[Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 14 16:17:11 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520
Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |overholt at redhat.com
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> 2009-08-14 12:17:10 EDT ---
Thanks for the submission. Everything looks pretty good. See comments below.
- it would be nice to use %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but it's not
a blocker
- my generated source tarball has a different md5sum but the contents are the
same (likely timestamp differences)
- will we build with maven once it's updated?
- other than the non-conffile-in-etc for the maven pom, everything is rpmlint
clean
- what provides %add_to_maven_depmap? I don't see it doing much in my log. Do
we need a BR on maven?
- please provide a link to the origin of the OSGi manifest
It builds fine locally for me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list