From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 00:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:03:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010003.nB103NG7028350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-11-30 19:03:22 EDT --- - Instead of %define libname f2c-libs %package -n %{libname} %files -n %{libname} just use %package libs %files libs and so on. - You don't need Provides: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} since the -devel package will be already %{name}-%{devel}. - Version the requires fully in the -devel package, i.e. Requires: %{libname} = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 00:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:25:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010025.nB10PrPX001203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #43 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-30 19:25:51 EDT --- Jochen, No disrecpect intended, but I get the feeling that you don't have a full handle on this package. There is no _upstream_ ftp source, as in sourceforge or something, because it is a collection of other smaller works from various places, assembled together for Debian. Now fedora can benefit from my integration work (or simple aggregation) and use the Debian source tar ball as the "source". Then, forget about my CVS repo and use the Debian source tar ball, but be aware than it is a moving target. ;-) Otherwise, the Debian tar ball is created from the make-orig.sh script in CVS, but the Debian diff file is created by the Debian package-building scripts. Hope this helps. Of course Arun SAG understood all this. Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 00:43:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:43:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010043.nB10huCc005721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2009-11-30 19:43:55 EDT --- The patch is not yet working: - strcat(filename, "/icons/InvulgoTracker.png"); + strcat(filename, "/icons/InvulgoTracker."); This needs to be "/pixmaps/InvulgoTracker.png" both times. I guess you have confused this with the desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 00:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010045.nB10jGui018796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-30 19:45:13 EDT --- I'm pretty sure that license is non-free, but I'll run it past Red Hat Legal. Assuming I'm wrong, we'd definitely need for the IUCr to give us an unrestricted patent grant that applies to us and all possible users and downstream users/modifiers/distributors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 01:03:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:03:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491790] Review Request: mediawiki-SpamBlacklist - An extension to provide a Spam Blacklist management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010103.nB113gV9023234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491790 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-30 20:03:40 EDT --- Just following up on this one, did you get any kind of response from the upstream author? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 01:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:05:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010105.nB115rSX011034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-30 20:05:50 EDT --- Any update here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 01:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010105.nB1154Aj010903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #23 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-30 20:05:01 EDT --- Is there any update here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 01:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:09:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010109.nB119al1024599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 --- Comment #19 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-30 20:09:33 EDT --- FWIW, we are waiting to hear back from Till Jaeger regarding the trademark licensing details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 01:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:07:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010107.nB117S1R024200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #36 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-11-30 20:07:22 EDT --- I'm going to lift FE-Legal here, on the assumption that this package will use the ASL 2.0 JSON package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 01:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010145.nB11jWXh000384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #8 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 20:45:31 EDT --- All the requires are fully versioned. %{libname} and %{develname} removed from all the packages. All the subpackages renamed to basename{-doc,-libs,-devel}. Destop files created in %prep. Patching moved from %build to %prep. The one exception is the molrender subpackage in mpqc, but it seems that could be moved into the main mpqc package with the other mpqc binaries. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-11.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 01:47:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:47:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010147.nB11l7uq020035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #6 from Carl Byington 2009-11-30 20:47:06 EDT --- Those should all be fixed in: http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c-20031026-3.0.3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 02:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010206.nB126Xag024646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #8 from William Witt 2009-11-30 21:06:32 EDT --- The bonobo .server file must be in either /usr/lib/... or /usr/lib64/... but it's plain text so it doesn't really matter which one. Since the the package is purely interpreted, it makes sense to make it a noarch package, but the value of %{_libdir} changes based on build architecture. Is this a case where hard coding the file paths would be accepted? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 02:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:51:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010251.nB12pxBb017296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #3 from Arun SAG 2009-11-30 21:51:58 EDT --- - As Mamoru Tasaka said MD5sum mismatch: The md5sum of source package included in src rpm mismatches with the package downloaded from source0 url c3fc06df65b4aea21fbf4e26a6d57f19 <- md5sum of package downloaded from upstream e5a756ca002a37adc85c4c4f12f6ba9c <- md5sum of package in src rpm Any modification to upstream source should be added as a patch. - If its your first package and you need SPONSOR please update BLOCKS field to FE-NEEDSPONSOR Please check http://shakthimaan.com/downloads/glv/howtos/packaging-rpm-workflow.html - Consider posting links to successful koji builds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:13:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010413.nB14DpH6007392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:13:50 EDT --- dgc-0.98-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010413.nB14Dvvf007438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.98-3.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:14:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:14:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010414.nB14EC8D007506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.2-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010414.nB14E7HW026008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:14:06 EDT --- python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:15:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010415.nB14FSGu026627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.0-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010415.nB14FNd6008363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:15:21 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:16:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010416.nB14GPML008691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:16:21 EDT --- poco-1.3.5-8.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update poco'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12333 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:22:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010422.nB14MBah011022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:22:09 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010421.nB14LkGo010904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:21:45 EDT --- jaxodraw-2.0.1-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jaxodraw'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12355 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010422.nB14MG1q029217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.0-2.fc12 |1.3.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010425.nB14PVlc030442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.8.3-4.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010425.nB14P3Zr030308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:25:02 EDT --- jaxodraw-2.0.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jaxodraw'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12377 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:25:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:25:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010425.nB14PP8F012427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:25:24 EDT --- rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010429.nB14TcQL013562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:29:36 EDT --- imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:29:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010429.nB14ThNP013623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.0.11-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010426.nB14Q9k1012596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:26:08 EDT --- mingw32-plib-1.8.5-0.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-plib'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12383 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:31:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010431.nB14V38K032608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:31:02 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010430.nB14UCbA032339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:30:11 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:31:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010431.nB14VA9k014755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.9-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:30:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010430.nB14UKTv014508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.103-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010434.nB14Yvnb001570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:34:56 EDT --- python-pep8-0.4.2-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533753] Review Request: python-pep8 - Python style guide checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010435.nB14Z2kZ001821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533753 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.2-2.fc11 |0.4.2-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:39:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010439.nB14d4jf003760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:39:04 EDT --- dgc-0.98-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:39:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010439.nB14dAZB003801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.98-3.fc12 |0.98-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010445.nB14jrW4007351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.9-2.fc10 |1.9-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:46:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:46:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010446.nB14kQuM007601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:46:22 EDT --- ghmm-0.7-4.svn2286.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:42:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010442.nB14gTXI005869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:42:28 EDT --- rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:46:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:46:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010446.nB14kVFa007648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7-4.svn2286.el5 |0.7-4.svn2286.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:42:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010442.nB14gYWn005908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.8.3-4.fc12 |3.8.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:45:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010445.nB14jomH021567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #4 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-30 23:45:48 EDT --- There is an unwanted executable permission given to TODO file. How do I create a patch for it, rpmlint is giving error for it, should I leave it out from the %doc section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 04:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010445.nB14jmos021530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-30 23:45:47 EDT --- gargi-fonts-1.9-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 05:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:15:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010515.nB15FNAZ028516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 --- Comment #5 from Carl Byington 2009-12-01 00:15:21 EDT --- http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/rasmol-2.7.5-7.fc12.src.rpm changes from ghemical review: - create desktop file in %%prep - remove __ macros http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1839653 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 05:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:22:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010522.nB15MjA3016655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-01 00:22:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-ruby_parser Short Description: A ruby parser written in pure ruby Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 05:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:26:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010526.nB15Qohg017687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-01 00:26:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-ruby2ruby Short Description: Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 05:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010525.nB15PFZW017347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #9 from William Witt 2009-12-01 00:25:14 EDT --- Went with forgoing the noarch so that I could use %{_libdir}, then using some sed-fu to "patch" the source files based on build arch. I there is a better way of doing this, please let me know. rpmlint: [unamanic at gimli ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/mintmenu-4.9.0-9.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [unamanic at gimli ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/mintmenu-4.9.0-9.fc12.x86_64.rpm mintmenu.x86_64: E: no-binary mintmenu.x86_64: W: no-documentation mintmenu.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/bonobo/servers /mintMenu.server 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. no-binary: it's pure python, so there won't be one no-documentation: upstream doesn't have any either script-without-shebang: this file is an xml bonobo server file not a script, I'm not sure what rpmlint is expecting here koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1839656 Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.0-9.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 06:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 01:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010644.nB16i32F016731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-01 01:44:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > There is an unwanted executable permission given to TODO file. Just use chmod at %prep. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 08:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 03:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010830.nB18USNj030750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #24 from Edouard Bourguignon 2009-12-01 03:30:25 EDT --- Only the weather icons are concerned by the restrictive license? I've just opened a ticket as you suggested https://fedorahosted.org/design-team/ticket/105 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 08:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 03:30:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010830.nB18UZbX030787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2009-12-01 03:30:34 EDT --- I don't see the need to continue the strange release tag, just change 3.0.3 to 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 08:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 03:34:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010834.nB18YdiE013643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 03:34:38 EDT --- volpack-1.0c7-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/volpack-1.0c7-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 08:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 03:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010835.nB18ZMp3031915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 03:35:21 EDT --- volpack-1.0c7-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/volpack-1.0c7-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 08:33:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 03:33:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010833.nB18XiQa031360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 03:33:14 EDT --- volpack-1.0c7-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/volpack-1.0c7-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 08:43:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 03:43:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540885] Review Request: cableswig - Create interfaces to interpreted languages for templated code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010843.nB18h0pB000907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540885 --- Comment #2 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-01 03:42:59 EDT --- Hello Mamoru, thanks for your comment. I looked at fedora people, but it seems I'd need to be already sponsored in order to get the space. A friend of mine could host them for a while at: ftp://85.54.198.199/FEDORA/cableswig-cvs20091120-1.fc12.src.rpm ftp://85.54.198.199/FEDORA/cableswig.spec ftp://85.54.198.199/FEDORA/InsightToolkit-3.16.0-1.fc12.src.rpm ftp://85.54.198.199/FEDORA/InsightToolkit.spec I'm looking forward to hearing from you soon, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 08:52:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 03:52:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010852.nB18qSrk018160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #20 from Johan Vromans 2009-12-01 03:52:08 EDT --- In a way, yes. I managed to contact one of the original authors and he promised to make the necessary changes. That was several weeks ago but I didn't get a response since. I'll try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 08:59:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 03:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010859.nB18xqiP020004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #19 from Roman Rakus 2009-12-01 03:59:48 EDT --- # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] ok # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] ok # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] ok # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] ok # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] ok # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] ok # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] ok # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] ok # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] ok # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] ok # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] ok # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] ok ---- Summary: Fix rpmlint errors. Check licences: - Many times LGPL (v2.1) (with incorrect FSF address) - aspell-0.60.6/modules/speller/default/affix.cpp: BSD (2 clause) - aspell-0.60.6/misc/po-filter.c: GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address) - aspell-0.60.6/ltmain.sh: GPL (v2 or later) - aspell-0.60.6/myspell/munch.c: BSD (2 clause) Remove using %{_datadir}/locale/*. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 09:08:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:08:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010908.nB198Jn8022743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-01 04:08:18 EDT --- - Are the .la files necessary for something? Get rid of them e.g. by running find %{buildroot}%{_libdir} -name *.la -exec rm -rf {} \; at the end of %install. - Try if --disable-static in %configure gets rid of the static library. - Molrender needs to own %{_datadir}/molrender/ not just %{_datadir}/molrender/molrender.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 09:04:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:04:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010904.nB194l9B021591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-01 04:04:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I don't see the need to continue the strange release tag, > just change 3.0.3 to 4. Yes, I agree. You could even reset it to 1, since the package hasn't been in Fedora for ages. ** By the way, you're using Source, but Patch0. Please be consistent, and use Source0 or drop the 0 from the patch. ** Looking at "changes" on netlib, the latest entry is Sat Apr 11 18:06:00 MDT 2009 src/sysdep.c src/sysdeptest.c: tweak for MacOSX (include ). so the version field should be updated to correspond to it (and the source be updated if you are using the version from the old spec file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 09:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:07:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010907.nB19741v007111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 --- Comment #20 from Roman Rakus 2009-12-01 04:07:02 EDT --- Also check comment #17. Changes are not made in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 09:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495246] Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010909.nB199vJi023163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495246 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-01 04:09:55 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-POE-Test-Loops New Branches: EL-5 Owners: stevetraylen Hi I contacted Chris a few weeks ago and he was happy for me to take perl-POE* in EPEL. Also explicitly for perl-POE-Test-Loops I asked again last week to confirm and no reply was given. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 09:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:17:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542313] Review Request: QTeXEngine - Add-on for QtiPlot to enable the export of 2D plots to TeX In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010917.nB19H7Pw025309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542313 --- Comment #1 from supercyper 2009-12-01 04:17:06 EDT --- koji build succeed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1839905 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 09:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 04:17:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541207] Review Request: liborigin2 - library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912010917.nB19H3XP009641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541207 --- Comment #2 from supercyper 2009-12-01 04:17:02 EDT --- koji build succeed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1839880 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 10:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011006.nB1A6Cpf005440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 05:06:11 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 10:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011006.nB1A6H6Q005476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 05:06:16 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 10:08:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:08:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011008.nB1A8c6r005815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Stefan Seidel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bz at stefanseidel.info --- Comment #43 from Stefan Seidel 2009-12-01 05:08:31 EDT --- Here are my 0.02 - I added build dependencies of gcc and gcc-c++, because it won't build without them. Maybe also need to add make, I'm not sure. Also, iconv {} -o {} gives a bunch of 0 byte files -> not what is intented I think. So I took the easy way out and used recode. I was building this on CentOS 5.4, and with these changes and the removal of "lzma" (package is not available here) and "perl(extra)" from the final dependencies I was able to build and install and run 'dpkg -h' just fine. --- dpkg.spec.latest 2009-12-01 10:56:33.000000000 +0100 +++ dpkg.spec 2009-12-01 10:59:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Patch1: fedora-fix-paths.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: zlib-devel, bzip2-devel, libselinux-devel, gettext, ncurses-devel +BuildRequires: zlib-devel, bzip2-devel, libselinux-devel, gettext, ncurses-devel, gcc, gcc-c++, recode %description @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ chmod +x %{__perl_requires} # fix to get man pages translated to utf-8 -find man -type f -exec /usr/bin/iconv -f latin1 -t utf8 {} -o {} ';' +find man -type f -exec /usr/bin/recode latin1..utf8 {} ';' %build %configure LDFLAGS='-lselinux' \ @@ -215,6 +215,10 @@ %changelog +* Tue Dec 1 2009 Stefan Seidel - 1.15.4.1-2 +- add required build dependencies +- fix wrong use of iconv + * Tue Nov 10 2009 Andrew Colin Kissa - 1.15.4.1-1 - Upgrade to latest upstream - review changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 10:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:19:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011019.nB1AJUA6025996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #44 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-12-01 05:19:28 EDT --- - The dependencies are not required. - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 I will test the other changes on fedora and update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 10:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 05:32:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011032.nB1AWd9P029507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #2 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-01 05:32:38 EDT --- Following Mamoru comments on bug 540885, I looked at fedora people for an alternative way to store the specs and srpms, but it seems I'd need to be already sponsored in order to get the space. A friend of mine offered to host them for a while at: ftp://85.54.198.199/FEDORA/InsightToolkit-3.16.0-1.fc12.src.rpm ftp://85.54.198.199/FEDORA/InsightToolkit.spec Hope this could ease the review process :) Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 11:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540885] Review Request: cableswig - Create interfaces to interpreted languages for templated code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011115.nB1BFpEn007778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540885 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-01 06:15:50 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 11:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:15:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011115.nB1BFJXY023253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-01 06:15:18 EDT --- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 11:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:15:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540885] Review Request: cableswig - Create interfaces to interpreted languages for templated code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011115.nB1BF6LO023095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540885 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-01 06:15:05 EDT --- Removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I just sponsored Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 11:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011116.nB1BGS6I023473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-01 06:16:28 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 12:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:26:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542991] New: Review Request: ArpON> - Portable handler daemon with nice tools to handle all ARP aspects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ArpON> - Portable handler daemon with nice tools to handle all ARP aspects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542991 Summary: Review Request: ArpON> - Portable handler daemon with nice tools to handle all ARP aspects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sm at sandro-mathys.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ArpON.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ArpON-1.90-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: ArpON (Arp handler inspectiON) has a lot of features and makes Arp a bit safer. This is possible using two kinds of anti Arp Poisoning techniques, the first is based on SARPI or "Static Arp Inspection", the second on DARPI or "Dynamic Arp Inspection" approach. Builds on i686 and x86_64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1840199 rpmlint is clean: $ rpmlint -i {SPECS,RPMS/i686,SRPMS}/ArpON* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 12:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 07:22:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542990] New: Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 Summary: Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/root.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/root-5.24.00b-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The ROOT system provides a set of object oriented frameworks with all the functionality needed to handle and analyse large amounts of data in a very efficient way. Having the data defined as a set of objects, specialised storage methods are used to get direct access to the separate attributes of the selected objects, without having to touch the bulk of the data. Included are histogramming methods in 1, 2 and 3 dimensions, curve fitting, function evaluation, minimisation, graphics and visualisation classes to allow the easy setup of an analysis system that can query and process the data interactively or in batch mode. Thanks to the built in CINT C++ interpreter the command language, the scripting, or macro, language and the programming language are all C++. The interpreter allows for fast prototyping of the macros since it removes the time consuming compile/link cycle. It also provides a good environment to learn C++. If more performance is needed the interactively developed macros can be compiled using a C++ compiler. The system has been designed in such a way that it can query its databases in parallel on MPP machines or on clusters of workstations or high-end PCs. ROOT is an open system that can be dynamically extended by linking external libraries. This makes ROOT a premier platform on which to build data acquisition, simulation and data analysis systems. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1839820 The ppc64 build fails with a segfault - so ExcludeArch is used rpmlint output: Root uses the CINT runtime C++ interpreter and therefore needs access to its classed header files at runtime, so the headers are not devel files, even though rpmlint complains about them. Root also uses short snippets of C++ code in its configuration files that is parsed by the CINT interpreter to do its plugin initialisation. The presence of these C++ source files in the packages is not a packaging error, but rpmlint complains about these too. All the documentation is in the doc package so most of the other rpms complain about missing documentation. Filtering out the "no-documentation" and "devel-file-in-non-devel-package" warnings, the following rpmlint output remains: [ellert at ellert ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/*/*root-* | sed -e /no-documentation/d -e /devel-file-in-non-devel-package/d root-doc.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/root-5.24.00b/test/RootShower/.rootshowerrc root-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/root-5.24.00b/test/tstring.cxx root-core.x86_64: E: rpath-in-buildconfig /usr/bin/root-config lines ['42'] root-proofd.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name proofd ('root-proofd', 'root-proofdd') root-rootd.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name rootd ('root-rootd', 'root-rootdd') 79 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2542 warnings. The rpath-in-buildconfig error is just a simple string match picked up by rpmlint. Root was configured with --disable-rpath, and the root-config script generated by configure does the right thing: [ellert at ellert root]$ root-config --has-rpath no [ellert at ellert root]$ root-config --libs -L/usr/lib64/root -lCore -lCint -lRIO -lNet -lHist -lGraf -lGraf3d -lGpad -lTree -lRint -lPostscript -lMatrix -lPhysics -lMathCore -lThread -lz -pthread -lm -ldl -rdynamic The string with the rpath is present in the root-config file, but is only printed out when root's configure was run without --disable-rpath. So there is no need to patch the script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 13:28:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:28:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011328.nB1DSU3h000461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 13:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:27:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011327.nB1DRb5P032274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at matbooth.co.uk --- Comment #3 from Mat Booth 2009-12-01 08:27:36 EDT --- I will take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 13:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:33:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011333.nB1DX6QJ001683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #45 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-01 08:33:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > Also, iconv {} -o {} gives a bunch of 0 byte files -> not what is intented I > think. Correct. It's a classic beginner's mistake to redirect a program's output to its input. You need to use a temporary file. > So I took the easy way out and used recode. Please don't. Use iconv. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 13:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 08:35:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525927] Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011335.nB1DZCVB001920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525927 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalev at smartlink.ee AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kalev at smartlink.ee Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-01 08:35:10 EDT --- Taking for review. I have never dealt with orphaned packages before, but it appears that you have already uploaded a newer version into CVS. I'll base my review on the following files instead: Spec URL: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/incollector/devel/incollector.spec?view=markup&pathrev=incollector-1_2-1_fc13 SRPM URL: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/incollector/1.2/1.fc13/src/incollector-1.2-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 14:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:09:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226102] Merge Review: lockdev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011409.nB1E9fpU009865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226102 --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-01 09:09:40 EDT --- Review follows: NO source files match upstream. - source URL gives 404 YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines. YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. YES dist tag is present. YES build root is correct. (no build root specified) NO license field matches the actual license. - the actual license seems to be LGPLv2, under LGPLv2+ is licensed only baudboy.h YES license is open source-compatible. NO License text included in package. NO latest version is being packaged. - is there a reason for not packaging 1.0.3? YES BuildRequires are proper. YES compiler flags are appropriate. YES %clean is present. YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). YES debuginfo package looks complete. YES rpmlint output is sane. lockdev.x86_64: E: setgid-binary /usr/sbin/lockdev lock 02711 lockdev.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/lockdev 02711 lockdev.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/lockdev 02711 These are ok. YES final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. YES shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths, ldconfig called in %post and %postun. YES owns the directories it creates. YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. YES no duplicates in %files. YES file permissions are appropriate. YES code, not content. YES documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. - documentation should include some files like AUTHORS, ChangeLog YES %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. YES headers packaged in -devel subpackage YES no pkgconfig files. YES no libtool .la droppings. YES not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 14:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:11:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226102] Merge Review: lockdev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011411.nB1EBiCG011907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226102 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 14:20:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:20:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011420.nB1EKwUh014703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #21 from Ivana Varekova 2009-12-01 09:20:54 EDT --- Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 14:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525927] Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011428.nB1ESE4v015658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525927 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Janssen 2009-12-01 09:28:12 EDT --- Yes, the old one was really old. And there was some build problem with devel (mass rebuild IIRC). Sorry, i forgot to update the spec and srpm here. Will do that today. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 14:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011453.nB1ErArO014348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-01 09:53:09 EDT --- Notes: * I'm not sure about name. Perhaps 'itk' would be better name than InsightToolkit? * No need to re-define %{name} and %{version}. Just put correct values to proper fields (Name: and Version:) at the top of the spec. * Source0 url should be corrected. See Source1 for example. * %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.cmake should be placed in devel rather than in main package, I believe. Also, I'm not sure this is a correct place to put CMake files in. * Unowned directory - %{_libdir}/%{name} . Just list it as %dir in main package's %files section. * Source1 should be added as %doc in devel-subpackage * In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} * Files within 'Copyrght' foler must be packages as %doc. * Consider, also, packaging of 'Docmentation' and 'Examples' folders. Please, comment my notes, and I'll continue. BTW, since I sponsored you, you can store files at fedorapeople.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 14:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525927] Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011458.nB1EwGEq016563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525927 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-01 09:58:15 EDT --- Thomas, I already got the spec and srpm from pkgdb / koji, no need to duplicate those here. Fedora review incollector-1.2-1.fc13.src.rpm 2009-12-01 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint says: incollector.i686: E: no-binary incollector.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. All these rpmlint warnings/errors are expected for mono packages and can be ignored. + rpmlint output + package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + specfile name matches base package name + package meets Packaging Guidelines + The stated license (GPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license ! The license doesn't match actual package license Every source file contains the following lines: * Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Marcin Krystian Krzywonos * License: GNU/GPL version 2 I think this means that the license tag should read 'GPLv2' + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 6701ac13da29119cd6719be3edcf30aa incollector-1.2.tar.gz 6701ac13da29119cd6719be3edcf30aa Download/incollector-1.2.tar.gz + Package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane + Spec file handles locales properly n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package doesn't bundle copies of system libraries + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Proper permissions and %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf %{buildroot} + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files + Proper .desktop file handling + Package doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf %{buildroot} + all filename are valid UTF-8 ! The following pushd/popd commands in the spec file without anything in between seem useless and should be removed: pushd po popd ! You have the following sed command to fix lib64 dir: sed -i 's|/usr/lib|%{_libdir}|' %{name} I think a proper way to do that is fix script.in instead (that's something you could also send upstream): -exec @MONO@ @prefix@/lib/incollector/incollector.exe $MONO_EXTRA_ARGS "$@" +exec @MONO@ @pkglibdir@/incollector.exe $MONO_EXTRA_ARGS "$@" Attaching the patch to the bug report in a separate file too. ! Consider removing %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.ico at the end of %install. I very much doubt anything uses .ico files in Fedora when there's a matching .png file in %{_datadir}/pixmaps/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 15:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011500.nB1F0jA0026531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-01 10:00:44 EDT --- * I just found, that ITK contains numerous bundled libraries, many of them are duplication Fedora's system ones - see 'Utilities' directory. This should be fixed (and necessary BuildRequires should be added). * Also I'm anxious about the contents of 'Code/Patented' folder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 15:02:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525927] Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011502.nB1F2eUS018101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525927 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-01 10:02:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=375079) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=375079) Patch to fix hardcoded @prefix@/lib/ dir in wrapper script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 15:05:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:05:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542990] Review Request: root - Numerical data analysis framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011505.nB1F5cfO019285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542990 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |juanucleus at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-01 10:05:34 EDT --- *** Bug 451744 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 15:05:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:05:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011505.nB1F5biZ019256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CANTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #39 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-01 10:05:34 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 542990 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 15:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011543.nB1FhEat007536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-01 10:43:12 EDT --- sed is ok, but should be done in %pre, so that package doesn't need to be touched after installation. If possible, try to preserver the timestams of the files, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackagingTricks I wonder it tracker is really sufficient or if tracker-search-tool is required. I think it is. %{_bindir}/mintmenu runs gconftool-2, so "Requires: Gconf2" is missing. %{_bindir}/mintmenu should be installed in %{_libexecdir} For licensing reasons, you are not allowed to include any Fedora icons in the package. You must use the logos provided by the fedora-logos package and Require: system-logos. system-logos is a virtual provides, so the package can be rebranded. If possible, use a generic name for the icon in the code, e.g. "icon-panel-menu.png" which is provided by different themes and on several distros such as Rhel or CentOS. Not sure about license of the mint icon, I think best is to leave it out. Disable building the empty debuginfo package with "%global debug_package %{nil}" at the beginning of the spec. /usr/lib64/bonobo/servers/mintMenu.server must not be executable, this is what causes the script-without-shebang error in rpmlint. I'd rather use install than cp because you can set proper permissions of the files. (In reply to comment #6) > How does one specify /usr/lib in a no arch package without using an absolute > path? This is where upstream places the files. %{_prefix}/lib, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros But I agree with Terje that the noarch stuff should be moved to %{_datadir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 15:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011556.nB1Fuln6011826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #46 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-01 10:56:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > Also, iconv {} -o {} gives a bunch of 0 byte files -> not what is intented I > think. So I took the easy way out and used recode. [tasaka1 at localhost TEMP]$ echo "??????????" > kanji.txt [tasaka1 at localhost TEMP]$ ls -al kanji.txt -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 31 2009-12-02 00:52 kanji.txt [tasaka1 at localhost TEMP]$ iconv -f UTF-8 -t EUC-JP kanji.txt -o kanji.txt [tasaka1 at localhost TEMP]$ ls -la kanji.txt -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 21 2009-12-02 00:52 kanji.txt [tasaka1 at localhost TEMP]$ iconv -f EUC-JP -t UTF-8 kanji.txt -o kanji.txt [tasaka1 at localhost TEMP]$ ls -al kanji.txt -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 31 2009-12-02 00:53 kanji.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 16:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011607.nB1G75Nj015714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #47 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-12-01 11:07:03 EDT --- In rely to comment #46, #43 That's exactly what i thought, I have double checked on my fedora build machine, i do not get any 0 byte files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 16:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226165] Merge Review: mt-st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011655.nB1GtSII001896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dhorak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-01 11:55:26 EDT --- Review follows: OK source files match upstream: fdd5f5ec673c9f630a102ceff7612774 mt-st-1.1.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock. OK debuginfo package looks complete. NO rpmlint is silent. mt-st.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit mt-st.x86_64: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit mt-st.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit mt-st.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/stinit mt-st.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name stinit ('mt-st', 'mt-std') Enabled by default and incoherent name are ok, but the script should be probably updated to match the Fedora init script guidelines. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK scriptlets are sane. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 17:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:19:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011719.nB1HJPZZ031611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet 2009-12-01 12:19:24 EDT --- Please, fix < Requires: php-pear-(OLE) > Requires: php-pear(OLE) %clean section is mandatory Please update to latest version 0.9.2 (great, this package seems back to life) as it fixes a number of bugs, especially php 5.3 compatibility. package.xml in 0.9.1 is an old V1 one, in 0.9.2 is a new V2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 17:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:31:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011731.nB1HVN0a011534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #6 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-01 12:31:21 EDT --- I have made the necessary changes. Here are the updated files. SPEC: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/artha/artha.spec SRPM: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/artha/artha-0.9.1-2.fc11.src.rpm The project artha is licensed under GPLv2, will it be okay to change it GPLv2+ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 17:30:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:30:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011730.nB1HUcwt002167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 --- Comment #48 from Stefan Seidel 2009-12-01 12:30:36 EDT --- Probably the effects of http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ca668b298e9b8c2c191eae259fddfed5e03a8dd4 Someone complained at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=439720 On my Debian Etch, Lenny and CentOS 5.4 Systems with glibc versions ranging from 2.3.6 to 2.7 it gives 0 bytes, but not on Ubuntu glibc 2.10.1. Anyway, here's the glibc-independent version: +find man -type f -exec /usr/bin/iconv -f latin1 -t utf8 {} -o {}._utf8 ';' -exec mv -f {}._utf8 {} ';' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:25:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011825.nB1IPNxg026106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.021-1.fc11 |1.021-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011825.nB1IP5Zg025949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.17-2.fc12 |3.17-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:26:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:26:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194559] Review Request: perl-Event In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011826.nB1IQFDh019197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194559 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 13:26:12 EDT --- perl-Event-1.13-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194559] Review Request: perl-Event In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011829.nB1IT4ZZ020019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194559 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 13:29:03 EDT --- perl-Event-1.13-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533723] Review Request: perl-Guard - Safe cleanup blocks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011825.nB1IPI4t018876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 13:25:17 EDT --- perl-Guard-1.021-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011826.nB1IQPZw019255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 13:26:24 EDT --- php-pecl-gmagick-1.0.2b1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:28:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:28:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011828.nB1ISbmR019896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.13-2.fc12 |0.13-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:28:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533721] Review Request: perl-Net-CIDR - Manipulate IPv4/IPv6 netblocks in CIDR notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011828.nB1ISWZB019859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533721 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 13:28:32 EDT --- perl-Net-CIDR-0.13-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011825.nB1IP04l018342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 13:24:59 EDT --- globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:25:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:25:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011825.nB1IPUa9018955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 13:25:29 EDT --- globus-gridftp-server-3.17-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516517] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011825.nB1IPYnC018988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516517 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.17-2.el5 |3.17-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:26:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:26:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526876] Review Request: php-pecl-gmagick - Provides a wrapper to the GraphicsMagick library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011826.nB1IQUiU019301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526876 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.2b1-3.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:27:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011827.nB1IR1SD026833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 13:27:00 EDT --- volpack-1.0c7-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update volpack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:45:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:45:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011845.nB1Ijc8Q032504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 13:45:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:48:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:48:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011848.nB1ImSBk026327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 13:48:28 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:46:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011846.nB1IkIhf025862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 13:46:17 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:46:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:46:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011846.nB1IkuPT026068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 13:46:54 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:44:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011844.nB1Iivhd025220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 13:44:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 18:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011851.nB1IpMh9001866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 13:51:21 EDT --- Is there some reason the Short Description here is the one that I originally complained about instead of the one that's currently in the spec? I went ahead and used the one from the spec, but if for some reason that's not what you wanted then please let me know. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011905.nB1J542u006728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 14:05:03 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011908.nB1J8875000390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #29 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 14:08:05 EDT --- There's already an F-12 branch for this package; I'm not sure why it's being requested here. Make sure you do "cvs update -d" to get any newly created directories when you update. I've made the EL-5 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011909.nB1J9Zlp000794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |xfce4-volumed - Daemon to |xfce-volumed - Daemon to |add additional |add additional |functionality to the volume |functionality to the volume |keys of the keyboard |keys of the keyboard Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 14:09:34 EDT --- CVS done; I corrected the summary of this ticket to match the requested package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:11:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:11:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011911.nB1JBCJM001748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 14:11:10 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:10:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533765] Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011910.nB1JAOnD001529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533765 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-01 14:10:23 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:17:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543147] New: Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fgfs.stefan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://riemens.org/fs/temp/mingw32-SDL_image.spec SRPM URL: mingw32-SDL_image-1.2.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Simple DirectMedia Layer (SDL) is a cross-platform multimedia library designed to provide fast access to the graphics frame buffer and audio device. This package contains a simple library for loading images of various formats (BMP, TIF, JPEG, PNG) as SDL surfaces. %{_mingw32_description} Note: see also http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org/msg01505.html Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:20:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543151] New: Review Request: erlang-exmpp - A library for the eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: erlang-exmpp - A library for the eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543151 Summary: Review Request: erlang-exmpp - A library for the eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-exmpp.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-exmpp-0.9.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Erlang XMPP library (exmpp) is a fast and scalable library for the eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol. Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1841907 rpmlint: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/erlang-exmpp-* erlang-exmpp.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/erlang/lib/exmpp-0.9.1/priv/lib/exmpp_xml_expat_legacy.so exmpp_xml_expat_legacy.so erlang-exmpp.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/erlang/lib/exmpp-0.9.1/priv/lib/exmpp_compress_zlib.so exmpp_compress_zlib.so erlang-exmpp.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/erlang/lib/exmpp-0.9.1/priv/lib/exmpp_xml_expat.so exmpp_xml_expat.so erlang-exmpp.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/erlang/lib/exmpp-0.9.1/priv/lib/exmpp_stringprep.so exmpp_stringprep.so erlang-exmpp.ppc: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/erlang/lib/exmpp-0.9.1/priv/lib/exmpp_tls_openssl.so exmpp_tls_openssl.so 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ These messages can be ignored since they mean that so-name has no suffix (which is normal for erlang C-modules). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:27:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:27:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543154] New: Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fgfs.stefan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.riemens.org/fs/temp/mingw32-SDL_mixer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.riemens.org/fs/temp/mingw32-SDL_mixer-1.2.8-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: A simple multi-channel audio mixer for SDL. It supports 4 channels of 16 bit stereo audio, plus a single channel of music, mixed by the popular MikMod MOD library. %{_mingw32_description} Note: see also http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org/msg01505.html Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1841931 Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:25:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011925.nB1JPuKT005934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |xfce-volumed - Daemon to |xfce4-volumed - Daemon to |add additional |add additional |functionality to the volume |functionality to the volume |keys of the keyboard |keys of the keyboard Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-01 14:25:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > CVS done; I corrected the summary of this ticket to match the requested package > name. Sorry, that was a typo in the cvs request. As you can see both the source and the package name is xfce4-volumed. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-volumed Short Description: Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard Owners: cwickert Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543147] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912011930.nB1JUCCC014389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147 --- Comment #1 from Stefan Riemens 2009-12-01 14:30:11 EDT --- Forgot to mention the koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1841893 Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 19:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543159] New: Review Request: zeitgeist - Framework providing Desktop activity awareness Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zeitgeist - Framework providing Desktop activity awareness https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543159 Summary: Review Request: zeitgeist - Framework providing Desktop activity awareness Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/zeitgeist.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/zeitgeist-0.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Zeitgeist is a service which logs the users's activities and events (files opened, websites visites, conversations hold with other people, etc.) and makes relevant information available to other applications. Note that this package only contains the daemon, which you can use together with several different user interfaces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 20:16:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012016.nB1KGd6V020216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Mat Booth 2009-12-01 15:16:38 EDT --- Built successfully for rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 20:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:16:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012016.nB1KGfU0020264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 Bug 537452 depends on bug 536684, which changed state. Bug 536684 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 20:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012016.nB1KGebT020241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 Bug 537451 depends on bug 536684, which changed state. Bug 536684 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 20:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:16:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537652] Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012016.nB1KGgr4020289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537652 Bug 537652 depends on bug 536684, which changed state. Bug 536684 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 20:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542436] Review Request: python-cloudfiles - Python language bindings for Rackspace CloudFiles API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012035.nB1KZTSm025406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542436 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Turner 2009-12-01 15:35:28 EDT --- Updated re:Comment #4 above:- http://c0456722.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/python-cloudfiles.spec http://c0456722.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/python-cloudfiles-1.6.0-3.fc12.src.rpm Thanks again for the guidance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 21:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:23:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537452] Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012123.nB1LNLPq005202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Mat Booth 2009-12-01 16:23:20 EDT --- Built successfully in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 21:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537454] Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012123.nB1LNMk6005226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537454 Bug 537454 depends on bug 537452, which changed state. Bug 537452 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf-validation - Verify the integrity of EMF models https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537452 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 21:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012123.nB1LNAVU012946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Mat Booth 2009-12-01 16:23:09 EDT --- Built successfully in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 21:23:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:23:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537652] Review Request: eclipse-m2m-qvtoml - Implementation of Operational QVT for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012123.nB1LNexv013106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537652 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Mat Booth 2009-12-01 16:23:39 EDT --- Built successfully in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 21:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537454] Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012123.nB1LNTP3013052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537454 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Mat Booth 2009-12-01 16:23:28 EDT --- Built successfully in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 21:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537454] Review Request: eclipse-emf-transaction - A model management layer for managing EMF resources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012123.nB1LNBLT012971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537454 Bug 537454 depends on bug 537451, which changed state. Bug 537451 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 21:46:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:46:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012146.nB1LkJvJ010921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-01 16:46:18 EDT --- * Tue Dec 01 2009 Kalev Lember - 1.5-2 - Use the system mono.snk key instead of regenerating on every build Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mono-bouncycastle.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-2.fc13.src.rpm Scratch build for rawhide now that nant is working again: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842242 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 22:54:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:54:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188105] Review Request: torque In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012254.nB1MsHgF004778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188105 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-01 17:54:12 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: torque New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: stevetraylen InitialCC: garrick I sent mails to the owner on September 23rd and more explicitly on November 25th requesting the EPEL branches. Also bug 479672 has been present for a while. Steve Traylen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 1 23:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 18:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912012307.nB1N7CUV032711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 Graeme Gillies changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ggillies at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Graeme Gillies 2009-12-01 18:07:11 EDT --- Having a quick build and running rpmlint over the spec, SRPM, and RPM produce the following errors warnings. $ rpmlint django-lint-0.11-3.fc12.noarch.rpm django-lint.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Django Lint is a static analysis tool that checks (or "lints") projects and applications that use the Django web development framework. django-lint.noarch: E: description-line-too-long It reports on common programming errors and bad code smells, including checking for nullable CharField field types, the use of brittle or deprecated Django features (such as auto_now_add) as well as the absence of recommended options in settings.py. It aims to encourage the development of high-quality re-usable Django applications. django-lint.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog django-lint.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/DjangoLint/script.py 0644 /usr/bin/env 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint django-lint-0.11-3.fc12.src.rpm django-lint.src: E: description-line-too-long Django Lint is a static analysis tool that checks (or "lints") projects and applications that use the Django web development framework. django-lint.src: E: description-line-too-long It reports on common programming errors and bad code smells, including checking for nullable CharField field types, the use of brittle or deprecated Django features (such as auto_now_add) as well as the absence of recommended options in settings.py. It aims to encourage the development of high-quality re-usable Django applications. django-lint.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. These should be relatively trivial to fix (wrap the lines containing description and change permissions on script.py) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 00:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541724] Review Request: gtk-chtheme - Gtk+ 2.0 theme preview and selection made slick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020028.nB20SoME027622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541724 --- Comment #1 from Vadim Raskhozhev 2009-12-01 19:28:49 EDT --- Sorry, the links above are broken due to dead hosting. Correct links are below: Spec URL: http://www.ddt.cs.vsu.ru/dexpl/rpms/fc12/gtk-chtheme-0.3.1/gtk-chtheme.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ddt.cs.vsu.ru/dexpl/rpms/fc12/gtk-chtheme-0.3.1/gtk-chtheme-0.3.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 00:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:41:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543248] Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020041.nB20fs9Y030635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543248 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |532499 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 00:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543248] New: Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543248 Summary: Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/python-jsonpickle/python-jsonpickle.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/python-jsonpickle/python-jsonpickle-0.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module allows python objects to be serialized to JSON in a similar fashion to the pickle module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 00:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:46:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543248] Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020046.nB20k8oV021786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543248 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |phrkonaleash at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |phrkonaleash at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Ryan Rix 2009-12-01 19:46:07 EDT --- I got this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 02:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:06:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020206.nB226XNb018379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #7 from Arun SAG 2009-12-01 21:06:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I have made the necessary changes. Here are the updated files. > The project artha is licensed under GPLv2, will it be okay to change it GPLv2+ > ? No. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 02:59:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:59:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020259.nB22xB7v030222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #9 from Carl Byington 2009-12-01 21:59:09 EDT --- Source updated from netlib, 0 dropped from patch, patch redone to correspond to the latest source, release tag reset to 1, alpha arch dropped. This latest f2c seems to be compatible with the rest of ghemical. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c-20090411-1.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842593 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 03:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020306.nB236hg6022329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #11 from William Witt 2009-12-01 22:06:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > sed is ok, but should be done in %pre, so that package doesn't need to be > touched after installation. If possible, try to preserver the timestams of the > files, see moved sed-foo to %pre > I wonder it tracker is really sufficient or if tracker-search-tool is required. > I think it is. changed... > %{_bindir}/mintmenu runs gconftool-2, so "Requires: Gconf2" is missing. Added > %{_bindir}/mintmenu should be installed in %{_libexecdir} I have to disagree on this one, libexdir takes it off the path. The mintmenu script allows the menu to be cleaned or or launched from the command line in its own window. > For licensing reasons, you are not allowed to include any Fedora icons in the > package. You must use the logos provided by the fedora-logos package and > Require: system-logos. system-logos is a virtual provides, so the package can > be rebranded. > If possible, use a generic name for the icon in the code, e.g. > "icon-panel-menu.png" which is provided by different themes and on several > distros such as Rhel or CentOS. > > Not sure about license of the mint icon, I think best is to leave it out. removed both mint and fedora logos, replaced with /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/24x24/apps/icon-panel-menu.png > > Disable building the empty debuginfo package with "%global debug_package > %{nil}" at the beginning of the spec. > Done > /usr/lib64/bonobo/servers/mintMenu.server must not be executable, this is what > causes the script-without-shebang error in rpmlint. I'd rather use install than > cp because you can set proper permissions of the files. Done > (In reply to comment #6) > > How does one specify /usr/lib in a no arch package without using an absolute > > path? This is where upstream places the files. > > %{_prefix}/lib, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros > But I agree with Terje that the noarch stuff should be moved to %{_datadir}. I moved as much as I can to %{_datadir}, but as I said the bonobo stuff needs to be in /usr/lib or /usr/lib64, using %{_prefix}/lib sets off hardcoded errors. I don't think there is a way around that while still keeping the package no arch, which it really should be. If this is acceptable, I can keep it this way. [unamanic at gimli ~]$ rpmlint /home/unamanic/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mintmenu-4.9.0-10.fc12.noarch.rpm mintmenu.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [unamanic at gimli ~]$ rpmlint /home/unamanic/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mintmenu-4.9.0-10.fc12.src.rpm mintmenu.src:73: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/linuxmint/mintMenu/mint*.png mintmenu.src:74: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/linuxmint/mintMenu/mint*.svg mintmenu.src:82: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers/ mintmenu.src:83: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers/mintMenu.server mintmenu.src:91: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers/mintMenu.server 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 0 warnings. koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842604 Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.0-10.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 03:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:27:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020327.nB23Rqsv028167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-01 22:27:50 EDT --- Updated the spec to the latest official release. SPEC as before. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ethos-0.2.2-1.fc12.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842620 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 03:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020333.nB23XkdA029713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #12 from William Witt 2009-12-01 22:33:45 EDT --- Do not use the previous koji build (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > sed is ok, but should be done in %pre, so that package doesn't need to be > > touched after installation. If possible, try to preserver the timestams of the > > files, see > > moved sed-foo to %pre > realized the sed in %pre with is not what is needed, moved it back to %install. koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842623 Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.0-11.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 03:36:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:36:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020336.nB23adEe008541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #13 from William Witt 2009-12-01 22:36:38 EDT --- koji should read: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 03:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020343.nB23htOQ010853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-01 22:43:55 EDT --- New upstream SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libmx-0.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842627 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020411.nB24B06Q008449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #10 from Carl Byington 2009-12-01 23:10:59 EDT --- molrender subpackage merged into the main package, --disable-static removed the .a files, use find to remove the .la files. It seems those .la files were used in the subsequent ghemical.spec build. For now I added the full list of libSC*so files to the ghemical link step. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-12.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842643 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:20:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020420.nB24KOqv020182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #8 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-01 23:20:23 EDT --- Are all other problems fixed, so that I can make a new rpm. Is there a check list for you for errors, so that next time I can refer to it, before submitting a review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020425.nB24PLYg021358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 23:25:20 EDT --- glite-security-util-java-2.0.3-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020425.nB24PFtu021320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 23:25:14 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Structured'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12465 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020427.nB24RO01012251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.3-7.fc11 |2.0.3-7.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:25:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020425.nB24PQ7n011652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.0.3-7.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:29:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:29:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020429.nB24TIeK012720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 23:29:17 EDT --- volpack-1.0c7-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update volpack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12498 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:28:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020428.nB24SnvF012635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 23:28:49 EDT --- mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-libgeotiff'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12490 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:29:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020429.nB24TO3i012761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 23:29:23 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Structured'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12499 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:27:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531051] Review Request: glite-security-util-java - Java Utilities for GSI Credentials In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020427.nB24RJrb022102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531051 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 23:27:18 EDT --- glite-security-util-java-2.0.3-7.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:27:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020427.nB24RE2q022071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 23:27:12 EDT --- mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-libgeotiff'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12480 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 04:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 23:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020446.nB24kTjP021381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-01 23:46:28 EDT --- volpack-1.0c7-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update volpack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 05:17:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 00:17:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020517.nB25HfdM005926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-02 00:17:39 EDT --- + is Ok - Needs work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842652 + rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM but is silent for RPM. yum-langpacks.src:36: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/yum-plugins/langpacks.py* ==>rpmlint message looks ok and can be ignored as this is noarch package. - Source URL is not working. + source files match(sha1sum) upstream url http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/yum-langpacks/yum-langpacks-0.1.4.tar.gz as 679464156861fb0af5d791d501f8eb597e10d518 yum-langpacks-0.1.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) Note that you can safely remove buildroot tag and cleanup of buildroot as per givaen at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install 2) update source url to correct download url. 3) Use %global instead of %define as per given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define 4) remove unnecessary Requires: python >=2.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 05:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 00:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538035] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020531.nB25VMJe032472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 Bug 538035 depends on bug 525159, which changed state. Bug 525159 Summary: openvas-libraries are outdated https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525159 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 05:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 00:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: libgle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020537.nB25bOj6010410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 06:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 01:42:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020642.nB26g707017224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #9 from Arun SAG 2009-12-02 01:42:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Are all other problems fixed, so that I can make a new rpm. Is there a check > list for you for errors, so that next time I can refer to it, before submitting > a review request. You can read the review guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines and check whether your spec file and package meets the requirement in it. When i tried to built the package i get build errors, am i doing something wrong? checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.K4pfcC (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.K4pfcC (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 07:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 02:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: libgle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020701.nB271BGk022147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-12-02 02:01:10 EDT --- $ rpmlint libgle-3.1.0-3.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i586/libgle-3.1.0-3.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i586/libgle-devel-3.1.0-3.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i586/libgle-debuginfo-3.1.0-3.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. There's a trailing space at the end of the second BuildRequires line. Personally I prefer one BuildRequires line per requirement. What's the reason for the mesa-libGL-devel requirement in the devel sub-package? Also, shouldn't the base package requirement include the -%{release} component? Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} The trademark in the description has to go: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Trademarks_in_Summary_or_Description $ md5sum SOURCES/gle-3.1.0.tar.gz da5b45c6906343d4a3672c3de35513ad SOURCES/gle-3.1.0.tar.gz $ wget http://www.linas.org/gle/pub/gle-3.1.0.tar.gz --2009-12-01 22:19:05-- http://www.linas.org/gle/pub/gle-3.1.0.tar.gz Resolving www.linas.org... 99.153.64.178 Connecting to www.linas.org|99.153.64.178|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 806861 (788K) [application/x-gzip] Saving to: `gle-3.1.0.tar.gz' 100%[======================================>] 806,861 112K/s in 7.6s 2009-12-01 22:19:14 (104 KB/s) - `gle-3.1.0.tar.gz' saved [806861/806861] $ md5sum gle-3.1.0.tar.gz da5b45c6906343d4a3672c3de35513ad gle-3.1.0.tar.gz Other than the issues noted above everything from the Review Guidelines is fine. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines I built the packages in mock on i586. They install properly and I tested them against my NanoEngineer-1 packages. I'm going to approve this. Please make the suggested fixes before building the package into Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 07:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 02:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] New: Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-rcov.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-rcov-0.9.6-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: rcov is a code coverage tool for Ruby. It is commonly used for viewing overall test unit coverage of target code. It features fast execution (20-300 times faster than previous tools), multiple analysis modes, XHTML and several kinds of text reports, easy automation with Rake via a RcovTask, fairly accurate coverage information through code linkage inference using simple heuristics, colorblind-friendliness... Background: This package has a bit of a history due to to the project being active -> idle -> forked -> forked to it's current state where the 'rcov' gem is maintained by Relevance. rubyforge/gemcutter considers them the definitive source for it, so I think it's safe to package. There was a previous review for rcov here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466331 but this version is far newer and well maintained. mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-rcov.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-rcov-* rubygem-rcov.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rcov-0.9.6/ext/rcovrt/1.8/rcovrt.c rubygem-rcov.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rcov-0.9.6/ext/rcovrt/1.8/callsite.c rubygem-rcov.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rcov-0.9.6/ext/rcovrt/1.9/callsite.c rubygem-rcov.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rcov-0.9.6/ext/rcovrt/1.9/rcovrt.c rubygem-rcov-doc.x86_64: W: no-documentation rubygem-rcov-doc.x86_64: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/rcov-0.9.6/ri/Rcov/RcovTask/test_files%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-rcov-doc.x86_64: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/rcov-0.9.6/ri/CoverageInfo/%5b%5d-i.yaml %5b rubygem-rcov-doc.x86_64: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/rcov-0.9.6/ri/Rcov/FileStatistics/is_code%3f-i.yaml %3f 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 07:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 02:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: libgle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020732.nB27WfSY005765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #14 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-02 02:32:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > What's the reason for the mesa-libGL-devel requirement in the devel > sub-package? It should be Requires: libGL-devel because the package doesn't actually depend upon Mesa's libGL-devel, but upon an arbitrary package which provides "libGL-devel" > Also, shouldn't the base package requirement include the > -%{release} component? It should. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 07:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 02:57:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: libgle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020757.nB27vttp011011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-12-02 02:57:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > What's the reason for the mesa-libGL-devel requirement in the devel > > sub-package? > It should be > Requires: libGL-devel > because the package doesn't actually depend upon Mesa's libGL-devel, but upon > an arbitrary package which provides "libGL-devel" Requiring libGL-devel versus mesa-libGL-devel is fine by me. But why does libgle-devel explicitly require libGL-devel? gle.h doesn't include any other include files. My gle-devel package required xorg-x11-proto-devel and did not own the /usr/include/GL directory, but I think having libgle-devel own /usr/include/GL is better. But I don't understand the libGL-devel requirement, since libGL-devel isn't required to build against libgle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 08:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 03:23:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020823.nB28N4Ht016221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 03:22:32 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 09:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 04:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: libgle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020919.nB29JRkm029384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #16 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-02 04:19:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > Requiring libGL-devel versus mesa-libGL-devel is fine by me. But why does > libgle-devel explicitly require libGL-devel? gle.h doesn't include any other > include files. Correct, but ... the situation actually is more difficult: # nm -D --undefined /usr/lib64/libgle.so w _Jv_RegisterClasses U __cxa_atexit w __cxa_finalize U __fprintf_chk w __gmon_start__ U acos U atan2 U free U glBegin U glColor3fv U glColor4fv U glEnd U glIsEnabled U glMultMatrixd U glNormal3dv U glPopMatrix U glPushMatrix U glTexCoord2d U glVertex3dv U gluBeginPolygon U gluDeleteTess U gluEndPolygon U gluNewTess U gluTessCallback U gluTessVertex U malloc U realloc U sincos U sqrt U stderr => There are hidden deps on libGL and libGLU. I am not sure (yet) how to handle this. A couple of real world use cases of libgle would easily clearify the issue. > My gle-devel package required xorg-x11-proto-devel and did not own the > /usr/include/GL directory, but I think having libgle-devel own /usr/include/GL > is better. That's a different (unresolved) problem: Ownership of the /usr/include/GL. In general, the current rule is: If package A depends on another package B which provides a directory, package A wants to install files into, then it is sufficient for package A to "R: B". If package A does not depend upon package B, then package B must own this directory (The directory would be owned by both A and B, then). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 09:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 04:48:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532590] Review Request: yaws - Web server for dynamic content written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912020948.nB29m7DT004940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532590 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-02 04:48:05 EDT --- Yet another bunch of notes: * Requires erlang-erlsom (needs patch - I'll try to provide it) * Requires egssapi (still not packaged) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 10:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:12:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021012.nB2ACF57011613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 05:12:13 EDT --- f2c-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation f2c-libs.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libf2c.so.0.22 f2c-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libf2c.so.0.22 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 f2c-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation f2c-libs.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libf2c.so.0.22 f2c-libs.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libf2c.so.0.22 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings. - The post and postun %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig should be %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig - I think the no-ldconfig-symlink warning can be fixed by creating ln -sf libf2c.so.0.22 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libf2c.so.0 Try if this works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 10:17:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021017.nB2AHmd8013003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 05:17:48 EDT --- Of course, not having documentation in some subpackage is OK, if there is nothing to be put there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 10:17:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:17:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021017.nB2AHJWa012900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 05:17:19 EDT --- Oh, and move the license files (and any other general files) to the -libs package, since the -libs package is going to be always present. The documentation specific to f2c stays in the main package, and the documentation to the headers and development libraries go to -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 10:21:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:21:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021021.nB2ALBDN007737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #91 from Michal Nowak 2009-12-02 05:21:00 EDT --- 3.4.2 in fp.o: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.4.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 10:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] New: Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Summary: Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sagarun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-irsim-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This package is provides Emacs mode for editing IRSIM netlists. IRSIM is a switch-level simulator for digital logic circuits. koji builds EPEL, F12,F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842928 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842936 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842950 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 10:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:24:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021024.nB2AOjl3014894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shakthimaan at gmail.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 10:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:39:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021039.nB2Ad566018710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 10:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:48:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021048.nB2Amv0M016788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 10:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 05:46:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226165] Merge Review: mt-st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021046.nB2AkAPL015847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2009-12-02 05:46:09 EDT --- The stinit initscript was recently updated in F-12 and rawhide (see bug 541592 for details) and it doesn't start any daemon, but it does only a one-time initialization of tape devices, so I think it can live as it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 11:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 06:05:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226165] Merge Review: mt-st In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021105.nB2B5vKB022980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226165 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-02 06:05:55 EDT --- Ok, thanks. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 11:16:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 06:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] New: Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 Summary: Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: spoyarek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/spoyarek/gource/gource.spec SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/spoyarek/gource/gource-0.18-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: OpenGL-based 3D visualisation tool for source control repositories. The repository is displayed as a tree where the root of the repository is the centre, directories are branches and files are leaves. Contributors to the source code appear and disappear as they contribute to specific files and directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 11:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 06:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021124.nB2BOU7P001790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-02 06:24:29 EDT --- #001: Use %{__rm} instead of rm. Use %{__mkdir} instead of mkdir. #002: Use %{__install} instead of having to define % global INSTALL. #003: In %prep, %build section, you are doing the same (cd) twice. Not required. #004: There is no README file? #005: These are redundant! %global pkg emacs-irsim-mode %global common_name irsim-mode %global pkgname Emacs-irsim-mode %global pkgdir %{buildroot}%{emacs_lispdir}/irsim-mode/ %global ver 0.1 %global rel 1 #006: Instead of 'ver', 'rel', you can call them something else? Avoid short-hand as much as possible. .spec needs to be readable. #007: "This package contains the elisp source files for Emacs-irsim-mode under GNU Emacs. You do not need to install this package to run Emacs-irsim-mode. Install the emacs-irsim-mode package to use %{pkgname} with GNU Emacs." The grammar in the above is incorrect. You just copied the text? :) Why do you need to give instructions on packaging it in the description? Just keep the following in the description: This package contains elisp source files for Emacs-irsim-mode for use with GNU Emacs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 11:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 06:22:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021122.nB2BM99I001243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Dan Hor?k 2009-12-02 06:22:04 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 068a46aa1ffbfe96fdbf5cedd480b795a4f6321a dialog-1.1-20080819.tgz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (LGPLv2). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths, correct scriptlets present OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in devel OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - rpmlint compains a bit, but these are OK dialog.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary dialog dialog.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary dialog This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 11:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 06:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021127.nB2BRFcP030023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-02 06:27:13 EDT --- * Wed Dec 02 2009 Kalev Lember - 1.5-3 - Temporarily bundle mono.snk with this package to fix build on < F-13 Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mono-bouncycastle.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-3.fc13.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1843092 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 11:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 06:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021140.nB2BeSfE001123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 --- Comment #1 from Siddhesh Poyarekar 2009-12-02 06:40:27 EDT --- Updated the SPEC and SRPM after rpmlint'ing the packages and specfile. Thanks Rahul Sundaram! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 12:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225302] Merge Review: automake In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021225.nB2CPBVV015798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225302 Karsten Hopp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #9 from Karsten Hopp 2009-12-02 07:25:09 EDT --- I couldn't find any MIT licensed files in the package anymore, dropped MIT from the list. I've also fixed the man page timestamps: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/devel/automake/automake.spec?revision=1.47&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 12:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:37:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021237.nB2CbLbu018958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #12 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-02 07:37:19 EDT --- Is there a reason for the lack of .el4 or 5 build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 12:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530193] Review Request: rubygem-calendar_date_select - A popular date picker widget for ruby on rails and prototype.js In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021243.nB2Chrrt025015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530193 Michal Babej changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbabej at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Michal Babej 2009-12-02 07:43:52 EDT --- The first three are just a result of how rdoc/ri deals with punctuaction in method names (escaping, "has_time?" => "has_time%3f"). "file MIT-LICENSE" says: MIT-LICENSE: ASCII English text, with CRLF line terminators so i think yes, dos2unix is your friend :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 12:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:49:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021249.nB2CnKmI022215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #28 from manuel wolfshant 2009-12-02 07:49:17 EDT --- Couple of things, after a quick glance over the spec - Unless you have very very good reasons to not do it, please consider using %dist in the release field. It'll save you some headaches later - I do not see the reason for # Create an empty otppasswd file [ ! -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/otppasswd ] && echo "" > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/otppasswd Since you are in a clean buildroot, the file does not exist unless make install created it. And a simple "touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/otppasswd" seems more elegant to me. Or even "> $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/otppasswd" (no need for the "echo " part ). However, nothing incorrect in your approach either. Just a matter of style - Please consider the comment #26. It's ugly to restart a daemon which was not specifically allowed to be on by the admin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 12:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:51:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021251.nB2CpUCd027354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #29 from manuel wolfshant 2009-12-02 07:51:28 EDT --- And please ditch the packager tag. The fedora buildsystem will fill it for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 12:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021257.nB2CvqqF025076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #13 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-02 07:57:51 EDT --- When I did the Fedora builds gsoap was not yet in EPEL. Gsoap has now been built for EPEL, and I have requested a buildroot override in order to build CGSI-gSOAP before gsoap gets into EPEL stable. The buildroot override was added on Sunday - so it is now possible to build the packages, I just had a lot of things to do since then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 13:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021300.nB2D0xUW026176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #2 from Arun SAG 2009-12-02 08:00:58 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-irsim-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji builds EPEL,F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1843275 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1843279 Everything addressed except #004 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 13:03:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:03:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021303.nB2D3dX1026751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-02 08:03:38 EDT --- Arun, update the spec and srpm as Shakthi recommends. Afterwards, I'll complete the review. If you have based your spec file on mine, please include its changelog as well. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/attachment/ticket/50/emacs-irsim-mode.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 13:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:04:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021304.nB2D4FMN030755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-02 08:04:13 EDT --- Ok, then I'll start the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 13:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021316.nB2DGN0I002136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #30 from manuel wolfshant 2009-12-02 08:16:21 EDT --- With respect to #26 and #28: please make sure the initscript does not install with the daemon started by default. Common Fedora policy is to allow the admin to activate the required services, not enforce them in a "started" state. Also, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#Required_Actions it would be nice if you could implement the missing actions (and also use the exit codes listed in that page) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 13:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:31:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530755] Review Request: dpic - A compiler for the pic language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021331.nB2DVmWw006762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530755 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-02 08:31:47 EDT --- can you please update all the packages you are preparing for cirkuit as they will determine the usability of the tool itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 13:36:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:36:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021336.nB2DaI1E004024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:03:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543480] New: Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543480 Summary: Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefoster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/javamail.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/javamail-1.4.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The JavaMail API provides a platform-independent and protocol-independent framework to build mail and messaging applications. Note: This is the successor to the glassfish-javamail packages -- see http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/. The classes included in the smtp, pop3, imap, and mailapi sub-packages are all also in the main javamail.jar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543480] Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021406.nB2E6DMj013739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543480 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |540986 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:06:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:06:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021406.nB2E6B6G013673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |543480, 543081, 530088 --- Comment #3 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-12-02 09:06:09 EDT --- Okay, here's a new version that uses Maven to build and makes use of the Javamail 1.4 classes. Unfortunately, this produces a few more dependencies ... Spec URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/logback.spec SRPM URL: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~mef3/soprano-sesame/logback-0.9.17-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:20:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021420.nB2EKbNM022547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-02 09:20:35 EDT --- #001: Description Use the following description instead : 32 IRSIM is a switch-level simulator for digital logic circuits. 33 This is an Emacs mode for editing IRSIM netlists. It provides 34 syntax highlighting and an extremely pleasant method if indentation. #002: Start file It should better have the following since I think it should be autoload 49 (autoload 'irsim-mode "irsim-mode" nil t) 50 (setq auto-mode-alist 51 (cons '("\\.sim$" . irsim-mode) auto-mode-alist)) #003: compile it with emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile %{pkg}.el #004 Directory ownership and duplicates Verify why you are having double directory ownership in the %files section for %{emacs_startdir} #005 Keep the spec file simple replace cd %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} by cd %{name}-%{version} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021425.nB2EPFuX024388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542730 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:39:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539268] Review Request: rubygem-will_paginate - Most awesome pagination solution for Rail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021439.nB2EdGR2031134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539268 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dpierce at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 09:39:14 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:40:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021440.nB2Ee1FV024270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 09:39:59 EDT --- ping? (By the way Jason's opinition is just as same as me) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:42:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021442.nB2EgCPV000482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 09:42:09 EDT --- Should we close this bug now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:49:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226661] Merge Review: yaboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021449.nB2EntVK027897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226661 --- Comment #3 from Ivana Varekova 2009-12-02 09:49:53 EDT --- Seems OK for e the last point I have is: %defattr(-,root,root) ->%defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021455.nB2EtLcX005524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 09:55:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > SPEC: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/artha/artha.spec > SRPM: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/artha/artha-0.9.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Connection timed out... By the way http://artha.sourceforge.org/ returns "Server not found"... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021457.nB2EvqnD030989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 09:57:51 EDT --- rpmlint output: mpqc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/molrender ['/usr/lib64'] mpqc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mpqc ['/usr/lib64'] mpqc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/scls ['/usr/lib64'] mpqc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/scpr ['/usr/lib64'] mpqc.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/chkmpqcout 0555 mpqc.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/chkmpqcout mpqc-data.noarch: W: no-documentation mpqc-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources mpqc-devel.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains the header files and static libraries needed to build programs linked mpqc-devel.x86_64: E: rpath-in-buildconfig /usr/bin/sc-config lines ['30'] mpqc-devel.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/sc-mkf77sym mpqc-libs.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains the shared libraries needed to run programs dynamically linked mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: macro-in-%description %{bname} mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCmolecule.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCmolecule.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCmolecule.so.7.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libmpqc.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmpqc.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmpqc.so.7.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCisosurf.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCclass.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCclass.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCclass.so.7.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCmisc.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCmisc.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCmisc.so.7.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCdft.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCwfn.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCmbpt.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCoptions.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCsymmetry.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCsymmetry.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCsymmetry.so.7.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCpsi.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCscf.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCoint3.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCkeyval.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCkeyval.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCkeyval.so.7.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCbasis.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCbasis.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCbasis.so.7.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCscmat.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCintv3.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCintv3.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCintv3.so.7.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCsolvent.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCref.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCcontainer.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCoptimize.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCgroup.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCstate.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libSCrender.so.7.1.0 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCrender.so.7.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libSCrender.so.7.1.0 exit@@GLIBC_2.2.5 mpqc-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 11 errors, 45 warnings. Fix these (you don't need to mind about the shared-libs-calls-exit warnings). The unstripped-binary-or-object warnings probably are caused by wrong permissions of the libraries. The libraries need to be installed as 755. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 14:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:59:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021459.nB2ExWgY006641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 09:59:31 EDT --- Notice that the description of the -libs package uses a macro %{bname} that doesn't exist. Also, the -devel package has a wrong summary, it should be something along the lines of "Development headers and libraries for %{name}". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 15:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021502.nB2F2AWJ007757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 10:02:09 EDT --- Please don't mix %{name} and "mpqc" in %files, it makes the list a bit hard to read. And, you might consider shortening the changelog, just keep the latest Mandriva entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 15:06:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:06:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021506.nB2F6cXD009038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 10:06:37 EDT --- Furthermore: drop the BuildConflicts, since that package does not exist in Fedora. Instead add export F77=gfortran to the beginning of %build to make the build process use gfortran instead of g77. Since for now we are building a serial version, add --disable-parallel to %configure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 15:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021515.nB2FFpkZ011950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 10:15:50 EDT --- I'd change the description to "The Massively Parallel Quantum Chemistry Program". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 15:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:13:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021513.nB2FDfka011157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #6 from Arun SAG 2009-12-02 10:13:40 EDT --- Spec URL:http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-irsim-mode.spec SRPM URL:http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-3.fc12.src.rpm Koji builds EPEL,F12 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1843821 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1843823 Issues #001 #002 #003 #004 #005 fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:02:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] New: Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mbabej at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mogurakun.web.runbox.net/rubygem-haml.spec SRPM URL: http://mogurakun.web.runbox.net/rubygem-haml-2.2.14-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Haml (HTML Abstraction Markup Language) is a layer on top of XHTML or XML that's designed to express the structure of XHTML or XML documents in a non-repetitive, elegant, easy way, using indentation rather than closing tags and allowing Ruby to be embedded with ease. rpmlint rubygem-haml.spec: rubygem-haml.spec: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: engine_test.patch 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint rubygem-haml-2.2.14-1.fc12.noarch.rpm: rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Script/Number/normalize%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Object/is_haml%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/CommentNode/invisible%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/Node/perform%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/Node/options%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Script/Number/convertable%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/ImportNode/invisible%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Engine/Line/comment%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/PropNode/perform%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/RuleNode/perform%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/PropNode/invalid_child%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/CommentNode/%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Helpers/action_view%3f-c.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Plugin/Rack/disable_native_plugin%21-c.yaml %21 rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Template/rails_xss_safe%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Script/Number/int%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/ActionView/Base/delegate_template_exists%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/PropNode/%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/IfNode/options%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Script/Literal/%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/ImportNode/perform%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Util/has%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Script/Number/unitless%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/RuleNode/%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/RuleNode/continued%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Script/Lexer/done%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Util/assert_html_safe%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/Node/invalid_child%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Plugin/options%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Engine/html%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/Node/%3c%3c-i.yaml %3c rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Engine/html5%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Util/ruby1_8%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Helpers/block_is_haml%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Script/Number/legal_units%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Exec/Generic/parse%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Util/rails_xss_safe%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/Node/invisible%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Engine/xhtml%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Tree/Node/%3d%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/ActionView/Helpers/InstanceTag/is_haml%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Engine/html4%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Sass/Script/Literal/assert_int%21-i.yaml %21 rubygem-haml.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/haml-2.2.14/ri/Haml/Helpers/is_haml%3f-i.yaml %3f 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 44 warnings. Notes: Patch0 is applied manually at %install stage; the misspelled-macro warnings are false positives (rdoc/ri deals with punctuation by escaping it into %xx form) This is my first package, so i'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021607.nB2G7Xkj021597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #7 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-02 11:07:32 EDT --- Hello Peter! thanks for your comments. * I'm not sure about name. Perhaps 'itk' would be better name than InsightToolkit? Yes, but package itk already exists and is an object oriented extensions to Tk. Maybe I should use libitk? * I just found, that ITK contains numerous bundled libraries, many of them are duplication Fedora's system ones - see 'Utilities' directory. This should be fixed (and necessary BuildRequires should be added). You're right. Shame on me! I'll fix it. * Also I'm anxious about the contents of 'Code/Patented' folder. The Patented code is optional for ITK and is actually disabled by default. However, I'll add the -DITK_USE_PATENTED:BOOL=OFF cmake flag to the specs to be sure that is never included in the packages. Do you want the folder to be erased in the %prep or %build part? I'm a bit busy and can't make all the requested changes right now, but I'll try to address all of your notes and make a new package later this week. BTW I activated my brand new fedora people account (how cool! :) ) and republished there the srpms and specs. http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/InsightToolkit.spec http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/InsightToolkit-3.16.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Beware that I simply copied there the old ones! I'll post a message when the new version is available. Cheers, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:11:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021611.nB2GBmOo031317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dan at danny.cz, | |dnovotny at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag|needinfo?(tsmetana at redhat.c |fedora-review? |om) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:10:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540885] Review Request: cableswig - Create interfaces to interpreted languages for templated code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021610.nB2GAerw023260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540885 --- Comment #5 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-02 11:10:37 EDT --- Thanks to Peter sponsorship I could activate my fedorapeople account. Thus from now on the updated srpms/spec locations will be: http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/cableswig.spec http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/cableswig-cvs20091120-1.fc12.src.rpm Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226175] Merge Review: mx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021610.nB2GAdw3023251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226175 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dan at danny.cz, | |dnovotny at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:17:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523224] Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021617.nB2GHvC5027501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523224 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Antti Andreimann 2009-12-02 11:17:53 EDT --- Thank You for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-xerces-c Short Description: MingGW Windows validating XML parser Owners: anttix Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:17:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021617.nB2GHq78027445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 11:17:48 EDT --- Some notes: ? Requires - Would you explain the necessity of "R: rubygem(rake)"? ( Maybe for lib/rcov/rcovtask.rb ? If so, I wonder if this script is used by default or not because no other scripts in rcov gem seems to require this script ) ! Note that I am not objecting to adding "R: rubygem(rake)". * ext/ - Files under ext/ are to generate C extension module (rcovrt.so) and should not be needed to be included into binary rpm. ( The trouble is that once we try to execute "rake check" under %geminstdir, rake task tries to regenerate .so file. In such cases files under ext/ are needed, however anyway this won't work but for root because write permission for %geminstdir is needed. So while you may want to add files under ext to -doc subpackage, these files should not be in main package. ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:19:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021619.nB2GJVF8002188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #13 from Carl Byington 2009-12-02 11:19:30 EDT --- I don't see any documentation files specific to the -libs package. Currently f2c does not require f2c-libs, and f2c-libs does not require f2c. Should I add a requires to force one or the other, so that the license files will always get installed? A similar question for mpqc. The only interpackage dependencies are mpqc-devel requires mpqc-libs requires mpqc-data. The license files are installed in mpqc, so if only mpqc-libs is installed, the user has no license files. What is the general approach to such packages with multiple mostly independent subpackages. It seems there are only three choices. Force an artifical dependency on the subpackage that contains the license files, install multiple copies of the license files in each independent subpackage, or allow some subpackages to install with no license files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:20:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021620.nB2GKmcA029977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-02 11:20:43 EDT --- eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1.20091005-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1.20091005-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021627.nB2GR8cw008230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-02 11:27:06 EDT --- msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543566] New: Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 Summary: Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jfsaucier at infoglobe.ca QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/tsocks.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/tsocks-1.8-1.beta5.fc12.src.rpm Description: tsocks is a library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying. It supports both SOCKS 4 and SOCKS 5 (only TCP). tsocks is designed for use in machines which are firewalled from the internet. It avoids the need to recompile applications like lynx or telnet so they can use SOCKS to reach the internet. It behaves much like the SOCKSified TCP/IP stacks seen on other platforms. This is my first submitted package and I need a sponsor. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:38:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:38:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021638.nB2Gcq8X005619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 Jean-Francois Saucier changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:49:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021649.nB2GnBkw017978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-02 11:49:10 EDT --- eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1.20091005-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1.20091005-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:51:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:51:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539268] Review Request: rubygem-will_paginate - Most awesome pagination solution for Rail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021651.nB2GpHDH009331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539268 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dpierce at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-12-02 11:51:16 EDT --- Sorry, have been getting SIGLIFE'd since your post. I'll have an update in the next week or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 16:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:57:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021657.nB2GvsEl011036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 --- Comment #16 from Patrice Dumas 2009-12-02 11:57:51 EDT --- What about my comments on the API? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 17:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:21:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225851] Merge Review: gob2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021721.nB2HLvov018227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225851 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dnovotny at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-02 12:21:56 EDT --- Review follows: OK source files match upstream: cced6d709df6fad3baf8831f027d62d5 gob2-2.0.16.tar.gz BAD source contains full URL - source should point to http://ftp.5z.com/pub/gob/gob2-2.0.16.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. - %makeinstall can be replaced with more correct make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD>_ROOT OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license (GPLv2+). OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 17:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:26:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021726.nB2HQrqi028898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #11 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-02 12:26:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #6) > > SPEC: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/artha/artha.spec > > SRPM: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/artha/artha-0.9.1-2.fc11.src.rpm > > Connection timed out... Sorry there is a power outrage over here. I am trying to locate some other possible location to upload it. Suggest if you have any place to do it. Only web based uploads possible. > By the way http://artha.sourceforge.org/ returns "Server not found"... It was a mistake, the url is http://artha.sourceforge.net/. Changed it in the spec. Should I revert the license to GPLv2 or should i keep GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 17:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021730.nB2HU9ZQ020788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 12:30:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Currently f2c does not require f2c-libs, and f2c-libs does not require f2c. > Should I add a requires to force one or the other, so that the license files > will always get installed? > > A similar question for mpqc. The only interpackage dependencies are mpqc-devel > requires mpqc-libs requires mpqc-data. The license files are installed in mpqc, > so if only mpqc-libs is installed, the user has no license files. What is the > general approach to such packages with multiple mostly independent subpackages. > It seems there are only three choices. Force an artifical dependency on the > subpackage that contains the license files, install multiple copies of the > license files in each independent subpackage, or allow some subpackages to > install with no license files. When the packages are configured to use shared libraries, the lib dependencies will always be there. For instance $ rpm -qp --requires mpqc-2.3.1-12.fc12.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/wish libSCbasis.so.7()(64bit) libSCclass.so.7()(64bit) libSCcontainer.so.7()(64bit) libSCdft.so.7()(64bit) and so on. The lib dependencies pull in the -libs package, along with its licenses. Independent packages must contain all (relevant) documentation in every package, but we avoid duplication of files in interdependent packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 17:34:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:34:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527549] Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021734.nB2HYTMB030996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549 Valent Turkovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |valent.turkovic at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Valent Turkovic 2009-12-02 12:34:27 EDT --- I would love to see this great app working in F11 and F12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 17:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:52:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226442] Merge Review: swig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021752.nB2HqGXi026487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226442 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlichvar at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mlichvar at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 17:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:56:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527549] Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021756.nB2HuTC0005134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549 --- Comment #7 from Valent Turkovic 2009-12-02 12:56:28 EDT --- I created rpm from your src.rpm and installed it on Fedora 12. It runs nice from what I could see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:04:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] New: Review Request: udisks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: udisks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 Summary: Review Request: udisks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davidz at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/udisks-pkg-review/20091202/udisks.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/udisks-pkg-review/20091202/udisks-1.0.0-0.git20091202.fc13.src.rpm Description: DeviceKit-disks recently got renamed to udisks, see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2009-December/000567.html so it is only proper to change the Fedora package name too. This package will obsolete (and provide - for transitioning) DeviceKit-disks. It is important to note that DeviceKit-disks has never claimed to provide a stable ABI or API, see $ head -9 /usr/share/doc/DeviceKit-disks-009/NEWS ------------------- DeviceKit-disks 009 ------------------- DeviceKit-disks is a daemon that provide interfaces to obtain information and perform operations on storage devices. NOTE NOTE NOTE: This is an unstable release of DeviceKit-disks, all API is subject to change. $ rpm -qf /usr/share/doc/DeviceKit-disks-009/NEWS DeviceKit-disks-009-3.fc12.x86_64 so changing the name is no different than uploading a new DeviceKit-disks package. Note also that the new udisks packages provide slightly stronger ABI and API guarantees (see the mail linked to above) so packages using it should be able to do Requires: udisks >= 1.0. Requires: udisks < 1.1.0 instead of the mess we have today. The main user, gnome-disk-utility, will use udisks in the next version. The only other user of DeviceKit-disks (according to 'repoquery --whatrequires DeviceKit-disks') is the emelfm2 package. It should be easy for that package to transition (the gnome-disk-utility patch is ~200 lines - mostly just changing the D-Bus bus names and interfaces) and emelfm2 would have to _anyway_ because DeviceKit-disks never claimed to support any stable ABI or API - e.g. the next DeviceKit-disks version could have used a completely different ABI. The spec file is based on the existing DeviceKit-disks one with a few cleanups. $ rpmlint udisks.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/udisks-1.0.0-0.git20091202.fc13.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/udisks-devel-1.0.0-0.git20091202.fc13.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/udisks-1.0.0-0.git20091202.fc13.x86_64.rpm udisks.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/udisks-bash-completion.sh udisks.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/udisks 0700 udisks.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.UDisks.conf udisks.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/udisks 0700 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. Both warnings and errors should be waived - reasons o /etc/profile.d/udisks-bash-completion.sh isn't a config-file at all - it is a shell script for bash completion o /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.UDisks.conf - if users/admins wants to override D-Bus config directives (they have no reason to do this though) they can drop files in /etc/dbus-1/system.d. Note that we have talked in the D-Bus project about using $datadir or $libdir for these kinds of files. It might happen. This is also the case for every other package using the D-Bus system bus. o /var/run/udisks and /var/lib/udisks needs these permissions because we don't want to disclose this data to other users (might be an information leak to let everyone know that a user has mounted a disk) Thanks for reviewing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:02:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:02:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021802.nB2I2VdD006765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #15 from Carl Byington 2009-12-02 13:02:30 EDT --- Ok for mpqc, but not f2c. rpm -q --requires f2c libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 it seems that f2c does not actually link against the libf2c shared libraries. Looking at the source, f2c itself does not use any of the code in libf2c. I think the c code *generated* by f2c needs the libf2c libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:12:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - The f2c Fortran to C/C++ conversion program and static libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021812.nB2ICCRl032124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 13:12:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Ok for mpqc, but not f2c. > > > it seems that f2c does not actually link against the libf2c shared libraries. > Looking at the source, f2c itself does not use any of the code in libf2c. I > think the c code *generated* by f2c needs the libf2c libraries. Well.. That's odd. OK, maybe libf2c contains some intrinsic Fortran functions, that are then called in the C code produced by f2c. Anyway, this means you will have to put in explicit dependencies. Better yet to version them fully. i.e. the main package has to Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release} and the devel package just Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} which pulls in f2c, which pulls in f2c-libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:16:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021816.nB2IGLFX001494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 13:16:19 EDT --- Some notes: * Version specific dependency - I don't think ">= 3.7.0" ">= 3.0.0" is needed (as all rpms shipped on Fedora satisfies this dependency) ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires ! demo - I tried demo program, then: ------------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ParseTree-3.0.4/demo/printer.rb /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ParseTree-3.0.4/demo/printer.rb:20: uninitialized constant ParseTree (NameError) ------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't know well the usefulness of this script, however at least "require 'parse_tree'" is missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:20:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021820.nB2IK3u8002720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #7 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-02 13:20:02 EDT --- s/if indentation./of indentation/g I have tested this package on Fedora 12 with Emacs 23.1-12 and it works fine! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021838.nB2IctT9007656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 13:38:54 EDT --- $ gem list -b haml returns that the latest is 2.2.15 and it seems to have been released on 2009-12-01. Would you update first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:41:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Unsupported Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021841.nB2IfCV4009000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 --- Comment #9 from leigh scott 2009-12-02 13:41:10 EDT --- Hi Felix, Bump :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021844.nB2Iip8t009838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: f2c - The |Review Request: f2c - |f2c Fortran to C/C++ |Fortran to C/C++ conversion |conversion program and |program |static libraries | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:47:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:47:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021847.nB2IloJi010993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-12-02 13:47:49 EDT --- OK - MUST: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-ppc/result/* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: Spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: License field in spec file doesn't matches the actual license. OK - MUST: License files included in %doc OK - MUST: Spec is in American English OK - MUST: Spec is legible OK - MUST: Sources match the upstream source by MD5 cca92b59002fa9e0515287f3df38cb1c OK - MUST: Successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on ppc N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: Handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. OK - MUST: Owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: No duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: Consistently uses macros OK - MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. Doesn't make sense for this package N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: Builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: Compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. N/A - SHOULD: Functions as described. FIX - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. update icon cache scriplet is missing https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete Just some cosmetical things, before you include it in cvs 1.) %{_datadir}/%{name} please suggest that this is a directory and attach a / behind NAME 2.) please try expand your description lines to 80 characters or one word less.. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:52:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021852.nB2IqsCB012339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 13:52:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #6) > > > SPEC: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/artha/artha.spec > > > SRPM: http://lug.nitdgp.ac.in/users/roshan/artha/artha-0.9.1-2.fc11.src.rpm > > > > Connection timed out... > > Sorry there is a power outrage over here. I am trying to locate some other > possible location to upload it. Suggest if you have any place to do it. Only > web based uploads possible. Ah, okay. Now I am sponsoring you. Please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedorapeople.org and use fedorapeople.org site. > Should I revert the license to GPLv2 or should i keep GPLv2+. Judging from the source code, the license should be GPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021855.nB2It447022089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #40 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-02 13:55:02 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you and will approve this package. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (gscribble) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". If you want to import this package into Fedora 11/12, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 18:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 13:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021855.nB2ItdD7013434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 --- Comment #6 from David Nalley 2009-12-02 13:55:37 EDT --- thanks for catching the %clean problem. I have updated spec/srpm to fix above problems and update to 0.9.2 SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.spec SRPM: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer-0.9.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 19:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:00:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021900.nB2J0SBs014937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-12-02 14:00:27 EDT --- thanks for the review. I stripped that require, SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-OLE.spec SRPM: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-OLE-1.0.0-0.2.rc1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 19:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021903.nB2J36On024592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |thomasj at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |thomasj at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen 2009-12-02 14:03:04 EDT --- + rpmlint is fine for a mono package. The permission is needed to run the script. rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm srpm-review-test/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-3.fc13.src.rpm mono-bouncycastle.x86_64: E: no-binary mono-bouncycastle.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib mono-bouncycastle.src: W: strange-permission bccrypto-generate-zip.sh 0755 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. + The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . ! The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Part of the source states: Apache Software License 1.1 (ASL 1.1) The Webpage says: MIT X11 Change the license to: MIT with ASL 1.1 + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file is legible. + The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. md5 d400421918c0c20f2f53fa003e25eb11 + It compiles + ExcludeArch done. + BuildRequires listed. + Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + Package owns all directories that it creates. + Permissions are set properly. + %clean section + Macros usage + The package must contain code, or permissable content. + %doc handling + At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Package will be approved after you corrected the license field. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 19:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:13:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021913.nB2JDJFh018320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-02 14:13:18 EDT --- #006 You don't need to create scratch for everytime you post your SRPM. The main idea of doing a scratch built is to verify whether you have all the buildrequires on your spec file. One scratch build is enough. #007 I would advice to autoload irsim-mode for - "*.cmd" - "*.simout" - "*.flt" - "*.sim" files as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 19:18:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021918.nB2JIQpl030305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-02 14:18:25 EDT --- #008 Preserve timestamps Your cp %{SOURCE0} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} cp %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} should be cp -p %{SOURCE0} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} cp -p %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} so should be your %{__install} -m to %{__install} -pm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 19:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021923.nB2JNExD021209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 --- Comment #1 from David Zeuthen 2009-12-02 14:23:13 EDT --- For good measure, the original DeviceKit-disks review was bug 456033. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 19:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:41:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021941.nB2JfT27027253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-02 14:41:27 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Thomas! My main reason for packaging bouncycastle was to get iTextSharp [1] included in Fedora. However, ASL 1.1 would make those two libraries incompatible. I sent a mail [2] to bouncycastle csharp development mailing list, asking if it would be possible to relicense the ASL 1.1 bits under ASL 2.0 instead. Anyway, this doesn't prevent from completing mono-bouncycastle review. According to Licensing Guidelines [3], separator between multiple licenses should be 'and', so I changed the License tag to read 'MIT and ASL 1.1'. Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mono-bouncycastle.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-4.fc13.src.rpm [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537437 [2] http://www.bouncycastle.org/csharpdevmailarchive/msg00370.html [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 19:42:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:42:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021942.nB2JgGQW004909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #2 from Michal Babej 2009-12-02 14:42:15 EDT --- Done. Updated packages are at the same place (http://mogurakun.web.runbox.net/) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 19:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912021943.nB2Jh4sk005102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Mike McGrath changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcgrath at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Mike McGrath 2009-12-02 14:43:02 EDT --- Seems this also needs python-setuptools: /usr/bin/orbited -c orbited.cfg Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/orbited", line 5, in ? from pkg_resources import load_entry_point ImportError: No module named pkg_resources -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 20:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022004.nB2K4nEm011557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2009-12-02 15:04:46 EDT --- Indeed, most of the issues are solved. However there are 2 cosmetic issues left which would be nice to see fixed (especially the first one): - please either remove the buildroot line completely or use one of the forms accepted by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - there are duplicate BuildRequires: pkgconfig (by glib2-devel), automake (by libtool), autoconf (by libtool) Since both issues are purely cosmetic now, I'll leave their fixing to your appreciation. Closing the review as done and fixed. Thank you, Adam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 20:08:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022008.nB2K8isq012662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-02 15:08:43 EDT --- i3lock-1.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/i3lock-1.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 20:08:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:08:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022008.nB2K8cQw012617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-02 15:08:37 EDT --- i3-3.d-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/i3-3.d-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 20:08:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:08:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022008.nB2K8qwL012705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-02 15:08:52 EDT --- i3status-2.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/i3status-2.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 20:12:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:12:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022012.nB2KCCkr003961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Thomas Janssen 2009-12-02 15:12:10 EDT --- *Approved* -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 20:12:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:12:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022012.nB2KC3Hd003893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 --- Comment #2 from David Zeuthen 2009-12-02 15:12:02 EDT --- FYI, the gnome-disk-utility package cvs has been updated to use udisks - I can't build the package until udisks is available in the build roots though. Anyway, once you install udisks (which will remove DeviceKit-disks in the process) you want the new gnome-disk-utility packages in order for GVfs/Nautilus to keep working. Normal users won't see this problem unless they specifically install udisks. Once the new gnome-disk-utilities packages are built users will transition without any problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 20:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:24:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022024.nB2KO5xn016471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge 2009-12-02 15:24:04 EDT --- Graeme, thank you for your review. I've corrected those issues: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/django-lint-0.11-4.fc12.src.rpm and http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/django-lint.spec [mrunge at sofja SPECS]$ rpmlint django-lint.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [mrunge at sofja SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/django-lint-0.11-4.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [mrunge at sofja SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/django-lint-0.11-4.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Should be fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 20:43:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022043.nB2KhRpt022950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-02 15:43:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mono-bouncycastle Short Description: Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono Owners: kalev Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 20:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543685] New: Package review: libnes - Driver library for libibverbs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package review: libnes - Driver library for libibverbs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543685 Summary: Package review: libnes - Driver library for libibverbs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- libnes is a simple package that provides a low level hardware driver for the libibverbs package. The current package requires libibverbs-1.1.3 or later to compile, and prebuilt versions as well as the spec file and srpm can be found on my person web page at: http://xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ rpmlint shows the following: [dledford at firewall rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/libnes-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm RPMS/x86_64/libnes-* libnes.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-provides libibverbs-driver libnes.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/libibverbs.d/nes.driver libnes-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. The first one is correct as it's a psuedo provides that only exists for the purpose of causing a yum install of libibverbs to pull in all the hardware drivers that make libibverbs operate. The second is a side effect of the libibverbs package. It requires the file in this location, but the file is not user changable and should not therefore be labeled as a conf file. The final one is because the -static package only has one file, the static library. All the docs are in the base package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 21:14:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:14:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543689] New: Package review: libipathverbs - Driver library for libibverbs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package review: libipathverbs - Driver library for libibverbs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543689 Summary: Package review: libipathverbs - Driver library for libibverbs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dledford at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- libipathverbs is a simple package that provides a low level hardware driver for the libibverbs package. The current package requires libibverbs-1.1.3 or later to compile, and prebuilt versions as well as the spec file and srpm can be found on my person web page at: http://xsintricity.com/dledford/Package_Review/ rpmlint shows the following: [dledford at firewall Package_Review]$ rpmlint libipathverbs* libipathverbs.src:11: W: unversioned-explicit-provides libibverbs-driver libipathverbs.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/libibverbs.d/ipath.driver libipathverbs.spec:11: W: unversioned-explicit-provides libibverbs-driver libipathverbs-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. [dledford at firewall Package_Review]$ The first and third ones are correct as it's a psuedo provides that only exists for the purpose of causing a yum install of libibverbs to pull in all the hardware drivers that make libibverbs operate. The second is a side effect of the libibverbs package. It requires the file in this location, but the file is not user changable and should not therefore be labeled as a conf file. The final one is because the -static package only has one file, the static library. All the docs are in the base package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 21:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:16:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022116.nB2LGbd7002262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2009-12-02 16:16:36 EDT --- Koji scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1844660 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 21:16:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022116.nB2LG78t002141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 21:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:15:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022115.nB2LFt9i002022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-12-02 16:15:54 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-pear-OLE.src: I: checking php-pear-OLE.noarch: I: checking php-pear-OLE.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines + License ok : PHP + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + no license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 232a44e1da145afc6f6a5b791ae605f8 OLE-1.0.0RC1.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + no documentation + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in koji + no test suite + scriptlets ok - Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear + Final Provides ok php-pear(OLE) = 1.0.0 php-pear-OLE = 1.0.0-0.2.rc1.fc8 In /usr/share/pear/OLE.php => require_once 'PEAR.php'; So you must add Requires: php(PEAR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 21:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:58:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022158.nB2Lw9H1013033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jsimon at fedoraproject.org, | |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 22:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:11:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022211.nB2MB27E016126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-02 17:11:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > At least: from my point of view your review is very poor. > > It's more "brief". I tried to build package locally, in mock and finally in > koji, and it passed. Another important thing is license, and that's also ok. Jochen, seriously, what was wrong here? Please point out any deficiencies of the package, I have a feeling that the CVS request might be delayed for this (other, older cvs requests have been processed), so I'd really like to have this cleared up. > I gave it another check. There is missing one "must" from java guidelines, and > that is "Require: java", jpackage-utils is not enough. Fair enough. Fixed. > * I think, javadoc shouldn't be in %doc Fixed. > * drop epoch from current changelog entry Done. New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/xstream.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/xstream-1.2.2-4.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 22:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543718] New: Review Request: wxmacmolplt - A graphics program for plotting 3-D molecular structures and normal modes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wxmacmolplt - A graphics program for plotting 3-D molecular structures and normal modes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543718 Summary: Review Request: wxmacmolplt - A graphics program for plotting 3-D molecular structures and normal modes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/wxmacmolplt.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/wxmacmolplt-7.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MacMolPlt is: * A modern graphics program for plotting 3-D molecular structures and normal modes (vibrations). Modern means: o Mouse driven interface for real-time rotation and translation. o copy and paste functionality for interfacing to other programs such as word processors or other graphics programs (like ChemDraw). o simple printing to color or black and white printers (publication quality). o multiple files open at once. * It reads a variety of file formats including any GAMESS input, log or IRC file directly to create animations of IRC's, DRC's, and optimizations. You may also import a $VEC group from any file (such as a GAMESS .DAT file). In addition xMol XYZ files, MolDen format files and Chemical Markup Language (CML) files are supported. Also some PDB file support and MDL MolFile support is included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 22:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:53:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022253.nB2Mrire018097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |543718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 2 22:53:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:53:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543718] Review Request: wxmacmolplt - A graphics program for plotting 3-D molecular structures and normal modes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912022253.nB2MrhO6018061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543718 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154(FE-SCITECH) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 00:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030001.nB3017s4013328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #17 from Carl Byington 2009-12-02 19:01:06 EDT --- Ok, requires added, both main and -devel require -libs which contains the license related files. The other f2c documentation is still in the main package. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1844942 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 00:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030014.nB30EEUL009063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #16 from Carl Byington 2009-12-02 19:14:13 EDT --- Change description or summary? Other fixes done - export F77, drop BuildConflicts, shorter changelog, typos in description and summaries fixed, permissions on installed .so files fixed (strange that an autoconf install installed those non-executable). The interesting one was 'script-without-shebang /usr/bin/chkmpqcout' and also sc-mkf77sym. I am not sure how bash figured out that it should use Perl on a script with a first line of '#', but I patched those two in the .spec file. scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1844954 Your rpmlint finds stuff that mine did not find. How are you invoking it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 01:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 20:59:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030159.nB31x2OF002120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #26 from Graeme Gillies 2009-12-02 20:59:01 EDT --- Hi, I have updated the specs/SRPMS to moovida 1.0.9 which came out recently. I am still trying to track down a sponsor for review moovida.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida.spec moovida-1.0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-1.0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm moovida-plugins-good.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good.spec moovida-plugins-good-1.0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good-1.0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm moovida-plugins-bad.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad.spec moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 02:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 21:04:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030204.nB324fiQ012362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-12-02 21:04:39 EDT --- There seems to be an error somewhere in the configure script, the package cannot be built in the current shape: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1845034 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 02:31:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 21:31:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030231.nB32VG5f010147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #10 from Arun SAG 2009-12-02 21:31:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-irsim-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-4.fc12.src.rpm Issues #007 and #008 addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 04:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 23:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030451.nB34pbgv020256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-02 23:51:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Change description or summary? Whoops; summary. > Your rpmlint finds stuff that mine did not find. How are you invoking it? I'm just running it on the packages created by a mock build in F-12. No magic involved. Some warnings you get only with installed packages, but I haven't got to that part, yet. (Besides, they aren't that important, normally.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 05:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 00:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030504.nB354Xso016173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 00:04:32 EDT --- kcm_touchpad-0.3.0-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 05:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 00:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030504.nB354do6025215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.0-5.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 05:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 00:12:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030512.nB35CVmP020387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 00:12:30 EDT --- kcm_touchpad-0.3.0-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 05:12:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 00:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529517] Review Request: kcm_touchpad - Synaptics driver based touchpads kcontrol module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030512.nB35CaB7020434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529517 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.0-5.fc11 |0.3.0-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 05:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 00:20:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030520.nB35KApX031127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 05:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 00:22:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030522.nB35MGKV023530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 00:22:14 EDT --- Taking over review. First note: use %{optflags} instead of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS since you're using %{buildroot} in favor of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:09:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:09:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030609.nB369PSG010387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-12-03 01:09:24 EDT --- >From last comment it seems you have done some update. If you change your spec or srpm, please do a release tag bump and write down changes in ChangeLog and post the new urls. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:21:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030621.nB36Lsnb014006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-12-03 01:21:53 EDT --- While skimming I found an unowned directory /usr/share/gource/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528469] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLogDatabaseTiein - eZ Components EventLogDatabaseTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030629.nB36T5aY007499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528469 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:29:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:27:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:27:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523224] Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030627.nB36RrLe007274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523224 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:27:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030626.nB36QPTY007008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:26:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:31:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030631.nB36VW3b016528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:31:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030630.nB36UPvc016216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-12-03 01:30:24 EDT --- "" autoreconf %configure --prefix=/usr make "" needs to be replaced with "" %configure make %{?_smp_mflags} "" %configure macro already has --prefix=/usr and other options and a lone make is not advisable. moreover timestamp needs to be saved, while copying files into BUILDROOT in %install section. I would also suggest to try and get rid of patch for version correction, as running autoreconf is not advised. If you really care about package version, try sed in configure script. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030633.nB36X99x008754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:33:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:30:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030630.nB36Unmg008298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:30:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030633.nB36XAaV016957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 01:33:10 EDT --- CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:33:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030633.nB36X5km016882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 01:33:03 EDT --- CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030633.nB36Xp9j017331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:33:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:34:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030634.nB36Ywel017538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:34:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:32:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030632.nB36WFng016720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:32:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:35:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:35:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030635.nB36ZdbL017947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:35:38 EDT --- Should be all corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541589] Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030637.nB36bnP4010038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541589 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:37:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537897] Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030636.nB36agAS009845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537897 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:36:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030638.nB36ceR1010187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:38:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:40:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:40:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030640.nB36eMV0019388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:40:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:39:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:39:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030639.nB36dWpw018939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:39:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:41:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529544] Review Request: php-phpunit-bytekit - A command-line tool built on the PHP Bytekit extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030641.nB36fIwM019670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529544 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:41:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:45:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188105] Review Request: torque In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030645.nB36j4O8020756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188105 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:45:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:43:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030643.nB36hiqT020221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-12-03 01:43:43 EDT --- Running autoreconf is not a real problem. I assume, that patch makes it anyway upstream and won't be required in the next release of gource, yes? Keeping the timestamps is not a must, it's just suggested by the way... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:46:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:46:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030646.nB36ktuo013706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:46:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 06:45:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 01:45:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495246] Review Request: perl-POE-Test-Loops - Reusable tests for POE::Loop authors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030645.nB36jc0D013468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495246 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-03 01:45:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 07:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030701.nB371Fmo017427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-03 02:01:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Running autoreconf is not a real problem. I disagree - People who do so are exposing themselves and their package's users to avoidable risks. > Keeping the timestamps is not a must, it's just suggested by the way... This suggestions is based on ill assumptions. Keeping timestamps is technically non-required eye-candy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 07:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:29:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226669] Merge Review: zip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030729.nB37TxVZ023961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226669 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kklic at redhat.com Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #9 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-03 02:29:57 EDT --- All comments are probably addressed now: - zip is updated to 3.0 in rawhide - zcrypt29.zip has been dropped - exec-shield.patch has been renamed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 07:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:44:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030744.nB37idRs002515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 02:44:38 EDT --- php-phpunit-File-Iterator-1.1.0-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpunit-File-Iterator-1.1.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 07:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:52:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030752.nB37qcxW004569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kklic at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kklic at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 07:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:56:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030756.nB37uAxS005523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 02:56:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Ok, requires added, both main and -devel require -libs which contains the > license related files. The other f2c documentation is still in the main > package. > > scratch build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1844942 Umm.. what about the spec and srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 07:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030756.nB37unIw030528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 02:56:48 EDT --- Please attach links to the new spec and srpm every time you make updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030801.nB381i9v032287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 --- Comment #1 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-03 03:01:43 EDT --- Hi, I am going to the co-maintainer for the openvas stack koji devel build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1845347 SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/openvas-libnasl.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/openvas-libnasl-2.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:05:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:05:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226050] Merge Review: libtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030805.nB385wjD001105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226050 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kklic at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kklic at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226441] Merge Review: sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030810.nB38AWCc009536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226441 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kklic at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kklic at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:13:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030813.nB38Dv1R010300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #19 from Terje R??sten 2009-12-03 03:13:56 EDT --- I wonder if this -libs -devel split makes sense for this package. Using f2c means that you want to convert Fortran code to C code, to actually compile the result of that you need -libs *and* -devel package as f2c will always add #include "f2c.h" to C output. Only f2c and f2c-devel is not useful, you have to add f2c-devel to make use of f2c-libs. f2c alone is only useful if you want to see the ugly converted output and do nothing more (very unlikely). Splitting f2c will be the same as splitting gcc in gcc (/usr/bin/gcc), gcc-libs (for the object files) and gcc-devel (headers). To me this don't make sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:15:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225980] Merge Review: latex2html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030815.nB38F9V3003787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225980 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kklic at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kklic at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030816.nB38GUQY004131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #20 from Terje R??sten 2009-12-03 03:16:29 EDT --- > > Umm.. what about the spec and srpm? Click links under "Descendent Tasks build". Then scroll down and you see a link to a srpm. This works ok for some days untill koji removes the links :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:20:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:20:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030820.nB38KxTh005194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #31 from Antoine Brenner 2009-12-03 03:20:57 EDT --- I agree with comment #30, it would really be nice to have all the required actions in the init script... (It did look very weird to not have at least status...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:22:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:22:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226213] Merge Review: openjade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030822.nB38Ma7x005444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226213 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kklic at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kklic at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030824.nB38OAJO005750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 03:24:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > > > > Umm.. what about the spec and srpm? > > Click links under "Descendent Tasks build". > Then scroll down and you see a link to a srpm. > > This works ok for some days untill koji removes the links :-) Yes, but still I don't want to build (or install) the srpm just to have a look at the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030823.nB38NJD1012424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 03:23:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I wonder if this -libs -devel split makes sense for this package. It does. > Using f2c means that you want to convert Fortran code to C code, to > actually compile the result of that you need -libs *and* -devel package > as f2c will always add > > #include "f2c.h" > > to C output. > > Only f2c and f2c-devel is not useful, you have to add f2c-devel > to make use of f2c-libs. No, you have to add f2c-devel to use f2c. So actually one could unite f2c-devel with f2c, which would just have a virtual Provides: f2c-devel. Anyway, if you build something with f2c, then the resulting package will only need the shared library, that is provided by f2c-libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030834.nB38YX8s008194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2009-12-03 03:34:32 EDT --- Siddhesh, I had a look to your spec file. A few thoughts and comments: - You are currently mixing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}, choose one and please keep it consistent (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS) - I can't see a reason to have the "Requires:" lines inside of the spec file. If your software links to a library, rpmbuild is catching up the dependency in the end of the build process and adds "Requires:" to the required libs. - Why do you do "%configure --prefix=/usr" rather "%configure"? Is there a real reason for? If you do "rpm --eval '%configure'", you see what %configure will be expanded to. - You want to use parallel make for making your package. If the software does not support it right now, please make a comment and otherwise please use it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Parallel_make - You might want to preserve timestamps by appending INSTALL="install -p" to the "make install" command. As Ralf agreed with me, it is not required on a technically base, Guidelines just suggest it, see e.g. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps - As far as I can see, you're missing "BuildRequires: freetype-devel", otherwise I had trouble to rebuild the package - Can you please choose a valid BuildRoot tag from the available list? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag - You are missing the pareparation of BuildRoot in %install section, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install - I'm wondering about the following lines in your spec file: %dir %{_datadir}/gource/* %dir %{_mandir}/man*/* %dir %{_datadir}/gource/fonts/* Have a look at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories - Can you please communicate with upstream and ensure that your patch really makes it into the next release of gource? Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:38:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:38:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030838.nB38cvl5009608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 03:38:56 EDT --- Besides, you haven't increased the release tag. Increment the release and add relevant comments to the changelog every time you make changes to the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:37:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541992] Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030837.nB38bCST009042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-03 03:37:06 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1842889 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 474428dcbf1833d71a4dff5fc84cda6916d95aba PDF-Create-1.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=9, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.32 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.41 CPU) + Package perl-PDF-Create-1.04-1.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(PDF::Create) = 1.04 perl(PDF::Create::Outline) = 1.00 perl(PDF::Create::Page) = 1.00 perl(PDF::Image::GIF) = 1.00 perl(PDF::Image::JPEG) = 1.00 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(CGI) perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(FileHandle) perl(PDF::Create) perl(PDF::Create::Outline) perl(PDF::Create::Page) perl(PDF::Image::GIF) perl(PDF::Image::JPEG) perl(integer) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application I can't find licence information. Can you point me if I have missed it? If its not there then ask upstream to include it in each .pm file and/or also in README or separate license text file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:40:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030840.nB38ee1v010501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) AssignedTo|redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d |nobody at fedoraproject.org |e | Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck 2009-12-03 03:40:38 EDT --- According to FAS, you're not yet a packager, so we need to block FE-NEEDSPONSOR bug report according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process. I'm resetting the fedora?review flag to empty, as only the reviewer, not the packager should ever set and change it. Sorry, but I'm not a sponsor for packaging, so I'm now removing myself from assigned. Nevertheless you should have a look to my comments and work on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:45:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:45:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030845.nB38jH5Q017677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #12 from Tareq Al Jurf 2009-12-03 03:45:15 EDT --- Fixed and updated to 0.60 SRPM http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i586/invulgotracker/invulgotracker-0.60-1.fc13.src.rpm SPEC http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i586/invulgotracker/invulgotracker.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:46:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:46:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030846.nB38kjuN018088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 03:46:45 EDT --- Make the link as instructed in comment #10. It fixes the rpmlint error f2c-libs.x86_64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libf2c.so.0.22 Actually, you might want to change the arguments of the link commands from -sf to -s, since the latter is safer. ** You don't need to patch the makefile for CFLAGS, running make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" overrides them in any case. Also the change of CC is not necessary. And you can drop the MFLAG declaration, it isn't used anywhere! ** The patch still needs a comment in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:51:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:51:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030851.nB38p8j6019344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-03 03:51:07 EDT --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1845439 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/groovy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/groovy-1.6.6-2.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030849.nB38nvOo012466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #25 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 03:49:56 EDT --- And the Requires are still not perfect. So, actually the main package has to also Requires: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} since the headers are needed for normal operation. Change the summary to "A Fortran 77 to C/C++ conversion program", since f2c doesn't work with any of the more modern versions of Fortran. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 08:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 03:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030859.nB38xMJQ015203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #26 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 03:59:21 EDT --- And for the sake of consistency I'd use %{_libdir}/libf2c.so.* in %files :) After these have been fixed, the review should pass with flying colors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030908.nB398C6g018545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #27 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 04:08:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > And for the sake of consistency I'd use > %{_libdir}/libf2c.so.* > in %files :) and for the same reason use f2c instead of %{name} in %{_bindir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:18:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030918.nB39ImZa023353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 --- Comment #9 from Siddhesh Poyarekar 2009-12-03 04:18:47 EDT --- The upstream developer has accepted the patch, so we should see it in the next upstream version: http://code.google.com/p/gource/issues/detail?id=21 I'll work on the spec file and revert with an update (with a bumped release number this time :) ). Thanks Robert, Rakesh and Ralf! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030937.nB39bJ42030067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 04:37:18 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:36:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030936.nB39aoSx029963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 04:36:49 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:36:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030936.nB39aOl7029895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 04:36:23 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:37:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030937.nB39bk3F003023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 04:37:45 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:46:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:46:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030946.nB39kito005423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 Scott Tsai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:46:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030946.nB39k0ST005109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Michal Babej changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:46:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] New: Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 Summary: Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: scottt.tw at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora NOTE: This is my first package and I'm seeking a sponsor. Spec URL: http://scottt.tw/fedora/udis86.spec SRPM URL: http://scottt.tw/fedora/udis86-1.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: udis86 is a disassembler library (libudis86) for x86 and x86-64. The primary intent is to aid binary code analysis. The no-documentation warning from rpmlint: udis86.x86_64: W: no-documentation is there because udis86 has no COPYING or AUTHORS file and its README file only contains a single line "See docs/udis86.pdf" and the sited udis86.pdf is included in the -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:50:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:50:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030950.nB39oIxG000970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 04:49:35 EDT --- mono-bouncycastle-1.5-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030950.nB39oOKR001051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 04:50:22 EDT --- mono-bouncycastle-1.5-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mono-bouncycastle-1.5-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:53:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525927] Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030953.nB39rHIH007218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525927 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen 2009-12-03 04:53:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks for the review Kalev. > + The stated license (GPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license > ! The license doesn't match actual package license > > Every source file contains the following lines: > * Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Marcin Krystian Krzywonos > * License: GNU/GPL version 2 > > I think this means that the license tag should read 'GPLv2' Some of the source, like the file 'missing' and 'config.guess' are GPLv2+. > ! The following pushd/popd commands in the spec file without anything in > between seem useless and should be removed: > pushd po > popd Removed. > ! You have the following sed command to fix lib64 dir: > sed -i 's|/usr/lib|%{_libdir}|' %{name} > > I think a proper way to do that is fix script.in instead (that's something you > could also send upstream): > -exec @MONO@ @prefix@/lib/incollector/incollector.exe $MONO_EXTRA_ARGS "$@" > +exec @MONO@ @pkglibdir@/incollector.exe $MONO_EXTRA_ARGS "$@" > > Attaching the patch to the bug report in a separate file too. Thanks for the patch. It's not a blocker to use sed, though i changed it to use patch since there was already a patch, for consistency. > ! Consider removing %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.ico at the end of %install. I > very much doubt anything uses .ico files in Fedora when there's a matching .png > file in %{_datadir}/pixmaps/. The ico is used inside the app it seems. Removing it breaks the compiling. I dont want to patch the software to make it use a png. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/incollector.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/incollector-1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1845565 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030956.nB39ufJA002553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-03 04:56:38 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:56:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030956.nB39ugj7002586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Bug 534168 depends on bug 534135, which changed state. Bug 534135 Summary: Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 09:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 04:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540653] Review Request: jazzy - Java-based spell checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912030956.nB39uvBm008108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540653 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-03 04:56:55 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for review and cvs! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 10:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 05:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525927] Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031004.nB3A4K3Q004703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525927 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Janssen 2009-12-03 05:04:17 EDT --- Man.. Coffee is missing: SRPM URL:http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/incollector-1.2-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 10:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 05:03:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525927] Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031003.nB3A3cZO004548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525927 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Janssen 2009-12-03 05:03:37 EDT --- Changed the license to read GPLv2 Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/incollector.spec SRPM URL:http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/incollector-1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 10:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 05:16:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226661] Merge Review: yaboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031016.nB3AG5Rf014119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226661 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Roman Rakus 2009-12-03 05:16:03 EDT --- Commited. Please check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 10:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 05:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525927] Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031037.nB3AbBwg015117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525927 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-03 05:37:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks for the patch. It's not a blocker to use sed, though i changed it to use > patch since there was already a patch, for consistency. Of course, using sed is no problem. However, the sed command was just a workaround. The reason why I came up with the patch is that it fixes the root cause, and I am sure upstream is glad to apply it. For you personally using sed is probably easier, but if you submit the patch to upstream, you might be able to eventually remove the workaround in a future release. > > ! Consider removing %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.ico at the end of %install. I > > very much doubt anything uses .ico files in Fedora when there's a matching .png > > file in %{_datadir}/pixmaps/. > > The ico is used inside the app it seems. Removing it breaks the compiling. I > dont want to patch the software to make it use a png. Yes, the .ico file gets embedded in the .exe file during %build section. However, what I was saying is that you might want to remove it at the end of %install from %{buildroot} (compiling is all done by that time). As I understand it, the .ico file gets embedded in the .exe during build, and nothing else uses it afterwards in %{_datadir}/pixmaps/. The .png is used for desktop integration, but since .ico files are mostly Windows-specific, I very much doubt Gnome or KDE would load them, especially if the .png file is present. There's a small chance that incollector itself might load the .ico at runtime, but grepping through the source gave me the impression that this is not the case. But this is nothing serious, and I am not sure if it's even worth removing it. Just pointed it out for you. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 10:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 05:58:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application::Plugin::ActionDispatch adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of the incoming HTTP request. For those who are familiar with Catalyst, the interface works very similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 11:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 06:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543863] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools - Tools to generate and maintain CGI::Application::Structured based web apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools - Tools to generate and maintain CGI::Application::Structured based web apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543863 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools - Tools to generate and maintain CGI::Application::Structured based web apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A simple, medium-weight, MVC, DB web micro-framework built on CGI::Application. The framework combines tested, well known plugins, templates and helper scripts to provide a rapid development environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 11:08:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 06:08:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031108.nB3B8BC8023661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 --- Comment #17 from Dan Hor?k 2009-12-03 06:08:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > What about my comments on the API? It's not a merge review blocker in my opinion and should be tracked in as a separate bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 11:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 06:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541589] Review Request: sqljet - Pure Java SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031109.nB3B9D3I023831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541589 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-03 06:09:11 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=144190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 11:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 06:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031118.nB3BI1r9030889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Bug 540986 depends on bug 542730, which changed state. Bug 542730 Summary: Please add Maven depmap fragments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542730 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 11:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 06:22:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031122.nB3BM9bT027380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 --- Comment #7 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-03 06:22:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Indeed, most of the issues are solved. However there are 2 cosmetic issues left > which would be nice to see fixed (especially the first one): > - please either remove the buildroot line completely or use one of the forms > accepted by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Fixed. > Closing the review as done and fixed. Thank you, Adam. Thank you for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 11:51:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 06:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031151.nB3BpWIU003059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #22 from Roman Rakus 2009-12-03 06:49:43 EDT --- Still problems with rpath: rpmlint aspell.spec aspell-0_60_6-9_fc13/*.rpm aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/nroff-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/sgml-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/context-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/email-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/tex-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/aspell-0.60/texinfo-filter.so ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/aspell ['/usr/lib64'] aspell.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libpspell.so.15.1.4 ['/usr/lib64'] 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 11:53:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 06:53:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225851] Merge Review: gob2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031153.nB3BrM7c008315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225851 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Novotny 2009-12-03 06:53:21 EDT --- so the only problem is the "Source:" URL. fixed in rawhide and F-12 -built F12 release candidate gob2-2.0.16-5.fc12, rawhide gob2-2.0.16-4.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 12:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 07:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225851] Merge Review: gob2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031201.nB3C1rVf010910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225851 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-03 07:01:51 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 12:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 07:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031212.nB3CClo9014555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #77 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-12-03 07:12:40 EDT --- I am NOT having any selinux issue on F12 (enforcing policy). Anyone still having problems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 12:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 07:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031224.nB3CO4ND011910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-03 07:24:02 EDT --- Do we really need the jdk14 jar? We are not shipping 1.4 jdk and TBH I don't believe it is even used nowadays. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 12:41:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 07:41:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031241.nB3Cf3RS022411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #44 from Peter Galbraith 2009-12-03 07:40:58 EDT --- New version: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/emacs-goodies-el/emacs-goodies-el_31.2.orig.tar.gz http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/emacs-goodies-el/emacs-goodies-el_31.2-1.diff.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 12:40:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 07:40:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031240.nB3CeIjo016694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-03 07:40:16 EDT --- Also I would like to see javadoc subpackage. For me the correct ant call to build only java 5 and javadocs is `ant dist-15 javadocs`. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 12:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 07:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031245.nB3CjvbD023918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 07:45:54 EDT --- pxe-kexec.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 26) 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Fix this. You don't actually need any indentation on the make line, since the whole command fits nicely on one line. - The changelog is messed up. Fix it. - If you updated the version from Ed's 0.1.7 to 0.2.3, you should have reset the release tag to 1. So the following should be release 2. Review: MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - Macro consistency problem. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK Fix the spec file before import to CVS. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 13:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:15:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031315.nB3DF5OI031402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 13:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:15:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543863] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools - Tools to generate and maintain CGI::Application::Structured based web apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031315.nB3DFEkC026311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543863 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 13:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:26:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031326.nB3DQRn9002112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-03 08:26:25 EDT --- Yes, just copy the Obsoletes line from kdebase-workspace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 13:32:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:32:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031332.nB3DWZMp003967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 08:32:34 EDT --- A few notes: - The source url should be http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL. (Mark this as Source0.) - Remove the commented empty Requires: line. - The summary should read "A disassembler Library for x86 and x86-64" (not just for x86). - Move # test the libudis86 we just built this is the only part that requires yasm export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/libudis86/.libs make check to the %check phase. - Remove the documentation installed by make install at the end of %install with rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_docdir} and list the relevant files instead as %doc, i.e. %doc docs/x86optable.* docs/udis86.* docs/index.html docs/ss.jpg docs/style.css -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 14:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543917] New: Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 Summary: Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: devrim at gunduz.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://projects.commandprompt.com/public/pgcore/repo/rpm/redhat/8.5/check_postgres/F-12/check_postgres.spec SRPM URL: http://yum.pgsqlrpms.org/srpms/8.4/fedora/fedora-12-i386/check_postgres-2.12.0-1.f12.src.rpm Description: check_postgres.pl is a script for checking the state of one or more Postgres databases and reporting back in a Nagios-friendly manner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 14:20:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:20:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031420.nB3EK94e018550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2009-12-03 09:20:07 EDT --- few initial notes: - I've found the homepage at http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~ajcd/psutils/ and downloadable archive as ftp://ftp.knackered.org/pub/psutils/psutils-p17.tar.gz, so the URL and Source tags can be filled - I see a licensing problem with the md??