and I'll sponsor you. Great! Thanks for your help and patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 16:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041613.n74GDE9G022589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-04 12:13:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > 8 character tabbing is the standard Off course >, and you should use it. but not must ;) > The package has been > > APPROVED. Thank you very much for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 16:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041613.n74GDOPq016934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 12:13:23 EDT --- Thanks for the information and your help. I will add the above code to be more compatible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 16:15:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041615.n74GFDbK023273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #21 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-04 12:15:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ccze Short Description: A robust log colorizer Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 16:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041618.n74GILmG018152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab 2009-08-04 12:18:20 EDT --- %configure doesn't work because it is being built in a subdir. There should be a general solution for that, since building outside of the srcdir is often preferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 16:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041626.n74GQMMX019920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-04 12:26:20 EDT --- rubygem-json-1.1.7-1.fc10 does not build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1580525 Some notes: * SourceURL - For gems, you can use: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/-.gem and this URL is easier. * Gem installation process - The main reason the build fails like: --------------------------------------------------- Binary file /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/rubygem-json-1.1.7-1.fc12.x86_64/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/json-1.1.7/ext/json/ext/generator/unicode.o matches --------------------------------------------------- is because you installs gem file under %buildroot instead of creating directory under %_builddir and installing gem file under there [1] This is also mentioned in current ruby guidelines [2] For example, please refer to rubygem-nokogiri spec file [3] [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-July/msg00929.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gem_with_extension_libraries_written_in_C [3] http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-nokogiri/devel/rubygem-nokogiri.spec?revision=1.11 * Enable tests - As this gem file installs some tests under %geminstdir/tests/, please enable tests (also see the example [3]) * Documents directories - Documents installed under %geminstdir should just be marked as %doc and should not be moved to under %_defaultdocdir because $ gem contents expects that those files should be under %geminstdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 16:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041639.n74GdPWm022537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 12:39:25 EDT --- vifir-0.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vifir-0.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 16:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041639.n74GdLbG022505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 12:39:20 EDT --- vifir-0.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vifir-0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 16:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041640.n74GeKWL028828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-04 12:40:19 EDT --- Well, where is license information? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 16:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041655.n74Gthmn031968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-04 12:55:41 EDT --- Thanks for waiting, SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/yum-download-order.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/yum-download-order-0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm I have updated the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 16:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041657.n74GvcI4032405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-04 12:57:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thanks for waiting, > > SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/yum-download-order.spec > SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/yum-download-order-0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm > Corrected Urls: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/yum-download-order.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/yum-download-order-0.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:02:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] New: Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 Summary: Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.sourada at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/constantine-backgrounds.spec SRPM URL: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/constantine-backgrounds-11.90.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Set of wallpapers we (design-team) are preparing for F12 Constantine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:06:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041706.n74H69oF001868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sean at middleditch. | |us) --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-04 13:06:07 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507631] Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - Ruby module for reading and writing zip files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041710.n74HA0qn028569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507631 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-04 13:09:59 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041709.n74H9RT7002484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-04 13:09:26 EDT --- Okay, then would you update this review request, Thomas? Please make openal-soft have "Obsoletes: openal <= " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041724.n74HON9r032014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-04 13:24:21 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:24:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041724.n74HOBKB031969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sourada 2009-08-04 13:24:10 EDT --- Looks like I left F11_Artwork in the URL instead of F12_Artwork... I'll change it together with source url when I finish to upload it on fedorahosted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:20:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041720.n74HKuPM031454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #36 from Vivek Shah 2009-08-04 13:20:53 EDT --- Updated the spec and srpm Please find it here: Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/mausezahn.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/mausezahn-0.34.8-2.fc9.src.rpm Had a successful scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1580758 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:32:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041732.n74HWtj1002023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sourada 2009-08-04 13:32:55 EDT --- Uploaded and changed. New SPEC URL: http://mso.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/constantine-backgrounds.spec I think re-uploading SRPM is not necessary, as the change is only cosmetic (and 24MB is rather a lot). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041735.n74HZrag008997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ian at ianweller.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ian at ianweller.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-08-04 13:35:52 EDT --- I'll take this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041736.n74HaPOG009153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|Ready | --- Comment #7 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-04 13:36:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ah, I searched for Batiz. Looks like you're set there. However, since you've > asked that this not be reviewed yet, I'll indicate that it's not ready. Please > clear the whiteboard when you'd like for someone to review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041736.n74HajDF003173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|Ready | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041738.n74Hccbu009417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #8 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-04 13:38:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Now cleared. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041744.n74HirKP004462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |urgent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:44:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041744.n74HiY9G010619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |urgent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041745.n74Hjm1L011183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: nss-util - |Review Request: nss-util - |Utilities for Network |Utilities for Network |Security Services (NSS) |Security Services (NSS) and | |Softoken module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226638] Merge Review: xorg-x11-filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041752.n74Hq6Ut012338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226638 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #5 from Adam Jackson 2009-08-04 13:52:03 EDT --- Dead in rawhide, nothing Requires: it anymore and filesystem Prov/Obs it as suggested in comment #4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 17:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041755.n74HtXO0013150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 13:55:32 EDT --- As you probably have noticed, I have sponsored you. This package is good to go. APPROVED Proceed with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner As I said before, you are now able to do package reviews in Fedora. It's a very efficient way to improve the package collection and we're not really short on reviews to be done, so your work would be greatly appreciated. After all, reviewing a package is a one-go thing, maintaining one is much more work :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 18:12:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041812.n74ICBdm016926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller 2009-08-04 14:12:10 EDT --- [ OK ] source files match upstream: fb004429dbd5ba53b8e0cef379d5ea23 constantine-backgrounds-11.90.0.tar.lzma fb004429dbd5ba53b8e0cef379d5ea23 constantine-backgrounds-11.90.0.tar.lzma.1 [ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [ OK ] dist tag is present. [ OK ] build root is correct. [ OK ] license field matches the actual license. [ OK ] license is open source-compatible. [ OK ] license text included in package. [ OK ] latest version is being packaged. [ OK ] BuildRequires are proper. [ N/A ] compiler flags are appropriate. [ OK ] %clean is present. [ ] package builds in mock. [ OK ] package installs properly. [ N/A ] debuginfo package looks complete. [ OK ] rpmlint is silent. [ OK ] final provides and requires are sane constantine-backgrounds = 11.90.0-2.fc11 constantine-backgrounds-extras = 11.90.0-2.fc11 [ N/A ] %check is present and all tests pass: [ OK ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [ OK ] owns the directories it creates. [FAILED] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. Both the main package and the subpackage own /usr/share/backgrounds/constantine. [ OK ] no duplicates in %files. [ OK ] file permissions are appropriate. [ N/A ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [ OK ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [ OK ] no headers. [ OK ] no pkgconfig files. [ OK ] no libtool .la droppings. [ N/A ] desktop files valid and installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 18:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041812.n74ICpQ4011147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 --- Comment #5 from Ian Weller 2009-08-04 14:12:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > [ ] package builds in mock. Still building this in mock, will post the result shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 18:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041831.n74IVdvn015967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(jkeating at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #8 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-04 14:31:38 EDT --- All good now, approving. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 18:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041847.n74IlAZd025596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #20 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-04 14:47:09 EDT --- Yes, I just noticed your sponsorship. Thank you again for that. I really appreciate your support. Package reviewing seems to be a good opportunity to become more familiar with the details of rpm packaging. I think, I will try to review some packages from time to time. But before, I have to practice a bit privately. Otherwise my comments probably wouldn't be of much help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 18:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458180] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041856.n74IuM0B028417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458180 --- Comment #13 from Till Maas 2009-08-04 14:56:20 EDT --- I am preparing a package, does someone still have the patch mentioned in the spec? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 18:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041856.n74Iu1fV022058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 --- Comment #6 from Ian Weller 2009-08-04 14:56:00 EDT --- Mock build [ OK ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 18:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041858.n74IwNYE022522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-04 14:58:22 EDT --- I added the mail in the file preprocessCore_license. Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-preprocessCore.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041900.n74J0A8h023069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ruby-json - |Review Request: |A JSON implementation in |rubygem-json - A JSON |Ruby |implementation in Ruby -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:00:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041900.n74J0HuF029478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 15:00:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Package reviewing seems to be a good opportunity to become more familiar with > the details of rpm packaging. I think, I will try to review some packages from > time to time. But before, I have to practice a bit privately. Otherwise my > comments probably wouldn't be of much help. That's always an option. But you learn by doing, and if you have a problem you're certainly not alone, you can always e.g. ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041904.n74J4YuS030843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-04 15:04:32 EDT --- It's building fine now in Rawhide (see scratch build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1581355) so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041905.n74J5gGH024723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 Chess Griffin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chess at chessgriffin.com --- Comment #1 from Chess Griffin 2009-08-04 15:05:40 EDT --- I think before anyone can give you a more detailed review, there are some things you should address and fix. As an initial point, you should run rpmlint with -vi switch to give you more information. Since this is a Python application, you may want to read the Python packaging wikipage (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python). It also appears you do not use the Makefile that is included with the source and it looks like the Makefile supports DESTDIR, PREFIX etc. Why do you not use it? Specifc comments are below: > gnomenu.src: W: non-standard-group Graphical desktop/GNOME As the message says, you have a non-standard group. Run "less /usr/share/doc/rpm-*/GROUPS" to get a list. I would also check similar packages in Fedora and see what groups they use. > gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib Add python-xlib as a BuildRequires. > gnomenu.src:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/gnomenu/GnoMenu.py You have a hardcoded path in your spec file (line 49). You should use macros instead (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros). If hardcoded paths are in the source, (and I think they are in the Makefile, for example) you may need to figure out a way to fix that if you can, either by overriding it if possible or using an inline sed or patch. Patches should be sent upstream. > gnomenu.src:62: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) > %{_libdir}/bonobo/servers/*.server > gnomenu.src:63: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) > %{_libdir}/%{name}/* Following on with the previous comment, double-check whether this really is a noarch package. I believe the Python packaging page linked to above has information on multilib installations. > gnomenu.noarch: E: script-without-shebang > /usr/lib/gnomenu/locale/Settings_LangPack_en.xml ... All of these "script without shebang" messages are explained here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#script-without-shebang Perhaps these xml files have an executible bit set when it is not needed. If so, you may need to remove that. > gnomenu.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gnomenu/prefix Configuration files often need to be handled with %config(noreplace) as mentioned here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Configuration_files > gnomenu.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Menu/Short/.png ... > gnomenu.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gnomenu/Themes/Icon/BW/.png Are these two files just cruft left over in the source? If so, should they be deleted before cleaning RPM_BUILD_ROOT? HTH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041923.n74JN3Jf004005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sourada 2009-08-04 15:23:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > [FAILED] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. The packages can be installed independently so it should be OK to own the dir by both, alternative would be to create another sub-package owning the directory and have both packages require it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041926.n74JQvIg030570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sourada 2009-08-04 15:26:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > [FAILED] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. > The packages can be installed independently so it should be OK to own the dir > by both, alternative would be to create another sub-package owning the > directory and have both packages require it. The case I'm referring to is 2) in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041929.n74JThbw030952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Ian Weller 2009-08-04 15:29:42 EDT --- Oh. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package (constantine-backgrounds) is APPROVED by me (ianweller) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041933.n74JX0kC031979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 Martin Sourada changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Martin Sourada 2009-08-04 15:32:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: constantine-backgrounds Short Description: Constantine desktop backgrounds Owners: mso Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041938.n74JcEiI008339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 15:38:13 EDT --- python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041934.n74JYmEi007355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Luke Macken 2009-08-04 15:34:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-tw-jquery Short Description: ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery Owners: lmacken Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041938.n74Jc9Bg001015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 15:38:08 EDT --- python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041938.n74JcIAs001123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 15:38:18 EDT --- python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041947.n74JlpuN003685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-04 15:47:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib > > Add python-xlib as a BuildRequires. No, this is correct. RPM does not pick up requires of Python packages, they have to be listed explicitly. rpmlint is misguided by the 'lib' in the dependency. ** Instead of BR: python you should BR: python-devel as per the Python packaging guidelines. ** You are using 'cp' in the spec file, so use -p to preserve timestamps. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps ** The script-without-shebang warnings are probably caused by wrong permissions. Remove the executable flags from the files with e.g. find %{buildroot} -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \; ** You must own %{_datadir}/gnomenu/ as no other package provides it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459751] Review Request: osgGtk - Gtk and Gtkmm widgets for OpenSceneGraph In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041953.n74Jr5Q7012343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459751 --- Comment #9 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-08-04 15:53:02 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 19:58:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512500] Review Request: multimedia-menus - Categorization for the GNOME/KDE Audio&Video/Multimedia menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908041958.n74JwnYn013798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512500 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 15:58:48 EDT --- multimedia-menus-0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/multimedia-menus-0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042008.n74K86gq015781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #3 from Chess Griffin 2009-08-04 16:08:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib > > > > Add python-xlib as a BuildRequires. > > No, this is correct. RPM does not pick up requires of Python packages, they > have to be listed explicitly. rpmlint is misguided by the 'lib' in the > dependency. > > ** > > Instead of BR: python you should BR: python-devel as per the Python packaging > guidelines. > > ** Ah, thanks for clarifying both of the above points. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510402] Review Request: znc - An advanced IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042028.n74KSL9d012336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510402 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 16:28:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042029.n74KTHQJ012459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 16:29:16 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042027.n74KR6aN012208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 16:27:05 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042031.n74KVkmQ021477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 16:31:45 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042031.n74KVE3l021398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 16:31:13 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042033.n74KX1Ws021632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?, fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 16:33:00 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042029.n74KTuKR020796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 16:29:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515531] Review Request: constantine-backgrounds - Constantine desktop backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042032.n74KWFsB013381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515531 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 16:32:14 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 20:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042042.n74Kg7Sg016055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #14 from Remi Collet 2009-08-04 16:42:06 EDT --- @Patrick What about also maintaining this package in EPEL-5 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 21:09:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042109.n74L9ChL029913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Matej Cepl 2009-08-04 17:09:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nimbus Short Description: Desktop theme originally from Sun Owners: mcepl Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 21:11:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042111.n74LBMxt030628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #19 from Matej Cepl 2009-08-04 17:11:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Did you get any feedback on the license? If not release it strict LGPLv2. No, I haven't. > Update the package and consider it APPROVED. Thanks. New package is on http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/nimbus-0.0.17-5.fc11.src.rpm and spec on http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/nimbus.spec Building it in koji as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1581664 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 21:24:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042124.n74LObue001062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-04 17:24:36 EDT --- Thanks for your help. (In reply to comment #13) > An initial review. Mostly looks good. Just some rpmlint bits to cleanup as you > previously mentioned. > > + rpmlint output The rpmlint output now [fab at laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint sugar-record* sugar-record.i586: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities sugar-record.i586: E: no-binary sugar-record.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/camerac/camera.c 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. I removed the embedded gst stuff and added it as a requirement. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record-64-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 21:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042131.n74LVUL6027171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 21:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042136.n74Laewt003761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #32 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-04 17:36:37 EDT --- Stephen, I just filed an upstream issue to change the .desktop file, since we changed the MIME types in libconcord to match upstream (Logitech): https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2832287&group_id=231128&atid=1082218 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 21:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042135.n74LZosS028065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #9 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-04 17:35:49 EDT --- I'm wondering if I set a wrong flag somewhere since no one has taken this for review and the code freeze for fedora 12 alpha is today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 21:45:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042145.n74LjMR2029859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-04 17:45:21 EDT --- Added Obsoletes: openal <= 0.0.9 and remove Conflicts: openal-devel http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft.spec http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft-1.8.466-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 21:57:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042157.n74LvvHW032187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #10 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-04 17:57:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Checking the "need additional information" box was a bad idea. the Request for review got cancelled, how to I reactivate it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 21:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042158.n74LwrW8032291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 17:58:52 EDT --- In case you aren't aware there are 550 package review tickets in the queue to be looked at. We have far too few reviewers to be able to look at any ticket instantaneously. You should certainly expect to wait more than four hours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 22:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042205.n74M5XC2001271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 22:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464757] Review Request: openssl-tpm-engine - OpenSSL engine for TSS API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042214.n74MEkGN003253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464757 Rajiv Andrade changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |srajiv at linux.vnet.ibm.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 22:34:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042234.n74MYtCc007889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-04 18:34:53 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: anerley Short Description: Moblin widgets for people information Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 22:58:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514540] Review Request: papyon - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042258.n74Mwqg5019726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514540 --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple 2009-08-04 18:58:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/papyon.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/papyon-0.4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Aug 4 2009 Brian Pepple - 0.4.1-2 - Update URL. Didn't fix the rpmlint error since it's not a blocker, and I could care less about mixing of space & tabs. The scratch build from comment #1 should still be fine to use since the only thing that changed was the project url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 23:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042305.n74N5gr9014130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #20 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-04 19:05:41 EDT --- I was wrong, there is another file listed twice, this time in the icon theme: %files -n nimbus-icon-theme %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ %ghost %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache icon-theme.cache is already covered by %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/. I don't really care about this that much, many other icon theme packages have the same problem, but the proper solution clould look like this: %files -n nimbus-icon-theme %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ %ghost %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/iconrc %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/*x*/ %dir %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 23:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042329.n74NTYgh018415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #4 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-04 19:29:33 EDT --- err. I believe Elio meant: SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-1.fc12.src.rpm bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 23:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] New: Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Summary: Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeating at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/python-offtrac.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/python-offtrac-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: There is the offtrac python library which offers the TracServer class. This object is how one interacts with a Trac instance via xmlrpc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 23:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042341.n74NfLQS028283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 19:41:20 EDT --- Thanks for the well-commented spec; I don't think I'd have understood what was going on with FileCache module without the comments. The way you're doing this makes sense to me. Lots of deprecation warnings from the test suite; I guess that's related to the FileCache thing. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 6ac9804279b68588d51cb3df2667f7f7e54571e32639d966f05e7d9406c2b2b1 Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache-0.22.tar.gz 9e3e8a177c61857491f5c20e26f79fcfaa3a6c53ca00d4bb4864aab0770b6b07 FileCache.pm * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::PageCache) = 0.22 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache = 0.22-1.fc12 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Catalyst::Runtime) perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(MRO::Compat) perl(base) perl(strict) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=16, Tests=130, 17 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.04 sys + 6.88 cusr 0.57 csys = 7.57 CPU) Result: PASS * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 23:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042342.n74NgRYf020875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 23:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042345.n74NjZC8021557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #10 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-08-04 19:45:33 EDT --- Updated to version 1.2: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/fedora-gnat-project-common.spec http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 23:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042348.n74NmPOq021943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 19:48:24 EDT --- Generic boring Perl module review follows: * source files match upstream. sha256sum: d8ac902870fbe0916aba2b4cc9b3aa2f1a12c94ef704003cc9fb1fd6153d4112 Catalyst- Plugin-Session-Store-Cache-0.01.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session::Store::Cache) = 0.01 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache = 0.01-1.fc12 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session) >= 0.06 perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=3, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.11 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.17 CPU) Result: PASS * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 23:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042349.n74NnPuD029576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-04 19:49:24 EDT --- Fixed Obsoletes: and Provides: sections http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft.spec http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft-1.8.466-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 4 23:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908042358.n74NwVKF023812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050025.n750PR00028558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwilson at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-04 20:25:24 EDT --- Is this something we should perhaps discuss in the next FESCo meeting? I've finally got personal reason to want to see this included in *some* repo, so we should answer the question of whether this can go into Fedora, or if it has to be relegated to a 3rd-party repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:28:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050028.n750S4si004320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:28:03 EDT --- efte-1.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511219] Review Request: conakry-fonts - N'Ko font by well-known Unicode.org expert & font designer Michael Everson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050027.n750RrGG004247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511219 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:27:52 EDT --- conakry-fonts-20070829-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511219] Review Request: conakry-fonts - N'Ko font by well-known Unicode.org expert & font designer Michael Everson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050027.n750Rvu8004288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511219 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20070829-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:28:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050028.n750SYR8029023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:28:34 EDT --- efte-1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050028.n750S9Vi028960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-5.el5 |1.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050029.n750T9Bo029163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:29:08 EDT --- R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:31:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473835] Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050031.n750VX91005491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:31:32 EDT --- autoarchive-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:31:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050031.n750V6pi005380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:31:05 EDT --- xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473835] Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050031.n750VbN6005527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.2-2.fc11 |0.1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050028.n750SdiU004512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-4.fc11 |1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050030.n750UxOX005336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.2-1.el5 |0.1.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473835] Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050031.n750VQ9p005449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.2-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050029.n750TDNk004610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.6.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:30:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050030.n750UhWI005297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:30:41 EDT --- emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs-common-proofgeneral'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8265 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473835] Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050031.n750VLhm030187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:31:19 EDT --- autoarchive-0.1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050030.n750UtB8029976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:30:54 EDT --- supybot-meetbot-0.1.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050033.n750X68j030565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:33:06 EDT --- R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050033.n750Xr9S030678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:33:52 EDT --- xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050033.n750XBBM030594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6.1-1.fc11 |1.6.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050031.n750VCWC030121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.8-6.pl00.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512263] Review Request: audtty - A ncurses based terminal client for the Audacious In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050033.n750XcmO006068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512263 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:33:37 EDT --- audtty-0.1.11-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:33:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050033.n750Xw6a006148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.8-6.pl00.fc11 |0.3.8-6.pl00.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511336] Review Request: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts - New Athena Unicode is a freeware multilingual font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050038.n750c7eb007270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:38:07 EDT --- apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts-3.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512263] Review Request: audtty - A ncurses based terminal client for the Audacious In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050037.n750bVwb007159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512263 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.11-3.fc10 |0.1.11-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:37:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512272] Review Request: surl - A URL shortening command line tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050037.n750bxvs007237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512272 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.4-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512263] Review Request: audtty - A ncurses based terminal client for the Audacious In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050033.n750XhIH006102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512263 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.11-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:38:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050038.n750cKg7007350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:38:19 EDT --- vifir-0.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vifir'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8287 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050034.n750YQC6006217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:34:25 EDT --- vifir-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vifir'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8277 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:36:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512574] Review Request: perl-Titanium - Strong, lightweight web application famework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050036.n750a60k031822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512574 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:36:05 EDT --- perl-Titanium-1.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511336] Review Request: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts - New Athena Unicode is a freeware multilingual font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050038.n750cCpn032580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.4-2.fc11 |3.4-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512272] Review Request: surl - A URL shortening command line tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050037.n750bsHo032524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512272 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:37:53 EDT --- surl-0.5.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:37:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511336] Review Request: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts - New Athena Unicode is a freeware multilingual font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050037.n750bbPi032421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:37:36 EDT --- apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts-3.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512574] Review Request: perl-Titanium - Strong, lightweight web application famework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050036.n750aBS2031857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512574 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.03-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512263] Review Request: audtty - A ncurses based terminal client for the Audacious In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050037.n750bPpR032372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512263 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:37:25 EDT --- audtty-0.1.11-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511336] Review Request: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts - New Athena Unicode is a freeware multilingual font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050037.n750bgu8032461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.4-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050037.n750bJID032338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:37:18 EDT --- emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs-common-proofgeneral'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050038.n750cPmd032656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:38:24 EDT --- python-sprox-0.6.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511219] Review Request: conakry-fonts - N'Ko font by well-known Unicode.org expert & font designer Michael Everson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050041.n750ffRr008802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511219 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20070829-2.fc10 |20070829-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050038.n750cTrP007497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.3-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 00:41:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 20:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511219] Review Request: conakry-fonts - N'Ko font by well-known Unicode.org expert & font designer Michael Everson In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050041.n750faLx001714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511219 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:41:35 EDT --- conakry-fonts-20070829-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 01:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050108.n7518g5T013742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 21:08:41 EDT --- And yet another cookie-cutter review. As I always build in rawhide I don't see the above failure. The only interesting thing here is the huge dependency list sucked in by graphviz. That package could really use a split. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 4a1fa7c96d655073bc48f893980a8290414ecdd69c91d792136e3a389eff3033 DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(DBIx::Class::TimeStamp) = 0.12 perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp = 0.12-1.fc12 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(DBIx::Class) perl(DBIx::Class::DynamicDefault) perl(DateTime) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=22, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.02 sys + 1.47 cusr 0.18 csys = 1.70 CPU) Result: PASS * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 01:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050126.n751Q83o010740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |515081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 01:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050126.n751Q7mS010711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515080 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 21:26:06 EDT --- Setting the blocker since this won't build until R-preprocessCore is in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 01:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050134.n751YALu018513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 03:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050309.n7539DvO032180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 23:09:12 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The only statement of the GPL version in use is in setup.py; the source file just says # This software may be freely redistributed under the terms of the GNU # general public license. which isn't all that specific. setup.py is sufficient for us to establish intent, even though it contradicts what's on the upstream web site. It would probably be a good idea to contact upstream and ask them to more clearly and consistently state the code license, and to follow the instructions in the "How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs" section of the GPL for indicating GPL version in individual pieces of code. I installed this and it seems to work, although there's no documentation at all so I didn't do anything other than run it in a pipe. The %description promises multiple scripts but I found only one. None of these issues are significant enough to hold up this review, but it would be nice to get the license stuff cleaned up before the code base grows much more. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 818856108f0cb4799dc3baad0f841fdc20bc80dcddc902ffbf932085b4d19dc0 pipestat-0.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (besides promising more than one script). * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: pipestat = 0.2-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.6 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 03:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050323.n753NZUH003194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 03:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050323.n753NjvM003242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-04 23:23:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache Short Description: Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 03:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050322.n753MX66002977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 23:22:32 EDT --- python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tgext-admin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 03:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050323.n753Nllg009955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 03:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050323.n753NX24009899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-04 23:23:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache Short Description: Cache the output of entire pages Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 03:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050323.n753Nugf010042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 03:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050323.n753Nsbk010006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-04 23:23:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp Short Description: DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 03:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050333.n753XGmh004979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-04 23:33:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Lots of deprecation warnings from the test suite; I guess that's related to the > FileCache thing. actually, they're not - as well as wanting deprecated FileCache, the test application itself does two other deprecated things - no warnings are generated for the actual PageCache module, though, so not too troublesome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 04:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050402.n7542nKV017410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #23 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-05 00:02:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > 8 character tabbing is the standard, You are in error. 8 char tabs are pretty common, but that's all. > and you should use it. You've got a learning curve ahead - Better concentrate on technical issues and not on cosmetic issues in reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 04:34:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050434.n754Ybkm015333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 04:33:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050433.n754Xvj8022402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #12 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-05 00:33:55 EDT --- Builds on all the branches. Closing this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 04:35:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050435.n754ZgmA015827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|UPSTREAM |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 04:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050442.n754gMvI024012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #21 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-05 00:42:20 EDT --- You should also replace the OpenSolaris logo that replaces the GNOME foot with the Fedora Logo or fall back to the foot one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 04:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050444.n754irHv024270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #7 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-05 00:44:51 EDT --- Is there a way to also consider sblim-sfcb also as a possible CIMOM instead of only considering tog-pegasus? It was discussed before at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183#c10, wouldn't it be better to have Requires:cim-server/cimserver instead of tog-pegasus. This allows sblim-sfcb also to be a possible CIMOM. Since the sblim-sfcb package already has "Provides:cim-server", it is better we leverage that in this package. But I am concerned about the "BuildRequires" and also about mentioning the right devel packages in "BuildRequires" and "Requries". Any suggestions?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 04:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050450.n754omFc018515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 00:50:48 EDT --- znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 04:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050450.n754oip0018479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 00:50:43 EDT --- znc-extra-0.074-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/znc-extra-0.074-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 05:03:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050503.n7553rld027924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jkeating at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jkeating at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-05 01:03:51 EDT --- Taking this review at Bob's request. First, the source is just listed as a tarball, with no URL to verify where it came from. Also since the tarball has "stripped" in the name, I'm assuming that some work is being done to remove content. How that's done needs to be listed in the spec for verification purposes. There are a lot of interesting things being done in the spec with very little comments to explain what's going on. I'd suggest being a bit more verbose. When using install, it's preferred to preserve the timestamp with -p. Also, calling mkdir to make dirs, and then install to install files seems odd, when install can just as easily make dirs too. You're installing something into the prelink.conf.d/ dir but not Requiring prelink as far as I can tell. That needs to be fixed. Your %files section has you taking ownership of the prelink.conf.d directory. prelink and only prelink should own that. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership Is there a particular reason why you use %dir for %{_includedir}/nss3 and then list a ton of files in it? Are there files that you don't want to package that wind up in that directory? I can't build this to test, because I'm missing nssutil-devel >= 3.12.3.99.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 05:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050534.n755Y4a6026258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-05 01:34:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dvisvgm Short Description: A DVI to SVG converter Owners: mgieseki Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 05:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 01:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050535.n755Zo9W001850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #22 from Matej Cepl 2009-08-05 01:35:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > %files -n nimbus-icon-theme > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING > %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ > %ghost %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache > %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/iconrc > %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/*x*/ > %dir %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ Now I am really confused ... you said %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache is covered by %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/, but instead of removing this duplicity, you add two more of them %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/*x*/ (which is certainly covered) and %dir %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050600.n75606Dr031273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Till Bubeck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Till Bubeck 2009-08-05 02:00:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vacation Short Description: Automatic mail answering program Owners: t.bubeck at reinform.de Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: t.bubeck at reinform.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:06:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050606.n7566cL6007282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:06:37 EDT --- Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:09:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:09:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050609.n7569tqm000316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:09:53 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:10:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050610.n756Acce008049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:10:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:11:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050611.n756Bbbs008147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:11:36 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050612.n756C9ic001089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:12:08 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:15:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050615.n756FL03001666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:15:18 EDT --- Unfortunately we can only accept FAS account IDs for Owners and InitialCC, not email addresses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050613.n756Dk4P008433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050613.n756DVZf008378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-05 02:13:30 EDT --- Thanks for the review :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-preprocessCore Short Description: A collection of pre-processing functions Owners: pingou Branches: F-10, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050613.n756DVoI008394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:13:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050616.n756GNoc009141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:16:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050614.n756ER6x008548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:14:26 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 06:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 02:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050650.n756oJHv007695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Till Bubeck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Till Bubeck 2009-08-05 02:50:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vacation Short Description: Automatic mail answering program Owners: bubeck Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 07:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 03:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050724.n757Ol6K014006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #25 from Matej Cepl 2009-08-05 03:24:46 EDT --- New package is on http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/nimbus-0.0.17-6.fc11.src.rpm and spec on http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/nimbus.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 07:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 03:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050723.n757NI37013823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #24 from Matej Cepl 2009-08-05 03:23:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > You should also replace the OpenSolaris logo that replaces the GNOME foot with > the Fedora Logo or fall back to the foot one. Added to %install # removing OpenSolaris branding use start-here.png from Fedora find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ -name start-here.png \ |while read FILENAME ; do NEWICON=$(echo $FILENAME \ |sed -e "s!$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.*nimbus\(.*\)\$!\.\./\.\./\.\./Fedora\1!") ln -sf -v $NEWICON $FILENAME done (plus Requires: fedora-logos for nimbus-icon-theme) Is that what you meant? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 07:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 03:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050730.n757U3eU015299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-08-05 03:30:01 EDT --- Thx for you interest. My first thought was that the wrapper should more or less match one of the "vendor driver" version or serie, either or not users got the driver from the Nvidia installer or from repositories (any 3rd part). That's because the nvidia driver provides the needed vdpau backend for the vdpau output to work. But actually the wrapper is rather stable thought time. So my technical concern about to leave the wrapper in the same repository as the nvidia driver has left. Having the wrapper in fedora would allow vdpauinfo (1) and qvdpauinfo (2) to enter in fedora. Theses tools do not make use of any ffmpeg vdpau codec, so they are fully usable, (as soon as a vdpau backend driver is there). They are respectively a glxinfo like tool, and a vdpau benchmark. What need to be verified for a vdpau enabled player (xine, gstreamer ?) in Fedora, is that the vdpau ouput isn't used and doesn't produce errors when the vdpau backend and codec (that live in ffmpeg) aren't available. Once done, the vdpau wrapper library should behave like any other opensource library that are redistributed within Fedora, but not fully usable with Fedora only. (example: the dirac codec was available in fedora before to be used by a fedora package). So I'm all in favour to have it discussed in the next FESCo meeting. (1) http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/11/SRPMS/vdpauinfo-0.0.6-1.fc11.src.rpm (2) http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/11/SRPMS/qvdpautest-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 07:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 03:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487080] Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050734.n757YS4L023863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-08-05 03:34:27 EDT --- I don't have much time to look at these packages (and bug 460894) but I'm more than happy to leave them open. If I catch Michel on IRC I'll remind him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 07:35:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 03:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050735.n757ZuCv024412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rjones at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-08-05 03:35:53 EDT --- I'll set it to NEEDINFO of me, but I don't have much time at the moment to spend on this. I'm quite happy leaving these bugs open for as long as they take, or if someone else is motivated to pick up the package and finish the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 07:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 03:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050743.n757hZ6Q025728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 03:43:35 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 07:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 03:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050755.n757tNCm020051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 03:55:17 EDT --- OK, upstream has released a new version that has removed any mention of the FORM license. Now it should be clear enough that JaxoDraw is under GPLv2+. The stylefile is under LPPL, but it isn't linked in any way to JaxoDraw. Removing FE-LEGAL. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jaxodraw.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jaxodraw-2.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint output is jaxodraw-latex.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 08:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050802.n7582TXl029916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-05 04:02:28 EDT --- built and on its way to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 08:04:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514540] Review Request: papyon - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050804.n7584ZTl030246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514540 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-05 04:04:33 EDT --- FIX: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/papyon-0.4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/papyon.spec ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/papyon-0.4.1-2.fc11.noarch.rpm papyon.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 16) /home/builder/rpmbuild/SPECS/papyon.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 16) papyon.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/papyon/msnp2p/test.py 0644 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. - You can ignore the warning but you need to fix the non-executable-script error OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. sha1sum papyon-0.4.1.tar.gz ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/papyon-0.4.1.tar.gz 8735c918f9dcbde978d7c99569734ba0923ccee8 papyon-0.4.1.tar.gz 8735c918f9dcbde978d7c99569734ba0923ccee8 /home/builder/rpmbuild/SOURCES/papyon-0.4.1.tar.gz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - Just fix before requesting cvs papyon.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/papyon/msnp2p/test.py 0644 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 08:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050817.n758HGqO000717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 04:17:16 EDT --- R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 08:16:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512500] Review Request: multimedia-menus - Categorization for the GNOME/KDE Audio&Video/Multimedia menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050816.n758Gihn000616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512500 --- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-05 04:16:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > multimedia-menus-0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. > http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/multimedia-menus-0.2-1.fc11 I don't think a chance such as this should be pushed to F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 08:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050817.n758HBhN025776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 04:17:10 EDT --- R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 08:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050832.n758Wxmk004657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #26 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-05 04:32:58 EDT --- Requires system-logos so that Remixes can provide drop in replacement for fedora-logos such as generic-logos. This also means you need to automatically fall back to the generic equivalent if fedora-logos package is not installed. An example: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/plymouth/devel/plymouth.spec?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 08:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050832.n758WIYj029481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #15 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-08-05 04:32:17 EDT --- > What about also maintaining this package in EPEL-5 ? I'm not interested in doing so. But please, feel free to take this task if it is valuable for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 08:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050836.n758aJfo005774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #30 from Liang Suilong 2009-08-05 04:36:16 EDT --- Thank you, I am so sorry that I am too late to upload the new pacakage for the reason that I am busy for another thing. Now I upload them and correct the install script. SRPM: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter-0.80-5.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter.spec I also build it in koji build system. It is OK. F-12: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1573736 F-11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1573840 F-10: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1573755 I know I was wrong. Maybe the reaseon is that my English is too bad so that I was hardly understand what you said. But now?after reading the packaging guidelines, I correct my problem. Thank you, Jan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 08:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 04:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050848.n758mPXl008283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #14 from Konstantinos 2009-08-05 04:48:24 EDT --- Here it comes... SPEC: http://tartufo.dyndns.org/temp/pyur/0984-3/python-urwid.spec SRPM: http://tartufo.dyndns.org/temp/pyur/0984-3/python-urwid-0.9.8.4-3.fc11.src.rpm Thanks Christoph Wickert for his help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 09:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 05:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050900.n7590U3c003733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 05:00:28 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 09:06:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 05:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050906.n7596AB3012335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 05:06:08 EDT --- ping, what's the status? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 09:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 05:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050912.n759Cgh5013712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-05 05:12:41 EDT --- Spec Url: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/cxxtest.spec SRPM Url: http://dvisvgm.sourceforge.net/fedora/cxxtest-3.10.1-3.fc11.src.rpm I've added the conditional removal of python object files as suggested in comment #3. The package builds in mock. Do I need another approval before setting the cvs flag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 09:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 05:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050926.n759Qr7C017021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 05:26:51 EDT --- No, nothing important has changed. That's normal package maintenance that you are able to do yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 09:34:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 05:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050934.n759Y0bZ018689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-05 05:33:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cxxtest Short Description: A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ Owners: mgieseki Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 09:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 05:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050934.n759YiTd018898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sundaram at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #27 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 05:34:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #20) > > %files -n nimbus-icon-theme > > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING > > %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ > > %ghost %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache > > %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/iconrc > > %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/*x*/ > > %dir %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ > > Now I am really confused ... you said %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache > is covered by %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/, but instead of removing this > duplicity, you add two more of them %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/*x*/ (which is > certainly covered) and %dir %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ ??? No, %dir %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ is just that directory and nothing below it. Everything below is listed explicitly: %ghost %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/iconrc %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/*x*/ Got it? (In reply to comment #21) > You should also replace the OpenSolaris logo that replaces the GNOME foot with > the Fedora Logo or fall back to the foot one. Rahul, is this really necessary? IMO this is a central part of the theme, just like the GNOME foot. Reading http://opensolaris.org/os/about/faq/trademark_faq/ and http://www.opensolaris.org/os/trademark/ there is nothing that prevents us from shipping it. (In reply to comment #24) > # removing OpenSolaris branding use start-here.png from Fedora > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ -name start-here.png \ > |while read FILENAME ; do > NEWICON=$(echo $FILENAME \ > |sed -e > "s!$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.*nimbus\(.*\)\$!\.\./\.\./\.\./Fedora\1!") > ln -sf -v $NEWICON $FILENAME > done This is a bad idea, you shouldn't link to Fedora's start-here.png. This link will make the package require fedora-logos, without it you have dangling symlinks. I suggest: If you want to link to something, link to start-here.png in gnome-icon-theme and require that package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 09:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 05:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050945.n759j0up013724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sundaram at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #28 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-05 05:44:58 EDT --- I haven't looked the legal requirements of the including the OpenSolaris Logo but it doesn't seem right to include a copy of a different operating system by default in a theme in such a prominent place. If you want, I can ask for a legal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 09:59:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 05:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050959.n759x9RP017026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 05:59:08 EDT --- php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 09:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 05:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908050959.n759x3XM016984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 05:59:02 EDT --- php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051001.n75A1Xss025568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #29 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 06:01:31 EDT --- Thanks for the fast response. I can understand your POV, but I don't share it. We also ship Debian's swirl and the OpenSUSE logo, although not in such a prominent place. Matej, what do you think? Use the GNOME foot or as FE-Legal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051006.n75A6F92026639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-05 06:06:14 EDT --- And now in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051006.n75A6KGR026734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #30 from Matej Cepl 2009-08-05 06:06:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Got it? Shut, yes, I got. > Rahul, is this really necessary? Actually, I don't care if it is necessary, but that was my problem with the theme as well ... I don't want to look like OS, when I am Fedora. > This is a bad idea, you shouldn't link to Fedora's start-here.png. This link > will make the package require fedora-logos, without it you have dangling > symlinks. system-logos (see comment 26), but yes, and why not? system-logos are always present. gnome-foo doesn't have to be (theoretically). (In reply to comment #26) > Requires system-logos so that Remixes can provide drop in replacement for > fedora-logos such as generic-logos. This also means you need to automatically > fall back to the generic equivalent if fedora-logos package is not installed. OK, I got changing Requires to system-logos, but I don't know how to find out what is /usr/share/icons/Fedora called when it is not Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:10:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051010.n75AAVtF020106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #31 from Matej Cepl 2009-08-05 06:10:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > OK, I got changing Requires to system-logos, but I don't know how to find out > what is /usr/share/icons/Fedora called when it is not Fedora. and when we are at it, why /usr/share/icons/default/index.theme points to Bluecurve, when default theme for Fedora is Fedora, isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] New: Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 Summary: Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: j.kaddelbach at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: i have no space (where can I request space?) SRPM URL: i have no space (where can I request space?) Description: First of all, this is a placeholder. I will add the spec and srpm after i find a space for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051023.n75ANIcC030894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #32 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 06:23:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > system-logos are always present. system-logos is a virtual provides of both fedora-logos and generic-logos. We never know which one is present and therefor cannot use symlinks to one or the other. > gnome-foo doesn't have to be (theoretically). I does: gnome-appearance settings is part of control-center which requires gnome-icon-theme > OK, I got changing Requires to system-logos, but I don't know how to find out > what is /usr/share/icons/Fedora called when it is not Fedora. This is why we cannot use symlinks here. We would have to inherit Fedora or Bluecurve in the index.theme. This can be done in my patch. (In reply to comment #31) > and when we are at it, why /usr/share/icons/default/index.theme points to > Bluecurve, when default theme for Fedora is Fedora, isn't it? No idea, I guess because we cannot make it point to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051029.n75ATm6K001169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #15 from Pascal Parois 2009-08-05 06:29:46 EDT --- I didn't do anything yet. I am struggling submitting my phd thesis by the end of the month. I'll catch up when I'll be a doctor :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051036.n75AauNR002869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-05 06:36:56 EDT --- At least, you may place spec-file right here, as an attachment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:48:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513869] Review Request: perl-Beanstalk-Client - Client class to talk to a beanstalkd server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051048.n75Am1cC005349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513869 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-05 06:47:59 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051047.n75AlXGT005275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-05 06:47:30 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 10:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 06:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051050.n75AoER6006049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #33 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 06:50:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356302) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356302) stock icons patch that also inherits Fedora Here is a version of the stock-icons.patch that also inherits Fedora. I'm afraid it also inherits other icons and not only start-here. And it doesn't really fix our problem, because if Fedora is not installed, there is no start-here. We would need to also inherit Gnome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051110.n75BAMFK010680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 --- Comment #17 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-08-05 07:10:19 EDT --- The current Rakudo source only build from the Parrot package on the ppc64, i386 and x86_64 cpu-architecture. Interesting is that it build on ppc64 but not on ppc. The error message where the build on ppc stops is: + make /usr/bin/parrot /usr/lib/parrot/1.4.0/library/PGE/Perl6Grammar.pbc \ --output=src/gen_grammar.pir --encoding=utf8 \ src/parser/grammar.pg src/parser/grammar-oper.pg make: *** [src/gen_grammar.pir] Segmentation fault error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SWs6bb (%build) Also only on ppc a build of pynie fails with a simular error: + ./setup.py build running build /usr/bin/parrot /usr/lib//parrot/1.4.0/library/PGE/Perl6Grammar.pbc --output=include/gen_grammar.pir Grammar/Grammar.pg error: command '/usr/bin/parrot' terminated by signal 11 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0zM1GQ (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.0zM1GQ (%build) The current spec file and source rpm are: spec URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/rakudo/rakudo.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/rakudo/rakudo-0.0.2009.07_1.4.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051114.n75BEHnF011507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:14:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > > and you should use it. > You've got a learning curve ahead - Better concentrate on technical issues and > not on cosmetic issues in reviews. Yes, this was a minor cosmetic issue (would have been easy to fix too). I've worked on 130 package reviews so far, and this has been the only one using a different tab width. Having two incompatible conventions is really not very useful. Converting the tabs to spaces might be a good option, since that way the tabbing is always correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051119.n75BJ6Hb004701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Depends on| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-08-05 07:19:05 EDT --- You are not a packager?! I didn't find you at FAS. Please create a fas account. added FE-Needsponsor before you add a spec or srpm, think about this: commanderstalin comes with boswar itself. so you have to patch this internal dependency out. I'm not a fan of the "remove flags in fedora packages" discussion, but I would make an exception to this package! It comes with nazi symbolicas. Please remove this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226111] Merge Review: lvm2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051123.n75BNKxB014177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:23:16 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051121.n75BLIMJ013878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:21:13 EDT --- ping again? Nils? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051121.n75BLrJA013945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225714] Merge Review: e2fsprogs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051124.n75BOlTf006133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225714 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:24:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:21:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051121.n75BLb35005564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:21:34 EDT --- ping again? Tomas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051122.n75BMCAM005706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225677] Merge Review: dbus-python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051125.n75BP4La006493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225677 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:25:03 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051124.n75BORbn006078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:24:25 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051123.n75BNxrY005970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:23:57 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225699] Merge Review: dmraid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051124.n75BOuAR006163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225699 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:24:55 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226331] Merge Review: pydict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051125.n75BPKHR014944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226331 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:25:18 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226159] Merge Review: mozplugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051125.n75BPitg015032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226159 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:25:42 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226024] Merge Review: libgssapi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051124.n75BOIWO014418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226024 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:24:16 EDT --- ping steved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:26:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226346] Merge Review: python-pyblock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051126.n75BQ0uT006633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226346 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:25:58 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051125.n75BPaUr006575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 07:25:35 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051129.n75BTsd2007291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-05 07:29:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I'm not a fan of the "remove flags in fedora packages" discussion, but I would > make an exception to this package! > It comes with nazi symbolicas. Please remove this. I don't think that history-related game needs such 1984-like censorship. Nazi regime was a part of European history, so let's not forget it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 11:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 07:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051145.n75BjKcP010979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-08-05 07:45:19 EDT --- It would make me sad to see a game with nazi symbolicas in a family friendly distribution like fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051210.n75CAGss016545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-05 08:10:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > It would make me sad to see a game with nazi symbolicas in a family friendly > distribution like fedora. Then, don't allow your children to learn the history of the world. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051217.n75CHrYG018003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #25 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-05 08:17:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > > and you should use it. > > You've got a learning curve ahead - Better concentrate on technical issues and > > not on cosmetic issues in reviews. > > Yes, this was a minor cosmetic issue (would have been easy to fix too). I've > worked on 130 package reviews so far, and this has been the only one using a > different tab width. Again, tab widths are personal preference, you can agree with or not. That said, your personal preference is irrelevant. Also, what might be news to apparent newcomers with only little programming experience like you: There exist large communities of programmers who are using other tab widths as their standard (e.g. FreeBSD uses 4, many people with vi-background use 3, etc.) > Having two incompatible conventions is really not very useful. Cosmetics are irrelevant. > Converting the > tabs to spaces might be a good option, since that way the tabbing is always > correct. That's a newbie's bikeshed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051219.n75CJWkP026117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 08:19:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > It would make me sad to see a game with nazi symbolicas in a family friendly > distribution like fedora. Haha, you are maintainer of gnaughty, which is definitely not family friendly because it can be used to bypass age verification. On the other hand: The swastica flag is forbidden in Germany. It's only allowed for education (which covers Peter's history argument) and arts, but not in computer games. See http://www.technolex-anwaelte.de/index.php?id=43&news_id=106 (German only) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051229.n75CTMfB028802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-05 08:29:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > It would make me sad to see a game with nazi symbolicas in a family friendly > > distribution like fedora. > > Haha, you are maintainer of gnaughty, which is definitely not family friendly > because it can be used to bypass age verification. Heh, nice catch! I always sure, that (almost) all aggressive moralists are hypocrites. On the other hand, what Fedora Policy states regarding nazi symbolics? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225677] Merge Review: dbus-python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051242.n75Cg7d7032057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225677 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhughes at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Richard Hughes 2009-08-05 08:42:05 EDT --- Not sure why I'm on cc for this bug... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051247.n75ClP29000897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #21 from Nils Philippsen 2009-08-05 08:47:24 EDT --- Sorry for the late response. The xsane-0.997-3.fc12 package is building right now with the changes below. (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > Thanks for your effort, but I'll not use your patch because it's not very > > readable (better use unified diffs: diff -u) and I want to discuss some things: > > Right. You could have generated an unified diff by patching a local copy of the > spec file, though :) Yuck ;-). > > (In reply to comment #11) > > > - Instead of make clean'ing in between building the different versions, I'd > > > suggest using off-root builds. > > > > Later you said you had problems with that, what were these? > > The automake stuff isn't configured properly. First of all, configure reads > some xsane. files (at least xsane.NEWS), so one needs to copy them to the build > dir. After that things got even messier since it seemed that there were > problems with header files etc as well. > > This could of course be overcome rather simply: do a manual setup of the build > tree by extracting the tarball twice into separate subdirs (gimp and nogimp) > where the builds can be made separately. > > This of course doubles the size of the -debuginfo package (although I'm not > sure if debugging xsane-gimp is even possible now!). Oh, I'd rather not have that ;-). It seems we need to fix the autofoo stuff in the package to use off-root builds, but I guess this is "out of scope" for this review anyway. > > > - No need to define desktop_vendor as it is only used in two places and is not > > > even supposed to be changed. > > > > "Existing packages that use a vendor tag must continue to do so for the life of > > the package." As this is a merge review, i.e. the package isn't new, I'll leave > > it as it is. > > Yes, that's exactly my point. As there are only two instances where the macro > is used, I'd replace them both with "fedora". Now I understand you ;-). Fixed. > > > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package > > > that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK > > > - Package must not own > > > %dir %{_datadir}/applications > > > which is a standard system directory. > > > - gimp package must Requires: gimp for dir ownership and not own > > > %dir %{_sysconfdir}/gimp > > > %dir %{_sysconfdir}/gimp/plugins.d > > > > fixed (-gimp subpackage already requires gimp) > > Only in %post and %postun phases. Fixed. > > > MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. NEEDSWORK > > > - %{_datadir}/sane, %{_datadir}/sane/xsane and > > > %{_datadir}/sane/xsane/xsane-eula.txt are owned by both xsane and xsane-gimp. > > > Is there a good reason for this? If xsane-gimp needs those files, it'd be wiser > > > to let xsane own them and put a Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} to > > > xsane-gimp. > > > > xsane and xsane-gimp can be installed independently, they both need the same > > xsane-eula.txt file. I believe the rule you're hinting on means files listed > > twice for the same package (e.g. twice in "%files gimp") > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles > > "A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files > listings. If you think your package is a valid exception to this, please bring > it to the attention of the Packaging Committee so they can improve on this > Guideline." > > Now you have xsane-eula.txt and the directories listed twice. Of course, you > can get around this by putting xsane-eula.txt in %doc of the xsane-gimp > package. No, I can't as xsane-gimp won't work properly without it in that exact location ;-). Anyway, I've moved the eula and documentation to a -common subpackage which gets pulled in by both xsane and xsane-gimp. > > > MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSWORK > > > - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root). > > > > The latter (which I use) is functionally equivalent to the former (which isn't > > mandatory either). > > Hmm, the guideline at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions > states: > "Unless you have a very good reason to deviate from that, you should use > %defattr(-,root,root,-) for all %files sections in your package." > Please, just use the version of the guideline. As I read the guideline I'm already compliant, because the one and the other mean exactly the same thing. There is no tangible benefit from substituting the short-hand version with the long-hand one other than the latter matches verbatim what's written in the guideline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051250.n75CoEFj026971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2009-08-05 08:50:13 EDT --- blocking FE-MORAL ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225677] Merge Review: dbus-python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051251.n75CpGZ6002373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225677 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 08:51:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Not sure why I'm on cc for this bug... You are on the commit list for this package with a bunch of other people https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/dbus-python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051255.n75CtwFp004101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:55:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:55:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051255.n75Ctxgv004132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 Bug 501960 depends on bug 501251, which changed state. Bug 501251 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051258.n75Cw56u029171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 08:58:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > As I read the guideline I'm already compliant, because the one and the other > mean exactly the same thing. There is no tangible benefit from substituting the > short-hand version with the long-hand one other than the latter matches > verbatim what's written in the guideline. Yeah, I discovered this only a while ago. No problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:00:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481502] Review Request: rubygem-ditz - A command-line issue tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051300.n75D0HpW005365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481502 --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-05 09:00:16 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 12:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051259.n75CxNu1004847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla at l | |inuxnetz.de) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481523] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051301.n75D1Acu030063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481523 --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-05 09:01:09 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051307.n75D7iNC006976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 --- Comment #9 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-05 09:07:43 EDT --- please don't use full path to files like: /usr/share/epic5/script/... which is in your %files section, use appropriate macro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051312.n75DCobA000502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-05 09:12:48 EDT --- Lubomir, could you please package latest version (1.5.1) if it is possible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051311.n75DBL0c032758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla at l | |inuxnetz.de) | --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-05 09:11:20 EDT --- Will correct 1/2/3/4, you're right. But given that 1 is a dumb Fedora decision, which makes no sense from the rpm-only point of view. Anything else I could correct as well? I don't want to provide a new *.src.rpm for every possible tiny future change - thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051314.n75DEpFQ008604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-05 09:14:50 EDT --- Lubomir, if it is possible, could you please package latest version? (0.3.93.1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:14:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051314.n75DE0pa008492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 09:13:59 EDT --- Dunn(In reply to comment #7) > > On the other hand, what Fedora Policy states regarding nazi symbolics? Dunno. Ask spot? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:17:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051317.n75DHImV009359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab 2009-08-05 09:17:17 EDT --- Spec URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym.spec SRPM URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym-0.9.8-0.1.fc11.beta.src.rpm I think I have addressed all issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051316.n75DGsZb001776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 --- Comment #5 from Bastien Nocera 2009-08-05 09:16:53 EDT --- And Christophe also found: %{_sbindir}/usbmuxd should be in the main package, not -devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051323.n75DNlO6003548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #8 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-05 09:23:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Spec URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym.spec > SRPM URL: > http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym-0.9.8-0.1.fc11.beta.src.rpm > > I think I have addressed all issues. At first sight, the release tag problem still persist. It should be 0.1.beta%{?dist} Your changelog should always reflect your changes. Now, after your changes, you only have: * Wed Aug 5 2009 Andreas Schwab - 0.9.8-0.1.fc11.beta - Initial version. But this is not the initial version. You still made some changes. I'll try to have a deeper look later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051329.n75DTGvd012589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 Steve Milner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Steve Milner 2009-08-05 09:29:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pipestat Short Description: Simple python script to watch data flowing over an anonymous pipe on shell consoles Owners: smilner Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:32:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051332.n75DWZrK006045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-05 09:32:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > And Christophe also found: > %{_sbindir}/usbmuxd > should be in the main package, not -devel I thought I'd already fixed that. I certainly noticed it. I've fixed it now in my local package and will update the package once the next release is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:26:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051326.n75DQ5eK004484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 --- Comment #2 from Steve Milner 2009-08-05 09:26:04 EDT --- Thanks, since I am now a committer on the project I'll fix these items before the first released package in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051349.n75DnvJS009656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2009-08-05 09:49:56 EDT --- ping what ? kindly state what you want -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051350.n75Doder010162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #7 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-05 09:50:37 EDT --- Hi Jussi, sorry to be a bit late, theres a couple of things below ** - rpmlint output 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. potrace-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation - you could move potracelib.pdf from -doc to -devel (it's the library developer manual) and let this warning go away OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc ** - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines license in SPEC is : GPL+ and LGPLv2+ looking at README you can safely use: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun (no shared libs) OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1583585 OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. e73b45565737d64011612704dd4d9f86 SOURCES/potrace-1.8.tar.gz NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros OK - The package must contain code, or permissable content OK - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (-doc present) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK - Header files must be in a -devel package (-devel present) OK - Static libraries must be in a -static package (static library present, but no shared libs, so everything goes in -devel) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file (no gui) OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 13:55:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051355.n75Dtu8A011654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab 2009-08-05 09:55:54 EDT --- Spec URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym.spec SRPM URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym-0.9.8-0.1.beta.fc11.src.rpm I didn't bother to update the changelog because that package does not really "exist" yet. But I can add some verbiage if required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 14:08:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051408.n75E8iHp018763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 10:08:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > ping what ? kindly state what you want Please address the issues in comment #1 (except the license issue which was cleared out) so that the package can be approved and the merge review closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 14:21:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225714] Merge Review: e2fsprogs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051421.n75ELX6a024034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225714 --- Comment #14 from Eric Sandeen 2009-08-05 10:21:31 EDT --- Everything but the potential uuidd ownership change has been committed and I don't have more info on that at this point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 14:37:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225714] Merge Review: e2fsprogs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051437.n75EbDgj002638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225714 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 10:37:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Everything but the potential uuidd ownership change has been committed and I > don't have more info on that at this point. Right. Actually rpmlint output is now clean since uuid has been moved to util-linux-ng. I don't have any more comments. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 14:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051454.n75EsptO000546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 --- Comment #9 from Xavier Lamien 2009-08-05 10:54:50 EDT --- gaahh, good point ! Ok, here's an update. I disabled test for now as failling on parser.rl (I need a closer look on that on) http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ruby-json/rubygem-json.spec http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ruby-json/rubygem-json-1.1.7-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 14:51:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051451.n75Ep2VU032320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e, tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-05 10:51:00 EDT --- I think, that's an ethical and legal thing here. In some countries (e.g. as in Germany) such symbolicas are even a legal problem. Maybe they can be slightly changed so that they're okay in all countries like commercial/proprietary games do for Germany as well? Time for a bit FE_LEGAL... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051514.n75FE5si006383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 11:14:05 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache-0.22-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache-0.22-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051515.n75FFJeD006936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 11:15:18 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache-0.01-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache-0.01-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051515.n75FFOVa006975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 11:15:23 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache-0.01-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache-0.01-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051514.n75FEAVd013400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 11:14:09 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache-0.22-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache-0.22-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051526.n75FQveB010085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #6 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-05 11:26:56 EDT --- I have sent an email to upstream asking him to put license files in CVS, but I didn't get an answer till now. I am gonna resend an email to him, and wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051538.n75FcIsQ019935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 11:38:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I have sent an email to upstream asking him to put license files in CVS, but I > didn't get an answer till now. > > I am gonna resend an email to him, and wait. That's a SHOULD, so the package can be approved once you have fixed the javadoc issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051552.n75FqcnW024679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-05 11:52:37 EDT --- Praveen, just a few annotations: :) - Source0 must be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sblim/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL) - remove INSTALL from %doc - add a changelog entry for each revision $ rpmlint sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm sblim-cmpi-rpm.src: E: description-line-too-long These CIM providers list the software packages installed on GNU/Linux system and provide some detail about them sblim-cmpi-rpm.src: E: no-changelogname-tag sblim-cmpi-rpm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 2) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. Martin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515752] New: Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515752 Summary: Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jomara at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://deathpong.org/jomara/fedora/python-soaplib/python-soaplib.spec SRPM URL: http://deathpong.org/jomara/fedora/python-soaplib/python-soaplib-0.7.2-2.20080816svn39.fc10.src.rpm Description: Soaplib is an easy to use python library for writing and calling soap web services. Webservices written with soaplib are simple, lightweight, work well with other SOAP implementations, and can be deployed as WSGI applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515752] Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051554.n75FsrMO017854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515752 Jordan OMara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Jordan OMara 2009-08-05 11:54:52 EDT --- Additional note: this is my first package, and I need a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide-en-US - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051556.n75FuvbT026193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Bug 476471 depends on bug 511184, which changed state. Bug 511184 Summary: Build Failed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511184 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 15:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051557.n75FvbFW026600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |esandeen at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Eric Sandeen 2009-08-05 11:57:34 EDT --- Oh, I'll take this for review, though I can't sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051600.n75G0X9U020841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 --- Comment #6 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-05 12:00:31 EDT --- Filed a FESCo ticket, proposing that it be discussed during this Friday's meeting (2009.08.07, 1700UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net). https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/238 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:10:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:10:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051610.n75GAfXi025022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Remi Collet 2009-08-05 12:10:39 EDT --- @Patrick : yes I need it, so I ask the new branch with me as owner. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: php-PHPMailer New Branches: EL-5 Owners: remi (only for this new branch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051618.n75GIXhF026963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #19 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-08-05 12:18:32 EDT --- > I need it, so I ask the new branch with me as owner. You're welcome ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051622.n75GMRsG002848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #8 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-05 12:22:26 EDT --- Updated the spec file. Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/PgsLookAndFeel.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/PgsLookAndFeel-1.1-3.20090805cvs.fc11.src.rpm Description: The PgsLookAndFeel is a nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing. It aims be a very modern cross-platform LookAndFeel with nice features and much interaction for users. rpmlint output : none Koji build page : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1584273 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051623.n75GND4j003020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #37 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-05 12:23:09 EDT --- Well, ---------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# mausezahn Mausezahn 0.34.7 - (C) 2007-2009 by Herbert Haas - http://www.perihel.at/sec/mz/ | ---------------------------------------------------- Maybe it is better to fix src/mz.h (this version is 0.34.8), however I will leave this to you. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (mausezahn) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051628.n75GS8Xm004310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab 2009-08-05 12:28:07 EDT --- rpmlint output: aranym.src:56: W: configure-without-libdir-spec aranym.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/aranym/AUTHORS aranym.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/aranym/changelog aranym-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/aranym-0.9.8beta/src/natfeat/nfbootstrap.cpp aranym-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/aranym-0.9.8beta/src/natfeat/nfbootstrap.h 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051629.n75GTSdI029978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-05 12:29:26 EDT --- hi Ignacio, Are you still interested in carrying this review forward ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:27:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051627.n75GRMAL029494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 Dimitris Glezos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dimitris at glezos.com --- Comment #11 from Dimitris Glezos 2009-08-05 12:27:20 EDT --- The fact that a package might be unacceptable in certain countries does not constitute a reason not to package it in Fedora. That's why packages and spins exist, so that we can substitute a package if we need to. If this package is not on the media we're distributing in events, then it shouldn't be a problem. If it is/will be, then we should do exactly what we are doing with OpenOffice in Brazil (which is trademarked): We have a different spin for it: "Fedora-11-i686-Live-BrOffice This spin is intended to be a Brazilian Portuguese localized spin that provides the legal brand for OpenOffice.org in Brazil." I'd encourage everyone to understand that Fedora is much, much bigger than what we think it is in our own realm. We ship our product in a bunch of countries, and the only real problem that we should be worrying about in this case should be: "does having such a package on our repos (and not on our media) break a law in USA which, through the trademark bridge, could hurt Fedora and Red Hat"? If the answer is no, then there should be a very serious reason to oppress the "Freedom" foundation of Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051634.n75GYM02005598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-05 12:34:21 EDT --- Some notes - LICENSE text says this is "GPLv2 or Ruby" - As gem file contains test/ directory, add %check section and execute some tests. By the way the comments 3] and 4] in comment 1 is blockers . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051639.n75GdMmu000542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 12:39:21 EDT --- You might want to use a fully versioned dependency, Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ** I'd change %{_javadir}/* to %{_javadir}/%{name}*.jar Actually, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Jar_file_naming states that "If the package provides several JAR files, the filenames assigned by the build must be used" so I think you shouldn't add the version suffix to the jar files. ** You need to run find -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; in %prep to remove any pre-existing jar and class files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051648.n75Gm42t009780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 12:48:03 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051648.n75GmfGP003328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 12:48:40 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051649.n75GnfY8003510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 12:49:40 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051647.n75GlZnm003027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 12:47:34 EDT --- CVS done. BTW, you should clear the FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker from all of your review requests, if you have any others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 16:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051648.n75Gmrit010089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 12:48:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > You need to run > find -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; > in %prep to remove any pre-existing jar and class files. Actually, there's something wrong with this command. Better to run find -name '*.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \; find -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; This actually reveals there was one jar file that you didn't remove, belonging to the JIDE SWING suite. It's probably the one at https://jide-oss.dev.java.net/ Needless to mention, this must be packaged separately as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:11:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225677] Merge Review: dbus-python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051711.n75HBE1W009569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225677 --- Comment #8 from John (J5) Palmieri 2009-08-05 13:11:13 EDT --- SMP compile is a holdover from the dbus package (when this was a subpackage of dbus). Why does the devel package need to require pkgconfig? It is a python library. I'm not even sure we need a devel section. That is also most likely a holdover from the dbus/bindings package split. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506954] Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051721.n75HLlso018112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 13:21:45 EDT --- uberftp-2.4-4.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:23:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513898] Review Request: keychecker - Generate list of installed packages sorted by GPG key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051723.n75HN0eE018531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513898 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-3.fc11 |0.1-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051723.n75HNPLw018663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-0.2.20090713git.el4 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512500] Review Request: multimedia-menus - Categorization for the GNOME/KDE Audio&Video/Multimedia menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051720.n75HKOSJ017715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512500 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-08-05 13:20:22 EDT --- I don't have any plans for now to push this to stable. It can stay in testing for folks who want to test it. Well, the package is in rawhide now, so we can close the bug. Thanks for the review and everything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487080] Review Request: jocaml - Join-calculus extension of Objective Caml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051722.n75HMPnp012640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487080 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:24:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051724.n75HOCmY013278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 13:24:10 EDT --- munge-0.5.8-4.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051722.n75HM2hq012564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513898] Review Request: keychecker - Generate list of installed packages sorted by GPG key In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051722.n75HMuTi012808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513898 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 13:22:55 EDT --- keychecker-0.1-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomper - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051724.n75HORhK013339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 13:24:25 EDT --- python-stomper-0.2.2-8.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051724.n75HOxaA013476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 13:24:57 EDT --- cim-schema-2.22.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051723.n75HNKii012894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 13:23:20 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051723.n75HNfW6013095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 13:23:40 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051723.n75HNkTL013152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.2.20090713git.el4 |0-0.2.20090713git.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051725.n75HP4hY013819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.22.0-1.el5 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487007] Review Request: python-stomper - A python client implementation of the STOMP protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051724.n75HOaIY013394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487007 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.2.2-8.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482757] Review Request: objcryst-fox - Viewing and solving crystal structures from powder diffraction data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051721.n75HLsSB012475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482757 --- Comment #11 from Pascal Parois 2009-08-05 13:21:52 EDT --- Sorry, notification mails got lost in my mailbox, I am still here, just very busy. So I'll look at this later. sometimes this month, as soon as I submit my thesis. As I need newmat-c++, I'll look at this one first (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051725.n75HPI7u019670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 13:25:17 EDT --- python-Scriptaculous-1.8.2-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051725.n75HPNJC019733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.8.2-2.fc10 |1.8.2-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051746.n75HkmDY019570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:47:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225677] Merge Review: dbus-python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051747.n75HluvS019878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225677 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 13:47:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > SMP compile is a holdover from the dbus package (when this was a subpackage of > dbus). Why does the devel package need to require pkgconfig? It is a python %files devel %defattr(-,root,root) %{_includedir}/dbus-1.0/dbus/dbus-python.h %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/dbus-python.pc ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Because of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051753.n75HriU6021714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jussi.lehtola at iki.fi |martin.gieseking at uos.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051756.n75HugrU027165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 17:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051757.n75HvRQL023101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:02:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051802.n75I2K50024131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|martin.gieseking at uos.de |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 14:02:19 EDT --- Martin: the assignee in reviews is the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051806.n75I6Xxg029314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-05 14:06:33 EDT --- For 1.1.7-2: * URL - Would you explain why you prefer to use http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/... instead of the URL I wrote in my previous comment (note that the repoid "59617" changes randomly every time the version is upgraded) ? Non-gem support - It is okay to add non-gem support, however would you explain why you want to add this for json (while ruby-json is not in Fedora yet)? ( And perhaps * Installation directory under %_builddir ----------------------------------------------------------- pushd ./%{gemdir} gem install --local --install-dir ./%{gemdir} -V --force %{SOURCE0} ----------------------------------------------------------- - So gem file is installed under %_builddir/%{name}-%{version}/%{gemdir}/%{gemdir}, which should be %_builddir/%{name}-%{version}/%{gemdir} ( The first line of "pushd" is not needed ) * gem script files under bin/ ----------------------------------------------------------- mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{gemdir}/bin/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{geminstdir}/bin ----------------------------------------------------------- - Well, actually the scripts under %gemdir/bin and under %geminstdir/bin are different and both scripts are needed. The scripts under %{gemdir}/bin load the file under %{geminstdir}/bin. While we usually move the scripts under %{gemdir}/bin to %{_bindir} like: ----------------------------------------------------------- mkdir %{buildroot}%{_bindir} mv %{buildroot}%{gemdir}/bin/* %{buildroot}%{_bindir} rmdir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} ----------------------------------------------------------- the scripts under %{geminstdir}/bin should not be modified (except for shebang issues or so) * %check - The reason %check fails for you is that you are trying to do "rake --test" under %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}, where some files needed for tests (like ext/) are already cleaned up. The correct way is to call "rake --test" under %_builddir/%name-%version/%{geminstdir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051811.n75IBVS3026099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 14:11:30 EDT --- Just went to review this, but the spec above doesn't match the src.rpm above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051814.n75IE3C2026348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #10 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-05 14:14:02 EDT --- Yes, sorry. It was a mistake. I was looking for the button to close the bug and thought I must be the owner of this ticket to do so. But then I recognized the Edit link beside the "Status" tag... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051833.n75IXL1C002645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 --- Comment #7 from Jeff Ortel 2009-08-05 14:33:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Just went to review this, but the spec above doesn't match the src.rpm above. This: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/c/h/chameleon/chameleon-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm matches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051829.n75ITYks001786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #6 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-05 14:29:32 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356396) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356396) shell script to split softokn and util out of the full nss tar ball The source tar balls for nss-softokn and nss-util are created from the full tar ball for nss via this script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051832.n75IWVuJ030789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 14:32:30 EDT --- OK. You don't have to close the bug yourself, you just fill in the bug number when you submit the update. The bug(s) are automatically closed when the update hits the (stable) updates repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051832.n75IWA5b030728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 --- Comment #12 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-05 14:32:09 EDT --- AFAIK spins that have the name "Fedora" in it are legally only allowed to ship whatever Fedora is shipping. And if there's something which violates the Fedora rules, it has to be called "remix" and never include the "Fedora" name IIRC. As far as I got Tom in his last talk I participated (FUDCon 2008), Fedora cares about legal issues in other countries as well and tries to solve them. And in this special case we don't talk about a trivial issue or about a law which is not enforced anyway, but about a real violation against the constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany which can bring imprisonment e.g. when distributing such symbolicas, which causes serious trouble to all German Fedora mirrors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051843.n75IhGp3004922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #38 from Vivek Shah 2009-08-05 14:43:14 EDT --- Thanks for the review Mamoru, I will fix the copyright before the import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051847.n75IlmJC006147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Vivek Shah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #39 from Vivek Shah 2009-08-05 14:47:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mausezahn Short Description: A fast versatile packet generator Owners: bonii Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: bonii -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051845.n75IjnKC003312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-05 14:45:48 EDT --- Ah, ok. I closed it manually because it's suggested in step 13 on page http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051855.n75It8Pi005966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(j.kaddelbach at goog | |lemail.com) --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-05 14:55:07 EDT --- The simplest solution here would be to replace the controversial images with something that is not controversial. Jens, as the proposed maintainer, are you willing to do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051854.n75Ism2A007759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-05 14:54:47 EDT --- I think that jide-oss have a very restrictive license to be included in Fedora : http://www.jidesoft.com/purchase/EULA.htm Correct me if i am wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 18:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051855.n75ItD2G008119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #7 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-05 14:55:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Yes, the source tarball has "stripped" in the name because some some work was done to remove non-free content. Attachment (id=356396) shoes how some of the processing is done. I'll add more comments to the both spec files. This spec file was derived from the big nss.spec file and I tried not to deviate too much from what it was already there and working. We do the install because there is no install target in the upstream makefile. Need to check with Kai about this. > You're installing something into the prelink.conf.d/ dir but not Requiring > prelink as far as I can tell. That needs to be fixed. Will do in the next iteration. > > Your %files section has you taking ownership of the prelink.conf.d directory. > prelink and only prelink should own that. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership Will respect ownership. > Is there a particular reason why you use %dir for %{_includedir}/nss3 and then > list a ton of files in it? Are there files that you don't want to package that > wind up in that directory? For backward compatibilty with the previous usage the %{_includedir}/nss3 directory is common to nss-util, nss-softkn, and nss. Nss-softkn doesn't populate the directory completely, nss-util would have placed files ther earlier and nss would do likewise later. I was thinking of having nss-util-devel own that directory so that the other two do not clobber it. Not sure whether I'm aswering your question adequately here. > I can't build this to test, because I'm missing nssutil-devel >= 3.12.3.99.3 Yes , we need to somehow chain the build of nss-softkn with that of nss-util on which it depends. I had problems using mosk but I was able to do rpmbuild -bi on each when in the same rpmb building area. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 19:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051901.n75J1Ur7007569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #8 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-05 15:01:28 EDT --- re nss-util, my bad. It also needs review. this bug is marked as a dependancy on the nss-util bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 19:09:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051909.n75J9nWd010988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Mathieu Bridon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bochecha at fedoraproject.org Bug 468230 depends on bug 480999, which changed state. Bug 480999 Summary: Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 19:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051925.n75JPA2P014756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Will Woods changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wwoods at redhat.com --- Comment #14 from Will Woods 2009-08-05 15:25:09 EDT --- What happened to the Fedora 11 update to add this package? It's been two months - perhaps it can go straight to stable at this point? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 19:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:44:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051944.n75Jid6l018891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #9 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-05 15:44:38 EDT --- Additionally, the discussion in Bug 508479 is worth reading as it explains the rationale for this work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 19:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908051953.n75JrgM6021678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #16 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-08-05 15:53:40 EDT --- About the x86_64 hack : Unfortunatly I only have a 32 bits processor. Upstream will do some compilation tests to find which one of the "fedora parameters" used creates an issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 20:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052003.n75K3qt4023999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-05 16:03:51 EDT --- It's dual licensed as per the link in comment #10. However, I am unable to get the project to build, [javac] ^ [javac] jide-oss/src/com/jidesoft/plaf/aqua/AquaJidePopupMenuUI.java:9: package apple.laf does not exist [javac] import apple.laf.AquaPopupMenuUI; [javac] ^ [javac] jide-oss/src/com/jidesoft/plaf/aqua/AquaJidePopupMenuUI.java:15: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol: class AquaPopupMenuUI [javac] public class AquaJidePopupMenuUI extends AquaPopupMenuUI { [javac] ^ Seems like it's trying to compile some MacOS/X extensions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 20:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515752] Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052043.n75Khgav032404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515752 Steve Milner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smilner at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Steve Milner 2009-08-05 16:43:41 EDT --- I don't believe I am able to sponsor you Jordan, but I will go through a pre-review to try to speed things up (and *hopefully* help out): - source files match upstream. Unable to find upstream version, but did find 0.8.1 (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/soaplib/0.8.1) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. - latest version is being packaged. This does not seem to be the case, can you verify? * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F10 i386) * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires seem sane: python(abi) = 2.6 pytz rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. - no generically named files /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/__init__.py /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/__init__.pyc /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/__init__.pyo /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/binary_test.py /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/binary_test.pyc /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/binary_test.pyo /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/clazz_test.py /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/clazz_test.pyc /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/clazz_test.pyo /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/primitive_test.py /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/primitive_test.pyc /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tests/serializers/primitive_test.pyo * code, not content. * documentation is small, no subpackage required. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 20:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052051.n75Kpm0E002416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 16:51:47 EDT --- Could you perhaps expand OSC to "Open Sound Control" in your description? It would have saved me having to look it up. It's not a big deal, but there's plenty of space. What's the commented line in %prep about? That C file is compiled as part of the build; is it needed? The comment should probably be removed if there's no point to it. Since you seem to prefer %{buildroot} over $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, you might also want to use %{optflags} instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS although there's no requirement that you do so. I don't see any blockers. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 2ab48f50761d472eaa52fcbcb90958d9b7f3797a74092d021b16c8377bac4d2c pyliblo-0.7.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (but could use some acronym expansion). * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: liblo.so()(64bit) pyliblo = 0.7.2-1.fc12 pyliblo(x86-64) = 0.7.2-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/python liblo.so.0()(64bit) libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.6 * shared libraries aren't added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 21:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515752] Review Request: python-soaplib - python library for creating SOAP services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052123.n75LNEDU009128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515752 --- Comment #3 from Jordan OMara 2009-08-05 17:23:13 EDT --- Updated http://deathpong.org/jomara/fedora/python-soaplib/python-soaplib-0.7.2-2.20080816svn39.fc10.src.rpm to remove included tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 21:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052123.n75LNHFi009167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Sean Middleditch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sean at middleditch. | |us) | --- Comment #21 from Sean Middleditch 2009-08-05 17:23:15 EDT --- packaged libtelnet, bug 515832. will package up clc once I get another release out the door. hopefully those are done well enough to validate my competency for gnome-mud as well. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 21:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] New: Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Summary: Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sean at middleditch.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/libtelnet.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/libtelnet-0.10.tar.gz Description: Packaged up my own upstream libtelnet TELNET protocol library. It's a small library that uses an event-based interface for writing clients, servers, or proxies. The package includes the main library, a -devel package with headers, and three separate packages for the libtelnet example applications (one of which, telnet-proxy, is actually quite useful all on its own). libtelnet is hosted at http://github.com/elanthis/libtelnet/tree/master I successfully built libtelnet on all dist-f12 targets via Koji. rpmlint reports 0 errors: elanthis at stargrazer:~/Source/libtelnet$ rpmlint libtelnet.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. elanthis at stargrazer:~/Source/libtelnet$ rpmlint /home/elanthis/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libtelnet-0.10-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. elanthis at stargrazer:~/Source/libtelnet$ rpmlint /home/elanthis/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libtelnet-* 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. elanthis at stargrazer:~/Source/libtelnet$ sudo rpm -Uvh /home/elanthis/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libtelnet-* My projects that use libtelnet all build against the version in these RPMs. I intend to package one of those projects (clc) for Fedora as well, once I'm ready with the next stable release, and the others are possibilities in the more distant future as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052207.n75M71FU018636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nb at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nb at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:07:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052207.n75M7DJl018681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052231.n75MVoHi023231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 --- Comment #2 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-05 18:31:50 EDT --- Spec refreshed and new source uploaded to: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/python-offtrac-0.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052231.n75MV9V3024388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 --- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout 2009-08-05 18:31:08 EDT --- The COPYING file in the source states it is for Pungi and that the license is GPLv2 only, and the rest of the sources state that the license is GPLv2+. Can you clarify this and release an updated source file please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052241.n75MfYnn025392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-05 18:41:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: offtrac Short Description: Trac xmlrpc library Owners: jkeating Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052240.n75Me3CP025046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nick Bebout 2009-08-05 18:40:02 EDT --- rpmlint is quiet [nb at nb SPECS]$ rpmlint python-offtrac.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-offtrac-0.0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [nb at nb noarch]$ rpmlint python-offtrac-0.0.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Sources match upstream from git Provides and requires are sane. Package doesn't own any directories belonging to other packages. Licensing issue fixed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:44:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052244.n75MiJV1026584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 18:44:18 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052242.n75MgAOc026307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 18:42:09 EDT --- REVIEW for b673626cecf9bc79d35953312cc9a304 python-urwid-0.9.8.4-3.fc11.src.rpm 28f918c66887d4e470ae0c3535579ad7 OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/python-urwid-* python-urwid.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/urwid/str_util.so 0775 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. This warning is bogus. It only happens when the package is build in mock, but not when it was built locally or in koji. Not sure if it's a mock or rpmlint issue. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: LGPLv2+ OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. N/A - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc: no license included in source OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 28f918c66887d4e470ae0c3535579ad7 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 OK - MUST: No ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro: no locales N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. FAIL - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates: %{python_sitearch}/urwid/ is not owned OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: TBD - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - SourceURL is valid OK - RPM_OPT_FLAGS honored Issues: The package doesn't own %{python_sitearch}/urwid/ and therefor this dir will be left behind if the package is uninstalled. So change %{python_sitearch}/urwid/* to %{python_sitearch}/urwid/ Timestamps don't match. Please download the source tarball again and keep the timestamp, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps To get rid of the bogus rpmlint warning we need to force permissions of str_util.so in the spec with %attr. This can be done with %attr(644,root,root) %{python_sitearch}/urwid/*.so str_util.so is already covered by %{python_sitearch}/urwid/ and we must not list the file twice. So we need to change the files section a little: dir %{python_sitearch}/urwid/ <-- this only owns the dir but no files %{python_sitearch}/urwid/*.py* %attrib 0644 %{python_sitearch}/urwid/py* One last tip: Please use %{python_sitearch}/*.egg-info/ instead of %{python_sitearch}/*.egg-info With the dash at the end a person who looks at the spec can see that urwid-0.9.8.4-py2.6.egg-info is a directory and not a file. Konstantinos, please apply the fixes and then I will approve the package. Rangeen, would you like to co-maintain this package with Konstantinos? Konstantinos can help you with wicd in turn. This is useful is one of you is on holidays or has not enough time to look after the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:43:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052243.n75Mhdcv025850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #40 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 18:43:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052248.n75MmZNj027018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-05 18:48:34 EDT --- I screwed up the name, I apologize. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-offtrac Short Description: Trac xmlrpc library Owners: jkeating Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: python-offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052255.n75MtKUe029004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: offtrac - |Review Request: |Trac xmlrpc library |python-offtrac - Trac | |xmlrpc library Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 18:55:20 EDT --- Got it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052255.n75Mtlmi028518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #16 from Till Maas 2009-08-05 18:55:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > REVIEW for b673626cecf9bc79d35953312cc9a304 > python-urwid-0.9.8.4-3.fc11.src.rpm > 28f918c66887d4e470ae0c3535579ad7 > > OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. > $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/python-urwid-* > python-urwid.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/urwid/str_util.so 0775 > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. > > This warning is bogus. It only happens when the package is build in mock, but > not when it was built locally or in koji. Not sure if it's a mock or rpmlint > issue. It is probably a umask or less likely a filesystem issue. What's the output of umask within a mock shell: $ /usr/bin/mock -r shell [...] mock-chroot> umask -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 22:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052254.n75MsZuU027995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #16 from Tom Lane 2009-08-05 18:54:33 EDT --- Hm. The license = "Python" bit definitely seems wrong, and it hasn't changed in 4.0, so I'll poke upstream about it. As for the MIT vs BSD part, I think you've opened a bit of a can of worms. The reason this package is labeled BSD is that it split off from PostgreSQL a long time ago, and it has the same license wording as PostgreSQL, which the upstream group for that project has always considered to be BSD-without-advertising. Not only because it came from Berkeley originally, but also because it once had an advertising clause, which UCB later allowed them (us) to remove. I am quite confused by the wiki's attribution of this wording to MIT, and frankly I'm not sure I believe it's authoritative. Particularly not when all their examples cite UCB not MIT. In short: if you want me to change this, you're going to have to persuade a large number of people that what they always thought was BSD wording is MIT wording. And a wiki page with these examples on it *ain't* going to do the trick. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 23:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 19:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052317.n75NHQoi000736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 19:17:25 EDT --- mock-chroot> umask 0022 mock-chroot> The strange thing is: The permissions of the *.so are always 0775, but rpmlint only complains on the package built in mock. Most of the other *so's in %{python_sitearch} are 0775 too, so this package is not the only one affected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 5 23:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 19:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908052351.n75NpFW7007063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #18 from Till Maas 2009-08-05 19:51:14 EDT --- The command was wrong, because it shows the umask for the root user, not the mock build user. Then the command is: su - mockbuild -c umask NEvertheless, fixing it in the spec is probably not that bad, but it should probably be done for all python packages... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 00:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060000.n7600l35008580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #19 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 20:00:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > su - mockbuild -c umask There is no user 'mockbuild' but only a 'mock' group. > NEvertheless, fixing it in the spec is probably not that bad, but it should > probably be done for all python packages... It's a lot of packages that need to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 00:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: python-offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060004.n7604cP6009180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-05 20:04:37 EDT --- Built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 00:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060012.n760CVNo011004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #20 from Till Maas 2009-08-05 20:12:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > su - mockbuild -c umask > > There is no user 'mockbuild' but only a 'mock' group. The command also needs to be run within the mock shell. > > NEvertheless, fixing it in the spec is probably not that bad, but it should > > probably be done for all python packages... > > It's a lot of packages that need to be fixed. Yes. I guess ideally rpm would support another parameter for %defattr for files that have the executable flag set, then this could be done with a simple sed script. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 00:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060027.n760RaQY013368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #21 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 20:27:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > The command also needs to be run within the mock shell. mock-chroot> su mockbuild mock-chroot> umask 0002 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 00:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060052.n760qTmr017541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Chris Samuel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |csamuel at vpac.org --- Comment #22 from Chris Samuel 2009-08-05 20:52:27 EDT --- Please note that Vacation 1.2.7.0 is BSD licensed and is from SourceForge (having been rebased for 1.2.7.0 from the version at savannah.nongnu.org in order to drop the BSD advertising clause in Vacation 1.2.6 on SourceForge). It is *not* the version in Debian (3.3.0), that has a different history (and codebase). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 00:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060053.n760rnJx017759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #40 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-05 20:53:45 EDT --- Ok, fine with co-maintainership. If you want to get involved deeper in Fedora, you can always do. You can update the package before import or afterwards. The latter has the advantage that the process is transparent for everyone because we all can see you commits. The update doesn't require changes to the spec, does it? Please apply for a Fedora account in FAS at https://admin.fedoraproject.org If you already have an account, apply for the packager group there, so I can sponsor you. For more info see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account After that it's time for the cvs admin procedure: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 01:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060114.n761EFwC022572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 21:14:15 EDT --- gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 01:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060113.n761DJGF022455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 21:13:18 EDT --- gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 01:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060136.n761aQqa025791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 21:36:25 EDT --- It's odd that rpm doesn't generate a python(abi) dependency for this package, but I guess that's because the modules aren't in the usual location for python modules. I don't think that causes any problems, because as far as I know even the .pyc and .pyo files are compatible between python versions. Otherwise, this builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The web site is a little sparse but I assume someone will take care of that as the software is developed further. I don't see any issues with the package. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: e70e8fa4cf67467f9ad90be0ee92479234e594306a638cc548c4150af96b189c chameleon-0.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: chameleon = 0.2-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/env python >= 2.3 python-ply * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 02:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060202.n7622U2C030440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 22:02:28 EDT --- rpath is indeed generally a 64-bit thing. Libtool somehow knows not to add /usr/lib to rpath, but can't figure out not to add /usr/lib64. That's libtool for you. However, when you add hacks like those sed calls over libtool, it's best to also add a comment indicating why it's necessary. You should not duplicate those doc files between the main and -devel packages. Are you sure the license is GPLv2 only? It looks like LGPLv2+ to me. The COPYING file contains the LGPL and the source code and upstream web site all says: * [...] GNU Lesser General Public * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either * version 2.1 of the License, or any later version. which is what we call LGPLv2+. Fix that up and I can go ahead and do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 02:55:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 22:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060255.n762tghl011370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #11 from Mark Goodwin 2009-08-05 22:55:39 EDT --- Hi Eric, I've just posted v3.0.0-2 : Spec URL: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp.spec Tar URL : ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp-3.0.0-2.src.tar.gz SRPM URL: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp-3.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Merged with pcp-2.9.0-1 and pushed up to: git://oss.sgi.com/markgw/pcp/pcp.git dev Changes since 3.0.0-1 are listed in the git logs, in summary : - merge with pcp-2.9.0-1 dev - bump to 3.0.0-2, update changelog and delete unncessary Vendor string - changes to the Fedora RPM spec in response to review feedback: - Incorporate a large number of suggestions and cleanups from Eric Sandeen - Greatly simplified the %post and %postun scriptlets - remove ancient crud - Added ldconfig scriptlets for -libs - Don't explicitly require IB libs, since they're libs and RPM figures it out - No need to explicitly BuildRequire gcc-c++ libstdc++-devel - Add BuildRequires on perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker - Remove explicit ia64 Requires: libunwind - Have pcp-libs require the base package since Fedora insists - Add and clarify some comments - Create %{_localstatedir}/run/pcp and ship it (so it'll be removed) - Use %doc for CHANGELOG COPYING INSTALL README VERSION.pcp pcp.lsm - git ignore generated gram*.tab.c - preserve generated gram.tab.c because debuginfo needs it - fix minor typo (Redhat -> Red Hat) in comment in Fedora spec - dont install trace demo binaries since src is installed anyway - tweak configure to move PCP_BINADM_DIR out of /usr/share, into /usr/lib. - Arch dependent binaries should not be installed below /usr/share. - delete unneeded explicit script interpreter to keep rpmlint happy - pmpost does not really need to be setuid - Nuke migrate_pcp_var_dir, no longer needed - default chkconfig off for all PCP services Still have the (benign) rpmlint errors: pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pmproxy pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pmie pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcp Cheers -- Mark Goodwin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 03:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 23:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060321.n763LHVC015193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 23:21:16 EDT --- I'm not one to argue with the legal folks on the license thing, but you're welcome to. Blocking FE-Legal so they can take a look. Maybe that page in the wiki is incorrect; I'm no expert in that area, but I'm also not just going to ignore what it says and approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 04:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 00:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060402.n7642jUF022280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #18 from Tom Lane 2009-08-06 00:02:43 EDT --- Hm, I think you missed the point of what I was saying: if the license label on this package is wrong, then so is the label on the postgresql package, which we've been shipping for ten years or so. I'm not sure of the point of holding up approval of this package while that gets straightened out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 05:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 01:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060554.n765sqOV013297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-06 01:54:51 EDT --- Hello Sean, could you please give us a link to the SRPM? The above URL links to the tarball. Also, I wasn't able to find you in the package group. What's your account name? Martin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 06:52:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 02:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060652.n766qlVH024435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #5 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-08-06 02:52:46 EDT --- Here's an upstream reference: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/rekonq/2009-July/000230.html Still ongoing as far as I know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 06:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 02:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060655.n766tPxY026585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-06 02:55:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. > $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/python-urwid-* > python-urwid.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/urwid/str_util.so 0775 > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. > > To get rid of the bogus rpmlint warning we need to force permissions of > str_util.so in the spec with %attr. This can be done with > %attr(644,root,root) %{python_sitearch}/urwid/*.so No, without executable permission debuginfo rpm will not be created correctly. Permission must be "0755" (not 0775) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 07:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 03:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060713.n767DilM029989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #11 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-06 03:13:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Andreas, these need to be addressed: > rpmlint output: > aranym.src:56: W: configure-without-libdir-spec I'll try to investigate the build system later. > aranym.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/aranym/AUTHORS > aranym.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/aranym/changelog https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#file-not-utf8 > aranym-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/aranym-0.9.8beta/src/natfeat/nfbootstrap.cpp > aranym-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/aranym-0.9.8beta/src/natfeat/nfbootstrap.h chmod -x src/natfeat/nfbootstrap.cpp src/natfeat/nfbootstrap.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 07:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 03:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060725.n767PKgT031314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab 2009-08-06 03:25:18 EDT --- > > aranym.src:56: W: configure-without-libdir-spec That's a bug/shortcoming in rpmlint. 53:%define subdir_configure \ 54:cat >configure <<'EOF'\ 55:#!/bin/sh\ 56:exec ../configure "$@"\ 57:EOF\ 58:chmod +x configure\ 59:%configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 08:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 04:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060844.n768ibaj018540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab 2009-08-06 04:44:36 EDT --- Spec URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym.spec SRPM URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym-0.9.8-0.2.beta.fc11.src.rpm aranym.src:63: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 09:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 05:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060930.n769UOIO028289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #23 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-06 05:30:22 EDT --- Sorry for the typo and for forgetting the debug info. But why do libs need to be executable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 09:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 05:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] New: Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Summary: Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davids at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dsommers/imapfilter-2.0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: IMAPFilter is a mail filtering utility. It connects to remote mail servers using the Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP), sends searching queries to the server and processes mailboxes based on the results. It can be used to delete, copy, move, flag, etc. messages residing in mailboxes at the same or different mail servers. The 4rev1 and 4 versions of the IMAP protocol are supported. This is just a pure packaging of the upstream imapfilter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 09:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 05:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908060939.n769dDRM029970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 David Sommerseth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 10:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061002.n76A2rau002041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 Jens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(j.kaddelbach at goog | |lemail.com) | --- Comment #14 from Jens 2009-08-06 06:02:51 EDT --- no, because this will steal the athmospehere of the game. so i will close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 10:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061012.n76ACA3M004589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 06:12:08 EDT --- http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/potrace-1.8-4.fc11.src.rpm I actually changed the license tag to GPLv2+. I had probably been looking only at the source code headers, which didn't specify a version. I didn't move the pdf to -devel, since the -doc package is almost as big as potrace and potrace-devel combined. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 10:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061024.n76AOYZd006065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-06 06:24:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Sorry for the typo and - Well, not typo. The reason you got "non-standard-executable-perm" on str_util.so was because with your mock str_util.so was created with "0775" permission, not "0755", which does not occur when I try local rpmbuild or mockbuild for dist-f12 i686, and try koji scratch build (i.e. when I try mockbuild, str_util.so was created with 0755 permission) I don't think this is because of umask issue, because at least rawhide rpm always sets umask to 022 when executing %prep, %build, %install: -------------------------------------------------------------- DEBUG: Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.MTc5VE DEBUG: + exit 0 DEBUG: + umask 022 DEBUG: + cd /builddir/build/BUILD DEBUG: + '[' /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-urwid-0.9.8.4-3.fc12.i386 '!=' / ']' ------------------------------------------------------------- > for forgetting the debug info. But why do libs need to > be executable? - Because find-debuginfo.sh tries to extract debug information from binaries with executable permission only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 10:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061040.n76Aex4M009650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #25 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-06 06:40:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > > Sorry for the typo and Ok, now I got it. Seems it was a little late last night. > > for forgetting the debug info. But why do libs need to > > be executable? > - Because find-debuginfo.sh tries to extract debug information > from binaries with executable permission only. Yeah, I know, I guess I should have asked more clearly: Why does the installed .so need to be executable? Or why is find-debuginfo.sh not smarter? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 10:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061046.n76AkIxA011729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Charles Lopes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tjarls at gmail.com) | --- Comment #7 from Charles Lopes 2009-08-06 06:46:17 EDT --- I have updated the package to version 0.11: http://sites.google.com/site/tjarls/fedora/opennhrp-0.11-1.fc11.src.rpm The git message is harmless. It was used in make to figure out a more precise version of the software. It is gone in this version. The script "/etc/opennhrp/opennhrp-script" defines actions that are triggered by some events like "peer-up". The one that gets installed by the upstream tar ball adds a requirement for racoon to be used conjointly. Racoon in turn has be be configured to call "/etc/opennhrp/racoon-ph1down.sh". I have renamed the script so that it doesn't get picked by default and now force the user to explicitly specify the path for a script to be used. Does anyone have any comments or suggestions on how to better handle this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 10:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 06:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061049.n76An1JI011120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-06 06:49:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) Yeah, I know, I guess I should have asked more clearly: Why does the installed > .so need to be executable? Or why is find-debuginfo.sh not smarter? Please ask rpm maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 11:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061101.n76B1wiJ014194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #8 from Charles Lopes 2009-08-06 07:01:57 EDT --- For using opennhrp in conjunction with encrypted GRE tunnels, either version 0.8 or a patched version of 0.7 of ipsec-tools is required. On the other hand one could technically not use encryption at all although it is strongly encouraged to use it and probably the most common use case. Should we drop the rpm dependency? In addition, a kernel compiled with CONFIG_ARPD is also required (see #502844). I have been thinking about adding a check for that variable in /boot/config-{current-kernel-version} to the rc script. Any comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 11:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061128.n76BSlF3020660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 --- Comment #4 from David Hannequin 2009-08-06 07:28:45 EDT --- Hi, I have no news of the upstream. What do I do? Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 11:38:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061138.n76BcQOf023758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-06 07:38:24 EDT --- OK well done; package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 11:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061147.n76BlKY6026270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 --- Comment #28 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 07:47:17 EDT --- Have you made any other submissions of performed informal reviews? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 11:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061149.n76BnAEr027283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 07:49:09 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: potrace Short Description: Transform bitmaps into vector graphics Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 11:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512729] Review Request: perl-IO-Async - A collection of modules that implement asynchronous filehandle IO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061155.n76BtDJi028261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512729 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-06 07:55:12 EDT --- All dependencies have been met, if I'm not mistaken. Resetting the review flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 11:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061154.n76Bsxtl027936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 07:54:58 EDT --- First, be sure to read and understand http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets Now, a few comments: - Drop BuildRequires: glibc-devel gcc binutils make as these are in the standard buildroot http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - Drop the Requires: line altogether, they're automatically picked up by RPM. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires - Instead of ./configure -p %{_prefix} -b %{_bindir} -s %{_datadir}/imapfilter -m %{_mandir} use %configure - Drop mkdir -m 755 -p ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ cp README LICENSE ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ as you already have listed the files in %doc. (The doc directory is removed, recreated and the files listed in %doc placed into it when %doc is processed.) - Replace /usr/bin/ with %{_bindir} /usr/share/ with %{_datadir} /usr/share/man with %{_mandir} - You're not owning %{_datadir}/imapfilter, instead of /usr/share/imapfilter/account.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/auxiliary.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/common.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/deprecated.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/mailbox.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/message.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/options.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/regex.lua /usr/share/imapfilter/set.lua you can just specify %{_datadir}/imapfilter/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 12:22:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512729] Review Request: perl-IO-Async - A collection of modules that implement asynchronous filehandle IO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061222.n76CMhTY002185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512729 --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-06 08:22:42 EDT --- The spec file listed above is different from the one in the .src.file. The former is for version 0.21 of the package while the latter is for 0.22. Kwizart, can I ask you to update the spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 12:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061230.n76CUuh3004805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #13 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-06 08:30:54 EDT --- true, u either compile with the provided MacOS jar, or patch it so that we don't have to use the MacOS extensions during compilation. but i am wondering if PgsLookAndFeel should depends on jide-oss as it provides a customized version of jide oss. if we want to compile PgsLookAndFeel with the original jide-oss, we have to patch it so that it doesn't check for a valid license. i am confused about what to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 12:48:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:48:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061248.n76Cm0cP007849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 08:47:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > true, u either compile with the provided MacOS jar, or patch it so that we > don't have to use the MacOS extensions during compilation. All pre-existing jar files MUST be removed, so it just has to build without it. > but i am wondering if PgsLookAndFeel should depends on jide-oss as it provides > a customized version of jide oss. You mean JIDE OSS is not the same thing PgsLookAndFeel depends on? > if we want to compile PgsLookAndFeel with the original jide-oss, we have to > patch it so that it doesn't check for a valid license. > > i am confused about what to do. What do you mean by checking for a valid license..? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 13:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505813] Review Request: Ballview - Molecule and protien visualisation and analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061305.n76D59aA011678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 09:05:08 EDT --- A few notes: - The license of GSL, FFTW &c does not affect the license tag (Fedora policy). License should be lgpl. - Drop the explicit Requires, they're automatically picked up by rpm. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires - You can only define subpackages BuildArch: noarch on >= F11 and >= RHEL6. - You can change find ./data/ -name \*.data -exec chmod 644 {} \; chmod 644 ./data/structures/test.btf chmod 644 ./source/STRUCTURE/smartsParserParser.y chmod 644 ./source/STRUCTURE/smartsParserLexer.l find ./ -name \*.h -executable -exec chmod 644 {} \; find ./ -name \*.C -executable -exec chmod 644 {} \; to find data/ -name \*.data -exec chmod 644 {} \; chmod 644 data/structures/test.btf \ source/STRUCTURE/smartsParserParser.y \ source/STRUCTURE/smartsParserLexer.l find . -name \*.h -executable -exec chmod 644 {} \; find . -name \*.C -executable -exec chmod 644 {} \; - Change BuildRequires: qt-devel to BuildRequires: qt4-devel to get qt4. - Why do you remove header documentation? You could place them in the -doc package. - Don't add an soversion yourself. This has to be done by upstream. - Drop #Install documentation mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name} cp -Rp ./doc/BALLView %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name} cp -Rp ./doc/doxygen %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}/doxygen instead list these in the %doc of -doc. - Instead of /%{_libdir}/libBALL.so.* use %{_libdir}/libBALL.so.* as %{_libdir} starts with a /. Same thing with other directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 13:06:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061306.n76D6BEu013138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #15 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-06 09:06:10 EDT --- if we try to build PgsLookAndFeel against jide-oss jar, we get an error message : [javac] Compiling 49 source files to /home/hicham/rpmbuild/BUILD/pgslookandfeel/classes [javac] /home/hicham/rpmbuild/BUILD/pgslookandfeel/src/com/pagosoft/plaf/PlafOptions.java:258: cannot find symbol [javac] symbol : class Lm [javac] location: package com.jidesoft.utils [javac] com.jidesoft.utils.Lm.verifyLicense("Patrick Gotthardt", "PgsLookAndFeel", "aW6dEcgCQMkW4e:OGYJCDdPATGYEiLo2"); That is what I meant by checking for a valid license. So the provided jar is not the same as the jide-oss jar, maybe it uses a different license. By removing that line, the code compile fine against jide-oss. What do u think I should do, patch PgsLookAndFeel to use the jide-oss jar? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 13:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061331.n76DVjbI018565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 09:31:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > if we try to build PgsLookAndFeel against jide-oss jar, we get an error message > : > > [javac] Compiling 49 source files to > /home/hicham/rpmbuild/BUILD/pgslookandfeel/classes > [javac] > /home/hicham/rpmbuild/BUILD/pgslookandfeel/src/com/pagosoft/plaf/PlafOptions.java:258: > cannot find symbol > [javac] symbol : class Lm > [javac] location: package com.jidesoft.utils > [javac] com.jidesoft.utils.Lm.verifyLicense("Patrick Gotthardt", > "PgsLookAndFeel", "aW6dEcgCQMkW4e:OGYJCDdPATGYEiLo2"); > > That is what I meant by checking for a valid license. So the provided jar is > not the same as the jide-oss jar, maybe it uses a different license. > > By removing that line, the code compile fine against jide-oss. > > What do u think I should do, patch PgsLookAndFeel to use the jide-oss jar? Yes, if it works. However, jide-oss must be built from source as well, and currently I don't know how to do it since it includes a binary jar file from MacOS X that must be somehow replaced. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 13:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061349.n76Dngiu023239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #17 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-06 09:49:41 EDT --- no problem in building jide-oss from source, I replaced the MacOS extensions with standard ones, and the code compiled fine. So is it OK to start a package review for jide-oss ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 13:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061357.n76DvqFG025673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 09:57:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > no problem in building jide-oss from source, I replaced the MacOS extensions > with standard ones, and the code compiled fine. So is it OK to start a package > review for jide-oss ? Oh OK. Yes, please submit it for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 14:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061424.n76EOYOv002210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-06 10:24:32 EDT --- Hmm.... that really isn't the proper way to put something into the public domain. Even though he isn't stating copyright, he isn't explicitly disclaiming it either, and in the US, you automatically gain copyright on a work that you create. Can you ask David Schwartz to make the following statement: 2009.08.06: I hereby place all of my code in the shmpps package (in particular, shmpps.tar, with MD5 checksum [[INSERT_CHECKSUM]]) into the public domain. I disclaim all copyright on my code. Portions taken from the NTP source (the time_shm structure and attach_shm code) are still covered by the NTP copyright/license. That would make it much clearer. He can do it via email, although, it would be better if he did so on the project webpage. Alternately, if he doesn't want to do so, he could simply use the MIT license, as that is extremely permissive and already compatible with the NTP code. As to the labeling of the License tag, you could either list it as you have done (which is correct), or simply use the MIT license (because those are the only terms you have to comply with). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 14:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Media Player written in pygtk that uses GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061438.n76EcCnF008170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-06 10:38:10 EDT --- I'll take this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 14:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514351] Review Request: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin - Stopwatch plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061438.n76EcU3W006416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-06 10:38:29 EDT --- I'll take this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 14:50:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061450.n76Eoode012969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-06 10:50:49 EDT --- SPEC: as before SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mutter-moblin-0.32.2-1.fc11.src.rpm New upstream release with some various cleanups to the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 14:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 10:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061454.n76EsgcE010591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 --- Comment #9 from Jeff Ortel 2009-08-06 10:54:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review Jason :) Since chameleon is an application (tool) rather then an extension of python libs, it seemed inappropriate to install in site-packages. After review of several other python tools, including RHN, /usr/share seemed to be consistent with other projects. As for the trac wiki, you're right, it's very sparse. This tool is a build requirement for the Fedora Spacewalk project and I needed to get this out there ASAP. I intend to provide a rich wiki, documentation and epydocs for the code in the coming weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 15:03:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] New: Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 Summary: Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dokuwiki/dokuwiki.spec SRPM URL: http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dokuwiki/dokuwiki-0-0.1.20090214.b.fc11.src.rpm Description: DokuWiki is a standards compliant, simple to use Wiki, mainly aimed at creating documentation of any kind. It has a simple but powerful syntax which makes sure the datafiles remain readable outside the Wiki and eases the creation of structured texts. All data is stored in plain text files no database is required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 15:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] New: Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Summary: Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-email-address-validation/php-email-address-validation.spec SRPM URL: http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-email-address-validation/php-email-address-validation-0-0.1.20090806svn.fc11.src.rpm Description: This email address validation function was originally released on AddedBytes.com in June 2004, and was updated following many comments and suggestions from readers. ICANN has announced that the TLD system would be opened up to allow the creation of many many more TLDs, making it more important than ever that email addresses are properly validated according to the standards that define them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 15:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061505.n76F57iv017112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516058 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 15:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061505.n76F58DI017135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516059 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 15:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061544.n76FikQw022373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 Jeff Ortel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jeff Ortel 2009-08-06 11:44:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chameleon Short Description: Database schema transformation tool. Owners: jortel Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: jortel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 15:42:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061542.n76Fgv4T022197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #44 from Axel Thimm 2009-08-06 11:42:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > (In reply to comment #40) > > The spec file should be easily readable without any specific tab width > > settings. Please use either a standard tab width or convert it to spaces. > You are first reviewer what don't accept that. File is easy readable. This > style of formating not covered any guidelines, as I can understand (kick me, if > I wrong) and I want leave it as it is. I don't want to kick anyone, but I agree with Christian, just click on the specfile you posted and it appears with standard tabsize 8 on my browser looking strange. > > Would it be possible to link it against the regular liblzo even for the Fedora > > package? This would save us one condition. > It is possible - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1579635 > But it some sort of hack. Are you sure what we should do it? That would be great, please do it! The lzo developer offers liblzo for shared builds and minilzo for embedded static builds. The current Fedora-only situation with a shared minilzo is awkward to say the least and should be removed. And if you get a patch to do the same with libvncserver you will win all my sympathy points and I will send you a truck full of good karma :) > > Additional if it would be possible to create a patch which would make this a > > compile option to switch between minilzo (which is designed to be internal) and > > external lzo then this patch would be hopefully acceptable for upstream. > There I agree with you - such option would be appreciated. But it requires some > additional times, and I wasn't planing do that. May be in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 15:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] New: Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 Summary: Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hicham.haouari at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/jide-oss.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/jide-oss-2.7.1-1.20090805svn.fc11.src.rpm Description: JIDE Common Layer is Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing. It is also the foundation of other component products from JIDE. This project has over 30 Swing components and over 100k lines of code. It greatly enhanced the default component set provided by Swing and allow developers to focus on business logic layer instead of making components. JIDE Common Layer was originally developed by JIDE Software developers as a foundation in order to build other more advanced components. In April of 2007, JIDE Software decided to open source this common layer so that more and more developers can leverage them instead of wasting time building them again. rpmlint output : none koji build page : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1586658 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 15:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061550.n76FoaW2027437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516074 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 15:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061550.n76Fob2l027458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |513119 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 15:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 11:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061553.n76FrefD024607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #19 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-06 11:53:39 EDT --- jide-oss have been submitted for review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 16:07:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061607.n76G7YnD027778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 12:07:33 EDT --- Use the SVN revision in the tarball name and revision, e.g. # SVN revision used %global svnrel 1181 Release: 1.%{svnrel}svn%{?dist} #This is a cvs snapshot, to create this tarball # svn co -r %{svnrel} https://jide-oss.dev.java.net/svn/jide-oss/branches/trunk_2.7.1/ jide-oss --username guest #create the tarball : tar -cjvf jide-oss-2.7.1.tar.bz2 jide-oss ** Still, don't version the jar as it isn't versioned by upstream. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Package_naming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 16:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061611.n76GB0gp031403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 12:10:59 EDT --- Also, you can drop BR: dos2unix if you just use https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Remove_DOS_line_endings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 16:18:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061618.n76GIjHT029833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #12 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-06 12:18:44 EDT --- Based on review comments from Bug 515034, which depends on this one, I have updated the spec file Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util.spec and created a new source rpm SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util-3.12.3.99.3-8.fc11.test.1.src.rpm Though it says fc11 it's intended for fc12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 16:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512729] Review Request: perl-IO-Async - A collection of modules that implement asynchronous filehandle IO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061629.n76GTBdc002688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512729 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-08-06 12:29:10 EDT --- I don't understand the problem, only the spec for 0.22 is available as http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-IO-Async.spec (might need to refresh the browser ?) perl-Test-Refcount is only available for Rawhide since I could only import it from now (chained dependencies). I will built it for stables branches ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 16:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061642.n76GgWLO003113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 --- Comment #18 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-08-06 12:42:30 EDT --- The problem with ppc is a bug in Parrot a ticket is created: https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/904 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 16:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061652.n76GqLF4005482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #3 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-06 12:52:20 EDT --- the jar is versioned by upstream. I updated the spec file. Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/jide-oss.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/jide-oss-2.7.1-2.1181svn.fc11.src.rpm Description: JIDE Common Layer is Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing. It is also the foundation of other component products from JIDE. This project has over 30 Swing components and over 100k lines of code. It greatly enhanced the default component set provided by Swing and allow developers to focus on business logic layer instead of making components. JIDE Common Layer was originally developed by JIDE Software developers as a foundation in order to build other more advanced components. In April of 2007, JIDE Software decided to open source this common layer so that more and more developers can leverage them instead of wasting time building them again. rpmlint output : none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 16:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513869] Review Request: perl-Beanstalk-Client - Client class to talk to a beanstalkd server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061655.n76GtXle008798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513869 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-08-06 12:55:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Beanstalk-Client Short Description: Client class to talk to a beanstalkd server Owners: ruben Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 16:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 12:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061657.n76GvTYd008996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-08-06 12:57:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Math-Calc-Units Short Description: Human-readable unit-aware calculator Owners: ruben Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 17:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061716.n76HGGY4011014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 13:16:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > the jar is versioned by upstream. Sorry, my bad :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 17:34:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061734.n76HYfkO014009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 Christopher Brown changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 17:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061736.n76HasTj016985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #27 from Christopher Brown 2009-08-06 13:36:50 EDT --- Hi Jason, Sorry - didn't realise this review was blocking FE-DEADREVIEW and had already posted the spec and review links. Anyway, here they are again. Its been a while since I worked on this but your review is appreciated. http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/simias/simias.spec http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/simias/simias-1.6-1.20071116svn.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 17:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061741.n76HfrQx015824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #5 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-06 13:41:52 EDT --- is the package ok now ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 18:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061822.n76IM4V3024524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 Bill McGonigle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bill-bugzilla.redhat.com at bf | |ccomputing.com --- Comment #11 from Bill McGonigle 2009-08-06 14:22:01 EDT --- Regarding the latest build, it builds and installs correctly for me (f11 on an 1000he). Starting the service does: http://fpaste.org/MnH2/ More generally, is there something exposed to set the FSB speed in Fedora already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 18:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061833.n76IXZbG026521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #12 from Bill McGonigle 2009-08-06 14:33:34 EDT --- Just noticed a parallel effort at: http://fedora-eee.com/ I sent the packager there a mail, hoping to combine efforts/knowledge here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 18:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061834.n76IYK9V028850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 14:34:19 EDT --- You don't have to create an account to check out, you can use --username guest as implicitly pointed out in comment #1. ** You should send the patches upstream, as they're probably needed by a lot of people. ** rpmlint is clean. existing class files and jars are correctly removed in %prep. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - Excerpt from LICENSE.txt JIDE Common Layer is a dual-licensed. The two licenses are GPL with classpath exception and free commercial license. The first license is GPL with classpath exception. This is the same license under which the Java platform is released. You can read the license agreement from the link below. GPL v2: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt Classpath Exception: http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/license.html - SwingWorker is LGPLv2+ but that's compatible with GPLv2. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. N/A MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. NEEDSWORK - There is a docs/JIDE_Common_Layer_Developer_Guide.pdf, which should go into -doc. (There's a .doc file too, but IMHO the pdf is better.) MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK - There is a http link to the license in LICENSE.txt, though, so this is not necessary. SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK ** The package has been APPROVED Before CVS import add the -doc package. (Remember, no need to define it explicitly as noarch since the main package already is noarch.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 18:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061839.n76IdPHk029650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 --- Comment #10 from Tim Fenn 2009-08-06 14:39:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Unfortunately that package doesn't build for me. > > + make -C doc/doxygen > make: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/maloc/doc/doxygen' > doxygen maloc.dox > make: execvp: doxygen: Permission denied > > That's kind of odd, but the package doesn't seem to have any build dependency > on doxygen, so most likely it's simply not there. Added doxygen to the buildreq: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/maloc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/maloc-0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 18:45:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061845.n76IjFlc031202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-06 14:45:14 EDT --- perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-0.09-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-0.09-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 18:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061845.n76Iji8C029275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #13 from Chris Bagwell 2009-08-06 14:45:43 EDT --- I've lost access to my eee-pc so I can't help debug things now. From ouptut in #11 it looks like perhaps you've misconfigured your /etc/eee-control.conf. Since upgrading/installing RPM won't overwrite an old copy, you may want to delete it before installing RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 18:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061849.n76InZWv031669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-06 14:49:34 EDT --- ok, so now you can update this package to use jide-oss, and after that update MiniCopier to use this package (if you didn't do so already). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 19:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061911.n76JB4jg002227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #14 from Bill McGonigle 2009-08-06 15:11:02 EDT --- Is modification of the conf file required? I just left it as defaults - the README doesn't really say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 19:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503300] Review Request: vim-c-support - C/C++ IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061913.n76JDprx004174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503300 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de | |, | |spurath at students.uni-mainz. | |de --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-08-06 15:13:50 EDT --- This is a review, but I'm not yet a packager on my one. Just for learning by reviwing other requests ;-) MUST: rpmlint: ~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint vim-c-support.spec ../SRPMS/vim-c-support-5.7-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/vim-c-support-5.7-1.fc11.noarch.rpm vim-c-support.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/c-support/codesnippets/calloc_int_matrix.c vim-c-support.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/c-support/codesnippets/calloc_double_matrix.c vim-c-support.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/c-support/codesnippets/main.c 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings This are codesnippets an no devel-file -> ok MUST: package name according to the Package Naming Guidelines ok MUST: spec file is %{name}.spec ok MUST: Fedora approved license GPLv2 ok MUST: %doc %{license} if license file provided not provided, ok MUST: %doc files not important for runtime ok MUST: spec file in American English ok MUST: spec file legible ok MUST: souces must match upstream source md5sum 5fe70bbf2bae6bf0ab9111c8726f0fba ok MUST: packages compiles succesfully ok MUST: build dependencies listed in BuildRequires ok MUST: locale handling with %find_lang no locales, ok MUST: shared libraries must call ldconfig in %post and %postun not needed, ok MUST: permissions properly set ok MUST: %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} ok MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. ok MUST: large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage doc is not large, ok MUST: header files must be in a -devel package codesnippets are no headers, ok MUST: libraries with ending .so must be in -devel package no libraries, ok MUST: -devel must Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} no -devel, ok MUST: static libraries must be in a -static package so libraries, ok MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. no pkgconfig, ok MUST: .la libtool archive are forbitten ok MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file and desktop-file-install in %install; no %{name}.desktop -> reason explained in %{name}.spec no gui, ok MUST: beginning of %install rm -rf %{buildroot} ok MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ok ############################### Current blocker: MUST: License field in the package spec file must match the actual license not said on %{URL} -> unsure MUST: owns each directory it creates does not own /usr/share/vim/vimfiles and folders down MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages currently not in final state MUST: don't list a file more than once in %files listening atm ok, but not yet final state? MUST: consistently using macros %post and %postun should use %{vimfiles} too ############################## SHOULD: package builds in mock. could not try, but builds in rpmbuild SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. For me it does *not* work correctly. The gui version with vim-X11 works perfectls, but as described on the website the '\foo' commands don't work. (in gui and non-gui mode) It seems vim does not load /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/ftplugin/c.vim correctly. Does it work for you? If don't please fix this. ;-) ############################# Currently TODO: * redo %files section * consistently use macros * get vim-c-support to work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 19:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] New: Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 Summary: Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/trac-accountmanager-plugin/trac-accountmanager-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/trac-accountmanager-plugin/trac-accountmanager-plugin-0.2.1-0.1.20090522svn5836.fc11.src.rpm Description: This Trac plugin allows users to create and manage an account on a Trac instance. % rpmlint trac-accountmanager-plugin-*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 19:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908061948.n76JmJBH010952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|esandeen at redhat.com |jwilson at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Eric Sandeen 2009-08-06 15:48:16 EDT --- Ok, here goes the last informal review and I'll hand off to Jarod. Koji rawhide scratch build here (successful): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1587488 rpmlint: # rpmlint /tmp/pcp-3.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/pcp*3.0.0-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm pcp.x86_64: E: obsolete-on-name pcp.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/pcp pcp.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pcp.env pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/trivial/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mounts/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pcp/demos/trace/app2.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/weblog/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/simple/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pcp/demos/pmclient/pmclient.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mmv/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/trivial/trivial.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/cisco/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mailq/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/linux/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pcp/demos/trace/stub.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/sample/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/txmon/txrecord.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/jstat/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/shping/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/summary/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/process/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pcp/demos/trace/app1.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/simple/simple.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pcp/demos/procmemstat/procmemstat.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/sendmail/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/txmon/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pcp/demos/trace/app3.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/trace/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pcp/demos/trace/pmtrace.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/txmon/txmon.c pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/lmsensors/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/apache/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/roomtemp/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/lustrecomm/domain.h pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/txmon/txmon.h pcp.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pcp pcp.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pmproxy pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pmie pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcp pcp-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libpcp_gui.so.1 libpcp_gui.so.2 pcp-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libpcp.so.2 libpcp.so.3 pcp-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libpcp_pmda.so.2 libpcp_pmda.so.3 pcp-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpcp_pmda.so.3 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 pcp-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 41 warnings. * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. See above. * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. NEEDSWORK? - 4 errors still above. subsys-not-used should be easy to fix up, A package should not obsolete itself, as it can cause weird errors in tools. # Prior to v3, the PCP package implicitly "provides" -libs and -devel. # Strictly, pcp-libs should obsolete the v2.x PCP package, but since # pcp requires pcp-libs, pcp can just obsolete itself. This is thus # redundant dependency, but included for clarity. Obsoletes: pcp < 3.0 I'll let Jarod be the final arbiter on this. * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. OK * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK? >From COPYING: All the libraries in the Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) open source release are licensed under Version 2.1 of the GNU Lesser General Public License. All other components in the PCP open source release are licensed under Version 2 of the GNU General Public License. but the specfile says: License: GPL+ and LGPLv2+ All .c and .h files do say "or any later version" so ideally COPYING should be fixed to reflect this. * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK (I might rather see a little more consistency between wildcards & explicit files, but not a big deal) * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms OK * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Note: "OK" based on pmda .h files "not being header files but rather used for configuration" * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files N/A * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. OK * MUST: Devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NEEDSWORK: Requires: pcp-libs = %{version} For whatever reason I guess we must require pcp, not pcp-libs. * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file N/A (but keep in mind for the pcp gui?) * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK SHOULD Items: * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A (license text is there) * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A (not available and I've never seen it!) * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. OK (I started pcp anyway) ;) * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. OK (now!) * SHOULD: Subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. NO, but it seems ok * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files N/A * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OK Just a few things left here, which I'll leave to Jarod's discretion. -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 20:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479594] Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062010.n76KAslq015645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479594 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |spurath at students.uni-mainz. | |de --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-08-06 16:10:52 EDT --- I'm no packager, reviewing this as learning guidelines by reviewing others MUST: rpmlint already posted, ok MUST: spec file is %{name}.spec ok MUST: Fedora approved license GPLv2+, ok MUST: License field in the package spec file must match the actual license ok MUST: %doc %{license} it is, ok MUST: %doc files not important for runtime ok MUST: spec file in American English ok MUST: spec file legible ok MUST: souces must match upstream source md5: cc51aeaa749d787915e8aa9bcd580c5d, ok MUST: packages compiles succesfully does, ok MUST: build dependencies listed in BuildRequires ok MUST: locale handling with %find_lang no locales, ok MUST: shared libraries must call ldconfig in %post and %postun ok MUST: owns each directory it creates ok MUST: don't list a file more than once in %files listening ok MUST: %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} ok MUST: consistently using macros partly ok, see further down MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. ok MUST: large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage not large, ok MUST: header files must be in a -devel package no header, ok MUST: libraries with ending .so must be in -devel package ok MUST: -devel must Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ok MUST: static libraries must be in a -static package ok MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. ok MUST: .la libtool archive are forbitten ok MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file and desktop-file-install in %install; no %{name}.desktop -> reason explained in %{name}.spec no gui, ok MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages ok MUST: beginning of %install rm -rf %{buildroot} ok MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ok MUST: permissions properly set probably ok, as just copying, *but*: The Makefile installs the programm in the wrong place! See prefix = /usr/local and not prefix = /usr As a test with make install DESTDIR=tmp INSTALL="install -p" is wrong, but within the spec, anything behaves correctly (->prefix = /usr). Don't see why. But ok ;-) The name email should be ok for me. There already exists email2trac, deletemail and archivemail. Furthermore email reflects, what the program does. This kind of common namespace should be avoided, but here not possible. How could it renamed? 'send' or whatever? yum search mail is much bigger than yum search email atm? No blocker, I'd approve this, if I could ;-) (After the explanation of my the makefile problem, of course^^) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 20:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062001.n76K12EW013842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-06 16:01:00 EDT --- > http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record-64-2.fc11.src.rpm Unfortunately you've uploaded the i586.rpm file rather than the srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 20:44:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062044.n76Ki1AU022818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #8 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-08-06 16:43:59 EDT --- It looks like there's something weird with your srpm in comment #7. I downloaded it, and rpm -ivh complains it's not a RPM. file tells me it's a ? lex description text ?, and if I open it with vim, I am presented with your spec file :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 21:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062111.n76LBpgV028734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 21:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062116.n76LGuNO030872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-06 17:16:55 EDT --- perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-0.09-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-0.09-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 21:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062138.n76LcJdt003202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #26 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-06 17:38:18 EDT --- Oh, sorry for delay. template: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. gnaughty.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnaughty.schemas 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK. MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK. MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. (Most of sources under GPLv2, but there progress-cell-renderer.c which is GPLv2 only) MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ md5sum gnaughty-1.2.0.tar.gz gnaughty-1.2.0_downloaded.tar.gz c4ba9b800af39c98dfe927788d42cd9b gnaughty-1.2.0.tar.gz c4ba9b800af39c98dfe927788d42cd9b gnaughty-1.2.0_downloaded.tar.gz OK. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1580797 OK. MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK. MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK. MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK. MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK. MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK. MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK. MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] OK. SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. License text present and included in package. SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1580797 SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1580797 SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. This is running. But work very strange - on download page appeared "dead" unfinished downloads. On "Delete finished" press some finished not deleted... I think you must fill bug on it to upstream. I will not do it as stop - problem for review, but if you don't do it now, I'll submit bug to gnaughty. SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. No. In configure you forgot --disable-schemas-install. In %pre and %post "killall -HUP gconfd-2 || :" In %post: "%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/%{name}.schemas > /dev/null || :" Please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets#GConf SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. N/A So, package is very well. Please, fix scriptlets and it will be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 21:42:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062142.n76Lgx37004334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #8 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-06 17:42:57 EDT --- Final Review: 1) The definition of tog_pegasus_version in spec file, I am not sure what the colon (:) supposed to be? Could you clarify? 2) For each of the "Requires", could you please add comments justifying why you need those packages. rpmlint output: ##rpmlint sblim-cmpi-network.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ##rpmlint sblim-cmpi-network-1.3.8-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Everything else looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 21:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062142.n76LgegK004279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 Bj?rn Persson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se --- Comment #4 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-08-06 17:42:38 EDT --- ? I don't see the point in first including %{buildroot} in both PREFIX and DESTDIR and then hacking around the doubled buildroot that this causes. As far as I can see the build works just as well without %{buildroot} in PREFIX. It eliminates the need for the hack and makes RPMlint happy. ? The guidelines say you shouldn't use both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Choose one or the other and stick to it. (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS) ? You changed "rm" to "%{__rm}", so to be consistent you should use "%{__chmod}" as well. (There doesn't seem to be a corresponding macro for "find".) Why do you use these macros by the way? What value do they add? ? According to the Perl packaging guidelines you shouldn't require Perl packages directly by name, but instead require the Perl modules by the "perl(Foo)" naming scheme. (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides) ? Most of the explicit dependencies seem unnecessary, because RPMbuild will add dependencies automatically. ("Requires:" that is, not "BuildRequires:") ? Please replace the tabs in the spec with spaces. They make the file look ugly in my editor, and in my web browser too. Apparently your editor has a different idea of tab width than mine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:00:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062200.n76M0VUX008305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 --- Comment #8 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-06 18:00:30 EDT --- Martin, Updated the files. Final links at: http://linux.us.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-rpm/sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm http://linux.us.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-rpm/sblim-cmpi-rpm.spec Thanks Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:14:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509158] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_fedora-gnat-project-commo?= =?utf-8?q?n_=E2=80=93_files_shared_by_Ada_libraries?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062214.n76MEuCC008771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #11 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-08-06 18:14:54 EDT --- Potential sponsors may want to look at my comments on these review requests: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126#c2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743#c3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351#c1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509#c2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866#c4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:29:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062229.n76MTetU012136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-06 18:29:39 EDT --- Updated and cleaned up the spec file SPEC: same as above SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bickley-0.4.3-2.fc11.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1587916 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062234.n76MYVhL013145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-06 18:34:30 EDT --- The spec at http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bisho.spec does not match the one in the package. mux-devel is missing. mux-devel is also missing from the rawhide repo. Looking at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8679 it looks a little messed up: Why is the package locked? And why did you build it for F9??? Anyway, starting the REVIEW for 6cfb7ae0d1ea8fcd504ff89f50a32079 bisho-0.10.2-1.fc11.src.rpm TBD - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK - MUST: Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: Spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ FAIL - MUST: License field in spec file doesn't match the actual license: It's GPLv2+, not GPLv2. Looking at the source you will find "... or any later version" OK - MUST: License file included in %doc OK - MUST: Spec is in American English OK - MUST: Spec is legible OK - MUST: Sources match the upstream source by MD5 f0b354455eabc021045920123198fcd9 OK - MUST: Successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 OK - MUST: No ExcludeArch OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, but you are listing a couple of redundant deps that get already pulled in by other packages: OK - MUST: Handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK - MUST: Not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: Owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: No duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: Consistently uses macros OK - MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content OK - MUST: No large docs OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. FAIL - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, but that file is not properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. TBD - SHOULD: The the package doesn't build in mock because mux is not available. TBD - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. TBD - SHOULD: The package functions as described. FAIL - SHOULD: Scriptlets are not sane. You are running gtk-update-icon-cache only in %post. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - Latest stable version packaged OK - RPM_OPT_FLAGS honored Issues: - Fix the license tag - Drop 'Requires(post): /bin/touch', explained in bug 507480 - Drop the redundant BuildRequires, it's no use listing them: glib2-devel, pkgconfig are pulled in be nearly every devel package, autoconf and automake are required by libtool. - The comment "Require these because ..." is misleading. gnome-common is (likely) needed and gettext/intltool are needed because of the locales. So all that is actually required to run autogen.sh is libtool. Please change the comment to reflect this. - Timestamps are nor preserved during %install, add "INSTALL='install -p'" to make install, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - Update icon-cache scriptlet with latest version from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache - What libtool archives are you trying to remove? There are none! - AUTHORS and TODO are missing from %doc. Don't add NEWS and README (empty) or ChangeLog (not useful) - Use desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate for the desktop file, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage Please fix the issues and contact rel-eng in order to get mux into the repo. Once this is done, I will finish this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062242.n76MgDEt016477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062249.n76Mn7VZ015649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-06 18:49:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The spec at http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bisho.spec does not match the > one in the package. mux-devel is missing. > > mux-devel is also missing from the rawhide repo. Looking at > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8679 it looks a little > messed up: Why is the package locked? And why did you build it for F9??? It seems I uploaded a new package and didn't update the bug. I never built it for F-9. There's 2 builds listed, both for F-12. I think the F-9 tag is to do with the way the tag inheritance works. Anyway, mux is obsolete (yes, already, welcome to moblin) and has been merged into nbtk. Matching srpm that goes with the spec file here: SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bisho-0.10.7-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:52:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062252.n76MqtHf016418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #26 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-06 18:52:54 EDT --- Ralf Corsepius, thank you for the support... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062255.n76Mt4mn016933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-06 18:55:03 EDT --- ccze-0.2.1-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ccze-0.2.1-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062254.n76MsWqX016566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-06 18:54:31 EDT --- ccze-0.2.1-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ccze-0.2.1-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062255.n76Mtcjo018801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-06 18:55:37 EDT --- ccze-0.2.1-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ccze-0.2.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 22:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062257.n76MvKp3018995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-06 18:57:18 EDT --- I doubt we are allowed to ship eee-icon.png. I also want to remind you of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 23:08:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062308.n76N868I019108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 Owen Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|walters at redhat.com |otaylor at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-06 19:08:04 EDT --- Taking the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 23:12:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062312.n76NCaNH019975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-06 19:12:34 EDT --- I'd already fixed most of these locally yesterday based on the other reviews but hasn't uploaded it yet. > Issues: > - Fix the license tag Fixed > - Drop 'Requires(post): /bin/touch', explained in bug 507480 Done > - Drop the redundant BuildRequires, it's no use listing them: glib2-devel, > pkgconfig are pulled in be nearly every devel package, autoconf and automake > are required by libtool. I don't see what is the major issue, dependencies change over time and it doesn't add build time so it ends up being semantics. I have removed them. > - The comment "Require these because ..." is misleading. gnome-common is > (likely) needed and gettext/intltool are needed because of the locales. So all > that is actually required to run autogen.sh is libtool. Please change the > comment to reflect this. Well none of them would be needed at all if the package was a released package that had "make dist" run, hence the comment. Maybe I haven't documented it properly. gnome-common isn't pulled in automatically hence the reason it was added, nor are gettext/intltool I believe. > - Timestamps are nor preserved during %install, add "INSTALL='install -p'" to > make install, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps > - Update icon-cache scriptlet with latest version from > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache Done. > - What libtool archives are you trying to remove? There are none! Copied over from a template, removed. > - AUTHORS and TODO are missing from %doc. Don't add NEWS and README (empty) or > ChangeLog (not useful) Added, they use to be empty :) > - Use desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate for the desktop file, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage Updated. > Please fix the issues and contact rel-eng in order to get mux into the repo. > Once this is done, I will finish this review. Not an issue, mux was in rawhide for about 2 weeks and then marked as a dead.package due to being merged into nbtk. Also fixed up the autoconf.sh so it doesn't run configure twice. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bisho-0.10.7-2.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1588011 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 23:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062333.n76NXq1L023488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-06 19:33:51 EDT --- Bj?rn Persson, thank you very much for the notes. (In reply to comment #4) > ? I don't see the point in first including %{buildroot} in both PREFIX and > DESTDIR and then hacking around the doubled buildroot that this causes. As far > as I can see the build works just as well without %{buildroot} in PREFIX. It > eliminates the need for the hack and makes RPMlint happy. I fix it. > ? The guidelines say you shouldn't use both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. > Choose one or the other and stick to it. > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS) Ok. > ? You changed "rm" to "%{__rm}", so to be consistent you should use > "%{__chmod}" as well. Ok. > (There doesn't seem to be a corresponding macro for > "find".) Yes. I also found it strange. > Why do you use these macros by the way? What value do they add? Really now - nothing. But if, when pathes changed - only one system macros definition must be changed too opposite direct search/replace hundreds of values. > ? According to the Perl packaging guidelines you shouldn't require Perl > packages directly by name, but instead require the Perl modules by the > "perl(Foo)" naming scheme. > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides) > > ? Most of the explicit dependencies seem unnecessary, because RPMbuild will add > dependencies automatically. ("Requires:" that is, not "BuildRequires:") I remove perl and prel-modules requires. But ppmbuild don't add next requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl-Unicode-Map or perl(Unicode::Map) perl-libintl as you think, its really don't needed (excuse me, I'm dont very similar with perl)? >Please replace the tabs in the spec with spaces. They make the file look ugly > in my editor, and in my web browser too. Apparently your editor has a > different idea of tab width than mine. Yes, I think 5 spaces tab width (it is convenient to easy distinguish pace and tabs indent in each editor). I think it is not issue. Sorry, I don't want change tabs to spaces. