[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Aug 10 14:48:45 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466
Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal)
--- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2009-08-10 10:48:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> This is my first package.
>
> I generated the .spec file using rpmdev-newspec and then edited it with Xemacs,
> the tabs look fine to me.
When I look at the spec in xemacs I see that Group:, URL: and License: are not
aligned with the rest of the lines. As far as I can tell this is not a tab
width issue since those are spaces, not tabs, in the spec file. Anyway, this is
just an esthetical issue.
> rpmbuild doesn't seem to work without the mkdirs, is it expecting them in
> Makefile?
Yes, normally makefiles have them. As you are upstream, you should add them to
the sys_basher release.
> My license is the original BSD. I have advertising on my sys_basher website for
> my products and services but there is none in the program or in the source
> package.
Yes, original BSD, i.e. 4 clause BSD is marked in Fedora as "BSD with
Advertising" as you could have seen from the link in comment #2. It is *NOT*
compatible with GPL. As lm_sensors is under GPLv2+, including this package in
Fedora at the moment would break licensing. Blocking FE-LEGAL.
> The program requires lm_sensors, is rpmbuild smart enough to figure that out
> from the source code?
Yes, rpm checks out everything that has been compiled dynamically and requires
the relevant libraries.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list