_0.ps files that should be copyrighted by Apple per the author The spec file looks good overall. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 14:44:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:44:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031444.nB3EidKW022231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 --- Comment #2 from Scott Tsai 2009-12-03 09:44:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=375797) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=375797) diff-r1-r2 spec file diff after incorporating fixes suggested in comment #1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 14:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031446.nB3EkCZ9027597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 --- Comment #3 from Scott Tsai 2009-12-03 09:46:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks a lot for the quick feed back! Fixed here: Spec URL: http://scottt.tw/fedora/udis86.spec SRPM URL: http://scottt.tw/fedora/udis86-1.7-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 14:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:50:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543940] Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031450.nB3Eo3pP028817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543940 Adrian Reber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |543797 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 14:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:48:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543940] New: Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543940 Summary: Review Request: libmpdclient - Library for interfacing Music Player Daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: adrian at lisas.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lisas.de/~adrian/rpm/libmpdclient.spec SRPM URL: http://lisas.de/~adrian/rpm/libmpdclient-2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A stable, documented, asynchronous API library for interfacing MPD in the C, C++ & Objective C languages. rpmlint libmpdclient-2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm libmpdclient-2.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm libmpdclient-devel-2.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm libmpdclient-debuginfo-2.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. mock build successful libmpdclient is needed to update mpc to 0.18 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 15:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226442] Merge Review: swig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031516.nB3FGjnF032123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226442 --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-03 10:16:43 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 2df766c9e03e02811b1ab4bba1c7b9cc swig-1.3.40.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. NO specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. - both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{_builddir} are used OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. NO license field matches the actual license. - the actual license seems to be BSD and MIT OK license is open source-compatible. NO License text included in package - the text is included in -doc subpackage, but I think should be in the main package with all other files except Doc and Examples directory. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock. OK debuginfo package looks complete. NO rpmlint is silent. swig.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Connects C/C++/Objective C to some high-level programming languages. swig.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/swig/1.3.40/ocaml/swigp4.ml swig.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/swig/1.3.40/perl5/noembed.h swig.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/swig/1.3.40/ocaml/swig.ml swig.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/swig/1.3.40/ocaml/swig.mli - the summary should be fixed. The rest is ok as swig is a development package. OK final provides and requires look sane. NO %check is present and all tests pass. - the package contains a testsuite, but it seems to fail, so it's disabled. It would be nice to get it working, but I don't think this is a blocker. Adding a %check with #make check and a comment why it's currently disabled should be fine. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. NO scriptlets are sane - the ldconfig calls are unnecessary, there are no libraries installed. OK code, not content. OK documentation is large, -docs subpackage used. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. - there are actually some headers installed but they are used only by swig. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 15:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:26:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226664] Merge Review: ypserv In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031526.nB3FQZh0007989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226664 Nikola Pajkovsky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |npajkovs at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |npajkovs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:19:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:19:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031619.nB3GJxqd024152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:19:58 EDT --- globus-duct-common-2.1-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duct-common-2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031619.nB3GJuBt024092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:19:55 EDT --- globus-duct-common-2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duct-common-2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031620.nB3GK14r024206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:20:00 EDT --- globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031619.nB3GJuLH024083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:19:54 EDT --- globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031619.nB3GJv7S024125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:19:57 EDT --- globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:20:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031620.nB3GKEAE024569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:20:13 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:20:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:20:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031620.nB3GK5X7024510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:20:05 EDT --- globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:20:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031620.nB3GKJD6024609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:20:18 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:22:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:22:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031622.nB3GMcN4020296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #32 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-12-03 11:22:35 EDT --- I've tried to implemented what you asked, please try again: SPEC: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd.spec SRPM: http://www.gpaterno.com/external/otpd-3.2.6-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:19:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031619.nB3GJpGm019089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:19:49 EDT --- globus-duct-common-2.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duct-common-2.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:19:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031619.nB3GJrDW019122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:19:53 EDT --- globus-duct-common-2.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-duct-common-2.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:20:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031620.nB3GK0QJ019175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:20:00 EDT --- globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:20:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:20:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031620.nB3GK3up019352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:20:02 EDT --- globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:23:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031623.nB3GNUQ5020421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 --- Comment #1 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2009-12-03 11:23:29 EDT --- * Thu Dec 3 2009 Jean-Francois Saucier - 1.8-2.beta5.fc12 - Fix Source0 URL as per the guidelines Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/tsocks.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/tsocks-1.8-2.beta5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031620.nB3GKFUJ019564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:20:13 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.fc12 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:20:14 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:35:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031635.nB3GZoJu024383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #45 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-03 11:35:48 EDT --- @Arun, Please tag the files from Peter and create a proper SPEC file and source rpm package, so we may continue this package review. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031637.nB3GbfRq024695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #14 from Dan Hor?k 2009-12-03 11:37:39 EDT --- FYI - the recent build uses completely wrong version-release info - gnusim8085-svn.141-5.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031651.nB3Gp78a001510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:51:06 EDT --- php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:52:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:52:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031652.nB3GqEwn029506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:52:13 EDT --- php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 16:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:50:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031650.nB3Go1EF028558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 11:50:00 EDT --- php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 17:08:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:08:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031708.nB3H8eJ0007224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 12:08:39 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 17:10:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:10:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031710.nB3HApOV002468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 12:10:50 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 17:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526426] Review Request: libgle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031727.nB3HR2ru015036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-12-03 12:26:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=375849) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=375849) Patch to make libgle's Makefile.examples libtool-independent. Here is a patch to examples/Makefile.examples to allow building the examples after the -devel package has been installed. cp -r /usr/share/doc/libgle-devel-3.1.0/examples/ ~ cd ~/examples make -f Makefile.examples Mary, can you add this patch to the RPM? Here's a sample compilation (resulting binary worked on i586): gcc -c -o mainsimple.o mainsimple.c ... gcc -c -o helix.o helix.c cc -g -O2 -Wall -o helix helix.o mainsimple.o -lgle -lglut -lGLU -lGL -lXmu -lXi -lXext -lXmu -lXt -lX11 -lm I think this answers the questions of what -devel packages libgle-devel should require, and also that it should not own /usr/include/GL since it will be installed by the libX11-devel -> xorg-x11-proto-devel dependency chain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 17:38:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:38:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031738.nB3Hcrwp012265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 12:38:53 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.6-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 17:39:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:39:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031739.nB3HddZI019866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 12:39:38 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.6-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.6-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 17:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544016] New: Review Request: cbpolicyd - Postfix anti-spam policy server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cbpolicyd - Postfix anti-spam policy server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544016 Summary: Review Request: cbpolicyd - Postfix anti-spam policy server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris.a.st.pierre at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/cbpolicyd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/cbpolicyd-2.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: Policyd v2 (codenamed "cluebringer") is a multi-platform policy server for popular MTAs. This policy daemon is designed mostly for large scale mail hosting environments. The main goal is to implement as many spam combating and email compliance features as possible while at the same time maintaining the portability, stability and performance required for mission critical email hosting of today. Currently, the package has no SELinux magic, but I've found someone to help me write that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 17:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031748.nB3HmRFE022627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-03 12:48:21 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name + Name of the package fullfill naming guidelines + Consistently usage of rpm macros + URL tag shows to proper project homepage + License tag state ASL 2.0 as valid OSS license + License in the copyright notes on the top of the source files matches license stated by the license tag + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Package sources matches with upstream (md5sum: d50466fab035b9c4eaff87e8eadb119d) + Package contains a javadoc subpackage + Package has proper BuildRoot definition + BuildRoot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + Local build works fine. + Rpmlint is silent on source package + Rpmlint is silent on binary package + Rpmlint is silent on javadoc subpackage + Scratch build on koji works fine + Local install and uninstall works fine + Start of application works without a crash + GUI menu works fine + Fies have proper permissions + Files stanza has no duplicated entries + All package files and dirs are own by the package + No file or dir may belong to another package + %doc stanza is small + Package has proper changelog Bad: - File LICENSE.txt doesn't contains a verbatin copy of the license text. Insteand you find a link to the license text provided by a website. - Not all source files seems to have a copyright notice. - It may be nice, if can the chose a shrter text for the GenericName tag in the desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 18:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031801.nB3I18Zu028105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 13:01:03 EDT --- php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 18:01:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:01:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031801.nB3I1mBO019983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-03 13:01:47 EDT --- php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 18:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:02:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226211] Merge Review: openhpi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031802.nB3I2PV8020166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226211 Michal Hlavinka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-12-03 13:02:22 EDT --- in short: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable - MUST[1]: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review + MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . + MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines + MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] + MUST[2]: The spec file must be written in American English. + MUST[3]: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - MUST[4]: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task + MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture + MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines + MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro + MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] + MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker + MUST: Package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory + MUST: Package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content 0 MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application + MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package 0 MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package + MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' - MUST[1]: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package + MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built + MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) fails, but this is no longer required ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PreppingBuildRootForInstall ) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 -------------------------------- comments: 1) rpmlint *.spec *.src.rpm x86_64/* openhpi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/openhpi/libsnmp_bc.so openhpi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/openhpi/libipmi.so openhpi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/openhpi/libsimulator.so openhpi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/openhpi/libwatchdog.so openhpi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/openhpi/libipmidirect.so openhpi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/openhpi/liboa_soap.so openhpi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/openhpi/libilo2_ribcl.so openhpi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/openhpi/libsysfs2hpi.so https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages : """.... The following are examples of file types which should be in -devel: * Header files (e.g. .h files) * Unversioned shared libraries (e.g. libfoo.so). """ these files should go to -devel package --------- openhpi.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/openhpi 01777 are these permissions really required? I've done only quick testing/googling (without proper configuration), but didn't find anything about this ----------------- openhpi-libs.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided openhpi why openhpi-libs obsoletes openhpi? for version specified, there were no openhpi-libs provided, but this line would lead to yum replacing openhpi with just openhpi-libs -> openhpid and other files will be missing what is your rationale for this? ----------- openhpi-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation no problem with this one 2) Correct english - see WordUsage.html %description hot swap -------- Correct. Two words, lower case. Capitalize when used at the beginning of a sentence only. Do not use ?hotswap? or ?hot-swap?. plug-in ------- Correct. Do not use "plugin". A hardware or software module that adds a specific feature or service to a larger system. For example, a number of plug-ins are available for the Netscape Navigator browser that enable it to display different types of audio or video messages. Navigator plug-ins are based on MIME file types. but these are not blockers ;-) 3) too much wildcards under %files section If upstream makes some changes to it's tarball and add/remove some files, this is not going to catch anything. It's good practice to list at least all files under %{_bindir} and %{_sbindir}. This will let you know if there is any new/missing one. 4) sources does not match upstream $ curl -s http://downloads.sourceforge.net/openhpi/openhpi-2.14.1.tar.gz | md5sum d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e - $ cat sources 1533972a05f2ed61f3ae441ecd3df5a9 openhpi-2.14.1.tar.gz Please fix these issues, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 18:17:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:17:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031817.nB3IHlMV002273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-03 13:17:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Bad: > - File LICENSE.txt doesn't contains a verbatin copy of > the license text. Insteand you find a link to the > license text provided by a website. Upstream was informed, this seems to be allowed per packaging guidelines though. > - Not all source files seems to have a copyright > notice. Sent a mail to upstream mailing list. > - It may be nice, if can the chose a shrter text > for the GenericName tag in the desktop file Will do that for next package spin. Does this block review (or any of the above two?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 18:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031823.nB3INBDH027210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-03 13:23:10 EDT --- Some notes: * %define -> %global - Now Fedora prefers to use %global over %define. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define * License - test/haml/spec/README.md is under WTFPL so the license tag should be "MIT and WTFPL". * Requires - Please add the needed rubygem related dependency. For example, lib/haml/html.rb contains: -------------------------------------------------------- 62 require 'hpricot' -------------------------------------------------------- So this package may need "Requires: rubygem(hpricot)" (here not speaking of BuildRequires). Note that I don't know if this dependency is optional or not. Also please check other dependency (if any). * %check - I think * hardcoding test files as %test_files is not preferable. It is difficult to see what this file list came from. * also even if hardcoding these files is needed, defining %test_files is not needed because - %test_files is in essence used only in one place (in %check) - Whether adding executable permission to a script or not should be determined (for this case) by checking if the script has shebang or not, and should not be determined by hardcoded file list. I think - fixing Rakefile and execute "rake test" - or using ------------------------------------------------------------ pushd %{buildroot}%{geminstdir} # The following -path list is from Rakefile find * \ -path 'test/*/*_test.rb' \ -not -path 'test/rails/*' \ -not -path 'test/plugins/*' \ -not -path 'test/haml/spec/*' | \ while read f do ruby $f done ------------------------------------------------------------ is better. * Macros - As %geminstdir is already defined, use the macro in %files. * %changelog style - When using Fedora CVS system, it is convenient when you put one line between each %changelog entry (for "make clog", for example), like ------------------------------------------------------------ %changelog * Wed Dec 02 2009 Michal Babej - 2.2.15-1 - Update to new upstream release * Wed Dec 02 2009 Michal Babej - 2.2.14-1 - Initial package ------------------------------------------------------------- By the way it is appreciated if you post the full URL of the new spec/srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 18:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:38:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031838.nB3IcBOP007848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #10 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-03 13:38:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Will do that for next package spin. Does this block review (or any of the above > two?) It may be nice, if we can do it in the package which we want to introduced into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 19:00:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:00:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031900.nB3J0sxP014374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |544039 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-12-03 14:00:52 EDT --- Bah, this is a fscking autoconf bug as it seems. Autoconf creates a busted configure file on Rawhide, can you please try e.g. Fedora 11 for reviewing? In the meantime, we've hopefully solved bug #544039 (which I opened now for this). Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 19:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:00:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226049] Merge Review: libtiff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912031900.nB3J0XP8004778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226049 --- Comment #5 from Tom Lane 2009-12-03 14:00:31 EDT --- All the above items are dealt with as of libtiff-3.9.2-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 20:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 15:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032019.nB3KJKjb024761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2009-12-03 15:19:17 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F10 and F11/x86_64. fails at the moment in devel due to bug #544039 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: unicornscan.src:39: W: configure-without-libdir-spec -> benign binary RPM: unicornscan.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /etc/unicornscan/modules.conf unicornscan unicornscan.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/unicornscan/modules.conf unicornscan unicornscan.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/unicornscan/modules.conf 0640 -> intended for security reasons [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Optional buildroot tag is correct ( %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) ) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of source file: 5361150afa999e68076a453072830dd23dd9bfee /home/wolfy/unicornscan-0.4.7-2.tar.bz2 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [-] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). -> existing .la files are needed by the plugins [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Final provides and requires are sane. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, i f available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10 and F11/x86_64 & x86 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on:F10 and F11/x86_64 & x86 [x] Package functions as described (in F10) [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [x] File based requires are sane. [-] %check is present and the test passes. === Issues === 1. The current version cannot be compiled in fedora rawhide, as pointed out in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id= 538190#c1 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544039 2. It would be nice if you could also compile a version with mysql support (maybe by compiling twice, once with mysql suppo rt and once with pgsql support --having both does not really make sense despite being theoretically possible (and done by o ther apps) 3. If it is not too much to ask, I'd like to see the php scripts included, at least as doc if not as a separate frontend pa ckage. That is, presuming that they work. ================ *** APPROVED *** but please wait for the rawhide version to get fixed before pushing to the repos ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 20:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 15:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032033.nB3KXLFG009853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #35 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-12-03 15:33:19 EDT --- I think I caught everything you pointed out except with the following: 1) I didn't do much about file/dir permissions yet but will. I have questions I'll post in a separate comment. 2) I didn't rename the libdspam to dspam-libs because you can install the library independent of dspam, it can be used in other projects/programs. If someone were to write a plugin for evolution or thunderbird. the dspam package is only necessary for an MTA, whereas the library can be used in all sorts of places. 3) The libdspam-X are required by the library for storage of all the token data it produces. So I'm not sure what to call them other than libdspam-X, I could rename them to dspam-plugin-X or dspam-storage-X but that implies you need the dspam package which you don't. So if you could advise what to do here. %changelog * Sun Nov 29 2009 Nathanael Noblet - 3.9.0-0.10.BETA4 - Change dspam init to not be enabled by default - Add EVR dependancy from all sub packages - Removed pkgconfig requirement - package -n dspam-web renamed to package web - Updated perl requires even though dspam-web is not being built currently - Added post/preun requirements to chkconfig and initscripts - Updated defattr lines - use _initrddir instead of _sysconfdir/rc.d/init.d (RHEL compat) - updated source file permissions - get libdspam to own the sql-scripts directory http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-0.10.BETA4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 20:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 15:41:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032041.nB3Kfkle032064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #36 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-12-03 15:41:44 EDT --- When you say the following: ============ START QUOTE ========================================== * %files entry unification - By the way %files entry --------------------------------------------------------------- %files %dir foo/ foo/* --------------------------------------------------------------- (where foo/ is a directory) can be unified as --------------------------------------------------------------- %files foo/ --------------------------------------------------------------- This style contains the directory foo/ itself and all files/directories/etc under foo/. ============ END QUOTE =========================================== I started looking at some of the files entries and am not sure about some of them for example. Should %{_bindir}/* be %{_bindir}/? Wouldn't that mean I would own the bindir? So I assume you want that applied only to directories I would own. Which brings me to my next question about that. %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/sql-scripts/mysql %doc %attr(0644,root,root) %{_datadir}/%{name}/sql-scripts/mysql/* Can I combine that into one line? I assume I can't because I want the attr to apply to the files and not the directory.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 20:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 15:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032056.nB3Kui6N004186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2009-12-03 15:56:43 EDT --- Manuel, thank you very much for the review. (In reply to comment #3) > 2. It would be nice if you could also compile a version with mysql support > (maybe by compiling twice, once with mysql support and once with pgsql > support --having both does not really make sense despite being theoretically > possible (and done by other apps) I'm very sorry, but there is no MySQL support at unicornscan at the moment, except the --with-mysql. If I enable that, make will fail, that the mysql.c is missing. If I investigate deeper, there's a mysql.c (or so) in the Attic, but if I move that file to its correct place, gcc fails with many errors. If you can provide me a way how to get MySQL support working, let me know - and I am happy to enable MySQL support immediately. > 3. If it is not too much to ask, I'd like to see the php scripts included, > at least as doc if not as a separate frontend package. That is, presuming > that they work. I can ship the PHP scripts as %doc, if you wish. But when reading them, they don't look that well engineered and not really PHP 5.3-compatible, so I decided not to package them, because then I actually would have to fix them - without using them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 21:02:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032102.nB3L2eU4018456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-12-03 16:02:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unicornscan Short Description: Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing Owners: robert Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: I of course will wait with importing into CVS until the bugs #537805 and #544039 are solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 21:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540986] Review Request: logback - A Java logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032111.nB3LBqxe008045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540986 Bug 540986 depends on bug 542730, which changed state. Bug 542730 Summary: Please add Maven depmap fragments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542730 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 21:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:14:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032114.nB3LEiFu021213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-03 16:14:43 EDT --- Builds fine in mock, I get the same rpmlint output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 21:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:22:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032122.nB3LMqwt010575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-03 16:22:51 EDT --- ln -s udisks $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/devkit-disks ln -s udisks.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/man/man1/devkit-disks.1 Should these be relative ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 21:44:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032144.nB3Li15c016381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-12-03 16:44:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The COPYING file just contain the LGPL2.1 and doesn't say anything about using > a later version of the license. Sometimes you get the license text in the > COPYING file and a note in the README on how to apply the license. IE LGPLv2.1 > only or LGPLv2.1 or any later version at the users choice. Hence my point. I said before: !!!! PLEASE LOOK IN THE COPYING-FILE !!!! Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Library specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and "any later version", you have the option of following the terms and conditions either of that version or of any later version published by the Free Software Foundation. If the Library does not specify a license version number, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation. This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. Nope. That's incorrect. you should be able to recreate the tar ball with the > same md5sum by using the procedure. That's the whole point of the md5sum.... > to ensure the source code isn't modified from upstream official > code/release. Nope? Why nope? Did you ever take a look in your archive? your checkout creates an !UNIQUE! .git directory. This is the reason why we all get another md5sum. You have to remove the .git directory from your source0 before you archive it. THEN and !only THEN! we all will get the same md5sum... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 22:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032220.nB3MKCqR025903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) --- Comment #4 from Mat Booth 2009-12-03 17:20:11 EDT --- Hmm, this package looks very much plexus-i18n to me... Is this some kind of fork or just a newer version of plexus-i18n? Plexus-lang provides identical copies of all the classes that plexus-i18n provides just under a different package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 22:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032227.nB3MRjgM027353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 17:27:44 EDT --- - You still have the empty Requires: line that has been commented out in the spec. Please remove it. - Normally the %build and %install phases are placed consecutively in the spec file, and the %check phase is somewhere near the end (e.g. before %clean). This is due to the fact that %check is ran after %install. - I'm wondering about the arrangement of the files. I don't think udcli should be in the -devel package. It would make a lot more sense, if udcli was in the main package. (Or a subpackage named udcli, as called by upstream) If the libs are used by other software, too, then one can separate the library into a subpackage. (-libs or libudis86 as called by upstream) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 22:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032234.nB3MYMqC028624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-03 17:34:21 EDT --- rpmlint output: udis86.src: W: strange-permission udis86-1.7.tar.gz 0600 udis86.x86_64: W: no-documentation udis86-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/udis86-1.7/libudis86/input.c udis86-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/udis86-1.7/libudis86/types.h udis86-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/udis86-1.7/libudis86/syn-att.c udis86-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/udis86-1.7/libudis86/udis86.c udis86-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/udis86-1.7/libudis86/syn-intel.c udis86-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/udis86-1.7/libudis86/decode.c udis86-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/udis86-1.7/udcli/udcli.c udis86-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/udis86-1.7/libudis86/syn.c udis86-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/udis86-1.7/libudis86/syn.h 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings. The first warning is caused by you having odd permissions on the source tarball when you have built the srpm. The debuginfo warnings are caused by odd permissions in the files within the tarball, and they can be fixed e.g. by adding find -name *.c -exec chmod 644 {} \; find -name *.h -exec chmod 644 {} \; in %prep, after %setup. Fix these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 22:37:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:37:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032237.nB3MbDSc008658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #15 from Christian Krause 2009-12-03 17:37:10 EDT --- Sorry that it took a little bit longer than expected, but here is now the complete review: * rpmlint: TODO dmapd.i686: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/sysconfig/dmapd - please consider to use "%config(noreplace)" dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/dmapd dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/dmapd 0700 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/dmapd dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/dmapd 0700 These entries seem to be false positives. dmapd-devel.i686: W: no-documentation This is also a false positive. dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/db/dmapd dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/db/dmapd 0700 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/db/dmapd/Pictures dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/db/dmapd/Pictures 0700 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/db/dmapd/Movies dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/db/dmapd/Movies 0700 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-uid /var/db/dmapd/Music dmapd dmapd.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/db/dmapd/Music 0700 dmapd.i686: W: non-standard-dir-in-var db Regarding these directories I have some doubts. I've read your explanation in comment #14, but I think that the chosen directory /var/db/dmapd is quite arbitrary. I would leave it up completely to the user, where he puts its data and so I'd recommend: - don't create these directories and don't package them - put the "--user dmapd" argument into the init script - comment out the line DMAPDARGS in /etc/sysconfig/dmapd and make sure, that the daemon complains about a missing option when the user has not adjusted or activated this line * naming: OK - name matches upstream - spec file name matches package name * Source0: OK - md5sum: 4ac7dc73d4374a4735a5714ff23aaa26 dmapd-0.0.17.tar.gz - sources matches upstream - Source0 tag ok - spectool -g works * License: OK - GPLv2+ acceptable for Fedora - license matches the actual license: Although the sources uses LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ it is OK to use soleley GPLv2+ as final license for the binary package. - license file packaged * spec file written in English and legible: TODO - please consider to use the standard order of the sections and the standard formatting of spec files * Compilation: OK - package builds in koji on Rawhide on all archs: OK - The package can not be built on F11 and F12 since libdmapsharing is not yet updated to 1.9.0.13 in these releases - parallel make ok * build requirements: TODO - IMHO avahi-devel and dbus-devel can be removed from the build requirements since all dbus/avahi handling will be done via libdmapsharing. A direct dependency for runtime or build time to avahi/dbus is not necessary. * locale handling: OK (n/a) * ldconfig in %post and %postun: OK * directory ownership: TODO Even if there is currently a proposal to change this, currently the official policy is still to "Require: pkgconfig" in the -devel subpackage if there are any pkgconfig files shipped. * files not listed twice: OK * file permissions: OK - %defattr used - actual permissions in packages ok * rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install and %clean: OK * macro usage: TODO - please substitute "%{PACKAGE_VERSION}" with "%{version}" for consistency - please use also %{_initdir} * code vs. content: OK (no content) * large documentation in subpackage: OK (n/a) * header files in -devel subpackage: OK * static libraries in -static package: OK (n/a) * *.so link in -devel package: OK * -devel package requires base package using fully versioned dependency: OK * package must not contain *.la files: OK * package containing *.pc files must "Requires: pkgconfig": TODO - please require pkgconfig in -devel subpackage (see above) * desktop-file: OK (n/a, server application) * compiler flags: OK (rpmoptflags used) * debuginfo complete: OK * functional check: TODO - /etc/init.d/dmapd start works - service DAAP service is detected and serving music works - /etc/init.d/dmapd stop does not work: root@:~# /etc/init.d/dmapd start Starting DMAP server: [ OK ] root@:~# /etc/init.d/dmapd stop Shutting down DMAP server: [FAILED] * packages must not own files/directories already owned by other packages: OK * all file names UTF-8: OK * scriptlets: TODO ldconfig: OK chkconfig: TODO http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript: - "Requires(preun): initscripts" is missing - "Requires(postun): initscripts" is missing - scriptles in spec file are ok user creation/deletion: ok * sysvinit scripts: - stop() should return $RETVAL - script mentions "condrestart", but command won't be accepted - this command is required - starting the service twice will result twice the number of dmapd processes and strange error messages: root@:~# /etc/init.d/dmapd start Starting DMAP server: [ OK ] root@:~# ** (dmapd:12388): WARNING **: Unable to start music sharing server on port 8770, trying any open port ** (dmapd:12388): WARNING **: Unable to notify network of media sharing: Could not add service: Local name collision ** (dmapd:12386): WARNING **: Unable to start music sharing server on port 3689, trying any open port ** (dmapd:12386): WARNING **: Unable to notify network of media sharing: Could not add service: Local name collision - Please have a look at "http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript" for the basic requirements for initscripts in Fedora (the LSB parts are not necessary). Probably it would be the best to use the example init scripts as a base for dmapd's init script. Most likely lots of the mentioned problems will be fixed then automatically. Summary: -------- - use "%config(noreplace)" for /etc/sysconfig/dmapd - consider not to package /var/db/dmapd at all - remove unneeded build requirements - minor macro usage fixes - consider to reformat the spec file to be more standard conform - add pkgconfig requirement for -devel subpackage - add the missing requires for the chkconfig scriptlets - rework the init scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 22:46:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032246.nB3MkUNm010877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: udisks |Review Request: udisks - | |Storage Management Service -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 23:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032328.nB3NS3xF009249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 23:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:38:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032338.nB3Ncmu5022315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #30 from Uwe Kubosch 2009-12-03 18:38:45 EDT --- I forgot the -d option on cvs update... Thank you for the EPEL-5 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 23:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032339.nB3NdYAu022481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 --- Comment #6 from Scott Tsai 2009-12-03 18:39:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=375961) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=375961) diff-r2-r3 spec file diff after incorporating fixes suggested in comment #4 and #5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 23:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543840] Review Request: udis86 - A x86 disassembler library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032345.nB3NjGb9024085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543840 --- Comment #7 from Scott Tsai 2009-12-03 18:45:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Fixed here: Spec URL: http://scottt.tw/fedora/udis86.spec SRPM URL: http://scottt.tw/fedora/udis86-1.7-3.fc12.src.rpm Regarding where to put 'udcli', after some thought I decided to move it to the main package. The rationale being that 'objdump' and 'libopcodes' are both in binutils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 3 23:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912032354.nB3NsVTa026661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 Bug 538190 depends on bug 544039, which changed state. Bug 544039 Summary: Autoconf >= 2.64 causes ./configure: line 2837: `yes:' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544039 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 00:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:07:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040007.nB407J7e018859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Stepan Kasal 2009-12-03 19:07:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Autoconf creates a busted configure file on Rawhide, [...] > bug #544039 (which I opened now for this). Well, as explained in bug #544039, the Autoconf sources in that project are borked, though they, by mere luck, happen to produce usable output with certain versions of Autoconf. But since your patch to configure.ac is very simple, I suggest that you do the same change to the generated configure and include it to the patch. It seems more adequate in this particular case. With that, you do not need to run autoconf, so you do not need to care about all the issues with the upstream Autoconf sources. A side note: if a package runs autconf, I prefer to do it at the begining of %build, so that %prep is only a cheap unpack, without any significant computation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 00:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 19:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040037.nB40bWWc003709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-03 19:37:31 EDT --- I don't find the relevant section in the guidelines, but I *believe* to remember, that you are not allowed to package 5 packages into this one. Don't you *have* to package cqrlib, cvector, neartree and cbflib first and at the end rasmol on its own?? As already said, I could be wrong here, but don't think so... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 01:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040115.nB41FnMY011343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 tjyuviaej changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tjyuviaej+crash at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from tjyuviaej 2009-12-03 20:15:47 EDT --- I have RPMs for packages of cqrlib, cvector, neartree and cbflib and they available at http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/install-memo/fedora/repoview/ I can fit them to fedora. After fitting my RPMs to Fedora, I'll create Fedora account and create review process shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 01:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:31:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040131.nB41VLY3014907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-03 20:31:20 EDT --- Nevermind, they are relative. Formal review: Package name: ok Spec file name: ok Packaging guidelines: the guidelines nowadays contain language that forbids explicit dependencies for stuff thats already pulled in via library dependencies. So the Requires for dbus, dbus-glib, glib2, polkit, parted, udev, libatasmart should be dropped unless you need the specific minimal versions. It might be nice to have a /usr/libexec/udisks/ instead of dumping all the helpers into /usr/libexec, but thats not a must-fix. License: ok License field: ok License file: ok Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream sources: need upstream location Buildable: ok ExcludeArch: ok, none BuildRequires: ok Locale handling: ok ldconfig: ok, no libs system libraries: ok, no libs relocatable: no directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: ok %doc content: ok header files: ok, none static libs: ok, none pc files: ok, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PkgconfigAutoRequires, which I believe was recently accepted shared libs: ok, none devel deps: ok libtool archives: ok, none gui apps: ok, no gui app file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok # TODO: should be fixed upstream Is it ? In summary: - remove explicit library dependencies, then the package is acceptable. - additionally, consider using a subdir in /usr/libexec and fixing the TODO upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 01:36:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:36:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040136.nB41awNB004710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 --- Comment #8 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-03 20:36:57 EDT --- Please ignore the account for comment #7. It's for crash reporter account. Anyway, I'll make RPMs for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 01:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:41:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226049] Merge Review: libtiff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040141.nB41f8Rm005860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226049 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Adam Goode 2009-12-03 20:41:05 EDT --- Here is the review checklist: MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. libtiff.src:84: W: make-check-outside-check-section OK, I see why make check would otherwise fail. libtiff-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK, except maybe apply this patch: Index: libtiff.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/libtiff/devel/libtiff.spec,v retrieving revision 1.58 diff -u -3 -p -r1.58 libtiff.spec --- libtiff.spec 3 Dec 2009 18:42:07 -0000 1.58 +++ libtiff.spec 4 Dec 2009 01:39:10 -0000 @@ -9,7 +9,11 @@ URL: http://www.remotesensing.org/libtif Source: ftp://ftp.remotesensing.org/pub/libtiff/tiff-%{version}.tar.gz Patch1: libtiff-acversion.patch + +# http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2129 Patch2: libtiff-mantypo.patch + +#http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2079 Patch3: libtiff-CVE-2009-2347.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. OK MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK All the SHOULDs are good. Except for the minor issue with upstream bug references, looks good! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 01:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:53:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040153.nB41rBpc008404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #4 from Graeme Gillies 2009-12-03 20:53:10 EDT --- Looks like now your package won't build in mock with the following error RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/django-lint-0.11-4.fc12.i386/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_lint-0.0.0-py2.6.egg-info/* Looks like /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_lint-0.0.0-py2.6.egg-info is a regular file not a directory as specified by this glob in the spec file %{_python_sitelib}/django_lint-0.0.0-py2.6.egg-info/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 02:08:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:08:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040208.nB428ihp011922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 --- Comment #8 from Scott Collier 2009-12-03 21:08:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > pxe-kexec.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 26) > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > Fix this. You don't actually need any indentation on the make line, since the > whole command fits nicely on one line. Fixed. > > > - The changelog is messed up. Fix it. > > - If you updated the version from Ed's 0.1.7 to 0.2.3, you should have reset > the release tag to 1. So the following should be release 2. > Fixed. > > Review: > > MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a > duplicate. OK > > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. NEEDSWORK > - Macro consistency problem. Fixed. > > > SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK > > > Fix the spec file before import to CVS. The package has been > > APPROVED Thanks for the review Jussi. Here's the new spec and srpm: Spec URL: http://boodle.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/pxe-kexec.spec SRPM URL: http://boodle.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/pxe-kexec-0.2.3-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 02:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040218.nB42I0SI013822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 Scott Collier changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Scott Collier 2009-12-03 21:17:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pxe-kexec Short Description: Linux boots Linux via network Owners: boodle Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: boodle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 02:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 21:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040250.nB42o6iY020588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-03 21:50:05 EDT --- Wrt to the bash completion script, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543989 which asks for it to be moved to /etc/bash_completion.d/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 05:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 00:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040509.nB459MBC020220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #19 from Carl Byington 2009-12-04 00:09:20 EDT --- - re-enable parallel to try to use multiple cpus. ghemical only used 1 cpu, but perhaps that has nothing to do with the --disable-parallel here. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-13.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1848542 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 05:12:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 00:12:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040512.nB45CG9i021158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #28 from Carl Byington 2009-12-04 00:12:15 EDT --- "The patch still needs a comment in the spec file." Not sure what you want there, but I added a note in the changelog. - add symlink to fix rpmlint error - remove unnecessary parts of the patch, which enables building a shared library. - main package now requires -devel since that is needed to be useful. - summary changed to specify this only works on F77 code. - %%files use explicit libf2c rather than * wildcard http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c-20090411-2.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1848552 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 05:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 00:48:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040548.nB45m4f2029487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-04 00:48:02 EDT --- Thank you for the review (In reply to comment #1) > Some notes: > > ? Requires > - Would you explain the necessity of "R: rubygem(rake)"? > ( Maybe for lib/rcov/rcovtask.rb ? If so, I wonder if this > script is used by default or not because no other scripts > in rcov gem seems to require this script ) > > ! Note that I am not objecting to adding "R: rubygem(rake)". > That's correct, I added that in an attempt to cover what I thought was a missing dependency. Upon a further examination lib/rcov/rcovtask.rb provides tasks *to* rake rather than depending *on* rake. I'll remove that. > * ext/ > - Files under ext/ are to generate C extension module > (rcovrt.so) and should not be needed to be included into > binary rpm. > > ( The trouble is that once we try to execute "rake check" > under %geminstdir, rake task tries to regenerate .so file. > > In such cases files under ext/ are needed, however anyway > this won't work but for root because write permission for > %geminstdir is needed. > So while you may want to add files under ext to -doc > subpackage, these files should not be in main package. ) Good catch, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 05:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 00:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040556.nB45uLXm009194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-04 00:56:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-rcov.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-rcov-0.9.6-2.fc13.src.rpm * Thu Dec 03 2009 Matthew Kent - 0.9.6-2 - Remove Requires for rubygem(rake) (#543337). - Move ext to -doc (#543337). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 06:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040606.nB466WR7011717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-04 01:06:31 EDT --- Thank you for the review. (In reply to comment #3) > Some notes: > > * Version specific dependency > - I don't think ">= 3.7.0" ">= 3.0.0" is needed (as all rpms shipped > on Fedora satisfies this dependency) > ref: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires > Apologies, should have caught this. > ! demo > - I tried demo program, then: > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ParseTree-3.0.4/demo/printer.rb > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ParseTree-3.0.4/demo/printer.rb:20: uninitialized > constant ParseTree (NameError) > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > I don't know well the usefulness of this script, however > at least "require 'parse_tree'" is missing. Yeah certainly doesn't look finished or useful at the moment, I'll exclude it with a note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 06:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:08:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040608.nB468x4k002459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 01:08:58 EDT --- rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 06:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040609.nB469hYT012317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 01:09:43 EDT --- rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 06:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:07:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040607.nB467Caq011913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-04 01:07:11 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ParseTree.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ParseTree-3.0.4-4.fc13.src.rpm * Thu Dec 3 2009 Matthew Kent - 3.0.4-4 - Drop needless versions from Requires (#541807). - Exclude demo/ for now as it's non functional (#541807). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 08:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 03:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040819.nB48J4Rv001029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #6 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-04 03:19:03 EDT --- Ooops... Forgot to add urls to the new spec and srpm Spec URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson-0.6.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 08:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 03:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040817.nB48Hivm000861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #5 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-04 03:17:05 EDT --- Sorry about the delay in getting this looked after. I have had an extremely distracting couple of weeks. (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > When you are running "%{cmake} ..", you can add the flag > "-DQJSON_BUILD_TESTS=1" so the tests are built. i.e. > %{cmake} .. -DQJSON_BUILD_TESTS=1 > > Then in the %check section you will execute these tests. Something like > %check > LD_PRELOAD=%{_target_platform}/%{_lib}/libqjson.so > %{_target_platform}/tests/testparser > LD_PRELOAD=%{_target_platform}/%{_lib}/libqjson.so > %{_target_platform}/tests/testserializer Done > Add BR: doxygen. Then in the doc/ directory, just run > doxygen > It will create an html/ direcory inside doc/ add this directory to the %doc of > the devel subpackage. Done. This should probably go in the base package shouldn't it? Its documentation not header files and I would assume that the docs contains how to use. > a directory. This package puts a file inside %{_includedir}/qjson/ but this > directory is not owned by any package! You must own this directory with the > devel subpackage. So replace the line > %{_includedir}/qjson/*.h > with either > %{_includedir}/qjson/ > or > %dir %{_includedir}/qjson > %{_includedir}/qjson/*.h > so that the directory is owned. I hope you got the idea. This must be satisfied > by any package in Fedora. Done > > - Where can I find an example to properly add FindQJSON.cmake as a requirment? > > Or better yet and quicker if you could detail the correct line. > > > > I don't know exactly. You might want to do some research. However, I see that > cmake package put a lot of modules into /usr/share/cmake/Modules/ so you might > want to move that file into that directory in %install. Also I believe that > this file must go to the devel package. Note that you will need to require > cmake (for the devel package) for directory ownership. > Cmake was added as Requirment in a the devel package as well and the module was moved over to the devel package. I don't believe that it should be included as a requirment because if it is required and it isn't yet built and installed then I would not be able to build the package. Please correct me if I'm wrong. > %{_libdir}/libfoo.so.* > go to the main library package, whereas the single file, which is a symlink > %{_libdir}/libfoo.so > goes to the devel package. Please fix this in your package accordingly. Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 08:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 03:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912040846.nB48kSSB015262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #7 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-04 03:46:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > In Fedora the files > > %{_libdir}/libfoo.so.* > go to the main library package, whereas the single file, which is a symlink > %{_libdir}/libfoo.so > goes to the devel package. Please fix this in your package accordingly. Oh. I think this must be an error because, if an app should make reference to the symlink and the development package is not installed it won't find the libarary. So I left all the libraries including he mentioned symlink in the base package. Please correct me if I'm wrong about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 10:20:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 05:20:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041020.nB4AKKTR029251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-04 05:20:19 EDT --- Umm. The main package contains the serial version, which MUST be compiled with --disable-parallel, especially since the mpich2 package does not currently obey the guidelines. However, even though it is a serial version, it can still use threads to parallelize on shared-memory computers. So, please add --disable-parallel to %configure. And, scrap the note about libmpich in the description. I'll try to have a look at the MPI stuff later on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 10:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 05:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041029.nB4ATSCn008474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-04 05:29:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > "The patch still needs a comment in the spec file." Not sure what you want > there, but I added a note in the changelog. I mean this # Patch makefile to build a shared library Patch: f2c-20090411.patch Also, the patch backup would better reflect the patch by naming it .sharedlib instead of .tim. - I think the devel package still has to require %{name} = %{version}-%{release}. Are there any pieces of software that don't use f2c, only the libraries..? Then again, I never have used f2c. ** rpmlint output: f2c.x86_64: E: devel-dependency f2c-devel f2c-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation f2c-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libf2c.so.0.22 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. These are all OK. ** MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 11:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 06:01:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041101.nB4B1nJ7017083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-04 06:01:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The COPYING file just contain the LGPL2.1 and doesn't say anything about using > a later version of the license. Sometimes you get the license text in the > COPYING file and a note in the README on how to apply the license. IE LGPLv2.1 > only or LGPLv2.1 or any later version at the users choice. Hence my point. COPYING is just the license text and does not distinguish between a particular version of license or "any later versions". The paragraph Simon quoted also does not solve this question, it only says "If the Library specifies a version number ..." So please take a look at the headers, they do specify a version number. All of them read: * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either * version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. So LGPLv2+ is the correct license tag. You should always rely on the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 11:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 06:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041105.nB4B55OD007672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 --- Comment #12 from Bastien Nocera 2009-12-04 06:05:03 EDT --- Added LADSPA plugins for bug 540198: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-plugins-bad/gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.spec http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gstreamer-plugins-bad/gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.17-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 12:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:16:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225749] Merge Review: fetchmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041216.nB4CGwUH004872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225749 Michal Hlavinka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-12-04 07:16:55 EDT --- in short: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + MUST[1]: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review + MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . + MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines + MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task $ curl -s http://download.berlios.de/fetchmail/fetchmail-6.3.13.tar.bz2 | md5sum db792fb311bc358e95ed0437389269ac - $ cat sources db792fb311bc358e95ed0437389269ac fetchmail-6.3.13.tar.bz2 311379d6f44f5713f42bc4f047e4f1b4 fetchmail-6.3.13.tar.bz2.asc $ curl -s http://download.berlios.de/fetchmail/fetchmail-6.3.13.tar.bz2.asc | md5sum 311379d6f44f5713f42bc4f047e4f1b4 - + MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture + MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines + MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro 0 MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] + MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker + MUST: Package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory + MUST: Package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content 0 MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application 0 MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package 0 MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package 0 MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' 0 MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package 0 MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built 0 MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 ----------------- comments: 1)rpmlint *.spec *.src.rpm x86_64/* fetchmail.spec:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes fetchmailconf fetchmail.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes fetchmailconf fetchmail.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided fetchmailconf 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. with %define fetchmailconf 1: fetchmailconf.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A GUI utility for configuring your fetchmail preferences. What's the status of fetchmailconf? When looking through koji builds it seems it was not built for a long time. Is Obsolete tag still required? Is fetchmailconf section still required? ------------- Looks good, but please explain fetchmailconf status ----- re comment #1: --with-kerberos5 is already used re comment #2: I think missing fetchmail initscript does not make fetchmail unusable so this request for enhancement should go through separate bug (RFE). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 12:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 07:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225693] Merge Review: dialog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041251.nB4CpcJd013135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225693 --- Comment #18 from Patrice Dumas 2009-12-04 07:51:32 EDT --- API issue are, in my opinion items pertaining to review request since they are a packaging issue and have implications on other packages. Also review request are a more general place for quality control of a package that doesn't have the overhead of doing multiple bugs. Sometimes one bug per isue is the most practical way to handle bugs, sometime a more global assesment is better, and the review is certainly the place for this global assesment. Moreover, review requests are the place where quality issues of any kind can be spotted and where packages with quality issues can be blocked from entering the distro, while bug reports can be ignored by maintainers. This is especially important, in my experience, for Merge reviews since in many package from core are in bad state before the merge review. Doesn't matter much in the end, I am not sure what the quality standard of fedora is these days, but in the old past it seemed to me that there was a preference for quality over quantity (but maybe it was just me). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 13:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041309.nB4D92GL009305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2009-12-04 08:08:59 EDT --- Stephan, can you please send me the diff how you've been able to get it work? I would like to apply that patch and send it upstream, that the next release doesn't have the same issue anymore. I tried to do this myself, but I think, I maybe did things wrong, as the build now fails for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 13:23:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041323.nB4DNgae021167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 --- Comment #7 from David Zeuthen 2009-12-04 08:23:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Wrt to the bash completion script, see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543989 which asks for it to be > moved to /etc/bash_completion.d/ I disagree it should be in /etc/bash_completion.d - and this very discussion has been had a number of times with the old PolicyKit version and I haven't changed my mind - /etc/profile.d is a fine location for the bash completion scripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 13:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041344.nB4Dil3a025965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 --- Comment #8 from David Zeuthen 2009-12-04 08:44:46 EDT --- Hey, thanks for reviewing this (In reply to comment #5) > Packaging guidelines: the guidelines nowadays contain language that forbids > explicit dependencies for stuff thats already pulled in via library > dependencies. So the Requires for dbus, I'm going to keep this one because we really need the bus daemon running - and it's not impossible (in fact it would be desirable) that libdbus.so could be packaged separately from the bus daemon. > dbus-glib, glib2, polkit, parted, Removed. > udev, We need the udev daemon - libudev and libgudev are packaged separately. > libatasmart We need the specified minimal version for certain bug-fixes. > It might be nice to have a /usr/libexec/udisks/ instead of dumping all the > helpers into /usr/libexec, but thats not a must-fix. All files are prefixed with udisks- anyway. We might want to just use $libdir/udisks instead to avoid this though. I'll consider this upstream. (FWIW, I'd rather see Fedora just pass --libexecdir=$libdir/$package_name just like Debian and SUSE does.) > Upstream sources: need upstream location Fixed (see TODO) > # TODO: should be fixed upstream > > Is it ? Not yet. I believe this is a bug with install(1) since the file has mode 0644 in the git repo - I need to investigate further. Here are the changes I've made: --- udisks.spec.prev 2009-12-04 08:26:12.000000000 -0500 +++ udisks.spec 2009-12-04 08:41:43.000000000 -0500 @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ License: GPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries URL: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/udisks -Source0: %{name}-%{version}.git20091202.tar.gz +# TODO: when fd.o #22578 is resolved, update URL to proper location +Source0: http://hal.freedesktop.org/releases/%{name}-%{version}.git20091202.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root BuildRequires: glib2-devel >= %{glib2_version} BuildRequires: dbus-devel >= %{dbus_version} @@ -30,14 +31,13 @@ BuildRequires: libgudev1-devel >= %{udev_version} BuildRequires: libudev-devel >= %{udev_version} BuildRequires: sg3_utils-devel >= %{sg3_utils_version} +# needed to pull in the system bus daemon Requires: dbus >= %{dbus_version} -Requires: dbus-glib >= %{dbus_glib_version} -Requires: glib2 >= %{glib2_version} -Requires: polkit >= %{polkit_version} -Requires: parted >= %{parted_version} +# needed to pull in the udev daemon Requires: udev >= %{udev_version} -Requires: mdadm >= %{mdadm_version} +# we need at least this version for bugfixes / features etc. Requires: libatasmart >= %{libatasmart_version} +Requires: mdadm >= %{mdadm_version} # for smp_rep_manufacturer Requires: smp_utils >= %{smp_utils_version} # for mount, umount, mkswap @@ -50,8 +50,7 @@ Requires: dosfstools # for mlabel Requires: mtools -# for mkntfs -# no ntfsprogs on ppc, though +# for mkntfs - no ntfsprogs on ppc, though %ifnarch ppc ppc64 Requires: ntfsprogs %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 13:49:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:49:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041349.nB4DnVim021226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 --- Comment #9 from David Zeuthen 2009-12-04 08:49:31 EDT --- Updated SPEC and SRPM files here Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/udisks-pkg-review/20091204/udisks.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/udisks-pkg-review/20091204/udisks-1.0.0-0.git20091202.1.fc13.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 13:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041359.nB4Dx4mE023773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-04 08:59:03 EDT --- Looks fine now. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 14:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544295] New: Review Request: upower - Power management service Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: upower - Power management service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544295 Summary: Review Request: upower - Power management service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rhughes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/upower.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/upower-0.9.1-0.1.20091204git.fc12.src.rpm Description: DeviceKit-power recently got renamed to upower, see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2009-December/000567.html so it is only proper to change the Fedora package name too. This package will obsolete (and provide - for transitioning) DeviceKit-power when we have converted the applications to use upower. It's expected DeviceKit-power and upower will co-exist for a couple of weeks to ease the pain a little. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 for more information. [hughsie at hughsie-work devel]$ rpmlint /home/hughsie/rpmbuild/*RPM*/upower* upower.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.UPower.conf 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Thanks for reviewing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 14:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:06:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041406.nB4E6IVW031831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #13 from Arun SAG 2009-12-04 09:06:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=376089) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=376089) build log rpmbuild --rebuild src.rpm was failed, i have attached the config.log for detailed information -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 14:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:18:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041418.nB4EIq0q028828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 David Zeuthen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from David Zeuthen 2009-12-04 09:18:51 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Requesting cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 14:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544299] New: Review Request: gnome-color-manager - Color management for the GNOME desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-color-manager - Color management for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544299 Summary: Review Request: gnome-color-manager - Color management for the GNOME desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rhughes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/gnome-color-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/gnome-color-manager-2.29.1-0.1.20091204git.fc12.src.rpm Description: gnome-color-manager is a session program that makes it easy to manage, install and generate color profiles in the GNOME desktop. This project has the following features: * Setting output gamma tables (with local brightness and adjustments) to any Xrandr output (falling back to the per-screen methods for drivers that do not yet support Xrandr 1.3). * Setting of settings at session start, and when monitors are hotplugged. * Easy install of vendor supplied ICC or ICM files, just by double clicking on the file. * Easy display calibration using an external calibration device, and scanner calibration using a inexpensive IT 8.7 target. For calibration, the ArgyllCMS package is required. * Integration X11 by setting the per-screen and per-output _ICC_PROFILE atom, which makes applications such as the GIMP use a color managed output. * Easy to use DBus interface for applications to query what ICC profiles should be used for a specific device. This is session activated and is only started when it is needed, and quits after a small period of idleness. For more information, please see http://projects.gnome.org/gnome-color-manager/ Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 14:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:23:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041423.nB4ENOVc003565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-04 09:23:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Created an attachment (id=376089) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=376089) [details] > build log > > rpmbuild --rebuild src.rpm was failed, i have attached the config.log for > detailed information ============================================================ configure:2264: checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc configure:2280: found /usr/local/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc configure:2291: result: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc configure:2569: checking for C compiler version configure:2576: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc --version >&5 i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 4.2.4 configure:2649: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables conftest.c >&5 conftest.c:1: error: bad value (atom) for -mtune= switch ============================================================ This message shows that you are using gcc built/installed by yourself and not using gcc provided by Fedora's rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 14:34:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:34:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544295] Review Request: upower - Power management service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041434.nB4EYXi3007446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544295 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-04 09:34:32 EDT --- builds fine in mock. rpmlint says: [mclasen at planemask Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm upower.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.UPower.conf 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The one warning is ignorable, files in /etc/dbus-1/system.d are not supposed to be config files (there was some upstream discussion in dbus to move this directory elsewhere, it may still happen). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 14:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 09:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041457.nB4EvX9e014687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #15 from Arun SAG 2009-12-04 09:57:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > > This message shows that you are using gcc built/installed by yourself > and not using gcc provided by Fedora's rpm. But when i compiled the source (artha)(not src rpm) it used Fedora-rpm provided gcc, only rpmbuild --rebuild is using custom gcc , why? how to fix this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 15:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:15:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041515.nB4FFSpt019362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #16 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-04 10:15:27 EDT --- Thank you for providing me the space. SPEC: http://roshansingh.fedorapeople.org/artha/artha.spec SRPM: http://roshansingh.fedorapeople.org/artha/artha-0.9.1-3.fc11.src.rpm I have kept the License as GPLv2+. Hope this fixes all the problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 15:18:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:18:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041518.nB4FIJx2012662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-04 10:18:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > > This message shows that you are using gcc built/installed by yourself > > and not using gcc provided by Fedora's rpm. > > But when i compiled the source (artha)(not src rpm) it used Fedora-rpm provided > gcc, only rpmbuild --rebuild is using custom gcc , why? how to fix this? I guess it is no and you used your custom gcc also for compiling artha tarball, only that it didn't fail perhaps because you didn't specify CFLAGS. Fedora sets CFLAGS determined in redhat-rpm-config rpm (you can see this by $ rpm --eval %optflags, and please check what %configure does by $ rpm --eval %configure). On F-12 it contains "-mtune=atom" on i686 and your custom gcc cannot recognize it. You can use "mock" to rpmbuild srpm "cleanly". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 15:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:25:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041525.nB4FPxRB015423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #18 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-04 10:25:58 EDT --- What does CFLAGS do ? I dont have any idea about it. I just know that it sets up build environment but what parameters and how. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 15:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:30:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041530.nB4FUiel023928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-04 10:30:43 EDT --- Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 15:30:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:30:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041530.nB4FUjVU023962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Bug 541512 depends on bug 541491, which changed state. Bug 541491 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 15:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525927] Review Request: incollector - Information collector for various kinds of information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041539.nB4Fd07o026491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525927 Thomas Janssen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 15:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544295] Review Request: upower - Power management service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041553.nB4Frnim022450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544295 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-04 10:53:48 EDT --- Looking at the docs, I notice that Upower.7 refers to DeviceKit(7) - that should probably be removed. Formal review: package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig These are not necessary when using %post(un) -p Requires: dbus >= %{dbus_version} Requires: dbus-glib >= %{dbus_glib_version} Requires: glib2 >= %{glib2_version} Requires: polkit >= %{polkit_version} The guidelines now have language that forbids explicit requires where an automatic library dep suffices. You probably want the explicit dep on dbus (for the daemon), so just add a comment there; but dbus-glib, glib2, polkit are probably all unnecessary. Might be good to compare with what david has done in upower. -devel should require gtk-doc for %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/, I think. mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} cp README AUTHORS NEWS COPYING HACKING doc/TODO $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} Why are you doing this ? Just %doc README AUTHORS NEWS... in the file list should suffice. License: ok to be continued... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 15:54:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:54:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544295] Review Request: upower - Power management service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041554.nB4Fs9wW030792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544295 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 16:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041610.nB4GAAwt027486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-04 11:10:09 EDT --- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (rubygem-rcov) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 16:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041613.nB4GDTYT003796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #23 from Ivana Varekova 2009-12-04 11:13:24 EDT --- Fixed in aspell-0.60.6-10.fc12, aspell-0.60.6-10.fc13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 16:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:19:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226661] Merge Review: yaboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041619.nB4GJWWR005483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226661 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 16:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:31:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041631.nB4GVnRD008812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #4 from Michal Babej 2009-12-04 11:31:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > * %define -> %global > - Now Fedora prefers to use %global over %define. Fixed. > > * License > - test/haml/spec/README.md is under WTFPL so the license tag > should be "MIT and WTFPL". Fixed. > > * Requires > - Please add the needed rubygem related dependency. > Note that I don't know if this dependency is optional or not. /usr/bin/html2haml requires it, so i think it's not optional. Added. > Also please check other dependency (if any). I checked all files for requires, and other possible external tools: 1. extra/haml-mode.el and extra/sass-mode.el are emacs highlighting files; not sure what to do with these. 2. extra/update_watch.rb requires sinatra and json, but this file seems only useful to haml developers, i think, so i'd like to remove it. 3. lib/haml/filters.rb: this depends on rubygem-RedCloth for Textile filter, but Markdown and Maruku filters doesn't have packaged dependencies in fedora (afaict). The code in filters.rb can handle it though, and these filters are not a requirement to use haml. What do you suggest ? 4. Rakefile has many dependencies (tlsmail, yard, rcov/rcovtask, ruby-prof, "git" command...) and i'm not sure how useful it is. The only thing i'd like to keep is the 'test' task. 5. test/benchmark has more requires (erubis, markaby, rbench - i didn't find this packaged) 7. test/haml/spec/lua_haml_spec.lua - requires lua 8. test/haml/spec/ruby_haml_test.rb - requires json; doesn't work currently, but i have a patch to make this work 6. test/sass/plugin_test.rb has require merb, but it will skip the test if no merb is found. > > * %check > - Whether adding executable permission to a script or not should > be determined (for this case) by checking if the script has > shebang or not, and should not be determined by hardcoded file list. Not all files from *_test.rb have shebang (Though i could create a patch for this and ask upstream to integrate it) > I think > - fixing Rakefile and execute "rake test" I prefer this one (where by fixing i mean leave only "test" task) > > * Macros > - As %geminstdir is already defined, use the macro in %files. Fixed. > > * %changelog style Fixed. > By the way it is appreciated if you post the full URL of the new > spec/srpm. Sure. SRPM: http://mogurakun.web.runbox.net/rubygem-haml-2.2.15-2.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://mogurakun.web.runbox.net/rubygem-haml.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 16:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226258] Merge Review: perl-Frontier-RPC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041647.nB4GlLFL004959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226258 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |adam at spicenitz.org Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 16:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:49:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226552] Merge Review: xdelta In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041649.nB4GnWnn013818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226552 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adam at spicenitz.org Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 16:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:52:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544295] Review Request: upower - Power management service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041652.nB4GqfKg015141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544295 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-04 11:52:40 EDT --- Just a few other comments: - %configure --disable-static works, no need to rm *.a - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 16:58:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:58:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532190] Review Request: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown - Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041658.nB4GwFkT017204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532190 Bug 532190 depends on bug 532191, which changed state. Bug 532191 Summary: Please update perl-Text-Markdown to latest upstream release (1.000029) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532191 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 17:08:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:08:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041708.nB4H8PKl020268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-04 12:08:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-rcov Short Description: Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 17:13:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226049] Merge Review: libtiff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041713.nB4HDdX8012715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226049 Tom Lane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Tom Lane 2009-12-04 12:13:36 EDT --- Yeah, I tried putting the make check in %check but it failed. Didn't seem worth jumping through hoops to get rid of a "W". As for the upstream URLs for the patches, my preference is to put commentary into the patch files themselves --- that way it's more likely to get updated when the patch changes. I've committed suitable additions to CVS, but not bothered to rebuild right now. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 17:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041743.nB4Hh4QR020227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-04 12:43:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > What does CFLAGS do ? I dont have any idea about it. I just know that it sets > up build environment but what parameters and how. For each CFLAGS parameters, please check $ man gcc. Now your spec/srpm is okay. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (artha) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 18:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 13:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544295] Review Request: upower - Power management service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041801.nB4I13vN027101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544295 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2009-12-04 13:01:01 EDT --- A bit more explicit listing in %files would not hurt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 18:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 13:07:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226049] Merge Review: libtiff In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041807.nB4I7sWe028720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226049 --- Comment #8 from Adam Goode 2009-12-04 13:07:53 EDT --- Sounds great, looking forward to trying 3.9.2! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 18:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 13:12:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544295] Review Request: upower - Power management service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041812.nB4ICWkv029947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544295 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-04 13:12:30 EDT --- License: field: ok License file: ok Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream sources: tarball missing Buildable: ok ExcludeArch: ok, none BuildRequires: ok locale handling: ok, none ldconfig: ok system libraries: ok relocatable: ok, no directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: ok, none %doc content: ok header files: ok static libs: ok, none pc files: ok shared libs: ok devel deps: ok .la files: ok gui apps: ok, none file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 18:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 13:26:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041826.nB4IQnC2001155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Vedran Mileti? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #24 from Vedran Mileti? 2009-12-04 13:26:46 EDT --- The VERIFIED, FAILS_QA and RELEASE_PENDING bug states are not used by Fedora (they are used in the RHEL process). I'm closing this bug ahead of time. It is possibly fixed, but Reporter, if you can reproduce it using a current version of Fedora (version 12), please reopen it. --- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 19:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:16:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] New: Review Request: report - Incident reporting library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: report - Incident reporting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 Summary: Review Request: report - Incident reporting library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gavin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://gavin.fedorapeople.org/report.spec SRPM URL: http://gavin.fedorapeople.org/report-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A generic problem/bug/incident/error reporting library, that can be configured to deliver a report to a variety of different ticketing systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 19:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041923.nB4JNEM3018863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 --- Comment #1 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-12-04 14:23:13 EDT --- $ rpmlint report.spec SRPMS/report-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/report-*.rpm report-gtk.noarch: W: no-documentation report-plugin-bugzilla.noarch: W: no-documentation report-plugin-catcut.noarch: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ The main package has minimal doc, the sub-packages don't have separate documentation. The intent is that the main 'report' package would be part of @base, as would the subpackage 'report-plugin-bugzilla'. The 'report-gtk' subpackage would go into the same group as all the other X/gtk/gnome packages. The 'report-plugin-catcut' would not be install by default at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 19:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041933.nB4JXdOo029840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #59 from Tim Fenn 2009-12-04 14:33:31 EDT --- Updated to the official 0.6 release: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.6-6.20091203svn2545.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 19:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:42:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041942.nB4JgkDV024148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-04 14:42:45 EDT --- RELEASE_PENDING was perhaps set by accident, however package review should not be closed by such a reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 19:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:42:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529084] Review Request: javatar - Java tar archive io package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912041942.nB4Jg2nQ032284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529084 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Jerry James 2009-12-04 14:42:01 EDT --- This appears to have been available for a month now, so I'm closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 20:10:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:10:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225954] Merge Review: junit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042010.nB4KAE1w031733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225954 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-04 15:10:12 EDT --- Long time in Fedora and review approved more than 2 years ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 20:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:45:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042045.nB4KjmeE017974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #33 from manuel wolfshant 2009-12-04 15:45:43 EDT --- Skimming through the output of rpmlint (and skipping the non relevant stuff), - the new src version has a cosmetic issue: otpd.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 1) - you forgot to upload the new source.tar.gz to googlecode - you forgot to add a new entry in the changelog (last entry still points to 3.2.5-2, which makes rpmlint unhappy: otpd.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 3.2.5-2 ['3.2.6-1.fc13', '3.2.6-1'] - the service is still installed as default enabled otpd.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/otpd - and you still do a service restart in %post, which, combined with the above entry, makes the service start even on the systems where the admin decided to stop it - and we still have otpd.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/otpd I am not familiar at all with the code and I cannot even test as I have no tokens, but maybe reload could be implemented as a synonym to restart ? As a second matter, do you have any other submissions or did you perform any package reviews? If you have, please be as kind as to point me to those bugzilla entries. If not, please consider doing so, as this is still a mandatory step before being sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 20:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531363] Review request: WiKIDToken - Token for the WiKID Strong Authentication System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042057.nB4KvVuq020718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531363 --- Comment #1 from Nick Owen 2009-12-04 15:57:30 EDT --- Still looking for a sponsor... :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 21:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:13:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540617] Review Request: django-lint - lint for (python) django web-framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042113.nB4LDO93024951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540617 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge 2009-12-04 16:13:22 EDT --- http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/django-lint.spec resp. http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/django-lint-0.11-5.fc12.src.rpm fixes this ugly thing. (last lines froom mock build log): ----- Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Requires: /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.6 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/django-lint-0.11-5.fc12.i386 warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: sofja.berg.ol Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/django-lint-0.11-5.fc12.noarch.rpm Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.BPvphJ + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd django-lint + rm -rf /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/django-lint-0.11-5.fc12.i386 + exit 0 Child returncode was: 0 LEAVE do --> ----- No error means good news, right? What else to check? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 21:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544299] Review Request: gnome-color-manager - Color management for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042132.nB4LWuRb022422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544299 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |yaneti at declera.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |yaneti at declera.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-12-04 16:32:55 EDT --- Licenses match. Some strange variations of .. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. line, which I think other than breaking automated license checkers don;t change the spirit, Source little hard to tell if it matches because its not an official release tarball and the steps to reproduce it are not included (yeah I know that it comes from git.gnome.org), would be nice to have some basic instruction in the spec file. Builds in mock. Installs without fuss. Runs fine as far as I can tell. The purpose of gcm-session is a unclear to me on a cursory glance. $rpmlint gnome-color-manager-2.29.1-0.1.20091204git.fc13.x86_64.rpm gnome-color-manager.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US colour gnome-color-manager.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/gcm-apply.desktop 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Can be ignored, although I think the British spelling is not necessary in a package called gnome-_color_-manager - The GCONF_DISABLE_MAKEFILE_SCHEMA_INSTALL bits are redundant since --disable-schemas-install seems to be handled properly - the gtk-update-icon-cache run in %post should probably be moved to %posttrans as per the packaging snippets guidelines - The scrollkeeper bits aren't necessary since it has been obsoleted by rarian. Looks ok. Issues not fatal but would be nice if addressed. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 22:05:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:05:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042205.nB4M5PnN006358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #21 from Johan Vromans 2009-12-04 17:05:21 EDT --- I now have a decent and positive response: ----snip---- From: Mario Dorion To: Johan Vromans CC: Martin Leclerc Subject: Re: Chord license Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:07:47 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Hi Johan, I apologize for the long delay in responding. I guess I had issues with "letting Chord go". Martin and I are happy to see the work you've been doing with Chordii and are enthusiastic about changing the original licensing so that Chordii can be bundled with major Linux distros. Do you require anything special to make this official? Do you want a signed letter? Is this email good enough? ----snip--- The intent is clear. Now what do they have to do to make it official? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 22:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042216.nB4MG8kC008878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Andreas Osowski 2009-12-04 17:16:07 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: almanah Owners: th0br0 Updated Description: Application for keeping an encrypted diary Reason: Packager is unresponsive, see #529969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 22:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:15:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544451] New: Review Request: rescene - Extracts RAR metadata and recreates RAR files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rescene - Extracts RAR metadata and recreates RAR files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544451 Summary: Review Request: rescene - Extracts RAR metadata and recreates RAR files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/rescene.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/rescene-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: ReScene is a mechanism for backing up and restoring the metadata from RAR archives. Notes: - The license isn't written anywhere on the upstream webpage nor in the source zip. However, I requested that upstream clarify the licensing terms of the source and they told me it was in the public domain. I also asked that they made this clear in the source zip, and they agreed to do so (but perhaps will wait until the next release). - Rpmlint has a few errors and warnings, but I think most are things expected of Mono packages; here they are, and how I explain them: - rescene.x86_64: E: no-binary: This package needs to be arch-ful because it uses %{_libdir}, as per Mono packaging guidelines. - rescene.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib As the Mono guidelines point out, this is expected and libdir is the right place for .exes and .dlls, as AOT information will be installed in the same directory as the CIL .exe and .dll files. - rescene.x86_64: W: no-documentation Upstream doesn't have any aside from the binary's help output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 22:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:25:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544451] Review Request: rescene - Extracts RAR metadata and recreates RAR files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042225.nB4MPDPZ010872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544451 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-12-04 17:25:12 EDT --- Cleanly builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1850603 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:36:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529196] Review Request: ms-anonymouspro-fonts - AnonymousPro fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042336.nB4Naeqo027207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529196 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:36:39 EDT --- msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts-1.001-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:36:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042336.nB4Nao0s027250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:36:48 EDT --- globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:36:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042336.nB4NaWTp027167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:36:31 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12607 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042338.nB4NcEXo020331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:38:13 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042335.nB4NZwLg019671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:35:57 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:38:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042338.nB4NcJRO020362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.2-1.fc11 |1.4.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042337.nB4Nbf52020103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:37:39 EDT --- mono-bouncycastle-1.5-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:36:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042336.nB4Na3UK019707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.4.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:37:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042337.nB4NblA1020156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.5-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042338.nB4NcVAX020420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:36:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042336.nB4Nas51019872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.7-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:39:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042339.nB4NdO3C020630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:39:23 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-HTTP-Request2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12623 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042337.nB4NbZ4t020051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:37:34 EDT --- php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-Net-URL2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12613 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:38:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042338.nB4Nc1Xb020266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:38:00 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-HTTP-OAuth'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12617 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:39:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042339.nB4NdkPV028106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:39:45 EDT --- globus-duct-common-2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042340.nB4NeUbg028575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.0.4-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042339.nB4NdJil027990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:39:18 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-HTTP-Request2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12622 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:38:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:38:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042338.nB4NcQCZ027742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 Bug 528476 depends on bug 528473, which changed state. Bug 528473 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:38:25 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042340.nB4NePNO021695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:40:24 EDT --- rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042339.nB4NdpS7020739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:40:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042340.nB4Ne0ux020994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:39:58 EDT --- eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1.20091005-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update eclipse-slice2java'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12633 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:49:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042349.nB4Nn47S025193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:49:03 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:49:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042349.nB4Nn97b031867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-1.fc10 |1.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:50:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:50:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042350.nB4NoxIS032617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:50:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042350.nB4No6ki026116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:50:03 EDT --- poco-1.3.5-8.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042354.nB4NskrF027631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:54:45 EDT --- mono-bouncycastle-1.5-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042351.nB4NpcZ5026814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:51:38 EDT --- globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:50:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:50:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042350.nB4Nor2k026556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:50:52 EDT --- globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042351.nB4Np71o026618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:51:05 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-1.0.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042351.nB4NphbK026849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.fc11 |2.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042350.nB4NoCbP026273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.5-8.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:51:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042351.nB4NpCkZ026654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.0-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042356.nB4NuRun001987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:56:27 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042356.nB4Nu80d001880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:56:07 EDT --- globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:56:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042356.nB4NuDK4001914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.7-1.fc12 |2.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:55:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:55:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042355.nB4NtuVn028736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:55:55 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042359.nB4NxM1e029527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:59:21 EDT --- rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:54:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537431] Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042354.nB4NspZP027705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5-4.fc11 |1.5-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042358.nB4NwRr1029379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:58:25 EDT --- imapfilter-2.0.11-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:59:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541491] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_parser - A ruby parser written in pure ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042359.nB4NxRfd029567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.4-3.fc11 |2.0.4-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:56:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042356.nB4NuWEX028877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7-1.fc11 |0.7-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:55:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042355.nB4NtA8Z028452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:55:09 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042356.nB4NuomC028999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:56:49 EDT --- php-phpunit-File-Iterator-1.1.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042356.nB4Nu1oG028784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.0-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042355.nB4NtFAG028577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.7-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:56:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:56:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042356.nB4NutWh029041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.0-4.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:57:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042357.nB4NvU0S029155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:57:29 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12692 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:58:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042358.nB4NwgOq029426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:58:41 EDT --- php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-Services-Twitter'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12696 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:56:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042356.nB4NuepE028916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:56:38 EDT --- i3lock-1.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update i3lock'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042357.nB4NvfPx029212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:57:40 EDT --- php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-Services-Twitter'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12694 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:57:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042357.nB4NvkIg002441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:57:46 EDT --- php-ezc-DatabaseSchema-1.4.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:57:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528473] Review Request: php-ezc-DatabaseSchema - eZ Components DatabaseSchema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042357.nB4Nvp0k002475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528473 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.2-1.fc12 |1.4.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:58:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042358.nB4NwWZK002699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.11-3.fc11 |2.0.11-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 23:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:59:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912042359.nB4NxFUT002901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 18:59:14 EDT --- i3-3.d-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update i3'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12700 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:00:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050000.nB500Ugq030581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.0-1.fc10 |1.2.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:00:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:00:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050000.nB500Pwb030528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:00:24 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050002.nB502sNk031239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:02:52 EDT --- msp430-libc-0-3.20090726cvs.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050002.nB502DuC030964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-1.fc12 |1.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:02:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528476] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein - eZ Components PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050002.nB5028m7030924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528476 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:02:07 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObjectDatabaseSchemaTiein-1.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050006.nB506lWm005996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:06:46 EDT --- php-phpunit-phpcpd-1.2.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:06:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529542] Review Request: php-phpunit-phpcpd - Copy/Paste Detector (CPD) for PHP code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050006.nB506pMp006034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529542 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.0-1.fc12 |1.2.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:02:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:02:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 507106] Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050002.nB502xcO004626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-3.20090726cvs.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:06:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050006.nB506DDb000476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:06:13 EDT --- globus-duct-common-2.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:06:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050006.nB506INK000519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.fc11 |2.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050006.nB506RCX000559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:06:26 EDT --- php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-Net-URL2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12741 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:05:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050005.nB505tHr032753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:05:54 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.6-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-HTTP-OAuth'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12735 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:05:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510195] Review Request: eclipse-slice2java - A plugin that integrates Eclipse with Ice object middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050005.nB505C7N032520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510195 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:05:11 EDT --- eclipse-slice2java-3.3.1.20091005-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update eclipse-slice2java'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12732 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050007.nB507imE006624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:07:43 EDT --- i3status-2.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update i3status'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12748 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:42:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:42:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050042.nB50gGct014868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:42:15 EDT --- xfce4-volumed-0.1.8-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-volumed-0.1.8-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 00:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:42:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050042.nB50gPtf014915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-04 19:42:24 EDT --- xfce4-volumed-0.1.8-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-volumed-0.1.8-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 02:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:11:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050211.nB52BPX6000380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #16 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-12-04 21:11:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd-0.0.18-1.fc12.src.rpm This fixes everything except: 1. The "starting the service twice" problem. The master process will have to terminate its children. I will have to fix this in my dmapd source. 2. I still use /var/db/dmapd. I think this is a good default, similar to /var/www and well-reasoned within the LSB definitions of /var and /var/db. My intention is a simple, pre-configured setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 02:38:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 21:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050238.nB52comW005962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #46 from Arun SAG 2009-12-04 21:38:48 EDT --- Spec URL:http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-goodies.spec SRPM URL:http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-goodies-31.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji builds F12,F11 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1850843 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1850846 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 04:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050411.nB54BKgu021091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-04 23:11:19 EDT --- .. and since there is heavy linear algebra involved in the calculations, it might be worthwhile to compile this against ATLAS instead of plain BLAS. To do this, add Requires: atlas-devel, and configure --with-blas="-L%{_libdir}/atlas -lf77blas -latlas" The same goes with the other ghemical-related packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 04:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:13:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542767] Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050413.nB54DMXA021355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542767 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-04 23:13:21 EDT --- Does ghemical *really* need only f2c-libs to compile, i.e. no f2c (and its headers) at all? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 04:15:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:15:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050415.nB54FRFW027687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-04 23:15:26 EDT --- I don't see any sense in a -libs package, when the main package doesn't contain any files. I'd just put the files in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 04:56:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 23:56:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050456.nB54uGZm003432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #14 from William Witt 2009-12-04 23:56:14 EDT --- Bumped version alonq with upstream now at 4.9.1: "Improved gmenu sub-category items detection, added python-gnomeapplet dependency, split other, administration and system tools categories" Added some move logic to ensure that timestamps are kept. koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1850947 Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.1-0.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 05:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050546.nB55kDxI008558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(smparrish at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #23 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-12-05 00:46:11 EDT --- Hello Steven .. may you import this in EL ASAP, it is need for some fedora infra work. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 06:31:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 01:31:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050631.nB56VY1s019088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 --- Comment #10 from Siddhesh Poyarekar 2009-12-05 01:31:33 EDT --- Uploaded updated spec files based on feedback in all comments above: http://people.redhat.com/spoyarek/gource/gource.spec http://people.redhat.com/spoyarek/gource/gource-0.18-3.fc12.src.rpm I've kept the autoreconf in place for now to cater for any autotools file patches in the future. I've also dropped the configure.ac patch for now since it does not really break anything. Accordingly, I've also dropped autoreconf since it's not necessary anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 06:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 01:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050632.nB56WwM8025079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 --- Comment #11 from Siddhesh Poyarekar 2009-12-05 01:32:57 EDT --- Sorry for the mixed up comment earlier, I'll rephrase that: I've dropped the configure.ac patch for now since it does not really break anything. Accordingly, I've also dropped autoreconf since it's not necessary anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 06:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 01:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532190] Review Request: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown - Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050654.nB56so9k031463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532190 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-12-05 01:54:49 EDT --- Scratch build is now available: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851066 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 07:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 02:06:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532190] Review Request: perl-Text-MultiMarkdown - Convert MultiMarkdown syntax to (X)HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050706.nB5764IB001928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532190 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-12-05 02:06:03 EDT --- Oh, and a new srpm with .fc13 tag: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Text-MultiMarkdown-1.000031-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 08:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 03:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544531] New: Review Request: xvkbd - Virtual Keyboard for X Window System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xvkbd - Virtual Keyboard for X Window System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544531 Summary: Review Request: xvkbd - Virtual Keyboard for X Window System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zbe64533 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.saturn.dti.ne.jp/~zbe64533/xvkbd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.saturn.dti.ne.jp/~zbe64533/xvkbd-3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: xvkbd is a virtual (graphical) keyboard program for X Window System which provides facility to enter characters onto other clients (softwares) by clicking on a keyboard displayed on the screen. This may be used for systems without a hardware keyboard such as kiosk terminals or handheld devices. This program also has facility to send characters specified as the command line option to another client. * This is my first package and I'm seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 09:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 04:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544531] Review Request: xvkbd - Virtual Keyboard for X Window System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050917.nB59HQDF027806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544531 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-12-05 04:17:25 EDT --- Previous (failed) review request for it, for reference - bug 405161 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 09:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 04:23:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529445] Review Request: i3-git - Improved tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050923.nB59NJSh024115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529445 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 09:23:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 04:23:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529446] Review Request: i3lock-git - A slightly improved version of slock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050923.nB59NGhQ024086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529446 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 09:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 04:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529447] Review Request: i3status-git - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050923.nB59NAe7029039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529447 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 09:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 04:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050947.nB59lVS1001155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-05 04:47:30 EDT --- Jochen, I'm not sure what's the action point now and replying "may be nice" didn't really help me. Could you please be more specific at what blocks this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 09:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 04:50:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912050950.nB59oQNa001793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #26 from Arun SAG 2009-12-05 04:50:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.7.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: F11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851091 Updated to latest version 2.7.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 10:16:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 05:16:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544540] New: Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544540 Summary: Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: musuruan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/genesis.spec SRPM URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/genesis-0.4.2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Genesis is a graphical frontend for SyncEvolution written in PyGTK. It makes SyncEvolution accessible without having to use a command line and provides graphical feedback of transaction results. Notes: Bug #533106 prevents genesis to run correctly. Please use the workaround described there to test genesis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 10:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 05:34:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051034.nB5AYLlX005487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com --- Comment #27 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-05 05:32:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Thanks for the review, hope someone sponsors this package ; I'll sponsor since I've taken your package review request for irsim-mode. Can you give me your FAS username please ? Also, for spice-mode and irsim, I'm hoping to see them into EL-5 branch too. Are you going to package haskell-mode for EL-5 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 11:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 06:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051115.nB5BFeaT014435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #28 from Arun SAG 2009-12-05 06:15:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #25) > > Thanks for the review, hope someone sponsors this package ; > > > I'll sponsor since I've taken your package review request for irsim-mode. > > Can you give me your FAS username please ? It is 'sagarun' > Also, for spice-mode and irsim, I'm hoping to see them into EL-5 branch too. yeah, sure > Are you going to package haskell-mode for EL-5 ? Yes, Koji build works fine EL-5 so i think there will be a problem in doing so. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851124 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 11:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 06:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051126.nB5BQx8q016762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #29 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-05 06:26:54 EDT --- Arun, before I can support you. I would like to know whether you are familiar with rpm packaging. Don't take me wrong since I've got some packagers which I sponsor in the past are still badly packaging their tools. Hence I would appreciate if you can improve the draft spec file which I've uploaded for nescc. It has an emacs mode. So since it's in your field, I believe it should be simple for you. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/85 You can upload your spec file there. Also, can you package spice-mode for us. It seems you are the emacs expert :) https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/75 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 11:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 06:31:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544540] Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051131.nB5BVVjp022839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544540 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmaphy at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 11:45:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 06:45:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051145.nB5BjQLG020526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-05 06:45:24 EDT --- > Name: report This ought to adhere to Fedora's Package Naming Guidelines for Python modules: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 > Summary: Incident reporting library Actually, the terminology for this software would be "module" not "library". Mentioning that it's for Python would be good, too. Perhaps: Summary: Python module for submitting reports to ticketing systems > Group: System Environment/Base Group "Development/Languages" sounds more appropriate, certainly for all (sub-)packages that don't include any ready-to-use executable. The RPM Group is independent from the comps @base group. > License: GPLv2+ That's a blocker. Nothing in the source tarball (except the .spec.in) confirms this licensing. Please include the GNU GPL license text, and as an added benefit follow its guidelines (consult its appendix) by adding brief GPL headers to the source files. > %description plugin-catcut > Plugin reporter to catcut Odd. Too brief. At least the description could try to explain what "catcut" means in this context. > Source0: report-0.4.tar.gz https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Specifying this is not necessary anymore with Fedora >= 10. > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Empyting the buildroot is done by default with Fedora >= 10. > %clean > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT There is a default %clean section with Fedora >= 10. > Requires: report == 0.4 Consider yourself lucky that this worked. Prefer '=' instead of '=='. > %files > ... > %attr(0664,root,root) %config(noreplace) /etc/catcut.config Why is this package included in the base module package instead of the -catcut subackage? > %dir %{python_sitelib}/report/alternatives/redhat_bugzilla > %{python_sitelib}/report/alternatives/redhat_bugzilla/* Wherever you do the two-line %dir plus '*' wildcard dance you could simply use a single line instead, which achieves exactly the same thing and includes the directory and all its contents recursively: %{python_sitelib}/report/alternatives/redhat_bugzilla/ > -rw-rw-r-- /etc/catcut.config g+w isn't really needed here. Nit-picky, I know. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 12:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:05:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543685] Package review: libnes - Driver library for libibverbs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051205.nB5C59t7029958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543685 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-05 07:05:08 EDT --- > %makeinstall Avoid this macro unless normal "make DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} install" (with an optional INSTALL="install -p" doesn't work. Add a comment if you really need this macro. The way %makeinstall overrides variables to insert the buildroot path bears risks and has lead to problems before. > %{_sysconfdir}/libibverbs.d/*.driver "repoquery --whatprovides /etc/libibverbs.d" on Fedora 12 returns nothing, which means it's an unowned directory. Most likely in package "libibverbs". > %package static > Summary: Static version of the libnes driver > Group: System Environment/Libraries Rather "Development/Libraries". > Provides: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} ... > %files static > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %{_libdir}/*.a A static library without any headers? Isn't this package missing a dependency on some -devel package that would define the API for this lib? Same question applies to the virtual -devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 12:11:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:11:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543689] Package review: libipathverbs - Driver library for libibverbs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051211.nB5CBRlN032033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543689 --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-05 07:11:25 EDT --- The same questions I've added to "libnes" apply here. Not just because of the virtual Provides this looks more like a driver/module/plugin than an ordinary shared library for software development. Without any dependency on a package that provides some headers it's questionable to create the two -devel packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 12:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051216.nB5CGqEb001643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-05 07:16:42 EDT --- mygui-3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mygui-3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 12:17:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051217.nB5CH1qL029056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-05 07:16:59 EDT --- mygui-3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mygui-3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 12:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:23:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051223.nB5CNDYD003695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #30 from Arun SAG 2009-12-05 07:23:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > Arun, before I can support you. I would like to know whether you are familiar > with rpm packaging. Don't take me wrong since I've got some packagers which I > sponsor in the past are still badly packaging their tools. > > Hence I would appreciate if you can improve the draft spec file which I've > uploaded for nescc. It has an emacs mode. So since it's in your field, I > believe it should be simple for you. > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/85 > > You can upload your spec file there. Ok, i will improve the emacs mode part in nescc draft spec. :-) > Also, can you package spice-mode for us. It seems you are the emacs expert :) > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/75 yes, i can package spice-mode. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 12:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051232.nB5CWppk006838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-05 07:31:48 EDT --- * Please run "rpmlint" on the src.rpm and the built rpms and either resolve any problems it reports or comment on why they need not be fixed. (!) This is explicitly left to you as an exercise. Feel free to ask any questions that might come up, though. * You could also submit a scratch-build in the official Fedora build system, which is explained at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join * Why the need for glibc-static? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Staticly_Linking_Executables > Release: 2.beta5%{?dist} This doesn't adhere to the Package Naming Guidelines for pre-releases: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages > Summary: Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying > Group: Applications/Internet Perhaps nit-picky, but what is it, a library or an application? ;-) > %description > ...the internet. ... the Internet. > %doc %{_mandir}/man?/* The %doc here is redundant. Files in %_mandir are implicitly marked as %doc. > %files There are a couple of documentation files included in the tarball, which look like worthy additions for the %doc line: FAQ ChangeLog > %post > /sbin/ldconfig > %postun > /sbin/ldconfig This creates shell-scripts within /sbin/ldconfig is executed via /bin/sh. The more common form is to run /sbin/ldconfig directly by using the -p argument (to specify what to run instead of /bin/sh): %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig > * Thu Dec 3 2009 Jean-Francois Saucier - > 1.8-2.beta5.fc12 Widely accepted practise is to omit the .fc12 expanded dist value here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 12:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519071] Review Request: wiipresent - Giving presentations (or control applications) with your Wiimote In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051237.nB5CbOQL008315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519071 Michael Monreal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michael.monreal+bugs at gmail. | |com --- Comment #8 from Michael Monreal 2009-12-05 07:36:27 EDT --- It has been some month... seeing if this is just blocking on the changelog, is there hope we will see this package included soon? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 13:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 08:09:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] New: Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 Summary: Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lvillani at binaryhelix.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/master/kde/shared-desktop-ontologies/shared-desktop-ontologies.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/shared-destkop-ontologies/ Description: The vision of the Social Semantic Desktop defines a user?s personal information environment as a source and end-point of the Semantic Web: Knowledge workers comprehensively express their information and data with respect to their own conceptualizations. Semantic Web languages and protocols are used to formalize these conceptualizations and for coordinating local and global information access. The Resource Description Framework serves as a common data representation format. With a particular focus on addressing certain limitations of RDF, a novel representational language akin to RDF and the Web Ontology Language, plus a number of other high-level ontologies were created. Together, they provide a means to build the semantic bridges necessary for data exchange and application integration on distributed social semantic desktops. Although initially designed to fulfill requirements for the Nepomuk project, these ontologies are useful for the semantic web community in general. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 13:12:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 08:12:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051312.nB5DCsk9015285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 --- Comment #1 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-05 08:12:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/master/kde/shared-desktop-ontologies/shared-desktop-ontologies.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/shared-desktop-ontologies/ Previous URI busted, use these instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 13:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 08:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] New: Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 Summary: Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lvillani at binaryhelix.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/master/kde/attica/attica.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/attica/ Description: Attica is a Qt library that implements the Open Collaboration Services API version 1.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 13:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 08:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051328.nB5DS3SI014009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 --- Comment #1 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-05 08:28:02 EDT --- Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851262 ________________________________________________________________ Rpmlint: [lvillani at enterprise attica]$ rpmlint /home/lvillani/devel/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/attica-0.1.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm /home/lvillani/devel/rpm/RPMS/x86_64/attica-devel-0.1.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm attica.spec attica-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I decided to include "documentation" (mainly license and readme file) only in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 13:25:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 08:25:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051325.nB5DPc5R013683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 --- Comment #2 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-05 08:25:37 EDT --- Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851267 ________________________________________________________________ Rpmlint: [lvillani at enterprise shared-desktop-ontologies]$ rpmlint /home/lvillani/devel/rpm/RPMS/noarch/shared-desktop-ontologies-0.2-1.fc12.noarch.rpm shared-desktop-ontologies.spec shared-desktop-ontologies.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/shared-desktop-ontologies.pc 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I would rather ignore the warning: that pkgconfig file is used only to help other packages find the ontologies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 14:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542210] Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051402.nB5E2alo026502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-05 09:02:34 EDT --- The README.txt included in %doc says: "See doc/ for more info, examples and contact info." So why don't you do a -doc subpackage and include doc/ there? Being more explicit in %files, like %{python_sitelib}/%{srcname}* would be great, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 14:26:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:26:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051426.nB5EQXiv031985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-05 09:26:30 EDT --- Could you please add the appropriate requires and update to the new release pre6 upstream? Then, I'll review this. It would also be great, if you put the documentation into a subpackage, because it's as big as the main programm on its own. Ok, both 'only' 500k, but a matter of point of view. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 14:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051429.nB5ET50b032425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-05 09:29:03 EDT --- > rpmlint is silent. Okay, lemme add some noise then. ;) > # There are some MIT files but the effective license is GPLv2+ > License: GPLv2+ The comment is confusing. What files do you refer to? In case any source files applied a license other than GPLv2+, the guidelines would want you to make that clear. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario All of the source files contain a GPLv2+ header, though. Only some autotools' scripts/files contain other headers, but we don't give them special treatment with regard to the licensing guidelines. > raul-gcc44.patch > ... > +#include In C++ the proper header is though. > %check > pushd tests > export LD_PRELOAD=../src/.libs/lib%{name}.so IMO, better would be this set-up: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir} > rpm -i /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/raul-devel-0.5.1-1.fc12.i686.rpm \ > /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/raul-0.5.1-1.fc12.i686.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > liblo-devel is needed by raul-devel-0.5.1-1.fc12.i686 Uh, it requires another -devel package that wasn't needed for building it. > $ rpm -qR raul-devel|grep devel > boost-devel > glib2-devel > jack-audio-connection-kit-devel > liblo-devel > $ pkg-config --cflags raul > -pthread -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include > -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include > $ pkg-config --libs raul > -pthread -lraul -lglibmm-2.4 -lgobject-2.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 > -lglib-2.0 -ljack -lpthread -lrt "Requires: glibmm24-devel libsigc++20-devel" is missing in raul-devel. Only because the pkg-config file adds them explicitly. Upstream might add proper "Requires" to raul.pc.in, in particular since some of these explicitly added libraries are not needed when building with libraul. > $ grep mm include/raul/* > AtomRDF.hpp:#include > AtomRDF.hpp:#include > Command.hpp:#include > Command.hpp:#include > Stateful.hpp:#include $ sudo repoquery --whatprovides /usr/include\*/redlandmm/Node.hpp $ Not in Fedora yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 14:38:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:38:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051438.nB5EcDlN029840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #27 from Sandro Mathys 2009-12-05 09:38:09 EDT --- ASL 2.0 only version of skinlf is about to hit Fedora (see bug 524784). With this step we should be ready to bring tvbrowser into Fedora...and it only took us a little over one year! ;) Who's up for the formal review? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 14:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544540] Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051439.nB5Ed06a029915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544540 --- Comment #1 from Dominic Hopf 2009-12-05 09:38:59 EDT --- $ rpmlint genesis.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint genesis-0.4.2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint genesis-0.4.2.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Specfile name matches %{name}.spec [x] Package seems to meet Packaging Guidelines [-] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. This is a noarch package. [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM: empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] License in specfile matches actual License and meets Licensing Guidelines License: GPLv2+ and GPLv3, results in GPLv3 [-] License file is included in %doc. There is no specific license file, the license text is included "hard coded" in the about dialogue [x] Specfile is legible and written in AE [x] Sourcefile in the Package is the same as provided in the mentioned Source SHA1SUM of Source: d9e4b3218ee8a1390ded665905a095146c647aab [x] Package compiles successfully [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires [x] Specfile handles locales properly [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] Package owns directorys it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not list a file more than once in the %files listing [x] %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly [x] %clean section is there and contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [!] Macros are consistently used [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage [x] Program runs properly without files listed in %doc [-] Header files are in a -devel package [-] Static libraries are in a -static package [-] Package requires pkgconfig if .pc files are present [-] .so-files are put into a -devel subpackage [-] Subpackages include fully versioned dependency for the base package [-] Any libtool archives (*.la) are removed [x] contains desktop file (%{name}.desktop) if it is a GUI application [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is removed at beginning of %install [-] Filenames are encoded in UTF-8 === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package contains latest upstream version [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] non-English translations for description and summary [x] Package builds in mock Tested on: F12/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. tested build with koji [x] Program runs [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] pkgconfig (*.pc) files are placed in a -devel package [-] require package providing a file instead of the file itself no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required Issues found: * You're using $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in line 51 and line 67, but %{buildroot} in line 60 and 61. This affects required consistency of used macros. * The program is translated into several languages, it would be nice if there also would be Summarys and descriptions for those languages provided by the program Once the macro-consistency issue is fixed I will approve this package. Everything else looks good. Very nice work Andrea! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 14:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:46:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541207] Review Request: liborigin2 - library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051446.nB5Ek0cB031688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541207 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-05 09:45:58 EDT --- One thing that's striking is: > * Sat Nov 25 2009 Super Cyper - 06042009-1 Certainly you are not named "Super Cyper". I highly recommend you to use your real name, also inside the .spec file and in bugzilla.redhat.com. [...] Skimming over the .spec file, it doesn't look bad. > Name: liborigin2 > Group: Development/Libraries Main library packages typically use RPM Group "System Environment/Libraries", since they are used at run-time and not specific to developing/building software. > %description devel > This package contains the header files, static libraries Static libraries are not included, so this description isn't true. > $ spectool liborigin2.spec > Source0: http://prdownload.berlios.de/qtiplot/liborigin2-06042009.zip This URL points at a web-page instead of the .zip archive. If you cannot find an URL that points at the archive directly (with a specific BerliOS mirror as the last resort), it would be better to follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Troublesome_URLs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 14:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] New: Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Summary: Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tomspur at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/python-minimock.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/python-minimock-1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: minimock is a simple library for doing Mock objects with doctest. _____________________________________ rpmlint clean: $ rpmlint python-minimock.spec python-minimock-1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm noarch/python-minimock-1.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. _____________________________________ builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851341 ______________________________________ python-daemon is currently broken, because this package is not yet in fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 14:47:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051447.nB5El9HQ003779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |513546 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 14:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 09:47:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528782] Review Request: xcf-pixbuf-loader - XCF (GIMP) image loader for GTK+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051447.nB5ElrFO003885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528782 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Debarshi Ray 2009-12-05 09:47:52 EDT --- I think it should be %{_target_platform} instead of %{_host} because on Fedora 11 x86_64: [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ rpm --eval %{_target_platform} x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ rpm --eval %{_host} x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ ls /etc/gtk-2.0/ gtkrc x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 15:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:08:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051508.nB5F884q003809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-05 10:08:06 EDT --- While I don't know I can review tvbrowser soon (as I have some other review requests assigned to myself), - first of all I want to recheck skinlf src/binary - and would you recheck your tvbrowser srpm and upload the new one if there is something you want to modify? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 15:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:07:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051507.nB5F7UEW008177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-12-05 10:07:27 EDT --- Well, the best thing would be for them to do a new tarball release which has the following in their AUTHORS file: "CHORD is licensed following the conditions of the GNU Public License, version 2 or later. See COPYING for the full license text." (All of the other wording about licensing should be replaced with the above sentences.) In addition, COPYING should be a copy of the GPL v2, and should be present in the tarball. If they don't want to do that for some reason, we would need an email from both Martin and Mario which includes the new license sentences (as above). We should save copies of those emails as text files, and package them as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 15:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543685] Package review: libnes - Driver library for libibverbs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051514.nB5FEcaK005107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543685 --- Comment #2 from Doug Ledford 2009-12-05 10:14:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > %makeinstall > > Avoid this macro unless normal "make DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} install" (with > an optional INSTALL="install -p" doesn't work. Add a comment if you really need > this macro. The way %makeinstall overrides variables to insert the buildroot > path bears risks and has lead to problems before. Fixed. > > %{_sysconfdir}/libibverbs.d/*.driver > > "repoquery --whatprovides /etc/libibverbs.d" on Fedora 12 returns nothing, > which means it's an unowned directory. Most likely in package "libibverbs". New version of libibverbs being built that now owns this directory. > > %package static > > Summary: Static version of the libnes driver > > Group: System Environment/Libraries > > Rather "Development/Libraries". Fixed. > > Provides: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release} > ... > > %files static > > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > %{_libdir}/*.a > > A static library without any headers? Isn't this package missing a dependency > on some -devel package that would define the API for this lib? Same question > applies to the virtual -devel package. Yes and no. Even if a user application directly links this file into their code, they wouldn't ever be calling it and wouldn't need any API information. This static library only serves a purpose when the user is also statically linking libibverbs into their application (in which case presumably they have the libibverbs-devel package already installed, which is the yes part of the answer), however even then, this library is actually only linked against libibverbs while the user code is also only linked against libibverbs, and since the libibverbs static library is already compiled just as this is, there really isn't any requirement for headers to define the API during the link process. So yes in the sense that the user space code probably needs the libibverbs headers before this is useful, but no in the sense that this library itself doesn't have any requirements as it's only going to be linked against other object code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 15:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:27:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543689] Package review: libipathverbs - Driver library for libibverbs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051527.nB5FRjIQ012847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543689 --- Comment #2 from Doug Ledford 2009-12-05 10:27:44 EDT --- Ditto the responses in the libnes bug. You are correct that this is a driver plugin or libibverbs and not something directly usable by the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 15:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:51:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544540] Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051551.nB5FpwXc013906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544540 --- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-05 10:51:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for your review Dominic! > Issues found: > * You're using $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in line 51 and line 67, but %{buildroot} in > line 60 and 61. This affects required consistency of used macros. I updated the SPEC file accordingly. > * The program is translated into several languages, it would be nice if there > also would be Summarys and descriptions for those languages provided by the > program Unluckily I have no ways to provide a translation for such fields in the SPEC file because upstream do not provide them and I'm not a polyglot. Anyway I added the Italian translations for Summary and Description. Of course other languages are welcome :) > Once the macro-consistency issue is fixed I will approve this package. > Everything > else looks good. Very nice work Andrea! Thanks! http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/genesis.spec http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/genesis-0.4.2.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Changelog: - More consistent macro usage - Added Italian summary and description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 16:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 11:16:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544531] Review Request: xvkbd - Virtual Keyboard for X Window System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051616.nB5GGqm9018892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544531 --- Comment #2 from zbe64533 at gmail.com 2009-12-05 11:16:51 EDT --- Thank you for commenting. I checked comments and linked review guideline. And I updated the package to include desktop files. Spec URL: http://www.saturn.dti.ne.jp/~zbe64533/xvkbd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.saturn.dti.ne.jp/~zbe64533/xvkbd-3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 16:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 11:25:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544540] Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051625.nB5GPWDW024804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544540 Dominic Hopf changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Dominic Hopf 2009-12-05 11:25:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Thanks for your review Dominic! > > > Issues found: > > * You're using $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in line 51 and line 67, but %{buildroot} in > > line 60 and 61. This affects required consistency of used macros. > > I updated the SPEC file accordingly. Looks good now, thanks. > > * The program is translated into several languages, it would be nice if there > > also would be Summarys and descriptions for those languages provided by the > > program > > Unluckily I have no ways to provide a translation for such fields in the SPEC > file because upstream do not provide them and I'm not a polyglot. That's why I wrote "would be nice" ;) > Anyway I added the Italian translations for Summary and Description. Of course > other languages are welcome :) You can also add a German translation if you want: Summary(de): Grafisches Frontend f?r SyncEvolution %description -l de Genesis ist ein grafisches Frontend f?r SyncEvolution welches in PyGTK geschrieben ist. Es macht einen Zugriff auf SyncEvolution m?glich, ohne die Kommandozeile nutzen zu m?ssen und gibt grafisch R?ckmeldung ?ber Transaktionen. (Sorry I didn't provide this translation a bit earlier) > > Once the macro-consistency issue is fixed I will approve this package. > > Everything else looks good. Very nice work Andrea! > > Thanks! > > http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/genesis.spec > http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/genesis-0.4.2.1-2.fc12.src.rpm > > Changelog: > - More consistent macro usage > - Added Italian summary and description The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 17:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051726.nB5HQ2DR002029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #30 from Carl Byington 2009-12-05 12:25:59 EDT --- Since -devel requires main is required by the standards above, I propose: -devel requires main requires -libs. That forces installation of -libs containing the licenses, but code built by f2c and compiled by gcc only needs -libs to run. You can then install just main, and use f2c to generate c code, but that code won't actually compile unless you install -devel, since it needs the headers to compile. We could re-add the current 'main requires -devel' but that leads to main and -devel requiring each other (which is strange) or merging main and -devel (which conflicts with the standard requirement of .so files must be in -devel subpackage). If we switch to '-devel requires main requires -libs', then packages that need f2c to build will need 'buildrequires f2c-devel' rather than their current buildrequires f2c. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 17:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:30:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051730.nB5HU0sg007121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 --- Comment #5 from Silas Sewell 2009-12-05 12:29:59 EDT --- SPEC http://github.com/silas/rpms/raw/master/lamson/lamson.spec SRPM http://cloud.github.com/downloads/silas/rpms/lamson-1.0-0.2.pre6.fc13.src.rpm I moved the examples directory into the doc subpackage and included the documentation although it isn't very useful without something like: pushd /usr/share/doc/lamson-doc-1.0/output/; python -m SimpleHTTPServer; popd rpmlint [silas at sewell rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/lamson-*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 18:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 13:00:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051800.nB5I0js1014142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 --- Comment #37 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-05 13:00:41 EDT --- For -0.10: * Naming (In reply to comment #35) > 2) I didn't rename the libdspam to dspam-libs because you can install the > library independent of dspam, it can be used in other projects/programs. If > someone were to write a plugin for evolution or thunderbird. the dspam package > is only necessary for an MTA, whereas the library can be used in all sorts of > places. - Fedora already many examples about this. e.g. There are some apprecations which requires mysql-libs, but not mysql or mysql-server. And there are many other examples. > 3) The libdspam-X are required by the library for storage of all the token data > it produces. So I'm not sure what to call them other than libdspam-X, I could > rename them to dspam-plugin-X or dspam-storage-X but that implies you need the > dspam package which you don't. So if you could advise what to do here. - You can name as dspam-plugin-foo or dspam-foo and this does not mean that dspam(-plugin)-foo requires dspam binary rpm (unless you write so in the spec file) * Directory ownership issue - This time the following directories are not owned by any packages: ---------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/dspam/ /var/lib/dspam/txt/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- (In reply to comment #36) > Which brings me to my next question about that. > > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}/sql-scripts/mysql > %doc %attr(0644,root,root) %{_datadir}/%{name}/sql-scripts/mysql/* > > > Can I combine that into one line? I assume I can't because I want the attr to > apply to the files and not the directory.. - I avoid to use %attr as much as possible. (0644,root,root) permission on files are default's permission so if you set this permission _in advance_, you don't have to write %attr(0644,root,root) explicitly. i.e. set permission at %install like --------------------------------------------------------------- chmod 0644 %buildroot%_datadir/%name/*/*/* --------------------------------------------------------------- and I don't usually write %attr(0644,root,root) for files and %attr(0755,root,root) for directories. Another thing: * Documents - Add "LICENSE" files to -libs package (because including "LICENSE" text to %doc is a must if it exists and all dspam related packages require -libs package) - And consider to move document files in dspam binary rpm to -libs package (because one can install dspam-libs package only) And please check permission/owner/group is corrently set for all files ( especially, I don't think permission of /usr/bin/dspam is set correctly. Currently /usr/bin/dspam has (2511,root,root) permission (i.e. has setgid bit and group is root), which means when this script is executed, the process is always run with root group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 18:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 13:25:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051825.nB5IPvaq015036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 --- Comment #2 from Carl Byington 2009-12-05 13:25:56 EDT --- Consistency of naming; we have .so files, which the standards say must be in a -devel subpackage. And the actual versioned .so.* files are always in a -libs subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 18:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 13:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051833.nB5IXBZ9016371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #31 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-05 13:33:10 EDT --- #08 In %build, you can use: emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile *.el I have tested this package, and it works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 18:37:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 13:37:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051837.nB5Ib2Ma021723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #32 from Jerry James 2009-12-05 13:37:01 EDT --- Actually, you can use: %_emacs_bytecompile *.el See /etc/rpm/macros.emacs for other available macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 18:42:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 13:42:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542767] Review Request: ghemical - Molecular mechanics and quantum mechanics frontend for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051842.nB5IgxkO018515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542767 --- Comment #2 from Carl Byington 2009-12-05 13:42:58 EDT --- ghemical does not need f2c at all. requirement removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 18:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 13:43:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051843.nB5IhDpW018569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-05 13:43:12 EDT --- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (rubygem-ParseTree) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 18:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 13:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051856.nB5Iu1ce025912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-05 13:56:00 EDT --- > License: GPLv2+ Several files contain a GPLv2 header _without_ the "or later" clause, e.g. log.*, lv2filter.* and lv2_ui.c The lv2_ui.h header contains a LGPL header! > Summary: Four-band parametric equalisers > > Description: > Stereo and mono LV2 plugins, four-band parametric equalisers. "equaliser" is British English while "equalizer" is American English _as well as_ British English. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 19:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:00:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-inito chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051900.nB5J0Z9X027010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #22 from Carl Byington 2009-12-05 14:00:33 EDT --- parallel disabled again, did not help with ghemical on multi-core anyway. atlas changes unnecessary, since something is already picking that up. ldd $(which mpqc) | grep atlas liblapack.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/liblapack.so.3 (0x021e7000) libf77blas.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/libf77blas.so.3 (0x076b1000) libcblas.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/libcblas.so.3 (0x0036a000) libatlas.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/libatlas.so.3 (0x077e4000) ldd /usr/lib/libghemical.so.5 | grep atlas liblapack.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/liblapack.so.3 (0x00b6d000) libf77blas.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/libf77blas.so.3 (0x008c3000) libcblas.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/libcblas.so.3 (0x005c4000) libatlas.so.3 => /usr/lib/atlas/libatlas.so.3 (0x010fe000) http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-14.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 19:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051908.nB5J833X024308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-05 14:08:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-ParseTree Short Description: Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 19:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912051911.nB5JBDIh025294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #33 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-05 14:11:11 EDT --- %_emacs_bytecompile *.el is failing on my Fedora 12 laptop with: === OUTPUT === + /usr/bin/emacs -batch --no-init-file --no-site-file -f batch-byte-compile haskell-c.el haskell-cabal.el haskell-decl-scan.el haskell-doc.el haskell-font-lock.el haskell-ghci.el haskell-hugs.el haskell-indent.el haskell-indentation.el haskell-mode.el haskell-simple-indent.el haskell-site-file.el inf-haskell.el In toplevel form: haskell-c.el:28:1:Error: Cannot open load file: haskell-mode Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-cabal.elc In toplevel form: haskell-decl-scan.el:130:1:Error: Cannot open load file: haskell-mode In toplevel form: haskell-doc.el:356:1:Error: Cannot open load file: haskell-mode In toplevel form: haskell-font-lock.el:104:13:Error: Cannot open load file: haskell-mode In haskell-ghci-locate-next-error: haskell-ghci.el:302:32:Warning: `string-to-int' is an obsolete function (as of Emacs 22.1); use `string-to-number' instead. In end of data: haskell-ghci.el:334:1:Warning: the function `comint-mode' might not be defined at runtime. Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-ghci.elc In haskell-hugs-gen-load-file: haskell-hugs.el:283:25:Warning: `string-to-int' is an obsolete function (as of Emacs 22.1); use `string-to-number' instead. Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-hugs.elc Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-indent.elc In haskell-indentation-mode: haskell-indentation.el:100:32:Warning: assignment to free variable `haskell-indent-last-position' In haskell-indentation-indent-line: haskell-indentation.el:264:20:Warning: assignment to free variable `haskell-indent-last-position' haskell-indentation.el:272:20:Warning: reference to free variable `haskell-indent-last-position' Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-indentation.elc In end of data: haskell-mode.el:621:1:Warning: the function `compile-internal' is not known to be defined. Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-mode.elc Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-simple-indent.elc Wrote /home/foo/rpmbuild/BUILD/haskell-mode-2.7.0/haskell-site-file.elc In toplevel form: inf-haskell.el:38:1:Error: Cannot open load file: haskell-mode nilerror: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rSeL06 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rSeL06 (%build) === END === Now, when I try using "emacs -batch -f batch-byte-compile *.el", I get the above error. But, using "emacs --batch --eval '(setq load-path (cons "." load-path))' -f batch-byte-compile *.el" builds fine though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 19:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544628] New: at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 Summary: at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- The accessibility framework is being rewritten on top of D-Bus to get rid of ORBit/CORBA. This package is an early release of the core of the new framework. I'm packaging it now to allow people to start testing and reporting problems. For now, the at-spi2 packages will have Conflicts with the at-spi packages. This will be replaced by Provides/Obsoletes, once at-spi2 is feature-complete and ready for prime time. SRPM: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/at-spi2-core-0.1.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/at-spi2-core.spec Mock complains about three empty interface definitions, which is probably a problem with the xslt script that converts them from the docs. I'll report that upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 19:38:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:38:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544629] New: at-spi2-atk - GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: at-spi2-atk - GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544629 Summary: at-spi2-atk - GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- The accessibility framework is being rewritten on top of D-Bus to get rid of ORBit/CORBA. This package is an early release of the core of the new framework. I'm packaging it now to allow people to start testing and reporting problems. For now, the at-spi2 packages will have Conflicts with the at-spi packages. This will be replaced by Provides/Obsoletes, once at-spi2 is feature-complete and ready for prime time. This package includes a gtk-module that bridges ATK to the new D-Bus based at-spi. It depends on at-spi2-core, which is under review in bug 544628 SRPM: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/at-spi2-atk-0.1.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/at-spi2-atk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 19:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 14:42:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] New: pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Summary: pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mclasen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- The accessibility framework is being rewritten on top of D-Bus to get rid of ORBit/CORBA. This package is an early release of the core of the new framework. I'm packaging it now to allow people to start testing and reporting problems. For now, the at-spi2 packages will have Conflicts with the at-spi packages. This will be replaced by Provides/Obsoletes, once at-spi2 is feature-complete and ready for prime time. This package contains Python bindings for D-Bus at-spi. The other parts of the at-spi2 stack are under review in bug 544628 and bug 544629. SRPM: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/pyatspi-0.1.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/pyatspi.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 20:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052020.nB5KKcUL008345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-05 15:20:37 EDT --- Things that make you go hmmm... > sed -i -e '/ldconfig/d' Makefile.template And later: > # Add missing symlinks > ln -sf liblv2-gui.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-gui.so.0 > ln -sf liblv2-gui.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-gui.so > ln -sf liblv2-plugin.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-plugin.so.0 > ln -sf liblv2-plugin.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-plugin.so > ln -sf libpaq.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libpaq.so.0 :) Actually, that's why the Makefile ran "ldconfig -n" in libdir to create the symlinks for the shared libpaq. With ldconfig, it would reduce to /sbin/ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir} ln -sf liblv2-gui.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-gui.so ln -sf liblv2-plugin.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-plugin.so at the end of %install. The two "ln -s" are left only because those two shared libs are built manually in the spec file. [...] Upstream is funny so to say: http://ll-plugins.nongnu.org/dox/lv2-c++-tools/1.0.2/ | These libraries are only available as static libraries (and most | of the code is template classes in header files), thus ABI stability | is not an issue. The API will be stable between major version bumps, | at which the pkg-config name would change to prevent plugins from | building against an incompatible version, but if you were to modify | the build system to create shared libraries and link against those | you are on your own. Translates to ''I don't really want this API to be used by any C++ application'' as all library updates will require app rebuilds, and API changes will require additional updates in build frameworks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 20:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052035.nB5KZktb011553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 --- Comment #3 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2009-12-05 15:35:45 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/tsocks.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/tsocks-1.8-0.3.beta5.fc12.src.rpm Thanks a lot for taking your time reviewing my package. I tried to solve most bugs, see below for transcript : * rpmlint : rpmlint is silent on the srpm and spec file. I fixed most of the errors/warnings on the rpm file. Here is the remaining warnings for the rpm file : - tsocks.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libtsocks.so.1.8 I checked to solve this one, but I'm not sure how to do it cleanly and what it affect. Can you enlight me on this? - tsocks.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libtsocks.so.1.8 exit at GLIBC_2.0 I could patch the program, but I'm not sure it's worth it. - tsocks.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libtsocks.so tsocks need this file and it's not a devel-file. * I submited scratch build for f11 and f12 on i386, x86_64, ppc and ppc64 and everything is good : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851702 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851708 * I patch the Makefile to remove the need of static library linking. * I think that I fixed my version and release string. I must have misread the guidelines ;) * You are right, I changed the group because tsocks is more a library with a wrapper script than an application. * Description, man pages, add worthy files, ldconfig and changelog all fixed! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 20:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:41:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052041.nB5Kfxl3012719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-05 15:41:57 EDT --- Review: Good: - License ok, but you should query upstream to add headers in .py files - %files section ok - permissions ok - BR/R ok - contains permissable content - contains %check section - name 'pre' is not in the guidelines examples, but I consider this as completely ok - noarch - no locales to handle - no .la files - no devel needed - macros everywhere - no header files - no pc files - doc package ok - no gui -> no .desktop Needswork: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - group is wrong: System Environment/Daemons would fit better - I talked upstream to correct the nasty %prep commands. It's tracked in http://support.lamsonproject.org/tktview/6e717821c1e513ce888252276ef8b6524861d9d0 The author of lamson said, he wants to have a release out later today. __________________________________ These are only minor issues, so I'll approve this now, but only import the next release into cvs... __________________________________ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 21:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:06:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520568] Review Request: python-purple - Python bindings for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052106.nB5L6eCc021738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520568 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-05 16:06:39 EDT --- Where does the source package comes from? See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 21:06:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:06:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052106.nB5L6wXG018362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fgfs.stefan at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Stefan Riemens 2009-12-05 16:06:57 EDT --- Well, that's not quite true... Just put the versioned lib in the main package and the headers and unversioned lib in -devel. I'll review this as soon as you have that cleaned up... Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 21:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:09:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052109.nB5L9MsD022143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-05 16:09:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > rpmlint is silent. > > Okay, lemme add some noise then. ;) > > Thanks for getting your hands dirty :) > > # There are some MIT files but the effective license is GPLv2+ > > License: GPLv2+ > > The comment is confusing. What files do you refer to? > > In case any source files applied a license other than GPLv2+, the guidelines > would want you to make that clear. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario > > All of the source files contain a GPLv2+ header, though. Only some autotools' > scripts/files contain other headers, but we don't give them special treatment > with regard to the licensing guidelines. > > Ah, I probably was going thru the source files and saw the MIT headers in the autotools files and didn't pay attention what they actually are for. I'll remove the comment. > > raul-gcc44.patch > > ... > > +#include > > In C++ the proper header is though. > Yes. But it's not too big of a deal (Is it?). And upstream accepted and applied my patch to the trunk. > > > %check > > pushd tests > > export LD_PRELOAD=../src/.libs/lib%{name}.so > > IMO, better would be this set-up: > > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir} > Could you tell me what makes this better? Don't they serve the same purpose in this case? Does LD_PRELOAD have a potential of hiding errors or breaking thing? > > > rpm -i /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/raul-devel-0.5.1-1.fc12.i686.rpm \ > > /home/qa/tmp/rpm/RPMS/raul-0.5.1-1.fc12.i686.rpm > > error: Failed dependencies: > > liblo-devel is needed by raul-devel-0.5.1-1.fc12.i686 > > Uh, it requires another -devel package that wasn't needed for building it. > A "Requires" in the devel package does not necessarily mean that you need that package during building. Just check the header files that go into the devel package and you will understand what I mean :). You will see that some #include headers from liblo and some #include headers from: > > boost-devel > > glib2-devel > > jack-audio-connection-kit-devel > > liblo-devel > So these requirements are for development purposes. > > $ pkg-config --cflags raul > > -pthread -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/include > > -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib/sigc++-2.0/include > > -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include > > $ pkg-config --libs raul > > -pthread -lraul -lglibmm-2.4 -lgobject-2.0 -lsigc-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 > > -lglib-2.0 -ljack -lpthread -lrt > > "Requires: glibmm24-devel libsigc++20-devel" is missing in raul-devel. Only > because the pkg-config file adds them explicitly. > > Upstream might add proper "Requires" to raul.pc.in, in particular since some of > these explicitly added libraries are not needed when building with libraul. > Should I remove these entries from the .pc file: -lglibmm-2.4 -lgobject-2.0 -lsigc-2.0 lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -ljack I don't think they are really required. > > > $ grep mm include/raul/* > > AtomRDF.hpp:#include > > AtomRDF.hpp:#include > > Command.hpp:#include > > Command.hpp:#include > > Stateful.hpp:#include > > $ sudo repoquery --whatprovides /usr/include\*/redlandmm/Node.hpp > $ > > Not in Fedora yet. Exactly. That's why I didn't add BR: redlandmm-devel (or whatever it is called) to the Requires of the devel package. I will add it once this package is in Fedora. For the time being this won't break anything. I don't know of any software that uses redlandmm feature of raul. In particular, redlandmm needs redland >= 1.0.8 or higher. But even in rawhide we still have 1.0.7. I talked to the maintainer and got the response that it is being worked on. I guess the progress is a little slow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 21:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052114.nB5LEwSs023255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-05 16:14:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > License: GPLv2+ > > Several files contain a GPLv2 header _without_ the "or later" clause, e.g. > log.*, lv2filter.* and lv2_ui.c > The lv2_ui.h header contains a LGPL header! > So what is your conclusion? > > > Summary: Four-band parametric equalisers > > > > Description: > > Stereo and mono LV2 plugins, four-band parametric equalisers. > > "equaliser" is British English while "equalizer" is American English _as well > as_ British English. I took this directly from upstream description. By the way, I saw many people in the US who use "*iser" instead of "*izer". Are you sure there is a rule for this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 21:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:36:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544628] at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052136.nB5La0Zd027743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-05 16:35:59 EDT --- Just a few comments: - There is no conflicts with the at-spi packages as described above, yet. - source url is wrong: should be download*DOT*gnome*DOT*org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 21:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052146.nB5Lkf8V026245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-05 16:46:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for having a look > Things that make you go hmmm... > > > sed -i -e '/ldconfig/d' Makefile.template > > And later: > > > # Add missing symlinks > > ln -sf liblv2-gui.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-gui.so.0 > > ln -sf liblv2-gui.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-gui.so > > ln -sf liblv2-plugin.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-plugin.so.0 > > ln -sf liblv2-plugin.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-plugin.so > > ln -sf libpaq.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libpaq.so.0 > > :) > > Actually, that's why the Makefile ran "ldconfig -n" in libdir to create the > symlinks for the shared libpaq. With ldconfig, it would reduce to > > /sbin/ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir} > ln -sf liblv2-gui.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-gui.so > ln -sf liblv2-plugin.so.0.0.0 %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/liblv2-plugin.so > > at the end of %install. The two "ln -s" are left only because those two shared > libs are built manually in the spec file. > > [...] > oops. I guess it's my sloppiness again. I didn't notice the -n flag and I thought it was trying to rebuild the cache which would need root access. I'll remove the unnecessary lines. > Upstream is funny so to say: > > http://ll-plugins.nongnu.org/dox/lv2-c++-tools/1.0.2/ > > | These libraries are only available as static libraries (and most > | of the code is template classes in header files), thus ABI stability > | is not an issue. The API will be stable between major version bumps, > | at which the pkg-config name would change to prevent plugins from > | building against an incompatible version, but if you were to modify > | the build system to create shared libraries and link against those > | you are on your own. > > Translates to ''I don't really want this API to be used by any C++ > application'' as all library updates will require app rebuilds, and API > changes will require additional updates in build frameworks. I am really not sure what would be the best approach here. I can leave them as static libs but Fedora doesn't really like static libs. Or just make shared libs despite the warning of upstream. For the time being, it is safe to do so since the only software that uses the library is made by the same author. By the way I noticed that the build hangs in F-12 at ar rcs libraries/lv2gui/liblv2-gui.a libraries/lv2gui/lv2gui.o It doesn't fail but it just stays there forever. When I make the build on F-11, it passes through that line without much delay. I don't know where the problem is. Any opinions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 21:50:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:50:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052150.nB5Lo2nx026817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 --- Comment #4 from Carl Byington 2009-12-05 16:50:00 EDT --- fixed. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/oglappth.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/oglappth-0.98-2.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 22:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:13:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052213.nB5MDMVq031266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-05 17:13:21 EDT --- The License tag is wrong, should be "BSD or CC-BY", not "BSD with advertising or CC-BY". The advertising clause reads something like: > 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software must > display the following acknowledgement: This product includes software developed > by the University of California, Berkeley and its contributors. (where the exact sentence to quote has generally been changed by variants of the license). The LICENSE.BSD in this package does (thankfully) NOT carry this annoying clause. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 22:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:10:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544660] New: Review Request: php-channel-swift - Adds swift mailer project channel to PEAR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-channel-swift - Adds swift mailer project channel to PEAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544660 Summary: Review Request: php-channel-swift - Adds swift mailer project channel to PEAR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-channel-swift.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-channel-swift-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Adds swift mailer project channel to PEAR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 22:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:14:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052214.nB5MEbo5031409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 --- Comment #7 from Silas Sewell 2009-12-05 17:14:35 EDT --- I fixed the global vs define issue. I disagree on your assertion that it should be assigned to the "System Environment/Daemons" group. I consider Lamson analogous to frameworks like Tornado, Django and CherryPy. Example Django Usage 1. django-admin.py startproject helloworld 2. cd helloworld 3. python manage.py runserver 4. etc... Example Lamson Usage 1. lamson gen -project helloworld 2. cd helloworld 3. lamson start 4. etc.. For both Django and Lamson they recommend using an external server for relaying/proxing traffic (http/nginx for Django and Postfix for Lamson). ====================================================================== Lamson FAQ http://lamsonproject.org/docs/faq.html ====================================================================== Why does Lamson send messages to a relay host? Lamson doesn?t have to deliver to a relay host, but it is a smarter more practical use of the technology. Lamson is written in Python and does actually run slower than the established mail servers. In addition, Lamson is hopefully doing something more than just routing email around to people. It is probably processing messages, crafting replies, querying databases, hitting REST interfaces, and all the other things you?d want to do with a modern application. This takes time and resources and are probably more valuable operations than just simple delivery. For this reason, you want to use a dumb workhorse like Postfix to do your actual delivery, and reserve the smart processing that has value for Lamson. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 22:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:18:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052218.nB5MIkfa003521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #31 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-05 17:18:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > You can then install just main, and use f2c to generate c code, but that code > won't actually compile unless you install -devel, since it needs the headers to > compile. We could re-add the current 'main requires -devel' but that leads to > main and -devel requiring each other (which is strange) or merging main and > -devel (which conflicts with the standard requirement of .so files must be in > -devel subpackage). Indeed, the -devel requires main requires -devel is strange behavior, when you look at it from a fresh point of view. The guidelines are not strict in this case; for e.g. compilers it is normal to put development libraries in the main package. So actually it would be best to unite -devel with main and make the main package Provides: f2c-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 22:23:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:23:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052223.nB5MNg3M004515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-05 17:23:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > In Fedora the files > > > > %{_libdir}/libfoo.so.* > > go to the main library package, whereas the single file, which is a symlink > > %{_libdir}/libfoo.so > > goes to the devel package. Please fix this in your package accordingly. > > Oh. I think this must be an error because, if an app should make reference to > the symlink and the development package is not installed it won't find the > libarary. So I left all the libraries including he mentioned symlink in the > base package. Please correct me if I'm wrong about that. I don't think I made a mistake. This is the standard way we handle shared libraries in Fedora. - .so goes to devel - .so.* go to the main package (or to the -libs subpackage if there is a further split) You can verify this by checking any shared library installed in your system. rpm -ql libogg rpm -ql libogg-devel rpm -ql libXinerama rpm -ql libXinerama-devel etc. When you are building a shared library, the compiler (or ld) needs the .so file. During runtime, on the other hand, the linker takes care of this and it will point your application to the correct .so.* file. So the .so file is only needed during building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 23:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528782] Review Request: xcf-pixbuf-loader - XCF (GIMP) image loader for GTK+ applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052310.nB5NAin3011020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528782 --- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray 2009-12-05 18:10:43 EDT --- I think your %postun scriptlet should be: if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Syntax -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 23:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:39:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052339.nB5Nd18x016977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #33 from Carl Byington 2009-12-05 18:39:01 EDT --- wrong copy/paste, should be f2c-20090411-4.fc12.src.rpm http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c-20090411-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 23:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:37:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052337.nB5NbXfT019836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #32 from Carl Byington 2009-12-05 18:37:32 EDT --- fixed. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/f2c-20090411-2.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851912 f2c.src:14: W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{name}-devel should that provides be made explicit? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 5 23:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:46:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912052346.nB5NkP0a021931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-05 18:46:24 EDT --- Hmm, yes, then it's my fault... I wanted to use Lamson as a 'workhorse' itself and therefore the daemon group... Development/Languages is ok. Just had a wrong imagination of that group, it's clear now... Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 00:17:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060017.nB60Hb7u025421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-05 19:17:36 EDT --- So, it *really* hangs? - I've experienced a long build-time with F12 i686, too, but g++/ccache was still sucking a lot of cpu power and memory on an already busy machine, so I killed the build and restarted it without ccache and with optflags=-g only. That had managed to build something before I returned. Will need another look it seems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 00:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060039.nB60dMLA029484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Silas Sewell 2009-12-05 19:39:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lamson Short Description: A Python SMTP server Owners: silas Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 00:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:36:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060036.nB60ar0s029166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-05 19:36:52 EDT --- > LD_LIBRARY_PATH vs. LD_PRELOAD The benefit would be that you would test run-time linking of the test-suite programs with the actual shared libs installed into the package buildroot. It's much more a real-world test scenario than forcefully making available a .so that won't even be put into the run-time library package. > A "Requires" in the devel package does not necessarily mean > that you need that package during building. I found it surprising enough to mention it. :-) Upstream could include a check for liblo in its build framework. Afterall, it's a requirement of the API. > Should I remove these entries from the .pc file: Raises the question whether you would like the increased maintenance requirements? [pkg-config is kind of unflexible in that area. For any inter-dependency on other .pc files that is added in a .pc file's "Requires" line, it propagates and accumulates the cflags and ldflags. Good for the cflags (to find headers in customised trees outside standard search paths). However, when linking shared-only, we don't need to relink against shared libs a base library is linked with already (as opposed to static linkage). So, as an affect, shared library ldflags pile up even if an API doesn't depend on any of the libs.] And in this case the author even specified all those cflags and ldflags manually instead of using dependencies. > I don't know of any software that uses redlandmm feature of raul. The cleaner work-around would be to %exclude those headers then and effectively disable that part of the API that could not be used. We can't ship an API that is defunctional because of missing headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 00:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:47:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060047.nB60lLJ4031328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 --- Comment #4 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-05 19:47:20 EDT --- * Sun Dec 6 2009 Lorenzo Villani - 0.2-2 - Fix license tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 01:02:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 20:02:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544684] New: Review Request: gqradio - Skinned radio tuner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gqradio - Skinned radio tuner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544684 Summary: Review Request: gqradio - Skinned radio tuner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/gqradio.spec SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/gqradio-1.9.2-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: Radio tuner with themes. Interfaces with video4linux compatible radio tuner cards. ------------------------------------------------------------- Patched for v4l2 for using in Fedora 12. rpmlint is CLEAN. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851962 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 01:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 20:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060105.nB615LBm002902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-05 20:05:20 EDT --- This needs a -devel subpackage for the .pc file, as rpmlint is trying to tell you. Otherwise, pkgconfig will be dragged in everywhere by the automatic pkgconfig Requires in current RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 01:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 20:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060114.nB61E7w9004298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-05 20:14:06 EDT --- > attica-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation This one can be ignored (all the documentation is in the main package which is required by -devel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 01:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 20:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060116.nB61GNKS004973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 --- Comment #6 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-05 20:16:22 EDT --- * Sun Dec 6 2009 Lorenzo Villani - 0.2-3 - Add -devel package and move CMake and pkgconfig files there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 05:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 00:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060526.nB65Q9K2025076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #9 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-06 00:26:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > > In Fedora the files > > > > > > %{_libdir}/libfoo.so.