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/xls2csv/xls2csv.spec http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/xls2csv/xls2csv-1.06-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 23:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062337.n76NbpC2024331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 6 23:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908062341.n76Nfsq6025146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-06 19:41:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > It seems I uploaded a new package and didn't update the bug. Peter, you have posted two different packages with the same version: 0.10.7-1. The one from comment #2 had a md5sum of 6cfb7ae0d1ea8fcd504ff89f50a32079, the one from comment comment #4 had 438f7278066fca02589fe16d26b7a80d. Please don't do that. Whenever you update the package, increase the release to avoid confusion. (In reply to comment #5) > > - Drop the redundant BuildRequires, it's no use listing them: glib2-devel, > > pkgconfig are pulled in be nearly every devel package, autoconf and automake > > are required by libtool. > > I don't see what is the major issue, dependencies change over time and it > doesn't add build time so it ends up being semantics. I have removed them. Ask yourself: What is the benefit of listing them as long as they are not versioned? None, so remove them. > > - The comment "Require these because ..." is misleading. gnome-common is > > (likely) needed and gettext/intltool are needed because of the locales. So all > > that is actually required to run autogen.sh is libtool. Please change the > > comment to reflect this. > > Well none of them would be needed at all if the package was a released package > that had "make dist" run, hence the comment. intltool is needed to generate the locales, gettext is needed for find_lang.sh. And I'm pretty sure that gnome-common is also not needed, so IMO the comment is still misleading. > > - AUTHORS and TODO are missing from %doc. Don't add NEWS and README (empty) or > > ChangeLog (not useful) > > Added, they use to be empty :) No they were not, even in 0.10.2 ;) > Not an issue, mux was in rawhide for about 2 weeks and then marked as a > dead.package due to being merged into nbtk. Then please make notice of this change in the bug to save the reviewer a lot of time and headache. > Also fixed up the autoconf.sh so it doesn't run configure twice. Fine. > SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bisho-0.10.7-2.fc11.src.rpm > koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1588011 OK, let me take a look at it. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 00:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 20:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070020.n770KF5L031857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-06 20:20:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > It seems I uploaded a new package and didn't update the bug. > > Peter, you have posted two different packages with the same version: 0.10.7-1. > The one from comment #2 had a md5sum of 6cfb7ae0d1ea8fcd504ff89f50a32079, the > one from comment comment #4 had 438f7278066fca02589fe16d26b7a80d. Please don't > do that. Whenever you update the package, increase the release to avoid > confusion. The comment I made in comment #4 was the same one. I didn't upload a new one there. Check the dates here http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ > > > - The comment "Require these because ..." is misleading. gnome-common is > > > (likely) needed and gettext/intltool are needed because of the locales. So all > > > that is actually required to run autogen.sh is libtool. Please change the > > > comment to reflect this. > > > > Well none of them would be needed at all if the package was a released package > > that had "make dist" run, hence the comment. > > intltool is needed to generate the locales, gettext is needed for find_lang.sh. > And I'm pretty sure that gnome-common is also not needed, so IMO the comment is > still misleading. I've needed it for gtk based apps in the past, that's why I added it. I will investigate it tomorrow. > > > - AUTHORS and TODO are missing from %doc. Don't add NEWS and README (empty) or > > > ChangeLog (not useful) > > > > Added, they use to be empty :) > > No they were not, even in 0.10.2 ;) Maybe they were empty in one of the other many packages. > > Not an issue, mux was in rawhide for about 2 weeks and then marked as a > > dead.package due to being merged into nbtk. > > Then please make notice of this change in the bug to save the reviewer a lot of > time and headache. The new package in comment #2 had it removed, sorry I assumed the latest package would be used. > > Also fixed up the autoconf.sh so it doesn't run configure twice. > > Fine. > > > SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bisho-0.10.7-2.fc11.src.rpm > > koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1588011 > > OK, let me take a look at it. Stay tuned. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 00:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 20:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070050.n770o5x6009966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #7 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-06 20:50:04 EDT --- the doc package should include the pdf file only? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 00:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 20:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070053.n770r5dw010521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-06 20:53:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > The comment I made in comment #4 was the same one. I didn't upload a new one > there. Check the dates here http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ Sorry, my bad. I md5sum'ed and reviewed the wrong package (0.10.2) but the correct spec, so I'm not going to start all over again. > I've needed it for gtk based apps in the past, that's why I added it. I will > investigate it tomorrow. gnome-common can be dropped, I tested it. intltool and gettext are needed for the locales, so the only thing left for autogen.sh is libtool. Just move the comment down by three lines and it's correct. Ok, now for 0.10.7 and the remaining issues: OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/bisho-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: %{name}.desktop properly validated with desktop-file-validate OK - SHOULD: The package builds in mock OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. However I noticed a small annoyance: When hovering the close button in the top right corner, I get the gtk-broken icon, although I have moblin-icon-theme-installed. Can you confirm this? If so, I will look into that OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane. Issues: "INSTALL='install -p'" belongs to make install, not to make! Should be make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL='install -p' The summary still is "Moblin web services settings", you might want to change that to to make Jeff happy. Please fix the remaining issues. None of these are real blockers, so the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 02:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516148] New: Review Request: trac-tickettemplate-plugin - Allows for templates in trac tickets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trac-tickettemplate-plugin - Allows for templates in trac tickets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516148 Summary: Review Request: trac-tickettemplate-plugin - Allows for templates in trac tickets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonstanley at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-tickettemplate-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-tickettemplate-plugin-0.5-0.1.svn6329.fc10.src.rpm Description: Allows for ticket templates in trac There's some licensing confusion here. The package includes the text of LGPLv2, however, I can't see any source header that applies that license. The setup.py also mentions that the license is BSD. I've got a mail into upstream in order to clarify these items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 03:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516148] Review Request: trac-tickettemplate-plugin - Allows for templates in trac tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070351.n773pv8w009417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516148 Jeff Sheltren changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sheltren at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sheltren at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 03:56:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516148] Review Request: trac-tickettemplate-plugin - Allows for templates in trac tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070356.n773udsA009978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516148 --- Comment #1 from Jon Stanley 2009-08-06 23:56:38 EDT --- Upstream was extremely responsive with my email, and I've updated the spec file above, and have a new SRPM at http://jstanley.fedorapeople.org/trac-tickettemplate-plugin-0.5-0.1.svn6332.fc10.src.rpm The only change is clarified licensing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 03:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070359.n773x10R010481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #10 from Kai Engert (kaie) 2009-08-06 23:59:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > > You're installing something into the prelink.conf.d/ dir but not Requiring > > prelink as far as I can tell. That needs to be fixed. > Will do in the next iteration. I object. NSS does not need prelink. Requiring prelink is wrong. But NSS needs to make sure that prelink won't touch certain files from NSS, therefore it needs to prepare for a potential installation of prelink. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070408.n7748Gud011921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #12 from Kai Engert (kaie) 2009-08-07 00:08:15 EDT --- > I can't build this to test, because I'm missing nssutil-devel >= 3.12.3.99.3 This bug requests new package nss-softokn. Another bug requests new package nss-util. Perhaps the base package nss-util should be produced/reviewed/completed first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070405.n7745pDD012034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #11 from Kai Engert (kaie) 2009-08-07 00:05:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > This spec > file was derived from the big nss.spec file and I tried not to deviate too > much from what it was already there and working. We do the install because > there is no install target in the upstream makefile. Elio, I believe Jesse doesn't refer to "make install" but rather to %{__mkdir_p} name_of_directory %{__install} ... file destination I think Jesse claims that "mkdir" is unnecessary, because "install" will create the directory automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:19:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516148] Review Request: trac-tickettemplate-plugin - Allows for templates in trac tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070419.n774JQKA014287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516148 Jeff Sheltren changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jeff Sheltren 2009-08-07 00:19:25 EDT --- rpmlint runs cleanly spec looks good built cleanly in mock for el5 x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516148] Review Request: trac-tickettemplate-plugin - Allows for templates in trac tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070430.n774USMo016258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516148 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jon Stanley 2009-08-07 00:30:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-tickettemplate-plugin Short Description: Allows creation of ticket templates in trac Owners: jstanley Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070435.n774ZEm0017095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #13 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-07 00:35:13 EDT --- Actually I meant that if you're going to use install to install the file, might as well use install to install the directory too. It's still two calls, but it's calls of the same application, and there is no need to macro it out. As far as the prelink issue, you may want to set that up as a trigger for if/when prelink is installed, and ghost the file. That way you don't wind up owning the prelink dir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512637] Review Request: ibus-table-quick - Quick table of IBus Table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070439.n774dGPZ019920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512637 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-07 00:39:15 EDT --- built on rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512636] Review Request: ibus-table-xinhua - Xin Hua table of IBus Table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070439.n774dhkm019971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512636 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-07 00:39:42 EDT --- built on rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512639] Review Request: ibus-table-translit - Translit table for IBus Table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070438.n774cudp019868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512639 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-07 00:38:55 EDT --- built on rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070442.n774gXJr020624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #14 from Kai Engert (kaie) 2009-08-07 00:42:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > As far as the prelink issue, you may want to set that up as a trigger for > if/when prelink is installed, and ghost the file. That way you don't wind up > owning the prelink dir. That sounds tricky. Do you remember a similar solution in another rpm package, we could look at as a reference? But I guess you refer to http://rpm.org/api/4.4.2.2/triggers.html and that may answer my question for an example already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:47:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511196] Review Request: ibus-table-array30 - Array30 Chinese input method for ibus-table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070447.n774l4f8021573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511196 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 00:47:03 EDT --- ibus-table-array30-1.2.0.20090729-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-table-array30-1.2.0.20090729-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070454.n774sEFL020224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 00:54:13 EDT --- php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070453.n774rorl023049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 00:53:48 EDT --- php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070454.n774sJ7h023153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.0.2-3.fc10 |5.0.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070457.n774vpIe024221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.1-1.fc11 |0.1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070453.n774rtAE023090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |5.0.2-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070456.n774u7V1023874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 00:56:06 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache-0.22-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070457.n774v6LG024094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 00:57:05 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache-0.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8320 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:00:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070500.n7750G3j022419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:00:15 EDT --- lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:57:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070457.n774vlgi021628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 00:57:46 EDT --- lxrandr-0.1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 04:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070455.n774tk4J021021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 00:55:45 EDT --- python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tgext-admin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070502.n7752ido026425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:02:43 EDT --- znc-extra-0.074-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:00:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070500.n7750LL5025536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-3.fc11 |0.4-3.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070501.n7751XtB025966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070502.n7752n7N026460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.074-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070501.n775166s023055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #15 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-07 01:01:05 EDT --- Yes, that's what I was talking about. It is fairly tricky, but it accomplishes what you wish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226152] Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070502.n77521JK023351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226152 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-07 01:01:59 EDT --- I guess I can commit as you have reviewed patch and allowed me to do so. Will commit now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070501.n7751S59023198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:01:27 EDT --- solang-0.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070500.n7750xv4022887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:00:57 EDT --- lxsession-0.3.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070505.n7755MUb024440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:05:21 EDT --- znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070505.n7755Rac024470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.074-1.fc10 |0.074-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070501.n7751362022926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.8-1.fc11 |0.3.8-1.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070504.n7754ocY024014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 01:04:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > the doc package should include the pdf file only? Yes, unless there's some other (biggish) documentation files I didn't find. I don't think there's is any sense in including the .doc in addition to the .pdf if their contents is identical - it's easier to get the .pdf displayed correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226078] Merge Review: libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070505.n7755Cpb024381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226078 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-07 01:05:10 EDT --- There are no blockers for this review. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070501.n77519YT023079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:01:08 EDT --- python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tgext-admin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8335 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070504.n7754FuN023903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:04:14 EDT --- gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-applet-cpufire'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070507.n7757rVA028360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:07:52 EDT --- gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-applet-cpufire'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8357 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070505.n77554uW027704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:05:03 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache-0.01-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8349 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgdamm - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070507.n7757F0I025474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:07:14 EDT --- compat-libgdamm-3.0.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgdamm - compat libs for libgdamm-3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070507.n7757Kkx025527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.0.1-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:07:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070507.n7757ABf025431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:07:09 EDT --- R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-preprocessCore'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8356 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070505.n7755XN8024538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:05:33 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache-0.22-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8352 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070505.n7755dNO024734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 01:05:37 EDT --- R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-preprocessCore'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 05:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 01:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514150] Review Request: ibus-qt - The qt support tools for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070518.n775ImvC027504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514150 --- Comment #2 from Huang Peng 2009-08-07 01:18:47 EDT --- Just uploaded the latest tarball to upstream download page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 06:04:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 02:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070604.n7764WYK002651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #13 from Mark Goodwin 2009-08-07 02:04:30 EDT --- Thanks Eric, once again. I'll work thru the list and have another update ready on Monday - particularly the license, which will need to be updated in the spec, based on the COPYING file .. ooops :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 07:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 03:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479594] Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070722.n777M1oa018781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479594 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-07 03:21:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > As a test with make install DESTDIR=tmp INSTALL="install -p" is wrong, but > within the spec, anything behaves correctly (->prefix = /usr). Don't see why. Probably one or more of these: a) DESTDIR must be an absolute directory. A relative dir (DESTDIR=tmp) will never work. b) You didn't pass the options, rpmbuild'ing applies, to configure. > The name email should be ok for me. Not for me - I consider this package's name, the binary's name and the config-files's names to be a short-sighted (silly?) upstream decision. > How could it renamed? * After the author (Dean Jones): djmail, deansmail * After the author's site (cleancode.org): cleanmail, cleancode.org-mail ... Bonzo? If this package was fully supporting autoconf, --program-prefix could be used as escape - Unfortunately this package doesn't. > No blocker, I'd approve this, if I could ;-) > (After the explanation of my the makefile problem, of course^^) Other issues: 1) The package doesn't honor $INSTALL => Besides the fact that make "INSTALL=install -p" is almost always meaningless, it is completely non-functional in this particular case. 2) The package tarball contains autom4te.caches. Shiping only adds bloat to a tarball and is hardly of any use. 3) The package seems to support ssl/tls, but is compiled without it (c.f. configure --help, check --with-ssl) 4) The sources contains excerpts from RFCs. c.f. files: RFC821, rfc3156-openpgp.txt, quoted-printable.rfc Normally RFCs are distributable for free when "being properly credited". I am not sure if this consideration applies to the files as being shipped with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 08:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 04:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070818.n778IijD027738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 08:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 04:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070818.n778In0X027800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #27 from Simon Wesp 2009-08-07 04:18:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > SHOULD Items: > Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, > but is not required to do. > SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A > package should not segfault instead of running, for example. > > This is running. But work very strange - on download page appeared "dead" > unfinished downloads. On "Delete finished" press some finished not deleted... > I think you must fill bug on it to upstream. I will not do it as > stop - problem for review, but if you don't do it now, > I'll submit bug to gnaughty. I already sent an email to upstream (no trac or bz). I found more bugs, and even #504247 is mailed to upstream. > SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, > and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. > > No. > In configure you forgot --disable-schemas-install. > In %pre and %post "killall -HUP gconfd-2 || :" > > In %post: "%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/%{name}.schemas > /dev/null || :" > > Please see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets#GConf > 1.) Scriplet _is_ sane 2.) It's a SHOULD-item 3.) It's a draft 4.) "%configure --disable-schema-install" and "export GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL=1 make install" are equal 5.) and 4.) should be conform to current guidelines > So, package is very well. Please, fix scriptlets and it will be approved. as this is 1.) a should item 2.) working i can't understand your block! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070901.n77913qV007116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #28 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-07 05:01:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > In configure you forgot --disable-schemas-install. Simon already has make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" This is an ether - or thing: You only need one, but not both. > In %pre and %post "killall -HUP gconfd-2 || :" This should no longer be used as it not necessary in any of the supported Fedora releases but only in RHEL 4. I doubt that Simon wants to package this for RHEL 4. > In %post: "%{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/%{name}.schemas > /dev/null || :" > > Please see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ScriptletSnippets#GConf The official scriptlets as ratified by the packaging committee is at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf and Simon's uses exactly the same scriptlets as from the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226152] Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070904.n7794LZk005258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226152 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-07 05:04:19 EDT --- I have committed changes in cvs. Can you build new release in rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226150] Merge Review: mod_auth_kerb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070903.n7793q3Y005205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226150 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-07 05:03:51 EDT --- I have committed changes in cvs. Can you build new release in rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226153] Merge Review: mod_auth_pgsql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070903.n7793Z0v007433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226153 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-07 05:03:34 EDT --- I have committed changes in cvs. Can you build new release in rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479594] Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070906.n7796MeL008210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479594 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-07 05:06:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The name email should be ok for me. There already exists email2trac, deletemail > and archivemail. Thomas, the package name is not (really) a problem, but the names of the installed files, especially %{_bindir}/%{name}. If every package chooses such silly names, we would have five different %{_bindir}/%{name} and all these packages would conflict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:06:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226154] Merge Review: mod_authz_ldap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070906.n7796c88006135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226154 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-07 05:06:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356627) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356627) Modified spec Suggested changes in SPEC file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226154] Merge Review: mod_authz_ldap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070907.n77970Dt006180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226154 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226152] Merge Review: mod_auth_mysql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070928.n779SOUa012805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226152 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-07 05:28:23 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=126147 Package built in rawhide is now APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:27:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226154] Merge Review: mod_authz_ldap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070927.n779RTqO012660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226154 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-07 05:27:28 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=126144 Package built in rawhide is now APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226153] Merge Review: mod_auth_pgsql In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070927.n779RrBw012727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226153 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(jorton at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-07 05:27:52 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=126145 Package built in rawhide is now APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226150] Merge Review: mod_auth_kerb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070928.n779SiZA012887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226150 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(jorton at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-07 05:28:43 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=126146 Package built in rawhide is now APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 09:33:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908070933.n779XiPK013895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-07 05:33:41 EDT --- Hello Praveen, here is my review of your package. :) rpmlint output: sblim-cmpi-rpm.i586: E: devel-dependency rpm-devel sblim-cmpi-rpm.i586: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog .0.1-3 ['1.0.1-3.fc11', '1.0.1-3'] sblim-cmpi-rpm.i586: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libcimrpm.so.0.0.0 sblim-cmpi-rpm.i586: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libcimrpm.so.0.0.0 sblim-cmpi-rpm.i586: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libcimrpmv4.so.0.0.0 sblim-cmpi-rpm.i586: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libcimrpmv4.so.0.0.0 sblim-cmpi-rpm-devel.i586: W: no-dependency-on sblim-cmpi-rpm/sblim-cmpi-rpm-libs/libsblim-cmpi-rpm sblim-cmpi-rpm-devel.i586: W: summary-not-capitalized devel files for sblim-cmpi-rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 3 warnings. - Add a changelog entry for *every* revision so that the revision history can be reproduced (revision number is 3 now, so there must be 3 changelog entries, newest first) - It wasn't necessary to shorten the description. The lines were just longer than 80 characters. Split long descriptions to several lines. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [#] OK, not applicable [-] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [-] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. - see rpmlint output [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: license file added to %doc [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - md5 hashes are different - please use the latest orignal tarball from upstream [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [#] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [-] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - add %post and %postun scriptlets - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries [#] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable,... - package not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [#] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large documentation [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [-] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - run configure with --disable-static to disable build of static libraries - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries [#] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. - no pkgconfig files [+] MUST: .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [-] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - add Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} to the -devel package [-] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - remove the .la files in the %install section and remove them from %files devel [#] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [-] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - no scriptlets - add %post and %postun (see above) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071009.n77A9VBr018048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-07 06:09:28 EDT --- > > I've needed it for gtk based apps in the past, that's why I added it. I will > > investigate it tomorrow. > > gnome-common can be dropped, I tested it. intltool and gettext are needed for > the locales, so the only thing left for autogen.sh is libtool. Just move the > comment down by three lines and it's correct. Done > OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. However I noticed a small > annoyance: When hovering the close button in the top right corner, I get the > gtk-broken icon, although I have moblin-icon-theme-installed. Can you confirm > this? If so, I will look into that That might be fixed in the upstream icon theme. I will add it to my check list for the weekend. I'm hoping to have a test spin to play with then. > Issues: > "INSTALL='install -p'" belongs to make install, not to make! Should be > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL='install -p' Oops. That will teach me to make changes at 1am :) Fixed. > The summary still is "Moblin web services settings", you might want to change > that to to make Jeff happy. How's "Moblin configuration tool for mojito social network aggregator" > Please fix the remaining issues. None of these are real blockers, so the > package is APPROVED. For reference changes are in spec and here: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bisho-0.10.7-3.fc11.src.rpm Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:11:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071011.n77ABf7C021743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-07 06:11:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bisho Short Description: Configuration tool for mojito social network aggregator Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071010.n77AAvbR018548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-07 06:10:56 EDT --- > > The summary still is "Moblin web services settings", you might want to change > > that to to make Jeff happy. > > How's "Moblin configuration tool for mojito social network aggregator" Actually I dropped Moblin from the front. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071023.n77ANZPt023795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-07 06:23:34 EDT --- I will fox the three issues before cvs import. Thanks for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:26:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071026.n77AQbZp024741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-07 06:26:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Actually I dropped Moblin from the front. Hmm, I think it's not bad to mention Moblin in the description. The rest looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071024.n77AOZHM024012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-07 06:24:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyliblo Short Description: Python bindings for the liblo OSC library Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:33:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071033.n77AXmhS022518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-07 06:33:47 EDT --- Further updates: SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bickley.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bickley-0.4.3-3.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1588735 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071035.n77AZrlS026744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-07 06:35:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bisho Short Description: Moblin configuration tool for mojito social network aggregator Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:43:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449393] Review Request: prism - make web apps standalone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071043.n77AhouD024208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449393 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071054.n77AsP3W029951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-07 06:54:23 EDT --- Hello Michal, your package is pretty clean. The only thing I'm not quite sure about is the license. The Website mentions GPL v2 but there is no version number given in README and AUTHORS. Maybe you can ask upstream if GPLv2+ is also applicable. Martin rpmlint output: 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [#] OK, not applicable [-] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [-] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - while the website explicitely mentions GPL v2, README and AUTHOR doesn't specify a GPL version, COPYING contains GPL v2, though - maybe you could ask upstream whether GPLv2 is required or GPLv2+ is also applicable [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - md5 hash is e5b33e067ebfcabafcf8737e2bdb5bcc [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines [#] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - no locales [#] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - no shared libraries [#] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - package not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [#] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large documentation [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [#] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - no header files [#] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libraries [#] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. - no pkgconfig [#] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - no shared libraries [#] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - no subpackages [#] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - no .la files [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. - the new icons look nice :) [#] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 10:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071056.n77AunrD026897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-07 06:56:48 EDT --- Concerning the scriptlet check, the last list item should be: [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - %post scriptlet is valid and sane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 11:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 07:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516195] New: Review Request: hunspell-mos - Mossi hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mos - Mossi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516195 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mos - Mossi hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-mos.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-mos-0.20090806-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Mossi hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 12:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071214.n77CEhrL014950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 08:14:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hello Michal, > > your package is pretty clean. The only thing I'm not quite sure about is the > license. The Website mentions GPL v2 but there is no version number given in > README and AUTHORS. Maybe you can ask upstream if GPLv2+ is also applicable. The first priority is the source code. In this case: $ grep -i license * -R gives a bunch of gnome-colors-common/scalable/devices/gnome-dev-symlink.svg: gnome-colors-common/scalable/devices/gnome-dev-symlink.svg: gnome-colors-common/scalable/devices/gnome-dev-symlink.svg: so the license is clearly GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 12:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512729] Review Request: perl-IO-Async - A collection of modules that implement asynchronous filehandle IO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071216.n77CGs13015523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512729 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-07 08:16:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I don't understand the problem, only the spec for 0.22 is available as > http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-IO-Async.spec > (might need to refresh the browser ?) Probably a mistake on my part. Review: + package builds in mock (F12 x86). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1588755 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 92cfc798a468e32aa1bd3d85ef1029e1 IO-Async-0.22.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. All tests successful. Files=32, Tests=726, 31 wallclock secs ( 0.15 usr 0.06 sys + 2.45 cusr 0.66 csys = 3.32 CPU) Result: PASS Package perl-IO-Async-0.22-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(IO::Async) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::ChildManager) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Connector) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::DetachedCode) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Handle) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Listener) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Loop) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Loop::IO_Poll) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Loop::Select) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::MergePoint) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Notifier) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Resolver) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Sequencer) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Signal) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Stream) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Test) = 0.22 perl(IO::Async::Timer) = 0.22 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(Heap::Fibonacci) perl(IO::Handle) perl(IO::Poll) perl(IO::Socket) perl(POSIX) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Socket) perl(Socket::GetAddrInfo) perl(Storable) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Should: Test::Pod should be added as a BuildRequires. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 12:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071220.n77CKAPx011952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #9 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07 08:20:09 EDT --- which location should i use for the doc package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 12:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071223.n77CNCDU012507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 08:23:12 EDT --- What do you mean by location? %files doc %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc docs/JIDE_Common_Layer_Developer_Guide.pdf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 12:31:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071231.n77CVSX7018781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-07 08:31:27 EDT --- I actually did a grep on the source. Can a part of an URI that points to a document really be considered clear? I mean, the link leads to the standard GPL v2 license text that is also included in the tarball. Without further explicit mentioning of the version number I would say that GPLv2+ could also be valid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 12:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071241.n77CfYh0020985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 08:41:33 EDT --- Judging only from the COPYING we'd mark the package as GPL+, but due to the license entries I would consider it quite clear that it's GPLv2. (The website is circumstantial evidence.) Of course, you can ask FE-LEGAL for confirmation if you want to be really sure. Or even better - ask upstream to add clear license headers to the source files and a note in e.g. COPYING stating that the package is distributed under GPLv2 (only). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 12:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071245.n77CjXn8021731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #11 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07 08:45:32 EDT --- updated the spec file. Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/jide-oss.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 12:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071255.n77Ctovx023889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 --- Comment #9 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-07 08:55:49 EDT --- Jussi, thanks for your comment. I was just wondering how the URI would have looked like if GPLv2+ was intended. However, I don't insist of a complete verification, of course. If you say GPLv2 is fine, then we can go with it. Nonetheless, Michal already sent an email to upstream asking for clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 13:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071307.n77D7bDY026714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 09:07:36 EDT --- Summary: User documentation for %{name} ^^^^ Isn't this more like *developer* documentation? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 13:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071316.n77DGAGa028792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #13 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07 09:16:09 EDT --- updated the spec file. Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/jide-oss.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 13:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071328.n77DSHHq031405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 09:28:16 EDT --- Yes, yes, import the package already! And update the other spec files so I can review them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 13:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071340.n77De0qJ029226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-07 09:39:59 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/sphinx/sphinx.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/sphinx/sphinx-0.9.8.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Changelog: * Fri Aug 7 2009 Allisson Azevedo 0.9.8.1-2 - Added sysv init. - Added logrotate.d entry. koji build scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1589151 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 13:40:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:40:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071340.n77DeHLF001378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #6 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-08-07 09:40:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Why do you use these macros by the way? What value do they add? > Really now - nothing. But if, when pathes changed - only one system macros > definition must be changed too opposite direct search/replace hundreds of > values. You mean if the commands were to be moved to some directory not in the default PATH? If you were to write "/usr/bin/make", and then make were moved to /bin, then your script would break, but if you write just "make", then it will still work as long as make is in one of the directories listed in PATH. Moving these commands out of the default PATH would annoy lots of people very very much, so it won't happen. Therefore I think writing "make" is just as future-proof as "%{__make}", and it's easier to read. The macros aren't forbidden though, as far as I know. > But ppmbuild don't add next requires: > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) You should keep that one, according to the guidelines. > perl-Unicode-Map or perl(Unicode::Map) perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel depends on perl(Unicode::Map), so you get that pulled in by the automatic dependency on perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel) > perl-libintl When I build the package I get an automatic dependency on perl(Locale::Recode), which perl-libintl provides. > Sorry, I don't want change tabs to spaces. Well, if this is what you want others to see when they read your spec, it's your choice: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/diverse/xls2csv.png It is a requirement that the spec be legible, but this misalignment isn't bad enough to make it illegible, so I suppose it's allowed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 13:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071342.n77DgKMm030003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-07 09:42:19 EDT --- Sean, would you provide the URL of your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 13:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071344.n77Di4OS001958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-07 09:44:02 EDT --- Well, would you address the issue in my comment 6? (In reply to comment #6) > Some notes: > > * License tag > - For this package license tag should be "LGPLv2+". > > * pkgconfig .pc file > - openal.pc (note: see below) contains: > --------------------------------------------------- > 3 libdir=${exec_prefix}//usr/lib > --------------------------------------------------- > (on i586), which is apparently wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 14:10:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071410.n77EALib003888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 14:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071409.n77E9lUx003510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #15 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07 10:09:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jide-oss Short Description: Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing Owners: hicham Branches: F-11 InitialCC: hicham -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 14:37:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071437.n77Eb5gk012355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-07 10:37:04 EDT --- Some notes: * Language API's - As per the package description you need to ship the Search API's with the package, as suggested before i think you should ship libsphinxclient as subpackages (lib and devel) since it is a library The other languages (PHP,Python,Ruby,Java) can be shipped within the main package * * Macros consistency - Well, if you want to use %{__mkdir} or %{__cp} style, please use %{__make}, %{__rm}, %{__sed}, etc for consistency. * Timestamps - Would you consider using --------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" install -p -D -m 0755 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/%{name} --------------------------------------------------------------- for example to keep timestamps on installed files? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 14:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071453.n77ErAcm019054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-07 10:53:09 EDT --- SPEC: as before SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mutter-moblin-0.32.3-1.fc11.src.rpm New upstream release with some various cleanups to the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 15:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071502.n77F2oH1019081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 15:06:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071506.n77F66Ff022245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Giandomenico De Tullio changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ghisha at email.it --- Comment #45 from Giandomenico De Tullio 2009-08-07 11:06:01 EDT --- %Name and %Group needs one more time... ehm tab. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 15:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071537.n77Fb9dN026825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #21 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07 11:37:07 EDT --- updated spec file Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/PgsLookAndFeel.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/PgsLookAndFeel-1.1-4.20090805cvs.fc11.src.rpm Description: The PgsLookAndFeel is a nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing. It aims be a very modern cross-platform LookAndFeel with nice features and much interaction for users. rpmlint output : none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 15:36:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071536.n77FaKal026716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #12 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-07 11:36:18 EDT --- xulrunner-devel-unstable dependency isn't needed - at least on F11, jsapi.h and mozilla-js.pc are part of the main xulrunner-devel. -devel subpackage requirement on gtk-doc doesn't seem needed. (gtk-doc is a tool for generating documentation from sources.) Suggest adding a '%check' section with 'make check' %description Gjs is a Javascript binding for GNOME. It's mainly based on Spidermonkey javascript engine and the GObject introspection framework. Suggest slight edit: Gjs allows using GNOME libraries from Javascript. It's based on the Spidermonkey Javascript engine from Mozilla and the GObject introspection framework. One missing BuildRequires noted below, otherwise looks good.(BuildRequires checked by inspection.) # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. OK: $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gjs-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i586/gjs-0.3-1.fc11.i586.rpm gjs.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgjs-dbus.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The 1 warning is ignorable. [Implements standard dbus exit-on-disconnect-from-session-bus behavior to bring down session with the session bus] # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] OK # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] OK # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. NA # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. X Needs BuildRequires: dbus-glib-devel # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] NA # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] OK # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. NA # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] OK # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] OK # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] NA # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] OK # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] OK # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] OK # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] OK # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. NA # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] OK * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [28] NA * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] Not tested * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] Not tested * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK $ gjs-console gjs> const Gtk = imports.gi.Gtk gjs> Gtk.init(None, None) gjs> w.show() gjs> Gtk.main() Looks good. * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [31] OK * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] NA * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. OK * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] NA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 15:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071549.n77FnRoT029217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 D. Marlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmarlin at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmarlin at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 15:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071554.n77FsoIQ030454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #6 from D. Marlin 2009-08-07 11:54:49 EDT --- I have a question regarding the sources for this package. The comment at the top of the spec file indicates that the sources come from git://git.gnome.org/mutter, but the URL: filed shows http://projects.gnome.org/NetworkManager. The Version: is 1.2, but the latest version of NetworkManager (at the provided URL) is 0.7. Will you please provide some clarification as the to the sources and versions needed for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071601.n77G18ql032290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-07 12:01:07 EDT --- The network-manager-netbook component uses a different versioning sheme to the main NetworkManager component. You can see the 1.2 version tag in the git repo here http://git.gnome.org/cgit/network-manager-netbook/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071606.n77G6vUF000985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:06:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071606.n77G6k14000947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 12:06:45 EDT --- - You are missing Requires: jide-oss. - Javadoc stuff has been fixed. - I'd drop the versioning since at least in this case it isn't done by upstream, as you install -D -p -m 644 jar/%{name}.jar \ %{buildroot}%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar install -D -p -m 644 jar/%{name}-jide.jar \ %{buildroot}%{_javadir}/%{name}-jide-%{version}.jar - Change %{_javadir}/* to %{_javadir}/PgsLookAndFeel-jide.jar %{_javadir}/PgsLookAndFeel.jar as it avoids the unnecessary wildcard which is troublesome e.g. when files are missing. With these notes the package is APPROVED please fix the issues before CVS import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071614.n77GExuD002829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-07 12:14:57 EDT --- OK. Updated everything except the make check (as it currently fails). Failed make check can be seen here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1589495&name=build.log I also added the examples to the -devel package as they might be useful. SPEC: as before SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gjs-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm koji build (without make check): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1589521 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071612.n77GCJBc002274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-07 12:12:18 EDT --- OK, I just received the email from Victor Castillejo confirming that GPLv2 is correct. Sorry for having been a bit nit-picking. Since everything else looks fine, I can finish the review here. So, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071624.n77GOWSi005116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-07 12:24:31 EDT --- I've updated the spec file SPEC: As above SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/network-manager-netbook-1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071626.n77GQ4N9008485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 Owen Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-07 12:26:02 EDT --- Do you have: /builddir/build/BUILD/gjs-0.3/test_user_data/logs/stderr.log ? it worked for me in a non-mock build, so probably some mock interaction. Having the make check isn't a blocker, but it would be nice to have eventually. Everything else looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071633.n77GXI9O007172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-07 12:33:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gjs Short Description: Javascript Bindings for GNOME Owners: pbrobinson otaylor walters Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071638.n77GcSNP011940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #23 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07 12:38:27 EDT --- updated the spec file Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/PgsLookAndFeel.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516249] New: Review Request: perl-TermReadKey - TermReadKey Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-TermReadKey - TermReadKey Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516249 Summary: Review Request: perl-TermReadKey - TermReadKey Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-TermReadKey/perl-TermReadKey.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-TermReadKey/perl-TermReadKey-2.30-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module, ReadKey, provides ioctl control for terminals and Win32 consoles so the input modes can be changed (thus allowing reads of a single character at a time), and also provides non-blocking reads of stdin, as well as several other terminal related features, including retrieval/modification of the screen size, and retrieval/modification of the control characters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 16:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510969] Review Request: valide - New Package IDE for vala In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071643.n77GhESj009569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510969 MERCIER Jonathan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 17:08:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071708.n77H86t6018299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 17:47:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:47:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] New: Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Curses-UI/perl-Curses-UI.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Curses-UI/perl-Curses-UI-0.9607-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: An object-oriented user interface framework for Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 18:04:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071804.n77I4kum030723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 14:04:45 EDT --- Why no F-10 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 18:03:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071803.n77I3wBa030648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 14:03:57 EDT --- yes yes, you can request the cvs branch, I've approved the package already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 18:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071813.n77IDMS3032665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 18:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071812.n77ICpW0032580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #25 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07 14:12:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: PgsLookAndFeel Short Description: Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing Owners: hicham Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hicham -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 18:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071811.n77IBJZE028558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #17 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07 14:11:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jide-oss Short Description: Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing Owners: hicham Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hicham -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 18:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071820.n77IKA57030486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #17 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-07 14:20:08 EDT --- Please try again. http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record-64-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 18:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071818.n77II1xe030008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-08-07 14:18:00 EDT --- Hi Andrew, I think this is still an unofficial review from me. I have packager status only just recently. I need to check what I can and can't do. 1) Looking at the .spec you have a cat <%{name}.httpd # %{name} ... EOF I'm fairly sure Fedora says not to do this but I really can't find a reference at moment, .... Instead include an extra source file Source1: %{name}. And in %{prep} cp -p %{SOURCE1} . 2) %post /sbin/service httpd condrestart > /dev/null 2>&1 || : %postun /sbin/service httpd condrestart > /dev/null 2>&1 || : a graceful will be enough(?) and has the advantage you won't end up with a non-running server at the end since the config will be checked. I'd be interested in policy on this situation since I'm working on another package with the same situation. 3) I would consider moving the sed lines to the %build area. The %install section should be limited to installing where ever possible. 4) Some trivial RPM errors. $ rpmlint dokuwiki.spec ../SRPMS/dokuwiki-0-0.1.20090214.b.fc11.src.rpm \ ../RPMS/noarch/dokuwiki-0-0.1.20090214.b.fc11.noarch.rpm dokuwiki.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 20, tab: line 1) dokuwiki.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 20, tab: line 1) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 18:21:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071821.n77ILuUN002131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 14:21:55 EDT --- - I suggest versioning the java BR and R as for the other packages. - Fix the .jar and .class clean operation, either find \( -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' \) -exec rm -f '{}' \; or find -name '*.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \; find -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; - This is silly (doesn't end up in the package anyway): chmod +x %{name}.sh drop it. Also use install -D -p -m 755 %{name}.sh %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} so you can drop the chmod line altogether. - Again, you are versioning the jars when upstream doesn't use versioned jars. You should drop the versioning altogether as it serves no purpose. - Don't use wildcards in %files when they're not needed, use %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar %{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar - Categories=Application is obsolete, drop it from the .desktop file. Drop GTK too. And remove the empty line at the top of the .desktop file. ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK - You could add -p to the javadoc cp section, but javadoc is anyway created from the sources. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. N/A MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK ** Fix the issues at the top of the comment and I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 18:55:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071855.n77ItJqT005047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 --- Comment #6 from Bowe Strickland 2009-08-07 14:55:17 EDT --- sed hacks commented, doc files trimmed (duped COPYING only), and obviously went too quickly when examining licenses... sorry :(. updated spec file at http://people.redhat.com/bowe/rpms/qrencode/qrencode.spec updated srpm at http://people.redhat.com/bowe/rpms/qrencode/qrencode-3.1.0-3.fc11.src.rpm thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 18:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 14:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071856.n77IuTDH009879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e --- Comment #29 from Simon Wesp 2009-08-07 14:56:26 EDT --- added Robert Scheck to CC Robert please request cvs for F-11, create the builds and the update for this package to F-11 after Pavel approved this. I'm on vacation for the next 3 weeks and maybe more! Thank you very much! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 19:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071915.n77JF0V2008842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tummy.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-07 15:14:59 EDT --- I'll take a stab at reviewing this. Look for a review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 19:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071921.n77JLHeE014368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-07 15:21:15 EDT --- Hi Steve, If you are a packager you can do a full review of packages, except those that require sponsorship. Issues raised: 1. I do not agree, i have not come across and fedora guidelines forbidding creating files from with in the spec file. Take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.desktop_file_creation which indicates you can create the file from with in the spec. Anyway i would prefer to maintain one file as opposed to maintaining multiple files. 2. Fixed. This seems to be a grey area the other packages i have seen use condrestart but i agree graceful is a better way to go. 3. I have moved them to %prep instead i think that is the most appropriate place for them. 4. Unfortunately i cannot fix this due to the sed lines, but this is not a blocker. Updated spec and srpm http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dokuwiki/dokuwiki.spec http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dokuwiki/dokuwiki-0-0.2.20090214.b.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 19:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516280] New: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI/perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This class provides a Curses::UI interface to configuration data managed by Config::Model -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 19:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516281] New: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516281 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-TkUI/perl-Config-Model-TkUI.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-TkUI/perl-Config-Model-TkUI-1.211-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This class provides a GUI for Config::Model -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 19:49:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516284] New: Review Request: mod_auth_cas - Apache 2.0/2.2 compliant module that supports the CASv1 and CASv2 protocols Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_cas - Apache 2.0/2.2 compliant module that supports the CASv1 and CASv2 protocols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516284 Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_cas - Apache 2.0/2.2 compliant module that supports the CASv1 and CASv2 protocols Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxamillion at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/mod_auth_cas.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/mod_auth_cas-1.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: mod_auth_cas is an Apache 2.0/2.2 compliant module that supports the CASv1 and CASv2 protocols -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 19:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071956.n77JusMS021389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-07 15:56:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072000.n77K0dSt022316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-07 16:00:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:01:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513869] Review Request: perl-Beanstalk-Client - Client class to talk to a beanstalkd server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072001.n77K1jGw022405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513869 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-07 16:01:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 19:59:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908071959.n77JxC8C021670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-07 15:59:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072003.n77K34UM018801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-07 16:03:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516148] Review Request: trac-tickettemplate-plugin - Allows for templates in trac tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072004.n77K46B9022803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516148 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-07 16:04:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072007.n77K75t7023623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-07 16:07:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072005.n77K57E0023241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-07 16:05:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516287] New: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-Itself - Model editor for Config::Model Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-Itself - Model editor for Config::Model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516287 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-Itself - Model editor for Config::Model Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-Itself/perl-Config-Model-Itself.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-Itself/perl-Config-Model-Itself-1.211-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072006.n77K646l019691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-07 16:06:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072008.n77K8mX1024153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 --- Comment #4 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07 16:08:47 EDT --- updated spec : Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/MiniCopier.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/MiniCopier-0.4-3.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint output : none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072019.n77KJs28026251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-07 16:19:53 EDT --- OK, looks clean. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072029.n77KTtX5024142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 16:29:55 EDT --- potrace-1.8-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/potrace-1.8-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072030.n77KUDVu029288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 16:30:12 EDT --- potrace-1.8-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/potrace-1.8-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:29:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072029.n77KTeTS028781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 16:29:39 EDT --- potrace-1.8-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/potrace-1.8-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516293] New: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh - OpenSsh configuration files editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh - OpenSsh configuration files editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516293 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh - OpenSsh configuration files editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh/perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh/perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh-1.207-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module provides a configuration model for OpenSsh. Then Config::Model provides a graphical editor program for /etc/ssh/sshd_config and /etc/ssh/ssh_config. See config-edit-sshd and config-edit-ssh for more help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:38:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072038.n77Kc0da030742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 --- Comment #6 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-07 16:37:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: MiniCopier Short Description: Graphical copy manager Owners: hicham Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hicham -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514602] Review Request: system-config-audit - an utility for editing audit configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072037.n77Kb4DN030637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514602 Steve Grubb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jochen at herr-schmi | |tt.de) --- Comment #6 from Steve Grubb 2009-08-07 16:37:02 EDT --- What's the status on this bug? This is blocking release of audit-2.0. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:38:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072038.n77KcLnX026389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072041.n77KfGl7031567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #17 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-07 16:41:15 EDT --- Peter: looks like Kevin misread the owners in the review request; just ask for approveacls in pkgdb and I'll approve it. (I don't mind co-maintaining the package.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 20:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072053.n77KrjYD001215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 16:53:44 EDT --- perl-Math-Calc-Units-1.06-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-Calc-Units-1.06-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 23:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072335.n77NZKEW029340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #27 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-07 19:35:16 EDT --- OK, here's a new package. This one's actually review-ready: it has a changelog and passes rpmlint. I also cleaned up a few other bits and took out some commented-out stuff. This should be ready for review. If someone could do it, that'd be great. Thanks! http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit-0.1.1-0.1.2431.aw_fc12.src.rpm http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit.spec -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 23:40:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:40:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072340.n77NeDKL025497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-07 19:40:12 EDT --- Fixed: (In reply to comment #6) > Some notes: > > * License tag > - For this package license tag should be "LGPLv2+". > > * pkgconfig .pc file > - openal.pc (note: see below) contains: > --------------------------------------------------- > 3 libdir=${exec_prefix}//usr/lib > --------------------------------------------------- > (on i586), which is apparently wrong. http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft.spec http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft-1.8.466-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 23:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072357.n77NvJwU028678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 --- Comment #3 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-08-07 19:57:18 EDT --- Updated the URLs because the PragmAda site moved: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/PragmARC.spec http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/PragmARC-20060427-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 7 23:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509160] Review Request: =?utf-8?b?IG1pbmVfZGV0ZWN0b3Ig4oCT?= =?utf-8?q?_a_mine-finding_game?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908072358.n77Nw0eE028750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 --- Comment #4 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-08-07 19:57:59 EDT --- Updated to version 6.0, and updated the URLs because the PragmAda site moved: http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/mine_detector.spec http://www.rombobj?rn.se/packages/mine_detector-6.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 00:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 20:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516312] New: Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on chipsets Eagle IV chipset Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on chipsets Eagle IV chipset https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Summary: Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on chipsets Eagle IV chipset Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hicham.haouari at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm-firmware4.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm-firmware4-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on chipsets Eagle IV chipset rpmlint output : none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 00:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 20:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516311] New: Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516311 Summary: Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hicham.haouari at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm-firmware123.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/ueagle-atm-firmware123-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets rpmlint output : ueagle-atm-firmware123.noarch: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 00:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 20:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware4 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle IV chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080031.n780VDHe002305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ueagle-atm-firmware4 - |ueagle-atm-firmware4 - |Firmwares for usb adsl |Firmwares for usb adsl |modems based on chipsets |modems based on Eagle IV |Eagle IV chipset |chipset -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 00:37:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 20:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080037.n780b5HF007690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 20:37:04 EDT --- jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 00:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 20:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080038.n780ccxT007936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-07 20:38:37 EDT --- jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 05:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 01:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080535.n785Z83a017229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 01:35:05 EDT --- php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 06:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 02:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080621.n786LmAO024034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 02:21:47 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-1.fc10.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-1.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 06:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 02:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080621.n786LhM1023987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 02:21:41 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-1.fc11.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-1.fc11.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 08:46:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 04:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080846.n788klRO018272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kalev at smartlink.ee -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 08:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 04:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516327] New: Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features Alias: perl-latest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 Summary: Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/latest/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-latest.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-latest-0.03-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Shake out any obscure problems that might result from your code being used by a program that requires the latest Perl version. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1590844 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 09:14:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 05:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080914.n789EmGP018622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-08-08 05:14:47 EDT --- Thx for the review. As I was busy, I plan to update on Monday, please ping if not done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 09:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 05:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226281] Merge Review: perl-TermReadKey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080916.n789GIoq023034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226281 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david.hannequin at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-08 05:16:16 EDT --- *** Bug 516249 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 09:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 05:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516249] Review Request: perl-TermReadKey - TermReadKey Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080916.n789GIOY023009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516249 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review- --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-08 05:16:16 EDT --- perl-TermReadKey is already in fedora (and has been for quite a while). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 226281 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 09:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 05:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080923.n789NqxP024113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 09:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 05:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080928.n789SSZc020933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalev at smartlink.ee Bug 502388 depends on bug 502387, which changed state. Bug 502387 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-08 05:28:27 EDT --- Now that mingw32-hunspell is in Fedora, we can go on with this review. Can you update mingw32-enchant to 1.5.0 before we go on? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 09:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 05:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080934.n789YKOW021740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-08 05:34:19 EDT --- Package fails to build in mock. You need to add BuildRequires for (at least) Test::Simple, Test::More, and Test::Pod. Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1590880 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 09:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 05:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908080957.n789vB8W025536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-08 05:57:09 EDT --- + source files match upstream. ea1cf6bdbcc0ee400592a44b138dba6404bc6b45 Config-Model-0.638.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. - license field matches the actual license. should be LGPLv2+ + license is open source-compatible. + license text included. + latest version is being packaged. - BuildRequires are proper. missing perl(Test::Pod) + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1590883 + package installs properly. - rpmlint has complaints: perl-Config-Model.noarch: I: checking perl-Config-Model.noarch: W: invalid-license LGPL perl-Config-Model.src: I: checking perl-Config-Model.src: W: invalid-license LGPL 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Config::Model) = 0.638 perl(Config::Model::AnyId) = 914 perl(Config::Model::AnyThing) = 845 perl(Config::Model::AutoRead) = 978 perl(Config::Model::CheckList) = 978 perl(Config::Model::Describe) = 669 perl(Config::Model::DumpAsData) = 978 perl(Config::Model::Dumper) = 906 perl(Config::Model::Exception) = 790 perl(Config::Model::Exception::Any) perl(Config::Model::Exception::Load) perl(Config::Model::Exception::LoadData) perl(Config::Model::Exception::Model) perl(Config::Model::Exception::ObsoleteElement) perl(Config::Model::Exception::RestrictedElement) perl(Config::Model::Exception::UnavailableElement) perl(Config::Model::Exception::UnknownElement) perl(Config::Model::Exception::UnknownId) perl(Config::Model::Exception::WrongType) perl(Config::Model::Exception::Xml) perl(Config::Model::HashId) = 905 perl(Config::Model::IdElementReference) = 775 perl(Config::Model::Instance) = 968 perl(Config::Model::ListId) = 861 perl(Config::Model::Loader) = 717 perl(Config::Model::Node) = 935 perl(Config::Model::ObjTreeScanner) = 715 perl(Config::Model::Report) = 641 perl(Config::Model::Searcher) = 905 perl(Config::Model::SimpleUI) = 541 perl(Config::Model::TermUI) = 669 perl(Config::Model::Value) = 978 perl(Config::Model::ValueComputer) = 905 perl(Config::Model::WarpedNode) = 993 perl(Config::Model::WarpedThing) = 729 perl(Config::Model::WizardHelper) = 790 perl-Config-Model = 0.638-2.fc12 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Carp::Assert::More) perl(Carp::Assert::More) perl(Config::Model) perl(Config::Model::Describe) perl(Config::Model::DumpAsData) perl(Config::Model::Dumper) perl(Config::Model::Exception) perl(Config::Model::IdElementReference) perl(Config::Model::Instance) perl(Config::Model::Loader) perl(Config::Model::Node) perl(Config::Model::ObjTreeScanner) perl(Config::Model::Report) perl(Config::Model::Searcher) perl(Config::Model::ValueComputer) perl(Config::Model::WizardHelper) perl(Config::Tiny) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exception::Class) perl(Exception::Class) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Path) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::File) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Log::Log4perl) >= 1.11 perl(Parse::RecDescent) perl(Parse::RecDescent) >= 1.90.0 perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Storable) perl(Term::ReadLine) perl(Text::Wrap) perl(UNIVERSAL) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) perl(warnings::register) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 - %check is present and all tests pass. t/pod.t ................... skipped: Test::Pod 1.00 required for testing POD [snip] All tests successful. Files=33, Tests=989, 9 wallclock secs ( 0.17 usr 0.08 sys + 7.98 cusr 0.78 csys = 9.01 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. Looking pretty good - just a missing BR: perl(Test::Pod), and the license tag needs to be changed. You could also remove a couple of the explicit Requires, but it's not strictly necessary to do so: perl(Carp::Assert::More) perl(Exception::Class) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 10:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 06:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081054.n78AsEDf006123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #10 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-08 06:54:13 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/mojomojo.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/mojomojo-0.999032-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1590934 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:13:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081113.n78BDDXh005481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mmapper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:12:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] New: Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Summary: Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kalev at smartlink.ee QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/mmapper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/mmapper-2.0.4-1.final2.fc12.src.rpm Description: MMapper is a graphical mapper for a MUD named MUME (Multi-Users in Middle Earth). The game is traditionally played in a text-only mode, but MMapper tries to represent the virtual world in user-friendly graphical environment. It acts as a proxy between a telnet client and a MUD server, being able to analyze game data in real time and show player's position in a map. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:13:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-LeakGuard-Object/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 516327 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object-0.06-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module provides tracking of objects, for the purpose of detecting memory leaks due to circular references or innappropriate caching schemes. Additional Comment: build requires perl-latest (review at bug #516327) *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:19:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081119.n78BJnW6006515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-08 07:19:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fupt/fupt.spec > SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fupt/fupt-20090808-1.fc12.src.rpm > Description: It is often useful to be able to easily paste text to the Fedora > Pastebin at http://fpaste.org and this simple script will do that > and return the resulting URL so that people may examine the > output. This can hopefully help folks who are for some reason > stuck without X, working remotely, or any other reason they may > be unable to paste something into the pastebin More info on the mock build can be found here: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fupt/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:17:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] New: Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Summary: Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fupt/fupt.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fupt/fupt-20090808-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: It is often useful to be able to easily paste text to the Fedora Pastebin at http://fpaste.org and this simple script will do that and return the resulting URL so that people may examine the output. This can hopefully help folks who are for some reason stuck without X, working remotely, or any other reason they may be unable to paste something into the pastebin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516195] Review Request: hunspell-mos - Mossi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081127.n78BRSZs011713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516195 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516281] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081130.n78BU7Eu012310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516281 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515079 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081130.n78BU6GG012282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515079 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516293] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh - OpenSsh configuration files editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081130.n78BU9OL012379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516293 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515079 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516287] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-Itself - Model editor for Config::Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081130.n78BU8K9012350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516287 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |515079 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081130.n78BU5xX012254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516280, 516281, 516287, | |516293 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081135.n78BZCtK009290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #17 from Filipe AZEVEDO 2009-08-08 07:35:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > SHOULD: fix the monkeystudio.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang type errors from > rpmlint. This seems to be due to spurious permissions of said files, ie, them > being executable. > > SHOULD: consider using some/more qt4-related rpm macros, see > /etc/rpm/macros.qt4 for details. In particular, %{_qt4_qmake} or > %{_qt4_bindir} make be useful > > MUST: drop qmake hack (on x86_64). The hack makes the build not use the > recommended compiler flags, see also: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags > Then, investigation can continue on finding the proper cause for missing > symbols in monkeystudio plugins. > > Looking closer, the only differences I see are with the hack, stuff is build > pretty much only with > -O2 > and without the hack, > -m64 -pipe -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic > and linked additionally with: > -m64 I built the sources adding the compiler flags u given without the hack using 64bits ubuntu/kubuntu jaunty, the application build and start fine ! It seem the problem does not come from mks sources :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] New: Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 Summary: Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pcc.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pcc-0.9.9-0.1.090808cvs.fc11.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/ Description: The compiler is based on the original Portable C Compiler by Stephen C. Johnson, written in the late 70's. Even though much of the compiler has been rewritten, some of the basics still remain. PCC debuted in Unix Version 7 and replaced the DMR compiler (Dennis Ritchie's original C compiler) in both System V and the BSD 4.x releases. Some history about pcc is in the A History of UNIX before Berkeley: UNIX Evolution: 1975-1984 and in the Evolution of C. About 50% of the frontend code and 80% of the backend code has been rewritten. Most stuff is written by Anders Magnusson, with the exception of the data-flow analysis part and the SSA conversion code which is written by Peter A Jonsson, and the Mips port that were written as part of a project by undergraduate students at Lule? University of Technology (LTU). rpmlint output: pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/lib/libpcc.a pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/libpcc_stddef.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/lib/libpccsoftfloat.a pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/libpcc_float.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/stddef.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/stdarg.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/float.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/libpcc_stdarg.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/stdbool.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/libpcc_stdbool.h 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. These are all OK since this is a compiler package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:47:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081147.n78BlMhe015256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-08 07:47:20 EDT --- Built and on its way to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 11:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081151.n78BpthD012403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-08 07:51:52 EDT --- Looks OK in pkgdb to me. BTW built and on its way to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 12:09:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 08:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515351] Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081209.n78C9BPm018988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515351 Ville-Pekka Vainio changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi --- Comment #1 from Ville-Pekka Vainio 2009-08-08 08:09:10 EDT --- I'll take this but it might be a while until a manage to do a review, hopefully this weekend, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 12:34:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 08:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514699] Review Request: jemmy - Java UI testing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081234.n78CYtl6023282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514699 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2009-08-08 08:34:53 EDT --- Successful Koji build against the devel branch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1591396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 13:00:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 09:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515351] Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081300.n78D0Gq5023416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515351 Ville-Pekka Vainio changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 13:06:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 09:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] New: Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 Summary: Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musuruan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/metadata-extractor.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Java based metadata extraction library for JPEG images with support for Exif and Iptc metadata segments, including manufacturer specific metadata of several digital camera models. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 13:08:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 09:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081308.n78D8cON028730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508351 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 13:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 09:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081308.n78D8bR9028706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516343 --- Comment #8 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-08 09:08:34 EDT --- I also packaged metadata-extractor: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 13:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 09:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081333.n78DXL9e000393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #5 from David Hannequin 2009-08-08 09:33:20 EDT --- Hi, New spec file and SRPM : Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model/perl-Config-Model.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model/perl-Config-Model-0.638-2.fc10.src.rpm I contact upstream to clarify license LGPL or GPL+ or Artistic. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 14:17:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081417.n78EHurM007667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-08 10:17:55 EDT --- I didn't mean to suggest that the license needs to be clarified - it's quite clearly LGPL 2.1 or later. Just that LGPL isn't acceptable as a license tag (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL) - it needs to be LGPLv2+ (and yes, it's 2+, not 2.1+) With that one change, I'll approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 14:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081415.n78EFCwX007277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from D Haley 2009-08-08 10:15:11 EDT --- Super fast Spec-only comments. I promise to look at this more closely in the next 24 hrs: *Why are the unit tests disabled? *Please consider including %{name}.jar symlinks to %{name}-%{version}.jar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 14:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081434.n78EY8rK010283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #30 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-08 10:34:04 EDT --- Ok, I'm recheck scriptlets, Simon Wesp, Christoph Wickert you are right. Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 14:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 10:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081435.n78EZcqd010804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-08 10:35:35 EDT --- REVIEW for 572380a735a4eba9019b9e5109c4e808 gbirthday-0.4.1-4.fc11.src.rpm FIX - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The SRPM is clean, but the binary not: $ rpmlint fedora/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/gbirthday-0.4.1-4.fc11.x86_64.rpm gbirthday.x86_64: E: no-binary gbirthday.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/gbirthday 0775 gbirthday.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/gbirthday/pics 0775 gbirthday.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/gbirthday 0775 gbirthday.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/gbirthday.desktop gbirthday.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/gbirthday/languages 0775 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings. - First warning is because the package should be noarch. Add "BuildArch: noarch". This will also fix the empty debuginfo package - "non-standard-dir-perm" warnings are because the icons should be 755 instead of 775. Can be fixed in the Makefile - same for "non-standard-executable-perm" - "non-conffile-in-etc": gbirthday.desktop should be marked config since it is in /etc. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Configuration_files OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. FIX - MUST: The package does not meet the Packaging Guidelines for several reasons outlined in this review. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license: OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. FIX - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible, but please add a blank line between each changelog entry FIX - MUST: The sources used to build the package don't match the upstream source by MD5 Package: cc6547cc498feaa52803e3c5a68d051e Source0 URL: d2a028ab886d05702152386e6e2978c7 Have you patched the source before? If you are making changes as a package maintainer, use the original source and patches. Changes must be visible. If you make changes as the upstream developer, make a new release of the package. OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures (noarch) package OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Todo: - fix rpmlint errors as explained above - We need to make sure gbirthday only starts in a session where there is actually a system tray present, GNOME etc. You could use desktop-file-install \ --add-category="TrayIcon" \ --add-only-show-in="GNOME;KDE;XFCE;" \ --dir=%{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/xdg/autostart/ \ %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop Things that should be fixed upstream: - Please add a license block to the gbirthday.py in the next release. - Add some docs: AUTHORS ChangeLog, ... - The desktop files contain hardcoded paths for the icons. How about installing the icons under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/..., then you don't need to care about they are in GTK's icon search path. You shouldn't use an suffix like png or svg ether, GTK will take care of choosing the best one depending on the size. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files - The paths in the Makefile are all hardcoded. - Use install rather than cp in the Makefile. - BTW: "Geburtstags-Reminder" - nice Denglish. ;) As you see there is a whole lot of things that are worth a new release, e.g. the permissions set in the Makefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 15:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513869] Review Request: perl-Beanstalk-Client - Client class to talk to a beanstalkd server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081518.n78FIbvu013394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513869 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 11:18:36 EDT --- perl-Beanstalk-Client-1.05-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Beanstalk-Client-1.05-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 15:24:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081524.n78FOE2i014360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-08-08 11:24:13 EDT --- Here you go: Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-enchant.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-enchant-1.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1591579 * Sat Aug 8 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 1.5.0-1 - Update to version 1.5.0 - Drop upstreamed patch - Don't use 'make %%{?_smp_mflags}' as this causes a compile failure in Koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 15:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515351] Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081536.n78FaXXW016480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515351 --- Comment #2 from Ville-Pekka Vainio 2009-08-08 11:36:32 EDT --- As this is only my second review, I have listed the relevant must and should items below with some comments. MUST items: MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Rpmlint output: vdr-epgsearch.i586: W: non-standard-uid /etc/vdr/plugins/epgsearch/conf.d vdr vdr-epgsearch.i586: W: non-standard-uid /etc/vdr/plugins/epgsearch vdr vdr-epgsearch.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/vdr/data/epgsearch vdr vdr-epgsearch.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: %{name}-0.9.25.beta14-fedora.patch That's ok, rpmlint doesn't see Patch0 being installed, not a problem. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines: OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption: OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines: I've tried to check all of these to the best of my knowledge and it should be OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+, OK. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license: OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc: COPYING has GPLv2, OK. MUST: The spec file must be written in American English: I presume this is OK, my knowledge of the differences between American and British English is limited. MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible: OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL: OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture: OK, checked with mock. MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines: OK, checked with mock. MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro: OK MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun: doesn't apply to VDR plugins. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory: seems to be OK. MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings: seems to be OK. MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line: OK. MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): OK. MUST: Each package must consistently use macros: OK. MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content: OK. MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present: Not tested but I don't see why not, so OK. MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time: Seems to be OK. MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): OK. MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8: OK. SHOULD items: SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock: OK. SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures: Couldn't test. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example: I can't test this item currently, it'll have to wait for a while. I consider this a review blocker, although one which is up to me and not the packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 15:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081551.n78FpVTD018811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-08 11:51:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Super fast Spec-only comments. I promise to look at this more closely in the > next 24 hrs: > > *Why are the unit tests disabled? Because if I enable it I get the following: [...] test: BUILD FAILED /home/andrea/devel/prg/metadata-extractor/build.xml:48: Problem: failed to create task or type junit Cause: the class org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask was not found. This looks like one of Ant's optional components. Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in -/usr/share/ant/lib -/home/andrea/.ant/lib -a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument Do not panic, this is a common problem. The commonest cause is a missing JAR. This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem BTW, this is what Debian does too. I'm not a Java boy and I do not know how to work this out. > *Please consider including %{name}.jar symlinks to %{name}-%{version}.jar I'm inexperienced, can you please tell me what are the pro's of doing this? Is this something mandatory? Or is this something suggested but strongly advised? I haven't seen anything about this in the guidelines. Thanks for your comments! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 15:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 11:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081559.n78Fx4a7019913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-08 11:59:03 EDT --- REVIEW FOR 2aecdc6fffa19a097537cca3b8a775e7 bickley-0.4.3-3.fc11.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/bickley-* bickley.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/bkl-orbiter.schemas bickley-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. (gconf schemas are no config files as they are not expected to be edited) OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: LGPLv2.1 ??? - MUST: License field in spec does not match the actual license: GPLv2 vs. LGPLv2 OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 0154c4813294c4fe76690795c7efd8ac OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on all primary arches OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang OK - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK - MUST: not relocatable OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application OK - MUST: Header files are in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package OK - MUST: - devel package 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK - MUST: library files that end in .so (without suffix) are in -devel package. OK - MUST: -devel package requires base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: No GUI app, no desktop file. OK - MUST: packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. FIX - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files are in -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version packaged OK - proper debuginfo package OK - compiler flags honored OK - timstamps preserved during install Issues: - Missing Requirements: Requrires: dbus (only dbus-libs will be pulled in but not) Requires(pre): GConf2 Requires(post): GConf2 Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(preun): GConf2 see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf - devel package Requires: gtk-doc, but I see no gtk doc files - %configure with -disable-schemas to avoid this build related error: /bin/sh: --makefile-install-rule: command not found Warning: No permission to install schema files, install manually add - %configure with --disable-rpath instead of the seed hack (tested and works) - License is unclear. Spec: GPLv2+, COPYING is GPLv2 but the headers of the sources are LGPLv2. This looks like a mistake to me. Please ask upstream for clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081604.n78G4blM020740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-08 12:04:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > libdir should be libdir64 ... should be lib64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456892] Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081604.n78G4Dhp020684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456892 --- Comment #16 from Paul G?ssinger 2009-08-08 12:04:10 EDT --- Since there is no development on aget anymore we can keep it closed. Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:03:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081603.n78G3tTU025004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-08 12:03:54 EDT --- There is an issue with bickley-0.4.pc on 64 bit: prefix=/usr exec_prefix=${prefix} libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib includedir=${prefix}/include libdir should be libdir64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:06:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081606.n78G6oOf021335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-08 12:06:47 EDT --- Ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081615.n78GF5Xb026961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |christoph.wickert at googlemai | |l.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081630.n78GU7aJ029224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 --- Comment #10 from Eric Sandeen 2009-08-08 12:30:03 EDT --- Andreas, ping? I think we're close to having this done. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081631.n78GVCGo029418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-08 12:31:09 EDT --- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (openal-soft) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- This package should be imported only for F-12 because this package obsoletes openal and there is soname bump (libopenal.so.0 -> libopenal.so.1) Also when importing into F-12, please announce it on fedora-devel-list because packages depending on libopenal.so need rebuilding. Possibly affected packages can be searched by # repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires libopenal.so.0 | sort -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081636.n78GahvZ030263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 12:36:42 EDT --- mausezahn-0.34.9-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mausezahn-0.34.9-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:36:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081636.n78GacCI030224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 12:36:34 EDT --- mausezahn-0.34.9-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mausezahn-0.34.9-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081652.n78Gqn4X000377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #8 from Dean Glazeski 2009-08-08 12:52:47 EDT --- I have now updated the spec file and source RPM to reflect a new version of OpenOCD that was released recently. Koji builds are showing clean for Fedora 10 and 11. http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd/openocd-0.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd/openocd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 16:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081658.n78Gwaql001335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-08 12:58:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Super fast Spec-only comments. I promise to look at this more closely in the > > next 24 hrs: > > > > *Why are the unit tests disabled? > > Because if I enable it I get the following: > > [...] > test: > > BUILD FAILED > /home/andrea/devel/prg/metadata-extractor/build.xml:48: Problem: > failed to create task or type junit > Cause: the class > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask was not found. > This looks like one of Ant's optional components. > Action: Check that the appropriate optional JAR exists in > -/usr/share/ant/lib > -/home/andrea/.ant/lib > -a directory added on the command line with the -lib argument > > Do not panic, this is a common problem. > The commonest cause is a missing JAR. > > This is not a bug; it is a configuration problem > > > BTW, this is what Debian does too. I'm not a Java boy and I do not know how to > work this out. > Did you try to BuildRequire: ant-junit ? It seems you lack the jar providing junit functions to ant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 18:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 14:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081837.n78Ibi7j015689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |501177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 18:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 14:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081837.n78Ibk7S015733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-08 14:37:45 EDT --- You can drop the buildroot. There is no need to define it anymore https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Also cleaning it up in %install is unnecessary as well. See the next section. Can you also request upstream to consider using fedorahosted.org? The output "Please tell us this resulting URL (may take a second)" seems pretty ambiguous. If this is intended for a non technical audience, tell whom? What is URL" If the upstream author needs help in better wording, fedora-docs list can be useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 18:41:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 14:41:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081841.n78IfhPr016413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-08 14:41:43 EDT --- Pong. The mime data (including the magic bits) should really be in chemical-mime-data, I really wouldn't include them in this package as the software by itself will anyway work fine, the mime stuff might be needed by other packages as well and they might conflict with other packages. If that is OK with you, that is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] New: Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 Summary: Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/xrdp/xrdp.spec SRPM URL: http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/xrdp/xrdp-0.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The goal of this project is to provide a fully functional Linux terminal server, capable of accepting connections from rdesktop and Microsoft's own terminal server / remote desktop clients. koji scratch build dist-f12 --> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1591824 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081906.n78J6F2q015599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-08 15:06:15 EDT --- this is the current xrdp-cvs version, I want to include it in fedora when the next version released -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081921.n78JLvRM022514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:21:56 EDT --- pondus-0.5.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081922.n78JMugJ022672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.8-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:23:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081923.n78JN5Nx018224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:23:02 EDT --- xylib-0.4-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081922.n78JM1cu017969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.3-3.el5 |0.5.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081922.n78JMpAd018174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:22:48 EDT --- python-repoze-what-1.0.8-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081924.n78JOuEx018596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:24:53 EDT --- nurbs++-3.0.11-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081923.n78JNAnE018273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4-4.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:24:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081924.n78JOMTX018507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:24:22 EDT --- jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jide-oss'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8376 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081924.n78JOH1c018470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:24:16 EDT --- potrace-1.8-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update potrace'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8377 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081923.n78JNRU8018328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:23:26 EDT --- jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jide-oss'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8370 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511196] Review Request: ibus-table-array30 - Array30 Chinese input method for ibus-table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081922.n78JMC03018030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511196 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:22:10 EDT --- ibus-table-array30-1.2.0.20090729-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ibus-table-array30'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8367 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081923.n78JNxRn018414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:23:58 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-1.fc11.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8375 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514101] Review Request: KMess - KDE Messaging client for MSN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081927.n78JRqrx024298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514101 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:27:50 EDT --- kmess-2.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:26:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081926.n78JQUsK024019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:26:29 EDT --- pondus-0.5.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081928.n78JS61O024378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:28:02 EDT --- cim-schema-2.22.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511078] Review Request: gdpc - A program for visualising molecular dynamics simulations data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081924.n78JO4A0022946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511078 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:24:03 EDT --- gdpc-2.2.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510808] Review Request: pondus - A personal weight management program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081926.n78JQY0I024050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510808 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.3-2.fc11 |0.5.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081925.n78JP0Mp023163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.11-6.fc10.1 |3.0.11-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081926.n78JQILt023983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-6.356bzr.el5 |0-6.356bzr.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514101] Review Request: KMess - KDE Messaging client for MSN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081927.n78JRuE3024331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514101 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:24:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:24:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511078] Review Request: gdpc - A program for visualising molecular dynamics simulations data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081924.n78JO8VU022985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511078 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2.5-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:29:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511078] Review Request: gdpc - A program for visualising molecular dynamics simulations data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081929.n78JTTe5020220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511078 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:29:28 EDT --- gdpc-2.2.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511078] Review Request: gdpc - A program for visualising molecular dynamics simulations data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081929.n78JTXgD020250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511078 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.2.5-1.fc11 |2.2.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081928.n78JSBhg019925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.22.0-1.el5 |2.22.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081926.n78JQDAG019555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:26:11 EDT --- unetbootin-0-6.356bzr.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081927.n78JRSpO019812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:27:27 EDT --- potrace-1.8-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update potrace'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:26:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081926.n78JQqvR019664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:26:51 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-1.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8381 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081927.n78JRAdU019764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-08 15:27:09 EDT --- Very nice spec. ;) I haven't done much in the way of java reviews, but this seems to match all the guidelines pretty nicely. There is one license question I ran into (see below). OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See Below - License See Below- License field in spec matches See Below- License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 0b23286374edc1e0a9ed7dd592b0fed3 cobertura-1.9-src.tar.gz 0b23286374edc1e0a9ed7dd592b0fed3 cobertura-1.9-src.tar.gz.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. Looking at the files here, it looks like the License should be: ASL 1.1 and GPLv2+ The ant parts seem to be under the ASL1.1, and the rest is GPLv2 or later. Unless there is something I am missing there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081931.n78JVD5C025718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:31:12 EDT --- xylib-0.4-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081932.n78JWW2q026124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.8-2.fc11 |1.0.8-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081932.n78JW3IX025901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:32:02 EDT --- perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-0.09-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081932.n78JWRdg026090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:32:26 EDT --- python-repoze-what-1.0.8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081931.n78JVmFq025840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.1-1.el5 |1.0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081931.n78JVIxe025752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-4.fc10 |0.4-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081932.n78JWJbp025979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.1-1.fc10 |1.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081933.n78JX5rq026228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-6.356bzr.fc11 |0-6.356bzr.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081932.n78JW8dE025942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.09-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081930.n78JU5gN025383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:30:04 EDT --- perl-Math-Calc-Units-1.06-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Math-Calc-Units'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8395 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514101] Review Request: KMess - KDE Messaging client for MSN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081930.n78JUrqR020987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514101 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:30:52 EDT --- kmess-2.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514101] Review Request: KMess - KDE Messaging client for MSN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081931.n78JV1fe021020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514101 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0-2.fc11 |2.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:32:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081932.n78JWEUh021345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:32:14 EDT --- qrupdate-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510700] Review Request: unetbootin - Create bootable Live USB drives for a variety of Linux distributions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081933.n78JX0IL021465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510700 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:32:59 EDT --- unetbootin-0-6.356bzr.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 19:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510839] Review Request: qrupdate - A Fortran library for fast updates of QR and Cholesky decompositions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908081931.n78JVhEs021276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510839 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 15:31:41 EDT --- qrupdate-1.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 21:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 17:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908082151.n78LpZGQ015982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kalev at smartlink.ee Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-08 17:51:34 EDT --- Taking for review. Approved packaging guidelines for MinGW: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw32-enchant-1.5.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm mingw32-enchant.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/enchant/libenchant_myspell.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-enchant-static-1.5.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm mingw32-enchant-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libenchant.a mingw32-enchant-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-enchant-1.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm mingw32-enchant.src: W: strange-permission compile-resources 0775 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-enchant.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 22:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 18:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908082201.n78M1xu3013193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-08 18:01:58 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-enchant-1.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 2009-08-09 + OK ! needs attention ! rpmlint output: mingw32-enchant.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/enchant/libenchant_myspell.a => This is a static lib which needs to be placed in a -static subpackage or removed. mingw32-enchant-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libenchant.a mingw32-enchant-static.noarch: W: no-documentation => Those errors / warnings are harmless and can be ignored for a mingw32 package. mingw32-enchant.src: W: strange-permission compile-resources 0775 => Should probably be 0755. + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name ! Package does not follow the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines The %files section must list DLLs separately, which also includes the DLLs in %{_mingw32_libdir}/enchant/ + The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package + The package contains the license file (COPYING.LIB) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 7dfaed14e142b4a0004b770c9568ed02 enchant-1.5.0.tar.gz 7dfaed14e142b4a0004b770c9568ed02 SRPM/enchant-1.5.0.tar.gz + Package builds in mock (Fedora Rawhide i386) n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed ! BuildRequires: automake is probably not needed and can be removed Besides that, BuildRequires look sane. n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr ! %clean contains rm -r $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, but according to packaging guidelines it should be "rm -rf" + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package ! Static libraries should be in -static %{_mingw32_libdir}/enchant/libenchant_myspell.a needs to be placed either in a -static subpackage or removed. ! Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 ! As per MinGW packaging guidelines, the mingw32- package should track native Fedora package as close as possible and include all the same patches. Consider including three additional patches that the native package has: #http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12160 Patch0: enchant-1.5.0-abi12160.searchdirs.patch #http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12173 Patch1: enchant-1.5.0-abi12173.leaks.patch #http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12174 Patch2: enchant-1.5.0-abi12174.fixbadmatch.patch ! A comment in the spec says that there's a file named "compile-resource" missing from the tarball. Have you filed an upstream bug report for the missing file? ! All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 22:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 18:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908082211.n78MBPYw019071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-08 18:11:23 EDT --- polkit-qt-0.9.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/polkit-qt-0.9.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 22:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 18:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908082215.n78MFJmB019730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-08 18:15:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openal-soft Short Description: OpenAL Soft is a cross-platform software implementation of the OpenAL 3D audio API. Owners: linuxdonald Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 22:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 18:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908082232.n78MWk5v022515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-08 18:32:43 EDT --- OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/dalston-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: LGPLv2 and GPLv2+ FIX - MUST: License field in spec file doesnt match the actual license LGPLv2 and GPLv2 OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 a0ec0af90200c7d11c418514eeba1cb1 OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 OK - MUST: No ExcludeArch OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang OK - MUST: not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code OK - MUST: No large documentation files OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. FIX - SHOULD: Scriptlets not sane: you are updating icon cache although there are no icons N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: no dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Other issues: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete Issues: - License field - drop redundant glib2-devel BR - drop Requires(post): /bin/touch - %description does not end with dot. - %description should be more detailed, mention power and volume - add INSTALL='install p' to make install - rm the autostart file instead of %exclude - no libtool archives, so nothing to remove - README missing from %doc - configure is run twice, your hack doesn't work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 22:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 18:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908082241.n78MfDLp023876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |christoph.wickert at googlemai | |l.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |christoph.wickert at googlemai | |l.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 22:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 18:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908082252.n78MqQGC020257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |christoph.wickert at googlemai | |l.com --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-08 18:52:24 EDT --- Minor: %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/%{name} should be marked %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 23:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 19:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908082327.n78NRboB030527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-08-08 19:27:35 EDT --- Thanks for the review! Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-enchant.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-enchant-1.5.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1592303 * Sun Aug 9 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 1.5.0-2 - Dropped BR: autoconf libtool - Added BR: m4 - Use 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILDROOT' in the %%clean phase - Fixed a 'strange-permission' rpmlint warning - Moved the file %%{_mingw32_libdir}/enchant/libenchant_myspell.a to the -static subpackage - Use a more verbose %%files list - Added a Requires: pkgconfig to the main package - Added patches from the native enchant package - Dropped another patch which isn't necessary anymore All the patches which are applied in this package are already upstreamed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 8 23:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 19:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908082330.n78NU9rq031056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 --- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-08-08 19:30:08 EDT --- Forgot to mention this: the missing file is also already known and solved upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 00:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 20:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090031.n790VFmI007439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 davids at webmaster.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |davids at webmaster.com --- Comment #7 from davids at webmaster.com 2009-08-08 20:31:12 EDT --- I am the author of the PPS-SHM interface code. Portions are taken from the NTP code and are still covered by the NTP copyright/license. Everything not taken from the NTP code was authored by me. I placed that code into the public domain and disclaimed copyright via public statements at the time. (I believe they went to comp.protocols.ntp, but I can't recall for certain.) I disclaim copyright on the PPS-SHM code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 00:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 20:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090055.n790tUQG010734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-08 20:55:30 EDT --- OK, drop the mime stuff. What about the rest? - does readdmol.awk really need exec perms? - package docs and examples in a noarch -doc package? - desktop file lacks categories. I suggest Education;Science;Chemistry;Physics - remove extension from Icon key in desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 01:28:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 21:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090128.n791SJtj015179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #8 from Chris Adams 2009-08-08 21:28:17 EDT --- I have updated the spec with the updated description, and I believe the licensing bits are cleared up now. Spec URL: http://cmadams.fedorapeople.org/shmpps/shmpps.spec SRPM URL: http://cmadams.fedorapeople.org/shmpps/shmpps-1.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Shared memory (SHM) driver to allow high-resolution pulse-per-second (PPS) time sources to be used with a Network Time Protocol (NTP) server without a PPS-enabled kernel. The PPS pin of the time source must be connected to the declared signal pin on a serial or parallel port. See /etc/sysconfig/shmpps for configuration. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 02:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 22:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090220.n792KSqk023238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 --- Comment #3 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2009-08-08 22:20:27 EDT --- Kevin, Thanks for review! (In reply to comment #2) > Issues: > > 1. Looking at the files here, it looks like the License should be: > ASL 1.1 and GPLv2+ > The ant parts seem to be under the ASL1.1, and the rest is GPLv2 or later. > Unless there is something I am missing there... Of course, you are right. http://cobertura.sourceforge.net/license.html I've admired by the juridical/technical trick of copyright holder, and forgot about my first wrong assumption. Now, it is corrected. BTW I hope, the spec file won't be considered as a thing that links software with incompatible licenses. See here: http://cobertura.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cobertura/trunk/cobertura/src/net/sourceforge/cobertura/ant/package.html?view=markup The second release is prepared for review: Spec URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/cobertura.spec SRPM URL: http://victorv.fedorapeople.org/files/cobertura-1.9-2.fc12.src.rpm Changes: * The license tag is changed The rpmlint tool shows 0 errors, 0 warnings against SRPM and all RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 03:06:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 23:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090306.n7936A1G024922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-08 23:06:09 EDT --- Well, - Usually the "Shor Description" in new cvs request should be the "Summary" in the spec file - And would you set fedora-cvs flag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 03:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 23:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090326.n793Qcxw028001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #4 from D Haley 2009-08-08 23:26:37 EDT --- >can you please tell me what are the pro's of doing this? Is >this something mandatory? It means that anyone trying to link to your jar can find it quite easily with build-classpath, and they wont have to update their package with the new jar version every time you update your version of this jar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 03:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 23:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090352.n793qumr004426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-08 23:52:55 EDT --- will do this review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 04:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 00:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090401.n7941nbZ000626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-09 00:01:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Well, > - Usually the "Shor Description" in new cvs request should be This is "Short Description" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 04:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 00:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090438.n794ch7c005501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-09 00:38:42 EDT --- Thanks David. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 05:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 01:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476600] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090534.n795YJi1018447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600 Bug 476600 depends on bug 476526, which changed state. Bug 476526 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 05:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 01:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476600] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090534.n795YkoD018517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600 Bug 476600 depends on bug 476525, which changed state. Bug 476525 Summary: Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 05:34:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 01:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090534.n795YIjL018418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2009-08-09 01:34:16 EDT --- Build in rawhide; sorry for the delay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1592522 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 05:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 01:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476525] Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090534.n795Yjld018493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2009-08-09 01:34:44 EDT --- Build in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1592527 Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 05:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 01:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090541.n795fnxv014912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-09 01:41:48 EDT --- >From build.log: * Using wrong autotools: ... /usr/bin/gnome-autogen.sh [[1mchecking for autoconf >= 2.53... [(B[[m testing autoconf2.50... not found. testing autoconf... /usr/bin/autoconf: line 519: echo: write error: Broken pipe found 2.63 ... * broken Makefile.am: dalston/Makefile.am: installing `./depcomp' libhal-panel-glib/Makefile.am:3: `%'-style pattern rules are a GNU make extension libhal-panel-glib/Makefile.am:4: subst -,_,$*: non-POSIX variable name libhal-panel-glib/Makefile.am:4: (probably a GNU make extension) libhal-power-glib/Makefile.am:3: `%'-style pattern rules are a GNU make extension libhal-power-glib/Makefile.am:4: subst -,_,$*: non-POSIX variable name libhal-power-glib/Makefile.am:4: (probably a GNU make extension) Likely harmless, but needs to be checked for correct operation in detail. * MUSTFIX: Make rules are non-verbose ... Making all in libhal-glib CC egg-dbus-monitor.o CC egg-dbus-proxy.o CC egg-debug.o CC hal-marshal.o CC hal-device.o CC hal-manager.o This is an automake-1.10/automake-1.11 incompatibility orginating from running the autotools during build.s -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 06:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 02:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511204] Review Request: wicd - A wireless and wired network manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090600.n7960Q77017788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511204 --- Comment #11 from Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury 2009-08-09 02:00:25 EDT --- > > I'm going to review this package when Rangeen gives us an updated spec. I > really like to see this in Fedora ASAP, but first we need to fix > selinux-policy-targeted. Please take up the this package as I am not able to dedicate enough time towards packaging and Fedora in general ( Little busy with my job). You can put me as a co maintainer. If you want I can also review the package at some point of time. By the way, if this package can wait for some time then I will take up the task after some time, once I have sufficient time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 05:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 01:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090555.n795tfHo017066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #27 from Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury 2009-08-09 01:55:39 EDT --- > > Rangeen, would you like to co-maintain this package with Konstantinos? > Konstantinos can help you with wicd in turn. This is useful is one of you is on > holidays or has not enough time to look after the package. I am a little busy with my job + I do not have a proper net connection yet since I recently relocated. But hopefully I will be able to obtain a net connection soon and also I will have sufficient time from next week onwards. So if Konstantinos wants he can put me as a co-maintainer and I will definitely try to help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 07:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 03:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090708.n79780ud028306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-09 03:07:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > You can drop the buildroot. There is no need to define it anymore > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag > > Also cleaning it up in %install is unnecessary as well. See the next section. > > Can you also request upstream to consider using fedorahosted.org? > > The output "Please tell us this resulting URL (may take a second)" seems pretty > ambiguous. If this is intended for a non technical audience, tell whom? What is > URL" > > If the upstream author needs help in better wording, fedora-docs list can be > useful. updated spec and srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fupt/fupt.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fupt/fupt-20090809-1.fc12.src.rpm regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 07:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 03:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090719.n797JTEu002612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-09 03:19:28 EDT --- I have fixed the issues. However, the program segfaults straight away. Actually, I don't think there is much sense in packaging this. The latest release is from 2004, and this program has been the basis for a commercial product so I doubt that anything new will happen with it. Given that the build & install is a mess, I wouldn't want to maintain the package either. So I think it's best to cancel this whole review. Closing as WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 07:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 03:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506954] Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090726.n797QpdW004097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 07:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 03:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515670] Review Request: commanderstalin - Soviet Boswar modification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090727.n797R2ep004188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515670 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 07:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 03:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491694] Review Request: anyterm - Web based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090726.n797QkMJ004054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 07:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 03:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090726.n797QgUt004014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 07:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 03:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515045] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Perl interface to the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090726.n797Qvtr004131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515045 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Bug 515045 depends on bug 507801, which changed state. Bug 507801 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 08:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 04:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090800.n7980W0X003969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-09 04:00:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Did you try to BuildRequire: ant-junit ? > It seems you lack the jar providing junit functions to ant Yes, that's what I get: [...] test: [junit] WARNING: multiple versions of ant detected in path for junit [junit] jar:file:/usr/share/java/ant-1.7.1.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.class [junit] and jar:file:/usr/share/java/ant.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.class [junit] Running com.drew.metadata.test.AllTests [junit] Tests run: 79, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,269 sec BUILD FAILED /home/andrea/devel/prg/metadata-extractor/build.xml:48: Test com.drew.metadata.test.AllTests failed Total time: 1 second (In reply to comment #4) > >can you please tell me what are the pro's of doing this? Is > >this something mandatory? > > It means that anyone trying to link to your jar can find it quite easily with > build-classpath, and they wont have to update their package with the new jar > version every time you update your version of this jar. I'll wait for more comments from your part to publish a new release. I'll include this improvement too. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 08:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 04:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090845.n798jXlI017836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-09 04:45:31 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 08:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 04:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090846.n798kDDs017896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-09 04:46:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openal-soft Short Description: Open Audio Library Owners: linuxdonald Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 08:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 04:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090853.n798rjQV018911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-08-09 04:53:44 EDT --- Thanks for the approval! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-enchant Short Description: MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library Owners: epienbro Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 09:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 05:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515351] Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090910.n799AdFH016136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515351 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Ville Skytt? 2009-08-09 05:10:38 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Note that when you find time to test, this package uses the new ISA qualified dependency to vdr(abi) which is available in vdr >= 1.6.0-26 which is currently in Rawhide only. I may end up pushing that to F-11 sometime later, but until that, either use Rawhide to test, rebuild vdr 1.6.0-26 for an earlier distro you're using, or install the plugin with --nodeps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 09:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 05:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090938.n799cEoE026257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #5 from Dominic Hopf 2009-08-09 05:38:12 EDT --- Just to clarify why I didn't upload a new release yet: I already fixed the issue with the license on my machine, but didn't think this small change was it worth to build and upload a new package. For any other issues i triggered upstream and I was told that graphem 0.3 will be available at the end of the coming week. So I think it's better to wait until this release with building and uploading a new package release instead of backporting those fixes for 0.2. I did *not* forget this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 09:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 05:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908090938.n799cxe8020607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-09 05:38:58 EDT --- Modified to use glibc version of crt. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pcc.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pcc-0.9.9-0.2.090809cvs.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 10:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 06:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091034.n79AYoTa029779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #6 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-09 06:34:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Did you try to BuildRequire: ant-junit ? > > It seems you lack the jar providing junit functions to ant > > Yes, that's what I get: > > [...] > test: > [junit] WARNING: multiple versions of ant detected in path for junit > [junit] > jar:file:/usr/share/java/ant-1.7.1.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.class > [junit] and > jar:file:/usr/share/java/ant.jar!/org/apache/tools/ant/Project.class > [junit] Running com.drew.metadata.test.AllTests > [junit] Tests run: 79, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0,269 sec > > BUILD FAILED > /home/andrea/devel/prg/metadata-extractor/build.xml:48: Test > com.drew.metadata.test.AllTests failed > > Total time: 1 second > You can ignore the warning (/usr/share/java/ant/ant-junit.jar is a symlink to /usr/share/java/ant/ant-junit-1.7.1.jar); however the package fails in one of the tests, that's probably why junit build was excluded from debian folks too. Which locale do you run the jvm into? The code calls a decimal number formatter which returns "x,xx" (or "x.xx" depending on locale) instead of the expected "x.xx" (should work in us locales, it's bad written code however because it makes a comparison between a value processed depending on locale with a static string). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 10:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 06:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091041.n79Af0v9031001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #7 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-09 06:40:59 EDT --- You can patch build.xml in the top directory: ---- 48a49 > ---- to make junit tests complete successfully, and send the patch upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 10:48:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 06:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091048.n79Am1Ht032148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #46 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-09 06:47:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > I don't want to kick anyone, but I agree with Christian, just click on the > specfile you posted and it appears with standard tabsize 8 on my browser > looking strange. Browser is not best spec-related tool, how you think? > > > Would it be possible to link it against the regular liblzo even for the Fedora > > > package? This would save us one condition. > > It is possible - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1579635 > > But it some sort of hack. Are you sure what we should do it? > > That would be great, please do it! The lzo developer offers liblzo for shared > builds and minilzo for embedded static builds. The current Fedora-only > situation with a shared minilzo is awkward to say the least and should be > removed. And if you get a patch to do the same with libvncserver you will win > all my sympathy points and I will send you a truck full of good karma :) Ok, ok, I done that. And I think for libvncserver patch is pretty same. Also x11vnc also shared linked with system libvncserver if you speak about them. Christian Krause, as there appeared patch which must be applied only for Fedora > 11 (this all troubles around separate X11 extensions into several packages) and I had introduce conditionals, I also replace file-based buildrequires, as you request before (I just don't known how omit it now :( ). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1592731 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1592750 http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc.spec http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-8.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 10:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 06:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091054.n79Asoie000677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-08-09 06:54:48 EDT --- Taking for review Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1592755 $ rpmlint mmapper.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/mmapper-2.0.4-1.final2.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/mmapper-2.0.4-1.final2.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ md5sum ~/Downloads/mmapper-2.0.4-final2-source.tar.gz ba690157374e51bf11291accb5de3b0e /home/erik/Downloads/mmapper-2.0.4-final2-source.tar.gz $ md5sum ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/mmapper-2.0.4-final2-source.tar.gz ba690157374e51bf11291accb5de3b0e /home/erik/rpmbuild/SOURCES/mmapper-2.0.4-final2-source.tar.gz + OK ! Needs to be looked into / Not applicable [+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [!] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [/] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [/] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [/] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [/] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [/] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [/] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [/] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [/] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [/] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [/] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [/] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [/] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [/] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [/] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. The license of this package is questionable. It contains a mix of GPLv2, GPLv2+ and (LGPLv2 with exceptions or GPLv3 with exceptions). If I understand the licenses correctly, the resulting license of this application is GPLv2. Could someone from FE-LEGAL confirm this? Other then the license, this package is good to go in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 11:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 07:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091121.n79BLOAo011432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-09 07:21:22 EDT --- rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - Ok The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - Ok The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. - ok The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. - ok, meets packaging and ruby specific guidelines The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. - ok The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - ok If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - ok The spec file must be written in American English. - ok The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - ok The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - ok The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - ok ExcludeArch present. - ok, no excludearch All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. - ok The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - ok Ldconfig in %post and %postun. - ok, not needed Relocatable package and /usr prefix. - ok, not relocatable A package must own all directories that it creates. - ok A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - ok Permissions on files must be set properly. - ok Each package must have a correct %clean section. - ok Each package must consistently use macros. - ok The package must contain code, or permissable content. - ok Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - ok If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - ok Header files must be in a -devel package. - ok, no header Static libraries must be in a -static package. - ok, no static Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' . - ok, no .pc Library with .so suffix must be in -devel package. - ok, no .so library In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - ok, no devel Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - ok, no .la Gui application and desktop-file-install. - ok, no gui Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - ok At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - ok All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - ok conclusion: Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 11:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 07:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091134.n79BYh4W013459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #31 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-09 07:34:40 EDT --- approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 11:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 07:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091141.n79BfNcv014846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 12:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 08:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091248.n79Cm487020995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-09 08:48:01 EDT --- I'm acting here now as provenpackager on behalf of Simon Wesp (comment #29). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnaughty Short Description: Downloader for adult content Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 13:43:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 09:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091343.n79DhJSb030335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-09 09:43:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Therefore I think writing "make" is just as future-proof as > "%{__make}", and it's easier to read. The macros aren't forbidden though, as > far as I know. I thought about it. > > But rpmbuild don't add next requires: > > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) > > You should keep that one, according to the guidelines. Ok. > > perl-Unicode-Map or perl(Unicode::Map) > perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel depends on perl(Unicode::Map), so you get that > pulled in by the automatic dependency on perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel) Hm... Such dependency may be broken in the future. Imagine: perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel) in the future may change implementation to do not use perl(Unicode::Map). Therefore, it is not mean what this package not use it also. So, I think it Requires: perl(Unicode::Map) should be explicit there. > When I build the package I get an automatic dependency on perl(Locale::Recode), > which perl-libintl provides. Ok, I wasn't saw that. > > Sorry, I don't want change tabs to spaces. > Well, if this is what you want others to see when they read your spec, it's > your choice: > http://www.rombobj?rn.se/diverse/xls2csv.png > It is a requirement that the spec be legible, but this misalignment isn't bad > enough to make it illegible, so I suppose it's allowed. Please, see explanations of Ralf Corsepius there - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865#c23 . In any case I can't say more. Please keep in mind - I am very grateful that he came, but I did not ask him about it myself. BTW, Bj?rn Persson, thank you for the help. Half way done, don't you want review this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 13:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 09:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091346.n79DkHWU030941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-09 09:46:16 EDT --- http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/xls2csv/xls2csv-1.06-3.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/xls2csv/xls2csv.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 16:10:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 12:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091610.n79GAIQ4023462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 16:13:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 12:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091613.n79GDR6K023863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-09 12:13:26 EDT --- GPLv3 requires a copy of the license to be included with the source. So add it as a additional source. Once you do that, you can go ahead and apply for cvs. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 16:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 12:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091631.n79GVLkD026781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-09 12:31:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Approved Do you think this was a wise decision? I don't. IMO, this package is not ready of public consumption. Rationale: - No understandable documentation. I have never heard about fpaste.org before, don't why I would want to access it, nor do I understand what this package does nor why I would want to install it. - Very immature implementation of the script. * No "usage()", no support for --help. * Naming a script *.sh is unnessary on Unix. * Using a "4 letter" name such as fupt for such a script is not necessarily a wise decision. - Improper upstream packaging (no tarball, no versions, ... ... part of this (as you already mentioned: improper licensing). - The script is unsafe: if [ ! -e /usr/bin/curl ]; then ... cat $1 | curl -s -i -F "content=<-;type=text/plain" .. ... Note: It tests for /usr/bin/curl but runs "curl". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 16:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 12:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] New: Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Summary: Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/blazeblogger.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1593092 [sebastian at localhost ~]$ rpmlint blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm blazeblogger.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/blaze-config 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This is apparently caused by the *-config file name in %{_bindir} and has been noted by the MiniGW folks in #468987. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 16:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 12:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091644.n79GiuTc004134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #6 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-09 12:44:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Approved > > Do you think this was a wise decision? I don't. IMO, this package is not ready > of public consumption. > > > Rationale: > > - No understandable documentation. > > I have never heard about fpaste.org before, don't why I would want to access > it, nor do I understand what this package does nor why I would want to install > it. > > - Very immature implementation of the script. > * No "usage()", no support for --help. > * Naming a script *.sh is unnessary on Unix. > * Using a "4 letter" name such as fupt for such a script is not > necessarily a wise decision. > > - Improper upstream packaging (no tarball, no versions, ... > ... part of this (as you already mentioned: improper licensing). > > > - The script is unsafe: > > if [ ! -e /usr/bin/curl ]; then > ... > cat $1 | curl -s -i -F "content=<-;type=text/plain" .. > ... > Note: It tests for /usr/bin/curl but runs "curl". hi, I'm waiting on Rahul to confirm the approval. I can ask upstream to do the needful if it's really needed. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 16:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 12:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091647.n79GlXCb029526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-09 12:47:32 EDT --- These are not really packaging issues but you can talk to upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 16:48:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 12:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515351] Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091648.n79GmtV9029603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515351 Ville-Pekka Vainio changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ville-Pekka Vainio 2009-08-09 12:48:54 EDT --- I tested this package by updating VDR and all the other plugins from Rawhide, Fedora 11's RPM has support for packages with XZ payload now, so it was no problem. The package seems to work fine, although the update removed all my search timers, that's probably due to a path having been changed between earlier testing versions of the package and the latest. It doesn't have anything to do with the review, though. In my opinion this package is suitable for inclusion into Fedora and I will accept the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 16:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 12:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091655.n79Gt4n6030800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-09 12:55:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > These are not really packaging issues but you can talk to upstream about it. okay.. im packaging it in the mean time.. if and when upstream responds, ill release a new package.. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 17:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 13:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091701.n79H12mO007028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #7 from David Hannequin 2009-08-09 13:01:00 EDT --- Hi, Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model/perl-Config-Model.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model/perl-Config-Model-0.638-4.fc10.src.rpm Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 17:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 13:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091705.n79H590h032569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-09 13:05:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fupt Short Description: Fedora Unity Paste tool Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-11 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 17:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 13:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091737.n79HbHof004910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-09 13:37:16 EDT --- Thank you both so far, I hopefully addressed all mentioned issues now: Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/rubygem-fastercsv.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 17:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 13:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091752.n79HqjnU007232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-08-09 13:52:44 EDT --- @ lain, If you want tprovo ape a package please set the fedora-review flag to '+'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 18:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514602] Review Request: system-config-audit - an utility for editing audit configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091815.n79IFsdg018354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514602 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(jochen at herr-schmi | |tt.de) | --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-08-09 14:15:53 EDT --- OK; I have take a short look on it and it seems to be ok, so I can approve your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 18:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908091822.n79IMVMD011773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 20:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 16:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908092023.n79KN4gu031813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #9 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-09 16:23:03 EDT --- Yep, that looks good now - would set the flag if Jochen hadn't beaten me to it ;) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 22:07:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908092207.n79M7Bmx022092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 22:06:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908092206.n79M6dKN015670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #10 from David Hannequin 2009-08-09 18:06:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Config-Model Short Description: Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors Owners: hvad Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hvad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 22:40:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908092240.n79MelAI020707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Ashay changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ashay.humane at gmail.com Bug 515046 depends on bug 507801, which changed state. Bug 507801 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #1 from Ashay 2009-08-09 18:40:46 EDT --- Here is my informal review: NA = Not Applicable X = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === Required Items === [X] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] rpmlint is clean. [X] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [X] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . [X] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [X] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [X] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] [NA] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] [X] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] [X] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] [X] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [X] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] Tested with rpmbuild and mock on: F11/x86_64 F11/i586 [NA] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] [X] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [NA] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] [NA] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] [X] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] [X] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] [X] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] [X] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] [X] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] [X] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] [NA] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] [X] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] [NA] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] [NA] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] [NA] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] [NA] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] [NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] [X] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] [X] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] [X] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] ==== Suggested Items ==== [?] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] [?] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [28] [X] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] Tested in mock fedora-11-x86_64 and fedora-11-i386 [?] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] [X] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [?] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [31] [?] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] [?] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [21] [?] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 23:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 19:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] New: Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 Summary: Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ashay.humane at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ashay.info/rpm/adtool.spec SRPM URL: http://ashay.info/rpm/adtool-1.3.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: adtool is a unix command line utility for Active Directory administration. Features include user and group creation, deletion, modification, password setting and directory query and search capabilities. This is my second package, first one is yet to be sponsored. First one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 9 23:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 19:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjrosen at polybus.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 01:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100104.n7A14KhU009525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #9 from Bj?rn Persson 2009-08-09 21:04:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel depends on perl(Unicode::Map), so you get that > > pulled in by the automatic dependency on perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel) > Hm... Such dependency may be broken in the future. Imagine: > perl(Spreadsheet::ParseExcel) in the future may change implementation to do not > use perl(Unicode::Map). Therefore, it is not mean what this package not use it > also. So, I think it Requires: perl(Unicode::Map) should be explicit there. The question is, does xls2csv use Unicode::Map directly, or does it need Unicode::Map only because Spreadsheet::ParseExcel uses it? Unicode::Map isn't mentioned anywhere in the code, only in the documentation. I also searched for the names of the documented methods of Unicode::Map, and didn't find any of them. Therefore I think that xls2csv doesn't use Unicode::Map directly, and that if Spreadsheet::ParseExcel gets changed to not use Unicode::Map, then xls2csv won't need it either. I'm not a Perl expert however, so I may have missed something. You may want to ask for advice on Fedora-perl-devel-list. > BTW, Bj?rn Persson, thank you for the help. Half way done, don't you want > review this package? I'm not qualified to do reviews. Comment and discuss like this is all I can do until I find a sponsor, but I think this package is close to being ready for approval. There is one thing I haven't mentioned before because I wasn't sure what's right, namely the license field. Using "and" in the license field means that the package contains some files with one license and some other files with another license. That's not really possible when the whole program is only one file. The licensing guidelines also say that in such cases there must be a comment explaining what parts are covered by which license. (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios) So should it be "GPL+ or Artistic" or "GPLv2+ or Artistic"? I'm not sure. The Perl packaging document seems to say that "the same terms as Perl itself" should be translated to "GPL+ or Artistic" (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#License_tag), but the points it makes aren't about the distinction between GPL+ and GPLv2+. Perhaps you should ask on Fedora-perl-devel-list about this too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 02:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 22:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100228.n7A2SSmM023143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-09 22:28:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-treetop Short Description: A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 04:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 00:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514452] Review Request: trac-agilo-plugin - a trac plugin to support the Scrum process. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100425.n7A4PhBu015740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514452 --- Comment #2 from Asgeir Frimannsson 2009-08-10 00:25:42 EDT --- 0.8 was released last week, so I'll update the spec to 0.8 final tomorrow. http://www.agile42.com/cms/blog/2009/08/5/agilo-pro-10-and-agilo-08-released- today-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:05:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100505.n7A55Fet021617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-10 01:05:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > These are not really packaging issues but you can talk to upstream about it. Pardon? A package being immature certainly is a review issue. It's one of the key points of why reviews exits. The fact, you (Rahul) are missing this, even on such a trivial package, is a scandal! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 361701] Review Request: konserve - System tray application that performs periodic backups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100506.n7A56tsq015795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361701 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf at gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Ben Boeckel 2009-08-10 01:06:51 EDT --- @Jason: There hasn't been a release since 2004[1] and upstream seems dead (no public repo on sf.net[2], nor one ont he webpage to be able to really tell). It's also KDE3-based which is unmaintained, so its future is bleak. @Marcela: If you're still interested in packaging this, please respond. [1]http://sourceforge.net/projects/konserve/files/ [2]http://konserve.cvs.sourceforge.net/konserve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100533.n7A5XpOU020139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-10 01:33:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100532.n7A5We24020037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-10 01:32:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:34:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100534.n7A5Yu4C026115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-10 01:34:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100537.n7A5bZdI026761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-10 01:37:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:36:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100536.n7A5aZBL020850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-10 01:36:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100539.n7A5dUM8026980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-10 01:39:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100542.n7A5gb3p027631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-10 01:42:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100543.n7A5hYHF027753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-10 01:43:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 05:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 01:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100556.n7A5uHsW024238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #9 from C?dric OLIVIER 2009-08-10 01:56:13 EDT --- About josm-translation, I found it at http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm/i18n/ Is it necessary to do a separate package ? josm core source needed to build josm-translation. I am adding actually josm-translation in this josm package. Can I do it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 06:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100606.n7A66lVU031719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #10 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-10 02:06:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I am adding actually josm-translation in this josm package. Can I do it ? I think it is fine. There is no use of josm-translation outside josm. Debian does this too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 06:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100613.n7A6Dl3O026754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #8 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-10 02:13:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Which locale do you run the jvm into? The code calls a decimal number formatter > which returns "x,xx" (or "x.xx" depending on locale) instead of the expected > "x.xx" (should work in us locales, it's bad written code however because it > makes a comparison between a value processed depending on locale with a static > string). I'm using an Italian locale. (In reply to comment #7) > You can patch build.xml in the top directory: > ---- > 48a49 > > > ---- > > to make junit tests complete successfully, and send the patch upstream. Thanks for the patch. I can successfully compile metadata-extractor outside rpmbuild. In rpmbuild I still have an error in the junit tests, although different: [...] Testcase: testUserCommentDescription_AsciiHeaderExtendedAsciiEncoding took 0.002 sec FAILED expected:<...extended characters [??? ???]> but was:<...extended characters [??? ???]> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...extended characters [??? ???]> b ut was:<...extended characters [??? ???]> at com.drew.metadata.exif.test.ExifDescriptorTest.testUserCommentDescrip tion_AsciiHeaderExtendedAsciiEncoding(Unknown Source) This is quite strange. I diff'ed the sources and they seem the same. I need to investigate this further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 06:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100634.n7A6YAl1003636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #12 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-10 02:34:09 EDT --- Ralf, Yes, the way upstream hosts the software is not ideal but we do not control it. It can only be requested to be changed and that information along with other suggestions from you has been conveyed upstream. Like you said, it is a trivial script and I am confident we can improve it via updates instead of holding up the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 06:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100645.n7A6jime005578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: sys_basher | - |- multi-threaded hardware | | --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 02:45:43 EDT --- The spec url is incorrect. Is this your first package? I could not find you in the Fedora Account system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 06:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100644.n7A6iaL8005121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-10 02:44:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Ralf, > > Yes, the way upstream hosts the software is not ideal Not ideal? I am questioning that this package is more than a 3rd lesson programming beginner's exercise and a package at all. > but we do not control it. Then do your job and encourage upstream to do convert their script into a usable and useful package. We do so on many occasions, so why did you fail to do so now? > It can only be requested to be changed and that information along with other > suggestions from you has been conveyed upstream. Like you said, it is a trivial > script and I am confident we can improve it via updates instead of holding up > the review. I think we should reject the this script until upstream has converted into a package. Fedora is not programming beginner's kindergarden nor a pool for silly scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 06:52:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100652.n7A6qeuc006744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 02:52:40 EDT --- Ashay: please fill in your full name in bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 06:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100652.n7A6qKCt006705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 02:52:19 EDT --- Taking over review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 06:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 02:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100651.n7A6pd1R006622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 02:51:38 EDT --- Blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR. To get this package in Fedora you will need to get a sponsor. I can sponsor you if you show me that you know the Fedora guidelines, most importantly http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets To do this you need to perform a couple of informal package reviews of packages of other people. You should also make another submission. ** A few notes: - The tabbing of the spec file does not look sane. Please fix it. - License tag is incorrect, should be BSD with advertising. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Software_License_List - Package does not build in mock; you are missing at least BuildRequires: ncurses-devel. - Explicit Requires: are not allowed, so drop the Requires line altogether. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines - You shouldn't need to mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir} as this should be done by make install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 07:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100723.n7A7N3tt006465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Bug 504479 depends on bug 504468, which changed state. Bug 504468 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 07:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100723.n7A7N2hJ006436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-10 03:23:01 EDT --- Thank you! Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 07:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100745.n7A7jH96016746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak 2009-08-10 03:45:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Martin! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 07:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100744.n7A7iS8F016256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 07:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100749.n7A7n7Y5011183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Michal Nowak 2009-08-10 03:49:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-colors-icon-theme Short Description: GNOME-Colors icon theme Owners: mnowak Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 08:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 04:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100853.n7A8rE96022979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-10 04:53:13 EDT --- Package updated to new upstream release that contains the udev patches. SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/usbmuxd.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/usbmuxd-0.1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 09:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100928.n7A9SOqQ003831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 --- Comment #8 from Bastien Nocera 2009-08-10 05:28:23 EDT --- Looks fine. Note how the fedora-review is already plussed, so go on, and import it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 09:31:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100931.n7A9VJpc004696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #9 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-10 05:31:18 EDT --- Can you provide location for your latest specfile and SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 09:40:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908100940.n7A9eq3b032257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-10 05:40:52 EDT --- Hehe, missed that one :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: usbmuxd Short Description: Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 10:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101018.n7AAI0qh007315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 10:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516327] Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101025.n7AAPWDM009117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516337 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-10 06:25:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1590844 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6bd08e93aa8212b8ef90db0428805c9aa0d187a3 latest-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.08 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.14 CPU) + Package perl-latest-0.03-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(latest) = 0.03 perl(latest::feature) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(version) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 10:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516195] Review Request: hunspell-mos - Mossi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101025.n7AAPkOE016550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516195 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-10 06:25:45 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1594216 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a15734ed54d7687406a206ea6885b806b89b3b38 DicoMoore.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 10:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101032.n7AAW5sL010639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-10 06:32:03 EDT --- License clarification sent upstream here, awaiting response: http://lists.moblin.org/pipermail/dev/2009-August/005755.html pkgconfig issue patched and bug filed to send patch upstream http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5295 All other issues are addressed. New package here: SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bickley-0.4.3-4.fc11.src.rpm Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 10:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101035.n7AAZfaK011469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 06:35:39 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 10:48:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514150] Review Request: ibus-qt - The qt support tools for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101048.n7AAmIiG013949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514150 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-10 06:48:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1578478 - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. ibus-qt.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig You should use %post -p instead of using: %post It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command for the excecution of the scriptlet. ibus-qt.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig You should use %postun -p instead of using: %postun It will avoid the fork of a shell interpreter to execute your command as well as allows rpm to automatically mark the dependency on your command for the excecution of the scriptlet. + source files match upstream url b3ed5e0bcbab7c88f9745e8fc83ac10d684ed9ce ibus-qt-1.2.0.20090728-Source.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package ibus-qt-1.2.0.20090728-1.fc12.i686 => Provides: libibus-qt.so.1 libqtim-ibus.so Requires: libQtCore.so.4 libQtDBus.so.4 libQtGui.so.4 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdbus-1.so.3 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libibus-qt.so.1 libm.so.6 libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package ibus-qt-devel-1.2.0.20090728-1.fc12.i686 => Requires: libibus-qt.so.1 + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1)Fix rpmlint messages before cvs import. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 10:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516327] Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101048.n7AAmEkC013924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-10 06:48:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-latest Short Description: Use the latest Perl features Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:03:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516533] New: Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516533 Summary: Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gatekeeper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gatekeeper-5.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: he Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gatekeeper package contains: Globus Gatekeeper Globus Gatekeeper Setup Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516515] New: Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 Summary: Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gfork.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gfork-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gfork package contains: GFork Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:01:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516514] New: Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 Summary: Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-authz.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-authz-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-authz package contains: Globus authz library Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516521] New: Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 Summary: Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-mp,spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-mp-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-mp package contains: Message Passing Library Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516525] New: Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 Summary: Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-duroc-common.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-duroc-common package contains: DUROC Common Library Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516524] New: Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 Summary: Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-duct-control.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-duct-control-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-duct-control package contains: Globus Duct Control Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516523] New: Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Summary: Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-duct-common.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-duct-common-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-duct-common package contains: Globus Duct Common Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:02:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516526] New: Review Request: globus-duroc-control - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Control Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-duroc-control - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Control Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516526 Summary: Review Request: globus-duroc-control - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Control Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-duroc-control.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-duroc-control-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-duroc-control package contains: DUROC Control Library Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516534] New: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error package contains: Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516513] New: Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 Summary: Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-authz-callout-error.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-authz-callout-error-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-authz-callout-error package contains: Globus authz error library (used by globus authz callouts) Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516522] New: Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Summary: Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-nexus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-nexus-6.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-nexus package contains: Nexus Library Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516529] New: Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gass-cache.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gass-cache-5.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gass-cache package contains: Globus Gass Cache Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516519] New: Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-client-7.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gram-client package contains: GRAM Client Library Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516518] New: Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516518 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-protocol.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-protocol-7.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gram-protocol package contains: GRAM Protocol Library Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516527] New: Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gass-server-ez.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gass-server-ez-2.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gass-server-ez package contains: Globus Gass Server_ez Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:01:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516520] New: Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 Summary: Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-data-conversion.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-data-conversion package contains: Data Conversion Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:01:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:01:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516517] New: Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Summary: Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gridftp-server.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gridftp-server-3.17-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gridftp-server package contains: Globus GridFTP Server Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516528] New: Review Request: globus-gram-client-tools - Globus Toolkit - Job Management Tools (globusrun) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-client-tools - Globus Toolkit - Job Management Tools (globusrun) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516528 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-client-tools - Globus Toolkit - Job Management Tools (globusrun) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-client-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-client-tools-5.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gram-client-tools package contains: Job Management Tools (globusrun) Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516532] New: Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 Summary: Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-scheduler-event-generator.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-scheduler-event-generator-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-scheduler-event-generator package contains: Scheduler Event Generator Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516536] New: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Jobmanager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Jobmanager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516536 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Jobmanager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-8.15-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gram-job-manager package contains: GRAM Jobmanager GRAM Job Manager Setup Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:03:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516539] New: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf - Globus Toolkit - LSF Job Manager Setup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf - Globus Toolkit - LSF Job Manager Setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516539 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf - Globus Toolkit - LSF Job Manager Setup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf-2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf package contains: LSF Job Manager Setup Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516538] New: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Setup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516538 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Setup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-condor.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-condor-4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gram-job-manager-setup-condor package contains: Condor Job Manager Setup Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516516] New: Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 Summary: Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gridftp-server-control.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gridftp-server-control-0.36-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gridftp-server-control package contains: Globus GridFTP Server Library Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:03:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516535] New: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-scripts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gram-job-manager-scripts package contains: GRAM Job ManagerScripts Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:03:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516537] New: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-fork - Globus Toolkit - Fork Job Manager Setup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-fork - Globus Toolkit - Fork Job Manager Setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516537 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-fork - Globus Toolkit - Fork Job Manager Setup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-fork-3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gram-job-manager-setup-fork package contains: Fork Job Manager Setup Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516531] New: Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gass-cache-program.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gass-cache-program package contains: Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516540] New: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs - Globus Toolkit - PBS Job Manager Setup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs - Globus Toolkit - PBS Job Manager Setup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516540 Summary: Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs - Globus Toolkit - PBS Job Manager Setup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs-2.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs package contains: PBS Job Manager Setup Globus Toolkit Packaging Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Globus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515351] Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101110.n7ABABpF019454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515351 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ville Skytt? 2009-08-10 07:10:10 EDT --- Thanks, adding you as a co-maintainer as discussed in private mail. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vdr-epgsearch Short Description: Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR Owners: scop vpv Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101114.n7ABEb0F027253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #14 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-10 07:14:35 EDT --- "Then do your job and encourage upstream to do convert their script into a usable and useful package." Encouraging, yes. Rejecting the software on the basis of that, no. Let's just agree to disagree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABUQYT023787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516523 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABUVNQ023832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABUA4j023705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516522 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:28:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516514] Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101128.n7ABSwdB023121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516513 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABUVqF023852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516520] Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABUApo023685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516522 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABUPM0023761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516522 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:29:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516518] Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101129.n7ABTev0023283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516518 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABU96w023659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516520, 516521 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516519] Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101129.n7ABTdjJ023256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABUUXh023807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516522, 516523 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101128.n7ABSxqf023146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516514 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516515] Review Request: globus-gfork - Globus Toolkit - GFork In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101129.n7ABTNBb030332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516515 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101131.n7ABVUYn031174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:32:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101132.n7ABWKpU031348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABUqve031019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516529] Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101132.n7ABWkxu031496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516531 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516519] Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101132.n7ABWJh6031327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516514] Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101129.n7ABTMui030307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:31:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516519] Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101131.n7ABVThZ031154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101131.n7ABVVhN031198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516526] Review Request: globus-duroc-control - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101132.n7ABWLBp031368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516526 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516519] Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABUpN7030998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:31:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101131.n7ABVXRE031219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:30:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101130.n7ABUoOu030973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516519, 516522 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516516] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101129.n7ABTOXY030355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101129.n7ABTLUC030282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516514, 516515, 516516 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516527] Review Request: globus-gass-server-ez - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Server_ez In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101132.n7ABWMqY031389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516527 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:31:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516526] Review Request: globus-duroc-control - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101131.n7ABVS4m031128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516526 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516519, 516522, 516524, | |516525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101132.n7ABWigw031454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516529 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516528] Review Request: globus-gram-client-tools - Globus Toolkit - Job Management Tools (globusrun) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101132.n7ABWIpa031301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516528 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516519, 516522, 516526, | |516527 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:33:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:33:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516518] Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101133.n7ABXmET024494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516518 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516532 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:33:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101133.n7ABXlTr024468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516522] Review Request: globus-nexus - Globus Toolkit - Nexus Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZSxP032446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516522 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516533] Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZXPl032554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516533 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516529] Review Request: globus-gass-cache - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZUwj032487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516529 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516524] Review Request: globus-duct-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZTdT032466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516524 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516518] Review Request: globus-gram-protocol - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Protocol Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZRoe032425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516518 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZZbO032597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZWqP032530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZVMG032509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516536] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Jobmanager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZQIM032397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516536 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516518, 516522, 516524, | |516529, 516531, 516532, | |516533, 516534, 516535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZY8M032576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516536 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZtce025189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516537 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516537] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-fork - Globus Toolkit - Fork Job Manager Setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZrcW025130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516537 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516531, 516535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101136.n7ABa34X025338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516540 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101136.n7ABa2TE025316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516540 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516539] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-lsf - Globus Toolkit - LSF Job Manager Setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZwuE025263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516539 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516531, 516535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZvYc025231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516538] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-condor - Globus Toolkit - Condor Job Manager Setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZuXh025206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516538 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516531, 516535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS cache s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZsC2025157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516537 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516540] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-setup-pbs - Globus Toolkit - PBS Job Manager Setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101136.n7ABa15w025290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516540 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516531, 516535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 11:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101135.n7ABZwOs025267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516538 Blocks| |516539 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 12:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] New: Review Request: django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Summary: Review Request: django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: diegobz at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-south/django-south.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-south/django-south-0.6-1.fc11.rc1.src.rpm Description: South brings migrations to Django applications. Its main objectives are to provide a simple, stable and database-independent migration layer to prevent all the hassle schema changes over time bring to your Django applications. This package is needed to suppress a dependency for the new Transifex 0.7-RC1. This is my first package and I need sponsor. Spec based on django-evolution package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 12:09:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101209.n7AC9PFc007491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #3 from David Sommerseth 2009-08-10 08:09:24 EDT --- btw. Spec URL now contains the new spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 12:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101208.n7AC8jEh007379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #2 from David Sommerseth 2009-08-10 08:08:44 EDT --- Quick update. I rearranged things according to suggestions. I could not change the ./configure to use %configure, as it is not a autotools based configure script, just a normal shell script doing some basic stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 12:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514602] Review Request: system-config-audit - an utility for editing audit configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101226.n7ACQTUL011604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514602 Miloslav Trma? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Miloslav Trma? 2009-08-10 08:26:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: system-config-audit Short Description: Utility for editing audit configuration Owners: mitr Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 12:40:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101240.n7ACeRUu007439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #3 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-10 08:40:26 EDT --- This is my first package. I generated the .spec file using rpmdev-newspec and then edited it with Xemacs, the tabs look fine to me. rpmbuild doesn't seem to work without the mkdirs, is it expecting them in Makefile? My license is the original BSD. I have advertising on my sys_basher website for my products and services but there is none in the program or in the source package. The program requires lm_sensors, is rpmbuild smart enough to figure that out from the source code? I'm the author of sys_basher, I wrote it to test hardware reliability and performance. As far as I know it's the only Linux native hardware diagnostic available. The unique feature of sys_basher is that it's multi-threaded which allows it to run CPU, Memory and IO tests on all of the cores in a system simultaneously. I've written it to operate all of the subsystems at their maximum possible speeds which ensures that the greatest amount of heat is generated, the maximum power is used, and the maximum switching noise created. Sys_basher can find RAM errors that memtest86 can't. I've been designing computers for 30 years, currently I sell high-speed commnication IP for ASICs and FPGAs. In the early 90s I had a commercial hardware diagnostic for the Mac which was sold as both as an end user utility and was used by Mac board manufacturers, I sold that product off in the mid-90s. I'm attaching my current spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 12:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101241.n7ACfY49015303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #4 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-10 08:41:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356883) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356883) spc file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 12:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101245.n7ACj33p016005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #5 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-10 08:45:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356884) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356884) source code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 13:13:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101313.n7ADD43h015229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-10 09:13:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > "Then do your job and encourage upstream to do convert their script into a > usable and useful package." > > Encouraging, yes. Rejecting the software on the basis of that, no. Great, ... I had not realisized the Fedora quality standards are such kind of low. I'd recommend you to stop reviewing or better you to quit Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 13:14:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101314.n7ADEX3X025257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rc040203 at freenet.de | --- Comment #16 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-10 09:14:32 EDT --- A master piece of a Red Hat employing letting through crap ware. Taking me off this childish review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 13:46:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:46:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516148] Review Request: trac-tickettemplate-plugin - Allows for templates in trac tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101346.n7ADkvG5023941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516148 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 09:46:56 EDT --- trac-tickettemplate-plugin-0.5-0.1.svn6332.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-tickettemplate-plugin-0.5-0.1.svn6332.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 13:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439195] Review Request: perl-Task-Weaken - Ensure that a platform has weaken support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101356.n7ADu879003257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439195 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #11 from Paul Howarth 2009-08-10 09:56:06 EDT --- The license for this package is "Same terms as Perl itself", which is "GPL+ or Artistic", not "GPLv2+ or Artistic" as included in the package. Perhaps you could fix that and update to 1.03? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 14:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516195] Review Request: hunspell-mos - Mossi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101413.n7AEDu8e008058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516195 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-08-10 10:13:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-mos Short Description: Mossi hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 14:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516578] New: Review Request: hyphen-fo - Faroese hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-fo - Faroese hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516578 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-fo - Faroese hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-fo.