[Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Aug 25 09:32:50 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724
--- Comment #46 from pjp <pj.pandit at yahoo.co.in> 2009-08-25 05:32:44 EDT ---
Hello Tom,
First of all thank you so much for your suggestions, I really appreciate it.
(In reply to comment #45)
> Recommendation: include one initscript per service and make the names of
> the initscripts match the services they control.
Okay, I'll do the changes.
> Second, the package is missing some important parts of djbdns -- axfdns,
> walldns, and rbldns, for example. While these parts are probably used less
> often than dnscache or tinydns, they are well established within DJB's bundle,
> and most people will expect them to be included in any package calling itself
> "djbdns". Recommendation: include the missing pieces.
Yes, they are in the queue and will be released in due course.
> Recommendation: split the package into logical subpackages,
> following Pavel Lisý's scheme, which makes a lot of sense from an
> administrator's point of view (and ought to be immediately understandable
> to anyone familiar with how to deploy from DJB's bundle).
I understand the point, but when I look at so many rpms/subpackages, it just
appears to be confusing to me. Anyway, I'll look at the sub-packaging again and
try to do it.
I was confused about, the few client tools like dnsip/dnsq/dnsname etc. and
with which server(dnscache/tinydns) should I package them or to make a separate
sub package for them.
> Fourth, DJB's bundle relied upon the multilog program from daemontools to
> handle logging, whereas our proposed package writes to log files directly.
> But multilog did more than just write to files; it also inserted timestamps,
> which our logs lack. Timestamps are essential in system logs, so we must
> put them back in somehow. Maybe we could use syslog or bring back multilog.
> Recommendation: Restore the timestamps in logs.
Yeah, I'm working on the logging part as well, will do the necessary changes.
> This package is looking great. I think it's just a few tweaks away from being
> both a good Fedora package and a faithful representation of everything that
> made DJB's bundle great. Keep up the good work!
Thanks a lot Tom, I sincerely appreciate it.
Thank you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list