* > > > go to the main library package, whereas the single file, which is a symlink > > > %{_libdir}/libfoo.so > > > goes to the devel package. Please fix this in your package accordingly. > > > > Oh. I think this must be an error because, if an app should make reference to > > the symlink and the development package is not installed it won't find the > > libarary. So I left all the libraries including he mentioned symlink in the > > base package. Please correct me if I'm wrong about that. > > I don't think I made a mistake. This is the standard way we handle shared > libraries in Fedora. > - .so goes to devel > - .so.* go to the main package (or to the -libs subpackage if there is a > further split) > > You can verify this by checking any shared library installed in your system. > rpm -ql libogg > rpm -ql libogg-devel > rpm -ql libXinerama > rpm -ql libXinerama-devel > etc. > > When you are building a shared library, the compiler (or ld) needs the .so > file. During runtime, on the other hand, the linker takes care of this and it > will point your application to the correct .so.* file. So the .so file is only > needed during building. I defer to your judgement and request.... And so done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 05:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 00:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060526.nB65QwRK025202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #10 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-06 00:26:58 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson-0.6.3-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 06:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 01:58:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060658.nB66wjNi008794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |544722 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 06:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 01:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542036] Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060658.nB66wldc008857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542036 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |544722 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 06:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 01:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060658.nB66wmjh008880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |544722 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 06:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 01:58:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060658.nB66wm2v008905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |544722 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 06:58:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 01:58:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060658.nB66wkNn008825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |544722 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 07:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:13:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060713.nB67Dg0p012050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |544724 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 07:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:13:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542045] Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060713.nB67DiuJ012104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |544724 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 07:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 02:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542036] Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060713.nB67DhrP012083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542036 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |544724 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 09:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 04:01:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060901.nB691JhL005071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #41 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-06 04:01:17 EDT --- I ran koji to create the package http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1852133. Is this okay? What is this section used for http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 09:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 04:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060949.nB69nMoa013852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #34 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-06 04:49:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > f2c.src:14: W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{name}-devel > > should that provides be made explicit? It should be versioned, i.e. Provides: %{name}-devel = %{version}-%{release}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 09:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 04:45:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544737] New: Review Request: qjson - A qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qjson - A qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544737 Summary: Review Request: qjson - A qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: magnus.tuominen at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rubbad.com/files/fedora/12/SPECS/qjson.spec SRPM URL: http://rubbad.com/files/fedora/12/SRPM/qjson-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange format. It can represents integer, real number, string, an ordered sequence of value, and a collection of name/value pairs. QJson is a qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant objects. JSON arrays will be mapped to QVariantList instances, while JSON's objects will be mapped to QVariantMap. This is my first package, need sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 09:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 04:50:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912060950.nB69o8Qj017447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #35 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-06 04:50:07 EDT --- The review is still OK. Apply for CVS branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 09:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 04:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544739] New: Review Request: kopete-facebook - Facebook Protocol support for Kopete Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kopete-facebook - Facebook Protocol support for Kopete https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544739 Summary: Review Request: kopete-facebook - Facebook Protocol support for Kopete Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: magnus.tuominen at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rubbad.com/files/fedora/12/SPECS/kopete-facebook.spec SRPM URL: http://rubbad.com/files/fedora/12/SRPM/kopete-facebook-0.1.4-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: Facebook protocol support for Kopete This is my second review requst, I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 10:02:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 05:02:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544540] Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061002.nB6A2KI4016669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544540 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-06 05:02:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: genesis Short Description: Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution Owners: musuruan Branches: F-12 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 10:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 05:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061019.nB6AJjfK020252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 10:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 05:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513541] Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061019.nB6AJLAx020158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|fabian at bernewireless.net |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 10:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 05:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061037.nB6AbJQr024603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-06 05:37:18 EDT --- The conclusion is: License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and GPLv2 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario By contacting the authors and asking them to clarify the licensing in the log.* files, it would reduce to "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+". The latter is due to the unchanged lv2_ui.h license. Upstream may opt to change the licensing of that file to GPLv2+ when following the guidelines in the LGPL paragraph 3. > By the way, I saw many peoplein the US who use "*iser" instead of > "*izer". Are you sure there is a rule for this? The following is not my original source, but one I can link to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences#-ise.2C_-ize and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_differences -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 10:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 05:53:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540368] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061053.nB6Arl3l031566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540368 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek 2009-12-06 05:53:45 EDT --- md5sum of tar inside does not match with upstream tar which is referenced in Source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 10:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 05:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] New: Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 Summary: Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sagarun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-spice-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-spice-mode-1.2.25-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This package provides an Emacs major mode for editing SPICE decks. Koji builds F11, F12, EL : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1852147 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1852145 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1852177 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 11:21:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 06:21:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061121.nB6BL7oN005235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 14:59:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 09:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061459.nB6ExPeN017971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #42 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-06 09:59:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > I ran koji to create the package > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1852133. > Is this okay? - If you are asking if your package is okay or not, then yes. > What is this section used for > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner > . - As written there, please check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure and write a CVS request for new package on this bug and set fedora-cvs flag to "?". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 15:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 10:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061504.nB6F4MMt019187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 --- Comment #5 from David Nalley 2009-12-06 10:04:21 EDT --- fixed the requires SRPM: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-OLE-1.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-OLE.spec Thanks for the review Remi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 15:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 10:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061508.nB6F83Qn023212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-06 10:08:02 EDT --- Avoid shorthand in spice-mode-init.el s/eldo outpt/eldo output/ I have tested this package and it looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 15:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 10:13:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061513.nB6FDs7O025055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-06 10:13:53 EDT --- Can you have a look and fix if possible the warnings during the build please? Also add .spice and .spc in the init.el file as they are the output format for magic and xcircuit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 15:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 10:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061524.nB6FOlwa027609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #8 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-06 10:24:45 EDT --- Hello Peter, Here we are. I have some questions, sorry if they are stupid, but I'm not very familiar with spec files: * No need to re-define %{name} and %{version}. Just put correct values to proper fields (Name: and Version:) at the top of the spec. Fixed * Source0 url should be corrected. See Source1 for example I'm not quite sure if I get this. Do you want me to remove %name and %version from Source0 and write directly http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/itk/InsightToolkit-3.16.0.tar.gz ? * %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.cmake should be placed in devel rather than in main package, I believe. Also, I'm not sure this is a correct place to put CMake files in. Moved to the devel section. Neither I am sure about their correct position. Maybe they should be put in cmake config dir? * Unowned directory - %{_libdir}/%{name} . Just list it as %dir in main package's %files section. Fixed * Source1 should be added as %doc in devel-subpackage First copied to builddir in %prep and then added as %doc. Not sure if this is the correct way * In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Fixed * Files within 'Copyrght' foler must be packages as %doc. Fixed * Consider, also, packaging of 'Docmentation' and 'Examples' folders. Added doc and examples sub-packages * I just found, that ITK contains numerous bundled libraries, many of them are duplication Fedora's system ones - see 'Utilities' directory. This should be fixed (and necessary BuildRequires should be added). Fixed adding -DUSE_SYSTEM_* to cmake flags. Anyway I didn't find any package for niether GDCM nor VXL. Should I package them as well or can I leave the itk versions for now? * Also I'm anxious about the contents of 'Code/Patented' folder. Fixed. After asking to the developers, we agreed to remove both Patented and Review: http://www.itk.org/pipermail/insight-users/2009-December/034323.html $ rpmlint SPECS/InsightToolkit.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings $ rpmlint SRPMS/InsightToolkit-3.16.0-2.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i686/InsightToolkit-devel-3.16.0-2.fc12.i686.rpm InsightToolkit-devel.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i686/InsightToolkit-doc-3.16.0-2.fc12.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I have a lot of warnings for: $ rpmlint RPMS/i686/InsightToolkit-examples-3.16.0-2.fc12.i686.rpm Mostly W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package and W: spurious-executable-perm But actually the C++ examples are devel files so I'm not sure if I should package here or in devel Also some error in the form of E: script-without-shebang but I thought that might wait until we decide if to package them into the example or the devel package. $ mock -r fedora-12-i386 rebuild InsightToolkit-3.16.0-2.fc12.src.rpm INFO: Done(SRPMS/InsightToolkit-3.16.0-2.fc12.src.rpm) Config(fedora-12-i386) 15 minutes 19 seconds but: $ koji build --scratch dist-f12 InsightToolkit-3.16.0-2.fc12.src.rpm exited with errors, but I don't understand why: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1852520 The new spec file and srpms are available in my brand new fedorapeople space! (Thanks Peter for that, it really works like a charm!) http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/InsightToolkit.spec http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/InsightToolkit-3.16.0-2.fc12.src.rpm I'm looking forward to hearing from you soon, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 16:03:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 11:03:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544628] at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061603.nB6G3v0v032693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-06 11:03:56 EDT --- This one is not conflicting. The at-spi2-atk and pyatspi packages are, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 16:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 11:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061607.nB6G75eK005052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-06 11:07:04 EDT --- Great! I'll review your new srpm tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 16:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 11:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061656.nB6GuLn7014500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-06 11:56:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=376474) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=376474) Fix free variables and backquote This fixes the free variables and the backquote warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 16:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 11:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] New: Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 Summary: Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-gettext.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-gettext-1.0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This library provides PHP functions to read MO files even when gettext is not compiled in or when appropriate locale is not present on the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 16:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 11:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061657.nB6GvOtO014747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-06 11:57:23 EDT --- #001: missing requires : gwave and ngspice #002: obselete spice3 in favour of ngspice Please patch the sources so that on the spice menu, we can see ngspice as one of the simulator and ensure that it is the default one since we don't ship any of the listed spice simulators. "spice3 -b" should be "ngspice -b" You can use a testcase from FEL's git repo e.g ota.sp http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/fedora-electronic-lab.git?p=fedora-electronic-lab.git;a=blob_plain;f=testsuite/ngspice/ota.sp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 17:18:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061718.nB6HISxe019150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #29 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-06 12:18:23 EDT --- Hi, any movement here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 17:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:20:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542210] Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061720.nB6HKreE019795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Moschny 2009-12-06 12:20:52 EDT --- Thanks for the comments, I updated the package. Imho there's no need for a -doc subpackage, but HTML docs are included now. Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-execnet/python-execnet.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-execnet/python-execnet-1.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Dec 5 2009 Thomas Moschny - 1.0.1-1 - Update to 1.0.1. - Build and include HTML documentation. - Be a bit more explicit in the %%files section. A scratch build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1852677 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 17:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061732.nB6HWf8C022512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-12-06 12:32:40 EDT --- Incorrect license specified: Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-gettext.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-gettext-1.0.9-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 17:34:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:34:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061734.nB6HYEUA022820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |felix at fetzig.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 17:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:43:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061743.nB6Hhg0g024838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele 2009-12-06 12:43:41 EDT --- Fresh review from FUDCon Toronto Room A: [+] source files match upstream: [felix at delta SPECS]$ sha256sum php-gettext-1.0.9.tar.gz ../SOURCES/php-gettext-1.0.9.tar.gz b3aac9dd13971cabd2474cc93abfc665752f1f732646f4c911928b4323a70319 php-gettext-1.0.9.tar.gz b3aac9dd13971cabd2474cc93abfc665752f1f732646f4c911928b4323a70319 ../SOURCES/php-gettext-1.0.9.tar.gz [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] license text included in package. [+] latest version is being packaged. [NA] BuildRequires are proper. [NA] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in mock. [+] package installs properly. [NA] debuginfo package looks complete. [+] rpmlint is silent. [+] final provides and requires are sane [NA] %check is present and all tests pass: [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [NA] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [+] no headers. [+] no pkgconfig files. [NA] no libtool .la droppings. [NA] desktop files valid and installed properly. APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 17:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:48:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061748.nB6Hm2eB025769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 17:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061750.nB6HoBF7026346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-12-06 12:50:10 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Felix!!! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-gettext Short Description: Gettext emulation in php Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 17:59:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:59:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061759.nB6Hxgci027990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 --- Comment #7 from Eric Christensen 2009-12-06 12:59:39 EDT --- SPEC: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-menutree/zikula-module-menutree.spec SRPM: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-menutree/zikula-module-menutree-2.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 18:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061806.nB6I6lqX025435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-06 13:06:46 EDT --- #009 Installation fails on EL-5, %global emacs_version 23.1.1 should be %global emacs_version 21.0 (Also update your other spec files accordingly) [root at noname ~]# rpm -Uvh /home/chitlesh/Desktop/emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-4.el5.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: emacs(bin) >= 23.1.1 is needed by emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-4.el5.noarch [root at noname ~]# rpm -q emacs emacs-21.4-20.el5 #010 my mistake on #007 : "*.simout" should be "*.out". Why *.out ? because during stuck-at fault simulation, irsim outputs a default fsim.out file. There are two features in this irsim-mode package: * indentation * highlight My test on fedora-12 works as expected. Please update the package accordingly and final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 18:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061812.nB6IC0wK026551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #36 from Carl Byington 2009-12-06 13:11:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: f2c Short Description: A Fortran 77 to C/C++ conversion program Owners: carllibpst Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 18:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061817.nB6IHNn1027702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-06 13:17:22 EDT --- python-mwclient-0.6.3-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-mwclient-0.6.3-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 18:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:24:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061824.nB6IOxKJ029323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-06 13:24:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Ok for mpqc, but not f2c. > > rpm -q --requires f2c > libc.so.6 > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7) > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > rtld(GNU_HASH) > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Funny. I get: $ rpm -q --requires f2c f2c-libs = 20090411-4.fc12 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libf2c.so.0()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Here the libf2c.so.0()(64bit) part is picked up automatically. So in my opinion you can drop the explicit requirement. Btw, do you have redhat-rpm-config installed on your system..? Or, if you want to be on the safe side, you can make the dep arch explicit: Requires: f2c-libs%{_isa} = %{version}-%{release} This would require that you install the 64-bit -libs with the 64-bit f2c package, even if you have the 32-bit -libs package present. Anyway, this doesn't really have anything to do with the review any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 18:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:36:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061836.nB6IaPgU003412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #38 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-06 13:36:25 EDT --- No F-11..? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 18:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:35:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061835.nB6IZ8eE003105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 13:35:07 EDT --- Pushed out and done. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 18:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 13:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061854.nB6IsM4R002939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #39 from Carl Byington 2009-12-06 13:54:21 EDT --- I was not sure on policy on adding new packages to n-1. If that is ok then I would also like an F11 branch also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 19:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061929.nB6JT8Ef010221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Jose Pedro Oliveira changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jpo at di.uminho.pt --- Comment #8 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2009-12-06 14:29:06 EDT --- Hi, Any chance of having this module branched for EL-5 ? jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 19:36:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:36:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061936.nB6JaZYe015303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-06 14:36:34 EDT --- for some reason, when I simulate ota.sp with ngspice on emacs, emacs gets freezed and I have to kill it. However with gnucap it works as expected without having to kill emacs. can you reproduce it ? if you encounter this issue, then I have to notify ngspice's upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 19:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:40:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912061940.nB6Je7aV012637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #40 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-06 14:40:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > I was not sure on policy on adding new packages to n-1. If that is ok then I > would also like an F11 branch also. So in that case New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: f2c Short Description: A Fortran 77 to C/C++ conversion program Owners: carllibpst Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: so that the CVS admins find it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 20:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 15:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062033.nB6KX9rn023604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #30 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-06 15:33:08 EDT --- So, I did some minor changes, now, using our available cpptasks. [lonely at localhost i686]$ rpmlint gluegen-1.0-1.135.svn.fc12.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. SPEC: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/SRPMs/gluegen/1.0-1.135.svn/gluegen.spec SRPM: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/SRPMs/gluegen/1.0-1.135.svn/gluegen-1.0-1.135.svn.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 20:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 15:59:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544869] New: Review Request: udunits2 - A library for manipulating units of physical quantities Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: udunits2 - A library for manipulating units of physical quantities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544869 Summary: Review Request: udunits2 - A library for manipulating units of physical quantities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/udunits2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/udunits2-2.1.11-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: The Unidata units utility, udunits2, supports conversion of unit specifications between formatted and binary forms, arithmetic manipulation of unit specifications, and conversion of values between compatible scales of measurement. (NOTE: udunits v1 is already in Fedora, but v2 is incompatible in notable ways. I am the maintainer of udunits v1. We will have multiple applications dependent on both versions of udunits for the foreseeable future.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 21:27:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:27:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062127.nB6LRZQ8005027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jreznik at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 21:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:41:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544873] New: Review Request: gitweb-caching - Gitweb w/ simple file caching Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gitweb-caching - Gitweb w/ simple file caching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544873 Summary: Review Request: gitweb-caching - Gitweb w/ simple file caching Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: warthog19 at eaglescrag.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~warthog9/gitweb-caching.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~warthog9/gitweb-caching-1.6.5.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Simple web interface to track changes in git repositories w/ caching from John 'Warthog9' Hawley from kernel.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 21:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544873] Review Request: gitweb-caching - Gitweb w/ simple file caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062145.nB6LjJk7008491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544873 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 22:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 17:56:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062256.nB6MuMBH022153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 Bug 511998 depends on bug 516667, which changed state. Bug 516667 Summary: Replace Cookie JavaScript in zikula-module-menutree https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516667 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062315.nB6NFmbI023428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 18:15:46 EDT --- Please put a cvs template here so we know what branches you need, etc. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests Reset the flag when ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:20:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062320.nB6NKs5O027080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 18:20:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544540] Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062320.nB6NK1Ve026692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544540 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 18:20:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:18:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062318.nB6NIcae026418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 18:18:37 EDT --- You should be able to just take ownership now at: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/almanah Make sure you look for and reassign any outstanding bugs already on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:22:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:22:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530772] Review Request: pxe-kexec - Linux boots Linux via network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062322.nB6NMJih024662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530772 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 18:22:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062323.nB6NNZQC027720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #41 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 18:23:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062324.nB6NOgYq027948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 18:24:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:26:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062326.nB6NQDrq025633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 18:26:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062325.nB6NPJ0x025495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 18:25:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:27:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062327.nB6NRIDQ025774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-06 18:27:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 6 23:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:59:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912062359.nB6NxEfk002418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-06 18:59:13 EDT --- picocontainer-1.3-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/picocontainer-1.3-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 01:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 20:24:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070124.nB71OlXl016414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Silas Sewell 2009-12-06 20:24:44 EDT --- Built and submitted to F-12 testing. Thanks Thomas and Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 01:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 20:42:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537897] Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070142.nB71gT6L020182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537897 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 02:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070229.nB72Tndk029518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #12 from Arun SAG 2009-12-06 21:29:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > #009 Installation fails on EL-5, > %global emacs_version 23.1.1 > should be > %global emacs_version 21.0 Hi, according to emacs packaging guidelines draft it should be 21.1 ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs#Packaging_of_add-ons_for_GNU_Emacs_and_XEmacs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 02:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070234.nB72YSDK030608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Iain Arnell 2009-12-06 21:34:27 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Number-Format New Branches: EL-5 Owners: iarnell InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 02:54:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 21:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544873] Review Request: gitweb-caching - Gitweb w/ simple file caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070254.nB72s1kd002524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544873 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jon Stanley 2009-12-06 21:54:00 EDT --- Some issues: - There is no version in the changelog - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs - The git checkout sha1 needs to be included in the release - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages - The URL field shouldn't be the location of the source tarball, but rather a place that I can find out more about what the package does. (maybe somewhere at git-scm.org) - The Source0 should, if possible, be a URL (all except the last element of the URL is tossed by rpmbuild) of where to download the package. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Troublesome_URLs Since Fedora 10 is no longer supported (and this will always be noarch anyways - the reason that this was in the original gitweb is that prior to F10 noarch subpackages were not supported), we can remove this from the spec: %if 0%{?fedora} >= 10 BuildArch: noarch %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 03:18:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 22:18:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544873] Review Request: gitweb-caching - Gitweb w/ simple file caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070318.nB73IWtJ007795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544873 --- Comment #2 from J.H. 2009-12-06 22:18:31 EDT --- Spec file updated and new SRPM is at: http://fedorapeople.org/~warthog9/gitweb-caching-1.6.5.2-2.cda981c9.fc12.src.rpm 1) Versions added to changelog 2) Sha1 added to release 3) URL field updated, it points to the gitweb instance since there is no other real web presence for this other than that. 4) fixed up Source0 5) setup to only build noarch instead of how it was setup. noarch is supported by F10 and EPEL so that will work fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 03:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 22:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070339.nB73dMed017759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from David Nalley 2009-12-06 22:39:20 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./zikula-module-menutree.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/zikula-module-menutree-2.2-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/zikula-module-menutree-2.2-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. GPL is in header of all source files aside from cookie.js which is ASL 2.0 OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at nalleyx60 SOURCES]$ md5sum ./tags_menutree_2.2-r192.zip* 72f19c4d95d935e29e54a8ecb1f8e795 ./tags_menutree_2.2-r192.zip 72f19c4d95d935e29e54a8ecb1f8e795 ./tags_menutree_2.2-r192.zip.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. FIX: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. This version only works with zikula 1.2 and greater, yet the Requires zikula would permit installation on 1.1 Also you call dos2unix but don't list it as a BuildRequires NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Eric: I noted above the Requires/BuildRequires problems. I assume you can fix that before it hits CVS. Thanks for the work, sorry it took me so long to get it done today. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 04:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070410.nB74ABbm019552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Eric Christensen 2009-12-06 23:10:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zikula-module-menutree Short Description: Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu for Zikula. Owners: sparks ke4qqq Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 04:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070417.nB74HQl8020978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-06 23:17:26 EDT --- php-gettext-1.0.9-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-gettext-1.0.9-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 04:17:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:17:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070417.nB74HHIV020928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-06 23:17:16 EDT --- php-gettext-1.0.9-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-gettext-1.0.9-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 04:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:17:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070417.nB74HMPV025972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-06 23:17:21 EDT --- php-gettext-1.0.9-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-gettext-1.0.9-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 04:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 23:20:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070420.nB74KI6W021848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #6 from Arun SAG 2009-12-06 23:20:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=376575) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=376575) Combined shakthi's patch with mine Combined Shakthi's patch and made changes to make ngspice as default simulator. Please test if simulation works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 05:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:10:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070510.nB75Ax6H006205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #13 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-07 00:10:58 EDT --- Actually that's a template for fedora but not for centos-5. Since centos-5 has emacs-21.4-20.el5, we've got to use %global emacs_version 21.1 instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 05:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070517.nB75HiYS002775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-07 00:17:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 05:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070517.nB75H4XM002644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-07 00:17:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 05:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070534.nB75Yo0R012201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 00:34:49 EDT --- rubygem-ruby2ruby-1.2.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ruby2ruby-1.2.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 05:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070536.nB75an9r012889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 00:36:49 EDT --- rubygem-ruby2ruby-1.2.4-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ruby2ruby-1.2.4-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 05:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:43:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070543.nB75hKZW009074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Osowski 2009-12-07 00:43:19 EDT --- Unfortunately, the package is retired. I'll ask in #fedora-devel whether someone can unretire the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 05:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:41:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070541.nB75f670008664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 00:41:05 EDT --- perl-Number-Format-1.73-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Number-Format-1.73-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 05:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070550.nB75oAvS015914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-07 00:50:09 EDT --- Sorry, the interface just showed orphan when I looked. ;( I have 'unretired' it, since I can't find any reason it's retired rather than orphaned. You should be able to take it over now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 05:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070552.nB75qx1B011278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 00:52:57 EDT --- rubygem-rcov-0.9.6-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rcov-0.9.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 05:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 00:53:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070553.nB75ru0x011455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 00:53:55 EDT --- rubygem-rcov-0.9.6-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rcov-0.9.6-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 06:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 01:28:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070628.nB76SlWO026255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 01:28:46 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Safe-1.2.5-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 06:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 01:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070628.nB76Sq9m026299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.2.5-6.el5 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 06:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 01:28:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070628.nB76SHK0026136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 01:28:16 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0952 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 06:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 01:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070629.nB76TExl026415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 01:29:14 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0966 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 06:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 01:31:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070631.nB76VNfp021656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 01:31:22 EDT --- php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pear-Net-URL2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0978 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070716.nB77GS0E007410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-07 02:16:27 EDT --- Your patch is working as expected on F-12. I'm currently testing it under F-12 and will test on centos-5 soon. The following are some improvements that we need to make and ensure. The spice-mode seems to be meant for proprietary spice simulators and is very old. Thereby, we need to tune it as appropriate #003: in the spice simulators list, obsolete "Nutmeg" "nutmeg" by "Nutmeg" "ngnutmeg" ngnutmeg is provided by ngspice package. #004: in the spice simulators list, please add gnucap. gnucap has a -b switch as ngspice. So you can safely copy ngspice section and paste it for gnucap. (create a separate patch for this). In the meantime, I'll contact Al Davis to see whether he already has some fine tunings for emacs. #005: ngspice still freezes emacs. #006: In the init file, you have different file extensions and for each you have a separate auto-mode-alist entry e.g (setq auto-mode-alist (cons '("\\.sim$" . irsim-mode) auto-mode-alist)) I'm not an emacs expect: Do several entries affect the load time of emacs ? #007: Set gnucap as default (since ngspice is freezing emacs). Remove ngspice from the Requires and add gnucap as BR #008: Warning for emacs >= 22 %if 0%{?fedora} sed -i "s|process-kill-without-query|process-query-on-exit-flag|" %{pkg}.el %endif #009: Can you set gnucap as a default simulator and gwave as a default viewer please ? Possibly in the init file #010: Debatable: If one opens a spice netlist with emacs-spice-mode, one will see the names of proprietary spice standards: Hspice,Eldo... as my attached screenshot demonstrates. I think we need to replace that with "Gnucap/Ngspice" if not it will look as if we are doing publicity for those vendors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] New: Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mime-types.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mime-types-1.16-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: MIME::Types for Ruby manages a MIME Content-Type database that will return the Content-Type for a given filename. MIME::Types was originally based on and synchronized with MIME::Types for Perl by Mark Overmeer, copyright 2001 - 2009. As of version 1.15, the data format for the MIME::Type list has changed and the synchronization will no longer happen. mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint rubygem-mime-types.spec /var/tmp/results/rubygem-mime-types-* rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/like%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/ascii%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Types/%5b%5d-i.yaml %5b rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/binary%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/eql%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/signature%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/registered%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/obsolete%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/system%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/%3c%3d%3e-i.yaml %3c rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/docs%3d-i.yaml %3d rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/platform%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Type/complete%3f-i.yaml %3f rubygem-mime-types-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/mime-types-1.16/ri/MIME/Types/%5b%5d-c.yaml %5b 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 15 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:25:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:25:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070725.nB77Pj5j010189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 02:25:42 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:28:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:28:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070728.nB77Sw1p004986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 02:28:58 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070729.nB77T4Vj005026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.4.0-2.fc12 |4.4.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:25:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:25:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070725.nB77PoSg004154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.4.0-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:31:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070731.nB77VHvM012259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Osowski 2009-12-07 02:31:17 EDT --- Thanks, Taking over was successful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070732.nB77WpLo006680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 02:32:50 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:34:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070734.nB77Y2KA006979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 02:34:00 EDT --- sugar-getiabooks-3-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:34:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070734.nB77YmHf007206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 02:34:47 EDT --- sugar-getiabooks-3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:32:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070732.nB77WuGt006721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.4.0-2.fc11 |4.4.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070734.nB77Y6G8007019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070730.nB77U84d005915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 02:30:04 EDT --- mygui-3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mygui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:32:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070732.nB77WeBn012851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 02:32:40 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bucardo-4.4.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515053] Review Request: sugar-getiabooks - Internet Archive Books receiver for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070734.nB77YrWP013446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515053 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3-2.fc12 |3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 07:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:34:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526444] Review Request: MyGUI - Fast, simple and flexible GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070734.nB77YPAk013341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526444 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 02:34:23 EDT --- mygui-3.0.0-0.4.2332svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mygui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12853 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 08:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 03:27:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070827.nB78RXGq028239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 supercyper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |supercyper at 163.com --- Comment #31 from supercyper 2009-12-07 03:27:28 EDT --- I think that maybe you can use a static copy of Gluegen which are included in the jogl src like debian. See http://packages.debian.org/sid/libjogl-java The source of jogl can be obtained from http://download.java.net/media/jogl/builds/archive/jsr-231-1.1.1a/jogl-1.1.1a-src.zip . Maybe scilab can build against a newer version of jogl like 2.0(http://download.java.net/media/jogl/builds/nightly/), you don't really need the exact version of jogl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 09:02:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 04:02:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544989] New: Review Request: obm: Enterprise class email and group ware solution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: obm: Enterprise class email and group ware solution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544989 Summary: Review Request: obm: Enterprise class email and group ware solution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huzaifas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/obm.spec SRPM URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/obm-2.2.15-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: More info: http://www.obm.org/doku.php?id=what_is_obm Koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1855777 Note; A couple of doc files are corrupt, so i will open a upstream bug, no blocker though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 09:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 04:25:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070925.nB79P3U6013449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #21 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-12-07 04:24:59 EDT --- Basically I think we'll abandon PortableXDR in favour of something else. However we're not sure yet, and indeed I'm still using PortableXDR in a number of places ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 09:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 04:31:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544299] Review Request: gnome-color-manager - Color management for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070931.nB79VMql014881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544299 --- Comment #2 from Richard Hughes 2009-12-07 04:31:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-color-manager Short Description: Color management for the GNOME desktop Owners: rhughes Branches: F-12 InitialCC: rhughes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 09:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 04:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544299] Review Request: gnome-color-manager - Color management for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912070932.nB79W3vr008552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544299 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 10:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 05:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545004] New: Review Request: wqy-microhei-fonts - compact Chinese font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wqy-microhei-fonts - compact Chinese font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545004 Summary: Review Request: wqy-microhei-fonts - compact Chinese font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/wqy-microhei-fonts/wqy-microhei-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/wqy-microhei-fonts/wqy-microhei-fonts-0.2.0-0.1.beta.fc12.src.rpm Description: Compact Chinese font derived from Droid Fallback -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 11:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 06:13:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071113.nB7BDTwN008495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #32 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-07 06:13:23 EDT --- Yesterday I give to jogl and gluegen a try https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627#c30 but jogl refuses to build with an external version of gluegen. Maybe it will be easier if we build both from the same tarball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 11:40:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 06:40:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071140.nB7BeIsb007916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 Sylvestre Ledru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sylvestre.ledru at scilab.org --- Comment #31 from Sylvestre Ledru 2009-12-07 06:40:12 EDT --- With the current development version of gluegen and jogl, it is possible to build them separately. It is not optimal from the packaging point of view (jogl is going to search for gluegen files into ../gluegen/) but I have been able to produce independent packages for Debian. I will try to upload my patches tonight. Next time, try Scilab with jogl 2.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 11:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 06:46:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226442] Merge Review: swig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071146.nB7Bkm8l009381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226442 --- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-07 06:46:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > NO %check is present and all tests pass. > - the package contains a testsuite, but it seems to fail, so it's disabled. It > would be nice to get it working, but I don't think this is a blocker. Adding a > %check with #make check and a comment why it's currently disabled should be > fine. Testcase is currently broken, I've added comment about it. All issues should be fixed in the latest build, swig-1.3.40-2.fc13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:02:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226442] Merge Review: swig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071202.nB7C2wSV020190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226442 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-07 07:02:57 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:14:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545039] New: Review Request: xulrunner-python - Files needed to run Gecko applications written in python. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xulrunner-python - Files needed to run Gecko applications written in python. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039 Summary: Review Request: xulrunner-python - Files needed to run Gecko applications written in python. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stransky at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/stransky/python/xulrunner-python.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/stransky/python/xulrunner-python-1.9.2-1.20091125hg.fc11.src.rpm Description: Files needed to run Gecko applications written in python. Former part of xulrunner package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] New: Review Request: neartree - An API for finding nearest neighbors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: neartree - An API for finding nearest neighbors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 Summary: Review Request: neartree - An API for finding nearest neighbors Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.matsuu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/neartree/neartree.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/neartree/neartree-2.1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a release of an API for finding nearest neighbors among points in spaces of arbitrary dimensions. This release provides a C++ template, TNear.h, and a C library, CNearTree.c, with example/test programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:40:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] New: Review Request: cqrlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cqrlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 Summary: Review Request: cqrlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.matsuu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/cqrlib/cqrlib.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/cqrlib/cqrlib-1.0.3-1.20090805.fc12.src.rpm Description: CQRlib is an ANSI C implementation of a utility library for quaternion arithmetic and quaternion rotation math. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:39:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545044] New: Review Request: cbflib - A library for accessing CBF and imgCIF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cbflib - A library for accessing CBF and imgCIF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545044 Summary: Review Request: cbflib - A library for accessing CBF and imgCIF files Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.matsuu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/cbflib/cbflib.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/cbflib/cbflib-0.8.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Description: CBFLIB is a library of ANSI-C functions providing a simple mechanism for accessing Crystallographic Binary Files (CBF files) and Image-supporting CIF (imgCIF) files. The CBFLIB API is loosely based on the CIFPARSE API for mmCIF files. Starting with this release, CBFLIB performs validation checks on reading of a CBF. If a dictionary is provided, values will be validated against dictionary ranges and enumerations. Tags missing under parent-child relationships or category key requirements will be reported. CBFlib provides functions to create, read, modify and write CBF binary data files and imgCIF ASCII data files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:42:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545044] Review Request: cbflib - A library for accessing CBF and imgCIF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071242.nB7CglK6022945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545044 --- Comment #1 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-07 07:42:46 EDT --- Note: This is my first package preview. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] Review Request: neartree - An API for finding nearest neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071244.nB7CiTbA023275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #1 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-07 07:44:28 EDT --- Note: This package requires cvector package which is package reviewed in bug 545046. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:41:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:41:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] New: Review Request: cvector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cvector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 Summary: Review Request: cvector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.matsuu at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/cvector/cvector.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/cvector/cvector-1.0.3-1.20090805.fc12.src.rpm Description: CVector is an ANSI C implementation of dynamic arrays to provide a crude approximation to the C++ vector class. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:46:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071246.nB7Ck9qI030902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 --- Comment #9 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-07 07:46:07 EDT --- Package review of cbflib, cqrlib, cvector, and neartree are filed in bug 545044, bug 545045, bug 545046, and bug 545047 respectively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:54:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:54:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071254.nB7CswEC026108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #14 from Arun SAG 2009-12-07 07:54:55 EDT --- #009 #010 Fixed. Spec URL:http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-irsim-mode.spec SRPM URL:http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 12:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 07:58:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071258.nB7CwJCW027038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net --- Comment #11 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-07 07:58:17 EDT --- My problem with this package is that it tries to load so many things at runtime that using emacs for one-time edits is uncomfortable (yes, I know there's emacsclient). Can't you put autoloads in site initialization files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 13:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:05:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226442] Merge Review: swig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071305.nB7D5IOS003744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226442 --- Comment #4 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-07 08:05:17 EDT --- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 13:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071314.nB7DEh70006045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-12-07 08:14:41 EDT --- seems no one interested. Closing this review.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 13:46:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:46:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071346.nB7DknTp015820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 08:46:45 EDT --- zikula-module-menutree-2.2-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zikula-module-menutree-2.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 13:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:55:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071355.nB7DtUgw010875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-07 08:55:28 EDT --- zikula-module-menutree-2.2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zikula-module-menutree-2.2-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:00:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071400.nB7E08AU012098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jiri Popelka 2009-12-07 09:00:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hostname Short Description: Provides commands which can be used to display the system's DNS name, and to display or set its hostname or NIS domain name. Owners: jpopelka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545044] Review Request: cbflib - A library for accessing CBF and imgCIF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071407.nB7E7O5m014235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545044 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: cvector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071408.nB7E8Kds022482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:08:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: cqrlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071408.nB7E828K022401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:08:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] Review Request: neartree - An API for finding nearest neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071408.nB7E8b4O022563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:12:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: cvector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071412.nB7EC22C023640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |545047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:12:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] Review Request: neartree - An API for finding nearest neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071412.nB7EC1ld023596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |545046 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:39:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:39:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071439.nB7Ede9s023056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-07 09:39:39 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:40:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071440.nB7Eeb8U031353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-07 09:40:35 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071440.nB7Eed0I031406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Bug 542559 depends on bug 541512, which changed state. Bug 541512 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:40:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071440.nB7Eec0T031382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Bug 541807 depends on bug 541512, which changed state. Bug 541512 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071444.nB7EilHN032641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 --- Comment #18 from Lon Hohberger 2009-12-07 09:44:45 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: fence-virt New Branches: F-11 Owners: lon fabbione -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:46:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524190] Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/ =?utf-8?q?Gnomecanvasmm_widget_for_=E2=80=9Cboxes_and_lines?= =?utf-8?q?=E2=80=9D_environments?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071446.nB7Ek5lA000784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524190 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-07 09:46:03 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:46:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:46:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071446.nB7Ek3am000659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 Fabio Massimo Di Nitto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071445.nB7EjlI8025197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mail at marcus-moell | |er.ch) --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-07 09:45:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 14:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:49:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: cqrlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071449.nB7EnSaT025904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-07 09:49:27 EDT --- Some comments: * Wrt. this construct: %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 sed -e '/^LIB/s/lib/lib64/g' -i Makefile %endif - Such sed calls can be generalized by applying %{_lib} (expands to "lib" on 32bit and to "lib64" on 64bit targets) - Such sed calls are equivalent to "configuring" a package. They belong into %build * static libs %files devel ... %{_libdir}/*.a Feel strongly encouraged not to ship static libs. If you really can't avoid shipping them, move the *.a's to a separate *-static package. * Upstream's tarball name is CQRlib. Fedora convention is to keep upstream's package name => Your package should be named "CQRlib", not cqrlib. * Your patch adds changes the shared libs from --shared to --export-dynamic and removes --release - Why? This is a significant behavioral change to upstream, I don't see any sense in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 15:02:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:02:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071502.nB7F2CqN030612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 Marcus Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|needinfo?(mail at marcus-moell | |er.ch) | --- Comment #21 from Marcus Moeller 2009-12-07 10:02:11 EDT --- Christoph already sponsored me. Best Regards Marcus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 15:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071519.nB7FJ1gu010700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-07 10:18:59 EDT --- For -2: (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > * Requires > > - Please add the needed rubygem related dependency. > > Note that I don't know if this dependency is optional or not. > > 3. lib/haml/filters.rb: this depends on rubygem-RedCloth for Textile filter, > but Markdown and Maruku filters doesn't have packaged dependencies in fedora > (afaict). The code in filters.rb can handle it though, and these filters are > not a requirement to use haml. What do you suggest ? - It seems filters related dependency is optional, so I don't think adding "R: rubygem(RedCloth)" is strictly needed. > 4. Rakefile has many dependencies (tlsmail, yard, rcov/rcovtask, ruby-prof, > "git" command...) and i'm not sure how useful it is. The only thing i'd like to > keep is the 'test' task. - We usually don't add dependency for Rakefile based dependency ( By the way I like to create -doc subpackage for rubygem based rpm and I usually put Rakefile to -doc, not to main package ) > > * %check > > - Whether adding executable permission to a script or not should > > be determined (for this case) by checking if the script has > > shebang or not, and should not be determined by hardcoded file list. > > Not all files from *_test.rb have shebang (Though i could create a patch for > this and ask upstream to integrate it) - But with your current rpm only ruby script with shebang have executable permission (and not all *_test.rb have shebang) anyway, so judging by my method should be possible. ( By the way if scripts without shebang have executable permission, or if scripts with shebang don't have exectable permission, rpmlint warns about this ). The reason I am talking about this is that I think hardcoding %test_files list should be avoided unless impossible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 15:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071526.nB7FQwIq012898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-07 10:26:52 EDT --- Well, I think it is time we should restart this review request (and later switch the maintainer of clamtk), as more than one month passed since non-maintainer procedure began. To Dave: First of all, would you update clamtk to 4.21? (note that I have not checked your srpm at all yet) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 15:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:28:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543151] Review Request: erlang-exmpp - A library for the eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071528.nB7FShM9013261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543151 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-07 10:28:42 EDT --- I discovered a very nasty issue with both 0.9.1 and current svn, which should be fixed before review. I'll update whiteboard when it will be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 15:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:32:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071532.nB7FWodU007680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 --- Comment #12 from Jose Pedro Oliveira 2009-12-07 10:32:48 EDT --- Iain Arnell, Thanks for the EPEL5 build. /jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 15:35:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071535.nB7FZQX6008649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 David Zeuthen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from David Zeuthen 2009-12-07 10:35:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: udisks Short Description: Storage Management Server Owners: davidz Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:15:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:15:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071615.nB7GFrHm022670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 --- Comment #14 from David Zeuthen 2009-12-07 11:15:52 EDT --- Actually I got it wrong - here's the right request (s/Server/Service). Sorry about that. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: udisks Short Description: Storage Management Service Owners: davidz Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:28:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071628.nB7GSlEn027409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #9 from Dave M 2009-12-07 11:28:46 EDT --- Here you are: Spec URL: http://clamtk.sourceforge.net/fedora/4.21/clamtk.spec SRPM URL: http://clamtk.sourceforge.net/fedora/4.21/clamtk-4.21-1.fc12.src.rpm Thank you for checking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544299] Review Request: gnome-color-manager - Color management for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071631.nB7GVi25001857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544299 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-07 11:31:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:31:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540368] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071631.nB7GV69H028698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540368 --- Comment #3 from Chen Lei 2009-12-07 11:31:04 EDT --- Hi Jan? sorry for my late reply. I have updated the tar with right md5sum in the src.rpm. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux-2.3-0.1.beta1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:34:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:34:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071634.nB7GYcn3029641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-07 11:34:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071631.nB7GVEQJ028743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-07 11:31:12 EDT --- Okay, I confirmed that mmoeller is approved by cwickert ------------------------------------------------------- This package (bmpanel2) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543608] Review Request: udisks - Storage Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071635.nB7GZSds003279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543608 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-07 11:35:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524105] Review Request: fence-virt - Modular virtual machine fencing daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071636.nB7GaNRF003591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524105 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-07 11:36:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:43:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:43:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526126] Review Request: python3 - Python 3.x (backwards incompatible version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071643.nB7Ghega000526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526126 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |545124 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:48:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:48:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540368] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071648.nB7GmYrK002252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540368 --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-12-07 11:48:33 EDT --- 1] Please bump Release each time you perform any change into spec file 2] In spec file you have: Version: 2.3 Release: 0.1.beta1%{?dist} However, version of llk is 2.3beta1 Imho you should have following in spec file (and update Source link to reflect this): Version: 2.3beta1 Release: 1%{?dist} And bump Release each change in spec file (so now it should be: Release: 2%{?dist} next version should have: Release: 3%{?dist} etc...) 3] Are compiler flags honored in Makefile by default? If no, you should honor them correctly http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags 4] if possible, you should use following way how to install desktop file http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage 5] comments in files section should be removed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 16:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 11:51:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541207] Review Request: liborigin2 - library for reading OriginLab Origin 7.5 project files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071651.nB7Gp9tH003519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541207 --- Comment #4 from Chen Lei 2009-12-07 11:51:08 EDT --- Sorry for my late reply. I fixed the spec file. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/liborigin2.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/liborigin2-06042009-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 17:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544299] Review Request: gnome-color-manager - Color management for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071717.nB7HHi5G011641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544299 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Richard Hughes 2009-12-07 12:17:42 EDT --- Package imported. Thanks to all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 17:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071719.nB7HJvlQ012278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet 2009-12-07 12:19:56 EDT --- grr... Sorry for the typo. Of course php(PEAR) didn't exists, so you must include php-pear(PEAR).... Else the package couldn't be installed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 17:25:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:25:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530684] Review Request: nordugrid-arc-nox - Advanced Resource Connector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071725.nB7HPoKg014048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530684 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |nordugrid-arc1 - Advanced |nordugrid-arc-nox - |Resource Connector |Advanced Resource Connector --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-07 12:25:49 EDT --- Updated to the final 1.0.0 release: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/nordugrid-arc-nox.spec http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/nordugrid-arc-nox-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 17:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225729] Merge Review: enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071749.nB7Hn8Nb024162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225729 --- Comment #2 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-07 12:49:07 EDT --- Probably ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/archive.download.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/5.2/en/os/i386/SRPMS/nenscript-1.13++-12.src.rpm - as this is the one from Red Hat 5.2 and in Red Hat 6.0 was already enscript-1.6.1-8.src.rpm - I'd prefer to change it to versioned obsolete but it is acceptable even unversioned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 17:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543248] Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071751.nB7Hpvps025010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543248 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu AssignedTo|ry at n.rix.si |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-07 12:51:56 EDT --- Ryan's sorta awol a bit tdday, I'll jump in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 17:53:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:53:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544873] Review Request: gitweb-caching - Gitweb w/ simple file caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071753.nB7HrpBI020494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544873 --- Comment #3 from J.H. 2009-12-07 12:53:50 EDT --- v3 is out now, documentation changes only: http://fedorapeople.org/~warthog9/gitweb-caching-1.6.5.2-3.cda981c9.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 17:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:51:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545132] Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071751.nB7HpuCZ020111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545132 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Berrange 2009-12-07 12:51:55 EDT --- RPMLint from a Fedora 12 i686 host $ rpmlint yajl.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/SRPMS/yajl-1.0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i686/yajl-1.0.7-1.fc12.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/berrange/rpm/RPMS/i686/yajl-devel-1.0.7-1.fc12.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. And a scratch build passes on all architectures http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1860375 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 17:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:50:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545132] New: Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545132 Summary: Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: berrange at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/yajl.spec SRPM URL: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/yajl-1.0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Yet Another JSON Library. YAJL is a small event-driven (SAX-style) JSON parser written in ANSI C, and a small validating JSON generator. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 17:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 12:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543248] Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071756.nB7HuvmT026302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543248 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-07 12:56:56 EDT --- $ rpmlint *.rpm noarch/*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings Naming: OK License: BSD OK BR/Requires: OK upstream source confirmed, 4948ba2a92437e952483aa1279a00eec jsonpickle-0.2.0.tar.gz (despite googlecode working hard to make wget not work) otherwise, looks like an excellent use of the noarch python .spec template, 0 issues there... OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 18:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:02:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071802.nB7I2B7H027975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 18:06:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:06:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071806.nB7I69hb024383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-07 13:06:07 EDT --- $ rpmlint *.rpm noarch/*rpm shared-desktop-ontologies-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Sources checked: md5sum *.bz2 6c004e1c377f768cae5b321bc111876b shared-desktop-ontologies-0.2.tar.bz2 Naming: OK License: OK BR/Requires: OK (none, really. :) ) Otherwise, very simple noarch/content package here. No other issues I can see. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 18:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:15:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545132] Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071815.nB7IFBQJ031393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545132 Steven Dake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sdake at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 18:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071818.nB7II6tp032152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-07 13:18:05 EDT --- Ah, you seems to be the upstream for clamtk, then: First of all, what does "the same terms as Perl itself" (in LICENSE file) exactly mean? - From your spec file, it seems to mean "ASL 2.0" - However http://dev.perl.org/licenses/ shows perl 5 license is under "ASL 2.0 or GPL+" - And $ rpm -qi perl shows on Fedora the license of perl is marked as "(GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic)". Note that (from clamav.src.rpm) clamav is under GPLv2 (not GPLv2+) and ASL 2.0 is incompatible with GPLv2, so ASL 2.0 (only) is not allowed for clamtk license: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 18:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:29:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071829.nB7IT3u9030999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-07 13:29:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Sorry, scratch out my previous comment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 18:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:25:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071825.nB7IPSpD030175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-07 13:25:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: shared-desktop-ontologies Short Description: Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments Owners: arbiter rdieter kkofler Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 18:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:27:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225729] Merge Review: enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071827.nB7IR3iu002252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225729 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-07 13:27:00 EDT --- Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec - MUST(4,5,6): The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - MUST(1): The License field in spec match the actual license - MUST(2): If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file must be included in %doc + MUST: The spec file written in American English + MUST: The spec file for the package is legible - MUST(3): The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL + MUST: The package successfully compile + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires + MUST: The spec file handle locales properly 0 MUST: Every package which stores shared library files in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + MUST: Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: Package own all directories that it creates + MUST: Package does not list a file more than once in the spec file + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line + MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: Package use macros consistently + MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content + MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application 0 MUST: Header files in a -devel package 0 MUST: Static libraries in a -static package 0 MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' 0 MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package 0 MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built 0 MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. 1) License is actually GPLv2+ - from README: "Enscript is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) any later version." 2) COPYING is not packaged in doc - please include it 3) enscript-1.6.4.tar.gz does NOT match upstream cvs: b5174b59e4a050fb462af5dbf28ebba3 enscript-1.6.4.tar.gz upstream (http://www.iki.fi/mtr/genscript/enscript-1.6.4.tar.gz): 9abb0dee940d898af776508a5693ff24 enscript-1.6.4.tar.gz please explain or fix Source0 - Source1 and Source2 do match upstream Additionally fix: 4) fix versioned obsoletes/provides 5) comment the patches, add bugzilla links (either in spec or in patches) 6) %find_lang usage to detect .mo files (to prevent issues in future releases) Rest seems to be ok... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 19:01:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:01:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071901.nB7J1diE007296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-07 14:01:38 EDT --- Well, * License - Anyway please clarify the license. On Fedora "under the same terms as Perl itself" means "GPL+ or Artistic", however is this what you intend? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#License_tag * BuildRequires - This srpm won't build without "BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils" (as this srpm calls "desktop-file-install" at %install) * Requires - "Requires: desktop-file-utils" should be removed ( see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database ) - Dependency for perl module related dependency must be specified by virtual Provides' names and not by using rpm name directly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides !!By the way please check if writing "Requires: perl-File-Find-Rule" (should be written as perl(File::Find::Rule)) explicitly is _really_ needed. rpmbuild detects perl module based dependency automatically and adds those dependency to binary rpm. Actually if you try $ rpm -qp --requires clamtk-XXXXX.noarch.rpm", you will see many "perl(foo)" dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 19:25:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226379] Merge Review: rsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071925.nB7JPHg8018628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226379 --- Comment #2 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-07 14:25:16 EDT --- Few comments before actual review: 1) Please add comment to spec file (at least) about source of rexec-1.5.tar.gz 2) Please comment patches (purpose, bugzillas) either in spec file or in patch itself 3) Requires: pam could be unversioned - 0.58 is quite old (even in RHEL-4 is newer) BuildRequires: audit-libs-devel could be unversioned - 1.5 is quite old (in RHEL-4 is older, in RHEL-5 newer) 4) Buildroot style is not ok - although it is no longer required, it would be better to fix this. rest looks ok at first sight... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 19:42:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:42:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071942.nB7JgGOs018139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-12-07 14:42:14 EDT --- SPEC file looks ok. in build section please use mkdir -p %{_target_platform} pushd %{_target_platform} %{cmake} popd make %{?_smp_mflags} -C %{_target_platform} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 19:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071948.nB7JmpVY024642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-07 14:48:50 EDT --- make that %{cmake} .. (the '..' was missing) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 19:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912071953.nB7JrZQV026238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-12-07 14:53:34 EDT --- ah sorry - copy/paste issue from other SPEC file (and removing option!) use appropriate install section make install/fast DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -C %{_target_platform} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 20:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912072008.nB7K8gfo026042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 --- Comment #6 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-07 15:08:40 EDT --- * Mon Dec 7 2009 Lorenzo Villani - 0.1.0-2 - Out of sourcetree build - Use make install/fast -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 20:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:11:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] New: Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 Summary: Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/sugar-visualmatch.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/sugar-visualmatch-8-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 20:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:13:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912072013.nB7KDKn2027424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #15 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-07 15:13:19 EDT --- The package looks ok. Only one glitch left it's the different RPM version on fedora and centos. You will need to replace Requires: emacs(bin) by Requires: emacs. The package as it is is ok for Fedora repos. Update this package for the last time and we are good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 20:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:13:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912072013.nB7KD5pE032409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 20:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:12:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912072012.nB7KCgVd032329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-12-07 15:12:40 EDT --- It looks ok for me, thanks! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 20:19:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:19:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912072019.nB7KJnUh029011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 --- Comment #8 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-07 15:19:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: attica Short Description: Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API Owners: arbiter rdieter kkofler jreznik Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 7 21:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 16:55:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912072155.nB7LtDZG020093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 01:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 20:21:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080121.nB81LkHh009366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 Michael Terry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike at mterry.name --- Comment #1 from Michael Terry 2009-12-07 20:21:45 EDT --- Hi, I'm the maintainer of deja-dup and saw this via google alerts. :) First, thanks so much for creating the spec! I've long wanted deja-dup on Fedora. However, I notice that the spec requires vala, and you comment on needing vala to rebuild the SRPM. You *shouldn't* need vala to build deja-dup from a tarball. You *do* need it to build from bzr. The tarball includes the vala source, but also already includes the generated C code. If you patch the vala source in the tarball, then you will need valac because the C code will be out of date. But you can patch the C code instead to avoid that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 01:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 20:35:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080135.nB81Zx21012553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-07 20:35:58 EDT --- Ah, I should have contacted you when I put up the review request but forgot about that. Sorry. I was pretty sure I added Vala as a build dependency based on the configure output but looks like I am misremembering something. Removed vala and updated the spec and SRPM in place. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 01:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 20:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080137.nB81b9HP022699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-07 20:37:08 EDT --- Also FYI, https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/2009-December/msg00005.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 01:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 20:53:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080153.nB81rNT5026420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-07 20:53:22 EDT --- Koji scratch build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1861894 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 02:13:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 21:13:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080213.nB82DCvZ031159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-07 21:13:10 EDT --- Updated to latest upstream release. Added BR on libnotify-devel http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/deja-dup.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/deja-dup-13.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 02:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 21:26:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080226.nB82QcVR002776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #6 from Michael Terry 2009-12-07 21:26:37 EDT --- Note that 13.x is tracking GNOME 2.30 development. That is, 13.3 is a 'development/unstable' release equivalent to 2.29.3. You still may want to package it, I just wanted to make that more explicit. 11.1 is still the latest stable release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 02:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 21:30:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080230.nB82U3Ku003537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-07 21:30:03 EDT --- Yes, I noticed the announcement. Assuming you will release in sync with GNOME 2.30, that release matches Fedora 13 schedule. I can branch the stable release for Fedora 12 if it this review gets approved soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 02:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 21:32:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080232.nB82W5t0026733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hours Worked| |05 --- Comment #16 from Arun SAG 2009-12-07 21:32:04 EDT --- Updated Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-irsim-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-6.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 03:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 22:25:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234753] Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080325.nB83PBOJ016409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234753 Ben Konrath changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |ben at bagu.org Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #5 from Ben Konrath 2009-12-07 22:25:09 EDT --- I'd like to restart this review. Here are the updated packages: Spec URL: http://bagu.org/scratch/accerciser.spec SRPM URL: http://bagu.org/scratch/accerciser-1.9.3-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 04:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080401.nB841sMp025112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 04:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:19:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080419.nB84J05x019480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-12-07 23:18:58 EDT --- Thanks for the careful review. Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/yum-langpacks/yum-langpacks.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/yum-langpacks/yum-langpacks-0.1.4-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 05:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:13:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080513.nB85Dr5j031252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 00:13:52 EDT --- rubygem-ParseTree-3.0.4-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ParseTree-3.0.4-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 05:14:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:14:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080514.nB85EO00008732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 00:14:23 EDT --- rubygem-ParseTree-3.0.4-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ParseTree-3.0.4-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 05:59:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:59:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080559.nB85xnoi019645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 --- Comment #7 from David Nalley 2009-12-08 00:59:48 EDT --- Bah - I know better too - what I get for blindly copy and pasting. Thanks, Remi SRPM: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-OLE-1.0.0-0.3.rc1.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-OLE.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:43:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080743.nB87hkek005238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 02:43:45 EDT --- php-gettext-1.0.9-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-gettext'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12876 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:46:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080746.nB87kGqh017239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 02:46:15 EDT --- rubygem-rcov-0.9.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:46:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080746.nB87kL0b017273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.6-2.fc12 |0.9.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:46:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:46:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080746.nB87knne017534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 02:46:47 EDT --- zikula-module-menutree-2.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080745.nB87j9at016879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.9.6-2.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:46:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:46:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080746.nB87kvfD017593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:45:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543337] Review Request: rubygem-rcov - Code coverage analysis tool for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080745.nB87j43J006058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543337 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 02:45:03 EDT --- rubygem-rcov-0.9.6-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:47:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:47:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080747.nB87l4rl006511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 02:47:04 EDT --- rubygem-ruby2ruby-1.2.4-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080748.nB87moCB006938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.4-2.fc12 |1.2.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:48:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080748.nB87mj3t018389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 02:48:45 EDT --- rubygem-ruby2ruby-1.2.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:47:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:47:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541512] Review Request: rubygem-ruby2ruby - Generate pure ruby from RubyParser compatible Sexps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080747.nB87l9Rf017803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541512 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.2.4-2.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:47:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080747.nB87ldw6018113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 02:47:38 EDT --- php-gettext-1.0.9-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-gettext'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12903 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:59:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:59:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080759.nB87x70j023171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-08 02:59:06 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 07:59:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:59:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080759.nB87x9mM023265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Bug 542559 depends on bug 541807, which changed state. Bug 541807 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 08:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080804.nB884oQi014408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 03:04:49 EDT --- picocontainer-1.3-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update picocontainer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 08:57:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 03:57:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080857.nB88vMrM027195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 03:57:19 EDT --- unicornscan-0.4.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unicornscan-0.4.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 09:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:04:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080904.nB8943Wm029345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Michal Nowak 2009-12-08 04:03:49 EDT --- Though, shouldn't we generate the C code from Vala, when rebuilding, ourselves? Since we don't have Vala-specific policy here, I'd use Fonts Packaging Policy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Building_from_sources where we sometimes have source files for OTF/TTF font files and we should build from them. I am not an expert on Vala but if maintainer is going to fix a bug in Deja Dup, I guess they fixes it in meta-code (Vala) rather than in code (C) itself. Just an idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 09:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:21:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080921.nB89LriH003181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #9 from Michal Nowak 2009-12-08 04:21:47 EDT --- newman at dhcp-lab-124 SRPMS $ rpmlint /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/deja-dup-13.3-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/deja-dup-debuginfo-13.3-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm deja-dup.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/deja-dup.schemas deja-dup.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/deja-dup-monitor.desktop This might be some rpmlint nonsense, I don't expect anyone to edit those two files. deja-dup.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/ps/man1/deja-dup-monitor.1.gz deja-dup.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/ps/man1/deja-dup-preferences.1.gz deja-dup.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/man/ps/man1/deja-dup.1.gz What's the purpose of '/ps' here? Can you remove it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 09:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080933.nB89XpA2007237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 09:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080933.nB89XkHk019303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #10 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-08 04:33:44 EDT --- The ps thing comes from upstream source. Not sure why. Michael Terry? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 09:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080933.nB89XL3Y019191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |sshedmak at redhat.com Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 09:37:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:37:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080937.nB89bbUv008780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #17 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-08 04:37:36 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package emacs-%{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i686. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. Emacs-irsim-mode does not have any. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths. Emacs-irsim-mode does not have any. - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files. Emacs-irsim-mode does not have any. - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i686. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 09:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080941.nB89fZmX010226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-08 04:41:33 EDT --- Request CVS branches as explained on here and and me on CC: I just want to monitor your first few packagers while you are doing your RPM baby steps :D https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/19#comment:7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 09:56:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:56:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545132] Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080956.nB89uVDs026828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545132 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 09:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530755] Review Request: dpic - A compiler for the pic language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080953.nB89rGsD025724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530755 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mathstuf at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-08 04:53:14 EDT --- Hello Ben, Can you please give some love to your package review requests please ? I'm relocating to another country by the end of this month and won't be available during january. If by the end of this month, I haven't approved your packages, I will remove myself as a reviewer from your packages : cirkuit and circuit_macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 09:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 04:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912080955.nB89tdMI014816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak 2009-12-08 04:55:38 EDT --- Michael/Rahul: Installed the 13.x version and noticed that in "Help" menu there are several items (Get Help..., Translate..., Report...), which on the first sight looks like those Ubuntu-specific items in every GNOME app in Ubuntu. Can this be done more GNOME way w/o those items, just for the sake of unification, please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 10:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 05:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081001.nB8A17XR016403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Arun SAG 2009-12-08 05:01:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-irsim-mode Short Description: Irsim mode for emacs Owners: sagarun chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 10:13:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 05:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545132] Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081013.nB8ADdPH019295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545132 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-12-08 05:13:37 EDT --- + rpmlint output (no errors or warnings) + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora 3 clause, new BSD, no advertising + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm + package successfully builds on at least one architecture built in Koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates /usr/include/yajl + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package COPYING ChangeLog README TODO + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 - use %global instead of %define Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures - review should test the package functions as described + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin --------- Please change %define githash ... to %global githash ... Apart from that, the package looks OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 10:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 05:13:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081013.nB8ADqTf031101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-08 05:13:50 EDT --- Thanks for the update. We are getting there.The SRPM link above is broken but I regenerated it from the SPEC file * Please don't just use the summary here %description devel %{summary}. You can use something like The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for developing applications that use %{name}. * These need to be in one line each LD_PRELOAD=%{_target_platform}/%{_lib}/libqjson.so %{_target_platform}/tests/testparser LD_PRELOAD=%{_target_platform}/%{_lib}/libqjson.so %{_target_platform}/tests/testserializer so just add a \ at the end of the first lines. * This issue still needs to be addressed: > > - Where can I find an example to properly add FindQJSON.cmake as a requirment? > > Or better yet and quicker if you could detail the correct line. > > > > I don't know exactly. You might want to do some research. However, I see that > cmake package put a lot of modules into /usr/share/cmake/Modules/ I found that you can pass this flag to cmake -DCMAKE_MODULES_INSTALL_DIR=%{_datadir}/cmake/Modules/ to make it install the cmake module to the correct location. Note that you will need to update the %files section accordingly. * I fixed the \ issue myself to build the package otherwise it will fail to build. The new package has the rpmlints: - qjson.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long JSON is a lightweight data-interchange format. It can represents integer, real number, string, Please make the description fit 80 columns. - qjson.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6.3-3 ['0.6.3-4.fc12', '0.6.3-4'] - qjson-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized qjson Development Files These can be fixed easily - qjson.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/qjson-0.6.3/html /installdox - qjson.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/qjson-0.6.3/html /installdox /usr/bin/perl I don't think this installdox file should be installed. - qjson-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation There are multiple mistakes here: . The doxygen documentation you built normally belongs to the devel package. It is supposed to be API documentation. . The doxygen documentation is not built properly. Check the generated index.html file. It is blank. You need the build the doxygen documentation that is inside the doc/ directory. Please make a test build in mock and check for rpmlints before you do the next update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 10:54:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 05:54:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: cvector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081054.nB8As1J9030203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-08 05:53:38 EDT --- A few notes: - you should have a comment about the necessity of the patch in the spec file, for example # Make install target libdir multilib compatible Patch0: cvector-1.0.3-libdir.patch I'm not sure why you change the libtool commands. Can you please clarify what is the intent of adding --tag=CC? - Please fix the tabbing of the subpackages in the spec file. - You have misspelled "vector" as "vecrot" in the %description of -devel. - Send the Makefile patch upstream. The makefile also lacks DESTDIR support, which should be included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 10:52:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 05:52:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081052.nB8AqeCe009150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-08 05:52:19 EDT --- I asked these questions to the author via email. Let us wait, then I will proceed with what comes out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 12:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 07:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: cqrlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081241.nB8CfvEc028144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 --- Comment #3 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-08 07:41:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CQRlib.spec > SRPM URL: > http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CQRlib-1.0.3-2.20090805.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CQRlib/CQRlib.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CQRlib/CQRlib-1.0.3-2.20090805.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 12:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 07:40:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: cqrlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081240.nB8CenOk027829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 --- Comment #2 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-08 07:40:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CQRlib.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CQRlib-1.0.3-2.20090805.fc12.src.rpm Thank you for your reviewing. I removed the patch file because all of the modification for Makefile is now in spec file. > * Wrt. this construct: > %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 > sed -e '/^LIB/s/lib/lib64/g' -i Makefile > %endif > > - Such sed calls can be generalized by applying %{_lib} (expands to "lib" on > 32bit and to "lib64" on 64bit targets) > > - Such sed calls are equivalent to "configuring" a package. They belong into > %build Use %{_lib} and the sed call is moved to %build section. > * static libs > %files devel > ... > %{_libdir}/*.a > > Feel strongly encouraged not to ship static libs. If you really can't avoid > shipping them, move the *.a's to a separate *-static package. Static library is separated to static subpackage. > * Upstream's tarball name is CQRlib. Fedora convention is to keep upstream's > package name => Your package should be named "CQRlib", not cqrlib. Renamed to CQRlib. > * Your patch adds changes the shared libs from --shared to --export-dynamic and > removes --release - Why? This is a significant behavioral change to upstream, I > don't see any sense in. Probably "--shared" you said means "-dynamic". I found that "-dynamic" should be not "--export-dynamic" but "-rdynamic". So I fix it to use "-rdynamic". For "--release" issue, I keep the option in Makefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 12:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 07:45:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: CQRlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081245.nB8CjrJ6029237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cqrlib - |Review Request: CQRlib - |ANSI C API for quaternion |ANSI C API for quaternion |arithmetic and rotation |arithmetic and rotation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 12:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 07:49:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544540] Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081249.nB8CnRMm019313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544540 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 07:49:25 EDT --- genesis-0.4.2.1-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/genesis-0.4.2.1-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 12:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 07:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544540] Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081251.nB8CpNat020228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544540 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-08 07:51:22 EDT --- Built. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 13:05:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:05:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226102] Merge Review: lockdev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081305.nB8D5i0f003172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226102 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Popelka 2009-12-08 08:05:42 EDT --- All problems should be fixed in lockdev-1.0.3-1.fc13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 13:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081342.nB8DgtkR001748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 08:42:54 EDT --- javacsv-2.0-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/javacsv-2.0-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 13:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:44:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081344.nB8Di67M001973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #12 from Michael Terry 2009-12-08 08:44:05 EDT --- Regarding 'ps': ps is the language code for Pashto. Deja Dup has translated man pages. Regarding Help items: They are inspired by Ubuntu, but are not Ubuntu specific. The links go to the upstream Deja Dup project page in Launchpad. You can patch them out if you don't want to look even a little like Ubuntu, but I'd prefer you didn't, as I'd get less translation traffic -- though I don't mind getting fewer bug reports and support requests :). You may be interested in patching the 'Report a bug' link to point at Fedora's bugzilla, but I don't mind getting bug reports directly. Regarding vala: Patching vala code is easier to do, but requires a build dependency on vala. It's a trade-off. Depends how much you expect to be patching Deja Dup and how difficult you find patching the generated C code to be. In terms of official upstream tarballs, the C code will always be in sync with the vala code, so you don't have to worry about a fix only being in the vala code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 13:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081345.nB8Dj9EK014592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 08:45:07 EDT --- almanah-0.6.1-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/almanah-0.6.1-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 13:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:44:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081344.nB8Di4Qh014134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 08:44:04 EDT --- javacsv-2.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/javacsv-2.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 13:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:45:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081345.nB8DjALR002582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 13:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081349.nB8Dnj0w015592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #13 from Dave M 2009-12-08 08:49:43 EDT --- I understand your comments and have implemented them, but have a question regarding the License portion. This would require changing the LICENSE file in the original tarball. So, what is the best way to do this: re-packaging 4.21 (4.21-2) with updated LICENSE information, or waiting for 4.22 and re-posting it here? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 13:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545132] Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081351.nB8DpY5K004324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545132 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Berrange 2009-12-08 08:51:32 EDT --- Updated s/define/global/ http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/yajl-1.0.7-2.fc12.src.rpm http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/yajl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 13:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:55:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] New: Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 Summary: Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: liberty at live.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is my first package, I am looking for sponsors. Thank you very much! Spec URL: http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 SRPM URL: http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict-0.9.0-0.1.20091111git.fc12.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 Description: Use of WebKit for an accurate articles' representation, complete with all formatting, colors, images and links; Support of multiple dictionary file formats and MediaWiki-based sites; Word suggestion; Full unicode support; Scan popup functionality; Tabbed browsing and more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 13:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:56:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081356.nB8DurSa005804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 Liberty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:11:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545408] New: Review Request: scantailor - post-processing tool for scanned pages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scantailor - post-processing tool for scanned pages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545408 Summary: Review Request: scantailor - post-processing tool for scanned pages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jhorak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://xhorak.fedorapeople.org/scantailor.spec SRPM URL: http://xhorak.fedorapeople.org/scantailor-0.9.7.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Scan Tailor is an interactive post-processing tool for scanned pages. It performs operations such as page splitting, deskewing, adding/removing borders, and others. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081410.nB8EABNP009832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mschwendt at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-08 09:10:08 EDT --- > This version only works with zikula 1.2 and greater, yet the Requires > zikula would permit installation on 1.1 It "Requires: zikula >= 1.2" and that is an unresolvable dependency, because latest in Fedora is 1.1.2 only. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: CVector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081419.nB8EJNNp012517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 Takanori MATSUURA changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cvector - |Review Request: CVector - |ANSI C API for Dynamic |ANSI C API for Dynamic |Arrays |Arrays --- Comment #2 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-08 09:19:22 EDT --- Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CVector.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CVector-1.0.3-2.20090805.fc12.src.rpm Update based on the comment for another in-parallel reviewing package. * Rename to CVector to keep upstream package name. * Move static library to separated subpackage. Thank you for reviewing, Jussi. (In reply to comment #1) > - you should have a comment about the necessity of the patch in the spec file, > for example > # Make install target libdir multilib compatible > Patch0: cvector-1.0.3-libdir.patch > I'm not sure why you change the libtool commands. Can you please clarify what > is the intent of adding --tag=CC? "--tag=" is now removed because it's not needed for Fedora package. Other fix is for changing destination directories and implement as a command at the beginning of %build. Therefore the patch is removed now. > - You have misspelled "vector" as "vecrot" in the %description of -devel. Fixed. Thanks. > - Send the Makefile patch upstream. The makefile also lacks DESTDIR support, > which should be included. Yes, upstream source lacks DESTDIR support. If DESTDIR support is included in upstream source, it would be better for our packaging. But I don't know upstream want it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: CVector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081420.nB8EKWq0013395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 --- Comment #3 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-08 09:20:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CVector.spec > SRPM URL: > http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CVector-1.0.3-2.20090805.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CVector/CVector.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CVector/CVector-1.0.3-2.20090805.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511998] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081423.nB8EN2Wh026032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511998 --- Comment #15 from Eric Christensen 2009-12-08 09:23:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > > This version only works with zikula 1.2 and greater, yet the Requires > > zikula would permit installation on 1.1 > > It "Requires: zikula >= 1.2" and that is an unresolvable dependency, because > latest in Fedora is 1.1.2 only. Yeah, this is known. Zikula 1.2 is in process now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081429.nB8ETkTS016115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-08 09:29:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) * License > I understand your comments and have implemented them, but have a question > regarding the License portion. This would require changing the LICENSE file in > the original tarball. So, what is the best way to do this: re-packaging 4.21 > (4.21-2) with updated LICENSE information, or waiting for 4.22 and re-posting > it here? Thanks. - Don't change 4.21 tarball itself. As you are the upstream - If you don't want to release 4.22 now, include new license text in the srpm (as SourceX) and keep 4.21 tarball itself as it is. Then replace the license text with the new one at %prep or so. - If you release 4.22, it is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:33:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:33:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545004] Review Request: wqy-microhei-fonts - compact Chinese font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081433.nB8EXboQ017545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545004 --- Comment #1 from Qianqian Fang 2009-12-08 09:33:36 EDT --- the spec file looks fine. Only two comments: 1. in the description, you may want to say "Compact Chinese/CJK font derived from Droid font family", as it contains the Latin glyphs (with hinting/kerning) from Droid Sans and Droid Sans Mono. 2. You may want to add the AUTHORS.txt file to the %doc record. I plan to add a fontconfig file in the next release. I guess when that comes, you just define a new fontconf variable and adjust SOURCE1 accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:34:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545132] Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081434.nB8EYAFv029664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545132 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-12-08 09:34:09 EDT --- APPROVED by rjones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545044] Review Request: CBFlib - A library for accessing CBF and imgCIF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081432.nB8EWsCr029430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545044 Takanori MATSUURA changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: cbflib - A |Review Request: CBFlib - A |library for accessing CBF |library for accessing CBF |and imgCIF files |and imgCIF files --- Comment #2 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-08 09:32:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CBFlib/CBFlib.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CBFlib/CBFlib-0.8.1-3.fc12.src.rpm Update based on the comment for another in-parallel reviewing package. * Rename to CBFlib * Move static library to separated subpackage * Changing destination directory for library files is implemented as a command at the beginning of %build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081432.nB8EWLKN029323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 Takanori MATSUURA changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: neartree - |Review Request: NearTree - |An API for finding nearest |An API for finding nearest |neighbors |neighbors --- Comment #2 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-08 09:32:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/NearTree.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/NearTree-2.1.4-2.fc12.src.rpm Update based on the comment for another in-parallel reviewing package. * Rename to NearTree * Move static library to separated subpackage * Remove patch * Changing destination directory for library files is implemented as a command at the beginning of %build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081437.nB8Ebf3L019533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 --- Comment #8 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-08 09:37:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=376915) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=376915) Fixes free variable reference warnings #01 Shouldn't the pkgname start with capital 'E'macs ? I see it is being used in the Name and in turn in Source0 as well, where the source tarball name starts with emacs-jabber-. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs#Template_for_a_add-on_package_for_GNU_Emacs_only #02 Attached is a patch to fix the 'free reference to variables' warnings. #03 We can use (declare-function foo) to stop the 'function X might not be defined at runtime' warning, but, declare-function is only available from Emacs 23. Otherwise, we can ignore the warning if you want to use with from Emacs 22. #04 Retain time stamp with 'cp -p', instead of using 'mv' in %install cp -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{emacs_lispdir}/*.el* \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{emacs_lispdir}/%{pkg}/ #05 Cosmetic change, use %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT? I have tested this package and it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081440.nB8EedpY031873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Roman Rakus 2009-12-08 09:40:38 EDT --- Now it's ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 14:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:44:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540368] Review Request: llk_linux - A very popular game from internet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081444.nB8Eib9o000646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540368 --- Comment #5 from Chen Lei 2009-12-08 09:44:35 EDT --- Thankkee Jan! I modified my spec files. New spec and SRPMS SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/llk_linux-2.3-0.2.beta1.fc12.src.rpm Some changes 1. I bumpd the release from 0.1.beta1%{?dist} to 0.2.beta1%{?dist}. 2. I think the version of llk_linux should retain 2.3 rather than 2.3beta1, beta1 should in the release number. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease 3. This package successfully honored compiler flags in Makefile by default, so we do not need to set $RPM_OPT_FLAGS/%{optflags} 4. I followed the guideline to intall desktop file, however the desktop file still need some additional modification such as adding a key to the desktop file or changing the content of a key that cannot accomplished by desktop-file-intall. 5. I removed comments in files section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 15:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545433] Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081514.nB8FEWSg030802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545433 --- Comment #1 from Richard Hughes 2009-12-08 10:14:31 EDT --- [hughsie at hughsie-work 12]$ rpmlint */shared-color-profiles* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Seemed to build in koji just fine too: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1862719 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 15:13:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545433] New: Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545433 Summary: Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: richard at hughsie.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-profiles.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-profiles-0.0.1-0.8.20091208git.src.rpm Description: The shared-color-profiles package contains various profiles which are useful for programs that are color management aware. This package only contains the free profiles that can be safely distributed with Fedora. *** BIG FAT LEGAL NOTE *** The SRPM ships with a lot of ICC profiles that we cannot use in Fedora[1] and therefore I'm only installing the profiles found in ArgyllCMS which are in the public domain. Other profiles will be added to the Fedora package in the future only if they are free software, ack'd by redhat-legal. I expect the number of manufacturers to relicence their profiles to CC-BY-ND or CC-BY-SA to be small, but still significant. The configure script defaults to only including the free profiles, not all of them. I guess someone could take the srpm and build it in rpmfusion with --enable-adobe --disable-argyll as shared-color-profiles-bad and it should coinstall nicely. This means that the noarch file is only a few kb in size, but the srpm is massive (13Mb). Worry not. *** BIG FAT LEGAL NOTE *** I want to make shared-color-profiles a hard dep on gnome-color-manager, as the next version will have UI that defaults to either the Adobe compatible gamut or the sRGB compatible gamut. This is required to make the UI feature compatible with what there is in OSX and Windows 7. The fact that the shared-color-profiles size is small also doesn't pose any issues if g-c-m is installed on the LiveCD by default. As an aside, if we ever hear back from the official ICC guys and fedora-legal give us the okay, we can use the official ICC profile, rather than the public domain one. Until then we're shipping the latter as it's 99% the same thing. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-December/msg00009.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 15:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:29:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: CVector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081529.nB8FTktR015760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-08 10:29:45 EDT --- More comments: - The Summary, Group and Requires fields of the subpackages are still not tabbed correctly. - LIBDIR should have no effect in %build, since nothing is installed yet. You can safely change make all CC="%{__cc}" CFLAGS="%{optflags}" LIBDIR="%{_libdir}" to make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} where %{?_smp_mflags} enables parallel compilation. - You are mixing macros: %{buildroot} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, %{optflags} vs. $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Choose a style and stick with it. - You don't have to ship the static library at all - you can just remove it at the end of %install. - Please do not use wildcards where they are not necessary: change %{_libdir}/*.so.* to %{_libdir}/libCVector.so.* and the same thing with *.so, and %{_includedir}/* to %{_includedir}/CVector.h -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 15:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533594] Review Request: Pootle - Localization and translation management web application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081539.nB8FdJeq005112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533594 --- Comment #2 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-12-08 10:39:18 EDT --- Updated to the final Pootle release: Spec URL: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/pootle-2.0.0-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/pootle-2.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 15:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539268] Review Request: rubygem-will_paginate - Most awesome pagination solution for Rail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081551.nB8FpRw1009442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539268 --- Comment #4 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-12-08 10:51:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Some quick notes: > > * %define -> %global > - Now Fedora prefers to use %global than %define: Done. > * License > - is MIT Done. > * Source > - Please use http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem Done. > * Requires/BuildRequires > - "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" is a must: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines > Also I usually suggest to add "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8" > for consistency. > > - Please check the needed Requires manually. > For example (only an example), lib/will_paginate.rb contains: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 1 require 'active_support' > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This means this binary rpm should have at least > "Requires: rubygem(activesupport)". > ! Note: use "rubygem(activesupport)" virtual Provides style for > Requires instead of using rpm names directly, ref: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides Done. Added a few BuildRequires and Requires for running tests. > * Using macros > - As %geminstdir is defined, please replace > %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ > (in %files) with this. Done. > - %ruby_sitelib seems to be used nowhere (in this spec file). Removed. > * Duplicate files > - Please fix below: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 57 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/will_paginate-2.3.11/CHANGELOG.rdoc > 58 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/will_paginate-2.3.11/LICENSE > 59 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/will_paginate-2.3.11/README.rdoc > ------------------------------------------------------------- > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplicate_Files > - Note: please keep these files marked as %doc. Fixed. > * Test program > - As this rpm contains %geminstdir/test/ please add %check section and > execute some test program (some extra BuildRequires are also needed). Done. Updated spec: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-will_paginate.spec Updated SRPM: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-will_paginate-2.3.11-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 15:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:58:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081558.nB8FwX3Z024445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-08 10:58:32 EDT --- almanah-0.6.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/almanah-0.6.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 16:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545132] Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081604.nB8G4AHd012537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545132 Daniel Berrange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Daniel Berrange 2009-12-08 11:04:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yajl Short Description: Yet Another JSON Library Owners: berrange Branches: F-12 InitialCC: virtmaint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 16:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:43:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081643.nB8GhEPj025406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 16:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081651.nB8Gp06K011188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 --- Comment #3 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-12-08 11:50:59 EDT --- Michael, thank you very much for your review. I have fixed what most of what you noted, includeing the Licence blocker, and explained why I did change the rest below. New spec file, SRPM, and tar ball at: Spec URL: http://gavin.fedorapeople.org/report.spec SRPM URL: http://gavin.fedorapeople.org/report-0.4-2.fc11.src.rpm TAR URL: http://gavin.fedorapeople.org/report-0.4.tar.gz > > Name: report > > This ought to adhere to Fedora's Package Naming Guidelines for Python modules: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 > > > > Summary: Incident reporting library > > Actually, the terminology for this software would be "module" not "library". > Mentioning that it's for Python would be good, too. Perhaps: > > Summary: Python module for submitting reports to ticketing systems I would like to stay with the 'report' name, or at least not make it Python specific. While we are developing these initial versions in Python, the plan is that as soon as the API seems solid enough, we are going to re-implement it in C/C++, and provided bindings from other interpreted languages (Python first, others as time permits and necessity requires). > > Group: System Environment/Base > > Group "Development/Languages" sounds more appropriate, certainly for all > (sub-)packages that don't include any ready-to-use executable. The RPM Group > is independent from the comps @base group. Yes, 'base' is wrong. Is 'System Environment/Libraries' better? That's what python-meh uses, and 'report' is much the same. > > License: GPLv2+ > > That's a blocker. Nothing in the source tarball (except the .spec.in) confirms > this licensing. Please include the GNU GPL license text, and as an added > benefit follow its guidelines (consult its appendix) by adding brief GPL > headers to the source files. Oops. Fixed. > > %description plugin-catcut > > Plugin reporter to catcut > > Odd. Too brief. At least the description could try to explain what "catcut" > means in this context. > > > %files > > ... > > %attr(0664,root,root) %config(noreplace) /etc/catcut.config > > Why is this package included in the base module package instead of the -catcut subackage? > > > > -rw-rw-r-- /etc/catcut.config > > g+w isn't really needed here. Nit-picky, I know. ;) Catcut is a ticketing interface that hasn't made (and may never make) it past the experimental prototype stage. I needed another ticketing system to test report's plugin configurablity, and it was an easy one to use. I should have, and now have, pulled it out of this project. > > Source0: report-0.4.tar.gz > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > Yup. Fixed. > > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > > Specifying this is not necessary anymore with Fedora >= 10. > > > %install > > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > Empyting the buildroot is done by default with Fedora >= 10. > > > %clean > > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > > There is a default %clean section with Fedora >= 10. I want to get report into EPEL 5, once it's in Fedora in general, and EPEL 5 still needs these. I should have noted this before. > > Requires: report == 0.4 > > Consider yourself lucky that this worked. Prefer '=' instead of '=='. Yup. Fixed. > > %dir %{python_sitelib}/report/alternatives/redhat_bugzilla > > %{python_sitelib}/report/alternatives/redhat_bugzilla/* > > Wherever you do the two-line %dir plus '*' wildcard dance you could simply > use a single line instead, which achieves exactly the same thing and includes > the directory and all its contents recursively: > > %{python_sitelib}/report/alternatives/redhat_bugzilla/ Ah, thanks. Fixed. -gavin... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 17:17:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:17:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081717.nB8HH1rU004575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #19 from BJ Dierkes 2009-12-08 12:16:59 EDT --- Hello, Can I get an update on this review? Just want to make sure nothing is waiting on me. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 17:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:26:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081726.nB8HQZvn023305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Saou 2009-12-08 12:26:33 EDT --- >From the spec, something got done at some point, all hope is not lost! (thanks, ajax ;-)) : * Tue Feb 10 2009 Adam Jackson - Merge review cleanups (not finished, #225638) Nevertheless, I've taken the liberty to at least partially continue the changes by including all of the obvious and unavoidable ones. Here is the detail : - Don't prefix summaries with "A" nor suffix them with a dot. - Move .so symlink to the devel sub-package (#203620). - Add highest known version to the cdparanoia-III obsoletes. - Remove incorrect buildroot removal from %%build. - Use acceptable %%clean section. - Provide cdparanoia-static in the devel sub-package since the *.a is there. - Use single-command scriplet syntax for /sbin/ldconfig calls. - Escape all macros in changelog. - Include license file since it is present with the sources. I'll rebase my other changes (cosmetic cleanups and install patch) against this new spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 17:45:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:45:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081745.nB8HjdpJ029444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Saou 2009-12-08 12:45:39 EDT --- The latest suggested changes to the package against the latest spec are here : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/merge-review/cdparanoia/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 17:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225638] Merge Review: cdparanoia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081745.nB8Hj93Q013020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225638 Bug 225638 depends on bug 203620, which changed state. Bug 203620 Summary: cdpranoia-libs .so should be in -devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203620 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 17:50:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226032] Merge Review: libjpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081750.nB8HoWCH014765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226032 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Saou 2009-12-08 12:50:31 EDT --- I still vote for the porcine beautifying :-) http://libjpeg.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libjpeg/libjpeg/ Only a handful of changes in the last 3 years, and none that look anything like cleanups or refactoring, the vintage makefiles seem here to stay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 18:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:16:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531605] Review Request: packmol - Packing Optimization for Molecular Dynamics Simulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081816.nB8IGSvP005304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531605 --- Comment #10 from Fabien Archambault 2009-12-08 13:16:26 EDT --- Hi, sorry for my slow answer. For the moment I have no other package to submit as I a trying to do the spec for mpqc but I have many errors and I am trying to understand all of them. If you can read French: http://forums.fedora-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=44709 I filled my surname and changed the spec file in order to be in adequation with it. Here are the rpmlint : $ rpmlint packmol-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint packmol-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint packmol-debuginfo-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I upped thos new files to : ftp://dedimarbo.ath.cx/pub/repo/srpms/packmol-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.src.rpm ftp://dedimarbo.ath.cx/pub/repo/rpms/x86_64/packmol-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm ftp://dedimarbo.ath.cx/pub/repo/rpms/x86_64/packmol-debuginfo-1.0.9.303-3.fc12.x86_64.rpm For the number of characters I have maximum 78 in one line I thought it was ok. I am seeing for an informal review. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 18:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:22:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541072] Review Request: certmonger - certificate status monitor and PKI enrollment client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081822.nB8IM72r023752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541072 --- Comment #1 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-12-08 13:22:06 EDT --- Please check http://nalin.fedorapeople.org/ (or http://certmonger.fedorahosted.org/) for updated versions as development continues. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 18:50:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:50:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531605] Review Request: packmol - Packing Optimization for Molecular Dynamics Simulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081850.nB8IouH7015516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531605 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 18:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531605] Review Request: packmol - Packing Optimization for Molecular Dynamics Simulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081850.nB8IohNS015449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531605 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-08 13:50:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Hi, > > sorry for my slow answer. > For the moment I have no other package to submit as I a trying to do the spec > for mpqc but I have many errors and I am trying to understand all of them. If > you can read French: http://forums.fedora-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=44709 Yes I can, but mpqc has already been submitted at bug 542759. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 18:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081853.nB8Ireci016459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #23 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-08 13:53:39 EDT --- By the way, you can remove the offset from the release. You have started numbering from release 11; it really should be started from 1. So the next spec should be revision 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 18:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:52:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081852.nB8IqRKp016243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mpqc - |Review Request: mpqc - |Ab-inito chemistry program |Ab-initio chemistry program -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 19:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081912.nB8JClBW007997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew.elwell at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Matthias Saou 2009-12-08 14:12:39 EDT --- *** Bug 509995 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 19:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:11:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081911.nB8JB6RY007503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Matthias Saou 2009-12-08 14:11:01 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-twill New Branches: EL5 Owners: thias -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 19:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081926.nB8JQw5D029059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Fabien Archambault changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marbolangos at gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Fabien Archambault 2009-12-08 14:26:55 EDT --- For information I also tried to make a spec for mpqc at the same time as you and did not succeed as you did but here is my spec file : ftp://dedimarbo.ath.cx/pub/repo/specs/mpqc.spec more information available (in French) at : http://forums.fedora-fr.org/viewtopic.php?id=44709 in particular the rpmlint errors and warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 19:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531605] Review Request: packmol - Packing Optimization for Molecular Dynamics Simulations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912081930.nB8JUJDx030334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531605 --- Comment #12 from Fabien Archambault 2009-12-08 14:30:15 EDT --- When I started the packaging the bug was not submitted but I was not able to go further as I was lacking some information (about autotools and makefiles) that I acquired a few weeks ago. Still looking for a package to review but even following the Guidelines is not that easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 20:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:27:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082027.nB8KRHWK015816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #12 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-08 15:27:15 EDT --- When I install groovy, I have the following menu text: "Programming environment for the Groovy langua..." This text is too large to display is at whole in the menu. So it want to see, that you may find a shorter version of this text which should fit into the menu. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 20:28:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:28:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082028.nB8KSNlk016040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #12 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-08 15:28:22 EDT --- I hope we're done. I think that I made all the changes requested (please double check) and ran rpmlint on the SPEC and SRPM files with zero errors on both files. The error you got with the doxygen index.html was funny. When I looked at the insides of the built RPMS, everything seemed fine. Could you please double check this with the provided files that I'm linking to here. Thanks SPEC URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson-0.6.3-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 20:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:42:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082042.nB8KgqsZ005148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #47 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-08 15:42:50 EDT --- Good: + Could download source tarball via spectool -g + Package tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: ec409b4628c2c9a4f9789cb7fb570271) + Local build works fine + Koji scratch build works fine Bad: - The provided patch is very huge, so I have the following question: * Can we splitt the patch into several smaller patches * Do you have submitted the patches to upstream? Please add a comment about this on top of the Patch tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 20:57:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:57:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082057.nB8KvihX025104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Ryan Rix changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ry at n.rix.si --- Comment #5 from Ryan Rix 2009-12-08 15:57:42 EDT --- Hi Eric, Could you please give this package a second look? If you don't have time for it atm, i'd be more than happy to take it over as Marketing wants to deploy limesurvey in infra and we need this review through first. Thanks, Ryan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 21:17:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 16:17:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082117.nB8LHU5W014607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-08 16:17:24 EDT --- Adding fedora-fonts-bugs-list in CC so it registers on the Fonts SIG review list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 21:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 16:32:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538657] Some Fedora 12 packages have versions that do not supersede the versions of Fedora 11 packages, In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082132.nB8LWDLQ019701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538657 Przemek Klosowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com Component|Package Review |distribution --- Comment #5 from Przemek Klosowski 2009-12-08 16:32:12 EDT --- Changed to 'distribution' component per Jason Tibbitts' comment #4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 22:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082211.nB8MBTGg013561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(musuruan at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-08 17:11:27 EDT --- Sorry for taking so long to review, I monitor fedora-fonts-bugs-list but only check for "wild" font package submissions when I have some free time. Anyway, review : 1. (comment) The font could probably be classified as cursive, but then the boundary between "fantasy handwriting" and "realistic handwriting" is a bit fuzzy See /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt 2. (comment) The fontconfig templates have been tweaked a little in fontpackages-devel, though the old templates you used will still work fine 3. (blocking) Since the font family name is "Digna's Handwriting" the package should be named *dignas-handwriting-fonts 4. (blocking) Since this font is distributed via the Open Font LiBrary project, the package should be named oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts 5. (non-blocking) There is no usable licensing statement in the font file, and it is not distributed with a detached .txt licensing file, so the only licensing trace is the OFL logo on OFLB. Since a web site can vanish at any time it would be nice to ask upstream to distribute the font file with a detached .txt licensing file in a zip archive (even better if the licensing info is also added to the font metadata). If upstream does not want to joining the copy of a mail where they state the font is OFL to the package as %doc would be better than nothing. 6. (non-blocking) fontlint is not happy with this font, it has some problems upstream should look at (cf attached repo-font-audit report) 7. (non-blocking) repo-font-audit detected partial lang coverage in the font, it'd be nice if upstream completed the partial languages (though, at this date, it may be difficult) 8. (non-blocking) please add a page describing this font on the wiki so it is documented with other Fedora fonts: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#1 Since you're self-packaging the font, it does not need to be very exhautive, just to provide minimal info about the font Anyway this is a very clean package and apart from the naming issues there is little to complain of, it should not be too hard to get it to approvable state -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 22:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:13:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082213.nB8MDMm3013858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-08 17:13:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377027) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377027) repo-font-audit report for this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 22:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082227.nB8MRBNg016893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #32 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-08 17:27:05 EDT --- Hi, Sylvestre, As you said, I've tried to build jogl from tha latest source and it complains about gluegen: [lonely at localhost make]$ ant Buildfile: build.xml BUILD FAILED /home/lonely/jogl~jogl-git/make/build.xml:8: Cannot find ../../gluegen/make/gluegen-cpptasks.xml imported from /home/lonely/jogl~jogl-git/make/build.xml If we can work around this we can, finally, have scilab in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 22:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082241.nB8MfRVU020230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 22:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082244.nB8Mi0EY004216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 23:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:00:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082300.nB8N0ce5009519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #33 from Sylvestre Ledru 2009-12-08 18:00:37 EDT --- Henrique, I just updated the bug #439630 with a preliminary patch for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 22:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082259.nB8MxxW1008858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #28 from Sylvestre Ledru 2009-12-08 17:59:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377049) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377049) With jogl/gluegen 2.0, a first patch to remove some hardcoded path to gluegen path -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 23:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082304.nB8N4KY7025913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |giallu at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |giallu at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-12-08 18:04:19 EDT --- I'll review this, one of my packages also bundles this lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 23:12:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:12:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545408] Review Request: scantailor - post-processing tool for scanned pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082312.nB8NCM8a027971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545408 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-08 18:12:20 EDT --- Nice programm... Review: _______ Good: - has %clean section - group ok - permissions ok - builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863668 Needswork: - desktop file should contain an icon, look in the folder resources/icons or resources/appicon.svg to add one - Please use the %cmake macro - in %files section: you have to own the directory %{_datadir}/scantailor/ - license is wrong: In COPYING and in the headers is "or at your opionon any later version". This is not *yet* relevant, but if there will be a GPLv4, it will. -> License is GPLv3+ In resources/icons/COPYING are several other licenses mentioned. -> License is GPLv3+ or GPLv2+ or Public Domain ***************** I'm unsure, if this can be reduced to GPLv3+, because this is the least common set. This is furthermore a bit strange, because no of this icons are installed laterly... A mistake from upstream? ***************** - why do you BuildRequires and Requires anything with version? Don't see any reason to do that atm... All Requires are not needed. They are added automatically, because you have all the headers as BuildRequires. - Use the full url to the source, e.g. http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - no %doc: e.g. COPYING and resources/icons/COPYING - rpmlint not clean: debuginfo-without-sources, it seems cmake doesn't use the proper compiler flags. You should ask upstream about this. - The COPYING file does not a GPLv3+ license, you should query upstream to add a license text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 23:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:42:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082342.nB8NgpbA018652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 --- Comment #2 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-12-08 18:42:50 EDT --- spec looks good, for more legibility I'd add some blank lines before %prep, %build and %install. One important thing though. I checked the license in nusoap.php and the correct one looks like LGPLv2+ http://nusoap.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nusoap/lib/nusoap.php?revision=1.121&view=markup You may also consider dropping the requirement on PHP 4.2, I'm pretty sure every current build target in Fedora has a newer one. Only the license is a blocker, fix it and I can approve this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 8 23:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912082350.nB8NoZEj020514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net --- Comment #34 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-08 18:50:32 EDT --- I had no problems rebuilding http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.7.0-1.fc12.src.rpm on F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 00:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 19:08:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090008.nB908XMb008104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #6 from Eric Christensen 2009-12-08 19:08:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/limesurvey/limesurvey.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/limesurvey/limesurvey-1.86-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Limesurvey is an open source, web-based survey application that is easy to setup and use. rpmlint is still yelling about file-not-in-%lang and incorrect-locale-subdir but they appear to be false positives. The language files are there and are in the correct locations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 01:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:21:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090121.nB91LYdr025643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |henriquecsj at gmail.com --- Comment #29 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-08 20:21:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Created an attachment (id=377049) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377049) [details] > With jogl/gluegen 2.0, a first patch to remove some hardcoded path to gluegen > path Thank you! I'll give it a try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 02:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090217.nB92HNMh022128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #30 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-08 21:17:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Created an attachment (id=377049) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377049) [details] > With jogl/gluegen 2.0, a first patch to remove some hardcoded path to gluegen > path I'm getting my source code from here http://kenai.com/projects/jogl/sources/jogl-git/show Is that the same place you are getting yours, Sylvestre? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 02:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090232.nB92WscS009363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #48 from Arun SAG 2009-12-08 21:32:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) > Bad: > - The provided patch is very huge, so I have the following question: > * Can we splitt the patch into several smaller patches We can, but i just removed the information specific to debian in the texi(info) file and made it as a patch. > * Do you have submitted the patches to upstream? There is no need to do so. > Please add a comment about this on top of the > Patch tag. Sure. I will add a comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 03:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 22:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470720] Review Request: gdnet - Demonstration tool for the libdnet interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090351.nB93piWr028576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470720 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2009-12-08 22:51:41 EDT --- Any particular reason to not build this package and close the review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 03:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 22:52:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541992] Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090352.nB93qTYa028801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-08 22:52:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 04:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:43:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090443.nB94hNYu023777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-08 23:43:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The conclusion is: > > License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and GPLv2 > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario > > By contacting the authors and asking them to clarify the licensing in the log.* > files, it would reduce to "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+". The latter is due to the > unchanged lv2_ui.h license. Upstream may opt to change the licensing of that > file to GPLv2+ when following the guidelines in the LGPL paragraph 3. Yes, but when these files get compiled into one file, the effective license is the most restrictive one, which in this case is GPLv2. That's the way we've been doing. See for instance: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-November/msg00027.html If there were different files being distributed under different licenses in the same package, then we use "A and B and ..." in the license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 04:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:47:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537363] Review Request: lv2-c++-tools - Support library for writing LV2 plugins in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090447.nB94l2WW024757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537363 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-08 23:47:01 EDT --- Yes, it hangs when -O2 is present. Did they modify the -O2 bundle recently because the same code compiles in F-11? I didn't have time to look into this further but I will. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 04:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090447.nB94lcvi009007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-12-08 23:47:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-nusoap.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-nusoap-0.7.3-2.fc12.src.rpm I added blank lines for legibility, corrected license to LGPLv2+, and dropped version require of php to an unversioned php-common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 04:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:51:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090451.nB94pjoj009951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-08 23:51:44 EDT --- The author replied and actually released a new version today, with the excessive linkage removed. So here we go: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/raul.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/raul-0.6.0-1.fc12.src.rpm ChangeLog - 0.6.0-1 - Update to 0.6.0. Build system uses waf now. - Drop upstreamed gcc44 patch - Removed irrelevant license comment - Change LD_PRELOAD to LD_LIBRARY_PATH in %%check - Exclude the headers that require redlandmm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 04:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 23:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090457.nB94vfCE026975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #49 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-08 23:57:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > > * Do you have submitted the patches to upstream? > > There is no need to do so. You should _always_ submit patches upstream! So, people who use upstream packages benefit from our work. Please do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 05:22:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 00:22:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090522.nB95MlWh002854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #33 from Chen Lei 2009-12-09 00:22:43 EDT --- debian includes the jogl.jar and gluegen-rt.jar in one deb package. http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/libjogl-java/filelist -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 05:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 00:30:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090530.nB95UqP4004865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-09 00:30:51 EDT --- Please change BR: qt to BR-qt-devel. Otherwise the package won't even build in mock, which means it won't build in koji. Moreover, I made a scratch build in koji with the above BR corrected. You can download the RPM's that are generated. We still have rpmlints: qjson-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized qjson Development Files This can be fixed easily. qjson-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/qjson-devel-0.6.3/html/installdox qjson-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/qjson-devel-0.6.3/html/installdox /usr/bin/perl The documentation is still blank. I see this line in the build.log: Error: file `/builddir/build/BUILD/qjson/doc/' not found Perhaps this will help you finding the problem. Again, I urge you to build packages on mock. It will make your life easier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 05:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 00:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541992] Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090550.nB95oZeO009851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2009-12-09 00:50:34 EDT --- The current package does not contain license information. I've been in contact with author and I've got an email from him about license being perl default now. However only the newer version of this will contain the license information that is probably going to be at the end of January. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 05:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 00:52:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090552.nB95qGHF010106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 00:52:15 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863799 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 78ba11f0e184d7d76ca8d6e166ea20d9621484dd CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=41, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.32 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.38 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-1.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::ActionDispatch) = 0.97 perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::ActionDispatch::Attributes) = 0.1 Requires: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::ActionDispatch::Attributes) perl(Class::Inspector) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(attributes) perl(strict) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: remove following lines from spec as you don't need them Requires: perl(CGI::Application) Requires: perl(Class::Inspector) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 05:52:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 00:52:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543863] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools - Tools to generate and maintain CGI::Application::Structured based web apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090552.nB95qJn0026021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543863 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 00:52:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863797 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 1a5a569b7b93c6a931fe8a0349a97c212c71bed1 CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=21, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.00 sys + 0.37 cusr 0.09 csys = 0.50 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-1.fc13.noarch=> Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Structured::Tools) perl(CGI::Application::Structured::Tools::Starter) = 0.007 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(CGI::Application::Structured::Tools::Starter) perl(Carp) perl(Config::Auto) perl(DBIx::Class::Schema::Loader) perl(English) perl(ExtUtils::Command) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Spec) perl(FindBin) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(HTML::Template) perl(Module::Starter) perl(Module::Starter::App) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::WWW::Mechanize::CGIApp) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 06:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:00:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: CVector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090600.nB960xdN028005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 --- Comment #5 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-09 01:00:58 EDT --- Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CVector/CVector.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CVector/CVector-1.0.3-3.20090805.fc12.src.rpm (In reply to comment #4) > - The Summary, Group and Requires fields of the subpackages are still not > tabbed correctly. It's not clear for me. Does the latest spec file refrain what you mean? > - LIBDIR should have no effect in %build, since nothing is installed yet. You > can safely change > make all CC="%{__cc}" CFLAGS="%{optflags}" LIBDIR="%{_libdir}" > to > make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} > > where %{?_smp_mflags} enables parallel compilation. Fixed. > - You are mixing macros: %{buildroot} vs. $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, %{optflags} vs. > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Choose a style and stick with it. I choose "macros" policy. > - You don't have to ship the static library at all - you can just remove it at > the end of %install. This package may be used by scientific programmer which have the computer with huge memory area. They sometimes link libraries as static for the "performance" with their own risk. Other scientific libraries such as blas/lapack or fftw also have static libraries in their package. So I suppose there is no problem that I pack static libraries as a separate subpackage. > - Please do not use wildcards where they are not necessary: change > %{_libdir}/*.so.* > to > %{_libdir}/libCVector.so.* > and the same thing with *.so, and > %{_includedir}/* > to > %{_includedir}/CVector.h Fixed. Thank you for continuous reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 06:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:04:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541661] Merge Review: perl-DBD-SQLite - Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090604.nB964XWr012748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541661 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 01:04:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863813 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 86cf772505009252d9e1239d8caab37ffc353c05 DBD-SQLite-1.27.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=54, Tests=831, 12 wallclock secs ( 0.21 usr 0.05 sys + 3.15 cusr 0.36 csys = 3.77 CPU) + Package perl-DBD-SQLite-1.27-2.fc13.i686 => Provides: perl(DBD::SQLite) = 1.27 perl(DBD::SQLite::db) perl(DBD::SQLite::dr) perl(DBD::SQLite::_WriteOnceHash) Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl >= 0:5.006 perl(DBI) >= 1.57 perl(DynaLoader) perl(locale) perl(strict) perl(Tie::Hash) perl(vars) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 06:06:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:06:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541664] Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod - Perl module for checking for POD errors in files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090606.nB966dpe029481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541664 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 01:06:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863816 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 1d833844267dfbb01880b7e0112e325e6ae992b1 Test-Pod-1.40.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=22, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 0.56 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.68 CPU) + Package perl-Test-Pod-1.40-1.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.40 perl(Test::Pod::_parser) Requires: perl >= 0:5.008 perl(File::Spec) perl(Test::Builder) perl(base) perl(strict) + Not a GUI application Should: 1) Correct license is "GPLv2 or Artistic 2.0" APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 06:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:14:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541666] Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage - Check for pod coverage in your distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090614.nB96E1fd015100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541666 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 01:14:00 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863818 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 9d9669917092e24d0943589ea2dfa77ef4e9c853 Test-Pod-Coverage-1.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=23, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.63 cusr 0.08 csys = 0.76 CPU) + Package perl-Test-Pod-Coverage-1.08-8.fc13.noarch=> Provides: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) = 1.08 Requires: perl(Pod::Coverage) perl(Test::Builder) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 06:13:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:13:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541662] Merge Review: perl-Pod-Coverage - Checks if the documentation of a module is comprehensive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090613.nB96Dj5Z015046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541662 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 01:13:44 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863811 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) c4786c39ae5a53ae6dbf553071d1e6f707deba61 Pod-Coverage-0.20.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=9, Tests=71, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.48 cusr 0.08 csys = 0.61 CPU) + Package perl-Pod-Coverage-0.20-3.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(Pod::Coverage) = 0.20 perl(Pod::Coverage::CountParents) perl(Pod::Coverage::ExportOnly) perl(Pod::Coverage::Extractor) perl(Pod::Coverage::Overloader) Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(B) perl(Devel::Symdump) perl(Pod::Coverage) perl(Pod::Find) perl(Pod::Parser) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 06:16:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:16:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090616.nB96G2BS031677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 01:16:01 EDT --- tomcatjss-1.2.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcatjss-1.2.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 06:16:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:16:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538673] Review Request: libunistring - GNU Unicode string library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090616.nB96GJ9G031855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538673 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 01:16:17 EDT --- This looks already built for all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 06:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:18:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090618.nB96IKmX016191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 01:18:19 EDT --- looks make test failed. see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863802 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 06:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:29:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090629.nB96TaIs019995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet 2009-12-09 01:29:34 EDT --- all "MUST" fixed. ***** APPROVED ***** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 06:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 01:50:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541668] Merge Review: perl-XML-XPath - XPath parser and evaluator for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090650.nB96oRNE025369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541668 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 01:50:26 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863888 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 72a8e7a71f5d0b46e004adfbc5c5dbf59affd03c XML-XPath-1.13.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + %doc is present. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=35, Tests=187, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.02 sys + 3.16 cusr 0.52 csys = 3.72 CPU) + Package perl-XML-XPath-1.13-9.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(XML::XPath) = 1.13 perl(XML::XPath::Boolean) perl(XML::XPath::Builder) perl(XML::XPath::Expr) perl(XML::XPath::Function) perl(XML::XPath::Literal) perl(XML::XPath::LocationPath) perl(XML::XPath::Node) perl(XML::XPath::Node::Attribute) perl(XML::XPath::Node::AttributeImpl) perl(XML::XPath::Node::Comment) perl(XML::XPath::Node::CommentImpl) perl(XML::XPath::Node::Element) perl(XML::XPath::Node::ElementImpl) perl(XML::XPath::Node::Namespace) perl(XML::XPath::Node::NamespaceImpl) perl(XML::XPath::Node::PI) perl(XML::XPath::Node::PIImpl) perl(XML::XPath::Node::Text) perl(XML::XPath::Node::TextImpl) perl(XML::XPath::NodeImpl) perl(XML::XPath::NodeSet) perl(XML::XPath::Number) perl(XML::XPath::Parser) perl(XML::XPath::PerlSAX) perl(XML::XPath::Root) perl(XML::XPath::Step) perl(XML::XPath::Variable) perl(XML::XPath::XMLParser) Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(IO::File) perl(XML::Parser) perl(XML::XPath) perl(XML::XPath::Boolean) perl(XML::XPath::Expr) perl(XML::XPath::Function) perl(XML::XPath::Literal) perl(XML::XPath::LocationPath) perl(XML::XPath::Node) perl(XML::XPath::Node::Attribute) perl(XML::XPath::Node::Comment) perl(XML::XPath::Node::Element) perl(XML::XPath::Node::Namespace) perl(XML::XPath::Node::PI) perl(XML::XPath::Node::Text) perl(XML::XPath::NodeSet) perl(XML::XPath::Number) perl(XML::XPath::Parser) perl(XML::XPath::Root) perl(XML::XPath::Step) perl(XML::XPath::Variable) perl(XML::XPath::XMLParser) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) Remove redundant BR perl >= 1:5.6.1 2)Remove macros line %{!?perl_vendorlib: %define perl_vendorlib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorlib`"; echo $installvendorlib)} APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 07:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 02:20:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090720.nB97KQUO015263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 02:20:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863928 - rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. woff.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.20091126-2.fc12 ['0.20091126-2.fc13', '0.20091126-2'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. ==> can be fixed easily + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 59879f1bdeeafce7fc9d4b51406e80d7a4cd0293 woff-code-latest.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) I think you can also add woff-2009-10-03.html to %doc as it contains specification information. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 07:20:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 02:20:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090720.nB97KYkO032619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 02:20:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1863931 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 08:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 03:11:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] New: Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 Summary: Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: keijser at stone-it.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://leon.fedorapeople.org/files/googsystray/googsystray.spec SRPM URL: http://leon.fedorapeople.org/files/googsystray/googsystray-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Googsystray is a system tray app for Google Voice, GMail, Google Calendar, Google Reader, and Google Wave. The idea is to be able to keep track of all that stuff without having to keep a bunch of browser tabs open, or constantly checking them. It notifies on new messages, alerts, etc., and provides basic services quickly (Reading or sending a new SMS message, or marking an email read, for example.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 08:36:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 03:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541992] Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090836.nB98aKBk016155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 03:35:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The current package does not contain license information. I've been in contact > with author and I've got an email from him about license being perl default > now. However only the newer version of this will contain the license > information that is probably going to be at the end of January. Then I am ok to accept this package. But if you already had discussion about licensing in email, is it ok with you to add reply from upstream in a file say LICENSE? APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 08:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 03:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090840.nB98exsp032693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-09 03:40:57 EDT --- You're contradicting yourself, and the thread on fedora-legal-list is not accurate and could be called "false advice". > the effective license is > the most restrictive one, which in this case is GPLv2. Then your package still cannot use "License: GPLv2+" as one source file remains GPLv2 and others remain LGPLv2+. License conversion is not implicit. Copying source code that applies license 1 into a project that applies license 2 does not automatically convert their licensing to anything like the "most restrictive one" or "the effective license". With regard to the GPL, to convert from one license to another means to re-license explicitly and in accordance with the current licensing terms. For a one-time conversion from LGPLv2+ to GPL this means to alter all notices that refer to the old license. The GPLv2 licensed file has further consequences as long as it is not converted to GPLv2+. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix Simply by building a program from a mixed sources project, you cannot alter/hide the licensing that applies to the program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 08:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 03:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541992] Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090856.nB98u8Ev003843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa 2009-12-09 03:56:07 EDT --- All right. I'll add the file when I check in. Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-PDF-Create Short Description: Create PDF files Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 09:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 04:23:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090923.nB99Nl2v011839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-09 04:23:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > the effective license is > > the most restrictive one, which in this case is GPLv2. > > Then your package still cannot use "License: GPLv2+" I know. The license tag on the package is wrong right now. I am just trying to figure out what is the best thing to put there. > Simply by building a program from a mixed sources project, you cannot > alter/hide the licensing that applies to the program. *sigh* Everybody is talking different. I don't know whom to believe. Once I did what you said for the kmplayer package. I put all the license names into the tag that belong to source files that get compiled into a final binary. Please see [1]. Upon consultation to spot, we were advised to cut the list and put the "effective license" there [2]. I will open another topic at fedora-legal list, as they are the most authorized people. [1] http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/devel/kmplayer/kmplayer.spec?revision=1.7&view=markup [2] http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/devel/kmplayer/kmplayer.spec?r1=1.10&r2=1.11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 09:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 04:30:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545433] Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090930.nB99Ulpl014209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545433 --- Comment #2 from Richard Hughes 2009-12-09 04:30:46 EDT --- Okay, here's a new spec, srpm and koji build. * I've added " and Public Domain" to the license tag * I've removed automake from the BR * I've updated the source tag to where it's going to live in reality * I've split the upstream repo into free and non-free, so it means the SRPM is not a few Kb in size, not Mb in size[1] Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-profiles.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-profiles-0.0.2-0.10.20091209git.src.rpm Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864001 Can you please review these new files -- thanks. Richard. [1] Debian was unable to ship the source file with the non-redistributable content, and insisted on two separate tarballs. I figured it was better for the mirrors (and possibly legally too) if the Fedora SRPM only contained the free files also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 09:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 04:36:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090936.nB99aV4R016285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-12-09 04:36:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Suggestions: > remove following lines from spec as you don't need them > Requires: perl(CGI::Application) > Requires: perl(Class::Inspector) Done. Thanks, Parag. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch Short Description: Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 09:53:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 04:53:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545433] Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912090953.nB99r0D8005338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545433 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |yaneti at declera.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |yaneti at declera.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-12-09 04:52:59 EDT --- Looks good. I would do @@ -26,16 +26,18 @@ %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT +mkdir Argyll +mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/color/icc/Argyll/{README,LICENSE} Argyll/ %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog +%doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog Argyll %dir %{_datadir}/color/icc %dir %{_datadir}/color/icc/Argyll -%{_datadir}/color/icc/Argyll/* +%{_datadir}/color/icc/Argyll/*.icm %{_datadir}/color/icc/*.icc %changelog but its up to you. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:06:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545433] Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091006.nB9A6Scw009874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545433 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Richard Hughes 2009-12-09 05:06:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: shared-color-profiles Short Description: Shared color profiles for color management aware applications Owners: rhughes Branches: F-12 InitialCC: rhughes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:23:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531254] Review Request: lfc-postgres - LCG File Catalog (LFC) server with postgres database backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091023.nB9ANheV014683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531254 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-09 05:23:43 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/lfc-postgres.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/lfc-postgres-1.7.3.1-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531256] Review Request: dpm - Disk Pool Manager (DPM) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091023.nB9ANkpj014710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531256 Bug 531256 depends on bug 531255, which changed state. Bug 531255 Summary: Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-09 05:23:45 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/dpm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/dpm-1.7.3.1-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531258] Review Request: dpm-postgres - Disk Pool Manager (DPM) server with postgres database backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091023.nB9ANnh0014734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531258 Bug 531258 depends on bug 531255, which changed state. Bug 531255 Summary: Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-09 05:23:48 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/dpm-postgres.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/dpm-postgres-1.7.3.1-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:26:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091026.nB9AQajk031070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from sandeep shedmake 2009-12-09 05:26:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: woffTools Short Description: Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files Owners: sandeeps, pnemade Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:26:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091026.nB9AQlZN031117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-09 05:26:46 EDT --- I think sources are not matching. e743a69c9a28abe374e9827eddd3370d5cfae055 openvas-libnasl-2.0.2.tar.gz 7a4342418de2a591353a4404455ca97a49d589d8 ../SOURCES/openvas-libnasl-2.0.2.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091023.nB9ANfX3030210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-09 05:23:39 EDT --- Update: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/lfc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/lfc-1.7.3.1-4.fc12.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > Hi, > > Question: There is this lfc building mysql variant and Bug #531252 > building a postgres variant. > > Both look to be build from the same source file? > > Is it possible not to merge these two packages? Actually there are 4 packages building from the same tarfile: - lfc (bug #531252 - this one) - lfc-postgres (bug #531254) - dpm (bug #531256) - dpm-postgres (bug #531258) Unfortunately there is no sane way to build all this at the same time in the same source tree. The configure options for building LFC and DPM are mutually exclusive. The same is true for building the servers with mysql, postgres (or oracle) support. The oracle support we can't build for Fedora anyway since the oracle client libraries are not free - which is kind of fortunate since otherwise there would be 6 package. If all the software were to be built in the same source RPM this source RPM would have to untar the source tarfile 4 times so that the build directory had 4 copies of the source tree, then apply the patches 4 times (once in each of the source trees), run configure 4 times with different options in each of the source trees, run make and make install 4 times. It would be a mess. Splitting it into 4 separate source RPMs seemed to be a much better way to do it to me. Each of these is more or less standard with setup, configure, make, make install. (In reply to comment #2) > rpmlint errors. > lfc-mysql.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/lfcdaemon > > I've not looked at the file at the logrotate file at all. The logrotate files are handled by alternatives so that there are not two copies of them installed in /etc/logrotate.d if you install both the mysql and postgres version of the services. The name of the symlink installed by the alternatives is the same for both packages and both packages own this symlink as a %ghost, as they should. However, since the name of this symlink must be the same for both packages it can not have the same name as the package, which is why rpmlint finds it "incoherent". > Also it seems not to like "backend" as not being a en_US word. Hyphenate > I guess: > > lfc-mysql.x86_64: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US backend I don't get this complaint with my version of rpmlint. (In reply to comment #3) > 1) # rpm -Uvh lfc-1.7.3.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > liblcgdm.so.1()(64bit) is needed by lfc-1.7.3.1-1.fc13.x86_64 > > which is course provided by lcgdm-1.7.3.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm > it seems to be normal in these case to explicitly require lcgdb = > %{version}-%{release} where the provides comes from one of the sub packages so > as not to end up with mixed versions of package. > > similar for lfc-mysql as well. Since the choice of building liblcgdm together with the LFC or the DPM is arbitrary, the Requires should not depend on this choice, and since having %{version}-%{release} Requires across source RPMs is a bad idea ... The same arbitrariness is true for building liblfc together with lfc-mysql or lfc-postgres. > 2) # /etc/init.d/lfc-mysql start > Starting lfcdaemon: FAILED : config file /etc/NSCONFIG empty > > So this file should probably be there as an example or something? > > I guess they come from these files which are apparently duplicated. > > # cat /usr/lib64/lfc-mysql/NSCONFIG.templ > /@ > [root at rawhide x86_64]# cat /usr/share/lfc/NSCONFIG.templ > /@ The duplication is due to the alternatives handling. The installed file is /usr/lib64/lfc-mysql/NSCONFIG.templ, and the symlink created by alternatives is /usr/share/lfc/NSCONFIG.templ. The instructions for creating the /etc/NSCONFIG file is now in the README.Fedora file (see below). > 3) The INSTALL-server-mysql is rather misleading to this RPM installation. Removed - replaced with a README.Fedora (see below). > 4) A quick read of the init.d script has > /etc/grid-security/$LFCUSER/lfccert.pem > so that directory should probably exist. Directory added. > 5) The same LICENSE file looks to be duplicated in both lfc and lfc-mysql Yes, this is again due to making the package content not depend on arbitrary choices about what parts to build in which source RPM. Since the mysql-postgres package should have the license file since it is built from a separate rpm it doesn't make sense for lfc-mysql not to have it since the choice about which flavour of the server to build in the main package is arbitrary. > 6) I'm guessing a schema or at least a database has to be created? > Maybe a README.Fedora? README.Fedora added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091025.nB9APVU9015484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 sandeep shedmake changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake 2009-12-09 05:25:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================== Package Name: woff Short Description: Encoding and Decoding for WOFF file format Owners: sandeeps, pnemade Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:26:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091026.nB9AQhNc015740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-09 05:26:41 EDT --- These are situations that make bad thoughts creep into my brain. :-/ The "effective license" once more? Huh? That's another term for "WTF? We don't care about proper licensing of a program". A term that cannot be found in Fedora's Licensing Guidelines. - I'm not a lawyer. Spot isn't one either. But it doesn't need a lawyer to come up with a case of a mixed-source program that is based on GPL'ed files and LGPL'ed files doing most of the work. The FSF wants program licenses to be applied in a clear, unambiguous way (which is also one reason why they distinguish between copying source code and linking with external libraries). And what do we do? We make up an "effective license" and pretend that the program is subject to the GPL only while actually parts of it apply the more liberal [less free!] LGPL. Uh, come on! Fedora's Licensing guidelines explicitly ask for "maintainers [to] make every possible effort to be accurate when filling the License: field". [...] I've sent a message to the lv2fil author, pointing out the mixed-source licensing and suggesting a clarification and conversion to GPLv2 or later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091035.nB9AZDJV000526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-09 05:33:26 EDT --- Please also put the fonts sig in InitialCC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:35:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:35:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091035.nB9AZHiw017742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-09 05:32:47 EDT --- Please also put the fonts sig in CC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:40:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:40:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091040.nB9Ae1o5001533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-09 05:39:59 EDT --- The link doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:45:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091045.nB9AjwE7003454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-09 05:45:56 EDT --- Hey, chill. I did not mean to piss you off. This is a legal issue and thus it is important that we do this consistently in Fedora. I have seen different implementations of this "effective license" and this breaks consistency. I have sent an email to Fedora Legal, and I hope that this issue will be settled once and for all. Thanks for contacting the lv2fil author. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:51:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091051.nB9ApGev004867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |rpandit at redhat.com Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #49 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-12-09 05:51:09 EDT --- No comments for long. Waiting for upstream work to complete. Will close it for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 10:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 05:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: CVector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091047.nB9Alqfi003905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-09 05:47:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > - The Summary, Group and Requires fields of the subpackages are still not > > tabbed correctly. > > It's not clear for me. > Does the latest spec file refrain what you mean? Perfect. > > - You don't have to ship the static library at all - you can just remove it at > > the end of %install. > > This package may be used by scientific programmer which have the computer with > huge memory area. > > They sometimes link libraries as static for the "performance" with their own > risk. Other scientific libraries such as blas/lapack or fftw also have static > libraries in their package. So I suppose there is no problem that I pack > static libraries as a separate subpackage. Uhm, I don't think the overhead of dynamic linkage is THAT great. Dynamic memory allocation, on the other hand, is slow. Static linking is most helpful a) on systems that don't support dynamic linking and b) if you want to run the same binary on a lot of different systems without having to recompile it. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries "Packages including libraries should exclude static libs as far as possible (eg by configuring with --disable-static). Static libraries should only be included in exceptional circumstances. Applications linking against libraries should as far as possible link against shared libraries not static versions." If you *really* think having the static library is necessary, then it's OK to ship it. I wouldn't, though. ** An aesthetical comment: you don't need to put so much empty lines within sections in the spec file. A few lines between sections (such as %build and %install) is enough, when there's nothing long and complicated happening. %post and %postun are also usually grouped together for symmetry. ** I am willing to sponsor you if you show me your knowing of the Fedora guidelines, most importantly http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Additionally to the Packaging Guidelines, there are a bunch of language / application specific guidelines that are linked to in the Packaging Guidelines. Here are some tricks of the trade: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues I will sponsor you if you have at least one other submission and perform a couple of informal reviews of packages of other people. Please review only packages *not* marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR. I will have to do the full formal review after you to check that you have got everything correctly. Once I have sponsored you you will be able to do formal reviews of your own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:00:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091100.nB9B0deg007012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|itamar at ispbrasil.com.br |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091114.nB9BEWPV029098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 --- Comment #7 from sandeep shedmake 2009-12-09 06:14:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================== Package Name: woff Short Description: Encoding and Decoding for WOFF file format Owners: sandeeps, pnemade Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team, fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091114.nB9BEcE6029156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake 2009-12-09 06:14:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: woffTools Short Description: Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files Owners: sandeeps, pnemade Branches: F-11, F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team, fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091128.nB9BS59u001168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 Mario Ceresa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mrceresa at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-09 06:28:03 EDT --- Hello Leon! This is an informal review. I gave the package a try, it compiled, installed and worked but, after the preference dialog, I could not see the icon in the taskbar nor use it in any other way. It might be a problem with the proxy or something with my configuration. I'll try again later on with a little more time. Reviewing the package everything seems ok: # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint googsystray.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/googsystray-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/googsystray-1.0.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . ok # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Ok # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Ok # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Ok # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Ok # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Ok # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. Ok # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Ok # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Verified: fcd12ed1bd0780943e607c5c43c2f680 googsystray-1.0.0.tar.gz # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Ok on Fedora 12 i686 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. n.a. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Ok # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Ok # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. n.a. # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. n.a. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. n.a. # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Ok # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Ok # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Ok # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Ok # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Ok # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. Ok # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). n.a. # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Ok # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. n.a. # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. n.a. # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). n.a. # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. n.a. # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} n.a. # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. n.a. # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. n.a. # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. n.a. # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). ok # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ok Please note that I'm not a sponsor and I've just started my experience with Fedora packages. Anyway I find your contribution very interesting. Thanks for your work, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091130.nB9BUgMK002241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 06:30:40 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/groovy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/groovy-1.6.7-1.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:46:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091146.nB9Bkb48019168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 06:46:36 EDT --- SPECS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/testng.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/testng-5.10-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:47:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091147.nB9BlgaB007123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-09 06:47:41 EDT --- Mario, since you are sponsored, you are now able to make the formal reviews. So I strongly advice you to re-assing this package to yourselr, raise fedora-review flag and proceed with reviewing (actually, you almost finished :) See this link for further details: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Reviewer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540708] Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091151.nB9BpNrs020347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Marek Mahut 2009-12-09 06:51:21 EDT --- Review complete offline, the package looks sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:52:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:52:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: CVector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091152.nB9Bqokb008558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 --- Comment #7 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-09 06:52:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Uhm, I don't think the overhead of dynamic linkage is THAT great. Dynamic > memory allocation, on the other hand, is slow. > > Static linking is most helpful a) on systems that don't support dynamic linking > and b) if you want to run the same binary on a lot of different systems without > having to recompile it. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries > "Packages including libraries should exclude static libs as far as possible (eg > by configuring with --disable-static). Static libraries should only be included > in exceptional circumstances. Applications linking against libraries should as > far as possible link against shared libraries not static versions." > > If you *really* think having the static library is necessary, then it's OK to > ship it. I wouldn't, though. Yes, I have read Guideline and keep it. Hmm... OK. static library is now removed. > An aesthetical comment: you don't need to put so much empty lines within > sections in the spec file. A few lines between sections (such as %build and > %install) is enough, when there's nothing long and complicated happening. %post > and %postun are also usually grouped together for symmetry. Thanks. I now get that the second empty line which is generated by rpm-spec mode in emacs or /etc/rpmdevtools/*-template.spec means "add more command or so". > I am willing to sponsor you if you show me your knowing of the Fedora > guidelines, most importantly > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > Additionally to the Packaging Guidelines, there are a bunch of language / > application specific guidelines that are linked to in the Packaging Guidelines. > > Here are some tricks of the trade: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues Thanks a lot for the information and expressing sponsorship. I'm collaborating with Jindrich (a maintainer of texlive packages) for adding Japanese TeX support into TeXLive (and formally teTeX) for many years. And this process is a good time for me to re-check my packaging skill. > I will sponsor you if you have at least one other submission and perform a > couple of informal reviews of packages of other people. > > Please review only packages *not* marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR. I will have to do > the full formal review after you to check that you have got everything > correctly. Once I have sponsored you you will be able to do formal reviews of > your own. Okay. I'll try. Do I have to select the review request which don't have any reviewer comments yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:52:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:52:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091152.nB9Bq5Kc020567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Marek Mahut 2009-12-09 06:52:04 EDT --- Package looks sane, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091158.nB9BwP4h009910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) | --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 06:58:24 EDT --- Good catch, Mat. To be honest, I could not determine. I sent a mail to gui that seems to be a single commiter to plexus-lang and asked him to clarify the situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:01:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:01:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540708] Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091201.nB9C1glu023070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |534168 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091201.nB9C1ivp023106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |540708 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 11:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 06:58:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542166] Review Request: patricia-trie - Java prefix tree library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091158.nB9BwXot022209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542166 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:02:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540708] Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091202.nB9C2dv8011123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 07:02:38 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gant Short Description: Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091203.nB9C3625023466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 07:03:04 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xmlbeans Short Description: XML-Java binding tool Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: CVector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091206.nB9C6Ctm012283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-09 07:06:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > Please review only packages *not* marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR. I will have to do > > the full formal review after you to check that you have got everything > > correctly. Once I have sponsored you you will be able to do formal reviews of > > your own. > > Okay. I'll try. > Do I have to select the review request which don't have any reviewer comments > yet? Yes, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:08:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091208.nB9C81n7024609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #4 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-09 07:08:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/NearTree/NearTree.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/NearTree/NearTree-2.1.4-3.fc12.src.rpm * remove static library * fix the library file name from libNearTree-2.1.3.so.* to libNearTree-2.1.4.so.* * update based on the comments at bug 545046 Note: * A patch included in this package has been sent to the upstream developer. * Library file name issue has been reported to the upstream developer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:16:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: CQRlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091216.nB9CGgtv026720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 --- Comment #5 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-09 07:16:41 EDT --- * The issue for the option in generating dynamic library has been reported to the upstream developer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:14:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:14:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: CQRlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091214.nB9CEXdM025896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 --- Comment #4 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-09 07:14:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CQRlib/CQRlib.spec SRPM URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CQRlib/CQRlib-1.0.3-3.20090805.fc12.src.rpm * Update based on the comment for another in-parallel reviewing package. * remove static lirary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091216.nB9CGNJA014729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 Mario Ceresa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mrceresa at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:19:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:19:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091219.nB9CJr1x015222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #50 from Arun SAG 2009-12-09 07:19:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #49) > > You should _always_ submit patches upstream! So, people who use upstream > packages benefit from our work. Please do so. Yes, we should always submit patches to upstream :-) , but in this case the patch i have created for emacs-goodies is specific to fedora, and the debian upstream may not need it. Any way i am sending this patch to PSG, who is also following this conversation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:30:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:30:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091230.nB9CUobL030543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.matsuu at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-09 07:30:47 EDT --- *** Bug 545044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:30:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545044] Review Request: CBFlib - A library for accessing CBF and imgCIF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091230.nB9CUnuk030503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545044 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-09 07:30:47 EDT --- There's already a review open on this one. Please remember to check bugzilla for open reviews before submitting new ones. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 523877 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:30:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091230.nB9CUxjG018473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #12 from Neal Becker 2009-12-09 07:30:57 EDT --- Since cedet is merged into mainstream emacs next release, does this package have a future? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:48:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:48:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226102] Merge Review: lockdev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091248.nB9CmH5T022588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226102 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-09 07:48:13 EDT --- OK source files match upstream. 64b9c1b87b125fc348e892e24625524a lockdev_1.0.3.orig.tar.gz OK License text included in package. - maybe would be good to include also AUTHORS and Changelog OK latest version is being packaged. Looks ok, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 12:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 07:52:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091252.nB9CqKmx003907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 --- Comment #10 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-09 07:52:19 EDT --- For CBFlib, see bug 523877. Sorry. I forgot to check it. I suggest this bug is depended on bug 523877, bug 545045, bug 545046, and bug 545047. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:03:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091303.nB9D31aG006250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #13 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-09 08:02:59 EDT --- I am not going to be patching help items. It is going to be however upstream puts it. As long as it's functional and serves the purpose, it is good to go. Whether we need to be building it from Vala source is a question for the packaging committee. I will post and enquire. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:04:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091304.nB9D4Pbx006477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #13 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-09 08:04:24 EDT --- Well, that depends on when the next version of Emacs will be released. IMHO it makes sense to have emacs-cedet package for Fedora 13, so that emacs-ecb can be used in that release. If the new version of Emacs gets to F-13, then it is obviously pointless to create the CVS repository and everything for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091316.nB9DGNXJ030433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from David Nalley 2009-12-09 08:16:22 EDT --- Thanks for the review Remi!! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-OLE Short Description: Package for reading and writing OLE containers Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: CQRlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091327.nB9DRRH3001386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 --- Comment #6 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-09 08:27:26 EDT --- Uah, the file name of the shared library include full version number. :-( It's not good. If this package is updated, we have to recompile all the software which link to this library. Now I'm contacting the upstream developer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091327.nB9DRaXE014469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #5 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-09 08:27:35 EDT --- Uah, the file name of the shared library include full version number. :-( It's not good. If this package is updated, we have to recompile all the software which link to this library. Now I'm contacting the upstream developer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:38:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091338.nB9Dcddk005137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #14 from Neal Becker 2009-12-09 08:38:38 EDT --- Emacs pretest 23.1.90 is now available for download via FTP, at the following location: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:38:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091338.nB9DcevX005159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #3 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-09 08:38:39 EDT --- Ehi cool! then I'll finish reviewing it: * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. n.a. * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. It seems that none is available from homepage * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Ok * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. As the package is marked as noarch, this should be n.a. as well * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. __NOTE__ After installing and configuring, there is no tray icon/or is invisible and nothing happens. There are a couple of bugs related to this upstream though so it is not a packaging problem: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2911136&group_id=277278&atid=1177508 * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. n.a. * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. n.a. * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. n.a. * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. n.a. ***************Summary: Everything seem ok, except for the problem I had in executing it (but see earlier in the SHOULD list). The authors specify dependencies on python >= 2.6 and pygtk2 >= 2.14: http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/googsystray/index.php?title=Installation I tried to remove the Requires line and the python dependence is picked up correctly but pygtk2 is not. My proposal is to remove python from the Requires and put pygtk2 >= 2.14. But it might be not needed to put the full version as my two f11 and f12 machines have these dependencies already satisfied. Peter, what do you think about this? If the problem in usage and the version are not blockers I think to approve the package. Cheers, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538057] Review Request: rhnmd - Red Hat Network Monitoring Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091349.nB9DnuaX008666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538057 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-09 08:49:55 EDT --- Let's go through the spec from top to bottom: Use %global instead of %define, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define Use %{_sharedstatedir} instead of %{_var}/lib/, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros Is the license GPLv2 or GPLv2+? Maybe add a doc to clarify? %{_initrddir} is considered deprecated on Fedora, but still needed on RHEL. You could catch this with a conditional, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag#Conditionals (but that's not really that important) Add -p to install in order to preserve timestamps of the files, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Please don't use excessive wildcards like %{_usr}/sbin/* because no other maintainer will know what this means when looking at the spec. The spec would be more legible if - you moved %preun before %clean and %files - you used proper text indention. The content of tags like Name, Version, ... usually starts at 17 characters (at least in spec generated with rpmdev-newspec). Add more docs, at least an AUTHORS file should IMO be there, ChangeLog would be nice too. Please use a more common format for your changelogs. Bug numbers should be at the end of a changelog entry, e.g. - remove the dependency of rhnmd on nocpulse-common (#494538) see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs BTW: there is a typo: "dependecy" instead of "dependency" The rpmlint warnings are mostly save to ignore, but - I disagree about service-default-enabled, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Why_don.27t_we.... - I don't understand dangerous-command-in-%pre: When you migrate settings from /home/nocpulse, why remove /var/lib/nocpulse/{bin,var}? This doesn't look related. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:52:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091352.nB9Dq639021566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-09 08:52:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Uah, the file name of the shared library include full version number. :-( > > It's not good. > If this package is updated, we have to recompile all the software which link to > this library. > > Now I'm contacting the upstream developer. Indeed. The library must be versioned with the soname, which may well be 2.1.3 for NearTree-2.1.4. But a clarification by upstream is in order. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:57:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091357.nB9Dv5bH010990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mathys 2009-12-09 08:57:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE-2.8.8-3.fc12.src.rpm Thanks for the comments so far guys. The new package/spec fixes all that except for the licensing issue. Will contact upstream about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 13:59:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:59:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091359.nB9DxeWc011657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-09 08:59:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > ***************Summary: > Everything seem ok, except for the problem I had in executing it (but see > earlier in the SHOULD list). > > The authors specify dependencies on python >= 2.6 and pygtk2 >= 2.14: > http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/googsystray/index.php?title=Installation > > I tried to remove the Requires line and the python dependence is picked up > correctly but pygtk2 is not. My proposal is to remove python from the Requires > and put pygtk2 >= 2.14. But it might be not needed to put the full version as > my two f11 and f12 machines have these dependencies already satisfied. > > Peter, what do you think about this? If the problem in usage and the version > are not blockers I think to approve the package. I strongly recommend to use version of required components in Requires if upstream mentioned them. So I really don't like the idea to remove python version from Requires (the same for PyGTK). Also this might confuse those packagers, who will package googsystray for other RPM-based distros and who will rely on Fedora srpm as the starting point. One more note, Mario - you mislooked one bundled library, already packaged in Fedora - python-xlib (which is bundled under the name gXlib). This should be either removed (sources should be fixed to properly use the system library) or reporter should argue for usage of the bundled copy (was forked and heavily changed from upstream, for example). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 14:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:06:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091406.nB9E6O91027075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-09 09:06:23 EDT --- And some more notes: - missing 'Requires' - hicolor-icon-theme (owner of the %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*x*/apps/ directories) - unowned directory - %{python_sitelib}/%{name} - Mario, please, try to rebuild the package in Koji (and provide link to the build). Other things looks sane for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 14:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:38:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091438.nB9Ec5oQ005433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 14:56:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 09:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226550] Merge Review: xcdroast In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091456.nB9EuUbS031564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226550 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|rrakus at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:17:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:17:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091517.nB9FHjt9005892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-12-09 10:17:44 EDT --- Official Review: * Naming is correct * License is good for Fedora * spec file legible * sources matches upstream * Mock build for F12 succeed APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091536.nB9Falxu012663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Ben Boeckel 2009-12-09 10:36:45 EDT --- Ping. Status update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:40:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091540.nB9Fe0jI027473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #29 from Sandro Mathys 2009-12-09 10:39:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser-2.7.4-2.fc12.src.rpm Only some little changes have been made to improve the spec. Also a patch was extended because of the change to jakarta-commons-compress 1.0 (the patch went into that direction before with another j-c-c version change). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:43:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508521] Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091543.nB9Fhtrl015132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 --- Comment #11 from Sandro Mathys 2009-12-09 10:43:53 EDT --- Won't build an EL-4 version due to lack of interest in maintaining it with java 1.5 (i.e. gcj). If someone else in the future wants to co-maintain this for EL-4 feel free to contact me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:44:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545893] New: Review Request: poky-depends - Poky platform builder dependency package list Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: poky-depends - Poky platform builder dependency package list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545893 Summary: Review Request: poky-depends - Poky platform builder dependency package list Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/poky-depends.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poky-depends-5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Poky-depends is a meta-package that lists and installs the required packages for a Poky build. Successful Koji builds for F-11, F-12 and EL-5 respectively: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864935 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864937 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864942 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:49:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:49:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091549.nB9FnqIe016803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:49:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: CQRlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091549.nB9Fnrtd016829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:49:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541462] Review Request: rasmol - Molecular Graphics Visualization Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091549.nB9Fnp0d016764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541462 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |523877, 545045, 545046, | |545047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091547.nB9Fleir016381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from David Nalley 2009-12-09 10:47:39 EDT --- Thanks for the review Gianluca! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-nusoap Short Description: SOAP toolkit for PHP Owners: ke4qqq Branches: EL-5 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:49:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091549.nB9Fnt26016915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:49:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545046] Review Request: CVector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091549.nB9Fns6x016872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |541462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:49:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] New: Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 Summary: Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/poky-scripts.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poky-scripts-6-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Poky-scripts contains utility scripts for Poky such as poky-qemu, which will run a Poky image in QEMU with the right arguments. Successful Koji builds for F-11, F-12 and EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864970 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864986 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864982 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:55:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:55:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091555.nB9FtxEg031980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-12-09 10:55:57 EDT --- Hey, even I'm wrong sometimes. :) This isn't really a license, this is actually a patent grant. The maintainer of this Fedora package should be careful to ensure that they do not apply patches which would cause this software to be out of compliance with the STAR/CIF data format standards (even though the copyright license permits it), because we would no longer have permission to use the patent(s). Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 15:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 10:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091558.nB9FwAML019970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #25 from Carl Byington 2009-12-09 10:58:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) It looks like the -11 was a typo that should have been -1. Can we renumber those at this point, or is there any data in koji that will get confused by eventually getting a -11 release that is different than the current -11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 16:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091600.nB9G0kSi021089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #6 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-09 11:00:45 EDT --- Thanks Peter for your comments! Hello Leon, so what it seems to be missing now is: - Asking to the developers why gXlib has been included and if could be removed. FYI: I used kdiff3 to check for differences between python-xlib-0.14-5.fc12.noarch.html and the gXlib included version and there are many differences. - Adding to the spec: Requires: python >= 2.6 Requires: pygtk2 >= 2.14 Requires: hicolor-icon-theme - Change %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/* to %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ As far as I understand this should own the directory and all its files. - I'll post koji's links from home. Peter: if you spot any error in what I told to Leon, please correct me. I still have a lot to learn before doing good revisions :) Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 16:19:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091619.nB9GJGQV006425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-09 11:19:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > - Change %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/* to %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ > As far as I understand this should own the directory and all its files. Yes, exactly. Just for the record - this should be fixed also by the following: %dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name} %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/* > Peter: if you spot any error in what I told to Leon, please correct me. Everything is ok so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 16:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 11:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530374] Review Request: nitrogen - A background browser and setter for X windows In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091628.nB9GS7rX028278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530374 --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mathys 2009-12-09 11:28:06 EDT --- I just had a nice chat with upstream and they will ask the author of the icons regarding the license change. As it's not clear whether that will succed I'll wait to fix all the other stuff until we're ready to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091706.nB9H6H1d008795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #26 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-09 12:06:16 EDT --- Yes, normally that would be the case since upgrade paths would be broken; however the package is not yet in Fedora so we don't really need to care about such things. Once you correct the release numbers you will probably get rpmlint warnings from the Mandriva stuff; at that stage I'd just scrap them and add a note in the first entry that the spec file is based on that of Mandriva (and maybe add a few names for the contributions). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:21:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:21:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091721.nB9HLN7k025818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-09 12:21:22 EDT --- Good: + Package contains recent release of the application + Packed tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: f63532d75560f101bf1f40b7a3760228) + Local build works fine + Local install/uninstall works fine + Desktop menu entry looks fine. + Mock build works fine *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091724.nB9HOUdr013274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 12:24:29 EDT --- Thank you! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: groovy Short Description: Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091736.nB9HaN4G030362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-09 12:36:22 EDT --- Please close this bug, if you have built the package for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:36:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:36:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545893] Review Request: poky-depends - Poky platform builder dependency package list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091736.nB9HaHtI030323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545893 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-09 12:36:15 EDT --- No separate meta-package in Fedora. Creating it as a sub-package in poky-scripts package. Please refer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:39:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:39:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091739.nB9HddHW031380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:39:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541992] Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091746.nB9HkWCm001703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:46:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091742.nB9Hg3js032525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:42:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:45:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091745.nB9HjKYg001349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:45:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091744.nB9HicAD000815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:44:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:43:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091743.nB9HhZRU000638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:43:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:42:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:42:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091742.nB9HgHrw000427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-09 12:42:16 EDT --- Created sub-package poky-depends in poky-scripts package itself. Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/poky-scripts.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poky-scripts-6-2.fc12.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-11, F-12 and EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1865273 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1865277 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1865279 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091747.nB9HlYW0020200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #51 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-09 12:47:33 EDT --- Sorry, we have two patches in the package: emacs-goodies-el.texi.patch which ist a small patch. But the only thing what I can see in the patch is the try to replace the string 'emacs-goodies' whith 'emacs-goodies-el'. This is not good, because the el subpackage should only contains the emacs sources of this emacs releated package. this mean, in common a user will only install the emacs-goodies package and the el subpackage may be only installed, if the user want to examinate or to modified the emacs sources of the macros. emacs-goodies-el_31.2-1.diff which has a size of approximately 477 Kilobytes and lok like the way how applications are pached in Debina. I can't believe, that this patch conatins only Fedora specific modifications. So please talk to the upstream maintainer how this patch may integrated in the main source tar ball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545132] Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091750.nB9HoArU002839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545132 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:50:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:48:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091748.nB9HmqVP002293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:48:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091747.nB9HllHJ002096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:47:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091752.nB9Hqgwc021742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:52:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:54:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091754.nB9Hsa9h022109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:54:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:51:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545433] Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091751.nB9Hpad5021458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545433 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:51:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:53:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091753.nB9HrRjO003834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:53:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:54:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540708] Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091754.nB9Hs0h4003942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:53:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 17:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:55:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495357] Review Request: python-twill - Simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091755.nB9Ht9Lb022634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495357 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-09 12:55:08 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542341] Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091805.nB9I54v4007477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542341 Bug 542341 depends on bug 542320, which changed state. Bug 542320 Summary: Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091805.nB9I53iT007450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 13:05:02 EDT --- Response from upstream: """ Please use plexus-i18n - the original one. Plexus-lang was a one off that kinda of stalled now, so if one is deprecated, that would be this one. """ Closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091810.nB9IAcF6008902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #27 from Carl Byington 2009-12-09 13:10:36 EDT --- http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-5.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1865396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:14:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091814.nB9IE3fK027923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #6 from Michal Babej 2009-12-09 13:14:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > - It seems filters related dependency is optional, so I don't think > adding "R: rubygem(RedCloth)" is strictly needed. OK. > > > 4. Rakefile has many dependencies (tlsmail, yard, rcov/rcovtask, ruby-prof, > > "git" command...) and i'm not sure how useful it is. The only thing i'd like to > > keep is the 'test' task. > > - We usually don't add dependency for Rakefile based dependency > ( By the way I like to create -doc subpackage for rubygem based rpm > and I usually put Rakefile to -doc, not to main package ) The problem is, i can't even do "rake test" because loading of rakefile fails on dependencies. > > - But with your current rpm only ruby script with shebang have executable > permission (and not all *_test.rb have shebang) anyway, so judging by > my method should be possible. In my current rpm, only two of 10 test files miss shebang line, in %install i add it to those two, and then set all 10 to +x with chmod. > ( By the way if scripts without shebang have executable permission, or > if scripts with shebang don't have exectable permission, rpmlint > warns about this ). I know. That's why i do all this :) > > The reason I am talking about this is that I think hardcoding %test_files > list should be avoided unless impossible. It's not impossible, but i'd have to: 1. create a patch that adds shebang lines, so all _test.rb have it; and 2. call chmod +x, or specify executable bit with %attr Do you think this would be OK ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:12:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091812.nB9ICcHY010613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #8 from Leon Keijser 2009-12-09 13:12:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > - Asking to the developers why gXlib has been included and if could be removed. > FYI: I used kdiff3 to check for differences between > python-xlib-0.14-5.fc12.noarch.html and the gXlib included version and there > are many differences. I have emailed upstream about this. > - Adding to the spec: > Requires: python >= 2.6 > Requires: pygtk2 >= 2.14 > Requires: hicolor-icon-theme Done. > - Change %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/* to %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ > As far as I understand this should own the directory and all its files. Done. New spec: http://leon.fedorapeople.org/files/googsystray/googsystray.spec New srpm: http://leon.fedorapeople.org/files/googsystray/googsystray-1.0.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864863 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:22:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:22:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091822.nB9IMbg4031198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 13:22:36 EDT --- This was indeed imported and built. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:22:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:22:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091822.nB9IMcu6031233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Bug 534168 depends on bug 534021, which changed state. Bug 534021 Summary: Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:24:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542341] Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091824.nB9IO6o6014685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542341 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 13:24:05 EDT --- This is not ready for review yet; needs to be moved from plexus-lang to plexus-i18n as per bug #542320. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091829.nB9ITnh5016195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 --- Comment #7 from Mat Booth 2009-12-09 13:29:48 EDT --- Cool. Easiest review I've ever done. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:28:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091828.nB9ISIDN015872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:30:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542320] Review Request: plexus-lang - Plexus language bundle access component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091830.nB9IUNSK001132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542320 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:34:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534168] Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091834.nB9IYBQl017425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 13:34:10 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 18:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 13:34:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540708] Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091834.nB9IYCb1017454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 Bug 540708 depends on bug 534168, which changed state. Bug 534168 Summary: Review Request: groovy - Agile dynamic language for the Java Platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534168 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 19:10:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:10:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091910.nB9JAT5X030869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 --- Comment #4 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-09 14:10:21 EDT --- [YES] source files match upstream: 613d7cfa23b70c0abae3fabb0a72ff5f lm_sensors-3.1.1.tar.bz2 [YES] package meets naming and versioning guidelines (lm_sensors has an exception that it can use underscore in its name) [YES] specfile is properly named [YES] specfile is cleanly written [NO] specfile uses macros consistently: %{SOURCEx} should probably be %{sourcex}, "Buildroot:" -> "BuildRoot:" [YES] dist tag is present [YES] build root is correct [YES] license field matches the actual license [YES] license is open source-compatible [YES] license text included in package [YES] latest version is being packaged [YES] BuildRequires are proper [YES] compiler flags are appropriate [YES] %clean is present [YES] package builds in mock [YES] debuginfo package looks complete [NO] rpmlint is silent $ rpmlint *.rpm lm_sensors.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre mv lm_sensors.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger mv lm_sensors.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger mv lm_sensors.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%trigger /usr/bin/sysconfig-lm_sensors-convert lm_sensors-libs.i686: W: summary-not-capitalized lm_sensors core libraries lm_sensors-libs.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libsensors.so.4.2.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 lm_sensors-libs.i686: W: no-documentation lm_sensors-libs.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libsensors.so.4.2.0 lm_sensors-libs.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libsensors.so.4.2.0 lm_sensors-sensord.i686: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sensord lm_sensors lm_sensors-sensord.i686: W: incoherent-init-script-name sensord ('lm_sensors-sensord', 'lm_sensors-sensordd') 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 8 warnings. Imho the following lines should be added to the spec file: %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig [YES] final provides and requires look sane [???] Please consider using "Requires: dmidecode" instead of "Requires: /usr/sbin/dmidecode" [OK] %check is not present [YES] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths in app package [YES] owns the directories it creates (no dirs) [YES] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't [YES] no duplicates in %files [YES] file permissions are appropriate [???] %defattr(-,root,root,-) should be used instead of %defattr(-,root,root) [YES] scriptlets ok [YES] code, not content [YES] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary [YES] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package [YES] no headers [YES] no pkgconfig files [YES] no libtool .la droppings [YES] not a GUI app -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 19:13:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:13:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091913.nB9JDSpP015278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 14:13:25 EDT --- emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 19:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:13:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091913.nB9JDqgY015413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 14:13:52 EDT --- emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 19:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091913.nB9JDhLP032035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 14:13:41 EDT --- emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 19:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:27:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545044] Review Request: CBFlib - A library for accessing CBF and imgCIF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912091927.nB9JRYqn021361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545044 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fenn at stanford.edu --- Comment #4 from Tim Fenn 2009-12-09 14:27:32 EDT --- Takanori: feel free to contribute towards the package I already have in review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 20:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545433] Review Request: shared-color-profiles - Shared color profiles for color management aware applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092000.nB9K0k3j031536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545433 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Richard Hughes 2009-12-09 15:00:45 EDT --- Imported, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 20:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:03:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546020] New: Review Request: php-swift-Swift - Free Feature-rich PHP Mailer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-swift-Swift - Free Feature-rich PHP Mailer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546020 Summary: Review Request: php-swift-Swift - Free Feature-rich PHP Mailer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: christof at damian.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-swift-Swift.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-swift-Swift-4.0.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Free Feature-rich PHP Mailer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 20:04:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:04:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092004.nB9K4lck032601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877 --- Comment #6 from Tim Fenn 2009-12-09 15:04:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > This isn't really a license, this is actually a patent grant. The maintainer of > this Fedora package should be careful to ensure that they do not apply patches > which would cause this software to be out of compliance with the STAR/CIF data > format standards (even though the copyright license permits it), because we > would no longer have permission to use the patent(s). > > Lifting FE-Legal. I'll do my best - if there is anything additional to make note of anywhere, let me know. Here's a version with most of the above comments/suggestions taken into account: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib-0.8.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 20:07:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:07:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544660] Review Request: php-channel-swift - Adds swift mailer project channel to PEAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092007.nB9K7T1X018238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544660 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |546020 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 20:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:07:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546020] Review Request: php-swift-Swift - Free Feature-rich PHP Mailer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092007.nB9K7SgE018196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546020 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |517191 Depends on| |544660 --- Comment #1 from Christof Damian 2009-12-09 15:07:27 EDT --- no rpmlint warnings / errors this depends on php-channel-swift , which also is waiting for a review ( Bug 544660 ) I packaged this in my quest to package Symfony ( Bug 517191 ) version 1.4 bundles this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 20:07:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:07:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092007.nB9K7TUZ018221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 Christof Damian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |546020 Bug 517191 depends on bug 517643, which changed state. Bug 517643 Summary: Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 20:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092031.nB9KV1S6009666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 15:31:00 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 20:32:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:32:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540708] Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092032.nB9KW0bP009956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-09 15:31:59 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 20:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 15:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092033.nB9KXkuc010243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(musuruan at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-09 15:33:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Sorry for taking so long to review, I monitor fedora-fonts-bugs-list but only > check for "wild" font package submissions when I have some free time. No problem. I'm not a font packager and I missed the suggestion to CC the fedora-fonts-bugs-list. > Anyway, review : > > 1. (comment) The font could probably be classified as cursive, but then the > boundary between "fantasy handwriting" and "realistic handwriting" is a bit > fuzzy > See /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt I choose "fantasy" because I browsed Fedora CVS for other handwriting fonts and this is what I found: brettfont-fonts: There is no fontconfig.conf http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel/ sj-fonts: "fantasy" http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/sj-fonts/devel/ dustin-domestic-manners-fonts: "fantasy" http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel/ > 2. (comment) The fontconfig templates have been tweaked a little in > fontpackages-devel, though the old templates you used will still work fine > > 3. (blocking) Since the font family name is "Digna's Handwriting" the package > should be named *dignas-handwriting-fonts > > 4. (blocking) Since this font is distributed via the Open Font LiBrary project, > the package should be named oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts I renamed the package, but I found really a lot of fonts in Fedora CVS that do not comply with this guideline. For example the aforementioned brettfont, icelandic-fonts, asana-math-fonts, roadstencil-fonts, sportrop, etc that are also distributed via the Open Font Library project. > 5. (non-blocking) There is no usable licensing statement in the font file, and > it is not distributed with a detached .txt licensing file, so the only > licensing trace is the OFL logo on OFLB. Since a web site can vanish at any > time it would be nice to ask upstream to distribute the font file with a > detached .txt licensing file in a zip archive (even better if the licensing > info is also added to the font metadata). If upstream does not want to joining > the copy of a mail where they state the font is OFL to the package as %doc > would be better than nothing. > > 6. (non-blocking) fontlint is not happy with this font, it has some problems > upstream should look at (cf attached repo-font-audit report) > > 7. (non-blocking) repo-font-audit detected partial lang coverage in the font, > it'd be nice if upstream completed the partial languages (though, at this date, > it may be difficult) I'll mail upstream about this, but I'm not confident at all that your points will be addressed. Upstream seems to have made only this font in its lifetime and it did it a long ago. > 8. (non-blocking) please add a page describing this font on the wiki so it is > documented with other Fedora fonts: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#1 > Since you're self-packaging the font, it does not need to be very exhautive, > just to provide minimal info about the font https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OFLB_Dignas_Handwriting_fonts Thanks for the review! http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts.spec http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts-20031109-2.fc12.src.rpm Changelog: - Changed package name to comply to Font Packaging Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 21:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:09:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092109.nB9L97DY018888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 Alexander Kahl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akahl at imttechnologies.com --- Comment #14 from Alexander Kahl 2009-12-09 16:09:05 EDT --- Hi Christof, I am the author of bug 351441 you've already discovered in the course of this request and want to warn you since I had to deal with Symfony upstream two times before leaving behind really negative impressions about cooperativeness and open-mindedness. Don't expect any support from the maintainer(s). If you want Propel support: I'm its package maintainer (surprise, surprise) but haven't updated it for ages - please drop me a line if you need an update, alternatively the package (actually they're two) could use a co-maintainer ;) Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 21:25:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:25:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092125.nB9LPHlF023075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-09 16:25:16 EDT --- Concerning the 1 or 4 my feeling is that your method you describe of 4 * (unpacks, patch, .... build, installs) is probably better in the long run. With the exception of the configure stage it is a series of loops(?). More of a pain now but better for future when you are updating the package. >Since the choice of building liblcgdm together with the LFC or the DPM is >arbitrary, the Requires should not depend on this choice, and since having >%{version}-%{release} Requires across source RPMs is a bad idea ... It's a bad idea normally but in this case its the same .tgz and so all the binary packages are essentially sub-packages to the binary end user. Certainly the two .src.rpms should/would be released together if they contain the same upstream update anyway. Obviously doing the loop avoids the situation. Also the lib you are building against is not the same instance as the one that this is then ran against. Its a private lib in the build. I was looking for precedents of two packages starting life with the same source. There are 66 tar.gz, .tgz or .bz2s in more than one rawhide package so they do exist but inspecting the list only these mostly probably for other reasons, e.g including private libs for some reason, but there are some that look similar to this one. e.g. //Python-2.6.4.tar.bz2 in python-0:2.6.4-3.fc13.src and //Python-2.6.4.tar.bz2 in python-docs-0:2.6.4-2.fc13.src There are certainly precedents for the multi build option, e.g one of mine ndoutils. Writing this really convinces me one package is the way to go. Lastly on a separate note rather than say /etc/init.d/lfc-mysql should/could it be /etc/init.d/lfc and an ghost and alternative to lfc-mysql , -postgres instances. Would be consistent with the other files managed under alternatives. Is it possible to make the init.d script db independent and avoid the situation completely? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 21:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:38:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092138.nB9LcCLX026041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #15 from Christof Damian 2009-12-09 16:38:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I am the author of bug 351441 you've already discovered in the course of this > request and want to warn you since I had to deal with Symfony upstream two > times before leaving behind really negative impressions about cooperativeness > and open-mindedness. Don't expect any support from the maintainer(s). I noticed that Symfony is certainly not the nicest software to package. > If you want Propel support: I'm its package maintainer (surprise, surprise) but > haven't updated it for ages - please drop me a line if you need an update, > alternatively the package (actually they're two) could use a co-maintainer ;) I thought I skip the propel support in the first release, because it would need an update to work with symfony 1.4 and Doctrine is the default now anyway. The good thing is that this makes me package other useful PHP software, even if Symfony never makes it :-) Doctrine is worth the effort at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 21:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092156.nB9Lui5f013322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-09 16:56:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Sorry for taking so long to review, I monitor fedora-fonts-bugs-list but only > > check for "wild" font package submissions when I have some free time. > > No problem. I'm not a font packager and I missed the suggestion to CC the > fedora-fonts-bugs-list. > > > Anyway, review : > > > > 1. (comment) The font could probably be classified as cursive, but then the > > boundary between "fantasy handwriting" and "realistic handwriting" is a bit > > fuzzy > > See /usr/share/fontconfig/templates/fontconfig-generics.txt > > I choose "fantasy" because I browsed Fedora CVS for other handwriting fonts and > this is what I found: > > brettfont-fonts: There is no fontconfig.conf > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/brettfont-fonts/devel/ > > sj-fonts: "fantasy" > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/sj-fonts/devel/ > > dustin-domestic-manners-fonts: "fantasy" > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/dustin-domestic-manners-fonts/devel/ If you want to say "handwriting" the correct generic is "cursive" in fontconfig and in css. "fantasy" is just where we dump fonts we can not categorize otherwise. > > 4. (blocking) Since this font is distributed via the Open Font LiBrary project, > > the package should be named oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts > > I renamed the package, but I found really a lot of fonts in Fedora CVS that do > not comply with this guideline. For example the aforementioned brettfont, > icelandic-fonts, asana-math-fonts, roadstencil-fonts, sportrop, etc that are > also distributed via the Open Font Library project. If you knew how I wished their packagers fixed those to comply with our naming guidelines (grumbles)? This is all stuff that antedates the formal font package naming guideline that was adopted last year. New packages can't use old problems as excuse to introduce new ones. > http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts.spec > http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts-20031109-2.fc12.src.rpm Will check those ASAP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 22:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092224.nB9MOA2C020710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #16 from David Hannequin 2009-12-09 17:24:08 EDT --- Hello, I added the symlink but you can specify in which category should be applied? Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 23:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092316.nB9NGa8x020843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-09 18:16:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377341) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377341) Multiple sources in .src.rpms For academic purposes the list of duplicate source files in .src.rpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 23:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530230] Review Request: plpa - Portable Linux Processor Affinity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092325.nB9NP0Gt004548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530230 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 23:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092328.nB9NSoAx005786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 Josiah Carlson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |josiah.carlson at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Josiah Carlson 2009-12-09 18:28:48 EDT --- I've updated the license for all files currently in the subversion repository at http://pype.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pype/ . If you would prefer to pull from subversion, it wouldn't bother me. Otherwise, you can wait a little longer for me to cut a release. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 23:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092345.nB9NjNam010077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-09 18:45:21 EDT --- Ping? What happened to this review request? Jaroslav, can you please add that Obsoletes line and that autostart .desktop file (either with OnlyShowIn=KDE; or in the KDE-specific /usr/share/autostart, of course) so we can continue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 9 23:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 18:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912092346.nB9NkTxN028296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-09 18:46:28 EDT --- (I can take care of adjusting kdebase-workspace and polkit-gnome once this is in.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 00:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 19:25:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545132] Review Request: yajl - Yet Another JSON Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100025.nBA0PdOP004983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545132 Daniel Berrange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Daniel Berrange 2009-12-09 19:25:37 EDT --- Built into rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 03:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100327.nBA3RWjd013441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #1 from Liberty 2009-12-09 22:27:31 EDT --- Updated package: Now it pass the rpmlint test and conform the guideline much more. spec: http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict-0.9.0-1.20091209gitc83b6cd.fc12.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 srpm: http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict-0.9.0-1.20091209gitc83b6cd.fc12.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 03:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:29:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226659] Merge Review: xsri In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100329.nBA3TMWb028213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226659 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-09 22:29:21 EDT --- re-re-re-ping? Any particular reason why this merge review is being ignored? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 03:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100339.nBA3dJd9016320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #52 from Arun SAG 2009-12-09 22:39:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > Sorry, we have two patches in the package: > > emacs-goodies-el.texi.patch which ist a small patch. But the only thing what I > can see in the patch is the try to replace the string 'emacs-goodies' whith > 'emacs-goodies-el'. This is not good, because the el subpackage should only > contains the emacs sources of this emacs releated package. this mean, in common > a user will only install the emacs-goodies package and the el subpackage may be > only installed, if the user want to examinate or to modified the emacs sources > of the macros. Hi, it does the reverse of what you have said :-) . It replaces 'emacs-goodies-el' string with 'emacs-goodies' > emacs-goodies-el_31.2-1.diff which has a size of approximately 477 Kilobytes > and lok like the way how applications are pached in Debina. I can't believe, > that this patch conatins only Fedora specific modifications. So please talk to > the upstream maintainer how this patch may integrated in the main source tar > ball. It is a upstream provided patch. i got the patch from _debian upstream itself_ http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/emacs-goodies-el/emacs-goodies-el_31.2-1.diff.gz ( i will add a comment about it in SPEC file). when applying this patch it gives birth to 48 more patches :-) @PSG could you please integrate those patches inside source tar ball if possible? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 03:39:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:39:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100339.nBA3dvlP016454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-09 22:39:55 EDT --- Ping? The fixes are all rather easy. Please give it a hand so we can close the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:01:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100401.nBA418gV004283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:01:02 EDT --- ndisc6-0.9.9-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:01:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100401.nBA41TFO022028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:01:29 EDT --- dia-CMOS-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:02:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100402.nBA42UML022417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:02:29 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:01:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538335] Review Request: dia-CMOS - Dia CMOS Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100401.nBA41YeC022067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538335 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc12 |0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:01:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100401.nBA41I5N021948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:01:17 EDT --- dia-electric2-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:01:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538339] Review Request: dia-electric2 - Dia electric2 Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100401.nBA41Mps021988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538339 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc12 |0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100402.nBA429hG022257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7.7-1.fc11 |0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538340] Review Request: dia-electronic - Dia electronic Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100402.nBA425OO022221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538340 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:02:04 EDT --- dia-electronic-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:02:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100402.nBA42aFj022475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.0-2.fc11 |1.3.0-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:03:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:03:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100403.nBA438SL022666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:03:06 EDT --- perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:00:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100400.nBA40k12021768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:00:45 EDT --- php-gettext-1.0.9-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-gettext'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0984 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:02:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100402.nBA42uGF022606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:02:55 EDT --- emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs-irsim-mode'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-1001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:03:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100403.nBA436Tl004873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:03:06 EDT --- libcue-1.3.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:02:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100402.nBA42h8E004740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:02:42 EDT --- dia-Digital-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:02:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538337] Review Request: dia-Digital - Dia Digital Shapes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100402.nBA42nbw004790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538337 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc12 |0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:03:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100403.nBA43Ba4004911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.0-2.el4 |1.3.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:03:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100403.nBA43DFX004950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.05-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:12:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100412.nBA4CWHF026692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:12:31 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:11:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100411.nBA4B2e3026215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:11:01 EDT --- javacsv-2.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update javacsv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12955 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:12:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:12:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539912] Review Request: javacsv - Stream-based Java library for reading and writing CSV and other delimited data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100412.nBA4CBpE026585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539912 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:12:10 EDT --- javacsv-2.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update javacsv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12964 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:16:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226659] Merge Review: xsri In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100416.nBA4GIIC010476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226659 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-12-09 23:16:17 EDT --- Just looking back at comment #1, I have no idea at all why you would think I am the last known maintainer. I've never had anything to do with the maintenance of this package. I fixed the license tag ages ago, but I fixed the license tags of many packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:12:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:12:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100412.nBA4CbEf008990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.003-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226659] Merge Review: xsri In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100421.nBA4LljS030782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226659 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-09 23:21:46 EDT --- and how would I know that you fixed license tag of many packages? :) I just saw your name in the changelog as the last human who edited the package. I am sorry, my bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100423.nBA4NMSK031233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:23:19 EDT --- unicornscan-0.4.7-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100422.nBA4MkHu031045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:22:44 EDT --- almanah-0.6.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update almanah'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100423.nBA4NT76014319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:23:28 EDT --- rubygem-ParseTree-3.0.4-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100423.nBA4NXml014355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.0.4-4.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:28:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100428.nBA4SWDf000815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:28:31 EDT --- unicornscan-0.4.7-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:29:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100429.nBA4Th6G001230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.4-4.fc12 |3.0.4-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100431.nBA4VEZu017475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:31:13 EDT --- perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:31:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100431.nBA4VpQI017640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:31:50 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:31:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541317] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured - Medium-weight, MVC, DB web framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100431.nBA4Vt4Z017679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541317 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.003-1.fc11 |0.003-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541807] Review Request: rubygem-ParseTree - Extracts the parse tree for a class/method and returns an s-expression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100429.nBA4TdAl016663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541807 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:29:38 EDT --- rubygem-ParseTree-3.0.4-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100427.nBA4RWvg016137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-09 23:27:31 EDT --- almanah-0.6.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update almanah'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13020 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:31:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100431.nBA4VJ2t002499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.05-2.fc11 |0.05-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 04:43:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 23:43:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100443.nBA4h6h7020629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #9 from Leon Keijser 2009-12-09 23:43:05 EDT --- Reply from the author about gXlib: """ python-xlib is an uncommon package. I absolutely despise having to install an obscure dependency (when downloading a source package), and I don't want to make anyone do the same. It's fine with package managers, but sucks from source. So I took the source, cut it down to what I needed, and included it (I really just needed a single feature from it). """ What i could do is in the %install section don't use the python installer but install each file seperately, excluding the gXlib dir and adding the python-xlib package to Requires ... but that seems like an awful lot of work and error prone. I could also just let it sit there in a subdir of the package and IMO it won't conflict with anything. Suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 05:37:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:37:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546138] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546138 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rootoutcast at hushmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: I don't have hosting space on fedora people so I put the on rapidshare. This is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 05:41:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:41:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546138] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100541.nBA5fkh3001413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546138 Joey Schofield changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 06:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530755] Review Request: dpic - A compiler for the pic language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100619.nBA6J7lu009899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530755 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mathstuf at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #9 from Ben Boeckel 2009-12-10 01:19:05 EDT --- Yes, I should be able to, finally getting to catch up from the end-of-semester rush. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 06:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543248] Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100617.nBA6HX8G009596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543248 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel 2009-12-10 01:17:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-jsonpickle Short Description: A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 06:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] New: Merge Review: kasumi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: kasumi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 Summary: Merge Review: kasumi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/kasumi/ We missed the merge review for kasumi somehow, guess because of Bug#165778 and/or Bug#165779, which apparently hasn't been done the certain reviews. so we need to revisit to ensure it's better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 08:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100826.nBA8QskX022691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-10 03:26:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Also the lib you are building against is not the same instance as the > one that this is then ran against. Its a private lib in the build. No, I do not build libraries multiple times. E.g. liblcgdm is only built by the lfc SRPM, the other three has the lcgdm-devel as a build dependency. > Lastly on a separate note rather than say > /etc/init.d/lfc-mysql > should/could it be > /etc/init.d/lfc > > and an ghost and alternative to lfc-mysql , -postgres instances. Would > be consistent with the other files managed under alternatives. > Is it possible to make the init.d script db independent and avoid the > situation completely? No, the alternatives in Fedora has a --initscript option for this purpose. These initscripts should however not themselves be handled by alternatives, and must have different names for different altenatives. The alternatives system makes sure that only one of the alternative's initscript is active at the same time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 08:39:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:39:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100839.nBA8dc7S009246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |521996 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 08:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100839.nBA8daIF009199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |521996 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 08:39:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:39:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100839.nBA8dZhB009157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Depends on| |521989, 522207 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 09:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100915.nBA9FULR018107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-10 04:15:29 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 09:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:15:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100915.nBA9FOM3018070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-10 04:15:23 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 09:14:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:14:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100914.nBA9ExHb017671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #16 from Alexander Kahl 2009-12-10 04:14:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I noticed that Symfony is certainly not the nicest software to package. Definitely. > I thought I skip the propel support in the first release, because it would need > an update to work with symfony 1.4 and Doctrine is the default now anyway. To me it seems the same in general, no one asks for Propel anymore because everyone migrated over to Doctrine. > The good thing is that this makes me package other useful PHP software, even if > Symfony never makes it :-) Doctrine is worth the effort at least. Absolutely! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 09:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100934.nBA9Yek0007915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-10 04:34:39 EDT --- woff-0.20091126-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woff-0.20091126-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 09:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:34:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100934.nBA9Yj1X007981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-10 04:34:44 EDT --- woff-0.20091126-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woff-0.20091126-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 09:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:40:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] New: Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 Summary: Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: huzaifas at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/libtar-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/libtar-ng-1.2.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: libtar-ng is a fork of the libtar library under the MIT license. koji rawhide build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1866790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 09:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541661] Merge Review: perl-DBD-SQLite - Self Contained RDBMS in a DBI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100947.nBA9lcXu027282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541661 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-12-10 04:47:37 EDT --- Thank you for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 09:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912100956.nBA9u6AJ014285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-10 04:56:03 EDT --- 1)I assume pki-native-tools will install %{_datadir}/pki/ and own directory. Currently I wonder whether %{_datadir}/pki/ is owned by only pki-native-tools or can be owned by this package also? If %{_datadir}/pki/ is supposed to be owned by pki-native-tools then you may need Requires: pki-native-tools in spec 2)why obsoletes and provides included here? Provides: pki-common-ui = %{version}.%{release} Obsoletes: pki-common-ui < %{version}.%{release} I can't see package pki-common-ui in fedora. 3) why following Requires is needed? Requires: bash >= 3.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 10:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101006.nBAA6tGb016695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #27 from Matthias Saou 2009-12-10 05:06:53 EDT --- I'll look into becoming your sponsor if needed. For now, a few comments about the moovida.spec file : * You should remove the first line (the python dir comment) * You're mixing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} when you shouldn't * You're inconsistently skipping one or two lines between sections * Putting all (build)requirements on a single line makes them hard to read... I personally prefer putting one per line (or a few more if they're related), not going over 80 columns and keeping the same order for requirements and buildrequirements. * The plain explicit "python" requirement is clearly not needed * The "%doc COPYING LICENSE*" line should be below the %defattr for consistency * Why are some files being forced to mode 755? If there is a reason, you should add a comment above, because doing that is at least partly wrong since they end up listed twice, possibly with different modes (and this might be an undefined behaviour, though it's certainly the last one who wins). The proper fix here if those files never need to be executed directly might be to remove the "#!" line instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 10:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101007.nBAA71iH031741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-10 05:06:59 EDT --- 1) why is it necessary to list explicitly selinux-policy-devel with versions for f9/f10/f11? 2) why not to choose following as Group? Group: System Environment/Base 3)Please add comments in SPEC on why rpmlint messages for pre/post/preun/postun is valid? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 10:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:21:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101021.nBAALfqB003351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-10 05:21:40 EDT --- woffTools-0.1-0.1.684svn.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woffTools-0.1-0.1.684svn.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 10:21:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:21:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101021.nBAALZPq003292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-10 05:21:33 EDT --- woffTools-0.1-0.1.684svn.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woffTools-0.1-0.1.684svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 10:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101019.nBAAJFdP002452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #20 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-12-10 05:19:13 EDT --- Sorry, I was AFK for a while. Last comments: - Provides need a full version-release in the subpackages - rpmlint is not clean: [ruben at slice SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/mysql-mmm-*3* mysql-mmm.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US mysql-mmm.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/mysql-mmm 0750 mysql-mmm.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/mysql-mmm 0750 mysql-mmm.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mysql-mmm/mmm_common.conf 0640 mysql-mmm.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/mysql-mmm-2.0.10/README mysql-mmm.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/mysql-mmm 0750 mysql-mmm-agent.noarch: W: no-documentation mysql-mmm-agent.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mysql-mmm/mmm_agent.conf 0640 mysql-mmm-agent.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/init.d/mysql-mmm-agent mysql-mmm-monitor.noarch: W: no-documentation mysql-mmm-monitor.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mysql-mmm/mmm_mon.conf 0640 mysql-mmm-monitor.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/init.d/mysql-mmm-monitor mysql-mmm-tools.noarch: W: no-documentation Most errors are harmless in my opinion, except for the directory permissions on /var/lib/mysql-mmm and /var/run/mysql-mmm, there's no harm in making them 0755. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 10:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:33:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101033.nBAAXQb2006014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-10 05:33:24 EDT --- 1) you don't need any perl packages as Requires, you can safely remove them as yum will auto installs them. 2) After removing those perl requires when I try to install package I see pkiperl file is needed by this package. May I know which package is supposed to provide pkiperl file? 3) why not to choose following as Group? Group: System Environment/Base -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 11:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101103.nBAB3M9l013444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #29 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-10 06:03:19 EDT --- Hi Chris, any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 11:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:05:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101105.nBAB5INS030939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-10 06:05:15 EDT --- any progress here if not then please close this if issue is not getting fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 11:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:09:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541664] Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod - Perl module for checking for POD errors in files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101109.nBAB9DcC031347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541664 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-12-10 06:09:12 EDT --- Thanks for your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 11:12:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:12:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226050] Merge Review: libtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101112.nBABCfmJ015867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226050 --- Comment #8 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-10 06:12:39 EDT --- [YES] source files match upstream: a4b36980765003b47dd75ac9429f4f11 libtool-2.2.6b.tar.lzma [YES] package meets naming and versioning guidelines [YES] specfile is properly named [YES] specfile is cleanly written [???] uses macros consistently: %{name} should be used instead of $PACKAGE and %{_datadir} instead of $datadir [YES] dist tag is present [YES] build root is correct [YES] license field matches the actual license [YES] license is open source-compatible [YES] license text included in package [YES] latest version is being packaged [???] BuildRequires are proper: no need to include gcc and gcc-c++, because they are added automatically [YES] compiler flags are appropriate [YES] %clean is present [YES] package builds in mock [YES] debuginfo package looks complete [NO] rpmlint is silent $ rpmlint *.rpm libtool.i686: E: no-binary libtool.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libtool-2.2.6/ChangeLog.2002 libtool.i686: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/libtool/config/ltmain.sh libtool.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libtool-2.2.6/ChangeLog.1998 libtool.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libtool-2.2.6/ChangeLog.1999 libtool.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/libtool-2.2.6/ChangeLog.1997 libtool-debuginfo.i686: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/libtool-2.2.6b/libltdl/.libs libtool-debuginfo.i686: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/libtool-2.2.6b/libltdl/.libs libtool-ltdl.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libltdl.so.7.2.1 exit at GLIBC_2.0 libtool-ltdl-devel.i686: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 8 warnings. [YES] final provides and requires look sane [OK] %check is present, but "make check" is commented out [YES] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths in app package [YES] owns the directories it creates [YES] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't [YES] no duplicates in %files [YES] file permissions are appropriate [YES] scriptlets ok [YES] code, not content [YES] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary [YES] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package [YES] no headers [YES] no pkgconfig files [YES] no libtool .la droppings [YES] not a GUI app -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 11:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226441] Merge Review: sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101115.nBABFMhG016691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226441 --- Comment #3 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-10 06:15:19 EDT --- [???] spec file contain source0 http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/dist/sudo-%{version}.tar.gz, but the file has been moved to http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/dist/OLD/sudo-%{version}.tar.gz [YES] source files match upstream: af672524b2c854a67612bf4c743f58b8 sudo-1.7.1.tar.gz [YES] package meets naming and versioning guidelines [YES] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently [YES] dist tag is present [YES] build root is correct [YES] license field matches the actual license [YES] license is open source-compatible [YES] license text included in package [NO] latest version is being packaged: latest version is sudo 1.7.2 [YES] BuildRequires are proper [YES] compiler flags are appropriate [YES] %clean is present [YES] package builds in mock [YES] debuginfo package looks complete [NO] rpmlint is silent $ rpmlint ./sudo-1.7.1-7.fc13.src.rpm sudo.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 70, tab: line 76) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint ./sudo-1.7.1-7.fc13.i686.rpm sudo.i686: E: non-readable /etc/sudoers 0440 sudo.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sudo-1.7.1/ChangeLog sudo.i686: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/sudo 0700 sudo.i686: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/sudoedit root 04111 sudo.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sudoedit 04111 sudo.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sudoedit 04111 sudo.i686: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/sudo root 04111 sudo.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sudo 04111 sudo.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/sudo 04111 sudo.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 2 warnings. The rpmlint output is appropriate for sudo. [YES] final provides and requires look sane [OK] no %check is present [OK] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths in app package [OK] owns the directories it creates [OK] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't [YES] no duplicates in %files [YES] file permissions are appropriate [YES] scriptlets ok [YES] code, not content [YES] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary [YES] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package [YES] no headers [YES] no pkgconfig files [YES] no libtool .la droppings [YES] not a GUI app -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 11:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101116.nBABGAPe001152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-10 06:16:07 EDT --- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1866911 Please verify again for - drop buildroot ----------------- Package APPROVED ----------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 11:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:18:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225980] Merge Review: latex2html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101118.nBABIAqv017324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225980 --- Comment #2 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-10 06:18:09 EDT --- [YES] source files match upstream: 275ab6cfa8ca9328446b7f40d8dc302e latex2html-2008.tar.gz [YES] source files match upstream: 7951e334e313a1a88946a1171c72e78f l2h-2K8-jp20081220.tar.gz [YES] package meets naming and versioning guidelines [YES] specfile is properly named, uses macros consistently [???] specfile is cleanly written. The spec file contains a lot of perl one-liners. Wouldn't it be better to write a patch that fixes the scripts generating wrong paths instead of those regular expressions? Is it too difficult? [YES] dist tag is present [YES] build root is correct [YES] license field matches the actual license [YES] license is open source-compatible [FAIL] license text included in package: license not included in the package It is included in the source archive. It should be installed in "/usr/share/doc/latex2html-2008/" [YES] latest version is being packaged [YES] BuildRequires are proper [YES] package builds in mock [NO] rpmlint is silent $rpmlint ./latex2html-2008-3.fc13.src.rpm latex2html.src:125: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build perl -pi -e"s,${RPM_BUILD_ROOT},," l2hconf.pm latex2html.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 79, tab: line 92) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint ./latex2html-2008-3.fc13.noarch.rpm latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/latex2html/cweb2html/cweb2html 0644 /usr/bin/perl latex2html.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/latex2html/docs/.latex2html-init latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/jlatex2html/makeseg/makeseg 0644 /usr/bin/perl latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/latex2html/makemap 0644 /usr/bin/perl latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/jlatex2html/makemap 0644 /usr/bin/perl latex2html.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/jlatex2html/cweb2html/makemake.pl /usr/local/bin/perl latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/jlatex2html/cweb2html/makemake.pl 0644 /usr/local/bin/perl latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/jlatex2html/cweb2html/cweb2html 0644 /usr/bin/perl latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/latex2html/makeseg/makeseg 0644 /usr/bin/perl latex2html.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/jlatex2html/docs/.latex2html-init latex2html.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/latex2html/cweb2html/makemake.pl /usr/local/bin/perl latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/latex2html/cweb2html/makemake.pl 0644 /usr/local/bin/perl 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 2 warnings. [YES] final provides and requires look sane [OK] %check is not present [YES] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths in app package [YES] owns the directories it creates [YES] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't [YES] no duplicates in %files [YES] file permissions are appropriate [YES] scriptlets ok [YES] code, not content [YES] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary [???] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package Documentation is not marked as %doc, and it is included in both /usr/share/latex2html/doc and in /usr/share/jlatex2html It is not compiled (just the .tex source, no .dvi/pdf/ps) It should be compiled, marked by %doc in %files, and it should not be included in /usr/share/latex2html. The file readme.hthtml should be in %doc /usr/share/makeseg/makeseg.tex should be built and the .dvi/pdf/ps should be included as %doc, but the .tex file should not be included. [YES] no headers [YES] no pkgconfig files [YES] no libtool .la droppings [YES] not a GUI app -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 11:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226213] Merge Review: openjade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101121.nBABLHME002639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226213 --- Comment #3 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-10 06:21:15 EDT --- [YES] source files match upstream: 7df692e3186109cc00db6825b777201e openjade-1.3.2.tar.gz [YES] package meets naming and versioning guidelines [YES] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently [YES] dist tag is present [YES] build root is correct [YES] license field matches the actual license [YES] license is open source-compatible [YES] license text included in package [YES] latest version is being packaged [YES] BuildRequires are proper [YES] compiler flags are appropriate [YES] %clean is present [YES] package builds in mock [YES] debuginfo package looks complete [NO] rpmlint is silent $rpmlint ./openjade-1.3.2-35.fc13.src.rpm openjade.src: W: no-url-tag openjade.src:5: E: prereq-use sgml-common >= 0.5 openjade.src:15: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes jade openjade.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jade openjade.src:217: W: macro-in-%changelog %doc 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. $rpmlint ./openjade-1.3.2-35.fc13.i686.rpm openjade.i686: W: no-url-tag openjade.i686: W: obsolete-not-provided openjade-devel openjade.i686: W: self-obsoletion jade obsoletes jade 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Prereq is used, but Requires (or BuildRequires?) should be used "URL: http://openjade.sourceforge.net/" should be added to the SPEC file. [NO] final provides and requires look sane It should probably not contain both "Provides:jade" and "Obsoletes:jade" [OK] no %check is present [OK] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths in app package It includes .so.0, but not .so in the app package. [YES] owns the directories it creates [YES] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't [YES] no duplicates in %files [YES] file permissions are appropriate [YES] scriptlets ok [YES] code, not content [YES] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary [YES] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package [YES] no headers [YES] no pkgconfig files [YES] no libtool .la droppings [YES] not a GUI app The following code is no longer necessary, because .la files are not packaged: # Fix up libtool libraries find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' | \ xargs perl -p -i -e "s|-L$RPM_BUILD_DIR[\w/.-]*||g" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 11:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:44:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101144.nBABiRU2023083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 Yuan Yijun changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bbbush.yuan at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Yuan Yijun 2009-12-10 06:44:26 EDT --- firstly, make sure you have a FAS account, and join the packager group. secondly, pickup some another package to review, in order to show your understanding to packaging guidelines. there is no sponsors in FZUG community (yet), however I believe many people from FZUG can help to review your package, and we may redirect some sponsors to you. Just keep active! Or you and your package will be forgotten. btw your updated spec link is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 11:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226567] Merge Review: xmltex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101149.nBABn57b024170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226567 --- Comment #2 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-12-10 06:49:03 EDT --- in short: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + MUST[1]: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review + MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . + MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines + MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - MUST[2]: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task + MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture + MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ? MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro 0 MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. + MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker + MUST: Package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory + MUST: Package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content + MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application 0 MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package 0 MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package 0 MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' 0 MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package 0 MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built 0 MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 and with comments: ------------------ 1) rpmlint *.spec *.src.rpm noarch/* xmltex.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/xmltex latex xmltex.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/pdfxmltex pdftex 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. looks good for me 2) Source file can't be downloaded $ wget ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/macros/xmltex-1.9.tar.gz --2009-12-10 11:52:00-- ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/macros/xmltex-1.9.tar.gz => ?xmltex-1.9.tar.gz? Resolving ftp.tex.ac.uk... 128.232.104.10 Connecting to ftp.tex.ac.uk|128.232.104.10|:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! ==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done. ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD (1) /tex-archive/macros ... done. ==> SIZE xmltex-1.9.tar.gz ... done. ==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR xmltex-1.9.tar.gz ... No such file ?xmltex-1.9.tar.gz?. 3) Why is %doc readme.txt gziped? 4) xmltex.1 should go upstream. Add comment in spec about its status. Was it sent upstream (and when)? was it accepted/rejected? is this "fedora specific" ? please fix this issues, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 12:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541668] Merge Review: perl-XML-XPath - XPath parser and evaluator for Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101228.nBACS3Kp017548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541668 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-12-10 07:28:02 EDT --- Thank you for your review. Your comments were fixed for rawhide and F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 12:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:31:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541666] Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage - Check for pod coverage in your distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101231.nBACVib7018407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541666 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-12-10 07:31:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage Short Description: Check for pod coverage in your distribution Owners: mmaslano Branches: InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 12:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:34:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546212] New: Review Request: planner2html - convert planner files to html Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: planner2html - convert planner files to html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546212 Summary: Review Request: planner2html - convert planner files to html Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/planner2html.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/planner2html-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Command line utility to convert planner files to html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 12:38:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:38:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546212] Review Request: planner2html - convert planner files to html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101238.nBACc8fv019633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546212 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jwulf at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2009-12-10 07:38:06 EDT --- *** Bug 546178 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 12:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:35:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541662] Merge Review: perl-Pod-Coverage - Checks if the documentation of a module is comprehensive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101235.nBACZXwn019292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541662 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-12-10 07:35:32 EDT --- Thank you for you review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 12:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:50:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226213] Merge Review: openjade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101250.nBACo9BA022691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226213 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-10 07:50:08 EDT --- Thanks for review... (In reply to comment #3) > [NO] rpmlint is silent > > $rpmlint ./openjade-1.3.2-35.fc13.src.rpm > openjade.src: W: no-url-tag > openjade.src:5: E: prereq-use sgml-common >= 0.5 > openjade.src:15: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes jade > openjade.src:16: W: unversioned-explicit-provides jade > openjade.src:217: W: macro-in-%changelog %doc > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. > > $rpmlint ./openjade-1.3.2-35.fc13.i686.rpm > openjade.i686: W: no-url-tag > openjade.i686: W: obsolete-not-provided openjade-devel > openjade.i686: W: self-obsoletion jade obsoletes jade > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. > > Prereq is used, but Requires (or BuildRequires?) should be used > "URL: http://openjade.sourceforge.net/" should be added to the SPEC file. Rpmlint warnings fixed > > [NO] final provides and requires look sane > It should probably not contain both "Provides:jade" and "Obsoletes:jade" Probably could be kept - versioned ... last version is ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/archive.download.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/6.2/en/os/i386/SRPMS/jade-1.2.1-9.src.rpm from Red Hat 6.2 . I see this harmless, I'll comment this and keep it > > The following code is no longer necessary, because .la files are not packaged: > # Fix up libtool libraries > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' | \ > xargs perl -p -i -e "s|-L$RPM_BUILD_DIR[\w/.-]*||g" Dropped... Fixed and built as openjade-1.3.2-36.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 13:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:08:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101308.nBAD8siT009799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #3 from Liberty 2009-12-10 08:08:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Updated package: > Now it pass the rpmlint test and conform the guideline much more. > > spec: > http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict-0.9.0-1.20091209gitc83b6cd.fc12.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 > srpm: > http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict-0.9.0-1.20091209gitc83b6cd.fc12.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 Sorry the spec file is wrong, here is the spec file: http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 13:44:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:44:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101344.nBADi8MR018990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #4 from Liberty 2009-12-10 08:44:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > firstly, make sure you have a FAS account, and join the packager group. > > secondly, pickup some another package to review, in order to show your > understanding to packaging guidelines. > > there is no sponsors in FZUG community (yet), however I believe many people > from FZUG can help to review your package, and we may redirect some sponsors to > you. Just keep active! Or you and your package will be forgotten. > > btw your updated spec link is wrong. Thank you very much for providing me such valuable information. I will try to review some other packages and keep active! I am using fedora for about 4 years and really want to contribute something to the fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 13:52:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:52:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: CQRlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101352.nBADqXqx009556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-10 08:52:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Uah, the file name of the shared library include full version number. :-( > > It's not good. Yep, but - this can be intentional. It's a matter of design. If, for some reasons, upstream wants it this way, you have to stick with what upstream wants - In most cases, however --release is a matter of upstreams not being familiar with Linux shared libs. Please also read info libtool 'Versioning' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 14:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:04:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101404.nBAE4EGP028836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-10 09:04:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Concerning the 1 or 4 my feeling is that your method you describe of > 4 * (unpacks, patch, .... build, installs) is probably better > in the long run. > > With the exception of the configure stage it is a series of loops(?). > More of a pain now but better for future when you are updating the > package. OK, here is an attempt to build everything in the same SRPM: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/lcgdm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/lcgdm-1.7.3.1-5.fc12.src.rpm It is quite a long specfile, and it creates 28 binary packages. It is not as messy as I feared. One advantage of this approach would be that there is only need for one review and not four. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 14:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:36:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226213] Merge Review: openjade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101436.nBAEaUA8006297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226213 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 14:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101437.nBAEbOsX022917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 14:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101438.nBAEcbvJ007025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(npajkovs at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 14:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:44:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226050] Merge Review: libtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101444.nBAEi0NX008733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226050 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(karsten at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 14:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:49:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101449.nBAEnUYe026432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #5 from Yuan Yijun 2009-12-10 09:49:29 EDT --- I cannot connect to http://site.google.com because of, you know, our Great Fire Wall of China. Please consider to use another service that is not blocked, and is easy to reach (provide a clean URL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 14:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:48:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225980] Merge Review: latex2html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101448.nBAEmLkF026095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225980 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(jnovy at redhat.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 14:47:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226441] Merge Review: sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101447.nBAEl6Dh025875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226441 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-10 09:47:04 EDT --- I am giving fedora-review+, there is nothing to be fixed on this package. This review can be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 15:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:04:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545047] Review Request: NearTree - An API for finding nearest neighbors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101504.nBAF4BYs031436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545047 --- Comment #7 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-10 10:04:09 EDT --- After the discussion with upstream developer, he has no objection to remove -release. I'll prepare a patch to remove -release and propose to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 15:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:03:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545045] Review Request: CQRlib - ANSI C API for quaternion arithmetic and rotation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101503.nBAF303G015075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545045 --- Comment #8 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-12-10 10:02:59 EDT --- After the discussion with upstream developer, he has no objection to remove -release. I'll prepare a patch to remove -release and propose to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 15:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:04:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101504.nBAF4eEl015502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 --- Comment #3 from Stjepan Gros 2009-12-10 10:04:39 EDT --- Please, double check it. I just downloaded source from the OpenVAS site and the checksum matches: # sha1sum openvas-libnasl-2.0.2.tar.gz /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/openvas-libnasl-2.0.2.tar.gz 7a4342418de2a591353a4404455ca97a49d589d8 openvas-libnasl-2.0.2.tar.gz 7a4342418de2a591353a4404455ca97a49d589d8 /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/openvas-libnasl-2.0.2.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 15:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:18:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226665] Merge Review: yp-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101518.nBAFIFHx004188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226665 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-10 10:18:12 EDT --- The rpmlint warnings were fixed. The package was updated to the newest version. Thank you, Jiri, for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 15:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:20:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226669] Merge Review: zip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101520.nBAFKiBG020981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226669 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 15:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:23:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226213] Merge Review: openjade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101523.nBAFNRuH006045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226213 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |openjade-1.3.2-36.fc13 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-10 10:23:25 EDT --- Thanks for review, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 15:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541494] Review Request: openvas-client : openvas-client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101532.nBAFWisN024768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541494 --- Comment #2 from Stjepan Gros 2009-12-10 10:32:43 EDT --- Ops, wrong bug ID. The correct one should be 538299. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 15:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:32:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541494] Review Request: openvas-client : openvas-client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101532.nBAFW3Hv024617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541494 Stjepan Gros changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stjepan.gros at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Stjepan Gros 2009-12-10 10:32:01 EDT --- But the openvas-libraries that are in Fedora are at version 1.0.2 while this client requires 2.x.y? And besides, isn't this duplicate of the bug 538297? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 15:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:38:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225726] Merge Review: emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101538.nBAFc217010561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225726 --- Comment #4 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-10 10:37:59 EDT --- It seems that verilog mode in Emacs is up to date: http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/emacs/lisp/progmodes/verilog-mode.el?root=emacs&view=log The vhdl-mode in Emacs is old, so someone who uses and understands this mode should update it. Please feel free to open a new bug (RFE) about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 16:10:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] New: Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 Summary: Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 532337 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-app-installer.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-app-installer-0.4.0-0.1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The Moblin Application Installer is a client application that is launched from the myzone panel on your Moblin netbook that provides a logically categorized list of applications that you can choose to install. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1867399 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 16:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225726] Merge Review: emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101618.nBAGI1W8024086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225726 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-10 11:17:59 EDT --- I have already done so http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2009-12/msg00232.html However, I'm hoping someone else to do it instead of me since first I'm using emacs since a week, second I'm crowded with huge amount of workload for FEL. The vhdl-mode is heavily targeting proprietary vhdl simulators while, we have opensource vhdl simulators on fedora : e.g ghdl and freehdl. I've created a patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2009-12/msg00309.html There are a few more improvements which need to be made. But I don't have much experience with emacs to get that fixed. Upstream is enforcing compatibility with older versions. The help of an experienced emacs user would be appreciated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 16:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:31:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523526] Review Request: clutter-box2d - 2D physics simulation layer for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101631.nBAGVEcN011050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523526 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|532337(FedoraMoblin21) |538447(Moblin22) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 16:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:31:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101631.nBAGV9gZ010965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|532337(FedoraMoblin21) |538447(Moblin22) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 16:30:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:30:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101630.nBAGUAdd030182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|532337(FedoraMoblin21) |538447(Moblin22) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 16:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101636.nBAGatxM013009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #6 from Liberty 2009-12-10 11:36:54 EDT --- It is hard to find a good host place. How about this: ftp://xth_4709239:123456 at ftp.xtreemhost.com/htdocs/goldendict-0.9.0-1.20091209gitc83b6cd.fc12.src.rpm ftp://xth_4709239:123456 at ftp.xtreemhost.com/htdocs/goldendict.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 16:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:51:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546301] Review Request: moblin-app-installer - Moblin Application Installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101651.nBAGpRTb017569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546301 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-10 11:51:26 EDT --- Updated. SPEC as before. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-app-installer-0.4.0-0.2.fc12.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1867514 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 17:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101712.nBAHCSxN010785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-10 12:12:27 EDT --- #001: BuildRequires : - glibc-devel requires glibc-headers already. You can remove glibc-headers from BR ( rpm -qR glibc-devel ) - poky-depends is a meta package. In other words, it doesn't build anything, hence it should not require an BR. That said, the spec file does not build anything except copying files to the buildroot. So I think you should remove all the BRs #002: Requires: In your spec file : poky-scripts requires poky-depends. poky-depends requires poky-scripts. It seems to be a circular-dependency. Shouldn't all the requires (since poky-depends is a metapackage) of poky-depends be put as requires for poky-scripts and remove poky-depends entirely ? #003: check the explicit requires with rpm -qR package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 17:26:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:26:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101726.nBAHQAt0027371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-10 12:26:09 EDT --- #001: Will remove glibc-headers. A person can choose to use the poky-scripts OR the poky-depends package. The poky-depends package is required if the developer wants to download and build Poky. The poky-scripts package is used if the developer only wants to test some downloaded pre-built images. So, we need to have BRs in the sub-package. Is that ok? #002: Yes, the circular dependency is wrong. I will remove it. #003 Explicit requires for what? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 17:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:49:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226567] Merge Review: xmltex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101749.nBAHnaXJ020955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226567 --- Comment #3 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-12-10 12:49:34 EDT --- I've forgotten one: 5) wrong buildroot tag https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag """The BuildRoot value MUST be below %{_tmppath}/ and MUST contain at least %{name}, %{version} and %{release}""" The recommended values for the BuildRoot tag is %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) Btw, if used only for Fedora 10+, there's no need to define BuildRoot tag at all: """The RPM in Fedora 10 defines a default buildroot so in Fedora 10 and above it is no longer necessary to define a buildroot tag.""" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 17:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:48:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226231] Merge Review: passivetex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101748.nBAHm4fT020722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226231 --- Comment #2 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-12-10 12:48:02 EDT --- in short: Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + MUST[1]: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review + MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} - MUST[4,5]: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . + MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines - MUST[2]: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] + MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - MUST[3]: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task + MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture + MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines 0 MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro 0 MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] + MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker + MUST: Package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory + MUST: Package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content 0 MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application 0 MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package 0 MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package 0 MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' 0 MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package 0 MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built 0 MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 and with comments: 1) rpmlint *.spec *.src.rpm noarch/* passivetex.spec: W: no-%build-section passivetex.src: W: no-%build-section 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings please add %build section even if empty 2)What is the LPPL license based on? It seems it should be "Copyright only" ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/CopyrightOnly ) 3)Source link is not valid $ wget http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/passivetex-1.25.zip --2009-12-10 18:37:32-- http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/passivetex-1.25.zip Resolving www.tei-c.org.uk... 163.1.2.156 Connecting to www.tei-c.org.uk|163.1.2.156|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-12-10 18:37:32 ERROR 404: Not Found. 4) Missing info for patches https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Every patch in spec file should contain a comment describing: * why is that patch used - for example bug number * upstream information - was it sent upstream (and when)? taken from upstream? was it accepted/rejected? is this patch "fedora specific" ? 5) wrong buildroot tag https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag """The BuildRoot value MUST be below %{_tmppath}/ and MUST contain at least %{name}, %{version} and %{release}""" The recommended values for the BuildRoot tag is %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) Btw, if used only for Fedora 10+, there's no need to define BuildRoot tag at all: """The RPM in Fedora 10 defines a default buildroot so in Fedora 10 and above it is no longer necessary to define a buildroot tag.""" Please fix these issues, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 18:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546376] New: Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 Summary: Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000-1.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library for ghc. Successful Koji builds for F-11, F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1867636 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1867644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 18:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101838.nBAIc3CE015495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #21 from BJ Dierkes 2009-12-10 13:38:01 EDT --- I've fixed the rpmlint errors except for the following: $ !rpmli rpmlint -i RPMS/noarch/mysql-mmm-*4* mysql-mmm.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mysql-mmm/mmm_common.conf 0640 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). mysql-mmm-agent.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mysql-mmm/mmm_agent.conf 0640 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). mysql-mmm-monitor.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mysql-mmm/mmm_mon.conf 0640 The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. Is it _really_ preferred that everyone can read all config files, or can I ignore these? Seems that would be a security issue if config files have sensitive information like passwords. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 18:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:58:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101858.nBAIw0O8021275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|limb at jcomserv.net |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #50 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-10 13:57:53 EDT --- OK, I have take a short look on your package and have to recorgnise, that the packaged release is obsolete, because this is an old review. So it may be nice, if you can create a package for the current release 3.1. If this package may ok, I'm willing to sponsor you. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 19:05:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:05:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101905.nBAJ5V8Z024285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2009-12-10 14:05:25 EDT --- npajkovs, may I assume you will take care if this ? As for the review, Thanks! Here is my take on things which need fixing: (In reply to comment #4) > [NO] specfile uses macros consistently: %{SOURCEx} should probably be > %{sourcex}, "Buildroot:" -> "BuildRoot:" Writing SOURCE with all caps is quite normal in spec files (most do it this way), and is allowed as long as it is in all caps everywhere inside the specfile, which it is. The buildroot thingie should be fixed. > [NO] rpmlint is silent > > $ rpmlint *.rpm > lm_sensors.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre mv > lm_sensors.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger mv > lm_sensors.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger mv > lm_sensors.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%trigger > /usr/bin/sysconfig-lm_sensors-convert These can all be ignored > lm_sensors-libs.i686: W: summary-not-capitalized lm_sensors core libraries Should be fixed > lm_sensors-libs.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libsensors.so.4.2.0 > exit at GLIBC_2.0 > lm_sensors-libs.i686: W: no-documentation Can be ignored > lm_sensors-libs.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin > /usr/lib/libsensors.so.4.2.0 > lm_sensors-libs.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun Oops, see below. > /usr/lib/libsensors.so.4.2.0 > lm_sensors-sensord.i686: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sensord > lm_sensors > lm_sensors-sensord.i686: W: incoherent-init-script-name sensord > ('lm_sensors-sensord', 'lm_sensors-sensordd') Can be ignored. > Imho the following lines should be added to the spec file: > %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig > %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig > Correct, and the ld_config from the main package %post should removed And the main package's: %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig Should be removed completely. > [???] Please consider using "Requires: dmidecode" instead of "Requires: > /usr/sbin/dmidecode" No need to not use file requires when the files are in one of /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. > [???] %defattr(-,root,root,-) should be used instead of %defattr(-,root,root) Can / should be fixed. Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 19:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:08:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101908.nBAJ8KwR011580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 --- Comment #22 from BJ Dierkes 2009-12-10 14:08:17 EDT --- Latest build fixing the above issues, with exception of changing the mode of the config files: http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mysql-mmm.spec http://5dollarwhitebox.org/tmp/mysql-mmm-2.0.10-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 19:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:08:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101908.nBAJ8LIu011636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Philip Prindeville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #317209|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #52 from Philip Prindeville 2009-12-10 14:08:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377565) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377565) Replacement .src file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 19:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101907.nBAJ7HTf024996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Philip Prindeville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #317207|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #51 from Philip Prindeville 2009-12-10 14:07:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377563) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377563) Replacement .spec file Bump to 3.1.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 19:30:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:30:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101930.nBAJU2UO020201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #53 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-10 14:29:57 EDT --- Good: + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Packaged tar ball matches with upstr (md5sum: d6497b48d2bffc4150472472004618c3) + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is silent on source package + Rpmlint is silent on binary package + Rpmlint is silent on debuginfo package + Scratch build on koji works fine *** APPROVED *** Please do the following step: 1.) Create a FAS account 2.) Fullfill the CLA 3.) Request membership in the packages group 4.) Send me your FAS-id for sponsoring. A additional advice for future reviews: Please try to get a webspace and upload the SPEC file and the source rpms to it. and post the URLs in the bug report. Of course you can take the space on fedorapeople.org which you will get after you has a valid FAS account. Best Regards Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 19:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:46:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101946.nBAJks3X024859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #54 from Philip Prindeville 2009-12-10 14:46:53 EDT --- Jochen: id is "philipp". I just sent in the packagers group request. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 19:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:57:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101957.nBAJvIWL009253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #55 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-10 14:57:16 EDT --- I have approve your membership request. so you can now create a CVSAdmin request for your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 19:57:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:57:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912101957.nBAJvfNS009334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 20:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:14:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102014.nBAKETvj013717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #14 from Dave Malcolm 2009-12-10 15:14:27 EDT --- See also bug 546202, which appears to be an assertion failure running a pre-release version of GnoMenu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 20:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:13:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546202] SIGABRT in "bonobo_activation_timeout_reg_check" in /usr/bin/GnoMenu.py In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102013.nBAKDQlQ013574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546202 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|python |Package Review AssignedTo|dmalcolm at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Summary|[abrt] crash detected in |SIGABRT in |python-2.6.2-2.fc12 |"bonobo_activation_timeout_ | |reg_check" in | |/usr/bin/GnoMenu.py Flag| |needinfo?(wmello at estacaotec | |h.com) --- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm 2009-12-10 15:13:25 EDT --- Thank you for reporting this bug. How reproducible is this problem? If you run the program from a terminal, is an error message printed? It looks from bug 515164 that GnoMenu isn't in Fedora yet; are you running a local build of it? Which version? Looking at the backtrace, it looks like the problem occurred in the program's single thread in bonobo_activation_timeout_reg_check Reassigning component from "python" to "Package Review" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 20:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:55:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102055.nBAKttCT011335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #15 from Xavier Maillard 2009-12-10 15:55:53 EDT --- My guess is that we won't have Emacs 24 before 2011: July 29, 2009 - Emacs 23.1 released September 5, 2008 - Emacs 22.3 released March 26, 2008 - Emacs 22.2 released June 2, 2007 - Emacs 22.1 released Feb 6, 2005 - Emacs 21.4 released (fixing a security hole) March 24, 2003 - Emacs 21.3 released March 18, 2002 - Emacs 21.2 released October 28, 2001 - Emacs 21.1 released So I would go for emacs-cedet in F-13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 21:01:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:01:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102101.nBAL1plX012759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 Nikola Pajkovsky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(npajkovs at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2009-12-10 16:01:49 EDT --- Hey Hans, sure I will tomorrow ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 21:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523224] Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102119.nBALJk7l030628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523224 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-10 16:19:44 EDT --- Ping Antti. You can now go on with importing and building the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 21:22:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:22:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102122.nBALMN1w018629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-10 16:22:21 EDT --- Waiting for your input, Erik. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 21:35:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:35:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102135.nBALZ1U7002100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Philip Prindeville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.djhsolutions.net | |/pprindeville/mod_proxy_htm | |l-3.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 21:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102135.nBALZvNp021729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #56 from Philip Prindeville 2009-12-10 16:35:55 EDT --- URLs: http://www.djhsolutions.net/pprindeville/mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm http://www.djhsolutions.net/pprindeville/mod_proxy_html.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 21:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:50:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537437] Review Request: itextsharp - Mono library for generating PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102150.nBALoNiT025265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537437 Bug 537437 depends on bug 537431, which changed state. Bug 537431 Summary: Review Request: mono-bouncycastle - Bouncy Castle Crypto Package for Mono https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537431 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-10 16:50:21 EDT --- There is a possible licensing problem. During mono-bouncycastle review it was discovered that mono-bouncycastle contains ASL 1.1 licensed code, which is incompatible with GPL. itextsharp contains code that is dual licensed under (LGPLv2+ or MPLv1.1). The problem is with LGPLv2+, which is not compatible with ASL 1.1. It might be possible that MPLv1.1 is compatible with ASL 1.1, but I couldn't find any references about that. I wrote to bouncycastle csharp crypto mailing list [1] and filed a ticket with their bugtracking system [2], asking if they could relicense the ASL 1.1 code under ASL 2.0. It should certainly be possible to solve this issue, as the ASL 1.1 code in bouncycastle originates from the Apache ANT project, which has been subsequently relicened to ASL 2.0. [1] http://www.bouncycastle.org/csharpdevmailarchive/msg00370.html [2] http://www.bouncycastle.org/jira/browse/BJA-238 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 21:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:55:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546445] New: Review Request: nagios-plugins-check-updates - A Nagios plugin to check if Red Hat or Fedora system is up-to-date Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins-check-updates - A Nagios plugin to check if Red Hat or Fedora system is up-to-date https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546445 Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins-check-updates - A Nagios plugin to check if Red Hat or Fedora system is up-to-date Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jpo at di.uminho.pt QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://um-pe09-2.di.uminho.pt./fedora/nagios-plugins-check-updates.spec SRPM URL: http://um-pe09-2.di.uminho.pt./fedora/nagios-plugins-check-updates-1.4.6-1.src.rpm Description: A Nagios plugin to check if Red Hat or Fedora system is up-to-date -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 22:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:11:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546451] New: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Template-IT - Simple template API. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Template-IT - Simple template API. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546451 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Template-IT - Simple template API. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/php-pear-packages/php-pear-HTML-Template-IT.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/php-pear-packages/php-pear-HTML-Template-IT-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Description: The Isotemplate API is somewhat tricky for a beginner although it is the best one you can build. template::parse() [phplib template = Isotemplate] requests you to name a source and a target where the current block gets parsed into. Source and target can be block names or even handler names. This API gives you a maximum of fexibility but you always have to know what you do which is quite unusual for php skripter like me. Features : * Nested blocks * Include external file * Custom tags format (default {mytag}) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 22:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102217.nBAMHwWR012249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #17 from Adam Miller 2009-12-10 17:17:56 EDT --- Updated to 0.9.0 from upstream, the SRPM name is a little different because I built in mock this go around. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 22:52:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102252.nBAMqkkl020067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #14 from Michal Nowak 2009-12-10 17:52:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377611) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377611) Deja Dup's SIGSEGV on cold Restore How to reproduce ----- 1. Build Deja Dup, install, run 2. press Restore (nothing was backed up ever :) 3. Segmentation fault (core dumped) See the log full report from ABRT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 10 23:02:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:02:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912102302.nBAN2QsB022983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #15 from Michael Terry 2009-12-10 18:02:25 EDT --- That seems bad... :-/ I've filed a bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/495248) and will look at it this weekend. Hopefully it's just on the 13.x line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 00:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:28:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110028.nBB0S05p027611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-10 19:27:59 EDT --- php-nusoap-0.7.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-nusoap-0.7.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 00:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:27:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110027.nBB0Roai027569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-10 19:27:49 EDT --- php-nusoap-0.7.3-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-nusoap-0.7.3-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 00:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110027.nBB0RtsL008503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-10 19:27:55 EDT --- php-nusoap-0.7.3-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-nusoap-0.7.3-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 00:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:30:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110030.nBB0UH2j028301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-10 19:30:15 EDT --- php-pear-OLE-1.0.0-0.4.rc1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-OLE-1.0.0-0.4.rc1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 00:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:46:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110046.nBB0kmSY012199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #7 from Yuan Yijun 2009-12-10 19:46:47 EDT --- I can read it now. Please note the bugzilla archive is open to all and open to search, is it OK to show the username and password? The spec is quite well written in my opinion, congratulations! Please fix %doc, at least there should be a COPYING which is the GPL3 text. I've not built it on my own system yet, will try it later. The git clone command is repeated twice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 00:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:51:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110051.nBB0pvep032289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #28 from Graeme Gillies 2009-12-10 19:51:53 EDT --- Hi Matthias, Thanks heaps for helping me with this and sponsoring me, much appreciated. I'm going through you comments now (all good points) and making the necessary changes and testing them in mock, just wanted to get your opinion about the last point (in moovida 1.0.9 it seems they fixed most the files with the problem, but only 2 remain). Originally I didn't have the mode 755 on them at all, but when I ran rpmlint over the rpms I would get moovida-base.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/core/launcher.py 0644 /usr/bin/python moovida-base.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/elisa/core/tests/test_launcher.py 0644 /usr/bin/python While I can exectute the scripts themselves and they work, if they are left without execute permissions moovida still works fine. Should I create a patch that removes the #!/usr/bin/python line from these scripts, or would it be better if I re-worked my %files section so instead of blindly including %{python_sitelib}/* I explicitly indicate all files/directories that need to be included (and thus leave the defattr settings on these files). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 02:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:30:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110230.nBB2ULpJ000569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #16 from Neal Becker 2009-12-10 21:30:19 EDT --- See: http://old.nabble.com/Emacs-23.2-plans-td26251038.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 02:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:32:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110232.nBB2WfvV020317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #17 from Neal Becker 2009-12-10 21:32:40 EDT --- "There are quite a number of changes relative to Emacs 23.1, including several new packages, notably the CEDET package of development tools. See etc/NEWS for details." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 03:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:11:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Unsupported Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110311.nBB3BU4X008974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Felix Kaechele 2009-12-10 22:11:27 EDT --- Okay FINALLY here we go. Sorry for the long delay: [+] specfiles match: 1c0efc114948b59b30cc9d28cfd6113d8244c007dd38d8fb8bc2762f1ec0d5ad compiz-fusion-unsupported.spec 1c0efc114948b59b30cc9d28cfd6113d8244c007dd38d8fb8bc2762f1ec0d5ad ../../Downloads/compiz-fusion-unsupported.spec [+] source files match upstream: 943d1ad6a1e4a92a518087c4b5ba44e91c5e2b9bc254dbfcc4adefe3dc42157b compiz-plugins-unsupported-0.8.2.tar.bz2 943d1ad6a1e4a92a518087c4b5ba44e91c5e2b9bc254dbfcc4adefe3dc42157b ../SOURCES/compiz-plugins-unsupported-0.8.2.tar.bz2 [+] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [+] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently. [+] dist tag is present. [+] build root is correct. [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license is open source-compatible. [+] license text included in package. [!] latest version is being packaged. Latest version that matches the version of compiz-fusion in Fedora is packaged. This is OK. [+] BuildRequires are proper. [+] compiler flags are appropriate. [+] %clean is present. [+] package builds in mock. [+] package installs properly. [+] debuginfo package looks complete. [!] rpmlint is silent. rpmlint has some warnings but these can be safely ignored. [+] final provides and requires are sane [N/A] %check is present and all tests pass: [+] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. [+] owns the directories it creates. [+] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [+] no duplicates in %files. [+] file permissions are appropriate. [+] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page. [+] code, not content. [+] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [+] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [+] no headers. Are in -devel where they belong [+] no pkgconfig files. [+] no libtool .la droppings. [N/A] desktop files valid and installed properly. APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 03:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110313.nBB3Deu6009421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #12 from Felix Kaechele 2009-12-10 22:13:38 EDT --- Is there still something happening here? I'm working through my Bugzilla review queue right now. If you're not interested in this anymore I'd like to close this for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 03:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110333.nBB3XqFT014638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #1 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-10 22:33:51 EDT --- The original source had README and README.new file with same contents That is fixed now. New source rpm at the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 04:13:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110413.nBB4DLjM010978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #2 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-10 23:13:20 EDT --- Absorbed the prep section in the code, new spec and srpm at the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 04:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:16:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110416.nBB4GAPL011815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |522207 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 04:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110416.nBB4GENp011915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |522207 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 04:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:16:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110416.nBB4GCW1011864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |522207 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 04:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:16:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110416.nBB4G9aN011773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Depends on| |521989, 522204, 522272 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 04:18:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:18:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110418.nBB4I8n2012215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-10 23:18:06 EDT --- As per build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1866683, added required deps in Bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 04:39:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:39:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110439.nBB4dBT0017032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-10 23:39:11 EDT --- Added README.new to the rpm now. spec and srpm at the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 04:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:35:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110435.nBB4Z3sZ016369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #8 from Liberty 2009-12-10 23:35:03 EDT --- It is a bad idea to show the ftp user and pass. But I will change my password if I can find out a better place to host the files. I have updated spec file and srpm to include the license file as doc.Also I have changed the group to Application/System according to stardict's spec file. Thank you very much for the advise and encouragement. SPEC: ftp://xth_4709239:123456 at ftp.xtreemhost.com/htdocs/goldendict.spec SRPM ftp://xth_4709239:123456 at ftp.xtreemhost.com/htdocs/goldendict-0.9.0-2.20091209gitc83b6cd.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 04:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110453.nBB4r1SE020066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 Mark Goodwin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jarod at redhat.com) --- Comment #27 from Mark Goodwin 2009-12-10 23:52:58 EDT --- Jarod, can I take comment #22 as final ack? Thanks -- Mark -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 04:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 23:55:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541483] Review Request: MakerDialog - Utility that conveniently handle configuration properties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110455.nBB4tSME000555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541483 --- Comment #2 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-12-10 23:55:27 EDT --- Issue address, new spec and srpm can be downloaded from following URL: Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/MakerDialog.spec SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/MakerDialog-0.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 05:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:15:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110515.nBB5F2fk025001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #4 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-11 00:15:01 EDT --- Absorbed ugly autoconf in the source now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 06:01:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:01:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110601.nBB61L5U002488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-11 01:01:19 EDT --- What is the purpose of this package? So far, your packages appears to be a private fork, to me. Is the upstream dead/non-responsive? Furthermore, please increment the release tag each time you change your src.rpm. Otherwise it's hard to tell for reviewers, whether you modified your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 06:07:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:07:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110607.nBB67vWf016002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #6 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-11 01:07:56 EDT --- Upstream, does not have time to maintain this anymore. There are patches lined up for months now sp the ones related to memory leak. See: https://lists.feep.net:8080/pipermail/libtar/2009-May/000259.html I will bump the release next time :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 06:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110625.nBB6P5wv020586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-11 01:25:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Upstream, does not have time to maintain this anymore. OK, then my impression was right, it's a private fork. > There are patches lined up for months now sp the ones related to memory leak. Well, this is nothing unusual. IMO, the appropriate approach to this would be to either "patch the original package" or to make your "private fork" a "public fork"/"official project". Private forks don't help anybody - How do other distros handle this issue in this particular case? > I will bump the release next time :) TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 06:29:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:29:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110629.nBB6TCrc009311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #8 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-11 01:29:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Upstream, does not have time to maintain this anymore. > OK, then my impression was right, it's a private fork. > > > There are patches lined up for months now sp the ones related to memory leak. > Well, this is nothing unusual. > > IMO, the appropriate approach to this would be to either "patch the original > package" or to make your "private fork" a "public fork"/"official project". > This is not a private fork. What makes a fork private or public? I am ready for other people to contribute to this project too, its just that its hosted on fedorahosted which is easier for me then putting it on sourceforge. > Private forks don't help anybody - How do other distros handle this issue in > this particular case? > > > I will bump the release next time :) > TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 06:49:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:49:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Unsupported Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110649.nBB6nnoi026486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from leigh scott 2009-12-11 01:49:48 EDT --- Thank you Felix. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compiz-fusion-unsupported Short Description: Unsupported Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz Owners: leigh123linux Branches: F-12 InitialCC: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 07:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:06:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110706.nBB76JJa030617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-11 02:06:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1864052 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 135f705c99d00d81c0e7d5058055178d30c181b0 pki-native-tools-1.3.0.tar.gz Suggestions: 1) you can preserve timestamps make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" 2) Note that you can safely remove buildroot tag and cleanup of buildroot in %install as per given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install 3) Please add newline after you added new changelog entry. 4) why not to choose following as Group? Group: System Environment/Base 5) Is the license tag "GPLv2 with exceptions" is already discussed and approved by emailing them to fedora-legal-list at redhat.com? 6) Why "Requires: perl" is needed? 7) I don't understand why following is included? BuildRequires: bash See after I removed it , koji scratch build is successful at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1869062 8) Try to use macros in all places in SPEC. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 07:21:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:21:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110721.nBB7LwHM022004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #14 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-11 02:21:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Please change BR: qt to BR-qt-devel. Otherwise the package won't even build in > mock, which means it won't build in koji. > > Moreover, I made a scratch build in koji with the above BR corrected. You can > download the RPM's that are generated. We still have rpmlints: > qjson-devel.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized qjson Development Files > > This can be fixed easily. Done > qjson-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/share/doc/qjson-devel-0.6.3/html/installdox > qjson-devel.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/qjson-devel-0.6.3/html/installdox /usr/bin/perl > Please see links below and comments regarding blank doxygen html directory: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Rpmlint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397#c4 The above warning doesn't seem to be of concern to Fedora. The warning is produced because I'm building the doxygen docs during rpmbuild and an installdox script is placed in the html folder on that build. > The documentation is still blank. I see this line in the build.log: Finally clued into this one. Sorry about the misunderstanding. Indeed in the source contained in the SRPM the html folder is indeed blank. However, if you were to examine the SPEC file on line 42 you would see that I build the doxygen during the build process. Which produces the rpmlint warning you mentioned above. Also, the doxygen docs are then successfully installed in the devel package on line 77. So if you were to look in the built devel package, you would see that the doxygen docs are built and in the correct location. > > Error: file `/builddir/build/BUILD/qjson/doc/' not found > > Perhaps this will help you finding the problem. If you were to look in both the qjson and qjson-devel package all the documentation specified in the installation goes to the location expected. > Again, I urge you to build packages on mock. It will make your life easier. Did that with the same results. SPEC URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson-0.6.3-6.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 07:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:38:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110738.nBB7cgRr004778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-11 02:38:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > This is not a private fork. Your fork is your private pleasure. Should it make it into Fedora, it is nothing but a Red Hat/Fedora proprietary fork, competing with other distros, other forks and the official upstream. > What makes a fork private or public? Launch an official project, with home-page, mailing list etc. > I am ready for other people to contribute to this project too, its just that > its hosted on fedorahosted which is easier for me then putting it on > sourceforge. There is nothing wrong with hosting a project on fedorahosted. > > Private forks don't help anybody - How do other distros handle this issue in > > this particular case? It's a pity you didn't answer this - For now I advise reviewers not to approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 07:59:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:59:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110759.nBB7xVoe008988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #10 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-11 02:59:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > This is not a private fork. > Your fork is your private pleasure. > What do you mean? I decided to fork because i want to add features and upstream has no time. > Should it make it into Fedora, it is nothing but a Red Hat/Fedora proprietary > fork, competing with other distros, other forks and the official upstream. > There is no official upstream now, he does not want to maintain, please read what i have said earlier. > > What makes a fork private or public? > Launch an official project, with home-page, mailing list etc. Home page: https://fedorahosted.org/libtar-ng/ mailing list: https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/libtar-ng-devel Next time, investigate before you say something! > > > I am ready for other people to contribute to this project too, its just that > > its hosted on fedorahosted which is easier for me then putting it on > > sourceforge. > There is nothing wrong with hosting a project on fedorahosted. > > > > Private forks don't help anybody - How do other distros handle this issue in > > > this particular case? > It's a pity you didn't answer this - For now I advise reviewers not to approve > this package. I really have a feeling you are trying to be more of a blocker than a contributor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 08:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110801.nBB81FYc030371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #11 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-11 03:01:14 EDT --- I am not forking this because Red Hat needs it, Working at Red Hat is my $DAYJOB, this is my contribution to Fedora, both of these are completely different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 08:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110830.nBB8UgGw004412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |musuruan at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-11 03:30:40 EDT --- The blocking part of the review have been addressed, so this package is ??? APPROVED ??? You can now continue from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a (please continue fixing the non-blocking problems even after package creation, however) I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ? REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 09:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:06:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110906.nBB96RWU024637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-11 04:06:25 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts Short Description: Handwriting font Owners: musuruan Branches: F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 09:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110930.nBB9UChY030028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 --- Comment #5 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-12-11 04:30:11 EDT --- actually i dont see how this can be packaged without the moblin web browser because it is supposed to Require it. not having a requires on it is a packaging bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 09:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:34:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537631] Review Request: moblin-panel-web - Moblin Panel for Web Browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110934.nBB9YkFV030992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537631 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-11 04:34:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > actually i dont see how this can be packaged without the moblin web browser > because it is supposed to Require it. not having a requires on it is a > packaging bug. Its in progess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 09:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:49:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110949.nBB9n36M002019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-12-11 04:49:02 EDT --- Hi Kevin, sorry for delay. I'm still not sure how to handle obsoletes - in kdebase-workspace these are versioned. Rex, could you please look at your SPEC which version I should set? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 09:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912110958.nBB9wCfX004131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-11 04:58:10 EDT --- I guess Obsoletes: PolicyKit-kde < 4.5 should be safe. (We're not going to provide 4.5 for F11, so there shouldn't be a PK-0.9-based PolicyKit-kde higher than 4.4.x.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 10:08:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:08:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111008.nBBA8fcx006425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #12 from Terje R??sten 2009-12-11 05:08:39 EDT --- Please calm down. I guess Ralf means that is much more useful if you work with other users of libtar. That would typically mean other distro maintainers. I see that e.g. Debian has several patches applied, here is the diffstat in lib/ lib/Makefile.in | 53 lib/extract.c | 8 lib/output.c | 5 lib/wrapper.c | 1 libtar/Makefile.in | 18 libtar/libtar.c | 5 Please contact the libtar maintainer in Debian and see if you guys can merge your efforts, then create a new release that both Fedora and Debian can use. When that is done, you can continue the package review (if needed, the libtar pkg can might continue it's life with updated sources). Debian info available here: http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/libtar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 10:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:27:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111027.nBBARVO4010693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-11 05:27:30 EDT --- 1) See my reply to your thread on fedora-devel-list 2) Quoting from comment 10: > Next time, investigate before you say something! > I really have a feeling you are trying to be more of a blocker > than a contributor. :-/ Fix your attitude, please. 3) Package is not ready yet. It would be insane to approve it or what is offered at the libtar-ng project site. I consider myself another blocker as I see multiple issues: * It conflicts with "libtar" not just all file names, but also in the SONAME. * The src.rpm does not even attempt at trying to resolve the conflicts with libtar. * Mind you, the original libtar maintainer has written he might want to return to maintaining _his_ libtar, but based on an already started albeit unfinished rewrite. This asks for further conflicts if you are serious about making your libtar-ng use a libtar ABI+API. * Packaged tarball only adds a README.new in an ambiguous way as the COPYRIGHT and README files have not been touched (despite having received a fresh file timestamp). The new web page is not mentioned anywhere. Instead, references to old web pages are still found. * Hints: Remove the superfluous autom4te.cache directory and their contents prior to packaging up the libtar-ng tarball. Cuts the tarball size in half. Additionally, prefer bzip2 over gzip. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 10:59:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:59:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111059.nBBAxU2S017829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #29 from Matthias Saou 2009-12-11 05:59:28 EDT --- In this particular case, I think the rpmlint errors should be treated as false positives. That check is meant to find scripts meant to be executed directly which would be lacking +x. Here, I seriously doubt these python files are meant to be executed "standalone", so it's just the developers who have introduced a useless though harmless "#!/usr/bin/python" at the top of the file. Various overlapping suggestions : * Poke upstream about it if you want, it could be easily fixed in the next release * Put a simple comment above the relevant line of %files with something like "# Some *.py files have a useless hashbang line we should just ignore" * Include a patch which would remove those lines and silence rpmlinl I think the comment should be fine. Since those are *launcher.py files, maybe they are occasionally run directly by some to debug things. Anyway, in the end, quite a minor issue if you ask me :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 11:18:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:18:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111118.nBBBI5LY022486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fgfs.stefan at gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Stefan Riemens 2009-12-11 06:18:04 EDT --- just a few comments: - Please use %global instead of %define - (already mentioned) If parallel make doesn't work, please mention that in a comment. Otherwise, the make line should just read make %{?_smp_mflags} I'm not a sponsor either... Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 11:21:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:21:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542580] Review Request: statusnet - Open Source microblogging platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111121.nBBBLM6w012222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542580 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fgfs.stefan at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Stefan Riemens 2009-12-11 06:21:21 EDT --- Just a quick comment: Please use %global instead of %define... Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 11:35:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:35:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111135.nBBBZgXM027011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-11 06:35:41 EDT --- Forwarding from my fedora-devel-list post, the license is more BSD (with no advertising clause) than MIT. The author backs up my impression as the comment on "MIT" prompted him to explicitly call his licensing "BSD-style": https://lists.feep.net:8080/pipermail/libtar/2009-December/000282.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 12:10:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:10:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111210.nBBCAnxm002702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-11 07:10:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > > > Private forks don't help anybody - How do other distros handle this issue in > > > > this particular case? > > It's a pity you didn't answer this - For now I advise reviewers not to approve > > this package. > > > I really have a feeling you are trying to be more of a blocker than a > contributor. Do a reasonable job and I will not complain. - This case however, you went too far - I am expecting you to excuse. Besides this: * Basing works on private forks are a classical way inexperienced programmers outsmart themselves (c.f. "bundled API incompatible libs). * Proposing to include them into Fedora is typical for new-comers, who are not aware about the issues they are causing. * It would not be the first time somebody @RH was pushing a RH fork into Fedora, without coordination with upstream and/or other distros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 12:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111224.nBBCO4ra027382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-12-11 07:24:02 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, I've been really busy lately.. * Fri Dec 11 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 3.29.3-1 - Update to 3.29.3 - Renamed 'webbrowser' in the summary to 'web browser' to keep rpmlint happy - Fixed the license tag Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-gtkhtml3.spec Spec SRPM: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-gtkhtml3-3.29.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Scratch build (F13): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1869444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 12:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:31:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111231.nBBCVNnX007738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #13 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-12-11 07:31:21 EDT --- Desktop file added + obsoletes. http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/polkit-kde/polkit-kde-0.95-0.2.20091125svn.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 12:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:32:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111232.nBBCWkq8008079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #25 from Simon Wesp 2009-12-11 07:32:42 EDT --- What's the current state of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 12:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111246.nBBCkZaF000417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #26 from Jan Blazek 2009-12-11 07:46:34 EDT --- Sorry, but I'm quite busy ATM. If someone wants to pick up this package feel free to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 12:49:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:49:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111249.nBBCnkAh001002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #27 from Simon Wesp 2009-12-11 07:49:45 EDT --- Then please close this bug and i will open a new one.... I need this pkg for my i3 desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 12:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:55:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111255.nBBCtdfc013567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Jan Blazek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 12:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111256.nBBCuxd9003186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-12-11 07:56:58 EDT --- Sorry for the delay but here's an updated build: * Fri Dec 11 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 7.19.7-1 - Update to 7.19.8 - Merged the patches of the native .spec file (7.19.7-8) - Use %global instead of %define - Automatically generate debuginfo subpackage Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-curl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-curl-7.19.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Scratch build (F-13): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1869501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 12:59:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:59:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111259.nBBCxCR2003604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-12-11 07:59:09 EDT --- I think it's safe to ignore the last 3 rpmlint errors since the files contain database passwords. I've looked at mysql-mmm-2.0.10-4 and see no further issues. This package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 13:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:20:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111320.nBBDKDg9019476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-11 08:20:12 EDT --- rpmlint silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 13:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] New: Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 Summary: Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/git-bugzilla.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/git-bugzilla-0-0.1.20091211git.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1869497 Description: Add commits as attachments to a Bugzilla bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 13:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538172] Review Request: pyactivemq - Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111344.nBBDiNMN015653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538172 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 13:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:44:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111344.nBBDiLMS025734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-11 08:44:19 EDT --- The pkgconfig file contains -luuid, but the libuuid-devel/e2fsprogs-devel is not listed as a Requires in the activemq-cpp-devel subpackage, so when I try to build the pyactivemq (bug #538172) that fails with "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -luuid". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 14:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:25:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111425.nBBEPIpY028745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 --- Comment #3 from Ngo Than 2009-12-11 09:25:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Some new/different rpmlint output (too long to copy&paste, instead a summary): > > - configure-without-libdir-spec > is ok, because the configure script doesn't support that. > > - summary-ended-with-dot A documentation system for C/C++. > summary-ended-with-dot A GUI for creating and editing configuration files. > it's fixed > - incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.6.1-1 ['1:1.6.1-1.fc13', '1:1.6.1-1'] > epoch is missing in changelog > it's fixed > - spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/examples/page/html/* > - doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/examples/include/html/* > "find examples -type f | xargs chmod -x" at the end of %build fixes this > it's fixed > - file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/LANGUAGE.HOWTO > iconv --from=ISO-8859-1 --to=UTF-8 LANGUAGE.HOWTO > LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new && \ > touch -r LANGUAGE.HOWTO LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new && \ > mv LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new LANGUAGE.HOWTO > > it's fixed > - wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/examples/tag/html/installdox perl > > it's fixed > Not in rpmlint: > > It would be better, if you split it examples and put them into a doc > subpackage, because the most space of this package is consumed by examples, > which the less people will watch. With splitting it's up to them to install > them and other people to save space. no, the package is small enough, it doesn't make sense to split it. doxygen-1.6.1-2 includes the fix for all above issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 14:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111444.nBBEiWLh010983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-11 09:44:30 EDT --- It all looks good now. there is a consistent use of macros. rpmlint is silent license is ok spec is clear and legible source matches sha256sum pki-util-1.3.0.tar.gz fedora/SOURCES/pki-util-1.3.0.tar.gz 512c826e870d2bf631f71d1ffeb31333936296a55c9e0892bcf0cafe5ea10319 pki-util-1.3.0.tar.gz 512c826e870d2bf631f71d1ffeb31333936296a55c9e0892bcf0cafe5ea10319 fedora/SOURCES/pki-util-1.3.0.tar.gz approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 14:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225980] Merge Review: latex2html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111447.nBBEl5Oq002088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225980 Jindrich Novy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jnovy at redhat.com) | --- Comment #3 from Jindrich Novy 2009-12-11 09:47:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > [???] specfile is cleanly written. > The spec file contains a lot of perl one-liners. > Wouldn't it be better to write a patch that fixes the scripts generating > wrong paths > instead of those regular expressions? > Is it too difficult? Yes, it is not trivial and it works so no need to break it. > [FAIL] license text included in package: license not included in the package > It is included in the source archive. > It should be installed in "/usr/share/doc/latex2html-2008/" Added. > [NO] rpmlint is silent > > $rpmlint ./latex2html-2008-3.fc13.src.rpm > latex2html.src:125: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build perl -pi > -e"s,${RPM_BUILD_ROOT},," l2hconf.pm > latex2html.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 79, tab: line 92) > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > $ rpmlint ./latex2html-2008-3.fc13.noarch.rpm > latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/latex2html/cweb2html/cweb2html 0644 /usr/bin/perl > latex2html.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir > /usr/share/latex2html/docs/.latex2html-init > latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/jlatex2html/makeseg/makeseg 0644 /usr/bin/perl > latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/latex2html/makemap 0644 > /usr/bin/perl > latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/jlatex2html/makemap 0644 > /usr/bin/perl > latex2html.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/jlatex2html/cweb2html/makemake.pl /usr/local/bin/perl > latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/jlatex2html/cweb2html/makemake.pl 0644 /usr/local/bin/perl > latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/jlatex2html/cweb2html/cweb2html 0644 /usr/bin/perl > latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/latex2html/makeseg/makeseg 0644 /usr/bin/perl > latex2html.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir > /usr/share/jlatex2html/docs/.latex2html-init > latex2html.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/latex2html/cweb2html/makemake.pl /usr/local/bin/perl > latex2html.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/latex2html/cweb2html/makemake.pl 0644 /usr/local/bin/perl > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 10 errors, 2 warnings. > Fixed. > [???] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package > Documentation is not marked as %doc, and it is included > in both /usr/share/latex2html/doc and in /usr/share/jlatex2html "docs" and "example" directory is now marked as %doc > It is not compiled (just the .tex source, no .dvi/pdf/ps) > > It should be compiled, marked by %doc in %files, and it should not be > included in /usr/share/latex2html. > > The file readme.hthtml should be in %doc readme.hthtml is mistakenly twice in the tarball. The copy in the root is bogus, thus deleted. > > /usr/share/makeseg/makeseg.tex should be built and the .dvi/pdf/ps > should be included as %doc, but the .tex file should not be included. > Leaving makeseg as is because it ships the makeseg script as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 15:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:23:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111523.nBBFNsY3012593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-11 10:23:52 EDT --- I will close this bug if no further response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 15:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:22:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111522.nBBFMPBE012333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(singh.roshan08 at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-11 10:22:22 EDT --- ping? (Please write CVS request) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 15:46:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:46:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111546.nBBFkLIn018884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-11 10:46:20 EDT --- Thanks, responding to comment #3 I've now built pyactivemq in a fresh build root rather than the one I used for activemq-cpp. Something I will now do routinely. Updated packages: http://straylen.web.cern.ch/straylen/rpms/activemq-cpp/activemq-cpp.spec http://straylen.web.cern.ch/straylen/rpms/activemq-cpp/activemq-cpp-2.2.6-5.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 15:58:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:58:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225980] Merge Review: latex2html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111558.nBBFwK1j022108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225980 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-11 10:58:18 EDT --- Shouldn't documentation in LaTeX format (.tex) be compiled to something more readable, e.g. PDF? There is no answer in packaging guideline. I am giving review+, because the package is good enough shape now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 16:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:17:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546666] Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111617.nBBGHDex027932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |546667 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 16:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:16:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546666] New: Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 Summary: Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/selenium-core.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/selenium-core-1.0.2-0.1.20091211svn.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1869933 Description: Selenium Core is the engine of both, Selenium IDE and Selenium RC (driven mode), but it also can be deployed on the desired application server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 16:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:17:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546667] New: Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 Summary: Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 546666 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/selenium-remote-control.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/selenium-remote-control- 1.0.2-0.1.20091211svn.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1869934 Description: Selenium Remote Control (RC) is a test tool that allows you to write automated web application UI tests in any programming language against any HTTP website using any mainstream JavaScript-enabled browser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 16:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:18:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546666] Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111618.nBBGIgQR005166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-11 11:18:41 EDT --- rpmlint is quitet. local mockbuild succeeded (hopefully the scratch build will as well) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 16:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:18:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546667] Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111618.nBBGIKvr005091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-11 11:18:19 EDT --- bug #546666 is a run-time dependency only; not a build-time one (until it's in; then we'll enable a test suite that needs it). rpmlint is quitet. local mockbuild succeeded (hopefully the scratch build will as well) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 16:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226567] Merge Review: xmltex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111626.nBBGQIb5007411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226567 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ovasik at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-11 11:26:16 EDT --- Thanks for review... 1) I see it harmless, too... 2) fixed - there is no tarball, so changed to comment 3) no longer zipped 4) there is no longer alive upstream (for more than 7 years), so I don't expect it could go upstream 5) fixed Built as xmltex-20020625-16.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 16:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225980] Merge Review: latex2html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111638.nBBGcGrV001493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225980 --- Comment #5 from Jindrich Novy 2009-12-11 11:38:15 EDT --- The TeX documentation is not essential wrt functionality of latex2html. The reason to ship the tex variant is that one can convert the tex file directly with latex2html if he wants to read it ;) This could be used to test latex2html. Furthermore pdf documentation is a bit wasteful as it is too big. Thanks for the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 17:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546686] New: Review Request: cricscore-applet - Cricket score applet for gnome panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cricscore-applet - Cricket score applet for gnome panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546686 Summary: Review Request: cricscore-applet - Cricket score applet for gnome panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sagarun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/cricscore-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/cricscore-applet-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a gnome panel applet.The goal of this package is to bring cricket score to your gnome desktop panel. koji builds F12,F11 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1870050 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1870052 Note: This is the first python panel applet i am packaging for fedora please help me fix things like Buildrequires and Requires in spec file Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 17:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111733.nBBHXVdv028160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 BJ Dierkes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from BJ Dierkes 2009-12-11 12:33:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mysql-mmm Short Description: Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL Owners: derks Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 17:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111745.nBBHjN0O031968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-11 12:45:19 EDT --- Well, then first of all how did you determine the list of %test_files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 17:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234753] Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111753.nBBHr9Tr024047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234753 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-11 12:53:07 EDT --- Ben, Please reopen a NEW review request. Otherwise the reporting scripts are going to confused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 17:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:49:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111749.nBBHnxjP023127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-11 12:49:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Some new/different rpmlint output (too long to copy&paste, instead a summary): > > > > - configure-without-libdir-spec > > is ok, because the configure script doesn't support that. > > > > - summary-ended-with-dot A documentation system for C/C++. > > summary-ended-with-dot A GUI for creating and editing configuration files. > > > it's fixed Yes, now the same for subpackage: oxygen-doxywizard.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A GUI for creating and editing configuration files. > > - file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/LANGUAGE.HOWTO > > iconv --from=ISO-8859-1 --to=UTF-8 LANGUAGE.HOWTO > LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new && \ > > touch -r LANGUAGE.HOWTO LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new && \ > > mv LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new LANGUAGE.HOWTO > > > > > it's fixed Not yet, you wrote 'touch -r LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new', but you need to write 'touch -r LANGUAGE.HOWTO LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new' > > > - wrong-script-interpreter > > /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/examples/tag/html/installdox perl > > > > > it's fixed Not here... Are you sure? - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define By the way. I don't know where the 'with_qt' flag is coming from, but maybe it would be more usefull to use bcond_with. See bug #540328 comment #1 as example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 17:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:57:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532261] Review Request: checkmedia - Checks installation media. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111757.nBBHvKpA025282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532261 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-11 12:57:19 EDT --- Can you please upload the files and SRPM to a place where I don't need to understand Russian to download them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111804.nBBI491u026915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-11 13:04:08 EDT --- New upstream 0.3.0 release. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libmx-0.3.0-1.fc12.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1870119 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:14:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111814.nBBIEpHX029981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:14:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111814.nBBIEAT0007481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:14:09 EDT --- php-pear-OLE-1.0.0-0.4.rc1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111813.nBBIDeZS007305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:13:38 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:14:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111814.nBBIEkAi007743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:14:43 EDT --- mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:16:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111816.nBBIGPhK008738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.7.3-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111813.nBBIDlWl007346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.1-3.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111816.nBBIGx2v008899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-0.1.684svn.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:14:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111814.nBBIEFMj007522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.0-0.4.rc1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:15:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:15:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111815.nBBIFY9f008277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.20091126-3.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:14:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111814.nBBIEdPH007690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:14:38 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:16:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:16:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111816.nBBIGKFE030967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:16:19 EDT --- php-nusoap-0.7.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111815.nBBIFTXW030751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:15:28 EDT --- woff-0.20091126-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111816.nBBIGsoi031154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:16:53 EDT --- woffTools-0.1-0.1.684svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:19:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111819.nBBIJEKj031968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-6.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:19:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546704] New: Review Request: python-whoosh - Fast, pure-Python full text indexing, search, and spell checking library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-whoosh - Fast, pure-Python full text indexing, search, and spell checking library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546704 Summary: Review Request: python-whoosh - Fast, pure-Python full text indexing, search, and spell checking library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-whoosh/python-whoosh.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-whoosh/python-whoosh-0.3.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Whoosh is a fast, featureful full-text indexing and searching library implemented in pure Python. Whoosh was created and is maintained by MattChaput. It was originally created for use in the online help system of Side Effects Software's 3D animation software Houdini. Side Effects Software Inc. graciously agreed to open-source the code. Some of Whoosh's features include: Pythonic API. Pure-Python. No compilation or binary packages needed, no mysterious crashes. Fielded indexing and search. Fast indexing and retrieval -- faster than any other pure-Python, scoring, full-text search solution I know of. Pluggable scoring algorithm (including BM25F), text analysis, storage, posting format, etc. Powerful query language parsed by pyparsing. Pure Python spell-checker (as far as I know, the only one). Whoosh might be useful in the following circumstances: Anywhere a pure-Python solution is desirable to avoid having to build/compile native libraries (or force users to build/compile them). As a research platform (at least for programmers that find Python easier to read and work with than Java ;) When an easy-to-use Pythonic interface is more important to you than raw speed. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1870135 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:19:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:19:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111819.nBBIJ9nr009921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:19:07 EDT --- emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:20:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:20:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111820.nBBIKwc7010741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:20:58 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13077 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:23:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111823.nBBINAi3001244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rhbugs at n-dimensional.