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-fo-0.20040420-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Faroese hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 14:38:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101438.n7AEcKdM005660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 10:38:19 EDT --- You don't need to attach the spec or the source tar ball, you just need to give the new links to the spec and srpm. For example, next time you update the spec file due to some comments (remember to increase the release tag every time you update!), you could give them as e.g. http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher.spec http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.17-2.fc11.src.rpm Of course, you would need to make them available at those addresses, first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 14:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101448.n7AEmjlw017364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 10:48:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > This is my first package. > > I generated the .spec file using rpmdev-newspec and then edited it with Xemacs, > the tabs look fine to me. When I look at the spec in xemacs I see that Group:, URL: and License: are not aligned with the rest of the lines. As far as I can tell this is not a tab width issue since those are spaces, not tabs, in the spec file. Anyway, this is just an esthetical issue. > rpmbuild doesn't seem to work without the mkdirs, is it expecting them in > Makefile? Yes, normally makefiles have them. As you are upstream, you should add them to the sys_basher release. > My license is the original BSD. I have advertising on my sys_basher website for > my products and services but there is none in the program or in the source > package. Yes, original BSD, i.e. 4 clause BSD is marked in Fedora as "BSD with Advertising" as you could have seen from the link in comment #2. It is *NOT* compatible with GPL. As lm_sensors is under GPLv2+, including this package in Fedora at the moment would break licensing. Blocking FE-LEGAL. > The program requires lm_sensors, is rpmbuild smart enough to figure that out > from the source code? Yes, rpm checks out everything that has been compiled dynamically and requires the relevant libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 14:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101455.n7AEtXrm010179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #13 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-10 10:55:32 EDT --- I have updated the contents of the URLs. Also did a scratch build and installed nss-util and nss-softokn in a virtual machine. As part of the split and nss-util (nss-util-devl actually) needs to become the owner of the /usr/includes/nss3 directory. This is fine if you are doing a clean install of Fedora 12. If someone does and update to F12 nss from F11 where nss is already there thre will be conflicts because nss was the previous owner. I had to execute rpm -ihv nss-util-*.rpm --force. Even tough a clean install of F12 is strongly recommended some users do update from F-11 to F-12 and will face those conflicts. How is changing of ownership of directories upon splits customarily handled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101518.n7AFI2UI015421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 11:18:01 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dvisvgm-0.8.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:17:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101517.n7AFH1Ij015261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #8 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-10 11:17:00 EDT --- I'll switch the license to New BSD so that it will be compatible with the GPL. I'll fix the Makefile and clean up the spec file. I'll let you know when I've updated my website. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:17:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101517.n7AFHuMI015376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 11:17:55 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.1-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dvisvgm-0.8.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:18:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101518.n7AFISeF015574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #356396|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #16 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-10 11:18:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356903) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356903) New spec file This is update spec file. The same one that I have updated at http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn.spec and a nwe srpm built from it is at http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-8.fc11.test.1.src.rpm It addresses most of the issues raised in the earlier review. Notice that: - Source3 is the script that makes the nss-softokn source tar ball out of the big nss source tar ball. - I have to save a couple of files to a temp location during build and restore them during install because now the buildroot gets removed at install whether we do it or not. (That had caused the f12 mass rebuild to fail for NSS) - I haven't implemented yet the suggestion of using Triggers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101523.n7AFNv2R017251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 11:23:56 EDT --- You can also remove the executable perms from the source files from the tarball. And your headers are lacking the license headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:20:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101520.n7AFKnAu016594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #32 from Liang Suilong 2009-08-10 11:20:47 EDT --- I upgrade a new version shutter. Here is shutter-0.80.1 SRPM: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter-0.80-5.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516578] Review Request: hyphen-fo - Faroese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101523.n7AFNY8V017172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516578 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101528.n7AFSBvN027519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101527.n7AFRmi2018369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #33 from Liang Suilong 2009-08-10 11:27:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: shutter Short Description: Shutter is a GTK+ 2.0 screenshot application written in perl. Owners: liangsuilong Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: liangsuilong Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101531.n7AFVdmf019543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-10 11:31:37 EDT --- well, the license makes sense to me. If you like we can ask legal to take a quick look at it to be sure? Hopefully they can do so soon so we can get your feature moving... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101541.n7AFf17g031176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 11:41:01 EDT --- pyliblo-0.7.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyliblo-0.7.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 15:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101541.n7AFf6HP031212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 11:41:06 EDT --- pyliblo-0.7.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyliblo-0.7.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 16:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512729] Review Request: perl-IO-Async - A collection of modules that implement asynchronous filehandle IO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101604.n7AG4bTs028309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512729 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-08-10 12:04:36 EDT --- Thx for the review, I will add the missing BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 16:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512729] Review Request: perl-IO-Async - A collection of modules that implement asynchronous filehandle IO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101606.n7AG6FMW029396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512729 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-08-10 12:06:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-IO-Async Short Description: A collection of modules that implement asynchronous filehandle IO Owners: kwizart Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 16:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101625.n7AGP9Io001207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 12:25:08 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - Use one of the time stamp keeping versions at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 to convert the encoding. - You shouldn't need to run chmod 0644 tests/test.sh shipping executable files in %doc is OK. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - No license is mentioned anywhere in the source code or documents. - GPLv2 license is attached, so the package is assumed to be under the GPL. => License tag must be GPL+. * You should contact upstream and ask them to add license headers to the source code. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 16:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101642.n7AGgEFp015392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #10 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-10 12:42:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356921) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356921) source files with New BSD license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 16:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101645.n7AGjNVC006186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #11 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-10 12:45:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356924) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356924) updated spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 16:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101646.n7AGkxND016737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #12 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-10 12:46:58 EDT --- I've changed the license from the original BSD to the new BSD. I've also fixed the Makefile and the spec file. My website has been updated to reflect these changes. Please look it over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 16:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101649.n7AGnrsx007040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 12:49:52 EDT --- chameleon-0.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chameleon-0.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 16:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101649.n7AGnwhl017153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 12:49:57 EDT --- chameleon-0.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/chameleon-0.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 17:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101702.n7AH2SHd019987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-10 13:02:26 EDT --- When you rebuit this, please announce this on fedora-devel-list because numbers of packages are affected by this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 17:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101700.n7AH0Zeq009650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #9 from D. Marlin 2009-08-10 13:00:34 EDT --- This package does not yet build due to missing dependencies: -------- checking for NMN... configure: error: Package requirements (dbus-glib-1 >= 0.75 gtk+-2.0 gconf-2.0 gnome-keyring-1 libnm-util libnm_glib mobile-broadband-provider-info) were not met: No package 'mobile-broadband-provider-info' found -------- Perhaps mobile-broadband-provider-info should be added to the "BuildRequires" list. In the meantime, I did a preliminary review of the spec file and found a few issues/questions: 1) * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. License: GPLv2+ but the COPYING file in the latest source RPM explicitly states "Version 3": GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 3, 29 June 2007 2) * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. I think the comment and URL field in the spec should be: # git clone git://git.gnome.org/network-manager-netbook URL: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/network-manager-netbook/ 3) * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. There are library files with a suffix in the files list, but no -devel package. Should one be added? 4) * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. I believe this needs to be added to the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 17:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101724.n7AHOXGG024830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 13:24:32 EDT --- python-repoze-what-plugins-sql-1.0-0.5.rc1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-what-plugins-sql-1.0-0.5.rc1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 17:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101723.n7AHNppj024738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Bug 468230 depends on bug 476789, which changed state. Bug 476789 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Luke Macken 2009-08-10 13:23:49 EDT --- Sorry about that, try this: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2-2.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 17:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101742.n7AHgYZD028682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #4 from David Sommerseth 2009-08-10 13:42:33 EDT --- Found one issue regarding debuginfo packages, missing CFLAGS=-g during compilation. I've contacted the upstream developer to see if we can get a patch into the configure scripts which adds the needed compiler flags via CFLAGS. Awaiting feedback before I continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 17:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101743.n7AHhMPH018388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 David Sommerseth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #5 from David Sommerseth 2009-08-10 13:43:22 EDT --- (removed FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 18:04:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101804.n7AI4kMS023929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 14:04:46 EDT --- python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 18:04:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101804.n7AI4gJr023891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 14:04:41 EDT --- python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 18:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101801.n7AI1Sca023405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 14:01:27 EDT --- License is now BSD which is GPL compatible, dropping FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 18:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101800.n7AI0t9e023161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 14:00:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I've changed the license from the original BSD to the new BSD. I've also fixed > the Makefile and the spec file. My website has been updated to reflect these > changes. Please look it over. As I advised in comment #6, please don't attach the specs or tarballs, just paste the relevant links to the spec & srpm. In this case: http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher.spec http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.17-3.fc11.src.rpm would have done nicely. ** Now the license tag is again incorrect, it should be just "BSD" instead of "BSD no advertising". Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Software_License_List ** You are still missing BuildRequires, making the package not build under mock. + make -j4 gcc -c -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g sys_main.c gcc -c -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g sys_utils.c gcc -c -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g sys_disk.c gcc -c -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g sys_kernel.c In file included from sys_disk.c:28: In file included from sys_utils.c:28: sys_basher.h:37:21: error: ncurses.h: No such file or directory sys_basher.h:37:21: error: ncurses.h: No such file or directory In file included from sys_main.c:28: sys_basher.h:37:21: error: ncurses.h: No such file or directory You might want to add a clause for ncurses.h, too. Or maybe switch to using e.g. GNU autotools to configure the build process. ** As one can see, the build process does not use the Fedora optimization flags. Use make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to fix this. ** On a side note, I'm wondering why you have many variables for the same thing in the Makefile. You should have only the standard variables CC and CFLAGS, and call them in the make process. I'll attach a patch in a moment. ** You are missing changelog entries altogether. Add entries for every change and release you've done so far. ** All of the tarball files (except the spec file) are still executable. Please remove the executable flags from the files in the upstream tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 18:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101804.n7AI4b2E001332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 14:04:35 EDT --- python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 18:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101805.n7AI5so5024558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-10 14:05:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=356931) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=356931) Patch to clean up upstream make file This patch cleans up the upstream makefile by - letting there be only one compiler variable - using CFLAGS everywhere - dropping mechanical compile commands that can be handled with a general algorithm - making clean clean everything (and not care if no objects exist) - adding a handler if ncurses.h does not exist Please apply this to the upstream makefile. Also run $ chmod 644 * before making the new tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 18:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458866] Review Request: xls2csv - A script that recodes a spreadsheet's charset and saves as CSV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101832.n7AIWVcV007379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458866 --- Comment #10 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-10 14:32:28 EDT --- Ok, you are agai right. Readme says: "This script is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.", so, according to guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#License_tag I change License to "GPL+ or Artistic" http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/xls2csv/xls2csv-1.06-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 18:33:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101833.n7AIXvT4007560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-10 14:33:56 EDT --- Some notes: * License - As far as I checked the whole codes, the license tag should be "GPLv2+ with exceptions" * -libs - Would you explain why you want to create -libs subpackage? * SourceURL / Naming - For cvs based source, please follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages * Miscs - In comments or %changelog, please use %% instead of % to avoid macros expansion. - About Patch1, I would recommend to just include your new startwm.sh as new source (because it can be seen much easier). - For Patch0, maybe $ sed -i -e '/\[xrdp2\]/,$d' xrdp/xrdp.ini may be easier. - Please fix the following rpmlint(s) --------------------------------------------------------------------- xrdp.i686: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/xrdp xrdp-debuginfo.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/xrdp-0.5.0/keygen/keygen.c --------------------------------------------------------------------- * Scriptlets - Calling /sbin/ldconfig is not needed (for -libs subpackage) because no libraries are installed under default library search paths (and so I wonder why -libs splitting is needed) * Files (If you want -libs subpackage) - Documents like COPYING or so should belong to -libs subpackage because -libs subpackage can be installed without main package while main package cannot be installed without -libs subpackage - Same for the ownership of the directory %{_libdir}/xrdp - Please example what package should own the directory %_datadir/xrdp - Would you explain why you want to write "default" attribute like %attr(0755,root,root) or %attr(0644,root,root) explicitly? You can set these permissions at %install instead and remove these explicit %attr if you are unsure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 18:37:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101837.n7AIbGXl031130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #16 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-10 14:37:14 EDT --- Thanks for the patch to my Makefile, I'll apply it. I'm also removing ncurses from the make file. I was playing with ncurses last year but I decided that it didn't add anything so I dropped it. I'll put up a new release shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 19:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101902.n7AJ2STB013129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 15:02:27 EDT --- perl-Flickr-API-1.02-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Flickr-API-1.02-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 19:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515136] Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101902.n7AJ2Sft013138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136 --- Comment #1 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-10 15:02:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/gettext-commons.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/gettext-commons-0.9.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: * Sun Aug 09 2009 Andrea Musuruane 0.9.6-2 - Created JAR alias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 19:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101904.n7AJ48sN013359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #10 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-10 15:04:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Can you provide location for your latest specfile and SRPM? Sure. Here they are: Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/metadata-extractor.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: * Mon Aug 10 2009 Andrea Musuruane 2.3.1-2 - Created JAR alias - Added a patch to make junit tests complete successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 19:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: scselinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101927.n7AJR0WM018830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #2 from Christopher Pardy 2009-08-10 15:26:59 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2.tar.gz Description: To better conform with the upstream the gui code that was previously in policycoreutils has been moved into it's own package and given a rewrite to use policy kit. This code implements the 2 guis, system-config-selinux and polgengui. These have in the past been implemented as a patch on fedora systems to the policycoreutils package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 19:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101931.n7AJVda0019947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 --- Comment #6 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-08-10 15:31:37 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 19:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: scselinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101931.n7AJVdUB019935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham 2009-08-10 15:31:38 EDT --- The description should describe what the package does, not its development history. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 19:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908101930.n7AJU6mE019555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #10 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-08-10 15:30:05 EDT --- Please, do not require python-sqlalchemy0.5 for Fedora 11. python-sqlalchemy-0.5.4 is already a part of Fedore 11. Requires: python-sqlalchemy0.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 20:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509658] Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102043.n7AKhARi002568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Ravikiran Rajagopal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ravi at gmx.de --- Comment #3 from Ravikiran Rajagopal 2009-08-10 16:43:09 EDT --- The specfile needs to add the command line parameter --api=18 in order to use the features provided by the currently shipping version of HDF5 libraries. Also, use BuildRequires: hdf5-devel >= 1.8.2 for the same reason (though F11 currently ships 1.8.3). Also add Requires: hdf5 >= 1.8.2 for runtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102133.n7ALXNp6002726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-10 17:33:23 EDT --- I have fixed most of the things, except for * SourceURL / Naming - For cvs based source, please follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control Can you help, about how to proceed with cvs ? http://sourceforge.net/projects/xrdp/develop I don't know if with cvs I can download a specific revision like svn does with "svn export -r 250" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102138.n7ALcdcX003594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 17:38:38 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.4.20090713git.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102138.n7ALchfT003627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.2.20090713git.el5 |0-0.4.20090713git.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:38:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102138.n7ALcol1003662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-10 17:38:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) I really don't understand for what you again post so much warning data mentioned twice previously... > TODO: > - update to RabbIT 4 Good suggestion. Done. > - try to contact upstream - he/she/it should use name and version as source, > not only mainversion. I contact them. He answer what do that, but now in vacation around 2 or 3 weeks. > - don't own with the rabbit-user the whole package Ok. > - remove my name from your changelog Really strange request... But off course ok. > - don't use packagename in summary Ok. > - own %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead of %{_datadir}/%{name}/htdocs Ok. > - you can use a macro in source0; %{name}3 instead of RabbIT3 Ok. But %lname, not %name. > - make your package RPMLINT-conform: > ~ remove class path in manifest There problem. If I remove it, I get error on start: # ./RabbIT Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xbill/DNS/Lookup at rabbit.dns.DNSJavaHandler.setup(DNSJavaHandler.java:32) at rabbit.proxy.HttpProxy.setupDNSHandler(HttpProxy.java:171) at rabbit.proxy.HttpProxy.setConfig(HttpProxy.java:272) at rabbit.proxy.HttpProxy.setConfig(HttpProxy.java:136) at rabbit.proxy.ProxyStarter.startProxy(ProxyStarter.java:66) at rabbit.proxy.ProxyStarter.start(ProxyStarter.java:60) at rabbit.proxy.ProxyStarter.main(ProxyStarter.java:18) Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.xbill.DNS.Lookup at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:205) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:323) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:294) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:268) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:336) ... 7 more and don't known what do around this :( > ~ you can't avoid all user-messages from rpmlint (/var/run/ and so is okay > for rabbit) I known :) > ~ userdel is okay Thank you for clarification. > ~ add a logrotate for log-files For what if it has inner mechanism of log rotation?? Just rpmlint can't known about this. > ~ make your init.d-script conform Conform to what?? > ~ check your user and your service name - you have rabbit and RabbIT -> just > use rabbit for all Ok, I use rabbit now for service and service file. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/RabbIT/RabbIT-4.0-8.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/RabbIT/RabbIT.spec Warning: this build is NOT run! Please see class-path error described before. I'm continue investigation. Help appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:39:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102139.n7ALd9nR013550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 17:39:06 EDT --- mausezahn-0.34.9-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mausezahn'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8412 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102145.n7ALjOLQ006116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 17:45:23 EDT --- polkit-qt-0.9.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102142.n7ALgqMA004934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 17:42:51 EDT --- jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:45:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102145.n7ALjSk2006149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.2-1.fc11 |0.9.2-1.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102142.n7ALgumP004978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:46:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102146.n7ALkVVu016535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #17 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-10 17:46:30 EDT --- I've uploaded a new release to my website. Please check it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102145.n7ALj75C016053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 17:45:07 EDT --- jide-oss-2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516074] Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102145.n7ALjCoc016084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc11 |2.7.1-3.1181svn.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102150.n7ALo37b008060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 17:50:02 EDT --- mausezahn-0.34.9-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mausezahn'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8443 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102153.n7ALr9ZG019037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.4.20090713git.fc11 |0-0.4.20090713git.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513869] Review Request: perl-Beanstalk-Client - Client class to talk to a beanstalkd server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102149.n7ALnwb0017882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513869 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 17:49:57 EDT --- perl-Beanstalk-Client-1.05-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Beanstalk-Client'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8443 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 21:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102153.n7ALr4e1009312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 17:53:03 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.4.20090713git.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 22:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513754] Review Request: moblin-session - Moblin User Experience Startup Scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102200.n7AM0Xcf021335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513754 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-10 18:00:32 EDT --- I've fixed all the above mentioned. There was an issue with the included moblin.desktop because it used an incorrect value in the file so I've updated in as a separate file and emailed the upstream author (there's no bugzilla component for it). SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-session-0.12-3.fc11.src.rpm > This package seems rather trivial; I wonder why it has not been merged with > some other core moblin stuff by upstream... Yes, I agree but I suppose a the session startup manager is a separate component no matter how small. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 22:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102228.n7AMSS3k026409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-10 18:28:26 EDT --- A few minor issues. This should be removed: /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/camerac/camera.c The COPYING/README files are included twice: /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/COPYING /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/NEWS Also does the removal of the embedded gst stuff make the package noarch again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 22:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102223.n7AMNslP025621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 --- Comment #10 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-10 18:23:53 EDT --- With the latest sources, had to add a patch to add libd.a among the libraries while linking. Without this there were some build failures because of the dlopen other dlxxxx function definitions missing. http://linux.us.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-rpm/sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm http://linux.us.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-rpm/sblim-cmpi-rpm.spec I added all the above changes suggested. Please verify. Thank you Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 22:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102248.n7AMmcNQ029278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-10 18:48:37 EDT --- > Perhaps mobile-broadband-provider-info should be added to the "BuildRequires" > list. It does include the package as BuildRequires. The problem is that the build of that package removes the pkgconfig during the build process and that is what its looking for. There is a bug filed which blocks this package in bugzilla. > In the meantime, I did a preliminary review of the spec file and found a few > issues/questions: > > > 1) * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > > License: GPLv2+ > > but the COPYING file in the latest source RPM explicitly states "Version 3": > > GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE > Version 3, 29 June 2007 Actually no its not. The COPYING file in the source package is actually a symbolic link to /usr/share/automake-1.10/COPYING so what your seeing is likely that file in your local file system. I've sent an email to the mailing list for a license clarification. See here http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2009-August/msg00084.html > 2) * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream > source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. > If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL > Guidelines for how to deal with this. > > I think the comment and URL field in the spec should be: > > # git clone git://git.gnome.org/network-manager-netbook > > URL: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/network-manager-netbook/ Copy and paste error. Will be fixed in the next srpm. > 3) * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. > libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in > a -devel package. > > There are library files with a suffix in the files list, but no -devel package. > Should one be added? I'll review this and update as appropriate. > 4) * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop > file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the > %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need > a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. > > I believe this needs to be added to the spec file. The gui is a applet so I don't think it needs one. I'll look further as there's possibly a configuration gui too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 22:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] New: Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: otaylor at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/gnome-shell.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/gnome-shell-2.27.0-1.src.rpm Description: GNOME Shell provides core user interface functions for the GNOME 3 desktop, like switching to windows and launching applications. GNOME Shell takes advantage of the capabilities of modern graphics hardware and introduces innovative user interface concepts to provide a visually attractive and easy to use experience. (The 2.27.0 tarball packaged here is mostly intended for getting packaging started rather than as a big splashy release; it's just taken in the middle of rapid development without any formal freeze process. I think it's in reasonable shape, but there probably are some horrible bugs we don't know about yet.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 23:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102302.n7AN2aS1021398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #19 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-10 19:02:35 EDT --- Don't know what I was looking at in pkgdb, indeed looks OK. Went ahead and filed a review request for a gnome-shell package using this package (bug 516654) - thanks for doing gjs! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 23:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102314.n7ANEwL6023137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #24 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-10 19:14:56 EDT --- i have send an mail to the fedora-devel-list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 23:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102328.n7ANS385025590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(gaburici at cs.umd.e | |du) | --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-10 19:27:59 EDT --- No response; closing as promised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 23:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102330.n7ANUqEL004388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 23:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514351] Review Request: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin - Stopwatch plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102335.n7ANZm48005168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-10 19:35:47 EDT --- Setting the fedora-review flag as that seems to have been overlooked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 10 23:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Media Player written in pygtk that uses GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908102336.n7ANa8Y3005228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-10 19:36:07 EDT --- Setting the fedora-review flag as that seems to have been overlooked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 01:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110105.n7B15Huf019035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 Paul W. Frields changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stickster at gmail.com Depends on| |516662 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 01:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110118.n7B1IkCN021121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 Paul W. Frields changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516667 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 02:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514150] Review Request: ibus-qt - The qt support tools for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110220.n7B2KI30021974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514150 --- Comment #4 from Huang Peng 2009-08-10 22:20:17 EDT --- OK. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 02:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514150] Review Request: ibus-qt - The qt support tools for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110223.n7B2NF5D022470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514150 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Huang Peng 2009-08-10 22:23:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ibus-qt Short Description: The qt support tools for ibus Owners: phuang Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 03:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110333.n7B3XLuO013856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 23:33:21 EDT --- PgsLookAndFeel-1.1-4.20090805cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PgsLookAndFeel-1.1-4.20090805cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 03:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110332.n7B3WAtr002733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Bug 513119 depends on bug 516074, which changed state. Bug 516074 Summary: Review Request: jide-oss - Swing component library built on top of Java/Swing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516074 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-10 23:32:09 EDT --- PgsLookAndFeel-1.1-4.20090805cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PgsLookAndFeel-1.1-4.20090805cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512729] Review Request: perl-IO-Async - A collection of modules that implement asynchronous filehandle IO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110500.n7B50wg0028175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512729 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-11 01:00:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:05:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110505.n7B55DU4017608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-11 01:05:12 EDT --- GOOD: * rpmlint is clean * Approved license and license tag matches LICENSE file. - No conflicting licenses found in headers of package. - License file included in %doc * Specfile is readable * Source matches upstream but see below. * No locale files * Not a shared library * Not relocatable * Owns all files and directories it creates * %clean section set corectly * macros used consistently * code, not content * %doc files do not affect package runtime. * All filenames are valid utf-8 NEEDSWORK: * Package name doesn't fit the guidelines but there is a lot of precedent for django plugins. Asking on the fedora-packaging list. options are: - python-django-south - Django-south - Write an exception and use django-south I like either the first or the last. * You should add a revision to the checkout line in the Source0 comment so that someone can get the exact revision at a later date. Something like this: # hg clone -r 3a3140b338a4 https://bitbucket.org/andrewgodwin/south/ django-south-0.6-rc1 The idea is for the reviewer to know how to reproduce the exact tarball that is in the srpm. * This is a pre-release so the Release should start with "0." to avoid update problems when 0.6 final is released. Since it's a snapshot package, it should have some information about being a checkout encoded as well: %global vcsdate 20090710 %global vcstag rc1-6 Release: 0.1.%{vcsdate}hg%{vcstag}%{?dist} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages * Does not build in koji: koji build --scratch dist-f12 django-south-0.6-1.fc11.rc1.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1596489 Looks like you need to BuildRequire: python-setuptools-devel In case you haven't seen them, the packaging generic Guidelines and python Guidelines are relevant to this package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514602] Review Request: system-config-audit - an utility for editing audit configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110503.n7B53aSD017172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514602 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-11 01:03:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514150] Review Request: ibus-qt - The qt support tools for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110507.n7B57X4K017921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514150 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-11 01:07:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:09:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516195] Review Request: hunspell-mos - Mossi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110509.n7B5991X018109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516195 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-11 01:09:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:10:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515351] Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110510.n7B5ADag029655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515351 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-11 01:10:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:13:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110513.n7B5D4rW030032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-11 01:13:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110514.n7B5Eg16019037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #34 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-11 01:14:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516327] Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110515.n7B5FZ9j030735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-11 01:15:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110516.n7B5Gax2019833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-11 01:16:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514150] Review Request: ibus-qt - The qt support tools for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110531.n7B5VAGk000786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514150 Huang Peng changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Huang Peng 2009-08-11 01:31:09 EDT --- Thanks Imported ibus-qt, and built it for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 05:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110551.n7B5pUx0004120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 01:51:29 EDT --- As instructed in comment #6 and comment #13, please paste new SPEC & SRPM urls in the review whenever you have updated something. ** The package *STILL DOES NOT COMPILE* In file included from sys_main.c:28: sys_basher.h:37:21: error: ncurses.h: No such file or directory In file included from sys_basher.h:49, from sys_main.c:28: sys_curses.h:29: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token sys_curses.h:30: error: expected ')' before '*' token sys_curses.h:31: error: expected ')' before '*' token In file included from sys_disk.c:28: sys_basher.h:37:21: error: ncurses.h: No such file or directory In file included from sys_utils.c:28: sys_basher.h:37:21: error: ncurses.h: No such file or directory In file included from sys_basher.h:49, from sys_disk.c:28: sys_curses.h:29: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token sys_curses.h:30: error: expected ')' before '*' token sys_curses.h:31: error: expected ')' before '*' tokenIn file included from sys_basher.h:49, from sys_utils.c:28: sys_curses.h:29: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token sys_curses.h:30: error: expected ')' before '*' token sys_curses.h:31: error: expected ')' before '*' token make: *** [sys_main.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... In file included from sys_kernel.c:28: sys_basher.h:37:21: error: ncurses.h: No such file or directory make: *** [sys_disk.o] Error 1 In file included from sys_basher.h:49, from sys_kernel.c:28: sys_curses.h:29: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token sys_curses.h:30: error: expected ')' before '*' token sys_curses.h:31: error: expected ')' before '*' token make: *** [sys_kernel.o] Error 1 make: *** [sys_utils.o] Error 1 If you need ncurses, add BuildRequires: ncurses-devel as instructed in comment #2. ** Makefile, COPYRIGHT and README in the upstream tarball *STILL* have executable flags. Remove them from the upstream release, or remove them in the %prep phase. ** You are missing the -2 release from the changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 06:13:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110613.n7B6Dd6L029228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #19 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-11 02:13:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Makefile, COPYRIGHT and README in the upstream tarball *STILL* have executable > flags. Remove them from the upstream release, or remove them in the %prep > phase. "chmod -x"ing then in %prep is what you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 06:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110646.n7B6kiXm014037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 02:46:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > > Makefile, COPYRIGHT and README in the upstream tarball *STILL* have executable > > flags. Remove them from the upstream release, or remove them in the %prep > > phase. > "chmod -x"ing then in %prep is what you want. .. but if one is upstream it is better to do it there since Fedora is not the only distribution suffering from incorrect permissions. ** Your %doc line is empty, add README and COPYRIGHT to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 06:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110653.n7B6rjjL003998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #36 from Jose Luis 2009-08-11 02:53:41 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: mrpt New Branches: F-11 Owners: jlblanco Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 06:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 02:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110654.n7B6sYl0004087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Jose Luis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 07:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512726] Review Request: perl-Test-Refcount - Assert reference counts on objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110723.n7B7Nj99021725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512726 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 07:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512729] Review Request: perl-IO-Async - A collection of modules that implement asynchronous filehandle IO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110723.n7B7Nn1G021756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512729 Bug 512729 depends on bug 512726, which changed state. Bug 512726 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Refcount - Assert reference counts on objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512726 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 07:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110729.n7B7TZXA022947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #21 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-11 03:29:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > (In reply to comment #18) > > > > > Makefile, COPYRIGHT and README in the upstream tarball *STILL* have executable > > > flags. Remove them from the upstream release, or remove them in the %prep > > > phase. > > "chmod -x"ing then in %prep is what you want. > > .. but if one is upstream it is better to do it there since Fedora is not the > only distribution suffering from incorrect permissions. Upstream is irrelevant at this point. We are talking about Fedora packaging conventions, not about upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 07:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110745.n7B7jNDu015328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 --- Comment #20 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 03:45:22 EDT --- I also had it tagged into the alpha as well so it should be in todays rawhide as well. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 07:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110749.n7B7nULQ016026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 Bug 507299 depends on bug 511318, which changed state. Bug 511318 Summary: mobile-broadband-provider-info doesn't include pkgconfig file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511318 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 07:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110752.n7B7qUuS016887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 03:52:29 EDT --- gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 07:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] New: Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Summary: Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste-0.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: It is often useful to be able to easily paste text to the Fedora Pastebin at http://fpaste.org and this simple script will do that and return the resulting URL so that people may examine the output. This can hopefully help folks who are for some reason stuck without X, working remotely, or any other reason they may be unable to paste something into the pastebin More info on the mock build etc here: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 07:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516195] Review Request: hunspell-mos - Mossi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110758.n7B7w8v0018133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516195 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 08:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110821.n7B8LS9E001538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-11 04:21:26 EDT --- Doesn't this do the same thing as your other submission ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 08:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110845.n7B8j73l028193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-11 04:45:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Doesn't this do the same thing as your other submission ? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 If you go through the comments of that bug, you'll see why I've switched to packaging fpaste.py instead of fupt. fupt is not going make it as a fedora package. I'll close that bug as soon as i've closed the unused cvs. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 08:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110847.n7B8lW0Q006699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 04:47:31 EDT --- built in koji for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 08:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110850.n7B8oX0k007386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-11 04:50:32 EDT --- Okay, but from reading the comments there i cannot actually tell that you have discontinued that submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 08:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110856.n7B8uhZG008444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-11 04:56:41 EDT --- hi, fupt is not going to be packaged due to the issues presented above. Switched to fpaste.py https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 08:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 04:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110859.n7B8xFCe008827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-11 04:59:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Okay, but from reading the comments there i cannot actually tell that you have > discontinued that submission. hi, updated the bug. Thanks for pointing it out. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 09:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514351] Review Request: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin - Stopwatch plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110909.n7B99aOE000442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 05:09:35 EDT --- > We also have desktop files in /usr/share/xsessions, which can not be installed > with desktop-file-utils ether. Maybe someone needs to update the packaging > guidelines to make the difference more obvious. Agreed. I've run into this issue with moblin packages too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 09:35:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] New: Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Summary: Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christoph.wickert at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/viewnior.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/viewnior-0.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Viewnior is an image viewer program. Created to be simple, fast and elegant. It's minimalistic interface provides more screenspace for your images. Among its features are: * Fullscreen & Slideshow * Rotate, flip, save, delete images * Animation support * Browse only selected images * Navigation window * Set image as wallpaper (only under GNOME) * Simple interface * Configurable mouse actions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 09:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515351] Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110938.n7B9cbDD006832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515351 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Ville Skytt? 2009-08-11 05:38:35 EDT --- Built for devel, F-11 forthcoming: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1597404 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 09:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908110938.n7B9c3bo006747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 --- Comment #11 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-11 05:38:01 EDT --- Of course, you may apply patches to the sources but you must not change the tarball from upstream. Otherwise it's hard to check its validity. Let rpmbuild do the work for you. Place the patch file into the SOURCES folder of your rpmbuild directory and add a Patch0 and a %patch0 entry to your spec file (this already seems to be done). rpmbuild will add the patch file to the SRPM and will apply it when creating the binary RPM. So again, don't change the tarball (or other upstream files) directly. Some minor things you should fix: - Add a short comment above Patch0 on what the patch does - change the two lines rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/cmpi/*.la rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la into these: rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/cmpi/*.la rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.la (the -r option is not necessary because you want to delete files here) - The description text is a bit unclear. At least, I didn't understand what the package contains before reading the info on the upstream website. Please use the complete text from upstream: These providers list the software packages (currently for RPM) installed on GNU/Linux systems and provide some detail information about them. Since the text is longer than 80 characters, split it to several lines. - in the changelog, add a blank between ">" and "-": Mon Jul 13 2009 Praveen K Paladugu - 1.0.1-2 Thu Jul 02 2009 Praveen K Paladugu - 1.0.1-1 (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 10:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515351] Review Request: vdr-epgsearch - Powerful schedules menu replacement plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111000.n7BA0XFj011177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515351 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 06:00:32 EDT --- vdr-epgsearch-0.9.25-0.3.beta14.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vdr-epgsearch-0.9.25-0.3.beta14.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 10:07:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111007.n7BA7YBf012741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 06:07:32 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-0.638-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Model-0.638-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 10:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111010.n7BAA7dM013340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 06:10:06 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-0.638-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Model-0.638-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 10:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 06:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516578] Review Request: hyphen-fo - Faroese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111020.n7BAKmMJ026193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516578 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-11 06:20:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1597506 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 85ad57dbee618da1b988a57a38ad4ca24da076df hyph_fo_FO-20040420a.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 11:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: scselinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111114.n7BBE76U027057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Pardy 2009-08-11 07:14:05 EDT --- fixed description, fixed spec file to actually create installable rpm. Spec URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2.tar.gz Description: system-config-selinux provides the graphical tools system-config-selinux and selinux-polgen for managing an SELinux system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 11:55:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111155.n7BBtpJ0011362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 07:55:48 EDT --- SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/network-manager-netbook.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/network-manager-netbook-1.2-3.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1597620 Build updated, test build complete in koji. Points addressed above: 1) no response yet, license currently "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" as that's the two licenses explicitly mentioned in the source. 2) fixed 3) no longer an issue. Not sure where I got the .so from. 4) gui application is an applet. desktop file is in autostart directory. desktop-file-utils borks because it has different values in it that are valid. See bug 514351 for another example of this issue. I've also done the following: - extended the description a little - cleaned up the BuildRequires somewhat - patched the desktop file so it will only start in the Moblin desktop environment and not gnome (will be submitting the patch upstream). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 12:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513754] Review Request: moblin-session - Moblin User Experience Startup Scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111211.n7BCBa0j021643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513754 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 08:11:34 EDT --- SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-session-0.12-4.fc11.src.rpm A minor fix to the last one to start the mutter WM not metacity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 11:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111156.n7BBuf1b023182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura 2009-08-11 07:56:36 EDT --- A new version was released: 0.4.2 FIXED: -rpmlint runs on any package: * fixed permissions * gbirthday.desktop is now config -blank line in changelog -only started with a system tray present -license block is there -desktop file not hardcoded -using install instead of cp in makefile Not fixed, as suggested: - some docs: authors will come in the future, but there is a changelog - the paths in the makefile are *not* hardcoded. To try type "make tar.lzma version=0815" and just "make tar.lzma". In the first case version is overridden -> not hardcoded. - Denglish: project will be added to fedora translation project soon (gettext isn't used atm anyway :-( ) SPEC: http://student.physik.uni-mainz.de/~spurath/gbirthday.spec SRPM: http://student.physik.uni-mainz.de/~spurath/gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 12:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452306] Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111232.n7BCWaOV004455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452306 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-08-11 08:32:34 EDT --- Ping? You've probably forgot on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 12:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111248.n7BCmpYC008496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 08:48:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hi Jussi, > > I just had a quick look into pcc and it works quite well. The Fortran frontend > seems to be disabled in the current cvs version, so that it's not built (manual > build fails with "undefined reference to `strlcat'" at the moment). Yup, I tried to compile the frontend but had the same kind of problems. The Fortran77 runtime library seems to be missing from the distribution. > The first sed call (sed -i 's|-Werror||g' configure) is currently redundant > because configure doesn't contain the gcc option -Werror. That may be since it was removed on Aug 8. > Another thing I recognized is, the pcc include directory (%{_includedir}/pcc) > doesn't contain any files. Thus, it's probably not necessary to add it. But > maybe this may also change in future upstream releases. It's in the pcc flags, so it's best to own it anyway. Some package might use it in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 12:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111246.n7BCkCqR008130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 08:46:10 EDT --- >From Christoph the following are fixed: - License field - drop redundant glib2-devel BR - drop Requires(post): /bin/touch - %description does not end with dot. - %description should be more detailed, mention power and volume - add INSTALL='install p' to make install - no libtool archives, so nothing to remove - README missing from %doc These are modified: - rm the autostart file instead of %exclude * Upstream has fixed these to add OnlyShowIn=MOBLIN; so it will only start in the Moblin Desktop so I've added them back in. This has the issues that desktop file validation won't work. Trying to ascertain the status of getting MOBLIN added into the upstream package. >From Ralf the following are fixed: - MUSTFIX: Make rules are non-verbose >From both I'm investigating these further, will fix/send upstream as appropriate: - Using wrong autotools - broken Makefile.am - configure is run twice, your hack doesn't work * disabled for the moment. Will re-enable once I've had time to investigate it further. Updated files as follows: SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston-0.0.29-2.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1597693 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 12:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111249.n7BCnBik016288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 08:49:08 EDT --- colossus-0.9.0-1.20090810svn4482.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/colossus-0.9.0-1.20090810svn4482.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 12:50:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111250.n7BCoDBr016823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 08:50:12 EDT --- colossus-0.9.0-1.20090810svn4482.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/colossus-0.9.0-1.20090810svn4482.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 12:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111223.n7BCNpD8030514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-11 08:23:50 EDT --- Hi Jussi, I just had a quick look into pcc and it works quite well. The Fortran frontend seems to be disabled in the current cvs version, so that it's not built (manual build fails with "undefined reference to `strlcat'" at the moment). The first sed call (sed -i 's|-Werror||g' configure) is currently redundant because configure doesn't contain the gcc option -Werror. Another thing I recognized is, the pcc include directory (%{_includedir}/pcc) doesn't contain any files. Thus, it's probably not necessary to add it. But maybe this may also change in future upstream releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111310.n7BDAWxq022442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 09:10:31 EDT --- Update to 20090811 with spec file cleanups. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pcc.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pcc-0.9.9-0.2.090811cvs.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226482] Merge Review: tcp_wrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111323.n7BDNEaf025449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226482 --- Comment #12 from Michal Nowak 2009-08-11 09:23:12 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226342] Merge Review: python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111322.n7BDMkpe018602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342 --- Comment #9 from Michal Nowak 2009-08-11 09:22:43 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111327.n7BDRELm026561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #22 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-11 09:27:12 EDT --- http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.17-5.fc11.x86_64.rpm http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.17-5.fc11.src.rpm http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher.spec I've removed the ncurses.h includes from all of the files. I've also put a chmod into my release script that should fix the flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516578] Review Request: hyphen-fo - Faroese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111327.n7BDR8kp020373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516578 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-08-11 09:27:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-fo Short Description: Faroese hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111335.n7BDZP0R022740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 09:35:24 EDT --- Now in rawhide. As always Christoph thanks for the review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111334.n7BDYnUh028036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Bug 513452 depends on bug 506804, which changed state. Bug 506804 Summary: Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111334.n7BDYiPv027923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 09:34:41 EDT --- Now in rawhide. Thanks for the review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111334.n7BDYmYc028015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Bug 507849 depends on bug 506804, which changed state. Bug 506804 Summary: Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111336.n7BDaBqm023209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #21 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 09:36:10 EDT --- Fixed as its now in rawhide. Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111353.n7BDrH9X027268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #17 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-11 09:53:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Perhaps the base package nss-util should be produced/reviewed/completed first. I agree with Kai, we should handle with Bug 515032 first. Having nss-util dealt with first will make this one a lot easier to handle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516779] New: Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 Summary: Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jsafrane at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/libcpuset/libbitmask.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/libcpuset/libbitmask-2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Simple multi-word bitmask library, required by libcpuset -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111351.n7BDpMNO026928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 09:51:21 EDT --- - Your changelog is not ordered in time. Fix it. ** + make -j4 gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g -c sys_main.c gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g -c sys_utils.c gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g -c sys_disk.c gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g -c sys_kernel.c gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g -c sys_fp.c gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g -c sys_int.c gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g -c sys_mem.c gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g -c lin_utils.c ./build_sensors.csh make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/sys_basher-1.1.17' make[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to parent make rule. gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g -c sys_sensors3.c make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/sys_basher-1.1.17' gcc -O2 -Wuninitialized -Wformat -Wno-multichar -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -g -lm -pthread -lsensors -lform -o sys_basher sys_main.o sys_utils.o sys_disk.o sys_kernel.o sys_fp.o sys_int.o sys_mem.o lin_utils.o sys_sensors_x.o /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lform You don't need libform anymore if you've dropped ncurses support. ** Your %doc line is empty, add README and COPYRIGHT to %doc. ** The build process does not use the Fedora optimization flags. Use make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" instead of make %{?_smp_mflags} to fix this. ** Doesn't this program work as a normal user? Change all occurrences of %{_sbindir} to %{_bindir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111355.n7BDtt9d000871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-11 09:55:54 EDT --- > Yup, I tried to compile the frontend but had the same kind of problems. The > Fortran77 runtime library seems to be missing from the distribution. With some tweaks I was able to build the Fortran compiler and libF77. However, I can't say anything about its reliability. Maybe it's better not to include it with the package at the current state, as it's obviously deliberately disabled upstream. > It's in the pcc flags, so it's best to own it anyway. Some package might use it > in the future. Yes, you're right. It's better to leave it as it is now. If you don't mind, I could do the review a bit later today or maybe tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:59:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516779] Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111359.n7BDx092028754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 --- Comment #1 from Jan Safranek 2009-08-11 09:58:59 EDT --- libcpuset is reviewed as bug #516782 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 13:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] New: Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 Summary: Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jsafrane at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/libcpuset/libcpuset.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/libcpuset/libcpuset-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Cpusets provide system-wide control of the CPUs on which tasks may execute, and the memory nodes on which they allocate memory. libcpuset provides a C API to leverage cpusets. It uses libbitmask, which goes through review as bug #516779 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:03:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514351] Review Request: xfce4-stopwatch-plugin - Stopwatch plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111403.n7BE3ArI002238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514351 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 10:03:08 EDT --- Just two minor notes at the bottom. One being the already acknowledged .desktop file issue. Do you know if its been bought up with the packaging committee? + rpmlint output rpmlint xfce4-stopwatch-plugin.spec xfce4-stopwatch-plugin-0.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm xfce4-stopwatch-plugin-*x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license BSD + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 2ce672f294ee42cdc49ddbe1a1d8ae96 xfce4-stopwatch-plugin-0.2.0.tar.bz2 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested using koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1597960 + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun+ does not use Prefix: /usr n/a package owns all directories it creates n/a no duplicate files in %files + Package perserves timestamps on install + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package n/a header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files + packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock/koji n/a the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures n/a review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin Notes/Issues: - I think the package needs to depend on hicolor-icon-theme due to installing icons into dirs owned by that package. - package contains a desktop file but doesn't validate it. Know isssue with some packages but noting it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:01:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111401.n7BE1kW8029678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 10:01:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > Yup, I tried to compile the frontend but had the same kind of problems. The > > Fortran77 runtime library seems to be missing from the distribution. > > With some tweaks I was able to build the Fortran compiler and libF77. However, > I can't say anything about its reliability. Maybe it's better not to include it > with the package at the current state, as it's obviously deliberately disabled > upstream. The C compiler is, too, still in development. Could you send me the patches necessary to build the F77 compiler? > > It's in the pcc flags, so it's best to own it anyway. Some package might use it > > in the future. > > Yes, you're right. It's better to leave it as it is now. > > If you don't mind, I could do the review a bit later today or maybe tomorrow. Sure, that'd be nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:04:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111404.n7BE4u30002534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 --- Comment #12 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-11 10:04:54 EDT --- Hey Martin, The upstream source files are intact. I never touched the sources. I added a patch file by the name "sblim_cmpi_rpm_ldl_library.patch" and patched the sources. The md5sum of the tar.bz2 file matches that of the upstream sources at : http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/sblim/sblim-cmpi-rpm/1.0.1/sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1.tar.bz2 I also made the other suggested changes: http://linux.us.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-rpm/sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1-4.fc10.src.rpm http://linux.us.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-rpm/sblim-cmpi-rpm.spec Thank you Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452306] Review Request: tcl-pgtcl - Tcl client library for PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111418.n7BEIct2001003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452306 --- Comment #3 from Tom Lane 2009-08-11 10:18:37 EDT --- Haven't forgot about it, but I'm waiting on PyGreSQL to get approved too so I can break them both out at once. That one's bug #452321. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111429.n7BETuQ6008723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #24 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-11 10:29:55 EDT --- http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher.spec http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.17-6.fc11.src.rpm http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.17-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm I've change sbinder to binder, the make statement, removed lform and added the docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111434.n7BEYCvC005703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 Linda Wang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516791 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516779] Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111432.n7BEWTkM005419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 Linda Wang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:41:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111441.n7BEfVf6011824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-11 10:41:30 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516779] Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111443.n7BEhmDJ008238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |varekova at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |varekova at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111443.n7BEhsRq012261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |varekova at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |varekova at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111448.n7BEm28e013295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-11 10:48:00 EDT --- Well, since there is GPLv2 only in the mix, it is the only viable option for the combination of files. As is, License: GPLv2 is correct. I would strongly recommend that you ask upstream to move the GPLv2 only code to GPLv2 or later, as it would provide more licensing flexibility for future use. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111445.n7BEjnOg012900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-11 10:45:47 EDT --- Hello Praveen, thanks for the fixes. Now, the md5sums match (5a6ebb04abe884b51416054e97777d64). The tarball in your previous SRPM sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm had a different hash value, and there was no patch file included with the SRPM: $ rpm -qlp sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1.tar.bz2 sblim-cmpi-rpm.spec $ md5sum sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1.tar.bz2 e1130e6a170f40e84e1a87d2cf41af8a sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1.tar.bz2 But now it's fixed. :) Everything seems to be clean now. You should check whether the build also works with make %{?_smp_mflags} If not, you can leave it as it is, and add a comment before the make statement that the smp flags break the builds. Besides of that, I think we can finish here. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111452.n7BEqDtA014419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #25 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 10:52:12 EDT --- Good, now the package builds in mock. There are still a few issues to fix: rpmlint reports: sys_basher.src: E: description-line-too-long low level functions including memory bandwidth (at all levels of the hierarchy), sys_basher.src: E: description-line-too-long disk IO bandwidth and integer and floating point operations using unrolled loops. sys_basher.src: W: strange-permission sys_basher.spec 0770 sys_basher.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long low level functions including memory bandwidth (at all levels of the hierarchy), sys_basher.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long disk IO bandwidth and integer and floating point operations using unrolled loops. sys_basher.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sys_basher 0775 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 1 warnings. To fix these you need to break the description to less than 80 character lines, e.g. sys_basher is a multithreaded system exerciser. It tests the CPU, RAM and Disks under conditions of maximum stress by running CPU, Memory and Disk tests on all Cores simultaneously. In addition to reliablity testing, sys_basher benchmarks low level functions including memory bandwidth (at all levels of the hierarchy), disk IO bandwidth and integer and floating point operations using unrolled loops. ** Change the spec file permission to 0644 (the one you build the srpm from). ** To fix the executable perm issue you can either run chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/sys_basher or modify the upstream makefile which should use install instead of 'mv': Add the definition INSTALL="install -p" to the top of the makefile and change the install target to install: sys_basher ${INSTALL} -D -m 755 sys_basher ${DESTDIR}/sys_basher This command will automatically create ${DESTDIR} if it does not exist, and copy the executable with 755 permissions. ** After these changes the package should be in order. Then you need to perform the informal reviews to show me that you know the Fedora guidelines as per comment #2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111453.n7BEruw1011296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-11 10:53:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I don't know if with cvs I can download a specific revision like svn does with > "svn export -r 250" Usually cvs repository does not use any "revision"s (Fedora CVS system use tags and we can use these tags) An alternative way is to specify the date (please see "$ cvs --help co" and the explanation of "-D" option in "$ man cvs") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 14:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111457.n7BEvUrI015554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 --- Comment #14 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-11 10:57:29 EDT --- Hey Martin, I verified that "make %{?_smp_mflags}" doesn't work. So, I will leave it as is. Thanks for your time. Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111500.n7BF0ceV016496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:00:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111500.n7BF0Lfj016429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 --- Comment #15 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-11 11:00:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-cmpi-rpm Short Description: CIM access to installed software packages Owners: praveenp Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: praveenp mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516802] Review Request: cryptcat - Standard netcat enhanced with twofish encryption capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111504.n7BF4ZCL014270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516802 kashyap chamarthy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |with twofish encryption | |capabilities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:03:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516802] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516802 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kchamart at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/cryptcat.spec SRPM URL: http://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/cryptcat-1.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: TCP/IP swiss army knife extended with twofish encryption Cryptcat is a simple Unix utility which reads and writes data across network connections, using TCP or UDP protocol while encrypting the data being transmitted. It is designed to be a reliable "back-end" tool that can be used directly or easily driven by other programs and scripts. At the same time, it is a feature-rich network debugging and exploration tool, since it can create almost any kind of connection you would need and has several interesting built-in capabilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111506.n7BF6Glq015215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #9 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-11 11:06:14 EDT --- One last thing, Please replace every mentioning of "sblim-cmpi-network" with %{name} in the spec file. (line 26, 35 and 65) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516327] Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111513.n7BFDEdm019828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 11:13:13 EDT --- perl-latest-0.03-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-latest-0.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516327] Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111513.n7BFD9JU019785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 11:13:08 EDT --- perl-latest-0.03-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-latest-0.03-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516327] Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111513.n7BFDlhk017171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-11 11:13:46 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:16:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111516.n7BFGXgE020842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #26 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 11:16:32 EDT --- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111537.n7BFb4Tx023524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #7 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-11 11:37:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=357038) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=357038) Patch to enable build of f77 compiler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111540.n7BFe85V024158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-11 11:40:08 EDT --- > The C compiler is, too, still in development. Could you send me the patches > necessary to build the F77 compiler? Yes, sure. I've attached the patch to this ticket. It just enables building of the f77 compiler. The makefile of libf77 has yet to be modified to make sure it's also built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111543.n7BFhW0r027506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-11 11:43:31 EDT --- look http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/xrdp/xrdp.spec http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/xrdp/xrdp-0.5.0.20090911cvs-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111544.n7BFikep027811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-11 11:44:45 EDT --- spot, thank you for helping us out with the license question. I have already contacted upstream and requested that the GPLv2 only code be relicensed. * Tue Aug 11 2009 Kalev Lember - 2.0.4-2.final2 - Changed license tag to read "GPLv2" as there is GPLv2-only code in the mix. Spec URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/mmapper.spec SRPM URL: http://www.smartlink.ee/~kalev/mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516802] Review Request: cryptcat - Standard netcat enhanced with twofish encryption capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111544.n7BFiAXm027702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516802 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-11 11:44:09 EDT --- Wow. Okay, a few things: * The current nc in Fedora is nc-1.84-21 * The nc code in this is 1.10. It is ancient. I would strongly recommend that you try to get this extension supported in the netcat upstream, otherwise, you will constantly be playing a catchup game with keeping this code working against the latest netcat code. * Netcat is licensed under the GPL, all versions (GPL+) * farm9crypt.cpp has no licensing information * twofish2.cc is under the "Cryptix General License", which is BSD, even though the license text is not present in this package (which should be fixed). In order to have this live in Fedora, you need to update the netcat code to the current revision, have upstream clarify the licensing on farm9crypt*, and include a copy of the Cryptix General License (just to be sure it is in fact, BSD). Blocking FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 15:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111554.n7BFslev028244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #27 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-11 11:54:46 EDT --- I'm not getting any rpmlint errors, however I'll shorten those lines anyway. Is install a script of yours? There is no such command as install on my system and I don't see it in yumex. I've created a man page, where do I specify? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111606.n7BG6GEV002528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-11 12:06:15 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:05:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111605.n7BG5loD002429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #45 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-11 12:05:43 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:05:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111605.n7BG5QQI002313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(edbrand at brandint. | |com) --- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-11 12:05:24 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:10:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111610.n7BGA96Q004160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-11 12:10:08 EDT --- oops new version -> http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/xrdp/xrdp.spec http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/xrdp/xrdp-0.5.0-2.20090811cvs.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:13:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111613.n7BGD4BV002714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Jason Farrell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |farrellj at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Jason Farrell 2009-08-11 12:13:03 EDT --- Hey Ankur - thanks for packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:24:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111624.n7BGOon6006125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-08-11 12:24:49 EDT --- Thanks for the confirmation spot. ============================================= The package mmapper is APPROVED by epienbro ============================================= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] New: Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Summary: Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/espresso-ab.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/espresso-ab-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Espresso takes as input a two-level representation of a two-valued (or multiple-valued) Boolean function, and produces a minimal equivalent representation. It is a boolean logic minimization tool. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111633.n7BGXKbr010931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |django-south - Intelligent |Django-south - Intelligent |schema migrations for |schema migrations for |Django apps |Django apps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111635.n7BGZVht009565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-11 12:35:30 EDT --- Successful Koji build on FC10 and FC11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1598561 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1598567 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111633.n7BGX3ZU008933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 --- Comment #2 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-11 12:33:02 EDT --- Thank you for the reviewing, Toshio. New Spec: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/Django-south/Django-south.spec New SRPM: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/Django-south/Django-south-0.6-0.1.20090811hgrc1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:08:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111608.n7BG8J2k000724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #28 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 12:08:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > I'm not getting any rpmlint errors, however I'll shorten those lines anyway. As you can see, I get them from the SRPM, not the spec file. > Is install a script of yours? There is no such command as install on my system > and I don't see it in yumex. install is a standard *nix utility: $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/install coreutils-7.2-2.fc11.x86_64 > I've created a man page, where do I specify? In the upstream makefile you should have ------ BINDIR=/usr/local/bin MANDIR=/usr/local/share/man/ INSTALL="install -p" install: $(INSTALL) -D -m 644 sys_basher.1 $(DESTDIR)$(MANDIR)/man1/sys_basher.1 $(INSTALL) -D -m 755 sys_basher $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)/sys_basher ------ In the spec file you run make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT BINDIR=%{_bindir} MANDIR=%{_mandir} and just add %{_mandir}/man1/sys_basher.1.* in %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111634.n7BGYGmJ011444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111634.n7BGYFW3011422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 --- Comment #4 from Ashay 2009-08-11 12:34:14 EDT --- I've fixed the iconv timestamp issue. I'm now keeping the exe script in doc. That gives a rpmlint warning. If that's Ok, then great... The license is GPLv2 in the "COPYING" file provided by upstream. http://ashay.info/rpm/adtool.spec http://ashay.info/rpm/adtool-1.3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111642.n7BGg7qD014044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 12:42:06 EDT --- mutter-2.27.2-1.fc12 is now built in rawhide (this is a dep for gnome-shell). I'll get it tagged for the alpha too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111640.n7BGePnr013462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-11 12:40:24 EDT --- no need for sponsorship as you have already been sponsored by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:44:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111644.n7BGieKd011640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-11 12:44:39 EDT --- Thank you for the review, Erik. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mmapper Short Description: Graphical MUME mapper Owners: kalev Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111645.n7BGjAVr014991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111644.n7BGiWnR014534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 12:44:31 EDT --- mingw32-enchant-1.5.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-enchant-1.5.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:44:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111644.n7BGinh9014575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|chitlesh at gmail.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111653.n7BGrd4d013881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 12:53:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The license is GPLv2 in the "COPYING" file provided by upstream. No, "COPYING" contains the GPLv2 license, but there isn't a mention anywhere that specifies the license of adtool. See comment #3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111654.n7BGsf1G016531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 Bug 516337 depends on bug 516327, which changed state. Bug 516327 Summary: Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-11 12:54:40 EDT --- perl-latest is there now, so scratch build available: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1598708 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 16:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111653.n7BGru0E016437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-11 12:53:55 EDT --- I've compiled the F77 frontend and library, but I can't get the frontend to work. When trying to compile a simple Hello World program program hello_world implicit none c character*32 text c text = 'Hello World' write (*,*) text c end I get $ pcc-f77 helloworld.f helloworld.f: MAIN hello: Error on line 1 of helloworld.f: syntax error Error on line 2 of helloworld.f: syntax error Error. No assembly. so I don't think there's any idea in shipping the F77 stuff. (Now I think I read somewhere some time ago that it doesn't work.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 17:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111722.n7BHMPd9022942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-11 13:22:24 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (New BSD) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED Don't forget to - request CVS branches for fedora - once CVS branches are granted, build and push espresso-ad directly to stable repositories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 17:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111728.n7BHSlqE022234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 13:28:46 EDT --- pipestat-0.3.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pipestat-0.3.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 17:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111730.n7BHUPK9022805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 13:30:24 EDT --- pipestat-0.3.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pipestat-0.3.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 17:27:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111727.n7BHRT9Q021951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 13:27:28 EDT --- pipestat-0.3.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pipestat-0.3.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 17:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111731.n7BHVQ0t023261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 17:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111730.n7BHUwcK023097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 --- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-11 13:30:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: espresso-ab Short Description: A boolean minimization tool Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 17:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111737.n7BHbPxr024649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #11 from Guido Grazioli 2009-08-11 13:37:23 EDT --- Mmh, rpmmacro exporting LANG seems to take precedence against my patch, so please forget it; what you need is: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ant dist-binaries javadoc in you specfile, but i cant say whether it's following packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 17:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111745.n7BHjvhG026533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 13:45:56 EDT --- mutter 2.27.2 tagged for F12 alpha -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 18:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] New: Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 Summary: Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/perl-Search-Xapian.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.11-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Perl XS frontend to the Xapian C++ search library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 18:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111831.n7BIVtQK007269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-11 14:31:54 EDT --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/perl-Search-Xapian.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.11-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 18:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111830.n7BIUJkp006948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 --- Comment #3 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-11 14:30:18 EDT --- Updated for parallel build problem (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591474 - I just turned off the parallel build rather than dealing with patching the Makefile.am) http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/gnome-shell.spec http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/gnome-shell-2.27.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 18:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] New: Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 Summary: Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eqntott.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eqntott-9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Converts Boolean logic expressions into a truth table that is useful for preparing input to espresso package for logic minimization, converting logic expressions into simpler forms, and for creating truth tables. Successful Koji builds for FC10, FC11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1599131 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1599155 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 18:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516878] New: Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516878 Summary: Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eqntott.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eqntott-9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Converts Boolean logic expressions into a truth table that is useful for preparing input to espresso package for logic minimization, converting logic expressions into simpler forms, and for creating truth tables. Successful Koji builds for FC10, FC11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1599131 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1599155 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 18:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516878] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111845.n7BIjeUi010674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516878 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 18:49:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111849.n7BInX0I011091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-11 14:49:31 EDT --- *** Bug 516878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 18:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516878] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111849.n7BInWJ1011061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516878 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-11 14:49:31 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 516874 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 18:52:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516802] Review Request: cryptcat - Standard netcat enhanced with twofish encryption capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111852.n7BIqje4011980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516802 --- Comment #2 from kashyap chamarthy 2009-08-11 14:52:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Wow. Okay, a few things: > > * The current nc in Fedora is nc-1.84-21 > * The nc code in this is 1.10. It is ancient. I would strongly recommend that > you try to get this extension supported in the netcat upstream, ok, will try this. > otherwise, you > will constantly be playing a catchup game with keeping this code working > against the latest netcat code. > > * Netcat is licensed under the GPL, all versions (GPL+) > * farm9crypt.cpp has no licensing information > * twofish2.cc is under the "Cryptix General License", which is BSD, even though > the license text is not present in this package (which should be fixed). > > In order to have this live in Fedora, you need to update the netcat code to the > current revision, have upstream clarify the licensing on farm9crypt*, and > include a copy of the Cryptix General License (just to be sure it is in fact, > BSD). I've already sent an email to upstream asking for license clarification. And Sure, will include the Cryptix General License copy. (FWIW, I've read and compared both Cryptix General License and BSD two clause license, it looks the same) > > Blocking FE-Legal. Thanks for the comments Tom. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 19:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111903.n7BJ3aJN011647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 19:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111915.n7BJFhTo017635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede 2009-08-11 15:15:42 EDT --- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 19:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516885] New: Review Request: perl-XSLoader - Dynamically load C libraries into Perl code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XSLoader - Dynamically load C libraries into Perl code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516885 Summary: Review Request: perl-XSLoader - Dynamically load C libraries into Perl code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/perl-XSLoader.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/perl-XSLoader-0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module defines a standard simplified interface to the dynamic linking mechanisms available on many platforms. Its primary purpose is to implement cheap automatic dynamic loading of Perl modules. For a more complicated interface, see DynaLoader. Many (most) features of DynaLoader are not implemented in XSLoader, like for example the dl_load_flags, not honored by XSLoader. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 19:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111931.n7BJVt9f017754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 --- Comment #4 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-11 15:31:54 EDT --- Updated for missing BuildRequires on gir-repository-devel http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/gnome-shell.spec http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/gnome-shell-2.27.0-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 19:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111933.n7BJXuX0018125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ivazqueznet at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #13 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-11 15:33:54 EDT --- hi Ignacio, I will post a new review request and close this in case I don't see any response in a week. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 19:39:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516885] Review Request: perl-XSLoader - Dynamically load C libraries into Perl code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111939.n7BJd9u8019395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516885 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-11 15:39:08 EDT --- Cancelling this request. This module is already included in perl. How stupid :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 19:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509619] Review Request: srtp - Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111943.n7BJhMYh023363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509619 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-11 15:43:20 EDT --- updates files here, still no answer from upstream http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/srtp/srtp.spec http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/srtp/srtp-1.4.4-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 19:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111950.n7BJo9fc021886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |516779 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 19:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516779] Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908111950.n7BJoAMk021915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |516782 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 20:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112017.n7BKHGRQ031254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede 2009-08-11 16:17:15 EDT --- Full review done, results: MUST FIX: --------- * You (correcty IMHO, esp as the icon is zgv) include icon cache scriptlets, but you install the icon under /usr/share/pixmaps instead of under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps Don't forget to add a Requires: hicolor-icon-theme for dir ownership when you fix this SHOULD FIX: ----------- * Please use "install -p -m ..." instead of "install -m ..." when installing non generated files to preserve the timestamps (for the keymap.bmp and fbzx.svg files) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 20:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112021.n7BKLTpu032221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-11 16:21:27 EDT --- Updated anjal snapshot including a spec cleanup. Also updated the release numbering to the Fedora pre release 0.x scheme. SPEC: as before SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/anjal-0.1.0-0.3.20090811git813fc0f.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1599410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 20:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112037.n7BKbvRW004101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 16:37:56 EDT --- potrace-1.8-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update potrace'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0272 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 20:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112037.n7BKbkKV000534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 16:37:45 EDT --- python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tw-jquery'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0268 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 20:37:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516148] Review Request: trac-tickettemplate-plugin - Allows for templates in trac tickets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112037.n7BKbDZ3000347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516148 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 16:37:12 EDT --- trac-tickettemplate-plugin-0.5-0.1.svn6332.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update trac-tickettemplate-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0264 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 20:48:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] New: Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Summary: Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jdetaeye at users.sourceforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/frepple/frepple/0.7.1/fedora_SRPM/frepple.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/frepple/frepple/0.7.1/fedora_SRPM/frepple-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Hello, I am leading the open source frePPLe project and would like to include it as a fedora package. Can you please review the package? FrePPLe stands for "Free Production Planning Library". It is a toolkit/ framework for modeling and solving production planning problems, targeted primarily at discrete manufacturing industries. BTW, a very similar review process has also been started for including frePPle in the Ubuntu distribution: see http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/frepple. Since I would like to focus on the upstream development, a volunteer maintainer of the Fedora package would be very welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 20:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 16:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112058.n7BKwlJC008796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #29 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-11 16:58:46 EDT --- http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.18-1.fc11.src.rpm http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.18-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher.spec I've added the man file and updated the -h section of the program so that it produces output that works well with help2man. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 21:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 17:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512228] Review Request: (Previously Orphaned) dumpasn1 - ASN.1 object dump utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112116.n7BLGApb008422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512228 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20090318-3 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Ville Skytt? 2009-08-11 17:16:08 EDT --- I see 20090318-3.fc12 has already been in Rawhide for quite a while so I think we're done with this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510626] Review Request: olpc-switch-desktop - OLPC utilities for switching desktop environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112233.n7BMXTw3029063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510626 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:33:28 EDT --- olpc-switch-desktop-0.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512164] Review Request: olpc-update - OLPC system update tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112231.n7BMV31h028623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512164 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.20-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112232.n7BMWu5a028983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:32:55 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-0.638-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Config-Model'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8470 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112230.n7BMUmDN028574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:30:47 EDT --- pyliblo-0.7.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pyliblo'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8455 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112235.n7BMZ5GS025750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:35:04 EDT --- chameleon-0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512164] Review Request: olpc-update - OLPC system update tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112230.n7BMUxZp024198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512164 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:30:58 EDT --- olpc-update-2.20-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112232.n7BMW6sf024675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:32:06 EDT --- R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:35:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112235.n7BMZIRf025799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:35:17 EDT --- R-preprocessCore-1.6.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:32:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112232.n7BMWjUu024819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:32:44 EDT --- PgsLookAndFeel-1.1-4.20090805cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112233.n7BMXDgB024996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:33:12 EDT --- sugar-update-control-0.21-2.fc11, bitfrost-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112235.n7BMZMSG025833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6.0-2.fc10 |1.6.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509399] Review Request: bitfrost - OLPC security platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112233.n7BMXIsg025038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509399 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.21-2.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112232.n7BMWoYY024857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1-4.20090805cvs.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112231.n7BMVHSZ024394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:31:17 EDT --- pyliblo-0.7.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pyliblo'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8454 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:32:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112232.n7BMWB2o024712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.6.0-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112234.n7BMYh3d025356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:34:42 EDT --- python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tw-jquery'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:32:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112232.n7BMW0ZT024631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:31:59 EDT --- colossus-0.9.0-1.20090810svn4482.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update colossus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8464 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112230.n7BMUres024163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:30:52 EDT --- gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-colors-icon-theme'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8458 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112237.n7BMbREx030857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #63 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:37:23 EDT --- gnome-do-plugins-0.8.1-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511922] Review Request: olpc-contents - OLPC contents manifest tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112236.n7BMatRr030660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511922 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:36:54 EDT --- olpc-contents-2.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112237.n7BMbC3q030727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.0.2-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:37:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112237.n7BMbbkH031008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8.1-6.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112235.n7BMZ9bo029926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112235.n7BMZTnU030085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:35:28 EDT --- colossus-0.9.0-1.20090810svn4482.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update colossus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8486 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112233.n7BMXcPN029251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:33:36 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dvisvgm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510321] Review Request: olpc-library - OLPC library page generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112237.n7BMb7v3026906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510321 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:37:06 EDT --- olpc-library-2.0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:38:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112238.n7BMcqGX027263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:38:51 EDT --- perl-Flickr-API-1.02-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:39:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112239.n7BMdVhD027447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-1.fc11 |0.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112239.n7BMdGNG027365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:39:15 EDT --- PgsLookAndFeel-1.1-4.20090805cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513119] Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112239.n7BMdL6p027393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-4.20090805cvs.fc10 |1.1-4.20090805cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112238.n7BMccnJ027171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:38:37 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-0.638-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Config-Model'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8496 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:38:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112238.n7BMckQH027212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:38:45 EDT --- python-repoze-what-plugins-sql-1.0-0.5.rc1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-repoze-what-plugins-sql'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8493 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112236.n7BMaYLM026728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 D. Marlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmarlin at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from D. Marlin 2009-08-11 18:36:33 EDT --- This package will not currently build due to a missing dependency: from root.log DEBUG util.py:256: No Package Found for bickley-devel so a full review will have to wait for bickley. configure will be run twice, once in the prep stage (through autogen.sh) and once in the build stage. # run autogen.sh until we have a proper release, but don't run configure twice. sed -i 's|echo|exit 0|g' autogen.sh ./autogen.sh The 'sed' change does not appear to work for this autogen.sh script. I think the following command line change will: # run autogen.sh until we have a proper release, but don't run configure twice. NOCONFIGURE=yes ./autogen.sh It appears that the libraries are being included in the files lists twice (duplicate): %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING README %{_libdir}/lib*.so.0* %{_libdir}/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so.* %{_libdir}/lib*.so.0* # duplicate %{_libexecdir}/moblin-panel* : %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_libdir}/lib*.so %{_libdir}/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc %{_libdir}/lib*.so # duplicate %{_includedir}/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:39:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509933] Review Request: chameleon - Database schema transformation tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112239.n7BMdREH031992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509933 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:39:26 EDT --- chameleon-0.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:38:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112238.n7BMcvJk031879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.02-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112241.n7BMf0Ml000302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:40:58 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dvisvgm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8499 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112241.n7BMf5wD028666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-11 18:41:04 EDT --- python-tw-jquery-0.9.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tw-jquery'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8500 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 22:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 18:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908112247.n7BMl8He030230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 --- Comment #3 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-11 18:47:07 EDT --- Wow.. South 0.6 was just released. SPEC: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/Django-south/Django-south.spec SRPM: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/Django-south/Django-south-0.6-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 00:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120016.n7C0G9Bd013780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-11 20:16:08 EDT --- Remove the initial buildroot definition and in %install section. Same as the previous review. Align the text in the description properly. Using wiki as a place to attach upstream tarballs is not acceptable. Ask upstream to use the releases directory similar to https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/y/python-fedora/ Running fpaste by itself simply hangs. It should show the --help output instead. A man page would be useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 04:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] New: Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 Summary: Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet Spec Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/tokyotyrant/tokyotyrant.spec SRPM Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/tokyotyrant-1.1.33-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Tokyo Tyrant is a network interface to Tokyo Cabinet. rpmlint [silas at fox rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant-libs.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/ttskeldir.so tokyotyrant-libs.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/ttskelproxy.so tokyotyrant-libs.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/ttskelmock.so tokyotyrant-libs.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/ttskelnull.so 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. Regarding non-standard-(uid/gid): - I create the tokyotyrant user/group so this is fine. Regarding no-soname: - I couldn't find anything that can/does link against these, but obviously I'm missing something. The primary library (libtokyotyrant) has a soname so I think its fine. NOTE: When I submitted this review the version of Tokyo Tyrant in devel wasn't compatible with versions of Tokyo Tyrant on the project website. Until Tokyo Cabinet >= 1.4.30 is available in devel you can use the SRPM below. Tokyo Cabinet 1.4.30: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/tokyocabinet-1.4.30-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 05:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120535.n7C5ZM1V004814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 Bug 512627 depends on bug 513119, which changed state. Bug 513119 Summary: Review Request: PgsLookAndFeel - Nice looking LookAndFeel for Swing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513119 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 01:35:21 EDT --- MiniCopier-0.4-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/MiniCopier-0.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 05:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120536.n7C5aEov005074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 01:36:13 EDT --- MiniCopier-0.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/MiniCopier-0.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 06:47:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516779] Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120647.n7C6liEX021901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 --- Comment #2 from Ivana Varekova 2009-08-12 02:47:44 EDT --- 1/ please change BuildRoot: to %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) (recommended one in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines) 2/ AUTHORS -file could be add to documentation that`s all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 06:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120653.n7C6r9eN023258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #30 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-12 02:53:08 EDT --- Doesn't compile: help2man -N sys_basher -o sys_basher.1 help2man: can't get `--help' info from sys_basher The command should be help2man -N ./sys_basher -o sys_basher.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 06:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 02:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120658.n7C6w1hr020023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-12 02:58:00 EDT --- Consider packaging latest upstream source 1.0.14.0 Good to keep version for this package as 1.0.14.0 as this package provides perl(Search::Xapian) = 1.0.14.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 07:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120701.n7C71nMq025506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 --- Comment #1 from Ivana Varekova 2009-08-12 03:01:48 EDT --- 1/ please change BuildRoot: to %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) (recommended one in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines) 2/ remove empty row: #Requires:....... 3/ AUTHORS -file could be add to documentation that`s all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 07:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120719.n7C7JJdO028595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-12 03:19:18 EDT --- License looks "GPL+ or Artistic" Consider cpanspec command to create spec file for perl packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 07:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120723.n7C7Nmwn025036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-12 03:23:47 EDT --- Hello Johan, since this seems to be your first review request and I can't find you in the Fedora account system, you need a sponsor reviewing this package. To find one, add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag in the Blocks field above. For further information see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request I just had a quick look at your spec file and noticed a couple of things to fix: - please remove the leading header comment - the License tag should probably be LGPLv2+ (see the license abbreviation page) - fix the Source tags according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL - remove "python" from Requires, as it's determined automatically - you probably don't need to add the autotools to BuildRequires - add a %changelog section at the bottom of the spec file showing the revision history $ rpm -qlp frepple-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm frepple-0.7.1.spec frepple-0.7.1.tar.gz The spec filename must be frepple.spec (remove the version number). $ rpmlint frepple-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm frepple.src: E: no-changelogname-tag frepple.src: W: invalid-license LGPL, v2.1 frepple.src: W: invalid-license greater frepple.src: E: invalid-spec-name 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. Again, the complete review must be done by a sponsor. :) Martin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 07:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120743.n7C7hZqs029337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 --- Comment #2 from Jan Safranek 2009-08-12 03:43:34 EDT --- 1, 2, 3: done In addition, I moved /usr/share/man/man4/cpuset.4.gz from -devel subpackage to libcpuset.rpm I uploaded new .spec and .srpm to aforementioned location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 07:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516779] Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120743.n7C7hrWe000841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 --- Comment #3 from Jan Safranek 2009-08-12 03:43:53 EDT --- 1, 2, 3: done I uploaded new .spec and .srpm to aforementioned location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 07:47:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120747.n7C7lM0P001608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 07:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516779] Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120746.n7C7kGwP030157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 07:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 03:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516779] Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120758.n7C7whni004791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ivana Varekova 2009-08-12 03:58:42 EDT --- Looks ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 08:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120815.n7C8F6uf004506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-08-12 04:15:05 EDT --- Sorry Christian, I have been really busy lately. I will get back to this in a week or two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 08:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516987] New: Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516987 Summary: Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tfujiwar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~fujiwara/ibus/20090812/ibus-anthy.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~fujiwara/ibus/20090812/ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20090804-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: - Fix bug 509483 - reconversion feature doesn't work - Fix bug 509485 - commit_first_segment feature doesn't work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 08:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120821.n7C8Ld69005788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Ivana Varekova 2009-08-12 04:21:37 EDT --- Looks ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 08:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516987] Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120830.n7C8UOxY011763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516987 fujiwara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from fujiwara 2009-08-12 04:30:23 EDT --- I'll bump the tarball after the review is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 08:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120835.n7C8Z8sn012617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-12 04:35:07 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 08:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120837.n7C8bo2C008726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-12 04:37:49 EDT --- Not OK: %build autoreconf -i %configure --disable-static --disable-dependency-tracking CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make %{?_smp_mflags} 1. running the autotools during builds is a silly idea. 2. %configure already contain CFLAGS. The explicit CFLAGS= is superflous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 08:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 04:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120858.n7C8wfkI016963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-12 04:58:41 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/perl-Search-Xapian.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.11.0-4.fc11.src.rpm Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 09:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 05:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908120944.n7C9iMAI026773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 --- Comment #5 from Jan Safranek 2009-08-12 05:44:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Not OK: > 1. running the autotools during builds is a silly idea. Surprisingly, upstream provides tarball without ./configure and autoreconf is really needed to create one. > 2. %configure already contain CFLAGS. The explicit CFLAGS= is superflous. Here you are right. I uploaded new .spec and .srpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 11:22:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471805] Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121122.n7CBMFuq015489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805 --- Comment #7 from Dean Mander 2009-08-12 07:22:12 EDT --- Hi Till, thanks for the remarks. I've created a new version of the specfile: - add make_target (to build on ppc) - add BuildRequires:gpg - add make tests - add %{?_smp_mflags} to make commands Patching Makefile.in behind my capacity but any help is appreciated. http://fedorapeople.org/~knol/srpms/aespipe/aespipe.spec http://fedorapeople.org/~knol/srpms/aespipe/aespipe-2.3e-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 11:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516987] Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121133.n7CBXDPT013858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516987 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-12 07:33:12 EDT --- Why is a package review needed for ibus-anthy which already exists on Fedora? You can just modify this on CVS if you are one of the maintainers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 12:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517021] New: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-DBIx-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-DBIx-Simple-1.32-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: DBIx::Simple provides a simplified interface to DBI, Perl's powerful database module. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1600592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 12:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121225.n7CCPwPS030002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #31 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-12 08:25:57 EDT --- I keep forgetting that the default path setup doesn't search the local directory first, my .cshrc file fixes that. I'll add the ./ to the help2man. rpmlint is giving me an error on the current version of the spec file. Line 40 is %{_mandir}/man1/sys_basher.1.*. What do I need to fix? rpmlint -v sys_basher.spec sys_basher.spec:40: E: files-attr-not-set 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Thanks for all your help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 12:36:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517029] New: Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 Summary: Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/shotwell.spec SRPM URL: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/shotwell-0.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Shotwell is a new open source photo organizer designed for the GNOME desktop environment. It allows you to import photos from your camera, view and edit them, and share them with others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 12:48:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:48:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121248.n7CCm0DD002506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwboyer at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwboyer at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 12:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121259.n7CCxtpK001762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-12 08:59:54 EDT --- Oh, I was going to comment about that. The reason why you get the error is because you have the entry in the wrong place: before the %defattr line, so there are no attributes (mode & owner) set. Move the man page line to the end of %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517029] Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121310.n7CDABtV005185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |yaneti at declera.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-08-12 09:10:10 EDT --- License matches. Source matches. No obvious sillies. Builds in mock. Seems to work fine. Please update the icon caches scriptlets with the ones from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121313.n7CDDuiY006186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 --- Comment #5 from Josh Boyer 2009-08-12 09:13:55 EDT --- +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [=] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [jwboyer at hansolo ~]$ rpmlint ~/Download/gnome-shell.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [jwboyer at hansolo ~]$ rpmlint ~/Download/gnome-shell-2.27.0-3.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [jwboyer at hansolo ~]$ rpmlint ~/Download/gnome-shell-2.27.0-3.x86_64.rpm gnome-shell.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency librsvg2 gnome-shell.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gnome-shell-2.27.0/README gnome-shell.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-shell.schemas 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [jwboyer at hansolo SOURCES]$ sha1sum gnome-shell-2.27.0.tar.bz2 9bf1f96e4d70505101730579d396cd32e2488bce gnome-shell-2.27.0.tar.bz2 [jwboyer at hansolo SOURCES]$ wget http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-shell/2.27/gnome-shell-2.27.0.tar.bz2 --2009-08-12 08:55:24-- http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gnome-shell/2.27/gnome-shell-2.27.0.tar.bz2 Resolving ftp.gnome.org... 130.239.18.173, 130.239.18.137, 2001:6b0:e:2018::173, ... Connecting to ftp.gnome.org|130.239.18.173|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 437202 (427K) [application/x-bzip2] Saving to: `gnome-shell-2.27.0.tar.bz2.1' 100%[=====================================>] 437,202 271K/s in 1.6s 2009-08-12 08:55:27 (271 KB/s) - `gnome-shell-2.27.0.tar.bz2.1' saved [437202/437202] [jwboyer at hansolo SOURCES]$ sha1sum gnome-shell-2.27.0.tar.bz2.1 9bf1f96e4d70505101730579d396cd32e2488bce gnome-shell-2.27.0.tar.bz2.1 [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [-] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [=] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1600644 So there are a couple of small items to fixup: 1) Fix the rpmlint output 2) I think the package should own %{_datadir}/gnome-shell and %{_libdir}/gnome-shell 3) You probably need Requires: GConf2 for the usage in %pre/%postun 4) You don't actually call dekstop-file-install in the %install section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121318.n7CDIxEh010804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #33 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-12 09:18:58 EDT --- Thanks, that fixed it. I'm going to check that sys_basher will still build on CentOS and on Ubuntu. Assuming everything is OK there I'll make the next point release. If you approve it I'll make RPMs for 32 bit Fedora 11 and for 32 and 64 bit F10 as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517029] Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121329.n7CDT1TP009903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-08-12 09:29:01 EDT --- Oh and $ rpmlint shotwell.spec shotwell-0.2.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm shotwell-debuginfo-0.2.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm shotwell.spec:35: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. can be ignored, the configure is a custom shell job not related to auto* tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:34:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121334.n7CDYHRj010975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 09:34:16 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.1-5.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dvisvgm-0.8.1-5.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517029] Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121336.n7CDaDiu015691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-08-12 09:36:12 EDT --- Updated the icon cache snipplets: Spec URL: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/shotwell.spec SRPM URL: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/shotwell-0.2.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516906] Review Request: frePPLe - Free Production Planning Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121338.n7CDcAjE016124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516906 Johan De Taeye changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from Johan De Taeye 2009-08-12 09:38:08 EDT --- Danke Martin! All your remarks are just and correct. I just uploaded a new SRPM and spec-file that fixes these issues. Johan $ mock -r fedora-devel-i386 rebuild frepple-0.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 0.9.16 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(frepple-0.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 0.9.16 INFO: Mock Version: 0.9.16 INFO: enabled root cache State Changed: unpacking root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(frepple-0.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(fedora-devel-i386) 4 minutes 11 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/frepple-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpm -qlp /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/frepple-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm frepple-0.7.1.tar.gz frepple.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121342.n7CDgpHw017610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 --- Comment #6 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-12 09:42:50 EDT --- > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. > So there are a couple of small items to fixup: > > 1) Fix the rpmlint output > gnome-shell.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency librsvg2 This warning is bogus; an explicit requirement on the librsvg2 package is needed because that package provides the svg loader for gdk-pixbuf, which we use to load the imagines in the shell. > gnome-shell.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gnome-shell-2.27.0/README I included the README even if it was zero-length in the theory that the upstream would get non-lame and write one soon enough. Wait, I am the upstream... filed a reminder to myself as: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591564 > gnome-shell.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-shell.schemas These aren't actually config files, just where GConf happens to put them. I'd rather have the rpmlint warning then to mark them spuriously as %config > 2) I think the package should own %{_datadir}/gnome-shell and > %{_libdir}/gnome-shell Looks like it does to me? > 3) You probably need Requires: GConf2 for the usage in %pre/%postun Not a bad idea - currently there will be a file dependency on libgconf-2.so.4 which will pull that in, but an explicit requires is probably safer. I'll add it. > 4) You don't actually call dekstop-file-install in the %install section. desktop-file-validate is a valid alternative now. The review checklist really should be updated... I complained about this reviewing someone else's package this a few weeks ago and was pointed to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage Updated: Spec URL: http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/gnome-shell.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/gnome-shell-2.27.0-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517029] Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121357.n7CDvb2E022433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2009-08-12 09:57:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: shotwell Short Description: A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop Owners: mclasen Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121354.n7CDstdi021162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #13 from Luke Macken 2009-08-12 09:54:53 EDT --- I did a little bit of testing after removing the easy-install.pth file, and this package still seems to work (after running pkg_resources.require("SQLAlchemy>0.5"), of course). http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-2.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5.spec * Wed Aug 12 2009 Luke Macken - 0.5.3-3 - Remove conflicting easy-install.pth file from our site-packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121357.n7CDv5F6022345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Josh Boyer 2009-08-12 09:57:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. > > So there are a couple of small items to fixup: > > > > 1) Fix the rpmlint output > > > gnome-shell.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency librsvg2 > > This warning is bogus; an explicit requirement on the librsvg2 package is > needed because that package provides the svg loader for gdk-pixbuf, which we > use to load the imagines in the shell. Ok. > > gnome-shell.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/gnome-shell-2.27.0/README > > I included the README even if it was zero-length in the theory that the > upstream would get non-lame and write one soon enough. Wait, I am the > upstream... filed a reminder to myself as: > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591564 Heh, cool :) > > gnome-shell.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-shell.schemas > > These aren't actually config files, just where GConf happens to put them. I'd > rather have the rpmlint warning then to mark them spuriously as %config That's fine with me. rpmlint is known to be stupid. > > 2) I think the package should own %{_datadir}/gnome-shell and > > %{_libdir}/gnome-shell > > Looks like it does to me? Oops. Yes. > > 3) You probably need Requires: GConf2 for the usage in %pre/%postun > > Not a bad idea - currently there will be a file dependency on libgconf-2.so.4 > which will pull that in, but an explicit requires is probably safer. I'll add > it. > > > 4) You don't actually call dekstop-file-install in the %install section. > > desktop-file-validate is a valid alternative now. The review checklist really > should be updated... I complained about this reviewing someone else's package > this a few weeks ago and was pointed to: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage Indeed. Thanks for pointing that out. > Updated: > Spec URL: http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/gnome-shell.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/gnome-shell-2.27.0-4.src.rpm APPROVED. Thanks, and happy packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 14:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121401.n7CE1r8D023926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #35 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-12 10:01:51 EDT --- Thanks. I'll take your suggestion and clean up the warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 13:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121348.n7CDmmYU014944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #34 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-12 09:48:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > Thanks, that fixed it. I'm going to check that sys_basher will still build on > CentOS and on Ubuntu. Assuming everything is OK there I'll make the next point > release. If you approve it I'll make RPMs for 32 bit Fedora 11 and for 32 and > 64 bit F10 as well. OK, you might want to clean up the unused variables at the same time. You don't have to paste links to binary RPMs here. Once you have done the informal reviews, I have sponsored you and approved this package you will be able to import it in the Fedora build system and build it on Fedora 10, 11 and RHEL 4 and 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 14:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121411.n7CEBFo8027224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 Owen Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-12 10:11:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-shell Short Description: Window management and application launching for GNOME Owners: otaylor walters Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 14:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121423.n7CENKcK024396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Bug 507805 depends on bug 507801, which changed state. Bug 507801 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 507805 depends on bug 507804, which changed state. Bug 507804 Summary: Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 10:23:18 EDT --- perl-Flickr-Upload-1.32-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Flickr-Upload-1.32-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 14:53:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121453.n7CErh3K004712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-12 10:53:42 EDT --- Hi Jussi, here is my review. I couldn't find any mistakes. Everything looks fine. If you're going to exclude the Fortran compiler you can remove the byacc build dependency. rpmlint output: pcc.i586: E: devel-dependency glibc-devel pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/lib/libpcc.a pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/libpcc_stddef.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/lib/libpccsoftfloat.a pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/libpcc_float.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/stddef.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/stdarg.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/float.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/libpcc_stdarg.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/stdbool.h pcc.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/pcc/i586-redhat-linux-gnu/0.9.9/include/libpcc_stdbool.h 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 10 warnings. These warnings are expected and can be ignored (see below). --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [#] OK, not applicable [-] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - no license file included [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5 hashes: pcc-090811.tgz: f5d7f2e3a305c32033578045c3404d85 pcc-libs-090811.tgz: 34e79113d554dac97b1c2c2dd8729f4d [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. - compiler is currently restricted to ix86 [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [#] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [#] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - no shared libraries included [#] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ... - package is not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [#] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large doc files [#] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - no %doc section [#] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [#] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - this is a development package so header and library files should stay in the main package (as this is the case) [#] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - no pkgconfig files [#] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [#] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [#] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. - some small test programs compile w/o errors and work as expected [#] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - no scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 15:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121501.n7CF1Aih006863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-12 11:01:09 EDT --- If you didn't find any issues then I'm sure you can approve the package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 15:16:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121516.n7CFGiTp010866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-12 11:16:43 EDT --- I have yet to think about that for a while. :) No, everything is fine and the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 15:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121519.n7CFJ8rr007486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-12 11:19:07 EDT --- http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX-417 has been fixed (thanks, Paul Gier!) in trunk. Spot, are we good to go ahead here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 15:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121519.n7CFJEYX011412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-12 11:19:13 EDT --- http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX-418 has been fixed (thanks, Paul Gier!) in trunk. Spot, are we good to go ahead here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 15:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121530.n7CFUC0I012000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) Depends on|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 11:30:11 EDT --- Sigh. Put the blocker in the depends on field. ;( Fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 15:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121547.n7CFlXeP020327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 11:47:31 EDT --- I'd like to see an updated SRPM first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 15:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121548.n7CFmvFq017174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 11:48:56 EDT --- As with 500252, I'd like to see a fixed SRPM with the proper license tag before letting this go forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 16:32:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121632.n7CGW0IY032078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-12 12:31:59 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pcc Short Description: The Portable C Compiler Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 16:06:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121606.n7CG6wvT022196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #7 from Tim Waugh 2009-08-12 12:06:56 EDT --- Would be really useful to have this done for Fedora 12, as it is causing perl to be required on the Live CD. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 16:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121645.n7CGjnx4002704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #36 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-12 12:45:48 EDT --- I think I'm ready. What's the procedure for submitting the package to the Fedora build system? http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher.spec http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.19-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121705.n7CH54ga004263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-12 13:05:03 EDT --- It's described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join but first you need to get sponsored in the packager group, which means you have to do a couple of informal package reviews for me. Please review only bugs not marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: python-offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121720.n7CHKPLx011196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-12 13:20:24 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-offtrac New Branches: F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:21:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121721.n7CHLZce013155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-12 13:21:33 EDT --- For -2: The following issues on comment 2 are not yet addressed: (In reply to comment #2) > * Miscs > - In comments or %changelog, please use %% instead of % to avoid > macros expansion. > > * Files > - Please example what package should own the directory > %_datadir/xrdp * Naming - Would you clearify if this is the "post" version of 0.5.0 or "pre" version of 0.5.0 (i.e. has 0.5.0 already been released)? If this is the "pre" version. the release number should be "0.X.%{cvs_related_tag}%{?dist}": https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages ! Requires - Note that Fedora tightvnc-server has "Provides: vnc-server", so even on Fedora "Requires: vnc-server" should be enough. * Macros ------------------------------------------------------------------- #install /etc/rc.d/init.d/xrdp, use %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d because On releases older ------------------------------------------------------------------- - You can use: ------------------------------------------------------------------- %{!?initddir: %global initddir %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d} ------------------------------------------------------------------- ! Creating rsakeys.ini - (First of all, please use macros: /etc -> %_sysconfdir) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros - The following command -------------------------------------------------------------------- %install .... xrdp-keygen xrdp %{buildroot}/etc/xrdp/rsakeys.ini -------------------------------------------------------------------- won't work because xrdp is not yet installed (under the system structure). If rsakyes.ini is to be created here, something like: -------------------------------------------------------------------- %install ..... export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/xrdp export PATH=%{buildroot}%{_bindir}:$PATH xrdp-keygen xrdp %{buildroot}/etc/xrdp/rsakeys.ini chmod 644 %{buildroot}/etc/xrdp/rsakeys.ini -------------------------------------------------------------------- is needed. However, while I am not familiar with xrdp, is it expected that all machines using Fedora have the same rsakeys.ini? (again I don't know well how this rsakeys.ini is used) If not, this script should be moved to %post (and some hacks like marking rsakeys.int as %verify(not md5,....) or so is needed). * sysinit -------------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# ps auwwx | grep xrdp root 15211 0.0 0.1 5332 824 pts/5 S+ 02:09 0:00 grep xrdp [root at localhost ~]# service xrdp status xrdp is running -------------------------------------------------------------------- - ?? -------------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# service xrdp start Starting: xrdp and sesman . . [root at localhost ~]# -------------------------------------------------------------------- - There should be the output like [OK] and the cursor should be moved to the new line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121723.n7CHNf2L011698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #38 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-12 13:23:40 EDT --- And here's the review of this package: rpmlint output: sys_basher.src: W: strange-permission sys_basher.spec 0770 sys_basher.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.9-1 ['1.1.19-1.fc11', '1.1.19-1'] 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Still, the spec file you used to generate the srpm has strange permissions. Run chmod 644 on it and regenerate the srpm. Fix the version in the changelog as well. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSWORK - You need to fix the source URL: $ spectool -g sys_basher.spec --2009-08-12 20:20:24-- http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.19.tar.gz Resolving www.polybus.com... 38.113.1.181 Connecting to www.polybus.com|38.113.1.181|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-08-12 20:20:25 ERROR 404: Not Found. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK - During compilation I get sys_disk.c: In function 'fileWrite': sys_disk.c:150: warning: implicit declaration of function 'open' you might want to fix this. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515614] Review Request: python-offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121723.n7CHNuoM013492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-12 13:23:55 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121732.n7CHW5pr013660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-12 13:32:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/fbzx.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/fbzx-2.1b-2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - Icon is now installed into %%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps - Added missing desktop-file-utils to BuildRequires - Added missing hicolor-icon-theme to Requires - Preserved timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:39:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516311] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121739.n7CHdZDg016257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516311 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-12 13:39:34 EDT --- Could you point out where you find the license described? I don't see it in the tarball, nor at the upstream web site. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:51:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121751.n7CHpHTe022524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2009-08-12 13:51:16 EDT --- Looks good now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121758.n7CHwlUA025657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 13:58:46 EDT --- Yeah, looks okay to me. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:04:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121804.n7CI4gPx026150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 14:04:41 EDT --- Excellent. I see no further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Feel free to request cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:01:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121801.n7CI1E4G025749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517141] New: Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 Summary: Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-fgl.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-fgl-5.4.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell fgl library for ghc. This is a library of types and functions for addressing graph problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] New: Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 Summary: Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-HUnit.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-HUnit-1.2.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell HUnit library for ghc. HUnit is a unit testing framework for Haskell, inspired by the JUnit tool for Java. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509658] Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121820.n7CIKhul029571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 14:20:42 EDT --- The proposed License tag of "BSD and (BSD or GPLv2+)" with a comment explaining the situation seems like the correct solution to me. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121825.n7CIPpAp031938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #39 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-12 14:25:49 EDT --- There are two forms of the open command and I'm using both which is why I wasn't using a prototype on it. I've just changed the second instance to pass a 0 arg for the don't care term. I'm going to have to run the sys_basher disk tests to make sure that this doesn't effect anything. If it works I'll create a 1.20 release which will resolve the warning. I've taken care of the other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121827.n7CIRbHb032124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 14:27:36 EDT --- The short answer is that French citizens cannot put works into the Public Domain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_copyright_law#Moral_rights "Any agreement to waive an author's moral rights is null and void, although the author cannot be forced to protect his work." Basically, what this means is that we need the AOP Alliance to actually give us licensing terms, even if they're extremely permissive ones. I would suggest the MIT license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121824.n7CIOxZs031407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-12 14:24:58 EDT --- Hello Sebastian, this is a small, pretty clean package. I couldn't find any issues that have to be fixed. Here comes my review: $ rpmlint blazeblogger*.rpm blazeblogger.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/blaze-config 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The warning is expected and can safely be ignored. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [#] OK, not applicable [-] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. - GPLv3 (executables) and GFDL (docs) [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. COPYING and FDL listed in %doc [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - md5 hash is 79b240e196cdb2f2a765e4ef10546163 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [#] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture,... - it's a Perl package that is expected to work on all architectures [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - no explicit build dependencies required [#] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. - no locales [#] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [#] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [#] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - no directories created [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [#] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [#] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [#] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [#] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [#] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [#] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [#] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [#] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. - no GUI [#] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - doesn't own any directories [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - I've tested some of the provided Perl scripts and they worked as expected [#] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - no scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121826.n7CIQIxK030800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-12 14:26:17 EDT --- Since the package is clean, I can already finish the review here. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 13:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121707.n7CH7nkp005201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bos at serpentine.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bos at serpentine.com Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c |fedora-review+ |om) | --- Comment #7 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-12 13:07:47 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. All pass cleanly, with a few warnings that are expected given Haskell packaging issues. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . Yes. # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Yes. # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . BSD. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] Yes. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] Yes. # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] Yes. # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] Yes. # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Yes. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] Yes. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] Yes. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes. # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] N/A. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] N/A. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] N/A. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] Yes. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] Yes. # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] Yes. # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] Yes. # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] Yes. # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] Yes. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] Yes. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] Yes. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] Yes. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] N/A. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] N/A. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] N/A. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] N/A. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] N/A. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] N/A. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] Yes. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] Yes. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] Yes. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121830.n7CIUicA000487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #47 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 14:30:42 EDT --- Looks like there are no outstanding issues for FE-Legal here, lifting it. If I'm wrong, just let me know. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121838.n7CIc91B001895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2009-08-12 14:38:08 EDT --- spot: Wouldn't the WTFPL be much closer to 'public domain' and be fine for integration into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121844.n7CIiPxb003262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #48 from Christian Krause 2009-08-12 14:44:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) > Looks like there are no outstanding issues for FE-Legal here, lifting it. > > If I'm wrong, just let me know. :) Yeah, the licensing issue should be solved. The only remaining issue I'm unsure is about shipping the pre-compiled binaries. Sure, they are not in the binary rpm, but they are still in the source rpm. Is this OK or is there any need to re-package the upstream tgz without them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509658] Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121845.n7CIjApu003658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(josephsmidt at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-12 14:45:09 EDT --- The legal blocker nonwithstanding, there's still been no response to my review commentary in over a month now. Setting needinfo; I will close this ticket soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121845.n7CIjfHW002107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 14:45:40 EDT --- Technically, yes, but the WTFPL is a ... poorly drafted license. MIT achieves the same end result and is far less offensive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121854.n7CIsIun005697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-12 14:54:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: blazeblogger Short Description: A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line Owners: sdz Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 18:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] New: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Summary: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-OpenGL.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-OpenGL-2.2.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell OpenGL library for ghc. These provide bindings to the OpenGL graphics library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 19:00:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121900.n7CJ0KwY007566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #49 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 15:00:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > The only remaining issue I'm unsure is about shipping the pre-compiled > binaries. Sure, they are not in the binary rpm, but they are still in the > source rpm. Is this OK or is there any need to re-package the upstream tgz > without them? Well, if you know the licensing for all of the pre-compiled binaries and you are 100% sure that we have permission to freely redistribute them without restriction, you can leave them in the tarball (and delete the files in %prep). If you're not 100% sure, make a new tarball that doesn't have them. Either way, you should ask upstream to consider removing the pre-built binaries from the source tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 19:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121915.n7CJFQ60011580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #8 from Sandro Mathys 2009-08-12 15:15:25 EDT --- I took the time to contact upstream over their mailing list, trying to explain the issue at hand and how to best solve it. I'll wait for an answer and then get back to this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 19:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121920.n7CJKd6s012602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 15:20:36 EDT --- We can't live with the icons as is. Either remove them or replace them. (We should also stop using them on publictest15 asap.) Mo and the Fedora Design Team might be able to help whip up some freely licensed replacements for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 19:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121940.n7CJe3mp017293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2009-08-12 15:40:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cobertura Short Description: Java tool for calculating the test coverage Owners: victorv Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 19:50:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121950.n7CJoDqc017527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 15:50:11 EDT --- zikula-module-scribite-3.2-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 19:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121950.n7CJoN8b017606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.2-3.fc10 |3.2-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 19:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908121949.n7CJnv5K019528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 15:49:56 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.1-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dvisvgm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0276 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515136] Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122027.n7CKRfAn025587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136 --- Comment #2 from C?dric OLIVIER 2009-08-12 16:27:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=357233) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=357233) mock build log I can't generate any rpm for gettext-commons with mock (tested on fc10 and fc11) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122041.n7CKfxFY030568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #40 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-12 16:41:58 EDT --- http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.20-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm I think this should do it. I've installed the koji tools, signed up for an account, uploaded my public key, and installed the cert. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122053.n7CKrI4Q000647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:53:17 EDT --- MiniCopier-0.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122052.n7CKq4sI032617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:52:01 EDT --- mausezahn-0.34.9-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:52:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122052.n7CKqABS032670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.34.9-1.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122053.n7CKrNhs000696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122054.n7CKsO1a031414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:54:23 EDT --- mingw32-enchant-1.5.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] New: Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 Summary: Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tgraf at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/mip6d/mipv6-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/mip6d/mipv6-daemon-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The mobile IPv6 daemon allows nodes to remain reachable while moving around in the IPv6 Internet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516327] Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122058.n7CKwBvw002603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:58:10 EDT --- perl-latest-0.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122057.n7CKvR1s002315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:57:24 EDT --- dansguardian-2.10.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122056.n7CKuaAD002007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:56:36 EDT --- mausezahn-0.34.9-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122057.n7CKvjWN002387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-3.fc10 |0.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122057.n7CKvwAJ002516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.10.1.1-1.fc11 |2.10.1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122056.n7CKugvL002055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.34.9-1.fc10 |0.34.9-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:54:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122054.n7CKsUf9001168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.5.0-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122058.n7CKw4JX002557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:58:03 EDT --- pipestat-0.3.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pipestat'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8513 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122057.n7CKvdvk000541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:57:38 EDT --- MiniCopier-0.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516327] Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122056.n7CKuAZV032636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:56:09 EDT --- perl-latest-0.03-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122057.n7CKvrYp000619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:57:52 EDT --- dansguardian-2.10.1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 20:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122057.n7CKvXSW000504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.10.1.1-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 21:20:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] New: Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 Summary: Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-symfony-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-symfony-symfony-1.2.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Symfony is a complete framework designed to optimize the development of web applications by way of several key features. For starters, it separates a web application's business rules, server logic, and presentation views. It contains numerous tools and classes aimed at shortening the development time of a complex web application. Additionally, it automates common tasks so that the developer can focus entirely on the specifics of an application. The end result of these advantages means there is no need to reinvent the wheel every time a new web application is built! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 21:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122125.n7CLPJgW009637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #1 from Christof Damian 2009-08-12 17:25:18 EDT --- two remarks: rpmlint complains about these errors/warnings: zero-length, hidden-file-or-dir, htaccess-file . As these are files needed for symfony I don't think this should be a problem. I called the package "php-symfony-symfony", because there is a "php-channel-symfony" and this package is build from the symfony pear package. Another choice would be "php-symfony" or just "symfony" and then use the normal tgz from the symfony website which would also be possible, but this might be more in line with the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 21:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122128.n7CLS8UM007826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 --- Comment #11 from Xavier Lamien 2009-08-12 17:28:06 EDT --- * URL I've no preference, i just omitted to fix that url. * Non-gem support We have some codes which not use Ruby gem. for remind, my first approach was to add ruby-json to fpc and currently have no objection to add and maintain both. * gem script fixed * %check fixed and passed. New updates: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ruby-json/rubygem-json.spec http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ruby-json/rubygem-json-1.1.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 21:47:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:47:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122147.n7CLloV6013871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-08-12 17:47:49 EDT --- This piece is from codeforpeople and I had mistakenly assumed the license was MIT; according to http://rubyforge.org/projects/codeforpeople/ which lists fattr, the license should be Ruby; New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-fattr.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/rubygem-fattr-1.0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 21:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122149.n7CLn5TC014075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #3 from Chess Griffin 2009-08-12 17:49:04 EDT --- Sorry, I had this done last week but have not had an opportunity to post back. Updated Spec: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tint2/tint2.spec Updated SRPM: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tint2/tint2-0.7.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Spec, SRPM, and RPM are rpmlint clean. Builds cleanly in x86_64 and i386 F11 mock. Builds cleanly in dist-f11 koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1601993 Builds cleanly in dist-f12 koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1602016 I am still trying to get to the informal reviews when I have the chance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 22:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122200.n7CM0kcd016757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |517197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 22:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] New: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bos at serpentine.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Depends on: 517155 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell GLUT library for ghc. This is a set of bindings to the C freeglut library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 22:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122222.n7CMMwM4018283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #14 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-12 18:22:57 EDT --- I think you mean this SRPM: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-3.fc11.src.rpm Checking it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 22:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122244.n7CMirTa024366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-12 18:44:52 EDT --- easy_install.pth no longer conflicts. Package builds in koji. Two problems that you can fix when you import the package: There's a new version sqlalchemy-0.5.5 that you might want to update to before pushing this to EPEL for the first time. 0.5.5 contains a rarely used API breaking change so getting it into the first release will make sure that no one is depending on the old behaviour if you need to update later. The egg info files are executable. I believe this is a bug in python-setuptools that I submitted a patch for and was fixed for Fedora but it's still plaguing the RHEL5 version of setuptools. You can probably change your chmod line like this: - find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib} -name '*.py' | xargs chmod -x + chmod -R a-X $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib} Since there shouldn't be any scripts under %{python_sitelib}. Provided you make those two changes when you import, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 22:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122249.n7CMnO03022754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-12 18:49:23 EDT --- Looks good. Now builds in koji and the other issues have been addressed. The only thing left is that there's now a tarball for the django-south-0.6 release but this is still building from an hg snapshot. That's not a huge issue but there are several advantages to using the tarball: * Since most people are going to be using the tarball, there's more QA effort going into the release from other ditributions and other people downloading it. * The hg snapshot includes the hg repository so it's larger than the tarball. Make that change and have the Source0: line point to the new tarball location and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 23:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122306.n7CN6O7R028615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giesen at snickers.org --- Comment #7 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-08-12 19:06:23 EDT --- I too would like to see this packaged, specifically in EPEL. Unfortunately, php-adodb does not have an EPEL branch right now, and the maintainer (abombard) is not interested in maintaning it. So there's a couple of options: 1) I would be willing to maintain the EPEL branches of php-adodb to ensure that ipplan gets packaged 2) If you're interested, you could maintain the php-adodb EPEL branch. Now, since my interest in php-adodb is only because of ipplan, I would prefer option 2, but I will do option 1 if that ensures that ipplan gets packaged. Let me know which you prefer. Also note that an updated package (4.92) is available from upstream so you may want to consider packaging that instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 23:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122333.n7CNXKxB031148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giesen at snickers.org --- Comment #9 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-08-12 19:33:19 EDT --- I believe the SRPM will have to be rebuilt with: %_source_filedigest_algorithm md5 %_binary_filedigest_algorithm md5 in ~/.rpmmacros in order for this to build properly for EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 23:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122334.n7CNYONm001288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #8 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-08-12 19:34:23 EDT --- One more thing, I believe the SRPM will have to be rebuilt with: %_source_filedigest_algorithm md5 %_binary_filedigest_algorithm md5 in ~/.rpmmacros in order for this to build properly for EL-5 (RHEL5 doesn't support the new digest algorithms that Fedora 10/11 use). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 23:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517029] Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122345.n7CNjbns001117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 23:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122356.n7CNux1s005828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 19:56:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 23:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122355.n7CNtvCk005706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 19:55:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 23:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122358.n7CNwllE003588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 19:58:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 23:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908122359.n7CNxphG006167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 19:59:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 00:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516578] Review Request: hyphen-fo - Faroese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130003.n7D03JNS006919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516578 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:03:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 00:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130002.n7D02Ewq006777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:02:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 00:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130001.n7D01G2f004244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:01:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 00:04:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517029] Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130004.n7D04pk3004668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:04:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 00:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130007.n7D07RJ5005448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:07:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 00:05:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130005.n7D05w6G005195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #37 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:05:54 EDT --- There already is a F-11 branch of this package. Make sure you do a 'cvs update -d' to get new directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 00:23:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130023.n7D0NrWe010428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #41 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-12 20:23:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sys_basher Short Description: Hardware reliability and performance tester Owners: bjrosen Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 00:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486721] Review Request: beagle-xesam - Xesam adaptor for Beagle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130037.n7D0bKuP012811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486721 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gareth.l.john at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #1 from Gareth John 2009-08-12 20:37:19 EDT --- Links are dead!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 00:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130039.n7D0dklx010774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2009-08-12 20:39:45 EDT --- Successful Koji build against the devel branch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1602409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 00:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130048.n7D0mO4w014626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-12 20:48:23 EDT --- new version with improved initscript file. http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/xrdp/xrdp.spec http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/xrdp/xrdp-0.5.0-0.1.20090811cvs.fc12.src.rpm I am generating rsakeys.ini file in %post section, but the file is un-owned, how to fix this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 01:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130129.n7D1T00O020193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 Owen Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-12 21:28:58 EDT --- Built successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1602365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 01:32:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516987] Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130132.n7D1WN48021005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516987 --- Comment #3 from fujiwara 2009-08-12 21:32:22 EDT --- The following is the patches. http://github.com/fujiwarat/ibus-anthy/commit/2e4bf57cf5625ad825a86b55fdfbce39eab360ab http://github.com/fujiwarat/ibus-anthy/commit/c77c9c8129900533e8415c5cc8dceb0327f37c6f -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 01:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517029] Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130131.n7D1VHLG020880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-08-12 21:31:16 EDT --- built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 02:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516987] Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130200.n7D20oGf028412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516987 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com, | |phuang at redhat.com, | |tagoh at redhat.com, | |tfujiwar at redhat.com Component|Package Review |ibus-anthy AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-12 22:00:49 EDT --- I can have a quick look over the patches if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 02:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130228.n7D2SBmU032502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-12 22:28:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Remove the initial buildroot definition and in %install section. Same as the > previous review. Align the text in the description properly. > > Using wiki as a place to attach upstream tarballs is not acceptable. Ask > upstream to use the releases directory similar to > > https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/y/python-fedora/ > > Running fpaste by itself simply hangs. It should show the --help output > instead. A man page would be useful. hi, new spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste.spec new srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste-0.3.2-1.fc11.src.rpm info from the mock build at: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/ @Rahul : i talked to upstream, it doesn't hang, it waits for input from standard io like cat etc. Tried it out too.. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 02:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130229.n7D2T6jF002025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-12 22:29:04 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/sphinx/sphinx.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/sphinx/sphinx-0.9.8.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Changelog: * Wed Aug 12 2009 Allisson Azevedo 0.9.8.1-3 - Fixed macros consistency. - Modified make install to keep timestamps. - Added libsphinxclient package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 03:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130354.n7D3sQJW018585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-12 23:54:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > #install /etc/rc.d/init.d/xrdp, use %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d because On > releases older > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > - You can use: > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > %{!?initddir: %global initddir %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d} > ------------------------------------------------------------------- --> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-May/msg00089.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 04:32:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516987] Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130432.n7D4WY0F024716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516987 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 04:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486721] Review Request: beagle-xesam - Xesam adaptor for Beagle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130445.n7D4jbT4028705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486721 David Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from David Nielsen 2009-08-13 00:45:36 EDT --- I am no longer a Fedora developer, aside that Beagle itself is orphaned now and has no active upstream development. Sad but true. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 04:47:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130447.n7D4l9bV027352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Alias| |dojo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 05:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130538.n7D5cF2Y005864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-13 01:38:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I believe the SRPM will have to be rebuilt with: > > %_source_filedigest_algorithm md5 > %_binary_filedigest_algorithm md5 > > in ~/.rpmmacros in order for this to build properly for EL-5 No, that's just for local builds in mock. Koji checks out the newest spec & sources from CVS and rebuilds the SRPM every time a package is built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 05:41:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130541.n7D5fuXE006856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #42 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-13 01:41:55 EDT --- You can't request CVS branches yet, since a) you have not been sponsored yet b) this package has not been approved yet. To get over a) you need to do the couple of informal reviews for me first. When I have checked them out, I will sponsor you and approve this package if I am happy with it (I haven't looked at the new spec yet). Perform the informal reviews first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 05:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130545.n7D5j7Ax005477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-13 01:45:06 EDT --- hi, Since the packaging process is not going to go ahead, can the cvs please be revoked? closing the bug as a WONTFIX regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 05:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130543.n7D5hFNh004959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-13 01:43:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fbzx Short Description: A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer Owners: musuruan Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 05:50:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130550.n7D5owrJ006608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-13 01:50:57 EDT --- blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 05:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130550.n7D5oqdq006569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-13 01:50:51 EDT --- blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 05:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130559.n7D5xZHt008056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-13 01:59:33 EDT --- hi, new spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste.spec new srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste-0.3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm rest of the mock build stuff at : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 06:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130604.n7D64Y0e010743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-13 02:04:33 EDT --- Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 06:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 02:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130627.n7D6RKvC013785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-13 02:27:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fpaste Short Description: A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 07:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130706.n7D76QJk021892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 srinivas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |srinivas_ramanatha at dell.com --- Comment #10 from srinivas 2009-08-13 03:06:24 EDT --- Implemented the changes suggested. Final rpmlint output: # rpmlint sblim-cmpi-network.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint ../SRPMS/sblim-cmpi-network-1.3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sblim-cmpi-network-* sblim-cmpi-network-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation sblim-cmpi-network-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fixed these warnings. Spec URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-network/sblim-cmpi-network.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-network/sblim-cmpi-network-1.3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 07:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130710.n7D7AZMs022692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507 Christopher Curran changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ccurran at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Christopher Curran 2009-08-13 03:10:04 EDT --- IANAL but given the various interpretations of good and evil I think this is not an issue. All we need is to find an appropriate thesis which shows good and evil do not exist or that good and evil are overlapping variables. If good can be evil in context and the equivalent event evil not good then there is no problem as the license negates itself. I say that it is moral to accept his software as sufficiently free and save discussions of morality for the pub, where real philosophy occurs. Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 07:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 03:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130758.n7D7wmQe000804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-13 03:58:46 EDT --- Approving, provided: - Please add the following text file as %doc: http://codeforpeople.com/lib/license.txt (In the spec file add this with _full URL_ like ------------------------------------------------------------------ URL: http://rubyforge.org/projects/codeforpeople/ Source0: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem Source1: http://codeforpeople.com/lib/license.txt ... ... %install rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gemdir} ... ... install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/ ... ... %files ... %doc %{geminstdir}/license .... ------------------------------------------------------------------ - If we say "the license is the same as Ruby's", on Fedora this means it is licensed under "GPLv2 or Ruby" (on Fedora "Ruby" license means the lines below "or the conditions below:" of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt), so please change the license tag to "GPLv2 or Ruby" (not GPLv2+ or) ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-fattr) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516578] Review Request: hyphen-fo - Faroese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130812.n7D8Cp7p004216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516578 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130835.n7D8Zl8o007101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-13 04:35:45 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-json) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130841.n7D8fLAQ009917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-13 04:41:20 EDT --- mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130841.n7D8fGEC008659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-13 04:41:15 EDT --- mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226069] Merge Review: libXevie In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130851.n7D8ptJV011770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226069 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226068] Merge Review: libXdmcp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130851.n7D8pMfW011693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226068 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226066] Merge Review: libXcursor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130851.n7D8pgsN011742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226066 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226071] Merge Review: libXfixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130851.n7D8p7Ec010681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226071 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226067] Merge Review: libXdamage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130851.n7D8pgqg010759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226067 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:50:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 04:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226086] Merge Review: libXres In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130850.n7D8owJT010574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226086 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 09:11:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:11:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130911.n7D9BfAS016685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-08-13 05:11:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein Short Description: Provides a Database filter for the Authentication component Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 09:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130912.n7D9CpBM015226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-08-13 05:12:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-Feed Short Description: This component handles parsing and creating RSS1, RSS2 and ATOM feeds Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 09:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226065] Merge Review: libXcomposite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908130926.n7D9QuYH018977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226065 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 10:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131046.n7DAkWGp005617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-13 06:46:30 EDT --- Gary, I have submitted a request to maintain php-adodb for EPEL, I will work on bumping ipplan to 4.92 soon. If you would be so kind as to look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 if you can, which is holding up php-layers-menu which in turn will hold up ipplan. Thanks in advance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 10:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 06:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131059.n7DAxQUo011368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-13 06:59:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > There is an issue with bickley-0.4.pc on 64 bit: > > prefix=/usr > exec_prefix=${prefix} > libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib > includedir=${prefix}/include > > libdir should be libdir64 The patch I provided has now been committed to upstream git. Will be in the next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 11:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131102.n7DB2Dg2009480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-13 07:02:12 EDT --- mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 11:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131102.n7DB27hT009436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-13 07:02:06 EDT --- mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 11:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131111.n7DBBicI014519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Bug 515081 depends on bug 515080, which changed state. Bug 515080 Summary: Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-13 07:11:42 EDT --- License tag has been corrected in the cvs: http://fgc.lsi.umich.edu/cgi-bin/blosxom3.cgi/affy R-preprocessCore is in stable now :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 11:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131118.n7DBInNU015991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #43 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-13 07:18:48 EDT --- Hoefully I've gotten the spec right this time. Let me know what you want me to look at. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 11:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131146.n7DBkPhs022872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #45 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-13 07:46:24 EDT --- Ugh, and the BuildRoot tag is wrong. Use %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 11:45:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131145.n7DBjhMl022756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #44 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-13 07:45:42 EDT --- OK: rpmlint output is clean NEEDSWORK: source does not match upstream: $ md5sum sys_basher-1.1.20.tar.gz ../SOURCES/sys_basher-1.1.20.tar.gz 729bdb57a9477b9d3c0fdef6bfc31ba9 sys_basher-1.1.20.tar.gz 18b02243dde1bef9560016a947647728 ../SOURCES/sys_basher-1.1.20.tar.gz ** Regenerate the SRPM using the correct tarball, or put the correct tarball on the web site. Do the informal reviews ASAP, give links to them here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 11:45:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131145.n7DBjko4020857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Xavier Lamien 2009-08-13 07:45:45 EDT --- Thanks Mamoru. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-json Short Description: A JSON implementation in Ruby Owners: laxathom Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 11:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131152.n7DBqaDP024169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-13 07:52:35 EDT --- I think you can fix the .htaccess errors by using an apache config file %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/symfony for all the configurations provided by the .htaccess. This is recommended because some sites will not allow overriding configurations using .htaccess files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 12:35:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517300] New: Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517300 Summary: Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ccss.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ccss-0.5.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libccss offers a simple API to * Parse CSS stylesheets. * Query for style configurations on a user-provided document representation. * Draw query results onto cairo surfaces. Original package review (from 2 months ago) for libccss is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 Announcement of version 0.5.0 including the dropping of lib from the naming: http://lwn.net/Articles/346658/ The above package is very similar to the previous package with some updates to current packaging recommendations and splitting out the developers docs to a -docs noarch sub package and the appropriate provides/obsoletes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 12:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131238.n7DCcXBn000560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #3 from Christof Damian 2009-08-13 08:38:32 EDT --- I don't think they need to be in the Apache configuration, because they are either related to tests: ./test/functional/fixtures/project/web/.htaccess ./lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/test/functional/fixtures/web/.htaccess ./lib/plugins/sfPropelPlugin/test/functional/fixtures/web/.htaccess ./lib/plugins/sfCompat10Plugin/test/functional/fixtures/web/.htaccess or are used on project creation as a template. ./lib/task/generator/skeleton/project/web/.htaccess The symfony library directory itself is usually not accessible from the web anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 12:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131242.n7DCgTLX003222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 --- Comment #5 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-13 08:42:28 EDT --- Done! SPEC: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/Django-south/Django-south.spec SRPM: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/Django-south/Django-south-0.6-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 12:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131242.n7DCgK5u001492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-13 08:42:19 EDT --- And now in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 12:45:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:45:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131245.n7DCja5Z004363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-13 08:45:35 EDT --- Oh okay thats fine then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 13:14:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517300] Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131314.n7DDEdhF012329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517300 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |yaneti at declera.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |yaneti at declera.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-08-13 09:14:38 EDT --- Diff looks good. Builds in mock. Provides/Obsoletes work as expected. APPROVED again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 13:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517300] Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131328.n7DDSeaH014460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517300 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-13 09:28:40 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ccss Short Description: A simple api for CSS Stylesheets Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 13:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131342.n7DDgCZD019543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #50 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-13 09:42:07 EDT --- Well, I got answer from Karl J. Runge. Since x11vnc 0.9.4 the full java source is available: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500970 So, I think we can redistribute its in src.rpm and delete binaries at built time. Also I ask him to devide x11vnc to separate packages with viewer applets - he answer what not interested in doing that upstream. I think we may leave all as is now. Tom, thank you for the check and lifting FE-legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 14:10:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131410.n7DEA8bi027080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507 --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-13 10:10:06 EDT --- Red Hat Legal (who are lawyers) disagree. Its a bad license, with unenforceable clauses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 14:54:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517338] New: Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 Summary: Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: npajkovs at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://www.package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp.spec SRPM: http://package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp-0.50-1.fc12.src.rpm PATCH: http://www.package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp-0.50-config.patch Description: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network * Sending and receiving messages in irssi's query windows * A roster with contact & resource tracking (contact list) * Contact management (add, remove, manage subscriptions) * Tab completion of commands, JIDs and resources * Many extensions supported (XEP) including Multi-User Chat (MUC) * Support for multiple accounts * Unicode support (UTF-8) * SSL support * ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 15:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131508.n7DF8Lp9012097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #51 from Christian Krause 2009-08-13 11:08:19 EDT --- Pavel, thanks for asking upstream regarding this issue. Since it looks like that most of the issues are addressed, I'll do the complete review on the weekend. Please apologize the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 15:27:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131527.n7DFRZIR017859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 15:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131527.n7DFREpj017777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-13 11:27:12 EDT --- Remove the buildroot definition and you dont need to clean it in %install section anymore. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Add a comment explaining what the patch does and it's upstream status https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 15:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131525.n7DFPxYc017450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #46 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-13 11:25:57 EDT --- http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher.spec http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.21-1.fc11.src.rpm http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.21-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm I've created a script that runs rpmlint, md5sums and spectool so I shouldn't have anymore problems with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 15:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131540.n7DFeXUZ021257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #14 from Till Maas 2009-08-13 11:40:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Remove the buildroot definition and you dont need to clean it in %install > section anymore. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag To be more precise: It's is only not needed, if the package is not going into EPEL 5 or 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 16:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] New: Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Summary: Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sagarun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package adds a Haskell major mode to Emacs. The Haskell mode supports font locking, declaration scanning, documentation, indentation, and interaction with Hugs and GHCi. Links to koji builds: Fedora 10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1603637 Fedora 11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1603639 Note:This is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 16:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131615.n7DGF0gI029903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jwilson at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-13 12:14:59 EDT --- I've started reviewing the package, have a few spec changes to recommend, will get some more details in here after lunch... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 16:36:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131636.n7DGadJ6002835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sagarun at gmail.com Version|rawhide |11 Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 16:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131642.n7DGg5Tp004389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Luke Macken 2009-08-13 12:42:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-sqlalchemy0.5 Short Description: Modular and flexible ORM library for python Owners: lmacken, toshio Branches: F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 16:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:47:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131647.n7DGlrIl005666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #47 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-13 12:47:52 EDT --- OK, I think this package is good to go now. But I won't approve it formally yet, you have to do the informal reviews first so I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131713.n7DHDXL0012186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-13 13:13:32 EDT --- #01 It should be: Patch0: Patch1: with capital 'P'. #02 Don't rename the source file. Although the latest sources say haskell-mode.tar.gz, please use the exact version: haskell-mode-2.4.tar.gz You have mentioned the same in the .spec file as "Version: 2.4" #03 You should add the "-b .patch" extension when applying "%patch -p1" #04 In the Makefile patch, substitute install command with a variable, like: INSTALL = /usr/bin/install #05 Put the 'clean' target in the Makefile as the last target, at the bottom. #06 Please remove control characters in haskell-site-file.el (^L), and check for the same in other files. #07 Don't include ~ files in the source package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:33:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:33:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131733.n7DHXsZW016978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #48 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-13 13:33:52 EDT --- OK let me know what you want me to review. Also I have a CentOS question. In installed the rpmdevtools on CentOS5.3 and built the package. The distro name was not included in the rpm name, sys_basher-1.1.21-1.i386.rpm Is there something different that I need to do on CentOS to get it to build the packages with the distro name included? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131747.n7DHlLNA019908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-13 13:47:20 EDT --- Is this essentially the same thing as bug 351441? Do the same issues which caused the closure of that review still apply? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486721] Review Request: beagle-xesam - Xesam adaptor for Beagle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131745.n7DHj0Mh019224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486721 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516779] Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131749.n7DHn5QC020376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131749.n7DHnLp2020435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:49:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131749.n7DHnccr020509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131749.n7DHnVR1020352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131749.n7DHnDs8020280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131751.n7DHpFWk020963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 Jason Landstrom changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jjlandstrom at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Jason Landstrom 2009-08-13 13:51:13 EDT --- I'm a newbie running Fedora 11 trying to run xfce4-screenshooter. Everything works great except when I select a region with copy to clipboard I am unable to paste it into OpenOffice Impress like I can with gnome screenshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131750.n7DHoqge020882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #49 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-13 13:50:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > OK let me know what you want me to review. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess Have your pick from the review list at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/ReviewRequests -> unassigned review requests but please review only bugs not tagged with FE-NEEDSPONSOR. > Also I have a CentOS question. In installed the rpmdevtools on CentOS5.3 and > built the package. The distro name was not included in the rpm name, > > sys_basher-1.1.21-1.i386.rpm > > Is there something different that I need to do on CentOS to get it to build the > packages with the distro name included? Actually I'm not sure which package ships the %{dist} macro, I tried to search for it today. But if you build the package in mock for EPEL it will get the correct value. (And the Fedora build system uses mock.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 17:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131758.n7DHwoW1022840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-13 13:58:48 EDT --- For -0.1: * _initddir - Well, actually the macro written at the top should be _initddir, not initddir, sorry... -------------------------------------------------------- %{!?_initddir: %global _initddir %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d} -------------------------------------------------------- * Macros - If you want to use %__install and %__rm, please use %__sed, %__make for consistency (and you also use "rm") * Directory ownership issue - Still the directory %_datadir/xrdp itself is not owned by any packages. * About %_sysconfdir/xrdp/rsakeys.ini: - You have to use %verify(not ....), like: --------------------------------------------------------- %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} .... # rsakeys.ini touch %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini chmod 06?? %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini .... %files .... %verify(not size md5 mtime) %{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini .... --------------------------------------------------------- * By the way, when I try xrdp-keygen, rsakeys.ini is created with 0600 permission. - If this permission (0600) is correct, %attr(0600,root,root) is also needed. - If the permission should be 0644 or so, %post scriptlet needs fixing. ( I think anyway changing permission on %post explicitly is preferred ) * Currently rsakeys.ini is recreated every time xrdp is upgraded. Is this correct? If not, something like --------------------------------------------------------- [ -s %{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini ] || \ xrdp-keygen xrdp %{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini >/dev/null chmod 06?? %{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini --------------------------------------------------------- is needed so that rsakeys.ini won't be overwritten. ( I used "-s" here, not "-f", because at first install, 0 size rsakeys.ini is installed ) * Note that I think ">/dev/null" is okay, however ">/dev/null 2>&1" should be avoided. If this command outputs some errors, we should check them and examine what was wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 18:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131815.n7DIFSg4026878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-13 14:15:27 EDT --- This closed review is not the place for bugs. ;) Please file a new bug on the xfce4-screenshooter package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 18:38:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:38:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131838.n7DIc0c6032236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #50 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-13 14:37:59 EDT --- I have a review question. I've downloaded the files for 481030, pmd-emacs and fetched the source file using spectool -g. Are all the sources including patches required to be in that file or is reviewer supposed to install the SRPM? Does the source archive format matter? This package was supplies as a .zip instead of a .tar.gz or a .tar.bz2. Zip is not a standard way to archive files on a *nix system although it's fully supported. Also should I be posting my review comments on that bug report given that I'm doing this as a learning experience? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 18:44:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131844.n7DIiZqN001350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #51 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-13 14:44:34 EDT --- Patches will be in the src.rpm; if all you have is the spec, you will generally not have what you need to build the package although in many situations it's enough. We generally have to consume what upstream provides when it comes to archive format. When given a choice, we prefer whatever is smaller. If upstream provides a .zip, we use a .zip. (And this is by far not uncommon, and certainly nothing against the package.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 18:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131859.n7DIxNBW004552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #52 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-13 14:59:23 EDT --- One more question. Is there a way to unpack an SRPM into a local directory rather than installing it or should I just do this inside of a VM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 19:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131913.n7DJDAfU007534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #53 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-13 15:13:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #52) > One more question. Is there a way to unpack an SRPM into a local directory > rather than installing it or should I just do this inside of a VM? I do all my reviews in mock. It uses a chroot to build the packages, so your build directory is clean. Another option is to have a second user on your system with which you build the packages (better this way, so you don't end up blowing all your files away when building a crappily written spec file). Just run $ rpmdev-setuptree and build the SRPM with $ rpmbuild --rebuild package.src.rpm Or you can build using your normal user name, this way your SPEC, SOURCES and RPMS directories just get messier with every package you review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 19:16:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131916.n7DJGJpG008482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-13 15:16:17 EDT --- Filed as bug 517408. