[Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Aug 14 16:17:11 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520


Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |overholt at redhat.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |overholt at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com>  2009-08-14 12:17:10 EDT ---
Thanks for the submission.  Everything looks pretty good.  See comments below.

- it would be nice to use %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but it's not
a blocker
- my generated source tarball has a different md5sum but the contents are the
same (likely timestamp differences)
- will we build with maven once it's updated?
- other than the non-conffile-in-etc for the maven pom, everything is rpmlint
clean
- what provides %add_to_maven_depmap?  I don't see it doing much in my log.  Do
we need a BR on maven?
- please provide a link to the origin of the OSGi manifest

It builds fine locally for me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list