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:26:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111826.nBBIQOvV013053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:26:22 EDT --- perl-Config-Model-CursesUI-1.103-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:26:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:26:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111826.nBBIQSRC013091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.103-3.fc10 |1.103-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:22:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111822.nBBIMpgA011709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc11 |1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111827.nBBIRnJ7003243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:27:48 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:27:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111827.nBBIRsaG003281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.1-3.fc12 |1.2.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:29:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:29:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111829.nBBITA1f003635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:29:09 EDT --- xfce4-volumed-0.1.8-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:29:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111829.nBBITU5x003764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-gtkhtml - MinGW |mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW |Windows port of GtkHTML |Windows port of GtkHTML --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-11 13:29:28 EDT --- I can see you've changed the package name to mingw32-gtkhtml3, so I'm updating the review request ticket's summary with the new name too. The package looks good, except for two issues: License tag ----------- The first version of mingw32-gtkhtml had License: 'LGPLv2+', however native gtkhtml3 package has 'LGPLv2+ and GPLv2'. When I pointed out that the two license tags above differ, you updated the license in mingw32-gtkhtml3 to read 'GPLv2+'. I went over the source files in gtkhtml-3.29.3, and they all appear to be LGPLv2+, so I think the native gtkhtml3 package has got the license tag wrong. The configure script (and other build scripts) are indeed licensed under GPLv2+ with exceptions, but they are not included in, and thus don't alter the final license of the resulting binary rpm package. So I'd suggest to change the License tag back to LGPLv2+, sorry. License files ------------- The updated gtkhtml-3.29.3 source tarball has two license files, COPYING and COPYING.LIB. The former is a GPL license (I suppose that's just there for autoconf/libtool scripts), but COPYING.LIB is the actual LGPL license text which needs to be included in the rpm. Currently only COPYING is included. Please add COPYING.LIB to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111830.nBBIU8jV014483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:30:07 EDT --- emacs-irsim-mode-0.1-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:29:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111829.nBBITFLF014024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.1.8-1.fc12 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:30:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543383] Review Request: emacs-irsim-mode - Irsim mode for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111830.nBBIUEHm004631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543383 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-6.fc11 |0.1-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:34:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111834.nBBIYLpg005978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:34:20 EDT --- woff-0.20091126-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:33:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111833.nBBIXq8P005836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:33:50 EDT --- woffTools-0.1-0.1.684svn.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111834.nBBIY9GZ005890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:34:08 EDT --- xfce4-volumed-0.1.8-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:34:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111834.nBBIYDQ4005927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.8-1.fc12 |0.1.8-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:33:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111833.nBBIXFAL015657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:33:14 EDT --- php-nusoap-0.7.3-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:33:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542027] Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111833.nBBIXKlZ015698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7.3-2.fc11 |0.7.3-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:33:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541793] Review Request: woffTools - Tool for manipulating and examining WOFF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111833.nBBIXuu2015904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541793 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-0.1.684svn.fc11 |0.1-0.1.684svn.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541792] Review Request: woff - Encoding and Decoding for Web Open Font Format(Woff) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111834.nBBIYQhV016086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541792 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.20091126-3.fc12 |0.20091126-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:22:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111822.nBBIMkMe001092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-11 13:22:45 EDT --- mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.1.svn1664.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 18:46:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111846.nBBIk5Bw010250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-11 13:46:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pki-util Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Utility Framework is required by the following four Dogtag PKI subsystems: the Dogtag Certificate Authority, the Dogtag Data Recovery Manager, the Dogtag Online Certificate Status Protocol Manager, and the Dogtag Token Key Service. Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 19:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111909.nBBJ958b026722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-11 14:08:56 EDT --- 1- Please install the devel package and open the index.html that it installs to your /usr/share/doc/qjson-devel-VERSION/ in your browser. 2- Next, unzip the source tarball of qjson manually, go to the doc/ directory. Do a doxygen inside that directory. It will build the docs. Now open the doc/html/index.html that you just generated in your browser. Do you see a difference between the two index.html's? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 19:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:08:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111908.nBBJ8xpc026671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #16 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-11 14:08:36 EDT --- @Ralf, you continue to blur the lines between folks who work on Fedora as a full time job and people who are volunteers within Fedora and happen to work at Red Hat. You need to stop doing that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 19:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:11:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111911.nBBJBeAN027981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) --- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-12-11 14:11:37 EDT --- MUST: ok rpmlint clean ok name ok %{name}.spec ok packaging guidelines ok GPLv2 is ok ok License field ok COPYING in %doc ok spec in AmEnglish ok spec legible(*) ok 8bf5e66351156356f3ad07454123affa usbview-1.1.tar.gz ok compiles and builds http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1870195 NA no excludearch ok BuildReqs are OK, proven by koji build NA no locale stuff (broken PACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR definition is unused) NA no libs installed ok no system lib copies NA not relocatable ok dir ownerships ok files listed only once ok file perms ok %clean ok consistent RPM macro usage ok contains code NA no large doc files ok %doc files not required for runtime NA no header files NA no static libs NA no .pc files NA no lib files NA no devel subpackage NA no .la files FAIL GUI app package must include %{name].desktop file ok no owning other packages' stuff ok %install removes buildroot ok all filenames are valid utf8 SHOULD: NA license text included NA no non-English languages ok package builds in koji ergo mock ok koji scratch build says all arches build OK ok works for me (on F11) NA no scriptlets NA no subpackages NA no .pc files NA no special dependencies (*) You could remove the commented out second "make ... install" line from usbview.spec. Summary: NEEDSWORK mandatory change: Add a usbview.desktop file (if you need a package to model that after, my nted package has passed review with a Fedora specific .desktop file) optional, but recommended change: remove the commented out "make install" line -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 19:12:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:12:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111912.nBBJCMZR028370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 19:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:36:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111936.nBBJa4gN005960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-11 14:36:03 EDT --- (I guess this is all we have to check for license issue) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 19:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:34:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111934.nBBJYecM005288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-11 14:34:36 EDT --- Umm.... Again sorry to raise license question, however: This time from mock build (koji scratch build result: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1870124 ) I tried to check the licenses of rpms listed as BuildRequires and its dependencies, then: ----------------------------------------------------------------- bsf-2.4.0-3.fc12 ASL 1.1 jakarta-oro-2.0.8-6.3.fc12 ASL 1.1 xalan-j2-2.7.0-9.5.fc12 ASL 1.1 and ASL 2.0 and W3C xml-commons-resolver-1.1-4.16.fc12 ASL 1.1 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Would you explain how these are used? (Especially bsf, jakarta-oro are listed directly as BuildRequires and lib/*.jar contains jars included in these rpms so I guess these 2 rpms are actually used for tvbrowser) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 19:47:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:47:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111947.nBBJlSxM029704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #59 from Adam Williamson 2009-12-11 14:47:22 EDT --- I did file an upstream ticket: http://trac.navit-project.org/ticket/508 no reply yet :( -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 19:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912111958.nBBJwcAt012233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) | --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-12-11 14:58:37 EDT --- here are a updated spec file. with desktop icon http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/usbview/usbview.spec http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/usbview/usbview-1.1-2.fc13.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1870499 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 20:16:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:16:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546738] New: Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546738 Summary: Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ben at bagu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://bagu.org/scratch/accerciser.spec SRPM URL: http://bagu.org/scratch/accerciser-1.9.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Accerciser is an interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop. It uses AT-SPI to inspect and control widgets, allowing you to check if an application is providing correct information to assistive technologies and automated test frameworks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 20:17:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:17:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 234753] Review Request: accerciser - An interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112017.nBBKHgek007602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=234753 --- Comment #7 from Ben Konrath 2009-12-11 15:17:41 EDT --- New bug submitted: Bug #546738 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 20:15:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:15:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112015.nBBKFlTG007251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-12-11 15:15:46 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-gtkhtml3.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-gtkhtml3-3.29.3-2.fc12.src.rpm * Fri Dec 11 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 3.29.3-2 - Looks like the original license tag was correct: LGPLv2+ - Bundle COPYING.LIB instead of COPYING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 20:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:21:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546666] Review Request: selenium-core - A DHTML test execution framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112021.nBBKLnlm018935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546666 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-11 15:21:48 EDT --- Requires: ant Requires: commons-logging Requires: servlet I'm missing these ^^^ they will be added on next package spin (once reviewed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 20:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:25:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532739] Review Request: emacs-cedet - Collection of Emacs Development Environment Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112025.nBBKP6W4020178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532739 --- Comment #18 from Xavier Maillard 2009-12-11 15:25:04 EDT --- Yeah, you are right :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 20:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112025.nBBKP0QZ019848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-11 15:24:58 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 20:32:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546667] Review Request: selenium-remote-control - Tool for remotely controlling a web browser to test a web site In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112032.nBBKWQee011849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546667 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-11 15:32:25 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/selenium-remote-control.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/selenium-remote-control-1.0.2-0.2.20091211svn.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 20:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112051.nBBKpDIR029099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 542028 depends on bug 542500, which changed state. Bug 542500 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet 2009-12-11 15:51:12 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.src: I: checking php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.noarch: I: checking php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines + License ok : LGPLv2+ + License is upstream (LGPL) + spec in english and legible + no license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 15691145ca8ac71ccd501a38892ee64a Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer-0.9.2.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F12.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + no documentation + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in koji + no test suite + scriptlets ok - Final Requires php >= 4.1.0 php-pear(OLE) >= 0.5 /usr/bin/pear + Final Provides ok php-pear(Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer) = 0.9.2 php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer = 0.9.2-1.fc8 + Koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1870628 All is ok, except the dependency on httpd... Just remove the php 4.1.0 (as for previous #542500, just requires php-common when version check is necessary). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:06:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:06:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530617] Review Request: libixp - Stand-alone client/server 9P library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112106.nBBL6PQt001832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2009-12-11 16:06:23 EDT --- http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libixp/libixp.spec http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libixp/libixp-0.5-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:04:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112104.nBBL4Fs3001053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #11 from Luke Macken 2009-12-11 16:04:13 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/orbited-0.7.10-2.fc11.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/orbited.spec * Fri Nov 13 2009 Luke Macken - 0.7.10-2 - Add an init script - Add the default configuration file - Patch the default config to enable epoll and to disable access - Remove python-demjson requirement - Require python-setuptools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:05:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112105.nBBL53on021332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bashton at brennanas | |hton.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:22:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:22:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112122.nBBLMBL8026056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember 2009-12-11 16:22:08 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-curl-7.19.7-1.fc12.src.rpm 2009-12-11 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint says: mingw32-curl.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US libcurl mingw32-curl.src: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US libcurl mingw32-curl-debuginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US mingw mingw32-curl-debuginfo.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US mingw mingw32-curl-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw32-curl-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libcurl.a mingw32-curl-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings. + rpmlint errors / warnings above are harmless and can be ignored. + Package is named according to the Fedora MinGW naming guidelines + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guideliens + The stated license (MIT) is a Fedora approved license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding native Fedora package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 26124caef7359de6338172abafa98dc0 curl-7.19.7.tar.lzma 26124caef7359de6338172abafa98dc0 Download/curl-7.19.7.tar.lzma + Package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed ! BuildRequires look sane, except that BR pkgconfig is probably not needed. n/a The spec file MUST handle locales properly + Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set and %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package contains code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries are in mingw32-curl-static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 ! This package includes curl.exe, which I believe is out of scope for Fedora MinGW, as only development libraries are allowed. Curl.exe is a full-blown command-line standalone cross-compiled application that is not allowed under the Fedora MinGW rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:22:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112122.nBBLMvmS007325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 Fabien Georget changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Fabien Georget 2009-12-11 16:22:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: imagej Short Description: Image Processing and Analysis in Java Owners: manawy Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: sorry for the waiting time, some problems, I prefer wait before starting the cvs process. Anyway, I have updated version to imagej-1.43-1.m. The bug we had when we tried to close an image not saved is corrected. But I have still no answer from upstream. I will try again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:28:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112128.nBBLSebQ009026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 --- Comment #12 from Fabien Georget 2009-12-11 16:28:39 EDT --- just to be clear, I meant "I preferRED wait before starting the cvs process". Now it is OK. I apologize for all my grammatical errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:30:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112130.nBBLUVUv028516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-11 16:30:30 EDT --- Changing the short description New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pki-util Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Utility Framework is required by various dogtag packages. Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:42:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:42:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112142.nBBLgVhP031848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-11 16:42:29 EDT --- Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Utility Framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:44:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:44:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538172] Review Request: pyactivemq - Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112144.nBBLiiHE032293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538172 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-11 16:44:43 EDT --- Fedora review - pyactivemq - 2009-12-11 rpmlint: $ rpmlint pyactivemq/*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + Package name follows naming guidelines + Specfile is named accordingly + The package's license "ASL 2.0" is a Fedora approved license + The package's license matches the license of the sources + The LICENSE.txt file is included as %doc + Specfile is written in legible English + Package builds in mock (Fedora 12) + Source matches upstream: $ md5sum pyactivemq-0.1.0.tar.gz pysrc/pyactivemq-0.1.0.tar.gz 2ba32ab034c91a6fc6d0deb581d6ea27 pyactivemq-0.1.0.tar.gz 2ba32ab034c91a6fc6d0deb581d6ea27 pysrc/pyactivemq-0.1.0.tar.gz + Build dependencies are sufficient + No bundled system libraries + Package owns directories it creates + No duplicate files + File permissions are sane and %files have %defattr + %clean clears buildroot + Specfile uses macros consistently + %doc is not runtime essential + Package does not own others' files + %install clears buildroot + Installed filenames are UTF-8 Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:43:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112143.nBBLhvTi032099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-12-11 16:43:55 EDT --- Fedora review - activemq-cpp - 2009-12-11 rpmlint: $ rpmlint activemq-cpp/*.rpm activemq-cpp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + Package name follows naming guidelines + Specfile is named accordingly + The package's license "ASL 2.0" is a Fedora approved license + The package's license matches the license of the sources + The LICENSE.txt file is included as %doc + Specfile is written in legible English + Package builds in mock (Fedora 12) + Source matches upstream: $ md5sum activemq-cpp-2.2.6-src.tar.gz src/activemq-cpp-2.2.6-src.tar.gz 1222f0d6c5f86ef3ed5a558a533c7564 activemq-cpp-2.2.6-src.tar.gz 1222f0d6c5f86ef3ed5a558a533c7564 src/activemq-cpp-2.2.6-src.tar.gz + Build dependencies are sufficient + Package calls ldconfig appropriately + No bundled system libraries + Package owns directories it creates + No duplicate files + File permissions are sane and %files have %defattr + %clean clears buildroot + Specfile uses macros consistently + %doc is not runtime essential + headers in devel package + no static libraries + devel depends on pkgconfig + devel depends on main with a fully qualified version + No libtool archive files + Package does not own others' files + %install clears buildroot + Installed filenames are UTF-8 Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:45:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112145.nBBLj8Da000422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 21:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:50:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112150.nBBLoZgU001832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-11 16:50:34 EDT --- > tsocks.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libtsocks.so.1.8 > I checked to solve this one, but I'm not sure how to do it > cleanly and what it affect. Can you enlight me on this? libtsocks isn't an ordinary shared library, which would be linked with applications at build-time and which would create a dependency on the internal library DT_SONAME in the application (as well as corresponding library dependencies in the RPM packages). libtsocks is loaded manually via LD_PRELOAD before the run-time linker loads other libraries needed for an application. Hence it doesn't need a SONAME (man ld). Which also explains why I questioned whether this is a library or an application? ;) To copy a more elaborate description from tsocks.8 and extending it with a note on the preloading would be added value. (One could argue whether the versioned files libtsocks.so.1.8 and libtsocks.so.1 need to be present at all, since nothing uses them currently. It's strange that the author installs the library this way instead of installing the library only as a single libtsocks.so file. However, in parts of the documentation he refers to the versioned library file names. Inconsistent. Dropping them would need a change of the docs, too. Not worthwhile IMO.) > - tsocks.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libtsocks.so.1.8 > exit at GLIBC_2.0 > I could patch the program, but I'm not sure it's worth it. Assuming you have ran "rpmlint -i" on the binary rpm, yes, in this case it would not be worth it. The preloaded library only exits in fatal OOM conditions. > - tsocks.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libtsocks.so > tsocks need this file and it's not a devel-file. True. It's a false positive for this particular package. It's important to understand this rpmlint warning, though, to apply it correctly in the context of ordinary shared library packages. > * I submited scratch build for f11 and f12 on i386, x86_64, ppc and > ppc64 and everything is good : > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851702 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1851708 The 64-bit builds are bad, however. On x86_64 and ppc64, %{_libdir} expands to /usr/lib64 (to allow for multi-lib installations), but /usr/bin/tsocks contains a hardcoded /usr/lib where it won't find the library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 22:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:02:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112202.nBBM2sPc005385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com, | |orion at cora.nwra.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski 2009-12-11 17:02:51 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ant-contrib New Branches: EL-5 Owners: orion Alexander - do you want to own the EL branch too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 22:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112204.nBBM44Je019171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Hans Ulrich Niedermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-12-11 17:04:02 EDT --- The only changes in usbview-1.1-2 are the addition of a %{name}.desktop and %{name}_icon.png file and the removal of the commented out line following the guidelines. This changes the one FAIL item above into an OK. ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 22:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:07:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112207.nBBM7rPf006746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 --- Comment #7 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-11 17:07:52 EDT --- Correction to CVS Request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: activemq-cpp Short Description: C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 22:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538172] Review Request: pyactivemq - Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112208.nBBM8gNE006916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538172 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-11 17:08:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pyactivemq Short Description: Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 22:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:06:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112206.nBBM6lS8006528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-11 17:06:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: activemq-cpp Short Description: C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: baz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 22:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112207.nBBM79oV020160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 --- Comment #4 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-12-11 17:07:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The only changes in usbview-1.1-2 are the addition of a %{name}.desktop and > %{name}_icon.png file and the removal of the commented out line following the > guidelines. This changes the one FAIL item above into an OK. > > ACCEPT Uhm... before checking in, please change the permissions of usbview_icon.png from 0755 to 0644. Icons do not need to be executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 22:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193897] Review Request: mysql-connector-java - Official JDBC driver for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112218.nBBMIi29023603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193897 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com, | |xjakub at fi.muni.cz --- Comment #20 from Orion Poplawski 2009-12-11 17:18:42 EDT --- Any chance of getting this into EPEL? I'd be willing to maintain. With the following patch and ant-contrib built for EPEL (I've requested one) it builds find on EL-5. diff -u -r1.11 mysql-connector-java.spec --- mysql-connector-java.spec 4 Dec 2009 16:44:20 -0000 1.11 +++ mysql-connector-java.spec 11 Dec 2009 22:15:26 -0000 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ BuildRequires: junit BuildRequires: log4j BuildRequires: java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel -BuildRequires: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel +BuildRequires: java-devel-gcj BuildRequires: jakarta-commons-logging Requires: jpackage-utils @@ -93,7 +93,11 @@ # We need both JDK1.5 (for JDBC3.0; appointed by $JAVA_HOME) and JDK1.6 (for JDBC4.0; appointed in the build.xml) export CLASSPATH=$(build-classpath ant-contrib jdbc-stdext jta junit log4j commons-logging.jar) +%if 0%{?rhel} == 5 +export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0 +%else export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj +%endif # We currently need to disable jboss integration because of missing jboss-common-jdbc-wrapper.jar (built from sources). # See BZ#480154 and BZ#471915 for details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 22:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:39:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112239.nBBMdgCX015021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-12-11 17:39:41 EDT --- fixed. http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/usbview/usbview.spec http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/usbview/usbview-1.1-3.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 22:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:53:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112253.nBBMrGFl031899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 --- Comment #6 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-12-11 17:53:15 EDT --- Perfect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 11 23:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912112302.nBBN29e0020735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-12-11 18:02:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: usbview Short Description: USB topology and device viewer Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 01:46:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:46:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120146.nBC1kq4g003567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #16 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-11 20:46:51 EDT --- Also version 0.7.1 is up. Could you update to the latest version? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 01:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:50:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120150.nBC1oCII004300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |magnus.tuominen at gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-11 20:50:10 EDT --- *** Bug 544737 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 01:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:50:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544737] Review Request: qjson - A qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120150.nBC1oBxk004272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544737 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-11 20:50:10 EDT --- Sorry, this package is under review already. Please try again with another package for sponsorship. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 539983 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 01:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120157.nBC1vRrV026155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 Liberty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |liberty at live.com --- Comment #2 from Liberty 2009-12-11 20:57:26 EDT --- Seems you have 2 sources one is .tar.gz and one is .deb. The official site only provides the .deb one. The description is too simple in my opinion. The equalizer is a good idea but I have a bad feeling packaging from a deb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 02:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:05:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120205.nBC257hB007627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #3 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-12-11 21:05:06 EDT --- This is just a temporary solution. I mailed the author and he told me that he is gonna move the project to launchpad soon. As for the two files, the tar.gz is a dummy file that is overwritten during the build. I had two solutions, this one, or write a custom %setup. I opted for the one because things go smoothly after making the tar.gz from the deb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 02:44:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:44:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm --- BBS client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120244.nBC2iGJR015613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 Liberty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |liberty at live.com --- Comment #1 from Liberty 2009-12-11 21:44:15 EDT --- The /usr/share/icons/ is hard coded in your desktop file while you uses the macro %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons to install the icons. In addition, I can't build your package: CMake Error: The following variables are used in this project, but they are set to NOTFOUND. Please set them or make sure they are set and tested correctly in the CMake files: QT_PHONON_INCLUDE_DIR (ADVANCED) used as include directory in directory /home/Liberty/rpmbuild/BUILD/qterm-0.5.7/src used as include directory in directory /home/Liberty/rpmbuild/BUILD/qterm-0.5.7/src/pic used as include directory in directory /home/Liberty/rpmbuild/BUILD/qterm-0.5.7/src/cursor used as include directory in directory /home/Liberty/rpmbuild/BUILD/qterm-0.5.7/src/scheme used as include directory in directory /home/Liberty/rpmbuild/BUILD/qterm-0.5.7/src/scripts used as include directory in directory /home/Liberty/rpmbuild/BUILD/qterm-0.5.7/src/po -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ViqvvI (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ViqvvI (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 03:05:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:05:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120305.nBC35SBr008563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 --- Comment #8 from David Nalley 2009-12-11 22:05:27 EDT --- SPEC: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.spec SRPM: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer-0.9.2-2.fc12.src.rpm Remi: Thanks for the review. I corrected the requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 03:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:16:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm --- BBS client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120316.nBC3Ga1e023341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 --- Comment #2 from Chen Lei 2009-12-11 22:16:35 EDT --- The package can be build successfully in koji, also %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons is removed by sed. Maybe your computer are missing some devel packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 03:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:22:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm --- BBS client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120322.nBC3MWaq024933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 --- Comment #3 from Liberty 2009-12-11 22:22:31 EDT --- That's strange. So you have built with mock? The BuildRequire shouldn't be missing. I am on Fedora 12 x86-64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 03:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:46:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120346.nBC3kwV8019436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #35 from Arun SAG 2009-12-11 22:46:55 EDT --- Hi, Updated the package to make it work with centos. Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.7.0-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 03:56:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:56:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532261] Review Request: checkmedia - Checks installation media. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120356.nBC3u4u1022034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532261 --- Comment #3 from xandry 2009-12-11 22:56:03 EDT --- Yes, certainly. And without captcha. http://fireforge.net/frs/download.php/441/checkmedia-2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm http://fireforge.net/frs/download.php/442/checkmedia.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 04:09:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:09:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532261] Review Request: checkmedia - Checks installation media. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120409.nBC495WC025091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532261 --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-11 23:09:04 EDT --- Alternatively if you want to simply generate a md5sum, md5sum command does that just fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 04:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:07:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532261] Review Request: checkmedia - Checks installation media. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120407.nBC47X7I004569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532261 --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-11 23:07:32 EDT --- Can you help me understand what problem this solves? It seems to be a simple md5sum generation utility that is fairly SUSE specific (output of the command says it is meant for SUSE, no proper project page, no man page etc) but we already have one in Fedora called checkisomd5 used in Anaconda. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 04:51:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:51:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120451.nBC4p4bo014394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-11 23:51:03 EDT --- Okay. I think the license issue is settled. Thanks for bringing it up. I updated the files: Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-fil-plugins.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/lv2-fil-plugins-2.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Changelog: 2.0-2 - Obey American English rules (equaliser -> equalizer) - Fix license. Add comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 04:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120450.nBC4oiaa002426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Roshan Singh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(singh.roshan08 at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #21 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-11 23:50:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > ping? (Please write CVS request) Should I add you to the 'InitialCC' as i dont have any other person to CC it to ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 04:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:53:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm --- BBS client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120453.nBC4raLx014871@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 --- Comment #4 from Chen Lei 2009-12-11 23:53:35 EDT --- There is no need to include the following packages or their dependencies as BuildRequires because they would occur too often. These packages are considered the minimum build environment. The derived list of all deps pulled in by this list is on Packaging:FullExceptionList . bash bzip2 coreutils cpio diffutils fedora-release findutils gawk gcc gcc-c++ grep gzip info make patch redhat-rpm-config rpm-build sed shadow-utils tar unzip util-linux-ng which -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 05:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:04:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120504.nBC54mnZ005299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #18 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-12 00:04:47 EDT --- Will do. Regarding the doxygen thing. I guess I must be a bit thick. Aging will do that to you. :) Sorry about the confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 06:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:17:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532261] Review Request: checkmedia - Checks installation media. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120617.nBC6H9gr021900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532261 --- Comment #6 from xandry 2009-12-12 01:17:08 EDT --- Yea, this package from OpenSUSE for check installation media. On how many I understand, only it can check disks and images SUSE. Including in Fedora. This is just convenient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 07:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:26:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120726.nBC7QkKd016504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-12 02:26:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > ping? (Please write CVS request) > > Should I add you to the 'InitialCC' as i dont have any other person to CC it to > ? You don't have to add me as InitialCC member. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 07:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 02:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120751.nBC7pi9e021247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #23 from Arun SAG 2009-12-12 02:51:43 EDT --- Your package has been sponsored ,now you need to set the fedora-cvs flag to "?" . please read http://shakthimaan.com/downloads/glv/howtos/packaging-rpm-workflow.html#_make_cvs_request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 08:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:49:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120849.nBC8ndvj019555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Roshan Singh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 08:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:49:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120849.nBC8nAc5031754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #24 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-12 03:49:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: artha Short Description: A handy thesaurus based on WordNet Owners: roshansingh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 08:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 03:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120850.nBC8o5TP019928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Roshan Singh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 09:13:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546138] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120913.nBC9DBXj004360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546138 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |promac at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-12-12 04:13:09 EDT --- This is a duplicate of bug #511204. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 09:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:37:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120937.nBC9bVN0030551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet 2009-12-12 04:37:30 EDT --- All is ok now. ***** APPROVED ***** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 09:49:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:49:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544739] Review Request: kopete-facebook - Facebook Protocol support for Kopete In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120949.nBC9ne57032584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544739 --- Comment #2 from Magnus Tuominen 2009-12-12 04:49:39 EDT --- rpmlint -iv kopete-facebook.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 09:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 04:47:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544739] Review Request: kopete-facebook - Facebook Protocol support for Kopete In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912120947.nBC9lOwR032320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544739 --- Comment #1 from Magnus Tuominen 2009-12-12 04:47:23 EDT --- forgot to submit rpmlint output: rpmlint -iv kopete-facebook-0.1.4-3.fc12.src.rpm kopete-facebook.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Depends on qjson, currently in review, bug ID 539983: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 10:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542463] Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121030.nBCAUMUb008336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542463 --- Comment #1 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-12 05:30:21 EDT --- Spec URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/zaz.spec SRPM URL: http://musuruan.fedorapeople.org/zaz-0.3.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Changelog: - Now Requires renamed Digna font package (BZ #542461) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 10:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:35:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121035.nBCAZfFo020581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 --- Comment #8 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-12 05:35:40 EDT --- Open Font Library email facility is not working. I have no other way to contact upstream :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 11:15:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:15:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121115.nBCBFfbO017179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-12-12 06:15:40 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-gtkhtml3 Short Description: MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML Owners: epienbro Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 12:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546866] New: Review Request: qffmpeg - Stripped-down fork of ffmpeg for libspice Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qffmpeg - Stripped-down fork of ffmpeg for libspice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546866 Summary: Review Request: qffmpeg - Stripped-down fork of ffmpeg for libspice Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/qffmpeg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/qffmpeg-0.4.9-0.15.20080908.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a stripped down version of upstream FFMPEG including only the codecs used by SPICE in order to avoid inadvertantly bundling or shipping any encumbered code or binaries. qffmpeg is a requirement for the remainder of the SPICE stack right now, although obviously the right thing to do is to eliminate the fork altogether and move forward using ffmpeg as available through Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 12:10:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:10:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] New: Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 Summary: Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/clac/clac.spec SRPM URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/clac/clac-004-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: clac (Command Line Advanced Calculator) evaluates mathematical expressions from the argument list or from stdin and writes the answer(s) to stdout. In short: a smarter replacement for bc and dc. Project page: http://clac.sourceforge.net/ The project provides only a single file, a python script, which also includes the license. There are no additional license or documentation files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 12:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:19:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546871] New: Review Request: qpixman - Modified version of pixman for spice Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qpixman - Modified version of pixman for spice https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546871 Summary: Review Request: qpixman - Modified version of pixman for spice Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/qpixman.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/qpixman-0.13.3-4.fc12.src.rpm Description: Qpixman is a pixel manipulation library for X and cairo. This package is a requirement for qcairo, which in turn is a requirement for qspice... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 12:23:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:23:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546872] New: Review Request: qcairo - A 2D graphics library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qcairo - A 2D graphics library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546872 Summary: Review Request: qcairo - A 2D graphics library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/qcairo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/qcairo-1.8.7.1-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a version of the cairo 2D graphics library, with additional features required to support the implementation of the spice protocol. Cairo is a 2D graphics library designed to provide high-quality display and print output. Currently supported output targets include the X Window System, OpenGL (via glitz), in-memory image buffers, and image files (PDF, PostScript, and SVG). Cairo is designed to produce consistent output on all output media while taking advantage of display hardware acceleration when available (e.g. through the X Render Extension or OpenGL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 12:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:23:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546872] Review Request: qcairo - A 2D graphics library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121223.nBCCNlOI009222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546872 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |546871 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 12:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:23:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546871] Review Request: qpixman - Modified version of pixman for spice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121223.nBCCNkIJ009197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546871 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |546872 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 12:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546873] New: Review Request: celt051 - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: celt051 - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546873 Summary: Review Request: celt051 - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/celt051.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/celt051-0.5.1.3-0.fc12.src.rpm Description: CELT (Constrained Energy Lapped Transform) is an ultra-low delay audio codec designed for realtime transmission of high quality speech and audio. This is meant to close the gap between traditional speech codecs (such as Speex) and traditional audio codecs (such as Vorbis). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 12:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:40:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121240.nBCCeKRt012639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Roshan Singh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #43 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-12 07:40:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gscribble Short Description: A desktop client for blogging Owners: roshansingh Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 13:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546866] Review Request: qffmpeg - Stripped-down fork of ffmpeg for libspice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121337.nBCDbZe4012904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546866 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-12 08:37:34 EDT --- Cf. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 for what I think about such forks. If you want it formally - NEEDSWORK: * Invalid Source0-URL - Package has no upstream. * Consider your application to dlopen ffmpeg * Package conflicts with ffmpeg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 13:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:41:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121341.nBCDf2Yd013676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |th0br0 at mkdir.name --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-12-12 08:41:01 EDT --- http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/dmenu/dmenu.spec http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/dmenu/dmenu-4.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 16:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:16:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546873] Review Request: celt051 - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121616.nBCGGjB4014640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546873 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-12 11:16:44 EDT --- Fedora ships celt-0.7.0, so * You should name it as compat-celt051 * Please, explain, why we really need this obsolete stuff. I suspect, that it has something in common with SPICE but I'm not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 17:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:27:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121727.nBCHR8Sr030937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #19 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-12 12:27:07 EDT --- Finally doxygen docs fixed.... I think... I hope. Thanks for your patience on this. SPEC URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson.spec SRPM URL: http://orbsky.homelinux.org/packages/qjson-0.7.1-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 18:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:15:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm --- BBS client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121815.nBCIFBmY009332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 --- Comment #5 from Liberty 2009-12-12 13:15:10 EDT --- Of course I have these packages installed. But seems a problem of phonon. The QT_PHONON_INCLUDE_DIR is not defined even I have phonon-devel installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 19:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:12:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912121912.nBCJCeIp023682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from David Nalley 2009-12-12 14:12:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer Short Description: Package for generating excel spreadsheets Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: Thanks Remi!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 21:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912122144.nBCLir67024978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-12 16:44:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377925) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377925) updated init file with default setting for simulator and viewer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 21:46:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:46:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912122146.nBCLk3ru025589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-12 16:46:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=377926) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=377926) .el update with minor fixes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 21:50:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:50:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912122150.nBCLogIA026695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #10 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-12 16:50:41 EDT --- The attached files are an updated init file and updated .el file which fixes the above items. I would advice you that next time when you create patches don't merge patches from another one. It is just a matter of respect someone's time spent to create a patch. In this case it's Shakthi's time. I won't block the package because of this. However I feel that Shakthi's contribution deserved to be recognised. :) Please update the package for final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 02:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:19:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912130219.nBD2JRH6030173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 --- Comment #12 from Silas Sewell 2009-12-12 21:19:26 EDT --- Orphaning per upstreams request. > ... > > I would actually prefer it if Lamson not be included in Fedora, but this > being a GPL project you are free to do what you want with it. However, > my strict policy on the various linux distros is that I provide no > support to people who use your packages because your modifications and > practice of carving projects into multiple disconnected pieces increases > my support load. > > If you do package it, then I'll be sending people who have bugs and use > your package to you. > > Again, not trying to be mean, just trying to avoid problems that come > from package management. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 03:18:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:18:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912130318.nBD3ISWN010710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #11 from Arun SAG 2009-12-12 22:18:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I would advice you that next time when you create patches don't merge patches > from another one. It is just a matter of respect someone's time spent to create > a patch. In this case it's Shakthi's time. I won't block the package because of > this. However I feel that Shakthi's contribution deserved to be recognised. :) Agreed :-) . I made a patch out of the updated spice-mode.el file and before patch0 line of SPEC file, i gave credits (as comment) to the authors. is that ok? (In reply to comment #7) > #007: Set gnucap as default (since ngspice is freezing emacs). Remove ngspice > from the Requires and add gnucap as BR I doubt this, do i have to add gnucap as Build requires? what is BR ? gnucap is needed to build the package? May be you meant Requires ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 08:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:04:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543863] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools - Tools to generate and maintain CGI::Application::Structured based web apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912130804.nBD84eJD007436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543863 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-12-13 03:04:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > APPROVED. Thank you, Parag. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools Short Description: Tools to generate and maintain CGI::Application::Structured based web apps Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 08:39:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:39:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application::Plugin::FormState provides a temporary storage area within the user's session for storing form-related data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 08:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module acts as a plugin for Config::Simple to be easily used inside of a CGI::Application module. It does not provide every method available from Config::Simple but rather easy access to your configuration variables. It does however provide direct access to the underlying Config::General object created if you want to use it's full power. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 10:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131050.nBDAo5jC011112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #12 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-13 05:50:04 EDT --- Yes, add gnucap and gwave as requires. BR: is the shortform to _say_ Build Requires (Buildrequires:) The gnucap is not used during the building of the rpm hence no need to add as a BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 11:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 06:41:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131141.nBDBf8Mb021304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #13 from Arun SAG 2009-12-13 06:41:07 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-spice-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-spice-mode-1.2.25-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 12:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131248.nBDCmDLp002287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 12:48:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:48:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131248.nBDCmRwn002348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 15:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131526.nBDFQIK2023683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Charles Lopes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Flag|needinfo?(tjarls at gmail.com) | --- Comment #20 from Charles Lopes 2009-12-13 10:26:15 EDT --- I will revisit once ipsec-tools 0.8 is out then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 15:30:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542292] Review Request: mintmenu - gnome-panel menu from LinuxMint In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131530.nBDFUWjE006431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542292 --- Comment #15 from William Witt 2009-12-13 10:30:31 EDT --- - Fixed uninstall context menu item, it was hardcoded to use apt-get. Modified it to use packagekit (added packagekit dependency). - Moved file path changes to a patch vs. sed in the spec file. Sed was there when before it was a noarch package, now koji: currently down due to server move Spec URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.witt-family.net/mintmenu-4.9.1-6.fc12.src.rpm [unamanic at gimli ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/mintmenu-4.9.1-6.fc12.src.rpm mintmenu.src:76: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/linuxmint/mintMenu/mint*.png mintmenu.src:77: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/linuxmint/mintMenu/mint*.svg mintmenu.src:92: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers/ mintmenu.src:93: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers/mintMenu.server mintmenu.src:103: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/bonobo/servers/mintMenu.server 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 0 warnings. [unamanic at gimli ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mintmenu-4.9.1-6.fc12.noarch.rpm mintmenu.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 16:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:34:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131634.nBDGYMqF005631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 16:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131632.nBDGWamp005229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-13 11:32:35 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package emacs-%{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i686. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. Emacs-spice-mode does not have any. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths. Emacs-spice-mode does not have any. - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files. Emacs-spice-mode does not have any. - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: mock builds successfully in i686. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 16:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:40:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131640.nBDGefOJ007841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bashton at brennanas |fedora-review+ |hton.com) | --- Comment #12 from Brennan Ashton 2009-12-13 11:40:39 EDT --- Alright, it looks like the necessary changes have been made, and I note that you have passed the daemon patch to upstream http://groups.google.com/group/orbited-users/browse_thread/thread/2fe09fefb9295421/cf1ffe4e4c795e4d?lnk=gst&q=daemon#cf1ffe4e4c795e4d I APPROVE this package, please request CVS now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 16:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131646.nBDGkTo1009358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Arun SAG 2009-12-13 11:46:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-spice-mode Short Description: SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs Owners: sagarun chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 17:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131700.nBDH0wJH027354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Deutsch 2009-12-13 12:00:56 EDT --- A quick rpmlint gives: $ rpmlint orbited-0.7.10-2.fc11.src.rpm orbited.src: W: strange-permission orbited.init 0775 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 17:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:11:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547118] New: Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118 Summary: Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: splinux25 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://splinux.fedorapeople.org/crun/crun.spec SRPM URL: http://splinux.fedorapeople.org/crun/crun-0.1.1-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: crun is a light weight, easy to use, simpler cron like tool. It Executes a given program, a specified number of times, after a specified time interval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 18:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131844.nBDIiXmm018503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #23 from Tristan Santore 2009-12-13 13:44:28 EDT --- New review request for OBM at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544989 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 19:05:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:05:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131905.nBDJ5lLt024520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #16 from Michael Terry 2009-12-13 14:05:44 EDT --- OK, I fixed the crash, but it was caused by the gconf schema not being installed (no default value for a certain key -- /apps/deja-dup/backend). If you installed from this .spec file, maybe the schema isn't being registered? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 19:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:58:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544989] Review Request: obm: Enterprise class email and group ware solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912131958.nBDJwJrQ028361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544989 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Xavier Lamien 2009-12-13 14:58:18 EDT --- Hello, there's already a review request for this package. I recommend you to mix your effort to package this with previous review (co-maintain if you interested). bug #444760 as it has more fix/work done (in the core spec file) to get in FPC correctly. That could be really good to mix your update release with all fixes done in other package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 21:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912132104.nBDL4nUA024058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #17 from Christof Damian 2009-12-13 16:04:48 EDT --- update to upstream 1.4.1 Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-symfony-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-symfony-symfony-1.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm I update the spec file to the symfony 1.4 release, which makes some things easier because some of the compatibility libraries are removed and a newer Doctrine version is used. But now the Swift Mailer is required, which I also submitted for review. I currently just target the use of doctrine, as propel needs an update too. The bundled propel is removed though. rpmlint just complains about zero length and htaccess files for skeleton and template files. This is probably a package for Fedora 13 and not older versions, because of the dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 13 23:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912132310.nBDNAAi1004589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-13 18:10:08 EDT --- IMHO, this should be packaged, and in a way to Obsoletes/Provides: libtar as it's backwards-compatible and actually actively maintained unlike libtar. The Obsoletes/Provides should of course be versioned, so if a new libtar springs up at a later point (i.e. if the maintainer really goes back to actively developing it), it can be introduced instead of or in addition to the fork. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 02:43:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:43:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547226] New: Review Request: pgu - pygame addon for making GUIs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pgu - pygame addon for making GUIs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547226 Summary: Review Request: pgu - pygame addon for making GUIs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: louizatakk at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~louizatakk/rpm/python-pgu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~louizatakk/rpm/python-pgu-0.12.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is my first package, I am therefore seeking a sponsor. This is a python package, so the build is basicaly made with 'python setup.py build' and then 'python setup.py install' rpmlint shows no error or warning : $ rpmlint SRPMS/python-pgu-0.12.3-1.fc12.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/python-pgu-0.12.3-1.fc12.noarch.rpm SPECS/python-pgu.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. awaiting your comments, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 07:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541765] Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140713.nBE7Deem020577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-12-14 02:13:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=378154) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=378154) x86-64 Fedora 12 Live USB installation package list I just tried this on an x86-64 Fedora 12 Live USB installation and it works as well as on x86. Sometimes on startup the UI hangs, and a forced quit is required, but most of the time the UI comes up without incident. I've attached the sorted package list from my test system. Can you compare this with yours? Also, did you try restarting NanoEngineer-1 after you saw the crash? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 07:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140738.nBE7cFCU007684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #18 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-14 02:38:14 EDT --- Hi, So taking into consideration all the feed back , here are the changes done: - bump soname in the code from 1.2.11 to 1.2.12 - In the srpm, libtar-ng now obsoletes libtar, so that the conflicts are resolved. - Tar ball is bz2 and not gzip to save space. - The autom4te.cache dir is now removed. - License changes from MIT to BSD as per the original suggestion of the author. - Removed README.new from the tar and updated README with new code details, Also updated COPYRIGHT, while retaining the original clauses. SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/libtar-ng.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/libtar-ng-1.2.12-1.fc12.src.rpm Any more comments/suggestions would be welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 07:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 02:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140757.nBE7vOtk012015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #19 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-14 02:57:22 EDT --- Some suggestions not related to packaging guidelines: * Post to http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/distributions and contact other distribution maintainers. Check if other distributions have patches you can merge. * Specify a Roadmap in the wiki or a TODO in the source code on your plans forward * I also recommend using LZMA compress archives (tar.xz) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 08:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:11:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140811.nBE8BD61000485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve.traylen at cern.ch Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-14 03:11:09 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: log4c New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: stevetraylen I sent this mail a week ago to Alex requesting and EPEL branch with no response. I am now going ahead and requesting the branch myself. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 08:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:27:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140827.nBE8R5CD019050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #53 from Arun SAG 2009-12-14 03:27:01 EDT --- Comments added in spec file before Patches: Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-goodies.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-goodies-31.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 08:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:27:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140827.nBE8RQGn019160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #20 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-14 03:27:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Some suggestions not related to packaging guidelines: > > * Post to http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/distributions and > contact other distribution maintainers. Check if other distributions have > patches you can merge. > done > * Specify a Roadmap in the wiki or a TODO in the source code on your plans > forward > done. The README file already had it, but i added it to the project web page too. > * I also recommend using LZMA compress archives (tar.xz) OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 08:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 03:36:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532241] Review Request: emacs-identica-mode - Identica mode for emacs. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140836.nBE8aN8m006096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532241 --- Comment #2 from Arun SAG 2009-12-14 03:36:22 EDT --- obsolete entries in spec file removed Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-identica-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-identica-mode-0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 09:02:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140902.nBE92MuB012886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-14 04:02:05 EDT --- > - bump soname in the code from 1.2.11 to 1.2.12 Caution! You did NOT change the internal SONAME at all. It is still "libtar.so.1". You also wrote "Bump the soname" in the README. Distribution packagers (but also developers and ordinary users) will run wild if you don't get the library versioning right. * Please run "rpmlint -i" on the src.rpm and the built binary rpms. It prints some helpful warnings. (This is also in the Review Guidelines) * "BuildRequires: libtool" is not needed for properly prepared source tarballs. * To have the top source directory file name contain the %{version} would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 09:17:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:17:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140917.nBE9H27w031181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #22 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-14 04:17:00 EDT --- Are there any actual ABI changes which would warrant going to .so.2? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 09:20:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140920.nBE9Kn6d017907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #23 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-14 04:20:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Are there any actual ABI changes which would warrant going to .so.2? There is no ABI change, hence the major soname is still .1 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 09:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:25:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140925.nBE9PFqg019364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #24 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-14 04:25:13 EDT --- Wrong question, Kevin. ;) An actual SONAME version change at this point would not only be unexpected, but nonsense as in case of an immediate ABI- (and perhaps also API-) incompatibility it would be more appropriate to use the "-ng" also in the SONAME. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 09:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140938.nBE9cpIE022530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #25 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-14 04:38:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > > - bump soname in the code from 1.2.11 to 1.2.12 > > Caution! You did NOT change the internal SONAME at all. It is still > "libtar.so.1". > You also wrote "Bump the soname" in the README. Distribution packagers (but > also developers and ordinary users) will run wild if you don't get the library > versioning right. > > As said later, there is no ABI change yet, hence it was wrong for me to mention "soname bump" in README, removed that. SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/libtar-ng-1.2.12-2.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/libtar-ng.spec > * Please run "rpmlint -i" on the src.rpm and the built binary rpms. It prints > some helpful warnings. (This is also in the Review Guidelines) rpmlint is happy now > > * "BuildRequires: libtool" is not needed for properly prepared source tarballs. > Does that mean i have to include a copy of libtool in the source ball, I saw a few libraries, but none of them really seem to do it. Any idea? > * To have the top source directory file name contain the %{version} would be > good. --- Comment #26 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-14 04:38:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > > - bump soname in the code from 1.2.11 to 1.2.12 > > Caution! You did NOT change the internal SONAME at all. It is still > "libtar.so.1". > You also wrote "Bump the soname" in the README. Distribution packagers (but > also developers and ordinary users) will run wild if you don't get the library > versioning right. > > As said later, there is no ABI change yet, hence it was wrong for me to mention "soname bump" in README, removed that. SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/libtar-ng-1.2.12-2.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/libtar-ng.spec > * Please run "rpmlint -i" on the src.rpm and the built binary rpms. It prints > some helpful warnings. (This is also in the Review Guidelines) rpmlint is happy now > > * "BuildRequires: libtool" is not needed for properly prepared source tarballs. > Does that mean i have to include a copy of libtool in the source ball, I saw a few libraries, but none of them really seem to do it. Any idea? > * To have the top source directory file name contain the %{version} would be > good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 09:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140938.nBE9cpQs022514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #25 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-14 04:38:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > > - bump soname in the code from 1.2.11 to 1.2.12 > > Caution! You did NOT change the internal SONAME at all. It is still > "libtar.so.1". > You also wrote "Bump the soname" in the README. Distribution packagers (but > also developers and ordinary users) will run wild if you don't get the library > versioning right. > > As said later, there is no ABI change yet, hence it was wrong for me to mention "soname bump" in README, removed that. SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/libtar-ng-1.2.12-2.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/libtar-ng.spec > * Please run "rpmlint -i" on the src.rpm and the built binary rpms. It prints > some helpful warnings. (This is also in the Review Guidelines) rpmlint is happy now > > * "BuildRequires: libtool" is not needed for properly prepared source tarballs. > Does that mean i have to include a copy of libtool in the source ball, I saw a few libraries, but none of them really seem to do it. Any idea? > * To have the top source directory file name contain the %{version} would be > good. --- Comment #26 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-14 04:38:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > > - bump soname in the code from 1.2.11 to 1.2.12 > > Caution! You did NOT change the internal SONAME at all. It is still > "libtar.so.1". > You also wrote "Bump the soname" in the README. Distribution packagers (but > also developers and ordinary users) will run wild if you don't get the library > versioning right. > > As said later, there is no ABI change yet, hence it was wrong for me to mention "soname bump" in README, removed that. SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/libtar-ng-1.2.12-2.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/libtar-ng.spec > * Please run "rpmlint -i" on the src.rpm and the built binary rpms. It prints > some helpful warnings. (This is also in the Review Guidelines) rpmlint is happy now > > * "BuildRequires: libtool" is not needed for properly prepared source tarballs. > Does that mean i have to include a copy of libtool in the source ball, I saw a few libraries, but none of them really seem to do it. Any idea? > * To have the top source directory file name contain the %{version} would be > good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 09:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140939.nBE9di7T004318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #27 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-14 04:39:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Wrong question, Kevin. ;) An actual SONAME version change at this point would > not only be unexpected, but nonsense as in case of an immediate ABI- (and > perhaps also API-) incompatibility it would be more appropriate to use the > "-ng" also in the SONAME. Do i really need to call the library as libtar-ng.so.X ? Since its supposed to be currently compatible to libtar.so.X -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 09:51:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:51:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140951.nBE9p75X008392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-14 04:51:06 EDT --- You can try to ask for help on the openfontlibrary mailing list (I know the situation sort of sucks right now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 09:59:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:59:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226231] Merge Review: passivetex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912140959.nBE9xqkF029141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226231 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-14 04:59:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1) rpmlint *.spec *.src.rpm noarch/* > > passivetex.spec: W: no-%build-section > passivetex.src: W: no-%build-section > 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings > > please add %build section even if empty Fixed - added empty build section.. > 2)What is the LPPL license based on? It seems it should be "Copyright only" ( > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/CopyrightOnly ) Changed to Copyright only - it was probably based on other distros... > 3)Source link is not valid > > $ wget http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/passivetex-1.25.zip > --2009-12-10 18:37:32-- > http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/passivetex-1.25.zip > Resolving www.tei-c.org.uk... 163.1.2.156 > Connecting to www.tei-c.org.uk|163.1.2.156|:80... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found > 2009-12-10 18:37:32 ERROR 404: Not Found. Correct link is http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/passivetex.zip - so added only as a comment... > 4) Missing info for patches > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment > > Every patch in spec file should contain a comment describing: > * why is that patch used - for example bug number > * upstream information - was it sent upstream (and when)? taken from upstream? > was it accepted/rejected? is this patch "fedora specific" ? Info added, 5 years old patch, no connected bugzilla, upstream is dead ... and will never be alive again... > 5) wrong buildroot tag > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag > > """The BuildRoot value MUST be below %{_tmppath}/ and MUST contain at least > %{name}, %{version} and %{release}""" > > The recommended values for the BuildRoot tag is > > %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) > > Btw, if used only for Fedora 10+, there's no need to define BuildRoot tag at > all: > > """The RPM in Fedora 10 defines a default buildroot so in Fedora 10 and above > it is no longer necessary to define a buildroot tag.""" Fixed and built as passivetex-1.25-11.fc13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 10:06:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:06:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141006.nBEA6YiM012186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #28 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-14 05:05:55 EDT --- > As said later, there is no ABI change yet, Do you know what the term SONAME refers to? > Does that mean i have to include a copy of libtool in the source ball, Yes, and you do so already. > I saw a few libraries, but none of them really seem to do it. Uh? Dozens if not hundreds of library projects, which produce shared libraries, use libtool (via autoconf/automake) and include it in their tarballs. > Do i really need to call the library as libtar-ng.so.X ? Well, see comment 13 and remember that the libtar author would prefer for forks not to use the libtar name. You've renamed the tarball name, but everything else still is in the libtar namespace. This will lead to complications if you ever (a) plan to really touch the SONAME, and even if (b) you plan to extend the API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 10:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:17:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141017.nBEAHXkF015238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #29 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-14 05:17:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > > As said later, there is no ABI change yet, > > Do you know what the term SONAME refers to? > i do > > Does that mean i have to include a copy of libtool in the source ball, > > Yes, and you do so already. > > > I saw a few libraries, but none of them really seem to do it. > > Uh? Dozens if not hundreds of library projects, which produce shared libraries, > use libtool (via autoconf/automake) and include it in their tarballs. > > > Do i really need to call the library as libtar-ng.so.X ? > > Well, see comment 13 and remember that the libtar author would prefer for forks > not to use the libtar name. You've renamed the tarball name, but everything > else still is in the libtar namespace. This will lead to complications if you > ever (a) plan to really touch the SONAME, and even if (b) you plan to extend > the API. I agree, by above. I am going to rename the namespace to libtar-ng, and the libraries name would change too. will submit new package soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 10:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:23:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141023.nBEANLrv017141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 --- Comment #10 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-14 05:23:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > You can try to ask for help on the openfontlibrary mailing list (I know the > situation sort of sucks right now) Nicolas, I saw you are already subscribed to that mailing list. Can you please write for me? I do not want to subscribe to another mailing list just for one post. Thanks! This is the error I get: "/var/www/openfontlibrary.org/htdocs/cclib/cc-debug.php"(287): error_log(../cchost_offline/cc-log.txt) [function.error-log]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory [2009-12-14 10:16 am][127.0.0.1][/media/people/contact/phranzysko] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 10:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141044.nBEAiWXc022598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-14 05:44:31 EDT --- Andrea, I am present in a lot of places but I have only so much free time in the day. Right now I'm way behind on the maintenance on my own packages, so I don't really have the time to relay other packager requests (and then track answers...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 12:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 07:02:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141202.nBEC2HRv031162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 --- Comment #11 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-14 07:02:12 EDT --- Once again, haven't had another look at the pkg since previously mentioned issues are still present and Mamoru has added a review. Just about the licensing: > * Licensing > - The license tag should simply be "GPLv2+". > src/Extensions.cpp is under GPLv2+, libferrisloki.so uses > .libs/Extensions.o, which renders libferrisloki.so to be under GPLv2+, > so other license tag is useless. * Relicensing of source files to GPLv2+ is neither automatic nor implicit. It would be best to make the GPLv2+ licensing explicit in all source files where license conversion is possible. Even the copied LGPLv2+ m4 macros could be converted to GPLv2+ by following the instructions in the LGPL appendix. However: * The BoostExtensions.hh file, which applies its own license, is included in the built rpms. Hence: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios * About the several C++ source files with very short licensing terms or just copyright messages (e.g. LockingPtr.h), please don't take these issues lightly. See what is included in the built rpms. Some of the files (albeit from Loki lib) explicitly refer to "MIT" licensing. Several other files, used in ferrisloki (e.g. SmallObj.cpp) apply terms that look like https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style instead, i.e. more than a "Copyright Only" header even if it doesn't mention "MIT" anywhere. Simply ignoring such licensing issues in the Fedora package "License:" tag would be wrong. In particular, what I don't feel good about is this: | provided that [...] both that copyright notice and this | permission notice appear in supporting documentation. The 2nd example on the linked "Copyright Only" Fedora Licensing page wants copyright notices "to remain" in documentation. Vague enough already. These terms, however, can be read as requiring them to appear in supporting documentation. Compare with the MIT#Old_Style pointed at above. That is more than what the GPL requires. Those files could not be converted to GPL without the permission of the original authors, as the requirement where to put copyright notices and additional terms would be some sort of sublicensing, which would be illegal with the GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 12:20:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 07:20:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546871] Review Request: qpixman - Modified version of pixman for spice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141220.nBECKnkP004740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546871 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-14 07:20:47 EDT --- Why aren't these patches being pushed upstream? I don't think we should be importing Spice forked versions like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 13:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530617] Review Request: libixp - Stand-alone client/server 9P library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141300.nBED0Y4W000322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-14 08:00:31 EDT --- This doesn't fix the issues since now you've added further problems. Probably it's necessary to expand a bit: > %package devel > Provides: %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release} This combination, a -devel package providing a virtual -static package, is dangerous, because it is special-case 2 on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries It requires special attention during review and later updates. $ rpmls -p libixp-devel-0.5-3.fc12.i686.rpm | grep -v shar -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/ixp.h -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/ixp_srvutil.h Package doesn't contain any static library. Raises the question whether a) the header files contain enough code fragments that would be inserted when compiling them, or b) whether a library for these API headers is missing? The answer is yes to b). After disabling the static build, the shared library for this API is missing, because it is misplaced in the "ixpc" subpackage: $ rpmls -p ixpc-0.5-3.fc12.i686.rpm | head -3 -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/ixpc -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/libixp.so -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/libixp_pthread.so This needs work. libixp-devel alone is useless. No library to link with. Notice how /usr/bin/ixpc and examples are linked with -lixp. rpmlint also prints new warnings when running it on the built rpms: ixpc.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libixp_pthread.so ixpc.i686: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libixp.so No versioned SONAME, no SONAME at all, automatic RPM dependencies will be less helpful => pray that libixp API and ABI will stay stable. $ rpm -qpR ixpc-0.5-3.fc12.i686.rpm | grep ixp libixp.so * A shared library linked with executables, such as /usr/bin/ixpc, will benefit from adding the /sbin/ldconfig scriptlets (which were inappropriate with only the static lib). * The CFLAGS still look strange. See build.log. /usr/local/include at beginning of search paths. %optflags at the beginning, too, with a multitude of -O1, -O0 and other optimisations overriding them more than once. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 13:06:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:06:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546871] Review Request: qpixman - Modified version of pixman for spice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141306.nBED61FL001906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546871 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-14 08:06:00 EDT --- Very good point. FWIW, I'm actually taking issue with this ignorant behaviour of qpixman's upstream. That's why I want the stack to be in Fedora; so that we, once more, may lead by example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 13:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:05:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225729] Merge Review: enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141305.nBED54n0020762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225729 --- Comment #4 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-14 08:05:02 EDT --- All problems should be fixed in enscript-1.6.4-16.fc13. Note it is quite tricky to check if source matches upstream. Upstream moved to GNU site and 1.6.4 tarball no longer publicly exists. You have to clone upstream git repo, create 1.6.4 tarball from v1.6.4 tag and compare distribution tarball and upstream tarball via "diff -urp". Please do not use {md5,sha*}sum. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 13:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:11:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141311.nBEDBN0P003337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-14 08:11:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Once again, haven't had another look at the pkg since previously mentioned > issues are still present and Mamoru has added a review. > > Just about the licensing: > > > * Licensing > > - The license tag should simply be "GPLv2+". > > src/Extensions.cpp is under GPLv2+, libferrisloki.so uses > > .libs/Extensions.o, which renders libferrisloki.so to be under GPLv2+, > > so other license tag is useless. > > * Relicensing of source files to GPLv2+ is neither automatic nor implicit. It > would be best to make the GPLv2+ licensing explicit in all source files where > license conversion is possible. - We always can it and there is no problem. > Even the copied LGPLv2+ m4 macros could be > converted to GPLv2+ by following the instructions in the LGPL appendix. > However: > > * The BoostExtensions.hh file, which applies its own license, is included in > the built rpms. Hence: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios > > * About the several C++ source files with very short licensing terms or just > copyright messages (e.g. LockingPtr.h), please don't take these issues lightly. > See what is included in the built rpms. Some of the files (albeit from Loki > lib) explicitly refer to "MIT" licensing. Several other files, used in > ferrisloki (e.g. SmallObj.cpp) apply terms that look like > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style > > instead, i.e. more than a "Copyright Only" header even if it doesn't mention > "MIT" anywhere. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios Quoted: If your package contains files which are under multiple, distinct, and *independent* licenses, then the spec must reflect this by using "and" as a separator. The relation between MIT and GPL is not independent. > Simply ignoring such licensing issues in the Fedora package "License:" tag > would be wrong. In particular, what I don't feel good about is this: > > | provided that [...] both that copyright notice and this > | permission notice appear in supporting documentation. > > The 2nd example on the linked "Copyright Only" Fedora Licensing page wants > copyright notices "to remain" in documentation. Vague enough already. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer Quoted: and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 13:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:20:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530198] Review Request: rubygem-columnize - Sorts an array in column order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141320.nBEDKgkO025011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530198 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-14 08:20:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Some notes: > > * %check > - Please add %check section as this package contains test/ > directory > Fixed. > * License > - Well, while I believe this is under GPLv2+, "README" says > this is under GPLv2, so it is safer that the license tag > is changed to GPLv2. > OK, fixed. > * %define -> %global > - We now prefer to use %global rather than %define. > Fixed. > * unused macro > - The defined macro %ruby_sitelib does not seem to be used. Fixed. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-columnize.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-columnize-0.3.1-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 13:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:26:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141326.nBEDQRsa007371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #14 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-14 08:26:25 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-net-ldap.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-net-ldap-0.0.4-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 13:32:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141332.nBEDWKte028195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-14 08:32:16 EDT --- > We always can it and there is no problem. We can always do what? > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer Such a legal disclaimer is not found in the files. As I pointed out before: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 13:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:45:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225729] Merge Review: enscript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141345.nBEDjsY6032398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225729 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |enscript-1.6.4-16.fc13 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-14 08:45:50 EDT --- Looks ok for me now, approved... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 14:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:19:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141419.nBEEJjIG010967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-14 09:19:43 EDT --- Fixed the issues, thanks for the patch! New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-linecache.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-linecache-0.43-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 14:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:22:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225286] Merge Review: aspell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141422.nBEEM239025094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225286 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #25 from Ivana Varekova 2009-12-14 09:21:55 EDT --- Review granted, so I'm closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 14:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543566] Review Request: tsocks - Library to allow transparent SOCKS proxying In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141424.nBEEORYX012305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543566 --- Comment #5 from Jean-Francois Saucier 2009-12-14 09:24:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/tsocks.spec SRPM URL: http://jfsaucier.fedorapeople.org/packages/tsocks-1.8-0.4.beta5.fc12.src.rpm Thank you very much for the explanation, I appreciate it. I change the Summary and Description field to reflect what is in tsocks.8. You are right, it is more complete and it better describe the library. I agree with you about the versioned library. I found it odd but I didn't want to change upstream too much. For the shared-lib-calls-exit warning, yes, I have run rpmlint -i on the binary RPM. For the x86_64 and ppc64 builds, I really missed there... I should have tested the RPM thoughtfully. For this new version, I changed the bash script to make it work on x86_64. Sadly, I don't have a ppc64 laying around ;) Do you know if Fedora make some hardware available to run some tests? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 15:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141515.nBEFFAHv009038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-14 10:15:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Such a legal disclaimer is not found in the files. > As I pointed out before: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style If you insist that the license you quoted is not MIT, ask spot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 15:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141515.nBEFFnGX028738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #30 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-14 10:15:45 EDT --- There's no requirement to include autotools-generated files in the upstream tarballs, it's perfectly possible to generate them at build time. Doing this generation at build time is just not the way the autotools are intended to be used by upstream. But it's done in quite a few cases and it has some advantages (but also drawbacks). That said, in this case, you aren't running libtool at build time, so it doesn't make sense to put it as BuildRequires. My personal recommendation would be to convert the build system to CMake, which doesn't use that kind of generated files at all and is just generally nicer. But there's nothing wrong from a packaging standpoint with using autotools, be it at tarball generation time or at build time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 15:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:18:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141518.nBEFI72g010143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #31 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-14 10:18:06 EDT --- Re renaming the .so library, the drawback is that doing that requires all the packages using it to be patched to use the new name and rebuilt. But it's true that it can prevent conflicts later on and that it does a better job of complying with the wishes of the original upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 15:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:55:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141555.nBEFt4pp009043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Bug 226299 depends on bug 224148, which changed state. Bug 224148 Summary: pkgconfig: Requires.private creates unnecessary depencencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=224148 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 15:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:57:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141557.nBEFvbOv023408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 --- Comment #34 from Giuseppe Paterno 2009-12-14 10:57:32 EDT --- Sorry guys, back from holidays. Will do in next days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 16:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:26:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141626.nBEGQ9cf031731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #10 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-14 11:26:06 EDT --- Hello Leon, sorry for the delay. I was trying to understand with Peter which is the policy for this type of problems. As far as I understand, if modifications are quite big, I can accept it as-is. On the other hand if modifications are a simple renaming to gXlib and removal of the unused bits, then I'm afraid but you'll have to remove gXlib, patch and require python-xlib before I can approve the submission. I'll try and dwell a bit into the code to understand how deep was xlib modified when copied and renamed, and if I could figure an easy patch to decouple from gXlib. You might want to politely ask the developers how would they proceed should they have to remove the gXlib dependency and rely instead on a system wide package, and post the link to the answer. This might be very helpful! Please be patient :) Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 16:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:43:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] New: Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 Summary: Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roysjosh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/jroys/fedora/cciss_vol_status.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/jroys/fedora/cciss_vol_status-1.06-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A very lightweight program to report the status of logical drives on Smart Array controllers and also fibre channel attached MSA1000. This is my first package; I am seeking a sponsor. $ rpmlint -vi /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/cciss_vol_status-* cciss_vol_status.i586: I: checking cciss_vol_status.src: I: checking cciss_vol_status-debuginfo.i586: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -vi /dev/shm/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/cciss_vol_status-*.rpm cciss_vol_status.src: I: checking cciss_vol_status.x86_64: I: checking cciss_vol_status-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 16:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542715] Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141656.nBEGup3S009103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715 ELMORABITY Mohamed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |melmorabity at fedoraproject.o | |rg --- Comment #1 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2009-12-14 11:56:49 EDT --- Hi, I'm not (yet) a packager, anyway I'd like to make an informal review of your package. * The spec. file in your SRPM is not the same than the one you gave the URL. I considered the last one for this review (the .spec refers to the version 0.12.1 of rabbitvcs whereas the SRPM refers to 0.12). Please upload an updated version of your SRPM. * You should use "%global" [1] instead of "%define" in %define title RabbitVCS * Your BuildRoot looks very strange. Why not using the standard way to declare it? BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) * It seems there is no arch-dependent file installed by your package so you should add in your .spec header this line : BuildArch: noarch [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define Once your SRPM updated, the review will be continued with more details. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141706.nBEH6CHv012534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 josh.kayse at gtri.gatech.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:25:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141725.nBEHPMGs018544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:25:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141728.nBEHSEJa005606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:28:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141727.nBEHRAIf005450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:27:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:31:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:31:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141731.nBEHVG9C006581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:31:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:29:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538172] Review Request: pyactivemq - Python wrapper around activemq-cpp for messaging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141729.nBEHTvRc005887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538172 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:29:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:36:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543863] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools - Tools to generate and maintain CGI::Application::Structured based web apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141736.nBEHan4R021554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543863 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:36:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:35:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533744] Review Request: ImageJ - Image Processing and Analysis in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141735.nBEHZEQQ007797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533744 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:35:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141741.nBEHfR3M023069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:41:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:38:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:38:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543248] Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141738.nBEHcvYk022209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543248 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:38:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:40:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141740.nBEHe896008997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:40:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:44:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141744.nBEHiW2a009996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #44 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:44:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:43:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141743.nBEHhTx2023812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:43:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Unsupported Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141742.nBEHgf5b023555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:42:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:45:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141745.nBEHjWkn010846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:45:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:47:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:47:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541666] Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage - Check for pod coverage in your distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141747.nBEHluq5011332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541666 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:47:54 EDT --- This package already exists. I expect this should be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:49:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518318] Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141749.nBEHnA3V011509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roysjosh at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Joshua Roys 2009-12-14 12:49:09 EDT --- Hello, Version 0.0.7 seems to be a bit out of date; 0.0.10 is out. Also, the Source0 line is not accessible (no ftp anymore). Why tabsize of 5? It just seems non-standard :) Don't suppose I could convince you to use 4 or 8 or to just use spaces? Do we really need that ugly looking thing above the %configure? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526311] Review Request: mysql-mmm - Multi-Master Replication Manager for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141748.nBEHmkgi025708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526311 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:48:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141750.nBEHobbL012299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-14 12:50:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 17:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:53:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141753.nBEHrmib027040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-14 12:53:44 EDT --- I have no idea what you're talking about. To not answer my brief question doesn't help. [...] In comment 11, I've mentioned that _some_ of the source file headers in the build rpm explicitly give the licensing the name "MIT License", $ grep MIT * CachedFactory.h:// Code covered by the MIT License DataGenerators.h:// Code covered by the MIT License Factory.h:// Code covered by the MIT License Key.h:// Code covered by the MIT License SPCachedFactory.h:// Code covered by the MIT License StrongPtr.h:// The copyright on this file is protected under the terms of the MIT license. while other files apply a nameless license as in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style Due to even different licenses applied to other files in the binary rpm, currently the following guideline applies: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios ==> License: GPLv2+ and MIT and Boost Compatibility with GPL is given by both MIT and Boost, but there is no automatic/implict conversion of the licensing of either The Program or individual files included in the binary rpms. Further, MIT#Old_Style does not explicitly permit sublicensing. And with that we're back at older comments in this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 18:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543248] Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141804.nBEI4dIl015734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543248 --- Comment #6 from John Paulett 2009-12-14 13:04:38 EDT --- Just FYI, we released a new version of jsonpickle this weekend (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/jsonpickle/0.3.1), and have switched to hosting the files on PyPi instead of Google Code. The PyPi file list is available at http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/j/jsonpickle/ Thanks for working on the packaging for jsonpickle--I'm excited to see it in Fedora! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 18:00:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:00:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141800.nBEI0KB4014899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #32 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-14 13:00:15 EDT --- At least in Fedora, libtar is used by only a few packages: $ repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide-source --srpm --whatrequires libtar-devel mfiler3-0:2.1.3-3.fc12.src abrt-0:1.0.0-1.fc13.src barry-0:0.15-0.9.20090630git.fc12.src hydrogen-0:0.9.4-1.fc12.src Double-checking: $ repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide --whatrequires libtar.so.1 hydrogen-0:0.9.4-1.fc12.i686 mfiler3-0:2.1.3-3.fc12.i686 libtar-devel-0:1.2.11-15.fc13.i686 abrt-plugin-filetransfer-0:1.0.0-1.fc13.i686 barry-0:0.15-0.9.20090630git.fc12.i686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 18:23:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141823.nBEINS9J022479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 --- Comment #10 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-12-14 13:23:26 EDT --- I have a version which fixes the files in /usr/local, but now I have to properly fix, unbundled and packaged the Module::Install:RTx perl module that is included in the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 18:52:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:52:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518441] Review Request: ike - Shrew Soft VPN Client For Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141852.nBEIq7Xe030598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518441 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roysjosh at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Joshua Roys 2009-12-14 13:52:05 EDT --- Hello, (The official 2.1.5 is out now, by the way.) I'm not entirely sure where you get the "Sleepycat" license from... is the license used in LICENSE.TXT just word-for-word identical for that? Is there an email thread somewhere? Two rpmlint issues: Fix the init script (see below). Use the %cmake macro... this avoids/fixes a rpmlint error on the debuginfo package (see below). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo#Useless_or_incomplete_debuginfo_packages_due_to_packaging_issues (esp. the note about CFLAGS, ...) $ rpmlint -vi /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-x86_64/result/ike-* ike.src: I: checking ike.x86_64: I: checking ike.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/iked The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. ike-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking ike-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo extraction not working as expected. Verify that the binaries are not unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 19:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:05:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141905.nBEJ5IuM015869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-14 14:05:16 EDT --- log4c-1.2.1-7.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/log4c-1.2.1-7.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 19:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:02:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141902.nBEJ2t09014823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-14 14:02:51 EDT --- log4c-1.2.1-7.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/log4c-1.2.1-7.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 19:10:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:10:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141910.nBEJA94C004157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Linuxguy123 changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |linuxguy123 at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Linuxguy123 2009-12-14 14:10:02 EDT --- Is there still a licensing issue with FreeCAD using Open_CASCADE ? It appears that Ubuntu is going to provide FreeCAD in the repository in one of their upcoming releases. Is Fedora willing to follow suit ? http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/free-cad/index.php?title=Licence http://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/free-cad/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=181&sid=de1b98bddcff1db4c893ae9c993cdb8e If not, could someone please approach Open CASCADE about resolving this issue ? The holdup seems to be more pragmatic than actual, at least according to what I read here: http://www.opencascade.org/org/forum/thread_15859 I would really, really like to see FreeCAD available in Fedora without me building it. Linux really , really needs a tool like this. Aside: I'd like to see this bug reopened in F12 or rawhide. Out of respect for the process I won't do that, but I'd like to see someone else do it. Thanks for listening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 19:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141926.nBEJQItp024429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #11 from Leon Keijser 2009-12-14 14:26:12 EDT --- Yeah, don't worry, thanks for reviewing this pkg :) I had an couple of ideas on how to handle this: 1) the python distutils setup.py tool is very flexible. You can make a subcommand that, for example, will install everything except the gXlib files. To be used for example like this: % setup.py install-without-python-xlib I'm not an expert python programmer, but if the author doesn't have time to make it (or doesn't want to?), i can give it a shot and create a patch. 2) install everything as normal and then rm -rf the gXlib dir. And rpmlint will most likely complain about using dangerous commands. 3) ask the author if he can pretty-please drop python-xlib and have the INSTALL file point to the download link from where they can download the dependency and install it themselves. Although IMO option 3 would be the best way package-wise, i doubt it would go well with the entire Fedora 'motto' which includes freedom. For the developers to create the application the way they want to (why should upstream adjust a perfectly good working application just because we can't package it nicely?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 19:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:26:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141926.nBEJQMu1010749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roysjosh at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Joshua Roys 2009-12-14 14:26:18 EDT --- Hello, You could use the snapshot link in the comments instead of the git clone/archive: http://git.collabora.co.uk/?p=user/cassidy/git-bugzilla;a=snapshot;h=fc2be928f49569646058812bd0f41251b837bc04;sf=tgz Here's an unofficial review: MUST: * rpmlint $ rpmlint -vi /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-x86_64/result/git-bugzilla-0-0.1.20091211git.fc12.* git-bugzilla.noarch: I: checking git-bugzilla.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * named according to guidelines * spec is %{name}.spec * meets package guidelines * license is ok: GPLv2+ * license tag matches source ~ n/a no separate license file * spec file is written in American English * ... and is legible * source matches * builds on x86_64 (as noarch) * builds under mock (BuildRequires are correct) ~ n/a locales ~ n/a ldconfig * does not bundle copies of system libraries ~ n/a relocatable * does not make any directories * %files list is ok * permissions are correct * %clean section is correct * macro usage is consistent * package contains code ~ n/a no large doc files ~ n/a no doc files ~ n/a no header files ~ n/a no static libraries ~ n/a no pkgconfig files ~ n/a no library files ~ n/a no -devel subpackage * no .la files ~ n/a no GUI app * doesn't duplicate file/dir ownership * %install has rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * file names are valid UTF-8 SHOULD: - If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. - The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. Hope to help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 19:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912141954.nBEJsW1V020427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 --- Comment #1 from Joshua Roys 2009-12-14 14:54:30 EDT --- Updated version based on comments: Spec URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/jroys/fedora/cciss_vol_status.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stl.gtri.gatech.edu/jroys/fedora/cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.fc11.src.rpm - removed INSTALL - removed README (it was two lines long, one of which referenced INSTALL and the other COPYING) - standardized sourceforge url - removed commented out *Requires $ rpmdev-diff SRPMS/cciss_vol_status-1.06-{1,2}* diff -r -Nup cciss_vol_status-1.06-1.fc11.src/cciss_vol_status.spec cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.fc11.src/cciss_vol_status.spec --- cciss_vol_status-1.06-1.fc11.src/cciss_vol_status.spec 2009-12-14 10:34:49.000000000 -0500 +++ cciss_vol_status-1.06-2.fc11.src/cciss_vol_status.spec 2009-12-14 14:49:01.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,18 +1,15 @@ Name: cciss_vol_status Version: 1.06 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: Show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers Group: Applications/System License: GPLv2+ URL: http://cciss.sourceforge.net/#cciss_utils -Source0: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cciss/files/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cciss/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Patch0: cciss-fix-compile.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -#BuildRequires: -#Requires: - %description A very lightweight program to report the status of logical drives on Smart Array controllers and also fibre channel attached MSA1000. @@ -39,11 +36,15 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING INSTALL README +%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}* %changelog +* Mon Dec 14 2009 Joshua Roys - 1.06-2 +- standardize sourceforge url +- remove INSTALL and README (it's two lines long) from %%doc + * Mon Dec 14 2009 Joshua Roys - 1.06-1 - initial packaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 20:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:12:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142012.nBEKCPZ9009336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 --- Comment #6 from Mads Kiilerich 2009-12-14 15:12:22 EDT --- Re comment #5: Nothing has changed, and the Open CASCADE license is still not free. (It is now on http://www.opencascade.org/getocc/license/ and at version 6.3, but with exactly the same content as 6.2.) We would all like to see FreeCAD in Fedora, but Fedora can not do anything until Open CASCADE makes a clear statement whether the license is free and GPL-compatible or not. It do not depend on the Fedora release schedule. As you can see on the forum thread Tom Callaway _has_ approached Open CASCADE and pointed out what the problem is. Debian (and Ubuntu?) explicitly considers Open CASCADE non-free but apparently makes a compromise with their own principles. Fedora makes no compromises regarding non-free software. [IANAL and just speaking on my own behalf as random Fedora packager] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 20:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:26:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142026.nBEKQZEg031411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 Jef Spaleta changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jspaleta at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Jef Spaleta 2009-12-14 15:26:34 EDT --- Hey Terje, If Sebastian is cool with it... I'll make some of the requested edits and push you a new spec file and put myself up as co-maintainer. Opinion as to whether doc/ should be in a docs subpackage or in the main package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 20:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:36:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543480] Review Request: javamail - Java Mail API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142036.nBEKaANn016179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543480 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roysjosh at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Joshua Roys 2009-12-14 15:36:09 EDT --- Hello, Here's an unofficial review: * rpmlint (the warning is in error; the _libdir macro is used inside the same conditional that triggers the package being noarch) $ rpmlint -vi /var/lib/mock/fedora-12-x86_64/result/javamail-*.rpm javamail.src: I: checking javamail.src:207: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} The %{_libdir} or %{_lib} macro was found in a noarch package in a section that gets included in binary packages. This is most likely an error because these macros are expanded on the build host and their values vary between architectures, probably resulting in a package that does not work properly on all architectures at runtime. Investigate whether the package is really architecture independent or if some other dir/macro should be instead. javamail.x86_64: I: checking javamail-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking javamail-javadoc.noarch: I: checking 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * package is named appropriately * spec is %{name}.spec * spec file in general is ok; minor nitpick: -- comment on line 112, convert license file to....? * approved license * license matches mail/src/main/resources/META-INF/LICENSE.txt * license included as %doc * specfile written in American English * ... and is legible * files match upstream (checked via `spectool -g' and `diff') * builds via mock on x86_64 ? ExcludeArch? do a scratch build in koji to check compile on all archs? * builds in mock: BuildRequires are probably correct ~ n/a locales ~ n/a ldconfig * does not bundle copies of system libraries ~ n/a not relocatable * handles directory ownership/creation correctly * %files doesn't duplicate anything * %defattr provided, proper permissions * %clean is correct * consistent macro usage * package contains code * no overly large docs * the only %doc files are a license and a html page ~ n/a no headers ~ n/a no static libraries ~ n/a no pkgconfig files * no foo.so.#.# files, only foo.so ~ n/a no -devel subpackage * no .la files * no gui app (that I'm aware of?) * no duplicate directory ownership * %install has a rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * all filenames are valid UTF-8 Hope to help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 20:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142059.nBEKx4fp023385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 --- Comment #7 from Linuxguy123 2009-12-14 15:59:00 EDT --- Thank you for the update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 21:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142146.nBELkZwM009561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 --- Comment #5 from Jef Spaleta 2009-12-14 16:46:34 EDT --- Terje, Here's the link to an updated specfile and packages. http://fedorapeople.org/~jspaleta/python-couchdb/ Koji isn't cooperating right now due to the intrastructure work going on i think but I built this locally on my F10 system without issue. I've made a devel subpackage for the api documentation as per the suggestion in the packaging guidelines. I've patched the python files under site-packages directory to remove the shebang as they are not meant to be executable and are not in an executable directory. This has already been filed upstream and should be fixed in later releases. https://bugs.launchpad.net/desktopcouch/+bug/486797 rpmlint is throwing one bogus error message python-couchdb.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2 This is a fault alarm.. python-httplib2 needs to be explicitly set as its the python bindins for the httplib2 library. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 21:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:47:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542715] Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142147.nBELlQMC025928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |474428 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 21:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542715] Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142146.nBELkaSL025638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715 --- Comment #2 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-12-14 16:46:34 EDT --- Thanks for the review, and sorry for uploading an old SRPM. Here's the new SRPM: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs-0.12.1-1.fc12.src.rpm The updated spec is on the same place as before: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs.spec As for the noarch, nautilus-python wants to load /usr/lib/libpython2.6.so even on x86_64 (instead of /usr/lib64/libpython2.6.so), which is why I didn't make the package noarch. Nautilus-python itself isn't noarch, and won't load the proper libpython. See bug 474428 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 21:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142152.nBELqdYU027660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 --- Comment #6 from Terje R??sten 2009-12-14 16:52:37 EDT --- A should a documentation-only package be called -devel? Stranger things has happen. I am still unsure about Requires: couchdb Any new input here? Well, well, this seems good. Will do a proper review soon. - Terje -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 22:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:13:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142213.nBEMDeoL002130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 --- Comment #7 from Jef Spaleta 2009-12-14 17:13:39 EDT --- The packaging guidelines on the wiki state that if the documentation is development related... like API documentation it should go in the -devel subpackage instead of -doc. So its a judgement call but in this case the situation exactly fits the example api documentation case. -jef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 22:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478531] Review Request: tuxmeteor - Tux Meteor is a meteor counting program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142210.nBEMAHBo001610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478531 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us --- Comment #3 from Eric Christensen 2009-12-14 17:10:15 EDT --- What happened with this review? Was there a problem that could be worked out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 22:23:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:23:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142223.nBEMN0fV004632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #17 from David Lutterkort 2009-12-14 17:22:57 EDT --- David, why is this still open ? Please close as RAWHIDE if you've built the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 22:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:28:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142228.nBEMSRmG024471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 David Huff changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 22:34:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:34:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529816] Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames-WWW - WWW color names and equivalent RGB values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142234.nBEMYb4r008666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529816 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-12-14 17:34:36 EDT --- Updated for v1.10 . Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-WWW/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-WWW.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-WWW/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-WWW-1.10-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 22:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:30:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520463] Review Request: perl-common-sense - "Common sense" Perl defaults In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142230.nBEMUSfY007304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520463 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-12-14 17:30:27 EDT --- Can we update this pacakge to the lastest ? Also I wonder if it get pushed to F-11 updates stable via bodhi ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 14 23:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:16:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912142316.nBENGLbq006210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-14 18:16:20 EDT --- #001: Yes #003: python-sqlite2 requires python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 00:46:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:46:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543863] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools - Tools to generate and maintain CGI::Application::Structured based web apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150046.nBF0kEP4027183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543863 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-12-14 19:46:12 EDT --- Bodhi timed out while contacting Bugzilla when I released the two updates. F-11 Package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-1.fc11 F-12 Package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.007-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 01:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:48:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150148.nBF1mTor023689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-14 20:48:27 EDT --- Regarding the following: 2) Note that you can safely remove buildroot tag and cleanup of buildroot in %install as per given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot_tag and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install Since there is discussion of building these in EPEL, we need to continue using the buildroot tag and cleanup of buildroot. The rest of these issues will be addressed in an upcoming update to the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 01:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:58:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542715] Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150158.nBF1w8YD026528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715 --- Comment #3 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2009-12-14 20:58:07 EDT --- Thanks for the update. You're right indeed about the package architecture, sorry, I talked by the way with the phatch maintener who is exactely in the same case than you (a full-Python application with a Nautilus plugin that must be in %{_libdir}/) :-) Anyway you should had this line at the top of your spec file: %global debug_package %{nil} Otherwise a useless (and empty!) debug package will be generated In your %install section, you launch the installation with this command: %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Is there any reason to specify the ? -O1 ? option? Some optimizations at the installation are really required here? About the BuildRequires, neither gtk2-devel nor nautilus-python maybe required for the build. pygtk2 and python-devel are enough here. By the way, in the Requires, you don't need also python, it is detected automatically as a Requires by rpmbuild. You don't need also to add pyobject2 as a Requires since pygtk2 is always declared as a Requires and requires pyobject2. I've rebuild your package and rpmlint complains about some issues: - on your SRPM: rabbitvcs.src: W: strange-permission rabbitvcs-0.12.1.tar.gz 0777 rabbitvcs.src: W: strange-permission rabbitvcs.spec 0777 you should remove the executables bits from this files in your build root. - on your generated RPM: rabbitvcs.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided nautilussvn See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages rabbitvcs.x86_64: E: no-binary It is a false-positive because of the Nautilus extension issue you explained above, no matter I think ;) rabbitvcs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/rabbitvcs/debug/ipython_view.py 0644 /usr/bin/python rabbitvcs.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/rabbitvcs/do-rabbitvcs-restart-nautilus 0644 /bin/sh This file has a shebang, you should remove it using sed as described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Remove_shebang_from_files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 03:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544451] Review Request: rescene - Extracts RAR metadata and recreates RAR files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150305.nBF35p8q010606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544451 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-12-14 22:05:51 EDT --- Updated (upstream added a license.txt file): http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/rescene.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/rescene-1.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 03:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:11:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150311.nBF3B6PX030682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-14 22:11:06 EDT --- These updated files address the issues from Comment #8. (with the exception of issue 2). see Comment #9) Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-native-tools/pki-native-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-native-tools/pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 03:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:28:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150328.nBF3SoTR003982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-14 22:28:48 EDT --- * Mon Dec 14 2009 Kevin Wright 1.3.0-3 - Removed 'with exceptions' from License Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-ca-ui/dogtag-pki-ca-ui.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-ca-ui/dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 03:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540127] Review Request: qterm --- BBS client designed for BBS browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150356.nBF3uRJ4011699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540127 --- Comment #6 from Chen Lei 2009-12-14 22:56:26 EDT --- New upstream released(0.5.8) SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/qterm-0.5.8-1.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1338197/1/qterm.spec koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1872506 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 04:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:48:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150448.nBF4mDbW025603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #30 from Graeme Gillies 2009-12-14 23:48:10 EDT --- Ah ok thanks :) I have updated the spec files and rebuilt the SRPMs (made the corrections you outlined to all three packages) moovida.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida.spec moovida-1.0.9-2.fc12.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-1.0.9-2.fc12.src.rpm moovida-plugins-good.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good.spec moovida-plugins-good-1.0.9-2.fc12.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-good-1.0.9-2.fc12.src.rpm moovida-plugins-bad.spec: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad.spec moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-2.fc12.src.rpm: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org/moovida-plugins-bad-1.0.9-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 04:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:52:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547601] New: Review Request: pfacter - A perl port of facter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pfacter - A perl port of facter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547601 Summary: Review Request: pfacter - A perl port of facter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-pfacter.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/perl-pfacter-1.13_3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Pfacter is a cross-platform distribution for retrieving facts about the system such as IP and MAC addresses, DIMMs, processors, and hardware information. Pfacter supports writing to an LDAP database, making it an ideal tool in the creation of a universal infrastructure host list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 06:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:56:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150656.nBF6ukW3025786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-15 01:56:44 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1872517 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 7062bbc726af7d49488727a1f25fbf7d88b3e490 pki-native-tools-1.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 08:18:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:18:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547622] New: Review Request: python-cloudservers - Python bindings to the Rackspace Cloud Servers API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-cloudservers - Python bindings to the Rackspace Cloud Servers API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547622 Summary: Review Request: python-cloudservers - Python bindings to the Rackspace Cloud Servers API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: acturneruk at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://c0456722.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/python-cloudservers.spec SRPM URL: http://c0456722.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/python-cloudservers-1.0a3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a client for Rackspace's Cloud Servers API. There's a Python API (the ``cloudservers`` module), and a command-line script (``cloudservers``). Each implements 100% of the Rackspace API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 08:16:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:16:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547621] New: Review Request: django-googlecharts - A suite of template tags for Django to assist in generating charts using Google's Chart API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-googlecharts - A suite of template tags for Django to assist in generating charts using Google's Chart API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547621 Summary: Review Request: django-googlecharts - A suite of template tags for Django to assist in generating charts using Google's Chart API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: acturneruk at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://c0456722.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/django-googlecharts.spec SRPM URL: http://c0456722.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/django-googlecharts-1.0a1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a suite of template tags to assist in generating charts using Google's `Chart API`. There's deliberately no Python-level API; try pygooglechart for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 08:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:30:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150830.nBF8UeQf015523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-15 03:30:39 EDT --- please update this package for review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 08:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:29:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150829.nBF8TKnu015008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-15 03:29:19 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1872515 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 3ebb71136636bf20394c6be3e359cbed0d43510e CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=20, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.03 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.07 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01-1.fc13.noarch=> Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::Config::Simple) = 1.01 Requires: perl(CGI::Application) perl(Config::Simple) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 08:29:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:29:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150829.nBF8TINd014976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-15 03:29:17 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1872513 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) c9da0b80ee9320f9ac3ed360ac75261464d7d693 CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=112, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.03 sys + 0.71 cusr 0.14 csys = 0.90 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12-1.fc13.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::FormState) = 0.12 Requires: perl(CGI::Application) perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::Session) perl(CGI::Session::ID::md5) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 09:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542313] Review Request: QTeXEngine - Library enabling Qt based applications to easily export graphics to TeX In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912150921.nBF9LD7p009594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542313 Chen Lei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: QTeXEngine |Review Request: QTeXEngine |- Add-on for QtiPlot to |- Library enabling Qt based |enable the export of 2D |applications to easily |plots to TeX |export graphics to TeX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 10:01:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:01:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151001.nBFA1LE9007103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-12-15 05:00:47 EDT --- Thank you for the review, Parag. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple Short Description: Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 10:01:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:01:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151001.nBFA1LFQ019132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-12-15 05:00:51 EDT --- Thanks, Parag. Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState Short Description: Store Form State without Hidden Fields Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 10:32:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:32:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151032.nBFAWNb6027612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #26 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-15 05:32:21 EDT --- I have found out that wordnet is not in EPEL-5 as told on IRC. Then I tried finding it at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8574, where it is not listed. So it is not possible to build artha for EL-5, what should I do now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 10:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:42:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547655] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151042.nBFAgJbk030674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547655 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |493335 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 10:42:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:42:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151042.nBFAgIn2030652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |547655 --- Comment #11 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-12-15 05:42:15 EDT --- New version : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-RTx-Calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-RTx-Calendar-0.07-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 10:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:40:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547655] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547655 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Module-Install-RTx.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Module-Install-RTx-0.25-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: This Module::Install extension implements one function, RTx, that takes the extension name as the only argument. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 10:47:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:47:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542715] Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151047.nBFAl4V5020269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715 --- Comment #4 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2009-12-15 05:47:02 EDT --- I forgot also 2 points ^^ * Your icons scriplets look strange... Why not referring to the specific guidelines? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache * You should also maybe tag of the files in %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/* (here AUTHORS and MAINTAINERS files) as "%doc", like this in your %files section: %doc %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/* Don't forget by the way to set the package as the owner of the %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/ directory by adding this in %files: %dir %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 10:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151058.nBFAwPX6002757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-15 05:58:23 EDT --- Well, * First rebuild this package on F-13(devel)/F-12/11 * For F-12/11, submit push requests on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ When these are done, I will close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. For EL-5, rebuilding this package for EL-5 is not mandatory. If you want to import this package into EL-5, contact wordnet maintainer (or file a bug against wordnet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 11:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:16:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225901] Merge Review: inn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151116.nBFBG560028421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225901 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-15 06:16:02 EDT --- Review of inn-2.5.1-2.fc13: Legend: "+" OK, "-" Not OK. + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - MUST(1): The License field in spec match the actual license + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file must be included in %doc + MUST: The spec file written in American English + MUST: The spec file for the package is legible + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL + MUST: The package successfully compile + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires + MUST: The spec file handle locales properly + MUST: Every package which stores shared library files in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + MUST: Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: Package own all directories that it creates + MUST: Package does not list a file more than once in the spec file + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line - MUST(2): Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: Package use macros consistently + MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content + MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application + MUST: Header files in a -devel package + MUST: Static libraries in a -static package + MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' + MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package + MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built + MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. 1 - After inspection it seems valid license should be "GPLv2+ and BSD and MIT and Public Domain" 2 - remove spurious "rm -f files.list files.main files.devel files.inews" line from %clean section Please fix appropriate rpmlint warnings and summarize rest of them + explain why they are invalid. Please add "Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release}" to -devel subpackage (and probably to the main inn package as well) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 11:29:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:29:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151129.nBFBTghS010942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #45 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-15 06:29:40 EDT --- I have built gscribble for devel, F-11 and F-12, will make request in Bodhi now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 11:28:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:28:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151128.nBFBSXxS010664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #28 from Roshan Singh 2009-12-15 06:28:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Well, > > * First rebuild this package on F-13(devel)/F-12/11 > * For F-12/11, submit push requests on bodhi: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ > > When these are done, I will close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE. > > For EL-5, rebuilding this package for EL-5 is not mandatory. > If you want to import this package into EL-5, contact wordnet > maintainer (or file a bug against wordnet). Ok, i have built artha for devel, F-11, and F-12 successfully. I will make request in bodhi now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 11:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:45:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226521] Merge Review: uucp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151145.nBFBj6h9004480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226521 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-15 06:45:04 EDT --- Review of uucp-1.07-20.fc13 package: + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . + MUST: The License field in spec match the actual license + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file must be included in %doc + MUST: The spec file written in American English - MUST(1): The spec file for the package is legible + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL + MUST: The package successfully compile + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires + MUST: The spec file handle locales properly + MUST: Every package which stores shared library files in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + MUST: Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: Package own all directories that it creates + MUST: Package does not list a file more than once in the spec file + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line + MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: Package use macros consistently + MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content + MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application + MUST: Header files in a -devel package + MUST: Static libraries in a -static package + MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' + MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package + MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built + MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. 1 - please fix all rpmlint warnings or explain them. 2 - please add %{?_smp_mflags} macro to "make" command in build section and remove implicit "all" target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 11:47:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:47:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518441] Review Request: ike - Shrew Soft VPN Client For Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151147.nBFBlx1f015843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518441 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-12-15 06:47:57 EDT --- - The license is based on the text in LICENSE.TXT, i have sent a mail to the devel list to clarify this. - %cmake macro implemented - Given the fact that this is a desktop app, users expect that it should just work on installation, disabling the service would prevent this from happening. So i think it is best to leave the service default enabled. - Updated spec and srpm http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ike/ike-2.1.5-1.fc12.src.rpm http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/ike/ike.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 11:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:54:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518441] Review Request: ike - Shrew Soft VPN Client For Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151154.nBFBsfx7017830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518441 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-12-15 06:54:40 EDT --- On checking the devel list achives, i can confirm that it is indeed the sleepycat license. http://lists.shrew.net/mailman/htdig/vpn-devel/2007-October/000020.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 13:11:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:11:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151311.nBFDB1LE027961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 --- Comment #12 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-12-15 08:10:59 EDT --- New version : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-RTx-Calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-RTx-Calendar-0.07-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 13:30:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:30:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226521] Merge Review: uucp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151330.nBFDUW5W012766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226521 --- Comment #2 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-15 08:30:30 EDT --- Thanks for review, Adam. - added _smp_mflags to make - removed implicit target - fixed all .srpm rpmlint warnings - commented patches - fixed build root - use buildrequires/requires instead of prereq For the #1 and rpm - there is a lot of setuid/setgid binaries, some scripts and other "old style" files/things. I would say those rpmlint warnings/errors are required for the package propper functionality, but feel free to discuss them specifically. Updated package built as uucp-1.07-21.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 13:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:42:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543248] Review Request: python-jsonpickle - A module that allows any object to be serialized into JSON In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151342.nBFDgear016385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543248 --- Comment #7 from Ben Boeckel 2009-12-15 08:42:39 EDT --- Thanks. I'll update the information in the spec file when I get my laptop unpacked. The netbook isn't well suited to packaging work :/ . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 13:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:59:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151359.nBFDxYKu021439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #20 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-12-15 08:59:30 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 13:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:57:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226521] Merge Review: uucp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151357.nBFDvYrr008977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226521 --- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-15 08:57:33 EDT --- We just discussed rpmlint warnings about the scripts in doc dir. All those rpmlint warnings come from the contrib directory with sample scripts. Those scripts have shebangs and are intended to be executable. Uucp is very old near-dead package with "old-style" packaging, so I would prefer to keep those as they are at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 14:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:06:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151406.nBFE6uvJ011925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #21 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-15 09:06:54 EDT --- a small comments regarding package description/summary, imho, it makes little sense to mention "multiplatform" or "on Qt4", (fedora) users won't care (or need to know) about what platforms are supported or the toolkit used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 14:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:19:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151419.nBFEJ5KQ028292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #16 from Daniel Novotny 2009-12-15 09:19:02 EDT --- hello Jon, I'll explain the remaining warnings: (In reply to comment #8) >The only ones that concern me are these: > > Lots of: > mailman.i386: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile > /usr/lib/mailman/templates/zh_TW/userpass.txt > A file in /usr is marked as being a configuration file. Store your conf files > in /etc/ instead. > these are the HTML files Mailman displays in its UI - they are both data (mailman treats them as data files) and config files, because the user can change them to customize the look and feel used by his mailing list (to conform with his web's design and/or content for example) > mailman.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre rm > mailman.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm we are not rm-ing any of the mailman's files, the %pre and %post script creates its own temporary flag file in /var/run, indicating if the service is running during an upgrade (see the "restart_flag" variable in the spec) and we are rm-ing only this script's temporary flag file > > mailman.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mailman $prog > The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your > actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have > to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible > that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains > nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest > themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in > these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the > script manually. the subsys is coherent, rpmlint is confused by the usage of shell variables ("It is also possible that rpmlint gets this wrong" applies here) > mailman.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mailman > The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security > reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the > init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword > to fix this if appropriate for this service. > yes, the service seems to be on by default: I can fix this after fedora server outage is over -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 14:36:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:36:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226379] Merge Review: rsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151436.nBFEaUYD014500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226379 --- Comment #3 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-15 09:36:28 EDT --- All issues written in comment #2 should be fixed in rsh-0.17-60.fc13. Note about rexec source - I tried to find current location but it seems it exists nowhere on Internet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 14:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:41:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226521] Merge Review: uucp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151441.nBFEfifY016224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226521 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-15 09:41:43 EDT --- Ok, package looks fine now. Reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 14:40:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:40:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226567] Merge Review: xmltex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151440.nBFEeMGB015890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226567 Michal Hlavinka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-12-15 09:40:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for review... > 1) I see it harmless, too... > 2) fixed - there is no tarball, so changed to comment > 3) no longer zipped > 4) there is no longer alive upstream (for more than 7 years), so I don't expect > it could go upstream > 5) fixed verified, no other objections thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 14:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:42:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151442.nBFEgMvm003031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 --- Comment #29 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-12-15 09:42:14 EDT --- Sorry for taking so long. Most of this (hopefully all blockers) should be fixed in sendmail-8.14.3-9.fc13. I didn't include the msp-authinfo support as it requires special permissions and makemap fails when trying to regenerate the file. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 14:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151444.nBFEiK1x003633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #22 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-15 09:44:19 EDT --- Cleaning up NotReady, since it is almost ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 14:45:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151445.nBFEjoko004727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #23 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-15 09:45:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > a small comments regarding package description/summary, imho, it makes little > sense to mention "multiplatform" or "on Qt4", (fedora) users won't care (or > need to know) about what platforms are supported or the toolkit used. I would like to keep at least mention about toolkit, since some users prefer GTK apps over Qt or vice versa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 14:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226431] Merge Review: squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151456.nBFEu6ku009106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226431 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 14:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226431] Merge Review: squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151457.nBFEv6KC009288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226431 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 15:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:04:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542166] Review Request: patricia-trie - Java prefix tree library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151504.nBFF4DE2023507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542166 ELMORABITY Mohamed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |melmorabity at fedoraproject.o | |rg --- Comment #1 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2009-12-15 10:04:12 EDT --- Hi, I'm not (yet) a packager, anyway I'd like to make an informal review of your package. * You should not rely explicitely on OpenJDK in your BuildRequires; use instead: Buildrequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 as suggested in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires Don't forget by the way to add a Java runtime by using: Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0 Did you tried to build your package with gcj by the way? * You should maybe in your javadoc subpackage add a Requires on "%{name} = %{version}-%{release}" also, as recommended here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#ant_2 Except these two points, your package seems OK. I rebuild your SRPM, it works fine and rpmlint doesn't complains :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 15:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:42:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151542.nBFFg4KY003045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #24 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-15 10:42:01 EDT --- OK, but please leave it out of the package summary at least, this could be something mentionable in the package description. that's a lesser of 2 evils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 15:41:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:41:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226431] Merge Review: squid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151541.nBFFf3Br024171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226431 --- Comment #4 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-15 10:40:59 EDT --- Formal review of squid-3.1.0.15-2.fc13: "+" means OK, "-" means not OK + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec - MUST(1): The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - MUST(2): The License field in spec match the actual license - MUST(3): If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file must be included in %doc + MUST: The spec file written in American English + MUST: The spec file for the package is legible + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL + MUST: The package successfully compile + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - MUST(4): The spec file handle locales properly + MUST: Every package which stores shared library files in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + MUST: Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: Package own all directories that it creates + MUST: Package does not list a file more than once in the spec file + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line + MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) - MUST(5): Package use macros consistently + MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content + MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application + MUST: Header files in a -devel package + MUST: Static libraries in a -static package + MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' + MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package + MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built + MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. 1: Use versioned Sources, please (s/Source/Source0/) 2: It seems package is distributed under GPLv2 only, not GPLv2+ 3: Include COPYING and COPYRIGHT files in %doc, please 4: use %find_lang macro, please. Check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files for more information 5: Use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS macro instead of %{optflags} Other: - please remove Source1 (the .asc signature). I don't see any reason to include it in the package - don't use -fPIE flag on architectures where -fpie is sufficient because -fpie generates faster code. I suggest to use this in the specfile: %ifarch sparcv9 sparc64 s390 s390x export CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fPIE" export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fPIE" %else export CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fpie" export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fpie" %endif export LDFLAGS="-pie" - I recommend to drop -Os, -g, -pipe and -fsigned-char parameters - don't export CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and LDFLAGS twice, the first export is sufficient - please use macros instead of hardcoded paths: - use %{_sysconfdir} instead of /etc - use %{_datadir} instead of /usr/share - fix (or explain) all rpmlint warnings - consider to add LSB header to initscript (not required, check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#LSB_Header) - remove the %triggerin as written in comments #1, #2 and #3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 15:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:54:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544016] Review Request: cbpolicyd - Postfix anti-spam policy server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151554.nBFFso2A008072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544016 --- Comment #1 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-12-15 10:54:48 EDT --- Policyd has released v2.0.9, so I've produced an updated specfile and SRPM for the new version. Spec URL: http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/cbpolicyd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/cbpolicyd-2.0.9-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 15:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151556.nBFFuxWV030180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 10:56:57 EDT --- activemq-cpp-3.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/activemq-cpp-3.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 15:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:57:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151557.nBFFvTXo030267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 10:57:29 EDT --- activemq-cpp-3.0.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/activemq-cpp-3.0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 16:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:36:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151636.nBFGai6l022781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-15 11:36:43 EDT --- #003: $ rpm -qR python-sqlite2 ... python(abi) = 2.6 It does pull python. So, we can remove the explicit dependency of including python in Requires? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 16:46:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:46:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225901] Merge Review: inn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151646.nBFGkjlI025728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225901 --- Comment #2 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2009-12-15 11:46:42 EDT --- > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/control/sendsys.pl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/control/ihave.pl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/innshellvars.tcl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/filter/INN.py > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/control/sendme.pl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/INN/Config.pm > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/innshellvars.pl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/filter/nnrpd_access.py > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/filter/filter_nnrpd.pl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/filter/nnrpd_dynamic.py > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/control/checkgroups.pl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/control/newgroup.pl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /var/lib/news/http/innreport.css > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/control/version.pl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/control/senduuname.pl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/filter/filter_innd.py > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/control/rmgroup.pl > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/filter/nnrpd.py > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/filter/nnrpd_auth.py > inn.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/news/filter/startup_innd.pl Upstream code. Missing !# > inn.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/news/incoming 0775 > inn.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/news/incoming/bad 0775 > inn.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/run/news 0750 > inn needs directory with umask 002 or 007 > inn.i386: E: non-readable /etc/news/passwd.nntp 0640 > inn.i386: E: non-readable /etc/news/innfeed.conf 0640 > inn.i386: E: non-readable /etc/news/radius.conf 0640 > inn.i386: E: non-readable /etc/news/incoming.conf 0640 It should be not readable to other users instead of news or users with group news inn.i386: E: setuid-binary /usr/libexec/news/innbind root 04510 inn.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/news/innbind 04510 inn.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/news/innbind 04510 inn.i386: E: setuid-binary /usr/libexec/news/rnews uucp 04550 inn.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/news/rnews 04550 inn.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/news/rnews 04550 That's correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 16:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151654.nBFGsJ0i027888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #6 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-15 11:54:18 EDT --- #001: Removed glibc-headers. Continue to use BR for poky-depends. #002: Removed circular dependency. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/poky-scripts.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poky-scripts-6-4.fc12.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-11, F-12 and EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1873827 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1873838 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1873840 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 17:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:14:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151714.nBFHEoQB000962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-15 12:14:49 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- 79 %check 80 pushd %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir} -------------------------------------------------------- can be simplified as: pushd .%{geminstdir} ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-linecache) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 17:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151719.nBFHJhtR025509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #54 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-15 12:19:40 EDT --- Good: + SPEC basename matches with package name + Package contains recent release of the application + Consistantly usage of rpm macros + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Could download upstream tar ball via spectool -g + Package tarball matches with upstream (m5dsum: ec409b4628c2c9a4f9789cb7fb570271) + License tag states GPLv2+ as a valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Package contains el subpackage for emacs lisp sources + Subpackage contains proper Required tag agains main package + Local build works fine + Package has proper Buildroot definition + Buildroot will be clean at start of %clean and %install + Rpmlint is silent on source package + Rpmlint is silent on binary package + Mock build works fine + Local install/uninstall works fine + Application seems to work properly + Files has proper permission + All files are owned by the package + There are new files or dirs belong to other packages + %doc stanza is small, so we need no separate doc subpackage + Package has proper Changelog Bad: - I could fount GPLv3 licensed source files in the package. Pliease change license tag to 'GPLv2+ and GPLv3' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 17:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151733.nBFHXdOs012673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 17:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:39:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541765] Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151739.nBFHdiD2001846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-12-15 12:39:42 EDT --- I updated my Live USB system to the latest Fedora 12 packages and I still can't replicate the crash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 17:55:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:55:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151755.nBFHtJoK019962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-15 12:55:18 EDT --- Shouldn't this be patched, so bugzilla.redhat is the default one and *not* the gnome one? Of course, this would be fedora/red hat specific, but the reasonablest way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 17:59:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:59:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151759.nBFHxgmf008161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 --- Comment #8 from Terje R??sten 2009-12-15 12:59:40 EDT --- OK, this seems mostly fine ok: rpmlint ok: naming ok: license BSD, every file seems to include header, good ok: language ok: md5sum: 446b8377cf2ddda94d5f2df29c4f705f CouchDB-0.6.tar.gz 446b8377cf2ddda94d5f2df29c4f705f CouchDB-0.6.tar.gz.1 ok: source url ok: dirs ok: perms ok: utf-8 koji is very slow, not possible to do a test build, local build seems fine. package the latest release: 0.6.1 and be more explicit in %files listing (makes things a lot easier for a new maintainer) and I will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 18:08:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:08:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151808.nBFI8RZ1023990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-15 13:08:25 EDT --- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-ruby-net-ldap) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 18:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151851.nBFIpY2J022333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 Jarod Wilson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Flag|needinfo?(jarod at redhat.com) |fedora-review+ --- Comment #28 from Jarod Wilson 2009-12-15 13:51:29 EDT --- Apologies for the delays, I've been a bit, um... tied up... with new happenings here in the office. Yeah, with the tweaks requested in comment #22 done, I'm going to say you're all set. Thanks much for your patience working though this Package APPROVED. iirc, we still need to get you hooked up packager group sponsorship, which I think needs to happen prior to filing a cvs request to add the package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 19:01:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:01:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151901.nBFJ10FO006069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 --- Comment #9 from Jef Spaleta 2009-12-15 14:00:58 EDT --- 0.6.1 doesn't need the shebang patch! Is this good enough for the detail level in the files sections? %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc ChangeLog.txt COPYING README.txt %{_bindir}/couchdb-dump %{_bindir}/couchdb-load %{_bindir}/couchdb-replicate %{_bindir}/couchpy %{python_sitelib}/CouchDB-%{version}-py2.5.egg-info %{python_sitelib}/couchdb %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc doc/api doc/index.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 19:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151908.nBFJ8Wet012033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-15 14:08:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pki-native-tools Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Native Tools Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 19:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:17:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547832] Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151917.nBFJH9oa031332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547832 Ralph Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 19:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151918.nBFJI1LM031668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Terje R??sten 2009-12-15 14:17:53 EDT --- Nice! Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 19:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:15:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530198] Review Request: rubygem-columnize - Sorts an array in column order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151915.nBFJFBeE030580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530198 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-15 14:15:07 EDT --- Well, ------------------------------------------------------------- 37 # Fix shebangs 38 find %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir} -type f -exec sed -r -e 's"^#!(.*)/usr/bin/env ruby"#!/usr/bin/ruby"' {} \; ------------------------------------------------------------- - This should be "-exec sed -i -e". Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-columnize) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 19:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547832] New: Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547832 Summary: Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: Ralph.Lange at bessy.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/~rlange/procserv/procServ.spec SRPM URL: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/~rlange/procserv/procServ-2.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: procServ is a wrapper that starts an arbitrary command as a child process in the background, connecting its standard input and output to a TCP port for telnet access. It supports logging, child restart (manual or automatic on exit), and more. This is my first fedora package, so I will need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 19:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:18:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151918.nBFJIIdQ015937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-15 14:18:14 EDT --- The "pki-native-tools" package does not own "%{_datadir}/pki/" -- however, multiple packages do own various subdirectories under "%{_datadir}/pki/": # rpm -qf /usr/share/pki dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-2.fc11.noarch -- sole-owner of "/usr/share/pki/common-ui/" pki-common-1.3.0-4.fc11.noarch -- sole-owner of "/usr/share/pki/scripts/" dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-2.fc11.noarch -- sole-owner of "/usr/share/pki/ca-ui/" ... Since Dogtag encompasses "six" distinct servers, but does not require all six to be installed, many distinct subdirectories will be owned under the common "/usr/share/pki/" directory, and we therefore follow the rule as described in: "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership" > 2)why obsoletes and provides included here? > Provides: pki-common-ui = %{version}.%{release} > > Obsoletes: pki-common-ui < %{version}.%{release} > > I can't see package pki-common-ui in fedora. > Dogtag directory server includes a "UI" package called "dogtag-pki-common-ui" whereas Red Hat directory server includes a "UI" package called "redhat-pki-common-ui". By providing "pki-common-ui" from both of these packages, we are able to have the dependent package "pki-common" simply Require "pki-common-ui", and thus can easily change the runtime "UI" components. > 3) why following Requires is needed? > Requires: bash >= 3.0 > Seven of the eight "UI" packages contain a single "Require" statement; we used "Requires: bash" (removed the >= 3.0) so that rpm would not complain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 19:31:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151931.nBFJVSrc021682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-15 14:31:21 EDT --- * Mon Dec 14 2009 Kevin Wright 1.3.0-4 - Removed 'with exceptions' from License Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-java-tools/pki-java-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-java-tools/pki-java-tools-1.3.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 19:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:35:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151935.nBFJZ3n5023155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-15 14:35:01 EDT --- This package is not currently ready. (see whiteboard) Will update as soon as the code has been updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 19:51:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:51:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912151951.nBFJpd2r029038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 Jef Spaleta changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jef Spaleta 2009-12-15 14:51:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-couchdb Short Description: A Python library for working with CouchDB Owners: jspaleta sdz Branches: F-12 F-13 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 20:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:40:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912152040.nBFKeXvp011205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2009-12-15 15:40:30 EDT --- Thanks, Daniel, these make sense. When you fix the service being on by default, can you add brief versions in logical places in the spec, at least for the HTML/conf file issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 20:45:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:45:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 359941] Review Request: drupal-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912152045.nBFKjasW031472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=359941 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2009-12-15 15:45:34 EDT --- Sven, I skipped looking at the ticket you opened. Looks like they closed it. Given the explanation they give, do you think copying or linking that statement is sufficient? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 20:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:53:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912152053.nBFKr5pj000820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #17 from Michael Terry 2009-12-15 15:53:04 EDT --- If you do decide to build from vala source, running 'rm */vala.stamp' should force re-compilation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 22:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912152254.nBFMsVHE003548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 --- Comment #12 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-15 17:54:28 EDT --- Cool, thanks everybody for taking on this one and sorry for being so calm lately, I've just been a bit swamped with work lately. Nice work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 23:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912152341.nBFNfLSX028093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-15 18:41:19 EDT --- #001: Why do need BR for the meta package ? #004: The following is not required # poky-depends %{__cp} -p %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}etch1 #005: %files : directory and file ownership %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} <<< 1 %{_bindir}/poky-* %{_datadir}/%{name} <<< 2 1 >>> directory ownership 2 >>> directory ownership and all the files and folders it contains. When you are using %{_datadir}/%{name} you don't have to use %dir %{_datadir}/%{name #006: the meta package should be a noarch package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 23:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:56:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529816] Review Request: perl-Graphics-ColorNames-WWW - WWW color names and equivalent RGB values In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912152356.nBFNuErb017381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529816 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-12-15 18:56:13 EDT --- Updated for v1.11 . Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-WWW/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-WWW.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-WWW/perl-Graphics-ColorNames-WWW-1.11-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 00:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:54:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160054.nBG0sZSR031035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-15 19:54:35 EDT --- Once reviewed, this move will also require changes in fedora-logos (and generic-logos) to reflect it's new location. I can take care of that... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 00:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:52:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160052.nBG0qvKk012613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |547701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 00:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:52:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] New: Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 Summary: Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/fedora-kde-icon-theme/fedora-kde-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/fedora-kde-icon-theme/fedora-kde-icon-theme-0.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora Currently, this content is included in kde-settings, and is not much more than a skeleton. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:09:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160109.nBG19l4L002979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 20:09:46 EDT --- php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160108.nBG18Cta002379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 20:08:10 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160109.nBG19esj002935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.0-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:08:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:08:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160108.nBG18HG1002421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:09:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160109.nBG19ZBt017364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 20:09:34 EDT --- php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:09:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:09:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160109.nBG19qZk017443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.0-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:10:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160110.nBG1AMMd017865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.6-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:10:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:10:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160110.nBG1AIYc017823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 Bug 542084 depends on bug 542077, which changed state. Bug 542077 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 20:10:17 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.6-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:16:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:16:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160116.nBG1G3O6020323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 Bug 542087 depends on bug 542084, which changed state. Bug 542084 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 20:16:02 EDT --- php-pear-Services-Twitter-0.4.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:16:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542087] Review Request: php-pear-Services-Twitter - PHP interface to Twitter's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160116.nBG1G8gX005760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542087 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.0-1.fc12 |0.4.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:18:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:18:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160118.nBG1I5wb006126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.1-1.fc11 |0.5.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:19:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547226] Review Request: pgu - pygame addon for making GUIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160119.nBG1JY3P006456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547226 William Witt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |william at witt-family.net --- Comment #1 from William Witt 2009-12-15 20:19:32 EDT --- I cannot sponsor you, however here is an informal review based on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines You'll also want to consider adding this as blocks FE-NEEDSPONSOR (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEEDSPONSOR) MUST Items: Items marked as MUST are things that the package (or reviewer) MUST do. If a package fails a MUST item, that is considered a blocker. No package with blockers can be approved on a review. Those items must be fixed before approval can be given. - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. ok rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/python-pgu.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-pgu-0.12.3-1.fc12.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-pgu-0.12.3-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . ok - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . ok - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . ok - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . ok - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] ok - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] ok - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] ok - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] ok - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. ok - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] n/a, noarch, purely interpreted code - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] n/a, noarch, purely interpreted code - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. ok - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] ok - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] n/a, not a lib - MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] ok - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] ok - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] you %files section contains: %{python_sitelib}/* %{_bindir}/* this states that your package owns all of the contents of /usr/bin and /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ this is incorrect, please specify the files/directories it does own. - MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] ok - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] ok - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] ok - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] ok - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] ok - MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] n/a, small ammount of %docs - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] ok - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] n/a - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] n/a - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] n/a - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] n/a - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] n/a - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] ok - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] Your package has a GUI (specifigcally leveledit and tileedit), but no desktop file - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] see comments above - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] ok - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] okj SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [28] ok - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [29] no translations, if available, please provide them - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [30] ok - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [31] noarch - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. works for me - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [32] ok - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [23] n/a - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [22] n/a - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:21:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:21:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160121.nBG1LVGL022473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 20:21:29 EDT --- janino-2.5.15-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160120.nBG1K1Oi021685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 20:20:00 EDT --- php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:20:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:20:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160120.nBG1K5Z5022015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.0-1.fc12 |0.3.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:21:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:21:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160121.nBG1LaBb022517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.5.15-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:18:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542077] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Request2 - Provides an easy way to perform HTTP requests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160118.nBG1I0Jm021145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542077 Bug 542077 depends on bug 542075, which changed state. Bug 542075 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 20:17:59 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-Request2-0.5.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:20:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160120.nBG1KRW1007324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 20:20:26 EDT --- php-pear-HTTP-OAuth-0.1.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:20:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542084] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-OAuth - Implementation of the OAuth spec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160120.nBG1KWNJ007361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542084 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.6-1.fc12 |0.1.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160122.nBG1MLaP022997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 20:22:21 EDT --- janino-2.5.15-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:22:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160122.nBG1MRLT023044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5.15-3.fc11 |2.5.15-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:44:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547930] New: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - output filter for rewriting HTML links in a proxy situation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - output filter for rewriting HTML links in a proxy situation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547930 Summary: Review Request: mod_proxy_html - output filter for rewriting HTML links in a proxy situation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: philipp at redfish-solutions.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.djhsolutions.net/pprindeville/mod_proxy_html.spec SRPM URL: http://www.djhsolutions.net/pprindeville/mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: mod_proxy_html is an output filter to rewrite HTML links in a proxy situation, to ensure that links work for users outside the proxy. It serves the same purpose as Apache's ProxyPassReverse directive does for HTTP headers, and is an essential component of a reverse proxy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160146.nBG1kaxa014308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #57 from Philip Prindeville 2009-12-15 20:46:33 EDT --- *** Bug 547930 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547930] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - output filter for rewriting HTML links in a proxy situation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160146.nBG1kZtU014248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547930 Philip Prindeville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Philip Prindeville 2009-12-15 20:46:33 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 452636 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 01:57:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:57:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160157.nBG1v9qQ016811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Philip Prindeville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #58 from Philip Prindeville 2009-12-15 20:57:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_proxy_html Short Description: reverse-proxy output filter for HTML Owners: philipp Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: s4504kr limb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 02:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160209.nBG292hQ002148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #59 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-12-15 21:08:58 EDT --- Please branch for EL-4 and EL-5 as well (if willing). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 02:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:18:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160218.nBG2I6gb022375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #60 from Philip Prindeville 2009-12-15 21:18:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_proxy_html Short Description: reverse-proxy output filter for HTML Owners: philipp Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: s4504kr limb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 02:23:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:23:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160223.nBG2N9BP005988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #55 from Peter Galbraith 2009-12-15 21:23:06 EDT --- > @PSG could you please integrate those patches inside source tar ball if > possible? See comments #20 to #23 above. So you are changing your mind? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 02:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:35:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160235.nBG2ZPsd026633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #56 from Arun SAG 2009-12-15 21:35:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #55) > > See comments #20 to #23 above. So you are changing your mind? Well, I have no problems with having the patches in separate diff file, but the reviewer/sponsor feels that the patch is big and needs to be integrated with the orig.tar.gz :-) . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 02:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:41:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160241.nBG2fmlR010216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #57 from Arun SAG 2009-12-15 21:41:47 EDT --- #fixed License SPEC URL:http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-goodies.spec SRPM URL:http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-goodies-31.2-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 02:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160246.nBG2kppk011447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 21:46:49 EDT --- usbview-1.1-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/usbview-1.1-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 02:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160247.nBG2l5KF011497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 21:47:04 EDT --- usbview-1.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/usbview-1.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 03:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:29:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160329.nBG3TS4q008091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Rudolf Kastl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com --- Comment #19 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-12-15 22:29:26 EDT --- just curious, according to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines the aot compile should be included. why did you remove it? are their building problems with it? will you add them back? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 03:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:32:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160332.nBG3Wlsu023159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us --- Comment #7 from David Nalley 2009-12-15 22:32:45 EDT --- Ian: If you're busy I'll take this review Eric: after brief perusal limesurvey bundles the following libraries: adodb datetimeconverter pchart php-gettext php-mailer domxml-php4-php5 progressbar sha256 (deprecated - this is now included in php5, but is often seen left lying around in php4 compatible apps) php-pear-Spreadshet-Excel-Writer (as an aside, I just packaged this last week) php-pear-OLE (I just packaged this as well, as the above depends on it) php-pear phpCAS phpzip tcpdf Those need to be unbundled. While a number of them can likely be eliminated (such as sha256) they might need some code massaging. I think the majority are already packaged, but you may have to package a few of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 04:00:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160400.nBG40VUD017123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #8 from Eric Christensen 2009-12-15 23:00:29 EDT --- *SIGH* Thanks, David, for helping out. It would appear that I'm WAY over my head. I'll keep plugging away at this but I'm going to need some help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 04:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:27:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160427.nBG4RhWB023892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 23:27:40 EDT --- gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 04:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:31:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160431.nBG4VxfX025128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 23:31:58 EDT --- gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 04:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:35:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160435.nBG4ZJXa026134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 23:35:17 EDT --- artha-0.9.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/artha-0.9.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 04:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160437.nBG4bVD1007844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-15 23:37:31 EDT --- artha-0.9.1-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/artha-0.9.1-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 05:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:10:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547655] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160510.nBG5AeLc016176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547655 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-16 00:10:39 EDT --- For obvious reasons, I am going to review this ;) * MUSTFIX: Your patch creates a backup files, which gets installed: # rpm -qlp perl-Module-Install-RTx-0.25-2.fc12.noarch.rpm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module/Install /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module/Install/RTx /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module/Install/RTx.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module/Install/RTx.pm.try_RTHOME_first /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module/Install/RTx/Factory.pm /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Install-RTx-0.25 /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Install-RTx-0.25/Changes /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Install-RTx-0.25/README /usr/share/man/man3/Module::Install::RTx.3pm.gz Note the file named RTx.pm.try_RTHOME_first. * Can you explain your patch? The original code first searches @INC, then searches the other (IMO questionable) places. As this module's purpose is to first check where RT is installed on a system, your patch IMO is wrong. Did you propose your patch to upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 05:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:25:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160525.nBG5PxbS019887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-16 00:25:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 05:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160529.nBG5Tdw3006712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #14 from matt chan 2009-12-16 00:29:36 EDT --- While creating a package for tkImg, I noticed that they include modified source versions of libz, libpng, libungif, libjpeg, and libtiff (from Aug 2000) so they can be loaded into the tcl/tk core. Does anyone care to weigh in on this? Does this count as a violation of Fedora's pre-packaged libraries clause? TkImg upstream seems to be dead or close to it. The last release was in Dec 2002 and there's only blips of activity on their sourceforge tracker so it may be difficult to have changes implemented. Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 05:30:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160530.nBG5UnYt021125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #61 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-16 00:30:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 05:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:27:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160527.nBG5RBde020194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-16 00:27:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 05:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:29:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160529.nBG5T1Jl020496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-16 00:28:59 EDT --- we don't have F-13 branches yet. Otherwise cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 05:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:32:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160532.nBG5WD3C007528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-16 00:32:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 05:35:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:35:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160535.nBG5Z4G3022388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-16 00:35:03 EDT --- Yes. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#When_a_Bundled_Library_is_Discovered_Post-Review Basically: file a bug on it, and make it block the blocker used to track these issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 05:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:49:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160549.nBG5nYN4011771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #16 from matt chan 2009-12-16 00:49:32 EDT --- Another bit of fun while exploring tkHTML3 this time: Everything is statically linked in, from 2006 or so. I'm not sure what it would take to refactor to use dynamic libs, never tried before and I don't know if the lib versions from 2006 are still around. Upstream appears to be dead as well: http://groups.google.com/group/tkhtml3/browse_thread/thread/3eeb094b7b460e3a As before, any thoughts? Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 06:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:40:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160640.nBG6e8JM025039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #9 from Ian Weller 2009-12-16 01:40:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Ian: If you're busy I'll take this review > Consider me busy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 07:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:00:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160700.nBG70You012463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #33 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-16 02:00:31 EDT --- The following changes have now been made: 1. Changed upstream code so that the soname actually changes from libtar.so to libtar-ng.so to avoid any conflicts in future. 2. Removed BR libtool from the spec. However the bundled tool which contains an example implementation of the library is still called libtar, Should i change that as well? New SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/libtar-ng.spec New SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/libtar-ng-1.2.12-3.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1874549 Michael, Kevin, Thanks for looking into this so far, Anything else i should do over here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 07:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:01:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160701.nBG71qgm030729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 02:01:51 EDT --- oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts-20031109-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts-20031109-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 07:01:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:01:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547974] New: Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547974 Summary: Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ibus-skk/ibus-skk.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ibus-skk/ibus-skk-0.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: SKK (Simple Kana Kanji) Japanese Input Method Engine for ibus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 08:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:29:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160829.nBG8T8jS032526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-16 03:29:05 EDT --- Thanks! I think it is good now. ---------------------------------------- This package (qjson) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 08:36:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:36:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546169] Review Request: libtar-ng : tar library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160836.nBG8aKw6001777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 --- Comment #34 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-16 03:36:18 EDT --- Ok, i guess since i am changing libtar to libtar-ng i might do so for the bundled test app as well. I have done the changes, new spec and srpm at the link given below. http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/libtar-ng.spec http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/libtar-ng-1.2.12-5.fc12.src.rpm Let me know if you want anything else done. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 08:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547655] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160844.nBG8i9lY003679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547655 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-12-16 03:44:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > For obvious reasons, I am going to review this ;) > Thanks :-) > * MUSTFIX: Your patch creates a backup files, which gets installed: > > # rpm -qlp perl-Module-Install-RTx-0.25-2.fc12.noarch.rpm > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module/Install > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module/Install/RTx > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module/Install/RTx.pm > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module/Install/RTx.pm.try_RTHOME_first > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Module/Install/RTx/Factory.pm > /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Install-RTx-0.25 > /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Install-RTx-0.25/Changes > /usr/share/doc/perl-Module-Install-RTx-0.25/README > /usr/share/man/man3/Module::Install::RTx.3pm.gz > > Note the file named RTx.pm.try_RTHOME_first. > oops, will fix. > > * Can you explain your patch? > The original code first searches @INC, then searches the other (IMO > questionable) places. As this module's purpose is to first check where RT is > installed on a system, your patch IMO is wrong. > The problem is it tries to use LocalPath from the @INC RT.pm, which is set to /usr/local/lib/rt3, thus installing the extension to the wrong place. So I create another RT.pm for the installation purpose and force the use of it thru the RTHOME envvar. However, the RT.pm from @INC is preferred over the one from RTHOME, which is a dubious in my opinion. If one is forcing the use of a RTHOME, one would assume this will be the first tried location, hence the patch. > Did you propose your patch to upstream? Yup, I linked the bug in the spec. No answer yet, but I logged it yesterday, so no surprise. http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=52776 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 08:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:51:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547655] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160851.nBG8pZ1d023184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547655 --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-12-16 03:51:34 EDT --- > > * Can you explain your patch? > > The original code first searches @INC, then searches the other (IMO > > questionable) places. As this module's purpose is to first check where RT is > > installed on a system, your patch IMO is wrong. > > > The problem is it tries to use LocalPath from the @INC RT.pm, which is set to > /usr/local/lib/rt3, thus installing the extension to the wrong place. So I > create another RT.pm for the installation purpose and force the use of it thru > the RTHOME envvar. However, the RT.pm from @INC is preferred over the one from > RTHOME, which is a dubious in my opinion. If one is forcing the use of a > RTHOME, one would assume this will be the first tried location, hence the > patch. > Oops, sorry, this is indeed not understandable as is. I'll blame a missing morning coffee. The RTHOME usage is actually referring to the perl-RTx-Calendar rpackage (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335), which is making use of Module::Install::RTx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 09:44:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:44:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547988] New: Review Request: kpilot - Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kpilot - Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547988 Summary: Review Request: kpilot - Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f13/kpilot.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f13/kpilot-5.3.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices. This package was part of kdepim until 4.3.4. It is being dropped from kdepim 4.4, so I'm packaging it as a standalone package, based on the last kdepim release which carried it (4.3.4). dist-f13 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1874593 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 09:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547988] Review Request: kpilot - Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160945.nBG9jV7W005585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547988 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-16 04:45:29 EDT --- rdieter said he'll do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 09:52:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:52:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160952.nBG9q5Gh007178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-16 04:52:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=378722) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=378722) diff between the old and the new spec files Attaching the diff between the old and the new spec files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 09:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:50:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] New: Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Summary: Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jconvolver.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jconvolver-0.8.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Jconvolver is a real-time convolution engine. It can execute up to a 64 by 64 convolution matrix (i.e. 4096 simultaneous convolutions) as long as your CPU(s) can handle the load. It is designed to be efficient also for sparse (e.g. diagonal) matrices. Unused matrix elements do not take any CPY time. This software changed its name from jconv to jconvolver. I am CCing the original reviewer Mattias in case he wants to re-review it. It should be a smooth re-review since not much has changed since the original review. I am also attaching the diff between the approved version of the jconv's spec file and this new spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 09:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:54:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160954.nBG9sepk021403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-16 04:54:00 EDT --- CC'ing the original reviewer. Mattias, you can remove yourself from the CC if you do not wish to re-review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 09:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160956.nBG9uPkB008335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 04:56:23 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 09:56:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:56:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912160956.nBG9uUeJ008367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 04:56:29 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 10:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:03:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161003.nBGA3KAn010024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 05:03:18 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 10:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:05:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188105] Review Request: torque In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161005.nBGA5Ivw024306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188105 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 05:05:13 EDT --- torque-2.3.8-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/torque-2.3.8-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 10:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 188105] Review Request: torque In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161006.nBGA6KkS024617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188105 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 05:06:19 EDT --- torque-2.3.8-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/torque-2.3.8-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 10:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161003.nBGA3EoX023697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 05:03:13 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 10:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:44:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161044.nBGAiFsU003063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-16 05:44:13 EDT --- where can I find current srpm for review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 11:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:05:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161105.nBGB5qt7009967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|chitlesh at gmail.com | Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 11:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226231] Merge Review: passivetex In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161133.nBGBXk3K002775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226231 --- Comment #4 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-12-16 06:33:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > 1) rpmlint *.spec *.src.rpm noarch/* > > > > passivetex.spec: W: no-%build-section > > passivetex.src: W: no-%build-section > > 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings > > > > please add %build section even if empty > > Fixed - added empty build section.. usually it's expected to have %build section between %prep and %install verified > > > 2)What is the LPPL license based on? It seems it should be "Copyright only" ( > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/CopyrightOnly ) > > Changed to Copyright only - it was probably based on other distros... verified > > 3)Source link is not valid > > > > $ wget http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/passivetex-1.25.zip > > --2009-12-10 18:37:32-- > > http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/passivetex-1.25.zip > > Resolving www.tei-c.org.uk... 163.1.2.156 > > Connecting to www.tei-c.org.uk|163.1.2.156|:80... connected. > > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found > > 2009-12-10 18:37:32 ERROR 404: Not Found. > > Correct link is http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Software/passivetex/passivetex.zip - so > added only as a comment... I'm getting : """ Connecting to www.tei-c.org.uk|163.1.2.156|:80... failed: Connection timed out. Retrying. """ will retry later > > 4) Missing info for patches > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment > > > > Every patch in spec file should contain a comment describing: > > * why is that patch used - for example bug number > > * upstream information - was it sent upstream (and when)? taken from upstream? > > was it accepted/rejected? is this patch "fedora specific" ? > > Info added, 5 years old patch, no connected bugzilla, upstream is dead ... and > will never be alive again... verified > > 5) wrong buildroot tag > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag > > > > """The BuildRoot value MUST be below %{_tmppath}/ and MUST contain at least > > %{name}, %{version} and %{release}""" > > > > The recommended values for the BuildRoot tag is > > > > %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) > > > > Btw, if used only for Fedora 10+, there's no need to define BuildRoot tag at > > all: > > > > """The RPM in Fedora 10 defines a default buildroot so in Fedora 10 and above > > it is no longer necessary to define a buildroot tag.""" > > Fixed verified > and built as passivetex-1.25-11.fc13. I'm waiting for upstream's web page getting back online. If the link is correct, I'll approve this review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 11:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:32:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547226] Review Request: pgu - pygame addon for making GUIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161132.nBGBWdFT017531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547226 Florent LC changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 12:08:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161208.nBGC8kEn011241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #17 from Arun SAG 2009-12-16 07:08:44 EDT --- #Fixed broken dependencies in ppc64 Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-spice-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-spice-mode-1.2.25-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 12:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:11:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544745] Review Request: emacs-spice-mode - SPICE Mode for GNU Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161211.nBGCBTuS012148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544745 --- Comment #18 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-16 07:11:28 EDT --- The review is complete. use ./common/cvs-import.sh to update your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 12:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226175] Merge Review: mx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161244.nBGCirsS020816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226175 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Novotny 2009-12-16 07:44:53 EDT --- hello Dan, how does it look here from your point of view? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 12:41:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:41:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161241.nBGCfcOD020011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #18 from Daniel Novotny 2009-12-16 07:41:33 EDT --- OK, I will add some brief comments btw one remark: the "service is default on" behavior was not apparent, because without creating the site list, mailman cannot function (and start up) - and that is why right after the installation mailman is not running: it cannot start properly before the site list is created by the administrator. unfortunately, site list creation needs user intervention (for example setting administrator's password) so it cannot be done automatically when mailman is installed, thus additional setup by the administrator is required after installation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 13:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538057] Review Request: rhnmd - Red Hat Network Monitoring Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161307.nBGD7iM9026524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538057 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Such? 2009-12-16 08:07:42 EDT --- > Use %global instead of %define, see done > Use %{_sharedstatedir} instead of %{_var}/lib/, see I'm not willing to use this macro. It eval differently on different systems. E.g in RHEL it eval to /usr/com > Is the license GPLv2 or GPLv2+? Maybe add a doc to clarify? It is GPLv2. Even license text is included in %doc, not sure how you want to clarify it even more. >%{_initrddir} is considered deprecated on Fedora, but still needed on RHEL. done > Add -p to install in order to preserve timestamps of the files, done > Please don't use excessive wildcards like %{_usr}/sbin/* In some previous reviews, somebody else encourages me to use wildcards. So what is correct behaviour? But I do not care :) Done. > you moved %preun before %clean and %files Done > Add more docs, at least an AUTHORS file should IMO be there, Negative. We do not have doc separately for rhnmd, we have documentation for Satellite and when the times come, we can make separate package from it. No intention to put it here due its size. Authors changes a lot. And we (as Spacewalk team) are not willing to maintains such document file. > ChangeLog would be nice too. We have changelog in spec. Guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs) do not say anything about separate file. So ... negative. > Please use a more common format for your changelogs. > Bug numbers should be at the end of a changelog entry, e.g. I would not say it is more common (at least outside of Fedora). On fedora-devel-list was discussion on April this year and there was no conclusion about format of changelog (apart from first line). And since our changelog is generated in upstream from commit messages, I can do hardly anything about it, unless I rewrite it or force upstream developers to change their behaviour. :( > BTW: there is a typo: "dependecy" instead of "dependency" fixed > I don't understand dangerous-command-in-%pre: When you migrate settings > from /home/nocpulse, why remove /var/lib/nocpulse/{bin,var}? This doesn't > look related. This for user who had previous version of rhnmd. It was crappy package and when you upgrade this two path will remain on your disk with some dynamicaly created links and files, which were previously not present in %files > I disagree about service-default-enabled, see Well this package is just special wrapper around sshd, and we behave to it similar way as to sshd. And sshd is enabled by default to. Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnmd/rhnmd-5.3.5-1.src.rpm Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rhnmd/rhnmd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 13:38:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:38:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161338.nBGDckTH002506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ian at ianweller.org |david at gnsa.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 14:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:05:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547988] Review Request: kpilot - Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161405.nBGE5nZi011327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547988 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-16 09:05:48 EDT --- I'll look at this today, sure (perhaps swap reviews for bug #547916 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 14:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:24:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523224] Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161424.nBGEOYQo016635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523224 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Antti Andreimann 2009-12-16 09:24:31 EDT --- Thanks for the reminder, Kalev. devel and F-12 branches built, going to submit update for F-12 promptly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 14:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:32:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523224] Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161432.nBGEWaFZ003679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523224 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 09:32:35 EDT --- mingw32-xerces-c-3.0.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-xerces-c-3.0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 14:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161456.nBGEux27027363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #58 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-16 09:56:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #56) > > See comments #20 to #23 above. So you are changing your mind? > Well, I have no problems with having the patches in separate diff file, but the > reviewer/sponsor feels that the patch is big and needs to be integrated with > the orig.tar.gz :-) . The Fedora policies says, that patches which are not Fedora specific should be forwarded to upstream for integration into the main sources. Because the big diff files seams to be a patch which is not Fedora specific, it may be nice if we can got integrate it into the main sources. The advance of integrate the patch into the main sources are: 1.) Better maintainmence for the packages 2.) Clarification that this is part of the common upstream distribution of the software Of courses it's not a blocker to have such big patch in the package as long as you have tried to sent this patch to upstream and have documented this in a comment in the SPEC file. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 15:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:03:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161503.nBGF39SK013497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #59 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-16 10:03:08 EDT --- Good: + License tag was changed to 'GPLv2+ and GPLv3' *** APPROVED *** Please create at FAS account and sign the CLA. After you have done this, please create a membership request to the packager group and let me know your FAS Userid. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 15:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161508.nBGF838W014844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 15:07:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:07:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161507.nBGF7m6h014783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-16 10:07:45 EDT --- sha256sum cciss_vol_status-1.06.tar.gz fedora/SOURCES/cciss_vol_status-1.06.tar.gz ba9a120d08e51a62412631c2d5286c6ba8b4491c9ff8c8240c3b84c459074450 cciss_vol_status-1.06.tar.gz ba9a120d08e51a62412631c2d5286c6ba8b4491c9ff8c8240c3b84c459074450 fedora/SOURCES/cciss_vol_status-1.06.tar.gz sources match upstream SPEC is clean and clear rpmlint is silent meets packaging and naming guidelines approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 15:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:12:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161512.nBGFC9ZL016238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #60 from Arun SAG 2009-12-16 10:12:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #59) > Good: > + License tag was changed to 'GPLv2+ and GPLv3' > > *** APPROVED *** > Thanks for approving the package :-) > Please create at FAS account and sign the CLA. After you have done this, please > create a membership request to the packager group and let me know your FAS > Userid. > My FAS id is 'sagarun' , i submitted more than one packages in bugzilla with this package, i already got sponsored from one of them. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/sagarun -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 15:15:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:15:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161515.nBGFFaGk001054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #61 from Arun SAG 2009-12-16 10:15:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-goodies Short Description: Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs Owners: sagarun Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 15:16:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161516.nBGFGmQl001273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #62 from Peter Galbraith 2009-12-16 10:16:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #58) > The Fedora policies says, that patches which are not Fedora specific should be > forwarded to upstream for integration into the main sources. > > Because the big diff files seams to be a patch which is not Fedora specific, it > may be nice if we can got integrate it into the main sources. > > The advance of integrate the patch into the main sources are: > > 1.) Better maintainmence for the packages > > 2.) Clarification that this is part of the common upstream distribution of the > software Tricky. The thing is that I am not the real upstream author for the majority of these files. I have bundled them and made their setup and integration easier for Debian. So in that regard my changes rightly appear in a separate diff file (the same as if you made the changes). But for you, I am "upstream" for this repackaging. I _could_ include the patches in the tar file and still comply with Debian's own package policies (although some in Debian might not agree) by still keeping the patches under the debian/ directory, in debian/patches/. I may do this in the next release. Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 15:24:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:24:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161524.nBGFO4gK021522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 --- Comment #3 from Joshua Roys 2009-12-16 10:24:03 EDT --- I think this is correct: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cciss_vol_status Short Description: show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers Owners: roysjosh Branches: F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 15:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548092] New: Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 Summary: Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: richard at hughsie.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets-0.0.1-0.6.20091216git.fc12.src.rpm Description: shared-color-targets contains target files for popular scanner calibration targets. These are used in gnome-color-manager to create accurate color calibration profiles when using pre-printed targets from various vendors. See http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/12/16/advances-of-freedom/ for why they are important. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 15:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161542.nBGFgtYm026984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #17 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-12-16 10:42:51 EDT --- When an upstream is dead like you're saying tkImg and tkHTML3 are, the problem of bundled and static libraries is exacerbated. In those cases, instead of having to wait for multiple upstreams to discover problems, make fixes, announce them, and then have the next upstream in the chain realise the problem affects their bundled libraries, make fixes, and release updated tarballs, we have upstreams whose source will never change even though there's known security vulnerabilities. This makes it even more imperative that the packager fixes these problems as soon as possible as the packager is the new upstream for the package and if they package with these problems then the maintenance burden for fixing those types of security problems falls entirely on them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 15:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161556.nBGFulHB013136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #8 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-16 10:56:46 EDT --- #001: If I put glibc-devel in Requires, rpmlint complaints: poky-depends.noarch: E: devel-dependency glibc-devel I have moved glibc-devel to Requires. Will ignore rpmlint warning. #004: I have added Source1: README.fedora. Retained the following: # poky-depends %{__cp} -p %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}etch1 %{__install} -pm 644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} #005: Fixed. #006: Added the following BuildArchitectures: noarch in -depends meta package. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/poky-scripts.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poky-scripts-6-5.fc12.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-11, F-12 and EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1875300 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1875306 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1875316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 16:13:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:13:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161613.nBGGDZdr017578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-16 11:13:34 EDT --- I'm going to review this, looks fairly straightforward at a first glance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 16:17:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547988] Review Request: kpilot - Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161617.nBGGHO9n004418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547988 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-16 11:17:23 EDT --- rpmlint: kpilot.src: E: summary-too-long Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices kpilot.src: E: description-line-too-long Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices. $ rpmlint *src.rpm x86_64/*.rpm kpilot.src: E: summary-too-long Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices kpilot.src: E: description-line-too-long Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices. error checking signature of kpilot-5.3.0-1.fc13.src.rpm kpilot.x86_64: E: summary-too-long Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices kpilot.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices. kpilot.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libkpilot_akonadibase.so libkpilot_akonadibase.so kpilot.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libkpilot_conduit_base.so libkpilot_conduit_base.so 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 0 warnings. Summary is longish, perhaps omit the "Utility to" part at the beginning? sources: ok a4f32a268802be8eb852d1de00cbd2f6 kdepim-4.3.4.tar.bz2 license: ok scriptlets: ok deps: ok Suggestions (consider these SHOULD items, can be addressed post-review): 1. make -libs package to be more multilib friendly 2. Add (something like): %if 0%{?fedora} < 13 Conflicts: kdepim < 6:4.3.80 %endif Otherwise, looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 16:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547988] Review Request: kpilot - Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161624.nBGGOUvH021332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547988 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-16 11:24:29 EDT --- Uh, KPilot is an application, why would you want to install it multilib? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 16:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547226] Review Request: pgu - pygame addon for making GUIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161625.nBGGPwo1007446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547226 --- Comment #2 from Florent LC 2009-12-16 11:25:56 EDT --- Thank you for your review (In reply to comment #1) > You'll also want to consider adding this as blocks FE-NEEDSPONSOR > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=FE-NEEDSPONSOR) > Ok, thanks, it's done. > - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not > create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does > create that directory. [13] > > you %files section contains: > > %{python_sitelib}/* > %{_bindir}/* > > this states that your package owns all of the contents of /usr/bin and > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ this is incorrect, please specify the > files/directories it does own. > I don't see what's wrong with this section. According to this page : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25files_section "Note that "%{_bindir}/*" does not claim that this package owns the /usr/bin directory - it claims that all the files that were installed inside the build root 's /usr/bin are owned by the package." This states that my package claims ownership of the files it installed in the %{buildroot}/usr/bin directory. That's different from the "real" /usr/bin directory. This makes it clear too: "Claiming ownership of "%{_bindir}/*" is fine, though; that just claims ownership of the subdirectories and files you placed under %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}." What did I miss? > - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop > file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the > %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need > a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. > [24] > > Your package has a GUI (specifigcally leveledit and tileedit), but no desktop > file > My package has indeed GUIs, but I don't think it should include a GUI because these GUIs are only examples for devs and NOT useful programs for the end-user. I don't think that having one or two new menu-entry whenever an user installs a game that has python-pgu as a dependency is a good thing. The different solutions I see for this problem are: - Move these examples in a different package (like python-pgu-examples?) - Just remove these examples from the package - just leave them in the package and add a comment explaining why there's no .desktop file What do you think should be done? > - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed > should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This > means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with > any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you > feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another > package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] > > see comments above > See answer above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 16:59:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:59:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161659.nBGGxPSj017206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 Bug 458254 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 16:59:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:59:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161659.nBGGxOGd017187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 Bug 447740 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 16:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:59:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161659.nBGGxNRV017155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Bug 447738 depends on bug 442714, which changed state. Bug 442714 Summary: Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 16:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:59:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161659.nBGGxMOa017115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | --- Comment #42 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-16 11:59:15 EDT --- SPEC: http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/master/zypp/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/sat-solver/ Notes: - reopening since the whole ZYpp stack seems now usable with rpm >= 4.6.0 - rpmlint: [lvillani at enterprise SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sat-solver{,-devel,-doc,-debuginfo}-0.14.11-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/{perl,python}-sat-solver-0.14.11-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ./sat-solver-0.14.11-1.fc12.src.rpm ../specs/zypp/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 17:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161738.nBGHcN8E027464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 Bug 447740 depends on bug 447738, which changed state. Bug 447738 Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 17:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161738.nBGHcOUr027483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 Bug 458254 depends on bug 447738, which changed state. Bug 447738 Summary: Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 17:38:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:38:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161738.nBGHcLxd027428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | --- Comment #21 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-16 12:38:18 EDT --- SPEC: http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/master/zypp/libzypp/libzypp.spec SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/libzypp/ Notes: - reopening: the whole ZYpp stack is now usable with rpm >= 4.6.0 - rpmlint: [lvillani at enterprise SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/libzypp{,-devel,-debuginfo}-6.28.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ../SRPMS/libzypp-6.28.0-1.fc12.src.rpm ../specs/zypp/libzypp/libzypp.spec libzypp-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 17:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544570] Review Request: attica - Implementation of the Open Collaboration Services API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161749.nBGHnjTB012263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544570 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 17:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544569] Review Request: shared-desktop-ontologies - Shared ontologies needed for semantic environments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161749.nBGHnDUF031516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544569 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 17:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161748.nBGHm6sk031207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 Bug 458254 depends on bug 447740, which changed state. Bug 447740 Summary: Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 17:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161748.nBGHm6Pj031186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DEFERRED | --- Comment #11 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-16 12:48:04 EDT --- SPEC: http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/blobs/master/zypp/zypper/zypper.spec SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/zypper/ Notes: - reopening: the whole ZYpp stack is now usable with rpm >= 4.6.0 - rpmlint: [lvillani at enterprise SRPMS]$ rpmlint zypper-1.2.15-1.fc12.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/zypper{,-debuginfo}-1.2.15-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ../specs/zypp/zypper/zypper.spec zypper.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/zypper.sh zypper-debuginfo.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/zypper-1.2.15/src/solve-commit.cc zypper-debuginfo.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/zypper-1.2.15/src/update.cc zypper-debuginfo.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/zypper-1.2.15/src/utils/pager.cc zypper-debuginfo.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/src/debug/zypper-1.2.15/src/install.cc 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 18:22:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:22:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161822.nBGIMtfA007676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-16 13:22:53 EDT --- * Mon Dec 14 2009 Kevin Wright 1.3.0-3 - Removed 'with exceptions' from License - Removed Requires bash Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-common-ui/dogtag-pki-common-ui.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/dogtag-pki-common-ui/dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 18:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:55:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226379] Merge Review: rsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161855.nBGItrJm030437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226379 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |rsh-0.17-60.fc13 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-12-16 13:55:50 EDT --- Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable + MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review rpmlint rsh-0.17-60.fc13.i686.rpm rsh.i686: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/rcp root 04755 rsh.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/rcp 04755 rsh.i686: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/rsh root 04755 rsh.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/rsh 04755 rsh.i686: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/rlogin root 04755 rsh.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/rlogin 04755 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 0 warnings. This is ok for this package. rpmlint rsh-0.17-60.fc13.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint rsh-server-0.17-60.fc13.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} + MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Some patches uncommented, rexec tarball without upstream reference - however those informations are too old to be found now... so I'm ok with it. + MUST: The package licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines + MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Source package doesn't contain text of the license in its own file, just BSD disclaimers in every source file. + MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task rexec can't be checked, netkit-rsh-0.17.tar.gz matches upstream + MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture 0 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines 0 MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro 0 MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. + MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker + MUST: Package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory + MUST: Package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content 0 MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application 0 MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package 0 MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package 0 MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' 0 MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package 0 MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built 0 MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 All the things which are must are ok, I would prefer to add README and BUGS file as %doc into main package. Not blockers, so APPROVED, please consider adding these documentation files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 19:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:34:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161934.nBGJYGCL030891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 14:34:14 EDT --- pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 19:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547988] Review Request: kpilot - Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161936.nBGJa1xU031466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547988 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-16 14:36:00 EDT --- You don't, but... anything matching %{_libdir}/lib*.so.* is automatically multilib'd, for better or worse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 19:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:36:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161936.nBGJaQUx031700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #25 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-12-16 14:36:23 EDT --- Ok, I change "multiplatform" on "Multiprotocol" what is more important for IM. Mention of QT4 have worth on my mind too. Summary rewritten. Release enumeration changed, some comments stripped. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/qutim/qutim-0.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/qutim/qutim.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 19:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161945.nBGJjJ55016617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 Joshua Roys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 19:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:59:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912161959.nBGJxvkh006248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 14:59:56 EDT --- pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 20:05:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:05:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162005.nBGK5FZq007982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 15:05:15 EDT --- pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 20:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:16:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547988] Review Request: kpilot - Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162016.nBGKGIM6010889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547988 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-16 15:16:14 EDT --- But multilibs aren't installed by default unless some 32-bit apps drags them in. If someone tweaks their yum configuration to install everything multilib, they get what they deserve. ;-) Anyway, I can add a -libs subpackage if you really think it's useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 20:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:26:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162026.nBGKQxXA013438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla 2009-12-16 15:26:55 EDT --- I've noticed that actually, I installed it for testing and I got a "Boot Errors" message. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 20:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:23:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547988] Review Request: kpilot - Utility to synchronize PIM (Personal Information Management) data with PalmOS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162023.nBGKNXKD012506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547988 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-16 15:23:32 EDT --- I think -libs is best, avoids possible multilib conflicts that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 20:39:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] New: Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 Summary: Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linville at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/hostapd.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/hostapd-0.6.9-2.src.rpm Description: hostapd is a user space daemon for access point and authentication servers. It implements IEEE 802.11 access point management, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP Authenticators and RADIUS authentication server. hostapd is designed to be a "daemon" program that runs in the back- ground and acts as the backend component controlling authentication. hostapd supports separate frontend programs and an example text-based frontend, hostapd_cli, is included with hostapd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 20:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:45:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547988] Review Request: kpilot - Sync PIM data with PalmOS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162045.nBGKjDRt018781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547988 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: kpilot - |Review Request: kpilot - |Utility to synchronize PIM |Sync PIM data with PalmOS |(Personal Information |devices |Management) data with | |PalmOS devices | Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-16 15:45:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kpilot Short Description: Sync PIM data with PalmOS devices Owners: kkofler than rdieter ltinkl jreznik arbiter mathstuf Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: tuxbrewr (I'll address the suggested improvements after importing.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 20:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:46:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162046.nBGKkAgc002342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |JamesAAllsopp at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #1 from John W. Linville 2009-12-16 15:46:08 EDT --- *** Bug 545169 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 20:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:47:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533919] Review Request: mplus fonts - The M+ family of fonts designed by Coji Morishita In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162047.nBGKlIfJ002665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533919 Igshaan Mesias changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(igshaan.mesias at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #3 from Igshaan Mesias 2009-12-16 15:47:15 EDT --- Hi Nicolas, Thanks for your package review and I will shortly tackle some of the above mentioned tasks, I do however, detect it being a slow process as I'm a bit pressed for time. For now I'll try and look at some of the rpmlint errors and file a bug for the license bit. Thanks again. Ciao, Igshaan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 20:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:48:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162048.nBGKmpSN003032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #18 from Christopher Sean Morrison 2009-12-16 15:48:46 EDT --- It's worth noting a few updates since this recent set of updates about tkImg and tkHTML3. First off, some clarifications. The tkImg package only bundles those external dependencies for download convenience and can be disabled. In fact, our bundling of tkImg itself in BRL-CAD was a simple subset of just the PNG Tcl bindings (without libpng, libz, or any other lib). That said .. we're already in the process of replacing tkImg with tkPNG since it's even more simple and is closer to the minimal functionality that we need. To top it off, we found existing RPMs for tkImg around the same time.. :) As for tkHTML3 and the assertion that things were being statically linked in, that was a mistake. The tkHTML3 sources don't even have any external dependencies, much less linking in anything static. There was some confusion inferred from a misleading statement on the website about a related code. So the basic summary, it's mostly all moot. We'll have to get tkPNG packaged, but that should be very easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 21:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162115.nBGLFMt5030735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adel.gadllah at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from John W. Linville 2009-12-16 16:15:17 EDT --- *** Bug 494171 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 21:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162115.nBGLFKlv030699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |linville at redhat.com Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #20 from John W. Linville 2009-12-16 16:15:17 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 548180 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 21:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:14:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162114.nBGLEh9Z030224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-16 16:14:41 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: polkit-qt New Branches: F-12 Owners: rdieter This was excluded from the F-12 mass branching because it got marked dead.package due to no version compatible with PolicyKit 1 having been available at the time. Now we have such a version and thus the package got resurrected, so we need it branched for F-12 to build it for F12 updates. (I talked to rdieter on IRC and he said it's a good idea to request the branch now.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 21:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:29:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162129.nBGLTY4K014087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kwizart at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-12-16 16:29:33 EDT --- - starting review - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 21:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:38:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] New: Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mediawiki-LdapAccount.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Restrict mediawiki to using LDAP accounts only, creates account based on LDAP information and authenticates using LDAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 21:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:38:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162138.nBGLclU9004300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #4 from John W. Linville 2009-12-16 16:38:46 EDT --- kwizart, I snuck-in a new copy using gnutls instead of openssl -- please take note! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 22:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:11:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162211.nBGMBFuG013894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #5 from John W. Linville 2009-12-16 17:11:13 EDT --- * Wed Dec 16 2009 John W. Linville - 0.6.9-3 - Use gnutls instead of openssl (avoid license disputes) - Turn-off internal EAP server (broken w/ gnutls) - Remove %doc files not applicable to chosen configuration - Un-mangle README filename for logwatch sub-package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 22:31:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162231.nBGMVJio030885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-12-16 17:31:17 EDT --- * You need to use our $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (at this time it only uses -O2 -Wall -g) * It's better to use "install -p" to prevent timestamp changes. (fixed in -3) * There are lot of commented options. Some are tagged as experimental, But I wonder if others cannot be enabled ? (this doesn't concern the Driver Interfaces). Specially as the CONFIG_EAP_FAST=y which requires the newer openssl * This package doesn't use a dist tag , Why ? TODO -> Duplication code verification, in progress. -> Runtime test on ath5k driver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 22:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:54:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162254.nBGMsqSg004366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #63 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 17:54:51 EDT --- mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 22:53:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:53:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162253.nBGMrKX1024152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #62 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 17:53:13 EDT --- mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 22:56:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:56:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162256.nBGMuc5b005229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #19 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-12-16 17:56:37 EDT --- > The tkImg package only bundles those external dependencies for download convenience and can be disabled. Excellent. As long as those are disabled in the Fedora build it's perfectly acceptable :-) The rest of your update sounds very encouraging as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 16 23:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:27:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912162327.nBGNRHfP032579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #7 from John W. Linville 2009-12-16 18:27:15 EDT --- Most of the "commented options" (I presume you mean in .config) relate to the internal EAP server. Jouni tells me that it is broken when using gnutls, so I disabled the related options when I changed the configuration to using gnutls. We could reenable some number of them if we use openssl instead, but I wanted to avoid the license disputes. The others relate to newer 802.11 features that may or may not be useful. I simply forgot the RPM_OPT_FLAGS and dist tag -- this one is a bit more of a pain to package than most. :-) Also, I had to hack the Makefile a bit to make RPM_OPT_FLAGS practical... * Wed Dec 16 2009 John W. Linville - 0.6.9-4 - Remove wired.conf from %doc (not in chosen configuration) - Use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Add %{?dist} tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 00:00:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:00:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170000.nBH00KA9007546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #65 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 19:00:18 EDT --- mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 00:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:00:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170000.nBH00Fvd020120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #64 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-16 19:00:13 EDT --- mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 00:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:00:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547226] Review Request: pgu - pygame addon for making GUIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170000.nBH00JWM020143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547226 --- Comment #3 from William Witt 2009-12-16 19:00:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I don't see what's wrong with this section. > According to this page : > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25files_section > > "Note that "%{_bindir}/*" does not claim that this package owns the /usr/bin > directory - it claims that all the files that were installed inside the build > root 's /usr/bin are owned by the package." > This states that my package claims ownership of the files it installed in the > %{buildroot}/usr/bin directory. That's different from the "real" /usr/bin > directory. > > This makes it clear too: > "Claiming ownership of "%{_bindir}/*" is fine, though; that just claims > ownership of the subdirectories and files you placed under > %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}." > > What did I miss? > Nothing, I'w new to packaging too and missed that, I apologize. > My package has indeed GUIs, but I don't think it should include a GUI because > these GUIs are only examples for devs and NOT useful programs for the end-user. > I don't think that having one or two new menu-entry whenever an user installs a > game that has python-pgu as a dependency is a good thing. > > The different solutions I see for this problem are: > - Move these examples in a different package (like python-pgu-examples?) > - Just remove these examples from the package > - just leave them in the package and add a comment explaining why there's no > .desktop file > > What do you think should be done? If they are examples, then they should moved moved out of /usr/bin and into an examples directory as part of %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 00:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:15:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170015.nBH0Fhxo023742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #8 from John W. Linville 2009-12-16 19:15:41 EDT --- *sigh* WPA-PSK connections seem to be broken with gnutls and/or turning-off all the EAP stuff. So, what are the ramifications of using openssl? If we go this route, we can reevaluate some of the other stuff in .config... * Wed Dec 16 2009 John W. Linville - 0.6.9-5 - Use openssl instead of gnutls (broken) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 00:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:18:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170018.nBH0IfTS012910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #9 from John W. Linville 2009-12-16 19:18:40 EDT --- SRPM: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/hostapd-0.6.9-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 01:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:04:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541355] Review Request: python-couchdb - A Python library for working with CouchDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170104.nBH14CtO024011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541355 Jef Spaleta changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Jef Spaleta 2009-12-16 20:04:09 EDT --- rawhide build complete... just needed to make one small buildrequires change to add python-setuptools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 01:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:11:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170111.nBH1BpxE004739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-12-16 20:11:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: yum-langpacks Short Description: Yum plugin that installs langpacks for packages Owners: petersen Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 01:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:32:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170132.nBH1WRiN009163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 --- Comment #5 from Carl Byington 2009-12-16 20:32:26 EDT --- any progress on the review, or anything else that I need to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 05:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:19:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170519.nBH5JvO2031964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-17 00:19:55 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1874463 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 10941e42da6b3b8962c57bdcb823b9653e505821 dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 06:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:09:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] New: Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 Summary: Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/gitolite.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/gitolite-0.95-1.20091216git.fc12.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1876569 Description: Gitolite allows a server to host many git repositories and provide access to many developers, without having to give them real userids on the server. The essential magic in doing this is ssh's pubkey access and the authorized keys file, and the inspiration was an older program called gitosis. Gitolite can restrict who can read from (clone/fetch) or write to (push) a repository. It can also restrict who can push to what branch or tag, which is very important in a corporate environment. Gitolite can be installed without requiring root permissions, and with no additional software than git itself and perl. It also has several other neat features described below and elsewhere in the doc/ directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 06:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170610.nBH6AWnj014376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-17 01:10:31 EDT --- RPMlint only complains about gitolite:gitolite not being standard uid:git; which is ok since we create the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 06:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170615.nBH6FUUS015650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-17 01:15:29 EDT --- Whoops, here's the correct scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1876573 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 07:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:04:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170704.nBH74FI2027800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-17 02:04:13 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1876549 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) fafcf9fae985c40a84d65389a0f78a73444ab038 dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) Before importing package in cvs, please remove Requires: bash APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 07:03:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:03:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170703.nBH73ALC014564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #26 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-17 02:03:06 EDT --- Ok, I don't see any outstanding issues so far, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 08:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:21:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170821.nBH8LYPF003330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 08:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:30:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526263] Review Request: l7-protocols - Protocol definitions files for l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170830.nBH8UG74005611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526263 --- Comment #12 from Marcus Moeller 2009-12-17 03:29:00 EDT --- Debian Guys had similar discussion about placing the protocol definitions: They've ended up with the simplest solution: protocol definitions are put in /etc and they are marked as conffiles. http://bugs.debian.org/546665 http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/09/msg00860.html http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ap-pkg-conffiles.html#sE.1 I personally prefer to place them into %{_datadir}. Besides that, the package has been updated: - made tests the main package and defined named subpackage Spec URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/l7-protocols/20090528-5/l7-tests.spec SRPM URL: http://www.marcus-moeller.de/share/build/l7-protocols/20090528-5/l7-tests-20090528-5.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint SRPMS/l7-tests-20090528-5.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/l7-protocols-20090528-5.fc11.noarch.rpm RPMS/i586/l7-tests-debuginfo-20090528-5.fc11.i586.rpm RPMS/i586/l7-tests-20090528-5.fc11.i586.rpm l7-tests-debuginfo.i586: E: debuginfo-without-sources Not sure how to get rid of these debuginfo-without-sources message. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 08:55:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533919] Review Request: mplus fonts - The M+ family of fonts designed by Coji Morishita In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170855.nBH8tqQE026483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533919 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-12-17 03:55:50 EDT --- Hi Igshaan, It's perfectly ok to take time do do things right, as long as you actually do it. I only dislike people who make you spend a lot of time on package reviews, and then never actually finish their package :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 09:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:22:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226541] Merge Review: wireshark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912170922.nBH9MDeG002055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226541 Bug 226541 depends on bug 203642, which changed state. Bug 203642 Summary: some .so should be in -devel, or not shipped? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203642 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 10:28:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:28:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171028.nBHAS9c0009033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2009-12-17 05:28:07 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 70ab9e22d9f21e03c0e43357072ecea8ed55ddab report-0.4.tar.gz OK* package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. BAD BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. BAD final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - I accept the reasoning for the package name from comment #3, but it can be useful for a straightforward upgrade path (after the python bindings are created) to add now Provide: python-report = %{version}-%{release} into the main package - the usual form of spec file contains the definition of subpackages directly after the main package and before the %prep section, the %files sections for the sub-packages are placed after the main %files section - you should omit the BuildArch and BuildRequires in the sub-packages, they are inherited from the main package - you should use Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} in the sub-packages instead of just the hardcoded version - please include the license text in the upstream source archive and then as %doc in the package - you can use fedorahosted facility to publish the source archive - rpmlint complains a bit report.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4-1 ['0.4-2.fc13', '0.4-2'] => looks as an omission report-gtk.noarch: W: no-documentation report-plugin-bugzilla.noarch: W: no-documentation => can be ignored Thanks goes to Michael for his almost complete review making my work much easier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 10:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:56:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171056.nBHAujsv016639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-17 05:56:43 EDT --- I haven't agreed to take on the review :) Anyway, you could, again, make the files listing more explicit. Did you run rpmlint on the packages? The %description of devel seems a bit long, looking at the spec file (I'm not sure, though). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 11:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:52:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171152.nBHBqd6w012292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-17 06:52:36 EDT --- *** Bug 230449 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 11:52:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:52:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171152.nBHBqb5f012234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-17 06:52:36 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 548180 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 12:22:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:22:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548422] New: Review Request: flash-kernel - Utility for writing kernels into flash memory Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: flash-kernel - Utility for writing kernels into flash memory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548422 Summary: Review Request: flash-kernel - Utility for writing kernels into flash memory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dan at danny.cz QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/flash-kernel.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/flash-kernel-2.27-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: flash-kernel is a script which will put the kernel and initramfs in the boot location of embedded devices that don't load the kernel and initramfs directly from /boot. flash-kernel supports devices that boot from flash memory (hence the name) as well as some devices that require a special boot image on the disk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 12:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546704] Review Request: python-whoosh - Fast, pure-Python full text indexing, search, and spell checking library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171224.nBHCOhwH008529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546704 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-17 07:24:41 EDT --- Review: Good: - name ok - using macros - buildroot ok - rpmlint clean - %clean section is there - permissions ok - %files section ok - arch ok - no .la files - no libs - no desktop file needed - builds in koji NEEDSWORK: - description is bad: If you do a 'yum search Java' you'll get this package, which has nothing to do with java... in PKG-INFO is: Whoosh is a fast, pure-Python indexing and search library. Programmers can use it to easily add search functionality to their applications and websites. Because Whoosh is pure Python, you don't have to compile or install a binary support library and/or make Python work with a JVM, yet Whoosh is still very fast at indexing and searching. Every part of how Whoosh works can be extended or replaced to meet your needs exactly. How about that? - BR wrong: please require only python-setuptools and not python-setuptools-devel - You should query upstream to include a license.txt or COPYING file. It's referenced in PKG-INFO, but nowhere to find. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 12:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532241] Review Request: emacs-identica-mode - Identica mode for emacs. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171255.nBHCtO9J017318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532241 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 12:59:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:59:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226379] Merge Review: rsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171259.nBHCxjjV029616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226379 --- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-17 07:59:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > All the things which are must are ok, I would prefer to add README and BUGS > file as %doc into main package. Done. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 13:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:09:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225670] Merge Review: cups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171309.nBHD9eQA021127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225670 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |atkac at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 13:14:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:14:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171314.nBHDEaa1001704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-17 08:14:34 EDT --- Review: + builds fine in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1877023 + rpmlint is NOT silent [petro at Workplace ~]$ rpmlint Desktop/mingw32-Open* mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosg.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgGA.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgTerrain.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgParticle.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgDB.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgShadow.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgFX.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgText.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgAnimation.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgManipulator.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgSim.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgUtil.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgVolume.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgViewer.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgWidget.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosg.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgGA.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgTerrain.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgParticle.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgDB.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgShadow.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgFX.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgText.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgAnimation.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgManipulator.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgSim.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgUtil.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/openscenegraph.pc mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgVolume.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgViewer.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libosgWidget.dll.a mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 mingw32-OpenThreads.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libOpenThreads.dll.a mingw32-OpenThreads.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig/openthreads.pc mingw32-OpenThreads.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libOpenThreads.dll.a mingw32-OpenThreads.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 16 errors, 20 warnings. [petro at Workplace ~]$ However all these messages may be omitted in case of mingw32-package. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2.zip* 0903e3a29eba07856c563d1b313f6b803bee702e9145a27677d8dcab57db98ab OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2.zip 0903e3a29eba07856c563d1b313f6b803bee702e9145a27677d8dcab57db98ab OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2.zip.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See link above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No need to run ldconfig for mingw32 libraries. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. - The package MUST own all directories that it creates. Unfortunately it doesn't own %{_mingw32_bindir}/osgPlugins-%{apivers} directory. Please, fix it. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No need to separate header files from main package for mingw32-related package. 0 No static libraries. 0 No need to require pkgconfig for pkgconfig(.pc) files in mingw32-related packages. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package for mingw32 packages, since they are intended for devel entirely. 0 The mingw32 package may contain necessary .la libtool archives. This is not a blocker. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. So, please fix the only issue found by me, and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 13:40:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:40:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171340.nBHDeo1K031560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 --- Comment #7 from Stefan Riemens 2009-12-17 08:40:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review! I've fixed the issue: http://www.riemens.org/fs/temp/mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-2.fc12.src.rpm http://www.riemens.org/fs/temp/mingw32-OpenSceneGraph.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 13:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:44:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171344.nBHDiHsS010902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-17 08:44:16 EDT --- Great. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 13:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:40:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225670] Merge Review: cups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171340.nBHDebX6010086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225670 --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-17 08:40:35 EDT --- Review of cups-1.4.2-17.fc13: Legend: "+" means OK, "-" means not OK. + MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec - MUST(1): The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . + MUST: The License field in spec match the actual license + MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file must be included in %doc + MUST: The spec file written in American English - MUST(2): The spec file for the package is legible + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL MUST: The package successfully compile + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - MUST(3): The spec file handle locales properly + MUST: Every package which stores shared library files in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun - MUST(4): Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries + MUST: Package own all directories that it creates + MUST: Package does not list a file more than once in the spec file - MUST(5): Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line + MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: Package use macros consistently + MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content + MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application + MUST: Header files in a -devel package + MUST: Static libraries in a -static package + MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' + MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package + MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built + MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file + MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) + MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. 2: - don't define initdir macro, use existing %{_initddir} macro - don't use /usr/lib/cups for binaries. Directory /usr/libexec/cups should be used instead. - don't use obsolete Prereq and BuildReq. Use modern Requires and BuildRequires instead. - remove unneeded versioned BuildRequires (gcc, libselinux, audit-libs, dbus) - drop -fstack-protector-all gcc flag. -fstack-protector is sufficient, I think. Consider to build cupsd (and other programs exposed on the network) as PIEs. - append %{?_smp_mflags} to "make" command - don't use hardcoded paths like /usr/bin, /usr/share, /etc. Use appropriate rpm macro (%{_bindir}, %{_datadir}, %{_sysconfdir}) instead. 3: - use %find_lang to package locale files. Check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files for more info. 4: - fire away Source4 and use system wide pstopdf, please. 5: - vast majority of binaries have incorrect perms. Please use 755 permissions for all shared libraries and binaries. There are so many rpmlint errors. Please fix them or explain why are they invalid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 13:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:45:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171345.nBHDjD39011561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 --- Comment #7 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2009-12-17 08:45:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > npajkovs, may I assume you will take care if this ? > > As for the review, Thanks! > > Here is my take on things which need fixing: > > (In reply to comment #4) > > [NO] specfile uses macros consistently: %{SOURCEx} should probably be > > %{sourcex}, "Buildroot:" -> "BuildRoot:" > > Writing SOURCE with all caps is quite normal in spec files (most do > it this way), and is allowed as long as it is in all caps everywhere > inside the specfile, which it is. > > The buildroot thingie should be fixed. > > [NO] rpmlint is silent > > > > $ rpmlint *.rpm > > lm_sensors.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre mv > > lm_sensors.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger mv > > lm_sensors.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger mv > > lm_sensors.i686: W: one-line-command-in-%trigger > > /usr/bin/sysconfig-lm_sensors-convert > > These can all be ignored > ignored > > lm_sensors-libs.i686: W: summary-not-capitalized lm_sensors core libraries > > Should be fixed > fixed > > lm_sensors-libs.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libsensors.so.4.2.0 > > exit at GLIBC_2.0 > > lm_sensors-libs.i686: W: no-documentation > > Can be ignored ignored > > lm_sensors-libs.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin > > /usr/lib/libsensors.so.4.2.0 > > lm_sensors-libs.i686: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun > fixed > Oops, see below. > > > /usr/lib/libsensors.so.4.2.0 > > lm_sensors-sensord.i686: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sensord > > lm_sensors > > lm_sensors-sensord.i686: W: incoherent-init-script-name sensord > > ('lm_sensors-sensord', 'lm_sensors-sensordd') > > Can be ignored. ignored. we will use same name as upstream > > Imho the following lines should be added to the spec file: > > %post libs -p /sbin/ldconfig > > %postun libs -p /sbin/ldconfig > > > > Correct, and the ld_config from the main package %post should removed > > And the main package's: > %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig > > Should be removed completely. > fixed > > [???] Please consider using "Requires: dmidecode" instead of "Requires: > > /usr/sbin/dmidecode" > > No need to not use file requires when the files are in one of /bin, /sbin, > /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. > ignored > > [???] %defattr(-,root,root,-) should be used instead of %defattr(-,root,root) > > Can / should be fixed. > fixed > Regards, > > Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 13:49:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:49:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225901] Merge Review: inn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171349.nBHDnmTS001827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225901 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |inn-2.5.1-3.fc13 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Adam Tkac 2009-12-17 08:49:46 EDT --- inn-2.5.1-3.fc13 looks fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 13:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:50:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225901] Merge Review: inn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171350.nBHDo5EY013167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225901 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 13:52:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171352.nBHDqqZX013996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 --- Comment #9 from Stefan Riemens 2009-12-17 08:52:51 EDT --- That was quick! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph Short Description: Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit Owners: stefanriemens Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 14:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547226] Review Request: pgu - pygame addon for making GUIs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171440.nBHEeUce030036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547226 --- Comment #4 from Florent LC 2009-12-17 09:40:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > What did I miss? > > > > Nothing, I'w new to packaging too and missed that, I apologize. > Ok, no problem ;) > If they are examples, then they should moved moved out of /usr/bin and into an > examples directory as part of %doc Ok, that's what I did, here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~louizatakk/rpm/python-pgu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~louizatakk/rpm/python-pgu-0.12.3-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 15:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:25:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544016] Review Request: cbpolicyd - Postfix anti-spam policy server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171525.nBHFPkNj001555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544016 --- Comment #2 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-12-17 10:25:45 EDT --- Turns out there was a blocking bug in 2.0.9, so v2.0.10 has been released. New specfile is up, and a new SRPM is at: http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/cbpolicyd-2.0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm I've also added a logrotate config to the 2.0.10 package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 15:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:35:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171535.nBHFZw4u004987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 Karel Kl?? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Karel Kl?? 2009-12-17 10:35:57 EDT --- I am giving fedora-review+. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 15:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:37:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226101] Merge Review: lm_sensors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171537.nBHFbZ8g005518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226101 Nikola Pajkovsky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 15:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:44:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548482] New: Review Request: gnome-dvb-daemon - Digital Television manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-dvb-daemon - Digital Television manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548482 Summary: Review Request: gnome-dvb-daemon - Digital Television manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gnome-dvb-daemon/gnome-dvb-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gnome-dvb-daemon/gnome-dvb-daemon-0.1.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: gnome-dvb-daemon contains a daemon responsible for handling Digital Television adapters, including recording, listing programs schedules and scanning for channels. This package also contains a Totem plugin for the movie player and a plugin for sharing recordings and live TV over UPNP using Rygel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 15:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171545.nBHFjNr9008288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #11 from John W. Linville 2009-12-17 10:45:22 EDT --- * Thu Dec 17 2009 John W. Linville - 0.6.9-6 - Enable RADIUS server - Enable "wired" and "none" drivers - Use BSD license option SRPM: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/hostapd-0.6.9-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 15:45:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:45:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548482] Review Request: gnome-dvb-daemon - Digital Television manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171545.nBHFj7xx017952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548482 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |532470 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 15:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:45:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532470] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171545.nBHFj9CG018027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532470 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |548482 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 16:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:00:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171600.nBHG0w5G014273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #12 from Tom Hughes 2009-12-17 11:00:56 EDT --- I notice you haven't uncommented CONFIG_IEEE80211N in the configuration so it won't have 802.11n support. The build I'm using at the moment does have that enabled (although I don't have any clients to test it with) and it doesn't seem to have caused any problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 16:07:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:07:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171607.nBHG7QL6026576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #13 from John W. Linville 2009-12-17 11:07:24 EDT --- Tom, thanks for the report! I would be open to enabling that, just haven't tested it myself. If you don't mind, let's get the package approved and then we can play with further configuration options...fair enough? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 16:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:07:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547655] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171607.nBHG7Oki017395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547655 --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-12-17 11:07:22 EDT --- Upstream applied the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 16:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:07:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171607.nBHG7urp017516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 --- Comment #5 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-12-17 11:07:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Thank you very much Dan. I've fixed all the issues you noted. Updated: Spec URL: https://fedorahosted.org/released/report/report.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/released/report/report-0.4-3.fc11.src.rpm TAR URL: https://fedorahosted.org/released/report/report-0.4.tar.gz -gavin... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 17:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:22:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548482] Review Request: gnome-dvb-daemon - Digital Television manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171722.nBHHMx4i015774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548482 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2009-12-17 12:22:58 EDT --- Dumb question - does it make sense to split off the totem plugin such that you'd be running the daemon on some server box, and the totem plugin on other machines on your network? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 17:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:22:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548522] New: Review Request: autotest-client - Autotest is a framework for fully automated testing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: autotest-client - Autotest is a framework for fully automated testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548522 Summary: Review Request: autotest-client - Autotest is a framework for fully automated testing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jlaska at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/autoqa/autotest-client.spec SRPM URL: http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/autoqa/autotest-client-0.11.0-3.fc12.src.rpm Description: Autotest is a framework for fully automated testing. It is designed primarily to test the Linux kernel, though it is useful for many other functions such as qualifying new hardware. The autotest-client package contains only the client-side software and does not include upstream tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 17:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:37:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171737.nBHHbwiE011196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 --- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham 2009-12-17 12:37:56 EDT --- Given the existence of the mx/mx-devel packages, a little more description in the -devel packages might help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 17:42:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:42:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171742.nBHHgoEf012848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2009-12-17 12:42:48 EDT --- There is also another project called mx/libmx which seems to be older and still be maintained: http://www.lostsidedead.com/mx/ I suggest to use moblin-mx to avoid potential future conflicts, but this might be worth discussion on fedora-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 18:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538465] Review Request: libmx - A clutter toolkit for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171829.nBHITJ5F001243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538465 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-17 13:29:18 EDT --- just had a quick look: * I think that %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/mx needs to be tagged with %doc. * Also please span the description to 80 columns as much as possible. * Source0 seems wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 18:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:35:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171835.nBHIZEoT003235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-17 13:35:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dogtag-pki-ca-ui Short Description: The Dogtag Certificate Authority User Interface Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 18:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171837.nBHIbfaa028520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-17 13:37:39 EDT --- Since this has been approved, I'm requesting the cvs branches be created. However, the review flag is still set to ? instead of +. I believe this is inadvertent. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dogtag-pki-common-ui Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Common Framework User Interface Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 19:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171922.nBHJM6pc021500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 14:22:00 EDT --- perl-Verilog-Perl-3.221-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 19:22:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:22:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522777] Review Request: perl-Verilog-Perl - Verilog parsing routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171922.nBHJMUpv021673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522777 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.221-1.el5 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 19:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:31:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542715] Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171931.nBHJVjCC019712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715 --- Comment #5 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-12-17 14:31:39 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. I don't understand how to generate the SRPM to fix the permission errors. I understand I have to set the permissions to 0644, but I don't understand *where* on the spec do I specify it. I uploaded a newer spec with all your considerations, along with a new SRPM, that I placed here: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs-0.12.1-2.fc12.src.rpm Using ExcludesArch while Bug 474428 is solved, after that, I'll make the package noarch. Thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 19:33:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:33:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548561] New: Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548561 Summary: Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: keijser at stone-it.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://leon.fedorapeople.org/files/poweradmin/poweradmin.spec SRPM URL: http://leon.fedorapeople.org/files/poweradmin/poweradmin-2.1.3-5.fc12.src.rpm Description: Poweradmin is a friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server. The interface has full support for most of the features of PowerDNS. It has full support for all zone types ( master, native and slave), for supermasters for automatic provisioning of slave zones, full support for IPv6 and comes with multi-language support. See feature list for all features. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1878241 rpmlint outputs 2 warnings, both of which i can explain: poweradmin.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /var/www/html/poweradmin/locale/nl_NL/LC_MESSAGES/messages.mo poweradmin.noarch: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm The locale file belongs to the poweradmin package and is not meant for system-wide usage. The rm command is to remove the ./install dir when upgrading the package. If it's not removed, PowerAdmin won't function properly anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 19:50:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:50:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912171950.nBHJoHOD024357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #63 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-12-17 14:50:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #62) > Tricky. The thing is that I am not the real upstream author for the majority > of these files. I have bundled them and made their setup and integration > easier for Debian. So in that regard my changes rightly appear in a separate > diff file (the same as if you made the changes). But for you, I am "upstream" > for this repackaging. I _could_ include the patches in the tar file and still > comply with Debian's own package policies (although some in Debian might not > agree) by still keeping the patches under the debian/ directory, in > debian/patches/. > I may do this in the next release. @Peter you are not the real upstream author? Who is the real project owner? Is there another project homepage then this one from Debian? From my point of view, we should avoid the creation of differents "upstreams" tar balls. so it may be nice, if you can work together with the "real" upstream to get a common tar ball in with the huge diff file is integrated. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 20:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172000.nBHK0RQ3000313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #18 from Adam Miller 2009-12-17 15:00:25 EDT --- New release from upstream Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs-0.9.4-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 20:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479594] Review Request: email - A command line SMTP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172050.nBHKoK54007828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479594 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-17 15:50:17 EDT --- No answer from upstream... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 21:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:05:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541992] Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172105.nBHL5HrR011317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Lucian Langa 2009-12-17 16:05:15 EDT --- imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 21:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172152.nBHLqgjp028728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-17 16:52:38 EDT --- The package itself looks fine and fixes all problems, but there is a trival rpmlint warning that you should fix: $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/invulgotracker-* invulgotracker.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Make sure to use spaces in line 10 too. And the changelog format is not quite right: Instead of *Thu Dec 03 2009 it should be * Thu Dec 03 2009 Note the whitespace before the date. You can fix this when updating to 0.61 which was just released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 22:04:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:04:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] New: Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 Summary: Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pvs/pvs-sbcl.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pvs/pvs-sbcl-4.2-1.svn20091008.fc12.src.rpm Description: PVS is a verification system: that is, a specification language integrated with support tools and a theorem prover. It is intended to capture the state-of-the-art in mechanized formal methods and to be sufficiently rugged that it can be used for significant applications. PVS is a research prototype: it evolves and improves as we develop or apply new capabilities, and as the stress of real use exposes new requirements. This is a build with SBCL. The name was chosen so that builds with other Common Lisp engines in the future are not precluded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 22:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172229.nBHMTqUa006177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Bug 479527 depends on bug 531773, which changed state. Bug 531773 Summary: Review Request: synfig - Vector-based 2D animation rendering backend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531773 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 22:29:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:29:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531773] Review Request: synfig - Vector-based 2D animation rendering backend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172229.nBHMTpbb006151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531773 Luya Tshimbalanga changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Luya Tshimbalanga 2009-12-17 17:29:48 EDT --- Closing this report because synfig is available on repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:03:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172303.nBHN3sBU014458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-17 18:03:52 EDT --- Sorry, this got lost in amongst 100s of abrt reports. Fixed the license SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ethos.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ethos-0.2.2-2.fc12.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1878617 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:40:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172340.nBHNe0qB015911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwheeler at dwheeler.com --- Comment #1 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-17 18:39:58 EDT --- Thanks for doing this! I did a quick scan of the spec file to start with, and have a few questions based on just that scan: * I think the release number should be changed. It's currently "1.svn20091008%{?dist}", but I don't think that will sort correctly with later items. As I interpret "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages", it should be something like "1.20091008svn%{?dist}". I understand why you had to pull from svn, and agree with that decision, but I'm not sure that will sort well later. * In the Summary, I'd add "(PVS)" at the end, to simply the job of keyword searchers. The expanded name of PVS is more historical than reality... I think it's always referred to by its initials, not its full name. * Patch0: I think it's okay for now, but in the long term, it might be nice for there to be a build option that skips mona and uses the existing packaging system. That way it'll be easier to package for other distros, *and* it may reduce your longer-term pain as PVS changes. I'd at least send the patch to the developers, explaining why it's needed. I'm surprised at the number of "cannot be built" documents due to missing components; did you ask SRI for them? At the least, I suspect Rushby wouldn't mind releasing his "/homes/rushby/tex/prelude" as OSS, or at least enough to build one of the docs. I don't see a license issue with the spec the way it is, so I don't think that should hold up anything, but it'd be nice for the future. I fear the amount of time it took to create *this* spec. This is definitely not a program that was designed to be packaged. Eek. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:40:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172340.nBHNeK4G022455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwheeler at dwheeler.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:52:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:52:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172352.nBHNq1EL018843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:52:00 EDT --- CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:52:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172352.nBHNqpuK025283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:52:49 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:52:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172352.nBHNquZd025324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.1-3.fc11 |1.2.1-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:51:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:51:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172351.nBHNpW0U024918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:51:32 EDT --- globus-duct-common-2.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:50:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172350.nBHNodCa024720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:50:38 EDT --- globus-duct-common-2.1-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:52:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172352.nBHNqIsW025117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:52:17 EDT --- globus-duroc-common-2.1-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:52:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172352.nBHNq62Q025066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc11 |1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:51:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172351.nBHNpbQo024955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.el4 |2.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516523] Review Request: globus-duct-common - Globus Toolkit - Globus Duct Common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172350.nBHNoiZL024753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516523 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.fc12 |2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172353.nBHNrZbo025478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7-1.fc12 |0.7-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:52:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172352.nBHNqWRI025187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:52:30 EDT --- pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-native-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-1011 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172356.nBHNuLMj020177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:56:19 EDT --- php-pear-Net-URL2-0.3.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:56:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:56:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542075] Review Request: php-pear-Net-URL2 - Class for parsing and handling URL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172356.nBHNuRwr020222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542075 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.0-1.fc11 |0.3.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:52:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516525] Review Request: globus-duroc-common - Globus Toolkit - DUROC Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172352.nBHNqNhN018977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516525 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.fc12 |2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:56:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172356.nBHNunmB020311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:56:47 EDT --- python-pip-0.4-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:53:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:53:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516535] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-scripts - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Job ManagerScripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172353.nBHNrUSF019182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516535 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:53:28 EDT --- globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-0.7-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172356.nBHNusdd020344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc12 |0.4-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:56:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172356.nBHNuZsJ026762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:56:35 EDT --- erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172356.nBHNufgY026797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.1-3.el5 |1.2.1-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172357.nBHNvR9R027003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:57:26 EDT --- CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:55:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172355.nBHNtA1a026399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:55:07 EDT --- volpack-1.0c7-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172357.nBHNvWRK027038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.el4 |1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172357.nBHNvBGJ026916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 18:57:10 EDT --- globus-gass-cache-program-2.7-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:57:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:57:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516531] Review Request: globus-gass-cache-program - Globus Toolkit - Tools to manipulate local and remote GASS caches In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172357.nBHNvF5Z026948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516531 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.7-1.fc11 |2.7-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 17 23:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:55:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912172355.nBHNtGot026528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0c7-3.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 00:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:41:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548482] Review Request: gnome-dvb-daemon - Digital Television manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180041.nBI0fLgT030613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548482 --- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera 2009-12-17 19:41:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Dumb question - does it make sense to split off the totem plugin such that > you'd be running the daemon on some server box, and the totem plugin on other > machines on your network? The Totem plugin doesn't hard-require Totem, so it's just a couple of python files on your computer... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 01:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:14:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180114.nBI1EETr011405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-17 20:14:11 EDT --- Hi kevin, sorry. looks I forgot to change fedora-review flag.I have set it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 03:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:52:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531252] Review Request: lfc - LCG File Catalog (LFC) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180352.nBI3qgal014450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531252 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|steve.traylen at cern.ch |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #9 from Steve Traylen 2009-12-17 22:52:40 EDT --- Won't be able to look at this for nearly a month to un-assigning. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:19:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180419.nBI4JqBC013905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:19:50 EDT --- oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts-20031109-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:20:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180420.nBI4KpDM014431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:20:49 EDT --- usbview-1.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update usbview'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13277 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:21:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:21:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180421.nBI4Laar014750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #66 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:21:29 EDT --- mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mod_proxy_html'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13279 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180424.nBI4OWwd022368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.1.2-5.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:23:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:23:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180423.nBI4Ni8M022186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:23:43 EDT --- pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-native-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180422.nBI4MZKB021862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:22:34 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13282 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:24:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:24:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180424.nBI4OPnY015830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #67 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:24:23 EDT --- mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:28:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522895] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-native-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180428.nBI4SDCF024288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:28:12 EDT --- pki-native-tools-1.3.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-native-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13314 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:28:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542518] Review Request: usbview - USB topology and device viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180428.nBI4SgK9024482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542518 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:28:41 EDT --- usbview-1.1-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update usbview'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:25:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180425.nBI4PrrK023507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:25:51 EDT --- artha-0.9.1-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update artha'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13301 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180429.nBI4TEtm017551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:29:12 EDT --- symkey-1.3.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180429.nBI4TJTQ017616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.0-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:30:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180430.nBI4UUMt018375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:30:28 EDT --- gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gscribble'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13325 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:31:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180431.nBI4VN0m018645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:31:21 EDT --- activemq-cpp-3.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update activemq-cpp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13332 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:31:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180431.nBI4V4IU025788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:31:00 EDT --- jaxodraw-2.0.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:31:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180431.nBI4V88t025835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0.1-4.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:37:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180437.nBI4b4ui020999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #68 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:37:03 EDT --- mod_proxy_html-3.1.2-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:35:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180435.nBI4Z9UA020439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:35:08 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13350 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:40:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180440.nBI4eBHP022445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.1-4.fc11 |2.0.1-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:37:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180437.nBI4bBnv021182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.1.2-5.fc12 |3.1.2-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:38:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180438.nBI4cNOK021660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:38:22 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13372 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:40:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:40:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180440.nBI4e6kY029252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:40:04 EDT --- jaxodraw-2.0.1-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180440.nBI4eieo029765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:40:43 EDT --- artha-0.9.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update artha'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13383 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:44:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544540] Review Request: genesis - Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180444.nBI4ixPH024178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544540 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:44:57 EDT --- genesis-0.4.2.1-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:46:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533899] Review Request: activemq-cpp - C++ implementation of JMS-like messaging client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180446.nBI4kAu5024816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533899 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:46:09 EDT --- activemq-cpp-3.0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update activemq-cpp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13394 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:45:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523224] Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180445.nBI4jBie031558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523224 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:45:10 EDT --- mingw32-xerces-c-3.0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523224] Review Request: mingw32-xerces-c - MingGW Windows validating XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180445.nBI4jGQV031746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523224 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.0.1-1.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:45:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180445.nBI4jO0i031838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:45:23 EDT --- gscribble-0.0.2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gscribble'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 04:47:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:47:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180447.nBI4lrcN025705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-17 23:47:52 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13398 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 06:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:28:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180628.nBI6SrPS000823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #14 from Tareq Al Jurf 2009-12-18 01:28:51 EDT --- fixed and updated SRPM http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i686/invulgotracker/invulgotracker-0.61-1.fc13.src.rpm SPEC http://taljurf.fedorapeople.org/Packages/i686/invulgotracker/invulgotracker.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 07:32:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547655] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180732.nBI7WQQG029949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547655 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-12-18 02:32:25 EDT --- Could you provide an updated src.rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 08:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:10:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542754] Review Request: artha - A handy thesaurus based on WordNet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180810.nBI8AR53014963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542754 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-18 03:10:24 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 08:08:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:08:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180808.nBI88e1J014416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #50 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-18 03:08:39 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 08:10:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:10:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180810.nBI8Ap5F015032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mail at marcus-moell | |er.ch) --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-18 03:10:50 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 08:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:20:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180820.nBI8Kh6X017016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-18 03:20:42 EDT --- Built and published. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 08:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:20:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542463] Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180820.nBI8Kiqb017047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542463 Bug 542463 depends on bug 542461, which changed state. Bug 542461 Summary: Review Request: digna-fonts - Handwriting font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 08:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:44:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548561] Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180844.nBI8iM9n022265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548561 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Resolution| |NOTABUG AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-12-18 03:44:21 EDT --- The package is already included in fedora ( >= 10 ) and epel (4 / 5) . https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/poweradmin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:18:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548694] Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180918.nBI9IIoI008105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694 Jan Huta? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:15:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180915.nBI9FpHS007235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mihai at limbasan.ro | |) --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-18 04:15:47 EDT --- Ping, Mihai! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180919.nBI9JF5X008481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-18 04:19:13 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:17:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:17:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180917.nBI9Hmwn007963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #18 from Bug Zapper 2009-12-18 04:17:44 EDT --- Fedora 10 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-12-17. Fedora 10 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:17:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496688] Review Request: monodevelop-database - Addin for MonoDevelop for an integrated database explorer and editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180917.nBI9Hri3007996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496688 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2009-12-18 04:17:52 EDT --- Fedora 10 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-12-17. Fedora 10 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:17:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496689] Review Request: monodevelop-java - Java language integration with MonoDevelop based on ikvm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180917.nBI9Hw1N003771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496689 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper 2009-12-18 04:17:57 EDT --- Fedora 10 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-12-17. Fedora 10 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:18:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548694] New: Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694 Summary: Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jhutar at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/rpmfluff.git?p=rpmfluff.git;a=blob_plain;f=python-rpmfluff.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/r/p/rpmfluff/python-rpmfluff-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: rpmfluff is a lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them so they are broken in controlled ways. It is intended for use when testing RPM-testers e.g. rpmlint and writing test cases for RPM tools e.g. yum -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:22:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:22:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547974] Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180922.nBI9M0gY010210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547974 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-18 04:21:59 EDT --- Some remarks: * Won't build without intltool: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1878893 * BR: ibus-devel does not seem to be needed ( Well, it seems that %{_datadir}/ibus/component/ or /usr/share/skk seems hardcoded ?? ) * Please consider to use --------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files ! Well, I tried using ibus-skk, however - when I enable ibus/ibus-skk (on gedit or firefox or jd) - type "kannji" then each time I type "ka", "nn", "ji" each string is changed immediately to "?" "?" then "?", and no kanji conversion by space bar works... (well, my explanation may be not good... then:) gedit?firefox,jd??ibus/ibus-skk????????? "kannji"????????"ka","nn","ji"????????? ?????"?""?""?"?????????????????????????? ??????????????????? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180925.nBI9PY6J012413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-12-18 04:25:32 EDT --- Thanks for update, all issues are fixed now, the package is APPROVED. Just a little remark at the end - as an upstream author please never publish an updated source archive under the same filename, it breaks the automatic checks between sources stored in Fedora and sources defined by the Source tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:30:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548092] Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180930.nBI9U7Au009264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-18 04:30:06 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180928.nBI9S5KP008297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-18 04:28:03 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines (WTFPL). + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (WTFPL) + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, (README) is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1.tar.gz* 2e1f690417ef79187b1c0e3a84b2cefd90a67138ffa8ba5985c7f653c7b69e55 mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1.tar.gz 2e1f690417ef79187b1c0e3a84b2cefd90a67138ffa8ba5985c7f653c7b69e55 mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:36:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:36:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547655] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-RTx - RT extension installer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180936.nBI9apvu017558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547655 --- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-12-18 04:36:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Module-Install-RTx.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Module-Install-RTx-0.25-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:01:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181001.nBIA1bsn020069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-18 05:01:35 EDT --- mingw32-gtkhtml3-3.29.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-gtkhtml3-3.29.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 09:59:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:59:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548092] Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912180959.nBI9xkjx019392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-18 04:59:44 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/shared-color-targets-0.0.1-0.6.20091216git.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. - I've got few complaints about file contents directory layout. -- First, nobody owns dir %{_datadir}/color/targets. This issue must be fixed. -- Second, I don't see necessity of creating {_datadir}/shared-color-targets/wolf_faust just for storing LICENSE and README. Just mark them as %doc. If you wish to reflect the fact, that these two files are relevant to wolf_faust, then just rename them into something like README.wolf_faust and LICENSE.wolf_faust (and, after that, just mark them as %doc). Also it resolves the issue with inclusion of files with licensing info (see note below) -- I'm not sure, that we need to package ChangeLog at all - it contains only technical data, regarding repository changes. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. - The License field in the package spec file contains wrong data. You forgot to add CC-BY-SA (see LICENSE file in {_datadir}/shared-color-targets/wolf_faust directory). Also I don't find any traces of "Public Domain" content. Perhaps, test.it8 is licensed under this license? - The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, MUST be included in %doc. See note above - you must mark LICENSE file for Wolf Faust's work as %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. - The sources used to build the package, MUST match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. I've got 404 while trying to D/L Source0. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. - The package MUST own all directories that it creates. See message above. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Ok, here is a TODO list: * Provide downloadable Source0 * Fix License field in spec-file * Package must own %{_datadir}/color/targets dir * Relocate docs related to Wolf Faust's work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:02:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181002.nBIA2grE026158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-18 05:02:23 EDT --- mingw32-gtkhtml3-3.29.3-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-gtkhtml3-3.29.3-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:05:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:05:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181005.nBIA5JEd026990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-18 05:05:18 EDT --- Some remarks * BR - Please check if gettext"-devel" is really needed for BR - Also "BR: automake autoconf" don't seem to be needed because no autotools are called during build. * SourceURL - I guess the following works. http://dl.sourceforge.jp/kasumi/41436/kasumi-2.5.tar.gz * %makeinstall - Please avoid to use %makeinstall and use "make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" instead https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used ! and consider to add 'INSTALL="install -p"' to "make install" to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. ? Removing desktop ----------------------------------------------------------- # remove .desktop file so that kasumi is accessible from # scim panel and it's not necessary for other users. rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop ----------------------------------------------------------- - Is this also true for people using ibus (as now we use ibus by default) and some other input method (such as uim/uim-anthy)? - Does this mean that %_datadir/pixmaps/kasumi.png can also be removed? * Misc rpmlint issues ----------------------------------------------------------- kasumi.i686: W: summary-ended-with-dot C An anthy dictionary management tool. ----------------------------------------------------------- - Please fix above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:14:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181014.nBIAENhn023712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 --- Comment #4 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-18 05:14:21 EDT --- [huzaifas at localhost temp]$ sha256sum openvas-lib* 4f295a3d1a414652c16037617544c5d1ea865b9790e83b76dbf1c71b7fd52e41 openvas-libnasl-2.0.2.tar.gz 4f295a3d1a414652c16037617544c5d1ea865b9790e83b76dbf1c71b7fd52e41 openvas-libraries-2.0.2.tar.gz Should openvas-libraries be called openvas-libnasl or vice versa? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:21:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181021.nBIALQGq025762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-18 05:21:24 EDT --- The rpmlint warning still remains: $ rpmlint Desktop/invulgotracker-0.61-1.fc13.src.rpm invulgotracker.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. But this is trivial, you can change it later. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:21:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181021.nBIALlkq031830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 --- Comment #5 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-18 05:21:44 EDT --- not really, fixing the srpm now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:25:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547974] Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181025.nBIAPZKq000374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547974 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-18 05:25:34 EDT --- One more thing - BuildArch should be noach. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:30:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226175] Merge Review: mx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181030.nBIAUMew028318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226175 --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2009-12-18 05:30:19 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: 70b4423a1f4d690976d57ded91ec3e9a71c6c0a3 egenix-mx-base-3.1.1.tar.gz OK* package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. BAD latest version is being packaged. Ok BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. BAD final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. BAD file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. BAD documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in devel subpackage OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - this package is a collection of python modules and should follow the guideline for naming python modules (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29), because this a merge review it will be sufficient to add a Provides that will match the guideline (python-mx = %{version}-%{release}) - version 3.1.2 was released - rpmlint complains a bit mx.x86_64: W: self-obsoletion mx2 <= 3.1.1-5.fc13 obsoletes mx2 = 3.1.1-5.fc13 => if the reason for these is an upgrade path from an earlier version present in F<=10, it could be dropped mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mx/Stack/mxStack/mxStack.so 0775 mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mx/BeeBase/mxBeeBase/mxBeeBase.so 0775 mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mx/UID/mxUID/mxUID.so 0775 mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mx/URL/mxURL/mxURL.so 0775 mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mx/Tools/mxTools/mxTools.so 0775 mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mx/Proxy/mxProxy/mxProxy.so 0775 mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mx/TextTools/mxTextTools/mxTextTools.so 0775 mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mx/Queue/mxQueue/mxQueue.so 0775 mx.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/mx/DateTime/mxDateTime/mxDateTime.so 0775 => chmod will fix them, AFAIK it's caused by the python dist/setup-tools mx-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation => no problem, but you can check if some of the existing docs could be moved here - the documentation contains a number of PDF files making 90% of the total package size and 65% of installed size and thus deserves a docs subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181034.nBIAY9sT003812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 --- Comment #6 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-18 05:34:08 EDT --- New: SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/openvas-libnasl.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/openvas-libnasl-2.0.2-3.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1879210 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:35:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181035.nBIAZVux004512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 --- Comment #7 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-18 05:35:30 EDT --- Xavier, It seems you have some spec/srpms as well, would you like to co-maintain the stack as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:42:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538297] Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181042.nBIAg4hI031432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538297 Bug 538297 depends on bug 538035, which changed state. Bug 538035 Summary: Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:42:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538035] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181042.nBIAg2DQ031375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-18 05:42:00 EDT --- openvas-libraries 2.0.4 are in rawhide now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:42:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538298] Review Request: openvas-plugins - Security check plugins for OpenVAS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181042.nBIAg5QE031459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538298 Bug 538298 depends on bug 538035, which changed state. Bug 538035 Summary: Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181042.nBIAg3ca031404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 Bug 538296 depends on bug 538035, which changed state. Bug 538035 Summary: Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538035 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 10:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181037.nBIAbfGb030136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-18 05:37:40 EDT --- Review: FIXIT: rpmlint is not happy testng.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/testng-5.10/README OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Non blockers but I would love to see them: 1. Maven pom and depmaps added - This will allow me to build testng support in maven-surefire which is disabled now. 2. Testng 5.11 is out - nice to import latest version directly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 11:02:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:02:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548092] Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181102.nBIB2YmA004326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhughes at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Richard Hughes 2009-12-18 06:02:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * Provide downloadable Source0 Done. > * Fix License field in spec-file Done > * Package must own %{_datadir}/color/targets dir Done > * Relocate docs related to Wolf Faust's work. Not done. Programs such as gnome-color-manager are expecting them to be in /usr/share/share-color-targets/$(VENDOR)/{README|LICENSE} -- this is so the user can click a link to the target readme or licence in the GUI and it will be displayed automatically. They shouldn't be listed as doc files as if they are missing then clients can't display the licence of the targets, which is bad. I hope this is okay, as functionality in the GUI client depends on the fact they are present, and named in this way. Richard. New spec file: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets.spec New SRPM: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets-0.0.1-0.7.20091218git.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 11:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:14:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181114.nBIBEtcH007486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-18 06:14:53 EDT --- eview: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1879210 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 7a4342418de2a591353a4404455ca97a49d589d8 openvas-libnasl-2.0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage present. + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package openvas-libnasl-2.0.2-3.fc13.i686 => Provides: libopenvasnasl.so.2 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgcrypt.so.11 libgcrypt.so.11(GCRYPT_1.2) libglib-2.0.so.0 libgnutls.so.26 libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4) libgpg-error.so.0 libgpgme.so.11 libgpgme.so.11(GPGME_1.0) libgpgme.so.11(GPGME_1.1) libnsl.so.1 libopenvas.so.2 libopenvas_hg.so.2 libopenvasnasl.so.2 libpcap.so.1 libresolv.so.2 libutil.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package openvas-libnasl-devel-2.0.2-3.fc13.i686 => Requires: /bin/sh libopenvasnasl.so.2 + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) I see some documentation still there. See if you can add that to spec. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 11:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:24:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181124.nBIBOnib009942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-18 06:24:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openvas-libnasl Short Description: Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server Owners: huzaifas, sgros Branches: rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 11:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181128.nBIBS2It018119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-18 06:28:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > License is unclear: COPYING is GPLv3, headers are LGPLv2+. Looking through the upstream git there is now a COPYING.LGPL file there (but the GPL3 COPYING file is still there) and I can only find references to LGPLv2+. I'm emailing upstream for clarification but updated the spec to LGPLv2+ In the mean time I've updated the build for the latest rest. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/emerillon-0.1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/emerillon.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 11:35:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:35:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548092] Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181135.nBIBZh97020685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-18 06:35:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum shared-color-targets-0.0.1.tar.gz* 47d52e4f4c21f88f71cb0332d7b07702c3efbb5fc24afe8b6022000e50db2e49 shared-color-targets-0.0.1.tar.gz 47d52e4f4c21f88f71cb0332d7b07702c3efbb5fc24afe8b6022000e50db2e49 shared-color-targets-0.0.1.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ > > * Relocate docs related to Wolf Faust's work. > > Not done. Programs such as gnome-color-manager are expecting them to be in > /usr/share/share-color-targets/$(VENDOR)/{README|LICENSE} -- this is so the > user can click a link to the target readme or licence in the GUI and it will be > displayed automatically. They shouldn't be listed as doc files as if they are > missing then clients can't display the licence of the targets, which is bad. > > I hope this is okay, as functionality in the GUI client depends on the fact > they are present, and named in this way. > > Richard. > > New spec file: > http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets.spec > New SRPM: > http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets-0.0.1-0.7.20091218git.fc12.src.rpm Ok, understood. You need to own %{_datadir}/shared-color-targets directory - that's the only issue remaining. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 12:27:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:27:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548092] Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181227.nBICRLiE000360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 --- Comment #5 from Richard Hughes 2009-12-18 07:27:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Ok, understood. You need to own %{_datadir}/shared-color-targets directory - > that's the only issue remaining. Eek, forgot that -- apologies. Fixed now. New spec file: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets.spec New SRPM: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/shared-color-targets-0.0.1-0.8.20091218git.fc12.src.rpm Richard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 12:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:36:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548092] Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181236.nBICaam0002991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-18 07:36:34 EDT --- Ok, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 12:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546704] Review Request: python-whoosh - Fast, pure-Python full text indexing, search, and spell checking library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181238.nBICcEA5003451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546704 --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-12-18 07:38:12 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-whoosh/python-whoosh.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-whoosh/python-whoosh-0.3.9-2.fc12.src.rpm Changelog - Fix BR. - Copy LICENSE.txt from svn to include in rpm. - Fix description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 12:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:56:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548092] Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181256.nBICuxIO008895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Richard Hughes 2009-12-18 07:56:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: shared-color-targets Short Description: shared-color-targets contains target files for popular scanner calibration targets. Owners: rhughes Branches: F-12 InitialCC: rhughes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 13:30:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181330.nBIDUdA0009423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-12-18 08:30:34 EDT --- Peter, thank you very much for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qutim Short Description: Multiprotocol (ICQ, Jabber, IRC etc) instant messenger with modern Qt4 interface Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 13:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181332.nBIDW6se009735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 --- Comment #5 from Ngo Than 2009-12-18 08:32:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Some new/different rpmlint output (too long to copy&paste, instead a summary): > > > > > > - configure-without-libdir-spec > > > is ok, because the configure script doesn't support that. > > > > > > - summary-ended-with-dot A documentation system for C/C++. > > > summary-ended-with-dot A GUI for creating and editing configuration files. > > > > > it's fixed > Yes, now the same for subpackage: > > oxygen-doxywizard.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A GUI for creating and > editing configuration files. > it's fixed in 1:1.6.1-3 > > > - file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/LANGUAGE.HOWTO > > > iconv --from=ISO-8859-1 --to=UTF-8 LANGUAGE.HOWTO > LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new && \ > > > touch -r LANGUAGE.HOWTO LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new && \ > > > mv LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new LANGUAGE.HOWTO > > > > > > > > it's fixed > > Not yet, you wrote 'touch -r LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new', but you need to write > 'touch -r LANGUAGE.HOWTO LANGUAGE.HOWTO.new' > t's fixed in 1:1.6.1-3 > > > > > - wrong-script-interpreter > > > /usr/share/doc/doxygen-1.6.1/examples/tag/html/installdox perl > > > > > > > > it's fixed > > Not here... Are you sure? > > > - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define > > > t's fixed in 1:1.6.1-3 > By the way. > I don't know where the 'with_qt' flag is coming from, but maybe it would be > more usefull to use bcond_with. > it's not needed, i dropped the conditinal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 13:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548694] Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181340.nBIDexQP012266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694 James Laska changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jlaska at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from James Laska 2009-12-18 08:40:57 EDT --- = rpmlint = $ rpmlint python-rpmfluff-0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm python-rpmfluff.src: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint python-rpmfluff-0.3-1.fc12.noarch.rpm python-rpmfluff.noarch: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The above is more of a warning and not something I would expect to cause issue. = general specfile formatting = I've made some minor formatting corrections based on the feedback I've always received from my package reviews. I don't think this is a requirement, but might help. See the changes at ... http://pastie.org/748652 = license = The spec file lists GPLv2, but there is no LICENSE file in the source or %doc. Perhaps someone else can speak to that. = copyright = The rpmfluff.py file has no copyright preamble. Should one be added? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 13:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:46:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181346.nBIDkZMa020687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #8 from Michal Babej 2009-12-18 08:46:33 EDT --- I asked one of the developers, he said test/*/*_test.rb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 13:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181357.nBIDvhmh023336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-18 08:57:42 EDT --- FYI: BR: tex(latex) is more general than texlive-latex Please use %global instead %define (I'm unsure, if this is new or I didn't see this last time). ########################## This was my first merge review, so I don't know the exact procedure... I'll approve this, when it's in devel, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 14:04:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:04:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181404.nBIE4pkP018098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-18 09:04:49 EDT --- License clarified by upstream: "My fault, the original plan was to have the new code under LGPLv2+ but emerillon globally as GPLv2+ due to some copied files. It looks like I copied by mistake the GPLv3 COPYING file instead than the GPLv2. This is not a big problem as the header in the files is right and this is the one with legal value and we - where by we I mean Pierre-Luc ;) - will fix it." http://www.ohloh.net/p/emerillon/analyses/latest SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/emerillon-0.1.0-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 14:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546704] Review Request: python-whoosh - Fast, pure-Python full text indexing, search, and spell checking library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181419.nBIEJ2EG029453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546704 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-18 09:19:01 EDT --- See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text Please delete the LICENSE.txt file again. Upstream *should* include it, if you email them and they say 'no' - that's ok. You only need to mail them, and that's it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 14:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:23:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181423.nBIENmuW030912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 --- Comment #7 from Ngo Than 2009-12-18 09:23:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > FYI: BR: tex(latex) is more general than texlive-latex > > Please use %global instead %define (I'm unsure, if this is new or I didn't see > this last time). > > it's not new and i don't see why we cannot use %define. > ########################## > > This was my first merge review, so I don't know the exact procedure... > > I'll approve this, when it's in devel, too. it's built in devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 14:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:32:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181432.nBIEWLhg026481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 --- Comment #7 from Prarit Bhargava 2009-12-18 09:32:19 EDT --- oget, For some reason I'm not listed in the ACL for dmidecode :/. I'll ping jwilson and see what I can figure out ... P. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 14:37:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:37:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545039] Review Request: xulrunner-python - Files needed to run Gecko applications written in python. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181437.nBIEbO05027968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545039 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-18 09:37:22 EDT --- Just a few comments for now: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - Why do you use add_files and not the normal %files section? - Why do you install in a own created directory and don't use $RPM_BUILD_ROOT? - nspr_version is not existent. Is it even needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 14:49:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:49:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181449.nBIEn0rZ006626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #2 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-18 09:48:57 EDT --- A few additional random thoughts on this package: * On Fedora there's already an /sbin/pvs (provided by lvm2), and /sbin is now in many users' paths. Is this likely to cause trouble? * I see a "Provides:", that's good. Should it provide "prototype-verification-system" instead of "pvs", since "pvs" has other meanings? * It seems to me that PVS should have a desktop entry, as defined by http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ That way, people can invoke it from the GUI, and double-click on ".pvs" files to invoke things correctly. Something like this in pvs.desktop: [Desktop Entry] Version=1.0 Type=Application Name=Prototype Verification System (PVS) Comment=A verification system (a specification language integrated with support tools and a theorem prover). TryExec=pvs Exec=pvs %F # Icon=fooview MimeType=image/x-pvs; (Obviously, such a desktop entry should be submitted upstream, so that in the long term everyone will package it up & they'll maintain the desktop entry.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 14:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:56:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181456.nBIEuLZH000933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-18 09:56:20 EDT --- That's what https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define says: """Use %global instead of %define, unless you really need only locally defined submacros within other macro definitions (a very rare case). """ In this case, it won't be a problem to use %define and not %global, but if FESCo decides to ust %global everywhere and not %define, we should simply get used to it or feel free to complain at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ If you use some %ifs or %{!?foo: ... } constructs and %define something in it, this could be gone, if you are out of the %if again, but still need it. Sometimes rpm removes the %define again, sometimes not... That's the main reason, why not using %define. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 14:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:58:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181458.nBIEwSrY009901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-18 09:58:27 EDT --- Sorry, setting the review flag to early... %define is a blocker... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 14:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:59:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181459.nBIExiSE010202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #3 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-18 09:59:42 EDT --- Is a *really* *really* long build time expected? I've had it build overnight using "rpmbuild -ba pvs.spec". It's STILL not done, after 14+ hours, and it's still burning cycles. I'm building on dual-processor Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.60GHz (32-bit x86), 4GiB RAM, Fedora 11, 4GiB RAM. Also, I noticed some problems related to BDDs (see below). "top" reports: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 14490 dwheeler 20 0 558m 44m 14m R 98.6 1.5 327758:45 sbcl 22306 dwheeler 20 0 25984 9768 4576 R 97.6 0.3 879:42.54 emacs ... Here's the tail of the build output at this time: ========================================================= Typechecking QuotientDistributive QuotientDistributive typechecked: 9 TCCs, 0 proved, 0 subsumed, 9 unproved Typechecking QuotientIteration QuotientIteration typechecked: 7 TCCs, 0 proved, 0 subsumed, 7 unproved Typechecking PartialFunctionDefinitions PartialFunctionDefinitions typechecked: 1 TCC, 0 proved, 0 subsumed, 1 unproved Typechecking PartialFunctionComposition PartialFunctionComposition typechecked: 2 TCCs, 0 proved, 0 subsumed, 2 unproved Done typechecking the prelude ; (LIST SB-RUNTIME::UNP-FUNCTION SB-RUNTIME:*UNPARSE-STYLE* ; SB-RUNTIME:*NO-ESCAPES* SB-RUNTIME:*SB-PRINT-DEPTH* ; SB-RUNTIME:*SB-PRINT-LENGTH* SB-RUNTIME::*FORMATTING-OFF*) ; ; caught WARNING: ; undefined variable: SB-RUNTIME:*FORMATTING-OFF* ; (EVERY #'FBOUNDP PVS::*UNTYPECHECK-HOOK*) ; --> LET BLOCK ; ==> ; (MAP NIL ; (LAMBDA (#:G2) ; (LET ((SB-IMPL::PRED-VALUE #)) ; (UNLESS SB-IMPL::PRED-VALUE (RETURN-FROM #:BLOCK3 NIL)))) ; PVS::*UNTYPECHECK-HOOK*) ; ; caught WARNING: ; undefined variable: PVS::*UNTYPECHECK-HOOK* ; (SB-RUNTIME:AW-TERM SB-RUNTIME::AW) ; ; caught STYLE-WARNING: ; undefined function: SB-RUNTIME:AW-TERM ; (SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT SB-RUNTIME::SELF STREAM SB-RUNTIME::BP :VALUE ; :UNITED-FLAG :CRS :SPACES :FORMAT) ; ; caught WARNING: ; undefined variable: SB-RUNTIME::BP ; (SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT SB-RUNTIME::PLACE STREAM SB-RUNTIME::PLACE ; SB-RUNTIME::LINETEXT SB-RUNTIME::LINENUMBER SB-RUNTIME::CHARNUMBER) ; ; caught WARNING: ; undefined variable: SB-RUNTIME::CHARNUMBER ; (ERGO-DISKSAVE TOOLS::ESS-FILENAME :RESTART-FUNCTION ; #'(LAMBDA () ; (FORMAT T "~%~72:@~%") ; (FORMAT T "~% Version ~A ~A" *ESS-VERSION* *ESS-VERSION-DATE*) ; (FORMAT T "~% with ~A" TOOLS::ESS-STRING) ; (FORMAT T "~% in ~A" TOOLS::BUILD-PARMS) ; (FORMAT T "~% generated ~A by ~A~%~%" TOOLS::BUILD-TIME TOOLS::BUILDER) ; (SETQ TOOLS::IN-REBORN-IMAGE-P T) ; (CASE (WINDOWSYSTEM) (:X11 (UNLESS # # #)) (:X10 (WHEN # # #))))) ; ; caught STYLE-WARNING: ; undefined function: ERGO-DISKSAVE ; (SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT SB-RUNTIME::PLACE STREAM SB-RUNTIME::PLACE ; SB-RUNTIME::LINETEXT SB-RUNTIME::LINENUMBER SB-RUNTIME::CHARNUMBER) ; ; caught WARNING: ; undefined variable: SB-RUNTIME::LINENUMBER ; ; caught WARNING: ; undefined variable: SB-RUNTIME::LINETEXT ; ; caught STYLE-WARNING: ; undefined function: SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT ; (SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT SB-RUNTIME::SELF STREAM SB-RUNTIME::TOKEN :KIND ; :SUBKIND :VALUE :STR-VALUE) ; ; caught WARNING: ; undefined variable: SB-RUNTIME:TOKEN ; ; compilation unit finished ; Undefined functions: ; SB-RUNTIME:AW-TERM ERGO-DISKSAVE SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT ; Undefined variables: ; SB-RUNTIME:*FORMATTING-OFF* PVS::*UNTYPECHECK-HOOK* SB-RUNTIME::BP SB-RUNTIME::CHARNUMBER SB-RUNTIME::LINENUMBER SB-RUNTIME::LINETEXT SB-RUNTIME:TOKEN ; caught 8 WARNING conditions ; caught 8 STYLE-WARNING conditions [undoing binding stack and other enclosing state... done] [saving current Lisp image into bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/pvs-sbclisp: writing 3432 bytes from the read-only space at 0x01000000 writing 2256 bytes from the static space at 0x01100000 writing 92459008 bytes from the dynamic space at 0x09000000 done] rm /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/bdd-sbcl.* rm: cannot remove `/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/bdd-sbcl.*': No such file or directory make: [bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/pvs-sbclisp] Error 1 (ignored) cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/sbcl bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/mu.so bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/bdd-sbcl.lisp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/mu-sbcl.lisp bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/WS1S/ix86-Linux/ws1s.so bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/WS1S/lisp/dfa-foreign-sbcl.lisp bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/utils/ix86-Linux/b64 bin/ix86-Linux ./pvs -batch -l emacs/emacs-src/pvs-set-prelude-info.el \ -f set-prelude-files-and-regions Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/focus-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/php-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/po-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/rpm-spec-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/rpmdev-init.el (source)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 15:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:27:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181527.nBIFRRdT010421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 Prarit Bhargava changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Prarit Bhargava 2009-12-18 10:27:26 EDT --- in 2.1.0-1.40. P. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 16:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:16:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181616.nBIGGl2L024672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-18 11:16:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > %define is a blocker... No it's not, since a) it is only a recommendation to use %global and b) it's only a draft that has never passed a FESCo vote. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 16:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:19:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181619.nBIGJ8Gx001950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 --- Comment #11 from Ngo Than 2009-12-18 11:19:07 EDT --- the %define is not needed, and dropped in doxygen-1.6.1-4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 16:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:23:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548795] Review Request: belier - Generates scripts allowing you to chain many ssh connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181623.nBIGNnWK003520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548795 Florent LC changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 16:23:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548795] New: Review Request: belier - Generates scripts allowing you to chain many ssh connections Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: belier - Generates scripts allowing you to chain many ssh connections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548795 Summary: Review Request: belier - Generates scripts allowing you to chain many ssh connections Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: louizatakk at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~louizatakk/rpm/belier.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~louizatakk/rpm/belier-1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: My second package, I'm still seeking a sponsor. Awaiting your reviews -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 16:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:26:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181626.nBIGQrrW004697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dave.nerd at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-18 11:26:50 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 16:56:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:56:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181656.nBIGuvMX014084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 Dave M changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dave.nerd at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #16 from Dave M 2009-12-18 11:56:54 EDT --- I would like to take the second option - try again with release 4.22, if that is still okay. I am doing some final testing and awaiting updated language files. It will not affect the spec file. Pending no objections, I will re-post the updated spec file and source rpm when complete. Otherwise, I can re-post them now as 4.21-2 for review. The downside is I would have to mess with the spec file, and I would just as soon not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 17:05:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:05:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181705.nBIH5xFL016697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-18 12:05:57 EDT --- Thank you for reply. Then I will wait for 4.22 release (as it seems it will be released soon) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 18:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:12:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] New: Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 Summary: Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: himanshu.sharmaa at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hiemanshu.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/security-menu.spec SRPM URL: http://hiemanshu.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/security-menu-1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This Package adds a Security Lab sub-menu to the xdg menu structure for GNOME and LXDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 18:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:21:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181821.nBIILDIJ026586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 Hiemanshu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 18:40:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:40:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181840.nBIIeLrr010754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cwickert at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-18 13:40:20 EDT --- This package still needs a lot of work, nevertheless I'm going to review it because I suggested something similar half a year ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 18:49:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:49:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181849.nBIInFa9001347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 --- Comment #2 from Hiemanshu 2009-12-18 13:49:14 EDT --- I am fixing a couple of issues I missed, I will update the links when the new release is uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 18:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:53:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181853.nBIIr9Bl014131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-18 13:53:08 EDT --- Some notes: * Source - Source0 in srpm differs from what I could download from the URL written in the spec file ------------------------------------------------------------- 5fa79d6ca562a39c72c89f5447a3fbd5 thor-0.12.0.gem 32e034949be3726ff1857d0edeae6566 rubygem-thor-0.12.0-1.fc13.src/thor-0.12.0.gem ------------------------------------------------------------- (and the contents of two gems actually differ) * Requires - bin/rake2thor contains: ------------------------------------------------------------- 8 require 'rake' ------------------------------------------------------------- As the Summary of this spec file says "that replaces rake,", I think it is admitted to add "Requires: rubygem(rake)" and this should surely be added. - lib/thor/shell/color.rb contains: ------------------------------------------------------------- 98 @diff_lcs_loaded = begin 99 require 'diff/lcs' 100 true 101 rescue LoadError 102 false 103 end ------------------------------------------------------------- I guess "diff/lcs" dependency is surely optional, however as Fedora already has rubygem-diff-lcs, you may want to add this dependency (however this is up to what you think) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 18:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:52:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181852.nBIIqpOh002429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 --- Comment #3 from Hiemanshu 2009-12-18 13:52:50 EDT --- Spec URL is the same, SRPM URL : http://hiemanshu.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/security-menu-1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Link to koji scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1880070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 19:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:07:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912181907.nBIJ7MkU006959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 --- Comment #4 from Hiemanshu 2009-12-18 14:06:53 EDT --- Updated, Fixed conflict with other packages SRPM URL : http://hiemanshu.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/security-menu-1.0-3.fc12.src.rpm Link to Koji scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1880103 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 21:08:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:08:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523715] Review Request: logiweb - a system for electronic distribution of mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912182108.nBIL8cRA021869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523715 --- Comment #7 from Klaus Grue 2009-12-18 16:08:36 EDT --- Now I have made a new version which does not provoke gcc bug http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37448 and which compiles on a 64-bit machine with 1GB RAM. I hope that allows to build on koji. The new version is here: Spec URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/logiweb.spec SRPM URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/logiweb-0.2.5-1.fc11.src.rpm HTML URL: http://logiweb.eu/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://logiweb.imm.dtu.dk/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html Mirror: http://topps.diku.dk/logiweb/1.0/doc/download/rpm.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 18 22:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:35:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548877] New: Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548877 Summary: Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: phalliday at excelsiorsystems.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.excelsiorsystems.net/media/files/python-virtualenv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.excelsiorsystems.net/media/files/python-virtualenv-1.4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: virtualenv is a tool to create isolated Python environments. The basic problem being addressed is one of dependencies and versions, and indirectly permissions. Imagine you have an application that needs version 1 of LibFoo, but another application requires version 2. How can you use both these applications? If you install everything into ``/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages`` (or whatever your platform's standard location is), it's easy to end up in a situation where you unintentionally upgrade an application that shouldn't be upgraded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 08:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:57:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912190857.nBJ8v2dM004362@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-19 03:56:58 EDT --- Thanks for the update Prarit. I know you did it with good intentions but please don't close a Merge Review until the reviewer sets the "+" flag. I see that some issues are resolved but some are not. And since the package had updates since I made the initial review, there are additional issues introduced, thus I'm reopening the bug (sorry!) (For each issue, I am adding the reference to the respective guideline which you can find at the bottom.) First the old issues and questions: (from comment #5) > > * The release tag is a mess. Can we continue with the usual convention?: > 2%{?dist} [1] > > * Source0 must be full URL (with %{name} and %{version} macros) [2] > > - Buildroot is improper but it will be obsoleted soon so it's not a problem. > > * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) [3] > > * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, > this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. [4] > Also additional issues: * Usage of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} in the spec file is against the macro consistency guideline. Please only use one or the other. [5] ! The patches should be explained and links from upstream bugtracker should be given as comments, if possible. [6] ! BuildRequires: /usr/bin/aclocal /usr/bin/automake /usr/bin/autoconf can be replaced by simply BuildRequires: automake autoconf since file dependencies should be avoided as much as possible. [7] [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Release [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481363 [4] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make [5] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros [6] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment [7] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 11:10:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 06:10:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191110.nBJBADt6015603@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 Bug 226295 depends on bug 468255, which changed state. Bug 468255 Summary: doc files are not in %doc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468255 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Resolution|WONTFIX | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 11:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 06:15:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542715] Review Request: RabbitVCS - Easy version control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191115.nBJBFQ06016029@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715 --- Comment #6 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2009-12-19 06:15:21 EDT --- Good initiative to refer to the bug 474428 in your .spec file -:) Anyway I don't think it's a good thing that the ExcludeArch is a good idea here. First it is not appropriated since this tag is only used when a package cannot be build/doesn't work in a particular arch (and it's not the case here ^^). Moreover, you exclude 64-bit users like me who want that very useful package ^^. And finally, there's several packages that have the same issue (I talked about phatch above) and that are arch-specific whereas they don't contain any binary. You should remove ExcludeArch and leave things like this for the arch. of your package :-) Be careful not to mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in your spec file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS About the doc: since the installer installs itself the files AUTHORS, COPYING and MAINTAINERS to %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}, I suggested before to flag them as %doc by replacing this line in your %files section: %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/* By %dir %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name} %doc %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/* (and by this way, the fact that %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name} is not owned by your package is solved). But if you use this like you did: %doc AUTHORS COPYING MAINTAINERS rpmbuild will automatically copy them from your build directory into %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} and you'll have duplicate files in your RPM. If you keep ? %doc AUTHORS COPYING MAINTAINERS ?, you should exclude the %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name} directory from being included in RPM by removing it for example in %install ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 12:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191206.nBJC6W8b005796@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 --- Comment #5 from Hiemanshu 2009-12-19 07:06:30 EDT --- Final Release, Fixed all issues with package, SPEC URL is the same, SRPM : http://hiemanshu.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/security-menu-1.0-4.fc12.src.rpm Link to koji scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1880993 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 12:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191208.nBJC8gNc005974@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 Hiemanshu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |himanshu.sharmaa at gmail.com Version|rawhide |12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 14:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:11:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191411.nBJEBrGV017263@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #64 from Peter Galbraith 2009-12-19 09:11:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #63) > @Peter > > you are not the real upstream author? See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090#c43 We are going in circles... emacs-goodies-el is a Debian package consisting of a _collection_ of miscellaneous Emacs add-ons. I am the Debian maintainer of that package. I am only "upstream" for a few of the included files. The other authors are all listed in the debian/copyright file. > Who is the real project owner? Is there another project homepage then this one > from Debian? There is no homepage for it because it is a collection of files from various authors that were suggested by Debian users, and packaged for Debian under a single package. > From my point of view, we should avoid the creation of differents > "upstreams" tar balls. so it may be nice, if you can work together with the > "real" upstream to get a common tar ball in with the huge diff file is > integrated. There is no single "real" upstream. The huge diff is mine, but the tar ball is as well, so it would be easy for me to integrate the diff into the tar ball. > Best Regards: > > Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 14:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191438.nBJEc4MP019445@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-19 09:38:03 EDT --- Updated SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/clutter-gesture-0.0.2-2.fc12.src.rpm Spec location as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 15:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:37:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191537.nBJFb8gJ024411@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-19 10:37:05 EDT --- * Named and versioned in accordance with guidelines * License tag correct, license ok * SPEC file clean and legible * Builds fine in mock * RPMlint silent and happy * Dependencies sane * Source archive matches upstream Nothing that would block the issues, the package is APPROVED A few small suggestions: 1.) You do not need to explicitly require perl(HTML::Entities) It's automatically in by autoreq (you probably still need the rest, as you seem to need specific versions). 2.) You have redundant entries in %files, even RPM complains: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/perl5/Pod/PseudoPod/Checker.pm warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/perl5/Pod/PseudoPod/DocBook.pm There are two solutions to the problem. One is prepending the "%{perl_vendorlib}/Pod/PseudoPod" line with "%doc" so that RPM doesn't automatically add its descendants recursively. Alternatively, you can leave the line as is and remove all its descendants below. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 14:36:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:36:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191436.nBJEaG1d001004@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-19 09:36:13 EDT --- Fixed: > - Let URL tag point to specific project page on moblin.org > - Add MIT to license tag > - Remove unusual %configure flags / CFLAGS Reported upstream. > - Package API documentation > - Fix public header files eom is the currently only supported test although there should be more support in Moblin 2.2 > - What would be a proper functional test? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 16:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:14:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191614.nBJGEDiN009655@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-19 11:14:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379357) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379357) [PATCH] Do not default to GNOME bugzilla git-send-bugzilla.pl | 8 +++++++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 16:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191614.nBJGEwdN027280@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-19 11:14:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379358) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379358) [PATCH] Do not default to GNOME bugzilla git-send-bugzilla.pl | 8 +++++++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 16:32:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:32:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191632.nBJGWPc4028676@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #379358|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 16:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:32:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191632.nBJGWSIU028689@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #379357|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 16:31:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:31:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191631.nBJGVlxV028619@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-19 11:31:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hello, > > You could use the snapshot link in the comments instead of the git > clone/archive: > http://git.collabora.co.uk/?p=user/cassidy/git-bugzilla;a=snapshot;h=fc2be928f49569646058812bd0f41251b837bc04;sf=tgz Good idea. Done. > Here's an unofficial review: Why unofficial? I see you're in packager group now. > SHOULD: > - If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file > from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. This is basically just one file; I'm not sure if upstream would include license separately. > - The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain > translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. Not available. (In reply to comment #3) > Shouldn't this be patched, so bugzilla.redhat is the default one and *not* the > gnome one? > > Of course, this would be fedora/red hat specific, but the reasonablest way. I'm reluctant to do a default here (I don't think people would use this much against Red Hat bugzilla). I've made it work against Red Hat bugzilla (oh, sorry for the attachments above) and removed GNOME bugzilla default. Now it demands that you configure a bugzilla instance to use and provides examples for GNOME and Red Hat bugzillas. New package: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/git-bugzilla.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/git-bugzilla-0-0.2.20091211git.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 17:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:04:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542461] Review Request: oflb-dignas-handwriting-fonts - Handwriting font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191704.nBJH4A1O013719@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542461 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: digna-fonts |Review Request: |- Handwriting font |oflb-dignas-handwriting-fon | |ts - Handwriting font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 17:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:27:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225709] Merge Review: doxygen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191727.nBJHRok2015491@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225709 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.6.1-4.fc13 Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-19 12:27:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > %define is a blocker... > > No it's not, since > a) it is only a recommendation to use %global and > b) it's only a draft that has never passed a FESCo vote. Sorry then, in irc the consensus was it's a blocker... ################ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 17:33:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191733.nBJHXmUw001650@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Eli Wapniarski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-19 12:33:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qjson Short Description: A qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant objects Owners: eliwap oget Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: oget -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 17:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:45:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191745.nBJHjZDF016723@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |hicham.haouari at gmail.com Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 18:00:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:00:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191800.nBJI0mvm018187@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #15 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-19 13:00:42 EDT --- Well, with GNOME reaching 3.0, gnomenu will be useless. Maybe packaging it should be a waste of time. Dont you think, guys? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 18:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:01:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191801.nBJI17gO018210@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|ERRATA |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 18:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:07:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526844] Review Request: cirkuit - A frontend for TikZ and circuit_macros In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191807.nBJI7aO4018768@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526844 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|chitlesh at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-19 13:07:34 EDT --- I'll be in Fedora-Vacation for at least one month. I won't be able to do the review, thus removing myself as the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 18:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:07:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530756] Review Request: circuit_macros - A set of macros for drawing high-quality line diagram In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191807.nBJI79WG018737@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530756 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC|chitlesh at gmail.com | AssignedTo|chitlesh at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #13 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-19 13:07:06 EDT --- I'll be in Fedora-Vacation for at least one month. I won't be able to do the review, thus removing myself as the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 18:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191824.nBJIORSe006280@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #36 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-19 13:24:22 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package emacs-%{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i686. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. Emacs-haskell-mode does not have any. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths. Emacs-haskell-mode does not have any. - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files. Emacs-spice-mode does not have any. - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: mock builds successfully in i686. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 18:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191831.nBJIVvPO021259@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-19 13:31:56 EDT --- Are you planning to ship this for EL-5 as well ? If yes, the RPM version of EL-5 does not support noarch subpackages. Hence you should add the following for the -depends %if 0%{?fedora} BuildArchitectures: noarch %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 18:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912191835.nBJIZAwZ006851@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Arun SAG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #37 from Arun SAG 2009-12-19 13:35:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: emacs-haskell-mode Short Description: Haskell editing mode for Emacs Owners: sagarun chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 21:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:28:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912192128.nBJLShsA024995@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|504493 | Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 21:52:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:52:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226649] Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912192152.nBJLqwjh008739@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226649 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-19 16:52:56 EDT --- $ rpmlint xorg-x11-xbitmaps.spec xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.1.0-1.fc13.src.rpm noarch/xorg-x11-xbitmaps-1.1.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm xorg-x11-xbitmaps.spec:17: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps xorg-x11-xbitmaps.spec:18: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps-devel xorg-x11-xbitmaps.src:17: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps xorg-x11-xbitmaps.src:18: W: unversioned-explicit-provides xbitmaps-devel xorg-x11-xbitmaps.noarch: W: no-documentation xorg-x11-xbitmaps.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/pkgconfig/xbitmaps.pc 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. - There is ChangeLog and COPYING for %doc. - Isn't %configure and --libdir a bit hacky? You assume, that the latest used --libdir is used in the configure. Don't know if that's always the case. Hope so ;) - Could the provides xbitmaps deleted, if bitmaps requires xorg-x11-xbitmaps and not xbitmaps anymore? AFAIK this is the only programm which uses 'xbitmaps' $ repoquery --whatrequires xbitmaps bitmap-0:1.0.3-6.fc12.x86_64 - parallel make is not really needed, because nothing is build in make, but could you use 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' anyway? - from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files requires: pkgconfig is missing Rest looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 21:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:56:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226649] Merge Review: xorg-x11-xbitmaps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912192156.nBJLu8LE027467@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226649 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-19 16:56:07 EDT --- Hmm, just wondering, which package owns /usr/include/X11 $ yum provides /usr/include/X11 says: xorg-x11-proto-devel and xorg-x11-xtrans-devel But this package should require a programm, for owning /usr/include/X11, but those two don't make sense... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 22:07:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:07:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549004] New: Review Request: ez-pine-gpg - GnuPG integration scripts for Pine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ez-pine-gpg - GnuPG integration scripts for Pine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549004 Summary: Review Request: ez-pine-gpg - GnuPG integration scripts for Pine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dcantrell at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/ez-pine-gpg/ez-pine-gpg.spec SRPM URL: http://dcantrel.fedorapeople.org/ez-pine-gpg/ez-pine-gpg-0.4h-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: ez-pine-gpg is a set of scripts that allows beginners and experts to use gpg with Pine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 22:57:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:57:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912192257.nBJMvMdK032337@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #65 from Peter Galbraith 2009-12-19 17:57:21 EDT --- There is no more diff file. The debian directory, along with all patches, are integrated in the tar ball in this new version: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/emacs-goodies-el/emacs-goodies-el_31.3.tar.gz -- Peter S. Galbraith, Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~psg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 23:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:33:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912192333.nBJNXA06016677@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #42 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-19 18:33:07 EDT --- ping, submit the updates on F-11 and F-12. Remember to fill in this bug number in the bug field of the updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 00:04:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200004.nBK04nkW019113@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-19 19:04:48 EDT --- Of course anyone else can review it too. Note that we have a broken dependency (zita-convolver/jconv) in the rawhide tree because this package is missing for the time being. It would be good to have this package reviewed before F-13 is out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 00:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:27:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200027.nBK0Rt03006490@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-19 19:27:54 EDT --- Thanks for the review. (In reply to comment #5) > Review: > > FIXIT: rpmlint is not happy > testng.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/testng-5.10/README Fixed. > Non blockers but I would love to see them: > 1. Maven pom and depmaps added - This will allow me to build testng support in > maven-surefire which is disabled now. Done. (at least attempted to :) > 2. Testng 5.11 is out - nice to import latest version directly Done. New package: SPECS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/testng.spec SRPMS: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/testng-5.11-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 00:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:39:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200039.nBK0dUC6021288@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #7 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-19 19:39:28 EDT --- * Mon Dec 14 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-5 - Bugzilla Bug #521993 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Bugzilla Bug #529070 - rpm packaging problems (cannot reinstall correctly) - Removed 'with exceptions' from License - Removed 'Requires: perl >= 5.8.0' updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-setup.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-setup-1.3.0-5.fc11.src.rpm removed NotReady from the whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 00:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200044.nBK0iXtB021567@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-19 19:44:31 EDT --- Regarding the issues from Comment #4 * "BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)" is provided because this package must also be made into an EPEL package * "BuildRequires: ant" is the ONLY BuildRequires in this package, so it cannot be removed unless it is replace by something more appropriate * Several packages may own the "%{_datadir}/pki/" directory, since there are multiple subdirectories (some owned solely by one package) underneath this common directory -- see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 00:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:47:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200047.nBK0lVWm007498@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #13 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-19 19:47:28 EDT --- Regarding issues with this package: * "BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)" is provided because this package must also be made into an EPEL package * Although we create the "}%{_datadir}/selinux/modules/" directory, we do not own the "modules" directory because ownership of this specific directory will be a part of one of Dan Walsh's SELinux packages (Ade can answer this better than I if needed) * Although the RPM contains four warnings, these are expected, and are inherited from other SELinux packages (SELinux can answer this better than I if needed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 01:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:00:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200100.nBK10iYl022854@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-19 20:00:42 EDT --- * Mon Dec 14 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-4 - Removed 'with exceptions' from License * Mon Dec 7 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-3 - Bugzilla Bug #528556 - policycoreutils-python (semanage) prerequisite missing from rpm - Removed "conditional" support for Fedora 9 Updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-selinux-1.3.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 01:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:09:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200109.nBK19l8Y023333@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-19 20:09:45 EDT --- Comments regarding this version of the spec file: * "BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)" is provided because this package must also be made into an EPEL package * "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0" and "Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0" versions are needed to distinguish our need for OpenJDK rather than libgcj * Several packages may own the "%{_datadir}/pki/" directory, since there are multiple subdirectories (some owned solely by one package) underneath this common directory -- see "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership" Updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-silent/pki-silent.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-silent/pki-silent-1.3.