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 19:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] New: Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Summary: Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: diegobz at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-authority/django-authority.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-authority/django-authority-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a Django app for generic per-object permissions, custom permission checks and permission requests. It also includes view decorators and template tags for ease of use. This package is needed to suppress a dependency for the new Transifex 0.7-RC1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 19:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] New: Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Summary: Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: diegobz at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-profile/django-profile.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-profile/django-profile-0.6-0.1.20090813svnr420.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a user private zone/profile management application, allowing the user to take control of his account and insert information about him in his profile. Inside this package you will find a demo application which will show you what can be accomplished with the rest of the utilities included in the package. This package is needed to suppress a dependency for the new Transifex 0.7-RC1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 19:20:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:20:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] New: Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 Summary: Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: diegobz at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-piston/django-piston.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-piston/django-piston-0.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Piston is a relatively small Django application that lets you create application programming interfaces (API) for your sites. This package is needed to suppress a dependency for the new Transifex 0.7-RC1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 19:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131923.n7DJNqkA010066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #6 from Christof Damian 2009-08-13 15:23:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Is this essentially the same thing as bug 351441? Do the same issues which > caused the closure of that review still apply? I didn't see that bug. But I guess they still apply. I had a quick grep through the sources and found these in the vendor directories: ./lib/plugins/sfCompat10Plugin/lib/vendor: phpmailer ./lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/vendor: doctrine ./lib/plugins/sfPropelPlugin/lib/vendor: phing, propel, propel-generator ./lib/vendor: lime - phpmailer, phing, propel and propel-generator are already available in Fedora. - doctrine isn't. - lime is just used by symfony anyway, as far as I know. It is just one file. Personally I think it is not a big problem, because symfony requires certain versions of the libraries. For example if I create a doctrine package of the current 1.1 it probably won't work with symfony 1.2. I would suggest bringing symfony into Fedora as is, with the plan to remove these duplicated libraries in one of the next releases where possible. I think this was how it was done in other packages which bundled libraries. Then I probably would: - remove the sfCompat10Plugin with the ancient phpmailer completely. - create the doctrine package, which I planned anyway. - check if symmfony works with the fedora propel & phing packages. If it doesn't I would remove that plugin too. - create a patch to make symfony look at the default library locations instead of vendor directories. Thank god I don't have to think about EPEL, because RHEL is still stuck at PHP 5.1 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 19:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517416] New: Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416 Summary: Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sereinity at online.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/awl.spec SRPM URL: http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/awl-0.37-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains Andrew's Web Libraries. This is a set of hopefully lightweight libraries for handling a variety of useful things for web programming, including: - Session management - User management - DB Records - Simple reporting - DB Schema Updating - iCalendar parsing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 19:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: pmd-emacs - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908131958.n7DJwjIl017887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-13 15:58:44 EDT --- Taking over review. Joshua Rosen will perform an informal review first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 20:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132032.n7DKWXF5026313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-13 16:32:32 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 20:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132033.n7DKXhIk024980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #34 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-13 16:33:36 EDT --- SPEC: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/zorba/zorba.spec SRPM: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/zorba/zorba-0.9.5-7.fc11.src.rpm I'd also like to see zorba packaged for Fedora. Unfortunately, the review process seems to have stalled. To keep it alive, I digged into the source and fixed the build problems. There are still some spec file issues to be resolved but that should be doable. Paul, if you can afford the time, please continue working on this package. :) $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i586/zorba-* zorba.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so.0.9.5 exit at GLIBC_2.0 zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/options_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/path_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/zorbastring_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/c/html/options_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/properties__base_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/simplestorec_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/simplestore_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/identtypes_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/smart__ptr_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/debugger__exception_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/store__consts_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/version_8h__incl.map zorba-python.i586: W: summary-not-capitalized zorba Python module for zorba zorba-python.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_zorba_api.so zorba-python.i586: W: no-documentation zorba-ruby.i586: W: summary-not-capitalized zorba Ruby module zorba-ruby.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/zorba_api.so zorba-ruby.i586: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 20:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132037.n7DKbkxk027344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #2 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-13 16:37:44 EDT --- Okay, so a few issues to work out... 1) without solid justification, the initscript should not be enabled by default, it should be up to the user to enable it. 2) in one place, the initscript says 'config: /etc/mip6d.conf', then later you test for /etc/sysconfig/mip6, then you source /etc/sysconfig/mip6d. And the package has no config file whatsoever mentioned anywhere. :) To resolve the enabled-by-default and three different names for the config, I'd suggest: --- mip6d.init.orig 2009-08-13 16:09:39.219807916 -0400 +++ mip6d.init 2009-08-13 16:22:46.888931134 -0400 @@ -2,11 +2,11 @@ # # mip6d Start script for the Mobile IPv6 daemon # -# chkconfig: 2345 55 25 +# chkconfig: - 55 25 # description: The mobile IPv6 daemon allows nodes to remain \ # reachable while moving around in the IPv6 Internet. # processname: mip6d -# config: /etc/mip6d.conf +# config: /etc/sysconfig/mip6d # ### BEGIN INIT INFO # Provides: mipv6-daemon @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ # Required-Stop: $local_fs $remote_fs $network # Should-Start: $syslog # Should-Stop: $network $syslog -# Default-Start: 2 3 4 5 +# Default-Start: # Default-Stop: 0 1 6 # Short-Description: Start and stop Mobile IPV6 daemon # Description: The mobile IPv6 daemon allows nodes to remain @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ # Source function library. . /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions -if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/mip6 ]; then +if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/mip6d ]; then . /etc/sysconfig/mip6d fi On to the spec file itself... 1) as previously mentioned, the config file isn't accounted for anywhere in the spec, and it needs to be, complete with %config(noreplace) labelling. 2) missing a chkconfig --add %post call 3) BuildRequires: /etc/init.d looks bogus, just flex and bison should be sufficient. 4) 'Requires: initscripts, chkconfig' should be sufficient for Requires. 5) Generally, you don't want to inclue INSTALL files in %doc, because they're irrelevant for a packaged install. Also, traditionally, %doc is the first line after %defattr in the %files section. 6) use %{_initrddir} instead of /etc/rc.d/init.d/ 7) %attr shouldn't be necessary on the initscript, you already install -m755'd it. I'd suggest the following spec file changes: --- mipv6-daemon-orig.spec 2009-08-13 11:36:05.068932552 -0400 +++ mipv6-daemon.spec 2009-08-13 16:26:20.352931018 -0400 @@ -11,9 +11,8 @@ Source1: mip6d.init Patch0: mipv6-daemon-header-fix.patch BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) -BuildRequires: flex bison /etc/init.d -Requires: initscripts -Requires(post): chkconfig >= 0.9, /sbin/service +BuildRequires: flex bison +Requires: initscripts, chkconfig %description The mobile IPv6 daemon allows nodes to remain @@ -31,8 +30,10 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags} rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT -install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/rc.d/init.d -install -m755 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/rc.d/init.d/mip6d +install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir} +install -m755 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/mip6d +install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig +touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/mip6d %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT @@ -44,6 +45,9 @@ then /sbin/chkconfig --del mip6d fi +%post +/sbin/chkconfig --add mip6d + %postun if [ "$1" -ge "1" ]; then /sbin/service mip6d condrestart > /dev/null 2>&1 ||: @@ -51,12 +55,13 @@ fi %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) +%doc AUTHORS BUGS COPYING NEWS README README.IPsec THANKS extras +%ghost %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/mip6d +%{_initrddir}/mip6d %{_sbindir}/* %{_mandir}/man1/* %{_mandir}/man5/* %{_mandir}/man7/* -%attr(0755,root,root) /etc/rc.d/init.d/mip6d -%doc AUTHORS BUGS COPYING INSTALL INSTALL.kernel NEWS README README.IPsec THANKS extras %changelog * Tue Aug 12 2009 Thomas Graf 0.4-1 With these changes applied, the only noise I get from rpmlint is a complaint about the initscript name not matching the package name, which we can ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 20:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132039.n7DKdMj0026169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #3 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-13 16:39:21 EDT --- Oh, I just did a touch and %ghost for the config file, but if you have a default config file (one of the example files maybe?) you want to drop in place, just with all the options commented out, that might not be a bad idea either, so that people know what the config file is supposed to look like without going hunting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 20:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132048.n7DKmUe0029711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-08-13 16:48:29 EDT --- Thanks; New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-fattr.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/rubygem-fattr-1.0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-fattr Short Description: Fatter attribute for Ruby Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 21:03:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132103.n7DL3XQn000480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-13 17:03:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Django-south Short Description: Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps Owners: diegobz Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: diegobz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 21:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132142.n7DLgBBg007798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #11 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-13 17:42:10 EDT --- done http://ispbrasil.com.br/xrdp/xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc12.src.rpm http://ispbrasil.com.br/xrdp/xrdp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 21:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132148.n7DLmRnr008782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rrelyea at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rrelyea at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 21:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132157.n7DLvYRp010872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #11 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-13 17:57:32 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 21:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132157.n7DLvsMc011988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 22:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132203.n7DM3LYp012909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rrelyea at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #14 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-13 18:03:19 EDT --- 1. URL - points to a generic NSS page. Is there a worry that mozilla may move the actual FTP site around. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for examples. I believe this tar was pulled for an NSS cvs tag and then the split.sh was ran on it. The wiki has examples for this case (you've partially included the right thing with the comment and conclusing of the nss.split.sh script. 2. You are creating a new empty directory %{libdir}/nss3 is there a reason (if so comment it, if not remove it). 3. the %define nspr-version should technically be %global 4. uncomment the Requires: nss-util in the nss-util-devel package section. 5. This last on is the biggest one: The issue showed up in multiple locations, including rpmlint. In the %build you are creating nss-util.pc and nss-util-config and placing them into the build root. This is a non-standard use of the build root, and requires the first command in %install which clears the buildroot to be removed. A better way would be to create nss-util.pc and nss-util-config in %build and place the results in mozilla/dist (where NSS build results are placed), then install them into their final location in the %include. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 22:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132203.n7DM3jSF012073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(emaldona at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 22:05:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132205.n7DM5mlF013514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rrelyea at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #15 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-13 18:05:47 EDT --- rpmlint output: bobs-laptop(79) rpmlint nss-util-3.12.3.99.3-8.fc11.test.1.src.rpm nss-util.src: W: strange-permission nss-split-util.sh 0775 nss-util.src:97: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig nss-util.src:104: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/nss-util.pc nss-util.src:114: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir} nss-util.src:122: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/nss-util-config nss-util.src:124: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/nss-util-config 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. < and just for the .spec, which has better line numbers > rpmlint nss-util.spec nss-util.spec:100: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig nss-util.spec:107: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/nss-util.pc nss-util.spec:117: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir} nss-util.spec:125: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/nss-util-config nss-util.spec:127: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/nss-util-config 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 22:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132229.n7DMTBxw017750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |allisson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |allisson at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-13 18:29:10 EDT --- I'll make review soon as posible :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 22:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132230.n7DMURM0018198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |allisson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |allisson at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-13 18:30:26 EDT --- I'll make review soon as posible :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 22:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908132229.n7DMTs7o017301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |allisson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |allisson at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-13 18:29:53 EDT --- I'll make review soon as posible :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 00:10:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140010.n7E0AjVA003493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(emaldona at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #16 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-13 20:10:44 EDT --- Bob, Please check the updated .spec and src.rpm files at http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util.spec and at http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util-3.12.3.99.3-8.fc12.test.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 00:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140036.n7E0aXcH007838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(emaldona at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #17 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-13 20:36:31 EDT --- neither the original nss, not this package ever puts any shared libraries in /usr/lib/nss3, so you should remove the creation of that directory and it's ownership in the .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 00:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140055.n7E0tESa011564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(emaldona at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #18 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-13 20:55:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) Line and comments above removed. Updated the .spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 01:04:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140104.n7E14Gsg012116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-13 21:04:15 EDT --- OK, much better. ACCEPT. bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 01:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140151.n7E1pNvH020096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-13 21:51:22 EDT --- $ rpmlint irssi-xmpp.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. FYI (not mandatory), you could use marcos like %__rm and %__make to replace rm and make. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 01:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140155.n7E1tL5G020873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 --- Comment #2 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-13 21:55:20 EDT --- mock failed: DEBUG util.py:256: ################################################## DEBUG util.py:256: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /builddir/build/SOURCES/irssi-xmpp-0.50.tar.gz;4a84c470: cpio: read failed - Invalid argument DEBUG util.py:256: error: /builddir/build/originals/irssi-xmpp-0.50-1.fc12.src.rpm cannot be installed DEBUG util.py:319: Child returncode was: 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 02:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517021] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140201.n7E21jnD021929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k at kaio.me --- Comment #1 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-13 22:01:44 EDT --- $ rpmlint perl-DBIx-Simple.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 02:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517021] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140205.n7E255Q5022786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-13 22:05:05 EDT --- mock done successfully: INFO: Done(perl-DBIx-Simple-1.32-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-i386) 1 minutes 28 seconds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 02:09:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140209.n7E29sCU024463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k at kaio.me --- Comment #1 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-13 22:09:53 EDT --- tokyocabinet is still 1.4.23 at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 02:17:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140217.n7E2HHjT026355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k at kaio.me --- Comment #1 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-13 22:17:16 EDT --- rpmlint is done: $ rpmlint viewnior.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 02:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140219.n7E2JXTw026704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-13 22:19:32 EDT --- mock is done: INFO: Done(viewnior-0.6-1.fc12.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-i386) 4 minutes 35 seconds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 02:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140223.n7E2NQhg026814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 02:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517021] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140223.n7E2NZpR026887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 02:23:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 22:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140223.n7E2Ni9E026930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k at kaio.me Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 03:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140323.n7E3Nh19006658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-13 23:23:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Not OK: > > 1. running the autotools during builds is a silly idea. > > Surprisingly, upstream provides tarball without ./configure and autoreconf is > really needed to create one. Yes, upstream doesn't package their package properly but ships a crippled package, which doesn't comply to the autotools' working principles. If you want deterministic builts, you're better off running the autotools in advance to building, generate patches and apply them during builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 03:35:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140335.n7E3ZU7g009543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k at kaio.me --- Comment #1 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-13 23:35:29 EDT --- rpmlint is okay: $ rpmlint globus-gram-job-manager-scripts.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 03:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140347.n7E3lZ9j010451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #2 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-13 23:47:34 EDT --- Wny don't install documentation directly to default RPM location? FYI, mock is passed: INFO: Done(globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-i386) 1 minutes 47 seconds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 05:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140507.n7E57RWq024114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #2 from Arun SAG 2009-08-14 01:07:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > #01 It should be: > > Patch0: > Patch1: > > with capital 'P'. > > #02 Don't rename the source file. Although the latest sources say > haskell-mode.tar.gz, please use the exact version: > > haskell-mode-2.4.tar.gz > > You have mentioned the same in the .spec file as "Version: 2.4" > > #03 You should add the "-b .patch" extension when applying "%patch -p1" > > #04 In the Makefile patch, substitute install command with a variable, like: > > INSTALL = /usr/bin/install > > #05 Put the 'clean' target in the Makefile as the last target, at the bottom. > > #06 Please remove control characters in haskell-site-file.el (^L), and check > for the same in other files. > > #07 Don't include ~ files in the source package! The changes has been made SPEC file: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-2.fc11.src.rpm Links to successfull koji builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1604549 -Fedora 10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1604576 -Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 06:21:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517021] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140621.n7E6LaOm003379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-08-14 02:21:35 EDT --- So what now? I set fedora-review flag to ? Should I fix something else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 06:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140634.n7E6YNpw006100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-14 02:34:21 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1604641 - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. perl-Search-Xapian.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency xapian-core-libs You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. == > Ok perl-Search-Xapian.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.11-4 ['1.0.11.0-4.fc12', '1.0.11.0-4'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. ==> Fix this + source files match upstream url 480fd99617975c1aaf9127cd7c7166bc05d07eb1 Search-Xapian-1.0.11.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=15, Tests=445, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.11 usr 0.01 sys + 0.68 cusr 0.11 csys = 0.91 CPU) + Package perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.11.0-4.fc12.i686 => Provides: Xapian.so perl(Search::Xapian) = 1.0.11.0 perl(Search::Xapian::BM25Weight) perl(Search::Xapian::BoolWeight) perl(Search::Xapian::Database) perl(Search::Xapian::Document) perl(Search::Xapian::ESet) perl(Search::Xapian::ESetIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::Enquire) perl(Search::Xapian::MSet) perl(Search::Xapian::MSet::Tied) perl(Search::Xapian::MSetIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::MultiValueSorter) perl(Search::Xapian::PerlStopper) perl(Search::Xapian::PositionIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::PostingIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::Query) perl(Search::Xapian::QueryParser) perl(Search::Xapian::RSet) perl(Search::Xapian::SimpleStopper) perl(Search::Xapian::Stem) perl(Search::Xapian::Stopper) perl(Search::Xapian::TermGenerator) perl(Search::Xapian::TermIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::TradWeight) perl(Search::Xapian::ValueIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::Weight) perl(Search::Xapian::WritableDatabase) Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0) libm.so.6 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libxapian.so.15 perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(Search::Xapian::BM25Weight) perl(Search::Xapian::BoolWeight) perl(Search::Xapian::Database) perl(Search::Xapian::Document) perl(Search::Xapian::ESet) perl(Search::Xapian::ESetIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::Enquire) perl(Search::Xapian::MSet) perl(Search::Xapian::MSet::Tied) perl(Search::Xapian::MSetIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::MultiValueSorter) perl(Search::Xapian::PerlStopper) perl(Search::Xapian::PositionIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::PostingIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::Query) perl(Search::Xapian::QueryParser) perl(Search::Xapian::RSet) perl(Search::Xapian::SimpleStopper) perl(Search::Xapian::Stem) perl(Search::Xapian::Stopper) perl(Search::Xapian::TermGenerator) perl(Search::Xapian::TermIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::TradWeight) perl(Search::Xapian::ValueIterator) perl(Search::Xapian::Weight) perl(Search::Xapian::WritableDatabase) perl(Tie::Array) perl(UNIVERSAL) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) you can write %files as %doc Changes README %{perl_vendorlib}/* %{_mandir}/man3/* 2) Fix Changelog entry versions in SPEC APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 06:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140638.n7E6cweJ006924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-08-14 02:38:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Wny don't install documentation directly to default RPM location? There is no easy way to do that. It is not --docdir that is wrong w.r.t. the RPM location, it is the name of the subdirectory inside --docdir. There is no configure switch for that. All globus packages in Fedora do it this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 06:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140642.n7E6g42a007093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 06:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 02:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140641.n7E6fWWS007047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-14 02:41:31 EDT --- Allisson, The final issue is not a blocker, just a good to have. The API's would be better installed in usable state (Java compiled, python in the correct directory, etc) Am sure you can do that before CVS if you want. Otherwise all looks fine now. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (sphinx) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 07:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140753.n7E7rs0K021279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 Steve Whitehouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |swhiteho at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |swhiteho at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Steve Whitehouse 2009-08-14 03:53:53 EDT --- I'll try and review this today - sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 07:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517462] New: Review Request: voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu - Chinese voice data from gcin project Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu - Chinese voice data from gcin project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517462 Summary: Review Request: voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu - Chinese voice data from gcin project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dchen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu.spec SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu-20090221-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This voice data records voice of Edward Der-Hua Liu, the gcin's author, for enabling "speak-as-you-type" functionality of gcin. Although this package is from gcin and for gcin mainly, I intend to extend its usage so other package can also use it. Thus this package does not depend on gcin. This package is actually a piece of whole voice data collection, so it does not own %{datadir}/voicedata/zh_TW/gcin at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 08:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140814.n7E8EV74024208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhughes at redhat.com --- Comment #25 from Richard Hughes 2009-08-14 04:14:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > We're talking about 80-150MB in roughly 2000 files, iirc. The mirrors can soak > that up. And having an index file you grab from the repodata is just like > things we already have. So, the user launches add/remove software, and searches for "office". 1. The desktop metadata gets downloaded (few Mb) 2. The results get shown with icon-missing (14) 3. PackageKit instructs yum to download icon data for 14 packages 4. The icons get downloaded by yum 5. Add / remove software updates the icons with the new themed icons Now, compare that to the Ubuntu add/remove experience: 1. The results are shown with the correct icons, near instantly Now we need the desktop metadata in one file so we can perform searching on the file (like searching for 'office' in Hungarian) and because we want to get results instantaneously. I would argue we need the icons included in the metadata file as we want to show the icons with the search results as they appear. The fact that Suse and Ubuntu want to share a common spec on this really makes integrating it so deeply with the Fedora repo metadata and yum core a bitter pill to swallow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 08:20:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517466] New: Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 Summary: Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stjepan.gros at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/lbreakout2/lbreakout2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/lbreakout2/lbreakout2-2.6-0.1.beta7.fc11.src.rpm Description: A breakout-style arcade game for Linux. I guess all of you know how to play breakout basically. Ball bounces around --> paddle keeps ball in game -> all bricks destroyed --> next level ;-D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 08:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517466] Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140838.n7E8ctn7031812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-14 04:38:54 EDT --- A few notes: - The description is nonsense. Use e.g. "The successor to LBreakout offers you a new challenge in more than 50 levels with loads of new bonuses (goldshower, joker, explosive balls, bonus magnet ...), maluses (chaos, darkness, weak balls, malus magnet ...) and special bricks (growing bricks, explosive bricks, regenerative bricks ...). If you are still hungry for more after that you can create your own levelsets with the integrated level editor." - The comments to your patches are missing. Add them. Send the patches upstream. - Add INSTALL="install -p" to make install to preserve time stamps. Use 'cp -p' instead of 'cp' for the same reason. - Don't mix %{name} and lbreakout2 in %files - use one or the other and stick with it. - Remove the docdir created by install; just list the necessary files as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 09:17:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140917.n7E9HIat003005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 --- Comment #6 from Steve Whitehouse 2009-08-14 05:17:17 EDT --- rpmlint output: [steve at quoit ~]$ rpmlint ./msp430-libc.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [steve at quoit ~]$ rpmlint ./msp430-libc-0-3.20090726cvs.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package name: OK Spec file name: OK Packaging Guidelines: Licensing Guidelines: OK License matches spec file: OK License not in upstream source: OK (but should request that upstream adds it) Spec file in US English: OK Spec file legible: OK Sources match upstream: OK Must build on one arch: OK BuildRequires: OK Locales: N/A Dynamic Lib: N/A Owns all created directories: OK Files only listed once: OK File permissions: OK Consistent Macro use: OK Contains code and permissible content: OK Large doc files: OK (there are none) Nothing in %doc is runtime: OK Header files must be in a -devel package: Static libraries must be in a -static package: - I assume these two only apply if the package is targetted at the installed platform and that this doesn't apply to cross-libraries & tools. It makes no sense to separate the headers from the library since both are always required to make use of this package. It makes no sense to name the library -static when msp430 only supports static libraries anyway. pkgconfig: OK (No .pc files included) Library files with .so suffix: OK (None included) Must not contain .la files: OK (None included) GUI Applications: N/A Must not own files/directories owned by other packages: OK Install removes build root: OK Filenames are UTF-8: OK ... and now for the SHOULD items... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 09:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908140929.n7E9TXXn008980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 --- Comment #7 from Steve Whitehouse 2009-08-14 05:29:32 EDT --- Package review SHOULD items: License in upstream source: As above, that should be requested to be added Translations of description & summary: No translations available - can we get those via Transifex I wonder? Not sure how we can arrange that for the spec file itself. Mock build: Robert, have you already tried that? If so I'll take your word for it that it works. Package functions: It is impossible to test all package functions without a huge test suite. I can see that the code looks sane and the only reason for non-functioning would be a broken compiler which is not an issue relating to this particular package. I have used certain functions from this library before and they have worked as expected. Scriptlets: N/A Subpackages: N/A .pc files: N/A File deps outside of certain directories: N/A So I think we are most of the way there with this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 10:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141027.n7EARcEq020224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-14 06:27:37 EDT --- Updated to upstream version 4.92 http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ipplan/ipplan.spec http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ipplan/ipplan-4.92-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 10:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141035.n7EAZ5xq021838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #16 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-08-14 06:35:01 EDT --- Thank you Spot for your advice. New version: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/WebCalendar-1.2.0-7.fc10.src.rpm * Fri Aug 14 2009 Patrick Monnerat 1.2.0-7 - Patch and tarball "newmenuicons" to replace menu icons that have an unclear license. - Upstream patch references added. rpmlint output: WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/phpmailer/class.smtp.php /usr/share/php/PHPMailer/class.smtp.php WebCalendar.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php 0660 WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/hKit/hkit.class.php /usr/share/php/hkit/hkit.class.php WebCalendar.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/WebCalendar 0775 WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/phpmailer/class.phpmailer.php /usr/share/php/PHPMailer/class.phpmailer.php 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. Same explanations as for 1.2.0-5 Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1604916 Since all problematic icons have been removed and replaced, we can probably lift FE_LEGAL. David, I let you do it if you agree. php-PHPMailer package has been approved, so we still have 2 blocking pending review requests: _ php_captchaphp (review request 505354) _ JSCookMenu (review request 505360) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 10:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141034.n7EAY2d5017882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-14 06:34:01 EDT --- > - License is unclear. Spec: GPLv2+, COPYING is GPLv2 but the headers of the > sources are LGPLv2. This looks like a mistake to me. Please ask upstream for > clarification. Got clarification from the developer that the license is LGPL2+. Email on the list is here http://lists.moblin.org/pipermail/dev/2009-August/005801.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 11:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141102.n7EB2EJo023787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #26 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-14 07:02:12 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: openal-soft New Branches: F-10, F-11 Owners: linuxdonald -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 11:03:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141103.n7EB3Wc0024012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 11:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517488] New: Review Request: vhostmd - Virtualization host metrics daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vhostmd - Virtualization host metrics daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517488 Summary: Review Request: vhostmd - Virtualization host metrics daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/vhostmd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/vhostmd-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: vhostmd provides a "metrics communication channel" between a host and its hosted virtual machines, allowing limited introspection of host resource usage from within virtual machines. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1604955 rpmlint output: vhostmd.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/vhostmd/vhostmd.dtd vhostmd.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/vhostmd/metric.dtd (Probably the upstream package shouldn't be placing the DTD files in that location. In any case I don't think those files should be edited by the user). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 11:17:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141117.n7EBHhXs027429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #15 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-14 07:17:41 EDT --- Right but then I would suggest that you keep them only in the EL branches and remove unnecessary cruft from the Fedora branches but that's left to the maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 11:20:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141120.n7EBKfsv031205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|sundaram at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #16 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-14 07:20:39 EDT --- Didn't realize this one requires a sponsor. Taking myself off as the reviewer although I can review it unofficially and make it easy for the sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 11:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] New: Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Summary: Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/perl-Nagios-Plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.33-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Nagios::Plugin and its associated Nagios::Plugin::* modules are a family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins. The main end user modules are Nagios::Plugin, providing an object-oriented interface to the entire Nagios::Plugin::* collection, and Nagios::Plugin::Functions, providing a simpler functional interface to a useful subset of the available functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 12:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141202.n7EC2pHP007074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-14 08:02:49 EDT --- I don't agree. I think keeping the BuildRoot stuff doesn't hurt anything: it's just a few lines, and it avoids using conditionals that are a lot easier to get wrong. Having one and only spec file for the different branches is a plus, also. ** - The %description line fits on two lines. No need to use four. - Any reason why you are not using SMP make? If it doesn't work, please document it. - Your patch doesn't have a comment. Add one explaining what it does and why it is necessary. - I think you are missing a Requires: on the package that provides the font dmenu uses. ** I am a sponsor, so I can sponsor you if necessary. You just need to do a few informal reviews first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 12:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141212.n7ECCebi009479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-14 08:12:38 EDT --- Package doesn't build: ... ERROR: Bad build req: No Package Found for perl(Math::Calc::Units). ... These 2 requires probaly are unneccessary: ... Requires: perl(Class::Accessor) Requires: perl(Config::Tiny) ... However, as this package currently doesn't build, it's hard to verify if they really are required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 12:18:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: pmd-emacs - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141218.n7ECIUhM010681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 Joshua Rosen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjrosen at polybus.com --- Comment #2 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-14 08:18:28 EDT --- This is an informal review, I'm new to the packaging process. Everything looks good to me. There are no rpmlint errors, the md5sums match, I was able to build it. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] OK # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source OK # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, NA # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. NA # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths NA # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, NA # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. NA # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.OK # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. NA # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 12:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517507] New: Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517507 Summary: Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Locale-Msgfmt.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Locale-Msgfmt-0.14-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module does the same thing as msgfmt from GNU gettext-tools,. except this is pure Perl. The interface is best explained through examples on home page. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605020 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 12:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517507] Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141235.n7ECZA03016956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517507 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 12:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517511] New: Package Review: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags - Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags - Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517511 Summary: Package Review: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags - Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags-1.01-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This Perl module parses ctags files and handles both traditional ctags as well as extended ctags files such as produced with Exuberant ctags. To the best of my knowledge, it does not handle emacs-style "etags" files. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605052 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 12:53:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517507] Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141253.n7ECrX61021436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517507 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-14 08:53:31 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605020 + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream url 767b2328e323eb06d0a9a5163b451d38748447ec Locale-Msgfmt-0.14.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=16, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.00 sys + 0.40 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.48 CPU) + Package perl-Locale-Msgfmt-0.14-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Locale::Msgfmt) = 0.14 perl(Locale::Msgfmt::Utils) = 0.14 perl(Locale::Msgfmt::mo) = 0.14 perl(Locale::Msgfmt::po) = 0.14 perl(Module::Install::Msgfmt) = 0.14 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Locale::Msgfmt) >= 0.14 perl(Locale::Msgfmt::Utils) perl(Locale::Msgfmt::mo) perl(Locale::Msgfmt::po) perl(Module::Install::Base) perl(Module::Install::Share) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 12:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141259.n7ECxYp1022908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #17 from David Nalley 2009-08-14 08:59:30 EDT --- I'll defer to spot for lifting FE-Legal. That said I'll try an do the balance of the review work this weekend and get all of the pending reviews for this package knocked out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 12:58:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515136] Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141258.n7ECwkl3019847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #357233|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: scselinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141302.n7ED2Sso023859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Pardy 2009-08-14 09:02:27 EDT --- If someone could please take a look at this, as today is my last day as an intern here and it would be nice to be able to give some sort of status on this thing. Also actually fixed the SRPM to point to an srpm. Spec URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: system-config-selinux-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: system-config-selinux provides the graphical tools system-config-selinux and selinux-polgen for managing SELinux systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515136] Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141306.n7ED6jnd022233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-14 09:06:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/gettext-commons.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/gettext-commons-0.9.6-3.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: - Fixed javadoc generation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517517] New: Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517517 Summary: Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-PPIx-EditorTools.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.07-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Base class and utility methods for manipulating Perl via PPI. Pulled out from the Padre::Task::PPI code. Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605092 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517507] Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141309.n7ED9l1B025711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517507 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:09:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] New: Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Summary: Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/easymock.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/easymock-2.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: EasyMock provides Mock Objects for interfaces in JUnit tests by generating them on the fly using Java's proxy mechanism. Due to EasyMock's unique style of recording expectations, most refactorings will not affect the Mock Objects. So EasyMock is a perfect fit for Test-Driven Development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141308.n7ED8XpG022574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-08-14 09:08:33 EDT --- Hi Ralf, Hmm, I might have been bitten by the freeze, perl-Math-Calc-Units for f-11 is in updates-testing now but hasn't been pushed to rawhide yet. Those 2 Requires: Requires: perl(Class::Accessor) Requires: perl(Config::Tiny) are necessary, they're not automatically picked up by rpm and the package doesn't work without them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517511] Package Review: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags - Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141309.n7ED9Kq8022850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517511 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141321.n7EDLHT1025878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-14 09:21:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sphinx Short Description: Free open-source SQL full-text search engine Owners: allisson Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517517] Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141324.n7EDOWlu029448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517517 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-14 09:24:31 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605092 - rpmlint output for RPM and SRPM. perl-PPIx-EditorTools.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 14) ==> can be fixed using " sed -i -e 's|\t| |g' perl-PPIx-EditorTools.spec" + source files match upstream url f9c74ff5642577e5369bac6375ffa06fa51998ba PPIx-EditorTools-0.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=33, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.89 cusr 0.09 csys = 1.03 CPU) + Package perl-PPIx-EditorTools-0.07-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(PPIx::EditorTools) = 0.07 perl(PPIx::EditorTools::FindUnmatchedBrace) = 0.07 perl(PPIx::EditorTools::FindVariableDeclaration) = 0.07 perl(PPIx::EditorTools::IntroduceTemporaryVariable) = 0.07 perl(PPIx::EditorTools::RenamePackage) = 0.07 perl(PPIx::EditorTools::RenamePackageFromPath) = 0.07 perl(PPIx::EditorTools::RenameVariable) = 0.07 perl(PPIx::EditorTools::ReturnObject) = 0.07 Requires: perl >= 0:5.008 perl(Carp) perl(Class::XSAccessor) perl(Class::XSAccessor) >= 1.02 perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Spec) perl(PPI) perl(PPI) >= 1.203 perl(PPIx::EditorTools::RenamePackage) perl(PPIx::EditorTools::ReturnObject) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517511] Package Review: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags - Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141330.n7EDUDCv031118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517511 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-14 09:30:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605052 + rpmlint is silent for RPM and SRPM. + source files match upstream url 79bd974d151cc6923b38cece4f563bc09cb9eb19 Parse-ExuberantCTags-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=21, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.07 CPU) + Package perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags-1.01-1.fc12.i686=> Provides: ExuberantCTags.so perl(Parse::ExuberantCTags) = 1.01 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl >= 0:5.006001 perl(XSLoader) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 13:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141352.n7EDqHbm004352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-14 09:52:15 EDT --- oops.. my bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:16:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141516.n7EFGctY022261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-14 11:16:37 EDT --- I think you're going to need to make a new custom tarball that doesn't have the icons, since it is not clear that we even have the permission to redistribute them in the tarball (and in the SRPM). Sorry for not making that clear originally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:27:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141527.n7EFRioP029432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-14 11:27:43 EDT --- Well, so (In reply to comment #10) > * Currently rsakeys.ini is recreated every time xrdp > is upgraded. Is this correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:26:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141526.n7EFQXe1029293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141526.n7EFQJ7X029238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-14 11:26:18 EDT --- It is not needed to reopen this bug with CVS change request. By the way would you explain why you want to import this package also on F-10/11? It will cause all packages depending on openal to be rebuilt due to soversion change, which should not happen in general on stable branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507631] Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - Ruby module for reading and writing zip files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141538.n7EFcHAh027813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507631 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-14 11:38:16 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141535.n7EFZPqx027469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sean at middleditch. | |us) --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-14 11:35:24 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:40:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141540.n7EFe1V0032477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-14 11:40:00 EDT --- Well, Good: + rpmlint silent + koji build OK http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605267 + package meets naming guidelines + package meets packaging guidelines + spec file legible, in am. english + source matches upstream + license (BSD) OK + no missing BR + no unnecessary BR + no locales + not relocatable + owns all directories that it creates + no duplicate files + permissions ok + %clean ok + macro use consistent APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141547.n7EFlqLc001812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #13 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-14 11:47:51 EDT --- yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141551.n7EFptgT003130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-14 11:51:54 EDT --- Thanks, Allisson. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-piston Short Description: A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs Owners: diegobz Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141557.n7EFvETJ000308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #26 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-14 11:57:10 EDT --- There is a terrible answer here, which is that you make users of PackageKit swallow a scheduled job that keeps all metadata fresh. Every few hours it just pulls down every single bit of metadata out there (think apt-get --update). That way whenever you go to use PackageKit, 9 times out of 10 you have the latest metadata and there is no need to go download anything new. And if there is a repo that is out of date (and we already have ways of discovering this very quickly/easily) the amount of new stuff to download will be quite small as compared to downloading for every repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 15:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488968] Review Request: fedora-app-install - Fedora application data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141558.n7EFw9Fv004763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968 --- Comment #27 from seth vidal 2009-08-14 11:58:07 EDT --- Putting a package in the distro that will be a giant bag of icons and translations that will need to updated whenever a pkg changes or gets added that adds/removes/changes that set is a bitter pill to swallow, too. It's the WRONG way to do things, furthermore and unlike Suse and Ubuntu we have evidence of it being a bad idea in the form of two pkgs: comps and specspo - both of which used to be packages trundled along in fedora/rhl/rhel. I was talking to James about this problem and generating the metadata at createrepo time isn't terribly difficult. And the users benefit b/c instead of downloading a package containing all this content each time it is updated they can just download the fedora-updates metadata for this content. Making this information be per-repo means that 3rd party and private repos can take advantage of it, too. So, you want this metadata available to yum and PK, great, we can do that - but the info must live in the repository metadata - not in some random pkg in the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141600.n7EG0DBR001233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:00:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:03:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141603.n7EG3tKq006170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-14 12:03:54 EDT --- Well, BAD: * rpmlint issues: django-profile.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6-0.1.20090813svn420 ['0.6-0.1.20090813svnr420.fc11', '0.6-0.1.20090813svnr420'] django-profile.noarch: W: no-documentation django-profile.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/demo/manage.py 0644 /usr/bin/env 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Please fix this issues. * no %doc files: Please add CHANGELOG.txt, LICENSE.txt, README.txt and TODO.txt in %doc section. * License mismatch: setup.py informs a MIT license, but, LICENSE.txt is a BSD license template, see those templates: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517466] Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141610.n7EGAON2007829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:14:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141614.n7EGECrZ008806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:14:11 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141614.n7EGEkDw008903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:14:45 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141613.n7EGDP6P008623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:13:24 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:15:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517300] Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141615.n7EGFLOu005034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517300 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:15:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141618.n7EGI73w005434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:18:06 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141616.n7EGGlIN005240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #19 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-08-14 12:16:44 EDT --- Thanks for the precision, Spot. I'll do it very soon. But I wonder how to name and/or version the package, since this case is not listed in the package naming guidelines, and the packaged tarball will not match upstream's. I can imagine commenting the spec file like in the CVS snapshot case, but it is nether a prerelease, nor a postrelease (in fact, it is a custom release)... Can you help me on this topic ? Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141617.n7EGHBaP005322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-14 12:17:10 EDT --- Thanks for the submission. Everything looks pretty good. See comments below. - it would be nice to use %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but it's not a blocker - my generated source tarball has a different md5sum but the contents are the same (likely timestamp differences) - will we build with maven once it's updated? - other than the non-conffile-in-etc for the maven pom, everything is rpmlint clean - what provides %add_to_maven_depmap? I don't see it doing much in my log. Do we need a BR on maven? - please provide a link to the origin of the OSGi manifest It builds fine locally for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517466] Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141616.n7EGGfTs005206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 --- Comment #2 from Stjepan Gros 2009-08-14 12:16:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - The description is nonsense. Use e.g. > "The successor to LBreakout offers you a new challenge in more than 50 levels > with loads of new bonuses (goldshower, joker, explosive balls, bonus magnet > ...), maluses (chaos, darkness, weak balls, malus magnet ...) and special > bricks (growing bricks, explosive bricks, regenerative bricks ...). If you are > still hungry for more after that you can create your own levelsets with the > integrated level editor." Fixed. > - The comments to your patches are missing. Add them. Send the patches > upstream. I sent them upstream, but I doubt anything will happen as the maintainter leaved message in January on the sourceforge page that he's taking break the next few months/years... Comments should go where? > - Add INSTALL="install -p" to make install to preserve time stamps. Use > 'cp -p' instead of 'cp' for the same reason. Fixed (I hope). > - Don't mix %{name} and lbreakout2 in %files - use one or the other and stick > with it. Changed two lines: '%{_datadir}/%{name}' and '%doc %{_docdir}/%{name}'. Hope that's it? > - Remove the docdir created by install; just list the necessary files as %doc. You mean by issuing 'rm -rf' on that directory? Otherwise, I have to generate the patch to prevent doc installation by 'make install'. That probably wont be accepted upstream... Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/lbreakout2/lbreakout2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/lbreakout2/lbreakout2-2.6-0.2.beta7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141620.n7EGKEcr010553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:20:13 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:17:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141617.n7EGH0xr009719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:16:58 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141619.n7EGJJ3D010104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:19:18 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141621.n7EGLAMc006615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:21:09 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141618.n7EGIg3a005604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:18:41 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141621.n7EGL3J0010779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-14 12:21:02 EDT --- Then okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (xrdp) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141623.n7EGNjMV011357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 12:23:44 EDT --- I've gone ahead and branched this because it's not really up to me to make the decision of whether this should be built or not, but I would still urge you to avoid breaking other packages in the stable releases. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141627.n7EGROR6012425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #30 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-14 12:27:22 EDT --- I will write the packager that uses opeanl an mail and say them that the must please upgrade thier packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141626.n7EGQGT3012245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #29 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-14 12:26:15 EDT --- The packager of AlienArena have requested that because it?s need to run correctly openal-soft because it segfaults with openal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515109 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:29:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141629.n7EGTTqw013120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-14 12:29:28 EDT --- Well, BAD: * rpmlint issues: django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._handling_admin.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._tips_tricks.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._installation.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._configuration.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._support.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._index.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._handling_template.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._create_per_object_permission.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/.theme/nature/._theme.conf django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/.static django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/.static django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._check_python.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/build/html/.buildinfo django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._documentation_guidelines.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/.theme django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/.theme django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._check_templates.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._create_basic_permission.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._handling_python.txt django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/._check_decorator.txt 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 20 warnings. Please fix this issues :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:36:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517466] Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141636.n7EGaqk8015487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 --- Comment #3 from Stjepan Gros 2009-08-14 12:36:51 EDT --- I corrected some warnings when running rpmlint on binary package. Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/lbreakout2/lbreakout2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/lbreakout2/lbreakout2-2.6-0.3.beta7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 16:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141655.n7EGtE8C019564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-14 12:55:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xrdp Short Description: Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:11:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141711.n7EHBR05023288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-14 13:11:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Thanks for the precision, Spot. I'll do it very soon. > But I wonder how to name and/or version the package, since this case is not > listed in the package naming guidelines, and the packaged tarball will not > match upstream's. I can imagine commenting the spec file like in the CVS > snapshot case, but it is nether a prerelease, nor a postrelease (in fact, it is > a custom release)... Can you help me on this topic ? Thank you. So, what you need to do is this: Take the tarball upstream provides and unpack it. Then, remove the files which we do not have permission to redistribute, and then make a new tarball with the same basename as the upstream tarball, but append "-clean" to the end of it. Finally, in the spec file, refer to the -clean tarball (without a URL), and add comments that point to the original upstream tarball and how you generated the new -clean tarball: # The upstream tarball contains icons which we could not determine the licensing # for. The original source was found here: http://foo.bar/baz.tar.gz # To generate the clean tarball, run: # tar xvfz baz.tar.gz # rm -rf baz/icons/*.png # tar cvfz baz-clean.tar.gz baz/ Source: baz-clean.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:25:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141725.n7EHPQSt026066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141726.n7EHQ4FS026419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141730.n7EHUYZS027446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141729.n7EHTLGP026986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #21 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-08-14 13:29:20 EDT --- Thanks Spot, but this was the "clear" part, and my question was not! My question is about package NAMING: is is a fourth case (after prerelease, snapshot and postrelease) where the %release should contain a specific alpha string ? (AFAIK, these are the only kind of packages that are allowed to contain a main tarball that is not directly downloadable from upstream). Or do I keep the regular package naming, breaking the "downloadable from upstream" rule ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514540] Review Request: papyon - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141744.n7EHipj9025607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514540 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Brian Pepple 2009-08-14 13:44:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review! I'll fix the script before importing into cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: papyon Short Description: Python libraries for MSN Messenger network Owners: bpepple Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:53:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141753.n7EHr0Zr027228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-14 13:52:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141755.n7EHt4K9000360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-14 13:55:03 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fpaste-0.3.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:53:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141753.n7EHrTXR032316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 13:53:28 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514540] Review Request: papyon - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141755.n7EHtCvN000404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514540 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 13:55:10 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141803.n7EI3BWA029398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-14 14:03:09 EDT --- Ah, I see. You're fine to keep the naming and versioning the same as if it was a normal package, just leave the "clean" off it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 17:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141758.n7EHwehv028479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-14 13:58:39 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fpaste-0.3.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512021] Review Request: zikula-module-advanced_polls - Advanced voting system for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141807.n7EI7pES003053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512021 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |nb at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nb at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout 2009-08-14 14:07:50 EDT --- I'll try to do this this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141814.n7EIEgPm004669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-14 14:14:42 EDT --- Django-south-0.6-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Django-south-0.6-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141814.n7EIEcTB031767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-14 14:14:37 EDT --- Django-south-0.6-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Django-south-0.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141818.n7EIITrE032631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-14 14:18:29 EDT --- django-piston-0.2.2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-piston-0.2.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141818.n7EIIYRG005628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-14 14:18:34 EDT --- django-piston-0.2.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-piston-0.2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141834.n7EIYvHt008809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 --- Comment #3 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-14 14:34:56 EDT --- Ops! Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-authority/django-authority.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-authority/django-authority-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141836.n7EIaeRa004247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-14 14:36:39 EDT --- xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141836.n7EIaj3u009561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-14 14:36:45 EDT --- xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141838.n7EIcALw009818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-14 14:38:09 EDT --- xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141838.n7EIc4DT009725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-14 14:38:03 EDT --- xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141836.n7EIaPD0009493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #23 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-08-14 14:36:24 EDT --- OK, thanks for the info. So here we are: New version: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/WebCalendar-1.2.0-8.fc10.src.rpm * Fri Aug 14 2009 Patrick Monnerat 1.2.0-8 - Use a custom source tarball to get rid of upstream icons with license issue. rpmlint output unchanged. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605649 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141839.n7EIdkFn010042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-14 14:39:45 EDT --- Some notes: ! About tokyocabinet dependency - Note that current latest package of tokyocabinet on koji is tokyocabinet-1.4.30-1.fc12 ( This already exists in koji dist-f12 buildroot, but has not pushed to rawhide tree yet because of F12alpha freeze ) * Package name - Usually development related package should be named as "tokyotyrant-devel", not "tokyotyrant-libs-devel" (even if you create tokyotyrant-libs package) * About removing rpath - Please avoid to use "chrpath" binary as much as possible for removing rpath but use more "standard" method ( Using chrpath --delete should be thought as the last resort, which is usually not needed ). For this package replacing "LD_RUN_PATH" with "LD_LIBRARY_PATH" should remove rpath without using chrpath * Macros - Use %_initddir for %_sysconfdir/rc.d/init.d https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScripts#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem * About %_libdir/ttskel*.so - Would you explain how these binaries are used? * Actually these binaries don't have sonames, don't have the names "libfoo.so", so these don't seem to be system-wide libraries. I suggest at least these libraries should be moved to package-specific directory (like %_libdir/%name) * Also I tried to find out how these binaries are used by using grep, however it seems these binaries are used nowhere... * %files - You don't have to add "COPYING" to all binary packages (only including to -libs package is enough because -libs package is needed by all packages) By the way README, THANKS or so should also be moved to -libs subpackage because tokyotyrant (binary rpm) depends on -libs subpackage and not opposite. * Dependency - Main package must have strict dependency "Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}" - For example installed /usr/include/tcrdb.h contains: --------------------------------------------------------------- 30 #include 31 #include --------------------------------------------------------------- so at least tokyotyrant-devel should have "Requires: tokyocabinet-devel". And tokyotyrant.pc should have "Requires: tokyocabinet". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141842.n7EIg4DU005317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-14 14:42:03 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:43:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141843.n7EIh1ii011085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #18 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-14 14:42:58 EDT --- Bob, nss-softokn is ready for review, I have updated the files at Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softkn.spec and SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-8.fc12.test.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141855.n7EItKea008472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jkeating at redhat.com |rrelyea at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 18:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141854.n7EIsfeo007944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #356903|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 19:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141904.n7EJ4Xhm010498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 --- Comment #3 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-14 15:04:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-profile/django-profile.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-profile/django-profile-0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Aug 14 2009 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420 - Added docs - Fixed version in the previous changelog - Fixed License to BSD based on the LICENSE.txt file Is it enough to change the license to BSD? I've opened a ticket upstream though. http://code.google.com/p/django-profile/issues/detail?id=64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 19:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517300] Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141926.n7EJQTnR015392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517300 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-14 15:26:28 EDT --- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 19:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141928.n7EJSSMg020994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-14 15:28:26 EDT --- I've now reviewed the outstanding items and I think they're all fixed. Patch from upstream for the license applied and patch for the pgkconfig issue. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bickley-0.4.3-5.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606207 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 19:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141936.n7EJaooA022816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Xavier Lamien 2009-08-14 15:36:48 EDT --- Imported and built. Thx guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 19:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908141957.n7EJvWmv027222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-14 15:57:31 EDT --- BAD: * rpmlint django-profile.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/demo/manage.py 0644 /usr/bin/env 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. I think this demo program at (/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/demo/) should be moved to docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142004.n7EK4jZ3022869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: scselinux - |Review Request: |GUI Code for |system-config-selinux - GUI |system-config-selinux, |Code for |polgen, and lockdown |system-config-selinux, | |polgen, and lockdown -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:17:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: pmd-emacs - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142017.n7EKHxVP025585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-14 16:17:58 EDT --- Joshua: rpmlint is not silent. pmd-emacs-el.noarch: W: no-documentation pmd-xemacs-el.noarch: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. These are, however, OK. ** As an (X)Emacs package, the Emacs guidelines are applied. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs The name of the package is incorrect, it should be emacs-common-pmd, and the names of the other packages should be {x,}emacs-pmd{,-el}. See e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs#Template_for_a_package_for_both_GNU_Emacs_and_XEmacs ** If you're using a space to separate BR:s, don't use a comma in Requires: xemacs(bin) >= %{xemacs_version}, xemacs-packages-extra As %install is a bit long, you could add additional space around it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142025.n7EKPuGJ000621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-14 16:25:54 EDT --- Is there any reason you are shipping static libraries ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497614] Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142029.n7EKTKkH001096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-14 16:29:19 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/icoutils/icoutils.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/icoutils/icoutils-0.27.0-1.fc11.src.rpm I've updated the package to the latest upstream release and fixed a build error occurred on ppc architectures. Eric, if you're no longer interested in maintaining this package, I could take it over. koji scratch build is successful: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606341 rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142033.n7EKXSvh028844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 --- Comment #5 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-14 16:33:27 EDT --- Updated! Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-profile/django-profile.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-profile/django-profile-0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.fc11.src.rpm * Fri Aug 14 2009 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420 (...) - Moved demo app to docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142034.n7EKYnXP029161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-14 16:34:48 EDT --- Approved. Please give me your FAS username so that I can sponsor you. Please read the rest of the packaging procedure to push Qtdmm to the repositories: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142038.n7EKcuHl003368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 Joshua Rosen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjrosen at polybus.com --- Comment #1 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-14 16:38:55 EDT --- This is an informal review, I'm just learning the packaging process. I can't find libg3d-devel in any repository, where do I get it from? Also wouldn't it be better to submit a package based on a recent version of this program? On the upstream site the current version is 0.8, this is for 0.2.99.4 which is from 2006. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] OK /home/bjrosen/rpmbuild/SPECS> rpmlint g3dviewer.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . ?? # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source ** This is a 3 year old version, the current version is 0.0.8. Wouldn't it be better to submit a current package?" # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. ?? # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, ?? # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires ?? # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. ?? # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths ?? # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ?? # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. ?? # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. ?? # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. ?? # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. ?? # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. ?? # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). ?? # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. ?? # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.?? # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142039.n7EKdL7h030227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 16:39:20 EDT --- I would certainly not approve a package at is with bundled libraries. The packaging guidelines say this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_Bundled_Libraries. Perhaps some other reviewer feels differently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497614] Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142044.n7EKitKf004653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 --- Comment #6 from Eric Moret 2009-08-14 16:44:54 EDT --- Feel free to take it over. In the mean time and for what it's worth I found out that Alchemy could do the same icon extracting job as icoutils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: pmd-emacs - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142044.n7EKiXr2031387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 --- Comment #4 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-14 16:44:32 EDT --- I've just submitted some comments on 483863. I'm blocked by a missing -devel package. I'm not sure where to get it. I didn't get any rpmlint errors on the pmd package rpmlint pmd-emacs.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 20:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142044.n7EKixkT031498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-14 16:44:57 EDT --- BAD: * rpmlint: django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/.static django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/.static django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/build/html/.buildinfo django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/.theme django-authority.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/django-authority-0.3/docs/.theme 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. I suggest remove docs/ for %doc section, these docs are build with python-sphinx, but, using command for build (python setup.py build_sphinx) fails on my F-11. * %doc section: Please add AUTHORS, LICENSE and README in %doc section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 21:11:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142111.n7ELBhEv005164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 --- Comment #6 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-14 17:11:42 EDT --- Well, You added demo/ in %doc but still here in /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/demo/ :) Modify %files section and add a %exclude like this: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc INSTALL.txt CHANGELOG.txt LICENSE.txt README.txt TODO.txt demo/ %{python_sitelib}/* %exclude %{python_sitelib}/demo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 21:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142117.n7ELHkPZ011723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-14 17:17:45 EDT --- Joshua: this bug depends on bug 483859, i.e. libg3d. Taking over review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 21:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142125.n7ELPTc5008165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-14 17:25:27 EDT --- Fabian: please update to newest version available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 21:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142125.n7ELPST4008142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(emaldona at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #19 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-14 17:25:26 EDT --- RPMLINT: rpmlint nss-softokn.spec nss-softokn.spec:171: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{unsupported_tools_directory}/shlibsign -i $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/libsoftokn3.so \ nss-softokn.spec:172: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{unsupported_tools_directory}/shlibsign -i $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/libfreebl3.so \ 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. NEEDSWORK: Some minor issues... 1. Remove the .test.1 from the version string. For test builds, you can use ~/.rpmmacros to set dist to your own test string (f12.elio.test for instance). 2. in the comment on getting the source you describe cvs nss-util, I think you mean cvs co nss-util. Also the directory name can be confused with the nss-util package perhaps the name nss-package-tools would be better. 3. A comment that the 'special install-post command actually gets executed as the last stip in the %install (so that the code operates on the stripped libraries). Also, I believe the %define needs to be a %global. bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 21:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497614] Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142145.n7ELjGfM012591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-14 17:45:15 EDT --- Martin, if you want to submit this, please open your own review ticket and close this one as a duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 21:44:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142144.n7ELiigR012122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #10 from Dean Glazeski 2009-08-14 17:44:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Is there any reason you are shipping static libraries ? That's my bad. I didn't see the information on static libraries in the packaging guidelines. There is an option to build a shared object instead, but when I do that I get the following warnings from rpmlint: openocd.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libopenocd.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 openocd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libopenocd.so I've removed 2 errors that have already been resolved as documented in the spec file. I'm not sure what to do with the unversioned shared object. According to the guidelines, this should be in the devel package. Should I just remove the symlink? Here are links to the version of the spec file that builds a shared object instead of a static library. http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd/openocd-0.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd/openocd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 22:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142219.n7EMJP7f023157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-14 18:19:24 EDT --- Thanks guys, here are the updated files: SPEC: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libg3d.spec SRPM: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libg3d-0.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm I guess that the rpath issue is fixed. [fab at ------ x86_64]$ rpmlint libg3d* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 22:24:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142224.n7EMOigi024066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-14 18:24:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Also wouldn't it be better to submit a package based on a recent version of > this program? On > the upstream site the current version is 0.8, this is for 0.2.99.4 which is > from 2006. I can't find any details on the upstream website that 0.2.99.4 isn't the latest release. libg3d 0.0.8 was released at 2009-01-19. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 22:34:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142234.n7EMY358025733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 --- Comment #5 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-14 18:34:02 EDT --- I mistook the library for the application. It specifies libg3d for the 2009 releases whereas the 2006 releases just say Preview edition. I assumed they were the same but I was wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 22:43:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142243.n7EMhwYw027457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-14 18:43:57 EDT --- Fooled me too, didn't check carefully enough :D Joshua: please do the full review. You need to build the dependency first and build this package using it. It's possible in mock by making a local repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 23:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516311] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142318.n7ENIrgd029775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516311 --- Comment #2 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-14 19:18:53 EDT --- I think I confused it with the license for the package : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 , thinking that both have the same license. I sent a mail to the firmwares vendor asking them for a clear license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 14 23:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908142356.n7ENuE21003963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 --- Comment #7 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-14 19:56:13 EDT --- Ops... didn't know about it. :) Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-profile/django-profile.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-profile/django-profile-0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.fc11.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Aug 14 2009 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420 (...) - Excluded demo app from python path -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 00:35:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150035.n7F0ZaQW014567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 --- Comment #5 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-14 20:35:35 EDT --- I added in %doc the docs/build/html instead. Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-authority/django-authority.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-authority/django-authority-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Aug 14 2009 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 0.3-2 (...) - Added only HTML built doc files from docs dir - Added some missed doc files like AUTHORS - Clean up .builinfo files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 02:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150212.n7F2CljV026264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-14 22:12:46 EDT --- It's ok now :) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 02:15:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514540] Review Request: papyon - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150215.n7F2FfMQ027085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514540 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Brian Pepple 2009-08-14 22:15:39 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 02:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150216.n7F2Garc027255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(emaldona at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #20 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-14 22:16:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) Moving the post unstall macro to the top fixes the rpmlint warning rpmlint nss-softokn.spec gives 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Updated nss-softokn.spec file and made a new source rpm, this latter at http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-8.fc12..src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 02:28:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150228.n7F2SGnj000992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-14 22:28:14 EDT --- It's good for me :) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 02:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150227.n7F2RgXj000908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 02:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150227.n7F2RUYZ000867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |giesen at snickers.org --- Comment #3 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-08-14 22:27:29 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. NEEDSWORK rpmlint php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.el5.noarch.rpm php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.4.0-2 1.4.0-2.el5 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. You should change "* Mon Jul 27 2009 Andrew Colin Kissa - 1.4.0-2" to "* Mon Jul 27 2009 Andrew Colin Kissa 1.4.0-2" (remove the dash/hyphen) so that that the version can be properly parsed # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. N/A # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. OK # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines OK # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. N/A # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. N/A # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 02:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150229.n7F2TJPB029691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #3 from Arun SAG 2009-08-14 22:29:18 EDT --- The upstream developer suggested me to use the code in CVS , which contains bugfixes to the previous release.so i updated the spec file. Link to the spec file: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec Link to the SRPM: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-3.20091015cvs.fc11.src.rpm Links to successful koji builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606727 -fedora 10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606744 -fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 02:45:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150245.n7F2jk3G004709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #4 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-08-14 22:45:45 EDT --- You just need to clean up the spec changelog versioning and I'll approve the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 02:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150250.n7F2oB4Z001775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #5 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-08-14 22:50:10 EDT --- I also wouldn't bother requesting a CVS branch for EL-4 since it doesn't meet the php-pear requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 03:33:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150333.n7F3XtT0009913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #26 from D Haley 2009-08-14 23:33:52 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-4.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-4.fc10.src.rpm Koji Builds: F10:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606818 F11:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606824 RPMLint: $ cat files Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mathgl-1.9-4.fc10.src.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-1.9-4.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-devel-1.9-4.fc10.i386.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mathgl-doc-1.9-4.fc10.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-debuginfo-1.9-4.fc10.i386.rpm $ rpmlint `cat files | sed 's/Wrote: //' | tr '\n' '\ '` mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 mathgl-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ sudo rpm -i ../RPMS/i386/mathgl-1.9-4.fc10.i386.rpm [sudo] password for makerpm: rpmlint mathgl skipping line skipping line skipping line $ rpmlint mathgl mathgl.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmgl-qt.so.5.0.0 /lib/libpthread.so.0 mathgl.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmgl.so.5.0.0 /usr/lib/libgomp.so.1 mathgl.i386: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib/libmgl.so.5.0.0 /usr/lib/libgslcblas.so.0 mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. These unused-direct-shlibs are simply -config extras, which I believe can be ignored. >For a good model on how to do it properly, look at Octave Forge, the package >containing additional tools for Octave: Octave packaging is done. pkg.m is not fun to work with :(. Note that I must manually use the -1.9.0 versioning as this is what octave searches for (you can see it from an strace, or by tracing the undocumented pkg.m file). >If you have defined the macro correctly, it is >expanded and you don't get such an error. I am unclear why %global octave_api %(octave-config -p API_VERSION || echo 0) is invalid. In any case, I have switched it to use the conditional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 05:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150503.n7F53MOP024352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 01:03:21 EDT --- espresso-ab-1.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/espresso-ab-1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 05:03:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 01:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150503.n7F53R2F028251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 01:03:26 EDT --- espresso-ab-1.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/espresso-ab-1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 06:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150633.n7F6XqOf006120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #27 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-15 02:33:51 EDT --- The links do not work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 06:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] New: Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Summary: Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: martin.gieseking at uos.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/icoutils/icoutils.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/icoutils/icoutils-0.27.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The icoutils are a set of programs for extracting and converting images in Microsoft Windows icon and cursor files. These files usually have the extension .ico or .cur, but they can also be embedded in executables or libraries. koji scratch build is successful: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606341 rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 06:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150645.n7F6jAXt008307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric.moret at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-15 02:45:08 EDT --- *** Bug 497614 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 06:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497614] Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150645.n7F6j9eV008278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-15 02:45:08 EDT --- Eric and Jason, thanks for your comments. I've opened a new ticket for this package. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 517615 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 06:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150646.n7F6kGe4012332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-15 02:46:14 EDT --- The changelog versioning issue is a bug in the rpmlint version (0.85) which is installed on RHEL, the Fedora version (0.87) does produce a clean result. With or without the "-" in the changelog rpmlint fails on RHEL but passes on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 07:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150700.n7F70v2E010859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Zabolotny 2009-08-15 03:00:56 EDT --- My FAS username is zap. I've tried to build the package on koji for the four main architectures and it worked fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 07:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150750.n7F7oOWe022393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 07:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150750.n7F7o94E018909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #7 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-08-15 03:50:08 EDT --- Ahh indeed you are correct. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150809.n7F89RJ9025879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513774] Review Request: python-firkin - A python module to convert between different measurement units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150810.n7F8AGKs026342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513774 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.02-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:13:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512068] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150813.n7F8DRxm023931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512068 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:13:24 EDT --- rancid-2.3.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150809.n7F89MWD022616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:09:21 EDT --- vifir-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513774] Review Request: python-firkin - A python module to convert between different measurement units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150810.n7F8ABeI023062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513774 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:10:10 EDT --- python-firkin-0.02-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150810.n7F8AZ1o023235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:10:33 EDT --- gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150809.n7F89eE6022668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-15 04:09:39 EDT --- Actually the license tag was incorrect, since there are a few files that are under 4-clause BSD, i.e. BSD with advertising. It is an acceptable license in Fedora and I've added it to the list. It isn't GPL compatible, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150812.n7F8CgRR023776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.01-1.fc10 |0.01-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:09:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150809.n7F898GQ022534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:09:06 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache-0.01-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512068] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150813.n7F8DWJ0023994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512068 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.3.2-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150810.n7F8AdfT023274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.6-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150809.n7F89D3q022574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.01-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:10:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150810.n7F8AnSx023341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:10:48 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fpaste'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8534 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150812.n7F8C52w023621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:12:04 EDT --- mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mmapper'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8546 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150811.n7F8Bdpi026782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:11:38 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache-0.22-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:14:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150814.n7F8EOA4027324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:14:22 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-1.fc11.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150812.n7F8CcvX026985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:12:37 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache-0.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150815.n7F8FBP2027783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:15:10 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-1.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150811.n7F8BjJi026823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.22-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150816.n7F8G8ju025273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:16:07 EDT --- mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150817.n7F8HdZK025529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:17:38 EDT --- django-piston-0.2.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:16:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150816.n7F8GiSI025386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6-2.fc11 |1.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150815.n7F8FFMO025041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.12-1.fc11.1 |0.12-1.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150817.n7F8HiQm025571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:16:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150816.n7F8GDR6025310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150814.n7F8ETbw024507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.12-1.fc11.1 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150816.n7F8G383025239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:16:01 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fpaste'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8571 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512068] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150819.n7F8JtSc029189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512068 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:19:53 EDT --- rancid-2.3.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:17:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150817.n7F8HOmP028516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:17:21 EDT --- ccrypt-1.8-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:18:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150818.n7F8ISqc028861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:18:27 EDT --- ccrypt-1.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150818.n7F8IWpi028898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.8-1.fc11 |1.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:16:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150816.n7F8Gd9Q028274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:16:38 EDT --- gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:17:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150817.n7F8HUu1028558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.8-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150822.n7F8MLfg027377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:22:20 EDT --- Django-south-0.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512068] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150820.n7F8K0eM026380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512068 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.3.2-3.fc10 |2.3.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150820.n7F8KrGS027082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:20:52 EDT --- perl-Math-Calc-Units-1.06-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:22:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150822.n7F8McZ2027451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:22:37 EDT --- xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150822.n7F8MCdu027341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.22-1.fc10 |0.22-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:20:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513774] Review Request: python-firkin - A python module to convert between different measurement units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150820.n7F8K8s5026711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513774 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:20:07 EDT --- python-firkin-0.02-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513774] Review Request: python-firkin - A python module to convert between different measurement units In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150820.n7F8KDUP026751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513774 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.02-2.fc11 |0.02-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150822.n7F8Moln027521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:22:49 EDT --- mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mmapper'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8607 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150820.n7F8KPhf026915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:20:24 EDT --- perl-Flickr-Upload-1.32-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Flickr-Upload'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150822.n7F8M7n1030392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:22:06 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache-0.22-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513869] Review Request: perl-Beanstalk-Client - Client class to talk to a beanstalkd server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150824.n7F8OVb5030935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513869 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:24:30 EDT --- perl-Beanstalk-Client-1.05-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:20:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150820.n7F8Kw3C030020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.06-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150822.n7F8MQPJ030461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150822.n7F8Mgra030542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150823.n7F8NKL0030681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:23:19 EDT --- blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update blazeblogger'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8609 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150828.n7F8S0xh029406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc11 |0.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513869] Review Request: perl-Beanstalk-Client - Client class to talk to a beanstalkd server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150824.n7F8OZIP028344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513869 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.05-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150827.n7F8RuwK032334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:27:55 EDT --- vifir-0.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150829.n7F8T1Xo000456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8-1.fc11 |0.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150828.n7F8StW1000425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:28:54 EDT --- mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150831.n7F8V4Il001895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:31:03 EDT --- sap-0.4.4-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150831.n7F8V9qG001934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.4-7.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 08:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150830.n7F8UtTj001678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 04:30:54 EDT --- blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update blazeblogger'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8631 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 09:21:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150921.n7F9LUOH007532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 05:21:29 EDT --- fbzx-2.1b-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fbzx-2.1b-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 09:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150924.n7F9OYjN007923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 05:24:33 EDT --- fbzx-2.1b-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fbzx-2.1b-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 09:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150925.n7F9PemQ011321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #28 from D Haley 2009-08-15 05:25:39 EDT --- PEBKAC - Fixed. The SRPM is also available from koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 09:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150931.n7F9VQct009223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #18 from Luke Macken 2009-08-15 05:31:24 EDT --- Hmm, with that chmod usage I'm getting error. I'm not sure if it's something messed up with my environment. The original version still works for me. + chmod -R a-X /home/lmacken/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-4.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages chmod: cannot access `/home/lmacken/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-4.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.5.3-py2.6.egg': Permission denied -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 09:37:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150937.n7F9bGNU010108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #30 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-15 05:37:15 EDT --- Oh nevermind, octave-forge packages are versioned too. I'm still wondering why you use 1.9.0 instead of 1.9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 09:34:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150934.n7F9YfHu009493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #19 from Luke Macken 2009-08-15 05:34:40 EDT --- Also, the nosetest changes don't work with this package. The old %check still works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 09:36:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908150936.n7F9aIRK013005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #29 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-15 05:36:17 EDT --- Why do you version the package's octave directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 10:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151019.n7FAJiTk019921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla at l | |inuxnetz.de) --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-15 06:19:43 EDT --- 1] license: there is setup.rb which is LGPL reflect it in spec file with appropriate comment https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios *rpmlint ok *ruby guidelines ok *legible & english spec file *naming ok *directory ownage & files section ok *clean/install section & macros ok *utf-8 ok conclusion: License needs to be corrected, otherwise it looks ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 10:26:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:26:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151026.n7FAQ4mk018550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #35 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-15 06:26:02 EDT --- Hi Liang, please close this ticket when package submitted into bodhi. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 10:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151030.n7FAUUs1021957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-15 06:30:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > 1] > license: > there is setup.rb which is LGPL I don't think we should consider the license of setup.rb ( like that we usually does not consider the license of Makefile, configure ) Anyway "GPLv2 or Ruby" is stricter than LGPLv2 so this can be ignored anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 10:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151041.n7FAfKfJ021019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 06:41:19 EDT --- gnaughty-1.2.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnaughty-1.2.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 10:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151038.n7FAcwfp020399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #33 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-15 06:38:56 EDT --- Package: gnaughty-1.2.0-2.fc12 Tag: dist-f12 Status: complete Package: gnaughty-1.2.0-2.fc11 Tag: dist-f11-updates-candidate Status: complete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 10:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151047.n7FAl5SE024580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |needinfo?(acme at redhat.com) --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-15 06:47:02 EDT --- add -p switch to install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps rpmlint output: oscilloscope.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib oscilloscope.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary Oscilloscope tuna.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tuna/oscilloscope.py 0644 /usr/bin/python please fix all comments raised so far and provide new src.rpm with bumped release number -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 11:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151101.n7FB19hX026897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #36 from Liang Suilong 2009-08-15 07:01:07 EDT --- Now, this bug report has been closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 11:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151106.n7FB6EK5025067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(redhat-bugzilla at l | |inuxnetz.de) | --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-15 07:06:13 EDT --- As this is clarified now, anything else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 11:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151123.n7FBNtIP030651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 Rasmus Ory Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 11:24:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510843] Review Request: samtools - Tools for nucleotide sequence alignments in the SAM format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151124.n7FBOD0a028260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510843 Rasmus Ory Nielsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 11:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151151.n7FBpVAS003670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-15 07:51:30 EDT --- Thanks for the review Gary, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB Short Description: PHP template system based on preg_* Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 11:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151156.n7FBuHPD004587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-15 07:56:15 EDT --- Christoph, is there any deeper reason for the lengthy loop body that fixes the file permissions? Why not simply use "chmod 0644 $file"? But maybe I'm missing something here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 12:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151215.n7FCFAKi007845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(martin.gieseking@ | |uos.de) --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-15 08:15:08 EDT --- 1] patch have upstream ticket id? Was it reporter to upstream? 2] license... there are files with GPLv2 and files with GPLv3 this is not good imho, could you please contact upstream and ask them to update license that only gplv3 or gplv2 will be used. otherwise it will be complicated and we would need to ask FE-LEGAL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 12:16:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151216.n7FCGKqS005367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 12:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151216.n7FCGPE5008422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #31 from D Haley 2009-08-15 08:16:24 EDT --- >I'm still wondering why you use 1.9.0 instead of 1.9. Octave does not detect the file if you simply place 1.9, if you follow pkg.m you can see that it requires Major.minor.micro notation. Took me a while to work that out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 12:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151232.n7FCW790007939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(martin.gieseking@ | |uos.de) | --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-15 08:32:06 EDT --- > 1] patch have upstream ticket id? Was it reporter to upstream? There is no upstream ticket concerning this patch. I already wrote an email to upstream but haven't got a reply yet. > 2] license... > there are files with GPLv2 and files with GPLv3 > this is not good imho, could you please contact upstream and ask them to update > license that only gplv3 or gplv2 will be used. otherwise it will be complicated > and we would need to ask FE-LEGAL Thanks for this hint. I'm going to ask upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 13:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151310.n7FDAq3J014539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-15 09:10:50 EDT --- Hi Timon, 1] please bump everytime you provide new version of package release number and post links to new version in your reply 2] %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) do you have any reason why not to use %defatter(-,root,root,-) ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions 3] cp in makefile is without -p switch, write patch that cp in Makefile will be performed with -p switch (sed during prep will be good enough) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps 4] BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) you have to include this as without it, not all tests are performed and you break this guideline: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#Perl_Packaging Hi Marcela, official review for new packagers which are not yet sponsored must be done by sponsor. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer I think that you should keep this ticket unassigned until Timon is sponsored. That sponsors will see that this ticket needs attention and is not assigned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 13:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151316.n7FDGksg018807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #9 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-15 09:16:46 EDT --- Marcela, please clear fedora.review as there are things which needs to be adressed before this package meets packaging guidelines and as Timon is not yet sponsored so fedora.review+ could be set only by sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 13:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151353.n7FDrCZE025158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-15 09:53:11 EDT --- Thank you, Allisson. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-profile Short Description: Django pluggable user profile zone Owners: diegobz Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: diegobz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 13:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151354.n7FDs45M025253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-15 09:54:03 EDT --- Thank you, Allisson. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-authority Short Description: A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks Owners: diegobz Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: diegobz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 13:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151357.n7FDvbfN026021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-15 09:57:36 EDT --- rpmlint output: mathgl.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mathgl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. These should be OK. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. ~OK - Please move the buildroot tag somewhere else from the middle of BuildRequires. I prefer the order: BuildRoot, BuildRequires, Requires. - Devel package does not contain static libraries, remove them from the summary. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - License is GPLv2+ not GPLv3. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK - The package needs to own %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead of just %{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts/*.vfm MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add COPYING, COPYRIGHT, NEWS, TODO. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 14:13:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151413.n7FEDSid028910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #8 from Christof Damian 2009-08-15 10:13:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I would certainly not approve a package at is with bundled libraries. > > Perhaps some other reviewer feels differently. No, you are obviously right. I will create packages and review requests for php-channel-doctrine and php-doctrine-doctrine and then see if I can fix this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 14:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] New: Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-channel-doctrine.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-channel-doctrine-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package adds the doctrine channel which allows PEAR packages from this channel to be installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 14:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151417.n7FEHvYU029757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #1 from Christof Damian 2009-08-15 10:17:56 EDT --- This is based on php-channel-symfony with s/symfony/doctrine/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 14:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151428.n7FESLRY031549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #33 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-15 10:28:20 EDT --- Please fill in your full name in Bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 14:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151433.n7FEX4Vh029076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |517643 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 14:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151433.n7FEX31i029059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |517643 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 14:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151433.n7FEX22p029034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |517191 Depends on| |517641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 14:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] New: Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Summary: Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-doctrine-Doctrine.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Doctrine is an object relational mapper (ORM) for PHP 5.2.3+ that sits on top of a powerful database abstraction layer (DBAL). One of its key features is the option to write database queries in a proprietary object oriented SQL dialect called Doctrine Query Language (DQL), inspired by Hibernates HQL. This provides developers with a powerful alternative to SQL that maintains flexibility without requiring unnecessary code duplication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 14:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151438.n7FEcXdv000889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #9 from Christof Damian 2009-08-15 10:38:32 EDT --- I created these now: bug 517641 : Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR bug 517643 : Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper I hope these are less controversial. If they are approved I will fix the spec file of this request to use the separate libraries for Doctrine and Propel and remove the Symfony 1.0 support with the ancient phpmailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 15:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151508.n7FF8wV9002968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #6 from Dominic Hopf 2009-08-15 11:08:57 EDT --- Updates available: Spec URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem.spec SRPM URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm md5sums a26594c15849b5751484537755205b8d graphem.spec da1e204a5950f4f5e01ca5fe382ea74a graphem-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm As I promised this includes an additional README and a .desktop-file from upstream. It also ships a Changelog where additional information on the changes of the program itself can be found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 15:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151558.n7FFwWA1011014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #20 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-15 11:58:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Hmm, with that chmod usage I'm getting error. I'm not sure if it's something > messed up with my environment. The original version still works for me. > I'm a dummy and reversed what "X" does in chmod but we resolved this on IRC using find -type f The nosetest changes worked when updated to sqlalchemy-0.5.5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 16:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225769] Merge Review: freeradius In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151619.n7FGJ1Ts017552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225769 --- Comment #6 from John Dennis 2009-08-15 12:18:58 EDT --- Thank you for your review. My apologies for the delay, I have been on vacation (actually I'm still on vacation) and will return to work Monday 8/17. I expect to be swamped the first few days back, however I will try to get to this as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 16:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151653.n7FGrZYY023413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #16 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-15 12:53:32 EDT --- Robert Oloffson kindly change version enumeration by my request, now tarball have version and release. Also new 4.1 version. I still don't known what do with classpath. Help is highly appreciated. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/RabbIT/RabbIT-4.1-9.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 17:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151738.n7FHcVcI028092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 13:38:30 EDT --- python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 17:38:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:38:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151738.n7FHcQVm031358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 13:38:25 EDT --- python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 18:15:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:15:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151815.n7FIFfJo003295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-15 14:15:40 EDT --- 1] wrong license, see [1] 2] disabled tests, should be enabled and as test fails, this should be reporter to upstream that fedora is not shipping something what is broken. see [1] 3] Makefile created during %prep is not using cp -p, modify/patch this Makefile that it will use it (could be done by sed for example) [2] --- [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 18:27:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:27:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151827.n7FIRLYj008232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 --- Comment #3 from Juanjo 2009-08-15 14:27:20 EDT --- Jan -- 1. I believe the artistic license version 2.0 it's OK for Fedora [1]. 2. I think the tests fail because of features not implemented, but I can confirm that with the developer. Anyway I'll check the whole test part, thank you. 3. OK, I'll fix this. Thank you for the pointers. --- [1]: Artistic 2.0, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 18:43:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517466] Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151843.n7FIhVdd010777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 Ed Brand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |edbrand at brandint.com --- Comment #4 from Ed Brand 2009-08-15 14:43:30 EDT --- The output of rpmlint looks clean. Giving your spec file a once over I see this: Use %global instead of %define, unless you really need only locally defined submacros within other macro definitions (a very rare case) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 18:46:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151846.n7FIkjnm008442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Ed Brand changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(edbrand at brandint. | |com) | --- Comment #39 from Ed Brand 2009-08-15 14:46:41 EDT --- I've started looking through new requested, and giving comments, beginng with Bug 517466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 18:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511107] Review Request: rhythmbox-equalizer - An Equalizer plugin for Rhythmbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151843.n7FIhsYG007689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511107 --- Comment #4 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-08-15 14:43:53 EDT --- Updated, the spec file and srpm : Spec URL : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/rhythmbox-equalizer.spec SRPM URL : http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/rhythmbox-equalizer-1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint output : spec file : none srpm file : nome bin rpm : [hicham at hicham i586]$ rpmlint rhythmbox-equalizer-1.2-1.fc11.i586.rpm rhythmbox-equalizer.i586: E: no-binary rhythmbox-equalizer.i586: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 19:15:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226100] Merge Review: lksctp-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908151915.n7FJFja3016425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226100 Henrik Nordstr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |henrik at henriknordstrom.net --- Comment #2 from Henrik Nordstr?m 2009-08-15 15:15:44 EDT --- Why is this merge review still open when the package has been part of Fedoar since several releases? Did it get added witout review and a review is still wanted? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 20:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152003.n7FK3iAR024734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-15 16:03:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Jan -- > > 1. I believe the artistic license version 2.0 it's OK for Fedora [1]. Did you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl?. I don't argue about validity of artistic license for fedora, artistic license is completely ok. In readme for XML::Parser::Lite::Tree::Xpath is: "License: Perl Artistic License 2.0 This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. " So from this i see it is dual licensed (artistic 2.0 and same terms as perl itself). from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl#License_tag "Perl itself is dual licensed, under both the GPL and Artistic licenses. Many perl modules follow this practice; when they do, the license tag should be filled out as "GPL+ or Artistic", not the other way around." >From this point, i don't see only "Artistic license" acceptable, there should be "GPL+ or Artistic" to follow perl specific packaging guidelines. > 2. I think the tests fail because of features not implemented, but I can > confirm that with the developer. Anyway I'll check the whole test part, thank > you. Please check, I'm looking into this too to determine if code is broken or functions are just not implemented at all. So far it looks like broken code for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 20:19:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:19:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500931] Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152019.n7FKJGGX027434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500931 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 20:19:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152019.n7FKJHuX027475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Bug 478749 depends on bug 500931, which changed state. Bug 500931 Summary: Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500931 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 20:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500931] Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152019.n7FKJZJ8023723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500931 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 20:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517466] Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152027.n7FKRWrQ029174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-15 16:27:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > - The comments to your patches are missing. Add them. Send the patches > > upstream. > > I sent them upstream, but I doubt anything will happen as the maintainter > leaved message in January on the sourceforge page that he's taking break the > next few months/years... > > Comments should go where? Some people put the comments to the apply phase, i.e. # Enable bar support %patch0 -p1 but I usually put them just before listing them, e.g. # This patch enables bar support Patch0: foo-bar.patch and so on, since normally one looks first at the Patch(N) lines. > > - Don't mix %{name} and lbreakout2 in %files - use one or the other and stick > > with it. > > Changed two lines: '%{_datadir}/%{name}' and '%doc %{_docdir}/%{name}'. Hope > that's it? No, not really. %{_bindir}/lbreakout2 %{_bindir}/lbreakout2server %{_datadir}/%{name} #there is no high scores for now %config(noreplace) %attr(664, root, games) %{_var}/games/lbreakout2.hscr %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README %doc %{_docdir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{_datadir}/pixmaps/lbreakout48.gif What bugs me is that you mix lbreakout2 and %{name}, both of which mean the same thing. I'd replace all occurrences of %{name} in %files with lbreakout2. > > - Remove the docdir created by install; just list the necessary files as %doc. > > You mean by issuing 'rm -rf' on that directory? Otherwise, I have to generate > the patch to prevent doc installation by 'make install'. That probably wont be > accepted upstream... Yes, exactly: remove the documentation installed by 'make install' at the end of %install with 'rm -rf' and just list the necessary files in %doc, which will install them in the correct directory. The current listing %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README %doc %{_docdir}/%{name} looks like you end up with the directories %{_docdir}/%{name} and %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}. PS. You can probably drop the --with-docdir=/usr/share/doc argument from %configure. (I haven't looked at the build at all, though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:09:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152109.n7FL9HEr032437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-15 17:09:16 EDT --- I would appreciate if you could look at the %docs and remove useless files as appropriate. Do not forget that every time you post a SRPM rpmlint should be clean on every single rpm produced. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:41:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152141.n7FLfcXp006539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513733] Review Request: entertainer - A simple media center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152141.n7FLfvB4011213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513733 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 17:41:56 EDT --- entertainer-0.4.2-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152141.n7FLfYcP011138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 17:41:33 EDT --- espresso-ab-1.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:42:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152142.n7FLgjZf011459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 17:42:44 EDT --- gnaughty-1.2.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513733] Review Request: entertainer - A simple media center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152143.n7FLhrhb011754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513733 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.2-5.fc11 |0.4.2-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152142.n7FLgpRH011536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.2.0-2.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513733] Review Request: entertainer - A simple media center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152142.n7FLg21w011266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513733 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.2-5.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152145.n7FLjEeR012283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 17:45:13 EDT --- fbzx-2.1b-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fbzx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8646 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:43:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513733] Review Request: entertainer - A simple media center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152143.n7FLhnNA006908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513733 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 17:43:48 EDT --- entertainer-0.4.2-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:46:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152146.n7FLkLeu007953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 17:46:20 EDT --- espresso-ab-1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152144.n7FLi3w7006961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 17:44:02 EDT --- xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:44:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152144.n7FLi8UG007009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc10 |0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152146.n7FLkGdx007915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-15 17:46:16 EDT --- fbzx-2.1b-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fbzx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8652 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 21:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152146.n7FLkPZd013033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-1.fc11 |1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 15 22:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463808] Review Request: robotfindskitten - A game/zen simulation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908152244.n7FMiFUt017312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463808 --- Comment #9 from Gideon Mayhak 2009-08-15 18:44:12 EDT --- I just noticed that this is still open. I wanted to chime in and say I've installed it in F11 (as well as a rebult F10 RPM under F8) and it works great. Thanks again for packaging this program! I don't know how Review Request reports are handled, so I won't close this myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 02:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160224.n7G2OZow025518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #34 from D Haley 2009-08-15 22:24:34 EDT --- >Please fill in your full name in Bugzilla. My full name is registered with FAS, and will not be registered on bugzilla. This has not been problematic in any of my earlier packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 05:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 01:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160503.n7G539Um019919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #4 from Arun SAG 2009-08-16 01:03:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The upstream developer suggested me to use the code in CVS , which contains > bugfixes to the previous release.so i updated the spec file. > > Link to the spec file: > http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec > > Link to the SRPM: > http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-3.20091015cvs.fc11.src.rpm > > Links to successful koji builds: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606727 -fedora 10 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1606744 -fedora 11 Date of Snapshot is wrong, it should be 20090815. Its fixed now. SPEC File: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM : http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-4.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm Link to koji builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1607485 - Fedora 10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1607487 - Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 06:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 02:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160613.n7G6D023026326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakthimaan at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-16 02:12:59 EDT --- #08 The %changelog entry should be 2.4-3.20090815cvs. Please change that. #09 If you are using a cvs snapshot, why are the sources still using emacs-haskell-2.4.tar.gz? #06 Please remove control characters in haskell-site-file.el (^L), and check for the same in other files. This still exists in the .src.rpm! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 06:19:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 02:19:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160619.n7G6JGnW027285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-16 02:19:16 EDT --- Among, "AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING INSTALL NEWS README", which ones do you want to retain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 07:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 03:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160716.n7G7GgM8010081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-16 03:16:41 EDT --- Keep those whose contents are useful to be considered as docs :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 08:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160826.n7G8QCRq024772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-16 04:26:11 EDT --- trac-tracnav-plugin-4.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-tracnav-plugin-4.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 08:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 04:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160859.n7G8xA3n024573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-16 04:59:09 EDT --- I'm preserving the timestamps. For the stuff inside it's not really important, but for content like docs the original timestamps should be preserved. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:08:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160908.n7G98U4w026260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:08:29 EDT --- Drop the conditional %if 0%{?_with_gnome:1} as we don't use these in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:08:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160908.n7G981hf026199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-16 05:07:59 EDT --- imho it should be "GPL+ or Artistic" from POD documentation and as per perl packaging guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160907.n7G97exf032354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:07:39 EDT --- chmod does not change the time stamps (try it!). You can safely drop the loop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:12:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160912.n7G9CYa5027252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #26 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:12:32 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:11:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160911.n7G9BuGh027073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:11:55 EDT --- ping again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:12:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160912.n7G9CLbO027174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:12:20 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:11:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500003] Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160911.n7G9Bl1N027041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500003 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:11:45 EDT --- ping again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:12:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160912.n7G9CfaG027286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:12:40 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160913.n7G9D0M8027349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:12:58 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160912.n7G9C7oV027122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #48 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:12:05 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508352] Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160912.n7G9CoUS000887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508352 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:12:49 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160912.n7G9CldN000856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-16 05:12:46 EDT --- approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513754] Review Request: moblin-session - Moblin User Experience Startup Scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160917.n7G9HpPI028431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513754 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:17:49 EDT --- Drop the %attr(0755,root,root) line from %files, as it serves no purpose (the file already has these permissions). With this modification the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160919.n7G9JfPL028699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-16 05:19:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > chmod does not change the time stamps. Oops, ok (one of these days again...) (In reply to comment #6) > Drop the conditional > %if 0%{?_with_gnome:1} > as we don't use these in Fedora. We do use similar conditionals and I see no reason why I should drop this. It's an additional feature for people who want to rebuild the package and it allows me to easily change the default behavior. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517720] New: Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 Summary: Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-BZ-Client/perl-BZ-Client.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-BZ-Client/perl-BZ-Client-1.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module provides an interface to the Bugzilla web services API -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160926.n7G9QmPp030546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:26:43 EDT --- Well, I guess this package is fine now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 09:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908160929.n7G9TMX6030874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-16 05:29:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Drop the conditional > > %if 0%{?_with_gnome:1} > > as we don't use these in Fedora. > > We do use similar conditionals and I see no reason why I should drop this. It's > an additional feature for people who want to rebuild the package and it allows > me to easily change the default behavior. I haven't seen any other packages using conditionals for support of packages. In SuSe it's common behavior and I think that some packages in RPMFusion, too, use them, but not in Fedora. Might you give some examples? You should enable support for everything in the package in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 10:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161003.n7GA3MmH004837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-16 06:03:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I haven't seen any other packages using conditionals for support of packages. > In SuSe it's common behavior and I think that some packages in RPMFusion, too, > use them, but not in Fedora. Might you give some examples? With "similar" I meant https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag#Conditionals Another example, not a particulary good one since it is my package is gwget: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gwget/F-11/gwget.spec?view=markup The epiphany extension was broken and I had to disable it during the F12 mass rebuild. I was able to do this by changing 1 to 0 instead of commenting out large parts of the spec. > You should enable support for everything in the package in Fedora. I surely wont do this because I consider the "enable everything" policy one of the biggest mistakes in Fedora. It introduces long dependency chains, just look at totem or pidgim, that require evolution-data-server and all it's dependencies. Currently we are thinking about viewnior to replace gpicview and become the default image viewer of LXDE. Having a gconf dependency is a no-go there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 10:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161004.n7GA4nrS010937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-16 06:04:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gwget/F-11/gwget.spec?view=markup Wrong link, should be http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gwget/devel/gwget.spec?revision=1.36&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 10:17:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161017.n7GAHhjA013264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-16 06:17:42 EDT --- pcc-0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pcc-0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 10:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 06:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513754] Review Request: moblin-session - Moblin User Experience Startup Scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161036.n7GAaCIC010298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513754 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-16 06:36:10 EDT --- Thanks Jussi. The attr is now dropped from my local version. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-session Short Description: Moblin User Experience Startup Scripts Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 11:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 07:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161103.n7GB317u014524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-16 07:03:00 EDT --- pcc-0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pcc-0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 11:25:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 07:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161125.n7GBPPog018414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-16 07:25:24 EDT --- Jan, thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-fastercsv Short Description: Faster, smaller and cleaner replacement to standard CSV library Owners: robert Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 11:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 07:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161157.n7GBvWaR031190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-16 07:57:31 EDT --- openal-soft-1.8.466-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openal-soft-1.8.466-7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 12:00:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 08:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161200.n7GC0s7G025206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-16 08:00:53 EDT --- openal-soft-1.8.466-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openal-soft-1.8.466-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 14:59:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517743] New: Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 Summary: Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sm at sandro-mathys.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE-2.8.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: PyPE (Python Programmers' Editor) was written in order to offer a lightweight but powerful editor for those of you who think emacs is too much and idle is too little. Syntax highlighting is included out of the box, as is multiple open documents via tabs. $ rpmlint SPECS/PyPE* SRPMS/PyPE* RPMS/noarch/PyPE* PyPE.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/PyPE/plugins/parsers.py 0644 /usr/bin/python 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings Not sure what to do about this error - should I make the script executable or remove the shebang line? I'm pretty sure that script is not executed stand-alone. By the way, this is my first python-package and I hope I did everything right :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 17:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161756.n7GHuJ5k026150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Graf 2009-08-16 13:56:18 EDT --- The different config files are necessary because mip6d only supports a few options to be set via command arguments, that's the reason for adding the check for sysconfig to allow passing on arguments to mip6d directly. An empty mip6d.conf is what should be done if the node is a client node which should be the default. Nevertheless I agree with all your recommendations and will make those changes. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 18:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161815.n7GIFxv8029395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #40 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-16 14:15:54 EDT --- Well, okay. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (sslogger) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 18:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161840.n7GIeKQS001032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-16 14:40:18 EDT --- colossus-0.9.0-2.20090810svn4482.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/colossus-0.9.0-2.20090810svn4482.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 18:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161850.n7GIo1Kq002573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-16 14:50:00 EDT --- colossus-0.9.0-2.20090810svn4482.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/colossus-0.9.0-2.20090810svn4482.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 19:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161940.n7GJeCXx010950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 --- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-16 15:40:11 EDT --- I found the locale issue has not been fixed yet with the latest release, informed upstream and haven't heard back. Will update when I do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 19:46:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908161946.n7GJkYVl012078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review- --- Comment #20 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-16 15:46:32 EDT --- Switching from fedora?review+ to fedora?review- as there was no formal package review and the whole process was stopped anyway with WONTFIX. Toshio, why does the search still find the "fupt" package? Can we please get rid of this really - and sane? Would be perfect :) https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/search/package/?searchwords=fupt&operator=AND&release=0&searchon=both -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 21:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908162111.n7GLBHtt025838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-16 17:11:15 EDT --- Thanks Peter (In reply to comment #18) > A few minor issues. > > This should be removed: > /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/camerac/camera.c Removed > The COPYING/README files are included twice: > /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/COPYING > /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/NEWS Fixed > Also does the removal of the embedded gst stuff make the package noarch again? The package is noarch. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record-64-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 21:35:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908162135.n7GLZaG8005350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 --- Comment #3 from Silas Sewell 2009-08-16 17:35:35 EDT --- I've addressed the issues listed above. Would you explain how these binaries are used? - I really couldn't figure it out, but I did move them to their own sub-directory. diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn312&r=312&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/tokyotyrant/tokyotyrant.spec srpm: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/tokyotyrant-1.1.33-2.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint [silas at fox rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 21:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908162149.n7GLnofl032143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-16 17:49:49 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 21:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458769] Review Request: geany-prj - Alternative project manager for geany fast light IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908162154.n7GLss9h000686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458769 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 22:05:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] New: Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Summary: Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/voms.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/voms-1.9.11-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: In grid computing, and whenever the access to resources may be controlled by parties external to the resource provider, users may be grouped to Virtual Organizations (VOs). This package provides a VO Membership Service (VOMS), which informs on that association between users and their VOs: groups, roles and capabilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 22:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] New: Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Summary: Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/voms-mysql-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: In grid computing, and whenever the access to resources may be controlled by parties external to the resource provider, users may be grouped to Virtual Organizations (VOs). This package provides a VO Membership Service (VOMS), which informs on that association between users and their VOs: groups, roles and capabilities. This package offers the MySQL implementation for the VOMS server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 16 22:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908162224.n7GMO6aw005851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 --- Comment #7 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-16 18:24:04 EDT --- This is an informal review, I'm just learning the packaging process. I've built and installed this package on 32 bit F11. The application appears on the Applications/Graphics menu which is the logical place for it. I starts up correctly. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] OK /home/bjrosen/rpmbuild/SPECS> rpmlint g3dviewer.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, NA # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths OK # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, NA # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. NA # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK, --disable-static switch in the %build section # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 00:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 20:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170015.n7H0FdrI024141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rayvd at bludgeon.or | |g) --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-16 20:15:38 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 00:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 20:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486570] Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170033.n7H0X6E4027594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486570 Rafael Gomes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rafaelgomes at projetofedora.o | |rg --- Comment #6 from Rafael Gomes 2009-08-16 20:33:05 EDT --- any news? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 01:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 21:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514452] Review Request: trac-agilo-plugin - a trac plugin to support the Scrum process. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170122.n7H1MkXE004053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514452 --- Comment #3 from Asgeir Frimannsson 2009-08-16 21:22:45 EDT --- Spec Updated to Agilo 0.8 final: Spec URL: http://asgeirf.fedorapeople.org/agilo/trac-agilo-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://asgeirf.fedorapeople.org/agilo/trac-agilo-plugin-0.8.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 04:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 00:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170404.n7H44wWw006269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #4 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-08-17 00:04:56 EDT --- Hello, guys, sorry to keep you waiting. I'm back to work now. Very soon I'll post another update here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 05:43:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170543.n7H5hoSb031391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |517764 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 05:43:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170543.n7H5hnBZ031362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |517763 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:01:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:01:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517776] New: Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517776 Summary: Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cedric.olivier at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/gettext-ant-tasks/gettext-ant-tasks.spec SRPM URL : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/gettext-ant-tasks/gettext-ant-tasks-0.9.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Gettext Commons project provides Java classes for internationalization (i18n) through GNU gettext. The lightweight library combines the power of the unix-style gettext tools with the widely used Java ResourceBundles. This makes it possible to use the original text instead of arbitrary property keys, which is less cumbersome and makes programs easier to read. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517776] Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170602.n7H6262F002315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517776 C?dric OLIVIER changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508351 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170602.n7H6281B002406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 C?dric OLIVIER changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |517776 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170603.n7H63xPD026674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #11 from C?dric OLIVIER 2009-08-17 02:03:57 EDT --- I also packaged gettext-ant-tasks at : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517776 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:06:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:06:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170606.n7H66Ama027328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #12 from C?dric OLIVIER 2009-08-17 02:06:08 EDT --- I have updated the josm package with svn version 1788 and adding josm-translation. Spec URL : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-1788/release2/josm.spec SRPM URL : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-1788/release2/josm-0-1.1788svn.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170620.n7H6KJAq030368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 --- Comment #6 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) 2009-08-17 02:20:17 EDT --- Pong Jussi - I'm so sorry, I missed your previous ping! For some reason, this bug didn't come up as needing attention from me. I have an updated csync .spec, but I haven't addressed all the issues yet: I should have this done in the next week or so. Thanks for being so persistent, it's much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517511] Package Review: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags - Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170645.n7H6j1eg010579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517511 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-08-17 02:45:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags Short Description: Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files Owners: mmaslano InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170641.n7H6ftjx010027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-17 02:41:53 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. ~OK - For consistency I'd change %{_bindir}/g3d* to %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_bindir}/g3d-thumbnailer (It's better style to use %{name} consistently in %files.) MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Missing CREDITS. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK ** Joshua: you missed the missing file in %doc. (However, we don't ship files related to installation such as INSTALL.) ** The issues are minor; with these notes the package is APPROVED please fix the issues before CVS import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517517] Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170645.n7H6jVkW002810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517517 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-08-17 02:45:30 EDT --- Thank you very much for all your reviews in short time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517507] Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170644.n7H6iLFc002153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517507 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-08-17 02:44:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Locale-Msgfmt Short Description: Compile .po files to .mo files Owners: mmaslano InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 06:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517517] Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170646.n7H6k8rX011144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517517 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-08-17 02:46:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-PPIx-EditorTools Short Description: Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI Owners: mmaslano InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 07:28:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170728.n7H7Sw9r019676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|dan at danny.cz |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(dan at danny.cz) | --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-17 03:28:55 EDT --- Andy, I am sorry, but I must step down as the reviewer. I am very busy with other work and can't dedicate the required amount of time for this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 09:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170904.n7H94TY7009218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-17 05:04:28 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/icoutils/icoutils.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/icoutils/icoutils-0.28.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Upstream maintainer Oskar Liljeblad updated the license to GPLv3+, adapted the comments accordingly, and applied the ppc build patch. koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1609039 rpmlint output is still clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 09:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170929.n7H9TqxJ015544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-17 05:29:51 EDT --- Since doctrine requires php >= 5.3.2 the requires should specify that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 09:54:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170954.n7H9sAXN021638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #3 from Christof Damian 2009-08-17 05:54:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Since doctrine requires php >= 5.3.2 the requires should specify that Doctrine 1.1 requires 5.2.3, but this request is just for the doctrine pear channel and doesn't require a certain php version. The bug 517643 is for the doctrine library and specifies 5.2.3 as required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 09:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908170954.n7H9sdbw013000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-17 05:54:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE.spec > SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE-2.8.8-1.fc11.src.rpm > Description: > PyPE (Python Programmers' Editor) was written in order to offer a > lightweight but powerful editor for those of you who think emacs is too > much and idle is too little. Syntax highlighting is included out of the > box, as is multiple open documents via tabs. > > $ rpmlint SPECS/PyPE* SRPMS/PyPE* RPMS/noarch/PyPE* > PyPE.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/PyPE/plugins/parsers.py 0644 /usr/bin/python > 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings > > Not sure what to do about this error - should I make the script executable or > remove the shebang line? I'm pretty sure that script is not executed > stand-alone. Remove the shebang, Python libraries don't need it. > By the way, this is my first python-package and I hope I did everything right > :) A few things to correct: - Use the safer, time stamp keeping versions of the conversion tricks from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Remove_DOS_line_endings - Don't install manually - use setup.py to do the install. Have a look at the sample python spec $ rpmdev-newspec python - You need to own %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ not %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171001.n7HA13R2014753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-17 06:01:02 EDT --- I do not see the point in installing a channel which may not be usable, unless the channel provides any packages that do not require => php 5.2 3 (you do realise that the channel will not be used exclusively by your other package, nothing will stop a user from running pear install pear.phpdoctrine.org/Doctrine-1.0.x) That information should be in the spec, such that anyone intending to use the spec for EPEL for instance will pick it up straight away that they cannot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171005.n7HA544X024271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mathys 2009-08-17 06:05:03 EDT --- Hi Jussi, thanks for the initial review! (In reply to comment #1) > Remove the shebang, Python libraries don't need it. Okay :) > A few things to correct: > > - Use the safer, time stamp keeping versions of the conversion tricks from > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 > and > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Remove_DOS_line_endings Hmm...what I'm using is actually what I was told to use in another review, but I'll look into this tricks :) > - Don't install manually - use setup.py to do the install. Have a look at the > sample python spec > $ rpmdev-newspec python Well, I did use the python spec-template. The thing is: there is no `setup.py install` that does this thing for you and if you try to do it like that, you only get the information that you should just copy the directory to wherever you want to execute it from. > - You need to own > %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ > not > %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/* Good catch! I'll implement those changes ASAP, whenever I've got some minutes :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:09:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171009.n7HA9odL016176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 _pjp_ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools |http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdn |/djbdns-1.05.tar.gz |s/djbdns-1.05.3.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171015.n7HAF0HH025956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #36 from _pjp_ 2009-08-17 06:14:55 EDT --- Hi, I'm *happy* to announce the new release of djbdns-1.05.3. Please take a look at: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns And for package review SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns.spec SORC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.3.tar.gz SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171025.n7HAP6x3019408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-17 06:25:05 EDT --- This is covered by multiple licenses (LGPLv2+,BSD,MIT) your spec should reflect that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171024.n7HAOwdQ019086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #13 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-17 06:24:56 EDT --- * To be consistent with other distributions (Debian ATM) you should use 0.0 instead of 0 as version. This is not mandatory though. * Release tag is still wrong. It should be 0.X.1788svn%{?dist} and not 1.1788svn%{?dist}. The first 0 indicate that this is a pre-release version. The X is an incremented number (start at 1) you should bump at *each* new release. 1788svn is the svn version of the checkout you used. * The version-release couple in the changelog is not consistent (0-1788svn) with the one declared at the beginning of the spec file. Always run rpmlint on the rpm produced by rpmbuild. Errors like this one can be easily caught in this way. * All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment In general, it is a good practise to state what a patch does. * Description can be improved. The following is from the Debian package: JOSM is an editor for OpenStreetMap (OSM) written in Java. The current version supports stand alone GPX tracks, GPX track data from OSM database and existing nodes, line segments and metadata tags from the OSM database. OpenStreetMap is a project aimed squarely at creating and providing free geographic data such as street maps to anyone who wants them. The project was started because most maps you think of as free actually have legal or technical restrictions on their use, holding back people from using them in creative, productive or unexpected ways. * Adapt this Debian patch not to include the dependencies into the target jar file http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/josm/0.0.svn1529-1/10_build * After that add gettext-commons and metadata-extractor to Requires. * Please remove junk from the SPEC file. Like: #find . -name 'jfcunit.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \; #find . -name 'josm-translation.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \; #find . -name 'metadata-extractor-2.3.1-nosun.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \; * I have some doubt about the following: install -p -m 644 dist/%{name}-custom.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar %{name}-%{version}.jar will be "josm-0" for a long time. I wonder if you should call it like upstream "josm-snapshot-svn_version". Maybe some more experienced java packager should help here :) * You should add an alias for josm.jar and use it to run the program without having to edit run script at each release. * Desktop file category you use is not right. "Network" is used by a "Network application such as a web browser": http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html You should use "Categories=Education;Science;Geoscience;" * You should also add a comment line in the desktop file, like: Comment=Editor for OpenStreetMap.org This is not mandatory but it could help the final user. * A man page is available from Debain. Please include it: http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/debianonly/view/josm/0.0.svn1529-1 * In the generate-tarball script, please: - clean up temporary directories at the end of the script. - you could reuse the same tarball in more then one Fedora release therefore do not use Fedora tags in the filename. Call it something like "josm-0.0.svnXXXX.tar.gz". You can also generate the filename based on $JOSM_SVN_TAG. This means you can drop the $NAME_VERSION and $RELEASE variables. - are you sure plugins are needed? Debian do not check them out. - you could use "svn export" and not remove .svn directories later. - instead of creating a i18n directory and moving into it, you could do it all in one line, specifying i18n as the destination directory instead of the current directory ".". The same would apply to plugins if they are required. - do not bother to remove macosx directory. Moreover, it can be useful. It has an .icns file with icons at different resolutions. These can be used instead of a single 128x128 icon. The libicns-utils can be used to extract them. - IMHO it would be better to get rid of src/org/apache in the %prep section of the SPEC file. * Add the following files in %doc: Contribution gpl-2.0.txt gpl-2.0.txt is required because of the text of the license must be included in %doc: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171028.n7HASo9O028709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #5 from Christof Damian 2009-08-17 06:28:49 EDT --- But the channel is usable by anyone, just not the Doctrine 1.1 package. If any more packages get added to the doctrine channel in the future which don't require 5.2.3 I would have to change the minimum again, this doesn't make sense. Or once Doctrine 2.0 is released I would have to change it to 5.3, which is even worse. But the main thing is: this channel doesn't require 5.2.3, Doctrine does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171033.n7HAXBnF020788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Graf 2009-08-17 06:33:10 EDT --- I've integrated all your recommendations and replaced the spec file and srpm with new versions. I've also included an example /etc/mip6d.conf and /etc/sysconfig/mip6d and fixed the reload init script target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171034.n7HAYN8i029751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-17 06:34:22 EDT --- That's why am asking you if the channel provides other packages apart from doctrine if it does then fine, if it is just dedicated to doctrine then you have to enforce the checking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:37:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:37:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171037.n7HAb0xZ021569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-17 06:37:00 EDT --- As far as i can tell this channel is dedicated only to doctrine pear list-all -c pear.phpdoctrine.org All packages [Channel pear.phpdoctrine.org]: ============================================ Package Latest Local pear.phpdoctrine.org/Doctrine 1.1.3 PHP Doctrine ORM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171041.n7HAffTN022481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #8 from Christof Damian 2009-08-17 06:41:40 EDT --- At the moment it is. And at the moment it is mainly for Doctrine 1.1, but it is not going to stay this way. And it doesn't matter, because the channel doesn't require php 5.2.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171044.n7HAirVY031772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|andrew at topdog.za.net |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171045.n7HAjBNB023249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:51:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171051.n7HApdtq024783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #2 from Christof Damian 2009-08-17 06:51:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This is covered by multiple licenses (LGPLv2+,BSD,MIT) your spec should reflect > that You are right, I didn't see that. I uploaded new versions: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-doctrine-Doctrine.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm I set it to: "LGPLv2 and MIT and BSD". I couldn't find any reference to LGPLv2+, but maybe I missed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 10:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171056.n7HAuW0m003920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-17 06:56:31 EDT --- A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. Note that this is LGPLv2+, not LGPL+, because version 2 was the first version of LGPL. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 11:01:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171101.n7HB1HHD005026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-17 07:01:14 EDT --- I am back in work from vacations, so the review continues. I have still found few issues: - you should have the license as "GPLv2+ and MIT" for the ppd subpackage because at least PPDs for Brother, OKI and SHARP are licensed under GPLv2+ - add the COPYING file from foomatic-db-20090702 as %doc for the main package - the question is who should own the /usr/share/foomatic/db/sources directory, because when only the "ppds" subpackage is installed then this dir (and all "upper dirs") will be unowned. If the "ppds" subpackage can be installed independently then creating "foomatic-db-filesystem" subpackage (containing the empty /usr/share/foomatic/db structure) looks like an option to me. The rest looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 11:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517822] New: Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517822 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hyphen-mr.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hyphen-mr-0.20090813-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Marathi hyphenation rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 11:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517821] New: Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517821 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hyphen-bn.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hyphen-bn-0.20090813-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Bengali hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 11:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171122.n7HBMuND032218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #4 from Christof Damian 2009-08-17 07:22:55 EDT --- The LICENSE file contains: "GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2.1, February 1999" It doesn't state "or higher" as far as I can see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 11:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171125.n7HBPps0010459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-17 07:25:50 EDT --- Just read comment #3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 11:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171131.n7HBVE3s001751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #37 from Dan Peterson 2009-08-17 07:31:09 EDT --- Please change the name. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 11:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171139.n7HBdrhS003243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #6 from Christof Damian 2009-08-17 07:39:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Just read comment #3 OK, changed to LGPLv2+ : Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-doctrine-Doctrine.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.1.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 11:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517416] Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171141.n7HBfd1X014425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-17 07:41:38 EDT --- There is an issue with the file placement, Non PEAR classes should be placed in %{_datadir}/php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 11:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171153.n7HBrtCg006719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #9 from Tim Waugh 2009-08-17 07:53:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db-4.0-3.20090702.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Aug 17 2009 Tim Waugh 4.0-3.20090702 - License for ppds sub-package should include GPLv2+. - Ship COPYING file in main package. - Added filesystem sub-package for directory ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 12:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171221.n7HCLRpd023772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-17 08:21:25 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 12:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171231.n7HCV4Y8016583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #11 from Tim Waugh 2009-08-17 08:31:03 EDT --- Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 12:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171233.n7HCXENF026167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #13 from Tim Waugh 2009-08-17 08:33:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: foomatic-db Short Description: Database of printers and printer drivers Owners: twaugh Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 12:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171232.n7HCWApX016713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Tim Waugh 2009-08-17 08:32:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: foomatic-db Short Description: Database of printers and printer drivers Owners: twaugh at redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 13:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171325.n7HDPm2c029976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-17 09:25:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Thanks for the submission. Everything looks pretty good. See comments below. > > - it would be nice to use %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but it's not > a blocker Fixed. > - my generated source tarball has a different md5sum but the contents are the > same (likely timestamp differences) I think so. > - will we build with maven once it's updated? Yes, once maven is updated to new enough version and all the needed plugins are packaged. > - other than the non-conffile-in-etc for the maven pom, everything is rpmlint > clean > - what provides %add_to_maven_depmap? I don't see it doing much in my log. Do > we need a BR on maven? It's provided by jpackage-utils so we don't need a BR on maven. > - please provide a link to the origin of the OSGi manifest Done. > > It builds fine locally for me. New links: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/easymock.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/easymock-2.5-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 13:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171328.n7HDSgh1030390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #5 from Colin Coe 2009-08-17 09:28:41 EDT --- OK, point taken. Spec file fixed and RPM rebased to v0.8.1.1 http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea.spec http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 13:38:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517849] New: Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517849 Summary: Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mpiwrappers.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mpiwrappers-1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides a compatibility layer with the use of environment modules for the MPI compilers in RHEL to ease packaging of MPI software in Fedora EPEL. ** See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MPI#EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 13:40:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171340.n7HDeWwC000795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 --- Comment #3 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2009-08-17 09:40:31 EDT --- SPEC: http://www.package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp.spec SRPM: http://package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp-0.50-1.fc12.src.rpm Now without patch. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1609791 I hope it's enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 13:43:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517849] Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171343.n7HDh1in001194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517849 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dledford at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-17 09:43:00 EDT --- CC Doug, you might want to take a look at this. ** I'm not totally sure if support for mvapich{,2} should be added, too. As they aren't available on all architectures building packages against them would require the use of conditionals in spec files using them. Besides, I don't think rpm on RHEL 4 and 5 can't cope with subpackages that don't have the same build arch as the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 13:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171341.n7HDfiwu010605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-17 09:41:43 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 13:45:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] New: Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Summary: Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: skomarag at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/beacon.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/beacon-0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 13:47:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171347.n7HDlUh3012084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Satya Komaragiri changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwade at redhat.com, | |loupgaroublond at gmail.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 14:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171401.n7HE1APM006655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-17 10:01:09 EDT --- You need to increment you spec file version when ever you make a change to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 14:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171403.n7HE3pwP016137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-17 10:03:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: easymock Short Description: Easy mock objects Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 14:11:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171411.n7HEBlcu009964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 --- Comment #5 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2009-08-17 10:11:46 EDT --- I thought that's not needed in initial build. Because there will be written only my mistakes when I tried to make new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 14:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] New: Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 Summary: Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: colin.coe at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-1.src.rpm Description: RackTables is a datacenter asset management system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 14:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] New: Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Summary: Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: colin.coe at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd-1.4.01-1.src.rpm Description: VMPS (VLAN Management Policy Server) is a way of assigning switch ports to specific VLANs based on MAC address of connecting device. OpenVMPS is a GPL implementation of VMPS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 14:48:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463808] Review Request: robotfindskitten - A game/zen simulation. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171448.n7HEmIZQ020628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463808 Will Woods changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Will Woods 2009-08-17 10:48:16 EDT --- Oh oops - this bug should have been closed when the package got pushed live, but I think I forgot to add the bug ID to the update request. Anyway, package is now live in F10/F11 updates and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 15:19:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171519.n7HFJIE0030454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-17 11:19:17 EDT --- Taking this. Satya: I'm wondering if you did any informal package reviews. In case you didn't it might be a good idea to do a couple of them, so that you can demonstrate that you're familiar with packaging guidelines in order to get sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 15:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171518.n7HFIrOu030358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit |mingw32-cppunit - MinGW |testing framework |Windows C++ unit testing | |framework --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-08-17 11:18:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-cppunit.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-cppunit-1.12.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework Changelog - Fix BR mingw32-gcc-c++ - Update description - Disable duplicated docs with native package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 15:26:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171526.n7HFQAdC008135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504493 Depends on|504493 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 15:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490140] Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171526.n7HFQBUE008170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504493 Depends on|504493 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 15:35:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171535.n7HFZesi011321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #21 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-17 11:35:38 EDT --- Fix for searching is in the packagedb devel branch but we're in the middle of some extensive changes right now. So it may be awhile before it's deployed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 15:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171538.n7HFcgcc004915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-17 11:38:40 EDT --- I have now kept only README and ChangeLog in the %doc section. SPEC URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eqntott.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eqntott-9.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for dist-f10, dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610099 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610109 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 15:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171553.n7HFrsqt016591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #2 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-17 11:53:53 EDT --- Satya: as your GSoC mentor, if you do some reviews informally, and can get sponsored as a packager before the program is over, i can definitely take that into account as part of your evaluation. Let me know if you have any questions about this process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 16:09:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171609.n7HG9o96012576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #6 from Arun SAG 2009-08-17 12:09:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > #08 The %changelog entry should be 2.4-3.20090815cvs. Please change that. > > #09 If you are using a cvs snapshot, why are the sources still using > emacs-haskell-2.4.tar.gz? > > #06 Please remove control characters in haskell-site-file.el (^L), and check > for the same in other files. > > This still exists in the .src.rpm! SPEC File: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM : http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm Link to koji builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610169 -Fedora 10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610177 -Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 16:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171629.n7HGTJDA017366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-17 12:29:17 EDT --- For -2: * Timestamps - Forgot to mention, however when using "install" or "cp" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps * Dependency/pkgconfig file - And please address the below: (In reply to comment #2) > - For example installed /usr/include/tcrdb.h contains: > --------------------------------------------------------------- > 30 #include > 31 #include > --------------------------------------------------------------- > so at least tokyotyrant-devel should have "Requires: tokyocabinet-devel". > And tokyotyrant.pc should have "Requires: tokyocabinet". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 16:48:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171648.n7HGmI4S022265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-17 12:48:17 EDT --- Disabling some option on configure is allowed (however the reason should be commented on the spec file so that other people can find the reason easily) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 17:43:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:43:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171743.n7HHho9Q011884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 John (J5) Palmieri changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |johnp at redhat.com --- Comment #37 from John (J5) Palmieri 2009-08-17 13:43:44 EDT --- Ping. I would really like to see this packaged. Right now I install by hand but it tends to stop working when eclipse is upgraded. Any status on getting this in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 17:53:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171753.n7HHrPht014355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #38 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-17 13:53:25 EDT --- The submitter seems to have gone away and this ticket should probably be closed. Perhaps someone else wants to submit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517507] Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171816.n7HIGpJb011826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517507 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-17 14:16:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513754] Review Request: moblin-session - Moblin User Experience Startup Scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171818.n7HIIGGS012256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513754 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-17 14:18:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517517] Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171815.n7HIF2fl011490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517517 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-17 14:15:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171819.n7HIJo7t012660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-17 14:19:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171824.n7HIOIPu013649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-17 14:24:17 EDT --- This package was already imported in bug 500257 as a 'pre-review' for the java update. Is this a continuation and full review of it? Can you coordinate with the owner there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171827.n7HIR0rL014415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-17 14:26:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171827.n7HIRSrS014568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 Christopher Pardy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.pardy at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Christopher Pardy 2009-08-17 14:27:26 EDT --- My RedHat email was deactivated, I'm adding my alternate email as cc. Spec URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: system-config-selinux provides the graphical tools system-config-selinux and selinux-polgen for managing SELinux systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517511] Package Review: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags - Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171830.n7HIUCL5023703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517511 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-17 14:30:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171826.n7HIQBn2022820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-17 14:26:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171827.n7HIRrPB023115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-17 14:27:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171828.n7HISoMq014811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-17 14:28:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513754] Review Request: moblin-session - Moblin User Experience Startup Scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171848.n7HImWU5027821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513754 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-17 14:48:30 EDT --- Built in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 18:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171851.n7HIpjUD028785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #6 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-17 14:51:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The different config files are necessary because mip6d only supports a few > options to be set via command arguments, that's the reason for adding the check > for sysconfig to allow passing on arguments to mip6d directly. An empty > mip6d.conf is what should be done if the node is a client node which should be > the default. Ah, okay, I was assuming there was only one config file, and it was just referenced with different names and paths, having both /etc/mip6d.conf and /etc/sysconfig/mip6d is fine too, so long as they're both referenced in the spec and properly used in the initscript. About to look over the updated package in a moment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171919.n7HJJN5K002419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 15:19:22 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171919.n7HJJJCM002383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 15:19:18 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171919.n7HJJEqJ002338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 15:19:13 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171922.n7HJMRCo027539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 15:22:26 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171922.n7HJMWUB003565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 15:22:31 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:22:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171922.n7HJMMoo003475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 15:22:20 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171922.n7HJMOSo003510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fnasser at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Fernando Nasser 2009-08-17 15:22:23 EDT --- Just rename to easymock2 and avoid conflicts with the unversioned easymock please -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171928.n7HJSMCw004659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-17 15:28:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > As with 500252, I'd like to see a fixed SRPM with the proper license tag before > letting this go forward. Spot, Do we need to put the license headers as a patch or we can just add a comment pointing to the jira issue for clarification? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171934.n7HJYiur031515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-17 15:34:43 EDT --- Just make a new SRPM where the source files are properly licensed, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171949.n7HJnIKl010047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #39 from rob 2009-08-17 15:49:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > Any status on getting this in Fedora? I will take a look at it for F11/rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171949.n7HJn4Dh009982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(acme at redhat.com) | --- Comment #8 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-08-17 15:49:02 EDT --- What is the problem with python-matplotlib being explicitely required? The oscilloscope uses it. fixed the -p and msgfmt buildreq issues, new files at: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna-0.9-2.fc11.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna.spec http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/tuna/tuna-0.9.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171958.n7HJwWsY004893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 15:58:31 EDT --- django-authority-0.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-authority-0.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 19:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908171958.n7HJwRqB012333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 15:58:26 EDT --- django-authority-0.3-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-authority-0.3-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:09:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172009.n7HK96bC014480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 16:09:05 EDT --- rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:09:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172009.n7HK9Bfw007638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 16:09:11 EDT --- rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172013.n7HKDAUD015573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #7 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-17 16:13:09 EDT --- Okay, per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines ... * MUST: rpmlint -- only 1 warning, can be ignored $ rpmlint mipv6-daemon* mipv6-daemon.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name mip6d ('mipv6-daemon', 'mipv6-daemond') 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * MUST: package name -- looks fine. typically, it should match the tarball name, but the -umip portion appears to be simply designating this as the usagi implementation of mobile ipv6. Perhaps it would be worth noting this in the %description field though, just so its clear. (though if this is the *only* implementation, then its sort of implied, I guess). * MUST: spec name matches -- ok * MUST: package meets packaging guidelines -- ok * MUST: license -- GPLv2, ok * MUST: license matches source -- ok * MUST: included license text installed w/pkg -- ok * MUST: spec in American English -- ok * MUST: spec legible -- ok * MUST: sources match upstream -- ok a8ebeb4f41ceed71037d0f5596ccc11d mipv6-daemon-umip-0.4.tar.gz a8ebeb4f41ceed71037d0f5596ccc11d mipv6-daemon-umip-0.4.tar.gz.1 * MUST: compile on at least one primary arch -- NEEDSWORK. I just gave this a shot in a rawhide x86_64 chroot, and the build failed. However, its simply a missing 'BuildRequires: indent', and then it builds fine. * MUST: ExcludeArch stuff -- n/a * MUST: build deps -- NEEDSWORK, see above re: indent. * MUST: locales -- n/a * MUST: ldconfig scriptlet -- n/a * MUST: own created directories -- ok * MUST: no multiple listings of a file -- ok * MUST: permissions -- ok * MUST: %clean rm -rf -- ok * MUST: macro consistency -- ok * MUST: pkg contains code -- ok * MUST: large docs in -doc sub-pkg -- n/a * MUST: %doc bits not used at runtime -- ok * MUST: header files -- n/a * MUST: static libs -- n/a * MUST: pkgconfig files -- n/a * MUST: libs w/suffix -- n/a * MUST: -devel req. main pkg -- n/a * MUST: libtool droppings -- n/a * MUST: gui .desktop file -- n/a * MUST: doesn't own other packages dirs -- ok * MUST: %install rm -rf -- ok * MUST: filenames valid UTF-8 -- ok * SHOULD: upstream need license? -- n/a * SHOULD: description/summary translations -- n/a * SHOULD: builds in mock -- NEEDSWORK (just the missing BR: indent) * SHOULD: builds on all arches -- unknown * SHOULD: functions as it should -- unknown (I don't have the time or knowledge at the moment for functional testing, assuming packager has tested) * SHOULD: scriptlets are sane -- ok * SHOULD: subpkg reqs -- n/a * SHOULD: pkgconfig files -- n/a * SHOULD: file requires -- n/a Basically, just add the missing BuildRequires: indent (or just tack it onto the end of the line with flex and bison), and this package is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500245] Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172016.n7HKG54A016428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500245 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-17 16:16:04 EDT --- SRPM as provided by Fernando imported. Jesse: what "pre-review" tag should I use for a build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172017.n7HKH32c016617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-17 16:17:02 EDT --- OK, renamed to easymock2. New links: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/easymock2.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/easymock2-2.5-3.fc11.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: easymock2 Short Description: Easy mock objects Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172022.n7HKMxkC012192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-17 16:22:58 EDT --- My review approval still stands with the re-named package and JARs, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172026.n7HKQs9E015889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 16:26:53 EDT --- rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:26:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172026.n7HKQbhn015698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 16:26:36 EDT --- django-profile-0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-profile-0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:26:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172026.n7HKQ0ek022717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 16:25:59 EDT --- django-profile-0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-profile-0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517914] New: Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517914 Summary: Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/aqute-bndlib.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/aqute-bndlib-0.0.203-4.2.fc12.src.rpm Description: The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. The key functions are: - Show the manifest and JAR contents of a bundle - Wrap a JAR so that it becomes a bundle - Create a Bundle from a specification and a class path - Verify the validity of the manifest entries The tool is capable of acting as: - Command line tool - File format - Directives - Use of macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517914] Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172045.n7HKjeUY030719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517914 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-17 16:45:39 EDT --- This is a full review request. The pre-review request was bug #500245. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 20:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172028.n7HKSS2A016697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-17 16:28:27 EDT --- Package: rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.el5 Tag: dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc10 Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc11 Tag: dist-f11-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert Package: rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc12 Tag: dist-f12 Status: complete Built by: robert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514310] Review Request: FUR - Mount a Windows CE based device on your Linux file system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172153.n7HLr1qB004331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514310 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:53:00 EDT --- FUR-0.4.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:53:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514310] Review Request: FUR - Mount a Windows CE based device on your Linux file system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172153.n7HLr6eT004371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514310 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4.6-2.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172152.n7HLqpgP004288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.71.103-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172154.n7HLsGJ5012658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:54:15 EDT --- pipestat-0.3.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:52:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172152.n7HLqkWu012457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:52:44 EDT --- Panini-0.71.103-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172157.n7HLvrIk006389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:57:51 EDT --- mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:53:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172153.n7HLro01004854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:53:49 EDT --- openal-soft-1.8.466-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:58:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513191] Review Request: php-facedetect - PHP extension to access the OpenCV library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172158.n7HLw5rE006477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513191 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:58:04 EDT --- php-facedetect-1.0.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513191] Review Request: php-facedetect - PHP extension to access the OpenCV library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172157.n7HLvJeB006160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513191 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:57:18 EDT --- php-facedetect-1.0.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511196] Review Request: ibus-table-array30 - Array30 Chinese input method for ibus-table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172155.n7HLttL3005642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511196 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:55:54 EDT --- ibus-table-array30-1.2.0.20090729-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513191] Review Request: php-facedetect - PHP extension to access the OpenCV library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172158.n7HLw9wO006510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513191 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.0-2.fc11 |1.0.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172153.n7HLrtWH004906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.8.466-7.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172157.n7HLvwN4006437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0.4-2.final2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511196] Review Request: ibus-table-array30 - Array30 Chinese input method for ibus-table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172156.n7HLu0DH005686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511196 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.0.20090729-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513191] Review Request: php-facedetect - PHP extension to access the OpenCV library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172157.n7HLvOFC006202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513191 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.0-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172157.n7HLvkMr006342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:57:45 EDT --- colossus-0.9.0-2.20090810svn4482.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update colossus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8676 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172153.n7HLrjKG004804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:53:44 EDT --- pcc-0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pcc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172157.n7HLvfOT006303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:57:39 EDT --- python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-sqlalchemy0.5'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8675 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172159.n7HLxckq014357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 17:59:36 EDT --- virtuoso-opensource-5.0.11-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172200.n7HM0D6x014742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #49 from Gareth John 2009-08-17 18:00:12 EDT --- Ok all done for your last recommendations have done one review as you know I will get another under my belt this week. I also upgraded to F11 during the past two weeks. In case the dist tag puzzles you as it has indeed changed. Also the ARCH has changed due to this again hope thats ok?? Further to that i questioned if -DOC files should be pulled in as docs or as standard files or doc as it presents a warning i am resigned to the fact that this will probably need to be done as i have opted to pull them in as normal files. ================================================= files: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-9.fc11.src.rpm http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec ================================================== $ rpmlint gtkmm-utils.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-9.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i586/gtkmm-utils-* gtkmm-utils-devel.i586: W: no-documentation gtkmm-utils-example.i586: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172202.n7HM2h1q008813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:02:42 EDT --- pipestat-0.3.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172201.n7HM1BQe008125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:01:10 EDT --- mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:03:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172203.n7HM3Wra009042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:03:32 EDT --- openal-soft-1.8.466-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:02:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512954] Review Request: opencryptoki - Implementation of the PKCS#11 (Cryptoki) specification v2.11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172202.n7HM2u0C008881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512954 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:02:54 EDT --- opencryptoki-2.2.8-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 21:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172159.n7HLxhvC007349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |5.0.11-3.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172203.n7HM3BNW008936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:03:10 EDT --- trac-tracnav-plugin-4.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update trac-tracnav-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8691 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172201.n7HM1Gqj015297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.4-2.final2.fc11 |2.0.4-2.final2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:05:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172205.n7HM5TAf016774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:05:28 EDT --- virtuoso-opensource-5.0.11-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:04:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172204.n7HM47Pb016002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:04:06 EDT --- Panini-0.71.103-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172202.n7HM2moW015621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.0-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172203.n7HM3pNZ015801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:03:50 EDT --- pcc-0.9.9-0.4.090816cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pcc'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8696 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:02:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172202.n7HM2YjY015563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:02:33 EDT --- colossus-0.9.0-2.20090810svn4482.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update colossus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8690 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172203.n7HM3bhc009136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.8.466-7.fc10 |1.8.466-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172205.n7HM5Ypc010474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.0.11-3.fc11 |5.0.11-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172204.n7HM4CSQ009704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.71.103-3.fc10 |0.71.103-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:25:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172225.n7HMPt9G014627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:25:54 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-1.20090817svn4489.