[Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Aug 31 16:57:28 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-08-31 12:57:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Replaced use of %makeinstall. I got that from the Fedora examples. I'm
> getting rather irritated by the Fedora documentation being contradictory and
> out of date for package building.
If you find something contradictory on Fedora documentation, please
notice it on fedora-packaging mailing list.
For -2:
* Packaging structure
- If you want to split binaries under %_bindir into a subpackage,
usually such subpackage is named as "-utils" on Fedora.
* About make install
- I still recommend to add 'INSTALL="install -p"' option to
'make install' to keep timestamps on installed files
(especially on header files to be installed)
* Documents
- You don't have to include a document file to all subpackages.
- Including license text (in this package "COPYING") to the main
package is rather mandatory
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list