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 01:23:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200123.nBK1NSAZ024069@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Bug 522207 depends on bug 522272, which changed state. Bug 522272 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #4 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-19 20:23:26 EDT --- * BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is provided because this package must also be made into an EPEL package * BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0" and "Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0 versions are needed to distinguish our need for OpenJDK rather than libgcj * "Conflicts: tomcat-native" is required because we truly cannot run when this package is present * Several packages may own the "%{_datadir}/pki/" and the "%{_javadir}/pki/" directories, since there are multiple subdirectories (some owned solely by one package) underneath these common directories -- see "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership" * Mon Dec 7 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-4 - Bugzilla Bug #522207 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Removed 'postinstall' tasks - Removed 'with exceptions' from License * Tue Nov 24 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-3 - Bugzilla Bug #522207 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Use "_javadir" macro when appropriate * Mon Nov 2 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-2 - Bugzilla Bug #522207 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Take ownership of directories Updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-common/pki-common.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-common/pki-common-1.3.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 01:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522210] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-ca In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200138.nBK1cIqa025434@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522210 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-19 20:38:13 EDT --- Notes on this update: * "BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)" is provided because this package must also be made into an EPEL package * "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0" and "Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0" versions are needed to distinguish our need for OpenJDK rather than libgcj * The "%{_initrddir}/*" macro must be used because this package must also be made into an EPEL package * Several packages may own the "%{_datadir}/pki/" directory, since there are multiple subdirectories (some owned solely by one package) underneath this common directory -- see "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership" * Mon Dec 7 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-6 - Bugzilla Bug #522210 - Packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Bugzilla Bug #529070 - rpm packaging problems (cannot reinstall correctly) - Removed 'with exceptions' from License * Tue Nov 24 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-5 - Bugzilla Bug #522210 - Packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Use "_javadir" macro when appropriate * Mon Nov 2 2009 Matthew Harmsen 1.3.0-4 - Bugzilla Bug #522210 - Packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Take ownership of directories Updated spec and src.rpm files can be found here: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-ca/pki-ca.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-ca/pki-ca-1.3.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 02:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547974] Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200208.nBK28guV028042@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547974 Daiki Ueno changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ueno at unixuser.org --- Comment #3 from Daiki Ueno 2009-12-19 21:08:40 EDT --- > then each time I type "ka", "nn", "ji" each string is > changed immediately to "?" "?" then "?", and no kanji > conversion by space bar works... That is expected behavior. To start kana-kanji conversion in SKK, you need to type first few letters in uppercase. For the above example, try "Kannji" or "KAnnji" instead of "kannji", and then type space. Anyway, thanks for packaging. The resulted RPM was successfully installed and seems to work fine here (on f12). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 05:03:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200503.nBK53DKp008578@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #10 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-20 00:03:12 EDT --- Reply for #9 Yes, for EL-5. Updated the if statement for -depends and made a new .spec file. SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/poky-scripts.spec SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/poky-scripts-6-6.fc12.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-11, F-12 and EL-5: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1881522 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1881524 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1881526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 05:38:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200538.nBK5cWxe011266@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #14 from Kyle Brantley 2009-12-20 00:38:30 EDT --- I can provide runtime testing on ath9k on 802.11n, if needed. I'd love to see this package accepted with the full set of features that I'd be using. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 09:11:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:11:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200911.nBK9BMOP029063@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-20 04:11:20 EDT --- Hicham, this looks useful and you've done a good job packing this, unfortunately upstream knows dick about properly maintaining a project. I'm still willing to review this, but am hesitant to approve it until upstream's problems that make it impossible to do a proper review are gone. Legend: * good - bad ? wtf * Package is named properly * Version correct and matches upstream ? Can't verify if sources match, could not download it (see below) * License is ok ? License is present in source tarball and installed as %doc (see below) - Spec file is clean and legible In fact it mostly is, just have to get rid of that pre-%setup voodoo in %prep - Does not build Enough said above. What you do in %prep is not only unnecessary, but also totally sick. In my case it BUILD/usr in the package and deleted it :) Please, never do anything outside your %{buildsubdir}. Unpack the other sources under it and if necessary create additional top-level directory with %setup -c. * Filelist sane * Requires/provides sane Action points: Please ask upstream for anonymously accessible address of tarball which they use to produce their .debs, eventually publish them unless they already do. Please ensure that tarball contains a license file. I believe a sane source tarball would make the %prep shit unnecessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 09:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:19:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200919.nBK9JLvx029672@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-20 04:19:20 EDT --- Two more issues: 1.) This file name is not nice: /usr/bin/pulseaudio-equalizer.sh How about stripping .sh? 2.) According to FHS, proper place for user commands is /usr/bin. Exec=/usr/share/pulseaudio-equalizer/pulseaudio-equalizer.py How about making /usr/bin/pulseaudio-equalizer-gui wrapper or something like that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 09:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:18:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547974] Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912200918.nBK9IZlb014817@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547974 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-20 04:18:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > then each time I type "ka", "nn", "ji" each string is > > changed immediately to "?" "?" then "?", and no kanji > > conversion by space bar works... > > That is expected behavior. To start kana-kanji conversion in > SKK, you need to type first few letters in uppercase. For the > above example, try "Kannji" or "KAnnji" instead of "kannji", and > then type space. Ah, thank you for explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 10:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:23:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201023.nBKANQb0022576@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 Daniel Elstner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daniel.kitta at gmail.com --- Comment #22 from Daniel Elstner 2009-12-20 05:23:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * License > - As http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ says libstdc++ documents > are under GFDL, the license tag should be "GPLv2+ and GFDL". No, the API reference documentation is released under the same license as the libstdc++ source code. It's not made very visible: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bk01pt01ch01s02.html See the bottom of the page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 11:31:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:31:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201131.nBKBVSgK010707@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-20 06:31:27 EDT --- Please don't comment such a thing on review request bugs closed more than one months ago and open a new bug against mm-common instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 11:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:34:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520322] Review Request: mm-common - common files for GNOME C++ bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201134.nBKBY8cc011247@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520322 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-20 06:34:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Please don't comment such a thing on review request bugs closed > more than one months ago and open a new bug against mm-common instead. Actually more than 3 months ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 12:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:25:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546376] Review Request: ghc-chalmers-lava2000 - Haskell chalmers-lava2000 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201225.nBKCPisU006529@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546376 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-20 07:25:43 EDT --- * Created patch to remove verification modules in build that use wrapper scripts that require, and invoke third party non-free binaries. * Remove Scripts/ folder. * Wrote README.fedora and removed default README. Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ghc-chalmers-lava2000-1.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for F-11, F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1881728 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1881732 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 13:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:08:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201308.nBKD8lD2010455@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-20 08:08:43 EDT --- Hicham, please don't close review requests that haven't been completed (i.e. the package is not yet imported and built). This was built just now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 15:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:06:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201506.nBKF6She003332@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-20 10:06:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-linecache Short Description: Caches (Ruby source) files Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-5 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 15:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201511.nBKFBK7l021677@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #8 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-20 10:11:18 EDT --- Updated %define -> %global New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-debug.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 15:12:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:12:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201512.nBKFCY9s003881@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-20 10:12:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap Short Description: A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-5 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 15:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530198] Review Request: rubygem-columnize - Sorts an array in column order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201514.nBKFE5pU021939@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530198 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-20 10:14:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-columnize Short Description: Sorts an array in column order Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-5 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 15:33:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:33:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530193] Review Request: rubygem-calendar_date_select - A popular date picker widget for ruby on rails and prototype.js In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201533.nBKFXgGo005982@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530193 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-20 10:33:41 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-calendar_date_select.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-calendar_date_select-1.15-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 16:40:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:40:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201640.nBKGeqQa012224@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-20 11:40:51 EDT --- Well, ? About Source1: - I checked http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html , however the license of Source1 seems unclear. Would you ask upstream? - While Source0 is 128K, Source1 has 6.0M (50 times the size of Source1) and as a result while jconvolver binary rpm has 6.4M its debuginfo rpm has only 48K. Is Source2 always needed for jconvolver? Also are there any reason behind that jconvolver and -reverbs are not seperately packaged (into rpm)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 19:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912201945.nBKJjJBw031669@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 Valent Turkovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |valent.turkovic at gmail.com --- Comment #31 from Valent Turkovic 2009-12-20 14:45:16 EDT --- Can't wait to install Moovida on Fedora 12! When do you expect rpms to be available in Fedora repos? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 20:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:06:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202006.nBKK6s4w001081@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-20 15:06:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379509) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379509) Patch for ruby-debug to use system-wide -base and test fix Ah... (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > - Please create one srpm per one gem. > > > > These gems do not distribute very well separately, they have the same upstream > > and one requires the other in a %{version}-%{release} specific manner. > > - Ah, I checked two gems and actually dependency is in loop... Well, I checked these two gems' dependency again and actually ruby-debug-base does not require ruby-debug ( ruby-debug-base-0.10.3/test/base/base.rb has "require 'ruby_debug'" for example, but this is satisfied by "ruby_debug.so" in ruby-debug-base (and not by ruby-debug.rb in ruby-debug gem) ) Also "rake test" under ruby-debug-base succeeds without ruby-debug gem. So still ruby-debug-base and ruby-debug should be packaged seperately. (ruby-debug-base does not depend on ruby-debug but ruby-debug does depend on ruby-debug-base) For ruby-debug, currently your spec file contains: --------------------------------------------------------- 99 %check 100 pushd %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{geminstdir2} 101 rake -f ../ruby-debug-0.10.3/Rakefile test --------------------------------------------------------- This skips many tests, because ruby-debug Rakefile contains --------------------------------------------------------- 27 CLI_TEST_FILE_LIST = FileList['test/cli/commands/unit/*.rb', 28 'test/cli/commands/*_test.rb', 29 'test/cli/**/*_test.rb', 30 'test/test-*.rb'] 61 t.test_files = CLI_TEST_FILE_LIST ---------------------------------------------------------- however many of these files cannot be detected if the working directory is ./%{geminstdir2}, not ./%{geminstdir}. "rake test" for ruby-debug should be done under .%{geminstdir}. Note that when executing "rake test" correctly under ./%{geminstdir} many tests fail and patch is needed (attached). After applying patch: ----------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ruby-debug-0.10.3]$ rake test (in /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/Reviewing/rubygem-related/rubygem-ruby-debug/rubygem-ruby-debug-0.10.3-4.fc12.src/TMP2/DEBUGINSTDIR/gems/ruby-debug-0.10.3) ruby_debug already installed, skipping creating shared library extension /usr/bin/ruby -I"lib:./ext:./lib" "/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb" "test/base/base.rb" "test/base/binding.rb" "test/base/catchpoint.rb" Loaded suite /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake/rake_test_loader Started ..... Finished in 0.003895 seconds. 5 tests, 30 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors /usr/bin/ruby -I"lib:./ext:./lib:./cli" "/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake/rake_test_loader.rb" "test/cli/commands/unit/regexp.rb" "test/cli/commands/catchpoint_test.rb" "test/cli/commands/catchpoint_test.rb" "test/test-edit.rb" "test/test-info.rb" "test/test-source.rb" "test/test-annotate.rb" "test/test-ctrl.rb" "test/test-list.rb" "test/test-catch.rb" "test/test-save.rb" "test/test-info-thread.rb" "test/test-emacs-basic.rb" "test/test-quit.rb" "test/test-init.rb" "test/test-method.rb" "test/test-info-var.rb" "test/test-output.rb" "test/test-trace.rb" "test/test-setshow.rb" "test/test-help.rb" "test/test-hist.rb" "test/test-raise.rb" "test/test-breakpoints.rb" "test/test-finish.rb" "test/test-stepping.rb" "test/test-frame.rb" "test/test-condition.rb" "test/test-enable.rb" "test/test-display.rb" "test/test-dollar-0.rb" "test/test-break-bad.rb" "test/test-pm.rb" Loaded suite /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake/rake_test_loader Started .........................Skipping method sig test .......... Finished in 18.947538 seconds. 35 tests, 46 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors ----------------------------------------------------------- Currently only the first 5 tests are executed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 20:22:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:22:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549189] New: Review Request: Djagios -> Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a co mplete Python Nagios API.. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Djagios -> Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a co mplete Python Nagios API.. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549189 Summary: Review Request: Djagios -> Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a co mplete Python Nagios API.. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kris.buytaert at inuits.be QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.krisbuytaert.be/download/djagios.spec SRPM URL: http://www.krisbuytaert.be/download/djagios-0.1.3-1.src.rpm Description: Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a complete Py thon Nagios API. The main goal of the tool was to make Nagios usable for non-Nagios admins. The i nitial install and configuration would have to be done by Nagios administrators. But once done ordinary users can add servers, appliances, devices, services the mselves. Note: This is my first package ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 20:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:23:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549189] Review Request: Djagios -> Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a co mplete Python Nagios API.. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202023.nBKKNIan020553@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549189 Kris Buytaert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 20:52:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:52:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202052.nBKKqtfS005162@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-20 15:52:54 EDT --- Thanks for your comments guys Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gummi.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gummi-0.4.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 20:52:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:52:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202052.nBKKqY3q005128@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) | --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-20 15:52:31 EDT --- Thanks for your patience. Here are the new files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bluemodem.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bluemodem-0.7-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882151 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 21:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:37:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] New: Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 Summary: Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-jabberbot.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-jabberbot-0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Project URL: http://thpinfo.com/2007/python-jabberbot/ Description: This is python-jabberbot, a Jabber bot framework for Python that enables you to easily write simple Jabber bots. You can use your Jabber bots to provide information about your running systems, to make your website interact with your visitors or notify you about updates or changes you monitor with your Python scripts. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882194 rpmlint output: [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint python-jabberbot-0.8-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-jabberbot-0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 22:09:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:09:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202209.nBKM93qm029055@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #6 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-12-20 17:09:02 EDT --- I just mailed the author and he told me that he won't put the sources in his launchpad account until mid january. And by the way, there seems to be a better equalizer which doesn't depend on ladspa in upstream pulseaudio : http://pulseaudio.org/wiki/SystemEqualizer, but this one has a Qt interface only. I am wondering if i should go with this package if upstream do have better solutions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 22:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:12:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202212.nBKMC6k4011324@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-12-20 17:12:04 EDT --- I wasn't able to use hostapd with the nl80211 driver on Fedora 11, but everything went fine for Fedora 12 using an atheros hardware. (none work with intel and a iwl3945 driver) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This package (hostapd) is APPROVED by me ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 22:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:22:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202222.nBKMMLHw029731@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #32 from Alex Lancaster 2009-12-20 17:22:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > Can't wait to install Moovida on Fedora 12! When do you expect rpms to be > available in Fedora repos? Only once Matthias has approved the package (which hopefully will be soon) and agreed to sponsor Graeme (which he appears to be willing to do), then the package can be built. The bottleneck is now getting Matthias' final approval, until then be patient Valent. Matthias: could you please set the review flag and ASSIGN to bug to yourself to indicate that you are actively doing the review as per the standard practice of reviewing? If you find yourself unable to finish this off in timely fashion (say within the next week or so, since it's already been 2 weeks since you initiated the review), please let us know and we can recommence the search for a new sponsor. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 22:20:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:20:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202220.nBKMKem5029642@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-20 17:20:39 EDT --- Thanks Mtasaka, (In reply to comment #4) > Well, > > ? About Source1: > - I checked http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html , > however the license of Source1 seems unclear. Would you ask upstream? > Sure. I just asked upstream via email. > - While Source0 is 128K, Source1 has 6.0M (50 times the size of Source1) > and as a result while jconvolver binary rpm has 6.4M its debuginfo rpm > has only 48K. > Is Source2 always needed for jconvolver? Also are there any reason > behind that jconvolver and -reverbs are not seperately packaged (into > rpm)? Ah, this is the way we used to package jconv. It is a "packager's choice" in some sense. Let me elaborate: Imagine that you are packaging an office package. The office software makes use of fonts that are under a special format that can only be opened from this particular office software. Of course the software can operate without these fonts but it is 50 times more functional if it these fonts were available. :) It is almost the same situation with jconv(olver). We can put these in a subpackage. But given the target audience is really limited to enthusiasts and these reverbs aren't updated independently from jconv(olver) software, it is not beneficial to make a subpackage (or a separate package). This package came from PlanetCCRMA. We didn't receive any user complaints about the size all this time either here or at PlanetCCRMA list. Therefore I decided to keep things the way they were for consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 22:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:46:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542463] Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202246.nBKMk61u031684@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542463 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xavier at bachelot.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-12-20 17:46:05 EDT --- OK: spec file is properly named OK: package is properly named OK: Spec is legible NOK: use of macros is consistent OK: tarball match upstream : d0e625ee9b8d4823955686048ac69d0a zaz-0.3.0.tar.gz OK: License field match the actual license and is acceptable Ok: BuildRoot is correct OK: BuildRequires and Requires are correct OK: no bundled copied of libraries OK: Desktop file is validated and installed OK: scriplets are correct. OK: locales are properly handled OK: defattr is correct OK: %doc is correct Ok: builds in mock OK: all files and directories are properly packaged Ok: doesn't own dirs it shouldn't OK: files/dirs perms are correct OK; rpmlint output is clean ; zaz.i686: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/zaz/FreeSans.ttf /usr/share/fonts/gnu-free/FreeSans.ttf zaz.i686: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/zaz/font1.ttf /usr/share/fonts/oflb-dignas-handwriting/phranzysko_-_Digna_s_Handwriting.ttf zaz.i686: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/zaz/FreeMonoBold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/gnu-free/FreeMonoBold.ttf 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. These 3 are expected and can be ignored. Ok: final provides and requires are correct Note : typo in %prep section : # Fix premissions ^^ Please fix use of macros, there is a spurious %{buildroot} when installing the icon, then this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 22:51:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:51:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202251.nBKMpgIi032122@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-20 17:51:40 EDT --- vanessa_logger-0.0.8-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vanessa_logger-0.0.8-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 22:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:53:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518318] Review Request: vanessa_socket - Simplify TCP/IP socket operations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202253.nBKMrbRf014237@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518318 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-12-20 17:53:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hello, > > Version 0.0.7 seems to be a bit out of date; 0.0.10 is out. Also, the Source0 > line is not accessible (no ftp anymore). You are rigth. Updated. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_socket/vanessa_socket-0.0.10-5.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/vanessa_socket/vanessa_socket.spec > Why tabsize of 5? It just seems non-standard :) Don't suppose I could > convince you to use 4 or 8 or to just use spaces? > Do we really need that ugly looking thing above the %configure? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PavelAlexeev/tabsize -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 23:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:10:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 436612] Review Request: avfs - A Virtual File System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202310.nBKNAi0j015866@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436612 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 23:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:09:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 436612] Review Request: avfs - A Virtual File System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202309.nBKN9cRt015776@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436612 Tony Fu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo+ | Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net Blocks|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #5 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-20 18:09:35 EDT --- Since I am interested in packaging worker (avfs is one of its dependencies) I am reopening this. SPEC URI: http://gitorious.org/lvillani/specs/trees/master/avfs SRPM URI: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/avfs/ Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882296 rpmlint output: [lvillani at enterprise avfs (master)]$ rpmlint avfs.spec ../../srpms/avfs-0.9.8-1.fc12.src.rpm ../../rpms/x86_64/{avfs-0.9.8-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm,avfs-debuginfo-0.9.8-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm,avfs-devel-0.9.8-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm} avfs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Notes: 'documentation' (license and readme files) is included in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 23:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:27:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202327.nBKNRd7h016916@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #43 from Carl Byington 2009-12-20 18:27:38 EDT --- done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 23:32:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:32:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202332.nBKNWKRu003295@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-20 18:32:19 EDT --- Review: Good: - name ok - %files section ok - permissions ok - rpmlint clean - macros everywhere - %clean is there - %doc ok - no *.la files - no libs - no gui -> no desktop file - no translations - group ok Needswork: - Have you queried upstream to include a COPYING file? If not yet, please do so. - BR: python-devel is not needed - --prefix=%{_prefix} is not needed in %install - License is GPLv3+ not GPLv3 only ####################### These are only minor issues, which are fixed easily -> appoving ####################### APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 20 23:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530473] Review Request: lessfs - Lessfs is an inline data deduplicating filesystem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912202359.nBKNxasc019530@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 --- Comment #19 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-12-20 18:59:34 EDT --- I'm very-very apologize for the big delay. Circumstances beyond my control, but I'm just trying to fight them ... Long awaited review: Legend: + - Ok. - - Error. +/- - It item acceptable, but I strongly recommend enhancement. = - N/A. MUST Items [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint * 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [-] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Patch0 has not any comment. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [-] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Comment in lessfs.c say: You can redistribute lessfs and/or modify it under the terms of either (1) the GNU General Public License; either version 3 of the or (at your option) any later version as published by the Free Software Foundation. So, license of package may be GPLv3+. Why you boundary it by GPLv3? [-] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text If the source package does not include the text of the license(s), the packager should contact upstream and encourage them to correct this mistake. Text of license is not includes. Do you try ask maintainer include it? [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. $ md5sum lessfs-0.9.4.tar.gz lessfs-0.9.4.tar.gz.downloaded c4c5dbe234dc026bbba7945dc14f8305 lessfs-0.9.4.tar.gz c4c5dbe234dc026bbba7945dc14f8305 lessfs-0.9.4.tar.gz.downloaded [+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882307 [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [=] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [=] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [=] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [-] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. Do not use direct path /etc/lessfs.cfg, /etc/init.d/lessfs . Macros like%{_sysconfdir} must be used. [-] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. lib_qlz.{c,h}: // QuickLZ data compression library // Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Lasse Mikkel Reinhold // lar at quicklz.com // // QuickLZ can be used for free under the GPL-1 or GPL-2 license (where anything. // released into public must be open source) or under a commercial license if such. // has been acquired (see http://www.quicklz.com/order.html). The commercial license. // does not cover derived or ported versions created by third parties under GPL. lib_BMW.c, lib_sboxes.c, lib_net.{h,c}, lib_tiger.c, listdb.c, have not any mention of license and require further clarification. miniacc.h, portab.h, portab_a.h : /* ACC --- Automatic Compiler Configuration This file is part of the LZO real-time data compression library. There also issue what it is library and must be packaged separately - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries [=] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [=] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [=] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [=] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [=] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [=] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [=] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [=] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882307 [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Its runs. I do not test anything other. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [=] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [=] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [=] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other issues: 1) It fails build on epel5 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882363 due to old fuse. If you wish maintain lessfs for epel too it need attention. If it designed only for Fedora, BuildRoot tag is ambiguous and deprecated. 2) I strongly recommend include AUTHORS (or authors) file into %doc. And may be README.crypto, README.file_io, README.hashes, README.performance_or_suffer too. My fault. P.S. Again sorry for delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 00:14:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:14:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549223] New: Review Request: ignuit - A memorization aiding tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ignuit - A memorization aiding tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549223 Summary: Review Request: ignuit - A memorization aiding tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ignuit.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ignuit-0.0.16-1.fc12.src.rpm Project URL: http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~trmusson/programs.html#ignuit Description: Ignuit is a memorization aid based on the Leitner flashcard system. It has a GNOME look and feel, a good selection of quiz options, and supports UTF-8. Cards can include embedded audio, images, and mathematical formulae (via LaTeX). It can import and export several file formats, including CSV. Ignuit can be used for both long-term learning and cramming. I'd really appreciate any feedback about the program and any problems you have with it. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882373 rpmlint output: [fab at localhost i686]$ rpmlint ignuit* ignuit.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ignuit.schemas 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint ignuit-0.0.16-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 00:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:19:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210019.nBL0Jagl006534@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 --- Comment #7 from Carl Byington 2009-12-20 19:19:34 EDT --- done. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/oglappth.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/oglappth-0.98-4.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882370 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 01:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549228] New: Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 Summary: Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hicham.haouari at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/fosfor.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/fosfor-0.1-0.82svn.fc12.src.rpm Description: A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits Rpmlint output: none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 01:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:06:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549228] Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210106.nBL16nEZ024937@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |549229 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 01:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:36:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529496] Review Request: libmtag - An advanced C music tagging library with a simple API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210136.nBL1aT5b012868@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529496 --- Comment #12 from Felipe Contreras 2009-12-20 20:36:28 EDT --- Ping. It seems everything has been done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 01:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:56:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520015] Review Request: ibus-table-cantonhk - Cantonese (Hong Kong) input method table for ibus-table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210156.nBL1u6iw014109@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520015 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dchen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-12-20 20:56:05 EDT --- Invalid URLs, did you put them elsewhere? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 01:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:54:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520017] Review Request: ibus-table-zhuyin - Zhu Yin input method tables for IBus-Table In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210154.nBL1sO8S014030@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520017 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dchen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dchen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-12-20 20:54:23 EDT --- Isn't Zhu Yin is not usable unless ibus-table has End-Key support? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 02:12:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:12:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531256] Review Request: dpm - Disk Pool Manager (DPM) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210212.nBL2CIwE015799@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531256 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dchen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-12-20 21:12:17 EDT --- Upstream names it as glite, thus, it will be great that your package reflect this. Also, I cannot found the dependency lcgdm-devel, where does it come from? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 02:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 21:14:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547427] Review Request: cciss_vol_status - show status of logical drives attached to HP Smartarray controllers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210214.nBL2Es2W030905@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-12-20 21:14:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 03:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:14:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210314.nBL3Ew02020763@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-20 22:14:52 EDT --- We no longer do F-10 branches as it's now end of life. otherwise, cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 03:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:45:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210345.nBL3jJM3006495@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-20 22:45:18 EDT --- waiting for dependencies to be first built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 03:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:43:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210343.nBL3hp2J006407@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-20 22:43:49 EDT --- Thanks for update. waiting for dependencies to be built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 03:47:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:47:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210347.nBL3l6jP006664@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #15 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-20 22:47:04 EDT --- unable to download srpm/spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 04:02:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:02:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210402.nBL42eO1007707@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-20 23:02:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882524 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 9d363872b283edbd8d719ccb11fd952e8a496482 pki-setup-1.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) As said in comment#4, please remove Requires for perl packages. perl dependencies are auto installed by yum. 2) May I know why this package have "Requires: pki-native-tools" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 05:12:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:12:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210512.nBL5CM4s031420@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-21 00:12:21 EDT --- Thank you for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > Some notes: > > * Source > - Source0 in srpm differs from what I could download from > the URL written in the spec file > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 5fa79d6ca562a39c72c89f5447a3fbd5 thor-0.12.0.gem > 32e034949be3726ff1857d0edeae6566 > rubygem-thor-0.12.0-1.fc13.src/thor-0.12.0.gem > ------------------------------------------------------------- > (and the contents of two gems actually differ) > Good catch! Looks like they replaced it after the recent rubyforge -> gemcutter migration. > * Requires > - bin/rake2thor contains: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 8 require 'rake' > ------------------------------------------------------------- > As the Summary of this spec file says "that replaces rake,", > I think it is admitted to add "Requires: rubygem(rake)" and > this should surely be added. > Yeah I went back and forth on this one a bit initial, but your right, it should be there. > - lib/thor/shell/color.rb contains: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 98 @diff_lcs_loaded = begin > 99 require 'diff/lcs' > 100 true > 101 rescue LoadError > 102 false > 103 end > ------------------------------------------------------------- > I guess "diff/lcs" dependency is surely optional, however > as Fedora already has rubygem-diff-lcs, you may want to > add this dependency (however this is up to what you think) Oh, missed this one. Looks like a minimal impact to add it as diff-lcs doesn't have any dependencies of its own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 05:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210513.nBL5DnNh031543@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-21 00:13:48 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-thor.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-thor-0.12.0-2.fc13.src.rpm * Fri Dec 18 2009 Matthew Kent - 0.12.0-2 - Add Requires for rubygem(rake) (#542559). - Upstream replaced Source after the gemcutter migration, update to latest (#542559). - Add Requires for rubygem(diff-lcs) as Thor can take advantage of it for colourized diff output (#542559). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 05:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210555.nBL5tCp2001883@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Michael Stahnke 2009-12-21 00:55:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki-LdapAccount Short Description: estrict mediawiki to using LDAP accounts only Owners: stahnma Branches: F11 F12 EL5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 06:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:22:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210622.nBL6M5xh004695@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 01:22:04 EDT --- kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 06:22:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:22:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210622.nBL6M03p019697@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 01:21:58 EDT --- kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 07:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210723.nBL7N2sJ026249@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #2 from Akira TAGOH 2009-12-21 02:23:01 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I should do self-review before submitting this ;) (In reply to comment #1) > Some remarks > > * BR > - Please check if gettext"-devel" is really needed for BR > - Also "BR: automake autoconf" don't seem to be needed because > no autotools are called during build. No they aren't needed. fixed. > * SourceURL > - I guess the following works. > http://dl.sourceforge.jp/kasumi/41436/kasumi-2.5.tar.gz Aha. it didn't work before IIRC. so that might be improved at sf.jp then :) cool. fixed. > * %makeinstall > - Please avoid to use %makeinstall and use "make install > DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" > instead fixed. > ? Removing desktop > ----------------------------------------------------------- > # remove .desktop file so that kasumi is accessible from > # scim panel and it's not necessary for other users. > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop > ----------------------------------------------------------- > - Is this also true for people using ibus (as now we use > ibus by default) and some other input method (such as uim/uim-anthy)? > - Does this mean that %_datadir/pixmaps/kasumi.png can also > be removed? added it back. ideally ibus-anthy should supports it as scim-anthy does and get rid of it from the menu after that, but anyway. > * Misc rpmlint issues > ----------------------------------------------------------- > kasumi.i686: W: summary-ended-with-dot C An anthy dictionary management tool. > ----------------------------------------------------------- > - Please fix above. fixed. please revisit the CVS again for confirming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 07:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:46:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547974] Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210746.nBL7kH1G028222@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547974 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-12-21 02:46:15 EDT --- Ueno-san, would you be interested in owning the package? I only submitted because I made a test package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 07:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:49:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541765] Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210749.nBL7nCDi028431@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-12-21 02:49:11 EDT --- I fixed the UI hang on startup -- see NanoEngineer-1_Suite_v1.1.1.12-fix-startup-hang.patch -- and made all the changes you requested. Here are the updated spec and SRPM files: http://fitzsim.org/packages/NanoEngineer-1.spec http://fitzsim.org/packages/NanoEngineer-1-1.1.1.12-0.2.fc12.src.rpm Please review and retest these on your x86-64 machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 07:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:51:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210751.nBL7pofU013958@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-21 02:51:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I just mailed the author and he told me that he won't put the sources in his > launchpad account until mid january. ... > I am wondering if i should go with this package if upstream do have better > solutions. Don't let that discourage you. Until upstream comes to senses, you can get at lease get rid of that gross %prep hack. You should probably use the .deb file as the only source, use %setup -c -T and unpack it with ar afterwards. (And of course address the other issues, which are more-or-less trivial). Feel free to ask for help should you need any! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 07:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:57:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] New: Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-merb-core.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-merb-core-1.0.15-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Ruby-based MVC framework that is agnostic to ORM, JavaScript library, and template languages. Merb is plugin-based, so the core is small and well organized. This package provides the core libraries that provide enough of Merb to run an application. This package contains the merb binary and merb-core library. --- For testing purposes I've put a demo application here http://magoazul.com/core-example.tgz it was created with merb-gen (will be another new package submission) as follows: merb-gen core core-example cd core-example merb-gen controller helloworld To run it: wget http://magoazul.com/core-example.tgz tar zxvf core-example.tgz cd core-example merb To view it: http://localhost:4000/helloworld --- This is the first of many merb gem submissions - some of which are rather file intensive. If if expedites the process Debian packagers have just conducted a detailed file by file review of the entire merb repository and identified some improvements to the licenses; all documented here http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ruby-extras/trunk/merb/debian/copyright They did not identify any areas of concern that are present in the shipped merb-core gem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 07:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210758.nBL7wRsb014547@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |549286 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 07:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210758.nBL7wPai014533@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |544964, 542559 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 07:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:58:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210758.nBL7wQv6014542@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |549286 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 08:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:02:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210802.nBL828i1014782@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-21 03:02:08 EDT --- Almost forgot the rpmlint! mkent at fedora-devel-chef:~/rpmbuild/SPECS$ rpmlint /var/tmp/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rubygem-merb-core-1.0.15-1.magoazul.src.rpm /var/tmp/results/rubygem-merb-core-* rubygem-merb-core-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation rubygem-merb-core-doc.noarch: W: misspelled-macro /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/merb-core-1.0.15/ri/Merb/Rack/Console/reload%21-i.yaml %21 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 100 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 08:06:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:06:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210806.nBL86LSa015141@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-21 03:06:20 EDT --- Checked kasumi.spec rev 1.34 (In reply to comment #2) > > ? Removing desktop added it back. ideally ibus-anthy should supports it as scim-anthy does and get > rid of it from the menu after that, but anyway. Then now please use desktop-file-{install,validate} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files By the way - "Application" in Category is deprecated and should be removed: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00723.html - It is better that "Icon=kasumi" instead of using "Icon=kasumi.png" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 08:12:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:12:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210812.nBL8CI8g015640@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #29 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-12-21 03:12:16 EDT --- Thank you, Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 08:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:17:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548694] Review Request: python-rpmfluff - Lightweight way of building RPMs, and sabotaging them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210817.nBL8H6Va016168@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548694 --- Comment #2 from Jan Huta? 2009-12-21 03:17:05 EDT --- Hello, thanks for the input! (In reply to comment #1) > = rpmlint = If some native speaker advises how to fix that, I'm pretty OK to do so. > = general specfile formatting = Fixed this. > = license = I have added separate LICENSE file. > = copyright = Not sure what does this mean and how to fix this. There is "Copyright (c) 2006 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved." in the comment on top of rpmfluff.py but not sure if that is what you mean. How to fix this? Thank you, Jan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 08:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:27:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210827.nBL8RnFi031562@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #16 from Adel Gadllah 2009-12-21 03:27:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I wasn't able to use hostapd with the nl80211 driver on Fedora 11, but > everything went fine for Fedora 12 using an atheros hardware. > (none work with intel and a iwl3945 driver) > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > This package (hostapd) is APPROVED by me > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Thanks for finally packing and reviewing this one ;) As for the intel issue it is not supported at the driver side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 08:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:54:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210854.nBL8sJ2c020116@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-21 03:54:18 EDT --- Please include a pom file e.g. http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/testng/testng/5.10/testng-5.10.pom. Just change the version to 5.11. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#maven contains a sample pom installation. Definitely not a blocker. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 08:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 03:56:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549296] New: Review Request: lshell - Python-based limited Shell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lshell - Python-based limited Shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549296 Summary: Review Request: lshell - Python-based limited Shell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/lshell.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/lshell-0.9.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Project URL: http://ghantoos.org/limited-shell-lshell Description: lshell provides a limited shell configured per user. The configuration is done quite simply using a configuration file. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882672 rpmlint output: [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint lshell-0.9.8-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint lshell-0.9.8-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 09:08:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:08:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210908.nBL98V5w021480@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-21 04:08:30 EDT --- Thank you. I'll include the POM upon import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: testng Short Description: Java-based testing framework Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 09:11:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:11:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210911.nBL9BEWA021843@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-12-21 04:11:13 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i686. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. poky does not have any. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths. poky does not have any. - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files. poky does not have any. - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: mock builds successfully in i686. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 09:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:28:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210928.nBL9SBIj005685@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.8.5-1 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 09:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:41:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548877] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210941.nBL9fZiQ025611@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548877 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 04:41:34 EDT --- Just some quick comment on your spec file. - Can you please remove the spaces in the description? - The %doc part needs some work. There are some duplicate. - There are two source tarballs (pip and distribute) in the Source RPM. What is the reason that those files are included? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 09:43:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:43:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210943.nBL9hHRZ007558@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 04:43:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review Thomas. (In reply to comment #1) > Needswork: > - Have you queried upstream to include a COPYING file? > If not yet, please do so. I'm waiting for an answer from upstream about that issue. > - BR: python-devel is not needed The Guidelines says 'python-devel' must be added because it's no longer in the default package set. Am I wrong? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python > - --prefix=%{_prefix} is not needed in %install Will be removed > - License is GPLv3+ not GPLv3 only Will be fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 09:53:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:53:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542463] Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210953.nBL9r1mL008403@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542463 --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-21 04:53:00 EDT --- Thank you for your review. I'll update this package to fix the small issues you found before committing it to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 09:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:52:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543154] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210952.nBL9qf1x008368@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-21 04:52:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I visited upstream's site, and found that version 1.2.11 while you packaged > 1.2.8. Is it intentional? I mean, that 1.2.11 is available, while you packaged previous one. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 09:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543154] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210952.nBL9q4GF008319@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-21 04:52:03 EDT --- I visited upstream's site, and found that version 1.2.11 while you packaged 1.2.8. Is it intentional? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 09:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:53:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543147] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210953.nBL9rdTV027197@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-21 04:53:38 EDT --- SDL_image 1.2.10 is available, but you packaged 1.2.7. Is it intentional? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 09:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:54:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542463] Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912210954.nBL9sWpt027238@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542463 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-21 04:54:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zaz Short Description: A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets Owners: musuruan Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 10:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:02:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530688] Review Request: ghc-language-c - Haskell language-c library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211002.nBLA2Rqf027928@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(michael.silvanus@ | |gmail.com) --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-12-21 05:02:26 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 10:01:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:01:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548795] Review Request: belier - Generates scripts allowing you to chain many ssh connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211001.nBLA1sww027854@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548795 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 05:01:53 EDT --- Just some quick comment on your spec file. - Please use '%global' instead of '%define' - Is 'Requires: python' really needed? Isn't it pulled in automatically by RPM? - '-n %{name}-%{version}' is the default. '%setup -q' is enough. - Please ask upstream to include a COPYING file. - You must use macros. Replace '/usr/bin/bel' with ' %{_bindir}/bel' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Macros - Your package provides an egg. Please have a look at the following page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 10:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 05:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546212] Review Request: planner2html - convert planner files to html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211056.nBLAu1IA002079@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546212 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Alias| |panner2html Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 05:56:00 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F12/i386 [!] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint planner2html-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): planner2html-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: de94e1fdd70eb35f9f8baf0aa521f53c Build source: de94e1fdd70eb35f9f8baf0aa521f53c [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [!] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [-] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [!] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [-] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [-] Follows desktop entry spec [-] Valid .desktop Name [-] Valid .desktop GenericName [-] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [!] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [!] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882804 [x] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format Please the issues and I will be happy to approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 11:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:03:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211103.nBLB3ELu015914@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #18 from Michal Nowak 2009-12-21 06:03:13 EDT --- * 13.4 is released. * Any input from packaging committee wrt building from Vala/C? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 11:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:02:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 469485] Review Request: fakeap - Fake Access Points generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211102.nBLB290F015785@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469485 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 11:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:03:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225769] Merge Review: freeradius In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211103.nBLB32Ir002684@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225769 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-21 06:02:59 EDT --- Latest scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882750 As usual for such oldschool packages, there is a large list of rpmlint's complaints and warnings (most of them may be safely ignored in this particular case): http://peter.fedorapeople.org/freeradius-2.1.7-5_rpmlint.txt Here is a diff over my last rpmlint check: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/freeradius-2.1.7-5.diff I removed safe-to-ignore rpmlint messages, and here is a final report (I added numbers for the simplicity): [petro at Workplace i386]$ cat ~/fuse/sshfs/sulaco/home/petro/fuse/sshfs/fedora/public_html/freeradius-2.1.7-5_rpmlint.txt |grep -v non-readable|grep -v non-standard-dir-perm|grep -v no-documentation -n 1:freeradius.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1.7-4 ['2.1.7-5.fc12', '2.1.7-5'] 2:freeradius.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/freeradius-2.1.7/rfc/draft-sterman-aaa-sip-00.txt 3:freeradius.i686: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/radiusd 4:freeradius.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/freeradius-2.1.7/rlm_dbm 5:freeradius.i686: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/freeradius-2.1.7/rfc/pppext-eap-sim-12.txt 6:freeradius.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /etc/raddb/certs/bootstrap 0750 7:freeradius.i686: W: incoherent-init-script-name radiusd ('freeradius', 'freeradiusd') 8:freeradius-debuginfo.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/freeradius-server-2.1.7/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool_tool.c 9:freeradius-debuginfo.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/freeradius-server-2.1.7/src/modules/rlm_linelog/rlm_linelog.c 10:freeradius-debuginfo.i686: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/freeradius-server-2.1.7/src/main/.libs 11:freeradius-debuginfo.i686: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/freeradius-server-2.1.7/src/main/.libs 21:12 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 122 errors, 18 warnings. [petro at Workplace i386]$ 1. Easyfix - you simply forgot to add %changelog entry for the latest rebuild. 2. I can't find easily what encoding this file is encoded with. If you know, then, please. add convert it from this codepage to UTF-8 at %prep stage. 3. Due to historical reasons, the main application name differs from the package's name. We cannot change too much here, so this issue should be omitted. 4. Please, add iconv -f iso8859-1 to the %prep stage. 5. The same as for p.2. If you know how to convert it to UTF-8, please do it at the %prep stage. Otherwise simply postpone fixing it to the (not so) nearest future. 6. See my comment above. In short - looks like this should be placed here due to historical reasons. So this issue may be omitted too. 7. Likewise. 8. Please, change permissions to 0644 at the %prep stage. 9. Likewise. 10. I think this may be ignored. 11. Likewise. See also this link (for those, who interested in John's PoV on these issues): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487059#c3 I mostly agree with his reasons, however I'd like to see #1,8,9 fixed. Ok, that's all about rpmlint messages. Also I've got some complaints regarding various aspects iof the package itself: * The *-devel package's description is irrelevant to the sub-package's content. It doesn't contain any static libraries - just a C header files. * I don't see any development libraries in *devel sub-package (in fact I don't see any librarties in the common ldconfig paths, but that will be my next question). I suspect, that shared library objects in %{_libdir}/freeradius/ , which doesn't contain 2.1.7 in their names, should be placed in *-devel sub-package, but I'm not sure. Could you, please, comment on this. * As I already mentioned, I don;'t see any shared library objects, visible to ldconfig. So I pretty sure there is no need to run ldconfig. * As I told in my previous comment. I don't see rationale behind splitting main package to freeradius and freeradius-libs. Could you, please, comment on this. Citing myself: "In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}, but freeradius-devel requires freeradius-libs instead. However, I suspect, that there is some rationale behind this. Actually, I suspect also, that something is broken here, since these two libraries located not in any of the standart ldconfig paths." * And one more - I suggestion you to enable modules for dealing with firebird and iodbc (both are available in Fedora). Obviously, this only applies to Fedora. That's all so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 11:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:15:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211115.nBLBFhM5003752@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 06:15:42 EDT --- qutim-0.2.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qutim-0.2.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 11:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:19:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547118] Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211119.nBLBJKcG004112@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Alias| |crun Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 06:19:19 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint crun-0.1.1-1.fc13.src.rpm crun.src: W: strange-permission crun-0.1.1.tar.gz 0400 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at localhost i686]$ rpmlint crun* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: 0865cb80e85afc598cab2ec5b4820c15 Build source: 0865cb80e85afc598cab2ec5b4820c15 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [-] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [-] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [-] Follows desktop entry spec [-] Valid .desktop Name [-] Valid .desktop GenericName [-] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [?] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID= [x] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 11:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:36:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543147] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_image - MinGW Windows port of the Image loading library for SDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211136.nBLBaAkC005987@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543147 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Riemens 2009-12-21 06:36:10 EDT --- yes, that is intentional, because the native version is also at 1.2.7 and according to the mingw packaging guidelines, mingw packages should be at the same version as the native packages. Thanks for looking at it though! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 11:34:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:34:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543917] Review Request: check_postgres - PostgreSQL monitoring script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211134.nBLBYg06005893@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543917 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 06:34:41 EDT --- Just some quick comment on your spec file. - Upstream is providing a tarball. Is there a reason that you don't use this tarball as a source? - Please preserve the timestamps during install. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 11:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:39:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543154] Review Request: mingw32-SDL_mixer - Simple DirectMedia Layer's Sample Mixer Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211139.nBLBd5NF019737@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543154 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Riemens 2009-12-21 06:39:04 EDT --- Yes, that is intentional. The native package is also still stuck at 1.2.8, and according to the mingw pacakging guidelines, these versions should match. Thanks for looking at it though! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 11:36:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:36:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211136.nBLBadZm019606@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 06:36:37 EDT --- Sorry for my delay. Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tinc.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tinc-1.0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882856 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:02:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211202.nBLC28rV009003@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gp at zimt.uni-siegen.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:10:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541724] Review Request: gtk-chtheme - Gtk+ 2.0 theme preview and selection made slick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211210.nBLCAacf023406@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541724 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 07:10:35 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint gtk-chtheme-0.3.1-2.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at localhost i686]$ rpmlint gtk-chtheme* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: f688053bf26dd6c4f1cd0bf2ee33de2a Build source: f688053bf26dd6c4f1cd0bf2ee33de2a [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [-] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [x] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [x] Follows desktop entry spec [x] Valid .desktop Name [x] Valid .desktop GenericName [x] Valid .desktop Categories [x] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [x] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [!] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882903 [x] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format - Please preserve the timestamps http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps - '%attr(644,root,root)' for the man pages is not necessary. - Using macros in URL is not very user friendly because copy-and-paste is not possible ;-) - From my point of view there are better options than showing the 'aud-Default' theme after the launch. For users this can look like that the application is not working correct. Maybe getting in touch with upstream would be a good idea. By the way, I'm not a sponsor. So you have to wait for a sponsor. In the meantime you should make some informal reviews by yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211216.nBLCGxR3024071@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 07:16:58 EDT --- Just one small comment: URL and Source0 points to the same location. Seams to be a copy-&-paste error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:30:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211230.nBLCU9Ia025291@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |530649 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530649] Review Request: massxpert - Mass Spectrometry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211230.nBLCU8J4025280@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530649 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |505154(FE-SCITECH) --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 07:30:07 EDT --- - Release 2.0.9 is out - Your are mixing '$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' and '%{buildroot}'. - In 2.0.9 is a huge usermanual. Perhaps it would be a good idea to make a separate package for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:34:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:34:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546212] Review Request: planner2html - convert planner files to html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211234.nBLCYuNP012558@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546212 --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2009-12-21 07:34:55 EDT --- http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/planner2html.spec http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/planner2html-1.0.0-2.fc12.src.rpm - Honours RPM_OPT_FLAGS (which also fixes debuginfo) - Use parallel make, only one source file, but doesn't hurt of course - Timestamps preserved with install -p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:37:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211237.nBLCbf6C026602@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |544628 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:37:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544629] at-spi2-atk - GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211237.nBLCbeOv026595@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544629 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |544628 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544628] at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211237.nBLCbdh3026586@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |544629, 544630 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-21 07:37:37 EDT --- Review: Good: - license ok - name ok - buildroot ok (unneeded in fedora) - parallel make - %clean section there - %files section ok * owns all directories it creates * requires d-bus for one folder - buildrequires/requires ok - builds in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882908 - noarch not possible - no *.la files - no shared libs - %doc ok Needswork: - URL still wrong, see comment #1 - from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Libexecdir 'Packagers are highly encouraged to store libexecdir files in a package-specific subdirectory of %{_libexecdir}, such as %{_libexecdir}/%{name}' - What's the status of the xslt script? ############################ Please fix the url; subdirectory of %{_libexecdir} and 'Is programm working as expected?' are just 'should' items. ############################ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:38:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541666] Merge Review: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage - Check for pod coverage in your distribution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211238.nBLCcbox012929@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541666 Marcela Ma?l??ov? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:52:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549189] Review Request: Djagios -> Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a co mplete Python Nagios API.. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211252.nBLCqkBa014267@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549189 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 07:52:46 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file. Please check your files with rpmlint. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint djagios-0.1.3-1.src.rpm djagios.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a complete Python Nagios API.. djagios.src: E: summary-too-long Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a complete Python Nagios API.. djagios.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Djagios djagios.src: E: description-line-too-long Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a complete Python Nagios API. djagios.src: E: description-line-too-long The main goal of the tool was to make Nagios usable for non-Nagios admins. The initial install and configuration would have to be done by Nagios administrators. But once done ordinary users can add servers, appliances, devices, services themselves. djagios.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 3 warnings. - Please replace '%define' with '%global' according to the Packaging Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - You must use macros. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:53:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549189] Review Request: Djagios - Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a complete Python Nagios API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211253.nBLCriuZ028226@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549189 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Djagios -> |Review Request: Djagios - |Djagios is an open source |Djagios is an open source |Nagios web based |Nagios web based |configuration tool with a |configuration tool with a |co mplete Python Nagios |complete Python Nagios API |API.. | Alias| |Djagios -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:53:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547622] Review Request: python-cloudservers - Python bindings to the Rackspace Cloud Servers API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211253.nBLCriW1014418@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547622 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 12:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:58:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211258.nBLCwx2W028701@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede 2009-12-21 07:58:58 EDT --- Reviewing this one, Martin thanks for all the useful comments so far. Full review done (tarbal matches upstream, license check, spec file readability, rpmlint, etc.). I've only one remark, which is a blocker though. MUST FIX: --------- * Requires: libpulse.so.0(PULSE_0) Is wrong for 64 bit systems, which have: libpulse.so.0(PULSE_0)(64bit) The only way I see to fix this, while allowing the package to stay noarch is using: Requires: pulseaudio-libs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 13:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211300.nBLD0IpV015479@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 13:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:30:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211330.nBLDUOc3032574@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #34 from Sylvestre Ledru 2009-12-21 08:30:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) Indeed (disclosure: I am the Debian packager of jogl), but fedora/redhat refuse that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 13:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:29:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211329.nBLDTXfQ032491@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Sylvestre Ledru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sylvestre.ledru at scilab.org --- Comment #31 from Sylvestre Ledru 2009-12-21 08:29:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) Sorry, I missed your question. Yes, I confirm that my patch applies against this version. You still have to edit: /home/sylvestre/dev/jogl2.git/make/build.xml /home/sylvestre/dev/jogl2.git/make/build-nativewindow.xml /home/sylvestre/dev/jogl2.git/make/build-jogl.xml to set the correct paths to gluegen. I will probably update this too and try to make it applied to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 13:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:41:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] New: Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 Summary: Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rosset.filipe at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/flaw/flaw.spec SRPM URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/flaw/flaw-1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game. It can be played by up to 5 players simultaneously. Each player controls a wizard. The goal of the game is to survive as long as possible while more and more fireballs appear on the screen. Tested with rpmlint, mock and koji. Koji results: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882983 This is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 13:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:42:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211342.nBLDgprf001839@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 Filipe Rosset changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://flaw.sourceforge.net | |/ Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 13:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:43:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225776] Merge Review: gamin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211343.nBLDhXW0001890@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225776 --- Comment #3 from Tom?? B?atek 2009-12-21 08:43:32 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Manuel, I've incorporated most of your notes. The only thing I disagree with are executable flags on .py doc files. These can be run directly and do their work. About licensing: I left it as LGPLv2 as long the COPYING file is LGPL as well. Otherwise, it's a mixture of GPLv2, LGPLv2, LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2.1. Built as gamin-0.1.10-6.fc13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 14:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:00:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211400.nBLE06j4003551@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from John W. Linville 2009-12-21 09:00:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hostapd Short Description: IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator Owners: linville Branches: F-12 InitialCC: linville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 14:19:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:19:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225776] Merge Review: gamin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211419.nBLEJuZ0024776@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225776 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2009-12-21 09:19:55 EDT --- any particular reason to use %makeinstall instead of the more recommended %make install (I have tested make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" and it works without problems) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 14:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549189] Review Request: Djagios - Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a complete Python Nagios API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211420.nBLEKFTs024835@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549189 --- Comment #2 from Kris Buytaert 2009-12-21 09:20:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Running rpmlint on the specfile rather than the src rpm apparently wasn't my smartest move . Rpmlint issues are gone. I've replaced all %defines with %global But I guess I need some more detail on where you want me to use macro's.. Thnx for the feedback ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 14:46:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:46:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546212] Review Request: planner2html - convert planner files to html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211446.nBLEkBqO009631@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546212 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 09:46:10 EDT --- Your way with the compiler flags is a bit unusual for me. I'm more familiar with just 'make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}"'. But this is your call. I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 15:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211505.nBLF5pU3011433@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #35 from Chen Lei 2009-12-21 10:05:49 EDT --- Maybe you can pull sources from upstream's revision control system, in most case these can build successfully. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control Pull jogl and gluegen sources from upstream's rcs. See http://kenai.com/projects/jogl/pages/FAQ#Get_the_Source_Code -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 15:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:08:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549189] Review Request: Djagios - Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a complete Python Nagios API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211508.nBLF8gsX031077@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549189 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 10:08:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) >(In reply to comment #1) > But I guess I need some more detail on where you want me to use macro's.. Here '/usr/share/djagios-0.1/' Your are defining in the head of the file '%global djagiosdir %{_datadir}/djagios'. I think this is not needed. At least I can see where it's used. A empty line between the changelog entries would be nice. You will see that those entries will be parsed to a website and with a blank line it's easier to ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 15:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:11:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211511.nBLFBZiU012600@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #36 from Sylvestre Ledru 2009-12-21 10:11:33 EDT --- Chen, about jogl, please have a look to bug #439630 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 15:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:18:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211518.nBLFIdCh013529@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #37 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-21 10:18:38 EDT --- Scilab 5.2 has been released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 15:41:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:41:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546212] Review Request: planner2html - convert planner files to html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211541.nBLFfgVa003467@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546212 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara 2009-12-21 10:41:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: planner2html Short Description: Convert planner files to html Owners: caolanm Branches: F-12 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:07:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211607.nBLG7hup019491@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 --- Comment #5 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-12-21 11:07:42 EDT --- Few little changes are made, which reflect the suggestions. The URLs and version number remain the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:08:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:08:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211608.nBLG8dm1019572@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211614.nBLGE647007639@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 --- Comment #6 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-12-21 11:14:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Pod-PseudoPod Short Description: Framework for extending the POD tags for book manuscripts Owners: gerd Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: gerd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:28:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211628.nBLGSRBr022724@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 --- Comment #23 from Stephen Gallagher 2009-12-21 11:28:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379647) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379647) python-djblets 0.5.6 SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:30:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211630.nBLGUe2Q022964@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Stephen Gallagher changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |review?(dmalcolm at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #24 from Stephen Gallagher 2009-12-21 11:30:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379648) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379648) specfile for python-djblets 0.5.6 I took Dave's specfile from http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/reviewboard/python-djblets.spec and updated it to support the latest stable release of Djblets (0.5.6) It would be helpful if this could be reviewed and committed to Fedora so as to facilitate the review process for ReviewBoard - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:32:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211632.nBLGWWIk010617@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-21 11:32:32 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-thor) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:35:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211635.nBLGZT9G023584@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:40:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:40:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211640.nBLGeFxv011739@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #8 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-12-21 11:40:14 EDT --- Ok, I have updated the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:47:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526265] Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211647.nBLGlXwG026030@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526265 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-21 11:47:32 EDT --- Build fails on F12 and devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1884039 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1884024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:57:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211657.nBLGvXaF027410@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |546868 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211657.nBLGvWA3027399@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |505154(FE-SCITECH) AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 11:57:31 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint clac-004-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint clac-004-1.fc12.noarch.rpm clac.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) spec file: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: GPLv3+ [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream file: 9c102f88a4bba4da42a7cd6697973c7f Build file: 9c102f88a4bba4da42a7cd6697973c7f [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [-] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [-] Follows desktop entry spec [-] Valid .desktop Name [-] Valid .desktop GenericName [-] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1884073 [x] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 16:59:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211659.nBLGxKXp014053@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 11:59:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-jabberbot Short Description: A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework Owners: fab Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 17:04:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:04:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511204] Review Request: wicd - A wireless and wired network manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211704.nBLH41Os028177@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511204 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rootoutcast at hushmail.com --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 12:03:58 EDT --- *** Bug 546138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 17:04:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:04:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546138] Review Request: Wicd - Wicd is an open source wired and wireless network manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211704.nBLH40dk028159@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546138 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Resolution| |DUPLICATE Summary|Review Request: - |Review Request: Wicd - Wicd | | --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 12:03:58 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 511204 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 17:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:06:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526265] Review Request: l7-filter-userspace - Userspace version of l7-filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211706.nBLH6F7H028414@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526265 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-21 12:06:14 EDT --- However here is a preliminary review. After you fix the build issue I will check the TBD items. TBD - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license: GPLv2+ OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 ac135b33fc7918bf1b25997bbff00c75 FAIL - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms TBD - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK - MUST: not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. TBD - SHOULD: builds in mock. TBD - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. TBD - SHOULD: functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg OK - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok TBD - Debuginfo complete -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 17:10:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:10:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211710.nBLHA6Op029032@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |544739 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 17:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:10:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544739] Review Request: kopete-facebook - Facebook Protocol support for Kopete In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211710.nBLHA5Hd029022@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544739 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Depends on| |539983 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 18:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211804.nBLI4IeE026247@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-12-21 13:04:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 18:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:07:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211807.nBLI752b026496@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-21 13:07:04 EDT --- (Well, it is better that you don't compare to font packages. Now Fedora has extra guidelines for font packages and bundling fonts in this way is _strictly_ forbidden and will surely be rejected ... https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy ) Still I don't understand. (In reply to comment #5) > Imagine that you are packaging an office package. The office software makes use > of fonts that are under a special format that can only be opened from this > particular office software. Of course the software can operate without these > fonts but it is 50 times more functional if it these fonts were available. :) - Well, how is it different from that "xscreensaver can be used with xscreensaver-base only but installing xscreensaver-extras or xscreensaver-gl-extras makes much better" (I guess people using xscreensaver-base usually also installs xscreensaver-extras), or "firefox can be used only with it but installing plugin foo or bar makes it much better"? Seperating source (or at least creating subpackages) has some advantages - You don't have to update seperated subpackage when you apply some patches against main package - Fedora already support noarch subpackage - Source1 may have different license (as it is rather contents package) (or license may change) and seperating it can make it easier to keep track of licensing issue > It is almost the same situation with jconv(olver). We can put these in a > subpackage. But given the target audience is really limited to enthusiasts and > these reverbs aren't updated independently from jconv(olver) software, it is > not beneficial to make a subpackage (or a separate package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 18:09:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:09:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211809.nBLI9qKZ006823@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Bug 487097 depends on bug 487098, which changed state. Bug 487098 Summary: Review Request: python-djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 18:09:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:09:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: python-djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211809.nBLI9okj006804@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Summary|Review Request: Djblets - A |Review Request: |collection of useful |python-djblets - A |classes and functions for |collection of useful |Django |classes and functions for | |Django Flag|needinfo?(ramez.hanna at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #25 from Dave Malcolm 2009-12-21 13:09:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > I've done the initial import into the devel branch. > > I can tag and build 0.5rc1 in all the branches, but I'd rather go ahead with > the update to upstream's latest, 0.5.5. I've tested a mock build; looks good > here. Any thoughts? Sorry for not responding. Looking in the package db, this is indeed in Fedora as "python-djblets" https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/python-djblets Looks like this review should have been closed out at that point. Renaming this bug to "python-djblets" and closing this review out as "CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE". Re comment #23 and #24, looking at the above link I see that Dan took Stephen's changes and committed them and built them about an hour ago, so we have the latest version of python-djblets built into rawhide (thanks Dan!). I think if there's a call to issue updates for earlier releases, file them as separate bugs to avoid confusing this review further. I've checked and there is a "python-djblets" is a component in bz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 18:12:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:12:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211812.nBLICIss007491@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-21 13:12:17 EDT --- (Well, I may be asking you some malicious question, however I still think that bundling 50 times larger package into the main package which you are saying is not strictly needed is not good) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 18:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211829.nBLITHUL010011@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-12-21 13:29:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: poky-scripts Short Description: Poky platform builder utility scripts Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 18:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211840.nBLIex0s031316@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #19 from Stephen Gallagher 2009-12-21 13:40:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379673) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379673) SRPM for ReviewBoard 1.0.5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 18:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:42:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211842.nBLIguGj031585@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #20 from Stephen Gallagher 2009-12-21 13:42:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379674) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379674) Specfile for ReviewBoard 1.0.5.1 I updated Dan Young's specfile from http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/reviewboard/ReviewBoard.spec to build ReviewBoard 1.0.5.1, now that python-djblets and Django 1.1.1 are available in Fedora. I needed to update to Django 1.1.1, as upstream ReviewBoard requires it for security fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 18:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:57:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211857.nBLIv1Gi013310@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #9 from Josephine Tannh?user 2009-12-21 13:56:59 EDT --- I would say this is ready for repo, now. Simon, what do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:01:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225769] Merge Review: freeradius In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211901.nBLJ15Kw001505@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225769 --- Comment #8 from John Dennis 2009-12-21 14:01:04 EDT --- Thank you for your careful review Peter. You're correct, there was no need for the freeradius-libs subpackage, I can't recall why it existed, possibly it was historic, I've removed it and added an Obsoletes for it. The subpackage dependencies were also upadated. You're correct, ldconfig is unnecessary. It's presence was part historic and part defensive. A somewhat common scenario with FreeRADIUS newbies is to grab the upstream tarball and build and install it themselves. They run into a number of problems because they didn't build and install it correctly so they query the support forum and are told to use prebuilt binaries, so they install the rpm's but they still have problems because they messed up ld from their initial unsuccessful attempts, then they are told to run ldconfig which clears up the problem for them. That's why running ldconfig was somewhat "defensive". However, your point about it being unnecessary is valid so I've removed it. I fixed the devel subpackage description. I removed the execute permissions on the source files. As for the 3 documentation files not being utf-8. The rlm_dbm and pppext-eap-sim-12 are getting triggered only for a contributor's name in the file. I spent about an hour trying to figure out what encoding these files were using but I couldn't, it'd definitely not iso-8859-1. If you use iconv to convert from iso-8859-1 to utf-8 on these files you'll discover they're not converted correctly. Since iconv doesn't produce the right result and between the two files it's only 3 characters in total which are bogus I don't see a point on running it if the only point is to eliminate the rpmlint message. The draft-sterman-aaa-sip-00.txt file is triggering the warning because the hyphen character used to break words during pagination is 0xED, it occurs only at the end of a line when a word is broken, it really doesn't affect ones ability to read the file, the errors occur on each copy of the file which showed up with a google search. It's within my comfort zone to ignore these utf-8 errors. These changes appear in the 2.1.7-6 version (not yet tagged or built, but in CVS) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:29:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211929.nBLJTH2q021908@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.04-2.el5 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:29:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211929.nBLJTDuQ009879@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 14:29:12 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:29:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211929.nBLJTN0E009911@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 14:29:22 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:29:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:29:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211929.nBLJTR3d009927@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.04-2.el5 |1.04-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:39:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546212] Review Request: planner2html - convert planner files to html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211939.nBLJdjeS023796@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546212 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:39:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:38:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211938.nBLJcEhZ023611@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:38:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:40:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:40:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211940.nBLJejef012747@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:40:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530198] Review Request: rubygem-columnize - Sorts an array in column order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211947.nBLJl5PA013489@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530198 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:47:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:46:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211946.nBLJkKqO013424@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:46:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:44:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211944.nBLJi9iS013256@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:44:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548092] Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211943.nBLJh3S6013162@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:43:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:47:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:47:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211947.nBLJlnGA013538@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:47:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:43:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:43:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211943.nBLJhU1Z013209@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-12-21 14:43:29 EDT --- python-devel is needed to build python packages. I'm remember precisely what the issue with that was, however, so it's possible that the python package in Fedora-13 has fixed this (dmalcolm fixed one issue with python-devel being needed in F-13's package). Fedora 12 and below still need it to build, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:48:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211948.nBLJmPUj025031@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:48:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:49:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211949.nBLJnMZh025119@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:49:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:51:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547988] Review Request: kpilot - Sync PIM data with PalmOS devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211951.nBLJpoXI014092@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547988 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:51:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 19:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:50:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912211950.nBLJoLkA013951@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 14:50:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:02:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542463] Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212002.nBLK2G6U015217@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542463 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 15:02:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:03:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212003.nBLK3Ma0027370@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 15:03:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212001.nBLK1U1T027241@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2009-12-21 15:01:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clac Short Description: Command Line Advanced Calculator Owners: wolfy Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:04:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212004.nBLK4H40015469@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #38 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 15:04:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212004.nBLK4bU6015499@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-12-21 15:04:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:10:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212010.nBLKAHMZ027977@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 15:10:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212006.nBLK6ttm027711@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #66 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 15:06:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212010.nBLKACjB027953@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James 2009-12-21 15:10:11 EDT --- Thanks for all the comments, David. Sorry to be slow responding. Darn viruses .... Comment 1: you're right about the version number. I'll fix that. There was a discussion on fedora-devel recently about not including the name of the package in its Summary field, and rpmlint complains if you do that. However, you have a good point about the expansion of PVS being purely historical. I've changed the Summary to "Interactive theorem prover from SRI". Patch0 is required for Fedora. No bundled libraries are allowed without an exception. As far as I know, other distributions have similar rules, so I don't see the point in making Patch0 optional. Furthermore, the PVS copy of mona has not kept up with upstream. There are multiple bug fixes in the current mona release that have never been copied over to the PVS version. (This is exactly the reason for the "no bundled libraries" rule, in fact.) I have, in fact, made Sam Owre aware that I'm doing this and why. I asked Sam for the missing documentation files at the beginning of November. He has never replied. I am not in contact with anyone else at SRI, but I suppose I could try locating John Rushby's contact information. Comment 2: I am also worried about that other "pvs". I'll make this one "pvs-sbcl". I think the current Provides is okay. /sbin/pvs is owned by the lvm2 package, which only provides these: config(lvm2) = 2.02.53-2.fc12 lvm2 = 2.02.53-2.fc12 lvm2(x86-64) = 2.02.53-2.fc12 so there is no conflict. I did the "pvs" Provides so that libraries of PVS theories can "Requires: pvs" and have that be satisfied by a PVS built by any supported Common Lisp. Thanks for the desktop entry. I have added that, with some modifications inspired by the coq desktop file. Comment 3: Do you have PVSEMACS=xemacs in your environment? If so, see http://calypso.tux.org/pipermail/xemacs-beta/2009-December/018035.html Those BDD-related messages are harmless. They are due to the way the Makefiles are set up, which assumes that you will be doing multiple builds in the same directory. You get those messages about failing to clean up the previous build on the first build ... which, of course, is the ONLY build when constructing an RPM. The total build time for me is usually 7-8 minutes, by the way. New files: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pvs/pvs-sbcl.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pvs/pvs-sbcl-4.2-1.20091008svn.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:10:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212010.nBLKAsiK016676@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 15:10:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:12:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212012.nBLKC6jD016806@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 15:12:01 EDT --- I don't see any answer after a week here, so going ahead with the request. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:12:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:12:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212012.nBLKCrTP028364@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 15:12:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:15:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212015.nBLKFxUJ017388@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-21 15:15:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:18:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212018.nBLKIwWw028916@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #7 from Josephine Tannh?user 2009-12-21 15:18:57 EDT --- OK - MUST: $ rpmlint emerillon.i686: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/emerillon.schemas emerillon-devel.i686: W: no-documentation OK - MUST: Named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: Spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license OK - MUST: License files included in %doc OK - MUST: Spec is in American English OK - MUST: Spec is legible OK - MUST: Sources match the upstream source by MD5 b8a5a7bf3c54b05be4b1358f285d0d40 OK - MUST: Successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i686 OK - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. If you want to import this to f12, too, you should do a kojibuild for f12 to see if this will be build on all f12 supported architectures. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: Handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager muststate this fact in the request for review. OK - MUST: Owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: No duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. NOT OKAY - MUST: Consistently uses macros you mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_DIR OK - MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package OK - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: Builds in mock. N/A - SHOULD: Functions as described. OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. OK - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete Issues: FIX macro-using correct the macro from $RPM_BUILD_DIR to %{buildroot} Simon, is this package okay? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:28:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225769] Merge Review: freeradius In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212028.nBLKSp8h030423@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225769 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-21 15:28:50 EDT --- Great. You fixed all blocking issues, and I have only few remaining non-blocking suggestions: * Since all sub-packages are requiring main freeradius package now, there is no need to try to create user/group radiusd at %pre stage while installing of any sub-package except main one (freeradius). * There is no need to explicitly mark man-pages as %doc * I'd like to introduce you the hidden directory creation power of 'install' utility. Instead of typing mkdir -p /my/path/ install file.ext /my/path/newfile.ext you may simply type install -D file.ext /my/path/newfile.ext and 'install' will create /my/path/ for you :) Anyway, these my suggestions won't dramatically change end user's experience with freeradius, so it's up to you to decide, whether or not to follow them. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:27:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549495] New: Review Request: bakefile - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bakefile - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549495 Summary: Review Request: bakefile - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rosset.filipe at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/bakefile/bakefile.spec SRPM URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/bakefile/bakefile-0.2.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Bakefile is cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator. It takes compiler-independent description of build tasks as input and generates native makefile (autoconf's Makefile.in, Visual C++ project, bcc makefile etc.). Tested with rpmlint, mock and koji. Koji results: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1884369 This is my second package. First package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:29:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549496] New: Review Request: bakefile - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bakefile - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549496 Summary: Review Request: bakefile - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rosset.filipe at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/bakefile/bakefile.spec SRPM URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/bakefile/bakefile-0.2.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Bakefile is cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator. It takes compiler-independent description of build tasks as input and generates native makefile (autoconf's Makefile.in, Visual C++ project, bcc makefile etc.). Tested with rpmlint, mock and koji. Koji results: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1884369 This is my second package. First package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:31:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549496] Review Request: bakefile - is cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212031.nBLKVqmU030759@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549496 Filipe Rosset changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://www.bakefile.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Summary|Review Request: bakefile - |Review Request: bakefile - | |is cross-platform, | |cross-compiler native | |makefiles generator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546212] Review Request: planner2html - convert planner files to html In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212041.nBLKfHHb031690@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546212 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:40:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212040.nBLKego1019897@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |549498 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:41:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212041.nBLKfXY7019985@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:49:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549189] Review Request: Djagios - Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a complete Python Nagios API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212049.nBLKn7Pd021670@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549189 --- Comment #4 from Kris Buytaert 2009-12-21 15:49:07 EDT --- I've updated the whitespace , and Used and replaced the %djagiosdir with the correct path. thnx in advance for your comments ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:56:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549496] Review Request: bakefile - is cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212056.nBLKuFFl022616@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549496 --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2009-12-21 15:56:15 EDT --- g) is the url http://www.bakefile.org/ or http://bakefile.sourceforge.net/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 20:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549496] Review Request: bakefile - is cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212054.nBLKsEg0022490@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549496 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #1 from Terje R??sten 2009-12-21 15:54:13 EDT --- Some random comments. a) Is summary a bit strange? Drop the leading verb? b) Useless line: %doc. Is there more info available in the package? c) I am favor of more explicit %files section, %{_libdir}/* can pick up random stuff. d) The source url is not correct, just drop %{name} macro here. e) %{_mandir}/man1/bakefil*.gz change to %{_mandir}/man1/bakefil* (compression might change to e.g. xz) f) commas in buildreq/req is just noise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:06:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212106.nBLL6bIQ023702@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 16:06:36 EDT --- clac-004-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clac-004-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:05:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212105.nBLL55AR023593@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 16:05:04 EDT --- clac-004-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clac-004-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:07:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212107.nBLL74iR023736@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 16:07:03 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file: - You should recheck the license. 'either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.' - Are you listed requirements in Requires: automatically picked by rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:20:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549496] Review Request: bakefile - is cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212120.nBLLKa3R025819@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549496 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 16:20:35 EDT --- Just some quick comment on your spec file. - The Source URL has a typo in one name macros. - Please check your BR. Isn't python-devel requiring python? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:26:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212126.nBLLQnNP006151@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Flag| |needinfo?(rosset.filipe at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-12-21 16:26:47 EDT --- I think you can replace %{_bindir}/flaw* with %{_bindir}/flaw please fix these things and post a updated spec + src.rpm, remember to bump version in spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:34:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212134.nBLLYN7Q007367@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-21 16:34:22 EDT --- Looks sane, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212141.nBLLfvt6008096@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 16:41:56 EDT --- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:43:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212143.nBLLhFju008251@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 16:43:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bluemodem Short Description: A bluetooth modem configuration utility Owners: fab Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549189] Review Request: Djagios - Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a complete Python Nagios API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212148.nBLLmnKO008876@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549189 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 16:48:48 EDT --- Can you please the updated files (spec and SRPM)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:57:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:57:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212157.nBLLvC83009915@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 16:57:10 EDT --- pki-util-1.3.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-util-1.3.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 21:59:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542165] Review Request: testng - Java-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212159.nBLLxKS2010673@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542165 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-21 16:59:20 EDT --- Thank you for the review. Imported (with pom) and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 22:03:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:03:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510651] Review Request: trafshow - A tool for real-time network traffic visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212203.nBLM33QO030930@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510651 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 17:03:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I could however not > > connect to the ftp download site and verify. But it seems like they only have > > trafshow-4.0.tgz available for download? Where do trafshow-5.2.3.tgz come from? > It come from their ftp (see link in Source0). And yes, it is seems down now. The FTP server is still down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 22:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:03:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548092] Review Request: shared-color-targets - Color targets from vendors for color calibration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212203.nBLM3SPt030980@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548092 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Richard Hughes 2009-12-21 17:03:27 EDT --- Built, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 22:40:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:40:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212240.nBLMeuLp004159@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 17:40:54 EDT --- pki-util-1.3.0-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-util-1.3.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 22:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:59:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549496] Review Request: bakefile - is cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212259.nBLMxA7e018002@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549496 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 17:59:08 EDT --- *** Bug 549495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 22:59:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:59:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549495] Review Request: bakefile - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212259.nBLMx9X2017991@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549495 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-21 17:59:08 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 549496 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 23:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:21:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549556] New: Review Request: perl-WebService-Google-Language - Perl interface to the Google AJAX Language API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Google-Language - Perl interface to the Google AJAX Language API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549556 Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Google-Language - Perl interface to the Google AJAX Language API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-WebService-Google-Language/perl-WebService-Google-Language.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-WebService-Google-Language/perl-WebService-Google-Language-0.10-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: WebService::Google::Language is an object-oriented interface to the Google AJAX Language API (http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlanguage/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 21 23:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:29:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912212329.nBLNTt2U011078@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 --- Comment #19 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-12-21 18:29:53 EDT --- Updated http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/deja-dup.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/deja-dup-13.4-1.fc13.src.rpm I asked at https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-December/msg00979.html and while noone from the packaging committee has chimed in, I am inclined to stick with building from C for now. Once we have a better pool of packages in Vala, we would be able to determine the right path forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 00:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220015.nBM0FKZp026975@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-21 19:15:18 EDT --- > Issues: > FIX macro-using > correct the macro from $RPM_BUILD_DIR to %{buildroot} $RPM_BUILD_DIR is not the same as %{buildroot}. I'm not sure of the newer style macro for BUILD_DIR but its the equivalent to ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/ as opposed to ~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/. It will be short lived as it will be removed in the next upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 00:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:27:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220027.nBM0RvS2017847@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-21 19:27:56 EDT --- Status update: - BR reduced \ - License is there \> (comment #1) - Requires: tex(latex) (comment #3) - Group changed to App/Publ (comment #4) - Publishing also in desktop-file-install (comment #2) ( bug 510376 also close to finished ;) ) #################### All issues fixed. #################### APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 00:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:59:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220059.nBM0xawU030697@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-21 19:59:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > URL and Source0 points to the same location. Seams to be a copy-&-paste error. Oh, yes, thanks. Corrected. URL: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/MiniMock Also updated to latest version. rpmlint still clean. Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/python-minimock.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 01:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548877] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220146.nBM1kWL6025225@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548877 --- Comment #2 from Peter Halliday 2009-12-21 20:46:31 EDT --- I updated the srpm. I removed all the spaces in the description that were extra. I fixed the %doc section by removing the _build directory and its files. I removed the virtual_support files from the pythong path. It's included, because it's included upstream. It's included upstream, because the same author develops all the other packages. It allows for installation without hitting the network again. I don't install them at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:06:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:06:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530649] Review Request: massxpert - Mass Spectrometry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220206.nBM26tSA006088@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530649 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-21 21:06:54 EDT --- - update to new release - only using %{buildroot} - usermanual in subpackage rpmlint clean (warning: build hangs a bit, esp. on the last file, building with c++. When waiting long enought, it's sucessfull... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1885132 ) Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/massxpert.spec SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/massxpert-2.0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:24:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220224.nBM2O7HG007479@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 21:24:06 EDT --- dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:23:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220223.nBM2NBMg007392@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 21:23:09 EDT --- dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549590] Review Request: pChart - A PHP class to build charts. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220229.nBM2Tnxf008049@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549590 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220229.nBM2Tm3o008044@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |549590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:28:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549590] New: Review Request: pChart - A PHP class to build charts. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pChart - A PHP class to build charts. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549590 Summary: Review Request: pChart - A PHP class to build charts. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric at christensenplace.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/pChart/pChart.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/pChart/pChart-1.27d-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A PHP class to build charts. rpmlint is clean EXCEPT for a no-documentation error. This is a lib from limesurvey and does not have any associated documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220232.nBM2W6mq008320@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 21:32:04 EDT --- dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:38:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220238.nBM2cGqq030724@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |544821 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:38:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544821] Review Request: php-gettext - Gettext emulation in php In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220238.nBM2cF94030714@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544821 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us Blocks| |508817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:41:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549593] New: Review Request: tumbler - D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tumbler - D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549593 Summary: Review Request: tumbler - D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/tumbler.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/tumbler-0.1.0-2.fc13.src.rpm Description: Tumbler is a D-Bus service for applications to request thumbnails for various URI schemes and MIME types. It is an implementation of the thumbnail management D-Bus specification described on http://live.gnome.org/ThumbnailerSpec written in an object-oriented fashion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220244.nBM2i3AH009792@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |505356 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220244.nBM2i2nj009781@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us Blocks| |508817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 02:58:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:58:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547974] Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220258.nBM2wZRF010842@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547974 --- Comment #6 from Daiki Ueno 2009-12-21 21:58:34 EDT --- Sure. I will put the fixed package on the Web shortly. (Perhaps I should make an upstream release before the package fix, since several minor bugs were fixed recently...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:25:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220325.nBM3P0sa014353@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 22:24:58 EDT --- dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:25:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220325.nBM3PLNo003689@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |549604 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:25:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549604] Review Request: domxml-php4-php5 - XML transition from PHP4 domxml to PHP5 dom module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220325.nBM3PKlN003679@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549604 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:25:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:25:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549604] New: Review Request: domxml-php4-php5 - XML transition from PHP4 domxml to PHP5 dom module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: domxml-php4-php5 - XML transition from PHP4 domxml to PHP5 dom module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549604 Summary: Review Request: domxml-php4-php5 - XML transition from PHP4 domxml to PHP5 dom module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric at christensenplace.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/domxml-php4-php5/domxml-php4-php5.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/domxml-php4-php5/domxml-php4-php5-1.21.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: XML transition from PHP4 domxml to PHP5 dom module This is a lib for limesurvey and does not have any associated documents which is the only warning from rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:31:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220331.nBM3V6nb015269@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen 2009-12-21 22:31:05 EDT --- Thanks :) I added haskell-sig to the CC list for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:26:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:26:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220326.nBM3QXNj014551@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 22:26:29 EDT --- dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:27:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220327.nBM3RaEn014780@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 22:27:35 EDT --- dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:31:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:31:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220331.nBM3V6Bw015263@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542028 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:31:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220331.nBM3V51u015246@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us Blocks| |508817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:28:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:28:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549605] New: Review Request: libopenr2 - MFC/R2 call setup library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libopenr2 - MFC/R2 call setup library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549605 Summary: Review Request: libopenr2 - MFC/R2 call setup library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/libopenr2/libopenr2.spec SRPM URL: http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/libopenr2/libopenr2-1.2.0-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: OpenR2 is a library that implements the MFC/R2 signalling over E1 lines using the Zapata Telephony interface. The MF R2 tones required for the signalling are generated by code borrowed from the LGPL library SpanDSP written by Steve Underwood, the user has the option to provide a MF interface to use his own MF R2 tone generation and detection so the library will use them when needed, that's why this library does not depend directly on spandsp, libteletone or zaptel for tone generation and detection (depends on zaptel for ABCD bits and general media transmission though) E1 with r2 signalling is used in brazil and mexico. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1885261 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:33:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220333.nBM3Xaxp015706@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542500 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542500] Review Request: php-pear-OLE - Package for reading and writing OLE containers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220333.nBM3XZBu015690@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542500 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us Blocks| |508817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:35:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220335.nBM3ZAR2005541@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 22:35:09 EDT --- pki-util-1.3.0-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-util-1.3.0-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:41:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:41:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220341.nBM3fJDU016914@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #10 from Eric Christensen 2009-12-21 22:41:18 EDT --- Ryan Rix and I worked on some of the libs tonight. Did a search against all the libs in BZ to see if any of them were in progress. Everything I found I made as a blocker to this ticket. At this time progressbar, sha256, phpCAS, and phpzip still need to be worked. Oh, datetimeconverter I couldn't find a license for. The text basically says that anyone can do anything with the file as long as we keep the header intact but it doesn't specifically list a license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 03:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:48:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220348.nBM3mkIg017709@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-12-21 22:48:44 EDT --- Package imported and built - thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:16:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220416.nBM4GwVj010401@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #5 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-21 23:16:57 EDT --- Jerry James said: > Patch0 is required for Fedora. No bundled libraries are allowed without an exception. As far as I know, other distributions have similar rules, so I don't see the point in making Patch0 optional.... Ooops, I wasn't clear enough. Sorry. I would like to see the capability of patch0 eventually merged into upstream, so that builders could easily remove the PVS-unique version of mona. By "optional", I meant "see if you could get SRI to add this option to PVS, enabling the removal of its local 'mona' library, so that future builds will not require as much patching". > I asked Sam for the missing documentation files at the beginning of November. He has never replied. Okay. Not a big deal. > I think the current Provides is okay. /sbin/pvs is owned by the lvm2 package, which only provides these... Yes, there's no naming conflict of the *packages*. But if you install pvs-sbcl and lvm2, there are two files in two different executable directories with the same name: /usr/bin/pvs and /sbin/pvs. Is there a possibility that at any time someone will call the "wrong" one? > Comment 3: Do you have PVSEMACS=xemacs in your environment? If so, see http://calypso.tux.org/pipermail/xemacs-beta/2009-December/018035.html I'll have to look. I ran PVS on that system at one time, and it's possible that I didn't clean it up properly. I'll try again on a different system; if that works, then clearly it was just a bad test on my part. > The total build time for me is usually 7-8 minutes, by the way. Thanks, that info helps. 24 hours wasn't enough in my case, so clearly there is something very wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:33:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220433.nBM4Xk84012670@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 fujiwara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tfujiwar at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from fujiwara 2009-12-21 23:33:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > added it back. ideally ibus-anthy should supports it as scim-anthy does and get > rid of it from the menu after that, but anyway. Please file a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:40:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:40:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220440.nBM4etAE013485@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:40:54 EDT --- i3lock-1.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:41:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220441.nBM4ffwB013585@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:41:40 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220440.nBM4exkh013499@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:46:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220446.nBM4k1J3025311@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:46:00 EDT --- mingw32-gtkhtml3-3.29.3-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:41:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:41:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220441.nBM4fjsr024667@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.04-2.el4 |1.04-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:45:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:45:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220445.nBM4jol8025294@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:45:49 EDT --- f2c-20090411-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update f2c'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13448 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:42:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220442.nBM4gMEl024836@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:42:15 EDT --- qutim-0.2.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qutim'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13435 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220447.nBM4lPc7014603@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:47:24 EDT --- volpack-1.0c7-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:46:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:46:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220446.nBM4k5AL014450@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.29.3-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:47:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:47:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220447.nBM4lTKD025806@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0c7-3.el5 |1.0c7-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542740] Review Request: f2c - Fortran to C/C++ conversion program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220446.nBM4kWDV025398@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542740 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:46:32 EDT --- f2c-20090411-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update f2c'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13454 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:48:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220448.nBM4mWTA025964@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #6 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-21 23:48:31 EDT --- I found a bug in the build. If you have a freshly-install sbcl, there hasn't been time for 'prelink' to mangle the sbcl executable. The current script assumes that prelink *has* modified sbcl, and crashes when that's not so. Here's the tail of the "rpmbuild -ba" output: checking for emacs version >= 19... found 23.1.1 checking for etags... etags checking for mkdir... mkdir checking for tar... tar checking for GNU tar version >= 1.11... found 1.22 checking for rm... rm configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating pvs config.status: creating pvsio config.status: creating doc/api/Makefile config.status: creating doc/user-guide/Makefile config.status: creating doc/language/Makefile config.status: creating doc/language/pvs-doc.el config.status: creating doc/prover/Makefile + cp -p /usr/bin/sbcl . + prelink -u ./sbcl prelink: ./sbcl does not have .gnu.prelink_undo section error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5D7Okc (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:54:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:54:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220454.nBM4shhF027381@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:54:42 EDT --- perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL-1.04-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:53:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220453.nBM4r7nO027124@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0c7-3.fc11 |1.0c7-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539480] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Daemon-SSL - Simple http server class with SSL support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220454.nBM4slPw027393@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539480 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.04-2.fc11 |1.04-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:52:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518315] Review Request: vanessa_logger - Generic logging layer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220452.nBM4qU8w027038@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518315 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:52:29 EDT --- vanessa_logger-0.0.8-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vanessa_logger'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13497 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:53:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:53:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 526998] Review Request: volpack - Portable library for fast volume rendering In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220453.nBM4r2Ea015645@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526998 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:53:01 EDT --- volpack-1.0c7-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:58:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220458.nBM4wND7028479@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.29.3-2.fc12 |3.29.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 05:00:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220500.nBM50Vl9028774@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.d-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 05:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220500.nBM50RGr017607@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 00:00:26 EDT --- i3-3.d-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 04:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:58:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 525540] Review Request: mingw32-gtkhtml3 - MinGW Windows port of GtkHTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220458.nBM4wJTk016746@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525540 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-21 23:58:18 EDT --- mingw32-gtkhtml3-3.29.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 05:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:05:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220505.nBM55Lv8029471@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 00:05:20 EDT --- poky-scripts-6-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/poky-scripts-6-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 05:05:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:05:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220505.nBM55P2M018224@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 00:05:24 EDT --- poky-scripts-6-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/poky-scripts-6-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 05:05:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:05:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220505.nBM55TS3018245@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 00:05:29 EDT --- poky-scripts-6-6.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/poky-scripts-6-6.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 05:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:17:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225769] Merge Review: freeradius In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220517.nBM5HVf8030886@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225769 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-22 00:17:30 EDT --- Since all changes now imported to cvs tree, I'm closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 05:58:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:58:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220558.nBM5wIhO002363@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 05:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:58:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220558.nBM5w2JI002346@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-22 00:58:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-thor Short Description: Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 06:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:13:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220613.nBM6Dh4X004521@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 01:13:42 EDT --- qjson-0.7.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qjson-0.7.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 06:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:13:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220613.nBM6Dluo024605@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 01:13:46 EDT --- qjson-0.7.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qjson-0.7.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 06:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:25:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547974] Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220625.nBM6Patg005736@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547974 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-22 01:25:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Sure. I will put the fixed package on the Web shortly. > (Perhaps I should make an upstream release before the package fix, since > several minor bugs were fixed recently...) Thank you. In such case, are you going to sponsor Ueno-san, Petersen-san? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 06:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:28:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549624] New: Review Request: rubygem-merb-slices - Merb plugin for using and creating application 'slices' Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-merb-slices - Merb plugin for using and creating application 'slices' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549624 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-merb-slices - Merb plugin for using and creating application 'slices' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mkent at magoazul.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-merb-slices.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-merb-slices-1.0.15-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: Merb-Slices is a Merb plugin for using and creating application 'slices' which help you modularize your application. Usually these slices are reusable extractions from the main application. A module is set up to serve as a namespace for controller, models, helpers, etc. Installing this package will provide the capability to run a Merb application slice. This package contains the slice binary and merb-slice library. --- For testing purposes I've put a demo application here http://magoazul.com/slice-example.tgz it was created with merb-gen (will be another new package submission) as follows: merb-gen slice slice-example cd slice-example To run it: wget http://magoazul.com/slice-example.tgz tar zxvf slice-example.tgz cd slice-example slice To view it: http://localhost:4000/ --- See Bug 549286 for more information about the background of merb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 06:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:29:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220629.nBM6T5Yd026115@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |549624 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 06:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:29:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549624] Review Request: rubygem-merb-slices - Merb plugin for using and creating application 'slices' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220629.nBM6T4BH026110@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549624 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |549286 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 08:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549189] Review Request: Djagios - Djagios is an open source Nagios web based configuration tool with a complete Python Nagios API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220819.nBM8J2EB005975@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549189 --- Comment #6 from Kris Buytaert 2009-12-22 03:19:01 EDT --- Files are up2date on http://www.krisbuytaert.be/download/djagios-0.1.3-1.src.rpm http://www.krisbuytaert.be/download/djagios.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 08:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:37:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220837.nBM8bgt5008785@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2009-12-22 03:37:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * SourceURL > - I guess the following works. > http://dl.sourceforge.jp/kasumi/41436/kasumi-2.5.tar.gz FWIW I just had a chance to talk about this with OSDN guy though, starting a download with the above URL isn't expected behaviour it seems. I'll revert this change because it may be changed in the future and safe to access the mirror site directly. (In reply to comment #3) > Then now please use desktop-file-{install,validate} > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files > > By the way > - "Application" in Category is deprecated and should be removed: > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00723.html > - It is better that "Icon=kasumi" instead of using "Icon=kasumi.png" All the above fixed in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 09:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:18:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220918.nBM9Ip21024701@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 04:18:50 EDT --- perl-Pod-PseudoPod-0.15-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-PseudoPod-0.15-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 09:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220931.nBM9Vu0k015531@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 04:31:56 EDT --- perl-Pod-PseudoPod-0.15-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-PseudoPod-0.15-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 09:41:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:41:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912220941.nBM9fUvo027689@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #11 from Felix Kaechele 2009-12-22 04:41:29 EDT --- Please let me know if you need more help with this (packaging/reviewing). Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 10:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:25:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221025.nBMAP5Gi000827@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2009-12-22 05:25:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > $RPM_BUILD_DIR is not the same as %{buildroot}. this is correct > I'm not sure of the newer style macro for BUILD_DIR %{builddir} Please take a look in /usr/lib/rpm/macros (LINE 836) (In reply to comment #7) > Simon, is this package okay? just a few notes... Peter, perhaps it is better to use the name-macro instead of the name in the file list! It would be nice if you could add a / to the directories in the filelist. %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name} both looks like a file %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name}/ differs directory and file in the includedir you should use a "*" instead of the versionnumber. it's easier for an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 10:24:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221024.nBMAOoC2000793@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp 2009-12-22 05:24:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I would say this is ready for repo, now. > Simon, what do you think? I disagree with you %{_libdir}/python2.6/site-packages/gtk-2.0/_ethos.so this is ugly. please use: %{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1))")} in the head of your spec and then %{python_sitelib}/gtk-*/_%{name}.so https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python you should use %{name} instead of the name and you should use the "*" instead of version numbers. It's easier for an mass rebuild; like a pygtk update. for example the new path will be gkt-3.0 your specfile is valid for this and it is nor required to edit it. Please add a / to the directories in your filelists, it's easier to differ files and directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 10:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:46:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538297] Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221046.nBMAkNtQ025357@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538297 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |huzaifas at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-22 05:46:22 EDT --- I am going to co-maintain the openvas stack. Now that openvas-libnasl is in rawhide we can go ahead with the other builds. Stejpan, I made a few changes to your spec and did a rawhide build. SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/openvas-server.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/openvas-server-2.0.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1885712 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 10:50:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:50:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538297] Review Request: openvas-server - Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221050.nBMAoiiT025793@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538297 Bug 538297 depends on bug 538296, which changed state. Bug 538296 Summary: Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 10:48:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:48:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221048.nBMAmZuw025560@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-22 05:48:27 EDT --- By the way ------------------------------------------------- # Copy in license from upstream git cp %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version} ------------------------------------------------- can be simplified as ------------------------------------------------- cp -p %{SOURCE1} . ------------------------------------------------- (please keep timestamps with adding -p option) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 10:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:50:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538296] Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221050.nBMAohKW025782@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-22 05:50:41 EDT --- build for rawhide. Closing this bug -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 10:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 05:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538298] Review Request: openvas-plugins - Security check plugins for OpenVAS server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221050.nBMAojUf025800@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538298 Bug 538298 depends on bug 538296, which changed state. Bug 538296 Summary: Review Request: openvas-libnasl - Support for NASL scripting language in OpenVAS Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538296 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 11:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:02:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538299] Review Request: openvas-client - Client component of Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221102.nBMB2L2h027230@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538299 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |huzaifas at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-22 06:02:19 EDT --- *** Bug 541494 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 11:02:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:02:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541494] Review Request: openvas-client : openvas-client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221102.nBMB2KFp027222@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541494 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2009-12-22 06:02:19 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 538299 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 11:57:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:57:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221157.nBMBvnni012049@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andreas Osowski 2009-12-22 06:57:47 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [x] F12/i686 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 6fb1ff6e414d5ef33d2f627b0ec563eaac19fbd8 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F12/i686 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: - [-] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Remaining issues: NONE. ********************** ****** APPROVED ****** ********************** * /.\ /..'\ /'.'\ /.''.'\ /.'.'.\ "'""""/'.''.'.\""'"'" jgs ^^^[_]^^^ :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 12:10:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:10:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221210.nBMCAc3Q013009@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 07:10:36 EDT --- clac-004-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clac-004-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 12:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:08:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221208.nBMC8Wl0012837@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #12 from Eric Christensen 2009-12-22 07:08:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Please let me know if you need more help with this (packaging/reviewing). > Thanks. Thanks for the offer. Any bug that blocks this ticket is probably in need of a review. I know that bug 549590 and bug 549604 are in need of a review which will help out with this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 12:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:10:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221210.nBMCAqDK003581@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 07:10:51 EDT --- clac-004-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clac-004-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 12:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:13:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221213.nBMCDrxp013352@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 Filipe Rosset changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rosset.filipe at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #3 from Filipe Rosset 2009-12-22 07:13:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/flaw/flaw.spec SRPM URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/flaw/flaw-1.2-2.fc12.src.rpm New files with the corrections identified in comments 1 and 2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 12:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:16:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548180] Review Request: hostapd - IEEE 802.11 AP, IEEE 802.1X/WPA/WPA2/EAP/RADIUS Authenticator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221216.nBMCGkCU013629@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548180 --- Comment #19 from G?ran Uddeborg 2009-12-22 07:16:44 EDT --- FYI: I picked up hostapd-0.6.9-6.fc12.x86_64 from Koji and tried with the ath5k driver and a Nintendo Wii on the other end. Worked fine! :-) I don't know why I couldn't get it to work with my previous local build. But it's always good with folks that know what they are doing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 12:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:19:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221219.nBMCJ29g004469@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 12:18:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:18:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221218.nBMCIoCc004456@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-12-22 07:18:49 EDT --- nice ascii thx for your review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dmenu Short Description: Generic menu for X Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 12:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549496] Review Request: bakefile - A cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221259.nBMCxGEQ018683@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549496 Filipe Rosset changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: bakefile - |Review Request: bakefile - |is cross-platform, |A cross-platform, |cross-compiler native |cross-compiler native |makefiles generator |makefiles generator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 13:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:00:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549496] Review Request: bakefile - A cross-platform, cross-compiler native makefiles generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221300.nBMD0WXv009345@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549496 --- Comment #5 from Filipe Rosset 2009-12-22 08:00:31 EDT --- Spec URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/bakefile/bakefile.spec SRPM URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/bakefile/bakefile-0.2.8-2.fc12.src.rpm New files with the corrections suggested in comments 1, 2 and 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 13:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221304.nBMD4bEY019629@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #21 from Daniel Novotny 2009-12-22 08:04:36 EDT --- http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dnovotny/f/mailman.spec http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1885973 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 13:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:03:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221303.nBMD35Um019494@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #20 from Daniel Novotny 2009-12-22 08:03:00 EDT --- ok, built mailman-2.1.12-13.fc13 with "not default on" patch. you can search for "rpmlint" in the spec for the comments you requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 13:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221304.nBMD4jkg019646@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 08:04:44 EDT --- gdata-sharp-1.4.0.2-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdata-sharp-1.4.0.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 13:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:04:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221304.nBMD4e2m019637@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 08:04:38 EDT --- gdata-sharp-1.4.0.2-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdata-sharp-1.4.0.2-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 13:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:01:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] New: Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 Summary: Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tbzatek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tbzatek.fedorapeople.org/libgnome-keyring/libgnome-keyring.spec SRPM URL: http://tbzatek.fedorapeople.org/libgnome-keyring/libgnome-keyring-2.29.4-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: gnome-keyring is a program that keep password and other secrets for users. The library libgnome-keyring is used by applications to integrate with the gnome-keyring system. -- Basically, this is a split of gnome-keyring (recent upstream decision), creating separate library with the core. Feel free to propose better description, I'm bad with that. rpmlint passes without warning, package builds fine in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 13:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:14:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221314.nBMDEW30010864@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #7 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-22 08:14:31 EDT --- I changed the "prelink" line to: prelink -u ./sbcl || true and re-ran "rpmbuild -ba pvs-sbcl.spec". Again, after more than 12 hours it's stuck. I did a "set | grep PVS" ; this system doesn't have *any* environment variables with "PVS" in the name. So that can't be the problem. Again, it's a 32-bit system. I suspect that this build doesn't work on 32-bit systems. Don't know why. ================================= ; (SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT SB-RUNTIME::SELF STREAM SB-RUNTIME::TOKEN :KIND ; :SUBKIND :VALUE :STR-VALUE) ; ; caught WARNING: ; undefined variable: SB-RUNTIME:TOKEN ; ; compilation unit finished ; Undefined functions: ; SB-RUNTIME:AW-TERM ERGO-DISKSAVE SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT ; Undefined variables: ; SB-RUNTIME:*FORMATTING-OFF* PVS::*UNTYPECHECK-HOOK* SB-RUNTIME::BP SB-RUNTIME::CHARNUMBER SB-RUNTIME::LINENUMBER SB-RUNTIME::LINETEXT SB-RUNTIME:TOKEN ; caught 8 WARNING conditions ; caught 8 STYLE-WARNING conditions [undoing binding stack and other enclosing state... done] [saving current Lisp image into bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/pvs-sbclisp: writing 3432 bytes from the read-only space at 0x01000000 writing 2256 bytes from the static space at 0x01100000 writing 92459008 bytes from the dynamic space at 0x09000000 done] rm /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/bdd-sbcl.* rm: cannot remove `/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/bdd-sbcl.*': No such file or directory make: [bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/pvs-sbclisp] Error 1 (ignored) cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/sbcl bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/mu.so bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/bdd-sbcl.lisp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/mu-sbcl.lisp bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/WS1S/ix86-Linux/ws1s.so bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/WS1S/lisp/dfa-foreign-sbcl.lisp bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/utils/ix86-Linux/b64 bin/ix86-Linux ./pvs -batch -l emacs/emacs-src/pvs-set-prelude-info.el \ -f set-prelude-files-and-regions Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/focus-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/php-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/po-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/rpm-spec-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/rpmdev-init.el (source)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 13:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 08:29:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221329.nBMDTqux022781@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-22 08:29:51 EDT --- mind you, the prelink hackery shouldn't be required in any mock/koji builds (only on live prelinked systems). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 14:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:17:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221417.nBMEHpqp029316@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-22 09:17:50 EDT --- Hi, I know "fonts" is not the best example. That's why I tried to emphasize that they were imaginary "special" fonts. Oh well... I still didn't get a response from the author. I'm removing the reverbs for now. I'll re-add them once the license is cleared up. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jconvolver.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jconvolver-0.8.4-2.fc12.src.rpm > - You don't have to update seperated subpackage when you > apply some patches against main package This is no big problem since we have deltarpms now :) As I said this is my choice. If there were multiple possible "plugins" available then I would probably not bundle any of them. But there is only 1 available in this case. And this was the way this has been packaged for a while, even before I took over the package. I assume that people using this software expect the reverbs to be there by now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 14:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221427.nBMER2fb032369@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tsmetana at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Daniel Novotny 2009-12-22 09:27:00 EDT --- OK, the "URL" and "Source" links can be added. About the licensing problem: I e-mailed the author of the package, whether he has some more information about this. The files are used in "fixmacps" utility, which fixes PostScript files generated on Mac computers. If the license will still be a problem, we will have to exclude this utility and these two files from the package. p.s. I have uploaded http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dnovotny/f/psutils.spec with the latest changes (currently added "URL" and "Source") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 14:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:49:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221449.nBMEn5F8003612@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Ma?l??ov? 2009-12-22 09:49:04 EDT --- Fixed: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-CPAN-Inject-0.11-2.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1886066 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 14:51:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:51:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221451.nBMEpS3x025121@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 Tom?? B?atek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|medium |high --- Comment #1 from Tom?? B?atek 2009-12-22 09:51:28 EDT --- Forgot to add that we will have to add libgnome-keyring dependency to all g-k clients and fix tons of packages in Fedora. This will effectively make decent mess once libgnome-keyring and new gnome-keyring packages will hit rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 14:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221455.nBMEtFmM025702@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera 2009-12-22 09:55:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Forgot to add that we will have to add libgnome-keyring dependency to all g-k > clients and fix tons of packages in Fedora. This will effectively make decent > mess once libgnome-keyring and new gnome-keyring packages will hit rawhide. Not really. Make the library depend on gnome-keyring, voila. You'd probably have a problem with bootstrapping gnome-keyring from scratch if it depends on libgnome-keyring, but that's relatively minor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 15:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:02:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221502.nBMF2Axl027235@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-22 10:02:10 EDT --- You still need a libgnome-keyring-devel BR everywhere... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 15:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:11:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221511.nBMFBKXp006813@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 --- Comment #4 from Tom?? B?atek 2009-12-22 10:11:19 EDT --- Right, we can add explicit Require: libgnome-keyring-devel to the gnome-keyring-devel, that might do the trick for the moment. FYI, we have bootstrapping problems in Fedora anyway, circular BR dependency nautilus <--> gnome-disk-utility (pulled in by gvfs, which nautilus depends on), but that's another story. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 15:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:18:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251545] Review Request: setroubleshoot-plugins - analysis plugins for setroubleshoot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221518.nBMFIhEK030276@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251545 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-22 10:18:39 EDT --- It seems that someone forgot to close this ticket :). I'm sure we can close it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 15:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:26:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221526.nBMFQm6o031452@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-22 10:26:47 EDT --- > %{python_sitelib}/gtk-*/_%{name}.so Actually the above needs to be %{python_sitearch} otherwise is doesn't find the files when built in koji. Rest updated. New updated: SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ethos.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ethos-0.2.2-3.fc12.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1886156 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 15:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:29:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221529.nBMFTVbc009988@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-22 10:29:30 EDT --- Updated: SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/emerillon.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/emerillon-0.1.0-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 15:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:32:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221532.nBMFWcsw010479@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 --- Comment #12 from David Nalley 2009-12-22 10:32:36 EDT --- Closing this ticket as this has been pushed to stable -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 15:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:32:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542028] Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221532.nBMFWo7L010515@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 15:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:35:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221535.nBMFZxxB011349@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #21 from Stephen Gallagher 2009-12-22 10:35:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379845) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379845) rpmlint output for 1.0.5.1 RPM Scratch build successfully performed for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1886173 Scratch build successfully performed for Fedora 12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1886175 rpmlint output attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 15:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:32:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221532.nBMFWpUn010526@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Bug 508817 depends on bug 542028, which changed state. Bug 542028 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 16:19:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:19:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221619.nBMGJGQ5016753@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmalcolm at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #22 from Dave Malcolm 2009-12-22 11:19:14 EDT --- I'll have a go at reviewing this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 16:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:25:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221625.nBMGPWUr017827@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 John W. Linville changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from John W. Linville 2009-12-22 11:25:31 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rfkill New Branches: EL-5 Owners: linville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 16:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:36:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221636.nBMGalMU019669@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #23 from Stephen Gallagher 2009-12-22 11:36:45 EDT --- For the record, this SRPM also builds successfully against EPEL5 ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1886304 ), though we would certainly need to build its dependencies as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 16:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:39:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522148] Review Request: sound-theme-fedora - Sound theme for Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221639.nBMGdk3M010770@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522148 udo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |udovdh at xs4all.nl --- Comment #9 from udo 2009-12-22 11:39:44 EDT --- Another piece of nice work lost. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538617 for the effects of this neglect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 16:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 499987] Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221645.nBMGjCdp020575@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Daniel Berrange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Daniel Berrange 2009-12-22 11:45:09 EDT --- > # See nss/README for the status of this package. > #BuildRequires: mingw32-nss > # Temporarily we can use OpenSSL instead of NSS: > BuildRequires: mingw32-openssl IIUC this will cause license compatibility problems for some apps using libcurl. OpenSSL is not GPL compatible unless the app has declared an exception for OpenSSL, so if libcurl uses OpenSSL instead of NSS, AFAICT, GPL apps won't be able to use it. This would prevent mingw32-libvirt using it for example. In addition this is causing mingw32-curl to deviate from native curl which is something we want to avoid with Mingw32. IMHO this package needs to be made to use mingw32-nss before approval -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 16:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:49:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221649.nBMGnJTI012007@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 --- Comment #23 from Orion Poplawski 2009-12-22 11:49:17 EDT --- EL-5 update request has been made. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 17:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:44:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221744.nBMHiDis028654@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #9 from Jerry James 2009-12-22 12:44:12 EDT --- Comment 5: I did tell Sam Owre that I was doing this. The comment in the spec file about not sending it upstream is therefore not completely accurate; I just don't expect upstream to apply it. They are concentrated on providing a single download for researchers to grab, unpack, and get to work. Finding dependencies would just complicate matters for them. I renamed the binary from pvs to pvs-sbcl to avoid a name collision (see my response to comment 2 in comment 4). So when I talked about the Provide, I was really only talking about the Provide, not the binary name. The build hang has nothing to do with 32-bit vs. 64-bit systems, although I have never seen that hang with 64-bit Emacs (but have with 64-bit XEmacs). The problem is that (X)Emacs is forking off a subprocess to run PVS, but isn't noticing when that process exits, and therefore waits forever. Stephen Turnbull believes that this is a bug in X (see the URL in comment 4). In any case, I believe I have found a workaround to the problem. Briefly, I'm replacing (sit-for 1), which doesn't always notice changes in process status, with (accept-process-output nil 1), which does. Comments 6 through 8: I have applied the "|| true" change to the spec file to avoid killing the build with an unprelinked sbcl binary. New URLs: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pvs/pvs-sbcl.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pvs/pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20091008svn.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 17:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221745.nBMHjnG3019896@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #24 from Dave Malcolm 2009-12-22 12:45:45 EDT --- This is looking good, with 4 issues that need attention (see below). As I understand things, as this review was opened by Ramez, he would be the initial owner as things stand. However it appears from comment #8 that he may be rather busy. I spoke with Stephen today and he's keen to get this into Fedora ASAP. Stephen: are you happy to maintain this? Ramez: are you still interested in maintaining this package within Fedora? Dan: are you interested in (co)maintaining it? So we may want to complete the "review" part of the review, have Stephen open a fresh review request, close this one as dup of the new, and "grandfather in" the work done here. Does that sound OK? = Issues needing attention = (i) installation issue on F-12 Stephen's F12 scratch build doesn't install on my laptop F-12 with updates enabled, but not updates-testing: Error: Missing Dependency: Django >= 1.1.1 is needed by package ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-1.fc12.noarch (/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-1.fc12.noarch) Error: Missing Dependency: python-djblets >= 0.5-0.1.rc1 is needed by package ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-1.fc12.noarch (/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1-1.fc12.noarch) - latest version of Django in F-12 updates is Django-1.1-4.fc12 - python-djblets doesn't seem to actually be in fedora-updates for f12 yet Stephen: do you have this installed and working on a machine? (ii) Source0: URL is 404; need to be changed to: http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/%{name}/1.0/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz (see http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/ ; I notice there's a 1.1 directory as well FWIW) (iii) desktop files: the rb-site executable has a PyGTK GUI, so would normally require us to ship a .desktop file. However it can only be run when supplied a directory as a command-line argument, hence it wouldn't be meaningful to create a .desktop file for it. So this is OK, but please add a comment about the exception to the specfile. (iv) Does the package embed all of the requirements for the various SCM backends? (How well does this work with git?) (not easy to check this without a working install) = Notes = Filesystem layout: upstream have structured this code as a library and supporting tools that can be used to create (potentially) multiple local instances of ReviewBoard on a host, each stored in an arbitrary directory on the filesystem. All information for a specific instance (e.g. config, logs, tmp) goes below a particular directory for that instance (rather than e.g. /etc). I think it's acceptable for our package to reflect how upstream have structured this. = Reviewed items = - naming: name matches that of upstream tarball - specfile name is good - packaging guidelines: - N-V-R looks good - licensing "MIT" in spec matches that of README and of setup.py - spec is legible - spec follow python norms - changelog: OK - tags: OK - buildroot path uses 2nd recommendation in guidelines - buildroot is cleaned - %clean is present and correct - buildrequirements: successfully scratch-built in Koji - textual documentation present in built RPM below /usr/share/doc/ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1 - compiler flags/debuginfo packages/devel packages: N/A - pkgconfig: N/A - shared libraries: N/A - packaging static libraries: N/A - dup of system libraries: doesn't seem to - rpath: N/A for pure python code - config files: see note about FHS above - initscripts: N/A - macros: OK - locale handling: no translations present in upstream source - scriptlets: N/A - code vs content: OK - file and dir ownership: OK - users and groups: doesn't have its own user - web app: uses /usr/lib/python for its data, which seems reasonable - /srv: OK - patches: none yet - epochs: OK - Python-specific guidelines: OK - license: OK - specfile is legible - MD5sum: OK - tarball in srpm: 16947ddda7ec9df41f243949ec83a950 ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1.tar.gz - tarball from upstream: 16947ddda7ec9df41f243949ec83a950 ReviewBoard-1.0.5.1.tar.gz - rest of the MUST items covered above - I've tested an earlier version of the rpm and it functions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 17:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221751.nBMHpNjA020406@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla 2009-12-22 12:51:22 EDT --- Ok, thanks, looks great. Any thoughts on #13 and #15? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 18:02:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:02:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221802.nBMI2u2r030727@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-22 13:02:53 EDT --- corrected the url for the spec file and srpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-selinux/pki-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-selinux/pki-selinux-1.3.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 18:10:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:10:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221810.nBMIAJC9032064@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-22 13:10:17 EDT --- both dependencies (pki-util & dogtag-pki-common-ui have been built in koji: see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=147450 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=148080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 18:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:09:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549809] New: Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549809 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dave at adsllc.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://adsllc.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-libzip.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1886662&name=mingw32-libzip-0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1886662 Description: mingw32 port of the C library for reading, creating, and modifying zip archives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 18:19:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:19:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549809] Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221819.nBMIJHEi023940@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549809 --- Comment #1 from Dave Ludlow 2009-12-22 13:19:17 EDT --- Fixed a copy/paste error in the changelog. Spec URL: http://adsllc.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-libzip.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1886687&name=mingw32-libzip-0.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1886687 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 18:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:33:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549821] New: Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549821 Summary: Review Request: dcap - Client Tools for dCache Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/dcap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/dcap-1.2.44-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: dCache is a distributed mass storage system. This package contains the client library and tools. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/dcap-*1.2.44-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm rpmbuild/SRPMS/dcap-1.2.44-1.fc12.src.rpm dcap.x86_64: W: no-documentation dcap-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation dcap-tunnel-gsi.x86_64: W: no-documentation dcap-tunnel-krb.x86_64: W: no-documentation dcap-tunnel-ssl.x86_64: W: no-documentation dcap-tunnel-telnet.x86_64: W: no-documentation 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 18:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:36:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549809] Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221836.nBMIauFo026477@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549809 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-22 13:36:55 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ~/Desktop/mingw32-libzip-0.9-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. 0 Upstream doesn't provide the file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum libzip-0.9.tar.gz* b0d0a768f9ef8fef14683adade0b819549dd3e61b9a5bf8ab8a92e378d87a05f libzip-0.9.tar.gz b0d0a768f9ef8fef14683adade0b819549dd3e61b9a5bf8ab8a92e378d87a05f libzip-0.9.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1886694 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No need to run ldconfig for mingw32 libraries. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No need to separate header files from main package for mingw32-related package. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package for mingw32 packages, since they are intended for devel entirely. 0 The mingw32 package may contain necessary .la libtool archives. This is not a blocker. 0 Not a GUI application. - The package DOES own files or directories already owned by other packages. Please, instead of adding whole %{_mingw32_libdir}/ add only %{_mingw32_libdir}/libzip.dll.a %{_mingw32_libdir}/pkgconfig/libzip.pc + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. So, please, fix the only issue with alread owned directories and I'll continue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 18:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:54:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549809] Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221854.nBMIsX1L005301@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549809 --- Comment #3 from Dave Ludlow 2009-12-22 13:54:32 EDT --- Wow Peter, that's some speedy service! Fixed as requested. Spec: http://adsllc.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-libzip.spec Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1886785 SRPM: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1886785&name=mingw32-libzip-0.9-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 18:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:55:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221855.nBMItT0g028488@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #89 from Sebastian Kr?mer 2009-12-22 13:55:21 EDT --- 1.4 release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 19:00:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:00:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221900.nBMJ04vn005885@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #90 from David Halik 2009-12-22 13:59:48 EDT --- The source ball hasn't been released yet. When it is I'll start working on it, but it's going to take time some I'm sure since it's been so long since the last stable release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 19:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:01:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549809] Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221901.nBMJ1B4k006010@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549809 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-22 14:01:09 EDT --- Ok, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 19:08:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:08:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549809] Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221908.nBMJ81dY031846@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549809 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Dave Ludlow 2009-12-22 14:08:00 EDT --- Thanks Peter! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libzip Short Description: MinGW port of the C library for manipulating zip archives. Owners: adsllc Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 19:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:20:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221920.nBMJKq2b012971@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #26 from Stephen Gallagher 2009-12-22 14:20:51 EDT --- This specfile built successfully in Koji here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1886848 The SRPM and built noarch RPM is also available there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 19:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221919.nBMJJhVx012600@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Stephen Gallagher changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #379674|0 |1 is obsolete| | Flag| |review?(dmalcolm at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #25 from Stephen Gallagher 2009-12-22 14:19:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=379897) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=379897) Specfile for ReviewBoard 1.0.5.1 I am willing to co-maintain ReviewBoard (but I do not want to be its exclusive maintainer). I don't think there's really a need to go through the trouble of opening a second review request, but if that's The Way It's Done, sure. Issues: (i) Dgango 1.1.1-2 is in updates-testing, python-djblets I installed from this koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=147983 (I have submitted this package for updates-testing in F-12, so it should be present tomorrow) (ii) Source location fixed. For the record, the 1.1 branch is their unstable development branch, and I do not intend at the moment to import that. (iii) Desktop file comment added. (iv) The package contains all the files necessary to support git, mercurial, bazaar, clearcase, cvs, perforce and subversion at least. I am unable to test the suitability of all of them. I have a test environment working with git successfully using this RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 19:40:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:40:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221940.nBMJeSBD015220@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #28 from Dave Malcolm 2009-12-22 14:40:27 EDT --- Thanks; I think several of us want to comaintain this package, so I think that should be OK. A minor issue: you didn't update the %changelog in your latest specfile Other than that, this looks good to go. ACCEPTED. Setting "fedora-review" flag Please fix the %changelog before importing the specfile - thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 19:55:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:55:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221955.nBMJtaNp017415@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 14:55:35 EDT --- rubygem-hawler-0.3-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 19:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:54:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221954.nBMJsEpG017208@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 14:54:12 EDT --- rubygem-hawler-0.3-5.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 19:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:54:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221954.nBMJsIHG017228@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.3-5.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 19:55:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:55:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530204] Review Request: rubygem-hawler - Hawler, the Ruby HTTP crawler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912221955.nBMJteGl008744@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530204 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3-5.fc12 |0.3-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 20:06:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:06:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542463] Review Request: zaz - A puzzle game where the player has to arrange balls in triplets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222006.nBMK6cBW019454@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542463 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-22 15:06:36 EDT --- Built and published. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 20:13:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:13:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222013.nBMKDd7o020740@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Stephen Gallagher changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #29 from Stephen Gallagher 2009-12-22 15:13:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ReviewBoard Short Description: Web-based code review tool Owners: sgallagh dmalcolm Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 20:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:34:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549863] New: Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549863 Summary: Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-interpolation.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-interpolation-1.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Plexus interpolator is the outgrowth of multiple iterations of development focused on providing a more modular, flexible interpolation framework for the expression language style commonly seen in Maven, Plexus, and other related projects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222133.nBMLXNhW023177@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-22 16:33:22 EDT --- Hi, I made a couple of changes to the source and checked them an at https://fedorahosted.org/security-spin/browser/security-menu Changes: * Rename X-Security-Lab to X-SecurityLab for better fdo compliance. Whitespces are usually just left out. * Add subcategories X-Anonymity, X-CodeAnalysis, X-Forensics, X-IntrusionDetection, X-Password-Tools, X-Reconnaissance and X-Wireless * Use TryExec to determine installed apps, see http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ar01s05.html * Menu tweaks * Enhance Makefile * Added AUTHORS * Added ChangeLog (for upstream changes, not packaging). Please review if my info is right! Please take a look the changes, especially what I have done for the applications included with . I think this might be needed for more apps, please check. When we are done with everything, we tag it 1.0 in git make a tarball to package. The spec looks sane, but * you should use desktop-file-validate in %install, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files * Don't forget to include AUTHORS and ChangeLog * Change the Source0 url to point to fedorahosted when we have a tarball there Please don't upload the rpms into git, just put them on your fedorapeople.org account while they are under review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521166] Review Request: OpenGTL - Graphics Transformation Languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222139.nBMLdENU031475@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521166 --- Comment #17 from Matthew Woehlke 2009-12-22 16:39:12 EDT --- Any idea when this will hit F12? Note: I had to change the setup line from 'opengtl' to 'OpenGTL-%{version}' to build the .spec from comment #16. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:43:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549863] Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222143.nBMLhIO7024046@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549863 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-12-22 16:43:16 EDT --- Good: - builds - source good (no diffs in my checkout vs. yours packed in the tarball) - macros fine - no pre-build JARs - files fine - clean present Needs work: - line length too long for %description - should probably get some %doc files - license should be ASL 2.0 and ASL 1.1 and MIT - rpmlint output is not clean: $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/plexus-interpolation-1.13-1.fc12.noarch.rpm plexus-interpolation.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Plexus interpolator is the outgrowth of multiple iterations of development focused on plexus-interpolation.noarch: E: description-line-too-long providing a more modular, flexible interpolation framework for the expression language plexus-interpolation.