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/colossus-0.9.1-1.20090817svn4489.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 22:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172229.n7HMTNeT015197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 18:29:22 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-1.20090817svn4489.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/colossus-0.9.1-1.20090817svn4489.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 17 23:32:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908172332.n7HNWgV9001281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #50 from Gareth John 2009-08-17 19:32:41 EDT --- Sorry scratch the 3rd paragraph in comment #49 its junk! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508511] Review Request: python-Lightbox - Lightbox photo display widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180021.n7I0LxIK002740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508511 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-2.fc11 |2.1-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508511] Review Request: python-Lightbox - Lightbox photo display widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180021.n7I0Lspv002695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508511 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:21:53 EDT --- python-Lightbox-2.1-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180022.n7I0MZds002814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:22:34 EDT --- python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-sqlalchemy0.5'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0282 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510979] Review Request: php-phpSmug - PHP wrapper for the SmugMug API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180025.n7I0P134010424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510979 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:24:59 EDT --- php-phpSmug-2.0.2-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180025.n7I0PS4G010825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:25:28 EDT --- pipestat-0.3.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510979] Review Request: php-phpSmug - PHP wrapper for the SmugMug API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180025.n7I0P5N3010755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.2-4.fc11 |2.0.2-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:24:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180024.n7I0Otn7010379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:24:54 EDT --- django-profile-0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update django-profile'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0293 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:23:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514931] Please build ruby-RMagick for EPEL 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180023.n7I0NaZ2003138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:23:35 EDT --- ruby-RMagick-1.15.17-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180023.n7I0NugW003335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:23:55 EDT --- perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-0.09-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:23:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514931] Please build ruby-RMagick for EPEL 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180023.n7I0Ne0S003252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514931 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.15.17-2.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510736] Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180025.n7I0PxH5004086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510736 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.15-3.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180026.n7I0QRRb004188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:26:26 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0300 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180024.n7I0OgAj003463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:24:41 EDT --- django-authority-0.3-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update django-authority'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0290 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:25:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:25:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510736] Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180025.n7I0PtLI011070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510736 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:25:54 EDT --- pycdio-0.15-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 00:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180027.n7I0RBgN011462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-17 20:27:10 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-layers-menu'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 01:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180107.n7I17clO018506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(emaldona at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #21 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-17 21:07:37 EDT --- NEEDSWORK. 1. I don't think you can use %{SOURCE4} in the trigger as the latter is part of the .srpm. You probably need to copy the file to an NSS private area and install it out of there. (verify this, if %{SOURCE4} is handled correctly, then I think it would be preferable. 2. You still have stuff from the examples that don't apply in your triggers. bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 02:07:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180207.n7I27tci029143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(ivazqueznet at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #14 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-08-17 22:07:52 EDT --- Yes, sorry, please do. Feel free to use my work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 03:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180352.n7I3qIus013935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #27 from Chess Griffin 2009-08-17 23:52:16 EDT --- Thanks for the ping. I'm on vacation with my wife and kids and only have very limited internet access. I'll be back home on Monday, August 24 and will try to get back on some informal reviews shortly thereafter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 05:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517511] Package Review: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags - Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180553.n7I5ralB004153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517511 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 05:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517507] Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180559.n7I5x4iN011504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517507 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 06:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517517] Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180600.n7I608VZ005550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517517 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 06:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180600.n7I60l7d012012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |psatpute at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |psatpute at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 06:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180608.n7I68KAT013319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Pravin Satpute changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|psatpute at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 06:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180615.n7I6F6qD008534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #51 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-18 02:15:05 EDT --- Update to upstream 0.4.1, it's been released in December 2008. (In reply to comment #49) > Ok all done for your last recommendations have done one review as you know I > will get another under my belt this week. Refresh my memory, will you - I could only find the other submission, but not any informal review you've made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 08:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517970] New: Review Request: lingot-0.7.6 - musical instruments tuner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lingot-0.7.6 - musical instruments tuner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517970 Summary: Review Request: lingot-0.7.6 - musical instruments tuner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kvolny at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/lingot.spec SRPM URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/lingot-0.7.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: LINGOT is a musical instrument tuner. It's accurate, easy to use, and highly configurable. Originally conceived to tune electric guitars, its configurability gives it a more general character. it builds in koji - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1611459 rpmlint does not complain two notes: * I don't know of any better way how to run this than to use aoss - I've put it into the .desktop file, but running simply "lingot" from the commandline will fail ... I doubt this is worth adding README.Fedora; as it is graphical application, it is supposed to be run via the launcher (.desktop) file * the package installs svg icon, but no cache updating is done - it seems that xdg-icon-resource works just with .png and .xpm while gtk-update-icon-cache is run on /user/share/icons and not on /usr/share/pixmaps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 08:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180849.n7I8nCLN014807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #14 from Mark Goodwin 2009-08-18 04:49:10 EDT --- Eric Sandeen wrote: > * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. > NEEDSWORK? - 4 errors still above. subsys-not-used should be easy to fix up, I looked at this and I'd rather not change it. It turned out not to be that easy to fix. The three PCP services (pcp, pmie and pmproxy) all manage their own var/run/pcp/pid files. This pre-dates the standard functionality for managing pid files and is also multi-platform and also rock solid stable. > * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > > NEEDSWORK? > From COPYING: > All the libraries in the Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) open source > release are licensed under Version 2.1 of the GNU Lesser General > Public License. > > All other components in the PCP open source release are licensed > under Version 2 of the GNU General Public License. > > but the specfile says: > License: GPL+ and LGPLv2+ The previous version tried to specify the license for the base package and the two subpackages, which is wrong because -libs has a different license. So I've now split this so each package specifies it's own license. Changed the spec so the base package and -devel specify "GPLv2+" (assuming "GPLv2+" is the best match for "GPLv2.1", as specified in COPYING since there is no explicit option for "GPLv2.1"), and -libs is "LGPLv2" (exactly matching what's in COPYING). > * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK > Note: "OK" based on pmda .h files "not being header files but rather used for > configuration" yes that's correct, as already discussed. > * MUST: Devel packages must require the base package using a fully > versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > NEEDSWORK: Requires: pcp-libs = %{version} > > For whatever reason I guess we must require pcp, not pcp-libs. Nathan and I discussed this and we concluded the only True Dependencies are: pcp-devel requires pcp-libs pcp requires pcp-libs Neither pcp-devel nor pcp-libs actually requires pcp. There is a good reason we don't want pcp-devel to require pcp - basically it has to do with the pcp daemon on the build machine getting killed when pcp in the chroot gets uninstalled, i.e. we want to be able to build packages (such as pcp-gui) that BuildRequires pcp-devel *without* pcp installed (just pcp-devel and pcp-libs should be installed). > * SHOULD: Subpackages other than devel should require the base package > using a fully versioned dependency. NO, but it seems ok Comment: if -libs and the base package require each other, then what's the point of splitting out -libs since they can never be installed separately? So based on the above, I'm leaving the run-time and build-time dependencies as they strictly need to be. If the final Fedora reviewer and/or sponsor insist on additional dependencies, then I'll conform, reluctantly :) Other changes in this round: - reconciled the open source spec with the current Fedora spec. - merged with latest 2.9 dev tree - bumped to 3.0.0-3 and pushed updated spec, .tgz and srpm files to oss. - pushed my tree to git://oss.sgi.com/markgw/pcp/pcp.git dev Cheers -- Mark -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 08:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908180857.n7I8veii016786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 09:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] New: Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 Summary: Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matthias at rpmforge.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/synergy-plus/synergy-plus.spec SRPM URL: http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/synergy-plus/synergy-plus-1.3.4-1.src.rpm Description: Synergy+ (synergy-plus) lets you easily share a single mouse and keyboard between multiple computers with different operating systems, without special hardware. All you need is a LAN connection. It's intended for users with multiple computers, where each system uses its own display. It's a little like having a 2nd or a 3rd desktop. Synergy+ is a maintenance fork for implementing bug fixes to the original Synergy, which hasn't received any source updates or new releases since 2006. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 09:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] New: Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 Summary: Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/3proxy/3proxy.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/3proxy/3proxy-0.6-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: 3proxy -- light proxy server. Universal proxy server with HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS v4, SOCKS v4a, SOCKS v5, FTP, POP3, UDP and TCP portmapping, access control, bandwith control, traffic limitation and accounting based on username, client IP, target IP, day time, day of week, etc. There only little Licence question. 3proxy available on several license, I list it all through "or". But there also present "GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.". I thought it should be something like LGPLv2.1+, but it is not present in allowable. Now it listed as LGPLv2+, but it is wrong. How I must indicate LGPL >= v2.1 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 10:06:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181006.n7IA6dJc001926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 --- Comment #6 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2009-08-18 06:06:37 EDT --- SPEC: http://www.package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp.spec SRPM: http://package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp-0.50-2.fc12.src.rpm changes were written in spec and incremented version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 10:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181018.n7IAIZA9030997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Graf 2009-08-18 06:18:34 EDT --- Fixed. Thanks very much for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 10:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181023.n7IANOnV032082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #52 from Gareth John 2009-08-18 06:23:23 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486721 is the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 10:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181029.n7IATaRf006840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #53 from Gareth John 2009-08-18 06:29:35 EDT --- sorry scratch last url this one.... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513754 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 10:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181052.n7IAqmZA007220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #54 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-18 06:52:47 EDT --- Right, so you have one more to do, after which I'll sponsor you. Remember to go through the comments in paperbox, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 12:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513892] Review Request: bilbo - Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181236.n7ICaid0029913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513892 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-18 08:36:43 EDT --- Hi Ben, I just had a quick look at your spec file and the sources. According to the source file headers you should change the license tag to GPLv3+. The included library bilbokblog seems to be licensed under LGPLv2+ (according to COPYING). However, the source file headers refer to its predecessor, the old GNU Library Public License version 2. It should be safe to use the license tag "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+" for the package, but you should ask upstream to update the file headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 12:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181237.n7ICbQbg004129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from David Hannequin 2009-08-18 08:37:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac Short Description: Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk Owners: hvad Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hvad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 12:39:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181239.n7ICd4qL030186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-18 08:39:03 EDT --- @ Sergio, ping ?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 12:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181256.n7ICusfg001656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181307.n7ID7LlX004222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 --- Comment #2 from David Hannequin 2009-08-18 09:07:20 EDT --- Hi, Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Curses-UI/perl-Curses-UI.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Curses-UI/perl-Curses-UI-0.9607-2.fc10.src.rpm Can you give me log url ? Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:18:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181318.n7IDIR3k014972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-18 09:18:26 EDT --- For me it seams that the stuff from comment #7 wasn't incorporated in the spec file. Am I wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181324.n7IDOWej009501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-18 09:24:31 EDT --- Don't forget the .desktop file since PyPE is a GUI application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181336.n7IDaAL6012227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-18 09:36:09 EDT --- Package officially approved, on to filing the cvs request and getting it imported. Er, wait... Do you have a Fedora account yet, or do you still need to get that part taken care of as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181349.n7IDnRqT015416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-18 09:49:26 EDT --- Hi Matthias, this package looks pretty clean. koji scratch build is successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1612162 $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/*.rpm synergy-plus-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/synergy-plus-1.3.4/lib/base/CLog.cpp 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. You should set the file permissions of lib/base/CLog.cpp to 644. I'll do the full review a bit later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:51:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518017] New: Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-sphinx/php-pecl-sphinx.spec SRPM URL: http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-sphinx/php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This extension provides PHP bindings for libsphinxclient, client library for Sphinx the SQL full-text search engine. rpmlint is clean, and scratch build successful - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1612311 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] New: Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Summary: Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/zyx-liveinstaller.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/zyx-liveinstaller-0.1.9-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1607892 [sebastian at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint ./zyx-liveinstaller-0.1.10-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint zyx-liveinstaller-0.1.10-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:54:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181354.n7IDsnCp017057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 --- Comment #1 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-18 09:54:39 EDT --- Ah, got the wrong link to the source RPM. This one should be better: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/zyx-liveinstaller-0.1.10-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181355.n7IDtrKO025502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #54 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-18 09:55:51 EDT --- Where do we stand on releasing sys_basher? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 13:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181356.n7IDuApH025631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 14:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181404.n7IE48sC027768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Satya Komaragiri changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skomarag at redhat.com --- Comment #38 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-18 10:04:03 EDT --- Unofficial review: [?] The spec file from spec link does not match spec file provided in srpm ?? [?] Naming guideline: fine, but as you have branched an existing project and changed it lot, it needs to be renamed. [x] Builds successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1611918 [x] License: Checked [x] rpmlint bash-4.0$ rpmlint djbdns-1.05.3-1.fc11.i586.rpm djbdns.i586: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/djbdns/tinydns.conf djbdns.i586: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/djbdns/servers/@ djbdns.i586: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/djbdns/dnscache.conf Two conf files need to have noreplace flag in %files section like %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here djbdns.i586: E: zero-length /etc/djbdns/ip/127.0.0.1 [?] Looks like this place will be populated by more empty files for some functionality, but placing all of them in /etc/ does not make sense. djbdns.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/djbdns/ip/127.0.0.1 djbdns.i586: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln djbdns.i586: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings. bash-4.0$ du -sh djbdns-debuginfo-1.05.3-1.fc11.i586.rpm 436K djbdns-debuginfo-1.05.3-1.fc11.i586.rpm file djbdns-1.05.3-1.fc11.i586/etc/djbdns/servers/@ lists root dns but name '@' should be changed to something meaningful. The package has too many servers and client side tools. It would make more sense to package them as subpackages so that anyone who say wants to run tinydns does not have to download whole djbdns tools in a single package. [?] Use %preun if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then /sbin/chkconfig --del %{name} fi in preun section and no need to create sym link. Simply install djbdns in /etc/init.d/ in %install section e.g mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/init.d/ mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/djbns / $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/init.d/ and include file in %files section [?] The package does not own all directories e.g /etc/djbdns, /etc/djbdns/ip, /etc/djbdns/servers/ bash-4.0$ rpmls djbdns-1.05.3-1.fc11.i586.rpm -rw-r--r-- /etc/djbdns/dnscache.conf -rw-r--r-- /etc/djbdns/ip/127.0.0.1 -rw-r--r-- /etc/djbdns/servers/@ -rw-r--r-- /etc/djbdns/tinydns.conf -------------------------------------------------- needs some fix in %files section List: [?] rpmlint done check above [x] Package Naming Guidelines: OKay -But it is better to rename it. [x] Basepackage name matches spec name [?] License: Fine Suggestion: Add license block at top in all source files. It seems after re-licensing you have just updated license blocks in files which you have modified. Other files should also get this block. [x] License file in spec matches actual licenses mentioned in wiki [?] Does not look like you are using RPM_OPT_FLAGS flags for compilation. [x] spec file written in American English [x] Legible [x] Builds on ppc, ppc64, i586, x86_64 [?] Does not own all directories [x] Extra Suggestions (unless you want this package to be imported into EPEL): 1. You can remove rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT from %install section - Not required any more 2. You can also remove BuildRoot ?: Needs attention x: OKay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 14:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181405.n7IE5rFI028490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #3 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-18 10:05:52 EDT --- Did a review at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724#c38 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 14:18:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181418.n7IEIaNn031471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Saou 2009-08-18 10:18:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > You should set the file permissions of lib/base/CLog.cpp to 644. Done. Note that I've just checked the current hg sources, and apparently the latest have changed quite a bit since 1.3.4. They've switched away from autotools for the build for instance, and the GUI seems to be included. I think sticking with the released version for now is best, though it will mean major changes to the spec/build once the next version is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 14:26:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181426.n7IEQ3DT001059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #55 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-18 10:26:02 EDT --- You've done informal reviews on bug #481030 and bug #483863. You probably hadn't noticed the existence of separate Emacs guidelines, which explains why you didn't pick out the bugs in the former. I've added you to the Packager group and sponsored you. This package has been APPROVED Continue with requesting the CVS branch by copying the contents of comment #41 here so it's easier to be found by the CVS admins and set the fedora_cvs tag to ?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 14:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181433.n7IEXFou002721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-18 10:33:12 EDT --- Looks fine now. APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 14:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181446.n7IEkMED029874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #57 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-18 10:46:22 EDT --- I don't seem to be able to set the fedora_cvs flag. Should I just wait a couple of hours or do I have to notify someone that I need the right to make a CVS request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 14:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181443.n7IEhvM5029048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #56 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-18 10:43:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sys_basher Short Description: Hardware reliability and performance tester Owners: bjrosen Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 14:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429483] Review Request: o3read - Standalone converter for OpenOffice.org documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181456.n7IEukhu032422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429483 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Deji Akingunola 2009-08-18 10:56:44 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: o3read New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: deji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 14:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181456.n7IEui5e032393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(emaldona at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #22 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-18 10:56:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) Confirmed, %{SOURCE4} cannot be used in a trigger. Sections like %build and %install execute in the development/build machine when we are building the RPM's whereas sections like %pre, %post, %preun, %postun and %trigger{in|un|postun} execute in the user's system where the install, update, and uninstall occurs and where files that the %{SOURCEn} macros refer to do not exist. I will save the file in the unsupported tools directory and restore it from there when needed in a trigger. I'm fixing those "copy and paste" errors on triggers and others and will also install libnssdbm3.so as part of nss-softoken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:05:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181505.n7IF51QY010471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-18 11:04:58 EDT --- You can make tests yourself using mock locally (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks), and once you're happy that the build works locally in mock, you can also request your own koji scratch build (e.g. koji build --scratch dist-f12 /path/to/perl-Some-Module-xx.yy-zz.src.rpm). But all looks good with this revision (log url is about 20 lines down). + source files match upstream (sha1). f7a506f6d62fa58028084d57c85ef78e59486623 Curses-UI-0.9607.tar.gz f7a506f6d62fa58028084d57c85ef78e59486623 ./Curses-UI-0.9607.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1612394 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Curses-UI.noarch: I: checking perl-Curses-UI.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Curses::UI) = 0.9607 perl(Curses::UI::Buttonbox) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Calendar) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Checkbox) = 1.11 perl(Curses::UI::Color) = 0.01 perl(Curses::UI::Common) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Container) = 1.11 perl(Curses::UI::ContainerWidget) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Dialog::Basic) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Dialog::Calendar) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Dialog::Dirbrowser) = 1.0 perl(Curses::UI::Dialog::Error) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Dialog::Filebrowser) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Dialog::Progress) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Dialog::Question) = 1.00 perl(Curses::UI::Dialog::Status) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Label) = 1.11 perl(Curses::UI::Language) perl(Curses::UI::Language::chinese) perl(Curses::UI::Language::czech) perl(Curses::UI::Language::dutch) perl(Curses::UI::Language::english) perl(Curses::UI::Language::french) perl(Curses::UI::Language::german) perl(Curses::UI::Language::italian) perl(Curses::UI::Language::japanese) perl(Curses::UI::Language::norwegian) perl(Curses::UI::Language::polish) perl(Curses::UI::Language::portuguese) perl(Curses::UI::Language::russian) perl(Curses::UI::Language::slovak) perl(Curses::UI::Language::spanish) perl(Curses::UI::Language::turkish) perl(Curses::UI::Listbox) = 1.3 perl(Curses::UI::MenuListbox) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Menubar) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Notebook) = 1.0001 perl(Curses::UI::PasswordEntry) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Popupmenu) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::PopupmenuListbox) = 1.0011 perl(Curses::UI::Progressbar) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Radiobuttonbox) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::SearchEntry) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Searchable) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::TextEditor) = 1.5 perl(Curses::UI::TextEntry) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::TextViewer) = 1.10 perl(Curses::UI::Widget) = 1.12 perl(Curses::UI::Window) = 1.10 perl-Curses-UI = 0.9607-2.fc12 = perl >= 1:5 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Curses) perl(Curses::UI::Color) perl(Curses::UI::Common) perl(Curses::UI::Container) perl(Curses::UI::Dialog::Basic) perl(Curses::UI::Label) perl(Curses::UI::Language) perl(Curses::UI::Listbox) perl(Curses::UI::Searchable) perl(Curses::UI::TextEditor) perl(Curses::UI::TextEntry) perl(Curses::UI::TextViewer) perl(Curses::UI::Widget) perl(Curses::UI::Window) perl(Cwd) perl(Exporter) perl(FileHandle) perl(Term::ReadKey) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. t/99misc.t .............. ok All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=169, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.11 usr 0.01 sys + 3.38 cusr 0.10 csys = 3.60 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181507.n7IF7L4v011498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #58 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-18 11:07:20 EDT --- Just wait, it should come up automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181510.n7IFAPqw012619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-18 11:10:23 EDT --- > Note that I've just checked the current hg sources, and apparently the latest > have changed quite a bit since 1.3.4. They've switched away from autotools for > the build for instance, and the GUI seems to be included. > I think sticking with the released version for now is best, though it will mean > major changes to the spec/build once the next version is out. OK, thanks for the information. I've checked out the sources from the hg repo and tried to build the binaries. It's quite easy. The whole build process can be done with if [ -f bin/hm.cfg ] then ./hm.sh build else echo 1 | ./hm.sh build fi Thus, it shouldn't be too complicated to adapt the spec file later. But I agree that it's currently better to stick with the official release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518046] New: Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for Trac Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518046 Summary: Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for Trac Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://trac.city-fan.org/cfo-trac/browser/trac-accountmanager-plugin/trunk/trac-accountmanager-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/websrv/trac-accountmanager-plugin-0.2.1-2.20090522svn5836.fc12.src.rpm Description: The AccountManagerPlugin offers several features for managing user accounts: * allow users to register new accounts * login via an HTML form instead of using HTTP authentication * allow existing users to change their passwords or delete their accounts * send a new password to users who've forgotten their password * administer user accounts using the trac web interface I've written up how I set up a trac instance with this plugin on Fedora here: http://www.city-fan.org/tips/TracWithFastCGIonFedora Once the package gets into Fedora I intend to adapt that guide for inclusion on the main Fedora wiki. A version of this package was previously submitted by Lorenzo Villani in Bug #494219 but he's no longer interested in maintaining it, so I've changed roles from reviewer to submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494219] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181516.n7IFGx7h005841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494219 --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth 2009-08-18 11:16:57 EDT --- I've now made a new package submission in Bug #518046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181527.n7IFRXgM008885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 --- Comment #9 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-18 11:27:31 EDT --- My informal review: - Package build fine on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1612465 dist-f11 - Silent rpmlint output I think is all done with this package and should be approved :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517970] Review Request: lingot-0.7.6 - musical instruments tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181528.n7IFSTIS009052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517970 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-08-18 11:28:28 EDT --- Question: Why do you not create a wrapper script for your application? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:37:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181537.n7IFbhrM011362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Pavel Lis? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pavel.lisy at gmail.com --- Comment #39 from Pavel Lis? 2009-08-18 11:37:39 EDT --- I can help with this one: > The package has too many servers and client side tools. It would make more > sense to package them as subpackages so that anyone who say wants to run > tinydns does not have to download whole djbdns tools in a single package. I've made ma own rpm long time ago which is divided to several subpackages. You can inspire from it. It is made for centos but it's useful for fedora too. this is list: djbdns-axfrdns-1.05-5.el5.i386.rpm djbdns-debuginfo-1.05-5.el5.i386.rpm djbdns-devel-1.05-5.el5.i386.rpm djbdns-dnscache-1.05-5.el5.i386.rpm djbdns-docs-1.05-5.el5.i386.rpm djbdns-man-1.05-5.el5.noarch.rpm djbdns-pickdns-1.05-5.el5.i386.rpm djbdns-rbldns-1.05-5.el5.i386.rpm djbdns-tinydns-1.05-5.el5.i386.rpm djbdns-tools-1.05-5.el5.i386.rpm djbdns-walldns-1.05-5.el5.i386.rpm Spec file is here: http://ftp-hk.tmapy.cz/tmapy-twist/centos/5/os/SRPMS/djbdns-1.05-5.el5.src.rpm There are other support packages too (daemontools, ucspi*). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:40:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181540.n7IFeEHn020832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #14 from Gareth John 2009-08-18 11:40:12 EDT --- http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/paperbox-0.4.3-4.fc11.src.rpm http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/paperbox.spec No rpmlint issues, changed as per recommendation. I also change to new upstream source 0.4.3, I am now running fc11 and compiles fine without any use of patches i assume this will be the same for fc12 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181541.n7IFfW7W012661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #55 from Gareth John 2009-08-18 11:41:31 EDT --- updated source here is the src rpm and spec although noting else has changed http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.1-10.fc11.src.rpm http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181544.n7IFileO022029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Joshua Rosen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:44:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181544.n7IFi5SV021924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rayvd at bludgeon.or | |g) | --- Comment #10 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-08-18 11:44:04 EDT --- Sorry guys, got super busy with work and have seriously neglected Fedora lately. I will do the formal review today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181542.n7IFggHQ021667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-18 11:42:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-record Short Description: Recording tool for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181543.n7IFhg7G013114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Matt Rogers changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mattr at kde.org --- Comment #7 from Matt Rogers 2009-08-18 11:43:40 EDT --- The latest version of the spec file is missing a BuildRequires on libsamplerate-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181556.n7IFuQDd016460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-18 11:56:25 EDT --- There is a problem with the name. There is already a project (an older one that is hosted on launchpad too) called gpxviewer ( https://launchpad.net/gpxviewer ). Upstream has started to rename all parts to gpx-viewer. Jason, can this simple be done with a 'Rename Request'? I made an initial import to gpxviewer but never made a build. If it's easier for you, delete this import without hesitation ;-) Rename Request ======================= Package Name: gpx-viewer Short Description: A simple gpx viewer Owners: fab Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181557.n7IFvEOa025971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2009-08-18 11:57:13 EDT --- oops, I totally missed the APPROVED part there, thanks! I'll get this imported (and add libsamplerate-devel) asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 15:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181558.n7IFwxUh026233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2009-08-18 11:58:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: liblastfm Short Description: Libraries to integrate Last.fm services Owners: rdieter Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 16:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181616.n7IGGkZu031621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 --- Comment #4 from David Hannequin 2009-08-18 12:16:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Curses-UI Short Description: Curses based OO user interface framework Owners: hvad Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hvad perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 16:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181601.n7IG1QjW027375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-08-18 12:01:25 EDT --- http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm should have the latest/fixed stuff now too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 17:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181700.n7IH0aiL009175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Graf 2009-08-18 13:00:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mipv6-daemon Short Description: Owners: tgraf Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 17:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181701.n7IH1pQm009492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Graf 2009-08-18 13:01:51 EDT --- I just created an account so I'm all set there. Can set the cvs request flag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 17:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181715.n7IHFOpZ003467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-18 13:15:22 EDT --- *** Bug 518046 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 17:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518046] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181715.n7IHFNXm003436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518046 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-18 13:15:22 EDT --- Perhaps you could work to review the existing submission. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 516114 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 17:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181718.n7IHIV8f012772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 17:18:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181718.n7IHIB5d012710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-18 13:18:10 EDT --- It seems that you are not in the packager group. Have you read through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers? If not, you really should, and if so then you missed the bit about telling folks that you need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 17:30:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181730.n7IHUWtX015567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-18 13:30:30 EDT --- Actually, the license is unclear, as the README file makes two contradictory statements regarding the license: " COPYRIGHT AND LICENCE Copyright (C) 2004-2009 Cal Henderson License: Perl Artistic License 2.0 This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. " If they worked an "or" in there between those statements things would be OK, but as it is I believe that clarification from the author is mandatory here. The code itself is no help as it either contains a bare copyright notice with no license grant (which is rather bad) or contains no copyright or license information at all. Blocking FE-Legal; this package cannot be approved until the license is clarified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 17:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181751.n7IHpFNt020446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks| |496433(RussianFedoraRemix) AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-18 13:51:14 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 17:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181751.n7IHpGWG020478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |517983 Bug 496433 depends on bug 502926, which changed state. Bug 502926 Summary: Review Request: sK1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 496433 depends on bug 489564, which changed state. Bug 489564 Summary: Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 496433 depends on bug 502878, which changed state. Bug 502878 Summary: Update xfce4-xkb-plugin to 0.5.3.3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502878 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 18:16:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181816.n7IIGncL016314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #23 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-18 14:16:47 EDT --- Bob, I updated the files at http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softkn.spec and http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-8.fc12.test.1.src.rpm for your review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 18:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181821.n7IILQGg017388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-18 14:21:25 EDT --- Everything looks fine now. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 18:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517977] Review Request: synergy-plus - Mouse and keyboard sharing utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181820.n7IIKdtj017282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517977 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-18 14:20:38 EDT --- Here comes the full review. :) I'm not familiar with the Fedora policy concerning larger upstream changes that require substantial changes of the spec file. If the next release becomes officially available, you should clarify whether another review is needed. I guess, it's not. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. acoording to the file comment headers license is GPLv2 only [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: The license file included with the tarball must be part of the %doc section [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5 hash is 2c565afe5f920d363eef38dd97449b73 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture,... - builds on all supported architectures [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files... - no shared libraries [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable,... - package not designed to be relocatable [.] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - does not create directories [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large documentation [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - no header files [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - no pkgconfig files [.] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),... - no shared libraries [.] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package - no -devel subpackage [.] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - no .la files [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. - no GUI [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds on all supported architecture in koji [.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - no scriptlets used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 18:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181825.n7IIPkoe018246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #24 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-18 14:25:45 EDT --- I've grabbed: SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn.spec and SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-8.fc12.src.rpm Are these the correct versions (the links given are bad). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 18:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181839.n7IId5Pj020528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(emaldona at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #25 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-18 14:39:03 EDT --- NEEDS work: 1) the new directory should be called nss3 to avoid conflict with name switch service. 2) libnssdbm3 needs to be added in to other places: a) .chk for look in %install b) post-install define at the top 3) need to uncomment libnssdbm3.chk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 18:45:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181845.n7IIj2wK032170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 --- Comment #6 from Juanjo 2009-08-18 14:45:01 EDT --- Jason, Jan -- I've asked the author for a licence clarification (at first I asked him to change the module license to allow its inclusion into Fedora, but he made a mistake leaving the "This library is..." sentence -- well, that was MY mistake because I didn't realize it before submitting the request, sorry). I've asked him about the tests too, and I hope he can tell me if the code is stable enough to be included into Fedora or not (in last case, I'd close this request). Thank you for you help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 19:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181901.n7IJ1QYS003210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(emaldona at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #26 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-18 15:01:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > NEEDS work: > > 1) the new directory should be called nss3 to avoid conflict with name switch > service. I'm saving underneath the existing /usr/lib/nss under which we also keep the unsupported-tools. > > 2) libnssdbm3 needs to be added in to other places: > a) .chk for look in %install > b) post-install define at the top Added it to a) and b) > > 3) need to uncomment libnssdbm3.chk Done. Updated the spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 19:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513892] Review Request: bilbo - Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181913.n7IJDg8u005322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513892 --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel 2009-08-18 15:13:41 EDT --- Fixed here and reported[1] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bilbo/+bug/415555 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 19:58:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181958.n7IJwEIk002720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Brett Lentz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518083 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 19:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181958.n7IJwD6g002700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Brett Lentz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |518082 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 19:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] New: Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wakko666 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-facade.spec SRPM URL: https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-facade-1.0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A module that helps implement the facade pattern -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 19:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] New: Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wakko666 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-pathname2.spec SRPM URL: https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-pathname2-1.6.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. This version treats a path name as a String, though with certain methods overloaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 19:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 15:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462530] Review Request: jarbundler - Mac OS X JarBundler ANT Task In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908181957.n7IJvpTe014264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462530 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-08-18 15:57:48 EDT --- The output of rpmlint reveals a few things that should be addressed. Don't worry about the nonstandard groups, or the gcj-mandated use of %{_libdir}, but everything else should be fixed. jarbundler.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary JarBundler jarbundler.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Java jarbundler.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/jarbundler-2.0.0/example/build.xml jarbundler-javadoc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation jarbundler.spec:9: W: non-standard-group Development/Java jarbundler.spec:47: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation jarbundler.spec:103: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} jarbundler.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 12) 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. MUST items: X : rpmlint output: see above OK: package name OK: spec file name OK: packaging guidelines OK: licensing guidelines OK: license field matches license OK: license file in %doc OK: spec file in American English OK: spec file is legible X : source matches upstream. It appears that upstream has gone on to version 2.1.0, and uses unversioned tar balls. OK: successful build on at least one primary architecture NA: use of ExcludeArch OK: all build dependencies in BuildRequires NA: proper locale handling NA: ldconfig in %post and %postun NA: relocatable package OK: own all created directories OK: no duplication in %files OK: good permissions on files and dirs OK: %clean section OK: consistent use of macros OK: code or permissible content NA: large documentation files in -doc subpackage OK: nothing in %doc needed at runtime NA: header files in -devel NA: static libraries in -static NA: Requires pkgconfig NA: .so files in -devel NA: -devel subpackage requires main package NA: no libtool archives NA: GUI applications have a desktop file OK: don't own files/dirs owned by other packages OK: clean at top of %install OK: all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD items: NA: ask upstream to include a license file NA: include translated description and summary fields OK: package builds in mock (tried Fedora 11 x86_64 only) ??: package builds on all supported arches (did not check) OK: package functions as described OK: sane scriptlets OK: subpackages require the main package NA: placement of pkgconfig files NA: file dependencies In addition, please consider making the javadoc subpackage be noarch. So all that needs to be done for this to pass review is to cleanup the rpmlint warnings and get a good match with an upstream tarball (probably by upgrading your spec file to 2.1.0). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 20:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182033.n7IKXNJx010250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 16:33:23 EDT --- sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 20:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517466] Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182032.n7IKW8nO010080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 --- Comment #6 from Stjepan Gros 2009-08-18 16:32:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Giving your spec file a once over I see this: > Use %global instead of %define, unless you really need only locally defined > submacros within other macro definitions (a very rare case) > See: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define Changed. (In reply to comment #5) > Some people put the comments to the apply phase, i.e. > > # Enable bar support > %patch0 -p1 > > but I usually put them just before listing them, e.g. > > # This patch enables bar support > Patch0: foo-bar.patch > > and so on, since normally one looks first at the Patch(N) lines. I've added comments to PatchN lines. > What bugs me is that you mix lbreakout2 and %{name}, both of which mean the > same thing. I'd replace all occurrences of %{name} in %files with lbreakout2. Replaced. > Yes, exactly: remove the documentation installed by 'make install' at the end > of %install with 'rm -rf' and just list the necessary files in %doc, which will > install them in the correct directory. The current listing Removed and added to %doc the whole subdirectory with manual files, i.e. docs/. > PS. You can probably drop the > --with-docdir=/usr/share/doc > argument from %configure. (I haven't looked at the build at all, though.) The default location to install the documentation is /usr/lbreakout2/docs so I used this switch to change the location. Now I removed it since it is not necessary any more. New files: Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/lbreakout2/lbreakout2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/lbreakout2/lbreakout2-2.6-0.4.beta7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 20:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182034.n7IKYKDL021881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 16:34:20 EDT --- sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 20:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182031.n7IKVqwU021577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 16:31:50 EDT --- sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 20:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182034.n7IKYpdi010486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 16:34:50 EDT --- sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 20:53:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182053.n7IKrTD4014334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stjepan.gros at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Stjepan Gros 2009-08-18 16:53:28 EDT --- I looked a bit on your package and I have few comments/questions. You are generating init scripts in spec file. Isn't it better to distribute them along with source? Furhtermore, I believe you should add %preun section to spec file that will try to stop the service before uninstaling it. There is an error reported by rpmlint when run on the binary package: $ rpmlint vmpsd-1.4.01-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm vmpsd.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS vmpsd.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary vmpsd vmpsd.x86_64: E: init-script-without-chkconfig-postin /etc/rc.d/init.d/vmpsd vmpsd.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/vmpsd 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. Trying to build package in mock was successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 20:55:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182055.n7IKtJUV026289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-18 16:55:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I just created an account so I'm all set there. Hrm... I don't see you in the 'packager' group... See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account > Can set the cvs request flag? Best to wait until you're all squared away in the packager group, otherwise a request with 'Owner: tgraf' isn't going to fly. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:08:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182108.n7IL8ehD028910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #1 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-18 17:08:39 EDT --- One more thing I forgot to add: This is my first package review request for Fedora, so I'm also going to need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182111.n7ILBV96018535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182112.n7ILCJMj018655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:12:18 EDT --- rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182112.n7ILCpmK018802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:12:50 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-layers-menu'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8708 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:11:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182111.n7ILBExD018469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:11:12 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182112.n7ILCOZd029808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.5.0-2.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182117.n7ILHB0M020358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:17:09 EDT --- perl-Flickr-Upload-1.32-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510736] Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182117.n7ILHS4V020441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510736 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:17:27 EDT --- pycdio-0.15-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:14:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510736] Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182114.n7ILECrR019151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510736 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:14:10 EDT --- pycdio-0.15-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182114.n7ILEVoa019276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:14:28 EDT --- django-authority-0.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182114.n7ILEnTQ019484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:14:48 EDT --- gnome-colors-icon-theme-5.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:14:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510736] Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182114.n7ILEGe0019184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510736 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.15-3.el5 |0.15-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:17:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510736] Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182117.n7ILHWmn020488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510736 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.15-3.fc10 |0.15-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182116.n7ILGHAP020116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:16:16 EDT --- django-profile-0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:14:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182114.n7ILEa0J019319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182117.n7ILHG0a020402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.32-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182116.n7ILGNAk020149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6-0.2.20090813svnr420.fc1 | |1 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_* In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182117.n7ILHk4Y020548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:17:45 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8735 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:14:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182114.n7ILEPmA019240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-18 17:14:23 EDT --- ok, that looks good. bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182116.n7ILGVOK020190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:16:30 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-1.20090817svn4489.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update colossus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8722 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock2- Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182116.n7ILGGuR003179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: easymock - |Review Request: easymock2- |Easy mock objects |Easy mock objects -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:17:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182117.n7ILHeO9004487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:17:39 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-layers-menu'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8732 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182115.n7ILFBnv001715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:15:10 EDT --- rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182135.n7ILZRRF025558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #28 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-18 17:35:26 EDT --- Thanks. I guess we should reassign this Bug to Jessie Keating for the next step in the process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:15:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182115.n7ILFGwO001899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5.0-2.fc10 |1.5.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515280] Review Request: gnome-colors-icon-theme - GNOME-Colors icon theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182114.n7ILEtot000939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515280 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |5.3-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182113.n7ILDrZZ031550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-18 17:13:50 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-1.20090817svn4489.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update colossus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8712 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182142.n7ILgtj1011178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 D. Marlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmarlin at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from D. Marlin 2009-08-18 17:42:53 EDT --- - I believe configure will be run twice, once in the prep stage (through autogen.sh) and once in the build stage. The following autogen.sh command line should avoid this: # run autogen.sh until we have a proper release, but don't run configure twice. NOCONFIGURE=yes ./autogen.sh - I think the spec file should be using desktop-file-install instead of just validating the .desktop file. -desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop +desktop-file-install \ + --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ + %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop - rpmlint complains: anjal.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-0.3 ['0.1.0-0.3.20090811git813fc0f.fc12', '0.1.0-0.3.20090811git813fc0f'] It seems to be confused by the "snapshot tag" in the release. Perhaps modify the %changelog entry to match? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182149.n7ILna02013832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rrelyea at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 21:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182148.n7ILmeBS013604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rrelyea at redhat.com |jkeating at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 22:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182209.n7IM9rqC019197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #29 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-18 18:09:52 EDT --- I don't think I'm needed here at all, since Elio is already sponsored. Just put in your CVS request stanza and build away! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 22:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182222.n7IMMYqC005254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #2 from Colin Coe 2009-08-18 18:22:33 EDT --- Sorry, I forgot to state that I need a sponsor. CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 22:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182221.n7IMLsee022126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|513452 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 22:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182221.n7IMLsln022100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|506825 | --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-18 18:21:52 EDT --- New upstream release that has split out bickley and a lot of other bits. Both good and bad! SPEC: As before SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mutter-moblin-0.34.0-1.fc12.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1613225 The above points are fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 22:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182238.n7IMcTPK024873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-18 18:38:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > - I believe configure will be run twice, once in the prep stage (through > autogen.sh) and once in the build stage. You are correct. I'll look into it. > - I think the spec file should be using desktop-file-install instead of just > validating the .desktop file. > > -desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop > +desktop-file-install \ > + --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ > + %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop desktop-file-validate is fine according to package guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage > - rpmlint complains: > > anjal.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-0.3 > ['0.1.0-0.3.20090811git813fc0f.fc12', '0.1.0-0.3.20090811git813fc0f'] > > It seems to be confused by the "snapshot tag" in the release. Perhaps modify > the %changelog entry to match? Its fine, basically the 0.3 part of the version is enough and most packages leave off the full git tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 22:49:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182249.n7IMnnGq010308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-18 18:49:48 EDT --- Updated build with single configure. SRPMS: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/anjal-0.1.0-0.4.20090813git2d4e6a0.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1613275 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 22:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182250.n7IMolaF010860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #30 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-18 18:50:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nss-softokn Short Description: Network Security Services Cryptographic Module Owners: emaldonado, kengert, rrelyea Branches: F-12 InitialCC: emaldonado, kengert, rrelyea -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 22:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182248.n7IMmZ50010095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-18 18:48:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nss-util Short Description: Network Security Services Utility Module Owners: emaldonado, kengert, rrelyea Branches: F-12 InitialCC: emaldonado, kengert, rrelyea -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 22:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908182253.n7IMrjLU011386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-18 18:53:43 EDT --- New upstream 0.3 release with spec cleanups and updated deps for the new release. http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/hornsey-0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 00:51:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190051.n7J0pA9K004145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 Jud Craft changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |craftjml at gmail.com --- Comment #64 from Jud Craft 2009-08-18 20:51:04 EDT --- Just wanted to say that I'm using the plugins for the first time and they're awesome. Thanks everybody! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 02:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510038] Review Request: python-icalendar - Parser and generator library for iCalendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190247.n7J2l0DF026714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 Konstantin Ryabitsev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mricon at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-08-18 22:46:58 EDT --- I haven't heard back from the lead maintainer, and looks like the support mailing lists are dead, too. I'm not sure what to do -- even if someone wants to continue maintaining the application, they will have to first settle the question of license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 02:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500003] Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190248.n7J2mEP4010257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500003 Konstantin Ryabitsev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |mricon at gmail.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-08-18 22:48:12 EDT --- I've decided against maintaining this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 03:00:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500003] Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190300.n7J30VJn012933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500003 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 03:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190354.n7J3satk022661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 --- Comment #5 from Silas Sewell 2009-08-18 23:54:34 EDT --- The above mentioned issues should be fixed. spec diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn313&r=313&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/tokyotyrant/tokyotyrant.spec tokyotyrant.pc diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn313&r=313&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/tokyotyrant/tokyotyrant-1.1.33.build.patch srpm: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/tokyotyrant-1.1.33-3.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint [silas at fox rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 04:54:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190454.n7J4sn9C020133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #40 from _pjp_ 2009-08-19 00:54:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > I've made ma own rpm long time ago which is divided to several subpackages. You > can inspire from it. It is made for centos but it's useful for fedora too. > > http://ftp-hk.tmapy.cz/tmapy-twist/centos/5/os/SRPMS/djbdns-1.05-5.el5.src.rpm Thank you so much Pavel; I'll take a look at the srpm and do the necessary. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 05:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190501.n7J51UhT005157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-08-19 01:01:28 EDT --- rpmlint output: ytnef.i586: I: checking1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. -- Looks like the license string for this should be set to GPLv2+ not GPL+ All other MUST items check out. All SHOULD items check out. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 07:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517822] Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190722.n7J7MWJj015988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517822 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |caolanm at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |caolanm at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 07:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517821] Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190722.n7J7Mq8g002162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517821 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |caolanm at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |caolanm at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 07:23:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517970] Review Request: lingot-0.7.6 - musical instruments tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190723.n7J7NrTD002311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517970 --- Comment #2 from Karel Voln? 2009-08-19 03:23:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Question: > > Why do you not create a wrapper script for your application? because I consider it overkill ... no problem starting the app from gui but if you think it should be done, basically nothing prevents me from doing that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 07:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517822] Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190728.n7J7S9nv017847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517822 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2009-08-19 03:28:08 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock + rpmlint is error-free for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 07:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190729.n7J7T6pa018415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #21 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-19 03:29:03 EDT --- with python-mako-0.2.4-2.fc11.noarch the connection to the database works However the export to XML produces an error: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/plugins/imex/xml.py:68: GtkWarning: gtk_file_chooser_button_set_property: Choosers of type `GtkFileChooserButton` do not support selecting multiple files. file_chooser.set_select_multiple(False) xml.py(83): on_dialog_response(/home/pierrey, True) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/plugins/imex/xml.py", line 85, in on_dialog_response self.__export_task(filename, one_file) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/plugins/imex/xml.py", line 95, in __export_task for table_name, table in tables.iteritems(): NameError: global name 'tables' is not defined Export to csv works fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 07:31:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517821] Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190731.n7J7VGog004773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517821 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2009-08-19 03:31:15 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock + rpmlint is error-free for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. Are these hyphenation rules good for Bengali as written in Bangladesh ?, I'd guess that they probably are, if so then maybe... pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/hyphen/ bn_IN_aliases="bn_BD" for lang in $bn_IN_aliases; do ln -s hyph_bn_IN.dic hyph_$lang.dic done popd after the cp is indicated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 07:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190732.n7J7WRJi004916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #56 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-19 03:32:25 EDT --- You've bumped the version, so reset the release to 1. Same for paperbox. Do the missing informal review, will you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 07:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 03:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190741.n7J7fCsH006661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-19 03:41:11 EDT --- Yes, seems to build fine in rawhide. Reset the release to 1, as you've updated the version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 08:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513892] Review Request: bilbo - Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190804.n7J84Fcd025742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513892 --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-19 04:04:13 EDT --- OK, there's already an upstream comment to the reported problem. However, they probably didn't quite understand the problem. COPYING.LGPL in subfolder bilbokblog contains the text of LGPL v2 (GNU *Lesser* General Public License) but the file headers refer to the outdated GNU *Library* public license. Maybe you could point them to this ambiguity. Anyway, it shouldn't be a blocker for this package. Could you please update the spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 08:22:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190822.n7J8MEdh014425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-19 04:22:13 EDT --- url is incorrect, should be http://filteredperception.org/smiley/projects/zyx-rli/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 08:45:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517822] Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190845.n7J8jSNp003679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517822 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-08-19 04:45:26 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-mr Short Description: Marathi hyphenation rules Owners: pnemade Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: pnemade -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 08:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517821] Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908190847.n7J8lhGd020440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517821 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-08-19 04:47:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I will ask upstream and if they says its ok I will add support for bn_BD. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-bn Short Description: Bengali hyphenation rules Owners: pnemade Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: pnemade -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 11:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517416] Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191127.n7JBR4X0002502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416 --- Comment #2 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-08-19 07:27:03 EDT --- done new spec : http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/awl.spec new srpm : http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/awl-0.37-2.fc11.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 11:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517914] Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191141.n7JBftkv005220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517914 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-19 07:41:54 EDT --- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 12:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517914] Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191202.n7JC2DIT026046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517914 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-19 08:02:12 EDT --- Rpmlint gives a number of warnings: rpmlint aqute-bndlib.spec aqute-bndlib.spec:37: W: non-standard-group Development/Java aqute-bndlib.spec:72: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation rpmlint aqute-bndlib-0.0.203-4.2.fc12.src.rpm aqute-bndlib.src: W: non-standard-group Development/Java rpmlint noarch/aqute-bndlib-* aqute-bndlib.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Java aqute-bndlib.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.203-4.2 ['0:0.0.203-4.2.fc12', '0:0.0.203-4.2'] aqute-bndlib.noarch: W: no-documentation aqute-bndlib.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/aqute-bndlib aqute-bndlib-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation I would like to see them (except non-conffile-in-etc) cleaned. Full review will follow shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 12:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191209.n7JC9aKS027465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #40 from rob 2009-08-19 08:09:30 EDT --- http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-2.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-2.2.0-1.fc11/ * Wed Aug 19 2009 Rob Myers 2.2.0-1 - Updated to 2.2.0 - Drop gcj support - Change jar location to /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/anyedit - Bump eclipse-platform to 3.4.0+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 12:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518189] New: Review Request: java-augeas - Java bindings for Augeas Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: java-augeas - Java bindings for Augeas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518189 Summary: Review Request: java-augeas - Java bindings for Augeas Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkearney at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/java-augeas.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/java-augeas-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1614282 Description: Java Bindings for Augeas. The spec file will be correct if/when David lets me have some space on augeas.net to put the tarball :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 12:41:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517416] Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191241.n7JCf30N001912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-19 08:41:02 EDT --- The srpm is actually an rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 12:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517416] Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191253.n7JCrkN1004591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416 --- Comment #4 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-08-19 08:53:45 EDT --- Oups, sorry http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/awl-0.37-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 12:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191259.n7JCxrHq020916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #41 from pjp 2009-08-19 08:59:48 EDT --- Hi, I've made most of the changes indicated in the *brilliant* review above, except for the sub package and name change part. I tried doing that as well, but I think it'll become more complex with so many rpm/subpackages and in turn be less intuitive for users. So it'll be better to install all tools/servers/docs from one rpm. Simple and straight forward. Please take a look at the latest files: SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns.spec SORC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.3.tar.gz SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Thanks so much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517416] Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191302.n7JD2bRt006690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:17:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191317.n7JDH1gB024749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #41 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 09:16:59 EDT --- 3 minor things: - please put comments above the package and assemble scripts saying that you wrote them - change the %files entry to be /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/anyedit - injecting the license isn't necessary Otherwise, good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517416] Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191331.n7JDV5nO028241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-19 09:31:04 EDT --- FIX: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/awl.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/awl-0.37-2.fc11.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/awl-0.37-2.fc11.noarch.rpm rpmbuild/SPECS/awl.spec:57: W: macro-in-%changelog _datadir rpmbuild/SPECS/awl.spec:58: W: macro-in-%changelog _datadir awl.src:57: W: macro-in-%changelog _datadir awl.src:58: W: macro-in-%changelog _datadir 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Just use /usr/share/php in the changelog OK: The package must be name according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines FIX: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Based on the README GPLv2+ can be used. OK: If (an only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources use to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. sha1sum awl_0.37.tar.gz rpmbuild/SOURCES/awl_0.37.tar.gz 1cee5d230672be387702d673c40ffdf9abacd0b4 awl_0.37.tar.gz 1cee5d230672be387702d673c40ffdf9abacd0b4 rpmbuild/SOURCES/awl_0.37.tar.gz OK: The package MUST successfully compile an build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. N/A: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture N/A: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires N/A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores share library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). FIX: Each package must consistently use macros. If you want to use %{__install} or %{__sed} style, please use %{__make}, %{__rm} for consistency. OK: The package must contain code, or permissible content. N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. N\A: Header files must be in a -devel package. N\A: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N\A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for Directory ownership and usability). N\A: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that en in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N\A: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency N\A: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be remove in the spec if they are built. N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. No real blockers just fix the issues raised before requesting CVS ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (awl) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock2- Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191338.n7JDc7rO015242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-19 09:38:06 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:41:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191341.n7JDfpmu030590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #42 from Dan Peterson 2009-08-19 09:41:49 EDT --- And why not the name change? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock2- Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191338.n7JDclHr029814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-19 09:38:46 EDT --- I should add that i disagree with renaming. it doesn't meet the guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191341.n7JDfdr3030515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-19 09:41:38 EDT --- This is a full review request. The pre-review request was bug #500253. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:40:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] New: Review Request: Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 Summary: Review Request: Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming-0.8-4.fc12.src.rpm Description: Old directory/naming module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:42:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191342.n7JDg0xY016148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191348.n7JDmECs017377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-19 09:48:11 EDT --- Brian, I'm sorry for shameless breaking of your review process, but it seems, that you forgot about this ticket :) REVIEW: - rpmlint is not silent (I added custom message numbering for the sake of simplicity) [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ~/Desktop/garmintools- 1. garmintools.ppc: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgarmintools.so.4.2.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 2. garmintools.ppc: E: postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libgarmintools.so.4.2.0 3. garmintools.ppc: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libgarmintools.so.4.2.0 4. garmintools.ppc: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgarmintools.so 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ The 1st message is indicated a possible design flaw in garmintools. You should consider asking upstream about it. The 2nd and the 3rd messaged should be fixed. Please remove "devel" from the %post and %postun sections (looks like the leftover), and be careful - don't forget the %post section which contains "rmmod garmin_gps &>/dev/null || true" The 4th message should be fixed - you accidentally listed file %{_libdir}/libgarmintools.so twice - in main package and in devel-subpackage. I advise you to change in %files section this line %{_libdir}/lib*.so* to that one: %{_libdir}/lib*.so.* + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec . - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines, but there is an issue, in the %files section, with owned directories which are already owned by other applications. See my note below. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum garmintools-0.10.tar.gz* ffd50b7f963fa9b8ded3223c4786b07906c887ed900de64581a24ff201444cee garmintools-0.10.tar.gz ffd50b7f963fa9b8ded3223c4786b07906c887ed900de64581a24ff201444cee garmintools-0.10.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1614626 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. - Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. See my notes, regarding rpmlint messages above. + The package owns all directories that it creates (none, actually). - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. See my notes, regarding rpmlint messages above. + Permissions on files were set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are in a -devel package. + No static libraries. - If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. See my notes, regarding rpmlint messages above. + The devel subpackage requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. - The package must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. Unfortunately, main package owns /etc/udev/rules.d and /etc/modprobe.d Please use the correct form (note the asterisk mark at the end of the strings)): %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/* %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/* + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm package are valid UTF-8. Please, fix issues noted above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191350.n7JDoiOu000735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-19 09:50:43 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191348.n7JDmrAm032553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-19 09:48:50 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191353.n7JDrtnR018453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-19 09:53:53 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-cppunit-1.12.1-2.fc11.src.rpm 2009-08-19 + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint is quiet + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm bd30e9cf5523cdfc019b94f5e1d7fd19 cppunit-1.12.1.tar.gz bd30e9cf5523cdfc019b94f5e1d7fd19 Download/cppunit-1.12.1.tar.gz + Package builds in mock (Fedora Rawhide i386) n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package n/a Static libraries should be in -static ! Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 ! According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs packages must use one of the changelog formats defined in there. 1) Use your real name in the changelog; 2) fix the date of latest entry (it reads Jan 5 right now); 3) remove spaces around your email address. It should read something like this: * Mon Jan 5 2009 Nicolas Chauvet - 1.12.1-1 Besides the missing Requires: pkgconfig and the problem with changelog entries the spec file looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 13:57:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:57:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock2- Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191357.n7JDvgve002203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 09:57:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I should add that i disagree with renaming. it doesn't meet the guidelines Understood. In the future (after this maven nightmare is fixed), we will move them: easymock2 -> easymock easymock -> easymock1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191401.n7JE16DY003340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Pre-Review |Review Request: |Request: directory-naming - |directory-naming - |Directory Naming |Directory Naming --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-19 10:01:05 EDT --- Fix summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191402.n7JE2DVY020503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #42 from rob 2009-08-19 10:02:12 EDT --- Should all be fixed now. http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-2.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-2.2.0-2.fc11/ * Wed Aug 19 2009 Rob Myers 2.2.0-2 - Drop LICENSE file - Minor spec file cleanup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:05:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191405.n7JE5uns004419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #28 from Karel Voln? 2009-08-19 10:05:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit-0.1.1-0.1.2431.aw_fc12.src.rpm just FYI, I did a koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1614676 after starting the application, the "Data" menu item is empty ... is that expected? - how do I load some larger map? (er, if the answer is RTFM then just give me some time, I just had a quick peek, will take deeper look in a few days :-)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191408.n7JE8ohe021898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #43 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 10:08:49 EDT --- Approved. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517914] Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191415.n7JEF9tR023507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517914 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 10:15:08 EDT --- Updated package: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/aqute-bndlib-0.0.203-4.3.fc12.src.rpm http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/aqute-bndlib.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:12:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191412.n7JECHgf022914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-19 10:12:16 EDT --- New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming-0.8-4.fc12.src.rpm Changes: - Remove gcj support. - Build with build.sysclasspath=only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191417.n7JEHni9007602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emmanuel.seyman at club-intern | |et.fr Flag| |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-19 10:17:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > New Package CVS Request The fedora?cvs flag isn't set so I doubt the CVS admins are going to see this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191421.n7JELTWS008881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-19 10:21:29 EDT --- New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming-0.8-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191426.n7JEQ2Pl010209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 rob changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #44 from rob 2009-08-19 10:26:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-anyedit Short Description: AnyEdit plugin for eclipse Owners: rmyers joshkayse Branches: F-11 InitialCC: overholt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191442.n7JEgAx3014483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518219] New: Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518219 Summary: Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/dumbster.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/dumbster-1.6-8.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Dumbster is a very simple fake SMTP server designed for unit and system testing applications that send email messages. It responds to all standard SMTP commands but does not deliver messages to the user. The messages are stored within the Dumbster for later extraction and verification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:44:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518219] Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191444.n7JEiZfd031030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518219 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-19 10:44:34 EDT --- This is a full review request. The pre-review request was bug #500251. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 14:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191441.n7JEftE4030612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 10:41:54 EDT --- A few issues: - rpmlint output: directory-naming.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java directory-naming.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/directory-naming-0.8/LICENSE.txt directory-naming.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/directory-naming - javadoc issues for naming-factory: [javadoc] /notnfs/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/directory-naming-0.8/naming-factory/src/java/org/apache/naming/factory/BeanFactory.java:64: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: org.apache.naming.config.XmlConfigurator [javadoc] /notnfs/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/directory-naming-0.8/naming-factory/src/java/org/apache/naming/factory/MailSessionFactory.java:59: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: org.apache.naming.config.XmlConfigurator [javadoc] /notnfs/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/directory-naming-0.8/naming-factory/src/java/org/apache/naming/factory/SendMailFactory.java:81: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: org.apache.naming.config.XmlConfigurator - there's a minor (a date in a comment) difference between the source that I generate and the one in the SRPM - I'd like to see a comment for the patch to the project files - I removed the remaining sed lines for "setproxy" and the build was fine. I think they can be removed. Otherwise, things look good. It's nice that all of the test suites run and have no failures/errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:13:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191513.n7JFDUbF021882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-08-19 11:13:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sblim-cmpi-network Short Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Network Providers Owners: vcrhonek Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191527.n7JFRqwM010051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #13 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-19 11:27:50 EDT --- Okay, I've sponsored you into the 'packager' group, will go ahead and set the cvs request flag now... Oh, looks like I already set it... Oops. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191532.n7JFWJXf027276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 --- Comment #7 from Juanjo 2009-08-19 11:32:18 EDT --- Fixed: 1. License issue: the author removed the offending line referring to Perl license. Now the module it's properly licensed (Artistic 2.0). 2. Tests problems: the author answered that the problem was in the dependency XML::Parser::Lite::Tree, so he released a new version of the module and XML::Parser::Lite::Tree::XPath requires XML::Parser::Lite::Tree >= 0.10. 3. Regarding the "install -p" issue, the install line executed is generated from Makefile.PL and I think it's safe (as far as I can see in other spec files). Updated data follows... Spec URL: http://jjmartinez.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath.spec SRPM URL: http://jjmartinez.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath-0.23-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a pure-Perl implementation of XPath as complement to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree, a pure-Perl XML tree parser and builder. It aims to implement 100% of the W3C XPath specification. This is my first package for fedora and I need someone to sponsor. Moreover I've upgraded XML::Parser::Lite::Tree (spec fetched from CVS), because this package needs to be updated (as stated previously in point .2). You can fetch the spec/SRPM from: http://jjmartinez.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree.spec http://jjmartinez.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191537.n7JFbsv3028752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-19 11:37:53 EDT --- Here we go... I screwed up and set the flag to + instead of ?. The ? lets the cvs admin folks know action is needed, the + signifies action has been taken. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mipv6-daemon Short Description: Owners: tgraf Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191536.n7JFavP5028636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at city-fan.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth 2009-08-19 11:36:55 EDT --- I'll review this one since I had a look at an earlier submission (Bug #494219) and when the submitter of that one lost interest I had a go at packaging it myself (Bug #518046). There may be some mileage in merging our efforts actually. First looks: * shouldn't the tarball name have _r5836 rather than _r0? * is the git-core dependency a remnant of starting with the spec file for the git plugin, or is there some actual reason for having it? * the package description could list a few extra features such as allowing users to change their passwords * the setuptools regression mentioned in the comments has been fixed in F-11 so that comment could be removed * there is a patch available in svn trunk for http://trac-hacks.org/ticket/4125 (it's in my package from Bug #518046). * please include sessionstore_convert.py script (see http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/trac-users at googlegroups.com/msg03696.html) * it's safe to use --skip-build as EPEL-4 doesn't have trac >= 0.11 so there's not likely to be an EL-4 branch of this package * the noarch/sitelib comment from the python spec file template can be dropped I think -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:43:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518219] Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191543.n7JFhRUd013768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518219 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 11:43:26 EDT --- - change the groups to make rpmlint quiet - md5sum of source doesn't match but contents do - you can remove the post{,un} requirements for javadoc - there are two sections to SimpleSmtpServer.java; I'd like to see the first one go upstream or at least be discussed with upstream. I won't block on this. Otherwise, things are good to go -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191543.n7JFhmxG030201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #13 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-08-19 11:43:46 EDT --- I'm looking for volunteers to go through Review Request of few other sblim-* packages, so if anyone is interested, feel free to take them;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518233] Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191547.n7JFlBd8031182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518233 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-19 11:47:09 EDT --- This is a full review request. The pre-review request was bug #500254. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:45:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518233] New: Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518233 Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/jakarta-commons-jxpath.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/jakarta-commons-jxpath-1.2-7.fc12.src.rpm Description: Defines a simple interpreter of an expression language called XPath. JXPath applies XPath expressions to graphs of objects of all kinds: JavaBeans, Maps, Servlet contexts, DOM etc, including mixtures thereof. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191554.n7JFsS40016505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] New: Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Summary: Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/backport-util-concurrent.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/backport-util-concurrent-3.1-2.src.rpm Description: This package is the backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0, to Java 1.4. The backport is based on public-domain sources from the JSR 166 CVS repository, and the dl.util.concurrent package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 15:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501576] Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191558.n7JFwor6017716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Bug 501576 depends on bug 476789, which changed state. Bug 476789 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-19 11:58:48 EDT --- python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-repoze-what-quickstart'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 16:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518233] Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191605.n7JG53AA019393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518233 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 12:05:02 EDT --- - extra spaces interspersed in %description - md5sums are different but contents are the same - svn revision I got was different # ... perhaps we should just remove that comment - licensing, naming fine - locations fine - rpmlint clean (except for maven fragment in /etc) - we should go to 1.3 ASAP but I can understand the strict need for 1.2 to get maven updated Please fix those minor things. Review approved since they're not blockers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 16:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191630.n7JGU5Eb010220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #29 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-19 12:30:03 EDT --- RTFReadme :) [adamw at adam ~]$ cat /usr/share/doc/navit-0.1.1/README.fedora Navit comes with a sample map of Munich, but if you live (or drive!) anywhere else, you'll need to add another map set. These are not available as packages because they're rather large and the data changes on a daily basis, so the packages would have to be refreshed very often. For instructions on downloading or generating, and installing, different types of map sets, see these Navit Wiki pages: http://wiki.navit-project.org/index.php/OpenStreetMaps http://wiki.navit-project.org/index.php/European_maps http://wiki.navit-project.org/index.php/Garmin_maps You should either add the appropriate configuration elements to /etc/navit/navit.xml, or copy /etc/navit/navit.xml to ~/.navit/navit.xml and edit it there. You may have to remove or comment out the section for the sample map set, also. Also note that the default configuration assumes you have a GPS device active, and gpsd running. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 17:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191744.n7JHiLdb028013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-19 13:44:20 EDT --- Two items of note: 1. Instead of using sed to try to stop configure from running twice (it doesn't work), do this: # run autogen.sh until we have a proper release, but don't run configure twice. NOCONFIGURE=true ./autogen.sh That works because the provided autogen.sh just calls out to gnome-autogen.sh, which has some intelligence. 2. Do you want to pass --enable-scaled-background to configure? == Review == Good: - rpmlint checks return: mutter-moblin.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmoblin-panel.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mutter-moblin-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation mutter-moblin-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so moblin-netbook.so.3400.0.0 All safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (c781f9a6558167658fc7891d1ba8c041db1a75113ef220441c05f11a877436ed) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - locales handled properly - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r Address the first two issues before commit, but this is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 18:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191833.n7JIXHqI006794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 14:33:15 EDT --- Looks good to me; still builds fine, and the issues I found are fixed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 18:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191849.n7JInHnm026132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 14:49:15 EDT --- OK, builds fine, rpmlint is as previously discussed above and the versioning loooks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 18:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191852.n7JIqDLg010817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel 2009-08-19 14:52:12 EDT --- I'll merge out spec files this week. Patches, description, and cleaning useless comments. And the git BR is due to starting from the git plugin ;) . It'll be gone next round. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 18:55:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191855.n7JIt3lc027561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-19 14:55:02 EDT --- > Two items of note: > > 1. Instead of using sed to try to stop configure from running twice (it doesn't > work), do this: > > # run autogen.sh until we have a proper release, but don't run configure twice. > NOCONFIGURE=true ./autogen.sh > > That works because the provided autogen.sh just calls out to gnome-autogen.sh, > which has some intelligence. Thanks. That is very good to know, I've seen so many different work arounds its hard to know which is best. > 2. Do you want to pass --enable-scaled-background to configure? I was discussing that one last night with someone, I agree I think its the best option. I will update them both before commit. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 18:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191858.n7JIw8F4028036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-19 14:58:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mutter-moblin Short Description: Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:08:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191908.n7JJ8BLw014049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 15:08:08 EDT --- Did you want to somehow update this package to include the proper licensing information? Either the updated source with proper licensing information or the email from the author clarifying the license needs to make it into the package. If I download the srpm from comment #3, and just look at what's in the package, the licensing situation is still unclear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:19:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191919.n7JJJDFZ031644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(akurtako at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-19 15:19:11 EDT --- I don't understand - what's happening here? I saw that this package was already reviewed and even imported into CVS tree (as well as these two - #518219 and #518233 ). Why you created another Review Request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191925.n7JJPKE9000766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(akurtako at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 15:25:19 EDT --- Unsetting flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191925.n7JJP00Q017820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 15:24:59 EDT --- See comment #1: "This is a full review request. The pre-review request was bug #500253." In an attempt to get maven updated, it was deemed necessary to "pre-review" some packages for bootstrapping purposes. We've decided to speed up the actual process by doing full reviews on packages that don't need this initial step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191928.n7JJSk4Y018617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-19 15:28:46 EDT --- There is a new upstream release that correct the license issue There are the updated version: Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-affy.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-affy-1.22.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513320] Review Request: boxbackup - A fast, secure and automatic online backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191933.n7JJXZQd002484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 15:33:34 EDT --- This fails to build for me: + test -e configure + ./bootstrap ./bootstrap: line 3: aclocal: command not found ./bootstrap: line 4: autoheader: command not found ./bootstrap: line 5: autoconf: command not found Looks like missing dependencies. Scratch build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1615423 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191945.n7JJj97N005245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 15:45:08 EDT --- I'm sorry that nobody has looked at this; we have far more review submissions than reviewers, and far too much traffic for anyone to actually follow all of the bugzilla mail. Posting to fedora-devel or dropping by #fedora-devel and requesting help is the best means of getting something time-sensitive noticed. However, I tried to take a look, but the package failed to build for me. It looks like the makefile calls restorecon, which is not only a really bad idea since I don't think it works as a regular user and there's no guarantee that the build filesystem supports contexts (think my home dir and NFS). But I think that it actually fails because policycoreutils isn't installed as nothing in the package actually requires it. Here's a scratch build showing the failure: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1615432 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:46:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518310] Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191946.n7JJkonk005611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518310 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 15:46:49 EDT --- Note that this is a full review request. The "pre-review" request (which has already been granted and the package imported into CVS) is bug #500246. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518310] New: Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518310 Summary: Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-classworlds.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-classworlds-1.2-0.a9.6.fc11.src.rpm Description: Classworlds is a framework for container developers who require complex manipulation of Java's ClassLoaders. Java's native ClassLoader mechanims and classes can cause much headache and confusion for certain types of application developers. Projects which involve dynamic loading of components or otherwise represent a 'container' can benefit from the classloading control provided by classworlds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:51:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518310] Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191951.n7JJp2ee023127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518310 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-19 15:51:01 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-classworlds.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-classworlds-1.2-0.a9.7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 19:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908191956.n7JJuYgN024238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 15:56:33 EDT --- That fails to compile for me. gcc -m64 -std=gnu99 -I/usr/include/R -DHAVE_ZLIB=1 -I/usr/local/include -I"/usr/lib64/R/library/preprocessCore/include" -fpic -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c rma2.c -o rma2.o rma2.c:109:29: error: rma_background4.h: No such file or directory rma2.c:120:45: error: preprocessCore_background_stubs.c: No such file or directory rma2.c:121:48: error: preprocessCore_normalization_stubs.c: No such file or directory rma2.c:122:48: error: preprocessCore_summarization_stubs.c: No such file or directory rma2.c:124:31: error: R_subColSummarize.h: No such file or directory rma2.c:125:37: error: R_subColSummarize_stubs.c: No such file or directory rma2.c: In function 'do_RMA2': rma2.c:134: warning: implicit declaration of function 'R_subColSummarize_medianpolish_log' rma2.c:134: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast rma2.c: In function 'rma_c_call': rma2.c:186: warning: implicit declaration of function 'qnorm_c' rma2.c: In function 'rma_c_complete': rma2.c:247: warning: implicit declaration of function 'rma_bg_correct' make: *** [rma2.o] Error 1 ERROR: compilation failed for package 'affy' Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1615456 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192015.n7JKF9XR011021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #11 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-19 16:15:07 EDT --- Damn stupid mistake... I forgot to use R-preprocessCore-devel in the BR. Corrected in : Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-affy.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-affy-1.22.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:16:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] New: Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Summary: Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_logger/vanessa_logger.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_logger/vanessa_logger-0.0.7-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Generic logging layer that may be used to log to one or more of syslog, an open file handle or a file name. Though due to limitations in the implementation of syslog opening multiple syslog loggers doesn't makes sense. Includes the ability to limit which messages will be logged based on priorities. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1615499 build done. P.S. In spec used 5 space tab width. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192021.n7JKLxXG029034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:21:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192021.n7JKLwR7029012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |518315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518316] New: Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 Summary: Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_adt/vanessa_adt.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_adt/vanessa_adt-0.0.7-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: Library of Abstract Data Types (ADTs) that may be useful. Includes queue, dynamic array and key value ADT. P.S. In spec used 5 space tab width. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518317] New: Review Request: perdition - Mail Retrieval Proxy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perdition - Mail Retrieval Proxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317 Summary: Review Request: perdition - Mail Retrieval Proxy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/perdition/perdition.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/perdition/perdition-1.17.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Perdition is a fully featured POP3 and IMAP4 proxy server. It is able to handle both SSL and non-SSL connections and redirect users to a real-server based on a database lookup. Perdition supports modular based database access. ODBC, MySQL, PostgreSQL, GDBM, POSIX Regular Expression and NIS modules ship with the distribution. The API for modules is open allowing arbitrary modules to be written to allow access to any data store. Perdition can be used to: Create large mail systems where a users mailbox may be stored on one of several hosts. Integrate different mail systems together. Migrate between different email infrastructure. And in firewall P.S. In spec used 5 space tab width. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192021.n7JKLcUs012618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518318 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518318] Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192022.n7JKMTGF012777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518317 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192022.n7JKMTnj012761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518317 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518317] Review Request: perdition - Mail Retrieval Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192022.n7JKMR3I012724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |518315, 518318, 518316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192022.n7JKMSHJ012745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518317 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518318] Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192021.n7JKLcgs012598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |518315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:21:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518318] New: Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 Summary: Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_socket/vanessa_socket.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_socket/vanessa_socket-0.0.7-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Library to simplify TCP/IP socket operations. Includes code to open a socket to a server as a client, to listen on socket for clients as a server and to pipe information between sockets. P.S. In spec used 5 space tab width. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192055.n7JKtMD4018951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-19 16:55:21 EDT --- Approved -- make sure to fix the changelog entry when importing into the repository -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192054.n7JKs9Jp002802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192053.n7JKrtGa002738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-19 16:53:52 EDT --- Review: ? rpmlint: source clean. binary has one warning: changelog incoherent anjal.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-0.3 ['0.1.0-0.4.20090813git2d4e6a0.fc12', '0.1.0-0.4.20090813git2d4e6a0'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: valid but bizarre (author does not trust FSF enough to use LGPLv2+ ?) ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK (Koji) ? build dependencies complete: OK (Koji) ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: OK ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? desktop file uses desktop-file-install: desktop-file-validate, OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK (Koji) ? package functioned as described: OK (tested on x86_64) ? scriplets are sane: OK ? require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 20:56:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192056.n7JKucfJ019265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 Andrew Zabolotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Andrew Zabolotny 2009-08-19 16:56:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: QtDMM Short Description: QtDMM is a DMM readout software including a configurable recorder. Owners: zap Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192100.n7JL03Ps004420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:00:01 EDT --- I have to agree with Christof here; the channel itself doesn't have any specific PHP version dependency, and it's foolish to try and track whatever might get added to the channel to somehow extract that information. Besides, no supported Fedora release has anything older than php 5.2.6, so the guidelines indicate that we shouldn't have a versioned dependency in any case. What troubles me is where you found an MIT license for the content in this package. I would tend to lean towards the one small XML file in this package being non-copyrightable data, but then the fedora-bookmarks just has a list of URLs and it carries the GFDL license, so I guess it's good that I'm not a lawyer. Doctrine itself is LGPLv2+. I guess I'll block FE-Legal for an opinion, but you could just clear this up if you just ask upstream for some indication of the license of the channel file. (Actually what really bothers me is that we have to be so anal about this, but that's the way it is.) In any case, this is the epitome of a trivial package. I'd approve it if the license issue were cleared up one way or the other. * source file matches upstream. sha256sum: 215215f50b339b89d72b15cfa0273728dd2ba397c7d300c51a785f8223f4cdbc channel.xml * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. ? license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints (no-documentation). * final provides and requires are sane: php-channel(pear.doctrine-project.com) php-channel-doctrine = 1.0.0-1.fc12 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pear php-cli php-pear(PEAR) * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (pear channel registration) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429483] Review Request: o3read - Standalone converter for OpenOffice.org documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192103.n7JL3jlW020657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429483 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:03:44 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192105.n7JL58iO021151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #59 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:05:07 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192105.n7JL5802021184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-19 17:05:07 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: anjal Short Description: An email client for small screen devices Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:04:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192104.n7JL4Lrh005154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:04:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpxviewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192108.n7JL85GY005924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:08:03 EDT --- I do not have the power to remove the old import. I've asked an admin to do it, and it should be gone soon. I've set up the new module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514634] Review Request: gpx-viewer - A simple gpx viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192108.n7JL8FDF021717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514634 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gpxviewer - |Review Request: gpx-viewer |A simple gpx viewer |- A simple gpx viewer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:10:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192110.n7JLAbMN022365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:10:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192114.n7JLER7T023159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:14:26 EDT --- You cannot request F-12 branches at this time. Otherwise, CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515090] Review Request: moblin-menus - Moblin config and data file for desktop menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192114.n7JLEVLj007080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515090 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192119.n7JLJ0aU024173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #31 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:18:58 EDT --- We cannot create F-12 branches at this time. Otherwise, CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:20:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517822] Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192120.n7JLKuX2008689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517822 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:20:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:26:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192126.n7JLQQti026030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #45 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:26:25 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:25:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517821] Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192125.n7JLPsVP025845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517821 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:25:53 EDT --- CVS done. You don't have to request a devel branch, you know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192138.n7JLcPoh011969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:38:24 EDT --- You have neglected to fill in the "short description:" field. I used "IPv6 mobility daemon" from the subject of this ticket. It helps speed things up if you could provide a complete CVS request. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192143.n7JLh8H4012967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:43:07 EDT --- The description should not contain the package name, so I removed "QtDMM is a". Otherwise, CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192140.n7JLeso6012733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:40:53 EDT --- I've asked for someone, anyone, to write up some minimal packaging guidelines so that the reviewers will have an idea of what these packages are supposed to look like. I doubt most reviewers are going to look at these package at all until we have something like that. We cannot create F-12 branches yet. Otherwise, CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:41:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:41:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192141.n7JLfMYX028418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:41:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192143.n7JLhb6L013096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-19 17:43:35 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 21:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192144.n7JLiak9013190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #16 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-19 17:44:35 EDT --- D'oh. Apologies and thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 23:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192320.n7JNKSJ5014968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #12 from D. Marlin 2009-08-19 19:20:27 EDT --- As far as I can tell, the only pending issues on this are: - The COPYING file in the source package is actually a symbolic link to /usr/share/automake-1.10/COPYING - the desktop file is not being properly installed (desktop-file-install) It also appears that the 'sed' command does not prevent configure from running in autogen.sh. Everything else looks good to me. Once these are resolved I can approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 23:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192329.n7JNThnM016520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-19 19:29:41 EDT --- imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 23:29:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192329.n7JNTo8Q016567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-19 19:29:49 EDT --- imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 23:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192340.n7JNe8Nf002921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-19 19:40:07 EDT --- liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 23:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908192339.n7JNdUns002451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-19 19:39:27 EDT --- liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 01:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508352] Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200147.n7K1lqbr006452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508352 --- Comment #16 from Ed Swierk 2009-08-19 21:47:49 EDT --- I'm on vacation for the next few weeks and hope to finish this when I return. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 03:35:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200335.n7K3ZU4g012452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-19 23:35:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ytnef Short Description: Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 04:22:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518360] New: Review Request: hyphen-as - Assamese hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-as - Assamese hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518360 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-as - Assamese hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hyphen-as.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hyphen-as-0.20090820-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Assamese hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 04:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514105] Review Request: courier-imap - The Courier IMAP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200428.n7K4SmDK022506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514105 --- Comment #10 from Aldrey Galindo 2009-08-20 00:28:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rafaelgomes.fedorapeople.org/courier-imap.spec SRPM URL: http://rafaelgomes.fedorapeople.org/courier-imap-4.5.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 04:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200435.n7K4ZquA007492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 --- Comment #3 from Jane Dogalt 2009-08-20 00:35:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > url is incorrect, should be > http://filteredperception.org/smiley/projects/zyx-rli/ url is now correct, I fixed the website :) -dmc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 05:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518365] New: Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518365 Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/jakarta-commons-configuration.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/jakarta-commons-configuration-1.4-6.fc12.src.rpm Description: Configuration is a project to provide a generic Configuration interface and allow the source of the values to vary. It provides easy typed access to single, as well as lists of configuration values based on a 'key'. Right now you can load properties from a simple properties file, a properties file in a jar, an XML file, JNDI settings, as well as use a mix different sources using a ConfigurationFactory and CompositeConfiguration. Custom configuration objects are very easy to create now by just subclassing AbstractConfiguration. This works similar to how AbstractList works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 05:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518365] Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200515.n7K5F00G013528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518365 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 01:14:59 EDT --- This is a full review request. The pre-review request was bug #500256. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 05:53:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518233] Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200553.n7K5rMKH021213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518233 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 01:53:21 EDT --- Should we do something else here because the package is already in cvs? Cvs was created and package imported from the Pre-Review bug. Maybe we should just build in rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 06:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200632.n7K6WaIF012690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 --- Comment #11 from Yang Yong 2009-08-20 02:32:34 EDT --- overholt, Added my changelog entry and removed the trailing tab character on line 6, please review again, thanks. SPEC URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/saxpath/saxpath.spec SRPM URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/saxpath/saxpath-1.0-1.5.fc12.src.rpm POM URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/saxpath/saxpath-1.0.pom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 06:58:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517822] Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200658.n7K6wqhJ000880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517822 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Parag 2009-08-20 02:58:51 EDT --- Built for all requested branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 06:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517821] Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200658.n7K6wliZ017038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517821 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Parag 2009-08-20 02:58:46 EDT --- Built for all requested branches with bn_BD support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 07:03:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518381] New: Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518381 Summary: Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/easymock.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/easymock-1.2-10.fc12.src.rpm Description: EasyMock provides Mock Objects for interfaces in JUnit tests by generating them on the fly using Java's proxy mechanism. Due to EasyMock's unique style of recording expectations, most refactorings will not affect the Mock Objects. So EasyMock is a perfect fit for Test-Driven Development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 07:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518381] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200705.n7K75BE1002191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518381 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 03:05:10 EDT --- This is a full review request. The pre-review request was bug #500257. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 07:05:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518381] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200705.n7K75clc018434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518381 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 07:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200751.n7K7pxkE012158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #12 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-20 03:51:58 EDT --- scratch build F11 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1616636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 09:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200901.n7K91iHa009937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-20 05:01:42 EDT --- David, Why did you set fedora.review+ ? It is not yet approved package. I have set fedora.review? back. I will review it this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 09:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512068] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200919.n7K9J6lW029988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512068 --- Comment #26 from Daniel Roesen 2009-08-20 05:19:03 EDT --- I do not have the details yet, but the update to 2.3.2-3 wiped out my CVSROOT completely. Just as a warning to other users... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 09:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908200949.n7K9npsF003824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-20 05:49:49 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - Don't mix '%{name}' and 'paperbox' in %files. Choose one and stick with it. - You can use longer lines in %description and fit it in 5 lines. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. NEEDSWORK - Drop --add-category="X-Fedora", it isn't used. MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 10:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201038.n7KAc3AW014305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(bos at serpentine.co | |m) --- Comment #1 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-20 06:38:02 EDT --- Oddly enough, i can't get the md5sums to match. The file sizes of what is shipped in the RPM is different than what i get from Hackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 10:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201043.n7KAhNq2015336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-20 06:43:21 EDT --- I'm getting the same checksum errors here. This is a bit odd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 10:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201050.n7KAoK58031930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-20 06:50:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-tar Short Description: Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell Owners: Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: fedora-haskell-list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 10:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517914] Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201055.n7KAtrRC000578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517914 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 06:55:51 EDT --- Formal review: OK; rpmlint gives only non-conffile-in-etc OK; The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: License bundled and marked as %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: Sources match upstream. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 11:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518381] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201118.n7KBIVQv021965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518381 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-20 07:18:29 EDT --- I am confused here. I can see this package built on koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128000 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 11:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518381] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201133.n7KBXWjg008459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518381 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 07:33:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I am confused here. I can see this package built on koji > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128000 It is build only in a special tag dist-f12-maven for bootstrapping purposes. And this bug is for the normal package review to get included in rawhide. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/Pre-review_Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 11:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock2- Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201135.n7KBZrPU009163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 07:35:52 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128038 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 11:41:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201141.n7KBfofH010494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 07:41:49 EDT --- A few issues: - rpmlint output: directory-naming.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Libraries/Java directory-naming.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/directory-naming-0.8/LICENSE.txt directory-naming.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/directory-naming FIXED except non-conffile-in-etc - javadoc issues for naming-factory: [javadoc] /notnfs/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/directory-naming-0.8/naming-factory/src/java/org/apache/naming/factory/BeanFactory.java:64: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: org.apache.naming.config.XmlConfigurator [javadoc] /notnfs/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/directory-naming-0.8/naming-factory/src/java/org/apache/naming/factory/MailSessionFactory.java:59: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: org.apache.naming.config.XmlConfigurator [javadoc] /notnfs/overholt/rpmbuild/BUILD/directory-naming-0.8/naming-factory/src/java/org/apache/naming/factory/SendMailFactory.java:81: warning - Tag @link: reference not found: org.apache.naming.config.XmlConfigurator FIXED. I don't see this warnings. - there's a minor (a date in a comment) difference between the source that I generate and the one in the SRPM I think this is acceptable. - I'd like to see a comment for the patch to the project files FIXED. Removed. It was for maven1 build which we do not support. - I removed the remaining sed lines for "setproxy" and the build was fine. I think they can be removed. FIXED. Removed. New sources: Spec: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming.spec Srpm: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming-0.8-6.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 11:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 07:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201156.n7KBuxpS013820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Stepan Kasal 2009-08-20 07:56:58 EDT --- Hello, (In reply to comment #4) > %configure --disable-static --disable-dependency-tracking > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > make %{?_smp_mflags} [...] > 2. %configure already contain CFLAGS. The explicit CFLAGS= is superflous. ... and misplaced; CFLAGS should be set *before* configure is called. (In reply to comment #6) > Yes, upstream doesn't package their package properly but ships a [..] > package, which doesn't comply to the autotools' working principles. Correct. Jan, please report that upstream. > If you want deterministic builts, you're better off running the autotools in > advance to building, generate patches and apply them during builds. ... and make sure that the timestamps of all the autotools generated files (no matter whether they chnaged or not) are in the correct order. Otherwise, the autotools rebuild rules are triggered. They do nothing in autotools-free buildroot, but do the rebuild otherwise; that can be confusing. But getting the timestamps right is often quite tricky. That's why I recommend calling autoreconf if the changes to autoconfigury are bigger. I would recommend it in this case as well. Moreover, the rule "do not run autotools" evolved in times when autotools were much less stable than these days, so the risk that things will break with an update was higher. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 12:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201202.n7KC2P3l000371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #9 from Christopher Pardy 2009-08-20 08:02:24 EDT --- I couldn't get your build log to display, but I think I've added enough build requires for all the python files. I moved the chcon and restorecon to %post, hopefully that works. Spec URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: system-config-selinux provides the graphical tools system-config-selinux and selinux-polgen for managing SELinux systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 12:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518219] Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201201.n7KC1cZL032567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518219 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 08:01:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - change the groups to make rpmlint quiet Fixed. > - md5sum of source doesn't match but contents do I can't do anything about this. > - you can remove the post{,un} requirements for javadoc Fixed. > - there are two sections to SimpleSmtpServer.java; I'd like to see the first > one go upstream or at least be discussed with upstream. I won't block on this. > I'll consider sending a patch. But project looks pretty much dead. Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/dumbster.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/dumbster-1.6-9.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 12:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201206.n7KC62aA018205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-20 08:06:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Hello, > > (In reply to comment #4) > > %configure --disable-static --disable-dependency-tracking > > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > > make %{?_smp_mflags} > [...] > > 2. %configure already contain CFLAGS. The explicit CFLAGS= is superflous. > > ... and misplaced; CFLAGS should be set *before* configure is called. Wrong. With modern autoconf (ca. 2.50) CFLAGS should be set after configure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 12:17:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:17:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201217.n7KCHO1D004206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 --- Comment #9 from Jan Safranek 2009-08-20 08:17:22 EDT --- CFLAGS are not in the .spec anymore, stay on topic please :). Regarding autoreconf... I think it's pretty stable and probability of broken builds is pretty low now, so I am going to stick to it as it is now. Of course, I'll report it upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 12:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] New: Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 Summary: Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: diegobz at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-filter/django-filter.spec SRPM URL: References: Message-ID: <200908201240.n7KCeZE6011755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 --- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-20 08:40:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > CFLAGS are not in the .spec anymore, stay on topic please :). > > Regarding autoreconf... I think it's pretty stable and probability of broken > builds is pretty low now, It's mere random luck. I guess, you also give a loaded gun to your children to play with? > so I am going to stick to it as it is now. Sufficent reason for me, to recommend other reviewers to not approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 12:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518441] New: Review Request: ike - Shrew Soft VPN Client For Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ike - Shrew Soft VPN Client For Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518441 Summary: Review Request: ike - Shrew Soft VPN Client For Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ike/ike.spec SRPM URL: http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ike/ike-2.1.5-0.1.rc2.fc11.src.rpm Description: This free IPSEC VPN client can be used to communicate with Open Source IPSEC VPN servers as well as some commercial IPSEC VPN servers. * Rpmlint is clean * Scratch build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617339 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 12:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201249.n7KCnWPi031894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #10 from Daniel Walsh 2009-08-20 08:49:31 EDT --- You should not need any restorecon in the post, rpm should handle this automatically. Also do not use chcon in a spec file. They will not survive a relabel. If you install and the labeling is wrong, then it needs to be fixed in the selinux-policy package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 12:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201251.n7KCpscr014934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |allisson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |allisson at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201307.n7KD77Jk004569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518446 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201307.n7KD728A004439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201307.n7KD7HDV004788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201307.n7KD7Dxu004675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201307.n7KD76V1004541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518446 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201306.n7KD6l6Z004328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-20 09:06:45 EDT --- Closed as its now in rawhide. Thanks spot! Will be adding very shortly the packages for the moblin panel that were split out of this package in the 0.34.0 release. They add functionality but the core UI is testable without them. I'll add them with a dep on this as a tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518449] New: Review Request: moblin-panel-people - Moblin Panel for People Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-people - Moblin Panel for People https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518449 Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-people - Moblin Panel for People Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 513452 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-people.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-people-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617424 Description: The Moblin mutter panel for managing and contacting people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518448] New: Review Request: moblin-panel-pasteboard - Moblin Panel for Paste Board Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-pasteboard - Moblin Panel for Paste Board https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518448 Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-pasteboard - Moblin Panel for Paste Board Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 513452 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-pasteboard.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-pasteboard-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617403 Description: The Moblin mutter panel for Paste Board. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518445] New: Review Request: moblin-panel-applications - Moblin Panel for launching Applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-applications - Moblin Panel for launching Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518445 Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-applications - Moblin Panel for launching Applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 513452 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-applications.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-applications-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617363 Description: The Moblin mutter panel for launching applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518446] New: Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446 Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 506825,513452 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-media.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-media-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: none at the moment due to dep on bickley. Built locally though. Description: The Moblin mutter panel for managing and playing media. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201307.n7KD7L4t019272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518450 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201307.n7KD79b9019201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518447 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518447] New: Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518447 Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 513452 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-myzone.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-myzone-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617385 Description: The Moblin mutter panel for MyZone. MyZone allows you to see that status of friends on social networks, chekck what you have on in your calendar, and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518450] New: Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518450 Summary: Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 513452 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-status.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-status-0.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617446 Description: The Moblin mutter panel for managing of social networks and your current status. This includes tweeting on twitter and updating of MySpace, FaceBook and you IM status. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:07:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201307.n7KD7wUi019465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-20 09:07:56 EDT --- #001 : ScriptletSnippets - Texinfo Please turn the spec file with respect to the Fedora packaging guidelines as stated on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo #002 : %prep instead of %build Move the following to the %prep section ------------- cd doc iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 openocd.info > openocd.info.conv mv -f openocd.info.conv openocd.info ------------- #003 : Improve future commit patches and logs Use the following style for the %configure : %configure \ --disable-werror \ --disable-static \ --enable-shared \ --enable-parport \ --enable-parport_ppdev \ --enable-ft2232_libftdi --enable-ep93xx \ --enable-at91rm9200 \ --enable-usbprog \ --enable-presto_libftdi \ --enable-jlink \ --enable-vsllink \ --enable-rlink \ --enable-dummy \ --enable-gw16012 \ --enable-amtjtagaccel \ --enable-arm-jtag-ew This is because, when openocd will be approved and everytime you will update it, you will have to commit the srpm to fedora cvs repositories. For each commit, a log message (a patch-like message) will automatically be sent to the fedora-cvs-commits mailing list, hence it would be nice that the updated item can be easily spotted in the logs. #004: Build requires: libftdi-devel already requires libusb-devel see $ rpm -qR libftdi-devel Remove libusb-devel from the buildrequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201309.n7KD97ga005803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-20 09:09:05 EDT --- and now pushed to rawhide. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201319.n7KDJoVN008223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-20 09:19:49 EDT --- [+] source files match upstream: [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. This is a noarch package. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617409 [+] package installs properly. [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] no scriptlets present. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:31:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201331.n7KDVeJR011665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-20 09:31:39 EDT --- Thank you, Allisson. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-filter Short Description: A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically Owners: diegobz Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: diegobz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201342.n7KDgM3F014278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #10 from Christof Damian 2009-08-20 09:42:20 EDT --- I have contacted the doctrine people via twitter, mailing list and IRC which hopefully will clear the license question up. Andrew pointed out in bug 517643 that Doctrine is a mix of LGPLv2+, MIT, and BSD. So, lets wait and see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:43:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201343.n7KDh0lx014548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #15 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-20 09:42:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Eric Sandeen wrote: > > * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. > > NEEDSWORK? - 4 errors still above. subsys-not-used should be easy to fix up, > > I looked at this and I'd rather not change it. > > It turned out not to be that easy to fix. The three PCP services > (pcp, pmie and pmproxy) all manage their own var/run/pcp/pid files. > This pre-dates the standard functionality for managing pid files and > is also multi-platform and also rock solid stable. I think we can live with that. > > * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > > license. > > > > NEEDSWORK? > > From COPYING: > > All the libraries in the Performance Co-Pilot (PCP) open source > > release are licensed under Version 2.1 of the GNU Lesser General > > Public License. > > > > All other components in the PCP open source release are licensed > > under Version 2 of the GNU General Public License. > > > > but the specfile says: > > License: GPL+ and LGPLv2+ > > The previous version tried to specify the license for the base package > and the two subpackages, which is wrong because -libs has a different > license. So I've now split this so each package specifies it's own license. > Changed the spec so the base package and -devel specify "GPLv2+" > (assuming "GPLv2+" is the best match for "GPLv2.1", as specified in COPYING > since there is no explicit option for "GPLv2.1"), and -libs is "LGPLv2" > (exactly matching what's in COPYING). "GPLv2+" is only for "GPLv2.anything or later", if it doesn't say "or later", then simply "GPLv2" is the tag you want. > > * MUST: Devel packages must require the base package using a fully > > versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > > > NEEDSWORK: Requires: pcp-libs = %{version} > > > > For whatever reason I guess we must require pcp, not pcp-libs. > > Nathan and I discussed this and we concluded the only True Dependencies are: > pcp-devel requires pcp-libs > pcp requires pcp-libs > > Neither pcp-devel nor pcp-libs actually requires pcp. There is a good > reason we don't want pcp-devel to require pcp - basically it has to do with > the pcp daemon on the build machine getting killed when pcp in the chroot > gets uninstalled, i.e. we want to be able to build packages (such as pcp-gui) > that BuildRequires pcp-devel *without* pcp installed (just pcp-devel and > pcp-libs should be installed). I think it might be cleanest/most obvious to users if the -devel package were renamed to pcp-libs-devel, since its really the devel headers for the libraries. Then we're even reasonably satisfying the guidelines, I'd argue. > > * SHOULD: Subpackages other than devel should require the base package > > using a fully versioned dependency. NO, but it seems ok > > Comment: if -libs and the base package require each other, then what's the > point > of splitting out -libs since they can never be installed separately? Welcome to multiarch. :) Splitting the libs out allows you to have pcp.x86_64, pcp-libs.x86_64 and pcp-libs.i686 all installed at the same time without any file conflicts (in theory). > So based on the above, I'm leaving the run-time and build-time dependencies > as they strictly need to be. If the final Fedora reviewer and/or sponsor insist > on additional dependencies, then I'll conform, reluctantly :) I don't think its necessary on this one, there's a reasonable reason not to. I presume this is the srpm I should be looking at now? ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp-3.0.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518233] Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201354.n7KDslTu030475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518233 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 09:54:46 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128061 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:51:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201351.n7KDpAS3029974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 09:51:08 EDT --- Other than the need to wrap the %changelog entries at <= 80 characters, this package is good to go. Let's fix the wrapping once it's in CVS. Approved. Thanks! Don't forget to follow this procedure to get it into CVS: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 13:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500254] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201354.n7KDsGJt017259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500254 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 09:54:15 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128061 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517914] Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201405.n7KE5g7o022186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517914 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 10:05:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aqute-bndlib Short Description: The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:07:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201407.n7KE7mM1001465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Chris Adams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Chris Adams 2009-08-20 10:07:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: shmpps Short Description: Shared Memory driver for PPS time signals Owners: cmadams Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:08:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201408.n7KE8i6c023045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 10:08:42 EDT --- CVS was already done from pre-review #500243. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:13:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517914] Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201413.n7KEDYum002727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517914 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 10:13:33 EDT --- Oops, I forgot that the pre-review had been passed and therefore there was already a CVS module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201414.n7KEE6lk002851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #2 from Colin Coe 2009-08-20 10:14:05 EDT --- Hi Stjepan Gros, and thanks for the review. My understanding is that it is OK to put the scripts in the spec file but I will put it in the source if I'm wrong. I've corrected to %preun and tidied up the rpmlint output. rpmlint /home/coec/rpmbuild/SRPMS/vmpsd-1.4.01-1.fc11.src.rpm /home/coec/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/vmpsd-1.4.01-1.fc11.i586.rpm vmpsd.spec vmpsd.i586: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/vmpsd 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I should have advised that I need a sponsor also. I've updated the spec and src.rpm. Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd-1.4.01-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201420.n7KEKiFw026267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 10:20:43 EDT --- In the near future, I'd like to see us move away from this package as it appears to be dead upstream. The summary and description could also use some work. Let's do something more like: Summary: Apache Directory Naming Component Description: Naming is a lightweight, in-memory JNDI service provider. To enable flexible deployment with limited dependencies, Naming is divided in 6 packages, each producing a separate jar artifact. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518219] Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201424.n7KEOaQ5005300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518219 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 10:24:35 EDT --- I no longer get the javadoc issue. Everything else looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518473] New: Review Request: odf-converter-integrator - Convert Office 2007 (OOXML) files for OpenOffice.or Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: odf-converter-integrator - Convert Office 2007 (OOXML) files for OpenOffice.or https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518473 Summary: Review Request: odf-converter-integrator - Convert Office 2007 (OOXML) files for OpenOffice.or Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: astokes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: References: Message-ID: <200908201439.n7KEdQ8A010859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 10:39:24 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128071 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201439.n7KEd5ji010789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 10:39:04 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128071 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:40:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518473] Review Request: odf-converter-integrator - Convert Office 2007 (OOXML) files for OpenOffice.or In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201440.n7KEejtq011532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518473 --- Comment #1 from Adam Stokes 2009-08-20 10:40:44 EDT --- Please note I also need EPEL branches created for at least 5 Thank you, Adam Stokes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:41:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518473] Review Request: odf-converter-integrator - Convert Office 2007 (OOXML) files for OpenOffice.or In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201441.n7KEf3Bt011697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518473 Adam Stokes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 14:58:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518310] Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201458.n7KEwFcI003934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518310 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 10:58:14 EDT --- Formal review: OK: rpmlint gives only no-conffile-in-etc for the maven pom. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: LICENSE.txt included as %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: Instructions for retrieving sources aded. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Javadoc subpackage. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. PK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. The package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201500.n7KF0Uou017536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 11:00:28 EDT --- ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201500.n7KF0YFN017577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.0.9-2.fc11 |1.4.0.9-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500931] Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201500.n7KF0fOd005176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500931 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 11:00:39 EDT --- emacs-verilog-mode-528-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500931] Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201500.n7KF0jgh017707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500931 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |528-1.el5 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:13:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] New: Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 Summary: Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: diegobz at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-sorting/django-sorting.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-sorting/django-sorting-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Django-sorting allows for easy sorting, and sorting links generation without modifying your views. ---- New dependency for the upcoming Transifex 0.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201518.n7KFIVKN021907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-20 11:18:29 EDT --- Well, - -3.fc12.src.rpm you posted does not seem to contain pkgconfig/Requires changes you posted on comment 5? - As I said in comment 2, adding "Requires: tokyocabinet" in tokyotyrant.pc{,in} is more correct than to add "-ltokyocabinet" to "Libs:" in case the directory where tokyocabinet header files are moved, like: ---------------------------------------------------- .... .... Name: Tokyo Tyrant Description: network interface of Tokyo Cabinet Version: 1.1.33 Requires: tokyocabinet Libs: -L${libdir} -ltokyotyrant Cflags: -I${includedir} --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518310] Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201523.n7KFNYHA011276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518310 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 11:23:33 EDT --- Built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617781 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518486] New: Review Request: eclipse-testframework - Eclipse Test Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-testframework - Eclipse Test Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518486 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-testframework - Eclipse Test Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-testframework.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-testframework-3.5.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Eclipse Test Framework. Used in conjunction with Eclipse JUnit tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201524.n7KFO1Xr011618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 11:23:59 EDT --- Built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617781 (Full review was bug #518310) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201527.n7KFRqbE025010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #16 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-20 11:27:51 EDT --- Okay, there's still some slightly alarming rpmlint spew... I understand the header files need to be in the main package, but what about all these c files? Particularly the ones under 'sample' and 'demo' sub-directories. These should go into somewhere like /usr/share/doc/pcp/{sample,demo}/, not into /usr/share/pcp or /var/lib/pcp. The .NeedRebuild touch and rm in the scriptlets is also... Not pretty. Files created by an rpm need to be owned by the rpm, even if they're temporary files. You could add an empty file to the rpm %files list itself, so the rpm lays it down and owns it, and there's technically no harm in the file being deleted from the system after this rebuild takes place. If the file continues to exist, an rpm -e will remove it, no need for the rm in the %postun scriptlet. Speaking of the scriptlets... Standard convention is to put them before the %files lists, not after. %files is generally the last thing before the %changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:29:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500247] Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201529.n7KFTCrc013286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500247 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 11:29:11 EDT --- Full review request: bug #518489. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518489] New: Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518489 Summary: Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-containers.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-containers-1.0-0.1.a34.7.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518486] Review Request: eclipse-testframework - Eclipse Test Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201531.n7KFVsKI025949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518486 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201536.n7KFa3SG015629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |allisson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |allisson at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518486] Review Request: eclipse-testframework - Eclipse Test Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201538.n7KFcO6G016142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518486 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 11:38:22 EDT --- OK naming, licensing OK files OK macros OK clean, sections ? can we get a better URL ? should it depend upon eclipse >= 3.5? ? do we need to symlink to the JUnit bundles in the installation? X please version the tarball and its contents X we need an R3_5 tag passed to the fetch script. otherwise, ... OK source (md5sum doesn't match, but contents do) X rpmlint is not clean: $ rpmlint eclipse-testframework-3.5.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test.source_3.5.0.200908201130 0775 eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test.source_3.5.0.200908201130/src/org.eclipse.test.performance_3.5.0.200908201130 0775 eclipse-testframework.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/eclipse-testframework-3.5.0/license.html eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test.source_3.5.0.200908201130/META-INF 0775 eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test_3.2.0/META-INF 0775 eclipse-testframework.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.easymock_2.4.0.v20090202-0900.jar ../../../../../java/easymock2.jar eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.test_3.5.0.200908201130 0775 eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test.source_3.5.0.200908201130/src 0775 eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test_3.2.0 0775 eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test.source_3.5.0.200908201130/src/org.eclipse.test_3.2.0 0775 eclipse-testframework.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/eclipse-testframework-3.5.0/epl-v10.html 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:40:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518381] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201540.n7KFe2PX027716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518381 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518381] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201548.n7KFmJ7B030343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518381 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 11:48:18 EDT --- OK license OK tarball instructions (md5sums of .gz don't match due to timestamps but contents match) OK (not really) naming - should be easymock1 and easymock2 should be easymock; I've opened bug #518495 to fix this after this maven update push is finished OK files OK requires Approved. Note: I'd like to see us re-build this package with maven once maven is updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518365] Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201548.n7KFmelB019166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518365 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201553.n7KFr769031497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 Allisson Azevedo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-20 11:53:06 EDT --- [+] source files match upstream: [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. This is a noarch package. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617869 [+] package installs properly. [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] no scriptlets present. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. Please modify URL and Source to use macros before import to CVS: URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/%{name} Source: http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/d/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 15:59:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518365] Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201559.n7KFxT87032558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518365 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 11:59:28 EDT --- OK naming OK version OK licensing OK requires OK source (md5sums match) OK files OK macros OK changelog OK sections (rm at beginning of install, clean present) X Fix description: add an "of" between "mix" and "different" X get rid of post{,un} requires for javadoc X use %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' instead of dos2unix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 16:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201607.n7KG7UAE023898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 Diego B?rigo Zacar?o changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Diego B?rigo Zacar?o 2009-08-20 12:07:29 EDT --- OK, changes required done! Thanks :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-sorting Short Description: A Django application for easy sorting Owners: diegobz Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: diegobz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 16:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201643.n7KGh882032727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-20 12:43:07 EDT --- REVIEW: - rpmlint is not silent (I added numbering for the sake of simplicity); [petro at Sulaco ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/ppc/3proxy-* 1. 3proxy.ppc: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/3proxy.cfg 2. 3proxy.ppc: E: script-without-shebang /etc/3proxy.cfg 3. 3proxy.ppc: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/3proxy 4. 3proxy.ppc: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/3proxy 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. [petro at Sulaco ~]$ 1st and 2nd warnings should be fixed - just use 644 as a parameter for "install" utility (seems that this is a typo) when you're installing 3proxy.cfg ( %{SOURCE2} ) 3rd may be omitted, but it's a generally good idea to provide add-on for logrotate in such cases. 4th should be fixed - just replace "# chkconfig: 2345 02 98" with "# chkconfig: - 02 98" (note the dash sign instead of 2345). + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec . + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual licenses. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum 3proxy-0.6.tgz* fbeec42136598afb7eab212c925501b27855b07281142b2f1bbc97c14c204fde 3proxy-0.6.tgz fbeec42136598afb7eab212c925501b27855b07281142b2f1bbc97c14c204fde 3proxy-0.6.tgz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ - All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617957 Missing BR dos2unix. Please, try to build in koji before submitting Review Requests. +/- Assuming, that you added dos2unix as a BR, the package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1617973 + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - Permissions on files must be set properly. See my notes, regarding rpmlint messages. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please, address issues noted below, and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 16:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518489] Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201646.n7KGkwd4001210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518489 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 12:46:57 EDT --- Formal review: OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. Rpmlint gives the following warnings: plexus-containers.noarch: W: no-documentation plexus-containers.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-containers plexus-containers-component-annotations.noarch: W: no-documentation plexus-containers-container-default.noarch: W: no-documentation It would be good if we can fix them but it's not a blocker. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: Instructions for fetching OK: The package MUST successfully compile OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] OK: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 16:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201647.n7KGlggB011989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #30 from Karel Voln? 2009-08-20 12:47:37 EDT --- soooo ... (In reply to comment #29) > http://wiki.navit-project.org/index.php/OpenStreetMaps ok, this led me to downloading http://maps.navit-project.org/api/map/?bbox=-12.963867187500007,33.59619140625,34.1455078125,72.09228515625 > You should either add the appropriate configuration elements to > /etc/navit/navit.xml, so I did - I modified the template so it reads: ... needless to say that the file exists and is world readable after starting navit, I still got the sample map, and the "Data" menu entry is empty > You may have to remove or comment > out the section for the sample map set, also. ok, so let's try to disable it: wov, now I can see the rest of the Europe, if I zoom out the map ... but still, the "Data" menu entry is empty ... OK, I'll go RTFM further ;-) > Also note that the > default configuration assumes you have a GPS device active, and gpsd > running. not a good default, IMO ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 16:50:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201650.n7KGo4AH001892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 16:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201649.n7KGnbm2001541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #11 from Christof Damian 2009-08-20 12:49:36 EDT --- I got a response from jwage on twitter and he said it is LGPL. So here are the new files: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-channel-doctrine.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-channel-doctrine-1.0.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 16:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201656.n7KGu6KX003316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #31 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-20 12:56:04 EDT --- I'm not sure I've ever seen anything in the Data menu. I'm not entirely sure what it's for :) The default may actually be different these days, I wrote the README for the Mandriva package back at version 0.1.0. I think it may not default to GPS mode any more, I'll have to check. Still, it would make a degree of sense, because it's specifically designed as a _navigation_ app, and that's not much use without GPS functionality. If you just want to look at maps there's better ways :) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:09:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201709.n7KH949Y016730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 13:09:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > In the near future, I'd like to see us move away from this package as it > appears to be dead upstream. The summary and description could also use some > work. Let's do something more like: Apache Directory project is pretty live project but this is just too old version. Latest release is from yesterday :). > > Summary: Apache Directory Naming Component > Description: Naming is a lightweight, in-memory JNDI service provider. To > enable flexible deployment with limited dependencies, Naming is divided in 6 > packages, each producing a separate jar artifact. Fixed. New sources: Spec: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming.spec Srpm: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming-0.8-7.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201714.n7KHE7sJ017733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 13:14:05 EDT --- Looks good; APPROVED. I'll unblock FE-Legal. By the way, your web server sends .spec files as application/octet-stream, so they can't be viewed in the browser. A bit inconvenient, that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201714.n7KHE9U5007001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 13:14:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > In the near future, I'd like to see us move away from this package as it > > appears to be dead upstream. The summary and description could also use some > > work. Let's do something more like: > Apache Directory project is pretty live project but this is just too old > version. > Latest release is from yesterday :). You're correct. I did mean the old component. > New sources: > Spec: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming.spec > Srpm: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/directory-naming-0.8-7.fc12.src.rpm Thanks. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518489] Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201719.n7KHJhnA018865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518489 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 13:19:41 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1618018 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:20:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500247] Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201720.n7KHK5H5019227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500247 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 13:20:04 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1618018 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201721.n7KHLvQS008941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 13:21:55 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128103 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518219] Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201722.n7KHMQVA020007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518219 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 13:22:25 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128103 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201727.n7KHRwmE010645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 13:27:55 EDT --- xine-ui-0.99.5-15.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509609] Review Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201727.n7KHRo3g010594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509609 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5-2.fc11 |1.5-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509609] Review Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201727.n7KHRkcu021494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509609 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 13:27:44 EDT --- mediawiki-rss-1.5-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201728.n7KHS2EF021554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.99.5-11.fc10 |0.99.5-15.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201733.n7KHXuIj011848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 13:33:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:39:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201739.n7KHd8Eu024047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 13:39:07 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517914] Review Request: aqute-bndlib - The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201739.n7KHdP6M024165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517914 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 13:39:24 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128069 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201736.n7KHa8iT023540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 13:36:06 EDT --- Owners: is blank in the above CVS request, we cannot create F-12 branches yes, and there seems to be no FAS ID "fedora-haskell-list". Please resubmit a corrected CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500245] Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201739.n7KHd7a6023982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500245 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 13:39:06 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128069 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201739.n7KHdgGe013028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 13:39:40 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:40:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201740.n7KHeMBl013602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 13:40:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:43:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:43:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518205] Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201743.n7KHhhfx025355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518205 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 13:43:42 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128106 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201743.n7KHhMJs025209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 13:43:21 EDT --- Build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128106 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201746.n7KHkpt6026407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Christof Damian 2009-08-20 13:46:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-channel-doctrine Short Description: Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR Owners: cdamian Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518365] Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201754.n7KHsi7I016631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518365 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 13:54:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > OK naming > OK version > OK licensing > OK requires > OK source (md5sums match) > OK files > OK macros > OK changelog > OK sections (rm at beginning of install, clean present) > > X Fix description: add an "of" between "mix" and "different" Fixed. > X get rid of post{,un} requires for javadoc Fixed. > X use %{__sed} -i 's/\r//' instead of dos2unix Fixed New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/jakarta-commons-configuration.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/jakarta-commons-configuration-1.4-7.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 17:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201758.n7KHwGt5028677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 13:58:14 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518365] Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201803.n7KI3T9h018790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518365 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 14:03:28 EDT --- Thanks. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201808.n7KI8O0w019809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-20 14:08:23 EDT --- Updated SRPM now uploaded. Sorry for the inconvenience! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201806.n7KI6UUb019634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bos at serpentine.co | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-20 14:06:28 EDT --- Updated SRPM now at the above URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:13:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201813.n7KID3oa020856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-20 14:13:02 EDT --- Some notes: * Unneeded macros - %ruby_sitelib does not seem to be used. * define -> global - Now Fedora recommends to use %global instead of %define for some reasons: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Build_Architecture_and_File_Placement * License - README says facade is under "Artistic 2.0" * About Source0 - For gem files, please consider to use http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem because with this URL you won't have to change "61520". * Requires/BuildRequires - Please refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gems ! Some Requires are missing. - For BuildRequire'ing gem module, using virtual dependency is preferred to using the actual rpm name, ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides i.e. use "BuildRequires: rubygem(rake)" instead of "BuildRequires: rubygem-rake" - "Requires: ruby >= 1.8.2" is not needed (but please check the wiki page above) * %setup, %build - Please write %setup, %build macro (even if they are empty) * Macros usage should be consistent - Use macros consistently. If you want to use %mkdir_p, please use %rm for consistency - As you defines %geminstdir, please use the macro in %files * Directory ownership issue - Some directories are not owned by this package properly, and some directories which should not be owned by this package are actually owned by this package. Please read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories and make it sure that all directories which are newly created during the install of this package are correctly owned by this package. * Test - As this package installs some files into under %geminstdir/test/, please create %check stage and execute some test programs in the stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201815.n7KIFMBE032449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-20 14:15:22 EDT --- On more thing * BuildArch - Looks like this package should be noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201816.n7KIGqHD021713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-20 14:16:50 EDT --- Please refer to my comments on bug 518082 and uploade the new srpm again. (note that please change the release number of the spec file every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201822.n7KIMsmr023104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:22:53 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shmpps-1.03-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201822.n7KIMg7J023043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:22:41 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shmpps-1.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:22:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201822.n7KIMmBu001468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:22:47 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shmpps-1.03-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201830.n7KIUJXN025009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:30:19 EDT --- django-filter-0.5.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-filter-0.5.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201830.n7KIU5Ar024852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:29:40 EDT --- django-filter-0.5.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-filter-0.5.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201830.n7KIUEOj024976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:30:13 EDT --- django-filter-0.5.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-filter-0.5.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201848.n7KImveQ006366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:48:57 EDT --- django-sorting-0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-sorting-0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201849.n7KIn2Bh006405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:49:01 EDT --- django-sorting-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-sorting-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201848.n7KImrW0028455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:48:52 EDT --- django-sorting-0.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-sorting-0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201854.n7KIsN3k029577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Sean Middleditch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sean at middleditch. | |us) | --- Comment #4 from Sean Middleditch 2009-08-20 14:54:21 EDT --- Sorry guys, I was moving cross-country (Ann Arbor MI to Redmond WA) and then apartment hunting for the last two weeks. Still settling in -- I won't have Internet access at home with my Fedora machines until this weekend, thanks to Comcast's waiting queue this time of year. I'll upload the actual SRPM as soon as Comcast gets me online. Sorry about that goofup. :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:56:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201856.n7KIu4g7008440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #16 from Chris Adams 2009-08-20 14:56:03 EDT --- Packages submitted to updates. Thanks everybody! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 19:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201922.n7KJMSRB003942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #60 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-20 15:22:26 EDT --- I need a little help building the EL5 version. I was able to build the Fedora packages without any problems. My guess is that the problem occurred because I built the SRPM on a CentOS5.3 system, as a result the packages did not include the distro in the label. I tried to do a mock rebuild but I clearly don't know what I'm doing with mock. Here is what I tried, mock -r epel-5-x86_64 --rebuild sys_basher-1.1.23-1.fc11.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 0.9.16 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(sys_basher-1.1.23-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(epel-5-x86_64) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 0.9.16 INFO: Mock Version: 0.9.16 INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum ERROR: Exception(sys_basher-1.1.23-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(epel-5-x86_64) 0 minutes 7 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/epel-5-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/epel-5-x86_64/root/ install buildsys-build Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have: Current : Thu Aug 20 10:48:52 2009 Downloaded: Wed Jun 24 19:08:12 2009 ******************************************************************************* koji e-mail Package: sys_basher-1.1.23-1.el5 Tag: dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate Status: failed Built by: bjrosen ID: 128117 Started: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:03:44 UTC Finished: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:06:02 UTC sys_basher-1.1.23-1.el5 (128117) failed on ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com (noarch), ppc7.fedora.phx.redhat.com (ppc): BuildError: error building package (arch ppc), mock exited with status 10; see root.log for more information SRPMS: sys_basher-1.1.23-1.el5.src.rpm Failed tasks: ------------- Task 1618329 on ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com Task Type: build (dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate, /cvs/pkgs:rpms/sys_basher/EL-5:sys_basher-1_1_23-1_el5) Task 1618333 on ppc7.fedora.phx.redhat.com Task Type: buildArch (sys_basher-1.1.23-1.el5.src.rpm, ppc) logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1618333&name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1618333&name=root.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1618333&name=state.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 19:22:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201922.n7KJMUZU013937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-20 15:22:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > REVIEW: > > - rpmlint is not silent (I added numbering for the sake of simplicity); > > [petro at Sulaco ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/ppc/3proxy-* > 1. 3proxy.ppc: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/3proxy.cfg > 2. 3proxy.ppc: E: script-without-shebang /etc/3proxy.cfg > 3. 3proxy.ppc: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/3proxy > 4. 3proxy.ppc: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/3proxy > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. > [petro at Sulaco ~]$ > > 1st and 2nd warnings should be fixed - just use 644 as a parameter for > "install" utility (seems that this is a typo) Yes, this is typo. I've replace config at end of packaging :) > 3rd may be omitted, but it's a generally good idea to provide add-on for > logrotate in such cases. According to http://3proxy.ru/0.6/Release.notes.txt (see chapter 3) log rotation possibility included in main functionality. > 4th should be fixed - just replace "# chkconfig: 2345 02 98" with "# chkconfig: > - 02 98" (note the dash sign instead of 2345). Fixed. > Missing BR dos2unix. Please, try to build in koji before submitting Review > Requests. Sorry. BR dos2unix added. > + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual licenses. Not exact :) So, you dont answer on my first question - how I should pint license LGPL >= 2.1 (not 2.0)?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 19:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201930.n7KJUvRs005882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-20 15:30:56 EDT --- I think LGPLv2+ is fine. However, to be really sure, I'm raising FE-LEGAL here. Please, update your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 19:41:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201941.n7KJfU0V007936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-20 15:41:29 EDT --- Sorry, off course: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/3proxy/3proxy-0.6-3.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/3proxy/3proxy.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 19:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201950.n7KJo3sQ019428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-20 15:50:02 EDT --- Ok, let's wait for the reaction from Fedora-Legal. BTW, I proposing anoother one small cosmetic change - these lines no longer needed: mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 19:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518365] Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201951.n7KJpBKR009874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518365 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 15:51:10 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128120 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 19:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500256] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201951.n7KJpYiW019753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 15:51:33 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128120 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 19:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908201955.n7KJtnra020667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-20 15:55:48 EDT --- It was intended be (small mistake): mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_initrddir} But you are right, when install used with -p flag it explicit creation is not needed anymore. I delete it. If you does not require - I'll not do new build now because only this changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 19:57:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] New: Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 Summary: Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xblas.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xblas-1.0.248-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The XBLAS library of routines is part of a reference implementation for the Dense and Banded Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines, along with their Extended and Mixed Precision versions, as documented in Chapters 2 and 4 of the new BLAS Standard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202011.n7KKBIDY013529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-20 16:11:17 EDT --- Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1618494 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:13:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202013.n7KKD8Dt013702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #4 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-20 16:13:08 EDT --- New package and spec file uploaded to my webserver. Please take another look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:13:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202013.n7KKDNds013739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 --- Comment #2 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-20 16:13:22 EDT --- New package and spec file uploaded to my webserver. Please take another look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518381] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202011.n7KKBQxT024173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518381 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 16:11:25 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128152 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500257] Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202010.n7KKAv9n023804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 16:10:55 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128152 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:15:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202015.n7KKF3Ef014205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #61 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-20 16:15:02 EDT --- As you can see from the koji root.log, the error is DEBUG util.py:256: No Package Found for lm_sensors-devel This is probably a package that is only in Client RHEL (and on ppc only Server is available), so you need to put in a %if 0%{?rhel} > 0 ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 %endif (or instead of ExclusiveArch put ExcludeArch: ppc). ** To build the srpm in mock for EPEL the srpm must have MD5 checksums instead of SHA1 that Fedora 11 uses. Add %_source_filedigest_algorithm 0 %_binary_filedigest_algorithm 0 to ~/.rpmmacros of the user you build the srpms as. (Or, you can probably also disable the checking of the checksums but I don't remember out of the blue how to do that.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] New: Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 Summary: Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: awilliam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libva.spec SRPM URL: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libva-0.30.4.1.sds3-1.aw_fc12.src.rpm Description: libva contains a library and tools relating to the VAAPI video playback acceleration specification. At present the only really working implementations of VAAPI support on the video driver side are in two proprietary drivers (VIA's own driver for its Chrome chipsets, and the infamous Intel Poulsbo driver), but there's a borderline-functional implementation of MPEG-2 acceleration for mainline Intel chipsets in the package, and more free implementations are definitely planned for the future, so this isn't like VDPAU, and the Packaging Committee meeting which discussed VDPAU was firmly in favour of allowing libva in. This package is the patched version of libva maintained by Gwenole Beauchesne of Splitted Desktop Systems, at http://www.splitted-desktop.com/~gbeauchesne/libva/ . Upstream libva is slated to include his changes from version 0.50 onwards. Some already seem to be merged, but not all, and building current upstream git doesn't give a libva that works with Poulsbo, so I'd prefer to go with Gwenole's patched version for now. I've got a spec on file for the upstream version too, so it'll be easy to switch when appropriate. Upstream libva lives at http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/vaapi , just for reference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504050] Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202025.n7KKPDd8027204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504050 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513320] Review Request: boxbackup - A fast, secure and automatic online backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202029.n7KKTGZu016866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320 --- Comment #2 from Stewart Adam 2009-08-20 16:29:15 EDT --- Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed this and I'm doing a scratch build now, if it succeeds I will post updated links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:29:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202029.n7KKTC6j016845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 16:29:11 EDT --- mipv6-daemon-0.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mipv6-daemon-0.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202031.n7KKVuxn028421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202039.n7KKdIUm029843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamatos at fc.up.pt --- Comment #2 from Jos? Matos 2009-08-20 16:39:17 EDT --- Just curious, why the call to autoconf at the end of the prep section? After a general analysis of the spec it looks like it was taken from a schoolbook. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202043.n7KKhARD019722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-20 16:43:09 EDT --- Because the patch for shared support applies to configure.ac, rather than configure, I need to rerun autoconf. As to the schoolbook nature of the spec, that's a good thing, right? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202049.n7KKnCRb031910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202046.n7KKkPn7031616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:48:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202048.n7KKmw2B031862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 --- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn 2009-08-20 16:48:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maloc Short Description: Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs Owners: timfenn Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202049.n7KKntZK020835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #39 from Tim Fenn 2009-08-20 16:49:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: apbs Short Description: adaptive poisson boltzmann solver Owners: timfenn Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:51:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202051.n7KKpk6Y032599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 --- Comment #4 from Jos? Matos 2009-08-20 16:51:45 EDT --- Yes, I noticed that after reading the documentation. Sorry. :-) Being an assistant professor I can say that the schoolbook nature of the spec is a bonus. :-) Expect a full review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202054.n7KKsoDY000956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.0-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202056.n7KKuRYW023076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 16:56:27 EDT --- liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202054.n7KKsinU022155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 16:54:43 EDT --- liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202056.n7KKuW2U023116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.0-2.fc11 |0.3.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202056.n7KKungj023165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 16:56:49 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update colossus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8783 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 20:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202056.n7KKuhH7002059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 16:56:42 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update colossus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8782 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202101.n7KL1otc025168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.7.1-4.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202104.n7KL48qp004971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 17:04:08 EDT --- cxxtest-3.10.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:03:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202103.n7KL38rb004771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 17:03:07 EDT --- cxxtest-3.10.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202101.n7KL1iaR004400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 17:01:40 EDT --- emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:03:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:03:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202103.n7KL3DKk004809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.10.1-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202102.n7KL28wh004525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 17:02:07 EDT --- rubygem-fattr-1.0.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-fattr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202102.n7KL24dF004488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-20 17:02:03 EDT --- == Review == Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv3) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (feeaff2f9078bf86ad52a5b15cafbb528cf90e8e) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file OK Nice package, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202104.n7KL4DLu025828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.10.1-3.fc11 |3.10.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202105.n7KL5XEc026586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-20 17:05:32 EDT --- Quick note: Unless you are branching this for EPEL, you don't need to define the buildroot or remove it in %install section anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202111.n7KLBKMF027668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 17:11:18 EDT --- Full review request (not just a pre-review): bug #518550. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:09:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518550] New: Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518550 Summary: Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-cli-1.2-7.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202132.n7KLWpFM031609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #13 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-20 17:32:50 EDT --- Andrew please continue the process as described on this page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Check_out_the_module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202131.n7KLVO7q010362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #27 from Simon Wesp 2009-08-20 17:31:21 EDT --- Okay, I got the trick... weekend froscon, then continue vacation in france for a couple of weeks... http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2955/fife.spec http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2955/fife-2009.0-0.14.r2955svn.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202133.n7KLXxSW031809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |praveen_paladugu at dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502596] Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202137.n7KLbCGh032485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |praveen_paladugu at dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202139.n7KLdOxC011513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 --- Comment #1 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-20 17:39:24 EDT --- Hey Vitezslav, The link for the SRPM is not working. Could you please check? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202147.n7KLl8cT001798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #28 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-20 17:47:07 EDT --- Mamoru can you review the package please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202147.n7KLladf013176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u-t | |okyo.ac.jp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248067] Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202157.n7KLvG2Q003736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 17:57:14 EDT --- After another month, I'm going ahead and closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 21:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 361701] Review Request: konserve - System tray application that performs periodic backups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202159.n7KLxE4a015339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361701 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(mmaslano at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 17:59:10 EDT --- It's been many months now with no response; I'm closing this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 22:02:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202202.n7KM2FnM016153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jos? Matos 2009-08-20 18:02:14 EDT --- Review: The source package is the same as upstream. The license is correct (BSD) and appropriate for Fedora. This is even more appropriate in the case since the copyright comes from Berkeley. :-) The package build in the supported Fedora architectures. (see #2) Build on F11 and rawhide. The package follows the packaging guidelines. The package is _approved_. PS: One small detail, I noticed that you have placed README.devel in the devel sub-package, after reading it I am not sure how useful the file is. I think that the content is useless for any developer, but I leave to you the final decision. The README file on the other hand is really helpful and in a sense it belongs more to devel than to the main package. If you think that I am being pedantic in the last argument (README) then I agree with you and you are free to ignore me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 22:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202210.n7KMAMum017623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 18:10:19 EDT --- I took a look at the package from comment #9. Unfortunately it failed to build in rawhide: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I. -I./inc -g -O2 -MT lanplus.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/lanplus.Tpo" -c -o lanplus.o lanplus.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/lanplus.Tpo" ".deps/lanplus.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/lanplus.Tpo"; exit 1; fi lanplus.c:70:26: error: openssl/rand.h: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [lanplus.o] Error 1 Perhaps a missing build dependency? A scratch build with a full log is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1618755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 22:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202214.n7KMEDpc006598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 18:14:11 EDT --- Any chance of being caught up soon? Should this ticket stay open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 22:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202219.n7KMJLYJ007617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 22:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202227.n7KMRwHL020751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #62 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-20 18:27:57 EDT --- I added ExcludeArch: ppc, that fixed it. I don't have access to any IBM servers so there is no way for me to test sys_basher on that architecture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 23:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202307.n7KN7b1c016500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #63 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-20 19:07:36 EDT --- I pushed the F10, F11 and EL5 packages to testing but the F12 package gave me the following error, sys_basher-1.1.23-2.fc12 not tagged as an update candidate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 23:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202309.n7KN9meW028140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #64 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 19:09:47 EDT --- You don't need to issue update requests for rawhide; as long as we are not in a freeze, it will appear with the next compose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 23:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202309.n7KN9cdN028109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 Suresh Siddha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |suresh.b.siddha at intel.com --- Comment #18 from Suresh Siddha 2009-08-20 19:09:37 EDT --- I tried the src rpm included in comment #16 on my FC11 x86_64 system. It worked fine with one small change though. I had to move the installed libaraies from /usr/lib/pidgin/ to /usr/lib64/pidgin to make it work. I built with: # ./configure --prefix=/usr # make install We have to fix the installation paths for x86_64 and other 64bit archs too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 23:15:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202315.n7KNF3O4017703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 19:15:01 EDT --- sugar-record-64-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-record-64-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 23:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202315.n7KNF82h017738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 19:15:07 EDT --- sugar-record-64-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-record-64-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 23:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202318.n7KNIwAh029622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 19:18:57 EDT --- ytnef-2.6-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ytnef-2.6-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 23:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202319.n7KNJ3oW018196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 19:19:02 EDT --- ytnef-2.6-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ytnef-2.6-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 23:20:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513320] Review Request: boxbackup - A fast, secure and automatic online backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202320.n7KNK27O018586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320 --- Comment #3 from Stewart Adam 2009-08-20 19:20:01 EDT --- Alright, build dependencies fixed. I also disabled the test bench as it requires a large amount of system resources as well as a specific firewall configuration (see comment in SPEC). SPEC: http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/boxbackup.spec SRPM: http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SRPMS/boxbackup-0.11-0.3.rc2.20090721svn.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1618669 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 23:28:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202328.n7KNSUTK019848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #65 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-20 19:28:29 EDT --- What's the criteria for moving from testing to stable? I figured I'd make an announcement about the testing package in comp.os.linux.hardware and on the Fedora forums, wait a couple of weeks to see if I get any feedback, and then push it to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 23:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908202348.n7KNmLMf001680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2009-08-20 19:48:20 EDT --- I haven't had time, sorry. This should probably be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 01:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210102.n7L12gAb002766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pj.pandit at yahoo.c | |o.in) --- Comment #43 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-20 21:02:37 EDT --- Hi pjp. you're shipping cbd [1] inside djbdns, I have ported cdb to gnu-autotools and make it as shared library, what you think about linking in it and removing cbd code inside of djbdns ? 1 - http://cr.yp.to/cdb/install.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 01:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210103.n7L13M05013906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(pj.pandit at yahoo.c | |o.in) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 01:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210133.n7L1XrPh019954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-20 21:33:52 EDT --- Yaakov, it's "haskell-sig". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 01:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210140.n7L1eeMZ010264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-20 21:40:37 EDT --- Zach, are you going to update the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 01:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518574] New: Review Request: compat-libgee01 - GObject collection library (v0.1.5) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgee01 - GObject collection library (v0.1.5) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518574 Summary: Review Request: compat-libgee01 - GObject collection library (v0.1.5) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/compat-libgee01.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/compat-libgee01-0.1.