[Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Aug 2 08:54:42 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509


Till Maas <opensource at till.name> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |opensource at till.name




--- Comment #4 from Till Maas <opensource at till.name>  2009-08-02 04:54:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)

> I'm unsure of the name.  The upstream site calls itself "pyhunspell" but the
> tarball and the module are called hunspell.  The guidelines only say "when in
> doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script",
> which would be "hunspell" (and to prepend "python-" if "py" isn't in the name).
>  Not really sure what's correct here.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29

Imho pyhunspell is ok here, because the project calls itself pyhunspell. But I
asked the packaging list to be sure:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-August/msg00002.html


> %description could use a period.
But it is not a complete sentence.


> I note that the compiler flags all appear twice; I think setup.py build gets
> them right without having them passed, but I'm not certain of it.

They come from rpmdev-newspec -t python, maybe they are needed for EPEL.


(In reply to comment #3)
> Bjorn's right about the licence; I grepped for lesser as usual and of course
> didn't find it.  You can bug upstream for a copy of the license text if you
> like; that's your business.  I don't find it productive to say that for well
> over half of the packages I see which don't bother to include license text.  

I will the change the license tag in the spec before importing it. Here is a
ticket to include the license text in the tarball and handle the other issues:
http://code.google.com/p/pyhunspell/issues/detail?id=1

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list