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a slight modification of the libgee package, renamed and made parallel-installable. Needed to support some applications (currently rygel) that strictly depends on libgee 0.1.5, since the header files change considerably in 0.1.6 and later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 02:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518445] Review Request: moblin-panel-applications - Moblin Panel for launching Applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210211.n7L2Bjdf016098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518445 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-20 22:11:43 EDT --- ReviewTemplate MUST ? rpmlint: OK ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK (md5sum = 62783ff603f2fc215d7748a0793ed736) ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK (Koji) ? build dependencies complete: OK (Koji) ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: OK ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK (Koji) ? package functioned as described: Unknown There is currently a bug with mutter-moblin: Window manager warning: Log level 16: Could not load library [/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so (/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)] Window manager warning: Log level 8: failed to load plugins and then mutter --mutter-plugins=moblin-netbook --replace terminates, returning me to my normal gnome-shell setup. If moblin-netbook.so.3400 is symlinked to moblin-netbook.so, I get further: Window manager warning: Log level 16: Could not load library [/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so (/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so: undefined symbol: meta_window_is_modal)] Window manager warning: Log level 8: failed to load plugins Window manager warning: Log level 8: meta_screen_tab_popup_destroy: assertion `screen->tab_handler != NULL' failed but apart from a barebone mutter, and my app windows, nothing else is displayed (no moblin-panel-applications) ? scriplets are sane: OK ? require package not files: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 02:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210236.n7L2avoK021517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 --- Comment #7 from Silas Sewell 2009-08-20 22:36:56 EDT --- OK, think I finally got it. diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/detail?r=315 srpm: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/tokyotyrant-1.1.33-4.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint [silas at fox rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 03:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517462] Review Request: voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu - Chinese voice data from gcin project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210353.n7L3rsTi014006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517462 --- Comment #1 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-08-20 23:53:53 EDT --- New Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu.spec New SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu-20090221-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 04:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210415.n7L4FWCe017802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #19 from Stefan Becker 2009-08-21 00:15:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I tried the src rpm included in comment #16 on my FC11 x86_64 system. It worked > fine with one small change though. I had to move the installed libaraies from > /usr/lib/pidgin/ to /usr/lib64/pidgin to make it work. I just tried to build an RPM from pidgin-sipe-1.6.1 and git HEAD with the RPM SPEC file from git HEAD. In both generated RPMs the library ends up in the correct place: $ rpm -qlp RPMS/x86_64/pidgin-sipe-1.6.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm /usr/lib64/pidgin/libsipe.so ... Either the SPEC needs to be updated or you didn't build it correctly by hand. Here is the configure command line from my git HEAD build for you to compare: running ./configure --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --datadir=/usr/share --libdir=/usr/lib64 --with-krb5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 04:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210419.n7L4J22c007892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #6 from Colin Coe 2009-08-21 00:19:00 EDT --- koji build --scratch dist-f11 ../SRPMS/editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:08 295.27 KiB 36.46 KiB/sec Created task: 1619542 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1619542 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1619542 build (dist-f11, editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm): free 1619542 build (dist-f11, editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm): free -> open (ppc9.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619543 buildArch (editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm, noarch): open (ppc3.fedora.redhat.com) 1619543 buildArch (editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm, noarch): open (ppc3.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1619542 build (dist-f11, editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm): open (ppc9.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1619542 build (dist-f11, editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 04:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210420.n7L4KVEg008483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #3 from Colin Coe 2009-08-21 00:20:30 EDT --- koji build --scratch dist-f11 ../SRPMS/RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:09 382.60 KiB 39.93 KiB/sec Created task: 1619497 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1619497 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1619497 build (dist-f11, RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm): free 1619497 build (dist-f11, RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm): free -> open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619498 buildArch (RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619498 buildArch (RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1619497 build (dist-f11, RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm): open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1619497 build (dist-f11, RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 04:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210419.n7L4JqSn007976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #3 from Colin Coe 2009-08-21 00:19:50 EDT --- koji build --scratch dist-f11 ../SRPMS/vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:06 195.38 KiB 29.98 KiB/sec Created task: 1619537 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1619537 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1619537 build (dist-f11, vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm): open (ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619541 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, i586): open (x86-1.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619538 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) 1619540 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619539 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619541 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, i586): open (x86-1.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 4 open 1 done 0 failed 1619539 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 3 open 2 done 0 failed 1619540 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 2 open 3 done 0 failed 1619538 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 4 done 0 failed 1619537 build (dist-f11, vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm): open (ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed 1619537 build (dist-f11, vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 04:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210446.n7L4kk5L012623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-21 00:46:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zyx-liveinstaller Short Description: Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 05:50:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210550.n7L5oUBh023868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #17 from Mark Goodwin 2009-08-21 01:50:29 EDT --- Jarod, thanks - I think I've addressed most of your questions, apart from the C source files, which I'll get to early next week if not sooner. Comments below. In Comment #15 from Jarod Wilson wrote: > "GPLv2+" is only for "GPLv2.anything or later", if it doesn't say "or later", > then simply "GPLv2" is the tag you want. Thanks for the clarification, fixed. > I think it might be cleanest/most obvious to users if the -devel package were > renamed to pcp-libs-devel, since its really the devel headers for the > libraries. Then we're even reasonably satisfying the guidelines, I'd argue. done. consulted the PCP community and they agree, good suggestion. > >> > > * SHOULD: Subpackages other than devel should require the base package > >> > > using a fully versioned dependency. NO, but it seems ok > > > > > > Comment: if -libs and the base package require each other, then what's the > > > point > > > of splitting out -libs since they can never be installed separately? > > Welcome to multiarch. :) Splitting the libs out allows you to have pcp.x86_64, > pcp-libs.x86_64 and pcp-libs.i686 all installed at the same time without any > file conflicts (in theory). ah ok, that's a good reason then :) > > > So based on the above, I'm leaving the run-time and build-time dependencies > > > as they strictly need to be. If the final Fedora reviewer and/or sponsor insist > > > on additional dependencies, then I'll conform, reluctantly :) > > I don't think its necessary on this one, there's a reasonable reason not to. > I presume this is the srpm I should be looking at now? > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp-3.0.0-3.fc10.src.rpm yes and I see you found it. The new version will be pcp-3.0.0-4.fc10 after the changes in this update. In Comment #16 from Jarod Wilson wrote: > Okay, there's still some slightly alarming rpmlint spew... I understand the > header files need to be in the main package, but what about all these c files? > Particularly the ones under 'sample' and 'demo' sub-directories. These should The /usr/share/pcp/demos directory can easily enough be moved to /usr/share/doc/pcp-*/demos so I'll do that (haven't in this update though because I need to investigate the QA fall-out). > ... go into somewhere like /usr/share/doc/pcp/{sample,demo}/, not into > /usr/share/pcp or /var/lib/pcp. I'll investigate simply not installing the source for the 'simple', 'trivial' and 'sample' agents at all. This source was shipped back in the days when PCP was proprietary; nowdays of course it's all readily available anyway :) > The .NeedRebuild touch and rm in the scriptlets is also... Not pretty. Files > created by an rpm need to be owned by the rpm, even if they're temporary files. > You could add an empty file to the rpm %files list itself, so the rpm lays it > down and owns it, and there's technically no harm in the file being deleted > from the system after this rebuild takes place. OK, I've added .NeedRebuild as an install target in src/pmns/GNUmakefile (since other platforms need it too, so just touching it during %install in the spec would be sub-optimal), and added an entry in %files for it. > If the file continues to exist, > an rpm -e will remove it, no need for the rm in the %postun scriptlet. ok fine, removed. > Speaking of the scriptlets... Standard convention is to put them before the > %files lists, not after. %files is generally the last thing before the > %changelog. ok, fixed. New srpm, spec and *.tgz uploaded to ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3 and pushed the changes up to git://oss.sgi.com/markgw/pcp/pcp.git dev (see the git log in that tree for commits) Thanks -- Mark Goodwin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 06:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210602.n7L62tSx003413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 pjp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pj.pandit at yahoo.c | |o.in), | |needinfo?(pj.pandit at yahoo.c | |o.in) | --- Comment #44 from pjp 2009-08-21 02:02:52 EDT --- Hey, hello Itamar, (In reply to comment #43) > you're shipping cbd [1] inside djbdns, I have ported cdb to gnu-autotools and > make it as shared library, what you think about linking in it and removing cbd > code inside of djbdns? Sure, that sounds reasonable. Nonetheless as I see, it won't be fast or easy change to do. Plus linking with external library means having a dependency on that package. So if you don't mind, I would like to be sure about few things, - does your shared library works on all operating systems, both 32/64 bit Linux/*BSD/Solaris etc. and all innumerable dirstributions of each? If not, I suggest *please* aim for that. - Is it packaged for any distribution? And does it have enough *useful* documentation for each API you provide. - Are you up for maintaining and supporting the library as long as it is in use? For it should not happen that I remove the code from djbdns source, start using the library and then one day you stop maintaining the library and then I'll be stuck somewhere nowhere. Besides that I'll need your help to do the actual transition. Thanks so much. PS: can I have a look at the library source? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 07:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] New: Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 Summary: Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gdata-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gdata-sharp-1.4.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Google Data APIs (GData) provide a simple protocol for reading and writing data on the web. (needed to build some GNOME Do plugins) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 07:28:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 03:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210728.n7L7SZp3019200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #66 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-21 03:28:32 EDT --- In Fedora, there is no criteria, it's up to the maintainer, although it is recommended to keep the package in testing for a couple of weeks to see if it picks up any karma from testers. In EPEL it *must* spend the two weeks in testing (or pick up enough karma), unless it is a security update or a critical bug fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 08:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210849.n7L8nRL9026702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 --- Comment #8 from David Woodhouse 2009-08-21 04:49:24 EDT --- Oh, I forgot to upload the package after making the fixes I was asked for. Sorry. Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/kernel-firmware.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/kernel-firmware-20090319-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 09:03:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226078] Merge Review: libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210903.n7L93Qg4008054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226078 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 09:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509159] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_PragmARC_=E2=80=93_a_comp?= =?utf-8?q?onent_library_for_Ada?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210903.n7L93cFj008120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 Bug 509159 depends on bug 507247, which changed state. Bug 507247 Summary: Gnat is compiled without support for libraries. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507247 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 09:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210924.n7L9Oh1s013108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-21 05:24:41 EDT --- Whoops. Set fedora-cvs- instead of fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 09:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226159] Merge Review: mozplugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210927.n7L9RV18014007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226159 --- Comment #7 from Ngo Than 2009-08-21 05:27:29 EDT --- >rpmlint output: >mozplugger.src:14: E: buildprereq-use libX11-devel >mozplugger.src:15: E: buildprereq-use libXt-devel What is problem here? Both BuildRequires are required! the rest is fixed in 1.12.1-6. Sorry for delayed respond -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 09:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518550] Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210933.n7L9XkmK015481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518550 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-21 05:33:45 EDT --- Review comments: OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. plexus-cli.noarch: W: no-documentation - Nice to fix but there is nothing suitable in the tar plexus-cli.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-cli OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX-418 for upstream clarifications. OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK:: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] This package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 09:39:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210939.n7L9d2qo016592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-21 05:39:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-tar Short Description: Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell Owners: ynemoy, petersen, bos Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 09:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210939.n7L9dh7u016730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-21 05:39:42 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1619853 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f9ca4403d02ecbe819a5f69fe4afcc0ab141398e Devel-LeakGuard-Object-0.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=60, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.03 sys + 0.28 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.37 CPU) + Package perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object-0.06-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Devel::LeakGuard::Object) = 0.06 perl(Devel::LeakGuard::Object::State) = 0.06 Requires: perl >= 0:5.008 perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Devel::LeakGuard::Object) perl(Devel::LeakGuard::Object::State) perl(Devel::Peek) perl(List::Util) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) license should be "GPLv2+ or artistic" as per LICENSE file APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 09:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517021] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210943.n7L9h7iK006455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-21 05:43:05 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1619858 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 124663099e555e4449844450dc5cbe5f3a291a3f DBIx-Simple-1.32.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=6, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.01 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.33 CPU) + Package perl-DBIx-Simple-1.32-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(DBIx::Simple) perl(DBIx::Simple::DeadObject) perl(DBIx::Simple::Dummy) perl(DBIx::Simple::Result) perl(DBIx::Simple::Statement) Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(DBI) perl(strict) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 09:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517021] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210953.n7L9rjFd019677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-08-21 05:53:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-Simple Short Description: Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI Owners: mmaslano InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 09:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908210958.n7L9w2dU009370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 10:00:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211000.n7LA02oG021155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-08-21 06:00:01 EDT --- I think you are wrong, libva upstream is here: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/vaapi The work of "Gwenole Beauchesne" is beeing merged in the freedesktop upstream project. I'm currently in vacation, so I cannot help with this until next week, but currently packaging libva seems prematured. (actually I cannot test any native implementation since I don't own such hardware). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 10:01:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226159] Merge Review: mozplugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211001.n7LA1dpT010399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226159 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-21 06:01:38 EDT --- BuildPreReqs are not used, use BuildRequires instead. But I see you had already changed that in the past 5 months, so that's OK. ** The patches don't have comments, please add them. ** The Obsoletes: plugger can probably be removed, since this package is 6 years old and we only support upgrades from F(N-1) -> F(N). That takes care of mozplugger.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes plugger mozplugger.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided plugger ** Did you fix the permissions on the header files as well? I suggest simply using find . \( -name *.h -o -name *.c \) -exec chmod 644 {} \; to get them all fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 10:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211009.n7LA9VfH022932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #32 from Karel Voln? 2009-08-21 06:09:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > The default may actually be different these days, I wrote the README for the > Mandriva package back at version 0.1.0. I think it may not default to GPS mode > any more, I'll have to check. it spits out some error messages about not being able to communicate with gpsd, so it seems yes, it assumes that there should be GPS device > Still, it would make a degree of sense, because > it's specifically designed as a _navigation_ app, and that's not much use > without GPS functionality. If you just want to look at maps there's better ways > :) well, route planning and review (that can be done before catching GPS signal) is quite important part of the navigation, and while navit does not seem to do this part well (yet?), what other better ways are there in Fedora? - you don't mean Firefox & http://maps.google.com, do you? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 10:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226159] Merge Review: mozplugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211018.n7LAIkK9024796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226159 --- Comment #9 from Ngo Than 2009-08-21 06:18:45 EDT --- >The patches don't have comments, please add them. it's fixed in mozplugger-1_12_1-7_fc12 >The Obsoletes: plugger can probably be removed, since this package is 6 years >old and we only support upgrades from F(N-1) -> F(N). That takes care of it's fixed in mozplugger-1_12_1-7_fc12 >Did you fix the permissions on the header files as well? I suggest simply >using find . \( -name *.h -o -name *.c \) -exec chmod 644 {} \; >to get them all fixed. it's fixed in mozplugger-1_12_1-7_fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 10:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:25:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211025.n7LAPQon015600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-21 06:25:25 EDT --- David, don't set fedora-cvs to '+'. The cvs admins should do that after creating the module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 10:44:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503598] Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211044.n7LAii6o029721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 10:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462296] Review Request: testgen4web-runner - Perl module to replay files recorded with TestGen4Web In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211058.n7LAwNXR032528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462296 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-08-21 06:58:22 EDT --- Ping, cvs request? Or is it something blocking this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:00:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505293] Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211100.n7LB0Kbc022233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505293 Daniel Mach changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226159] Merge Review: mozplugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211105.n7LB5d1F001531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226159 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-21 07:05:38 EDT --- I still get mozplugger.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mozpluggerrc mozplugger.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mozplugger-1.12.1/README 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fix at least the latter warning. Otherwise, this package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503598] Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211106.n7LB6GIH001810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-21 07:06:14 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/sphinxbase-* rpmbuild/SPECS/sphinxbase.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/sphinxbase-0.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm sphinxbase-libs.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libsphinxbase.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 sphinxbase-libs.i586: W: no-documentation sphinxbase-python.i586: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license OK: License text included OK: The spec file must be written in American English OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source sha256sum sphinxbase-0.4.1.tar.bz2 rpmbuild/SOURCES/sphinxbase-0.4.1.tar.bz2 d86cc8e874118ec736aaebbc377d252bd0f5c39c4c1278e4bf334d5426b22d0f sphinxbase-0.4.1.tar.bz2 d86cc8e874118ec736aaebbc377d252bd0f5c39c4c1278e4bf334d5426b22d0f rpmbuild/SOURCES/sphinxbase-0.4.1.tar.bz2 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1620017 N\A: ExcludeArch OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires N\A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly OK: Must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N\A: If the package is designed to be relocatable OK: A package must own all directories that it creates OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once OK: Permissions on files must be set properly OK: Each package must have a %clean section OK: Each package must consistently use macros OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK: Header files must be in a -devel package N\A: Static libraries must be in a -static package OK: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package OK: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package Requires the libs package OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (sphinxbase) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211116.n7LBGsnk025497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226159] Merge Review: mozplugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211127.n7LBRnjt006073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226159 --- Comment #11 from Ngo Than 2009-08-21 07:27:48 EDT --- >I still get >mozplugger.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mozpluggerrc >mozplugger.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/mozplugger-1.12.1/README it's fixed now in CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211129.n7LBTVT1006246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 07:29:24 EDT --- eclipse-anyedit-2.2.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-anyedit-2.2.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211130.n7LBURBl006633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-21 07:30:26 EDT --- Initial issues, * The description - This is not accurate as it gives the impression that this will only be used on embedded and handheld devices, yet the home page states it works equally well on a desktop which is where most fedora users will possibly encounter it. * .desktop file - Needs a %{name}.desktop file http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.desktop_file_creation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:34:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211134.n7LBY3C2007080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-21 07:34:02 EDT --- Strange - I hadn't noticed that LICENSE file contains the text of GPLv2. But there's also a little chunk at the head of LICENSE explaining the terms of Perl itself (i.e. GPL+ or Artistic) and the license in the code itself (Object.pm and State.pm) is also "same terms as Perl itself". I believe that means it really is only "GPL+ or Artistic" and that the GPLv2 license text is for information only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211136.n7LBagDe007836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-21 07:36:41 EDT --- Another issue. * Non Standard Group - Applications/Speech, am sure you can safely use Applications/Multimedia instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518634] Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211148.n7LBmLMZ031841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518634 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-21 07:48:20 EDT --- This is a full review request. The pre-review request was bug #500249. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518634] New: Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518634 Summary: Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-digest.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-digest-1.0-8.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518634] Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211148.n7LBmZTX009791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518634 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 11:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211146.n7LBkcRm009586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-21 07:46:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object Short Description: Scoped checks for object leaks Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518636] New: Review Request: django-reversion - Django extension that provides version control capabilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-reversion - Django extension that provides version control capabilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518636 Summary: Review Request: django-reversion - Django extension that provides version control capabilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: luca.botti at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-reversion.spec SRPM URL: http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-reversion-1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Reversion is an extension to the Django web framework that provides comprehensive version control facilities. Features: * Roll back to any point in a model's history - an unlimited undo facility! * Recover deleted models - never lose data again! * Admin integration for maximum usability. * Group related changes into revisions that can be rolled back in a single transaction. * Automatically save a new version whenever your model changes using Django's flexible signalling framework. * Automate your revision management with easy-to-use middleware. Reversion can be easily added to your existing Django project with a minimum of code changes. See http://code.google.com/p/django-reversion/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:07:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518637] New: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp - C++ variant of Perl's XS language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp - C++ variant of Perl's XS language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518637 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp - C++ variant of Perl's XS language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: skasal at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kasal.fedorapeople.org/pac_rev/perl-ExtUtils-XSpp.spec SRPM URL: http://kasal.fedorapeople.org/pac_rev/perl-ExtUtils-0.04-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1620165 %description ExtUtils::XSpp handles the XS++ language, used to create an extension interface between Perl and C++ code/library. This package is a build require for the patest version of perl-Padre. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455622] Review Request: scriptaculous-js - JavaScript libraries for web user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211214.n7LCEx3d014690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 Satya Komaragiri changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skomarag at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-21 08:14:57 EDT --- Unofficial review rpmlint output: $ rpmlint scriptaculous-js-1.8.1-1.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SPECS/scriptaculous-js.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint scriptaculous-js-1.8.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint scriptaculous-js-tests-1.8.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm scriptaculous-js-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Warning can be ignored ------- Builds successfully on Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1619781 ------- $ rpm -i scriptaculous-js-1.8.1-1.src.rpm warning: user dmalcolm does not exist - using root warning: group dmalcolm does not exist - using root warning: user dmalcolm does not exist - using root warning: group dmalcolm does not exist - using root warning: user dmalcolm does not exist - using root warning: group dmalcolm does not exist - using root $ du -sh scriptaculous-js-1.8.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 92K scriptaculous-js-1.8.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm $ du -sh scriptaculous-js-tests-1.8.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 84K scriptaculous-js-tests-1.8.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm -------- list: [x] Rpmlink output pasted above. [x] Naming guidelines are followed. [x] Spec file from spec link matches spec in srpm. [x] License checked. [x] The package meets the packaging guidelines. [x] The license file is included in %doc. [x] The spec file is written in American English. [x] The spec file for the package is legible. [x] The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source. [x] The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms. [x] A package owns all directories that it creates. [x] No file is listed more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains only permissible content. [x] Files listed in %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. [x] Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [x] At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] All file names in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. (The point from the MUST list of review guidelines that are left out here do not apply in this case.) --------- [x] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x] The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x] Subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. (The point from the SHOULD list of review guidelines that are left out here do not apply in this case.) -------- x: OKay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518636] Review Request: django-reversion - Django extension that provides version control capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211214.n7LCERb5004416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518636 Luca Botti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211219.n7LCJi0U015625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #4 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-21 08:19:42 EDT --- Did another review at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455622] Review Request: scriptaculous-js - JavaScript libraries for web user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211216.n7LCGqda015339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 --- Comment #4 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-21 08:16:52 EDT --- > [x] Rpmlink output pasted above. Oops, please read that as rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518486] Review Request: eclipse-testframework - Eclipse Test Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211220.n7LCKRx9016059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518486 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-21 08:20:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > OK naming, licensing > OK files > OK macros > OK clean, sections > ? can we get a better URL I can't find any better URL > ? should it depend upon eclipse >= 3.5? Yes, fixed. > ? do we need to symlink to the JUnit bundles in the installation? They will be resolved from the eclipse-jdt (added as requires). > X please version the tarball and its contents Done > X we need an R3_5 tag passed to the fetch script. otherwise, ... Done > OK source (md5sum doesn't match, but contents do) > > X rpmlint is not clean: > > $ rpmlint eclipse-testframework-3.5.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test.source_3.5.0.200908201130 > 0775 > eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test.source_3.5.0.200908201130/src/org.eclipse.test.performance_3.5.0.200908201130 > 0775 > eclipse-testframework.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/eclipse-testframework-3.5.0/license.html > eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test.source_3.5.0.200908201130/META-INF > 0775 > eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test_3.2.0/META-INF > 0775 > eclipse-testframework.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.easymock_2.4.0.v20090202-0900.jar > ../../../../../java/easymock2.jar > eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.test_3.5.0.200908201130 > 0775 > eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test.source_3.5.0.200908201130/src > 0775 > eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test_3.2.0 > 0775 > eclipse-testframework.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm > /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/testframework/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.test.source_3.5.0.200908201130/src/org.eclipse.test_3.2.0 > 0775 > eclipse-testframework.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/eclipse-testframework-3.5.0/epl-v10.html > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 3 warnings. Done. I wasn't seeing all the errors you listed. But the only rpmlint warning i see is dangling-relative-symlink which is normal. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-testframework.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-testframework-3.5.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518637] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp - C++ variant of Perl's XS language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211223.n7LCNZI8006125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518637 --- Comment #1 from Stepan Kasal 2009-08-21 08:23:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > This package is a build require for the patest version of perl-Padre. a correction: it's a build requirement for latest perl-Wx, 0.92. Sorry for the mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518550] Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211224.n7LCOvHW016852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518550 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 08:24:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-cli Short Description: Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus Owners: overholt Branches: InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:29:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:29:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518486] Review Request: eclipse-testframework - Eclipse Test Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211229.n7LCTPvi017888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518486 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 08:29:24 EDT --- Thanks for the fixes. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516281] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211226.n7LCQ9X1017454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516281 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emmanuel.seyman at club-intern | |et.fr --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-21 08:26:08 EDT --- This requires at least perl(Test::More) to be added to the BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211227.n7LCR6JZ017653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #20 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-08-21 08:27:05 EDT --- Suresh: I think you did something wrong. On my machine, everything is installed in the correct places: icon at rakta:[~]$ rpm -ql pidgin-sipe | grep libsipe.so /usr/lib64/pidgin/libsipe.so This package was built using koji. See: icon at rakta:[~]$ rpm -qi pidgin-sipe Name : pidgin-sipe Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 1.6.0 Vendor: Fedora Project Release : 2.fc11 Build Date: Fri 31 Jul 2009 01:39:46 PM EDT Install Date: Fri 31 Jul 2009 01:46:11 PM EDT Build Host: x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com Group : Applications/Internet Source RPM: pidgin-sipe-1.6.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Size : 258570 License: GPLv2+ Signature : (none) Packager : Fedora Project URL : http://sipe.sourceforge.net/ Summary : Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server Description : Provides an Open Implementation of SIP/Simple protocol for connecting Pidgin to Live Communications Server 2003/2005 and Office Communications Server 2007. Since Koji is building it correctly, I don't think there are any issues with the .spec file -- maybe something is wrong with your build environment? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518486] Review Request: eclipse-testframework - Eclipse Test Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211240.n7LCeTbP009861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518486 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-21 08:40:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-testframework Short Description: Eclipse Test Framework Owners: akurtakov overholt Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518445] Review Request: moblin-panel-applications - Moblin Panel for launching Applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211257.n7LCv3cA013435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518445 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-21 08:57:02 EDT --- > There is currently a bug with mutter-moblin: > > Window manager warning: Log level 16: Could not load library > [/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so > (/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so: cannot open shared object file: > No such file or directory)] > Window manager warning: Log level 8: failed to load plugins > > and then mutter --mutter-plugins=moblin-netbook --replace terminates, returning > me to my normal gnome-shell setup. > > If moblin-netbook.so.3400 is symlinked to moblin-netbook.so, I get further: > > Window manager warning: Log level 16: Could not load library > [/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so > (/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so: undefined symbol: > meta_window_is_modal)] > Window manager warning: Log level 8: failed to load plugins > Window manager warning: Log level 8: meta_screen_tab_popup_destroy: assertion > `screen->tab_handler != NULL' failed > > but apart from a barebone mutter, and my app windows, nothing else is displayed > (no moblin-panel-applications) Yes. I noticed a few issues that I need to dig into further. Out of interest 32 or 64 bit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518634] Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211253.n7LCrfG1012627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518634 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 08:53:40 EDT --- X please make lines 126 and 144 <= 80 characters X please remove "ghost symlink" comment since it's no longer true X the license appears to be exclusively ASL 2.0; remove " and Plexus" OK sources match what I download OK rpmlint output acceptable: plexus-digest.noarch: W: no-documentation plexus-digest.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-digest Ok naming, versioning OK files OK requires OK builds OK macros OK rm -rf at beginning of %install and %clean present -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518445] Review Request: moblin-panel-applications - Moblin Panel for launching Applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211258.n7LCwDw2023922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518445 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-21 08:58:12 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-panel-applications Short Description: Moblin Panel for launching Applications Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518634] Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211258.n7LCwgLb024006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518634 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-21 08:58:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > X please make lines 126 and 144 <= 80 characters Fixed > X please remove "ghost symlink" comment since it's no longer true Fixed. > X the license appears to be exclusively ASL 2.0; remove " and Plexus" Fixed. > > OK sources match what I download > OK rpmlint output acceptable: > plexus-digest.noarch: W: no-documentation > plexus-digest.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-digest > Ok naming, versioning > OK files > OK requires > OK builds > OK macros > OK rm -rf at beginning of %install and %clean present New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-digest.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-digest-1.0-8.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518634] Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211259.n7LCxuY3013900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518634 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 08:59:56 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 12:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518634] Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211258.n7LCwxFM013760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518634 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-21 08:58:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > X please make lines 126 and 144 <= 80 characters Fixed > X please remove "ghost symlink" comment since it's no longer true Fixed. > X the license appears to be exclusively ASL 2.0; remove " and Plexus" Fixed. > > OK sources match what I download > OK rpmlint output acceptable: > plexus-digest.noarch: W: no-documentation > plexus-digest.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-digest > Ok naming, versioning > OK files > OK requires > OK builds > OK macros > OK rm -rf at beginning of %install and %clean present New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-digest.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-digest-1.0-9.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 13:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518634] Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211302.n7LD27n4024941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518634 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-21 09:02:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-digest Short Description: Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components Owners: akurtakov overholt Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 13:03:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211303.n7LD3nYa014884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #14 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-21 09:03:47 EDT --- This is not a formal review. I miss the basic knowledge of how aranym works. Nonetheless, I hope this will help in getting aranym approved. OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistent macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. GPLv2+ - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English SEE BELOW - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 8a9fd404c8d72b1a2a23ea866d322132 aranym-0.9.8beta.tar.gz 8a9fd404c8d72b1a2a23ea866d322132 aranym-0.9.8beta.tar.gz.orig NA - Package needs ExcludeArch SEE BELOW - BuildRequires correct NA - Spec handles locales/find_lang NA - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. SEE BELOW - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. NA - Doc subpackage needed/used. - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. NA - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. NA - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun NA - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig NA - .so files in -devel subpackage. NA - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA - .la files are removed. SEE BELOW - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. Fedora 11/i386 OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. SEE BELOW - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane SHOULD Items: SEE BELOW - Should build in mock. SEE BELOW - Should build on all supported archs - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. NA - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. The layout of the SPEC file, although formally correct, isn't very readable. Please move the BuildRequires and Requires at the bottom of Header Information, just after the BuildRoot. Even better, please do follow the layout of the SPEC template Fedora uses: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Writing_a_package_from_scratch It is very handy to have one BuildRequires/Requires entry per line. Thus when diff'ing cvs revisions, it is very clear what have been added/removed. 2. Rename Patch to Patch0 3. Patch0 should patch configure too and not only configure.ac thus making autoreconf no longer needed. Autoreconf shouldn't be used in the %prep or %build sections of a package's spec file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/AutoConf 4. You require autoreconf but you don't have autoconf among the BR. This is wrong and it implies the package cannot be built using mock. But please solve this issue getting rid of autoreconf as stated above. 5. Submit Patch1 upstream: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment 6. Remove #Suggests: afros Make a file named README.Fedora and place it among the docs: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#summary State there that aranym needs afros to be useful and where to find it. Debian does something like this, if you need inspiration for the text: http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/debianonly/view/aranym/0.9.8beta-1 7. Ignoring verifying the file mode because aratapif needs to be setuid root manually by the user is wrong: %verify(not mode) %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/aratapif Install it with setuid root _and_ check that SELinux won't complain about it. If it complains at runtime, try to solve the issue. Do not delegate this to the final user. 8. The %{_docdir}/aranym directory is not the one where Fedora users expect to find the documentation in. It should be %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}. You include INSTALL and you must not. I have some doubts about changelog too: it is too detailed to be useful to the final user, it points to the source code a lot and there is already a more readable NEWS file. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation You could remove %{_docdir}/aranym in %build and specify the doc files in %files. 9. Try to build aranym as the following sniplet does. It is much more readable and you shouldn't get rpmlint warnings. # JIT only works on i586 %ifarch %ix86 %configure --enable-jit-compiler make %{?_smp_mflags} mv aranym aranym-jit make clean %endif %configure --enable-addressing=direct --enable-fullmmu --enable-lilo make %{?_smp_mflags} mv aranym aranym-mmu make clean %configure --enable-addressing=direct make %{?_smp_mflags} BTW, why do you disable the (default) native debugger? If it is really needed, consider adding a comment. 10. Preserve time stamps with "touch -r" in the loop you are doing to fix char encoding. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps 11. Please add a semicolon at the end of the "Categories" key, in the desktop file. Report this problem upstream. desktop-file-install --dir=/home/fedora/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/aranym-0.9.8-0.2.beta.fc11.i386/usr/share/applications contrib/aranym.desktop contrib/aranym.desktop: key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character, fixing 12. These icons will not be used by desktop file because their names are not correct: /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/icon-32.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/icon-48.png Files must be named "aranym.png" according to the desktop file. 13. You must also install desktop files for aranym-mmu and aranym-jit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files 14. Do not use %define: %define pre beta Use %global: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define 15. As I said I don't really know how aranym works and I saw that there are some executables and documentation in usr/share/aranym/. Why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 13:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518647] New: Review Request: django-robots - django extension to manage correctly robots.txt Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-robots - django extension to manage correctly robots.txt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518647 Summary: Review Request: django-robots - django extension to manage correctly robots.txt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: luca.botti at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-robots.spec SRPM URL: http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-robots-0.6.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm Description: A Django app for managing robots.txt files following the robots exclusion protocol Need Sponsorship -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 13:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518647] Review Request: django-robots - django extension to manage correctly robots.txt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211335.n7LDZrMN023013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518647 Luca Botti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim at niemueller.de Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 13:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211339.n7LDdFPP023877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 09:39:14 EDT --- Full review request (including updated licensing): bug #518650. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 13:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518650] Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Mail Sender In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211339.n7LDdnvq023957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518650 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 09:39:48 EDT --- This is a full review request. Old pre-review request: bug #500252. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 13:38:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518650] New: Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Mail Sender Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Mail Sender https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518650 Summary: Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Mail Sender Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-mail-sender.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-mail-sender-1.0-0.a2.9.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. This Plexus component provides SMTP transport. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 13:43:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211343.n7LDhuAJ001580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #14 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 09:43:54 EDT --- Spot: updated SRPM with patch to clarify licensing on the one file: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-mail-sender-1.0-0.a2.9.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 13:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211356.n7LDuQ9i028386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-21 09:56:24 EDT --- Thanks. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 14:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211411.n7LEBtBS010156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-21 10:11:54 EDT --- Package Change Request ======================= Package Name: espresso-ab Short Description: A boolean minimization tool Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh New Branches: EL-5 [Successful espresso-ab build for dist-5E-epel http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1621387] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 14:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211444.n7LEiC5u018172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #13 from Andy Cress 2009-08-21 10:44:09 EDT --- It does depend upon openssl-devel, and that should be checked. I'll add that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 14:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211458.n7LEwYwb009933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #2 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-21 10:58:33 EDT --- Err. That's exactly what I said: "This package is the patched version of libva maintained by Gwenole Beauchesne of Splitted Desktop Systems, at http://www.splitted-desktop.com/~gbeauchesne/libva/ . Upstream libva is slated to include his changes from version 0.50 onwards...Upstream libva lives at http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/vaapi , just for reference." The Poulsbo implementation - which I'm currently working on packaging into RPM Fusion - is already usable and very useful to Poulsbo owners, since Poulsbo-based systems do not have the horsepower to manage decent video playback without hardware acceleration. Therefore I don't see this as 'premature', it will already be useful, and there's no 'disadvantage' to having something that will become useful packaged early anyway. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518650] Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Mail Sender In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211500.n7LF0gXK022658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518650 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-21 11:00:41 EDT --- Review: OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. plexus-mail-sender.noarch: W: no-documentation But there is nothing suitable in the sources. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX-417 OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462560] Review Request: xmlpull-api - XmlPull v1 API is a simple to use XML pull parsing API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211510.n7LFAs0m025049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462560 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Jerry James 2009-08-21 11:10:51 EDT --- Output from rpmlint: xmlpull-api.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Java xmlpull-api-javadoc.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation xmlpull-api.spec:39: W: non-standard-group Development/Java xmlpull-api.spec:66: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation xmlpull-api.spec:140: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. All of which are fine. We don't care about the group, and gcj forces you to use %{_libdir}. MUST items: OK: rpmlint output OK: package named according to Package Naming Guidelines OK: spec file name matches package name OK: package meets packaging guidelines OK: package license meets licensing guidelines OK: license field matches actual license OK: license file included in %doc [1] OK: spec file in American English OK: spec file is legible OK: sources match upstream sources [2] OK: package builds successfully on at least one primary arch (x86_64) NA: appropriate use of ExcludeArch OK: all build dependencies in BuildRequires NA: proper locale handling NA: proper use of ldconfig NA: relocatable packages need rationale OK: package owns all created directories OK: no duplicate listings in %files OK: permissions on files OK: %clean section OK: consistent use of macros OK: code or permissible content NA: large documentation in -doc subpackage OK: nothing in %doc needed at runtime NA: header files in -devel NA: static libraries in -static NA: Requires: pkgconfig NA: .so files in -devel NA: -devel requires main package OK: no libtool archives NA: proper installation of desktop file OK: does not own files/dirs owned by other packages OK: clean at start of %install OK: all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD items: NA: ask upstream to include license file NA: provide translated summary and description OK: package builds in mock (only tried Fedora 11 x86_64) ??: package builds into binary RPMs on all supported arches (did not check) OK: package functions as described (only able to test lightly) OK: sane scriptlets OK: subpackages require main package NA: placement of pkgconfig files NA: file dependencies Footnotes: [1] %doc also includes LICENSE_TESTS.txt, which seems odd, since the tests are neither run nor included in the binary package. [2] With regard to comments #1 and #3, note that there have been more CVS checkins (in 2006!) since the 1.1.4b tag, and the log entries for those checkins refer to version 1.2-RC1. There have been no messages to the user or dev mailing lists since 2007. Is upstream dead? Here are a few more changes I would like you to consider. I won't block the review on any of these, but I think they are worth considering. 1. Make the -javadoc subpackage be noarch. 2. Add the doc subdirectory to %doc. 3. Make an -addons subpackage to hold (parts of) the addons/java subdirectory. This may be more trouble than it is worth. I'll leave that judgment call to you. 4. Make a -samples subpackage to hold (parts of) the src/java/samples subdirectory. Ditto #3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211519.n7LFJqRo026857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nushio at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-08-21 11:19:51 EDT --- I checked the Spec: rpmlint is clean. No errors or warnings. It is Apache Licensed, which passes the license test. Now, I tried building it on Koji, and it failed for both F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1622399 F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1622369 I think its a bug related to mono-nunit22, because the build.log says: error CS0006: cannot find metadata file `nunit.framework.dll' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518650] Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Mail Sender In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211526.n7LFQ9V2028544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518650 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 11:26:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-mail-sender Short Description: Plexus Mail Sender Owners: overholt Branches: InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:33:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211533.n7LFXl6f018249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #33 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-08-21 11:33:44 EDT --- I guess getting GPS position fixes from some GPS device into the computer and then distributed to local applications via gpsd or gypsy is an issue mostly orthogonal to a navit review. As far as I can tell, setting up permissions for GPS devices and running gpsd is still a manual task on Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS/PositionFixes (corrections welcome) So testing navit with gpsd might need manual work right now, but the existence of a navit package will make development of a plug and play gpsd solution so much more attractive that it will probably happen by itself :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211535.n7LFZTBT018851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-21 11:35:27 EDT --- For -2: * Requires - Still some Requires are missing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines * "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" is missing. * Also, for consistency I usually suggest to add "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8". * About the following line: ---------------------------------------------------------- %{__mkdir_p} %{buildroot}%{_libdir} ---------------------------------------------------------- - Perhaps "%{_mkdir_p} %{buildroot}%{gemdir}" is correct. * Directory ownership issue - Still directory ownership issue is not correctly handled. ! If you try # rpm -ivv rubygem-facade-1.0.4-2.fc12.noarch.rpm, it will show: ---------------------------------------------------------- D: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/facade-1.0.4 directory created with perms 0755, no context. D: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/facade-1.0.4 directory created with perms 0755, no context. D: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/facade-1.0.4/lib directory created with perms 0755, no context. D: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/facade-1.0.4/test directory created with perms 0755, no context. ---------------------------------------------------------- Then for example: ---------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/facade-1.0.4/README rubygem-facade-1.0.4-2.fc12.noarch [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/facade-1.0.4/ file /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/facade-1.0.4 is not owned by any package ---------------------------------------------------------- i.e. rubygem-facade binary rpm creates the directory %geminstdir to install "README" under there, however %geminstdir itself is not correctly owned by rubygem-facade, which is wrong. Again please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories especially: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes and modify the %files entry. ! Especially: For example ------------------------------------------------------------ %files %{geminstdir}/lib/ ------------------------------------------------------------ contains the directory %geminstdir/lib and all files/directories/etc under %{geminstdir}/lib. ! When fixing %files entry, please also check the section https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplicate_Files By the way I will appreciate it if you post the full URL of your srpm/spec on this bugzilla when you upload the new ones so that we can find them easily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211538.n7LFcSve031324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-21 11:38:27 EDT --- Please refer to my comments on bug 518082 again. Additionally: - I see %geminstdir/test is also in this spec file, so adding %check section is preferable. - Please check license (see README) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500259] Pre-Review Request: javacvs - Netbeans CVS module and library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211537.n7LFbPWO031102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500259 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|429551 | --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 11:37:23 EDT --- The JAR that ends up being included in javacvs-lib contains the exact same classes that are in the file from netbeans-ide10 (F-11; netbeans-ide11 is in rawhide), /usr/share/netbeans/ide10/modules/org-netbeans-lib-cvsclient.jar Other than some minor manifest updates to the JAR (un-related to the maven stack, I presume), I think we'll just need to add the javacvs POM to the netbeans SRPM and get it included in netbeans-ide10 (or 11). I'll work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211545.n7LFjZQj021208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #34 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-21 11:45:34 EDT --- I've already tested it with GPS input (from a Windows Mobile phone connected by USB, since I like having a complicated life...). It works very well. I used gpsd. We were just discussing the defaults. Actually I think when I wrote that doc, navit would just throw its toys out of the pram by default if you ran it without a GPS device connected, whereas now it runs but just complains a bit at the console. So it's probably fine to leave the default. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211548.n7LFmdMX021589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: pmd-emacs - |Review Request: emacs-pmd - |an interface to PMD for |an interface to PMD for |(X)Emacs |(X)Emacs --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2009-08-21 11:48:37 EDT --- With respect to comment 3, I have fixed the names. Note that there is no common element, so I have not created an emacs-common-pmd package, which would be empty. With respect to comment 4, I am utterly confused by the first paragraph. What on earth are you talking about? As for the second part, you only ran rpmlint on the spec file, not on the packages. Thanks for the review. New files are here: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/emacs-pmd/emacs-pmd-0.6-1.fc11.src.rpm http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/emacs-pmd/emacs-pmd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211556.n7LFuaGV023324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-21 11:56:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xblas Short Description: Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines Owners: spot Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. Thanks for the review (I did make that minor change). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 15:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211556.n7LFu6nN002588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-21 11:56:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > With respect to comment 4, I am utterly confused by the first paragraph. What > on earth are you talking about? As for the second part, you only ran rpmlint > on the spec file, not on the packages. Joshua's comment was not related to this review. He's a new packager, and the comment was related to the sponsorship process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 16:00:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503598] Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211600.n7LG0sIL024293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-08-21 12:00:53 EDT --- Thank you very much for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sphinxbase Short Description: Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products Owners: jjames Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 16:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211603.n7LG3IfL024638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-21 12:03:17 EDT --- Okay, except for one thing: - Perhaps http://lxc.sourceforge.net/ (written as URL) has no relation with tokyocabinet/tokyotyrant and http://tokyocabinet.sourceforge.net/ should be used for URL. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (tokyotyrant) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 16:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211614.n7LGEsoa027484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-21 12:14:52 EDT --- emacs-pmd-el.noarch: W: no-documentation xemacs-pmd-el.noarch: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. These are expected. ** Change the %define's into %global's, unless you have a specific reason to use %define's. ** %define xemacs_lispdir %{_datadir}/xemacs/site-packages/lisp should be %global xemacs_lispdir %{_datadir}/xemacs/site-packages as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs#Template_for_a_package_for_both_GNU_Emacs_and_XEmacs N.B. the difference in %files of the spec file template and your version %files -n emacs-%{pkg} %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{emacs_lispdir}/%{pkg}/*.elc %{emacs_startdir/*.el %dir %{emacs_lispdir}/%{pkg} %files -n emacs-%{pkg}-el %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{emacs_lispdir}/%{pkg}/*.el "For GNU Emacs, files for add-on package foo should be placed in /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/foo." "For XEmacs, files for add-on package foo should be placed in /usr/share/xemacs/site-packages/lisp/foo." ** As instructed by the Emacs packaging guideline, change the main package to emacs-common-pmd and put the %doc there, no need to replicate it in emacs-pmd and xemacs-pmd. ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 16:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211634.n7LGYDuD011478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #2 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-08-21 12:34:12 EDT --- Ok, so I checked gdata's makefile, and its faulty. Line 131 says: $(CSC) $(DEFINES) -target:library -out:unittests.dll $(ALLREFS) -r:nunit.framework.dll $(test_sources) I fixed it locally, by replacing the last part with: -r:/usr/lib/mono/nunit22/nunit.framework.dll $(test_sources) However, I haven't made a patch that looks on lib64 in case of 64 bit, my patch is only hardcoded to /usr/lib I'll try to find some examples for patching, to fix this asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 16:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211653.n7LGrA2j003675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 12:53:09 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fpaste-0.3.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 16:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211658.n7LGwPc2016336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-21 12:58:24 EDT --- 1.) Requires list Please consider using "webserver" dependency (and owning /etc/httpd then) instead of "httpd", at least some of the web application packages do that 2.) Configuration file Please mark this file as %config(noreplace): /usr/share/beacon/php/settings.php 3.) Do not abuse /var/tmp Please refer to FHS for reason why is this bad. I suggest you use /var/lib/beacon instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 17:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211703.n7LH39cf017898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2009-08-21 13:03:08 EDT --- Thank you for the comments. With respect to comment 1, I have updated the summary and description. On the other hand, I have not provided a desktop file, as I do not believe one is needed. There is no GUI application in this package, just command line tools. There are GUI applications which use pocketsphinx, some of which I will be submitting Real Soon Now. Those applications will have desktop files. With respect to comment 2, I have changed the group. I have also made a few other minor cleanups to the spec file. New versions are available here: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pocketsphinx/pocketsphinx.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pocketsphinx/pocketsphinx-0.5.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 17:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211708.n7LH8Z29006931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-21 13:08:34 EDT --- No problem, the screenshot on the projects homepage looked like a GUI application to me, i am going to do a full review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 17:06:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211706.n7LH6fH4019000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 13:06:41 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fpaste-0.3.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 17:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211712.n7LHCXOX008589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2009-08-21 13:12:32 EDT --- Oh, yeah, that is confusing. That's a screenshot of this: http://opie.handhelds.org/. Thanks for the reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 17:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211729.n7LHTnmY023585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #6 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-21 13:29:48 EDT --- Ok. I've resolved the issues you mention. Please review one more time. https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-facade.spec https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-facade-1.0.4-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 17:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211731.n7LHVoJ8024189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 --- Comment #4 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-21 13:31:49 EDT --- Ok. I've resolved the issues you mention. Please review one more time. https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-pathname2.spec https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-pathname2-1.6.2-3.fc11.src.rpm I've removed the %geminstdir/test directory for now. The tests require rubygem(test-unit), which isn't yet packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:17:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211817.n7LIHgFS024431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-21 14:17:41 EDT --- Yep that's correct, that's the screenshot. And you are welcome. FIX: rpmlint must be run on every package rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/pocketsphinx-* rpmbuild/SRPMS/pocketsphinx-0.5.1-2.fc11.src.rpm rpmbuild/SPECS/pocketsphinx.spec pocketsphinx.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/pocketsphinx/model/lm/turtle/turtle.handdict pocketsphinx-libs.i586: W: no-documentation pocketsphinx-plugin.i586: W: no-documentation pocketsphinx-python.i586: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. Based on the README turtle.handdict can be safely removed OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license FIX: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license According to the copying file the gstreamer plugin is LGPLv2 so you should be using BSD and LGPLv2 OK: License text included OK: The spec file must be written in American English OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source sha256sum pocketsphinx-0.5.1.tar.bz2 rpmbuild/SOURCES/pocketsphinx-0.5.1.tar.bz2 3c939b806db9a1928100730a08cdf4dc40a70dc4f2df32f00a58838fe0a7dfd9 pocketsphinx-0.5.1.tar.bz2 3c939b806db9a1928100730a08cdf4dc40a70dc4f2df32f00a58838fe0a7dfd9 rpmbuild/SOURCES/pocketsphinx-0.5.1.tar.bz2 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture OK: ExcludeArch OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires N\A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly OK: Must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N\A: If the package is designed to be relocatable OK: A package must own all directories that it creates OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once OK: Permissions on files must be set properly OK: Each package must have a %clean section OK: Each package must consistently use macros OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK: Header files must be in a -devel package N\A: Static libraries must be in a -static package OK: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package OK: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package Requires the lib subpackage. OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 Fix the lint error and License and its good to go, you will need to push sphinxbase first though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211822.n7LIM9Sj025513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 14:22:08 EDT --- *Scratches head* why did it work on my local machine? I'll try and work on it too, but if you get done first, just attach the patch to this bug. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518550] Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211818.n7LIIkXM024627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518550 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:18:45 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516271] Review Request: perl-Curses-UI - Curses based OO user interface framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211823.n7LINCoP025675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516271 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:23:10 EDT --- CVS Done No need to add an owner to the InitalCC list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211821.n7LILrgK025464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:21:51 EDT --- CVS Done you cant request F-12 branches yet for future reference please dont put commas between usernames -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518650] Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Mail Sender In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211819.n7LIJZGg024781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518650 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:19:34 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518486] Review Request: eclipse-testframework - Eclipse Test Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211825.n7LIP5JV026386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518486 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:25:03 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211826.n7LIQksS026747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:26:44 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211827.n7LIRchw026855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:27:37 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517021] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211826.n7LIQ6Ed026608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:26:05 EDT --- CVS Done without branches you get devel only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:24:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211824.n7LIOM2Y025940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #40 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:24:18 EDT --- CVS Done No need to put an owner on the initallCC list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518445] Review Request: moblin-panel-applications - Moblin Panel for launching Applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211828.n7LISKXL004726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518445 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:28:18 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211829.n7LIT05S004816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:28:59 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211831.n7LIVm3C005606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:31:47 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211837.n7LIbHMo006678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #21 from Suresh Siddha 2009-08-21 14:37:16 EDT --- Building it directly from spec file worked. In the manual build looks like I have to use --libdir option aswell. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211837.n7LIbJa3006699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James 2009-08-21 14:37:18 EDT --- Good catch on the license. It appears to be LGPLv2+, right? I see the "or later" clause in there. New versions: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pocketsphinx/pocketsphinx.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pocketsphinx/pocketsphinx-0.5.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518634] Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211843.n7LIhK9F008089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518634 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-21 14:43:18 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211848.n7LImUk1009213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 14:48:30 EDT --- OK, it builds fine now. spec and SRPM at previous place. Here's the Koji build (for F-12): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1623823 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:50:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211850.n7LIoPSh009827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 14:50:24 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1623814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211849.n7LInsds031949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 14:49:53 EDT --- xblas-1.0.248-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xblas-1.0.248-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:51:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518486] Review Request: eclipse-testframework - Eclipse Test Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211851.n7LIppvF032647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518486 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 14:51:50 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128643 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518550] Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211849.n7LInrkc031923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518550 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 14:49:52 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1623814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211849.n7LInxfO031985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 14:49:58 EDT --- xblas-1.0.248-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xblas-1.0.248-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211859.n7LIxulr011885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 18:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211856.n7LIu1m8011299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-21 14:56:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I've removed the %geminstdir/test directory for now. The tests require > rubygem(test-unit), which isn't yet packaged. As far as I am correct test-unit gem is needed when using ruby 1.9.x. Now Fedora still uses ruby 1.8.x and actually test/unit.rb exists (in ruby-libs). I guess modifying test/test_pathname.rb is preferable to deleting this completely. Would you try this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211900.n7LJ0jxt002138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211905.n7LJ57AJ003013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-21 15:05:05 EDT --- Yes thats correct LGPLv2+, Looks Good. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (pocketsphinx) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:11:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211911.n7LJBxYl004557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 15:11:58 EDT --- See full review request: bug #518634. Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1623893 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518634] Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211911.n7LJBP1O004381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518634 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 15:11:24 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1623893 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503598] Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211914.n7LJEnMr014808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211914.n7LJEZjm005115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jerry James 2009-08-21 15:14:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pocketsphinx Short Description: Real-time speech recognition Owners: jjames Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518445] Review Request: moblin-panel-applications - Moblin Panel for launching Applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211918.n7LJIdcb007281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518445 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-21 15:18:38 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211927.n7LJRfXi009995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-08-21 15:27:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > 2 months without response. Yeah, sorry about that. I got tangled up in real-life. > i will close this. please feel free to reopen it again, without a local copy of > libtlen I got a reply from upstream. They said they use only a some parts of libtlen and that it's not feasible to use the external library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:24:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518713] New: Review Request: hunspell-ak - Akan hunspell dictionary Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ak - Akan hunspell dictionary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518713 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ak - Akan hunspell dictionary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ak.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ak-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Akan hunspell dictionary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:30:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211930.n7LJUTlf018502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504493 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211929.n7LJTLHN010331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW), | |504493 | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455622] Review Request: scriptaculous-js - JavaScript libraries for web user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211945.n7LJjqLv019527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 --- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm 2009-08-21 15:45:51 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this. If I'm reading through the unofficial review correctly, am I right in thinking there's nothing needing to be addressed? I noticed 1.8.2 is the latest stable release recommended by upstream, so I updated the specfile accordingly. New specfile with 1.8.2 is here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/js/scriptaculous-js.spec (overwriting old one) New SRPM here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/js/scriptaculous-js-1.8.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211945.n7LJjTKt019462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 --- Comment #8 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-21 15:45:27 EDT --- @ Spot: Thanks for the review! :) @ Rahul: Won't this have rpmlint complaining on the SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211951.n7LJpbqC023212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 --- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-21 15:51:35 EDT --- Yes, it it will. I have filed and got it changed from an error to just a warning and a warning is still useful since packages do get branched for EPEL but remember that our guidelines must be given higher weight than rpmlint always. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211956.n7LJu0LH024364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 15:55:58 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1623947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 19:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518650] Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Mail Sender In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908211955.n7LJtj52024190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518650 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-21 15:55:43 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1623947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 20:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212004.n7LK4Iw7023370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 --- Comment #14 from Tim Fenn 2009-08-21 16:04:16 EDT --- builds for EL-5, F-11 and devel done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 20:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212017.n7LKH3Gr025928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 --- Comment #8 from Jerry James 2009-08-21 16:17:02 EDT --- I replaced %define with %global. I restructured the packages so that emacs-common-pmd is the top-level package. The %files section now conforms to the guidelines. New versions: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/emacs-pmd/emacs-common-pmd-0.6-2.fc11.src.rpm http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/emacs-pmd/emacs-common-pmd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 20:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518450] Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212034.n7LKYkPP031581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518450 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 16:34:45 EDT --- Some minor rpmlint error -- use Emacs M-q to fix? moblin-panel-status.i686: E: description-line-too-long The Moblin mutter panel for managing of social networks and your current status. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. SRPM's rpmlint is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 20:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518450] Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212044.n7LKiraQ031307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518450 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 16:44:52 EDT --- The only other problem is with the license file (see note within the review). MUST ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: ? license file not deleted Note: bundled license file is inaccurate (LGPL, not GPL). Contact upstream developers? The source file headers all refer to GPLv2+ so I'm assuming that's the correct one ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK (Koji) ? build dependencies complete: OK (Koji) ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: OK ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOTL OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? if license text missing, ask upstream to include it Not missing in this case, but inaccurate (worse?) ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK ? package functioned as described Not tested yet ? scriplets are sane: OK ? require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 20:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212049.n7LKnK2V032228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 16:49:16 EDT --- Reopening; sorry for the delay. Since Fedora 10 is going to be EOL-ed pretty soon anyway, and its version of LLVM is rather out-of-date (2.3), I'll probably target F-11 and above only, so that part can be ignored. Going to address the other issues in an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 20:54:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455622] Review Request: scriptaculous-js - JavaScript libraries for web user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212054.n7LKs5c0003161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pahan at hubbitus.info Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-21 16:54:03 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 21:09:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212109.n7LL9ghg006938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 17:09:41 EDT --- zyx-liveinstaller-0.1.10-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zyx-liveinstaller-0.1.10-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 21:11:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212111.n7LLBsYx005811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 --- Comment #11 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-21 17:11:53 EDT --- Yup, agreed. I fixed it before building. It should be on its way on his way to Rawhide now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 22:04:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212204.n7LM47ij016412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 --- Comment #6 from Ashay Humane 2009-08-21 18:04:06 EDT --- The upstream author was kind enough to change the License in the source files as I requested. http://ashay.info/rpm/adtool.spec http://ashay.info/rpm/adtool-1.3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 22:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212215.n7LMFWjN018676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 22:20:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212220.n7LMKtdM019598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 18:20:54 EDT --- Updated SRPM: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/pure-0.29-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji build (F-11): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1624253 The F-12 build currently fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1624272 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 22:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518450] Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212226.n7LMQOnr022186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518450 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-21 18:26:23 EDT --- > Note: bundled license file is inaccurate (LGPL, not GPL). Contact upstream > developers? The source file headers all refer to GPLv2+ so I'm assuming that's > the correct one I will query upstream to get them to update the COPYING file but the package was split out of mutter-moblin and its GPLv2 so it will be the same license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 22:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518450] Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212240.n7LMeBBj024584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518450 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-21 18:40:10 EDT --- Upstream query http://lists.moblin.org/pipermail/dev/2009-August/005861.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 22:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212241.n7LMf51m022904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Dave Malcolm 2009-08-21 18:41:03 EDT --- Looks like I managed to let this stall; I think I was expecting dyoung to post a revised specfile, but on rereading I think dyoung was expecting me to approve. Sorry about the miscommunication. Based on comment #12, I'm flagging this review as approved, though please do address the caveats I mentioned there when you import the specfile: > - Please add a comment above the License tag indicating the upstream license > text, and the link to fedora-legal-list above. > - Please change License to "MIT and (MIT or GPL)", with a further comment > about the bundled version of jquery. Thanks! (Looks like upstream have released a new version in the meantime, though I think it's best to get this into Fedora as is with the old version, and then track the update in pkg cvs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 22:47:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212247.n7LMlMRB025602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #12 from Dean Glazeski 2009-08-21 18:47:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) I made changes #1-4. I also switched back to a static library, but removed the library from the distribution. This was suggested by upstream. Here is the new spec file and SRPM. http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd/openocd-0.2.0-3.fc11.src.rpm http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd/openocd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 22:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518447] Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212245.n7LMjrTq025401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518447 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 22:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518447] Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212257.n7LMvFuN027137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518447 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 18:57:13 EDT --- MUST ? rpmlint source: clean binary: $ rpmlint moblin-panel-myzone-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm moblin-panel-myzone.src: E: description-line-too-long The Moblin mutter panel for MyZone. MyZone allows you to see that status of friends on 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Description needs Emacs M-q-ing ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: This is questionable. Unlike some other moblin-panel packages, the only C file in this package does not have a license header. Thus it cannot be possible to determine, per se, whether it's GPLv2 strict or v2+. From precedence, we can guess v2+, but could you prod upstream to add the missing header and/or write a clarification in README ? ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK (MD5 sum: 4f7bfb14fa11d183c5cd0e150ed51806) ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK (Koji) ? build dependencies complete: OK (Koji) ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: OK ? library -> ldconfig: MUSTFIX This package ships some shared libraries, so ldconfig must be called on post and postun ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? headers in -devel: OK ? devel requires versioned base package: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK (Koji) ? package functioned as described: so says Peter :) ? scriplets are sane: OK ? require package not files: OK ================================= So basically there's a license thing that's not urgent, but probably worth noting somewhere, the description formatting issue, and ldconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 23:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518448] Review Request: moblin-panel-pasteboard - Moblin Panel for Paste Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212304.n7LN4Q38028045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518448 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 19:04:24 EDT --- Everything is fine -- APPROVED MUST ? rpmlint: OK ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK (MD5 sum: 021077a72d5ed786a6eaa6dab232cd90) ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK (Koji) ? build dependencies complete: OK (Koji) ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: OK ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK (Koji) ? package functioned as described: OK ? scriplets are sane: OK ? require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 23:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212312.n7LNCpNV028533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(christoph.wickert | |@googlemail.com) --- Comment #13 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 19:12:50 EDT --- Christopher? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 23:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518446] Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212311.n7LNBjbJ028408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 19:11:44 EDT --- Assigning this to myself; will do review once bickley lands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 23:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518449] Review Request: moblin-panel-people - Moblin Panel for People In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212310.n7LNAlZ5028320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518449 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 19:10:46 EDT --- Everything is fine here. APPROVED. MUST ? rpmlint: OK ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK (MD5 sum: df86408bf2291bbe01d9277217f68901) ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK (Koji) ? build dependencies complete: OK (Koji) ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: OK ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK (Koji) ? package functioned as described: OK ? scriplets are sane: OK ? require package not files: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 23:21:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:21:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518447] Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212321.n7LNLV5b030117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518447 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-21 19:21:30 EDT --- > $ rpmlint moblin-panel-myzone-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm > moblin-panel-myzone.src: E: description-line-too-long The Moblin mutter panel > for MyZone. MyZone allows you to see that status of friends on > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. > > Description needs Emacs M-q-ing Fixed > ? license field accurate: > This is questionable. Unlike some other moblin-panel packages, the only C > file in this package does not have a license header. Thus it cannot be possible > to determine, per se, whether it's GPLv2 strict or v2+. From precedence, we can > guess v2+, but could you prod upstream to add the missing header and/or write a > clarification in README ? I will email upstream and request clarification. > ? library -> ldconfig: MUSTFIX > This package ships some shared libraries, so ldconfig must be called on post > and postun Fixed. No idea how I missed that one! > ? package functioned as described: so says Peter :) Oh yes.... its running on rawhide on my eeePC as I type this :) SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-myzone-0.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 23:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518448] Review Request: moblin-panel-pasteboard - Moblin Panel for Paste Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212324.n7LNOOaS031465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518448 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-21 19:24:23 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-panel-pasteboard Short Description: Moblin Panel for Paste Board Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 23:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518449] Review Request: moblin-panel-people - Moblin Panel for People In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212325.n7LNPhop031936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518449 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-21 19:25:42 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-panel-people Short Description: Moblin Panel for People Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 23:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212334.n7LNYDOm000561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(christoph.wickert | |@googlemail.com) | --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-21 19:34:11 EDT --- Sorry, busy with Fedora as FROSCon this weekend. Please wait till Monday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 23:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518447] Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908212357.n7LNv4lQ003628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518447 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-21 19:57:03 EDT --- All systems go. Speaking of netbooks, in your experience, does it go faster with hyperthreading on or off? I'm tempted to run mine with maxcpu=1 because once CPU usage goes near 100%, performance falls off a cliff :( APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518447] Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220003.n7M039WC004518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518447 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-21 20:03:08 EDT --- Thanks. TBH I've never run mine with HT disabled. I don't use mine for much more than browser, ssh, IM and VoIP so its not overly taxed. I suppose it would depend on what your doing and how well threaded the apps are. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-panel-myzone Short Description: Moblin Panel for MyZone Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220045.n7M0juKF010904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #5 from Sean Middleditch 2009-08-21 20:45:55 EDT --- SRPM: http://middleditch.us/sean/libtelnet-0.10-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220057.n7M0vtfM012936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 20:57:54 EDT --- django-filter-0.5.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220058.n7M0w0sx012970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.0-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:58:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220058.n7M0wHQS013019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 20:58:11 EDT --- eclipse-anyedit-2.2.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update eclipse-anyedit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8834 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:58:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220058.n7M0wboU013289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 20:58:36 EDT --- django-sorting-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220058.n7M0wjkZ013330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:58:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220058.n7M0wvc8013372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 20:58:56 EDT --- sugar-record-64-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-record'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8838 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220100.n7M103V6013879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 21:00:02 EDT --- mipv6-daemon-0.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220103.n7M136hL014704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 21:03:05 EDT --- django-sorting-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220059.n7M0xaIu013523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.0-1.fc10 |0.5.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220059.n7M0xWDx013491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 20:59:31 EDT --- django-filter-0.5.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220100.n7M1084E013916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:00:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220100.n7M10G2X014030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 21:00:15 EDT --- sugar-record-64-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-record'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8851 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 00:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220059.n7M0x3xJ013405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 20:59:02 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update shmpps'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220100.n7M10YU2014107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 21:00:33 EDT --- ytnef-2.6-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ytnef'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8853 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220102.n7M12bLg014623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 21:02:36 EDT --- php-channel-doctrine-1.0.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-channel-doctrine'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8866 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220102.n7M12oBw014907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 21:02:49 EDT --- pyliblo-0.7.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220105.n7M15Lhh015788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7.2-2.fc11 |0.7.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:03:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220103.n7M13Av3014985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc10 |0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220102.n7M12tCd014942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.7.2-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220105.n7M15CCY015744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 21:05:11 EDT --- ytnef-2.6-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ytnef'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8871 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512020] Review Request: pyliblo - Python bindings for the liblo OSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220105.n7M15HRe015927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512020 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 21:05:16 EDT --- pyliblo-0.7.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220106.n7M162YO016030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 21:05:59 EDT --- emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:06:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220106.n7M166e9016061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.7.1-4.fc10 |3.7.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 01:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220106.n7M16R3v016153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-21 21:06:26 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update shmpps'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8881 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 02:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472793] Review Request: jgraph - Java graph visualization and layout In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220247.n7M2lQBj032441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472793 --- Comment #6 from D Haley 2009-08-21 22:47:24 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 05:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517776] Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220546.n7M5kSdb028478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517776 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from D Haley 2009-08-22 01:46:27 EDT --- Some quick comments: *In generate-tarball, please specify a specific version in the repository for checkout. I cannot verify the MD5 without this. *Generate tarball permission bits should be 744. (rpmlint output) *Using svn export is probably a better idea than using find to remove .svn after an svn co *If you like (not required, but I like it), you can add this to the top of generate-tarball to guard against misuse of generate-tarball: if [ $# -ne 2 ] ; then echo USAGE: ./generate-tarball NAME_VERSION RELEASE exit 1 fi *.java files do not appear to have LGPL licence headers, as required by the licence. Please raise upstream bug. *Any kind of licence files are missing. Please raise upstream bug. *Please post rpmlint output for reviews, as well as koji builds where possible *"Requires: jpackage-utils" for javadoc not needed, as javadoc requires main package which also requires jpackage-utils *Summary should replace the word "library" with "task". *Should this package not require gettext-commons (bug 515136) ? I assume that the ant-task will fail if it cannot find the gettext jar file. *Raise bug for upstream to provide tagged source releases in future. This will assist maintaining sync with project releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 06:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220640.n7M6enSb004035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-22 02:40:48 EDT --- * Dependency issue - vanessa_logger-sample should depend on vanessa_logger not on vanessa_logger-devel, as libvanessa_logger.so.0 is in vanessa_logger not in the devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 06:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220647.n7M6lsQ3004892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-22 02:47:53 EDT --- perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object-0.06-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object-0.06-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 06:47:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220647.n7M6lnB6004858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-22 02:47:48 EDT --- perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object-0.06-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object-0.06-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 06:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510668] Review Request: canorus - Music Score Editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220646.n7M6kAPc004749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510668 --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-08-22 02:46:08 EDT --- Yay! Finally! I'm very sorry for the delay (In reply to comment #13) > > * naming: TODO > - name matches upstream > - spec file name matches package name > - snapshot release tag (assuming it is a post-release snapshot) should contain > the date (the svnrev can be appended, but the date is required) > ( according to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages ) > Added > > * License: TODO > - the package contains sources under the GPLv2, too: > src/import/pmidi/except.c (GPLv2 as published), most likely this means > that the complete package must be released as GPLv2 > - the source package (and the built binary package) contain lots of examples > and so it is necessary to check their legal status - in the worst case they > must not only be stripped out from the binary but also from the sources - do > you have any information whether they are distributable? > - license file packaged: if the final package would be GPLv2, then we should > not package GPLv1 > I removed the midi and the xml files which have unclear licenses. Also removed a can file with bad license. I created a new tarball and gave the instructions. Upstream told me the program itself is GPLv2. > * Sources: OK > - Source0 URL ok > - spectool -g canorus.spec works > - sources matches upstream - md5sum: > 2dc201fec21d781d0add487c5a9ed35b canorus_0.7svn.R1163_source.tar.bz2 > - even if the URL for the nightly builds is linked directly from canorus' > homepage it is a little bit strange to use plain IP addresses here - let's hope > that upstream does an official release soon and the URL can be changed again to > something like this: > http://prdownload.berlios.de/canorus/canorus_0.7.R1002_source.tar.bz2 > Yes, I will turn to regular release tarballs when the software turns more stable. > > * Locales handling: TODO > The package contains language files in a non-gettext format (*.qm files). > Is it necessary to add them also via the %lang(xx) tag? > Yes, we do this with qt applications. For instance, I was asked in the past explicitly to mark the .qm files as %lang(xx) for qjackctl and qsynth > > * code vs. content: TODO > - see above (license issues) > - package contains example midi files, sheets of music, etc. (3.5 MB) > - according to the guidelines examples in general are not considered as > content, but if they e.g. contain notes from music which is still under > copyright I assume it would not be permissable... > See above > > * functional test: TODO > - program segfaults when it is closed > - program segfaults when opening any of the musicxml examples > Yes, the last time I talked to them on IRC upstream knew about the issue. But I didn't contact them in the past 3-4 weeks (I was too busy) so I don't know what is the current situation. Upstream had told me before that canorus is still alpha quality, for the time being. But they did a good job for a start and I see it worth packaging. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/canorus.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/canorus-0.7-3.R1177.20090804svn.fc11.src.rpm koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1624776 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 06:53:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220653.n7M6rUKD005676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-22 02:53:29 EDT --- * Is this a typo ? "confgure|configure" # I am providing my own configure macro replacement. Hopefully this # will result in fewer portability problems than using the one supplied # by various vendours. I fear that I hope in vein. CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS if [ -f confgure.in ]; then aclocal libtoolize --force --copy autoheader automake autoconf fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 06:59:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220659.n7M6xKBN006566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 07:25:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220725.n7M7PXYf010761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david-b at pacbell.net Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #13 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-22 03:25:31 EDT --- I sponsored you as a Fedora packager with its relative rights. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 07:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220747.n7M7lm1u013917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-22 03:47:47 EDT --- The package looks good to me except the following warnings are found during the rpmbuild warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openocd/contrib/libdcc warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openocd/contrib/libdcc/README warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openocd/contrib/libdcc/dcc_stdio.c warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openocd/contrib/libdcc/dcc_stdio.h warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openocd/contrib/libdcc/example.c warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/openocd/contrib/openocd.udev To fix it, replace %{_datadir}/%{name} by %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 07:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908220748.n7M7mT63014418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #15 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-22 03:48:28 EDT --- [Pending] MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [Pending] MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. Fix the %files as mentioned above --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPLv2) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i586. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly.: No locales in this package - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i586. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: Those scriptlets used are sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. Update the package for approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 10:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 06:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486570] Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221011.n7MABS3j005801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486570 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|itamar at ispbrasil.com.br |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 11:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 07:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221132.n7MBWsfk017996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #12 from D Haley 2009-08-22 07:32:53 EDT --- Your uploaded spec and SRPM do not appear to match. Please do not modify the uploaded spec without posting a matching SRPM. Please repost an updated SRPM with the changes suggested by Guido (Comment 11). Also I don't think you need Requires: jpackage-utils in the javadoc package, as it depends on the main, which also requires jpackage-utils. > Read upsteam homepage for license information Upstream says "The code is protected by copyright, though only to avoid people selling it unmodified or copyrighting it themselves." Which is not quite PD, but close. Someone else may need to confirm the licencing here. All the source headers appear to be in place. $ diff -uh metadata-extractor.spec metadata-extractor.spec-orig --- metadata-extractor.spec 2009-08-11 04:58:42.000000000 +1000 +++ metadata-extractor.spec-orig 2009-08-22 21:32:37.000000000 +1000 @@ -11,15 +11,13 @@ # Patch provided by Gabriel Ebner to remove all references to the # com.sun classes. Package builds with a free java implementation now. Patch0: %{name}-2.3.1-nosun.patch -# Patch provided by Guido Grazioli to make junit tests complete successfully -Patch1: %{name}-2.3.1-buildxml.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: jpackage-utils BuildRequires: java-devel BuildRequires: ant -BuildRequires: ant-junit +BuildRequires: junit Requires: jpackage-utils Requires: java @@ -44,7 +42,6 @@ %prep %setup -q -c %patch0 -p1 -%patch1 -p0 # Remove pre-built JAR and class files find -name '*.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \; @@ -56,6 +53,9 @@ # Fix end-of-line encoding sed -i 's/\r//' ChangeLog.txt +# Do not execute unit test +sed -i 's:clean, compile, test:clean, compile:' build.xml + %build ant dist-binaries javadoc @@ -96,9 +96,8 @@ %changelog -* Mon Aug 10 2009 Andrea Musuruane 2.3.1-2 +* Sun Aug 09 2009 Andrea Musuruane 2.3.1-2 - Created JAR alias -- Added a patch to make junit tests complete successfully * Sun Aug 02 2009 Andrea Musuruane 2.3.1-1 - First release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 11:49:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 07:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511144] Review Request: openstreetmap - A JavaScript library for displaying the OpenStreetMap.org map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221149.n7MBn01J020107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511144 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com --- Comment #4 from D Haley 2009-08-22 07:48:59 EDT --- Quick 2 cents: Openlayers is in fedora -- why is this package needed? >I need this API for an application I'm developping >*snip* >Possibility 2 causes problems, as upstream might make a new release and break >API compatibility. How is this a fedora problem? Why would fedora want two packages of the same code from different upstreams? This seems most odd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 12:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 511144] Review Request: openstreetmap - A JavaScript library for displaying the OpenStreetMap.org map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221218.n7MCIrcR024686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511144 --- Comment #5 from Mathieu Bridon 2009-08-22 08:18:52 EDT --- Openlayers and OpenStreetMap are not the same code. This openstreetmap package extends the openlayers one for accessing the OpenStreetMap.org data. So this is just another Javascript library, built on top of the OL library. For example, some of the OSM code got merged in the OL 2.8 release as it was generic code. But the rest really is an extension of OL. Maybe the two will be merged one day, I have no idea. Until then, both are different and, depending on what you do, needed. (and yes, I know OL is in Fedora, I co-maintain it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 13:23:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221323.n7MDN9t5003425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #13 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-22 09:23:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Please repost an updated SRPM with the changes suggested by Guido (Comment > 11). Also I don't think you need Requires: jpackage-utils in the javadoc > package, as it depends on the main, which also requires jpackage-utils. Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/metadata-extractor.spec SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-3.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: * Sat Aug 22 2009 Andrea Musuruane 2.3.1-3 - Used a different workaround as suggested by Guido Grazioli to make junit tests complete successfully Please note that I didn't removed the "Requires: jpackage-utils" because this exactly what is used in the ant template you can find in the Java Packaging Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java > > Read upsteam homepage for license information > Upstream says "The code is protected by copyright, though only to avoid people > selling it unmodified or copyrighting it themselves." Which is not quite PD, > but close. Someone else may need to confirm the licencing here. All the source > headers appear to be in place. Upstream, in the "About this library" paragraph in its homepage, also states this: "This metadata library is available with Java source code for usage in the public domain." Moreover, as you noted, all source files contain the following text: * This class is public domain software - that is, you can do whatever you want * with it, and include it software that is licensed under the GNU or the * BSD license, or whatever other licence you choose, including proprietary * closed source licenses. Similarly, I release this Java version under the * same license, though I do ask that you leave this header in tact. * * If you make modifications to this code that you think would benefit the * wider community, please send me a copy and I'll post it on my site. * * If you make use of this code, I'd appreciate hearing about it. * drew.noakes at drewnoakes.com * Latest version of this software kept at * http://drewnoakes.com/ Or the following text: * This is public domain software - that is, you can do whatever you want * with it, and include it software that is licensed under the GNU or the * BSD license, or whatever other licence you choose, including proprietary * closed source licenses. I do ask that you leave this header in tact. * * If you make modifications to this code that you think would benefit the * wider community, please send me a copy and I'll post it on my site. * * If you make use of this code, I'd appreciate hearing about it. * drew at drewnoakes.com * Latest version of this software kept at * http://drewnoakes.com/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 13:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221344.n7MDihUD006688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 --- Comment #11 from Christopher Pardy 2009-08-22 09:44:42 EDT --- I've removed all the selinux commands, it should now build but requires packages that currently must be built out of koji to run. Spec URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: system-config-selinux provides the graphical tools system-config-selinux and selinux-polgen for managing SELinux systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 14:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221404.n7ME4qRE010914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #16 from Dean Glazeski 2009-08-22 10:04:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) I've updated the spec file to have the fix for the warnings about the files being listed twice. New links given below. http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd/openocd-0.2.0-4.fc11.src.rpm http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd/openocd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 14:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221427.n7MER1PF015185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 --- Comment #9 from Silas Sewell 2009-08-22 10:27:00 EDT --- Thanks Mamoru Tasaka. I've fixed the URL. diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/detail?r=316 srpm: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/downloads/detail?name=tokyotyrant-1.1.33-5.fc12.src.rpm [silas at fox rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 14:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221427.n7MERnSB014078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Silas Sewell 2009-08-22 10:27:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tokyotyrant Short Description: A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet Owners: silas Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 14:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221454.n7MEsxqB017749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-22 10:54:58 EDT --- espresso-ab-1.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/espresso-ab-1.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 15:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221523.n7MFNOTL023418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-22 11:23:23 EDT --- Just as an FYI, it generally doesn't make much sense to push new packages into testing, as it is very unlikely that anyone will test a new package. You should be safe to simply push them to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 15:46:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] New: Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Summary: Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwheeler at dwheeler.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/auto-destdir.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/auto-destdir-1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Auto-DESTDIR is a set of programs for POSIX/Unix/Linux systems that helps automate program installation from source code. The Auto-DESTDIR tools (run-redir and make-redir) redirect file installations so that the installed files are placed inside the the $DESTDIR directory, even if the provided makefile doesn't support the DESTDIR convention. For example, you can replace "make install" with "make-redir DESTDIR=xyz install", and then all files are stored inside $DESTDIR. This program can be useful for creating native packages (e.g., RPM or deb), or for installing programs from source code to be managed by tools like GNU stow. Note: rpmlint gives one warning: auto-destdir.src:50: W: configure-without-libdir-spec This warning is irrelevant; this only installs bash scripts and documentation, so there's no libdir to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 16:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221630.n7MGUICR002045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #25 from David Nalley 2009-08-22 12:30:14 EDT --- Hi Patrick: sorry for the lag on my part. I don't see anything else blocking this. (There are the dependencies of course, but those are separate review requests.) but this request is APPROVED Thanks for all of your work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 16:32:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221632.n7MGWPgb000580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #11 from David Nalley 2009-08-22 12:32:24 EDT --- Andrew: sorry for my lag I will try and get this pushed out to you this weekend. Thanks for your work on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 17:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221704.n7MH4cIF006429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #12 from David Nalley 2009-08-22 13:04:37 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt43 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./ipplan.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt43 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/ipplan-4.92-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt43 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/ipplan-4.92-1.fc11.noarch.rpm ipplan.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/ipplan 0700 ipplan.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ipplan/config.php 0640 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . GPLv2+ per source code FIX: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. SPEC file says GPLv2 should be GPLv2+ FIX: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc gpl.html isn't pushed to %doc - I realize that this is likely due to the fact that it is referenced by the application - but consider symlinking. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Ok: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines [ke4qqq at nalleyt43 SOURCES]$ md5sum ipplan-4.92.tar.gz* 2540b381744d1891b53b660fffc5ec56 ipplan-4.92.tar.gz 2540b381744d1891b53b660fffc5ec56 ipplan-4.92.tar.gz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. FIX: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. I think there is yet another bundled library - phpmailer http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpmailer/ This already exists in fedora as: php-PHPMailer OK: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). NA: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. So just one or two minor fixes left. As an aside - I personally don't like the idea of generating a password in a spec file, or of doing a restart of httpd (even though it is a condrestart) Several lines of reasoning for this - first - there could be a different webserver (I assume it will work with lighttpd and others.) Second - the idea that a package is doing this doesn't give me warm fuzzies personally. That said I can't find any packaging guidelines that prohibit this, so feel free to disregard these comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 17:24:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221724.n7MHOpc4009965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #10 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-22 13:24:49 EDT --- Updated to 0.30; now builds on Rawhide against just-updated LLVM. Will build LLVM for F-10 and F-11 as well so reviewer only has to rebuild pure. http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/pure-0.30-1.fc12.src.rpm Addressing previous pre-review concerns, here are the rpmlint warnings: pure.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libpure.so pure.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libpure.so.3.0 pure.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libpure.so.3.0 pure.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pure/pure_main.c pure.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/pure/runtime.h 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. This package is for an interpreted language, so those development files are actually needed at runtime -- similar situation with Scheme implementations. The guidelines make an exception for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 18:39:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518779] New: Review Request: libnfc - NFC SDK and Programmers API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libnfc - NFC SDK and Programmers API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518779 Summary: Review Request: libnfc - NFC SDK and Programmers API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fkooman at tuxed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/libnfc/libnfc.spec SRPM URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/libnfc/libnfc-1.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: libnfc is the first free NFC SDK and Programmers API released under the GNU Lesser General Public License. It provides complete transparency and royalty-free use for everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 18:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221841.n7MIfYQO026104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #45 from Tom Moertel 2009-08-22 14:41:29 EDT --- I have inspected the proposed packaging of djbdns and am delighted that somebody has decided to get it into Fedora. To help make the package better, I have a few suggestions. First, as the package does not use DJB's daemontools to manage the services it provides, it requires initscripts for that purpose. Only one initscript is included in the package, however, and it is named "djbdns", making unclear which of the services it controls (it's dnscache). The initscript for tinydns, for example, is missing. Recommendation: include one initscript per service and make the names of the initscripts match the services they control. Second, the package is missing some important parts of djbdns -- axfdns, walldns, and rbldns, for example. While these parts are probably used less often than dnscache or tinydns, they are well established within DJB's bundle, and most people will expect them to be included in any package calling itself "djbdns". Recommendation: include the missing pieces. Third, I must agree with Satya Komaragiri about the need for subpackages. It's very common to need only one part of djbdns for any particular install, either dnscache (for a site needing a local, recursive DNS cache), tinydns (for a site needing a content DNS server to publish its public records), or the tools (for administration and debugging). To place all of these in one package will contribute clutter to the typical install. (This problem wasn't so bad in DJB's bundle because it didn't use initscripts, but we do, and installing 5 initscripts when the typical sysadmin will need only 1 seems excessive.) Recommendation: split the package into logical subpackages, following Pavel Lis?'s scheme, which makes a lot of sense from an administrator's point of view (and ought to be immediately understandable to anyone familiar with how to deploy from DJB's bundle). Fourth, DJB's bundle relied upon the multilog program from daemontools to handle logging, whereas our proposed package writes to log files directly. But multilog did more than just write to files; it also inserted timestamps, which our logs lack. Timestamps are essential in system logs, so we must put them back in somehow. Maybe we could use syslog or bring back multilog. Recommendation: Restore the timestamps in logs. This package is looking great. I think it's just a few tweaks away from being both a good Fedora package and a faithful representation of everything that made DJB's bundle great. Keep up the good work! Cheers, Tom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 18:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221846.n7MIkRQt024124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-22 14:46:26 EDT --- Well, I missed the following, however: - I guess %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/ri should also be marked as doc. And the 3 lines: ----------------------------------------------------- %files %dir %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version} %doc %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/rdoc %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/ri ------------------------------------------------------ can be simplified as: ------------------------------------------------------ %files %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/ ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 19:12:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221912.n7MJCQr3031283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #11 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-22 15:12:25 EDT --- Builds fine against F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1625828 and the updated LLVM has been built for F-10 and F-11, you can grab them for building (please vote for the update if it works): https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/llvm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 19:43:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908221943.n7MJhjoN001283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter 2009-08-22 15:43:43 EDT --- Fair enough, turns out we no longer really need the customized platform definition for our fedora qt builds anyway, so I'll test that out here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 20:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455622] Review Request: scriptaculous-js - JavaScript libraries for web user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908222030.n7MKU81V011805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-22 16:30:05 EDT --- MUST items: [+/-] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint * scriptaculous-js-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation Consider put into tests sub-package files MIT-LICENSE README.rdoc. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [-] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Yes. I only doubt about one file sound.js, it contain comment string: "// Based on code created by Jules Gravinese (http://www.webveteran.com/)" I have not fount on this page any license. So, I fire FE-legal here, please try clarify this issue, contact with author or leave for Spot... [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ md5sum * 10aa518e3b44f5a2a55f2bc8caadcd62 scriptaculous-js-1.8.2_RPM.tar.bz2 10aa518e3b44f5a2a55f2bc8caadcd62 scriptaculous-js-1.8.2.tar.bz2 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1626056 [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Only note: You may also use %{name}-%{version} in Source0 tag, but it on you choose. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc sub-package. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1626056 [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. There nothing test I think. Some additional things: 1) It is optional. You name subpackage as scriptaculous-js-tests, but actually no tests there! It contain only html-files with functionality demo. Please consider rerename it into something like scriptaculous-js-demo or scriptaculous-js-examples 2) You Requiere httpd. Why??? It is contain only static jasascript files, so I eleav it may functional on any web-server. So you must require "webserver" (this is meta provides) 3) You bundle prototypejs library here (http://prototypejs.org/) and even this is not standard binary library, It is not permited anyway and must be packaged separately. For things see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_Bundled_Libraries#For_the_Review_Guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software (this one is about Java packaging, but speak also about "Other bundled software" so I think it applicable) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 20:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455622] Review Request: scriptaculous-js - JavaScript libraries for web user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908222035.n7MKZTJ4012727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 20:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908222035.n7MKZx1b009936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |3proxy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 21:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908222127.n7MLRgIZ017731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at matbooth.co.uk --- Comment #11 from Mat Booth 2009-08-22 17:27:40 EDT --- Hi Victor, Are you going to build this package for F-11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 21:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908222139.n7MLdOAD019676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-22 17:39:23 EDT --- Colin Kissa, thank you. I fix them. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_logger/vanessa_logger-0.0.7-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 21:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518318] Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908222140.n7MLeV4Y020047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-22 17:40:30 EDT --- Small fix: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_socket/vanessa_socket-0.0.7-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 21:40:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908222140.n7MLe11v022197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-22 17:40:00 EDT --- Small fix: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_adt/vanessa_adt-0.0.7-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 22:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518317] Review Request: perdition - Mail Retrieval Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908222202.n7MM2klL023400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317 --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-22 18:02:45 EDT --- Small fix: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/perdition/perdition-1.17.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 23:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908222348.n7MNmmXv007234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #14 from D Haley 2009-08-22 19:48:46 EDT --- Does not build in koji: F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1626400 F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1626402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 22 23:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:56:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] New: Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Summary: Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gtk-splitter.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gtk-splitter-2.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://gtk-splitter.sourceforge.net/ Description: gtk-splitter can split files into smaller pieces and combine them back together. It can also generate a DOS batch file so that the split files can be combined on DOS/Windows systems. gtk-splitter is good for working around file limitations with floppy disks, email attachments, etc. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1626394 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop016 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gtk-splitter-2.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop016 x86_64]$ rpmlint gtk-splitter* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 00:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230003.n7N03Yml012621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #19 from Rex Dieter 2009-08-22 20:03:33 EDT --- Oh fudge, something seems to have changed recently to cause build failures: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1626403 My first guess would be the recent qscintilla-2.4 update. Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 00:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518445] Review Request: moblin-panel-applications - Moblin Panel for launching Applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230001.n7N01wVa012448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518445 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-22 20:01:58 EDT --- In rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 00:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230038.n7N0cxdD014715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-22 20:38:57 EDT --- There was a problem with the earlier LLVM build, but it only affects PPC, so it can still be used to test Pure i686 or x86_64. Discussing with maintainer whether the ppc build is stable enough to ship or not. Upstream's "make check" does not actually return a non-zero value if a test fails. The spec is now updated to optionally do this, but it's disabled for now so we get RPMs out to test. One test is specifically disabled because, on Rawhide at least, it causes the pure interpreter to stop: $ pure -v < test011.pure sscanf "this" "%d"; , line 2: unhandled exception 'scanf_error ()' while evaluating 'sscanf "this" "%d"' sscanf "this" "%g"; , line 3: unhandled exception 'scanf_error ()' while evaluating 'sscanf "this" "%g"' sscanf "this" "%s"; "this" *** glibc detected *** pure: malloc(): smallbin double linked list corrupted: 0x0000000001e2f910 *** Some other tests fail, though in non-fatal ways. The failures are being tracked upstream: http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/issues/detail?id=13#makechanges Peter, if you could attach the build log you get on Fedora 11, it'd be helpful, we can then narrow down whether the problem is with Rawhide or with either of LLVM or pure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 01:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230126.n7N1Qocl021552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-22 21:26:49 EDT --- cobertura-1.9-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cobertura-1.9-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 01:36:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230136.n7N1aq7U023028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 --- Comment #13 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2009-08-22 21:36:51 EDT --- Hi Mat, Please, test it and change its karma ( at least in bodhi :-) ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 02:31:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230231.n7N2VaVw001145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #7 from D Haley 2009-08-22 22:31:34 EDT --- I have notified upstream of the licencing and rpmlint issues, and am happy to complete this package (provided someone else reviews of course :) ). I have also found that their unit tests fail on my machine, and have notified upstream: #Upstream has been notified of exit() calls. #https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2842844&group_id=67094&atid=516866 #Upstream has been notified of licencing issues #https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2842854&group_id=67094&atid=516866 #Upstream has been notfied of unit test problems #https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2842847&group_id=67094&atid=516867 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 03:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230304.n7N34PM6002948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #18 from D Haley 2009-08-22 23:04:23 EDT --- Hi Conrad, I have notified upstream via email wrt. to the exit call. They now provide versioned tarballs at the following location: http://www-lmc.imag.fr/CASYS/LOGICIELS/givaro/Downloads/: ==== Dear Prof. Roch and Gautier, Recently givaro has been submitted for package review[1] for inclusion in the Fedora linux repositories. However small error was noticed during an automated source-code check. As a requirement of packaging, upstream (you) must be notified of this error. File src/kernel/zpz/givzpz16table1.C is included in a shared library (libgivaro.so), and Line 46 makes a call to the exit() function. Calling exit() in a shared library results in incorrect de-allocation of system resources. If it is possible to update this file in the next version of givaro to not use exit(), this would be most helpful. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 Kind Regards. D. Haley === -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 03:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230308.n7N38oU3003689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #19 from Conrad Meyer 2009-08-22 23:08:49 EDT --- Hi, I also no longer have time for this package. If you would like to take it, you are quite welcome. Otherwise, it should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 03:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230347.n7N3lLGF009531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-22 23:47:20 EDT --- Included all suggested changes: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/perl-Search-Xapian.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.11.0-5.fc11.src.rpm Thanks, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Search-Xapian Short Description: Xapian perl bindings Owners: rakesh Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 04:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230412.n7N4C6Al016033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 --- Comment #14 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-23 00:12:05 EDT --- Included them, SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/yum-download-order.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/yum-download-order-0.1-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 04:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230414.n7N4E5JO016356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #31 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-23 00:14:01 EDT --- ping, may you start cvs procedure ? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 04:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230433.n7N4X025019552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #20 from D Haley 2009-08-23 00:32:59 EDT --- I'm happy to try to push this through -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 04:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230438.n7N4ctYc020340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #21 from Conrad Meyer 2009-08-23 00:38:54 EDT --- Ok, sounds good! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 05:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230534.n7N5YDJO025524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #22 from D Haley 2009-08-23 01:34:12 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/givaro.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/givaro-3.2.15-0.1.rc1.fc10.src.rpm F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1626651 F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1626660 rpmlint: $ rpmlint `cat tmp` givaro.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgivaro.so.0.0.4 exit at GLIBC_2.0 givaro-devel.i386: W: no-documentation givaro-devel.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/givaro/givaro-makefile 0644 givaro-static.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. $ cat tmp /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/givaro-3.2.15-0.1.rc1.fc10.src.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-3.2.15-0.1.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-devel-3.2.15-0.1.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-static-3.2.15-0.1.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-debuginfo-3.2.15-0.1.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm Notes: *Upstream has been notified about GPL headers, and as above, exit() usage *Tarball has been re-downloaded from new download area on givaro website *makefile has been placed into %{_datadir}/%{name}/ *Trailing slashes have been added *givaro-config.in has been patched to produce correct output in case of multiple flags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 05:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230539.n7N5daka029093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #23 from D Haley 2009-08-23 01:39:35 EDT --- Whoops. Sorry for the noise, but I have fixed that E, with "sed -i 's|#! /bin/sh||' $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/givaro-makefile" in my current spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 05:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 01:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518473] Review Request: odf-converter-integrator - Convert Office 2007 (OOXML) files for OpenOffice.or In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230538.n7N5ch6X029003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518473 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-23 01:38:42 EDT --- Please, do not raise fedora-review flag by yourself - it would be done by the Reviewer of your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 07:12:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518473] Review Request: odf-converter-integrator - Convert Office 2007 (OOXML) files for OpenOffice.or In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230712.n7N7CYGU010970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518473 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Adel Gadllah 2009-08-23 03:12:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: > SRPM URL: > http://astokes.fedorapeople.org/odf-converter-integrator/odf-converter-integrator-0.2.3-1.src.rpm > Description: > A utility to convert Microsoft Office 2007 (Office Open XML) files and > automatically start OpenOffice.org. Registers file types and mime > types such as .docx, .xlsx, and .pptx so that Nautilus, Firefox, and > other programs automatically recognize them. Two things: 1) Current open office (3.x) can already open Office Open XML Files 2) What is more important: /usr/bin/OdfConverter is only shipped as a binary, ie there is no source in the tarball but just the pre build binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 07:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 03:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230749.n7N7nqVQ012794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #15 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-23 03:49:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Does not build in koji: > > F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1626400 > F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1626402 I have really enough of junit test failings. Can we just disable them as I did when I submitted the package? After all, there should be a reason why Debian disabled them too. For the record it fails this test: [..] Testcase: testUserCommentDescription_AsciiHeaderExtendedAsciiEncoding took 0 sec FAILED expected:<... extended characters[ ]> but was:<... extended characters[]> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<... extended characters[ ]> but wa s:<... extended characters[]> at com.drew.metadata.exif.test.ExifDescriptorTest.testUserCommentDescription_ AsciiHeaderExtendedAsciiEncoding(ExifDescriptorTest.java:79) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 08:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230805.n7N85YOZ019748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-23 04:05:33 EDT --- If the program uses autotools, use %configure instead of ./configure %configure also sets a lot of other stuff, such as the optimization flags. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 08:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518473] Review Request: odf-converter-integrator - Convert Office 2007 (OOXML) files for OpenOffice.or In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230835.n7N8ZGEJ026138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518473 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-23 04:35:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 2) What is more important: /usr/bin/OdfConverter is only shipped as a binary, > ie there is no source in the tarball but just the pre build binary. Good catch! Where is the source code, Adam? I cannot find it even on SF. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 08:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230857.n7N8v8dn029356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-23 04:57:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > This warning is irrelevant; this only installs bash scripts and documentation, > so there's no libdir to use. Correct, but it uses bindir and datadir, two configuration options you don't pass to configure (MUSTFIX). (In reply to comment #1) > %configure also sets a lot of other stuff, such as the optimization flags. Very bad explanation, optimization flags are irrelevant on noarch-packages (such as this). What is not irrelevant are installation directories (c.f. comment above) Finally, I am having doubts that this package works and will ever work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 09:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230922.n7N9MGVj029614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-23 05:22:15 EDT --- php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 09:22:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230922.n7N9MBuC029579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-23 05:22:09 EDT --- php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 09:31:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:31:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230931.n7N9VKli002399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-23 05:31:19 EDT --- php-ezc-Feed-1.2.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Feed-1.2.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 09:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908230931.n7N9VOWZ002433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-23 05:31:23 EDT --- php-ezc-Feed-1.2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Feed-1.2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 10:23:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231023.n7NANofC007148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-23 06:23:48 EDT --- Thanks David, * License Tag - fixed * Bundled Library (php-PHPMailer) - unbundled * License include - fixed * Password generation - fixed * Apache restart - fixed - Updated spec and srpm http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ipplan/ipplan.spec http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ipplan/ipplan-4.92-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 10:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231025.n7NAPhTq007641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-23 06:25:41 EDT --- New package with fixes. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/network-manager-netbook-1.2-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 10:47:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518713] Review Request: hunspell-ak - Akan hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231047.n7NAl3Th014935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518713 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 10:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231048.n7NAmLIa011311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 Andrey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaafree at yahoo.com --- Comment #10 from Andrey 2009-08-23 06:48:18 EDT --- Is this bug still actual ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 10:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518637] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp - C++ variant of Perl's XS language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231046.n7NAkOBh011018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518637 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-23 06:46:23 EDT --- will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 10:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231052.n7NAq9s6015727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-23 06:52:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Is this bug still actual ? Definitely, it is. Nobody made full review so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 11:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231149.n7NBnAhM020546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 Andrey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #12 from Andrey 2009-08-23 07:49:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Definitely, it is. Nobody made full review so far. Right now we have F11/Eclipse 3.4.2, initial request was for F7/Eclipse 3.2.1. And I can't see spec file actual for today given somewhere in comments. Link to spec file on comment #4 is dead. So I still wonder... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 12:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231225.n7NCP1JM026639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #16 from D Haley 2009-08-23 08:24:59 EDT --- I don't know enough about the Exif specification and the current code to understand why this test fails. If you can explain why this test will not ever affect downstream users, then disable it with a comment, otherwise please identify why the code does not work, then patch it and send patches upstream. I know it kinda sucks when you want to get a package done, but packagers stand between bugs and users! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 12:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231232.n7NCWoj6031573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #17 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-23 08:32:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > I don't know enough about the Exif specification and the current code to > understand why this test fails. If you can explain why this test will not ever > affect downstream users, then disable it with a comment, otherwise please > identify why the code does not work, then patch it and send patches upstream. > > I know it kinda sucks when you want to get a package done, but packagers stand > between bugs and users! Junit test fails because they assume: 1. You are using an en-US locale 2. You are using an UTF-8 locale For some reason, the workaround Guido found does not work with mock (and therefore koji). It still fails because of 2. Unluckily I'm not a Java programmer and I cannot patch the code myself. External help is always welcome :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 12:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231239.n7NCdM9X032568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 --- Comment #14 from Mat Booth 2009-08-23 08:39:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Hi Mat, > > Please, test it and change its karma ( at least in bodhi :-) ). I rated it positively in Bodhi, thanks. One more question, while I'm here: Is there any particular reason you packaged this version as opposed to the latest version? I was specifically after creating "summaryXml" format reports, but I see now that option is only available in Cobertura >= 1.9.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 12:53:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231253.n7NCrPbq002861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #32 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos 2009-08-23 08:53:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cerebro Short Description: presence information service Owners: Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos Branches: F-10 F-11 FedoraOLPCDelta InitialCC: michael at laptop.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 13:02:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231302.n7ND2C9p004605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #3 from David A. Wheeler 2009-08-23 09:02:10 EDT --- It doesn't use autotools, and optimization rules are irrelevant since this is implemented entirely in bash. It *does* use bindir and datadir. I can set those, and if %configure is the preferred way to set them, that's fine. As far as the doubts that this works, it "works for me", with a variety of programs. Let's let users decide if it works for them :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 13:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518473] Review Request: odf-converter-integrator - Convert Office 2007 (OOXML) files for OpenOffice.or In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231308.n7ND83FR005497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518473 --- Comment #5 from Adel Gadllah 2009-08-23 09:08:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > 2) What is more important: /usr/bin/OdfConverter is only shipped as a binary, > > ie there is no source in the tarball but just the pre build binary. > > Good catch! > > Where is the source code, Adam? I cannot find it even on SF. I did some research and it seems that OdfConverter is a separate project hosted here: http://odf-converter.sourceforge.net/ The command line tool should probably be packaged as a separate package and make the odf-convertor-integrator depend on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 14:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231405.n7NE5p9i013491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #18 from D Haley 2009-08-23 10:05:50 EDT --- I can look at this, but not for another week. I suggest emailing upstream in the mean time for assistance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 15:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] New: Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 Summary: Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phalliday at excelsiorsystems.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.excelsiorsystems.net/media/files/python-werkzeug.spec SRPM URL: http://www.excelsiorsystems.net/media/files/python-werkzeug-0.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is my first package, so I need a sponsor as well. Werkzeug started as simple collection of various utilities for WSGI applications and has become one of the most advanced WSGI utility modules. It includes a powerful debugger, full featured request and response objects, HTTP utilities to handle entity tags, cache control headers, HTTP dates, cookie handling, file uploads, a powerful URL routing system and a bunch of community contributed addon modules. Werkzeug is unicode aware and doesn't enforce a specific template engine, database adapter or anything else. It doesn't even enforce a specific way of handling requests and leaves all that up to the developer. It's most useful for end user applications which should work on as many server environments as possible (such as blogs, wikis, bulletin boards, etc.). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 15:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231518.n7NFI40T028980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 Peter Halliday changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 15:45:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518857] Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231545.n7NFjR95031352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518857 Luca Botti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 15:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231544.n7NFiMxk030941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 --- Comment #15 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2009-08-23 11:44:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Is there any particular reason you packaged this version as opposed to the > latest version? There is only one significant reason the version 1.9 was tested together with the NetBeans 6.7.1. > I was specifically after creating "summaryXml" format reports, > but I see now that option is only available in Cobertura >= 1.9.1 You can discuss inclusion of the latest version to the NetBeans here: mailto:nbusers at netbeans.org mailto:users at codecoverage.netbeans.org I'm sure if the new features of the Cobertura will be valuable for community then the latest version will be used by the NetBeans and the version, of course, will be included in Fedora. Note, we are not far from the NetBeans 6.8. AFAIU the main point to use "summaryXml" is based on existence of a large project under test. There are many users of the NetBeans who has working on very large projects. You can find support from their side in voting against RFE filed here: http://www.netbeans.org/issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 15:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518857] New: Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518857 Summary: Review Request: django-extensions - django command line extensions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: luca.botti at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-extensions.spec SRPM URL: http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-extensions-0.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a repository for collecting global custom management extensions for the Django Framework Need sponsorship - this is one of my first packages ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 15:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231551.n7NFpjm7032497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-23 11:51:44 EDT --- Btw, please do this one soon, so we can get to the packages that depend on this, like GLUT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 15:51:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231551.n7NFpHHD032439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(bos at serpentine.co | |m) --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-23 11:51:16 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [yankee at koan ghc-OpenGL]$ rpmlint -iv *rpm *spec ghc-OpenGL.src: I: checking ghc-OpenGL-devel.i586: I: checking ghc-OpenGL-devel.ppc: I: checking ghc-OpenGL-devel.x86_64: I: checking ghc-OpenGL-doc.i586: I: checking ghc-OpenGL-doc.i586: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-OpenGL library. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. ghc-OpenGL-doc.ppc: I: checking ghc-OpenGL-doc.ppc: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-OpenGL library. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. ghc-OpenGL-doc.x86_64: I: checking ghc-OpenGL-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-OpenGL library. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. ghc-OpenGL-prof.i586: I: checking ghc-OpenGL-prof.i586: E: devel-dependency ghc-OpenGL-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-OpenGL-prof.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-OpenGL-prof.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/OpenGL-2.2.1.1/libHSOpenGL-2.2.1.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-OpenGL-prof.ppc: I: checking ghc-OpenGL-prof.ppc: E: devel-dependency ghc-OpenGL-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-OpenGL-prof.ppc: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-OpenGL-prof.ppc: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/OpenGL-2.2.1.1/libHSOpenGL-2.2.1.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-OpenGL-prof.x86_64: I: checking ghc-OpenGL-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-OpenGL-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-OpenGL-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-OpenGL-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/OpenGL-2.2.1.1/libHSOpenGL-2.2.1.1_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 10 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 6 warnings. CHEKC -- All acceptable within the realm of haskell packages MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >>CHECK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >>CHECK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . >>CHECK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >>CHECK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >>CHECK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >>CHECK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >>CHECK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >>CHECK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >>CHECK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >>CHECK MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] >>CHECK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >>CHECK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] >>CHECK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] >>CHECK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] >>CHECK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] >>CHECK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] >>CHECK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] >>CHECK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] >>CHECK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] >>CHECK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] >>CHECK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] >>CHECK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] >>CHECK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] >>CHECK SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] >>CHECK SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] >>CHECK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. >>CHECK SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] >>CHECK Resolution: PASS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 16:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231626.n7NGQ2BW006180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-23 12:26:01 EDT --- ghc-tar-0.3.0.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-tar-0.3.0.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 16:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231630.n7NGUPXY007001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 16:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231629.n7NGT6NG006581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #4 from David A. Wheeler 2009-08-23 12:29:05 EDT --- Okay, here's a new package release that I believe addresses the issues above. Basically, I changed ./configure to %configure. The %configure macro includes settings for bindir and datadir, addressing the MUSTFIX. This eliminates all rpmlint complaints, too, because the macro sets libdir. Updated package here: Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/auto-destdir.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/auto-destdir-1.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Anything else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 17:25:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231725.n7NHPsWv019354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-23 13:25:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Anything else? Yes, * MUSTFIX: remove this from your spec: ... # This only has simple scripts, so there's nothing to put in a debug package: %define _enable_debug_package 0 %define debug_package %{nil} %define __os_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress %{nil} ... This doesn't make any sense. (In reply to comment #3) > As far as the doubts that this works, it "works for me", with a variety of > programs. Let's let users decide if it works for them :-). OK, then elaborate how this package works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 17:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231726.n7NHQD65016746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-23 13:26:12 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/vanessa_logger.spec ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/vanessa_logger-* 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package FIX: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - Remove the requires /sbin/ldconfig, which is available on any fedora - Remove COPYING and README from the -devel and sample package the ones in the main package are sufficient. Having them in both just creates and ownership issue as they are placed in the same place. - Change the ./configure to %configure --disable-static (the macro defines all that you have defined there - use rpm --showrc to see) OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license OK: License text included OK: The spec file must be written in American English OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source sha256sum vanessa_logger-0.0.7.tar.gz rpmbuild/SOURCES/vanessa_logger-0.0.7.tar.gz 65323bf673cbe94c7077f7bc475f95ef25a18d51f96a59cfa463a18b0e6881d0 vanessa_logger-0.0.7.tar.gz 65323bf673cbe94c7077f7bc475f95ef25a18d51f96a59cfa463a18b0e6881d0 rpmbuild/SOURCES/vanessa_logger-0.0.7.tar.gz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1627488 N\A: ExcludeArch OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires N\A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly OK: Must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N\A: If the package is designed to be relocatable OK: A package must own all directories that it creates OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once OK: Permissions on files must be set properly OK: Each package must have a %clean section OK: Each package must consistently use macros OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage N\A: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK: Header files must be in a -devel package OK: Static libraries must be in a -static package N\A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package OK: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 The issues to fix are not blockers so i will approve, please make the fixes before requesting CVS. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (vanessa_logger) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 17:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231746.n7NHkT32020131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u-t | |okyo.ac.jp) | --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-23 13:46:26 EDT --- Well, Fedora specific compilation flags are not corretly honored yet: --------------------------------------------------------- 329 FIFE msvc9 project file succesfully created (/builddir/build/BUILD/fife-2009.0_r2955/build/win32/build_environments/visual_studio_9/fife.vcproj) 330 g++ -o engine/core/audio/soundclip.os -c -fPIC -Wall -ggdb -O0 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -DLOG_ENABLED -DHAVE_ZIP -DHAVE_OPENGL -I/opt/include -I/usr/include/vorbis -I/usr/include/python2.6 -I/usr/include/SDL -Iext/install/include -Iengine/core -Iengine/swigwrappers engine/core/audio/soundclip.cpp 331 g++ -o engine/core/audio/soundemitter.os -c -fPIC -Wall -ggdb -O0 -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -DLOG_ENABLED -DHAVE_ZIP -DHAVE_OPENGL -I/opt/include -I/usr/include/vorbis -I/usr/include/python2.6 -I/usr/include/SDL -Iext/install/include -Iengine/core -Iengine/swigwrappers engine/core/audio/soundemitter.cpp --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 18:23:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222191] Review Request: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231823.n7NINgZ4028773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #13 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-23 14:23:40 EDT --- It should perhaps be renamed Merge Review, not Review Request anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 19:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 15:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518360] Review Request: hyphen-as - Assamese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908231959.n7NJxdEc009650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518360 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |caolanm at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |caolanm at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 20:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518360] Review Request: hyphen-as - Assamese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908232001.n7NK1V4Y012736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518360 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2009-08-23 16:01:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. + rpmlint is error-free for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 20:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512273] Review Request: php-pear-File-Bittorrent2 - Decode and Encode data in Bittorrent format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908232006.n7NK6I0D013730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512273 Paul W. Frields changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 22:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491545] Review Request: pynac - A modified version of GiNaC using Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908232218.n7NMIFZO032080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491545 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2009-08-23 18:18:14 EDT --- Ok, closing unless someone gets time to work on this (I don't). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 22:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518892] New: Review Request: gedit-valencia - A gedit plugin providing lightweight Vala IDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gedit-valencia - A gedit plugin providing lightweight Vala IDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518892 Summary: Review Request: gedit-valencia - A gedit plugin providing lightweight Vala IDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silvanus at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gedit-valencia.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/gedit-valencia-0.2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Valencia is a gedit plugin that turns gedit into a lightweight IDE for Vala. Using Valencia, you can easily browse between symbols in a Vala program. You can build a Vala program inside gedit and can easily jump to lines with build errors. You can also get tooltips for methods and get autocompletion suggestions by invoking autocomplete in the appropriate context. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 23 23:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908232336.n7NNaui7015889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from David Nalley 2009-08-23 19:36:55 EDT --- Andrew: Oustanding I note that you still have requires for /sbin/service, though it's not used any longer. I am sure you can fix that before it hits CVS. I have installed and am playing with this package now. Thanks for your work on this! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 02:13:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240213.n7O2DNUb004620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #6 from David A. Wheeler 2009-08-23 22:13:22 EDT --- * "MUSTFIX: remove this from your spec:" Okay, removed. Thanks for noticing. I made a few more tweaks while doing it. * "OK, then elaborate how this package works." For that, see its "man" page, esp. the "implementation approach" section. This is available as PDF here: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/make-redir.pdf A longer paper, discussing alternative approaches, is here: http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/automating-destdir.html Here's the new version, which addresses all previously-noted MUSTFIX-es: Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/auto-destdir.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/auto-destdir-1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 02:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240215.n7O2Fc7F005085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #7 from David A. Wheeler 2009-08-23 22:15:38 EDT --- FYI, I think the "_enable_debug_package 0" stuff was to make Fedora 9 or 8 happy; I wrote the original .spec file a long time ago. Obviously that's irrelevant today. In any case, it's gone now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 03:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240316.n7O3GPg9015457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #41 from Ed Brand 2009-08-23 23:16:21 EDT --- Cool, Thanks. ooking into importing into koji/bodhi -Ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 03:31:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518360] Review Request: hyphen-as - Assamese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240331.n7O3VTvZ017877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518360 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Parag 2009-08-23 23:31:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-as Short Description: Assamese hyphenation rules Owners: pnemade Branches: F-11 InitialCC: pnemade -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 03:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240338.n7O3cPtJ022693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 03:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518900] New: Review Request: desktop-effects - Switch GNOME window management and effects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: desktop-effects - Switch GNOME window management and effects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518900 Summary: Review Request: desktop-effects - Switch GNOME window management and effects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: otaylor at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/2009-August/msg00119.html Spec URL: http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/desktop-effects.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/desktop-effects-0.8.0-1.src.rpm Description: desktop-effects provides a preference dialog to allow switching the GNOME desktop between three different window managers: Metacity (the standard GNOME 2 window manager), Compiz (offering 3D acceleration and special effects), and GNOME Shell, which offers a preview of the GNOME 3 user experience. Notes: * Because this is a split-out of the desktop-effects dialog previously in compiz-gnome, compiz will need a rebuild to require rather than include desktop-effects once this lands. * No upstream tarball location - this is pretty much Fedora specific and there's no obvious place to put a tarball releases. There's a signed tag in git for the release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 03:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518900] Review Request: desktop-effects - Switch GNOME window management and effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240347.n7O3ldgK024196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518900 --- Comment #1 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-23 23:47:38 EDT --- One additional note here is that without the fix I attached to: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591171 Switching from gnome-shell to something else may work badly since gnome-shell will try to restart metacity itself when it exits and that will race with what desktop-effects is doing. (Hopefully we'll have new gnome-shell packages with that fix within the next few days.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 04:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518903] New: Review Request: ibus-table-jyutping - JyutPing input method table for IBus-Table. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-jyutping - JyutPing input method table for IBus-Table. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518903 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-jyutping - JyutPing input method table for IBus-Table. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-jyutping.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-jyutping-1.2.0.20090824-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: JyutPing input method table for IBus-Table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 04:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518903] Review Request: ibus-table-jyutping - JyutPing input method table for IBus-Table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240422.n7O4MsUD025783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518903 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 04:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240450.n7O4oC4Z002077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-24 00:50:10 EDT --- I can sponsor you. Package looks good at first glance. The only thing I'd suggest for now is that, seeing as docs/ is very large (2.6 MB!), you'd definitely have to put it in a -doc subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation Have you created your Fedora account? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account Welcome to Fedora, -- Michel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 04:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518360] Review Request: hyphen-as - Assamese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240457.n7O4vjjc003287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518360 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-24 00:57:43 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 05:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491545] Review Request: pynac - A modified version of GiNaC using Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240526.n7O5QTFr008114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491545 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 06:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518637] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp - C++ variant of Perl's XS language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240628.n7O6SCbs017051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518637 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-24 02:28:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1620165 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 63f0aeb67c0bf45bc72ef9ceafde8a2472e766d9 ExtUtils-XSpp-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=37, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.02 sys + 1.16 cusr 0.11 csys = 1.34 CPU) + Package perl-ExtUtils-XSpp-0.04-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(ExtUtils::XSpp) = 0.04 perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Driver) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Grammar) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Grammar::YappDriver) = 1.05 perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Access) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Argument) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Class) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Constructor) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Destructor) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::File) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Function) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Method) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Module) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Package) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Raw) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node::Type) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Parser) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Typemap) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Typemap::parsed) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Typemap::reference) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Typemap::simple) Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl >= 0:5.004 perl(Carp) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Driver) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Grammar) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Node) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Parser) perl(ExtUtils::XSpp::Typemap) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Path) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::Handle) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) This is noarch package so remove optimize="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" 2) also remove find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.bs' -type f -empty | xargs rm -f APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 06:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518713] Review Request: hunspell-ak - Akan hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240629.n7O6TufY017271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518713 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-24 02:29:55 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1628401 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 322f71b2f5f570685239a80116586cd2dbe8d51e akan_ns__mfuaasekyer__-0.3-fx.xpi + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 06:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226064] Merge Review: libXaw In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240633.n7O6XFJe021771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226064 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-24 02:33:13 EDT --- Approved build libXaw-1.0.6-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 06:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226064] Merge Review: libXaw In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240633.n7O6XWCx018092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226064 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 06:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226062] Merge Review: libX11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240633.n7O6XpRd018133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226062 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-24 02:33:49 EDT --- Approved build libX11-1.2.99-5.20090805.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 06:33:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226063] Merge Review: libXau In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240633.n7O6XRoa018071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226063 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-24 02:33:25 EDT --- Approved build libXau-1.0.4-8.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 06:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518910] New: Review Request: ibus-table-cantonese - Cantonese input method table for IBus-Table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-cantonese - Cantonese input method table for IBus-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518910 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-cantonese - Cantonese input method table for IBus-Table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-cantonese.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-cantonese-1.2.0.20090824-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Cantonese input method table for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 07:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240707.n7O77370028512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #20 from Filipe AZEVEDO 2009-08-24 03:07:02 EDT --- Hi, It seem this build eror comes from the introduction of Qt 4.5.2 in distros. It have been fixed in our svn trunk. I will contact eopnyme so he can update he package when it will have time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 07:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517021] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240703.n7O73s1U027799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-08-24 03:03:31 EDT --- Yes, I know. I wanted only devel branch. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 07:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518360] Review Request: hyphen-as - Assamese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240715.n7O7FePw025637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518360 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-24 03:15:39 EDT --- hyphen-as-0.20090820-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hyphen-as-0.20090820-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 07:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518713] Review Request: hunspell-ak - Akan hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240743.n7O7hOGo002937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518713 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-08-24 03:43:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-ak Short Description: Akan hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 07:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518900] Review Request: desktop-effects - Switch GNOME window management and effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240753.n7O7ru2d005028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518900 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Adel Gadllah 2009-08-24 03:53:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > * No upstream tarball location - this is pretty much Fedora > specific and there's no obvious place to put a tarball > releases. There's a signed tag in git for the release. You can upload a tarball at fedorahosted.org see: --------------- How can I publish archive releases (tgz, zip, etc) for my project? Create the archive on your workstation and run scp myProject-0.1.tar.gz fedorahosted.org:. The archive will be located under https://fedorahosted.org/releases/ Is there a more convenient way to access releases than the path /releases/m/y/myproject? There is. https://fedorahosted.org/released/myproject will go to the same place. The disadvantage of this is you must know the project name and can't browse for projects. ---------------- Build fails in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1628520&name=build.log Seems like you need to BR intltool Besides this the package seems to look good. * No dist tag, but as it will go away in F13 (so F12 only) it is probably fine. * You might want to update the Changelog and ship it as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 08:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240803.n7O83I33003132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(walters at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #15 from Adel Gadllah 2009-08-24 04:03:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Colin, Adel, ping? I fixed the URL in all branches (but only submitted a build for devel). Yeah package is imported, so bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 08:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240811.n7O8Bijs005006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |emmanuel.seyman at club-intern | |et.fr AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |emmanuel.seyman at club-intern | |et.fr Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 08:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240818.n7O8IMlP006411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #26 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-08-24 04:18:18 EDT --- ... and many thanks for your work too, David. I've noted this package is ready for CVS, but I will wait for the two other reviews, to avoid dependency problems in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 08:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240820.n7O8KCkl011810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-24 04:20:09 EDT --- David: Thanks for the review and all the help. - Fixed the requires. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipplan Short Description: Web-based IP address manager and tracker Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 08:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240827.n7O8RK5f013206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 --- Comment #2 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-08-24 04:27:18 EDT --- Hi, Sorry, SRPM URL up to date: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-gather/sblim-gather-2.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-gather/sblim-gather.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 09:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240911.n7O9Bv3b016715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-24 05:11:56 EDT --- Updated spec and srpm http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ansel/ansel.spec http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ansel/ansel-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 09:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:33:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908240933.n7O9Xrrw027819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andrew at topdog.za.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-24 05:33:51 EDT --- A few issues to begin with. * Use configure macro %configure instead of ./configure - %configure --disable-static * Remove unnecessary requires /sbin/ldconfig * Remove the files README,COPYING from the devel package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 10:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:16:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] New: Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 Summary: Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: talcite at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Please note this is my first package. I am looking for a sponsor. Spec URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/brlcad/brlcad.spec SRPM URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/brlcad/brlcad-7.14.9.20090823svn-0.fc11.src.rpm Description: BRL-CAD is a powerful Open Source combinatorial Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) solid modeling system that includes interactive 3D solid geometry editing, high-performance ray-tracing support for rendering, geometric analysis, signal-processing tools, path-tracing, and photon mapping support for geometric representation and analysis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 10:50:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241050.n7OAoIsT003865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-24 06:49:59 EDT --- Approved. Please commit the packaging process as described as from this section: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 11:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241145.n7OBjDTG020863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #6 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-24 07:45:12 EDT --- Thanks a lot for reviewing the package. Updated the spec file with the changes suggested. New spec file: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/beacon.spec New SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/beacon-0.5-2.fc11.src.rpm I updated the spec file to require webserver instead of httpd but I am unsure if I should own /etc/httpd. Could you please explain this a bit as I seem to be missing something here. The beacon upstream shifted to using MySQL (they used flat files before because of which I needed /var/tmp) so I could simply remove that and update the tarball. I also added settings.php to %config(noreplace) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 11:47:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518900] Review Request: desktop-effects - Switch GNOME window management and effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241147.n7OBlnPR014613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518900 --- Comment #3 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-24 07:47:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Create the archive on your workstation and run scp myProject-0.1.tar.gz > fedorahosted.org:. The archive will be located under > https://fedorahosted.org/releases/ Oh, cool, I didn't know about that. > Build fails in koji: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1628520&name=build.log > Seems like you need to BR intltool Hmm, yep. Also missing desktop-file-utils. (I started a Koji scratch build before, but forgot to check if it finished succesfully. Built fine with those two additions.) > Besides this the package seems to look good. > * No dist tag, but as it will go away in F13 (so F12 only) it is probably fine. Just an oversight. Added. > * You might want to update the Changelog and ship it as %doc I don't really like ChangeLogs for projects if there's alraeady a verbose and readable version control log. Adding a disthook to turn git history into a distributed ChangeLog or writing NEWS manually is definitely possible, but for this project I'm too lazy :-) I've now added a note to the ChangeLog in git that it intentionally isn't being updated. New spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/desktop-effects.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnome.org/~otaylor/desktop-effects-0.8.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 12:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518900] Review Request: desktop-effects - Switch GNOME window management and effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241207.n7OC7rfi018706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518900 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Adel Gadllah 2009-08-24 08:07:52 EDT --- ================== REVIEW ================== [+] source files match upstream: c05c44d0f4b0c1749a54f91eb1257cce4fc38881 [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible: GPLv2+ [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1628777 [+] package installs properly. [+] debuginfo package looks complete. [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] final provides and requires are sane: desktop-effects = 0.8.0-2.fc12 desktop-effects(x86-64) = 0.8.0-2.fc12 ---- /bin/sh /bin/sh gnome-session hicolor-icon-theme libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXcomposite.so.1()(64bit) libXfixes.so.3()(64bit) libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgconf-2.so.4()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglade-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libxml2.so.2()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] scriptlets are sane. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [+] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. [+] desktop files valid and installed properly. ================== COMMENTS ================== Looks fine => APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 12:13:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241213.n7OCDI0g026646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-24 08:13:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Updated the spec file with the changes suggested. Thanks! > I updated the spec file to require webserver instead of httpd but I am unsure > if I should own /etc/httpd. Could you please explain this a bit as I seem to be > missing something here. If you create a directory that neither you nor none of your dependencies own, that directory would not be removed upon package removal. That could happen in case user would elect to use e.g. lighttpd instead of apache httpd (which would satisfy the webserver dependency). So you can either depend on "webserver" and own /etc/httpd, or depend directly on "httpd" (as you did previously). It might be a better idea to just switch back to httpd (since you use apache:apache user, etc.); sorry for the noise. Also, please improve your %description, it seems rather short and uninformative. I don't think any of these are blockers, I'll approve the package once you are sponsored. Please apply for packagers group so that you can get sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 12:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241236.n7OCasP7025437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-24 08:36:50 EDT --- The RPM builds fine on both F-12 and F-11. Bothe build have a lot of "Cannot stat: No such file or directory" errrors but F-12 has a number of failures in the make check. I'll review more formally shortly. F-11 build log: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1628827&name=build.log F-12 build log: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1628818&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 12:48:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513892] Review Request: bilbo - Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241248.n7OCmGCs027730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513892 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-24 08:48:15 EDT --- Here is the full review of your package. There are just a few issues to be fixed (see below). rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. [X] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - please update the License field to "GPLv3+ and LGPLv2+" [X] MUST: Files containing license texts must be added to %doc. - you should also include bilbokblog/COPYING containing the L(ibrary)GPL license text (rename it to COPYING.LGPL) [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources in the SRPM must match the upstream source. - md5 hash is 396da4f5fc1d91d692eefaf8e9871795 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile,... [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable,... - package not relocatable [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in %files [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: %clean section must contain rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - no header files packaged [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' [.] MUST: .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - no .so files/symlinks without suffixes packaged [.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency - no devel package [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [X] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - in the %install section, you should check the .desktop file integrity with desktop-file-validate (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files) [+] MUST: Packages must not own files/dirs already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: %install MUST start with run rm -rf %{buildroot} [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - builds in koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1628570 [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. - application seems to work properly [X] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. - used scriptlets are required and sane - you have to update the icon cache using gtk-update-icon-cache (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 12:50:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241250.n7OCow57028402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #8 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-24 08:50:56 EDT --- Thanks a lot! New Description: Beacon is an XSLT based plug-able WYSIWYG editor for DocBook xml. It is intended to serve as an easy to use tool which will attract new contributors who would otherwise be discouraged by the steep learning curve involved with DocBook and will also provide a convenient alternative to those who are old-timers. More information is available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocBook_Editor_Documentation and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocBook_Editor_Feature. New spec file: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/beacon.spec New SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/beacon-0.5-3.fc11.src.rpm I just applied to join the packagers group. My FAS username is satyak. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 12:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241256.n7OCumPT004353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-24 08:56:47 EDT --- The license tag is still incorrect, instead of GPLv2 it should be GPLv2+ as the license statement is * This file may be used subject to the terms and conditions of the * GNU Library General Public License Version 2, or any later version * at your option, as published by the Free Software Foundation. ** Restore the chmod 0644 tests/test.sh in %prep, it is needed after all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 12:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518900] Review Request: desktop-effects - Switch GNOME window management and effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241255.n7OCts9U004239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518900 Owen Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-24 08:55:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: desktop-effects Short Description: Switch GNOME window management and effects Owners: otaylor drago01 Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 12:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241258.n7OCwPOu030184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 13:09:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241309.n7OD993m007251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-24 09:09:08 EDT --- Oh, and change the description to adtool is a unix command line utility for Active Directory administration. Features include user and group creation, deletion, modification, password setting and directory query and search capabilities. (you can use longer lines without getting any warnings) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 13:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241318.n7ODIIGT003553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-08-24 09:18:16 EDT --- Seems fine now. Accepted you into packager group, lifting FE-NEEDSPONSOR. The package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 13:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241357.n7ODvSZg013632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(zoglesby at zach.tk) | --- Comment #26 from Zach Oglesby 2009-08-24 09:57:24 EDT --- Indeed, sorry we just had a baby and I see to not have enough time in the day, I will try and get it updated today or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 14:01:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241401.n7OE1tFA021039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #10 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-24 10:01:53 EDT --- Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 14:39:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241439.n7OEdeKa030407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-24 10:39:37 EDT --- *** Bug 236856 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 14:39:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - An extensive Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) modeling system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241439.n7OEdd0M030373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-24 10:39:37 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 518949 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 14:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241447.n7OElkUF000956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-24 10:47:45 EDT --- Matt, you're using x86_64 as a marker for 64-bt arch - please, keep in mind, that we also have sparc and ppc64 targets. I'll post more notes later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 15:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519009] New: Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 Summary: Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nushio at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/gnome-do-docklets/gnome-do-docklets.spec SRPM URL: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/gnome-do-docklets/gnome-do-docklets-0.8.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains various docklets for GNOME Do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 15:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241521.n7OFL389003082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 --- Comment #1 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-08-24 11:21:02 EDT --- As a note: The Volume Control docklet appears to be broken. Perhaps I should remove it from the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 15:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241534.n7OFYmAX013587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-24 11:34:47 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fpaste-0.3.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 15:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241540.n7OFe8ak015229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-24 11:40:07 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fpaste-0.3.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 15:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241539.n7OFdxqm014741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(zdzichu at irc.pl) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-24 11:39:57 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 15:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507631] Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - Ruby module for reading and writing zip files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241545.n7OFj47l016418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507631 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(mastahnke at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-24 11:45:03 EDT --- Closing. If someone want to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 16:48:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241648.n7OGm3DY028856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-24 12:48:01 EDT --- Some notes: * URL - The URL written in the spec file seems 404. * BuildRequires: - Would you explain why "BuildRequires: automake, autoconf, libtool, zlib-devel" are needed? It seems none of them is needed. * %makeinstall - Please avoid to use %makeinstall unless unavoildable: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used Try to use ------------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------------ to also keep timestamps on installed files. * %defattr - Now on Fedora %defattr(-,root,root,-) is preferred. * About package structure - Would you explain why you want to create 5 binary rpms instead of just creating libtelnet and -devel binary rpms? The result binary rpms are very small (among current Fedora rpms), no other dependencies are needed when installing these packages and currently I don't see any benefit on creating 5 binary rpms. Note that every time you modify your spec file please change the release number to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 17:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241728.n7OHScct028831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-24 13:28:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > A few issues to begin with. > > * Use configure macro %configure instead of ./configure > - %configure --disable-static Ok. > * Remove unnecessary requires /sbin/ldconfig Done. > * Remove the files README,COPYING from the devel package I have done that. Bot now rpmlint complain about no documentation: $ rpmlint vanessa_adt-devel-0.0.7-5.fc11.athlon.rpm vanessa_adt-devel.athlon: W: no-documentation Is it normal (It was why I add it)? http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_adt/vanessa_adt-0.0.7-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 18:05:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500261] Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241805.n7OI5P5Q005519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500261 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-24 14:05:24 EDT --- Full review request: bug #519051. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 18:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519051] New: Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051 Summary: Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/maven2-plugin-shade.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/maven2-plugin-shade-1.0-5.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides the capability to package the artifact in an uber-jar, including its dependencies and to shade - i.e. rename - the packages of some of the dependencies. This is a regular full review request. The old pre-review request was bug #500261. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 18:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241820.n7OIKS88017802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #21 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-08-24 14:20:25 EDT --- Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/monkeystudio.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc11/monkeystudio-1.8.4.0-0.1.20090824svn3243.fc11.src.rpm Changelog : I'm now using svn version. Package now builds on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1630094 rpmlint output : monkeystudio.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/Empty file/$File Name$ monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.cpp monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.h monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 14 warnings. As I now have an x86_64 processor, I'll make tests about the plugins thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 18:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241851.n7OIp6vk024915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #14 from D. Marlin 2009-08-24 14:51:04 EDT --- Review of package network-manager-netbook-1.2-4 OK * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint SPECS/network-manager-netbook.spec network-manager-netbook-1.2-4.fc12.* network-manager-netbook.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/network-manager-netbook.desktop network-manager-netbook.ppc64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/network-manager-netbook.desktop network-manager-netbook.ppc: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/network-manager-netbook.desktop network-manager-netbook.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/network-manager-netbook.desktop 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. network-manager-netbook.desktop is not a "config" file - can ignore warning. OK * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. e45589dde04728029f0afa616af6fed3 SOURCES/network-manager-netbook-1.2.tar.bz2 OK * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. N/A * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. N/A * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. N/A * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. # Issues with this due to MOBLIN autostart value not recognized by Fedora's d-f-u network-manager-netbook.desktop fails validation only due to unregistered value "MOBLIN" $ desktop-file-validate network-manager-netbook.desktop network-manager-netbook.desktop: error: value "MOBLIN;" for key "OnlyShowIn" in group "Desktop Entry" contains an unregistered value "MOBLIN"; values extending the format should start with "X-" This has been submitted for registration, and is required for proper operation. OK * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: OK * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. #Copy license files until upstream fixes them in git N/A * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. OK * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. It does appear that .configure is still being run twice, once in autogen.sh and once during the %build stage. autogen.sh does not appear to recognize the NOCONFIGURE=true added to the spec file. This is not a blocker, but something that should probably be addressed at some point. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:13:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241913.n7OJDaCD021663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-24 15:13:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > - Remove the requires /sbin/ldconfig, which is available on any fedora Ok. > - Remove COPYING and README from the -devel and sample package the ones in the > main package are sufficient. Having them in both just creates and ownership > issue as they are placed in the same place. Done. But now rpmlint complain 'no documentation'. Is it normal? > - Change the ./configure to %configure --disable-static (the macro defines all > that you have defined there - use rpm --showrc to see) Ok. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_logger/vanessa_logger-0.0.7-4.fc11.src.rpm Andrew Colin Kissa, thank you very much for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241914.n7OJEVGG029766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-24 15:14:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vanessa_logger Short Description: Generic logging layer Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518318] Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241920.n7OJKCB1031137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-24 15:20:11 EDT --- http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_socket/vanessa_socket-0.0.7-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:25:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519051] Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241925.n7OJPXGY025335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jjohnstn at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jjohnstn at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-24 15:25:32 EDT --- Review Comments: 1. There is a BSD license at the top of the spec. Should the licensing add "and BSD"? 2. The description for the javadoc sub-package should be: This package contains the API documentation for %{name}. The template has its group as Development/Documentation, not Documentation. 3. The Java packaging guidelines state that there should be: Requires: jpackage-utils 4. The following sections from the maven template of the Java guidelines are missing. %post %update_maven_depmap %postun %update_maven_depmap -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518317] Review Request: perdition - Mail Retrieval Proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241934.n7OJYqKj027761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518317 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-24 15:34:51 EDT --- http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/perdition/perdition-1.17.1-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241938.n7OJcw9L029396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:38:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241940.n7OJeaYA029959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:40:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503598] Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241937.n7OJb4io028952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:37:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241937.n7OJbrxO029100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:37:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519051] Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241939.n7OJdfdo029504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-24 15:39:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1. There is a BSD license at the top of the spec. Should the licensing > add "and BSD"? The License field is for the contents of the package, not the .spec. > 2. The description for the javadoc sub-package should be: > > This package contains the API documentation for %{name}. Done. > The template has its group as Development/Documentation, not Documentation. That makes rpmlint whine. > 3. The Java packaging guidelines state that there should be: > > Requires: jpackage-utils Fixed. > 4. The following sections from the maven template of the Java > guidelines are missing. > > %post > %update_maven_depmap > > %postun > %update_maven_depmap Oops :) Fixed. http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/maven2-plugin-shade.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/maven2-plugin-shade-1.0-6.fc11.src.rpm P.S. I think you're supposed to set the fedora-review flag to '?' while you're reviewing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518713] Review Request: hunspell-ak - Akan hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241942.n7OJgU3H004183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518713 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:42:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518900] Review Request: desktop-effects - Switch GNOME window management and effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241941.n7OJfX4s030385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518900 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:41:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518447] Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241951.n7OJpcAs005996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518447 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:51:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241953.n7OJrIlM006282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:53:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:54:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518448] Review Request: moblin-panel-pasteboard - Moblin Panel for Paste Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241954.n7OJs8v6000474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518448 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:54:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518449] Review Request: moblin-panel-people - Moblin Panel for People In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241952.n7OJqMAc032609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518449 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:52:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:56:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241956.n7OJuCMX001250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-24 15:56:10 EDT --- We aren't doing F-12 branches yet. Otherwise, cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 19:58:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908241958.n7OJwbbV001502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-24 15:58:36 EDT --- It can probably be excluded for now, yes. Let me see if it works on F-12 (small chance, considering I'm packaging something right now that works fine in F-11 but breaks on F-12!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 20:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503598] Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242014.n7OKEgiD004526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-24 16:14:41 EDT --- sphinxbase-0.4.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sphinxbase-0.4.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 20:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518713] Review Request: hunspell-ak - Akan hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242010.n7OKAiYH003965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518713 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 20:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519051] Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242014.n7OKEhSI010639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-24 16:14:42 EDT --- Thanks for addressing the comments. I have set the Fedora-review flag. Package approval waiting on build of package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 20:28:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242028.n7OKSGYl013336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 --- Comment #15 from Sergio Pascual 2009-08-24 16:28:15 EDT --- rpmlint OK name: a better name would be yum-plugin-download-order license: OK license included: OK spec legible: OK sources match upstream: OK compiles: FAIL, you have to add python-devel to BuildRequires to compile the package it owns all directories that it creates: OK permissions: OK clean section: OK macros consistent: OK So, you have to add python-devel to BuildRequires. A better name for the package is yum-plugin-download-order, according to the majority of the yum plugins -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 20:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242028.n7OKSup8007388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #35 from Linuxguy123 2009-08-24 16:28:52 EDT --- I'm happy to see all the activity happening with regards to Navit. Good work. Has it been published to any repositories yet ? Thanks ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 20:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518900] Review Request: desktop-effects - Switch GNOME window management and effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242033.n7OKX9jv014420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518900 Owen Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-24 16:33:08 EDT --- Build into F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 20:36:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242036.n7OKaIYP009889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 --- Comment #3 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-08-24 16:36:17 EDT --- I found the bug on gnome-do's launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/do/+bug/395740 Its fixed in trunk, but they haven't released a fix to the public. Disabling until a new version ships it should be fine. The same Volume Docklet bug affected some Ubuntu users I talked with, so its not distro related. Updated the SPEC and SRPM to match. Also note that I disabled the PPC* builds while the rebuild is going on Fedora 11. Spec URL: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/gnome-do-docklets/gnome-do-docklets.spec SRPM URL: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/gnome-do-docklets/gnome-do-docklets-0.8.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 20:52:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242052.n7OKqiuZ018850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #8 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-24 16:52:43 EDT --- Ok. Simplified the doc dir. https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-facade.spec https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-facade-1.0.4-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 20:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242054.n7OKsg4n019107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 --- Comment #6 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-24 16:54:41 EDT --- You're right. The test_pathname.rb only needs some minor changes to run with ruby 1.8. Fixed that, and simplified the doc dir in the %files section. https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-pathname2.spec https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-pathname2-1.6.2-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 20:59:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242059.n7OKxjXl014018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-24 16:59:44 EDT --- You can safely ignore that rpmlint error, will do the full review later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 21:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] New: Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 Summary: Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugzilla-redhat at jens.kuehnel.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/wiipresent.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/wiipresent-0.7.5.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: wiipresent is a program to control applications using your Nintendo Wii Remote, short wiimote. It was originally developed for giving presentations with your wiimote, but can also be used to control your mouse-pointer and control various applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 21:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519073] New: Review Request: chrootuid - This tool offers su and chroot fuctionaltity in one program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chrootuid - This tool offers su and chroot fuctionaltity in one program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519073 Summary: Review Request: chrootuid - This tool offers su and chroot fuctionaltity in one program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugzilla-redhat at jens.kuehnel.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/chrootuid.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/chrootuid-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Chrootuid makes it easy to run a network service at low privilege level and with restricted file system access. At Eindhoven University we use this program to run the gopher and www (world-wide web) network daemons in a minimal environment: the daemons have access only to their own directory tree, and run under a low-privileged userid. The arrangement greatly reduces the impact of possible loopholes in daemon software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 21:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519074] New: Review Request: fakeroot-ng - Fools programs into thinking they are running with root permission Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fakeroot-ng - Fools programs into thinking they are running with root permission https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519074 Summary: Review Request: fakeroot-ng - Fools programs into thinking they are running with root permission Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugzilla-redhat at jens.kuehnel.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/fakeroot-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/fakeroot-ng-0.17-0.1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Fakeroot-ng is a clean re-implementation of fakeroot. The core idea is to run a program, but wrap all system calls that program performs so that it thinks it is running as root, while it is, in practice, running as an unprivileged user. When the program is trying to perform a privileged operation (such as modifying a file's owner or creating a block device), this operation is emulated, so that an unprivileged operation is actually carried out, but the result of the privileged operation is reported to the program whenever it attempts to query the result. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 21:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242125.n7OLPCHA019129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmaphy at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 21:24:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242124.n7OLOQNg018749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-24 17:24:25 EDT --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1630524 There are some things to fix: to sum up, spec file permission, and a directory ownership problem that's really a gnome-do packaging bug. MUST ? rpmlint: gnome-do-docklets.src: W: strange-permission gnome-do-docklets.spec 0755 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. gnome-do-docklets.x86_64: E: no-binary gnome-do-docklets.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. spec permission needs to be fixed; the binary warnings are fine for Mono ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK note: do you plan to get it into F-11 that fast? otherwise we can still enable ppc* builds, at least for Rawhide ? build dependencies complete: OK ? locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: N/A ? own all directories: FAIL oops, bug. Nobody owns this! Could you update gnome-do so it creates %{_libdir}/gnome-do/plugins and own it? ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures: PPC unknown ? package functioned as described: This one is problematic. On Rawhide x86_64, none of the docklets show up on the dock. I could configure the Weather docklet, after which it does show an icon in the list of docklets, but it does not appear on the dock. All the others have the package icon in the listing and do not show up. ? scriplets are sane: OK ? other subpackages should require versioned base ? if main pkg is development-wise, pkgconfig can go in main package ? require package not files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 21:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519074] Review Request: fakeroot-ng - Fools programs into thinking they are running with root permission In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242127.n7OLRCoS025529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519074 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmaphy at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 21:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519073] Review Request: chrootuid - This tool offers su and chroot fuctionaltity in one program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242125.n7OLPlkN025413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519073 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmaphy at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 21:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242127.n7OLRWBX019480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-24 17:27:32 EDT --- Correction: I was not configuring the docklets properly. Confirmed that volume control is not working, everything else seems to work. I can't test workspace switcher as gnome-shell handles workspaces differently. The battery docklet hilariously misread my battery status as 109.7% but seems to work fine -- detecting plugging and unplugging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 21:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242127.n7OLRgg3019528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jjohnstn at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jjohnstn at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-24 17:27:41 EDT --- rpmlint successful rpmlint backport-util-concurrent-3.1-2.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Comments: 1. Add details of how SOURCE0 was created. 2. Change the description of javadoc sub-package to be: This package contains the API documentation for %{name}. 3. Add Requires: jpackage-utils 4. Why isn't the standard defattr used in %files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 21:45:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242145.n7OLjdeN023236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 --- Comment #6 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-08-24 17:45:38 EDT --- Fixing gnome-do permissions. Now gnome-do will own the plugins dir. Also enabling PPC and PPC64 as requested. (Same SPEC URL) As for the functional package? I had a bit of a hiccup too. I had to enable the 'docky' theme, then switch to classic, and switch back to 'docky'. The second time, the plugins showed up and worked. I don't have a laptop, so I can't confirm the battery status personally, but I did read a blogpost where the KDE battery said 5800000% left, might be related? The workspace switcher does work on Gnome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518449] Review Request: moblin-panel-people - Moblin Panel for People In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242212.n7OMCbYb001208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518449 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-24 18:12:36 EDT --- I can't seem to check this module out. I'm getting the following errors. $ fedora-cvs moblin-panel-people Checking out moblin-panel-people from fedora CVS as pbrobinson: cvs server: cannot find module `moblin-panel-people' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:13:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242213.n7OMDL0g027826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-24 18:13:18 EDT --- Built and on its way to rawhide. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:13:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518448] Review Request: moblin-panel-pasteboard - Moblin Panel for Paste Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242213.n7OMDU5f027865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518448 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-24 18:13:29 EDT --- Built and on its way to rawhide. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:14:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242214.n7OMEX3L001447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-24 18:14:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Built and on its way to rawhide. Thanks! Not built. wrong bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242216.n7OMGYJR002064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-24 18:16:32 EDT --- Thanks. All fixed: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/backport-util-concurrent.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/backport-util-concurrent-3.1-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242222.n7OMMv8j029577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 D. Marlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242227.n7OMRIOn004101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-24 18:27:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: network-manager-netbook Short Description: Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:28:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518447] Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242228.n7OMS9Hm030462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518447 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-24 18:28:08 EDT --- built in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242230.n7OMU6Q2030952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-08-24 18:30:04 EDT --- Hi Mattias, 1) First the simple rpmlint errors. voms.src:387: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package vomsjapi %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} (Should be fixed) voms-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on voms/voms-libs/libvoms (I'm not sure what this is) voms-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation (okay) voms-server.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/voms (should be easy enough to add or maybe it looks like a specific lock is created? Its tricky I don't know of anything else that launches multiple deamons per configuration) voms-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name voms ('voms-server', 'voms-serverd') (okay) 2) Why is it? %package -n vomsjapi and not just %package japi 3) After installing voms-server # service voms start ls: cannot access /etc/voms: No such file or directory [root at globus x86_64]# echo $? 0 /etc/voms should be created and owned by the package. I guess (not checked) voms is the directory containing the /voms.conf files? If so maybe /etc/voms.d/ might be better? 3.1) Is it worth adding an example configuration and perhaps a README.Fedora to describe simply how to get up and running? Create database., ... 4) Given there is no need to run voms as root ( except host cert) is it a good idea to add a voms user and run as that? I realise it gets to a point where the init script ends up being written from scratch. 5) For my own education I expect in BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel%{?_isa} why/how is the %{?_isa} added? 6) Concerning EPEL support this is probably only difficult because of the bouncycastle requirment which requires a slew of missing dependencies. Could it be built without the javaapi support? It is a lot less important I would say. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242233.n7OMXCUO005002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-24 18:33:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks. All fixed: > > http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/backport-util-concurrent.spec > http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/backport-util-concurrent-3.1-3.src.rpm Ok, thanks. Approval now pending a successful build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 22:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 18:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242238.n7OMcI2t032131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-24 18:38:17 EDT --- This package should be buildable on F-11 or even on F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 23:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242330.n7ONUeXD008618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #1 from Gareth John 2009-08-24 19:30:39 EDT --- Hi Till, I'm looking to get sponsored and your package has raised a few questions for me on my informal review. I'm pretty sure I'm right in saing you don't need prefix={_prefix} in install and configure. However I question if you do need a .desktop file or not considering that the target interface for this is plain WMs not DEs, it is at least something to think about though. Jussi I hope you can provide some guidance on this and tell me that I am maybe reading too much into the matter of the .desktop file. * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation....NEEDSWORK - Not sure if these apps are considered GUI as they would run in a DE. They may need a .desktop file I'm not too sure on this but its a thought. * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker....NEEDSWORK - Not sure if you need to use prefix in the configure and install sections as the {_prefix} macro is automatically appended to the build, even if source default is /usr/local/ it doesn't end there. At least from the package I built that defaults to /usr/local/ this is true. * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review....OK * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines....OK * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption....OK * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines....OK * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines....OK * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license....OK * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc....OK * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English....OK * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible....OK * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this....OK * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture....OK * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line.....OK * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense....OK * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden....N/A * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun....N/A * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory....OK * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings....OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line....OK * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)....OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros....OK * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content....OK * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity)....N/A * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present....OK * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package....N/A * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package....N/A * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability)....N/A * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package....N/A * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}....N/A * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built....OK * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time....OK * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)....OK * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8....OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 23:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242339.n7ONdrZh009945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #57 from Gareth John 2009-08-24 19:39:50 EDT --- Sorry I know I said I would do it by the end of the week but got a bit busy in other matters! Is done now for you I have also just changed paperbox and will post that later on tonight after checking it builds and checking rpmlint output is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 23:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242348.n7ONmkUU017664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #36 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-24 19:48:44 EDT --- no, I'm still waiting for someone to officially approve it. You can grab the last .src.rpm I posted and rebuild it, though. It works fine. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 23:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242354.n7ONsfjL012296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #17 from Gareth John 2009-08-24 19:54:40 EDT --- That's the final two fixes done FILES http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/paperbox-0.4.3-2.fc11.src.rpm http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/paperbox.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 24 23:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908242357.n7ONvTeR012929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #58 from Gareth John 2009-08-24 19:57:28 EDT --- Ok release numbers changed FILES http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 02:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250205.n7P25U5d001273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Dean Glazeski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Dean Glazeski 2009-08-24 22:05:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openocd Short Description: Debugging, in-system programming and boundary-scan testing for embedded devices Owners: dnglaze Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 02:28:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519009] Review Request: gnome-do-docklets - Docklets for gnome-do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250228.n7P2SFlC013033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519009 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-24 22:28:13 EDT --- Not sure; on mine it seems to be off by only about 10% or so. Though today yum shows me progress percentages of thousands of percents for each download, heh. OK, everything else is fine -- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250405.n7P456nE031366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 --- Comment #2 from Peter Halliday 2009-08-25 00:05:05 EDT --- I have already created my Fedora account yes. My username is hoangelos. I have applied for the packager group, but haven't been approved yet. I re-uploaded the spec and SRPM files to my server with the changes that you described. I have created the docs as a subpackage. Thanks for the welcome. I have a few other RPMs I'm going to submit after I get this down. I'm proud to contribute to an operating system and a distrubtion that I've enjoyed for so long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250416.n7P4Gejx000653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Gary T. Giesen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250427.n7P4RY0K002719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:27:33 EDT --- ccze-0.2.1-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510788] Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250428.n7P4SMYI002900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510788 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:28:20 EDT --- WebShell-0.9.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510788] Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250428.n7P4SRSL002955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510788 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.6-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250427.n7P4Ro92002770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Bug 498277 depends on bug 498276, which changed state. Bug 498276 Summary: Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:27:49 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4TT4Y028558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:29:28 EDT --- potrace-1.8-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250426.n7P4Q77I027786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:26:05 EDT --- ghc-tar-0.3.0.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:25:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250425.n7P4Pset027600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:25:53 EDT --- trac-tracnav-plugin-4.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233588] Review Request: perl-Graph - A Perl module for dealing with graphs, the abstract data structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4TV3L028587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233588 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.84-1.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4Tlaj028681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.0-3 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250428.n7P4SBkK028296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.248-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4TdUc028637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:29:37 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update shmpps'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0329 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250426.n7P4Qk40028007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:26:45 EDT --- php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8896 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4TgFW003514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:29:40 EDT --- reinteract-0.5.0-3 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4TG3x003356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:29:15 EDT --- fbzx-2.1b-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:31:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:31:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250431.n7P4Vbjn004313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:31:34 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250433.n7P4XGw5004677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:33:15 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510788] Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250431.n7P4VEnO004208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510788 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.6-3.fc10 |0.9.6-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518360] Review Request: hyphen-as - Assamese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4T91Z003316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518360 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.20090820-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4TLbZ003397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.1b-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4TX3i003470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.8-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250431.n7P4VoOd004389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:31:48 EDT --- zyx-liveinstaller-0.1.10-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zyx-liveinstaller'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510788] Review Request: WebShell - Encrypted shell access via web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250431.n7P4V9Ao029696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510788 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:31:08 EDT --- WebShell-0.9.6-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250431.n7P4VgrK029856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc1 | |0 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250433.n7P4XNoU030166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:33:22 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fpaste'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8931 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250437.n7P4bFSo006382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:37:14 EDT --- ccze-0.2.1-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250437.n7P4bS52006461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:37:27 EDT --- fbzx-2.1b-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250437.n7P4bKB9006421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.2.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250437.n7P4bXRj006497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1b-2.fc10 |2.1b-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250437.n7P4bjvD006560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.8-4.fc11 |1.8-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510982] Review Request: psimedia - Audio and video RTP services for Psi-like IM clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250438.n7P4cXG9006779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510982 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.3-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510982] Review Request: psimedia - Audio and video RTP services for Psi-like IM clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250438.n7P4cT9u031691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510982 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:38:27 EDT --- psimedia-1.0.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250440.n7P4eU8v032382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.0-1.fc11 |0.9.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250439.n7P4dMkG031837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.0-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250437.n7P4bAXF031490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:37:09 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update fpaste'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8943 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:39:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250439.n7P4deMd031906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:39:39 EDT --- php-ezc-Feed-1.2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Feed'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8949 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250439.n7P4d6jF007237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:39:05 EDT --- xblas-1.0.248-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:39:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250439.n7P4dHfU007301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:39:16 EDT --- blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:40:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250440.n7P4eQsX007866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:40:25 EDT --- blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250439.n7P4dABo007269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.248-2.fc11 |1.0.248-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250442.n7P4gKkm008266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc1 |0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc1 |0 |1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250442.n7P4gEx2000669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:42:13 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250447.n7P4lLiF010270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:47:20 EDT --- php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein-1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8978 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250437.n7P4beKm031562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:37:39 EDT --- potrace-1.8-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518360] Review Request: hyphen-as - Assamese hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4T40Z028476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518360 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:29:04 EDT --- hyphen-as-0.20090820-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250428.n7P4S710002810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:28:06 EDT --- xblas-1.0.248-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:29:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233588] Review Request: perl-Graph - A Perl module for dealing with graphs, the abstract data structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250429.n7P4TRsX003431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233588 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:29:25 EDT --- perl-Graph-0.84-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250425.n7P4PxCc027644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.1-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250426.n7P4QCmo002522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.0.0-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 04:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250447.n7P4lBng010230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 00:47:10 EDT --- php-ezc-Feed-1.2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Feed'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8977 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 06:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250631.n7P6VDvp020246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2009-08-25 02:31:12 EDT --- Thx for your preliminary review. (In reply to comment #1) > * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop > file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the > %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need > a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your > explanation....NEEDSWORK > - Not sure if these apps are considered GUI as they would run in a DE. They > may need a .desktop file I'm not too sure on this but its a thought. I can add a comment, why there is no .desktop file. It does not make sense to have one, because dzen2 needs to get data from stdin, which cannot be passed if it is run from a .desktop file. > * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state > this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for > relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is > considered a blocker....NEEDSWORK I do not use Prefix: /usr in the spec. This would be a Tag like "Name: dzen2" or "Version 0.8.5" in the beginning of the spec file. > - Not sure if you need to use prefix in the configure and install sections as > the {_prefix} macro is automatically appended to the build, even if source > default is /usr/local/ it doesn't end there. At least from the package I built > that defaults to /usr/local/ this is true. I am very sure that prefix is needed at least in %install, because it does not use any special build system like autotools oder cmake. There the path is passed to the makefiles using the %configure or %cmake macro. But here only plain make files are used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 06:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250642.n7P6gMSh029793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-25 02:42:20 EDT --- Yap; your request to join packager gets approved when your sponsor signs off on your first package (in this case, this one). Reviewing using this Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1631426 MUST ? rpmlint: source: clean main package: clean -doc subpackage: 1 warning You'd want to remove _build/html/.buildinfo within the %install section. Examples are also rather large, and non-essential to using the main package, so they should go into -doc as well. Also, since the documentation is already pre-built (so you don't need to BR: on python-sphinx and build it yourself), you really only want the content of _build/html. Thus %doc docs/_build/html examples and then you can update %description doc -- currently it's even shorter than the summary! You can say, for example, (optionally copy the first paragraph of the main package's %description here) This package contains documentation and examples for %{name}. ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK 620955f34b8424c92674fe76d5c47679 Werkzeug-0.5.1.zip 620955f34b8424c92674fe76d5c47679 ../SOURCES/Werkzeug-0.5.1.zip ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK (noarch, Koji) ? build dependencies complete: OK ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? large docs => -doc: Almost (see above) ? doc not runtime dependent: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK (noarch, Koji) ? package functioned as described: not tested ? scriplets are sane: OK ? other subpackages should require versioned base: OK ? require package not files: OK One more minor change and I'll approve this and the packager request. Cheers, -- Michel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 06:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250643.n7P6hX3U022039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 06:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250659.n7P6xMjk000635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-25 02:59:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > - Not sure if you need to use prefix in the configure and install sections as > > the {_prefix} macro is automatically appended to the build, even if source > > default is /usr/local/ it doesn't end there. At least from the package I built > > that defaults to /usr/local/ this is true. > > I am very sure that prefix is needed at least in %install, because it does not > use any special build system like autotools oder cmake. There the path is > passed to the makefiles using the %configure or %cmake macro. But here only > plain make files are used. Some programs need to set the prefix also in the build phase, if paths are hard coded with definitions in the source code. This is not the case here. Use just export CFLAGS="%{optflags}" export LDFLAGS="%{optflags}" make %{?_smp_mflags} DZEN_XINERAMA=1 DZEN_XPM=1 make -C gadgets %{?_smp_mflags} in %build and rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT PREFIX=%{_prefix} make -C gadgets install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT PREFIX=%{_prefix} in %install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 07:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250706.n7P76UuX002208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-25 03:06:29 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - Check comment #3. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK - The install target of the makefiles is a bit oddly written (uses 'cp' and 'chmod' instead if 'install'). - All files that are copied by the makefile have been compiled in %build and thus don't have a time stamp worth preserving. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A - Program works with stdin, not applicable. MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. NEEDSWORK - The files are %{_bindir}/dzen2 %{_bindir}/dbar %{_bindir}/gcpubar %{_bindir}/gdbar %{_bindir}/textwidth and what troubles me most is 'textwidth'. I'm afraid it will have to be changed before this package can be included in Fedora. MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK - License text is not included in the tarball, please ask upstream to include it. SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 07:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250736.n7P7a4LM031924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #3 from matt chan 2009-08-25 03:36:02 EDT --- Thanks for the quick comments! I've made the changes to add sparc64, ppc64, and alpha to the %ifarch operator The spec file at the link has been updated. The new SRPM is at http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/brlcad/brlcad-7.14.9.20090823svn-1.fc11.src.rpm Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 07:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250759.n7P7xJIS011663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-25 03:59:18 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/vanessa_adt-* vanessa_adt-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK: The spec file name must match the base package FIX: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - Please add the %{?_smp_mflags} macro to the make command OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license OK: License text included OK: The spec file must be written in American English OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source sha256sum vanessa_adt-0.0.7.tar.gz rpmbuild/SOURCES/vanessa_adt-0.0.7.tar.gz 61ae87d1e0f6edaee423fc68d6b6dd5355b1a9bf8d17ed9e9047fc9e3459c0fd vanessa_adt-0.0.7.tar.gz 61ae87d1e0f6edaee423fc68d6b6dd5355b1a9bf8d17ed9e9047fc9e3459c0fd rpmbuild/SOURCES/vanessa_adt-0.0.7.tar.gz OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture N\A: ExcludeArch OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires N\A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly OK: Must call ldconfig in %post and %postun N\A: If the package is designed to be relocatable OK: A package must own all directories that it creates OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once OK: Permissions on files must be set properly OK: Each package must have a %clean section OK: Each package must consistently use macros OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content N\A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage N\A: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application OK: Header files must be in a -devel package N\A: Static libraries must be in a -static package N\A: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package OK: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives N\A: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 Fix the smp flags before import i have tested and it does build with the flags set. Otherwise all looks good. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (vanessa_adt) is APPROVED by topdog ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 08:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250811.n7P8BYrK014678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-25 04:11:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in koji (dist-f12). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1631629 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7f5e00a3d683b1d39b169d9d772de33b Nagios-Plugin-0.33.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=16, Tests=969, 6 wallclock secs ( 0.29 usr 0.02 sys + 5.01 cusr 0.17 csys = 5.49 CPU) Result: PASS + Package perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.33-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Nagios::Plugin) = 0.33 perl(Nagios::Plugin::Config) perl(Nagios::Plugin::ExitResult) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Functions) = 0.33 perl(Nagios::Plugin::Getopt) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Performance) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Range) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Threshold) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Spec) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Math::Calc::Units) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Config) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Functions) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Range) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Threshold) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Spec) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Math::Calc::Units) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Config) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Functions) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Range) perl(Nagios::Plugin::Threshold) perl(Params::Validate) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Should: 1) License text is not included in package. This module does not contain the text of the licenses it is licensed under. Please contact upstream and encourage them to correct this mistake. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 08:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513892] Review Request: bilbo - Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250835.n7P8ZdPh011943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513892 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 08:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250838.n7P8cjBr019970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-25 04:38:43 EDT --- MISSING: R: perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) WRONG: R: perl(base) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 08:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250845.n7P8jEHY021578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-25 04:45:13 EDT --- Andrew Colin Kissa, I'll add %{?_smp_mflags}. Thank you very much for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vanessa_adt Short Description: Library of Abstract Data Types Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 08:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250849.n7P8nLIW014393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 08:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250849.n7P8nCTE014362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pahan at hubbitus.info Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-25 04:49:11 EDT --- I'll review it. But before formal review, please remove mention of Windows from description. As minimum - it is registered trademark and our use it is prohibited. Additionally - it absolutely have nothing worth for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 08:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519118] New: Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519118 Summary: Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: felix at fetzig.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/nforenum.spec SRPM URL: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/nforenum-3.4.7-0.1.r2184.fc12.src.rpm Description: It takes as input any number of files that contain something that vaguely resembles valid NFO, and produces, to the best of its ability, encodable NFO files, one for each input file. It also detects and warns about some common mistakes made in NFO coding. All errors that will cause TTDPatch to reject the GRF during the initialization or activation phases should be detected; if any are not, it is a bug and should be reported as such. Sprites that are too short, not of the correct type (real/pseudo/&c.), too long, or otherwise not in agreement with their data or the preceeding sprites are all detected. I submitted this to improve the building of the OpenGFX package for OpenTTD. Also see https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openttd-opengfx-0.1.0-0.1.alpha6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 09:07:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250907.n7P97tXE026013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-25 05:07:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > MISSING: > R: perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) Correct. Ruben, please add "perl(Class::Accessor::Fast)". Like the other two, it's also used as a base module and we can't guarantee that it will always be provided by the rpm that provides "perl(Class::Accessor)". > WRONG: > R: perl(base) How so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 09:24:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250924.n7P9O28k021546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-25 05:24:02 EDT --- Thanks, I have updated the description. http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ansel/ansel.spec http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ansel/ansel-1.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 09:28:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250928.n7P9SJiL030315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 05:28:18 EDT --- ipplan-4.92-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipplan-4.92-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 09:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250928.n7P9SDXK030271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 05:28:12 EDT --- ipplan-4.92-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipplan-4.92-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 09:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250932.n7P9WoSr031306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #46 from pjp 2009-08-25 05:32:44 EDT --- Hello Tom, First of all thank you so much for your suggestions, I really appreciate it. (In reply to comment #45) > Recommendation: include one initscript per service and make the names of > the initscripts match the services they control. Okay, I'll do the changes. > Second, the package is missing some important parts of djbdns -- axfdns, > walldns, and rbldns, for example. While these parts are probably used less > often than dnscache or tinydns, they are well established within DJB's bundle, > and most people will expect them to be included in any package calling itself > "djbdns". Recommendation: include the missing pieces. Yes, they are in the queue and will be released in due course. > Recommendation: split the package into logical subpackages, > following Pavel Lis?'s scheme, which makes a lot of sense from an > administrator's point of view (and ought to be immediately understandable > to anyone familiar with how to deploy from DJB's bundle). I understand the point, but when I look at so many rpms/subpackages, it just appears to be confusing to me. Anyway, I'll look at the sub-packaging again and try to do it. I was confused about, the few client tools like dnsip/dnsq/dnsname etc. and with which server(dnscache/tinydns) should I package them or to make a separate sub package for them. > Fourth, DJB's bundle relied upon the multilog program from daemontools to > handle logging, whereas our proposed package writes to log files directly. > But multilog did more than just write to files; it also inserted timestamps, > which our logs lack. Timestamps are essential in system logs, so we must > put them back in somehow. Maybe we could use syslog or bring back multilog. > Recommendation: Restore the timestamps in logs. Yeah, I'm working on the logging part as well, will do the necessary changes. > This package is looking great. I think it's just a few tweaks away from being > both a good Fedora package and a faithful representation of everything that > made DJB's bundle great. Keep up the good work! Thanks a lot Tom, I sincerely appreciate it. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 09:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518637] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp - C++ variant of Perl's XS language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250947.n7P9l2ns027751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518637 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Stepan Kasal 2009-08-25 05:47:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp Short Description: C++ variant of Perl's XS language Owners: kasal Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 09:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908250928.n7P9SPL3022484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 05:28:24 EDT --- ipplan-4.92-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ipplan-4.92-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 10:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518448] Review Request: moblin-panel-pasteboard - Moblin Panel for Paste Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251015.n7PAFd9D002993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518448 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 10:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251018.n7PAIqke003775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-25 06:18:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > WRONG: > > R: perl(base) > > How so? Sorry, scratch this remark - I was in error :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 10:22:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251022.n7PAMlFt011296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #27 from Zach Oglesby 2009-08-25 06:22:45 EDT --- Updated http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft-0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 10:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519135] New: Review Request: scribus-stable - DeskTop Publishing application written in Qt Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scribus-stable - DeskTop Publishing application written in Qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519135 Summary: Review Request: scribus-stable - DeskTop Publishing application written in Qt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/scribus-stable.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/scribus-stable-1.3.3.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Scribus is an desktop open source page layout program with the aim of producing commercial grade output in PDF and Postscript, primarily, though not exclusively for Linux. While the goals of the program are for ease of use and simple easy to understand tools, Scribus offers support for professional publishing features, such as CMYK color, easy PDF creation, Encapsulated Postscript import/export and creation of color separations. Notes: - this is the stable branch (v1.3.3.x) of Scribus strongly recommended by upstream for doing serious work, it is installable in parallel with the scribus package containing the upcoming stable branch - rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 10:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251024.n7PAOIPe011464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #59 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-25 06:24:15 EDT --- I've just sponsored you in FAS. Now you are able to do reviews of your own. We have a huge review queue and are highly undermanned, so we really need reviewers. Reviewing is usually very quick to do and is a one-off thing when compared to packaging that also requires regular maintenance. It is the fastest way of improving Fedora to your liking. This package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 10:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251024.n7PAOLoj011489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-25 06:24:19 EDT --- You didn't update the spec file, it is still at 0.4.3-4. (It took me a while to remember that I told you to reset the release.) ** I'd divide the description as Paperbox is a document browser. It lets you nicely view your ebooks, office and text documents and organise them by tags. Relying on Tracker, it is able to instantly discover all documents on your desktop, and present them in a convenient way. Tags and other metadata are shared across all Tracker-based applications. as IMHO it looks a bit cleaner this way. With this comment the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 10:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519138] New: Review Request: libbs2b - Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libbs2b - Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519138 Summary: Review Request: libbs2b - Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kvolny at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/libbs2b.spec SRPM URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/libbs2b-3.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP (bs2b) library and plugins is designed to improve headphone listening of stereo audio records. Recommended for headphone prolonged listening to disable superstereo fatigue without essential distortions. The package builds in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1631840 rpmlint complains on the -devel subpackage: [makerpm at dhcp-lab-151 x86_64]$ rpmlint -v -i libbs2b-* libbs2b-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking libbs2b-devel.x86_64: I: checking libbs2b-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. libbs2b.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ... but there is no -devel specific documentation, I have nothing to include. This library is needed for the bs2b plugin for qmmp-0.3.0 (new in this version). Other players, like Audacios and XMMS, and anything able to handle VST plugins can also benefit from this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 11:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517720] Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251116.n7PBGfiZ014520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |skasal at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |skasal at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 11:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251156.n7PBujL3029483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 11:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251157.n7PBv4fX029531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #60 from Gareth John 2009-08-25 07:57:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtkmm-utils Short Description: C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm Owners: gljohn Branches: F10 F11 InitialCC: n/a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 12:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251214.n7PCEqYM026023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 08:14:51 EDT --- perl-Flickr-API-1.02-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Flickr-API-1.02-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 12:24:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:24:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251224.n7PCOme4002645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 --- Comment #7 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-25 08:24:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Sorry, scratch this remark - I was in error :( No sweat, Ralf. Thanks for catching my mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 12:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251237.n7PCbZsg005309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 --- Comment #4 from Peter Halliday 2009-08-25 08:37:34 EDT --- I've updated the Spec and the SRPM 1) deleting the .buildinfo file 2) only including the html portion of docs, and 3) moving examples to the -docs subpackage. I included the rst files originally to allow users to create other forms of documentation. However, I guess if they want it they can grab the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 12:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251253.n7PCrKhX004131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #15 from Andreas Schwab 2009-08-25 08:53:17 EDT --- Spec URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym.spec SRPM URL: http://home.mnet-online.de/whitebox/aranym-0.9.8-0.3.beta.fc11.src.rpm Thank you for the detailed review. A few notes on your notes: 5. That's really a bug in zlib. 6. I've used requires(hint) instead. 9. That makes debugging of build problems harder, and can make the debuginfo package incomplete. rpmlint should really be fixed, and configuring in a subdir should be supported by default. IMHO srcdir != builddir should be the norm. The included spec file uses --disable-nat-debug as well. 10. That wouldn't change anything since the installation won't preserve timestamps anyway. And I've already fixed it upstream. 11. Fixed upstream. 15. The things in /usr/share/aranym are part of the emulation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 12:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517720] Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251239.n7PCd00m032652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Stepan Kasal 2009-08-25 08:38:58 EDT --- Review: + package builds in koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1631969 FAIL rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. - summary ends with dot; please delete it - OTOH, the %description sentence should end with a dot + source file matches upstream url + package meets naming and packaging guidelines + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + dist tag is present + build root is correct + license is open source-compatible FAIL License text is included in package - please add LICENSE to %doc + %doc is present. FAIL BuildRequires are proper - please add perl(HTTP::Cookies) + %clean is present + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does own the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test succeeded + provides and requires OK + Not a GUI application A suggestion: in %files, you might replace %{perl_vendorlib}/* by the more specific %{perl_vendorlib}/BZ Please make the four small changes under the three FAILs above and consider my suggestion. With these nits fixed, the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 13:06:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251306.n7PD6qat011079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gareth.l.john at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #1 from Gareth John 2009-08-25 09:06:51 EDT --- Need to update desktop db for the .desktop file. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database %post update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications %postun update-desktop-database %{_datadir}/applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 13:17:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251317.n7PDHYrQ009490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-25 09:17:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Need to update desktop db for the .desktop file. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database "Use this when a desktop entry has a 'MimeType key." This desktop file doesn't have MimeType key, so the desktop database update is not needed. However, the categories GNOME and Application should be removed from the desktop file in %install. ** I wouldn't use docdir=%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} \ in %install, I'd just run rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_docdir} and list the necessary files in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 13:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517720] Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251319.n7PDJaIn009914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-25 09:19:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > FAIL rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. > - summary ends with dot; please delete it > - OTOH, the %description sentence should end with a dot Done. > FAIL License text is included in package > - please add LICENSE to %doc Done. > FAIL BuildRequires are proper > - please add perl(HTTP::Cookies) Done. > A suggestion: > in %files, you might replace > %{perl_vendorlib}/* > by the more specific > %{perl_vendorlib}/BZ Done. Thanks for the review. Asking for CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-BZ-Client Short Description: A client for the Bugzilla web services API Owners: eseyman Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 13:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251303.n7PD3snc010338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-25 09:03:53 EDT --- F-11 test build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1632248 The changes fixed the remaining issue; package is APPROVED. I have sponsored your application; go ahead and proceed with the remaining steps to get the package imported. Let me know at any time at salimma at fedoraproject.org if you need to clear up something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 13:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251325.n7PDPrA8012233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gareth.l.john at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 13:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251331.n7PDVtbv016733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 --- Comment #3 from Gareth John 2009-08-25 09:31:54 EDT --- You could probably leave Hosts out of doc as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 13:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251331.n7PDV58m013705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |508496 --- Comment #5 from Stepan Kasal 2009-08-25 09:31:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Wx::Perl::DataWalker .../usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/ppc-linux-thread-multi/auto/Wx/Wx.so: > undefined symbol: Perl_Guse_safe_putenv_ptr This is bug #508496. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 14:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251432.n7PEWcJn031243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 --- Comment #7 from Bowe Strickland 2009-08-25 10:32:36 EDT --- ping... just making sure the ball's in yall's court... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 14:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251445.n7PEjWG0001800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Bruno Wolff III changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno at wolff.to --- Comment #47 from Bruno Wolff III 2009-08-25 10:45:28 EDT --- Note that axfrdns is really desired if you are using tinydns, as it handles fallback to tcp. Multilog also handles rotating the logfiles. It also handles a full disk in a way that DJB thought reasonable, though not everyone may want it to work that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 14:43:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251443.n7PEhf94001040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm |needinfo? |ail.com) | --- Comment #28 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-25 10:43:37 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [yankee at koan ghc-X11-xft]$ rpmlint -iv *{spec,rpm} ghc-X11-xft.src: I: checking ghc-X11-xft.src: I: checking ghc-X11-xft-devel.i586: I: checking ghc-X11-xft-devel.ppc: I: checking ghc-X11-xft-devel.x86_64: I: checking ghc-X11-xft-doc.i586: I: checking ghc-X11-xft-doc.i586: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-X11-xft library. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. ghc-X11-xft-doc.ppc: I: checking ghc-X11-xft-doc.ppc: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-X11-xft library. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. ghc-X11-xft-doc.x86_64: I: checking ghc-X11-xft-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-X11-xft library. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. ghc-X11-xft-prof.i586: I: checking ghc-X11-xft-prof.i586: E: devel-dependency ghc-X11-xft-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-X11-xft-prof.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-X11-xft-prof.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/X11-xft-0.3/libHSX11-xft-0.3_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-X11-xft-prof.ppc: I: checking ghc-X11-xft-prof.ppc: E: devel-dependency ghc-X11-xft-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-X11-xft-prof.ppc: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-X11-xft-prof.ppc: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/X11-xft-0.3/libHSX11-xft-0.3_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-X11-xft-prof.x86_64: I: checking ghc-X11-xft-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-X11-xft-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-X11-xft-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-X11-xft-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/X11-xft-0.3/libHSX11-xft-0.3_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 11 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 6 warnings. >>> CHECK --> All normal for GHC packages with one exception. I think cabal2spec is generating the description errors because i had the same problem on another review. n MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >>> CHECK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >>> CHECK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >>> CHECK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >>> CHECK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >>> CHECK MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] >>> CHECK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >>> CHECK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] >>> CHECK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] >>> CHECK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] >>> CHECK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] >>> CHECK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] >>> CHECK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] >>> CHECK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] >>> CHECK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] >>> CHECK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] >>> MISSING MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] >>> CHECK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] >>> CHECK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] >>> CHECK SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. >>> CHECK SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] >>> MISSING Resolution: Not yet passed. Please add in the last depedencies and fix the description. Congrats on the baby :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 14:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251449.n7PEnG4e002360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #16 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-25 10:49:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > 5. That's really a bug in zlib. If so, report a bug against zlib. > 6. I've used requires(hint) instead. AFAIK "requires(hint)" is exactly the same of "requires" in Fedora, bringing in something that doesn't exist in Fedora. Therefore it will be impossible to install aranym. You'll be able to include this after an afros package will be submitted for review and approved in Fedora. Until then, I do think that a README is the right solution for this problem. > 9. That makes debugging of build problems harder, and can make the debuginfo > package incomplete. rpmlint should really be fixed, and configuring in a > subdir should be supported by default. IMHO srcdir != builddir should be the > norm. I disagree, but as I'm not the official reviewer, I let this decision to him. > The included spec file uses --disable-nat-debug as well. This is not a good reason. For example other distributions don't disable it. Moreover, upstream spec files are often badly written, seldom updated and never follow Fedora guidelines. So, there should be some reason to disable it different from someone is doing this but I don't know why. > 10. That wouldn't change anything since the installation won't preserve > timestamps anyway. And I've already fixed it upstream. What have you fixed upstream: the preservation of timestamps or the encoding of the files? Anyway, as it is now, this loop will lose the timestamps of the original files: for f in AUTHORS ChangeLog; do iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t UTF-8 $f > $f.new mv $f.new $f done > 15. The things in /usr/share/aranym are part of the emulation. Even the README files? This is not the right place for documentation and files are not tagged like docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 14:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251457.n7PEvQqC002423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-25 10:57:25 EDT --- Actually, Requries(hint): specifies a dependency for the nonexistent "hint" scriptlet, and simply exploits the fact that rpm does not currently mark this as a syntax error. It should not be used in any Fedora package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 15:02:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251502.n7PF230L008477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 --- Comment #9 from Ashay Humane 2009-08-25 11:01:53 EDT --- Alright... made License and chmod changes: http://ashay.info/rpm/adtool.spec http://ashay.info/rpm/adtool-1.3.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 15:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251522.n7PFMiFI017845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, needinfo? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-25 11:22:41 EDT --- Actually, i take that back. Just fix the description. I was looking over the template again, and i forgot that we put everything in a -devel package. Just fix the description and it's a pass. I was looking at it funny. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 15:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251525.n7PFPCWx013286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(bos at serpentine.co | |m) --- Comment #1 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-25 11:25:09 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [yankee at koan ghc-HUnit]$ rpmlint -iv *{spec,rpm} ghc-HUnit.src: I: checking ghc-HUnit-devel.i586: I: checking ghc-HUnit-devel.ppc: I: checking ghc-HUnit-devel.x86_64: I: checking ghc-HUnit-doc.i586: I: checking ghc-HUnit-doc.i586: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-HUnit library. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. ghc-HUnit-doc.ppc: I: checking ghc-HUnit-doc.ppc: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-HUnit library. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. ghc-HUnit-doc.x86_64: I: checking ghc-HUnit-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-HUnit library. Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. ghc-HUnit-prof.i586: I: checking ghc-HUnit-prof.i586: E: devel-dependency ghc-HUnit-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-HUnit-prof.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-HUnit-prof.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/HUnit-1.2.0.3/libHSHUnit-1.2.0.3_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-HUnit-prof.ppc: I: checking ghc-HUnit-prof.ppc: E: devel-dependency ghc-HUnit-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-HUnit-prof.ppc: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-HUnit-prof.ppc: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/HUnit-1.2.0.3/libHSHUnit-1.2.0.3_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-HUnit-prof.x86_64: I: checking ghc-HUnit-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-HUnit-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-HUnit-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-HUnit-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/HUnit-1.2.0.3/libHSHUnit-1.2.0.3_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 10 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 6 warnings. >>> CHECK -> normal for haskell packages, with the exception of the description warning. Please fix it. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >>> CHECK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >>> CHECK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >>> CHECK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >>> CHECK -> Presuming innocence here re: using the official tarballfor the Platform project. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >>> CHECK MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] >>> CHECK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >>> CHECK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] >>> CHECK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] >>> CHECK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] >>> CHECK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] >>> CHECK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] >>> CHECK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] >>> CHECK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] >>> CHECK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] >>> CHECK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] >>> CHECK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] >>> CHECK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] >>> CHECK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] >>> CHECK SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. >>> CHECK SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] >>> CHECK SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] >>> CHECK Resolution: PASS, please fix the description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 15:06:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516464] Review Request: adtool - Active Directory administration utility for Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251506.n7PF68qX004832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516464 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-25 11:06:07 EDT --- The package has been APPROVED ! I could not test the operation as I don't have access to an AD server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 15:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251531.n7PFVN3v014837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #18 from Andreas Schwab 2009-08-25 11:31:22 EDT --- I've seen Requires(hint) documented somewhere, but I can't remember where right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251602.n7PG2nC7027681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 12:02:46 EDT --- munge-0.5.8-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251602.n7PG2bNQ027600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 12:02:35 EDT --- ipplan-4.92-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ipplan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0334 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:03:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506954] Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251603.n7PG3Wng022642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 12:03:30 EDT --- uberftp-2.4-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:09:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251609.n7PG9sXk029890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-25 12:09:52 EDT --- That's a standard ignorable warning with maven packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251609.n7PG95wm029769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #5 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-25 12:09:03 EDT --- build successful. 1 warning issued by rpmlint on the binary rpm. If this is a meaningful warning please deal with it, otherwise I'll approve the package. rpmlint -i *.rpm backport-util-concurrent.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/backport-util-concurrent A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251613.n7PGDhhP030834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-25 12:13:42 EDT --- Ok, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251615.n7PGFmKL031443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-25 12:15:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: backport-util-concurrent Short Description: Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251626.n7PGQ2MV027515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #19 from Andreas Schwab 2009-08-25 12:26:01 EDT --- It is used by lyx, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251629.n7PGTBOU001851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #30 from Zach Oglesby 2009-08-25 12:29:10 EDT --- Fixed, http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft-0.3-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251644.n7PGi6Qi031024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-25 12:44:05 EDT --- So that package needs to be fixed. The fact that some other package does something it shouldn't be doing doesn't mean that it's OK for this package to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518447] Review Request: moblin-panel-myzone - Moblin Panel for MyZone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251648.n7PGmqk6032178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518447 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-25 12:48:51 EDT --- In rawhide. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518448] Review Request: moblin-panel-pasteboard - Moblin Panel for Paste Board In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251649.n7PGnA5V032279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518448 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-25 12:49:09 EDT --- In rawhide. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 16:52:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510743] Review Request: aranym - Atari Running on Any Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251652.n7PGqojp000898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510743 --- Comment #21 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-25 12:52:49 EDT --- For a discussion about Requires(hint) please read: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-June/msg00071.html But the real problem is that you are trying to require (even if optionally) something that doesn't exist! Afros is not in Fedora. This is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 17:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251703.n7PH3xsj009335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #35 from Jerry James 2009-08-25 13:03:54 EDT --- The latest findbugs needs mysql-connector-java 5.1.7 or later (supposedly; I'm looking at a potential way to dodge that bullet), which needs this work done first (see comment 30). Is there anything I can do to help move this forward? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 17:12:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251712.n7PHCt4K005576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-25 13:12:54 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 17:17:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] New: Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 Summary: Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linville at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/rfkill.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/rfkill-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: rfkill is a small tool to query the state of the rfkill switches, buttons and subsystem interfaces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 18:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518238] Review Request: backport-util-concurrent - Backport of java.util.concurrent API, introduced in Java 5.0 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251858.n7PIw7WZ001905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518238 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-25 14:58:06 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1633017 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 19:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519236] New: Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Resource Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Resource Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519236 Summary: Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Resource Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-resources.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-resources-1.0-0.1.a4.5.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 19:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519236] Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Resource Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251924.n7PJO4uY003530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519236 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-25 15:24:03 EDT --- Old pre-review request for this package: bug #500264. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 19:23:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500264] Pre-Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251923.n7PJNgvX003425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500264 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-25 15:23:41 EDT --- Full review request: bug #519236 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 19:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251936.n7PJasID006715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181444 Roland McGrath changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Roland McGrath 2009-08-25 15:36:52 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lcov New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: roland -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 19:39:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510055] Review Request: ModemManager - mobile broadband modem service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908251939.n7PJdQiU011761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510055 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |christoph.wickert at googlemai | |l.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-25 15:39:25 EDT --- > ModemManager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.ModemManager.conf > > This can be safely ignored. Shouldn't this be somewhere in /usr/share/dbus-1 then? Closing, as this was built on 2009-07-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 20:00:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252000.n7PK0MKG011845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #52 from Christian Krause 2009-08-25 16:00:16 EDT --- Pavel, Thanks for all your work on this package and also for your patience, here is now the full review of the package. In general it looks good, but there are still some issues left. * rpmlint: OK rpmlint SPECS/x11vnc.spec SRPMS/x11vnc-0.9.8-8.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/i386/x11vnc-* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * naming: OK - name matches upstream - spec file name matches package name * License: TODO 1. source files - OK The COPYING files contains the regular GPLv2. There are some source files released under GPLv2+ and there are also a couple of source files which explicitly state GPLv2. Most of these files are in the unused libvncserver/ directory, so they can be ignored. However, the file x11vnc/x11vnc.c which used to build /usr/bin/x11vnc (included in the binary RPM) is licensed under GPLv2. This would lead to the conclusion that the whole package should be GPLv2. - License tag: OK - matches actual License: OK - License file packaged: OK - OpenSSL exception: OK In theory GPL code can not be compiled against the openssl library. However, Karl Runge, the upstream author, has explicitely give the permission to do so" In addition, as a special exception, Karl J. Runge gives permission to link the code of its release of x11vnc with the OpenSSL project's "OpenSSL" library (or with modified versions of it that use the same license as the "OpenSSL" library), and distribute the linked executables. You must obey the GNU General Public License in all respects for all of the code used other than "OpenSSL". If you modify this file, you may extend this exception to your version of the file, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from your version. " 2. binary files - TODO The upstream package ships some pre-compiled java binaries: x11vnc-0.9.8/classes/VncViewer.jar x11vnc-0.9.8/classes/ssl/VncViewer.jar x11vnc-0.9.8/classes/ssl/SignedVncViewer.jar x11vnc-0.9.8/classes/ssl/UltraViewerSSL.jar x11vnc-0.9.8/classes/ssl/SignedUltraViewerSSL.jar The jar files can be re-generated using the shipped sources (GPLv2). However, as Tom Callaway pointed out, only if we are 100% sure about the actual license of the binary files we may distribute it. I have checked their web page as well as the various README files in the package and I could not find any specific information regarding the status of the binaries. This means, that I'm not 100% sure about it and so I think we should re-package it: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code However, if Tom or somebody else from the FE-LEGAL team gives their explicit permission for redistribution I would be happily accept this. ;-) * specfile in American English and legible: TODO - indentation: I know this may sound like nitpicking, however I'm still convinced that the spec files should be written in such a way that it can be easily read by any other user with any program. It should not be necessary to guess the tab width for each spec file. ;-) I think using some kind of standard for things like this will certainly help that all Fedora package maintainers can easily work together. - typo: pathes -> paths - wording: IMHO "performant" isn't an Enlish word, probably just use "fast" - spelling: "prebuild clients" -> "prebuilt clients" - spelling: "acording" -> "according" - spelling: "macroses" -> "macros" - spelling: "arount" -> "around" - indentation in %prep: The small code snippet to do the conversion into UTF-8 is not indented correctly. The begin ("for file....") and the end ("done") of the for loop should be one tab more to the left than the body of the for loop. - please order the patches by number * %description: TODO (minor) - Although "x11vnc" is a name, I would start it with a capital "C" at the beginning of the sentence. - In the second sentence I think the comma can be omitted. * Sources: OK - Source0 URL ok - spectool -g x11vnc.spec works - sources matches upstream - md5sum: 13e41380fe9ba2581db180061d1cbd22 x11vnc-0.9.8.tar.gz * Patch0: TODO During the review I was wondering that x11vnc is neither linked against the lzo library nor the minilzo library. Indeed since we neither build or use libvncclient nor libvncserver from the x11vnc package, there is no need at all to take care of lzo here. Just to be on the save side I would still delete the minilzo.[ch] in the spec file, but I think the lzo patch as well as the usage of __ln_s/__sed can be omitted. * Patch1: OK * Patch2: OK * Compilation: TODO - the first 2 lines which exports the CFLAGS and the LDFLAGS should not be necessary Otherwise, the compilation is OK - package builds correctly in koji for F12, F11 and F10 - RPMOPTFLAGS used - parallel build supported via _smp_mflags * debuginfo sub-package: OK - non-empty - debuginfo file works together with gdb * BuildRequires: TODO - most likely lzo-devel can be omitted * Locales handling: OK (n/a) * shared/static libs, pkgconfig/header/*.la files: OK (n/a) * packages must own all directories: OK * packaged files and directories: TODO It looks like that /usr/share/x11vnc is packaged although it is empty. Please don't package it. * files not listed twice: OK * permissions of files: OK - %defattr used - final file permissions OK * %clean section: OK * macro usage: OK * code vs. content: OK (only code) * large documentation into sub-package: OK It may be debatable whether 1MB README file is too large, but since it describes the command line parameters in detail etc. I think it is quite useful even in the main package and since the size is not that big, it seems to be OK. * GUI application needs %{name}.desktop: OK * no directories owned which are already owned by other packages: OK * rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %{install}: OK * all filenames UTF8: OK * functional test: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 20:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519073] Review Request: chrootuid - This tool offers su and chroot fuctionaltity in one program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252007.n7PK7KsO017658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519073 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 20:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252007.n7PK74A0013356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 20:07:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:07:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519074] Review Request: fakeroot-ng - Fools programs into thinking they are running with root permission In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252007.n7PK7ZQT013439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519074 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 20:06:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252006.n7PK682D013206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 --- Comment #3 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-25 16:06:07 EDT --- REVIEW:: user1# rpmlint sblim-gather.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. user1# rpmlint sblim-gather-2.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. user1# rpmlint sblim-gather-2.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricNetworkPort.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetriczCH.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryProcessor.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryUnixProcess.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryzCH.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryLocalFileSystem.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryzLPAR.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryOperatingSystem.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetriczLPAR.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricXen.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricLocalFileSystem.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricIPProtocolEndpoint.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetriczECKD.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryIPProtocolEndpoint.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricUnixProcess.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricOperatingSystem.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryNetworkPort.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetricProcessor.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/mplug/libmetriczCEC.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryzECKD.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryzCEC.so sblim-gather.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/rplug/librepositoryXen.so user1# rpmlint sblim-gather-provider-2.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: no-documentation sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugzLPAR.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugUnixProcess.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricForMEProvider.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugIPProtocolEndpoint.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricDefinitionProvider.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugzCEC.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricValueProvider.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugOperatingSystem.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricGathererProvider.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugzECKD.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricInstanceProvider.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricRepositoryServiceProvider.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugLocalFileSystem.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugzCH.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugNetworkPort.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugXen.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/gather/cplug/libcimplugProcessor.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricIndicationProvider.so sblim-gather-provider.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/cmpi/libOSBase_MetricDefForMEProvider.so user1# rpmlint sblim-gather-devel-2.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm sblim-gather-devel.i386: W: no-documentation user1# sblim-gather-test-2.1.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm sblim-gather-test.i386: W: no-documentation **Please add comments about the patches if you can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 20:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519236] Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Resource Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252031.n7PKVZE1023363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519236 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jjohnstn at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jjohnstn at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-25 16:31:34 EDT --- rpmlint successful Comments: 1. Packaging naming convention has the number incrementing ahead of the alphatag. So release should be 0.2.a4 and then 0.3.a4 etc.. 2. Javadoc description should not reference itself (use API documentation for xxx) 3. No %doc files 4. post and postun sections are maven-only. Is this a problem since with_maven is 0? 5. defattr non-standard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 20:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252037.n7PKbmR3024696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2009-08-25 16:37:47 EDT --- I did not hear from upstream, so here is an updated spec and srpm: Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/pyhunspell.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/pyhunspell-0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm - Remove CFLAGS, which are used automagically - Change the %%description to a full sentence - Adjust the license tag, it's actually LGPLv3+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 20:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518647] Review Request: django-robots - django extension to manage correctly robots.txt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252037.n7PKbL82024625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518647 --- Comment #1 from Luca Botti 2009-08-25 16:37:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-robots.spec > SRPM URL: > http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-robots-0.6.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > Description: A Django app for managing robots.txt files following the robots > exclusion protocol > > Need Sponsorship Wrong SRPM URL: correct one is http://lucabotti.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-robots-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Still Need Sponsorship -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 20:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252052.n7PKqRC3027972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2009-08-25 16:52:25 EDT --- Shipping the GPLv3 with a software which is GPLv2+ is legal. You can specify any minimum version, it doesn't have to be the one you ship. You're only required to ship a copy of any (one) version of the GPL which is valid for your software, not all of them. So, I don't see any licensing issue there, it's safe to mark this as GPLv2+ if the license header says so. Plus, are you sure the parts of kdebase-workspace which are being used are not actually LGPL or GPLv2+? GPL v2 only is deprecated in KDE, most stuff is not actually v2 only. But this isn't really relevant as the code is GPLv2+ anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 20:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252054.n7PKsdxn028382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Chris Adams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Chris Adams 2009-08-25 16:54:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Just as an FYI, it generally doesn't make much sense to push new packages into > testing, as it is very unlikely that anyone will test a new package. You should > be safe to simply push them to stable. Oops, I meant to change that. I thought it was considered okay to push a new package (especially something small like this) directly to stable for Fedora, and I went digging in the wiki to see if there was a policy for EPEL (didn't really find anything definite for either Fedora or EPEL), and then forgot to change it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 21:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252101.n7PL1amB030136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2009-08-25 17:01:34 EDT --- Rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST items: OK: rpmlint output (see above) OK: named according to package naming guidelines OK: spec file name matches package name XX: package meets packaging guidelines: You need to add a comment on the patch. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment OK: Fedora approved license. I wouldn't worry about that. I found public domain declarations in multiple files. OK: License field matches actual license OK: License file is included in %doc OK: Spec file in American English OK: Spec file is legible OK: Sources match upstream (compare equal with md5sum) OK: package builds into binary RPM on at least one arch (F-11 x86_64) NA: Appropriate use of ExcludeArch OK: All build dependencies in BuildRequires NA: Proper handling of locales NA: ldconfig called in %post/%postun OK: No relocatable packages OK: Package owns all directories it creates OK: No duplicate listings in %files OK: Appropriate permissions in %files OK: Package has a %clean section with appropriate contents OK: Consistent use of macros OK: Code or permissible content NA: Large documentation in a -doc subpackage OK: No runtime dependencies in %doc NA: Header files in -devel NA: Static libraries in -static NA: Requires: pkgconfig NA: .so files in -devel NA: -devel requires base package NA: No libtool archives NA: GUI applications need a desktop file OK: Don't own files/dirs already owned by other packages OK: Clean at the beginning of %install OK: All filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD items: NA: Ask upstream to include a license file NA: Provide translated description and summary fields OK: Package builds in mock (checked x86_64 F-11 only) ??: Package builds on all supported arches (did not check) OK: Package functions as described (minimal testing only) OK: Sane scriptlets OK: Subpackages require base package NA: Placement of pkgconfig files NA: File dependencies Finally, I have a few comments on the spec file. First, would you consider adding ChangeLog and BUGS to %doc? I know their contents may be trivial, and the author isn't working on the code right now, but there just may be a new version some day .... Second, the -javadoc subpackage does not need to "Requires: jpackage-utils", since it requires the base package, which requires jpackage-utils. Third, I don't understand the use of %dir in the "%files javadoc" section. I think this is more readable: %files javadoc %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_javadocdir}/%{name} %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 21:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252101.n7PL18Hb026094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #7 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-08-25 17:01:06 EDT --- Finally an update; Spec URL: http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.2.0/rekonq.spec SRPM URL: http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.2.0/F11/rekonq-0.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm I fixed the spec file and updated to the latest upstream version. I think I fixed most, if not all, issues reported earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 21:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252107.n7PL7LJg031531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-08-25 17:07:20 EDT --- Ah, I forgot one thing. Would you also "rm -f" the pre-built jar file in %prep, just for my peace of mind? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 21:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252149.n7PLnUtQ003169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mapleoin at fedoraproject.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 21:46:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 17:46:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519282] New: Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 Summary: Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mapleoin at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/calibre/calibre.spec SRPM URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/calibre/calibre-0.6.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Calibre is meant to be a complete e-library solution. It includes library management, format conversion, news feeds to ebook conversion as well as e-book reader sync features. . Calibre is primarily a ebook cataloging program. It manages your ebook collection for you. It is designed around the concept of the logical book, i.e. a single entry in the database that may correspond to ebooks in several formats. It also upports conversion from a dozen different ebook formats to LRF and EPUB. A graphical interface to the conversion software can be accessed easily by just clicking the "Convert E-books" button. . Supported input formats are: MOBI, LIT, PRC, EPUB, ODT, HTML, CBR, CBZ, RTF, TXT, PDF and LRS. -- Much of this has been inspired by the debian package. I've added some things and removed others. I don't know if I should give them credit or not (ie. what the fedora way of handling this is). I'm not too sure how I should list the man pages in the %files section since that directory is under %{python_sitelib}/%{name} and it would be hard to pick every subdirectory of that and every file instead. I've searched for a way to get rid of the `file listed twice` error, but with no luck. I also don't know what to do about these errors: `calibre.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object`. Since those files are plugins, can I just ignore them? Here's a full rpmlint output: http://fpaste.org/wMBy/ I have never had a package accepted into Fedora, though this isn't my first try. As such, I am looking for a sponsor. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503598] Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252211.n7PMBjTc011090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 18:11:44 EDT --- sphinxbase-0.4.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503598] Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252211.n7PMBnoU011125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252212.n7PMCwhl011267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 18:12:57 EDT --- ipplan-4.92-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ipplan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9010 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252210.n7PMAgx2010901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 18:10:41 EDT --- ipplan-4.92-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ipplan'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8990 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252214.n7PME4jX007755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.1-4.fc11 |0.8.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252212.n7PMC7NT007349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8.1-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252212.n7PMC1GH007297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Bug 515049 depends on bug 515206, which changed state. Bug 515206 Summary: Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 18:12:00 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:13:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252213.n7PMDxef011629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-25 18:13:58 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:15:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252215.n7PMFjw1012293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 rob changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rob.myers at gtri.gatech.edu --- Comment #56 from rob 2009-08-25 18:15:38 EDT --- What is the status on this? I took a shot at bringing the 2.0.2-1 package up to Fedora standards: http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/postgresql-slony-engine/postgresql-slony-engine-2.0.2-1.1.fc11.src.rpm http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/postgresql-slony-engine/postgresql-slony-engine-2.0.2-1.1.fc11/postgresql-slony-engine.spec Here is the rpmlint output: postgresql-slony-engine.src: W: strange-permission filter-requires-perl-Pg.sh 0755 - How do I do the equivalent of %define __perl_requires %{SOURCE2} without this being executable? postgresql-slony-engine.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/slony1 - I wasn't sure if it was safe to rotate the files in this directory, so I left this out for now. postgresql-slony-engine.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/slony1 ${NAME} - This appears to be a false positive/limitation of rpmlint. postgresql-slony-engine.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name slony1 ('postgresql-slony-engine', 'postgresql-slony-engined') - This could easily be changed to match, if that is desirable. Here is the scratch build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1633604 This package has not been tested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252242.n7PMg8dD012958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-08-25 18:42:07 EDT --- Packaging-wise, it looks fine, except for this: The spec file says: License: BSD However, rfkill.c has just copyright assignment, no license (=no permission to distribute) rfkill.h is GPLv2+ Additionally, the text of the license in COPYING is missing the copyright notice that must be (according to the text) retained on all copies of the software. This must be sorted out before the package can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 22:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252246.n7PMk1ax017470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-08-25 18:46:00 EDT --- Additionally, it doesn't seem to be working out-of-the-box: $ rfkill list Can't open RFKILL control device: No such file or directory strace shows: open("/dev/rfkill", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 23:10:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252310.n7PNA305021683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 --- Comment #9 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2009-08-25 19:10:01 EDT --- Hello Arnaldo, Please consider the following comments: 1) oscilloscope.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary Oscilloscope Here: "Summary: Generic Oscilloscope" Are there other good summary that doesn't use "Oscilloscope" word? 2) oscilloscope.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib It seems that rpmlint confused by "lib" string wrongly, concluding that it is a package that contains an ELF shared library that should be depended on automatically. IMO, it's ok. 3) tuna.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tuna/oscilloscope.py 0644 /usr/bin/python Will oscilloscope.py be executed (fix permission) or not? If not, I think that /usr/bin/python line could be removed. Cheers, Douglas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Aug 25 23:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908252344.n7PNiHCq022992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gareth.l.john at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #3 from Gareth John 2009-08-25 19:44:16 EDT --- Hi Aleksey, First off your link is broken but I found http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid-1.8-1.fc11.src.rpm so that is what I'm going on as it's a later version RPMLINT OUTPUT: $ rpmlint lightsquid.spec lightsquid.spec:84: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.spec:85: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.spec:86: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.spec:87: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.spec:88: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.spec:89: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.spec:90: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.spec:91: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.spec:93: E: files-attr-not-set ---Needs "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" under Files section lightsquid.spec: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install --- Again easily sorted with "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" at start of install section lightsquid.spec: W: no-%build-section --- I'm stumped at the minute 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/lightsquid-1.8-1.fc11.src.rpm lightsquid.src:84: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.src:85: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.src:86: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.src:87: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.src:88: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.src:89: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.src:90: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.src:91: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.src:93: E: files-attr-not-set lightsquid.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install lightsquid.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 1 warnings. --------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/lightsquid-* lightsquid.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/lightsquid/tools/fixreport.pl ---May want to talk about this to upstream I'm not sure if you know of a reason why this script is missing a shebang lightsquid-apache.noarch: W: no-documentation ---I'm new to this game so not sure what initiative to take I know this error was ok for a package I did I assume its the same in this case 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Also "All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment" again maybe talk to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 00:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260016.n7Q0GWw7028405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-25 20:16:30 EDT --- It is much easier for reviewers if you clearly post the updated spec and srpm urls with each update: the spec file still seems to be from March... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 01:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519302] New: eog-plugins - A collection of plugins for the eog image viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: eog-plugins - A collection of plugins for the eog image viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519302 Summary: eog-plugins - A collection of plugins for the eog image viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- srpm: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/eog-plugins-2.27.91-1.fc12.src.rpm spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/eog-plugins.spec desc: It's a collection of plugins for use with the Eye of GNOME Image Viewer. The included plugins provide a map view for where the picture was taken, display of Exif information, Zoom to fit, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 01:17:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 21:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260117.n7Q1HJQ0010771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 --- Comment #10 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-08-25 21:17:17 EDT --- New Koji scratch build in case someone would review this: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1631677 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 02:00:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260200.n7Q20791019064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|480154 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 03:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226048] Merge Review: libtheora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260341.n7Q3fDHO005496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226048 Bug 226048 depends on bug 478651, which changed state. Bug 478651 Summary: Violates package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478651 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 03:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225865] Merge Review: gstreamer-plugins-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260341.n7Q3fCKq005479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225865 Bug 225865 depends on bug 478651, which changed state. Bug 478651 Summary: Violates package naming guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478651 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 03:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260359.n7Q3x6Gm008120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #31 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-25 23:59:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358664) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358664) deps clean up Please apply these dependency fixes. I know it is a bit tedious doing all this stuff by hand, but let's try to keep our sig packages clean until cabal2spec is smart enough. :) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1634073 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 04:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260422.n7Q4MOik007632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(bos at serpentine.co | |m) | --- Comment #5 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-26 00:22:22 EDT --- Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 04:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260427.n7Q4Rbgc008442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-26 00:27:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-OpenGL Short Description: bindings to the C OpenGL library Owners: bos petersen ynemoy Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 04:28:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260428.n7Q4SVVF008564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bos at serpentine.co | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-26 00:28:30 EDT --- Will do, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 04:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260432.n7Q4WU5L013633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-26 00:32:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358666) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358666) ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec-1.patch clean and fix requires and BRs http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1634104 Since ghc-X11-xft is ready maybe we can drop the xft bcond though -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 04:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260429.n7Q4TLtE012922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-26 00:29:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-HUnit Short Description: unit testing support for Haskell Owners: bos ynemoy petersen Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 04:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260433.n7Q4XTwf009451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-26 00:33:28 EDT --- If you update the urls I will try to pick with the review and hope we have this timely. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 04:34:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260434.n7Q4YbVH009580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-26 00:34:36 EDT --- ugh, take 2: If you update the urls I will try to pick up the review and hope we can finish this timely. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 04:39:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260439.n7Q4dHH2010465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 --- Comment #6 from sandeep shedmake 2009-08-26 00:39:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vemana2000-fonts Short Description: Telugu OpenType Font Owners: sandeeps Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 05:47:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260547.n7Q5lE0t027807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #11 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-26 01:47:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: beacon Short Description: WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 05:53:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 01:53:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260553.n7Q5rvQL028964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 06:00:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260600.n7Q60Lfq030490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #12 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-26 02:00:20 EDT --- Oops! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: beacon Short Description: WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml Owners: satyak Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 06:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260606.n7Q663xm031427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #10 from Christof Damian 2009-08-26 02:06:02 EDT --- I changed the spec file to remove the included libraries (except of lime) and added a patch for one problem with Doctrine 1.1: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-symfony-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-symfony-symfony-1.2.8-2.fc11.src.rpm I am still missing a reviewer for bug 517643 : Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine , before this can go through though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 06:21:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260621.n7Q6Lbwa001692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-26 02:21:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > lightsquid.spec: W: no-%build-section > --- I'm stumped at the minute > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 1 warnings. One just needs to add an empty %build section if there is nothing to build. reason > lightsquid-apache.noarch: W: no-documentation > ---I'm new to this game so not sure what initiative to take I know this error > was ok for a package I did I assume its the same in this case It's OK as long as there's nothing relevant to ship as the documentation, and as long as there is no duplication between interdependent packages. For instance if the main package ships COPYING, the -devel package that requires the main package doesn't need to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 06:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 02:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-plugin-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260633.n7Q6XaJq003696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |yum-download-order - Yum |yum-plugin-download-order - |plugin to order downloading |Yum plugin to order |of packages |downloading of packages --- Comment #16 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-26 02:33:35 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/yum-plugin-download-order.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/yum-plugin-download-order-0.1-5.fc12.src.rpm Updated with both changes. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 07:07:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518574] Review Request: compat-libgee01 - GObject collection library (v0.1.5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260707.n7Q77Yk2004689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518574 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net --- Comment #1 from Alex Lancaster 2009-08-26 03:07:33 EDT --- What's upstream's timeframe for rygel to get ported to libgee 0.1.6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 07:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519161] New Package CVS Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260707.n7Q774DZ004593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519161 Jiri Moskovcak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|cvs |Package Review AssignedTo|jmoskovc at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Jiri Moskovcak 2009-08-26 03:07:02 EDT --- CVS is a package, you should use "Package review" as a component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 07:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 03:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518450] Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260711.n7Q7BJhl005589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518450 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-26 03:11:18 EDT --- Let's move on while waiting on that -- just make a note to fix it once we hear back from upstream. After all, it is valid to choose to revert any LGPL package under the corresponding GPL version. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 08:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260811.n7Q8BBVC025450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-26 04:11:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358681) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358681) Upstream patch for API changes b/w bognor 0.4.9 and .10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 08:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260813.n7Q8DXdD019343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-26 04:13:32 EDT --- The following patch need to be applied with -p1 (it was just applied in Git 2 days ago). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 08:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518450] Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260821.n7Q8L4Vq021115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518450 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-26 04:21:03 EDT --- Thanks Michael. I'll add a note to the spec file. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moblin-panel-status Short Description: Moblin Panel for Social Network Status Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 08:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-plugin-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260831.n7Q8Vt2w023255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Sergio Pascual 2009-08-26 04:31:53 EDT --- APPROVED, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 09:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 05:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908260905.n7Q95Wfs004327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 10:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261042.n7QAglIA018325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-26 06:42:44 EDT --- I just read carefully Licensing page, and found that either LGPLv2+ or LGPLv2.1+ licenses must be marked as LGPLv2+, so I'm unblocking FE-LEGAL. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 10:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261054.n7QAsq38025962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 --- Comment #5 from Aleksey Popkov 2009-08-26 06:54:51 EDT --- Ok. Thaks. Fixed. $ rpmlint /home/aleksey/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/lightsquid-* lightsquid-apache.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/aleksey/rpmbuild/SRPMS/lightsquid-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Spec URL: http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid.spec SRPM URL: http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid-1.8-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 11:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519302] Review Request: eog-plugins - A collection of plugins for the eog image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261106.n7QB6Duu022900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519302 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|eog-plugins - A collection |Review Request: eog-plugins |of plugins for the eog |- A collection of plugins |image viewer |for the eog image viewer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 11:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515046] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-XPath - XPath access to XML::Parser::Lite::Tree structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261115.n7QBFZvw030759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515046 Juanjo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 11:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261130.n7QBUEjp027403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-26 07:30:12 EDT --- Peter, thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 3proxy Short Description: Tiny but very powerful proxy Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 11:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 07:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261149.n7QBn8DV031416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-26 07:49:03 EDT --- Updated files as follows: SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1634751 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 12:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] New: Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 Summary: Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-xklavier.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-xklavier-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for libxklavier which is a library providing high-level API for X Keyboard Extension known as XKB. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1634926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 12:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261246.n7QCkRNL013571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sayamindu at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2009-08-26 08:46:26 EDT --- Adding the upstream author in the CC list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 12:51:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261251.n7QCp44H018329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-26 08:51:03 EDT --- Fix the license. I will take a quick look and then approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 13:09:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:09:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519161] New Package CVS Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261309.n7QD9QZ5023091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519161 --- Comment #2 from Peter Halliday 2009-08-26 09:09:25 EDT --- I think the wiki should be changed to indicate that. I'll take note of that for next time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 13:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222191] Merge Review: eclipse - An open, extensible IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261311.n7QDBrtj019933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222191 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: eclipse - |Merge Review: eclipse - An |An open, extensible IDE |open, extensible IDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 13:22:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519161] New Package CVS Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261322.n7QDMInt022312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519161 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-26 09:22:17 EDT --- you make the request in a approved reviewed new package request in bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 13:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519161] New Package CVS Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261334.n7QDYr7f025442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519161 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-26 09:34:51 EDT --- The wiki does state that clearly in the CVS procedure. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure "Be sure to use the same bugzilla ticket that you used to get the package approved in the first place, to make your cvs request." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 13:42:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519161] New Package CVS Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261342.n7QDgGOU027254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519161 --- Comment #5 from Peter Halliday 2009-08-26 09:42:15 EDT --- I already have been approved and will put it there. I apologize, but the paragraph still is not clear that it belongs in the same bug. It is clear about timing. However, the wording needs to be improved to make it clear that the request belongs in the same bug that was initiating the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 14:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261414.n7QEEK3p006340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 --- Comment #10 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-08-26 10:14:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Hello Arnaldo, > > Please consider the following comments: > > 1) oscilloscope.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary Oscilloscope > > Here: "Summary: Generic Oscilloscope" > > Are there other good summary that doesn't use "Oscilloscope" word? Replaced with: Summary: Generic graphical signal plotting tool > 2) oscilloscope.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib > > It seems that rpmlint confused by "lib" string wrongly, concluding that it is a > package that contains an ELF shared library that should be depended on > automatically. IMO, it's ok. Ah, that makes sense, agreed. > 3) tuna.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tuna/oscilloscope.py 0644 /usr/bin/python > > Will oscilloscope.py be executed (fix permission) or not? > If not, I think that /usr/bin/python line could be removed. Done > Cheers, > Douglas Thanks! New files at: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna-0.9-3.fc11.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna.spec http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/tuna/tuna-0.9.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 14:14:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261414.n7QEE8fS006310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #53 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-26 10:14:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #52) > 2. binary files - TODO > The upstream package ships some pre-compiled java binaries: > x11vnc-0.9.8/classes/VncViewer.jar > x11vnc-0.9.8/classes/ssl/VncViewer.jar > x11vnc-0.9.8/classes/ssl/SignedVncViewer.jar > x11vnc-0.9.8/classes/ssl/UltraViewerSSL.jar > x11vnc-0.9.8/classes/ssl/SignedUltraViewerSSL.jar > > The jar files can be re-generated using the shipped sources (GPLv2). > However, as Tom Callaway pointed out, only if we are 100% sure about the > actual license of the binary files we may distribute it. > I have checked their web page as well as the various README files in the > package and I could not find any specific information regarding the status > of the binaries. This means, that I'm not 100% sure about it and so I think > we should re-package it: As I already say before, Karl Runge (upstream developer) answer me what there no non-free code, and all sources also included there. I have not check it. But have we any foundation to do not trust him?? > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code If you very want, off course I may repack it. > However, if Tom or somebody else from the FE-LEGAL team gives their explicit > permission for redistribution I would be happily accept this. ;-) Tom lifting FE-legal early :) > * specfile in American English and legible: TODO > - indentation: I know this may sound like nitpicking, however I'm still > convinced that the spec files should be written in such a way that it can be > easily read by any other user with any program. It should not be necessary to > guess the tab width for each spec file. ;-) I think using some kind of standard > for things like this will certainly help that all Fedora package maintainers > can easily work together. There was discussion on this theme - http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.extras.packaging/6214/focus=6224 And accordingly it proposed draft guidelines change - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Tabs So, there many people argue with your arguments. So, I think until it is only draft and FESCO do not approve that, it can't be as required item. > - typo: pathes -> paths > - wording: IMHO "performant" isn't an Enlish word, probably just use "fast" Sure? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/performant But if you want, I replace it by productive. Is it ok? > - spelling: "prebuild clients" -> "prebuilt clients" > - spelling: "acording" -> "according" > - spelling: "macroses" -> "macros" There I don't known (replaced as you say). Macros have not multiple form at all? > - spelling: "arount" -> "around" Thank you. All fixed. > - indentation in %prep: > The small code snippet to do the conversion into UTF-8 is not indented > correctly. The begin ("for file....") and the end ("done") of the for loop > should be one tab more to the left than the body of the for loop. Again... I'm change it as you like see it for only do not start new long flame-war. But this is very similar to tab-width space. In Fedora we even not have (as I known) some recommended "coding standards" or similar documents/guidelines/policies. So, than it can't be error at all! > > - please order the patches by number Ok. > > * %description: TODO (minor) > - Although "x11vnc" is a name, I would start it with a capital "C" at the > beginning of the sentence. Capital "X" I think? I'm unsure. BTW, I reorder sentence, please see. > - In the second sentence I think the comma can be omitted. Ok. > * Patch0: TODO > During the review I was wondering that x11vnc is neither linked against the > lzo library nor the minilzo library. Indeed since we neither build or use > libvncclient nor libvncserver from the x11vnc package, there is no need at all > to take care of lzo here. > Just to be on the save side I would still delete the minilzo.[ch] in the > spec file, but I think the lzo patch as well as the usage of __ln_s/__sed can > be omitted. Yes, you are right. Today, after linking with system libvncserver. > * Compilation: TODO > - the first 2 lines which exports the CFLAGS and the LDFLAGS should not be > necessary Ok. > * BuildRequires: TODO > - most likely lzo-devel can be omitted Ok. > * packaged files and directories: TODO > It looks like that /usr/share/x11vnc is packaged although it is empty. > Please don't package it. Ok, excluded. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.8-10.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/x11vnc/x11vnc.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 14:31:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519161] New Package CVS Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261431.n7QEVeio007367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519161 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-26 10:31:39 EDT --- Since you have a Fedora Account and access to the wiki, feel free to edit it so that it is more clearer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 14:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-plugin-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261436.n7QEaEBZ008572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-26 10:36:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yum-plugin-download-order Short Description: Yum plugin to order downloading of packages Owners: rakesh Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 14:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519161] New Package CVS Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261439.n7QEds7W012542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519161 --- Comment #7 from Peter Halliday 2009-08-26 10:39:53 EDT --- Didn't know that I had that ability. Will do that. Thanks. Not trying to be argumentative. Just trying to improve the way for those who are new after me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 14:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519420] New: Review Request: mupen64 - Nintendo 64 Emulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mupen64 - Nintendo 64 Emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519420 Summary: Review Request: mupen64 - Nintendo 64 Emulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: heydedummy at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dl-web.getdropbox.com/get/RPMBUILD/SPECS/mupen64.spec?w=d7dad25d SRPM URL: https://dl-web.getdropbox.com/get/RPMBUILD/SRPMS/mupen64-0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm?w=b18f37c7 Description: Nintendo 64 emulator for Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 14:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519420] Review Request: mupen64 - Nintendo 64 Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261448.n7QEmaMq014652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519420 Heyde Moura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 15:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261504.n7QF4Ih3014872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #54 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-26 11:04:17 EDT --- At a minimum, you must rebuild those jars from source. Assuming that you have the source and are able to do that, I think you are safe to simply delete the bundled prebuilt jars during %prep, and do not need to make a custom tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 15:07:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261507.n7QF7Eiw018735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 --- Comment #3 from Sayamindu Dasgupta 2009-08-26 11:07:12 EDT --- Release 0.2 has the issues fixed: http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/external/python-xklavier/python-xklavier-0.2.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 15:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519236] Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Resource Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261506.n7QF6UB2015663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519236 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-26 11:06:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1. Packaging naming convention has the number incrementing ahead of the > alphatag. So release should be 0.2.a4 and then 0.3.a4 etc.. Oops, fixed. > 2. Javadoc description should not reference itself (use API documentation for > xxx) Fixed. > 3. No %doc files There's nothing to mark %doc. > 4. post and postun sections are maven-only. Is this a problem since with_maven > is 0? No. > 5. defattr non-standard. Fixed. Updated spec and SRPM: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-resources.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-resources-1.0-0.2.a4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 15:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] New: Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 Summary: Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming-1.0-0.1.a3.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 15:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261530.n7QFUQLp026026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 Bug 504671 depends on bug 503598, which changed state. Bug 503598 Summary: Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 11:30:24 EDT --- pocketsphinx-0.5.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pocketsphinx-0.5.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 15:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261530.n7QFU37a028322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 --- Comment #3 from John W. Linville 2009-08-26 11:30:02 EDT --- re: comment 2 -- your kernel doesn't have support for /dev/rfill. I assure you that it works fine here. :-) re: comment 1 -- I think rfkill.c would be fine if the COPYING file was a bit more clear. But the rfkill.h having come from the kernel throws the whole BSD license claim into doubt. :-( I'll see if I can get that sorted-out upstream... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 15:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261535.n7QFZSRJ027797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-26 11:35:27 EDT --- Old pre-review request: bug #500265. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 15:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261533.n7QFXc97027207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-26 11:33:37 EDT --- I have opened this JIRA upstream to see if we can get the licensing clarified: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXCOMP-144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 15:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500265] Pre-Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261535.n7QFZrKi030048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500265 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-26 11:35:52 EDT --- Full review request: bug #519425. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 16:06:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226434] Merge Review: star In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261606.n7QG65aD002551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226434 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2009-08-26 12:06:02 EDT --- It's about time someone reviewed this, isn't it? Rpmlint shows some things that need to be fixed. star.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/star-1.5/AN-1.5 star.spec:84: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib star.spec:201: W: macro-in-%changelog files star.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 36, tab: line 51) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings. The first warning is triggered because of some ISO8859-1 characters in the file. Please convert that file to UTF-8. The second warning is harmless. To fix the third warning, change "%files" to "%%files" in the changelog entry of Fri Aug 26 2005. Please also fix the fourth warning by using either spaces or tabs, but not both. MUST items: XX: rpmlint output (see above) OK: package named according to package naming guidelines OK: spec file name matches package name XX: package meets packaging guidelines First, there are no comments on the patches, as required by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Second, the BuildRoot does not contain %{release}, as required by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag OK: package has a Fedora-approved license OK: license field matches actual license OK: license file in %doc OK: spec file in American English OK: spec file is legible OK: source matches upstream source (checked with md5sum) OK: package builds successfully on at least one primary arch NA: appropriate use of ExcludeARch OK: all build dependencies in BuildRequires NA: proper locale handling NA: call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK: no relocatable packages OK: package owns all directories it creates OK: no duplicate listings in %files OK: permissions on files are set correctly OK: appropriate %clean section OK: consistent use of macros OK: code or permissible content NA: large documentation in -doc OK: no runtime dependencies in %doc NA: header files in -devel NA: static libraries in -static NA: Requires pkgconfig NA: .so files in -devel NA: -devel requires base package OK: no libtool archives NA: desktop file for GUI apps OK: do not own files/dirs owned by other packages OK: clean at top of %install OK: all filenames are UTF-8 SHOULD items: NA: ask upstream to include a license file NA: include translated description and summary fields OK: package builds in mock OK: package builds and compiles on all supported arches OK: package functions as described (minimal testing only) OK: sane scriptlets NA: subpackages require the base package NA: placement of pkgconfig files NA: file dependencies Finally, would it be helpful to include READMEs/README.linux in %doc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 16:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519161] New Package CVS Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261614.n7QGENhm005619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519161 --- Comment #8 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-26 12:14:22 EDT --- Yes and bringing it up was important so that we can cut down any barriers to entry. Thanks for that. In this case, you have the ability to fix it as well! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 16:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261629.n7QGTZcH008734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakthimaan at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-26 12:29:34 EDT --- I have built this package from the given .spec file, installed, and tested the same on Fedora 11, and it works fine with Eclipse. Only catch is that, if we create a .tex file within a project workspace, one has to choose to open the .tex file with 'LaTeX editor', the first time, for syntax highlighting to take effect. By default, it uses the 'Text editor', and syntax highlighting doesn't show up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 16:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513191] Review Request: php-facedetect - PHP extension to access the OpenCV library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261644.n7QGiuls009938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513191 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 12:44:55 EDT --- php-facedetect-1.0.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-facedetect-1.0.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 17:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261714.n7QHEKl0018122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 --- Comment #5 from Mat Booth 2009-08-26 13:14:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I have built this package from the given .spec file, installed, and tested the > same on Fedora 11, and it works fine with Eclipse. > > Only catch is that, if we create a .tex file within a project workspace, one > has to choose to open the .tex file with 'LaTeX editor', the first time, for > syntax highlighting to take effect. By default, it uses the 'Text editor', and > syntax highlighting doesn't show up. That's the sort of thing that should be filed upstream as an RFE In the meantime, you can make the association manually with Preferences->General->Editors->File Assocations -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 17:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519420] Review Request: mupen64 - Nintendo 64 Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261726.n7QHQ8js020682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519420 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-26 13:26:07 EDT --- 403 while downloading spec. Anyway, the real problem is that whether mupen64 can be included in Fedora, since it emulates not the processor, but the proprietary architecture. And another one possible issue - do you have any free/open content to test it? BTW I just found that mupen64 is obsoleted by mupen64plus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 17:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261752.n7QHqHaU023621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519236] Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Resource Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261801.n7QI1nZ8026474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519236 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-26 14:01:48 EDT --- [jjohnstn at vermillion noarch]$ rpmlint plexus-resources-* plexus-resources.noarch: W: no-documentation plexus-resources.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-resources Built successfully. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519236] Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Resource Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261813.n7QIDka8028962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519236 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-26 14:13:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-resources Short Description: Plexus Resource Manager Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:19:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261819.n7QIJruw030233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-26 14:19:52 EDT --- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261820.n7QIKShK000326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jjohnstn at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jjohnstn at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-26 14:20:26 EDT --- rpmlint successful Comments: 1. The Java Packaging Guideline states: BuildRequires and Requires At a minimum, Java packages MUST: BuildRequires: java-devel [>= specific_version] BuildRequires: jpackage-utils Requires: java >= specific_version Requires: jpackage-utils the spec file only has the BuildRequires: jpackage-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 17:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261752.n7QHqcTR023672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261824.n7QIOVfr031678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #10 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-26 14:24:30 EDT --- I have applied to the packagers group. FAS Account name: wakko666 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:27:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261827.n7QIRxAH032630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-26 14:27:57 EDT --- Hi Christoph, any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261832.n7QIWUiW001236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-26 14:32:29 EDT --- Updated .spec and .src.rpm: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming-1.0-0.2.a3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261835.n7QIZqmv003590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261835.n7QIZiij003539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-26 14:35:43 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261840.n7QIeag4002970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #55 from Christian Krause 2009-08-26 14:40:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > At a minimum, you must rebuild those jars from source. Assuming that you have > the source and are able to do that, I think you are safe to simply delete the > bundled prebuilt jars during %prep, and do not need to make a custom tarball. Thanks for doing the final call. Completely fine with me and easier for packaging. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 18:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261845.n7QIjluI004400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-26 14:45:46 EDT --- Updated .spec and .src.rpm with JDK and JRE requirement: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming-1.0-0.3.a3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519482] New: Review Request: zikula-module-feeds - RSS feeds module for zikula Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-feeds - RSS feeds module for zikula https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519482 Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-feeds - RSS feeds module for zikula Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-feeds.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-feeds-2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: RSS feeds module for Zikula Application Framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261906.n7QJ6sYJ011543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-26 15:06:53 EDT --- Well, - Please fix the following rpmlint warning: ------------------------------------------------------------- rubygem-pathname2.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. ------------------------------------------------------------- Fedora suggests that Summary should not end with dot. ! Well, maybe you like to use underscore, however you can use hyphen in patch name (just noting). - Source1 should be changed to Patch0 (as this is a patch) - By the way usually applying a patch should be done at %prep and use %patchX macro which rpm provides. Current ruby packaging guideline suggests that ruby gem file should be installed under %buildroot at %install directly, however when applying a patch or executing test is needed, I usually suggest to once unpack gem file under %_builddir and copy the unpacked tree to %buildroot at %install like: --------------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q -c -T %{__mkdir_p} .%{gemdir} gem install --local --install-dir=.%{gemdir} \ --force --rdoc %{SOURCE0} pushd .%{geminstdir}/test %patch0 -p0 popd %build %install %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} %{__mkdir_p} %{buildroot}%{gemdir} %{__cp} -a .%{gemdir}/* %{buildroot}%{gemdir}/ %check ruby -I$(pwd)%{geminstdir}/lib $(pwd)%{geminstdir}/test/test_pathname.rb %clean ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] New: Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-pagemaster.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-pagemaster-0.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Pagemaster is a fully Zikula 1.1 compliant but non complete clone of Pagesetter (relations and mediashare plugin are missing still). The main task of the module is creating pages with dynamic content like news articles, product descriptions, band listings etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502596] Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261927.n7QJR8Xs013278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 --- Comment #1 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-26 15:27:08 EDT --- user1# rpmlint sblim-tools-libra.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. user1# sblim-tools-libra-0.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. user1# sblim-tools-libra-0.2.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. user1# sblim-tools-libra-devel-0.2.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm sblim-tools-libra-devel.i386: W: no-documentation Replace the occurrence of "sblim-tools-libra" with %{name} whenever possible. Since this package only provides the libraries, it should be Grouped under Libraries instead of Applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261929.n7QJTqI2016165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loupgaroublond at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, | |needinfo?(bos at serpentine.co | |m) --- Comment #1 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-26 15:29:50 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] [yankee at koan ghc-fgl]$ rpmlint -iv *{spec,rpm} ghc-fgl.src: I: checking ghc-fgl-devel.i586: I: checking ghc-fgl-devel.ppc: I: checking ghc-fgl-devel.x86_64: I: checking ghc-fgl-doc.i586: I: checking ghc-fgl-doc.ppc: I: checking ghc-fgl-doc.x86_64: I: checking ghc-fgl-prof.i586: I: checking ghc-fgl-prof.i586: E: devel-dependency ghc-fgl-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-fgl-prof.i586: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-fgl-prof.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/fgl-5.4.2.2/libHSfgl-5.4.2.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-fgl-prof.ppc: I: checking ghc-fgl-prof.ppc: E: devel-dependency ghc-fgl-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-fgl-prof.ppc: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-fgl-prof.ppc: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.3/fgl-5.4.2.2/libHSfgl-5.4.2.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-fgl-prof.x86_64: I: checking ghc-fgl-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-fgl-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-fgl-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-fgl-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/fgl-5.4.2.2/libHSfgl-5.4.2.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 10 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. >>> CHECK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >>> CHECK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >>> CHECK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >>> CHECK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >>> CHECK --> presuming innoncence here MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >>> CHECK MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] >>> CHECK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >>> CHECK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] >>> CHECK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] >>> CHECK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] >>> CHECK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] >>> CHECK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] >>> CHECK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] >>> CHECK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] >>> CHECK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] >>> CHECK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] >>> CHECK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] >>> CHECK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] >>> CHECK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] >>> CHECK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] >>> CHECK SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. >>> CHECK SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] >>> CHECK SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] >>> CHECK Resolution: PASS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261931.n7QJVcvj014148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 15:31:37 EDT --- lyx-1.6.4-1.fc11,koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-1.6.4-1.fc11,koffice-1.6.3-24.20090306svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503496] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-params - SBLIM params instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261934.n7QJYpKn014515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503496 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |praveen_paladugu at dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:35:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503496] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-params - SBLIM params instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261935.n7QJZ7lp017611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503496 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500266] Pre-Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261945.n7QJj8UA017591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500266 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-26 15:45:07 EDT --- Full review request: bug #519488. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519488] New: Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519488 Summary: Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-registry.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-registry-1.0-0.1.a3.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519488] Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261945.n7QJj19s019308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519488 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-26 15:45:00 EDT --- This is a full review request. The previous pre-review request was bug #500266. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519488] Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261946.n7QJk0pd017922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519488 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-26 15:46:00 EDT --- Note that this package will require the latest maven (once it finishes building) to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514549] Review Request: lyx-fonts - Math Symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261945.n7QJjwkB017897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514549 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 15:45:57 EDT --- lyx-1.6.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lyx-1.6.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 19:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428776] Review Request: perl-SNMP-Info - SNMP::Info perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908261954.n7QJsOJb021119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428776 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 15:54:20 EDT --- perl-SNMP-Info-2.01-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-SNMP-Info-2.01-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 20:08:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262008.n7QK8UmN024283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 --- Comment #6 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-26 16:08:29 EDT --- Approved pending the license issue and successful build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 20:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262005.n7QK53sp023677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #4 from matt chan 2009-08-26 16:05:02 EDT --- I discovered that the SRPM had a directory name bug when doing a koji build. I've updated the tarball name and rebuilt it. The latest link now points to the correct version. Sorry for the inconvenience, Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 20:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262004.n7QK4eaQ023310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-26 16:04:39 EDT --- [-] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint * ansel.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/ansel/styles.php.dist ansel.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/ansel/hooks.php.dist ansel.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/ansel/conf.xml ansel.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/horde/ansel/prefs.php.dist ansel.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/horde/ansel/styles.php.dist 0640 ansel.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/horde/ansel/hooks.php.dist 0640 ansel.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/horde/ansel/prefs.php 0660 ansel.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/horde/ansel/styles.php 0660 ansel.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/horde/ansel/conf.xml 0660 ansel.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/horde/ansel 0770 ansel.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/horde/ansel/prefs.php.dist 0640 ansel.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/horde/ansel/hooks.php 0660 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 4 warnings. *.dist files as I understand is examples. So, it shouldn't be marked as config and should be placed to docs. Permissions also must be checked and fixed. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [-] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. builder.js, editcaption.js, embed.js, imagefaces.js, slideshow.js, slugcheck.js, tagactions.js, togglewidget.js have unknown license. I absolutely don't known how it distributable. This require author clarification. Package contain parts of Prototypejs (carousel.js): 1) It licensed under MIT, not GPLv2 2) Prototypejs should be packaged separately as it separate project with offsite, upstream developer and etc. http://prototypejs.org. This pachage should only require them. Some files have reference to scriptaculous (which is under my review in that moment - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622). I think what available must depend on it. cropper.js - BSD License lightbox.js - Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. $ md5sum *.gz a4bad0fba80ae7621ce7726b29b49966 ansel-h3-1.0_RPM.tar.gz a4bad0fba80ae7621ce7726b29b49966 ansel-h3-1.0.tar.gz [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1636407 [-] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. In spec you unconditional relay to %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d, so httpd then must be required. BUT, as I see in source, ansel provide also .conf file for lighttpd. I think we may add Requires: webserver if add some magic to configure both (may be you can even all available in Fedora? There plus boa)... [-] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. You explicit copy binary .mo files. This is not permitted: 1) Binary content prohibited and must be deleted in %prep - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries 2) Locale files must be generated from source (.po files also there). Otherwise for what you add BuildRequires: gettext? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files [-] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. See above about /etc/httpd [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [-] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. See rpmling errors at begining. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [=] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Please conside place JavaScript unstripped files (src) into -devel package (if thay leaved thereaftere all issues with it). It is not requirement, just suggestion. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+/-] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. You should preserve timestamps when iconv files. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1636407 [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. Do we try reload webserver after install/uninstall package? This is open question - I don't known answer. Additional thing - Until review started, and even by offsite screenshots I don't understand what it is WEB-based gallery. May be we can add it info in description? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 20:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262025.n7QKPMZb026301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-08-26 16:25:20 EDT --- Hi Eelko, thanks for the update. I had a look at the new package: * The BR's are messed up. You want to BR qt-devel and kde-workspace-devel. Not just qt and kde-workspace! Otherwise it won't build on koji. I suggest you running mock or the scratch build feature of koji before posting updates. Other than this, the following issues are still there: (from comment #1) > * ScriptletSnippets aren't used properly. Follow: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets > > * Currently, package does not own %{_kde4_appsdir}/rekonq/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 20:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262048.n7QKmrmO001234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #9 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-08-26 16:48:52 EDT --- Alright, thanks again Orcan. I intentionally mixed/messed up the BR's. Somehow I thought it the -devel packes weren't needed to build it as it build perfectly fine without them on my system (afaik). I'll change that back. While I'm at it, I'll also try your other suggestions and fixes and will get back on it as soon as possible. Yet again, thanks so far! - Eelko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 20:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519488] Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262052.n7QKqri3031953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519488 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jjohnstn at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jjohnstn at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-26 16:52:52 EDT --- rpmlint successful No comments. Approved pending successful build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 21:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519512] New: Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519512 Summary: Review Request: cmusphinx3 - Large vocabulary speech recognition in C Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/sphinx3/cmusphinx3.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/sphinx3/cmusphinx3-0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Sphinx-3 is CMU's state-of-the-art large vocabulary speech recognition system. It uses Hidden Markov Models (HMM) with continuous output probability density functions (PDF). It supports several modes of operation. The more accurate mode, known as the "flat decoder", is descended from the original Sphinx-3 release. The faster mode, known as the "tree decoder", was developed separately. The two decoders were merged in Sphinx 3.5, though the flat decoder was not fully functional until Sphinx 3.7. The previous paragraph is upstream's description. I have named this packages "cmusphinx3" instead of "sphinx3" because we already have an unrelated "sphinx" package in Fedora, so "sphinx3" looks like a compatibility package. Matters are made more complex by the fact that upstream has "sphinx3" and "sphinx4" projects (I will be submitting the latter soon) which serve the same purpose and are both under active development, but sphinx3 is written in C and sphinx4 is written in Java. Combine that with upstream's tendency to refer to sphinx3 version 0.7 as "Sphinx 3.7", as in the paragraph above, and things get a bit confusing. I have chosen to name the packages "cmusphinx3" and "cmusphinx4" to try to avoid the confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 21:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262132.n7QLWxI9007620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2009-08-26 17:32:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/dzen2.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/dzen2-0.8.5-4.fc10.src.rpm - use make -C instead of pushd/popd - add manpages from debian - prefix gadgets with dzen2 like debian does it - export LDFLAGS - explain missing .desktop file (In reply to comment #4) > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK > - License text is not included in the tarball, please ask upstream to include > it. I guess you did not see the file LICENSE that is also included in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 21:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262151.n7QLpE8P011361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Thomas Moschny 2009-08-26 17:51:12 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-markdown New Branches: EL-5 Owners: thm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262211.n7QMBNtT018754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Tomasz Torcz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(zdzichu at irc.pl) | --- Comment #14 from Tomasz Torcz 2009-08-26 18:11:22 EDT --- My comments for my first unofficial review are at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799#c4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262209.n7QM9hqm018095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Tomasz Torcz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zdzichu at irc.pl --- Comment #4 from Tomasz Torcz 2009-08-26 18:09:42 EDT --- I'm not a packager yet (just aspiring), here are my comments: - package is named OK - licensing is OK (GPL2 or later), file is included in %doc - source file location is OK - builds for me on x86_64 - package doesn't include locales nor shared libraries, no special actions needed - package consist code, docs and icon, so it's OK - it's a GUI app, has properly handled .desktop - packaged program works In short, eveyrthing looks OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518316] Review Request: vanessa_adt - Library of Abstract Data Types In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262215.n7QMFWuQ019643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518316 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:15:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:17:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262217.n7QMHJcI019805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:17:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519236] Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Resource Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262216.n7QMGVT3019736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519236 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:16:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262219.n7QMJWWh016310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loupgaroublond at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:19:31 EDT --- we are not doing F-12 branches yet. Otherwise cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:20:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262220.n7QMKoNp020625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loupgaroublond at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:20:48 EDT --- cvs done (except we aren't doing F-12 branches yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:24:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517720] Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262224.n7QMOoSG017309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:24:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518637] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-XSpp - C++ variant of Perl's XS language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262223.n7QMNFZP017083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518637 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:23:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262226.n7QMQdxP017915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:26:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262230.n7QMUIgt018564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:30:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262227.n7QMRY6g018010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #61 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:27:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262229.n7QMT6Ej018145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:29:05 EDT --- The package database has an issue with your account: Email address satya.komaragiri at gmail.com is not a valid bugzilla email address. Either make a bugzilla account with that email address or change your email address in the Fedora Account System https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ to a valid bugzilla email address and try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262232.n7QMWV2E022507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:32:30 EDT --- Please add a cvs template here so we know what you want. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518449] Review Request: moblin-panel-people - Moblin Panel for People In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262233.n7QMXFKn022609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518449 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:33:14 EDT --- oops. Try now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:30:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262230.n7QMUAuX022026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-26 18:30:08 EDT --- > (In reply to comment #4) > > > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK > > - License text is not included in the tarball, please ask upstream to include > > it. > > I guess you did not see the file LICENSE that is also included in %doc. Whoops, sorry. ** If the binaries work in Debian with just a brute-force rename, then it isn't an issue in Fedora. (No interlinks between them and so on.) ** You can still drop PREFIX=%{_prefix} from the build phase, it's only used by the install target of the makefile. Do before import to CVS. This package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-plugin-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262235.n7QMZKqW019522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:35:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519521] New: Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 Summary: Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ismael at olea.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/kompozer.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/paquetes-rpm/fedora-10/kompozer-0.8a4-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: A complete Web authoring system for Linux Desktop users, similar to Microsoft Windows programs like FrontPage and Dreamweaver. KompoZer is an unofficial branch of Nvu, previously developed by Linspire Inc. It makes managing a Web site a snap. Now anyone can create Web pages and manage a Web site with no technical expertise or HTML knowledge. Features * WYSIWYG editing of pages, making Web creation as easy as typing a letter with your word processor. * Integrated file management via FTP. Simply log in to your Web site and navigate through your files, editing Web pages on the fly, directly from your site. * Reliable HTML code creation that works with today's most popular browsers. * Jump between WYSIWYG editing mode and HTML using tabs. * Tabbed editing to make working on multiple pages a snap. * Powerful support for frames, forms, tables, and templates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518450] Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262234.n7QMY709022827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518450 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:34:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:38:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518449] Review Request: moblin-panel-people - Moblin Panel for People In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262238.n7QMcn9v020040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518449 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-26 18:38:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > oops. Try now? Fixed. Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181444] Review Request: lcov -- process gcov output into nice html pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262236.n7QMaEDc019770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181444 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:36:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262237.n7QMbaHt019906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-26 18:37:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 22:40:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519521] Review Request: kompozer - Web Authoring System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262240.n7QMe4MX024136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519521 --- Comment #1 from Ismael Olea 2009-08-26 18:40:03 EDT --- $ rpmlint -iv fedora-10/kompozer-0.8a4-3.fc10.i386.rpm kompozer.i386: I: checking kompozer.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/kompozer/dictionaries /usr/share/myspell The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is included in a package in this package's dependency chain. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (BTW if the provided links doesn't work wait a bit to let the server finish sync) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 23:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262302.n7QN2Ene028030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-26 19:02:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > However, the categories GNOME and Application should be removed from the > desktop file in %install. fixed > I wouldn't use > docdir=%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} \ > in %install, I'd just run > rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_docdir} > and list the necessary files in %doc. changed Here are the updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gtk-splitter.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gtk-splitter-2.2.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 23:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517720] Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262311.n7QNBTXn029912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 19:11:28 EDT --- perl-BZ-Client-1.02-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-BZ-Client-1.02-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 23:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262334.n7QNYZwg001462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 19:34:33 EDT --- ccze-0.2.1-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Aug 26 23:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908262339.n7QNdYKM002294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 --- Comment #11 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2009-08-26 19:39:33 EDT --- Hello Arnaldo, The spec changes looks good to my eyes. Anyway, soon someone will post an approval to your package or a new request of change to you. Cheers, Douglas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 00:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] New: Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 Summary: Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chkr at plauener.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/clutter-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/clutter-sharp-0-0.1.20090827.fc11.src.rpm Description: C#/.NET bindings to Clutter Package builds on F12 for all architectures: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1636949 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 00:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270052.n7R0qssq014339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-26 20:52:53 EDT --- quick pre-review of important things: * Licensing looks good. Mixture of GPL and MIT. There is no included license file but hte source references: GNU/GPL - http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html * The module includes a copy of livepipe which is not a blocker as it is a javascript library and we don't yet have javascript guidelines. Something that will need to be moved out into its own package in the future, though. * There is an included version of FilterUtil: http://code.zikula.org/filterutil that seems like it should be in its own package. Is there a reason it shouldn't? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 00:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270054.n7R0skmv014492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-26 20:54:46 EDT --- Also, the Source0: url isn't a static link. It's generated whenever a person asks to download a file. itbegins will query upstream about uploading the extension to code.zikula.org but for now, a comment that says what URL to go to and what to click to get the code is fine for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 01:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519482] Review Request: zikula-module-feeds - RSS feeds module for zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270105.n7R15RFX016443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519482 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-26 21:05:26 EDT --- Quick prereview: * Licensing looks good.. Probably should be GPL+ or GPLv2+ though -- there's no mention of which GPL version in this package. zikula itself says it's GPLv2+. * Same comment about source as zikula-module-pagemaster -- since the link is generated everytime a download is requested, you need to have a comment that tells how to get the source instead of the URL in the Source0 (since that won't work for subsequent downloaders). I see nothing in here that will need extra work. I'll do a full review of this tonight or tomorrow if no one else gets to it first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 01:06:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519420] Review Request: mupen64 - Nintendo 64 Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270106.n7R166kq012772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519420 --- Comment #2 from Heyde Moura 2009-08-26 21:06:05 EDT --- Well, sorry about my missings, i should think on it before requested. About the 403 error i have no problems here, ping is ok. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 01:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519541] Review Request: dropbox - Nautilus Dropbox Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270112.n7R1CPAu017499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519541 Heyde Moura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |i386 Version|rawhide |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 01:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519420] Review Request: mupen64 - Nintendo 64 Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270114.n7R1E4W4013928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519420 Heyde Moura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 01:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519541] New: Review Request: dropbox - Nautilus Dropbox Implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dropbox - Nautilus Dropbox Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519541 Summary: Review Request: dropbox - Nautilus Dropbox Implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: heydedummy at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dl-web.getdropbox.com/get/RPMBUILD/SPECS/nautilus-dropbox.spec?w=6dd5fee3 SRPM URL: https://dl-web.getdropbox.com/get/RPMBUILD/SRPMS/nautilus-dropbox-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm?w=4ee6b392 Description: A Implementation of Dropbox for Nautilus File Manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 01:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270140.n7R1eYWu022374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 Peter Halliday changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Peter Halliday 2009-08-26 21:40:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-werkzeug Short Description: The Swiss Army knife of Python web development Owners: hoangelos Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: hoangelos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270211.n7R2BMQA028077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 22:11:19 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270214.n7R2EgXg025502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.03-1.fc11 |1.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270211.n7R2BTDi024657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.03-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270214.n7R2Eb2P029247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 22:14:35 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270216.n7R2G6oZ030076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 22:16:04 EDT --- php-channel-doctrine-1.0.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270217.n7R2HL0a026885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-26 22:17:18 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270217.n7R2HQFX026920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9-1.fc10 |1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:16:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270216.n7R2GBXg026555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.0-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519541] Review Request: dropbox - Nautilus Dropbox Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270221.n7R2LhYp031690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519541 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-26 22:21:42 EDT --- Both links are invalid. However, that doesn't really matter, because unless things have changed significantly in the last month, dropbox is not acceptable for Fedora because it's not free software. See the thread starting at https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-July/msg00039.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519615] New: Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519615 Summary: Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phalliday at excelsiorsystems.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.excelsiorsystems.net/media/files/python-virtualenv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.excelsiorsystems.net/media/files/python-virtualenv-1.3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: virtualenv is a tool to create isolated Python environments. The basic problem being addressed is one of dependencies and versions, and indirectly permissions. Imagine you have an application that needs version 1 of LibFoo, but another application requires version 2. How can you use both these applications? If you install everything into ``/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages`` (or whatever your platform's standard location is), it's easy to end up in a situation where you unintentionally upgrade an application that shouldn't be upgraded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:38:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519541] Review Request: dropbox - Nautilus Dropbox Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270238.n7R2c6PB003080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519541 Heyde Moura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 02:58:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270258.n7R2wFn8007728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |michael.silvanus at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michael.silvanus at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-26 22:58:14 EDT --- Taking this review. Could you put a comment above the source line, describing how exactly to reproduce the tarball you're using? With SVN and Hg, I'd recommend just using the revision number instead of revision date, but with Git's long revision number... say # DIRNAME=... ./clutter-sharp-make-git-snapshot.sh the-commit-id Source0: ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 03:59:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270359.n7R3x0JB020350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 06:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270614.n7R6ERRX005500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 --- Comment #4 from Kushal Das 2009-08-27 02:14:26 EDT --- New SPEC and SRPM: Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-xklavier.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-xklavier-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1637290 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 06:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270655.n7R6tbtF017481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-27 02:55:35 EDT --- Well, okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (hdaspd) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 07:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270700.n7R708Wd018319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-27 03:00:07 EDT --- If you want this package on F-11 and tokyotyrant really needs tokyocabinet >= 1.4.30 please file a RFE bug ticket against tokyocabinet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 07:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270701.n7R71IUp018557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-27 03:01:16 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 07:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270707.n7R77X7Y019644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(red at fedoraproject | |.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 07:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270707.n7R77Jqm015599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-27 03:07:16 EDT --- Would you update the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 07:06:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270706.n7R76Nnc015450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-27 03:06:22 EDT --- * Rpmlint - There are comments in the spec file to indicate that the permissions need to be more restrictive than rpmlint wants because passwords are stored in those config files so they cannot be world readable. - The xml files are not marked as no replace because they are replace during upgrade and should not be edited by users. * License - I have emailed upstream for clarity on the named files - The carousel.js is from Prototype-UI http://www.prototype-ui.com/ which according to the developer is not production ready, So am guessing i am going to have to suspend this review until Prototype-UI is production ready. * Dependency - Ansel requires horde which in turn require PHP which in turn required httpd which means the dependency will be resolved without explicitly requiring httpd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 07:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270723.n7R7NEJq018889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-27 03:23:13 EDT --- Well, - If this package really needs ipsec-tools >= 0.8, please file a RFE bug report against ipsec-tools and mark the bug block this ticket. - Checking CONFIG_ARPD in /boot/config-* of the kernel _currently running_ may be one of the ideas (note that usually people installs several kernels and not always the newest kernel on the system is running) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 07:24:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270724.n7R7OMaO023552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(th.p.janssen at goog | |lemail.com) --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-27 03:24:20 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 08:07:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226434] Merge Review: star In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270807.n7R87gom001080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226434 --- Comment #2 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-08-27 04:07:30 EDT --- Thanks for taking this merge review. -Relevant rpmlint warnings fixed (rm .%{_prefix}/lib kept) -Comments on patches added - although it is SHOULD and not MUST item to have commented patches, it could be useful and star has not so many patches - so no problem with this... -Buildroot from spec file is no longer used by newer rpm, so this is harmless too - anyway, fixed for sanity... Built as star-1.5-7.fc12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 08:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270836.n7R8ahYv007480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #33 from Zach Oglesby 2009-08-27 04:35:58 EDT --- Sorry about that! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-X11-xft Short Description: Haskell binding to Xft Owners: zoglesby Branches: F10 F11 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 08:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 04:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270853.n7R8rth9011147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #16 from Thomas Janssen 2009-08-27 04:53:53 EDT --- Good question. You flagged me with needinfo. I have no idea what's up with Byron. He wanted to maintain the package. If he gives up, i can take it. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 09:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487241] Review Request: ntlmaps - NTLM Authentication Proxy Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270901.n7R91hsG007699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487241 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-27 05:01:41 EDT --- few notes before a formal review: - you can drop the version specification in BR: python-devel, we have 2.x for a long time - as it is supposed to be run as a service it should have an init script and an own user - the dos2unix conversion is better done in %prep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 09:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270916.n7R9GZtp010686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-27 05:16:34 EDT --- Looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 09:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270916.n7R9GwiZ010761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 09:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270921.n7R9Llfg017308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Kushal Das 2009-08-27 05:21:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-xklavier Short Description: Python bindings for libxklavier Owners: kushal Branches: InitialCC: kushal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 09:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519302] Review Request: eog-plugins - A collection of plugins for the eog image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270923.n7R9NbQb012002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519302 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 09:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270923.n7R9Nl3U012059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-08-27 05:23:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi Mattias, Hi! > 1) First the simple rpmlint errors. > > voms.src:387: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package vomsjapi %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} > (Should be fixed) This is a false warning from rpmlint. The reason for the false warning is that rpmlint does not interpret specfile conditionals. All Java packages that follow the guidelines for packaging ahead-of-time compiled Java triggers this false warning. > voms-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on voms/voms-libs/libvoms > (I'm not sure what this is) This warning is due to that the current rpmlint version does not support %{_isa} tags. This has been fixed in the rpmlint sources, but there is no new rpmlint release yet. This warning will go away when the next rpmlint version is released. > voms-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > (okay) > voms-server.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/voms > (should be easy enough to add or maybe it looks like a specific lock > is created? Its tricky I don't know of anything else that launches > multiple deamons per configuration) The init.d script is using subsys, however the rpmlint check greps for the string "/var/lock/subsys", and the script in the voms package has "$VOMS_LOCATION_VAR/lock/subsys" where VOMS_LOCATION_VAR has been set to /var. > voms-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name voms ('voms-server', > 'voms-serverd') > (okay) > 2) Why is it? > > %package -n vomsjapi > and not just > %package japi Fedora Java Packaging guidelines says: "If a package provides a single JAR file it must have the same name as the package itself." See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Jar_file_naming > 3) After installing voms-server > # service voms start > ls: cannot access /etc/voms: No such file or directory > [root at globus x86_64]# echo $? > 0 > > /etc/voms should be created and owned by the package. Fixed. > I guess (not checked) voms is the directory containing the > /voms.conf files? If so maybe /etc/voms.d/ might be better? I'd rather not change this, since many scripts has this location hardcoded. > 3.1) Is it worth adding an example configuration and perhaps a README.Fedora > to describe simply how to get up and running? Create database., ... Fixed. > 4) Given there is no need to run voms as root ( except host cert) is > it a good idea to add a voms user and run as that? I realise it gets > to a point where the init script ends up being written from scratch. Fixed. No need to rewrite the script, only add a /etc/sysconfig/voms file defining the user - now included in the package. > 5) For my own education I expect in > BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel%{?_isa} > why/how is the %{?_isa} added? On a multilib installation (e.g. i386/x86_64) the "BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel" is satisfied by both the i386 and x86_64 RPM package. By adding the %{?_isa} you explicitly request the right version (provided the version of RPM used by the distribution is new enough to support it). > 6) Concerning EPEL support this is probably only difficult because > of the bouncycastle requirment which requires a slew of missing > dependencies. Could it be built without the javaapi support? It > is a lot less important I would say. EPEL packages can be built without the Java API. > Steve. New version is here: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/voms.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/voms-1.9.11-2.fc11.src.rpm Mattias. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 09:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519302] Review Request: eog-plugins - A collection of plugins for the eog image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908270945.n7R9jJDX016313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519302 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-27 05:45:18 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 1a6786f0550f84ab0c99ab540ec344ed8d6b1f05 eog-plugins-2.27.91.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK* license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK* compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - the champlain and postr plugins should add license header into their source files - the build flags were checked directly in the Makefiles because the build itself is non-verbose, you should switch to verbose mode either in configure or build with "make V=1" This package is APPROVED, just enable the verbose build mode during the import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 10:12:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519652] New: Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519652 Summary: Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/sabnzbdplus.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/sabnzbdplus-0.4.11-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Fully automatic Binary Newsgrabber. Supports multiple Operating Systems. Server-oriented using a web-interface. The active successor of the abandoned SABnzbd project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 10:14:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519652] Review Request: sabnzbdplus - Heavily Featured Automatic Binary Newsgrabber In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271014.n7RAEU1s027993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519652 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-08-27 06:14:29 EDT --- Note, this package contains code that works with rar files, I'm not sure if this is a legal concern or not. The relavent code in upstream svn is here: http://svn2.assembla.com/svn/SABnzbd/trunk/main/sabnzbd/utils/rarfile.py I'm going to block this on FE-legal until this matter is clarified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 10:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518189] Review Request: java-augeas - Java bindings for Augeas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271026.n7RAQ6eq031759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518189 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-27 06:26:05 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 1f5de83f1d17e11b184f72c0e5dc8d4536cbac23 java-augeas-0.0.1.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (LGPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - Prefix tag is not be used in Fedora (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Relocatable_packages) - the spec has subtle differences compared to the official ant-based template (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#ant_2) - cp doesn't preserver attributes = "-p" is missing - the javadocs are installed into a versioned dir - rpmlint complains a bit java-augeas.src:4: W: hardcoded-prefix-tag augeas => remove the tag java-augeas.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 1) => use only one of them java-augeas-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation => it's OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 10:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271029.n7RATHLc032400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Till Maas 2009-08-27 06:29:16 EDT --- Thank you both for the review. I'll remove the extra PREFIX before import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dzen2 Short Description: Owners: till Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: A general purpose messaging and notification program -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 10:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271052.n7RAqv83032739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(th.p.janssen at goog | |lemail.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 10:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271052.n7RAqQmQ032646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(byron at theclarkfam | |ily.name) --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-27 06:52:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Good question. You flagged me with needinfo. I have no idea what's up with > Byron. He wanted to maintain the package. If he gives up, i can take it. Ah, okay. Setting NEEDINFO for Byron. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 12:22:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271222.n7RCMEr2022628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Byron Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(byron at theclarkfam | |ily.name) | --- Comment #18 from Byron Clark 2009-08-27 08:22:13 EDT --- I don't see any unanswered questions or concerns, what further information is needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 13:03:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519695] New: Review Request: hunspell-shs - Shuswap hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-shs - Shuswap hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519695 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-shs - Shuswap hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-shs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-shs-0.20081107-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Shuswap hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 13:43:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518189] Review Request: java-augeas - Java bindings for Augeas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271343.n7RDhSVv008233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518189 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2009-08-27 09:43:27 EDT --- Thank you for the review. I have made the comments you suggested, and uploaded new files. You can see the new files at: Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/java-augeas.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/java-augeas-0.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 14:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498285] Review Request: mozilla-adblockplus - Adblocking extension for Mozilla Firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271415.n7REFA4R011480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498285 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 14:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271415.n7REFpqM011701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-08-27 10:15:49 EDT --- Ok, I've added perl(Class:Accessor::Fast), thanks for catching this. And thanks for the review, both of you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Nagios-Plugin Short Description: Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins Owners: ruben Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 14:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271426.n7REQIYf013797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-27 10:26:17 EDT --- perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.11.0-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.11.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 14:36:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226434] Merge Review: star In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271436.n7REaqcW021277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226434 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2009-08-27 10:36:49 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271519.n7RFJNxl024869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-27 11:19:19 EDT --- In rawhide. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519236] Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Resource Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271519.n7RFJcrP024978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519236 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-27 11:19:37 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1638868 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428780] Review Request: perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession - Integrates Apache::Session into Mason In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271528.n7RFSDde027203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428780 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-27 11:28:10 EDT --- perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession-0.30-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MasonX-Request-WithApacheSession-0.30-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271532.n7RFWc6T001980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #20 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-27 11:32:35 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271536.n7RFa89R003427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 Bug 439627 depends on bug 167525, which changed state. Bug 167525 Summary: Review Request: cpptasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271536.n7RFa4pn003327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|NOTABUG | AssignedTo|gemi at bluewin.ch |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jerry James 2009-08-27 11:36:00 EDT --- I would have found this sooner if it wasn't marked CLOSED NOTABUG and blocked FE-DEADREVIEW. :-) Is there a reason for not building with gcj? If so, please include an explanatory comment at the top of the spec file. If not, please add the aot compilation bits. There is ongoing work to migrate to maven 2.0.8. Does this package need to wait for that release of maven in order to build the manual? Although it appears someone will have to package these first anyway: http://clirr.sourceforge.net/ http://mojo.codehaus.org/clirr-maven-plugin/ In the absence of a manual, how about putting a URL to the online manual in the description or in a README.fedora? Does this package need to drop a file into /etc/ant.d? MUST items: OK: rpmlint out 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: package name OK: spec filename matches package name XX: packaging guidelines are met https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires requires that jpackage-utils also be a Requires, that java-devel be a BuildRequires, and that java be a Requires. OK: licensing guidelines OK: license field matches actual license OK: license file in %doc OK: spec file in American English OK: spec file is legible (but put a blank line between the first 2 %changelog entries, please) OK: source matches upstream (checked with md5sum) OK: package builds successfully on at least one primary arch NA: appropriate use of ExcludeArch OK: all build dependencies in BuildRequires NA: proper handling of locales NA: ldconfig invocation OK: no relocatable packages XX: package owns all directories it creates This package does not own /usr/share/doc/cpptasks, which is the wrong name anyway (no version). Please replace the %doc lines for the base package with this: %doc LICENSE NOTICE OK: no duplicate listings in %files OK: correct permissions on files OK: %clean section OK: consistent use of macros OK: code or permissible content OK: large documentation in -doc (more information needed on the manual, though; see above) OK: no runtime dependencies in %doc NA: header files -in -devel NA: static libraries in -static NA: requires pkgconfig NA: .so files in -devel NA: -devel requires base package OK: no libtool archives NA: GUI applications need a desktop file OK: do not own files/dirs owned by other packages OK: clean at top of %install OK: all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD items: NA: ask upstream to include a license file NA: include translated description and summary OK: package builds in mock (tried x86_64 Fedora 11 only) ??: package builds on all supported arches (did not check) ??: package functions as described (I don't know how to check) OK: sane scriptlets XX: subpackages require the base package The -javadoc subpackage does not require the base package. NA: placement of pkgconfig files NA: file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:43:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271543.n7RFh6TD005027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #19 from Gareth John 2009-08-27 11:43:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: paperbox Short Description: A GTK tracker based document browser Owners: gljohn Branches: F10 F11 InitialCC: n/a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271543.n7RFhIfC031987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271542.n7RFgDh3031699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Gareth John changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:42:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271542.n7RFgEt9031720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Bug 503847 depends on bug 503256, which changed state. Bug 503256 Summary: Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518189] Review Request: java-augeas - Java bindings for Augeas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271551.n7RFpc4R007282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518189 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-27 11:51:37 EDT --- The "-p" argument is missing in the javadocs copy command, but there's no need for another iteration, just change that during the import into CVS. This package is APPROVED with the notice above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 15:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518189] Review Request: java-augeas - Java bindings for Augeas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271557.n7RFvaJ1003839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518189 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Bryan Kearney 2009-08-27 11:57:35 EDT --- Dan: Thank You. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: java-augeas Short Description: Java Bindings for the Augeas library Owners: bkearney Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 16:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271601.n7RG1Rpt004927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-27 12:01:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I don't see any unanswered questions or concerns, what further information is > needed? At least you should fix the issue raised by Jason (comment 12). You can get these rpmlint warnings by $ rpmlint stfl after installing stfl binary rpm (note that rpmlint can also be used for installed rpms). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 16:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271623.n7RGNPZE008951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 16:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271626.n7RGQrcx014689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-27 12:26:51 EDT --- Presumably: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 16:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271634.n7RGYqHQ011353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-27 12:34:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358906) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358906) more -doc deps I think to be consistent we better have all the doc deps too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 16:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:36:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271636.n7RGa8h2012694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-27 12:36:07 EDT --- Erm, and: +BuildRequires: ghc-xmonad-doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 17:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271703.n7RH3Ggq023381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-27 13:03:14 EDT --- Can anyone review this for me please ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 17:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519051] Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271743.n7RHhT2G001397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-27 13:43:28 EDT --- Now that maven2 is built in rawhide, you can probably just: yum --enablerepo=rawhide update maven2 and then build this package. Here's the latest .spec and .src.rpm: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/maven2-plugin-shade.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/maven2-plugin-shade-1.0-7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 17:47:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271747.n7RHlt1u031781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at matbooth.co.uk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Mat Booth 2009-08-27 13:47:54 EDT --- Sure, I've packaged a couple eclipse plugins, so I will take the review if you like. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 18:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458245] Review Request: python-markdown - Markdown implementation in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271813.n7RIDpQq005579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458245 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-27 14:13:50 EDT --- python-markdown-2.0.1-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-markdown-2.0.1-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 18:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226434] Merge Review: star In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271857.n7RIvqfH020156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226434 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |star-1.5-7.fc12 Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 19:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519482] Review Request: zikula-module-feeds - RSS feeds module for zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271905.n7RJ5rPY016423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519482 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-27 15:05:52 EDT --- Good: * rpmlint: zikula-module-feeds.noarch: W: no-documentation There is no documentation in the upstream tarball so this is fine. * Package is named according to the naming Guidelines * spec file is named after the package. * License is good. (either GPL+ or GPLv2+) * Spec file is legible. * Sources match upstream -- but see below. Also note, since the zip file is created dynamically when a download is requested, md5sums do not match. This is due to timestamps differing, not differences in the code. * Builds in koji on EPEL-5 and rawhide. * not a shared library * not content * not relocatable * Package owns all directories it creates. * macros used consistently * Permissions set correctly * rm -rf %{buildroot} run at appropriate times. NEEDSWORK: * Change the license tag to GPL+ or GPLv2+ -- the code itself only references the GPL, so it would be GPL+. However, this depends on zikula so it might be GPLv2+ like zikula. * Since the source isn't retrievable by a direct URL, you need a Source0: line with the name of the zip file and then a comment that tells where to go to get the Source. When you do these two things, I'll approve this. Optional: * No license file in the zip file. Query upstream to see if they'll include one in their next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 19:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519161] New Package CVS Request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271912.n7RJClP2023497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519161 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 19:24:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519302] Review Request: eog-plugins - A collection of plugins for the eog image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271924.n7RJOQdJ020969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519302 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-08-27 15:24:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eog-plugins Short Description: A collection of plugins for the eog image viewer Owners: mclasen Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 19:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271931.n7RJVhtL028388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bos at serpentine.co |fedora-cvs? |m) | --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-27 15:31:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-fgl Short Description: functional graph library for Haskell Owners: bos ynemoy petersen Branches: F-11 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 19:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271937.n7RJbO5C029579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 19:41:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271941.n7RJf9AG024835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-27 15:41:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > * Rpmlint > - There are comments in the spec file to indicate that the permissions need to > be more restrictive than rpmlint wants because passwords are stored in those > config files so they cannot be world readable. It can not be applicable for files like /etc/horde/ansel/styles.php.dist. If you use such extra permissions - it must be minimum and commented. > - The xml files are not marked as no replace because they are replace during > upgrade and should not be edited by users. There one xml-file - /etc/horde/ansel/conf.xml. So, ok, if it configuration for horde provided by package this warning may be ignored. But in this case really it altogether should be marked as %config? > * License > - I have emailed upstream for clarity on the named files > - The carousel.js is from Prototype-UI http://www.prototype-ui.com/ which > according to the developer is not production ready Why??? Prototype is famous framework and have several stable releases - http://prototypejs.org/download And I think it should not be difficult to package... > * Dependency > - Ansel requires horde which in turn require PHP which in turn required httpd > which means the dependency will be resolved without explicitly requiring httpd No, it is not: $ rpm -qp --requires ansel-1.0-3.fc11.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/php config(ansel) = 1.0-3.fc11 horde >= 3 php-gd >= 4.3.0 php-pear(MDB2) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 You miss my additional point - should ansel require exactly httpd (implicit or explicit)? Meta "webserver" don't satisfactory us? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 19:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 15:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908271949.n7RJnKMt032107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-27 15:49:19 EDT --- ghc-HUnit-1.2.0.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-HUnit-1.2.0.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507830] Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272001.n7RK1GP6029508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507830 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dan at danny.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:05:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272005.n7RK5PDj004703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-27 16:05:24 EDT --- ghc-OpenGL-2.2.1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-OpenGL-2.2.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272019.n7RKJOi9000724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #8 from David A. Wheeler 2009-08-27 16:19:22 EDT --- Here's the new version, which addresses all previously-noted MUSTFIX-es *AND* improves the test suite. rpmlint gives no warnings, no errors: Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/auto-destdir.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/auto-destdir-1.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Let me know of anything else that needs doing; I don't know of anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272032.n7RKWJ2S009770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-27 16:32:17 EDT --- A few minor things: Remove the # commented out lines. The description deosn't seem aligned and seems too long. Unless you are branching out for EPEL, you don't need to define the buildroot or remove it in the %install section anymore. IIUC, the mini scripts that are in /usr/share are really helper apps that should be in /usr/libexec instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272035.n7RKZP7M004206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:33:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272033.n7RKXRfI003666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 --- Comment #8 from Mat Booth 2009-08-27 16:33:26 EDT --- There's really not a lot wrong with this package, which is good. After going through all the applicable guidelines, here are my only comments: * You make a comment about the zero-length file, so I'm fine with that. * Could you make a comment about what your patches do and whether they need to go upstream or not? * The plugin includes a copy of the licence in "about.html", so you must at least include that as a %doc. * As is the case with source archives generated from source control, the sum doesn't match what your script generates, but diff says they are identical so that's fine. * And for bonus points, in the package description, "syntax highlighting" should start with an upper-case S, but I'm really nit-picking now. :-) * The package appears to work - but it complained about my preferences when I tried to preview one of the samples. I assume my complete ignorance of Latex is to blame. I also agree with Comment #1 about the tar file: * Please either gzip your source archive in the script (tar czvf, perhaps?) or omit the .gz file extension; it would be nice if it matched the file type. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272037.n7RKbYJE004586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #13 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-27 16:37:33 EDT --- hm, do we still miss something ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272049.n7RKn3MM006752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 --- Comment #9 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-08-27 16:49:02 EDT --- Ruben, you need to ask the flag dedora-cvs (ie, make it fedora-cvs?, not fedora-cvs+). The CVS admin will put it to '+' when he has created the module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272052.n7RKqa8B013495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-27 16:52:35 EDT --- http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-pagemaster.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-pagemaster-0.3.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Upstream claims FilterUtil is not a stand alone module and is getting obsoleted so I am not inclined to split it up. Let me know if there is anything else I need to do -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:51:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519482] Review Request: zikula-module-feeds - RSS feeds module for zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272051.n7RKpHnL007821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519482 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-27 16:51:16 EDT --- http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-feeds.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/zikula-module-feeds-2.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Will query upstream about including a copy of the license. Anything else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 20:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272055.n7RKttfU014348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rc040203 at freenet.de | --- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-27 16:55:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > * "OK, then elaborate how this package works." > For that, see its "man" page, esp. the "implementation approach" section. > This is available as PDF here: > http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/make-redir.pdf Well, if you think this is a nice approach, I can't avoid to disagree. I will not approve this package and recommend other reviewers to do the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 21:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272113.n7RLD2cY017827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #11 from David A. Wheeler 2009-08-27 17:13:01 EDT --- Thanks for commenting! * "The description deosn't seem aligned and seems too long". I can shorten it, sure! But I don't understand the 'aligned' comment. Can you explain what you mean? * "Remove the # commented out lines... Unless you are branching out for EPEL, you don't need to define the buildroot or remove it in the %install section anymore." Actually, I *am* hoping to have the same .spec file for other RPM-based systems, including RHEL/EPEL. These lines are critically necessary for many systems, and they cause no harm to Fedora. So, I'd rather leave them in. Please tell me if removing them is really critical. * "IIUC, the mini scripts that are in /usr/share are really helper apps that should be in /usr/libexec instead." If they were binaries, I'd 100% agree with you. But these files do NOT depend on the specific architecture being used. Unfortunately, /usr/libexec isn't in FHS, so it's hard to find really good rules to make a clear determination. The FHS DOES say /usr/lib is for architecture-dependent data (e.g., ELF files like .so files), while /usr/share is for architecture-independent data. I think /usr/libexec is intended to be like /usr/lib, namely, it stores architecture-specific files, as suggested by the name similarity. Following that line of thought, private executables that are architecture-independent would go into /usr/share instead. Obviously, if you take the position that "all private executables go into /usr/libexec, architecture-neutral or not", then /usr/libexec would be the answer. The GNU coding standards talk about libexecdir, but don't make it entirely clear (to me) if private scripts would go here too. Anyone know of a semi-official Fedora position (either way) on this? If they should be moved, that would be trivial to do, by just changing %configure to: %configure --scriptdir=%{_libexecdir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 21:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] New: media-player-id - Data files describing media player capabilities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: media-player-id - Data files describing media player capabilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 Summary: media-player-id - Data files describing media player capabilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/media-player-id.spec srpm: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/media-player-id-1-1.fc12.src.rpm description: media-player-id is a repository of data files describing media player (mostly USB Mass Storage ones) capabilities. These files contain information about the directory layout to use to add music to these devices, about the supported file formats, etc. The package also installs a udev rule to identify media player devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 21:25:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272125.n7RLPjeh020635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 --- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-27 17:25:44 EDT --- While we're at it. Please add InitialCC: perl-sig to all "New Package CVS Requests" of perl-modules. TIA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 21:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272127.n7RLR8de020822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-27 17:27:06 EDT --- On alignment, there is a lot of white space in between lines and makes it harder to read the text and text does get displayed in many places including PackageKit and therefore writing a shorter description makes sense. It is mostly cosmetic however. Removing the buildroot stuff is not critical at all. If you want, you can keep them and branch for EPEL as well https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL The guidelines for libexec are at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Libexecdir The majority of packages in /usr/libexec are binaries but I found a few shell scripts as well. rpm -qf /usr/libexec/xscreensaver-autostart xscreensaver-base-5.08-12.fc12.i686 This is recommended but I won't insist on it. Btw, Fedora did try to get it into FHS but it appears there are no owners to keep it updated anymore. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 21:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272157.n7RLvcjx026648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #13 from David A. Wheeler 2009-08-27 17:57:37 EDT --- Okay, I per comment #12, I moved the scripts to libexecdir and shortened the description. (You didn't REQUIRE this, but they made sense). I left the buildroot stuff, as discussed above. rpmlint still reports 0 errors, 0 warnings. The new versions, with the optional changes suggested, are here: Spec URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/auto-destdir.spec SRPM URL: http://www.dwheeler.com/auto-destdir/auto-destdir-1.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for the approval! (see comment #12) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 22:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272202.n7RM2iKn021722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from David A. Wheeler 2009-08-27 18:02:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: auto-destdir Short Description: Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" Owners: dwheeler Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 22:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272253.n7RMrj1F030383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-27 18:53:43 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-0.638-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 22:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272253.n7RMrnSE030432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.638-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 22:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517720] Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272253.n7RMrdfl030336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-27 18:53:38 EDT --- perl-BZ-Client-1.02-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-BZ-Client'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9060 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 22:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272258.n7RMw7Pq004672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #57 from Christian Krause 2009-08-27 18:58:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=358976) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=358976) patch to prevent building of the clients in the classes directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 22:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272256.n7RMuLA8004436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.1-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 22:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272257.n7RMv3vI004537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #56 from Christian Krause 2009-08-27 18:57:00 EDT --- Thanks for the new package. There are just some smaller cosmetic changes left. (In reply to comment #53) > > * specfile in American English and legible: TODO > > - indentation: I know this may sound like nitpicking, however I'm still > > convinced that the spec files should be written in such a way that it can be > > easily read by any other user with any program. It should not be necessary to > > guess the tab width for each spec file. ;-) I think using some kind of standard > > for things like this will certainly help that all Fedora package maintainers > > can easily work together. > There was discussion on this theme - > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.extras.packaging/6214/focus=6224 > And accordingly it proposed draft guidelines change - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Tabs > > So, there many people argue with your arguments. So, I think until it is only > draft and FESCO do not approve that, it can't be as required item. Yes, I've also read this thread. However, it is for sure not wrong to use a standard tab width. And you would do nearly all other packagers the favor that they could easily read your spec file with a proper formatting. The alternative would be to use just spaces. This would work for everyone and since there is usually not that many changes in a spec file, it should not have that much overhead. Would you agree on this solution? > > - typo: pathes -> paths > > - wording: IMHO "performant" isn't an Enlish word, probably just use "fast" > Sure? http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/performant Not any more. ;-) I did some more research: In the mentioned URL the meaning of "performant" is described as "a performer" but not as an adjective with the meaning of "fast". However, just searching for "performant" with google revealed lots of people debating about it. ;-) Even if it is not in the standard dictionaries, it can be found here: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Performant > But if you want, I replace it by productive. Is it ok? Either way is fine with me by now. ;-) > > - spelling: "prebuild clients" -> "prebuilt clients" > > - spelling: "acording" -> "according" > > - spelling: "macroses" -> "macros" > There I don't known (replaced as you say). Macros have not multiple form at > all? Yes, "macros" is in widespread use. > > - indentation in %prep: > > The small code snippet to do the conversion into UTF-8 is not indented > > correctly. The begin ("for file....") and the end ("done") of the for loop > > should be one tab more to the left than the body of the for loop. > Again... > I'm change it as you like see it for only do not start new long flame-war. > But this is very similar to tab-width space. In Fedora we even not have (as I > known) some recommended "coding standards" or similar > documents/guidelines/policies. So, than it can't be error at all! I think basic indentation is a well-accepted coding standard for nearly all languages. Especially the inner blocks of constructs like "if () then ... else ..." or "for" loops should be indented one step more than the surrounding code. Here are the missing minor pieces: 1. tab width: it would really be nice if you could use either a tab width of 8 or just convert the spec file to spaces 2. According to Tom it is not necessary to re-package the tarball. However, he suggests that the pre-built binaries are deleted in the %prep section. My suggestion: - add "find -name '*.jar' -exec rm {} \;" to the end of the %prep section - add the attached patch to prevent that "make" will enter the "classes" directory 3. Please make sure that the comments in the spec file and the %changelog entries don't exceed 80 chars per line. Sure, that's also not strictly required but nearly all spec files do it this way. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 22:55:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272255.n7RMtpVg031297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.638-4.fc11 |0.638-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 22:56:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272256.n7RMuGTj031621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-27 18:56:15 EDT --- pocketsphinx-0.5.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 22:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515079] Review Request: perl-Config-Model - Framework to create configuration validation tools and editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272255.n7RMtkHP031138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515079 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-27 18:55:45 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-0.638-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 23:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272317.n7RNHqX8003252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 --- Comment #8 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-27 19:17:51 EDT --- Fixed. Please take another look: https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-pathname2.spec https://wakko.is-a-geek.com/~brett/rubygem-pathname2-1.6.2-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 23:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488563] Review Request: pure - The Pure programming language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908272324.n7RNOscW009637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488563 --- Comment #14 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-27 19:24:51 EDT --- Updated package: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/pure-0.32-0.1.fc12.src.rpm The "cannot stat" seems to be an LLVM packaging bug: they were pointing to directories that only make sense when LLVM was built. Oops. Will try and fix that. Different problem with pure 0.32: on F-12 it's as before -- some tests need commenting out; on F-11 it now fails all tests. F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1639666 F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1639669 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 00:09:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280009.n7S09S9d017704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 --- Comment #2 from Christian Krause 2009-08-27 20:09:27 EDT --- I have added the commit id (usually a part of it is sufficient) to the spec file, enhanced the snapshot script and documented its usage. - commit id is needed to allow reproducible creation of tarball - date is needed to create correct tag for snapshot releases Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/clutter-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/clutter-sharp-0-0.2.20090828.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 00:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520015] New: Review Request: ibus-table-cantonhk - Cantonese (Hong Kong) input method table for ibus-table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-cantonhk - Cantonese (Hong Kong) input method table for ibus-table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520015 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-cantonhk - Cantonese (Hong Kong) input method table for ibus-table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-cantonhk-1.2.0.20090828-1.fc12.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-cantonhk.spec Description: Cantonese (Hong Kong) input method table for ibus-table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 01:00:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520015] Review Request: ibus-table-cantonhk - Cantonese (Hong Kong) input method table for ibus-table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280100.n7S10L8R026838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520015 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 01:44:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490210] Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280144.n7S1i8a0027347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-27 21:44:06 EDT --- So what's the status of this review? The SRPM at the above URL is corrupted, but that's of little consequence because the package obviously isn't acceptable as-is. It can't even be built in Fedora due to missing build dependencies. Unless there are plans to change that, this ticket should be closed. RPMFusion would be a better place for this package. (Assuming that someone hasn't already submitted it there; someone was talking about doing so on #fedora-devel today.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 01:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520017] New: Review Request: ibus-table-zhuyin - Zhu Yin input method tables for IBus-Table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-zhuyin - Zhu Yin input method tables for IBus-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520017 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-zhuyin - Zhu Yin input method tables for IBus-Table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-zhuyin.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-zhuyin-1.2.0.20090828-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Zhu Yin input method tables for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 02:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520015] Review Request: ibus-table-cantonhk - Cantonese (Hong Kong) input method table for ibus-table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280204.n7S24PDu030800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520015 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|i18n | CC| |k at kaio.me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 02:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518903] Review Request: ibus-table-jyutping - JyutPing input method table for IBus-Table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280204.n7S24Bgv004659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518903 Caio 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|i18n | CC| |k at kaio.me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 02:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280233.n7S2Xpio010535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-27 22:33:50 EDT --- Hmm, I had typed up a whole review and thought I was waiting on you, but now that I look at the ticket I don't see any of it. Sorry about that; I'll do it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 03:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504261] Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280306.n7S36UXT010888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504261 --- Comment #16 from Ben Boeckel 2009-08-27 23:06:28 EDT --- Is this built for Rawhide? If so, this bug can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 03:28:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513892] Review Request: bilbo - Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280328.n7S3SbE3014604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513892 --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel 2009-08-27 23:28:36 EDT --- Fixed (with backported patches for licensing): Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/bilbo/bilbo.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/bilbo/bilbo-0.9-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 03:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280338.n7S3caYP016337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Silas Sewell 2009-08-27 23:38:34 EDT --- Built for rawhide and a bug request made for F-11 push. Thanks Mamoru and Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 03:38:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280338.n7S3crMx021896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 --- Comment #14 from Silas Sewell 2009-08-27 23:38:52 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 03:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280351.n7S3pcaF024204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #20 from Byron Clark 2009-08-27 23:51:36 EDT --- Those warnings are present becuase users of libstfl.so must also link against libncursesw.so. Is this something that needs to be fixed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 04:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280400.n7S40BcG025446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-08-28 00:00:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/trac-accountmanager-plugin/trac-accountmanager-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/trac-accountmanager-plugin/trac-accountmanager-plugin-0.2.1-0.2.20090522svn5836.fc11.src.rpm Fixed up the spec, merging with yours to fix things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 04:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519482] Review Request: zikula-module-feeds - RSS feeds module for zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280412.n7S4CP0N027506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519482 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-28 00:12:24 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 04:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519482] Review Request: zikula-module-feeds - RSS feeds module for zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280423.n7S4NXJa023204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519482 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-28 00:23:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zikula-module-feeds Short Description: RSS feeds module for zikula Owners: sundaram Branches: EL-5 InitialCC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 04:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280433.n7S4XYMF030557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-28 00:33:33 EDT --- The important difference is not whether it's standalone. The question is whether it's a separate project. * It does have a separate subversion repository so that's a point against it being just a piece of pagemaster. * It's been incorporated into zikula-2 but AFAIK pagemaster has not been incorporated into the core. * Does it get released separately? I think it doesn't have tarballs so this is somewhat favorable to it being part of pagemaster. * Does it get incorporated into other modules? It looks like it used to be included in ModuleStudio as well but that's but because ModuleStudio wanted to be php-4 compatible, it dropped the FilterUtil code: http://community.zikula.org/module-Forum-viewtopic-topic-54622.htm All in all, I don't feel comfortable considering it to be a part of pagemaster. It seems much more like a separate module that pagemaster depends on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 04:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280435.n7S4ZMta025229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-28 00:35:21 EDT --- Note: discussing this more with Simon (itbegins) on logistics at lists.fedoraproject.org, though. I might be persuaded that this is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 04:37:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:37:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519483] Review Request: zikula-module-pagemaster - Creates pages with dynamic content like news, articles, etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280437.n7S4boX8025601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519483 --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-28 00:37:49 EDT --- Ok. I will wait for you to decide one way or the other then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 04:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280444.n7S4i2JH032205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 00:44:01 EDT --- OK, it indeed builds fine and rpmlint has only the expected two complaints. You probably want "dependency" instead of "dependance" in %description. Note also that the templates in the R guidelines changed from using "tetex-latex" to "tex(latex)" to use what modern tex packages use and to prepare for the next texlive upheaval. I'm sure the texlive packages will provide the old symbols for compatibility so the existing packages won't break, but at some point I guess they'll need to be fixed up. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: b04fb91a451f75504c939e4d2b5eff6bd65ab1bf3f7417e293c8267e16fb60c8 affy_1.22.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: affy.so()(64bit) R-affy = 1.22.1-2.fc12 R-affy(x86-64) = 1.22.1-2.fc12 = /bin/sh R R >= 2.8.0 R-Biobase R-affyio R-preprocessCore R-tkWidgets libR.so()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) * %check is necessarily disabled. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (R package registration). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 04:58:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280458.n7S4wZ09002191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-28 00:58:33 EDT --- potrace-1.8-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 04:58:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515206] Review Request: potrace - Transform bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280458.n7S4wd0e002229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515206 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.8-4.fc10 |1.8-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 05:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 01:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280508.n7S5859F030755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #58 from Axel Thimm 2009-08-28 01:08:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #56) > 2. According to Tom it is not necessary to re-package the tarball. However, he > suggests that the pre-built binaries are deleted in the %prep section. My > suggestion: > - add "find -name '*.jar' -exec rm {} \;" to the end of the %prep section > - add the attached patch to prevent that "make" will enter the "classes" > directory I don't think Tom implies to not have any java bits. Just don't use prebuilt ones as shipped. If the Makefile supports rebuilding the jars then perhaps all that is needed is to add some java build dependencies (and remove the java build targets to trigger the builds). The problem with prebuilt software is the lack of possible review and the possibility of a Trojan import in case the upstream project has been compromised. The shipment of jar files by the upstream authors is meant as a convenience, just use the source and rebuild the java support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 06:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435514] Review Request: lbrickbuster2 - Brickbuster arcade game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280600.n7S60fTI007341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435514 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stjepan.gros at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Stjepan Gros 2009-08-28 02:00:38 EDT --- *** Bug 517466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 06:00:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517466] Review Request: lbreakout2 - A breakout-style arcade game for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280600.n7S60eTR007307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517466 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from Stjepan Gros 2009-08-28 02:00:38 EDT --- I just found out that lbreakout2 was rebranded as lbrickbuster2, so I'm closing this ticket. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 435514 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 06:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504261] Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280619.n7S6JkTS016365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504261 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Sandro Mathys 2009-08-28 02:19:44 EDT --- Yep, it's been in rawhide for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 06:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280631.n7S6VEP5018548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-28 02:31:13 EDT --- Prototype and prototype-UI are two different frameworks although prototype-UI is based on prototype and script.aculo.us. Ansel uses the latter. As you can see from the notice below in the code, its not production ready. /* Namespace: UI Introduction: Prototype-UI is a library of user interface components based on the Prototype framework. Its aim is to easilly improve user experience in web applications. It also provides utilities to help developers. Guideline: - Prototype conventions are followed - Everything should be unobstrusive - All components are themable with CSS stylesheets, various themes are provided Warning: Prototype-UI is still under deep development, this release is targeted to developers only. All interfaces are subjects to changes, suggestions are welcome. DO NOT use it in production for now. Authors: - S?bastien Gruhier, - Samuel Lebeau, */ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 06:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507830] Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280643.n7S6hXfl014480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507830 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-28 02:43:32 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: ce04cd2d4abe265b19a365a515f225111dcfb969 camorama-0.19.tar.bz2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK GUI app with desktop file - comments should be added about the status and purpose of the patches - GConf schemas are installed during build, --disable-schemas or exported environment variable is missing, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf for details -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 06:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520048] New: Review Request: ibus-table-stroke5 - Stroke 5 table for IBus-Table. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-stroke5 - Stroke 5 table for IBus-Table. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520048 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-stroke5 - Stroke 5 table for IBus-Table. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-stroke5.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-stroke5-1.2.0.20090828-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Stroke 5 table for IBus-Table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 07:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507830] Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280729.n7S7TU0A028419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507830 --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-08-28 03:29:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > formal review is here, see the notes below: > Thanks! > > - comments should be added about the status and purpose of the patches > - GConf schemas are installed during build, --disable-schemas or exported > environment variable is missing, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf for details Both fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/camorama.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/camorama-0.19-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 07:34:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280734.n7S7YiOF029305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-28 03:34:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Prototype and prototype-UI are two different frameworks although prototype-UI > is based on prototype and script.aculo.us. Ups, I'm really don't understand it first. Thanks for clarification. But on main site - http://www.prototype-ui.com/ now Release Candidate present. So, I think it is ready for packaging if you willing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 07:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507830] Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280744.n7S7ifhp031305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507830 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-28 03:44:40 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 07:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280753.n7S7r36D028329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 07:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280752.n7S7qulq028294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #59 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-28 03:52:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #55) > (In reply to comment #54) > > At a minimum, you must rebuild those jars from source. Assuming that you have > > the source and are able to do that, I think you are safe to simply delete the > > bundled prebuilt jars during %prep, and do not need to make a custom tarball. > > Thanks for doing the final call. Completely fine with me and easier for > packaging. ;-) Hm... I must rebuild it before make decision what it may be excluded?? In this case, will be best solution include it also in package... Sic, it require additional time in any case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 08:28:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507830] Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280828.n7S8SjL2002841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507830 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2009-08-28 04:28:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: camorama Short Description: Gnome webcam viewer Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 08:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280846.n7S8kMsT006500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-28 04:46:20 EDT --- Are the any reason why libstfl.so _itself_ is not linked against libncursesw.so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 08:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 04:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519695] Review Request: hunspell-shs - Shuswap hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280849.n7S8nw1R006963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519695 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-28 04:49:57 EDT --- will review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 09:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280900.n7S90dNO009374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-28 05:00:38 EDT --- 3proxy-0.6-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/3proxy-0.6-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 09:03:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280903.n7S93Orw014534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-28 05:03:23 EDT --- 3proxy-0.6-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/3proxy-0.6-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 09:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280902.n7S92DRk009826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-28 05:02:13 EDT --- 3proxy-0.6-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/3proxy-0.6-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 09:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280942.n7S9gYVe017326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #60 from Christian Krause 2009-08-28 05:42:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #58) > (In reply to comment #56) > I don't think Tom implies to not have any java bits. Just don't use prebuilt > ones as shipped. If the Makefile supports rebuilding the jars then perhaps all > that is needed is to add some java build dependencies (and remove the java > build targets to trigger the builds). Yes and no. ;-) 1. The java client doesn't build out of the box just by by the global "make". There are some manual steps necessary. However, the pre-built binaries would be installed when using "make install". 2. On the other hand, I was under the expression that we don't want to ship the clients at all. If this is the case, we must make sure that they don't go into the binary rpm. The safest way to achieve this is to delete them as early as possible in the %prep section. If we decide later to add them, we can just remove the patch and add probably some commands in the %build section to build them, too. (In reply to comment #59) > (In reply to comment #55) > > (In reply to comment #54) > > > At a minimum, you must rebuild those jars from source. Assuming that you have > > > the source and are able to do that, I think you are safe to simply delete the > > > bundled prebuilt jars during %prep, and do not need to make a custom tarball. > > > > Thanks for doing the final call. Completely fine with me and easier for > > packaging. ;-) > > Hm... I must rebuild it before make decision what it may be excluded?? In this > case, will be best solution include it also in package... Sic, it require > additional time in any case. I think there is a misunderstanding. If we don't want to ship the java client, we can just delete the binaries and we don't need to rebuild them. The only minor request I had was to move the deletion from the %install section to the %prep section to be on the safe side, that no any change in the build system of upstream would leak them accidentely in later... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 09:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908280952.n7S9qfxH024211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-08-28 05:52:39 EDT --- I must have been sleepwalking :-) Let's try again. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Nagios-Plugin Short Description: Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins Owners: ruben Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 10:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281030.n7SAULNc026464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #20 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-28 06:30:19 EDT --- Please proceed for build and push as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Check_out_the_module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 10:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281029.n7SATU6Q031481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-28 06:29:28 EDT --- Ping ? please refer to comment #13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 10:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281046.n7SAkCL7002183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-08-28 06:46:10 EDT --- before importing change: %define to %global on top of your spec file, were python_sitearch is defined. Latest templates have those modifications. Changing the ticket status to ASSIGNED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 10:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498195] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281058.n7SAwGgU031700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-08-28 06:57:59 EDT --- 6.30.1 is released now, shall we pick this up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 11:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281102.n7SB2Hf3005141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 11:05:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498195] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281105.n7SB5jOf000743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2009-08-28 07:05:44 EDT --- Doesn't work so far, because FELEGAL at bug #498194 still exists and the legal issue between FSF Europe thinking and FSF US thinking or whatever it is, is not yet resolved - correct, Tom? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 11:02:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519383] Review Request: python-xklavier - Python bindings for libxklavier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281102.n7SB23uT032604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519383 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #8 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-08-28 07:02:01 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 12:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281214.n7SCEbm6017283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #61 from Axel Thimm 2009-08-28 08:14:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #60) > 1. The java client doesn't build out of the box just by by the global "make". > There are some manual steps necessary. Well, can't these manual steps be written in a specfile? > 2. On the other hand, I was under the expression that we don't want to ship the > clients at all. Whether the java applet is desired or not is a different question depending on its usefulness (the license question has already been checked). What is rather certain and would require an exception by the FPC otherwise is that if there are any java bits to be packaged they have to have been built by the package. So, it's either a) Rebuild the java support and the first step would be to remove the existing targets and add build support to the specfile or the upstream Makefile(s), or b) don't add any java support, but you don't need to actually delete them during the build if they are not used in packaging, removing the folders from the main Makefile is enough (like in a diff further up the report). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 12:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281229.n7SCTwwv020143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #62 from Christian Krause 2009-08-28 08:29:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #61) > Whether the java applet is desired or not is a different question depending on > its usefulness (the license question has already been checked). What is rather > certain and would require an exception by the FPC otherwise is that if there > are any java bits to be packaged they have to have been built by the package. I fully agree. It is up to the packager whether we wants to add the java client or not. I'm fine with either way. > So, it's either > > a) Rebuild the java support and the first step would be to remove the existing > targets and add build support to the specfile or the upstream Makefile(s), or Yes. > b) don't add any java support, but you don't need to actually delete them > during the build if they are not used in packaging, removing the folders from > the main Makefile is enough (like in a diff further up the report). I agree that this may be debatable. Personally think explicit deleting of the pre-built binaries in spec file in the %prep section will make it quite obvious for anyone who looks at the spec file later, that there is an issue with pre-built binaries which must be kept in mind. That's all. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 12:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460182] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Tool to create isolated Python environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281242.n7SCgaXJ018330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460182 Peter Halliday changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phalliday at excelsiorsystems. | |net --- Comment #11 from Peter Halliday 2009-08-28 08:42:33 EDT --- *** Bug 519615 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 12:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519615] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281242.n7SCgYqu018300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519615 Peter Halliday changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Clone Of| |460182 Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Peter Halliday 2009-08-28 08:42:33 EDT --- I just recognize taht this duplicates 460182. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 460182 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 12:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281259.n7SCx81n026926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #9 from D Haley 2009-08-28 08:59:03 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/cpptasks-1.0b5-2.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc10.src.rpm RPMLint: $ cat tmp Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc10.src.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc10.noarch.rpm Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/cpptasks-javadoc-1.0b5-2.fc10.noarch.rpm $ rpmlint -v `cat tmp | awk '{print $2}'` cpptasks.src: I: checking cpptasks.noarch: I: checking cpptasks.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ant.d/cpptasks cpptasks-javadoc.noarch: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I'm ignoring the warning, as I don't think this should be marked as a configuration file. Users should *not* be modifying this file in any way. Koji: F10:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1640839 F11:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1640849 >I would have found this sooner if it wasn't marked CLOSED NOTABUG and blocked >FE-DEADREVIEW. :-) Mea culpa. >In the absence of a manual, how about putting a URL to the online manual in the >description or in a README.fedora? Good idea. Done. > Does this package need to wait for that release of maven in order to build the manual? Well, I don't know. It needs the clirr plugins, so it isn't going to build at the moment. I must admit I find maven somewhat opaque, and am not overly keen on packaging clirr. If it gets packaged, I will update however. >Is there a reason for not building with gcj? Sorry, not sure why this needs to be done. If licencing is the concern, Sun's javac has been free (as in software) for quite a while now, I believe since F9. I note that packages such as maven2-plugin-release use OpenJDK in preference to gcj... > Does this package need to drop a file into /etc/ant.d? Yes, Fixed. I also moved the jar file + symlink to %{_javadir}/ant/, in line with other ant tasks (ant-commons-logging,ant-junit, etc) >The -javadoc subpackage does not require the base package. Fixed. >Please replace the %doc lines for the base package with this: Fixed, however I also added README.fedora as well. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 13:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281324.n7SDOvHY027595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-28 09:24:56 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dvisvgm-0.8.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 13:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281323.n7SDNAp3027407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |palango at gmx.de --- Comment #3 from Paul Lange 2009-08-28 09:23:09 EDT --- Thanks for creating the package. I don't have the time to make a full review but I noticed some things. * mixed use of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ($RPM_BUILD_ROOT only in %install) * latest changelog version is 0-0.3 but release field says 0.2 * shouldn't the %defattr filed be %defattr(-,root,root,-)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 13:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281325.n7SDP3BZ000665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-28 09:25:02 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dvisvgm-0.8.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 13:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281325.n7SDP8jO000713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-28 09:25:08 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.3-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dvisvgm-0.8.3-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 13:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281334.n7SDYZdS029437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #16 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-28 09:34:34 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review :) I'll do the two correction before importing in the CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-affy Short Description: Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays Owners: pingou Branches: F-10, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 13:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498195] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281350.n7SDoApQ000819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-28 09:50:09 EDT --- Well, that's not exactly the issue, but yes, the licensing issue isn't resolved. There was some progress made yesterday, but the folks at RH Legal who were handling this particular issue are on vacation until next week, so we won't see any progress until at least then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281409.n7SE9IrU009579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #35 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-28 10:09:17 EDT --- Martin: as dvisvgm has already been introduced in the stable repository, the new updates don't resolve this bug anymore as it has already been marked closed. Don't mark this bug any more in updates, OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281424.n7SEOvND013450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-28 10:24:56 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] (devshell)[yankee at koan ghc-GLUT]$ rpmlint -iv *{spec,rpm} ghc-GLUT.src: I: checking ghc-GLUT-devel.i686: I: checking ghc-GLUT-devel.ppc: I: checking ghc-GLUT-devel.x86_64: I: checking ghc-GLUT-doc.i686: I: checking ghc-GLUT-doc.ppc: I: checking ghc-GLUT-doc.x86_64: I: checking ghc-GLUT-prof.i686: I: checking ghc-GLUT-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-GLUT-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-GLUT-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-GLUT-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.4/GLUT-2.1.1.2/libHSGLUT-2.1.1.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-GLUT-prof.ppc: I: checking ghc-GLUT-prof.ppc: E: devel-dependency ghc-GLUT-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-GLUT-prof.ppc: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-GLUT-prof.ppc: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.4/GLUT-2.1.1.2/libHSGLUT-2.1.1.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. ghc-GLUT-prof.x86_64: I: checking ghc-GLUT-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-GLUT-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-GLUT-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-GLUT-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.4/GLUT-2.1.1.2/libHSGLUT-2.1.1.2_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 10 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. >>> CHECK -- Normal for a haskell package MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . >>> CHECK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . >>> CHECK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] >>> CHECK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] >>> CHECK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] >>> CHECK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. >>> CHECK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] >>> CHECK MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] >>> CHECK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >>> CHECK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] >>> CHECK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] >>> CHECK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] >>> CHECK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] >>> CHECK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] >>> CHECK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] >>> CHECK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] >>> CHECK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] >>> CHECK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] >>> CHECK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] >>> CHECK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] >>> CHECK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] >>> CHECK SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] >>> CHECK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. >>> CHECK SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [31] >>> CHECK SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] >>> CHECK Resolution: PASS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281428.n7SESr5I009948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:28:52 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281427.n7SERF33009743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #36 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-28 10:27:14 EDT --- That's strange. I didn't enter a bug number in the "Bugs" field and unchecked the box "Close bugs when update is stable" in the bodhi web-interface. However, the bug number from the previous build was automatically assigned after submitting the new update. I thought that's the normal behavior... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281429.n7SETr4w010164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:29:51 EDT --- Please set the fedora-cvs flag back to '?' when you've fixed the above issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:32:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493013] Review Request: dzen2 - A general purpose messaging and notification program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281432.n7SEWYRL015357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:32:33 EDT --- It looks like you mixed up "Short Description" and "InitialCC". I've made the assumption that you wanted InitialCC to be empty. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281432.n7SEWTCi015323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause 2009-08-28 10:32:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for creating the package. I don't have the time to make a full review > but I noticed some things. > > * mixed use of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ($RPM_BUILD_ROOT only in > %install) > * latest changelog version is 0-0.3 but release field says 0.2 > * shouldn't the %defattr filed be %defattr(-,root,root,-)? Thanks for the comment - all issues fixed: Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/clutter-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/clutter-sharp-0-0.3.20090828.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281431.n7SEVEmE010901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:31:09 EDT --- Franches are named "F-10", "F-11", etc. I've fixed that up. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281437.n7SEb7J3016384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:37:05 EDT --- Branches are named "F-10", "F-11", etc. I've fixed that up. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518189] Review Request: java-augeas - Java bindings for Augeas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281437.n7SEbv7U012079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518189 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:37:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281440.n7SEeikU012762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:40:43 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519302] Review Request: eog-plugins - A collection of plugins for the eog image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281438.n7SEcTWN012192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519302 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:38:28 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281439.n7SEd1CS012280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:39:00 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519482] Review Request: zikula-module-feeds - RSS feeds module for zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281439.n7SEdY8W016763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519482 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:39:33 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281441.n7SEfXIj017426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:41:32 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507830] Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281441.n7SEf23J012929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507830 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 10:41:01 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281447.n7SEl8LK018443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 --- Comment #12 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-08-28 10:47:05 EDT --- ping, is there anything else I need to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 14:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281458.n7SEw2jL016458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth 2009-08-28 10:58:01 EDT --- The tarball in the SRPM is missing a bunch of stuff - seems you still have a broken setuptools/subversion still? One of the missing items is the sessionstore_convert.py script, so you shouldn't need a separate source item for that. The templates directory is also missing. There are still a couple of comments left over from the template (sitelib at the top, and again in the %files list). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 15:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281513.n7SFDnRP019283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #24 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-28 11:13:47 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-8.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 15:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281516.n7SFGt2Z024532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 --- Comment #6 from Ben Boeckel 2009-08-28 11:16:54 EDT --- Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/trac-accountmanager-plugin/trac-accountmanager-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/trac-accountmanager-plugin/trac-accountmanager-plugin-0.2.1-0.3.20090522svn5836.fc11.src.rpm Oops, forgot to do the gz->bz2 from using your script. Now it's using the correct tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 15:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281530.n7SFUOTM027228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 15:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281553.n7SFr3PJ027194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 11:53:02 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 15:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281555.n7SFtw4v027978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 11:55:57 EDT --- Don't forget to set the fedora-cvs flag; otherwise most CVS admins won't see your request. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 16:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281604.n7SG4bZI029515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-28 12:04:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-GLUT Short Description: bindings to the C GLUT library Owners: bos petersen ynemoy Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 16:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281609.n7SG9vwD001979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 12:09:56 EDT --- I've just created the F-11 branch. If you really, really need a very early F-12 branch, we may be able to do that later today, so if that's what you need then go ahead and make another CVS request. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 16:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513892] Review Request: bilbo - Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281626.n7SGQaUA005541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513892 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-28 12:26:35 EDT --- Applying bilbo-0.9-license-headers.patch is redundant since it doesn't change the program code and has no effect on building the package. So it can be omitted. Beside that, everything looks fine now. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 16:42:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281642.n7SGgxXh005062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #20 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-28 12:42:56 EDT --- Debian did put mkimage into a separate source package - http://packages.debian.org/lenny/uboot-mkimage. I can make and submit a rpm based on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 17:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518449] Review Request: moblin-panel-people - Moblin Panel for People In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281704.n7SH4hi6008955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518449 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-28 13:04:42 EDT --- Imported into CVS. Has build issues at the moment as the telepathy-mission-control has broken anerley. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 17:04:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518450] Review Request: moblin-panel-status - Moblin Panel for Social Network Status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281704.n7SH4uMU009080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518450 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-28 13:04:55 EDT --- Imported into CVS. Has build issues at the moment as the telepathy-mission-control has broken anerley. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 17:06:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281706.n7SH6q7V009907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-28 13:06:50 EDT --- New upstream relese SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston-0.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 17:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281744.n7SHiWbB019088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-28 13:44:30 EDT --- With license fix from upstream: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming-1.0-0.4.a3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 17:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513892] Review Request: bilbo - Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281745.n7SHj0hZ019191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513892 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Ben Boeckel 2009-08-28 13:44:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bilbo Short Description: Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 18:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519138] Review Request: libbs2b - Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281801.n7SI1T75023938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519138 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |martin.gieseking at uos.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-28 14:01:26 EDT --- Hello Karel, here is the review of your package. It is pretty clean. Just the BuildRequires(pre/post) should be removed (see below). rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/*.rpm libbs2b-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The warning is expected and can safely be ignored. --------------------------------- keys used in following checklist: [+] OK [.] OK, not applicable [X] needs work --------------------------------- [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: License file(s) must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - md5 hash is 00d32ffa6461dde6a632c846da3e0a13 [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile,... [X] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. - Requires(post) and Requires(pre) are redundant here (no %pre scriptlet) - dependency /sbin/ldconfig is determined automatically (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Shared_libraries) [.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - no locales [+] MUST: Packages with shared libs must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable,... [.] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - doesn't create directories [+] MUST: File must not be listed more than once in the %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - no large docs [+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - no static libs [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' [+] MUST: .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: devel packages must have a Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. [.] MUST: Packages with GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. - builds in mock [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. - koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1641475 [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 18:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281807.n7SI7Mt4025479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2009-08-28 14:07:21 EDT --- > Well, I don't know. It needs the clirr plugins, so it isn't going to build at > the moment. I must admit I find maven somewhat opaque, and am not overly keen > on packaging clirr. If it gets packaged, I will update however. I've had a look, and clirr just isn't going to happen for Fedora. First, it's a dead project. Second, it only builds with maven1, NOT maven2. But it's not needed for building the manual, anyway, is it? I think we can just patch the clirr-related parts out of build.xml. > >Is there a reason for not building with gcj? > Sorry, not sure why this needs to be done. If licencing is the concern, Sun's > javac has been free (as in software) for quite a while now, I believe since F9. > I note that packages such as maven2-plugin-release use OpenJDK in preference to > gcj... Last I heard, OpenJDK on PPC/PPC64 is 1 or 2 orders of magnitude slower than gcj-generated code. GCJ support is not a MUST item, so I won't block the review on this point. Personally, I'd be happy to see gcj-compiled code go away and all Java packages become noarch. For that to happen, though, the speed problems with OpenJDK need to be fixed. I don't know who is working on that or what the status is. So, going over the list again, java-devel still isn't a BR, but it's pulled in by ant, so I guess that's okay. Everything else is fixed, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 18:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281833.n7SIXIZk002466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 --- Comment #1 from Dominic Hopf 2009-08-28 14:33:17 EDT --- $ rpmlint wiipresent.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint wiipresent-0.7.5.2-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint wiipresent-0.7.5.2-2.fc11.i586.rpm wiipresent-debuginfo-0.7.5.2-2.fc11.i586.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUSTs ----- OK: packaged is named according to the package naming guidelines OK: specfile name matches %{name}.spec OK: package seems to meet packaging guidelines OK: license in specfile matches actual license and meets licensing guidelines OK: license file is included in %doc OK: specfile is written in AE OK: specfile is legible OK: sourcefile in the package is the same as provided in the mentioned source, md5sum fits OK: package compiles successfully OK: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires N/A: package handles locales properly there are no locales installed with this package N/A: call ldconfig in %post and %postun there is no binary installed with this package OK: package is not designed to be relocatable OK: package owns directorys it creates OK: does not list a file more than once in the %files listing OK: %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly OK: %clean section is there and contains rm -rf %{buildroot} NOT OK: macros are consistently used OK: package contains code N/A: subpackage for large documentation files there are no large documentation files OK: program runs properly without files listed in %doc N/A: header files are in a -devel package there are no header files N/A: static libraries are in a -static package there are no static libs N/A: require pkgconfig if package contains a pkgconfig(.pc) there is no pkgconfig file N/A: put .so-files into -devel package if there are library files with suffix there is no library with suffix, in fact there isn't any library N/A: devel package includes fully versioned dependency for the base package there is no devel package N/A: any libtool archives are removed there are no libtool archives OK: contains desktop file if it is a GUI application OK: package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages OK: buildroot is removed at beginning of %install N/A: filenames are encoded in UTF-8 not necessary since there are no non-ASCII filenames SHOULD ------ N/A: non-English translations for description and summary there are no other languages supported by this package, in fact it does not provide any localization. I assume localizations are not needed for this package. OK: package builds in mock OK: package builds into binary rpms for all supported architectures N/A: program runs I did not test myself if the program works as it should N/A: subpackages contain fully versioned dependency for the base package there are no subpackages N/A: pkgconfig file is placed in a devel package there is no pkgconfig file N/A: require package providing a file instead of the file itself no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required Please do not use macros for rm and make install in the %install section. This also should fix the consistency of using macros which is not ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 19:06:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-id - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281906.n7SJ6T46009328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2009-08-28 15:06:28 EDT --- MUST items: - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - *** 1) This package consists of nothing but configuration files and a udev rules file. These are configuration, and not necessarily copyrightable. 2) Spot says "use a permissive license just to be sure." 3) Which implies the BSD in the tarball is OK... 4) except it still states: Copyright (c) The Regents of the University of California. which is almost certainly wrong, in the case that the package *is* copyrightable. Should be Christophe & Martin, or whomever. - License field in spec matches - OK, as it stands - License file included in package - OK - Spec in American English - OK - Spec is legible. - OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 878fd1b6a8baccf0ce46d29f2fde559a40d6573c media-player-id-1.tar.gz OK. - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** Might want 'ExcludeArch: s390 s390x '. But I doubt it matters that much. - BuildRequires correct - OK. - Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot - OK %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK (tested F12) - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. - OK - final provides and requires are sane: - OK Can we get them to fix the licensing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 19:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513892] Review Request: bilbo - Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281919.n7SJJ39C011721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513892 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 15:19:02 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 19:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281952.n7SJqNOw018855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 --- Comment #8 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-28 15:52:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > With license fix from upstream: > > http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming.spec > http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming-1.0-0.4.a3.fc11.src.rpm I ran into a problem building due to the level of plexus-utils in f11 not being adequate to build the rpm. It tries to build but the junit test fails and the build does not complete. Please add a release number to the BuildRequires for plexus-utils BuildRequires: plexus-utils >= 1.4.5 since downloading the plexus-utils 1.4.5-1.2 from rawhide solved the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 19:59:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225746] Merge Review: fedora-release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908281959.n7SJxC6A020142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225746 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-28 15:59:09 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: fedora-release New Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 20:03:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225746] Merge Review: fedora-release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282003.n7SK3koI021375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225746 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-28 16:03:45 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 20:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282022.n7SKMRBK021416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-28 16:22:26 EDT --- Sorry, added: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-naming-1.0-0.5.a3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 20:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-id - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282030.n7SKUKgJ022936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-08-28 16:30:19 EDT --- > Might want 'ExcludeArch: s390 s390x ' Why ? Is there a reason, other than 'media players are pretty irrelevant on s390' ? > Can we get them to fix the licensing? I'll point that out to them. I might hold off a few days on completing this review anyway, since Christophe was considering renaming it to media-player-info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 20:32:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-id - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282032.n7SKW4pJ026667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 --- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham 2009-08-28 16:32:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Might want 'ExcludeArch: s390 s390x ' > > Why ? Is there a reason, other than 'media players are pretty irrelevant on > s390' ? No, not really. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 20:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282047.n7SKlIsm029603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Brett Lentz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 20:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282044.n7SKiCIa028864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Tomasz Torcz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Tomasz Torcz 2009-08-28 16:44:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hdapsd Short Description: Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected Owners: ttorcz Branches: F-12 InitialCC: ttorcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 20:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282053.n7SKr3YZ027379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-28 16:53:02 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:00:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282100.n7SL0HrU032344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-28 17:00:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-naming Short Description: Plexus Naming Component Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282106.n7SL6EoJ030145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 --- Comment #1 from Ionu? Ar??ri?i 2009-08-28 17:06:13 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/calibre-0.8.10/calibre.spec SRPM URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/calibre-0.8.10/calibre-0.6.10-1.fc11.src.rpm I fixed a few issues: the man page duplication, and man page installation, .desktop files, lrfviewer icon file and a new upstream release. rpmlint output: http://fpaste.org/Z7qg/ I've gotten rid of anything but these two new warnings and all the old non-executable-script errors. calibre.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/calibre calibre.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/95-calibre.rules Feedback welcome! ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282118.n7SLIH0u003559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 Stephen Warren changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.or | |g --- Comment #7 from Stephen Warren 2009-08-28 17:18:16 EDT --- It'd be nice to package libvdpau_trace.so too, although I suppose that would be a different package. Just as an aside, S3's implementation doesn't use the wrapper lib; they just overwrite libvdpau.so with their main driver binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282145.n7SLjTHn005260@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |christoph.wickert at googlemai | |l.com --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-28 17:45:28 EDT --- Pleas note that %post /usr/bin/update-desktop-database -q || : %postun /usr/bin/update-desktop-database -q || : is not necessary, because the desktop file contains no mimetype. This is only needed it an application is supposed to open a certain mime type, so the "Open with..." entry gets created. And of course, Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils are not necessary ether. This would only be neccessary if there was a mime type AND you want to build this package on EPEL/Fedora < 5, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database I don't like the summary. Summary should be short an precise but not whole sentences. How about: "Tool to control applications or presentations with a Wiimote"? I didn't test it, but %if 0%{?fedora} <= 11 BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel %else BuildRequires: libXi-devel %endif looks bogus to me, as libXi-devel requires xorg-x11-proto-devel. %{_mandir}/man1/wiipresent.1* does not need to be tagged as %doc, rpmbuild will take care of this. It doesn't do no harm, it's just a hint. Finally: the build root tag should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) or even better %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) Doesn't really matter ether, but IMO for new packages we should follow the guidelines from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag That's all from my side, nothing more to add. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520202] New: Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Doxia content generation framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Doxia content generation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520202 Summary: Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Doxia content generation framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overholt at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/maven-doxia-sitetools.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/maven-doxia-sitetools-1.0-0.2.a10.fc11.src.rpm Description: Doxia is a content generation framework which aims to provide its users with powerful techniques for generating static and dynamic content. Doxia can be used to generate static sites in addition to being incorporated into dynamic content generation systems like blogs, wikis and content management systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520202] Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Doxia content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282148.n7SLm8OU005668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520202 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-28 17:48:07 EDT --- This is a full review request. The previous pre-review request was bug #500267. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500267] Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282148.n7SLmJOr005709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500267 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-28 17:48:18 EDT --- Full review request: bug #520202 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519302] Review Request: eog-plugins - A collection of plugins for the eog image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282146.n7SLkUqQ005462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519302 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2009-08-28 17:46:29 EDT --- Build done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282151.n7SLphUu009783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Zabolotny 2009-08-28 17:51:42 EDT --- Sorry, was tracked away by everyday life. Have commited everything to F-10, F-11 and -devel. Did a successful test build for everyone. Should I do 'make update' now for both distros? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282156.n7SLuuDG010872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #39 from Stepan Kasal 2009-08-28 17:56:49 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl New Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 21:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516869] Review Request: perl-Search-Xapian - Xapian perl bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282158.n7SLw0US011096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516869 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-28 17:57:58 EDT --- perl-Search-Xapian-1.0.11.0-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Search-Xapian'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9090 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 22:00:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282200.n7SM0NlD008513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-28 18:00:22 EDT --- ghc-OpenGL-2.2.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghc-OpenGL'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9108 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 22:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282201.n7SM1R8J012604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-28 18:01:26 EDT --- perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.33-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.33-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 22:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282209.n7SM97JC010466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #22 from Tim Niemueller 2009-08-28 18:09:04 EDT --- I have uploaded a new version of the package. The shared libraries are now renamed (adding a 3 as suffix). Therefore the problem with parallel installing libkni3 (and a later proposed libkni v4) is solved. SRPM at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni3-3.9.2-11.fc11.src.rpm, spec at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni3,spec. Can I consider this package as approved then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 22:20:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520204] Review Request: aspell5-ro - Romanian dictionary for Aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282220.n7SMKHDS016132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520204 Ionu? Ar??ri?i changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 22:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520204] New: Review Request: aspell5-ro - Romanian dictionary for Aspell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: aspell5-ro - Romanian dictionary for Aspell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520204 Summary: Review Request: aspell5-ro - Romanian dictionary for Aspell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mapleoin at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/aspell-ro/aspell-ro.spec SRPM URL: http://mapleoin.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/aspell-ro/aspell-ro-3.2.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Provides the word list/dictionaries for the following: Romanian -- I basically copied a lot of this from the french one: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/aspell-fr/F-11/aspell-fr.spec?view=co Modified a bit for extra files and different source. This is (sort of) my first package so I would please like a sponsor! I've got another package awaiting review/sponsorship here: #519282 Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 22:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513892] Review Request: bilbo - Blogging client, focused on simplicity and usability In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282226.n7SMQoGr013572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513892 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Ben Boeckel 2009-08-28 18:26:49 EDT --- Built for F-11 (Rawhide has dependency issues), closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 22:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282239.n7SMd1aC015306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-28 18:39:00 EDT --- One more thing.... The desktop file contains: Categories=Application;Office;X-Red-Hat-Base; ... GenericName=Written by Dag Wieers and Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann "Application" no longer is a valid category, see http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html "X-Red-Hat-Base" is obsolete, too. The last one is an abuse of the GenericName tag that doesn't make any sense. You could do this with desktop-file-install (instead of desktop-file-validate): desktop-file-install \ --remove-category="Application" \ --remove-category="X-Red-Hat-Base" \ --copy-name-to-generic-name \ --delete-original \ --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/wiipresent.desktop Instead of --copy-name-to-generic-name you can also use --remove-key=GenericName. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 22:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282251.n7SMpi4D017865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 --- Comment #4 from Jens Kuehnel 2009-08-28 18:51:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/wiipresent.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/wiipresent-0.7.5.2-3.fc11.src.rpm Fixed all marked topics in 0.7.5.2-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Aug 28 22:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512106] Review Request: rpmconf - Tool to handle rpmnew and rpmsave files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908282255.n7SMt1ji022463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512106 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-08-28 18:55:00 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rpmconf New Branches: F-10 Owners: mjakubicek msuchy (has been discussed with msuchy) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 00:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290049.n7T0nfJ1003556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from D Haley 2009-08-28 20:49:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cpptasks Short Description: Compile and link task for ant Owners: mycae Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 01:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290100.n7T10IYO005354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 01:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290159.n7T1xFtA018368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 Jose Pedro Oliveira changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt --- Comment #10 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2009-08-28 21:59:13 EDT --- Ruben, Any chance of EL-5 branches for this perl module and perl-Nagios-Plugin (#517497) ? tia, jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 03:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290321.n7T3LJ5W032642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-28 23:21:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 03:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290318.n7T3Iqsh032025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-28 23:18:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 03:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290322.n7T3MZJF032757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-28 23:22:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 03:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290323.n7T3NZfP028230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-28 23:23:34 EDT --- Please add a cvs request template: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure to let us know what you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 03:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226276] Merge Review: perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290326.n7T3QJcS001033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226276 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #40 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-28 23:26:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 03:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512106] Review Request: rpmconf - Tool to handle rpmnew and rpmsave files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290328.n7T3SeaX001170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512106 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-28 23:28:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 03:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517776] Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290333.n7T3Xx89001916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517776 --- Comment #2 from D Haley 2009-08-28 23:33:59 EDT --- Quick additional comment. Ant tasks are required to register themselves in /etc/ant.d/%{name} , see Bug 167525 for more info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 04:01:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290401.n7T41vxO001349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-29 00:01:55 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 04:07:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 00:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290407.n7T47Edb007181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-29 00:07:13 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 07:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290741.n7T7fC56013110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #8 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-29 03:41:10 EDT --- David, could you please provide latest package with corrected license? rpmlint must be run on every package. - ok [makerpm at kokain result]$ rpmlint perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac-1.2-2.fc11.*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec - OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. - OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. - NOK - waiting for new srpm with correct license The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - NOK - waiting for new srpm with correct license If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - The spec file must be written in American English. - OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - OK The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK ExcludeArch present. - OK, not needed All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. - OK The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK Ldconfig in %post and %postun. - Not needed,OK Relocatable package and /usr prefix. - Not needed,OK A package must own all directories that it creates. - Not needed,OK A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK Each package must have a correct %clean section. - OK Each package must consistently use macros. - OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' . - OK Library with .so suffix must be in -devel package. - OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in thespec if they are built. - OK Gui application and desktop-file-install. - Not needed,OK Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK summary: Please provide new version of srpm with correct license and do build in koji for F-10 and F-11 and provide link to these builds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 07:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510104] Review Request: epic5 - an ircII chat client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290742.n7T7gTX4007671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510104 --- Comment #10 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-29 03:42:27 EDT --- any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 07:52:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290752.n7T7qOgL009317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-29 03:52:23 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 08:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-id - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290819.n7T8JXj0019822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-29 04:19:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** > > Might want 'ExcludeArch: s390 s390x '. But I doubt it > matters that much. I don't think that Matthias should add this line. If he adds it, then he would create bugzilla tickets (for each excluded arch), describing reasons why this package is excluded from articular architectures, but we haven't such reasons except "I'm not sure that someone will use it there". Actually, I also can't imagine, that someone will plug his iPod to s390x mainframe, but there are no technical issues preventing us from building this package on every available arch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 08:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908290824.n7T8OSXd020714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #16 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-29 04:24:27 EDT --- Yes you should : https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 10:18:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291018.n7TAI5jI003051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #10 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-08-29 06:18:03 EDT --- Alright, here it goes again. The scratch build was succesfull and I think I have resolved the remaining issues also. I sorted out the BR's and the ScriptletSnippets as far as I can tell. I'm not sure if I dealt correctly the ownership issue. Spec URL: http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.2.0/rekonq.spec Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1642555 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 10:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291025.n7TAPImx004412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #62 from Michal Nowak 2009-08-29 06:25:11 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 10:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291034.n7TAYvjQ005529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 --- Comment #5 from Dominic Hopf 2009-08-29 06:34:56 EDT --- The Links unfortunately do not work. "Forbidden" for the Spec-File and "Not Found" for the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 10:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291034.n7TAYslc009463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-29 06:34:52 EDT --- rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. - OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. - OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. - OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - OK The spec file must be written in American English. - OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - OK The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK ExcludeArch present. - not needed, ok All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. - OK The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK Ldconfig in %post and %postun. - not needed, ok Relocatable package and /usr prefix. - OK A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK Each package must have a correct %clean section. - OK Each package must consistently use macros. - OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' . - OK Library with .so suffix must be in -devel package. - OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK Gui application and desktop-file-install. - OK Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK conclusion: approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 10:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519073] Review Request: chrootuid - This tool offers su and chroot fuctionaltity in one program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291044.n7TAikBS007020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519073 --- Comment #1 from Dominic Hopf 2009-08-29 06:44:45 EDT --- $ rpmlint chrootuid.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint chrootuid-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint chrootuid-1.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm chrootuid-debuginfo-1.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm chrootuid-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. MUSTs ----- OK: packaged is named according to the package naming guidelines OK: specfile name matches %{name}.spec OK: package seems to meet packaging guidelines OK: license in specfile matches actual license and meets licensing guidelines NOT OK: license file is included in %doc OK: specfile is written in AE OK: specfile is legible OK: sourcefile in the package is the same as provided in the mentioned source md5sum fits OK: package compiles successfully N/A: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires there are no build dependencies N/A: package handles locales properly there are no locales installed with this package N/A: call ldconfig in %post and %postun there is no binary installed with this package OK: package is not designed to be relocatable OK: package owns directorys it creates OK: does not list a file more than once in the %files listing OK: %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly OK: %clean section is there and contains rm -rf %{buildroot} OK: macros are consistently used OK: package contains code N/A: subpackage for large documentation files there are no large documentation files OK: program runs properly without files listed in %doc N/A: header files are in a -devel package there are no header files N/A: static libraries are in a -static package there are no static libs N/A: require pkgconfig if package contains a pkgconfig(.pc) there is no pkgconfig file N/A: put .so-files into -devel package if there are library files with suffix there is no library with suffix, in fact there isn't any library N/A: devel package includes fully versioned dependency for the base package there is no devel package N/A: any libtool archives are removed there are no libtool archives N/A: contains desktop file if it is a GUI application this is a commandline application OK: package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages OK: buildroot is removed at beginning of %install N/A: filenames are encoded in UTF-8 not necessary since there are no non-ASCII filenames SHOULD ------ N/A: non-English translations for description and summary there are no other languages supported by this package, in fact it does not provide any localization. I assume localizations are not needed for this package. OK: package builds in mock OK: package builds into binary rpms for all supported architectures N/A: program runs I did not test myself if the program works as it should N/A: subpackages contain fully versioned dependency for the base package there are no subpackages N/A: pkgconfig file is placed in a devel package there is no pkgconfig file N/A: require package providing a file instead of the file itself no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required - The summary should be short and pregant, no whole sentence - the description could be a bit more general, the 'we use this'-style is definitely not the best. You could take the description at the top in file chrootuid.c for example, this seems to be fine - The license file is missing in the %files-section - also a license file named COPYING would be nicer, a license hint in the source file itself would be nice too, you may want to contact upstream regarding this issues - If there are no requires, remove the Requires and BuildRequires completely, not just comment them out. - the CFLAGS parameter is missing in %build-section, when you add this, this should also fix the rpmlint error for the debuginfo package - Please use the install command in the %install-section instead of cp, at least add the -p to preserve timestamps - Please gzip the manpage (you may also want to let upstream know about this) - it is not neccessary to tag the manpage as %doc since RPM detects this automatically, but it is also ok if you do so - I would recommend you to use %{version} in Source0 and in the %prep-section (e.g. %{name}%{version}), this would make maintenance work a bit easier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 10:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291051.n7TApvNc008542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Satya Komaragiri changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Satya Komaragiri 2009-08-29 06:51:55 EDT --- I have made a bugzilla account with satya.komaragiri at gmail.com. Changing the fedora-cvs flag to ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 11:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291110.n7TBANn2011625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-29 07:10:20 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jd New Branches: F-12 Owners: mtasaka Early branching request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 11:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220443] Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291112.n7TBCoHN015578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-29 07:12:49 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnome-commander New Branches: F-12 Owners: mtasaka Early branching request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 11:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291112.n7TBC6DJ011920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-29 07:12:01 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: kazehakase New Branches: F-12 Owners: mtasaka Early branch request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 12:14:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:14:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519074] Review Request: fakeroot-ng - Fools programs into thinking they are running with root permission In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291214.n7TCEQeN022034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519074 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmaphy at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 12:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291214.n7TCEcjw022067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmaphy at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 12:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519074] Review Request: fakeroot-ng - Fools programs into thinking they are running with root permission In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291214.n7TCE2Zr021985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519074 --- Comment #1 from Dominic Hopf 2009-08-29 08:14:01 EDT --- $ rpmlint fakeroot-ng.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint fakeroot-ng-0.17-0.1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint fakeroot-ng-0.17-0.1.fc11.x86_64.rpm fakeroot-ng-debuginfo-0.17-0.1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUSTs ----- OK: package is named according to the package naming guidelines OK: specfile name matches %{name}.spec OK: package seems to meet packaging guidelines OK: license in specfile matches actual license and meets licensing guidelines NOT OK: license file is included in %doc OK: specfile is written in AE OK: specfile is legible OK: sourcefile in the package is the same as provided in the mentioned source, md5sum fits NOT OK: package compiles successfully the package does not compile for ppc64. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1642634 Possible solutions: Patch the configure script yourself and/or report this issue to upstream. You can temporarily work around this with 'ExcludeArch: ppc64' to get through the build system, but please note that this is really just a workaround and no solution N/A: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires there are no build dependencies N/A: package handles locales properly there are no locales installed with this package N/A: call ldconfig in %post and %postun there is no binary installed with this package OK: package is not designed to be relocatable OK: package owns directorys it creates OK: does not list a file more than once in the %files listing OK: %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly OK: %clean section is there and contains rm -rf %{buildroot} OK: macros are consistently used OK: package contains code N/A: subpackage for large documentation files there are no large documentation files OK: program runs properly without files listed in %doc N/A: header files are in a -devel package there are no header files installed with this package N/A: static libraries are in a -static package there are no static libs installed with this package N/A: require pkgconfig if package contains a pkgconfig(.pc) there is no pkgconfig file N/A: put .so-files into -devel package if there are library files with suffix there is no library with suffix, in fact there isn't any library N/A: devel package includes fully versioned dependency for the base package there is no devel package N/A: any libtool archives are removed there are no libtool archives N/A: contains desktop file if it is a GUI application this is a command line application OK: package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages OK: buildroot is removed at beginning of %install N/A: filenames are encoded in UTF-8 not necessary since there are no non-ASCII filenames SHOULD ------ N/A: non-English translations for description and summary there are no other languages supported by this package, in fact it does not provide any localization. I assume localizations are not needed for this package. OK: package builds in mock NOT OK: package builds into binary rpms for all supported architectures see above N/A: program runs I did not test myself if the program works as it should N/A: subpackages contain fully versioned dependency for the base package there are no subpackages N/A: pkgconfig file is placed in a devel package there is no pkgconfig file N/A: require package providing a file instead of the file itself no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required - I would recommend to use the %{version} tag in Source, since this makes maintenance work easier - the CFLAGS parameter for make is missing in %build section - there is a %doc without any following files in one line - the license file (COPYING) is missing in the %files section - please also add AUTHORS, ChangeLog, INSTALL, NEWS, README and README.porting to the %files-section and tag them as %doc - the header files (*.h) are missing a licensing hint, it would also be nice to see one there. Please report this to upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 12:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 08:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519073] Review Request: chrootuid - This tool offers su and chroot fuctionaltity in one program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291214.n7TCEsiC025731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519073 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmaphy at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 13:02:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291302.n7TD2FnW001310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 --- Comment #11 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-08-29 09:02:13 EDT --- Sure, I don't have nagios running on EL-5, so won't be able to test. Do you want to co-maintain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 13:05:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459925] Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291305.n7TD5KJ1002015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459925 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt_domsch at dell.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Matt Domsch 2009-08-29 09:05:17 EDT --- In private mail with Simon, he is happy for others to maintain libowfat in epel, but he has no interest in doing so himself at this time. As noted above, libowfat is needed for opentracker. I'm not planning on building libowfat against dietlibc in epel, but against glibc, as epel has no dietlibc. Please branch EL-5 from devel if you can. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libowfat New Branches: EL-5 Owners: mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 13:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291324.n7TDORDM001079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 --- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-29 09:24:25 EDT --- Updated: SRPM:http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-texlipse-1.3.0-2.20090829cvs.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-texlipse.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 13:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291346.n7TDkaAS008670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-29 09:46:34 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, it was a busy week for me. Good: - Requires/Requires(pre,post,postun) are sane - Requires of devel package are sane to, gtk-doc was dropped - License was clarified, license tag matches - bickley-0.4.pc fixed for 64 bit Bad: - Some redundant BRs that *could* (not must) be removed: clutter-devel and clutter-gtk-devel require gtk2-devel clutter-gtk-devel and clutter-gst-devel require clutter-devel - I wonder if "Applications/Multimedia" really is the proper group tag for a framework. - Are sqlite and xdg-user-dirs really required? I dont't see them referenced in the source - %configure is still run twice. - %configure correctly uses --disable-rpath and --disable-schemas, but now during build I see: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-maintainer-mode ... configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-rpath, --disable-schemas the first is a bug in autogen.sh and should be fixed upstream, but the second ones need fixing in the package. --disable-shemas can be dropped as you already have export GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL=1 in %install This leaves --disable-rpath. I'm pretty sure I checked that it works, but AFAIKS it can be dropped too as the applications contain no rpath (tested with chrpath). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 14:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291412.n7TECihw008910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-29 10:12:42 EDT --- rpmlint must be run on every package. - ok, rpmlint clean The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. - OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. - OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. - OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - OK The spec file must be written in American English. - OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - OK The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK ExcludeArch present. - OK All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. - OK The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK Ldconfig in %post and %postun. - not needed, OK Relocatable package and /usr prefix. - OK A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK Each package must have a correct %clean section. - OK Each package must consistently use macros. - OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK, no large documentation If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK, no static lib Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' . - OK, no .pc Library with .so suffix must be in -devel package. - OK, no .so In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK, no devel Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK, no .la Gui application and desktop-file-install. - OK, no desktop Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK conclusion: approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 14:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291426.n7TEQv9n011483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mat Booth 2009-08-29 10:26:55 EDT --- There's just one more thing: I don't know how I didn't notice this before, but there's a typo in the description, "utline navigation" is missing the leading "o". I approve this package, just fix that type before checking into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 14:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291446.n7TEkgGP019007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-29 10:46:40 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPLv2) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i586. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly.: No locales in this package - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package doesn't include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i586. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: Those scriptlets used are sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. Approved --------- Tested contents of file ex.eqn: ------- F1 = !A|B|C; F2 = !A&C; F3 = A&B|!C; ------- $ eqntott -l ex.eqn .i 3 .o 3 .na ex .ilb A B C .ob F1 F2 F3 .p 6 0-- 1 0 0 --0 0 0 1 0-1 0 1 0 --1 1 0 0 -1- 1 0 0 11- 0 0 1 .e ----------------------------------- Package eqntott Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 14:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291450.n7TEoQdK015676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-29 10:50:25 EDT --- Shakthi can you please review this small package for me please ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 14:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291451.n7TEpsGo016003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-29 10:51:52 EDT --- Thanks I will fix the typo: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-texlipse Short Description: Eclipse-based Latex plugin Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 15:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291508.n7TF8G1X018799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-29 11:08:14 EDT --- Once resetting fedora-cvs flag. Brett, please write the CVS request for new package following the above URL and set fedora-cvs flag again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 15:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291506.n7TF6nHi018671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-29 11:06:47 EDT --- Well, I again forgot to point out that we now recommend to use %global instead of %define. Please fix this when importing this to Fedora CVS. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-pathname2) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 15:11:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291511.n7TFBRxi023373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz --- Comment #16 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-08-29 11:11:26 EDT --- The package has been still not imported into CVS and built, what prevents that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 15:12:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291512.n7TFCrMa023524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-29 11:12:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eqntott Short Description: Generates truth tables from Boolean equations Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 15:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291542.n7TFgT6T028417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #17 from Balaji G 2009-08-29 11:42:27 EDT --- Hi Jochen First of all sorry for the real delay. I was not in station unexpectedly and hence couldnt do it. I have made the changes and uploaded the SPEC file and the SRC RPM at the following location http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Thanks for your inputs and time. Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 16:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-id - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291612.n7TGCeK5029205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-08-29 12:12:39 EDT --- Renamed packages: spec: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/media-player-info.spec srpm: http://people.redhat.com/mclasen/media-player-info-2-1.fc12.src.rpm I've mentioned the Copyright headers to Christophe, but that fix is not included yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 16:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519986] media-player-info - Data files describing media player capabilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291619.n7TGJv6e001895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519986 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|media-player-id - Data |media-player-info - Data |files describing media |files describing media |player capabilities |player capabilities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 17:07:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505264] Review Request: wb_builder - Wishbone Bus Builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291707.n7TH7npn009909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-29 13:07:48 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=359159) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=359159) Fix some Perl strict warnings and errors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 17:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505264] Review Request: wb_builder - Wishbone Bus Builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291709.n7TH9vAK010150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakthimaan at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-29 13:09:56 EDT --- While the package runs, I am not convinced with the code design. Maybe, a person learning Perl can re-do the design part. I have tried using strict, warnings, and it has yielded lot of errors, and warnings. Is it ok to not use strict, warnings? Otherwise, package looks ok. Attached patch, fixes some Perl strict warnings and errors, but, please double-check that it doesn't alter the wishbone logic, as I am not familiar with the domain, yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 17:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291717.n7THHSWD011754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #9 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-08-29 13:17:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eqntott.spec > SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eqntott-9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm > Description: Converts Boolean logic expressions into a truth table that is > useful for preparing input to espresso package for logic minimization, > converting logic expressions into simpler forms, and for creating truth tables. > > Successful Koji builds for FC10, FC11: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1599131 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1599155 Successful Koji build for EL-5; http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1643030 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 18:05:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520246] New: Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520246 Summary: Review Request: python-sysv_ipc - System V IPC for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at lonetwin.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.lonetwin.net/python-sysv_ipc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lonetwin.net/python-sysv_ipc-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The sysv_ipc module which gives Python access to System V inter-process semaphores, shared memory and message queues on systems that support them. [steve at laptop SPECS]$ rpmlint ./python-sysv_ipc.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [steve at laptop SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/steve/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/python-sysv_ipc-0.4.2-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [steve at laptop SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/steve/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/python-sysv_ipc-examples-0.4.2-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [steve at laptop SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/steve/rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-sysv_ipc-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [steve at laptop SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 18:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513874] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291806.n7TI6xnm015270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513874 --- Comment #12 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2009-08-29 14:06:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Sure, I don't have nagios running on EL-5, so won't be able to test. Do you > want to co-maintain? Ruben, Feel free to add me as a co-maintainer of perl-Math-Calc-Units and perl-Nagios-Plugin. I'll handle the EPEL tickets. /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 18:41:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908291841.n7TIfa4M021164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-29 14:41:35 EDT --- Some random comments ? About enabling tests - As this package contains tests/ directory, it is usually highly recommended that you add %check section and execute some test program there. However for this package to execute test_all.sh under tests/ directory we have to add "--with-tests" option explicitly to configure - because without this option some symbols needed for test program are marked as "static" and these symbols are not included in libqrencode.so. i.e. when "--with-tests" option is added to configure, it will add some addtional symbols to libqrencode.so which seems to be used only the test program in this tarball. So while I think generally executing test program is preferable, for this package I am not sure. How do you think? * Timestamps - Please consider to use ----------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ----------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible (especially on header files). This method usually works for Makefiles generated from recent autotools. * pkgconfig file - Currently I don't see any reason why pkgconfig file should be deleted. This pkgconfig file may be used by other applications. * Documents - You don't have to add documents to subpackages which are already included in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 20:18:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219327] Review Request: kazehakase - Kazehakase browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908292018.n7TKIs1P005173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219327 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-29 16:18:53 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 20:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220443] Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908292018.n7TKIZPN005123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-29 16:18:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 20:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908292022.n7TKMPnr010032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-29 16:22:24 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 20:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908292019.n7TKJ8hj009299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-29 16:19:07 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 20:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908292021.n7TKLh04009935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-29 16:21:42 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 21:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 17:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908292144.n7TLiusR019849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Zabolotny 2009-08-29 17:44:55 EDT --- Done, needs karma to be pushed into stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 22:26:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908292226.n7TMQAFa026783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-29 18:26:09 EDT --- next time, do add the bug number while you pushed to stable so that bodhi automatically closes this bug. Hence I'm closing it manually and including QtDMM on FEL's livedvd for F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Aug 29 22:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 18:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908292243.n7TMh3Tb000318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-29 18:43:02 EDT --- eclipse-texlipse-1.3.0-2.20090829cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-texlipse-1.3.0-2.20090829cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 03:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908300328.n7U3Si8i009451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-29 23:28:42 EDT --- Although we are still waiting for bickley, here is the formal part of the review. REVIEW FOR 9ddf1cc689b20120ed787338eb4e4c6a hornsey-0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm TBD - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: LGPLv2 OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 1e959a8b2a70f059b502e05fe2c90687 OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on all arches OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK - MUST: Not relocatable. OK - MUST: Owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: No duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content OK - MUST: No large documentation OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly validates with desktop-file-validate in the %install section. OK - MUST: packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. OK - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. TBD - SHOULD: builds in mock. TBD - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. TBD - SHOULD: functions as described. OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. OK - SHOULD: No file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin. Other items: OK - latest stable version packaged OK - proper debuginfo package OK - compiler flags honored OK - timstamps preserved during install Issues: - Apply the patch from comment #3. - Description does not end with a dot. - Description is a little sparse. How about: Hornsey is a Image, Audio and Video media browser and player for Moblin. (taken from README) - hornsey.desktop contains a mime type, but package lacks scriptlets from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database - AUTHORS and README are missing from %doc - MINOR: desktop file should get "Player" as additional category to allow nested menus like in the studio spin. Doesn't really matter for Moblin though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 03:58:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] New: Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Summary: Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: heydedummy at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stashbox.org/615883/notify-osd.spec SRPM URL: http://stashbox.org/615881/notify-osd-0.9.11-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent, implementing the freedesktop.org Desktop Notifications Specification with semi-transparent click-through bubbles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 03:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908300358.n7U3wjwi010511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Heyde Moura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |i386 Version|rawhide |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 04:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908300442.n7U4gtMv017393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-30 00:42:54 EDT --- Missing BR gnome-common. Even with gnome-common it wont build for me on F-11 with all your moblin packages backported. Does this work for you on Rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 05:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908300506.n7U56voM021558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-30 01:06:56 EDT --- Your server seems to be down. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 06:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 02:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908300624.n7U6Og3v002291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-30 02:24:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Jan! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: icoutils Short Description: Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files Owners: mgieseki Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 07:37:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 03:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519118] Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908300737.n7U7b2jw012922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519118 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-30 03:37:01 EDT --- Two minor niggles: It doesn't look like "upx" is actually necessary for the build (only for "make release") - please remove the BuildRequires. The name of the installed binary is too generic - please rename it to "nforenum". And a very minor grammatical issue - I would also consider changing the first word of the description to "nforenum". With those tiny changes, APPROVED. + source files match upstream. diff -qr reveals no differences (svn export, checksum not suitable) + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPLv2+ + license is open source-compatible. + license text is included. + latest version is being packaged. - BuildRequires not proper. doesn't look like upx is actually necessary + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1643847 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: nforenum.src: I: checking nforenum.x86_64: I: checking nforenum-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: nforenum = 3.4.7-0.1.r2184.fc12 nforenum(x86-64) = 3.4.7-0.1.r2184.fc12 = libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.1)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. - generically named files "renum" is too generic - please rename it to "nforenum" + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 07:41:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 03:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908300741.n7U7fJk3013630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-08-30 03:41:18 EDT --- Hi, Wanted to follow through the README.Fedora or try the example configuration but could not see it anywhere? You have /etc/grid-security/voms and /etc/voms owned by uid voms but these should I say probably be root owned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 08:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908300837.n7U8b8D5028753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-30 04:37:07 EDT --- Hello Heyde, according to the Fedora Account System you're not yet an approved packager. Thus, you need a sponsor doing the formal review of this package. (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request) I had a quick look at your package and noticed a couple of issues. $ rpmlint notify-osd-0.9.11-1.fc11.src.rpm notify-osd.src: E: description-line-too-long Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent, implementing the freedesktop.org Desktop Notifications Specification with semi-transparent click-through bubbles. notify-osd.src: W: non-standard-group Desktop Environments/GNOME notify-osd.src:64: E: files-attr-not-set notify-osd.src:65: E: files-attr-not-set 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. - You should split the %description text to several lines with max. 80 characters per line. - Choose a proper package group - move %defattr(-,root,root,-) to the top of the %file section - The package doesn't build in mock because of a missing BuildRequires: libnotify-devel. Also, BuildRequires and Requires contain many redundant dependencies. It should be sufficient to give: BuildRequires: GConf2-devel BuildRequires: libwnck-devel BuildRequires: dbus-glib-devel BuildRequires: glib2-devel BuildRequires: libnotify-devel - Add your email address to the %changelog entry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 09:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908300909.n7U99usx002006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #16 from Pascal Parois 2009-08-30 05:09:54 EDT --- Finally, I made the corrections. the license is fixed version soname is removed version bumped to 11 http://pascal.parois.net/fedoraproject/ http://svn.debroglie.net/specs/trunk/newmat.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 10:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 06:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301052.n7UAqxLd019219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #17 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-30 06:52:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > version soname is removed Very bad idea. Could it be you haven't understood the purpose of SONAMEs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 11:39:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301139.n7UBdDOd027436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Heyde Moura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|i386 |i586 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 11:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301142.n7UBgiGM023408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #2 from Heyde Moura 2009-08-30 07:42:44 EDT --- I have made the package for a newer version. Spec URL: http://stashbox.org/616073/notify-osd.spec SRPM URL: http://stashbox.org/616072/notify-osd-0.9.19-1.fc11.src.rpm I think that my work arround in the SPEC file should be right now, i've followed your instructions, i'd run: $ rpmlint notify-osd-0.9.19-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 11:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301148.n7UBmknK024372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #3 from Heyde Moura 2009-08-30 07:48:45 EDT --- SPEC URL:http://stashbox.org/616084/notify-osd.spec SRPM URL: http://stashbox.org/616085/notify-osd-0.9.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Added Conflicts to Spec file $ rpmlint notify-osd-0.9.19-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 11:59:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301159.n7UBxXlM026112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-30 07:59:31 EDT --- I am not a sponsor, consider this a unofficial quick review: Your earlier spec was inaccessible. If you don't have a proper place to upload packages, get a Fedora account at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts Apply for fedorabugs group there and I will approve so that you can scp your files to fedorapeople.org https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org Also, you should avoid using the trademark name "Canonical" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description A better summary and description would be "On-screen-display notification" and "On-screen-display notification agent, implementing the freedesktop.org Desktop Notifications Specification with semi-transparent click-through bubbles." There is a typo in your conflicts and also on "initial package". Since notification-daemon is a explicit dependency of many packages, how is a user expected to install this package? You don't need to define the buildroot or remove it in %install section anymore. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag You shouldn't add explicit requires for libraries unless RPM can't detect it by itself. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 12:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301202.n7UC2h9P031855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-30 08:02:43 EDT --- Actually, a better description that avoids jargon is in the README: "The Desktop Notifications framework provides a standard way of doing passive pop-up notifications on the Linux desktop. These are designed to notify the user of something without interrupting their work with a dialog box that they must close. Passive popups can automatically disappear after a short period of time." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 12:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - Canonical's on-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301238.n7UCcP6q005149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #6 from Heyde Moura 2009-08-30 08:38:23 EDT --- SPEC url: http://heydemoura.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/notify-osd.spec SRPM url: http://heydemoura.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/notify-osd-0.9.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Avoided Canonical's trademark. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 12:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520306] New: Review Request: python-editobj - Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-editobj - Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520306 Summary: Review Request: python-editobj - Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adrien.schreque at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://adrien.schreque.free.fr/repo/python-editobj.spec SRPM URL: http://adrien.schreque.free.fr/repo/python-editobj-0.5.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Homepage : http://home.gna.org/oomadness/en/editobj/ This is my first package submitted to Fedora extras. I need a sponsor. Description: I would appreciate a review of the EditObj, a python module. EditObj can create and display a Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object (similarly to what Java call a Bean editor, but for Python object). EditObj is a useful tool for writing (text or non-text) editors of all kinds, including GUI editor, 3D editor,... It also includes a Python console. EditObj supports also lists, dictionaries and hierarchies (nested lists) edition. EditObj includes also a tree widget for Tkinter, an event framework and a mutiple undo/redo system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 13:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301332.n7UDW3xN010811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Heyde Moura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: notify-osd |Review Request: notify-osd |- Canonical's |- On-screen-display |on-screen-display |notification agent |notification agent | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 13:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301338.n7UDcMFo011807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-30 09:38:21 EDT --- Can you respond to the other suggestions and questions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 13:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301339.n7UDdaHe016746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-30 09:39:34 EDT --- ping Nicolas Chauvet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 13:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301352.n7UDqIVD014414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #8 from Heyde Moura 2009-08-30 09:52:17 EDT --- SPEC url: http://heydemoura.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/notify-osd.spec SRPM url: http://heydemoura.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SRPMS/notify-osd-0.9.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Sorry i forgot to change the description to the one in the README. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 14:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301403.n7UE3BKU016236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-30 10:03:10 EDT --- You still have missed out a few suggestions and the question on conflicts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 14:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:19:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301419.n7UEJu2A019056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #10 from Heyde Moura 2009-08-30 10:19:55 EDT --- How i can know what dependencies RPM can track automatically or what can't? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 14:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301433.n7UEXE2c026643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #11 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-30 10:33:13 EDT --- As explained in the guidelines, dependencies on libraries can in the general case be tracked by RPM itself directly. You can drop all of them. Look at the content inside ls /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/find-provides* if you want the specific details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 16:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] New: Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Summary: Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: qdlacz at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wips.pl/~kudi/rpm/mm-common/mm-common.spec SRPM URL: http://wips.pl/~kudi/rpm/mm-common/mm-common-0.7.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The mm-common module provides the build infrastructure and utilities shared among the GNOME C++ binding libraries. It is only a required dependency for building the C++ bindings from the gnome.org version control repository. An installation of mm-common is not required for building tarball releases, unless configured to use maintainer-mode. This is my first package, so I'm seeking for a sponsor. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 16:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301622.n7UGM9qe014079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 18:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301808.n7UI87Lj024914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-30 14:08:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > version soname is removed > Very bad idea. Could it be you haven't understood the purpose of SONAMEs? AFAIK we don't add soname's, since that really should be done by upstream. Or is there some policy I am blissfully unaware of? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 19:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908301915.n7UJFpJC009183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-30 15:15:49 EDT --- Some random notes: * License - The license tag should be "GPL+", because no version information is given in the tarball (just putting GPLv2 license in the tarball does not specify the version of GPL: see below) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F * URL - The following is more proper: http://vmps.sourceforge.net/ * BuildRequires - BR: gcc is redundant. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 * Building source - Unless some specialy reason exists, compiling source codes (by "make", for example) must be done at %build stage and %install stage should do just installing files (by "make install", for example) and so on. (i.e. add "make %{?_smp_mflags}" after %configure, also see below) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make * Timestamp - Please consider to use ---------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ---------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. This method usually works for Makefiles generated from recent autotools. * Creating scripts by cat in spec file - Please avoid this as much as possible, just create a text files beforehand, add these as %SOURCEx, and install the text files at %install (also see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps * About scriptlets treatment ! Please read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript Some notes: - Some Requires(pre) or so is missing. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets - Service should not be enabled by default: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#.23_chkconfig:_line - Please use %_initddir https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem - Consier to add "condrestart" at %postun * Macros - Please use macros properly. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros - Use %{_sysconfdir}, %{_bindir} and so on. - %{_datadir/man} should be %{_mandir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 20:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302007.n7UK7O4x017658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #22 from Rex Dieter 2009-08-30 16:07:21 EDT --- fyi, followed-through on threat in comment #18, built a new qt for rawhide, %changelog * Thu Aug 27 2009 Rex Dieter 4.5.2-12 - use platform linux-g++ everywhere (ie, drop linux-g++-64 on 64 bit), avoids plugin/linker weirdness described in bug #475110 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 20:12:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302012.n7UKCqbe013513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kushaldas at gmail.com --- Comment #28 from Kushal Das 2009-08-30 16:12:49 EDT --- Eh, I missed this entry totally , I am already having working rpm and spec ready. Should I submit it here ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 20:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302016.n7UKG5wp014142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #18 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-30 16:16:04 EDT --- Thanks about that :) (and sorry for the tag, I forgot) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 20:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302037.n7UKbpb6022554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-30 16:37:50 EDT --- R-affy-1.22.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-affy-1.22.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 20:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302037.n7UKbv0U022595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-30 16:37:56 EDT --- R-affy-1.22.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-affy-1.22.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 20:35:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302035.n7UKZ1W1021874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-08-30 16:34:59 EDT --- Hi Eelko, The directory is still unowned. I gave the solution to this problem above in comment #1. Let me rephrase: %{_kde4_appsdir}/%{name}/* owns everything inside the directory but does not own the directory itself. %dir %{_kde4_appsdir}/%{name} owns just the directory but does not own the contents of the directory. %{_kde4_appsdir}/%{name}/ owns both the directory and its contents. This is what you want. Alternatively you can do %dir %{_kde4_appsdir}/%{name} %{_kde4_appsdir}/%{name}/* which is longer but has the same effect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 21:06:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302106.n7UL6QSi027821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #12 from Heyde Moura 2009-08-30 17:06:25 EDT --- SPEC url: http://heydemoura.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/notify-osd/notify-osd.spec SRPM url: http://heydemoura.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/notify-osd/notify-osd-0.9.19-1.fc11.src.rpm I've followed your instructions and i removed the libs from .spec requirements, remove the line that delete the buildroot from %install. But i don't know how i can install this package without the --force option in rpm command line and you're right the conflicts flag that points to notification-daemon have to disappear in the .spec file, how i can resolve the conflicts between the packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 21:39:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302139.n7ULdX1f028227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 Andreas Bierfert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Andreas Bierfert 2009-08-30 17:39:31 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libopensync-plugin-synce New Branches: F-10 Owners: awjb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 21:44:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520306] Review Request: python-editobj - Tkinter dialog box for editing any Python object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302144.n7ULisxi029136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520306 --- Comment #1 from Adrien Schreque 2009-08-30 17:44:53 EDT --- rpmlint result above SPEC and SRPM file : [builder at srv01 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/python-editobj-0.5.7-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at srv01 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/python-editobj.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 22:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302241.n7UMfWwi011773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #13 from Heyde Moura 2009-08-30 18:41:30 EDT --- SPEC url: http://heydemoura.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/notify-osd/notify-osd.spec SRPM url: http://heydemoura.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/notify-osd/notify-osd-0.9.18-1.fc11.src.rpm Downgraded to version 0.9.18 because in the newer version the notify bubbles are on the middle of the screen and this is motive of various reclamations from notify-osd fans, and is a completely not convenient to the end-user to get notify bubbles at the middle of your screen. The comment #12 applies here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 22:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302250.n7UMoRLB008762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura 2009-08-30 18:50:26 EDT --- Thanks for the notice. Could take a while till, they reinstalled the system, it seems :-( Try it here: SPEC: http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/spurath/public/fedora/gbirthday.spec SRPM: http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/spurath/public/fedora/gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Aug 30 23:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908302346.n7UNkZw5020039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 --- Comment #8 from Peter Halliday 2009-08-30 19:46:33 EDT --- I added the files and built clean with koji, but forgot to add the bug#in the commits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 00:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310003.n7V03ox8027035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 Peter Halliday changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 00:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310007.n7V07OJf023176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #7 from Sean Middleditch 2009-08-30 20:07:23 EDT --- Indeed, I put the wrong URL. Corrected. I have a requirement on buildrequires for those because I believed them to be needed. I suppose automake, autoconf, libtool are only needed to regenerate the files shipped in the dist tarball, so they are removed. I try to avoid those things wherever possible and only even used them in libtelnet because RPM made it very difficult to work without them. Removed the build requires. zlib-devel is required because it's supposed to be building against zlib, but apparently I forgot to include that in the configure script I wrote. Whoops. Removed for now, will re-add when I release 0.11 with an updated configure script. Replaced use of %makeinstall. I got that from the Fedora examples. I'm getting rather irritated by the Fedora documentation being contradictory and out of date for package building. Fixed the two places I forgot the fourth parameter to %defattr. So far as the package structure, the packaging guidelines didn't offer any advice. Other distros I've packaged for try to avoid putting binaries in lib* packages, and frankly I agree with that -- the people who need the library probably do not need the other utilities, which would just make /usr/bin that much bigger and more full of unnecessary crap. If individual binary RPMs are undesirable in Fedora, I would prefer to put the binaries into a libtelnet-utils or libtelnet-bin package like libproxy does., so people can get libtelnet on its own without the chaff. I will update to do just that. Not sure why you felt the need to tell me to update the release number when I've only ever posted one version of the spec file so far. The new spec file has the appropriate updates. http://middleditch.us/sean/libtelnet.spec http://middleditch.us/sean/libtelnet-0.10-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 00:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520343] New: Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Summary: Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sean at middleditch.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Very simplistic MUD client for command line usage. Note: Requires the libtelnet package under review at bug #515832. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 01:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518849] Review Request: python-werkzeug - an advanced WSGI utility module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310153.n7V1rfTa011991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518849 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-30 21:53:40 EDT --- When using the update system, unless your update references some bug#s, you might want to put in a description detailing what it does. Everything else looks fine! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 02:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310220.n7V2KgD6012282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 --- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-30 22:20:41 EDT --- Christoph: Did you apply the patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 02:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310238.n7V2cd79019551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #19 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-30 22:38:38 EDT --- AFAIS, (In reply to comment #18) > AFAIK we don't add soname's, since that really should be done by upstream. It's correct that it's hardly possible to invent SONAMEs if upstream doesn't, but shipping a shared library without any SONAME doesn't work either. Or differently: Letting both the base package and the *-devel package contain *.so, doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 04:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520017] Review Request: ibus-table-zhuyin - Zhu Yin input method tables for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310428.n7V4StZr004879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520017 --- Comment #1 from Caio 'kaio' Chance 2009-08-31 00:28:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-zhuyin.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-zhuyin-1.2.0.20090831-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Zhu Yin input method tables for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 04:47:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520352] New: Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 Summary: Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phalliday at excelsiorsystems.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.excelsiorsystems.net/media/files/python-pip.spec SRPM URL: http://www.excelsiorsystems.net/media/files/python-pip-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Pip is a replacement for `easy_install `_. It uses mostly the same techniques for finding packages, so packages that were made easy_installable should be pip-installable as well. pip is meant to improve on easy_install.bulletin boards, etc.). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 06:13:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310613.n7V6DkoH017217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #12 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-08-31 02:13:45 EDT --- Hi Orcan, Thank you very much for that last comment with example! I now fully understand the issue which is being referred to. I will get that fixed this evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 06:34:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310634.n7V6YHSP026134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #17 from Ivana Varekova 2009-08-31 02:34:15 EDT --- Thanks, just build in fc12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 06:49:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310649.n7V6nQEC022861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-08-31 02:49:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hi, > Wanted to follow through the README.Fedora or try the example configuration > but could not see it anywhere? The file is /usr/share/doc/voms-server-1.9.11/INSTALL.Fedora > You have > > /etc/grid-security/voms > and > /etc/voms > > owned by uid voms but these should I say probably be root owned. Could you please elaborate on this. I'm not saying they should not be changed, but I would like to know your reasoning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 07:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520367] New: Review Request: ibus-table-ziranma - ZiRanMa table for IBus-Table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-ziranma - ZiRanMa table for IBus-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520367 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-ziranma - ZiRanMa table for IBus-Table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-ziranma.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-ziranma-1.2.0.20090831-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: ZiRanMa table for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 07:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520366] New: Review Request: ibus-table-wu - Wu table for IBus-Table Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-wu - Wu table for IBus-Table https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520366 Summary: Review Request: ibus-table-wu - Wu table for IBus-Table Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: k at kaio.me QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-wu.spec SRPM URL: http://kaio.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-wu-1.2.0.20090831-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Wu table for IBus-Table -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 07:48:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310748.n7V7mOMg001542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-31 03:48:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > AFAIS, (In reply to comment #18) > > AFAIK we don't add soname's, since that really should be done by upstream. > It's correct that it's hardly possible to invent SONAMEs if upstream doesn't, > but shipping a shared library without any SONAME doesn't work either. > > Or differently: Letting both the base package and the *-devel package contain > *.so, doesn't work. The guidelines are quite clear on that one: MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages Unversioned shared libraries are placed in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 07:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310750.n7V7oqMA002192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 03:50:52 EDT --- vemana2000-fonts-1.1.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vemana2000-fonts-1.1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 07:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310750.n7V7om72002124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 03:50:46 EDT --- vemana2000-fonts-1.1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vemana2000-fonts-1.1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 08:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518189] Review Request: java-augeas - Java bindings for Augeas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310806.n7V86reg012120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518189 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-08-31 04:06:52 EDT --- Closing as the package is imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 08:22:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310822.n7V8Mh71009297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt 2009-08-31 04:22:42 EDT --- Well, deciding on where to place the library file is not an issue. Publishing a SONAME-less library, which other components will link with, is the issue. It leads to either silent ABI breakage during library upgrades (worse-case) or explicit dependencies on package name+version, which increase the package maintenance requirements. One ought not invent SONAMEs, which bear a risk of conflicting with upstream's future SONAMEs, but one can choose versioned SONAMEs, which would change whenever the library version changes. e.g. libfoo-1.0.so.0, libfoo-1.1.so.0 and so on (alternatively, one maps the API/ABI to a build id, which may change more slowly than the library version). That way library upgrades require rebuilds of dependencies or else there would be broken RPM dependencies. The remaining problem is that these SONAMEs also differ from upstream and any other source of builds made for upstream's library. Still, such a work-around is better than shipping a library without a versioned SONAME. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 08:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519695] Review Request: hunspell-shs - Shuswap hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310834.n7V8Yojo011209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519695 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-08-31 04:34:48 EDT --- Review: * koji build= >http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1644989 * source looks different c4b1a65d281684841304db9dc7224514b7e19a45 aspell-0.01.tar.gz (in srpm) f5ef1cb29e43d277be516e02f9d7d925092b68a9 aspell-shs-HEAD.tar.gz ( upstream) I don't think it will be good to have source of this package named as aspell-0.1.tar.gz I see URL "http://git.debian.org/?p=users/neskie-guest/aspell-shs.git;a=snapshot;h=HEAD;sf=tgz" is working fine It gave file named aspell-shs-HEAD.tar.gz which I see is correct name and way to specify in SPEC file. Please update spec and then import to cvs. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 08:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519695] Review Request: hunspell-shs - Shuswap hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310842.n7V8gSMC019185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519695 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2009-08-31 04:42:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-shs Short Description: Shuswap hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 08:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519138] Review Request: libbs2b - Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310849.n7V8ndbO013830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519138 --- Comment #2 from Karel Voln? 2009-08-31 04:49:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > here is the review of your package. thanks > It is pretty clean. Just the > BuildRequires(pre/post) should be removed (see below). oops, too much cut&paste ... new version uploaded: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/libbs2b.spec http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/libbs2b-3.1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 08:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310856.n7V8u8fI022064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #14 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-31 04:56:07 EDT --- When you submit a revised spec, make sure you bump up the release and add a changelog entry explaining the change briefly. You don't need to define the buildroot anymore. So you can drop, "BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)" Fix the typo in "Initial Pakcage" rpmlint shows the changelog as incoherent. Fix that as well. Instead of using conflicts, the right answer would be to get the packages that directly depend on notification-daemon to use the virtual provides called desktop-notification-daemon instead (a file based dependency can also work but I wouldnt suggest that). You have to file a RFE against them # repoquery --whatrequires --all notification-daemon blueman-0:1.10-4.fc12.i686 notification-daemon-engine-nodoka-0:0.1.0-10.fc12.i686 --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 09:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310900.n7V90IOK022884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #22 from Pascal Parois 2009-08-31 05:00:17 EDT --- I sent an email upstream about the soname. Before looking for a workaround which seems not to be trivial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 09:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310904.n7V94CBi016417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |520380 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 09:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513239] Review Request: ansel - Full featured photo management application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310904.n7V94QkR016456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513239 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-08-31 05:04:24 EDT --- I will package it, am still waiting for clarification from upstream on the licensing on the other files, i will then do the packaging and patch ansel to use that package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 09:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310904.n7V94e12016509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-08-31 05:04:38 EDT --- Hi Mattias, Some of these are really upstream bugs. Yes the INSTALL.Fedora is there, my mistake. 1) The /usr/share/voms/voms_install_db --voms-vo=test --port=15000 \ --db-type=mysql --db-admin=root --db-pwd="" \ --sqlloc=/usr/lib64/voms/libvomsmysql.so fails if there are no CA's installed. rror opening Certificate /etc/grid-security/certificates/*.0 5899:error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory:bss_file.c:356:fopen('/etc/grid-security/certificates/*.0','r') 5899:error:20074002:BIO routines:FILE_CTRL:system lib:bss_file.c:358: unable to load certificate so adding a comment that there must be some CAs installed before voms_install_db is ran would make sense though not required. Quite why you need CAs to do this is not obvious. 2) Permissions on /etc/voms. I think it is normal for files only read by a deamon when they can be owned by root to be owned by root. That way if voms user is compromised the voms configuration can't be altered by the voms user. I think voms_install_db can and should be executed as root. You end up now with. voms:voms , a+r /etc/voms root:root , a+r /etc/voms/test root:voms , ug+r /etc/voms/test/voms.pass root:root , a+r /etc/voms/test/voms.conf given that /etc/voms/test is root owned I see little point anyway in having /etc/voms owned voms:voms 3) Permission on /etc/grid-security/voms Again this directory is populated by root even if hostkey/cert.pem file have to owned by voms. 4) $ voms-proxy-init --voms test Cannot find file or dir: /etc/vomses /etc/vomses should be probably be in the client package. 5) /usr/share/voms/voms_install_db -h displays --logformat format See the vomsd(8) man page for details. --logdateformat format See the vomsd(8) man page for details. should be voms not vomsd. 6) I'll take a look at the start up script later, some return codes need some work. But service now running and signing proxies for me. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 09:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908310956.n7V9u140027528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |petersen at redhat.com Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-31 05:55:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no > upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL > Guidelines for how to deal with this. > >>> CHECK -> Presuming innocence here re: using the official tarballfor the Platform project. I didn't understand this comment: the reference src tarball is from hackage. > MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed > should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This > means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with > any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you > feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another > package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] > >>> CHECK > SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A > package should not segfault instead of running, for example. > >>> CHECK Errm, HUnit is already in ghc.... So do we remove HUnit from ghc or drop this package for now? Looks like a typo in haskell-platform.cabal to me? Or am I totally confused? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 10:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311004.n7VA4Rfa028812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #19 from Patrice FERLET 2009-08-31 06:01:12 EDT --- Excuse me, really buzy this last months (preparing my wedding, holliday...) so I'm back now ! I will recreate package tonight ! Thanks Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 10:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311004.n7VA4RQV004956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-31 06:02:45 EDT --- > Looks like a typo in haskell-platform.cabal to me? Correctly it is part of ghc-src-extralibs, which haskell-platform will replace of course. Anyway we don't need this until we drop extras from ghc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 10:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311009.n7VA9dQZ029989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 10:09:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311009.n7VA9Sgo029948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loupgaroublond at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 10:10:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517141] Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311010.n7VAAXIo030366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loupgaroublond at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 10:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311014.n7VAEKJi030924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #8 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-31 06:14:18 EDT --- Are they the same version? Personally, i'd rather deliver as many libraries via subpackages anyways. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 10:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311017.n7VAH5g3007352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #9 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-08-31 06:17:03 EDT --- Is the tarball from hackage then? Some of the tarballs Bryan used came from the platform tarball and for some reason did not checksum properly. It was the only problem we found, and for the matter of speed, i let it slide, as the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 10:33:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311033.n7VAX7Rv010079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-31 06:33:05 EDT --- * Thu Aug 27 2009 Yaakov M. Nemoy - 0.8.1-7 - removed bcond since xft will be in fedora soon Ok, I'll wait for ghc-X11-xft to get into rawhide before completing this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 11:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507830] Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311126.n7VBQo78020807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507830 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2009-08-31 07:26:49 EDT --- Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 12:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519138] Review Request: libbs2b - Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311227.n7VCRce2023454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519138 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-31 08:27:36 EDT --- The spec file looks fine now and I found no further things to complain about. :) The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 12:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311231.n7VCVjfH001428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 --- Comment #6 from Jens Kuehnel 2009-08-31 08:31:44 EDT --- Ups, sometimes I hate SELinux. Fixed now. Sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 12:37:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502596] Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311237.n7VCb5mj025294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 --- Comment #2 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-08-31 08:37:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > user1# rpmlint sblim-tools-libra.spec > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > user1# sblim-tools-libra-0.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > user1# sblim-tools-libra-0.2.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > user1# sblim-tools-libra-devel-0.2.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm > sblim-tools-libra-devel.i386: W: no-documentation > > Replace the occurrence of "sblim-tools-libra" with %{name} whenever possible. Done. > > Since this package only provides the libraries, it should be Grouped under > Libraries instead of Applications. sblim-tools-libra - System Environment/Libraries sblim-tools-libra-devel - Development/Libraries OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 12:42:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519138] Review Request: libbs2b - Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311242.n7VCgL81004001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519138 Karel Voln? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Karel Voln? 2009-08-31 08:42:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libbs2b Short Description: Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP library Owners: kvolny Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 13:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311352.n7VDqfRk019928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Heyde Moura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |520437 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 14:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311405.n7VE5Hb4012174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-08-31 10:05:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tuna Short Description: Application tuning GUI & command line utility Owners: acme Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 14:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311410.n7VEAkeQ013146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Heyde Moura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |520442 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 14:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311421.n7VELJCr026221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #15 from Heyde Moura 2009-08-31 10:21:18 EDT --- Another way to resolve the conflicts that i think is to use alternatives to let the user switch between the notification-daemon and notify-osd, chnaging only the file /usr/share/dbus-1/services/org.freedesktop.Notifications.service . This way the packages that depends on notification-daemon don't need to be rebuild. But how i can get this feature into the RPM package, any suggestion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 14:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311448.n7VEmJ0t032293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 Bug 520278 depends on bug 520442, which changed state. Bug 520442 Summary: RFE: Rebuild to depend on desktop-notification-daemon and not notification-daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520442 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 15:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311514.n7VFERPJ028055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |520431 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 15:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/POE-Component-Pluggable OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-POE-Component-Pluggable.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-POE-Component-Pluggable-1.24-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: POE::Component::Pluggable is a base class for creating plugin enabled POE Components. It is a generic port of POE::Component::IRC's plugin system. If your component dispatches events to registered POE sessions, then POE::Component::Pluggable may be a good fit for you. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1645911 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 15:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] New: Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! Alias: perl-common-sense https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 Summary: Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/common-sense OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-common-sense.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-common-sense-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module implements some sane defaults for Perl programs, as defined by two typical (or not so typical - use your common sense) specimens of Perl coders: use strict qw(vars subs); use feature qw(say state switch); no warnings; Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1645924 Additional Comment: This is a new BR of the latest JSON::XS. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 15:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520460] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Pluggable - A base class for creating plugin-enabled POE components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311525.n7VFP7Jj009376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520460 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschmidt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mschmidt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 15:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311536.n7VFaBcr000763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-08-31 11:36:10 EDT --- Hi! I was just back from few days off this weekend... I've updated the srpm/spec without bumping release because nothing was related to the binary package itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 15:41:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520278] Review Request: notify-osd - On-screen-display notification agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311541.n7VFfumM001803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520278 --- Comment #16 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-31 11:41:53 EDT --- Alternatives is used in GCJ. Spec file is at http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/java-1.5.0-gcj/devel/java-1.5.0-gcj.spec?view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 16:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311606.n7VG6DLc018252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #15 from Jerry James 2009-08-31 12:06:09 EDT --- I don't see a Rawhide build of this package. Is there a problem on Rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 16:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311609.n7VG9M8u007281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-31 12:09:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Sorry for the delay, it was a busy week for me. NP: know the feeling all too well. > Bad: > - Some redundant BRs that *could* (not must) be removed: > clutter-devel and clutter-gtk-devel require gtk2-devel > clutter-gtk-devel and clutter-gst-devel require clutter-devel Dropped, added gstreamer-devel to the list. > - I wonder if "Applications/Multimedia" really is the proper group tag for a > framework. I couldn't find a better one and that's what gstreamer uses. > - Are sqlite and xdg-user-dirs really required? I dont't see them referenced in > the source Dropped. > - %configure is still run twice. I think this is fixed. Seems there's a number of different ways to fix this, the cleanest being the one that's part of gnome-common. > - %configure correctly uses --disable-rpath and --disable-schemas, but now > during build I see: > > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-maintainer-mode > ... > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-rpath, --disable-schemas > > the first is a bug in autogen.sh and should be fixed upstream, but the second > ones need fixing in the package. --disable-shemas can be dropped as you already > have > export GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL=1 > in %install > > This leaves --disable-rpath. I'm pretty sure I checked that it works, but > AFAIKS it can be dropped too as the applications contain no rpath (tested with > chrpath). Fixed. The rpath one was added at some point I think when a previous build needed it. I'll bring up the the --enable-maintainer-mode issue with upstream. SPEC: as above SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bickley-0.4.3-6.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1646385 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 16:20:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311620.n7VGKoXc009925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-31 12:20:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Missing BR gnome-common. > > Even with gnome-common it wont build for me on F-11 with all your moblin > packages backported. Does this work for you on Rawhide? It does on my rawhide build VM which I use for testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 16:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311623.n7VGNnxk010413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-31 12:23:48 EDT --- > Issues: > - Apply the patch from comment #3. > - Description does not end with a dot. > - Description is a little sparse. How about: Hornsey is a Image, Audio and > Video media browser and player for Moblin. (taken from README) > - hornsey.desktop contains a mime type, but package lacks scriptlets from > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database > - AUTHORS and README are missing from %doc All fixed. SPEC: As above SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/hornsey-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 16:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - Save a tree AND a kitten, use common::sense! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311637.n7VGba9Q024754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 12:37:35 EDT --- This has to be in the running for worst summary ever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 16:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311642.n7VGg59l025633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Brett Lentz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-31 12:42:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-facade Short Description: A module that helps implement the facade pattern Owners: wakko666 Branches: F-12 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 16:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 510097] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311651.n7VGpinu015926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510097 --- Comment #29 from Konstantinos 2009-08-31 12:51:42 EDT --- I was working something and is almost ready but I've been busy because of my exams. So you are welcome! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 16:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311654.n7VGsXmM027721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-31 12:54:32 EDT --- Well, "Branches F-12" means that you request for early branch? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-August/msg01435.html Current stable branches are F-11 and F-10. As your srpm has ".fc11" suffix, I guess you want F-11 branch, not F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 16:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311657.n7VGvSLP028439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-31 12:57:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Replaced use of %makeinstall. I got that from the Fedora examples. I'm > getting rather irritated by the Fedora documentation being contradictory and > out of date for package building. If you find something contradictory on Fedora documentation, please notice it on fedora-packaging mailing list. For -2: * Packaging structure - If you want to split binaries under %_bindir into a subpackage, usually such subpackage is named as "-utils" on Fedora. * About make install - I still recommend to add 'INSTALL="install -p"' option to 'make install' to keep timestamps on installed files (especially on header files to be installed) * Documents - You don't have to include a document file to all subpackages. - Including license text (in this package "COPYING") to the main package is rather mandatory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] New: Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 Summary: Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musolinoa at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog.spec SRPM URL: http://silxnet.org/~alex/fedora/picprog/picprog-1.9.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Picprog is a simple program for burning programs to various Microchip PIC micro-controllers via several types of serial port programmers. This is my first package for Fedora, so I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517144] Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311704.n7VH4RWB018168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 --- Comment #10 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-31 13:04:26 EDT --- GHC 6.12 will be out within a matter of weeks (beta is scheduled for September 14), and won't include any extralibs, so let's just leave this as is. We'll be wanting to upgrade within the early lifetime of F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311708.n7VH83Dn030396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478481 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:15:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461692] Review Request: python-markdown2 - A fast and complete Python implementation of Markdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311715.n7VHFV2I020686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461692 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Thomas Moschny 2009-08-31 13:15:29 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-markdown2 New Branches: EL-5 Owners: thm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520479] New: Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 Summary: Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve.traylen at cern.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/myproxy-rpms/myproxy.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/myproxy-rpms/myproxy-4.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MyProxy is open source software for managing X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) security credentials (certificates and private keys). MyProxy combines an online credential repository with an online certificate authority to allow users to securely obtain credentials when and where needed. Users run myproxy-logon to authenticate and obtain credentials, including trusted CA certificates and Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447954] Review Request: perl-Math-Cephes - Perl interface to the cephes math library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311724.n7VHO5jj001293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447954 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com, | |kanarip at kanarip.com --- Comment #14 from Jan Klepek 2009-08-31 13:24:02 EDT --- any update? there is new version of perl-math-cephes in cpan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:26:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311726.n7VHQSUi001950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |520479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:26:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311726.n7VHQQdr001913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |517763 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518446] Review Request: moblin-panel-media - Moblin Panel for Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311729.n7VHTvX4002408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518446 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-31 13:29:56 EDT --- Added upstream patch for bognor-regis 0.4.10. Builds on my local build box. SPEC: as above SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-panel-media-0.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311730.n7VHUeVR002921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #23 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-08-31 13:30:37 EDT --- Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/monkeystudio.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc11/monkeystudio-1.8.4.0-0.2.20090824svn3243.fc11.src.rpm changelog : - Add qt-devel version to avoid plugin problems - Removed UpdateChecker plugin compilation Package builds on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1646487 Rpmlint output is still the same : 1 errors, 14 warning I tried the rpm x86_64 from the last koji build (with qt-devel 4.5.2-12), and now everything works fine. I also removed UpdateChecker plugin from compilation process because I think that it's not really usefull (yum is the UpdateChecker ;) ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 17:49:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519488] Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311749.n7VHne17027689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519488 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #4 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-31 13:49:38 EDT --- Please add min release number for jakarta-commons-dbcp. Having 1.2.1-12.5 does not build but having 1.2.1-13.7 builds successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519488] Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311804.n7VI4bCf009650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519488 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(overholt at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 14:04:36 EDT --- Done: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-registry.spec http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-registry-1.0-0.2.a3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:03:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:03:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520477] Review Request: picprog - Microchip PIC micro-controller serial programmer software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311803.n7VI3lEv009485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520477 Martin Gieseking changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.gieseking at uos.de Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-31 14:03:46 EDT --- Hello Alex, I'm not a sponsor but nevertheless some quick comments from me. :) - according to the source headers, the license is GPLv2 only - add comments to the referenced patches about what they do - it shouldn't be necessary to give the BuildRequires and Requires dependencies - "make dep" is redundant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520485] Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311807.n7VI7Si9032482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520485 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-31 14:07:27 EDT --- This is a full review request. Pre-review was #500268 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:06:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520485] Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311806.n7VI6BsG032057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520485 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:06:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520485] New: Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520485 Summary: Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Srpm URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-tools-2.1-4.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-tools.spec Description: The Maven Plugin Tools contains the necessary tools to play with Maven Plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519488] Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311814.n7VIEjLF012032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519488 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-31 14:14:44 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519488] Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311821.n7VILck7014060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519488 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 14:21:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-registry Short Description: Plexus Registry Component Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311823.n7VINFKv003921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #20 from Renich Bon Ciric 2009-08-31 14:23:12 EDT --- Whoa! Well, here in M?xico, to the guys, we say "I'm so sorry!" I hope you enjoy your vacation ;) Oh, yeah... and... the package... yeah -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311828.n7VISMsw005469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 14:28:20 EDT --- CVS done (although I'm confused as to how this ended up with F-9 and F-11 branches but no F-10 branch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461692] Review Request: python-markdown2 - A fast and complete Python implementation of Markdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311829.n7VITDhN015647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461692 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 14:29:11 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459925] Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311832.n7VIWwb1016590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459925 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 14:32:55 EDT --- Generally we'd like to see an ack in the ticket instead of having such comments be in private email where we can't see them, but I've no reason to doubt you. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:33:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311833.n7VIXtQp016862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 14:33:54 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520491] Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311835.n7VIZZQ7017504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520491 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-31 14:35:34 EDT --- This is a full review request. Pre-review was #500269 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520491] New: Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520491 Summary: Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-embedder.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-embedder-2.0.4-5.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Maven Embedder is used by the Maven CLI, by IDE integration projects like Mevenide and potentially any tool that needs to embed Maven's capabilities. You could embed Maven in a Continuous Integration application to run Maven build, an application lifecycle management (ALF) tool, or Ant tasks that utilize Maven's functionality. These are just a few examples of what the Maven Embedder can be used for. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311843.n7VIhWxF018897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 --- Comment #13 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-08-31 14:43:30 EDT --- 'lo Orcan, I chose the last way to add the ownership. I think it's easier to read and better to understand (for me at least - so I will not forget it next time when I submit a package for review). :) Hopefully the last and final update; Spec URL: http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.2.0/rekonq.spec Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1646581 - Eelko -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500259] Pre-Review Request: javacvs - Netbeans CVS module and library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311843.n7VIhasQ008803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500259 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 14:43:35 EDT --- We're just going to use the netbeans JAR instead. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520485] Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311845.n7VIjbUd019569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520485 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jjohnstn at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jjohnstn at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(akurtako at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-31 14:45:36 EDT --- rpmlint successful. build successful. 1. Please add 1.4.5 mininum for plexus-utils 2. Please add java-devel for BuildRequires 3. Please change description of javadoc to not use Javadoc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519695] Review Request: hunspell-shs - Shuswap hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311847.n7VIlNXJ010037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519695 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 14:47:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311850.n7VIoKHb010687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 14:50:19 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311846.n7VIkWOA009807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 14:46:30 EDT --- It's pretty early for wanting an F-12 branch of a new package, but we can create them now so I've gone ahead and done so. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:51:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:51:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311851.n7VIplsg021073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #16 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-31 14:51:46 EDT --- Is F-12 not the right thing to request? I presume the %{?dist} macro will expand to whatever suffix is appropriate. F-11 or F-12 (or both) is fine by me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519138] Review Request: libbs2b - Bauer stereophonic-to-binaural DSP library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311849.n7VInjuH020205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519138 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 14:49:44 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519488] Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311854.n7VIscVS011394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519488 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 14:54:36 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311856.n7VIuEtF022172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 14:56:13 EDT --- I've already processed the CVS request as provided, although I assume that anyone who requests an F-12 branch at this point understands where their builds will go. If you really wanted your packages to be available on F-11, you will need to make a new CVS request for an F-11 branch. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 18:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519425] Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311858.n7VIwS8S012605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519425 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 14:58:26 EDT --- Built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520485] Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311904.n7VJ4KFW014134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520485 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(akurtako at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-31 15:04:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > rpmlint successful. build successful. > > 1. Please add 1.4.5 mininum for plexus-utils Fixed. > > 2. Please add java-devel for BuildRequires Fixed. > > 3. Please change description of javadoc to not use Javadoc Fixed. New sources: Srpm URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-tools-2.1-5.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-tools.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520485] Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311912.n7VJCgP9025384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520485 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-31 15:12:41 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:17:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520485] Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311917.n7VJH1ZV017365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520485 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-31 15:17:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-plugin-tools Short Description: The Maven Plugin Tools contains the necessary tools to play with Maven Plugins. Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519695] Review Request: hunspell-shs - Shuswap hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311926.n7VJQvsa029094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519695 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520500] Review Request: References: Message-ID: <200908311931.n7VJVj6N030392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520500 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-31 15:31:44 EDT --- This is a full review request. Pre review was #500270 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520500] Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311932.n7VJW7Vs030599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520500 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: | Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: References: Message-ID: <200908311930.n7VJUrix020839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-31 15:30:52 EDT --- Updated to Gwenole's latest patch version, which adds OpenGL extensions. Spec in the same place. New .src.rpm is http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libva-0.30.4.1.sds5-2.fc11.src.rpm . -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:31:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518546] Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311931.n7VJVPRj021005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 --- Comment #4 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-31 15:31:24 EDT --- damn, wrong URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/libva-0.30.4.1.sds5-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519051] Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311939.n7VJdlAE022342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 15:39:46 EDT --- Here's a fixed maven2: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130018 It isn't yet in the yum repos, but manually downloading the RPMs and then using yum localinstall should work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:46:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520501] Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311946.n7VJkt3p023980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520501 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-31 15:46:54 EDT --- This is a full review request. Pre-review was #500271 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520491] Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311947.n7VJlkDX024219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520491 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com, | |xjakub at fi.muni.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xjakub at fi.muni.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:46:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520501] New: Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520501 Summary: Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-archiver.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-archiver-2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Maven Archiver is mainly used by plugins to handle packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 19:54:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520202] Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Doxia content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908311954.n7VJsNhV002572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520202 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 15:54:22 EDT --- Note that you'll need to build maven-doxia from CVS as it has yet to hit the repos. You'll probably also need to get maven-surefire from here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130035 and build plexus-registry from CVS. The latest maven build which should work is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130018 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520500] Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312008.n7VK8WiC028611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520500 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 16:08:31 EDT --- - no differences in source I get vs. what's in the SRPM X please make lines 19, 20, 90, and 95 < 80 characters ? should we make the versioned BRs and Rs on maven2 be >= 2.0.8? X let's drop the with_maven/without_maven junk at the top - macros sane - clean used appropriately - licensing fine - description and summary fine X please add a changelog entry - builds fine - rpmlint output is fine (doesn't like maven fragment in /etc and no files to mark as documentation) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520500] Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312012.n7VKCFwt029459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520500 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 16:12:14 EDT --- I forgot one thing: X please only own the fragment %{name} and specific pom (JPP-maven-enforcer-rule-api.pom) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520501] Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312017.n7VKHvDO007530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520501 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 16:17:56 EDT --- - naming and licensing fine X please wrap lines 47, 104, and 108 at <= 80 characters X please add a changelog entry X please only own the fragment %{name} and specific pom (JPP-maven-archiver.pom) X please drop the with_maven/without_maven stuff at the top of the .spec - sources fine (I get no differences between my export and the one in the tarball) ? should we make the maven2 R/BR >= 2.0.8? ? let's make the description "The Maven Archiver is used by other Maven plugins to handle packaging." - cleaning done appropriately - builds fine - macros good - rpmlint output is fine: $ rpmlint maven-archiver-2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint maven-archiver-2.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm maven-archiver.noarch: W: no-documentation maven-archiver.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-archiver 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint maven-archiver-javadoc-2.2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:22:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312022.n7VKMTQS031812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember 2009-08-31 16:22:28 EDT --- Adding a Requires line certainly counts as a change to the binary rpm. Anyway, the package looks good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312028.n7VKSEKM000583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 16:28:13 EDT --- icoutils-0.28.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/icoutils-0.28.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:28:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312028.n7VKSJQ1000626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 16:28:18 EDT --- icoutils-0.28.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/icoutils-0.28.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500264] Pre-Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312030.n7VKU0Et000844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500264 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 16:29:59 EDT --- Closing as full review complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500265] Pre-Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312030.n7VKU9SW010302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500265 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 16:30:08 EDT --- Closing as full review complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519051] Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312035.n7VKZfWc011682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-31 16:35:40 EDT --- Build successful. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520500] Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312037.n7VKbVZH003007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520500 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-31 16:37:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - no differences in source I get vs. what's in the SRPM > X please make lines 19, 20, 90, and 95 < 80 characters Fixed. %add_to_maven_depmap line can't be fixed because this breaks the macro. > ? should we make the versioned BRs and Rs on maven2 be >= 2.0.8? Done. > X let's drop the with_maven/without_maven junk at the top Fixed. > - macros sane > - clean used appropriately > - licensing fine > - description and summary fine > X please add a changelog entry Done. > - builds fine > - rpmlint output is fine (doesn't like maven fragment in /etc and no files to > mark as documentation) > X please only own the fragment %{name} and specific pom > (JPP-maven-enforcer-rule-api.pom) Fixed. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-enforcer-rule-api.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-enforcer-rule-api-1.0-0.1.a2.1.5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519051] Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312042.n7VKgPN8004170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 16:42:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven2-plugin-shade Short Description: Maven Shade Plugin Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520500] Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312046.n7VKkZNt014138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520500 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 16:46:34 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:44:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312044.n7VKieMs013376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-08-31 16:44:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-cppunit Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework Owners: kwizart Branches: devel F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520501] Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312045.n7VKjGqv013843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520501 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-31 16:45:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - naming and licensing fine > X please wrap lines 47, 104, and 108 at <= 80 characters Done. > X please add a changelog entry Done. > X please only own the fragment %{name} and specific pom > (JPP-maven-archiver.pom) Done > X please drop the with_maven/without_maven stuff at the top of the .spec Done > - sources fine (I get no differences between my export and the one in the > tarball) > ? should we make the maven2 R/BR >= 2.0.8? Done > ? let's make the description "The Maven Archiver is used by other Maven plugins > to handle packaging." Done. > - cleaning done appropriately > - builds fine > - macros good > - rpmlint output is fine: New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-archiver.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-archiver-2.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520501] Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312052.n7VKqTP6006144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520501 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 16:52:28 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:54:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520500] Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312054.n7VKsnO5006419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520500 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-31 16:54:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-enforcer-rule-api Short Description: This component provides the generic interfaces needed to implement custom rules for the maven-enforcer-plugin. Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520500] Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312055.n7VKtFes017121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520500 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 20:56:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520501] Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312056.n7VKubxU017394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520501 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-31 16:56:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-archiver Short Description: The Maven Archiver is used by other Maven plugins to handle packaging. Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 21:01:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312101.n7VL1ERb018492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #73 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-08-31 17:01:07 EDT --- The latest version is here: http://atrpms.net/name/yafaray/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 21:02:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520202] Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Doxia content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312102.n7VL2Fk1018666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520202 Jeff Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jjohnstn at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jjohnstn at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jeff Johnston 2009-08-31 17:02:14 EDT --- Build successful. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 21:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520202] Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Doxia content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312113.n7VLDWJ7021379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520202 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-31 17:13:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-doxia-sitetools Short Description: Doxia content generation framework Owners: overholt, akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 21:17:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312117.n7VLH2A0022392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-08-31 17:17:01 EDT --- Almost ready to pass review; there is a trivial summary change to make, and a more serious case of some dependencies not being listed Koji build (F-12): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1646731 MUST ? rpmlint: source -- clean clutter-sharp.x86_64: E: no-binary clutter-sharp.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These are harmless, rpmlint is not Mono-aware clutter-sharp-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized pkgconfig file for clutter-sharp clutter-sharp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The first should probably be fixed. The default spec file has Development files for %{name} which could be used. Esp. since we're packaging more than just the .pc file! OK package name OK spec file name OK package guideline-compliant OK license complies with guidelines OK license field accurate OK license file not deleted OK spec in US English OK spec legible OK source matches upstream OK builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded (Koji) OK build dependencies complete (Koji) FAIL on the other hand, runtime dependencies are not complete rpm -q --requires clutter-sharp rpm -e clutter 2>out.txt cat out.txt | grep sharp shows that the dependency on clutter is not picked up; this should be added manually. Also, once clutter-gtk can be enabled (prod the maintainer for an update?) you'd want to Requires: clutter-gtk, and meanwhile, now you want to %exclude %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/clutter-gtk-sharp.pc NA locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale NA library -> ldconfig NA relocatable: give reason OK own all directories OK no dupes in %files OK permission OK %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK macros used consistently OK Package contains code OK headers in -devel OK if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig OK devel requires versioned base package OK clean buildroot before install OK filenames UTF-8 SHOULD OK package build in mock on all architectures ? package functioned as described not tested OK scriplets are sane OK require package not files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 21:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312117.n7VLHE5v011729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #74 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-08-31 17:17:13 EDT --- Still doesn't work for me ... (even on x86_64 ) Where is a build.log ? Please submit a direct link to src.rpm/spec. Have you tried to force compilation with -fPIC -DPIC ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 21:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 512729] Review Request: perl-IO-Async - A collection of modules that implement asynchronous filehandle IO In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312118.n7VLITiD011891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512729 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 21:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248996] Review Request: libopensync-plugin-synce - Synce plugin for libopensync In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312130.n7VLU96P024917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248996 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler 2009-08-31 17:30:08 EDT --- Because F10 shipped with the libopensync 0.3x development version. There are plans to revert everything to 0.22 because the 0.3x versions are just broken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 22:13:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312213.n7VMDwk9022600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-31 18:13:56 EDT --- OK, let's see what we've got in gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc12.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible, changelog look fine now OK - MUST: SourceO URL is correct OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 c117a6b90e51d836ed2590e6f0f48164 OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. OK - SHOULD: License block added OK - SHOULD: ChangeLog was added OK - No more hardcoded path in desktop file OK - Autostarts only in desktops known to have a systray Famous last words: - The spec in the Sourec0 tarball still is at 0.4.1-5 but I guess this is a chicken and egg problem. - Would be nice if install also preserved time stamps. Ether add '-p' or make the Makefile accept as an argument, so one could use: make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL='install -p' in the spec. But these are minor and should be targeted upstream. Thanks for taking care of this program BTW. No blockers left, the gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm is APPROVED. Next steps: - Get yourself a Fedora accound and tell me it's name: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account - Request the CVS admin procedure: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 22:18:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312218.n7VMI8mw001525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #9 from Sean Middleditch 2009-08-31 18:18:07 EDT --- Alright, I'll change it to utils. I take it libproxy-bin is just grandfathered in then? I'll add the INSTALL="install -p" bit. The README was meant to be the license file. I only even included COPYING because autotools, in its infinite wisdom, practically forced me at gunpoint. :) I'll add COPYING to the doc list and remove docs from everything but the core pacakge. Also added NEWS to the doc list, since that is (or will be after another upstream release or two) relevant to regular users. Hmm. I'm getting an rpmlint warning on the subpackages for not including any documentation. Should I report this bug to fedora-packaging? ;) Note that I pushed an upstream release to 0.11 and updated the spec file accordingly. This mostly just fixes the configure.ac to actually check for and enable zlib, hence I re-added a BuildRequires on zlib-devel. libtelnet-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libtelnet-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. http://middleditch.us/sean/libtelnet.spec http://middleditch.us/sean/libtelnet-0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 22:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312228.n7VMSnMv003219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 22:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312244.n7VMirjM006175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #75 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-08-31 18:44:51 EDT --- The compilation used -fPIC only: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/patches/build.log http://dl.atrpms.net/all/yafaray-0.1.1-1.src.rpm http://dl.atrpms.net/all/yafaray.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 22:53:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312253.n7VMrVVM007887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 18:53:30 EDT --- 3proxy-0.6-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update 3proxy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0362 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 22:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312249.n7VMnMXD007092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-31 18:49:20 EDT --- OK: Requires: sqlite dropped OK: BuildRequires are correct with gnome-common OK: configure options are same OK: functions as described, although I noticed that blk-orbiter uses quite some CPU cycles when I plugged in a 200 GB USB HDD full of music. But I guess this is the normal indexing. (In reply to comment #17) > Dropped, added gstreamer-devel to the list. Huh? I don't see gstreamer-devel in the spec and I doubt it needed You mean clutter-gst-devel, right? > I couldn't find a better one and that's what gstreamer uses. How about System Environment/Daemons or User Interface/Desktops? Doesn't really matter, bickley-0.4.3-6.fc11.src.rpm is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 22:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312254.n7VMs7HN030028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.0.2-3.fc11 |5.0.2-3.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 22:54:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312254.n7VMs2ar008039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 18:54:01 EDT --- php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 22:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312259.n7VMxt1M009030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-31 18:59:54 EDT --- Thank you as always Christoph! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bickley Short Description: A meta data management API and framework Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:02:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312302.n7VN23Td031694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 --- Comment #7 from Dominic Hopf 2009-08-31 19:02:02 EDT --- No Problem, I was able now to have another look on your package. :) $ rpmlint wiipresent.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint wiipresent-0.7.5.2-3.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint wiipresent-0.7.5.2-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm wiipresent-debuginfo-0.7.5.2-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm wiipresent.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7.5.2-2 ['0.7.5.2-3.fc11', '0.7.5.2-3'] NOTE: You forgot to update your %changelog. MUSTs ----- OK: packaged is named according to the package naming guidelines OK: specfile name matches %{name}.spec OK: package seems to meet packaging guidelines OK: license in specfile matches actual license and meets licensing guidelines OK: license file is included in %doc OK: specfile is written in AE OK: specfile is legible OK: sourcefile in the package is the same as provided in the mentioned source, md5sum fits OK: package compiles successfully OK: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires N/A: package handles locales properly there are no locales installed with this package N/A: call ldconfig in %post and %postun there is no binary installed with this package OK: package is not designed to be relocatable OK: package owns directorys it creates OK: does not list a file more than once in the %files listing OK: %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly OK: %clean section is there and contains rm -rf %{buildroot} OK: macros are consistently used OK: package contains code N/A: subpackage for large documentation files there are no large documentation files OK: program runs properly without files listed in %doc N/A: header files are in a -devel package there are no header files N/A: static libraries are in a -static package there are no static libs N/A: require pkgconfig if package contains a pkgconfig(.pc) there is no pkgconfig file N/A: put .so-files into -devel package if there are library files with suffix there is no library with suffix, in fact there isn't any library N/A: devel package includes fully versioned dependency for the base package there is no devel package N/A: any libtool archives are removed there are no libtool archives OK: contains desktop file if it is a GUI application OK: package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages OK: buildroot is removed at beginning of %install N/A: filenames are encoded in UTF-8 not necessary since there are no non-ASCII filenames SHOULD ------ N/A: non-English translations for description and summary there are no other languages supported by this package, in fact it does not provide any localization. I assume localizations are not needed for this package. OK: package builds in mock OK: package builds into binary rpms for all supported architectures N/A: program runs I did not test myself if the program works as it should N/A: subpackages contain fully versioned dependency for the base package there are no subpackages N/A: pkgconfig file is placed in a devel package there is no pkgconfig file N/A: require package providing a file instead of the file itself no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required BLOCKERS: - As written above, you forgot to update your %changelog, i'd like to see this added before approving Just as hints: - Indenting the arguments for desktop-file-install would make the spec i bit more legible imho. It's on your's if you like to do so. - I don't see why you are using a wildcard for the manpage, I think writing 'wiipresent.1.gz' would do the job also. If there is no specific reason for that I would recommend you to fix that with your next release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520501] Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312318.n7VNIbOf013016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520501 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 19:18:35 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520485] Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312314.n7VNEbCa011979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520485 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 19:14:36 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 519051] Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312315.n7VNFEIt012449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519051 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 19:15:13 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312315.n7VNFssb012555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 19:15:53 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:17:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 520500] Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312317.n7VNHgLJ012878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520500 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 19:17:41 EDT --- I shortened the Short Description to actually be short. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312319.n7VNJ2ZM013234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-31 19:19:01 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312329.n7VNTS4w004043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:29:26 EDT --- perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object-0.06-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312329.n7VNTWtb015204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.06-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312335.n7VNZ6SM006057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:35:05 EDT --- vemana2000-fonts-1.1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312333.n7VNXkXt005454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:33:45 EDT --- perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object-0.06-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312336.n7VNaTlV017824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:36:28 EDT --- zyx-liveinstaller-0.1.10-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 516337] Review Request: perl-Devel-LeakGuard-Object - Scoped checks for object leaks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312333.n7VNXpXC016829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516337 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.06-1.fc10 |0.06-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:35:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312335.n7VNZBOS017450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312336.n7VNaYQT017875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.10-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312335.n7VNZJQv017588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:35:18 EDT --- R-affy-1.22.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-affy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9146 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:40:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:40:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312340.n7VNeWsO007630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:40:31 EDT --- R-affy-1.22.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-affy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9181 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:36:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:36:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312336.n7VNaRXP006692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-31 19:36:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Christoph: Did you apply the patch? Erm, obviously not. :( TBD items from comment #5: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/hornsey-* hornsey-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/hornsey-0.3/src/hrn-texture-cache.h hornsey-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/hornsey-0.3/src/hrn-texture-cache.c 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. chmod -x src/hrn-texture-cache.* in %prep will fix this. OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described, although there are *lots* of clutter related warnings. I also noted that bognor-regis-daemon will continue playing after hornsey was closed, but I guess this is intended. Remaining issues from comment #5: OK - bognorregis-0.4.10.patch applied OK - Description ends with a dot. OK - Description enhanced, but shouldn't it be "an Image" instead of "a Image"? OK - update-desktop-database sriptlet correct. OK - AUTHORS and README added to %doc Fix the rpmlint error, add the missing 'n' in the description and consider hornsey-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:40:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312340.n7VNetip019537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:40:54 EDT --- vemana2000-fonts-1.1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312343.n7VNhTLk020089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 --- Comment #19 from Christoph Wickert 2009-08-31 19:43:26 EDT --- Looks good so far, but the autotools issues from comment #15 remain. Ralf, you mind helping out with a patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312341.n7VNf0pA019568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.1-2.fc10 |1.1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312342.n7VNgYw2019882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2.1.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312342.n7VNg5nb019790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.0-2.20090829cvs.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:39:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312339.n7VNdvEk018975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:39:53 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cpptasks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-9177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517497] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin - Family of perl modules to streamline writing Nagios plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312339.n7VNdkJD018933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517497 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:39:45 EDT --- perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.33-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Nagios-Plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9172 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:42:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312342.n7VNg17H008215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:41:59 EDT --- eclipse-texlipse-1.3.0-2.20090829cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312342.n7VNgT8q008318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:42:28 EDT --- ghc-OpenGL-2.2.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312341.n7VNfmqV008165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-31 19:41:47 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cpptasks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9186 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312354.n7VNsrZL010631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-31 19:54:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hornsey Short Description: The moblin media player Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:53:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312353.n7VNrrpm022313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-31 19:53:52 EDT --- > Fix the rpmlint error, add the missing 'n' in the description and consider Thanks :) rpmlint error is fixed locally, but I think I being blind with the missing 'n'! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Aug 31 23:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200908312357.n7VNvoep011278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-31 19:57:49 EDT --- Imported and built in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.