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.8-1 ['1.13-1.fc12', '1.13-1'] plexus-interpolation.noarch: W: no-documentation plexus-interpolation.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-interpolation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/plexus-interpolation-1.13-1.fc12.src.rpm plexus-interpolation.src: E: description-line-too-long Plexus interpolator is the outgrowth of multiple iterations of development focused on plexus-interpolation.src: E: description-line-too-long providing a more modular, flexible interpolation framework for the expression language 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/plexus-interpolation-javadoc-1.13-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:57:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222157.nBMLvqUA026120@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 16:57:51 EDT --- pki-util-1.3.0-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-util'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-1044 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222157.nBMLvWJl026037@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 16:57:31 EDT --- clac-004-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update clac'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-1037 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:57:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222157.nBMLvlgJ026097@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 16:57:46 EDT --- poky-scripts-6-6.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update poky-scripts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-1043 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:56:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222156.nBMLumb3001764@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #91 from Scott Williams 2009-12-22 16:56:44 EDT --- Looks like 1.4 source is available: http://publicsvn.songbirdnest.com/client/branches/Songbird1.4/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:58:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222158.nBMLw4Um001900@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 16:58:03 EDT --- clac-004-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update clac'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-1049 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:57:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222157.nBMLvbjK001843@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 16:57:35 EDT --- dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dogtag-pki-common-ui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-1039 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:57:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222157.nBMLvwgl026183@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-22 16:57:56 EDT --- dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dogtag-pki-ca-ui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-1047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 21:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:58:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549863] Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222158.nBMLweb6026545@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549863 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-22 16:58:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Good: > - builds > - source good (no diffs in my checkout vs. yours packed in the tarball) > - macros fine > - no pre-build JARs > - files fine > - clean present > > Needs work: > > - line length too long for %description Fixed. > - should probably get some %doc files There is nothing suitable. > - license should be ASL 2.0 and ASL 1.1 and MIT Fixed. > - rpmlint output is not clean: > Output now is but both are fase positives.: plexus-interpolation.noarch: W: no-documentation plexus-interpolation.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-interpolation New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-interpolation.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-interpolation-1.13-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 22:08:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:08:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549884] New: Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884 Summary: Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurtako at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-io.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-io-1.0-0.1.a5.1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Plexus IO is a set of plexus components, which are designed for use in I/O operations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 22:16:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:16:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222216.nBMMGPYu029306@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #10 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-22 17:16:21 EDT --- Sadly, the workaround doesn't seem to work around. It still hangs, same place, when trying to build PVS. I fired up another build for "pvs-sbcl-4.2-2.20091008svn.fc12.src.rpm" (per comment 9 ), but it hangs the same spot. I don't know why this happens, but I've put some details below in the hope that they help. The rpmbuild hangs after printing this: ; caught STYLE-WARNING: ; undefined function: SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT ; (SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT SB-RUNTIME::SELF STREAM SB-RUNTIME::TOKEN :KIND ; :SUBKIND :VALUE :STR-VALUE) ; ; caught WARNING: ; undefined variable: SB-RUNTIME:TOKEN ; ; compilation unit finished ; Undefined functions: ; SB-RUNTIME:AW-TERM ERGO-DISKSAVE SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT ; Undefined variables: ; SB-RUNTIME:*FORMATTING-OFF* PVS::*UNTYPECHECK-HOOK* SB-RUNTIME::BP SB-RUNTIME::CHARNUMBER SB-RUNTIME::LINENUMBER SB-RUNTIME::LINETEXT SB-RUNTIME:TOKEN ; caught 8 WARNING conditions ; caught 8 STYLE-WARNING conditions [undoing binding stack and other enclosing state... done] [saving current Lisp image into bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/pvs-sbclisp: writing 3432 bytes from the read-only space at 0x01000000 writing 2256 bytes from the static space at 0x01100000 writing 92459008 bytes from the dynamic space at 0x09000000 done] rm /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/bdd-sbcl.* rm: cannot remove `/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/bdd-sbcl.*': No such file or directory make: [bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/pvs-sbclisp] Error 1 (ignored) cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/sbcl bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/mu.so bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/bdd-sbcl.lisp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/mu-sbcl.lisp bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/WS1S/ix86-Linux/ws1s.so bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/WS1S/lisp/dfa-foreign-sbcl.lisp bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/utils/ix86-Linux/b64 bin/ix86-Linux ./pvs -batch -l emacs/emacs-src/pvs-set-prelude-info.el \ -f set-prelude-files-and-regions Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/focus-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/php-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/po-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/rpm-spec-mode-init.el (source)... Loading /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/site-start.d/rpmdev-init.el (source)... {and there it sits.} "top" shows that emacs is outrageously busy. When I did the rpmbuild this time it's process 30005 that is busy busy busy; here are extracts from "ps -ef -H --width 99999": dwheeler 29178 29115 0 15:33 pts/0 00:00:00 rpmbuild -ba pvs-sbcl.spec dwheeler 29279 29178 0 15:33 pts/0 00:00:00 /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ftYHYX dwheeler 29829 29279 0 15:33 pts/0 00:00:00 make SBCLISP_HOME=/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2 PVSPATH=/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/ dwheeler 29999 29829 0 16:25 pts/0 00:00:00 /bin/sh ./pvs -batch -l emacs/emacs-src/pvs-set-prelude-info.el -f set-prelude-files-and-regions dwheeler 30005 29999 98 16:25 pts/0 00:29:32 emacs -batch -load /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/emacs/go-pvs.el -l emacs/emacs-src/pvs-set-prelude-info.el -f set-prelude-files-and-regions dwheeler 30006 30005 0 16:25 ? 00:00:00 /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/bin/ix86-Linux/devel/pvs-sbclisp --noinform --no-userinit The incessantly-busy 'emacs' process 30005 has fired off a "pvs-sbclisp" process. I used gdb to try to get some backtrace information with 'gdb /usr/bin/emacs 30005'; gdb then told me to load the debug libraries by doing: yum --enablerepo='*-debuginfo' install /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/80/ba91d6689ccf229be06e5e2d828cd9e95dc65b.debug debuginfo-install alsa-lib-1.0.20-1.fc11.i586 atk-1.25.2-2.fc11.i586 bzip2-libs-1.0.5-5.fc11.i586 cairo-1.8.8-1.fc11.i586 dbus-libs-1.2.12-2.fc11.i586 e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.4-12.fc11.i586 expat-2.0.1-6.i586 fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.i586 freetype-2.3.9-5.fc11.i586 giflib-4.1.6-2.fc11.i586 glib2-2.20.4-1.fc11.i586 glibc-2.10.1-4.i686 gtk2-2.16.5-1.fc11.i586 libICE-1.0.4-7.fc11.i586 libSM-1.1.0-4.fc11.i586 libX11-1.2.2-1.fc11.i586 libXau-1.0.4-5.fc11.i586 libXcomposite-0.4.0-7.fc11.i586 libXcursor-1.1.9-4.fc11.i586 libXdamage-1.1.1-6.fc11.i586 libXext-1.0.99.1-2.fc11.i586 libXfixes-4.0.3-5.fc11.i586 libXft-2.1.13-2.fc11.i586 libXi-1.2.1-1.fc11.i586 libXinerama-1.0.3-4.fc11.i586 libXpm-3.5.7-5.fc11.i586 libXrandr-1.2.99.4-3.fc11.i586 libXrender-0.9.4-5.fc11.i586 libattr-2.4.43-3.fc11.i586 libcap-2.16-4.fc11.1.i586 libcroco-0.6.2-2.fc11.i586 libgsf-1.14.11-3.fc11.i586 libjpeg-6b-45.fc11.i586 libotf-0.9.9-3.fc11.i586 libpng-1.2.37-1.fc11.i586 librsvg2-2.26.0-1.fc11.i586 libselinux-2.0.80-1.fc11.i586 libtiff-3.8.2-14.fc11.i586 libxcb-1.2-4.fc11.i586 libxml2-2.7.3-3.fc11.i586 m17n-lib-1.5.5-1.fc11.i586 ncurses-libs-5.7-2.20090207.fc11.i586 pango-1.24.5-1.fc11.i586 pixman-0.14.0-2.fc11.i586 zlib-1.2.3-22.fc11.i58 So I did that. Here's the result of "list" command: (gdb) list 5153 clear_input_pending (); 5154 QUIT; 5155 } 5156 5157 return got_some_input; 5158 } 5159 ^L 5160 /* Given a list (FUNCTION ARGS...), apply FUNCTION to the ARGS. */ 5161 5162 static Lisp_Object and here's a backtrace, with local variable info: (gdb) bt full #0 0x081c1e64 in wait_reading_process_output (time_limit=-1, microsecs=0, read_kbd=0, do_display=0, wait_for_cell=138051073, wait_proc=0x0, just_wait_proc=0) at process.c:5158 channel = 0 nfds = 0 Available = {fds_bits = {0 }} Connecting = {fds_bits = {0 }} check_connect = 0 check_delay = 0 no_avail = 0 xerrno = 2 proc = -1 timeout = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0} end_time = {tv_sec = 1261522014, tv_usec = 51076} wait_channel = -1 got_some_input = 0 #1 0x081c395b in Faccept_process_output (process=138051073, seconds=138051073, millisec=0, just_this_one=138051073) at process.c:4211 secs = 0 usecs = 0 #2 0x08186ad6 in Feval (form=160954061) at eval.c:2386 numargs = argvals = {138051073, 138051073, 138051073, 138051073, 141037869, 137730968, 1, 1} args_left = 138051073 i = 4 fun = val = original_fun = 138248977 original_args = 138051073 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda33e0, function = 0xbfda3328, args = 0xbfda32f0, nargs = 0, evalargs = 1 '\1', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #3 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=160954069) at eval.c:450 val = #4 0x08187720 in Fwhile (args=160954053) at eval.c:1112 test = 160954021 body = 160954069 #5 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=160954013) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {-1076218560, -1076218920, -1076218924, -1, 0, 141024045, 1, 136506808} args_left = 160954053 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- i = fun = val = original_fun = 138192857 original_args = 160954053 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda3490, function = 0xbfda33f8, args = 0xbfda33f4, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #6 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=161921117) at eval.c:450 val = #7 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=161921141) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {4, 3, 136506808, 1, 161543620, 161686483, 138051121, -726506426} args_left = 161921133 i = fun = val = original_fun = 138190409 original_args = 161921133 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda3520, function = 0xbfda34a8, args = 0xbfda34a4, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #8 0x08186997 in Feval (form=160953997) at eval.c:2434 fun = val = original_fun = 138389929 original_args = 160954005 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda3610, function = 0xbfda3538, args = 0xbfda3534, nargs = -1, evalargs = 1 '\1', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #9 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=160953989) at eval.c:450 val = #10 0x08187acb in FletX (args=160953813) at eval.c:1034 varlist = 138051073 val = 161922733 elt = 160953629 #11 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=160953557) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {138051073, 160955317, -1076218232, 135818103, 160955101, 0, 2, 138051097} ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- args_left = 160953813 i = fun = val = original_fun = 138192833 original_args = 160953813 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda36c0, function = 0xbfda3628, args = 0xbfda3624, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #12 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=160954133) at eval.c:450 val = #13 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=160955293) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {138051073, 1, -1076218168, 138051073, 160956933, 137730944, 2, 2} args_left = 160953541 i = fun = val = original_fun = 138190433 original_args = 160953541 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda37e0, function = 0xbfda36d8, args = 0xbfda36d4, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #14 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=160955253) at eval.c:450 val = #15 0x08187918 in Flet (args=160955141) at eval.c:1090 tem = 138051073 elt = 138051073 varlist = 138051073 #16 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=160955037) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {-1076217776, -1076217896, -1076217900, -1, 0, 161922517, 138190409, -726506426} args_left = 160955141 i = fun = val = original_fun = 138192809 original_args = 160955141 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda3950, function = 0xbfda37f8, ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- args = 0xbfda37f4, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #17 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=160955005) at eval.c:450 val = #18 0x08187009 in funcall_lambda (fun=, nargs=, arg_vector=0x0) at eval.c:3225 val = syms_left = 138051073 next = 138364953 i = 4 optional = 1 rest = 0 #19 0x0818711b in apply_lambda (fun=160954165, args=161127685, eval_flag=1) at eval.c:3156 args_left = 138051073 i = tem = 138051073 #20 0x08186804 in Feval (form=161127653) at eval.c:2436 fun = 0 val = original_fun = 160679793 original_args = 161127685 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda3a00, function = 0xbfda3968, args = 0xbfda38a0, nargs = 4, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #21 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=161127757) at eval.c:450 val = #22 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=161127597) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {-1076217232, -1076217352, -1076217356, -1, 1073741824, 140924397, 138215665, 138051097} args_left = 161127605 i = fun = val = original_fun = 138190409 original_args = 161127605 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda3b20, function = 0xbfda3a18, args = 0xbfda3a14, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #23 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=161127765) at eval.c:450 val = ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #24 0x08187918 in Flet (args=161127589) at eval.c:1090 tem = 138051121 elt = 138051073 varlist = 138051073 #25 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=161127557) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {138051073, 138051073, -1076217048, 1, 138051073, 161686563, -1076216952, 135819547} args_left = 161127589 i = fun = val = original_fun = 138192809 original_args = 161127589 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda3be0, function = 0xbfda3b38, args = 0xbfda3b34, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #26 0x08186d20 in Fprog1 (args=161127773) at eval.c:481 val = 138051073 args_left = 161127773 #27 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=161127549) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {138287577, 138051073, -1076216824, 161943842, 1, 1152, -1076216840, 135784745} args_left = 161127773 i = fun = val = original_fun = 138192617 original_args = 161127773 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda3d00, function = 0xbfda3bf8, args = 0xbfda3bf4, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #28 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=161127541) at eval.c:450 val = #29 0x08187918 in Flet (args=161127477) at eval.c:1090 tem = 138051073 elt = 138051073 varlist = 138051073 #30 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=161127461) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {138237929, -1, -1076216524, 136506700, 4, 138486601, ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- -1076216552, 135749314} args_left = 161127477 i = fun = val = original_fun = 138192809 original_args = 161127477 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda3e70, function = 0xbfda3d18, args = 0xbfda3d14, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #31 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=161127453) at eval.c:450 val = #32 0x08187009 in funcall_lambda (fun=, nargs=, arg_vector=0x0) at eval.c:3225 val = syms_left = 138051073 next = 141206777 i = 3 optional = 1 rest = 0 #33 0x0818711b in apply_lambda (fun=161127941, args=161090469, eval_flag=1) at eval.c:3156 args_left = 138051073 i = tem = 138051073 #34 0x08186804 in Feval (form=161090461) at eval.c:2436 fun = 0 val = original_fun = 160768913 original_args = 161090469 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda3f40, function = 0xbfda3e88, args = 0xbfda3dc0, nargs = 3, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #35 0x08187a1c in FletX (args=161090509) at eval.c:1028 varlist = 161090501 val = 138051073 elt = 161090453 #36 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=161090349) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {38, 161956788, 17591862, 137734976, -1076215960, 138051073, -1076215976, 135813586} args_left = 161090509 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- i = fun = val = original_fun = 138192833 original_args = 161090509 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda40b0, function = 0xbfda3f58, args = 0xbfda3f54, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #37 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=161088661) at eval.c:450 val = #38 0x08187009 in funcall_lambda (fun=, nargs=, arg_vector=0x0) at eval.c:3225 val = syms_left = 138051073 next = 160768793 i = 4 optional = 1 rest = 0 #39 0x0818711b in apply_lambda (fun=161088669, args=161371885, eval_flag=1) at eval.c:3156 args_left = 138051073 i = tem = 160768961 #40 0x08186804 in Feval (form=161371853) at eval.c:2436 fun = 0 val = original_fun = 160768841 original_args = 161371885 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda41b0, function = 0xbfda40c8, args = 0xbfda4000, nargs = 4, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #41 0x08187894 in Flet (args=161371949) at eval.c:1074 tem = elt = 161371845 varlist = #42 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=161371837) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {161686707, 138051073, -1076215352, 135658398, 137988592, 141330729, -1076215352, 135749314} args_left = 161371949 i = fun = ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- val = original_fun = 138192809 original_args = 161371949 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda4320, function = 0xbfda41c8, args = 0xbfda41c4, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #43 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=161371725) at eval.c:450 val = #44 0x08187009 in funcall_lambda (fun=, nargs=, arg_vector=0x0) at eval.c:3225 val = syms_left = 138051073 next = 138344865 i = 1 optional = 0 rest = 0 #45 0x0818711b in apply_lambda (fun=161372101, args=161655861, eval_flag=1) at eval.c:3156 args_left = 138051073 i = tem = 138935811 #46 0x08186804 in Feval (form=161655853) at eval.c:2436 fun = 0 val = original_fun = 161259201 original_args = 161655861 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda44e0, function = 0xbfda4338, args = 0xbfda4270, nargs = 1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #47 0x08187632 in internal_lisp_condition_case (var=138051073, bodyform=161655853, handlers=161655893) at eval.c:1457 val = c = {tag = 138051073, val = 138051073, next = 0xbfda5614, gcpro = 0x0, jmp = {{__jmpbuf = {161655888, 161655853, 161655845, -1076214696, -1797473159, 280053014}, __mask_was_saved = 0, __saved_mask = { __val = {3218752592, 3218752440, 3218752256, 58657919, 0, 138051073, 3218752472, 135749314, 138051073, 1, 3218752536, 137734976, 3218752520, 138051073, 3218752616, 135817419, 138051073, 3218752512, 138076932, 138076928, 138051073, 161259632, 3218752584, 135750692, 161259633, 138051073, 138051073, 138076928, 3218752736, 3218752552, 3218752496, 161927669}}}}, backlist = 0xbfda44e0, ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- handlerlist = 0xbfda56dc, lisp_eval_depth = 12, pdlcount = 61, poll_suppress_count = 1, interrupt_input_blocked = 0, byte_stack = 0xbfda48f0} h = {handler = 161655893, var = 138051073, chosen_clause = 161655813, tag = 0xbfda4374, next = 0xbfda56dc} #48 0x081876db in Fcondition_case (args=161655845) at eval.c:1398 bodyform = 161655853 handlers = 0 var = 138051073 #49 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=161655837) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {161058099, 138051121, 138051121, 138051073, 138051073, 3, -1076214520, 774} args_left = 161655845 i = fun = val = original_fun = 138192977 original_args = 161655845 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda4590, function = 0xbfda44f8, args = 0xbfda44f4, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #50 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=161658733) at eval.c:450 val = #51 0x08186b77 in Feval (form=161658613) at eval.c:2323 numargs = 0 argvals = {0, 0, 0, -1076214276, 161661517, 1, 5, 3} args_left = 161658677 i = fun = val = original_fun = 138190409 original_args = 161658677 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda46f0, function = 0xbfda45a8, args = 0xbfda45a4, nargs = -1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #52 0x08186d8d in Fprogn (args=161656701) at eval.c:450 val = #53 0x08187009 in funcall_lambda (fun=, nargs=, arg_vector=0x0) at eval.c:3225 val = syms_left = 138051073 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- next = 1 i = 0 optional = -1076214120 rest = 135948681 #54 0x0818711b in apply_lambda (fun=161656773, args=138051073, eval_flag=1) at eval.c:3156 args_left = 138051073 i = tem = 139764032 #55 0x08186804 in Feval (form=161656797) at eval.c:2436 fun = 0 val = original_fun = 161251457 original_args = 138051073 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda4838, function = 0xbfda4708, args = 0xbfda4650, nargs = 0, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #56 0x081a8581 in readevalloop (readcharfun=139764036, stream=, sourcename=, evalfun=0x8186600 , printflag=0, unibyte=138051073, readfun=138051073, start=, end=138051073) at lread.c:1785 c = val = 0 b = 0x854a140 continue_reading_p = 1 whole_buffer = 1 first_sexp = #57 0x081a8830 in Feval_buffer (buffer=139764036, printflag=138051073, filename=138971419, unibyte=138051073, do_allow_print=138051121) at lread.c:1846 tem = buf = 139764036 #58 0x0818507d in Ffuncall (nargs=6, args=0xbfda4880) at eval.c:3059 fun = original_fun = funcar = numargs = 5 val = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda49c8, function = 0xbfda4880, args = 0xbfda4884, nargs = 5, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} internal_args = 0xbfda4884 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- i = 0 #59 0x081bae89 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=136555643, vector=136555660, maxdepth=48) at bytecode.c:678 op = stack = {pc = 0x83487a4 "\210,\16$\204\231", top = 0xbfda4894, bottom = 0xbfda4880, byte_string = 136555643, byte_string_start = 0x8348716 "\306\b!\204\22", constants = 136555660, next = 0xbfda4da0} top = 0xbfda4880 result = #60 0x08186f14 in funcall_lambda (fun=, nargs=, arg_vector=0x0) at eval.c:3232 val = syms_left = 138051073 next = i = 4 optional = 1 rest = 0 #61 0x08184edb in Ffuncall (nargs=5, args=0xbfda4a20) at eval.c:3102 fun = 0 original_fun = 138428073 funcar = numargs = 4 val = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda4ba0, function = 0xbfda4a20, args = 0xbfda4a24, nargs = 4, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} internal_args = i = #62 0x08185279 in call4 (fn=138428073, arg1=138971419, arg2=138971419, arg3=138051073, arg4=138051121) at eval.c:2899 ret_ungc_val = 0 #63 0x081a972e in Fload (file=138967923, noerror=0, nomessage=138051121, nosuffix=138051073, must_suffix=138051073) at lread.c:1208 val = stream = fd = 3 found = 138971419 efound = hist_file_name = 138971419 newer = -1076213160 compiled = 141274136 handler = safe_p = 141014557 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- tmp = {141014221, 139155901} version = 0 #64 0x08186ab3 in Feval (form=141014261) at eval.c:2390 numargs = argvals = {138967923, 138051073, 138051121, 138051073, 138051073, 1, -1076232192, 139787044} args_left = 138051073 i = 5 fun = val = original_fun = 138180161 original_args = 141014253 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda4ce8, function = 0xbfda4bb8, args = 0xbfda4b80, nargs = 4, evalargs = 1 '\1', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #65 0x081a8581 in readevalloop (readcharfun=139787044, stream=, sourcename=, evalfun=0x8186600 , printflag=0, unibyte=138051073, readfun=138051073, start=, end=138051073) at lread.c:1785 c = val = 0 b = 0x854fb20 continue_reading_p = 1 whole_buffer = 1 first_sexp = #66 0x081a8830 in Feval_buffer (buffer=139787044, printflag=138051073, filename=138633667, unibyte=138051073, do_allow_print=138051121) at lread.c:1846 tem = buf = 139787044 #67 0x0818507d in Ffuncall (nargs=6, args=0xbfda4d30) at eval.c:3059 fun = original_fun = funcar = numargs = 5 val = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda4e78, function = 0xbfda4d30, args = 0xbfda4d34, nargs = 5, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} internal_args = 0xbfda4d34 i = 0 #68 0x081bae89 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=136555643, vector=136555660, maxdepth=48) ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- at bytecode.c:678 op = stack = {pc = 0x83487a4 "\210,\16$\204\231", top = 0xbfda4d44, bottom = 0xbfda4d30, byte_string = 136555643, byte_string_start = 0x8348716 "\306\b!\204\22", constants = 136555660, next = 0xbfda5140} top = 0xbfda4d30 result = #69 0x08186f14 in funcall_lambda (fun=, nargs=, arg_vector=0x0) at eval.c:3232 val = syms_left = 138051073 next = i = 4 optional = 1 rest = 0 #70 0x08184edb in Ffuncall (nargs=5, args=0xbfda4ed0) at eval.c:3102 fun = 0 original_fun = 138428073 funcar = numargs = 4 val = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda5078, function = 0xbfda4ed0, args = 0xbfda4ed4, nargs = 4, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} internal_args = i = #71 0x08185279 in call4 (fn=138428073, arg1=138633667, arg2=138633667, arg3=138051073, arg4=138051121) at eval.c:2899 ret_ungc_val = 0 #72 0x081a972e in Fload (file=138614003, noerror=0, nomessage=138051121, nosuffix=138051073, must_suffix=138051073) at lread.c:1208 val = stream = fd = 3 found = 138633667 efound = hist_file_name = 138633667 newer = 0 compiled = 141274136 handler = safe_p = 2003054437 tmp = {141021573, 139155901} version = 0 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #73 0x0818507d in Ffuncall (nargs=4, args=0xbfda50c0) at eval.c:3059 fun = original_fun = funcar = numargs = 3 val = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda5218, function = 0xbfda50c0, args = 0xbfda50c4, nargs = 3, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} internal_args = 0xbfda5020 i = 0 #74 0x081bae89 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=136739427, vector=136739444, maxdepth=80) at bytecode.c:678 op = stack = { pc = 0x832d686 "\210*\202\276\3\16L???#\2\347\16N\206\16\2\f\211A\24@!\36S\346\16S!\36T\352\16T\314??$\210*\202\276\3\16L???L\2\331\26Q\16N\206\67\2\f\211A\24@\211\26F;\204B\2\333\355!\210\356\347\16F!!\210\202\276\3\16L???Z\2\360\331!\210\202\276\3\16L\361\232\203h\2\362\363!\210\202\276\3\321\364\16L\"\203y\2\365\16L!\26B\202\276\3\321\366\16L\"\203\226\2\365\325\326\16L\"!\26B\365\325\367\16L\"!\26A\202\276\3\332\16L\16H\"\211\26F\203\254\2\16FA@\f\233\24\202\276\3\332\16L\16J\"\211\26F\203\302\2\16FA@\f\233\24"..., top = 0xbfda50cc, bottom = 0xbfda50c0, byte_string = 136739427, byte_string_start = 0x832d48f "\306 \210\b\203\21", constants = 136739444, next = 0xbfda52d0} top = 0xbfda50c0 result = #75 0x08186f14 in funcall_lambda (fun=, nargs=, arg_vector=0x0) at eval.c:3232 val = syms_left = 138051073 next = i = 1 optional = 0 rest = 0 #76 0x08184edb in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0xbfda5260) at eval.c:3102 fun = 0 original_fun = 138988161 funcar = numargs = 1 val = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda53a8, function = 0xbfda5260, args = 0xbfda5264, nargs = 1, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- internal_args = i = #77 0x081bae89 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=136725691, vector=136725708, maxdepth=56) at bytecode.c:678 op = stack = { pc = 0x832fdf0 "\210\16L\203\32\6\201", , top = 0xbfda5264, bottom = 0xbfda5260, byte_string = 136725691, byte_string_start = 0x832f7e2 "\306 \20\307\21\n\23\310\311!\210\310\312!\210\310\313!\210\314\315!\211\34\307=\204;", constants = 136725708, next = 0xbfda5460} top = 0xbfda5260 result = #78 0x08186f14 in funcall_lambda (fun=, nargs=, arg_vector=0x0) at eval.c:3232 val = syms_left = 138051073 next = i = 0 optional = 0 rest = 0 #79 0x08184edb in Ffuncall (nargs=1, args=0xbfda53f0) at eval.c:3102 fun = 0 original_fun = 138870409 funcar = numargs = 0 val = backtrace = {next = 0xbfda55a0, function = 0xbfda53f0, args = 0xbfda53f4, nargs = 0, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} internal_args = i = #80 0x081bae89 in Fbyte_code (bytestr=136722315, vector=136722332, maxdepth=48) at bytecode.c:678 op = stack = { pc = 0x833069a "\210+\340\341\342\"\210\343\321\344\"\211\36$;\203\254", top = 0xbfda53f0, bottom = 0xbfda53f0, byte_string = 136722315, byte_string_start = 0x8330609 "\b\203\b", constants = 136722332, next = 0x0} top = 0xbfda53f0 result = #81 0x08186f14 in funcall_lambda (fun=, nargs=, arg_vector=0x0) at eval.c:3232 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- val = syms_left = 138051073 next = i = 0 optional = -1076210292 rest = 2682433 #82 0x0818711b in apply_lambda (fun=136722292, args=138051073, eval_flag=1) at eval.c:3156 args_left = 138051073 i = tem = 138593888 #83 0x08186804 in Feval (form=138620021) at eval.c:2436 fun = 0 val = original_fun = 138958121 original_args = 138051073 funcar = backtrace = {next = 0x0, function = 0xbfda55b8, args = 0xbfda5500, nargs = 0, evalargs = 0 '\0', debug_on_exit = 0 '\0'} #84 0x0811d453 in top_level_2 () at keyboard.c:1368 No locals. #85 0x08184491 in internal_condition_case (bfun=0x811d440 , handlers=138094225, hfun=0x8120850 ) at eval.c:1512 val = 0 c = {tag = 138051073, val = 138051073, next = 0xbfda5738, gcpro = 0x0, jmp = {{__jmpbuf = {138593872, 138593872, 138593888, -1076209928, -1795785607, 282255126}, __mask_was_saved = 0, __saved_mask = { __val = {27, 27, 3218757240, 135724656, 2774624, 0, 2775064, 3218757360, 3218757288, 3218757300, 1, 1, 0, 134540224, 3087905304, 0, 138377389, 138377389, 3218757320, 135444720, 138377389, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2817468, 3087925248, 3218757328, 4294967295, 2772932, 134540224}}}}, backlist = 0x0, handlerlist = 0x0, lisp_eval_depth = 0, pdlcount = 2, poll_suppress_count = 1, interrupt_input_blocked = 0, byte_stack = 0x0} h = {handler = 138094225, var = 138051073, chosen_clause = 134526964, tag = 0xbfda5614, next = 0x0} #86 0x08120605 in top_level_1 () at keyboard.c:1376 No locals. #87 0x08184571 in internal_catch (tag=138090249, func=0x81205a0 , arg=138051073) at eval.c:1248 c = {tag = 138090249, val = 138051073, next = 0x0, gcpro = 0x0, jmp = { {__jmpbuf = {138593872, 138593872, 138593888, -1076209656, -1795933063, 282126102}, __mask_was_saved = 0, __saved_mask = { ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- __val = {3218757620, 3218757768, 135396002, 3218757632, 0, 0, 0, 3253566, 0, 0, 138076928, 138051073, 138291416, 3218757608, 135750692, 138291417, 138288674, 138051073, 138076928, 6, 110, 119, 4077456, 91, 110, 119, 138051097, 58, 22, 0, 138291417, 138051073}}}}, backlist = 0x0, handlerlist = 0x0, lisp_eval_depth = 0, pdlcount = 2, poll_suppress_count = 1, interrupt_input_blocked = 0, byte_stack = 0x0} #88 0x08120681 in command_loop () at keyboard.c:1331 No locals. #89 0x08120a4a in recursive_edit_1 () at keyboard.c:953 val = #90 0x08120b72 in Frecursive_edit () at keyboard.c:1015 buffer = 138051073 #91 0x08116ef2 in main (argc=0, argv=) at emacs.c:1852 dummy = -1076208744 stack_bottom_variable = 8 '\b' do_initial_setlocale = 138593872 skip_args = 1 rlim = {rlim_cur = 10485760, rlim_max = 18446744073709551615} no_loadup = 0 junk = 0x0 dname_arg = 0x0 Sadness. Any ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 22:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:18:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222218.nBMMIVI2004783@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #92 from Scott Williams 2009-12-22 17:18:27 EDT --- For what it's worth, songbird 1.4 appears to work in f12 by extracting the tarball'd binary and running it, if that's any hope for your packaging of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 22:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222231.nBMMVs55006286@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-22 17:31:52 EDT --- Package builds fine in mock, and rpmlint is silent: rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/libgnome-keyring-*.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 22:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:42:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222242.nBMMgwbB032064@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #11 from Jerry James 2009-12-22 17:42:57 EDT --- That's annoying. The workaround fixed the hang with 64-bit XEmacs, and 64-bit Emacs never seemed to have a problem. So what's up with 32-bit Emacs? I don't know, off the top of my head. Can you try setting PVSEMACS=xemacs and see if you get the same hang? If so, it really is a 32-bit versus 64-bit issue somehow, although I still fail to see how that could have anything to do with it. If not, we'll just set PVSEMACS in the spec file to make sure we don't get a hung build for now, and I'll talk to the Emacs developers to see if they have any ideas. Incidentally, there's another bug somewhere. I was just working on a proof, tried to prove a TCC, and Lisp threw an error, claiming that *EXPRS-GENERATING-ACTUAL-TCCS* is unbound. That isn't possible, since it is defvar'd in globals.lisp and given an initial value of nil. I did a setq to nil, and was able to continue with the proof, but that shouldn't have happened... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 22:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:48:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549863] Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222248.nBMMmi8h000628@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549863 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-12-22 17:48:43 EDT --- Okay, thanks for the fixes. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 22:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:55:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222255.nBMMtOOb008912@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 23:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549709] Review Request: libgnome-keyring - Framework for managing passwords and other secrets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222306.nBMN6WOB010611@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549709 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-22 18:06:31 EDT --- package name: ok spec name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec language: ok spec readable: yes upstream source: ok buildable: yes ExcludeArch: none, ok BuildRequires: ok locale handling: none, ok ldconfig: ok system libraries: none, ok relocatable: no, ok directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok permissable content: ok large docs: none, ok %doc content: ok header files: ok static libs: none, ok pc files: ok shared libs: ok devel deps: ok libtool archives: none, ok gui apps: no, ok file ownership: ok, but we should figure out how to handle the conflict with the old gnome-keyring package %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Summary: all looks good, we just need to figure out the conflict with the old gnome-keyring package. Probably add something like Conflicts: gnome-keyring < 2.29.4 Conflicts: gnome-keyring-devel < 2.29.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 23:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:20:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549915] New: Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 Summary: Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: henriquecsj at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/freemat/4.0-1/freemat.spec SRPM URL: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/freemat/4.0-1/FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Freemat is an interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment for engineering and scientific applications, similar to the commercial package MATLAB. Freemat provides visualization, image manipulation, and plotting as well as parallel programming. [lonely at localhost i686]$ rpmlint FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm FreeMat-doc-4.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm FreeMat-debuginfo-4.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm FreeMat.i686: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/blas.ini FreeMat.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/FreeMat-4.0/toolbox/test/addArrays.c FreeMat-doc.i686: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. I still have some issues to work, but I'm really confused here. This FreeMat-debuginfo package was automatically generated by rpmbuild, but my package has some strange requirements that i haven't defined as a "Requires" in my spec: [lonely at localhost i686]$ su -c 'rpm -ivh FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686.rpm' Senha: erro: Depend?ncias n?o satisfeitas: libCore.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 libFN.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 libFreeMatlib.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 libGraphics.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 libMatC.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 libMex.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 libXP.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 libarpack_c.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 libblasref.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 libdynblas.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 liblapack_c.so ? requerido por FreeMat-4.0-1.fc12.i686 What is happening? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 23:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:29:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222329.nBMNTEgs005929@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-22 18:29:13 EDT --- Ugh. "blas.ini" in %{_bindir}?? - You're not owning %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/, add %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ to the main %files. - Are the files in %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help used by the main program? In that case you don't need to make a separate %doc package. On the other hand if the files are not used by the program itself, use %{_docdir} instead of %{_datadir}. - I think you are missing some buildrequires, since judging from the project homepage FreeMat links against BLAS. Actually, you should link against ATLAS, which is faster than reference BLAS & LAPACK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 23:49:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:49:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222349.nBMNnRdH008410@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 --- Comment #2 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-22 18:49:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Ugh. "blas.ini" in %{_bindir}?? Yes... it is in the same place that upstream places it (with this strange 644 permission, already fixed). Is it the wrong place? > - You're not owning %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/, add > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ > to the main %files. Thank you, I'm doing it right now. > - Are the files in > %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help > used by the main program? In that case you don't need to make a separate %doc > package. On the other hand if the files are not used by the program itself, use > %{_docdir} instead of %{_datadir}. You are right, those help files are more like a collection of manuals and it is used by the main software. I'll merge it. > - I think you are missing some buildrequires, since judging from the project > homepage FreeMat links against BLAS. Actually, you should link against ATLAS, > which is faster than reference BLAS & LAPACK. I've just look at an "how to build in Linux file", but with a little lack of details. I'm going to do some more reading about linking it in ATLAS. I'm waiting for some answers from upstream too. Thank you for your help Jussi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 22 23:53:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:53:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912222353.nBMNrYWc016496@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #30 from Dan Young 2009-12-22 18:53:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Dan: are you interested in (co)maintaining it? Sure, I can co-maintain. I'll request the ACL once ReviewBoard lands in CVS/pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 00:02:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:02:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230002.nBN020QK009315@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #31 from Dan Young 2009-12-22 19:01:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > (i) Dgango 1.1.1-2 is in updates-testing, python-djblets I installed from this > koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=147983 (I have > submitted this package for updates-testing in F-12, so it should be present > tomorrow) I submitted python-djblets in bodhi shortly after building: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-djblets-0.5.6-0.fc12 I assume I just did that too late in the day yesterday for RelEng to sign it for updates-testing today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 00:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:03:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548824] Review Request: security-menu - Menu Structure for the Security Spin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230003.nBN03SBh009457@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548824 --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-22 19:03:27 EDT --- Some more comments on the spec: drop %define ..., it is not needed. If you need such things, use %global instead, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define Drop Requires(pre) and add Requires: redhat-menus for directory ownership. As long as we have no icons, remove the icon-cache scriptlets. When we have, add the latest version of the scripts again. Yours are slightly outdated compared to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 00:19:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:19:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230019.nBN0JITo018402@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #12 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-22 19:19:17 EDT --- Okay, as you suggested I'm about to fire this off: export PVSEMACS=xemacs rpmbuild -ba pvs-sbcl.spec I have to run an errand, but when I return, *hopefully* this will be done. I don't know why *EXPRS-GENERATING-ACTUAL-TCCS* was unbound, but for all the world that looks like some sort of namespace issue (where the namespace used when reading globals.lisp isn't being used properly later). There's actually a remarkable number of warnings when sbcl compiles PVS; the few that I looked at seemed to be just hints about how to generate faster code, and not real issues, but it's possible that at least one of those warnings is more serious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 00:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:49:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544628] at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230049.nBN0n6PO020880@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-22 19:49:04 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I've fixed the url in the package that I am going to import.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 00:50:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:50:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544628] at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230050.nBN0oWZP013859@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-22 19:50:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: at-spi2-core Short Description: Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi Owners: mclasen Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 01:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:38:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230138.nBN1cVZ9025474@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 Steven Seed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Steven.Seed at disneyanimation | |.com --- Comment #34 from Steven Seed 2009-12-22 20:38:25 EDT --- Is there and EL-5 package available in EPEL? I can't seem to find one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 02:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:03:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544629] at-spi2-atk - GTK+ module that bridges ATK to D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230203.nBN23owm027683@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544629 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-22 21:03:49 EDT --- Updated to 0.1.4: SRPM: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/at-spi2-atk-0.1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/at-spi2-atk.spec The Conflicts is no longer necessary since I have turned on the relocation support that makes this package coexist peacefully with at-spi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 02:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:55:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544630] pyatspi - Python bindings for at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230255.nBN2tVGP032491@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544630 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-12-22 21:55:30 EDT --- New release: SRPM: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/pyatspi-0.1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Spec: http://mclasen.fedorapeople.org/at-spi2/pyatspi.spec I have now turned on the relocation feature (via a .pth module) which allows this package to coexist peacefully with at-spi-python, so the Conflicts: is no longer necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 03:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:09:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230309.nBN39anC025961@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #35 from Michael Larabel 2009-12-22 22:09:34 EDT --- Hi Steven, Joseph will need to comment in regards to the status of EPEL packages, but if you simply run the upstream phoronix-test-suite package it should run fine and can be installed using the included install script. Alternatively, using the Fedora RPM on RHEL should work just fine too, but I think even the Fedora RPMs are sadly out of date. Let me know if you have any further questions. Michael Larabel Michael [at] phoronix.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 03:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230349.nBN3nuuS031467@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-22 22:49:54 EDT --- As expected build failed. We need pki-util package in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1887721 Generally newer packages are checked against rawhide first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 03:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:51:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230351.nBN3phBx007248@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 04:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:14:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230414.nBN4EHCS002242@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #13 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-22 23:14:16 EDT --- Drat, and double-drat. Doing "export PVSEMACS=xemacs" has a useless effect... it merely means that xemacs gets stuck in an endless loop instead of emacs. "top" reports that "xemacs" is very busy, essentially using the entire CPU: 31372 dwheeler 20 0 21724 12m 3552 R 97.3 2.5 164:51.99 xemacs Note the "TIME" value of >164minutes. Sure isn't 10 minutes. Doing a ps -ef, I see: dwheeler 30543 29115 0 19:56 pts/0 00:00:00 rpmbuild -ba pvs-sbcl.spec dwheeler 30544 29115 0 19:56 pts/0 00:01:05 tee ,pvs-results dwheeler 30645 30543 0 19:56 pts/0 00:00:00 /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8WyTz0 dwheeler 31195 30645 0 19:57 pts/0 00:00:00 make SBCLISP_HOME=/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2 PVSPATH=/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/ dwheeler 31366 31195 0 20:48 pts/0 00:00:00 /bin/sh ./pvs -batch -l emacs/emacs-src/pvs-set-prelude-info.el -f set-prelude-files-and-regions dwheeler 31372 31366 99 20:48 pts/0 02:43:13 xemacs -batch -load /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/emacs/go-pvs.el -l emacs/emacs-src/pvs-set-prelude-info.el -f set-prelude-files-and-regions dwheeler 31374 31372 0 20:48 ? 00:00:00 /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/bin/ix86-Linux/devel/pvs-sbclisp --noinform --no-userinit I don't actually *know* if this is a 32-bit vs. 64-bit issue, but IIRC you tested on 64-bit, while I'm testing on 32-bit, so it's an obvious difference in the test environment that *might* explain the difference in results. This looks like exactly the same problem as before. There is an interesting oddity, though I don't know if it's important. I though I might need to search through the build output later, so I ran the build through "tee" like this: rpmbuild -ba 2>&1 > ,pvs-results Just like last time, it reported that it was loading "rpmdev-init.el" just before it got hung, but then it reported one additional line. Its *last* line reported: Loading leim-list... (*without* a terminating newline, oddly enough.) So I got one extra line of output. I'm not sure that is significant; that may be simply because I changed (slightly) how I invoked rpmbuild. But maybe that's important. Anyway, here's the tail of the build report: ; caught STYLE-WARNING: ; undefined function: SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT ; (SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT SB-RUNTIME::SELF STREAM SB-RUNTIME::TOKEN :KIND ; :SUBKIND :VALUE :STR-VALUE) ; ; caught WARNING: ; undefined variable: SB-RUNTIME:TOKEN ; ; compilation unit finished ; Undefined functions: ; SB-RUNTIME:AW-TERM ERGO-DISKSAVE SB-RUNTIME::PRINT-STRUCT ; Undefined variables: ; SB-RUNTIME:*FORMATTING-OFF* PVS::*UNTYPECHECK-HOOK* SB-RUNTIME::BP SB-RUNTIME::CHARNUMBER SB-RUNTIME::LINENUMBER SB-RUNTIME::LINETEXT SB-RUNTIME:TOKEN ; caught 8 WARNING conditions ; caught 8 STYLE-WARNING conditions [undoing binding stack and other enclosing state... done] [saving current Lisp image into bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/pvs-sbclisp: writing 3432 bytes from the read-only space at 0x01000000 writing 2256 bytes from the static space at 0x01100000 writing 92459008 bytes from the dynamic space at 0x09000000 done] rm /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/bdd-sbcl.* rm: cannot remove `/home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/bdd-sbcl.*': No such file or directory make: [bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/pvs-sbclisp] Error 1 (ignored) cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/sbcl bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/ix86-Linux/mu.so bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/bdd-sbcl.lisp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/BDD/mu-sbcl.lisp bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/WS1S/ix86-Linux/ws1s.so bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/WS1S/lisp/dfa-foreign-sbcl.lisp bin/ix86-Linux/runtime/ cp /home/dwheeler/rpmbuild/BUILD/pvs-4.2/src/utils/ix86-Linux/b64 bin/ix86-Linux ./pvs -batch -l emacs/emacs-src/pvs-set-prelude-info.el \ -f set-prelude-files-and-regions Loading /usr/share/xemacs/site-packages/lisp/site-start.d/rpmdev-init.el... Loading leim-list... I have no idea why it's getting hung. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 05:33:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230533.nBN5Xmkt010278@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #14 from Jerry James 2009-12-23 00:33:47 EDT --- The hangs you are experiencing all appear to be happening in the same code where I initially experienced the hang. If Stephen Turnbull is right, this is a bug in X, and if my attempted workaround doesn't do the job, then we're just sunk ... with an X build. Let's try using emacs-nox or xemacs-nox. I'll work up the necessary spec file changes tomorrow after a good night's rest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 05:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:48:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230548.nBN5mr9B018463@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-23 00:48:51 EDT --- as requested. Rawhide build complete: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1887750 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 06:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:27:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230627.nBN6RFTS015691@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 matt chan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |549980 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 06:27:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:27:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230627.nBN6RD4a015675@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980 matt chan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518949, | |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 06:26:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:26:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549980] New: Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980 Summary: Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: talcite at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This package is being requested as a part of the brlcad package. It is being abstracted to clean out external libraries. Spec URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama-devel-1.2.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A set of C++ headers implementing the Java Matrix Library. Contains templates for classical matrix algebra and for a series of matrix decompositions such as LU, QR, SVD, Cholesky methods. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 07:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:10:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230710.nBN7AB9g020584@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 02:10:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > added it back. ideally ibus-anthy should supports it as scim-anthy does and get > > rid of it from the menu after that, but anyway. > > Please file a bug. Well, how should I think of desktop file for now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 07:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:30:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230730.nBN7Ur3i029690@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #12 from Josephine Tannh?user 2009-12-23 02:30:50 EDT --- > %{_bindir}/%{name}/ %{_bindir}/%{name} is a file, not a directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 07:37:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:37:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230737.nBN7bbeD023067@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #12 from Josephine Tannh?user 2009-12-23 02:37:34 EDT --- as far as i understand it right, you should use wildcards for every versionnumber in your filelist. But I'm not sure, just make sense to me, as far as i understand it correctly. %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING AUTHORS README NEWS %{_libdir}/libethos*.so.* %{_libdir}/%{name}/ %{_libdir}/girepository-*/Ethos-*.typelib %{_datadir}/%{name}/ %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_includedir}/%{name}-*/ %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}*.pc %{_libdir}/*.so %{_datadir}/gir-*/Ethos-*.gir %files docs %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/%{name}/ %files python %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{python_sitearch}/gtk-*/_%{name}*so %{python_sitearch}/gtk-*/%{name}/ %{_datadir}/pygtk/*/defs/%{name}* %files vala %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_datadir}/vala/vapi/%{name}*vapi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 08:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:24:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230824.nBN8O3Eh027345@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-23 03:24:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Ugh. "blas.ini" in %{_bindir}?? > Yes... it is in the same place that upstream places it (with this strange 644 > permission, already fixed). Is it the wrong place? Absolutely. It should be placed in %{_datadir}/%{name}/. Please ask upstream to fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 08:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230824.nBN8OhN7027398@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #7 from fujiwara 2009-12-23 03:24:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Well, how should I think of desktop file for now? I think reverting the desktop file in the rpm would be a workaround. It's a problem when a language specific tool is shown on other language menu items. It would be better to remove the .desktop file after ibus-anthy language bar could show the menu. That's why I asked to file a bug in ibus-anthy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 08:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:44:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230844.nBN8iVII004488@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 08:44:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230844.nBN8isRl004520@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|550001 | Depends on| |550001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 08:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546147] Merge Review: kasumi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230846.nBN8kTkw029685@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546147 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 03:46:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Well, how should I think of desktop file for now? > > I think reverting the desktop file in the rpm would be a workaround. > It's a problem when a language specific tool is shown on other language menu > items. > It would be better to remove the .desktop file after ibus-anthy language bar > could show the menu. > That's why I asked to file a bug in ibus-anthy. Filed as bug 550001 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 08:51:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:51:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549863] Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230851.nBN8pHCc030109@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549863 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-23 03:51:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-interpolation Short Description: Plexus Interpolation API Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 08:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:58:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912230858.nBN8wPcY030761@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-23 03:58:22 EDT --- removed all Requires for perl packages. updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-setup.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-setup/pki-setup-1.3.0-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 10:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:02:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231002.nBNA26Hp005308@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-23 05:02:01 EDT --- 1) Scratch build again failed for rawhide, See log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1887806&name=root.log May I request you to please check spec file and see if all BuildRequires packages for this pki-common package is built in rawhide. This time we are missing dogtag-pki-common-ui package. 2) But I also observed that build (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1887883) is successful if we remove BuildRequires: dogtag-pki-common-ui 3) I also see few more things can be cleaned up in spec file for Requires: lines you can replace following lines Requires: %{_javadir}/pki/cmsutil.jar Requires: %{_javadir}/pki/nsutil.jar with simple Requires: pki-util 4) There is no rhgb package in Fedora active branches but yes yum will give you its replacement plymouth-system-theme which is empty(meta) package. So why would this package need theme package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 10:12:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:12:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231012.nBNACSkE006774@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-23 05:12:26 EDT --- Thanks. Koji build:-http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1887911 As issue2 in above comment is not blocking this review. I will approve this package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 10:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:18:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231018.nBNAIHLU015248@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-23 05:18:16 EDT --- 5) you can change defattr of -javadoc subpackage to %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 10:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:33:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231033.nBNAXUGO016639@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-23 05:33:28 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1887819 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) f8e9e4d1230ed80cfe38a5f28b5e96dc655ba54c pki-java-tools-1.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) don't forget to change defattr of javadoc subpackage to %defattr(-,root,root,-) 2) again why this package have Requires: pki-native-tools though this is not a blocker. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 10:54:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 05:54:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231054.nBNAsnhB019129@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 Andreas Petzold changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas.petzold at gmail.com --- Comment #93 from Andreas Petzold 2009-12-23 05:54:42 EDT --- Reply to comment 92: I've downloaded the binary tarball Songbird_1.4.2-1434_linux-i686.tar.gz yesterday, but it's not working for me on F12: (songbird-bin:21336): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/home/petzold/download/Songbird/gst-plugins/libgstpulse.so': /usr/lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined symbol: vorbis_version_string (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstjpeg.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstjpeg.so: undefined symbol: _gst_debug_get_category (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstvideo4linux2.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstvideo4linux2.so: undefined symbol: _gst_debug_get_category (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstapp.so': /usr/lib/libgstapp-0.10.so.0: undefined symbol: gst_buffer_list_get_type (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdeinterlace.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdeinterlace.so: undefined symbol: gst_video_format_parse_caps_interlaced (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstmatroska.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstmatroska.so: undefined symbol: gst_util_array_binary_search (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstpulse.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstpulse.so: undefined symbol: gst_message_new_request_state (songbird-bin:21343): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdv.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdv.so: undefined symbol: gst_tag_list_new_full ././songbird-bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gst-0.10/gst/_gst.so: undefined symbol: gst_task_pool_get_type Could not initialize GStreamer: Error re-scanning registry , child terminated by signal Googling these error messages, I've found the advise to set LD_BIND_NOW=1 when running songbird. This seems to help a bit, but songbird is still crashing randomly. Scott, what did you do to make it work for you? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 11:23:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:23:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231123.nBNBN58K014882@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-23 06:23:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gummi Short Description: A simple LaTeX editor Owners: fab Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 11:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231129.nBNBTJud023480@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 --- Comment #4 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-23 06:29:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Absolutely. It should be placed in %{_datadir}/%{name}/. Please ask upstream to > fix this. Leave it to me. Can you tell me something about this implicit requirements that my package is asking for? By the way, here is a little update in the p?ckage but I just realized that if we move %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help to %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/help the help section of the software will break. Is there a more elegant solution to this problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 11:41:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:41:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231141.nBNBfoVI017478@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 --- Comment #5 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-23 06:41:49 EDT --- ooops! Sorry. Here goes the files. SPEC: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/freemat/4.0-2/freemat.spec SRPM: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/freemat/4.0-2/FreeMat-4.0-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 11:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231153.nBNBr8oI026421@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 11:52:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231152.nBNBqqZp026391@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-23 06:52:50 EDT --- - Do you really need 'python_sitearch'? I guess that this is a left-over from the template. - Can you please preserve the timestamps in the install section? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps The biggest issue is still the missing license statement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 12:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:31:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231231.nBNCV1k2022362@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-23 07:31:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Absolutely. It should be placed in %{_datadir}/%{name}/. Please ask upstream to > > fix this. > Leave it to me. > Can you tell me something about this implicit requirements that my package is > asking for? > By the way, here is a little update in the p?ckage but I just realized that if > we move %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help to > %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/help the help section of the software will break. > Is there a more elegant solution to this problem? If it breaks, then the files are needed by the main package and thus cannot be placed in -doc, instead they are placed in the main package. Now you have %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/toolbox %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help so change this simply to %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} or %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ both of which are equivalent, but the latter is IMHO clearer to the reader of the spec file. It's a bit off that the datadir is versioned. Only a few packages do this. Is there a configure option or whatnot to change the datadir to %{_datadir}/%{name} instead of using %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 12:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513497] Review Request: ovirt-viewer - A vnc viewer for oVirt managed vms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231239.nBNCdbjx032205@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513497 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-23 07:39:35 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 12:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:39:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 513497] Review Request: ovirt-viewer - A vnc viewer for oVirt managed vms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231239.nBNCdscr023919@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513497 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mmorsi at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 13:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:04:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231304.nBND4Yow002264@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-23 08:04:32 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: MIT [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: 404ad9b0b2052686dee28936403aa3e7 Build source: 404ad9b0b2052686dee28936403aa3e7 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [-] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [-] Follows desktop entry spec [-] Valid .desktop Name [-] Valid .desktop GenericName [-] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888127 [?] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 13:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:12:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 266001] Review Request: webunit - Python web testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231312.nBNDCjUH003640@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266001 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-23 08:12:43 EDT --- Upstream closed the bug [1] about the license as 'wont fix'. [1] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=20323&atid=120323 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 13:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:15:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231315.nBNDFnX6028329@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-23 08:15:48 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing this. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-minimock Short Description: The simplest possible mock library Owners: tomspur Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 13:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:19:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231319.nBNDJ3iS004166@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-23 08:18:58 EDT --- Looks good, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 13:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:34:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550067] New: Review Request: perl-Template-Tiny - Template Toolkit reimplemented in as little code as possible Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Tiny - Template Toolkit reimplemented in as little code as possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550067 Summary: Review Request: perl-Template-Tiny - Template Toolkit reimplemented in as little code as possible Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Template-Tiny.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Template-Tiny-0.09-1.fc13.src.rpm Description: WARNING: THIS MODULE IS EXPERIMENTAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE Template::Tiny is a reimplementation of a partial subset of the Template Toolkit, in as few lines of code as possible. It is intended for use in light-usage, low-memory, or low-cpu templating situations, where you may need to upgrade to the full feature set in the future, or if you want the familiarity of TT-style templates. It is intended to have fully-compatible template and stash usage, with a limited by similar Perl API. Unlike Template Toolkit, Template::Tiny will process templates without a compile phase (but despite this is still quicker, owing to heavy use of the Perl regular expression engine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 13:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548877] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231357.nBNDvh3O000509@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548877 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-23 08:57:42 EDT --- Could you post the new url to the spec file? The one above should be an old one, because there are still the spaces. Just some other comments: - %gobal over %define see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - BR: python-setuptools-devel is not needed, python-setuptools is enought - How about modifying the description a bit? You could use %{python_sitelib} instead of ``/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages``, so the example in the description will always be uptodate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 13:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231354.nBNDsRLQ032696@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-23 08:54:25 EDT --- I made a full review. Here are my comments, questions etc: * Package does not build in mock. It pulls gcj. We want openjdk. I added that BR fol the rest of the review. As far as I know, all java packages need these BR's and R's: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires * Additionally, the guidelines tell us to include these R's for maven: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#maven * rpmlint says plexus-io.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-io Is this ignorable? Why? ! javadoc package does not require the main package. (just a warning. I don't know if this is intentional) ? Shouldn't the release tag just be 0.1.a5%{?dist} ! For macro consistency plexus-io can be replaced by %{name} at two places -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 14:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231402.nBNE2ohD001270@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-23 09:02:48 EDT --- > %{_bindir}/%{name} is a file, not a directory. Good catch, rushed update. Now fixed. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/emerillon-0.1.0-5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 14:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:04:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231404.nBNE4jjA001614@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-23 09:04:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > as far as i understand it right, you should use wildcards for every > versionnumber in your filelist. But I'm not sure, just make sense to me, as far > as i understand it correctly. Sorry I don't understand what your asking. Is this a geneeral query, or something in the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 14:18:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:18:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231418.nBNEIv27011159@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-23 09:18:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I made a full review. Here are my comments, questions etc: > > * Package does not build in mock. It pulls gcj. We want openjdk. I added that > BR fol the rest of the review. > As far as I know, all java packages need these BR's and R's: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires Fixed. > > * Additionally, the guidelines tell us to include these R's for maven: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#maven Fixed. > > * rpmlint says > plexus-io.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/plexus-io > Is this ignorable? Why? This is the place where mvn looks for fragments. And they are clearly non conffile because users should not edit them. > > ! javadoc package does not require the main package. (just a warning. I don't > know if this is intentional) Perfectly ok. There are many times when you want to install just the javadoc for local reference and studing the API without any need to use it. > > ? Shouldn't the release tag just be 0.1.a5%{?dist} Fixed. > > ! For macro consistency plexus-io can be replaced by %{name} at two places Fixed Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-io.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/plexus-io-1.0-0.2.a5.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 14:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:33:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 524190] Review Request: flowcanvas - an interactive Gtkmm/=?UTF-8?Q?Gnomecanvasmm=20widget=20for=20=E2=80=9Cboxes=20and=20lines=E2=80=9D=20environments?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231433.nBNEXdtk013744@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524190 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 09:33:37 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 14:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:34:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510784] Review Request: dieharder - A random number generator tester and timer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231434.nBNEYAtR005865@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510784 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 09:34:07 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 14:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:38:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231438.nBNEch98014396@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-23 09:38:43 EDT --- Thanks! Good to go. -------------------------------------------- This package (plexus-io) is APPROVED by oget -------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 14:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:42:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231442.nBNEgFeX007263@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-23 09:42:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-io Short Description: Plexus IO Components Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:08:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:08:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231508.nBNF8vBA017876@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-23 10:08:54 EDT --- Sandro, I don't mind accepting this now with the old version, if it's clear, which file has which license. You can choose, between - adding a comment above the License: field - refer to a file upstream, where anything is explained - breack down in the %files section. See [1] for further information. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:13:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] New: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Summary: Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-olpcgames.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-olpcgames-1.6-1.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888451 See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 [sebastian at localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint ./RPMS/noarch/python-olpcgames-1.6-1.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [sebastian at localhost rpmbuild]$ rpmlint ./SRPMS/python-olpcgames-1.6-1.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:18:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550102] New: Review Request: ghc-mtl - Haskell Monad Transformer Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-mtl - Haskell Monad Transformer Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550102 Summary: Review Request: ghc-mtl - Haskell Monad Transformer Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-mtl/ghc-mtl.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-mtl/ghc-mtl-1.1.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Haskell Monad Transformer Library A standard library part of haskell-platform. This package is needed for ghc-6.12 to build a bunch of packages already in fedora including ghc-gtk2hs, ghc-uniplate, happy xmonad, and haskell-platform of course. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:23:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546620] Review Request: git-bugzilla - Attach patches to a bugzilla bug In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231523.nBNFNtNH020113@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546620 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-23 10:23:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > SHOULD: > > - If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file > > from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > > This is basically just one file; I'm not sure if upstream would include license > separately. Upstream don't *have* to include a license file, you just need to say hi and ask them to do so. If they don't, it'll ok, too. Joshua, you started good. Do you intent continuing this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:23:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550102] Review Request: ghc-mtl - Haskell Monad Transformer Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231523.nBNFNfnh011815@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550102 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |high CC| |fedora-haskell-list at redhat. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:26:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548877] Review Request: python-virtualenv - Virtual Python Environment builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231526.nBNFQsBZ020704@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548877 --- Comment #4 from Peter Halliday 2009-12-23 10:26:53 EDT --- I actually am not sure why the define was there at all, because I wasn't using it. I removed the define. I changed python-setuptools-devel just to python-setuptools. I changed the description as you suggested. I also updated both the spec file and the SRPM as per the changes to the original URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:37:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231537.nBNFbCUo013492@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #15 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-23 10:37:11 EDT --- > Let's try using emacs-nox or xemacs-nox. Agree. That's an unfortunate solution if it's long-term, but it's a reasonable short-term solution *AND* it would definitely help narrow down where the bug is. Please modify the spec so that it'll be easy to switch back to "normal" emacs or xemacs. It's my hope that using *emacs-nox is a relatively temporary solution. Your earlier patch modified "exit-pvs-process" by replacing (sit-for 1) with (accept-process-output nil 1). Although it's a nasty hack, you could instead repeatedly (1) wait for 1 second using sleep, then (2) use "system" to invoke "ps" directly and see if the process is gone. Yeah, that's a nasty hack. Might work, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:38:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550104] New: Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550104 Summary: Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fhornain at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fhornain.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/magento/magento.spec SRPM URL: http://fhornain.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/magento/magento-1.3.2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Magento is an ecommerce web application. Since it is a web application, this electronic commerce browser works on many platforms, making your store application easily manageable from any location. Magento is the perfect ecommerce browser for the sell professional and novice alike. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:41:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550104] Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231541.nBNFfwM4022406@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550104 Frederic Hornain changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550105] New: Review Request: ghc-parsec - Haskell parser library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-parsec - Haskell parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550105 Summary: Review Request: ghc-parsec - Haskell parser library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: petersen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-parsec/ghc-parsec.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/ghc-parsec/ghc-parsec-2.1.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Haskell parser library Part of haskell-platform, currently need for ghc-6.12.1 to build ghc-network, haskell-platform, and darcs I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:49:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550105] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Haskell parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231549.nBNFnGZB023653@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550105 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:50:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231550.nBNFoFvO015579@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231549.nBNFnwWE015551@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-23 10:49:56 EDT --- oglappth.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary oglappth oglappth.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary oglappth oglappth.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liboglappth.so.2.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 oglappth-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Fix the summaries. Judging by the description, "Library for creating portable OpenGL applications with easy-to-code scene setup and selection operations." the summary should be e.g. An OpenGL wrapper library ** The -devel package doesn't contain static libraries, so drop their mention from the summary. ** The changelog does not conform to Fedora standards. Leave the Mon Jan 12 entry (replacing the + with a -), drop the rest. ** Source url should be http://www.uku.fi/~thassine/projects/download/current/lib%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz ** Change %{_includedir}/* to %{_includedir}/oglappth/ for clarity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530198] Review Request: rubygem-columnize - Sorts an array in column order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231555.nBNFt5AK024291@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530198 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 10:55:04 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:57:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522820] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231557.nBNFvWc8016307@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:56:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231556.nBNFuoEJ016238@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 10:56:49 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:56:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231556.nBNFupGw016248@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 Bug 532306 depends on bug 533725, which changed state. Bug 533725 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:56:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231556.nBNFu7QC016177@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 10:56:05 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:56:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:56:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231556.nBNFuqJx016255@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-23 10:56:51 EDT --- MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. NEEDSWORK - According to the naming guidelines, the name of the package should be liboglappth, not oglappth. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSWORK - Source URL is incorrect, but source matches upstream. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - Add INSTALL="install -p" to make install to preserve time stamps. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK - You might want to add statements [ -s NEWS ] && exit 1 [ -s README ] && exit 1 in %setup to make the build fail and thus become notified if these files acquire content. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. NEEDSWORK - This is automatically picked up on at least Fedora 12; if you want to build for EPEL then you need to add Requires: pkgconfig. Better safe than sorry, so please add this. MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:58:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231558.nBNFwlE2024816@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 10:58:45 EDT --- Well, for now I won't object to use %test_files. So would you modify your spec file if there is something you want to do so and reupload your spec/srpm again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:57:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522819] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231557.nBNFvBjY024668@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 15:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:58:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231558.nBNFwYQ6016578@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 16:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:33:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547118] Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231633.nBNGX22E021283@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118 --- Comment #2 from Damien Durand 2009-12-23 11:33:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: crun Short Description: Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool Owners: splinux Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: splinux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 16:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:39:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231639.nBNGdFHg030251@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #10 from Josiah Carlson 2009-12-23 11:39:14 EDT --- FYI, I released a new version with all of the license and code updates yesterday. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 16:44:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:44:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231644.nBNGiTfE030807@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #11 from Sandro Mathys 2009-12-23 11:44:28 EDT --- Just wanted to post the same thing as Josiah - there's a new release with the fixes and I'm going to create a new srpm with it. Might very well get 2010 until I'm able to do so, tho. But maybe I'll find some time to do it earlier... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 16:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:48:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547118] Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231648.nBNGmn0H031807@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 17:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:03:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231703.nBNH3YII025855@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 David A. Wheeler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dwheeler at dwheeler | |.com) | --- Comment #24 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-23 12:03:28 EDT --- Petr - thanks for releasing version 2.0 of DiVinE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 17:14:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:14:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231714.nBNHEO4x026984@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-23 12:14:23 EDT --- Just a few comments for now, because I'm unsure, if reviewing this is the right procedure... - use %global and not %define https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - permissions of buildmanifest.py need to be 664, like they where. But this is no executable script and contains #!/usr/bin/env Fix this with [1] to delete the shebang and not touching the permissions. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Remove_shebang_from_files About the procedure: It seems, the original submitter does not care anymore about this package and you want to take it. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers would be the best thing to do in this case and no new review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 17:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:25:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231725.nBNHPABe004840@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 12:25:09 EDT --- Well for SOURCE1, I leave it to your choise how to package it (however please make upstream clarify the license first) ------------------------------------------------------- This package (jconvolver) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 17:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:31:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231731.nBNHVFPY005625@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-23 12:31:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pki-setup Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Setup Framework Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 17:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:36:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231736.nBNHaj68030644@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #94 from David Halik 2009-12-23 12:36:41 EDT --- 1.4.3 is on it's way to being released, so I'm going to wait for that. @Scott the svn checkout isn't the same as their officially released source ball (different paths, structure, etc), so I wait for that. Otherwise I have to change the build process to cope and it's a bunch of extra work for nothing. Songbird dev stevel will notify me when the ball is out, so I'll get on it soon after. @Andreas You should probably post your issues on the songbird help list, because what I do here with the respin is very different than what they provide. I use almost all system components from Fedora, except for xulrunner and tagib, they package everything to their own patched copies. It's very likely that gstreamer bugs will not be the same because of the different versions involved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 17:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:41:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550138] New: Review Request: xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550138 Summary: Review Request: xcftools - Command-line tools for extracting information from XCF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/SPECS/xcftools.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/srpms.fc12/xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Xcftools is a set of fast command-line tools for extracting information from the Gimp's native file format XCF. The tools are designed to allow efficient use of layered XCF files as sources in a build system that use 'make' and similar tools to manage automatic processing of the graphics. These tools work independently of the Gimp engine and do not require the Gimp to even be installed. This package builds on koji : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888672 rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX ~]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/xcftools-1.0.7-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/xcftools-debuginfo-1.0.7-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 17:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:49:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550139] New: Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550139 Summary: Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: allisson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/pino/pino.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/pino/pino-0.1.0-0.1.rc2.fc12.src.rpm Description: A fast, easy and free Twitter client -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 17:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:56:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 436612] Review Request: avfs - A Virtual File System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231756.nBNHuaGQ008966@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436612 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-23 12:56:33 EDT --- Lorenzo, you should open your own review request and close this one as dublicate of your new request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 18:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:10:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461119] Review Request: libtiger - Rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231810.nBNIAWRK010261@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461119 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-23 13:10:31 EDT --- It would be easier to remove %{buildroot}%{_docdir} and add '%doc doc/html' to the %files devel section... Furthermore docs need to be installed in %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}. The above would fix this issue, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 18:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:14:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] New: Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 Summary: Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alagunambiwelkin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://download.sf.net/webattery/webattery.spec SRPM URL: http://download.sf.net/webattery/webattery-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Webattery is a command line tool to display battery status with a cool battery like output. This my first package, need Sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 18:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:27:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231827.nBNIRU0g012343@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-23 13:27:29 EDT --- Just a few comments, because I'm no sponsor anyway: - $ rpmlint webattery-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm x86_64/webattery-* webattery.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install webattery.src: W: no-buildroot-tag webattery-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/webattery-1.1/src/webattery.c 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. * in %install needs to be rm -rf %{buildroot} as first line * no-buildroot-tag can be ignored, this is not needed anymore in fedora (only if you want to import it in EL-5, too...) * webattery.c needs to be 644, please change this in %install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 18:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231845.nBNIjnTb006143@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #16 from Jerry James 2009-12-23 13:45:48 EDT --- Argh. The elisp code calls add-submenu AT COMPILE TIME! Since this function doesn't exist in (x)emacs-nox, the compilation fails. I still don't understand why the accept-process-output hack isn't working for you, though. It runs code that is supposed to check for process statuses, on both emacsen. Since it solved the problem I was having with XEmacs, I know that code is being run. I'm going to make a virtual 32-bit machine and see if I can debug the hang you're seeing. It looks like the same hang, but may not be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:24:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:24:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231924.nBNJOo6v023113@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:26:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231926.nBNJQ29I015124@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 --- Comment #14 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-23 14:26:01 EDT --- I'll take a look, Not a blocker, looks like we have an upstream release/tarball, woo, ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/apps/KDE4.x/admin/polkit-kde-1-0.95.1.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:24:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:24:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231924.nBNJOpA0015069@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 --- Comment #10 from Carl Byington 2009-12-23 14:24:49 EDT --- done http://www.five-ten-sg.com/liboglappth.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/liboglappth-0.98-5.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888795 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:40:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:40:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231940.nBNJeEPP024238@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:40:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510376] Review Request: bluemodem - A bluetooth modem configuration utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231941.nBNJfHJE024361@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510376 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:41:16 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:42:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231942.nBNJgXxw016659@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:42:32 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549863] Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231939.nBNJdJw3016372@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549863 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:39:18 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:41:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231941.nBNJfNUs016553@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-23 14:41:21 EDT --- Well, * License - I guess the license for this package should be "GPL+ or Ruby or Artistic". * rcov for %check - build.log says: ------------------------------------------------------- 89 + rake test 90 Hoe.new {...} deprecated. Switch to Hoe.spec. 91 (in /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16) 92 which: no dot in (/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/root/bin:/usr/local/sbin) 93 /usr/bin/ruby -w -Ilib:ext:bin:test -e 'require "rubygems"; require "test/unit"; require "test/test_mime_type.rb"; require "test/test_mime_types.rb"' 94 RCov is not available. In order to run rcov, you must: sudo gem install spicycode-rcov ------------------------------------------------------- I don't know well about RCov, however when I install rubygem-rcov, rake check fails as: ------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost mime-types-1.16]$ rake test --trace (in /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16) Hoe.new {...} deprecated. Switch to Hoe.spec. rake aborted! undefined method `test_files' for # /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16/Rakefile:53 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rcov-0.9.6/lib/rcov/rcovtask.rb:91:in `initialize' /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16/Rakefile:51:in `new' /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16/Rakefile:51 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2382:in `load' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2382:in `raw_load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2016:in `load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2067:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2015:in `load_rakefile' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1999:in `run' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2067:in `standard_exception_handling' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1997:in `run' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/bin/rake:31 /usr/bin/rake:19:in `load' /usr/bin/rake:19 ------------------------------------------------------- ref: http://bugs.gentoo.org/288996 Would you check this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:45:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:45:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231945.nBNJjV7T024817@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:45:30 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:43:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:43:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541346] Review Request: polkit-kde - PolicyKit integration for KDE Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231943.nBNJheHB024691@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541346 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-23 14:43:39 EDT --- Simple spec. $ rpmlint *.rpm */*.rpm polkit-kde.src:24: W: unversioned-explicit-provides PolicyKit-authentication-agent polkit-kde.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided PolicyKit-kde polkit-kde.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/polkit-kde-authentication-agent-1.desktop 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. License: OK Source: OK (better, when using verifiable upstream tarball) macros: OK Obsoletess/Provides: OK I see now issues or blockers, looks good, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:44:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:44:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549809] Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231944.nBNJiUGx016887@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549809 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:44:29 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:46:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231946.nBNJkpDe017040@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:46:49 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:43:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:43:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547118] Review Request: crun - Lightweight, easy to use, simpler cron-like tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231943.nBNJhRT9016824@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547118 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:43:25 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231950.nBNJoaF1025293@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:50:34 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:48:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:48:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231948.nBNJm0rT025108@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:47:59 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:49:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231949.nBNJnZWr017284@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:49:33 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544628] at-spi2-core - Protocol definitions and daemon for D-Bus at-spi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231951.nBNJpNbn017400@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:51:22 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:53:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 519221] Review Request: rfkill - A tool to query the state of RF kill interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231953.nBNJrbv0025995@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519221 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-12-23 14:53:36 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:57:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231957.nBNJvEV3026388@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-23 14:57:13 EDT --- Oh no,... forgot to add the branches :'( Sorry, Dennis. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-minimock New Branches: F-12 F-11 EL-5 Owners: tomspur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 19:59:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:59:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912231959.nBNJxH3m018773@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-23 14:59:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pki-native-tools Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Java Tools Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 20:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:07:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232007.nBNK7ifm019516@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-23 15:07:43 EDT --- (fixing the short description) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pki-native-tools Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Native Tools Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 20:11:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:11:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232011.nBNKB1cD027654@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-23 15:10:56 EDT --- Whoops, this slipped under my radar. I had a look at the requirements: to build itext in EL-5 three more packages would have to be built. Looks like too much work, I'll just have to deal with an older release of jmol in EL-5 for good. Sorry for bothering you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 20:08:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:08:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232008.nBNK8HxV027333@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-23 15:08:16 EDT --- The Requires: pkgconfig should be for -devel which actually contains the pkgconfig file. Otherwise the package looks very clean now. APPROVED Fix the require before import to CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 20:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:08:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232008.nBNK83UR027299@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 --- Comment #2 from Alagunambi Welkin 2009-12-23 15:08:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > * in %install needs to be rm -rf %{buildroot} as first line > * no-buildroot-tag can be ignored, this is not needed anymore in fedora > (only if you want to import it in EL-5, too...) > * webattery.c needs to be 644, please change this in %install Cleared all, should I replace the given src.rpm and spec file with the new one or do I need to add them separately along with the old src.rpm and sepc file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 20:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:13:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232013.nBNKDnP9020610@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #10 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-23 15:13:48 EDT --- ugh! back to the first description: Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Java Tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 20:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:15:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232015.nBNKFU6s020872@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 --- Comment #16 from Tareq Al Jurf 2009-12-23 15:15:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: invulgotracker Short Description: Tasks & projects tracking tool Owners: taljurf Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: taljurf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 20:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:25:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232025.nBNKPYQl023335@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-23 15:25:34 EDT --- dmenu-4.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dmenu-4.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 20:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232024.nBNKOh6Y023163@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-12-23 15:24:42 EDT --- Thanks! I won't add it until the license is cleared. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jconvolver Short Description: Real-time Convolution Engine Owners: oget nando Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 20:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:46:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542747] Review Request: oglappth - Libraries for the oglappth chemistry package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232046.nBNKkRCP027219@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542747 Carl Byington changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Carl Byington 2009-12-23 15:46:26 EDT --- done http://www.five-ten-sg.com/liboglappth.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/liboglappth-0.98-6.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888886 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: liboglappth Short Description: An OpenGL wrapper library Owners: carllibpst Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 20:54:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:54:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232054.nBNKsvAI003772@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #28 from Carl Byington 2009-12-23 15:54:55 EDT --- http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mpqc-2.3.1-6.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888901 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 21:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:15:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232115.nBNLFPsi007998@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-23 16:15:24 EDT --- pki-setup-1.3.0-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-setup-1.3.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 21:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:16:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232116.nBNLGpTq008348@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-23 16:16:50 EDT --- pki-setup-1.3.0-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pki-setup-1.3.0-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 21:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:18:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 531040] Review Request: jsmath-fonts - A collection of Math symbol fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232118.nBNLILxL008583@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531040 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rdieter at math.unl. | |edu) | --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-23 16:18:19 EDT --- SPEC: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jsmath-fonts/jsmath-fonts.spec SRPM: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jsMath-fonts/jsmath-fonts-20090708-2.fc12.src.rpm %changelog * Wed Dec 23 2009 Rex Dieter 20090708-2 - use simple template -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 21:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:29:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232129.nBNLTXNM003550@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #3 from Carl Byington 2009-12-23 16:29:32 EDT --- http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mopac7.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mopac7-1.15-5.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1888970 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 22:01:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:01:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232201.nBNM1MNY010230@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-23 17:01:21 EDT --- rpmlint output: mopac7.x86_64: E: no-binary mopac7-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation mopac7-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation What you are actually doing with sed "s/\.\/src/\/usr\/bin/" run_mopac7 > %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/run_mopac7 is replacing the binary with a temporary libtool wrapper. What's the actual problem you want to solve? The sed line looks like you could do with another separator than /, using e.g. | would make the expressions a lot neater. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 22:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:02:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232202.nBNM2jmj017935@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-23 17:02:45 EDT --- Besides, you are shipping makefiles in the documentation. Try if %check make test works, if it does then IMHO you don't need to ship the tests directory at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 22:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:15:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232215.nBNMFsEr012724@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-23 17:15:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just a few comments for now, because I'm unsure, if reviewing this is the right > procedure... > > - use %global and not %define > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define Right, makes sense! > - permissions of buildmanifest.py need to be 664, like they where. > But this is no executable script and contains #!/usr/bin/env > Fix this with [1] to delete the shebang and not touching the permissions. > > [1] > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Remove_shebang_from_files I thought it should be executable since it had a main() part. Anyway, thanks for the hints! I think I'll just open another bug and try to ping the original maintainer again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 22:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:24:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232224.nBNMOXkd021807@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550176 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-23 17:24:32 EDT --- Okay, I opened #550176 to proceed with the non-responsive maintainer policy. I'm making this a dependant, as we'll presumably need a review afterwards anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 22:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:29:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232229.nBNMThXu015028@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-23 17:29:42 EDT --- You forgot to set the Flag (somewhere at the top right of this page) fedora?cvs to ?, otherwise the CVS admin don't see your request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 22:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:36:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232236.nBNMaM1b016631@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-23 17:36:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > About the procedure: > It seems, the original submitter does not care anymore about this package and > you want to take it. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > would be the best thing to do in this case and no new review. I suggested to open a new package review according to the following section [1]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package_Procedure The package was never built and from my point of view a review is needed anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 23:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:02:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250533] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for writing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232302.nBNN2m1d028824@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250533 --- Comment #12 from Noah Kantrowitz 2009-12-23 18:02:45 EDT --- I am no longer associated with the OLPC project nor do I think I have access to a Fedora build environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 23:02:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:02:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232302.nBNN2Fox028744@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Bug 550100 depends on bug 550176, which changed state. Bug 550176 Summary: Please respond to #250533 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550176 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 23:08:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:08:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550139] Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232308.nBNN8afd022382@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550139 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-23 18:08:36 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file. - You need to add 'hicolor-icon-theme' as a requirement to avoid issues with the ownership of the %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor directory - Please follow the guidelines for the installation of the .desktop file https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files - Can you please take a look at your BRs . Isn't gettext needed by intltool and didn't libgee-devel pulls in libgee. The rpmlint output [fab at localhost i686]$ rpmlint pino* pino-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 23:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:24:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232324.nBNNOIqP024922@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #6 from Carl Byington 2009-12-23 18:24:18 EDT --- fixed. The .dat files in ./test seem to be samples that could also be used for testing. It seems reasonable to install those in %doc (without the Makefiles). The sed expressions were from mandriva - cleaned up now, and installed the real binary rather than the libtool wrapper. run_mopac7 is a convenience fortran wrapper that needs to reference the installed mopac7 binary. Not caught earlier since ghemical just needs the libraries, not the main mopac7 binary. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mopac7.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mopac7-1.15-6.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1889228 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 23:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:43:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232343.nBNNhAfw028375@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |542759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 23:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:43:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232343.nBNNh8Qp028359@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Blocks| |505154(FE-SCITECH) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 23:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:53:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232353.nBNNrZ8B030558@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-23 18:53:34 EDT --- Okey dokey, so both Fabian and I have been added to the package now thanks to Noah's reply! I guess we still need this review since it has never been built. Once that's done, we'll presumably either need a cvs change request or a rel-eng ticket. Anyway, I've updated the files according to Thomas' comments. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-olpcgames.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/python-olpcgames-1.6-2.src.rpm Would be cool to get this reviewed. Happy Holidays! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 23 23:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:56:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912232356.nBNNu35W031184@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-23 18:56:02 EDT --- rpmlint output: mopac7.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mopac7 ['/usr/lib64'] mopac7-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation mopac7-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Get rid of the rpath. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath ** You have %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_bindir}/run_mopac7 in files, better change %{name} to mopac7. ** Btw, the build process doesn't seem to use f2c at all - gfortran is used to compile the Fortran stuff. ** There is no CCOPTIONS variable in the makefiles, drop CCOPTIONS="%{optflags}" from make. The used flags are already picked up by %configure. ** MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. ~OK - I think you could do with a few clarifying comments in the %install section. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. - Place the %doc in -libs instead of the main package, as the main package requires the libraries but not vice versa. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages andno general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 00:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:12:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240012.nBO0CWLZ005823@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #36 from Steven Seed 2009-12-23 19:12:28 EDT --- There are a number of dependencies not available in RHEL5 for the fc9 package. See the following output: # rpm -Uvh phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm warning: phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 6df2196f error: Failed dependencies: freeimage is needed by phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch freeimage-devel is needed by phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch glew-devel is needed by phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch jam is needed by phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch openal is needed by phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch openal-devel is needed by phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch perl-SDL is needed by phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch taglib-devel is needed by phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-server-devel is needed by phoronix-test-suite-1.8.1-1.fc9.noarch Even when I was able to cobble together everything (except perl-SDL and xorg-x11-server-devel) from various fedora repos and EPEL, and installed the rpm (using the --nodeps flag), I still could not run the gui. I get either of these two messages: PHP Fatal error: Class 'GtkWindow' not found in /usr/share/phoronix-test-suite/pts-core/objects/gtk/pts_gtk_window.php on line 23 The PHP GTK module must be loaded for the GUI. This module can be found @ http://gtk.php.net/ I've tried, but I can't get php-gtk2 to build. I'm on RHEL 5.4 x86_64. 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 For now, I'll try running it without the gui -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 00:20:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:20:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240020.nBO0K1iY007037@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-23 19:20:01 EDT --- Fix: The license file is olpcgames/COPYING [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 00:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:18:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240018.nBO0IGMT006746@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-23 19:18:14 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-olpcgames-1.6-2.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings Binary RPM(s): [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint python-olpcgames* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: BSD [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: 53146b6acf61947499061f318889b5ba Build source: 53146b6acf61947499061f318889b5ba [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [-] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [-] Follows desktop entry spec [-] Valid .desktop Name [-] Valid .desktop GenericName [-] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1889292 [x] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 00:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:30:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240030.nBO0UC1p008716@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Conrad Meyer 2009-12-23 19:30:10 EDT --- Thanks much New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-zdaemon Short Description: Python Daemon Process Control Library Owners: konradm Branches: F-12 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 00:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240034.nBO0Y9oB005985@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-23 19:34:08 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-olpcgames New Branches: F-11 F-12 Owners: kantrn fab sdz According to [1], the original maintainer isn't involved with OLPC anymore. Fabian and I'll be maintaining python-olpcgames. However, since the package has never been built before, we need new branches for F11 and F12, as well as updated settings for the devel branch, which is otherwise locked. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550176 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 00:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240044.nBO0ir45011632@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #37 from Michael Larabel 2009-12-23 19:44:52 EDT --- Hi Steven, As I believe is described earlier in this bug report, the Fedora RPM includes all possible external dependencies needed for every included test. Personally I find this to be a bit much and prefer to just install the dependencies as needed (PTS can handle that internally), but that was the Fedora packaging choice. With that said, as long as the php-cli package is installed, the Fedora RPM should be able to be forced without any issues. Unfortunately, one of the packages still not found in Fedora is php-gtk, which provides GTK support for PHP. This is needed by the GUI (the version of PTS you are using just emits a fatal error though, in newer versions it makes this clear). Your options here would be to either build PHP GTK from source (http://gtk.php.net/) or to find a third-party RPM for it somewhere. Hopefully php-gtk will get packaged up for Fedora / EPEL soon... Running it from the command-line interface should work just fine. If you encounter any problems, try either 2.2.0 or a 2.4 snapshot ideally, as new features and test profiles are quick to be pushed in :) -- Michael -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 00:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:46:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240046.nBO0kAWd008326@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-23 19:46:08 EDT --- * Wed Dec 23 2009 Kevin Wright 1.3.0-5 - Bugzilla Bug #522207 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Removed Requires: %{_javadir}/pki/cmsutil.jar - Removed Requires: %{_javadir}/pki/nsutil.jar - Removed BuildRequires: dogtag-pki-common-ui - added Requires: pki-util - changed -javadoc to: %defattr(-,root,root,-) Updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-common/pki-common.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-common/pki-common-1.3.0-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 01:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 20:33:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240133.nBO1XpXP016181@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #8 from Carl Byington 2009-12-23 20:33:50 EDT --- Fixed; only the 64 bit version has rpath? Needs chrpath to get rid of it. http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mopac7.spec http://www.five-ten-sg.com/mopac7-1.15-7.fc12.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1889314 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 03:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:52:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240352.nBO3qGDo027262@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-23 22:52:13 EDT --- python-mwclient-0.6.3-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 03:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:52:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523789] Review Request: python-mwclient - Mwclient is a client to the MediaWiki API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240352.nBO3qKjo012589@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523789 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(smparrish at gmail.c | |om) | Fixed In Version|0.6.3-3.fc11 |0.6.3-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 04:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:34:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240434.nBO4YrRL020872@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #12 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-23 23:34:52 EDT --- any comment on issue#4 raised in comment#9? I think rhgb should not be needed by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 04:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240449.nBO4njPZ023821@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980 --- Comment #1 from matt chan 2009-12-23 23:49:45 EDT --- updated spec and SRPM to BuildArch: noarch since package consists of only header files. Spec URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama-devel-1.2.5-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 04:56:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:56:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] New: Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 Summary: Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: talcite at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This package is being submitted as a part of the review request for brlcad. This is one of the libraries being abstracted out of the brlcad package. Note that this package consists of solely header files. There is nothing to compile. Spec URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/tnt/tnt-devel.spec SRRPM URL: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/tnt/tnt-devel-3.0.11-0.1.beta.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 04:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240456.nBO4uf0H024998@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 matt chan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |518949 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 04:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:56:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240456.nBO4uhI1025013@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 matt chan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550234 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 04:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:57:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240457.nBO4vOm8025117@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 matt chan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 05:06:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:06:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240506.nBO56AkS009735@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 --- Comment #20 from matt chan 2009-12-24 00:06:00 EDT --- A quick update on our progress so far: The TNT (and JAMA) libraries have been abstracted out and packaged. The review requests are at 549980 and 550234. If someone has a second, could they review them quickly please? They are just a bunch of headers and have less than 25 files each package. It shouldn't take more than 30 mins for each. And on the tkhtml3 front, the former upstream dev has confirmed directly that the project is dead. The brlcad team have made provisions to take over the upstream for the STEP and Utah projects. The transition to tkPng will be made in the next release, and tkImg will be dropped as a requirement. Tkhtml3 and OpenNURBS are the remaining issues which have not been resolved yet. Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 05:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:37:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240537.nBO5bj77015395@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 --- Comment #3 from Alagunambi Welkin 2009-12-24 00:37:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * in %install needs to be rm -rf %{buildroot} as first line I was recommend to leave this part since it is no need[1], thanks to mether :-D my new spec URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/webattery/files/webattery-rpm/webattery.spec/download my new src.rpm URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/webattery/files/webattery-rpm/webattery-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm/download Waiting for a Sponsor :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 05:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240541.nBO5fYwM016014@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 --- Comment #4 from Alagunambi Welkin 2009-12-24 00:41:34 EDT --- > I was recommend to leave this part since it is no need[1], thanks to mether :-D [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 06:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:58:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547993] Package Name Change: jconvolver - Real-time Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240658.nBO6wCa5030274@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-24 01:58:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 06:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:59:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240659.nBO6xYff015373@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-24 01:59:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 07:01:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:01:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240701.nBO715lW015605@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-24 02:01:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 07:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:03:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240703.nBO73faQ031208@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-24 02:03:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 07:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:04:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528150] Review Request: invulgotracker - Tasks & projects tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240704.nBO74oUD016295@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528150 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-24 02:04:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 07:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:07:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240707.nBO77Unj032383@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-24 02:07:28 EDT --- Sigh. I processed this without checking... you meant pki-java-tools here for the package name? Can you post a fully correct version ? I think I fixed pki-native-tools back, if not let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 08:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:51:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240851.nBO8pNke016824@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-24 03:51:20 EDT --- Doesn't %configure sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool do the trick? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 09:40:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:40:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240940.nBO9eldr026197@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 09:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:50:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240950.nBO9oJqu013324@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-24 04:50:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Ok, I have updated the spec file. Looks better (probably the best that can be done). APPROVED Just stumbled upon one tiny issue; probably a typo, please correct it upon CVS import: 1.) You seem to be missing a period here (sh vs .sh): sed -i s/%{name}sh/%{name}/ usr/share/%{name}/%{name}.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 09:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912240956.nBO9ulNc029311@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-24 04:56:44 EDT --- Hans: changed (actually requiring < 1, quetly and probably wrongly assuming that soname's number corresponds to the major version number) SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/earcandy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/earcandy-0.5.1-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 10:04:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:04:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547832] Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241004.nBOA4N7V030717@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547832 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-24 05:04:22 EDT --- rpmlint output is not clean [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint procServ-2.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm procServ.src: E: description-line-too-long procServ is a wrapper that starts an arbitrary command as a child process in the background, connecting its standard input and output to a TCP port for telnet access. It supports logging, child restart (manual or automatic on exit), and more. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 10:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:19:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241019.nBOAJhUe018620@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-24 05:19:41 EDT --- I'd leave both BuildRoot: and %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Without it, the package will build on Fedora >= 10 only but not on EPEL or alike. The license tag is wrong. COPYING is GPLv3 and the source states "version 3 or any later version", so the tag should be GPLv3+ Please change %{_mandir}/man1/webattery.1.gz to %{_mandir}/man1/webattery.1.* because the compression of the manpages is applied automatically to the package and we might switch to something different than gz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 10:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:28:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241028.nBOASmdm002626@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #14 from Josephine Tannh?user 2009-12-24 05:28:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > you should use "*" instead of version numbers. I tried to do that with your filelist, like: %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc COPYING AUTHORS README NEWS %{_libdir}/lib%{name}* %{_libdir}/%{name}/ %{_libdir}/girepository-*/Ethos-*.typelib %{_datadir}/%{name}/ %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_includedir}/%{name}-*/ %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}*.pc %{_libdir}/*.so %{_datadir}/gir-*/Ethos-*.gir %files docs %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/%{name}/ %files python %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{python_sitearch}/gtk-*/_%{name}*so %{python_sitearch}/gtk-*/%{name}/ %{_datadir}/pygtk/*/defs/%{name}* %files vala %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_datadir}/vala/vapi/%{name}*vapi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 10:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241031.nBOAVuBV021108@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-24 05:31:53 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F12/i386 [!] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-visualmatch-8-1.fc12.src.rpm sugar-visualmatch.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities sugar-visualmatch.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-visualmatch-8-1.fc12.noarch.rpm sugar-visualmatch.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: GPLv3 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: a5a7d70c3943a71df066263a1d8e6cfd Build source: a5a7d70c3943a71df066263a1d8e6cfd [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [-] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [-] Included tests passed successfully [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [-] Follows desktop entry spec [-] Valid .desktop Name [-] Valid .desktop GenericName [-] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [!] Latest version is packaged [-] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F12/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1889622 [x] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format - Fix the mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs error - The license file contains the text of a MIT license (Modern Style with sublicense) and the source code as well. GPLv3 is wrong. - The latest version seams to 12. Beside that I see no further blocker. Please fix the issues before you make the initial import into CVS. Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 10:56:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:56:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550277] New: Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 Summary: Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/x2goclient-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/x2goclient-cli-3.0.1-1.1.2.fc12.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.x2go.org Description: x2goclient CLI is a commandline client which enables you to connect to a x2go system. The client offers you the possibility to setup own clients, programs and ideas. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1889710 rpmlint output: [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint x2goclient-cli-3.0.1-1.1.2.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint x2goclient-cli-3.0.1-1.1.2.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 11:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:01:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241101.nBOB1Rdf008401@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |514687 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 11:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:16:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241116.nBOBGCTm029046@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 06:16:11 EDT --- python-jabberbot-0.8-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-jabberbot-0.8-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 11:14:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:14:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241114.nBOBEUti028785@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #10 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-24 06:14:28 EDT --- Thanks everybody for working on this! I've imported the most recent versions into the branches, but trying to build on devel still gives me this [1]. Also, cvs-import fails on the F-11 and F-12 branches at some point, because the tag has apparently already been created in devel. cvs tag -c python-olpcgames-1_6-2 ERROR: The tag python-olpcgames-1_6-2 is already applied on a different branch ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches python-olpcgames-1_6-1:devel:sdz:1261233260 python-olpcgames-1_6-2:devel:sdz:1261652809 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! Do we still need a rel-eng ticket to unblock it from devel? And how do we proceed with the strange tag names (which apparently lack the Fedora release number at the moment)? [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1889740 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 11:16:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:16:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241116.nBOBGHha010906@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 06:16:16 EDT --- python-jabberbot-0.8-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-jabberbot-0.8-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 11:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241130.nBOBUgua014067@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-24 06:30:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > as far as i understand it right, you should use wildcards for every > versionnumber in your filelist. Not everyone, but where it makes sense. (In reply to comment #14) > %files -f %{name}.lang ... > %{_libdir}/lib%{name}* ... > %files devel ... > %{_libdir}/*.so This will result in files listed twice because %{_libdir}/lib%{name}* and %{_libdir}/*.so both include /usr/lib64/libethos-1.0.so /usr/lib64/libethos-ui-1.0.so Correct is %{_libdir}/libethos*.so.* for the base package (this is what Peter is using right now). > %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/%{name}/ this should be %doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/%{name}/ The python and the vala package should be in the group Development/Languages instaed of Development/Libraries What owns/provides /usr/share/gir-1.0/? Make sure the dir is not unowned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 11:40:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:40:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241140.nBOBe4mc001225@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #11 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-24 06:40:03 EDT --- Ouch! Bad mistake here, better not leave %{dist} out. Sorry for the confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 11:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:48:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241148.nBOBm6jD017343@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 --- Comment #7 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-12-24 06:48:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Now you have > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} > %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/toolbox > %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help > so change this simply to > %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} > or > %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ > both of which are equivalent, but the latter is IMHO clearer to the reader of > the spec file. Hi, when I tried to use only %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} (or %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}) leaving %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/toolbox and %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/help undeclared rpmbuild, at the end, complais about a lot of missing files. I've tried %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/* too, but the result is the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 11:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 06:57:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549915] Review Request: FreeMat - An interpreted, matrix-oriented development environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241157.nBOBvdVn019390@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549915 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-24 06:57:38 EDT --- What exactly did you try? Did you remember to remove the %dir statement, i.e. use %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} instead of %dir %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version} as the latter will own only the directory, not its contents? The config file should not have executable permissions. Remove chmod 755 %{buildroot}/%{_bindir}/blas.ini Any rpmlint warnings/errors about nonexecutables in %{_bindir} are caused by the idiotic placement of config files in bindir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 12:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:08:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241208.nBOC8lDd020931@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #12 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-24 07:08:46 EDT --- Okay, so the package still fails to build for all branches since it's blocked. I filed a rel-eng ticket here: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 12:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:29:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241229.nBOCTLtU009270@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-24 07:29:20 EDT --- Matt, I don't sse you in the list of those persons, who requested membership in 'Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group'. Please, go to FAS and apply for membership here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 12:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241232.nBOCWiH8024820@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #10 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-12-24 07:32:43 EDT --- Fixed the typo, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 12:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:31:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241231.nBOCVgbW024645@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-24 07:31:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #12) > > %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/%{name}/ > > this should be > %doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/%{name}/ The directory %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ and all files/directories/etc under this are automatically marked as %doc (check $ rpm --eval %__docdir_path and /usr/lib/rpm/macros ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 12:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241239.nBOCdEGd025982@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #11 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-12-24 07:39:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pulseaudio-equalizer Short Description: A 15 Bands Equalizer for PulseAudio Owners: hicham Branches: F-12 InitialCC: hicham -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 12:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:39:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241239.nBOCdrv3026175@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 12:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:44:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241244.nBOCiam1012625@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-12-24 07:44:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-visualmatch Short Description: A visual matching game Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 12:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:44:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - A 15 Bands Equalizer for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241244.nBOCirRK027066@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |pulseaudio-equalizer - |pulseaudio-equalizer - A 15 |PulseAudio Equalizer |Bands Equalizer for | |PulseAudio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 12:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:49:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241249.nBOCnw07013705@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 --- Comment #6 from Alagunambi Welkin 2009-12-24 07:49:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The license tag is wrong. COPYING is GPLv3 and the source states "version 3 or > any later version", so the tag should be GPLv3+ Changed > %{_mandir}/man1/webattery.1.* Changed Thanks for correcting me Here are the new modified spec and src.rpm files SPEC URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/webattery/files/webattery-rpm/webattery.spec-1.1-3/download SRPM URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/webattery/files/webattery-rpm/webattery-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm/download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 12:54:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:54:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543151] Review Request: erlang-exmpp - A library for the eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241254.nBOCs5bA029298@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543151 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-24 07:54:04 EDT --- Ver. 0.9.2 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-exmpp.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-exmpp-0.9.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 13:52:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241352.nBODqkE9025219@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-24 08:52:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > What owns/provides /usr/share/gir-1.0/? Make sure the dir is not unowned. # repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatprovides '/usr/share/gir-1.0' | sort atk-devel-0:1.29.4-2.fc13.i686 gobject-introspection-devel-0:0.6.7-1.fc13.i686 gtk2-devel-0:2.19.2-1.fc13.i686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 14:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:19:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547832] Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241419.nBOEJNmr011752@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547832 --- Comment #2 from Ralph Lange 2009-12-24 09:19:22 EDT --- Fixed. (By breaking up the description into separate lines.) New URLs are Spec URL: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/~rlange/procserv/procServ.spec SRPM URL: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/~rlange/procserv/procServ-2.5.0-2.fc12.src.rpm Thanks and happy holidays! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 14:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:22:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548482] Review Request: gnome-dvb-daemon - Digital Television manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241422.nBOEM6oH030662@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548482 --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera 2009-12-24 09:22:05 EDT --- Updated: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gnome-dvb-daemon/gnome-dvb-daemon.spec http://people.fedoraproject.org/~hadess/gnome-dvb-daemon/gnome-dvb-daemon-0.1.14-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 14:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:27:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548795] Review Request: belier - Generates scripts allowing you to chain many ssh connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241427.nBOER2JE031520@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548795 --- Comment #2 from Florent Le Coz 2009-12-24 09:27:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just some quick comment on your spec file. > Thank you > - Please use '%global' instead of '%define' done > - Is 'Requires: python' really needed? Isn't it pulled in automatically by > RPM? You're right, removed. > - '-n %{name}-%{version}' is the default. '%setup -q' is enough. I know, but I thought this way was clearer and easier to maintain. But, ok, fixed. > - Please ask upstream to include a COPYING file. Done on their mailing list : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=4B33734C.30509%40fedoraproject.org > - You must use macros. Replace '/usr/bin/bel' with ' %{_bindir}/bel' > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Macros Done > - Your package provides an egg. Please have a look at the following page > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs Sorry but I don't understand what is wrong with my package, here. The egg is correctly created and installed in %{python_sitelib} using the upstream setuptools script. The page you ask me to read doesn't say much more than that... I will provide a new version of my package once the last point is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 14:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:30:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241430.nBOEU8dc014041@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-24 09:30:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #15) > > What owns/provides /usr/share/gir-1.0/? Make sure the dir is not unowned. It should be this package that owns it. > gobject-introspection-devel-0:0.6.7-1.fc13.i686 These two have just recently had their own native G-O-I added (seen in rawhide reports) so they shouldn't own it and at a guess the packages just need the files explicitly added rather than a dir. > atk-devel-0:1.29.4-2.fc13.i686 > gtk2-devel-0:2.19.2-1.fc13.i686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 14:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:51:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539268] Review Request: rubygem-will_paginate - Most awesome pagination solution for Rail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241451.nBOEpiqW003657@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539268 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-24 09:51:42 EDT --- Well, it seems I completely forgot this review request... For -2: * BuildRequires - Please add some missing BuildRequires http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1890393 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 14:53:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:53:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241453.nBOErcVA003955@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nathanael at gnat.ca | |) --- Comment #38 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-24 09:53:31 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 15:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241539.nBOFdaQW011226@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 10:39:35 EDT --- python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 15:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:40:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241540.nBOFedfk025781@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 10:40:39 EDT --- python-minimock-1.2.5-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-minimock-1.2.5-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 15:41:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:41:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241541.nBOFfUpq012030@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 10:41:29 EDT --- python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 16:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241634.nBOGYWAc002964@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #10 from Carl Byington 2009-12-24 11:34:31 EDT --- possibly, but that seems much more fragile than using chrpath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 16:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241633.nBOGXNvZ002802@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Nathanael Noblet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nathanael at gnat.ca | |) | --- Comment #39 from Nathanael Noblet 2009-12-24 11:33:22 EDT --- still here and kicking... We just had to migrate our server to a new dual server setup so I've been super busy... I'll address the rest of the issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 17:09:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:09:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241709.nBOH9LEd025865@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-24 12:09:19 EDT --- corrected package name: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pki-java-tools Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Java Tools Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 17:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241720.nBOHKCvJ028064@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-24 12:20:10 EDT --- * Thu Dec 24 2009 Kevin Wright 1.3.0-6 - Bugzilla Bug #522207 - packaging for Fedora Dogtag - Removed Requires: rhgb Updated spec file and src rpm: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-common/pki-common.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-common/pki-common-1.3.0-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 17:39:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:39:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550277] Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241739.nBOHddxv013300@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-24 12:39:38 EDT --- Does it make sense to package the client without the server? Or is it also on the way? A few other comments: - License is GPLv2+ and not GPLv2 only - Could you explain your strange release number? Currently it's 1.1.2. The first 1 seems to be your 'bump the release' thing, if you change something and the last 1.2 is upstreams' subversion -> 3.0.1-*1.2* Shouldn't this be swaped? Current version is 3.0.1-1.1.2, if you change something 3.0.1-2.1.2. New version upstream 3.0.1-1.1.3 If swaped: Current version is 3.0.1-1.2.1, if you change something 3.0.1-1.2.2. New version upstream 3.0.1-1.3.1 If not swaped, your changed version is later than the new version ( or I didn't understand, what you wanted to do ;) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 17:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:44:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241744.nBOHiCsM013962@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-24 12:44:10 EDT --- The example provided by you works for me. Some remarks: * Requires Would you check if the following dependencies are not needed? - ebb from lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/ebb.rb - ruby-debug from lib/merb-core/config.rb - ruby-prof from lib/merb-core/core_ext/kernel.rb lib/merb-core/rack/middleware/profiler.rb - swiftiply from lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/evented_mongrel.rb lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/swiftiplied_mongrel.rb - thin from lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/thin.rb - thin-turbo (could not find on gems.rubyforge.org) from lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/thin_turbo.rb - webrat from lib/merb-core/test.rb - webrick from lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/webrick.rb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 17:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:52:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550360] New: Review Request: dnstop - Displays information about DNS traffic on your network Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dnstop - Displays information about DNS traffic on your network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550360 Summary: Review Request: dnstop - Displays information about DNS traffic on your network Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/dnstop.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/dnstop-20090128-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: dnstop is a libpcap application (ala tcpdump) that displays various tables of DNS traffic on your network. dnstop supports both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. To help find especially undesirable DNS queries, dnstop provides a number of filters. dnstop can either read packets from the live capture device, or from a tcpdump savefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 17:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550360] Review Request: dnstop - Displays information about DNS traffic on your network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241755.nBOHtK8w015543@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550360 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2009-12-24 12:55:19 EDT --- Builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1890572 (This is a super easy package to review -- autotools %configure/make/make install, very few source files, nothing surprising.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 18:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:05:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476600] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241805.nBOI5tvt002580@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600 Bug 476600 depends on bug 476527, which changed state. Bug 476527 Summary: Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 18:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:05:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241805.nBOI5sQD002567@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #22 from Conrad Meyer 2009-12-24 13:05:52 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1890575 Imported and built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 18:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:07:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241807.nBOI7SBq002880@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #95 from Andreas Petzold 2009-12-24 13:07:19 EDT --- David, I'm aware of your great effort over the last 1.5 years. Keep on and good luck! I was just wondering why the upstream binary tarball seems to work for some and not for others on f12. Anyway, I'll wait for your rpm to make things work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 18:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:20:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241820.nBOIKCJ6005253@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 --- Comment #2 from matt chan 2009-12-24 13:20:11 EDT --- Thanks for the heads up Peter. I've applied for the packager group now. Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 18:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:52:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241852.nBOIq4p4010594@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede 2009-12-24 13:52:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Hans: changed (actually requiring < 1, quetly and probably wrongly assuming > that soname's number corresponds to the major version number) > Yes that assumption is most likely wrong, I would advise you to remove the < 1 in the requires before building, other then that it now looks ok: Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 19:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:30:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241930.nBOJUtsa005763@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-24 14:30:54 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR since I just sponsored Matt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 19:32:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518949] Review Request: brlcad - computer aided solid modelling and design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241932.nBOJWH2S006150@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518949 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #21 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-24 14:32:14 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR since I just sponsored Matt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 19:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:32:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241932.nBOJWT4C006242@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-24 14:32:28 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR since I just sponsored Matt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 19:34:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:34:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241934.nBOJYO15021990@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-24 14:34:24 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 19:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:34:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912241934.nBOJY1K0021932@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-24 14:34:00 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 19:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:53:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550369] New: Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550369 Summary: Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/spill.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/spill-0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.rc0.org.uk/spill Description: spill is a program for creating set of symbolic links from one directory hierarchy which point to corresponding filenames in a separate directory hierarchy. It's primary use is to allow packages built from source to be installed in separate directory trees, which are all linked together under a common directory tree (e.g. /usr/local) to reduce the length of the PATH environment variable. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1890668 rpmlint output: [fab at localhost i686]$ rpmlint spill* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint spill-0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:25:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:25:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242025.nBOKPcv0030335@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-24 15:25:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Hans: changed (actually requiring < 1, quetly and probably wrongly assuming > > that soname's number corresponds to the major version number) > > > > Yes that assumption is most likely wrong, I would advise you to remove the > < 1 in the requires before building Ok, will do. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: earcandy Short Description: Sound level manager Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:23:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542341] Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242023.nBOKNH5l014184@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542341 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-24 15:23:16 EDT --- Ready for review now: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/mercury.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/mercury-1.0-0.2.alpha6.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542166] Review Request: patricia-trie - Java prefix tree library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242029.nBOKTsds031065@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542166 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-24 15:29:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi, > > I'm not (yet) a packager, anyway I'd like to make an informal review of your > package. > > * You should not rely explicitely on OpenJDK in your BuildRequires; use > instead: > Buildrequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 > as suggested in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires > Don't forget by the way to add a Java runtime by using: > Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0 Given the java packages don't follow uniform versioning, requiring a version with epoch will only drag in OpenJDK anyway. I'm requiring the unversioned OpenJDK so that the package works on other RPM-based platforms (openSUSE). In fact Fedora OpenJDK's generic provides should probably be fixed to provide epoch-less versions (despite the package itself providing the epoch). > Did you tried to build your package with gcj by the way? Yup. Did not work, did not bother to find out why, just switched to OpenJDK. > > * You should maybe in your javadoc subpackage add a Requires on "%{name} = > %{version}-%{release}" also, as recommended here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#ant_2 Good point, will do once the official review is done. > Except these two points, your package seems OK. I rebuild your SRPM, it works > fine and rpmlint doesn't complains :-) Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:35:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:35:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242035.nBOKZWrr032049@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.12-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:36:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242036.nBOKaCDc032205@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.01-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:36:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242036.nBOKaJK9032233@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:36:18 EDT --- clac-004-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update clac'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13609 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:36:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242036.nBOKaXxd017032@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:36:33 EDT --- gdata-sharp-1.4.0.2-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:35:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:35:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242035.nBOKZv1h016886@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:35:56 EDT --- gdata-sharp-1.4.0.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:36:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:36:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242036.nBOKabEG017048@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.0.2-3.fc11 |1.4.0.2-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:35:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242035.nBOKZSx8016789@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:35:26 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:36:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:36:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242036.nBOKa8Ce016935@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:36:07 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:36:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 518586] Review Request: gdata-sharp - .NET library for the Google Data API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242036.nBOKa1i0016906@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518586 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.4.0.2-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:36:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242036.nBOKaTQF017015@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:36:27 EDT --- pki-setup-1.3.0-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-setup'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13613 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242035.nBOKZDul016736@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:35:11 EDT --- gummi-0.4.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gummi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13599 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:42:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242042.nBOKgMvP018594@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:42:21 EDT --- poky-scripts-6-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:42:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:42:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242042.nBOKgQDn018616@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6-6.fc11 |6-6.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:39:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242039.nBOKdFRm017911@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:39:14 EDT --- perl-Pod-PseudoPod-0.15-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:41:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242041.nBOKfnig018442@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:41:45 EDT --- kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:38:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:38:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242038.nBOKcWvf017722@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:38:31 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple-1.01-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:41:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242041.nBOKfrlF018466@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4-1.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:42:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:42:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242042.nBOKgjJD018693@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3-6.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:40:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242040.nBOKeNgb018181@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.0-2.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:41:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242041.nBOKf8uM018308@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |6-6.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:39:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242039.nBOKdJam017931@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.15-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:40:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:40:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529253] Review Request: dmenu - Generic menu for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242040.nBOKeJFT000879@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529253 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:40:18 EDT --- dmenu-4.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:41:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545895] Review Request: poky-scripts - Poky platform builder utility scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242041.nBOKf4Yb001027@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545895 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:41:03 EDT --- poky-scripts-6-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:38:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:38:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 532813] Review Request: gummi - A simple LaTeX editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242038.nBOKckZ7017785@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532813 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:38:45 EDT --- gummi-0.4.2-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gummi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13631 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242040.nBOKeUEj018212@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:40:29 EDT --- dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dogtag-pki-ca-ui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13645 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:39:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242039.nBOKd0pt000540@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.12-1.fc11 |0.12-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:38:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547017] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Config-Simple - Add Config::Simple support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242038.nBOKcam0000440@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.01-1.fc11 |1.01-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:38:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547016] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState - Store Form State without Hidden Fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242038.nBOKctmH000517@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547016 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:38:55 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-FormState-0.12-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:38:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242038.nBOKcpSi017816@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:38:50 EDT --- dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dogtag-pki-common-ui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13632 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:39:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242039.nBOKdUKa017972@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:39:29 EDT --- qjson-0.7.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qjson'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13638 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:39:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242039.nBOKdmHV000752@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:39:47 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:40:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242040.nBOKeig7000974@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:40:43 EDT --- pki-util-1.3.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-util'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13650 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:38:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242038.nBOKc4sc032744@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:38:02 EDT --- pki-util-1.3.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-util'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13624 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:39:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242039.nBOKdYZW000686@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:39:33 EDT --- pki-setup-1.3.0-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pki-setup'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13639 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:39:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:39:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242039.nBOKd8OS017880@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:39:05 EDT --- qjson-0.7.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qjson'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13633 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242039.nBOKdqKE000772@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.97-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:37:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:37:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242037.nBOKbGLL032548@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:37:14 EDT --- dogtag-pki-common-ui-1.3.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dogtag-pki-common-ui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13618 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242037.nBOKbWh7032602@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:37:31 EDT --- python-jabberbot-0.8-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-jabberbot'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13620 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:42:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242042.nBOKgfaX001394@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:42:40 EDT --- picocontainer-1.3-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:45:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242045.nBOKjCjd002310@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:45:11 EDT --- perl-Pod-PseudoPod-0.15-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:46:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242046.nBOKk4AZ002499@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc12 |0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:44:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:44:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549198] Review Request: python-jabberbot - A simple jabber (XMPP) bot framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242044.nBOKissr002251@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549198 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:44:54 EDT --- python-jabberbot-0.8-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-jabberbot'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13674 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:45:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539863] Review Request: perl-Pod-PseudoPod - Extending the POD tags for book manuscripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242045.nBOKjG6k019620@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539863 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.15-1.fc11 |0.15-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:45:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242045.nBOKjvLn019768@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:45:56 EDT --- kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:44:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:44:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242044.nBOKiOad019436@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.97-1.fc11 |0.97-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:44:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543861] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch - Adds attribute based support for parsing the PATH_INFO of an HTTP request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242044.nBOKiKBb019420@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543861 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:44:19 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ActionDispatch-0.97-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:46:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546868] Review Request: clac - Command Line Advanced Calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242046.nBOKkaI1002614@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546868 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:46:36 EDT --- clac-004-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update clac'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13687 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 20:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522208] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-ca-ui In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242046.nBOKkfXd002643@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522208 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-24 15:46:40 EDT --- dogtag-pki-ca-ui-1.3.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dogtag-pki-ca-ui'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13688 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 21:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242105.nBOL5Wpn006926@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-24 16:05:28 EDT --- python-olpcgames is on the way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 21:46:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:46:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542341] Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242146.nBOLkotj014580@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542341 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-24 16:46:49 EDT --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1890768 f12, doesn't build in f13 at the time, presumably due to some maven2-plugin-jar breakage; yet to be looked into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 23:18:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:18:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225932] Merge Review: jakarta-commons-launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242318.nBONIRsg015947@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225932 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-24 18:18:25 EDT --- Closing. It was approved almost 3 years ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 23:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:33:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547832] Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242333.nBONXFpd001707@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547832 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-24 18:33:14 EDT --- I did a quick test without autoconf, just used '%configure --docdir=%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}' and the doc stuff is in the right place. If this really works the way it should there are no BR needed and the %install section only needs 'make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"' - Please add '%{?_smp_mflags}' to make https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Parallel_make - A blank line between the changelog entries would be nice ;-) - Without further investigation I would say that '%attr(755,root,root)' is not needed for '%{_bindir}/procServ' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 24 23:52:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550369] Review Request: spill - A segregated package install logical linker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912242352.nBONqq8Z021782@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550369 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-24 18:52:50 EDT --- Review: Good: - license ok - %files ok - %doc ok - permissions ok - parallel make - name ok - url ok - buildroot ok - no BR/R ok - no *.la - no libs - rpmlint clean Comment: Is there a reason, why not using %makeinstall? from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used "%makeinstall is a kludge that can work with Makefiles that don't make use of the DESTDIR variable" There is no DESTDIR variable, and %makeinstall works (only wrong permissions, that can be fixed after that or/and complained upstream.) Doing the install like this is ok, too; but I prefer %makeinstall in this case... So please consider changing to %makeinstall :) ################################################# APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 00:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:24:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542760] Review Request: mopac7 - Semi-empirical quantum mechanics suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250024.nBP0OVEl010223@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542760 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-24 19:24:30 EDT --- Anyway, it's the recommended way. Chrpath is a last resort and should be treated as such. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 00:32:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250032.nBP0W16b011983@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 457210, which changed state. Bug 457210 Summary: Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 00:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:31:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 470639] Review Request: dpatch - Debian patch utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250031.nBP0VwHP011968@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470639 Bug 470639 depends on bug 457210, which changed state. Bug 457210 Summary: Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 00:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457211] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250031.nBP0Vv3H011962@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457211 Bug 457211 depends on bug 457210, which changed state. Bug 457210 Summary: Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 00:31:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:31:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250031.nBP0VuNm011951@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 Bug 456756 depends on bug 457210, which changed state. Bug 457210 Summary: Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 00:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250031.nBP0VsFm011934@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #49 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-24 19:31:45 EDT --- What's the state on this? Leigh does not want to package this anymore (see comment #38), so it's the choice of oget or Andrew to take it over, but please do the following: (In reply to comment #37) > If this gets closed, anyone else is welcome to open their own review ticket. > If that happens, please mark this one as a duplicate of the new one. Closing till someone else opens an own review request and closes this as duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 00:35:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:35:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457211] Review Request: debhelper - Helper programs for debian/rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250035.nBP0ZQ0A029282@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457211 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-24 19:35:25 EDT --- Leigh, what's the state on this? You didn't want to continue dpkg, what's with this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 00:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:34:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456756] Review Request: alien - A program that converts between the rpm, dpkg, stampede slp, and slackware tgz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250034.nBP0YYRI029165@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456756 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |needinfo?(leigh123linux at goo | |glemail.com) --- Comment #13 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-24 19:34:30 EDT --- Leigh, what's the state on this? You didn't want to continue dpkg, what's with this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 00:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:53:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250053.nBP0r830031911@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Alias|dpkg | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 02:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:47:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250247.nBP2lYXW001979@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #17 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-24 21:47:29 EDT --- I have no idea if this is related, but I found that someone had to specially patch interaction between GIMP and emacs when using emacs' sit-for. Maybe this would help?: http://github.com/pft/gimpmode/commit/296ca334d510975a5d271fb151e4250676f61ae3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 03:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250324.nBP3OhBN025394@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #18 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-24 22:24:42 EDT --- I've been hunting for other reports about problems with sit-for. You may have seen all this, but perhaps I've found something you haven't seen. Anyway, I found this PVS bug report: http://pvs.csl.sri.com/cgi-bin/pvs-bug?id=440 And maybe this is useful too: http://emacs-w3m.namazu.org/ml/msg09645.html Good luck, and Merry Christmas! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 06:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 01:29:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250629.nBP6Tm2m024694@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #96 from Scott Williams 2009-12-25 01:29:41 EDT --- my best guess as to why it would work for one and not the other from tarball is a dependency issue. Thus an RPM will be nice to have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 08:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:20:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250820.nBP8KcVG026245@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-25 03:20:31 EDT --- osutil-1.3.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osutil-1.3.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 08:44:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 03:44:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250844.nBP8iYTJ026875@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-25 03:44:32 EDT --- osutil-1.3.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/osutil-1.3.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 09:26:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:26:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912250926.nBP9QAs8005063@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-25 04:26:09 EDT --- - The name of this package should be 'tnt', not 'tnt-devel'. - Srap the BuildRequires and Requires lines, they are empty. - Instead of cp -a %{_builddir}/tnt/*.h %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/ you can just use cp -a *.h %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/ because you are in the builddir already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 10:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 05:16:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550277] Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912251016.nBPAGtMT013172@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-25 05:16:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Shouldn't this be swaped? > > Current version is 3.0.1-1.1.2, > if you change something 3.0.1-2.1.2. > New version upstream 3.0.1-1.1.3 The current numbering system is correct, check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages i.e. when upstream releases 3.0.1-1.3, you bump the release number to 2 so that you get 3.0.1-2.1.3 as the new rpm version-release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 13:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 08:59:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550277] Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912251359.nBPDxpDR010372@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-25 08:59:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Shouldn't this be swaped? > > > > Current version is 3.0.1-1.1.2, > > if you change something 3.0.1-2.1.2. > > New version upstream 3.0.1-1.1.3 > > The current numbering system is correct, check > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages This link to Post-Release_packages applies to 'Non-Numeric Version in Release'. If you don't know the .spec and the upstream version naming, you can't know what is meant by this long version number, if you just see 3.0.1-1.1.2. Usualy the last number is the 'relese bump number'. This destroys anything... -1, for applying Non-Numberic Version guidelines to this Numberic Version... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 15:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 10:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550277] Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912251557.nBPFv677032385@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-25 10:57:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Does it make sense to package the client without the server? > Or is it also on the way? > > A few other comments: > > - License is GPLv2+ and not GPLv2 only > > - Could you explain your strange release number? > Currently it's 1.1.2. The first 1 seems to be your 'bump the release' thing, > if you change something and the last 1.2 is upstreams' subversion -> > 3.0.1-*1.2* > > Shouldn't this be swaped? > > Current version is 3.0.1-1.1.2, > if you change something 3.0.1-2.1.2. > New version upstream 3.0.1-1.1.3 > > If swaped: > Current version is 3.0.1-1.2.1, > if you change something 3.0.1-1.2.2. > New version upstream 3.0.1-1.3.1 > > > If not swaped, your changed version is later than the new version > ( or I didn't understand, what you wanted to do ;) ) Think the case that the upstream releases 3.0.1-1.2.1 In your versioning way, - current 3.0.1-1.2.1 - update on Fedora 3.0.1-1.2.2 - upstream releated 3.0.1-1.2.1 -> ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 16:05:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 11:05:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550277] Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912251605.nBPG5k1k029812@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-25 11:05:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > - upstream releated 3.0.1-1.2.1 -> ??? s|releated|released| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 16:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 11:24:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550277] Review Request: x2goclient-cli - A command-line client for the x2go system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912251624.nBPGOggh003992@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550277 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-25 11:24:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Think the case that the upstream releases 3.0.1-1.2.1 > In your versioning way, > - current 3.0.1-1.2.1 > - update on Fedora 3.0.1-1.2.2 > - upstream releated 3.0.1-1.2.1 -> ??? True... Thanks for pointing that out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 18:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 13:53:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543159] Review Request: zeitgeist - Framework providing Desktop activity awareness In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912251853.nBPIrAlZ025480@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543159 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-25 13:53:04 EDT --- Review: Good: - name ok - latest version packaged - correctly installing *.mo - no *.la - no libs - %files ok - %doc ok - group ok - %install ok - rpmlint clean Needswork: - BR/R not complete: to own the folder %{_datadir}/dbus-1/services: Requires: dbus is missing - License is wrong: In COPYRIGHT is mentioned that zeitgeist/loggers/iso_strptime.py is stolen and under license LGPLv3 only Rest of the *.py headers say LGPLv3+ -> Correctly license is LGPLv3+ and LGPLv3 Please mention, that zeitgeist/loggers/iso_strptime.py is LGPLv3 and the rest LGPLv3+ in the specfile as a comment. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 19:47:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:47:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543159] Review Request: zeitgeist - Framework providing Desktop activity awareness In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912251947.nBPJlSVt005454@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543159 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-12-25 14:47:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - BR/R not complete: > to own the folder %{_datadir}/dbus-1/services: > Requires: dbus is missing It's not only missing for directory ownership but also to make zeitgeist work. dbus-python and gnome-python2-gconf are missing to, not sure if these are all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 19:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550519] New: Themonospot suite - core, plugins, console and gui's applications to parse multimedia files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Themonospot suite - core, plugins, console and gui's applications to parse multimedia files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550519 Summary: Themonospot suite - core, plugins, console and gui's applications to parse multimedia files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hmandevteam at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Core Base Component: SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-base-0.8.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Plugin Avi Component: SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Plugin Mkv Component: SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Console Component: SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-console.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-console-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Gui Gtk Component: SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk-0.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Gui Qt Component: SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt-0.1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: is the evolution of Themonospot project. In this suite there are 3 software layer: - core base component - plugins components - console and gui's components The suite provide to scan multimedia files to extract audio and video streams informations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Dec 25 21:33:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 16:33:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537897] Review Request: mingw32-openjpeg - mingw32 package for openjpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912252133.nBPLXmkc018581@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537897 Moritz Barsnick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |moritz at barsnick.net --- Comment #7 from Moritz Barsnick 2009-12-25 16:33:44 EDT --- Wow, I think rpmlint needs some new rules. This package's dscription is borked. See new bug #550532. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 02:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 21:11:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549809] Review Request: mingw32-libzip - mingw32 port of libzip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260211.nBQ2BmOJ004190@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549809 Dave Ludlow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Dave Ludlow 2009-12-25 21:11:47 EDT --- The Bohdi<--->bugzilla link seemed to break, so this is a manual note that this package has been pushed into F11 updates & F12 updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 04:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 23:05:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260405.nBQ459i3026325@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 --- Comment #6 from matt chan 2009-12-25 23:05:08 EDT --- I've implemented the last 2 changes but I've held back releasing the spec because the 1st is giving me trouble. The project consists only of header files. Should it still be named 'tnt' and not 'tnt-devel'? When I name the package 'tnt', rpmlint complains about having headers in a non-devel package. Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 05:10:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:10:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550519] Themonospot suite - core, plugins, console and gui's applications to parse multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260510.nBQ5Ahuj016828@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550519 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-26 00:10:42 EDT --- Please submit seperated review requests for each packages (i.e. submit 6 review requests) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 06:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 01:15:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550582] New: Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 Summary: Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dpkg/dpkg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/dpkg/dpkg-1.15.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains the tools (including dpkg-source) required to unpack, build and upload Debian source packages. This package also contains the programs dpkg which used to handle the installation and removal of packages on a Debian system. This package also contains dselect, an interface for managing the installation and removal of packages on the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 06:17:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 01:17:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260617.nBQ6HPMt014991@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #50 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-12-26 01:17:23 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 550582 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 06:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 01:17:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260617.nBQ6HQxg015001@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-12-26 01:17:23 EDT --- *** Bug 457210 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 06:23:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 01:23:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260623.nBQ6NZ0W008796@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 Dave Ulrick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |d-ulrick at comcast.net --- Comment #37 from Dave Ulrick 2009-12-26 01:23:32 EDT --- After installing kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4-1.fc11, the cashew reappeared on my desktop. If I attempt to add the Ihatethecashew widget, I get the message: "This object could not be created for the following reason: Could not find requested component: ihatethecashew". The plasmoid's shared library does in fact exist: $ rpm -ql kde-plasma-ihatethecashew /usr/lib/kde4/plasma_applet_ihatethecashew.so /usr/share/doc/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4 /usr/share/doc/kde-plasma-ihatethecashew-0.4/COPYING /usr/share/kde4/services/plasma-applet-ihatethecashew.desktop $ ls -l /usr/lib/kde4/plasma_applet_ihatethecashew.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 29056 2009-12-21 00:04 /usr/lib/kde4/plasma_applet_ihatethecashew.so* Other plasmoids in the /usr/lib/kde4/ directory can be added successfully (e.g., Fuzzy Clock). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 07:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 02:13:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260713.nBQ7DoUO018839@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-26 02:13:49 EDT --- What you need to do is create a -devel subpackage. For example, see the GSL spec file at http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gsl/devel/gsl.spec on how to do this. The trick is, that you do not proclaim a %files section for the main package. That way the main rpm won't be created. However, if in the future the project implements a runtime library, then we will have the opportunity to expand the package in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 07:38:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 02:38:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260738.nBQ7c6rX023148@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #38 from Eli Wapniarski 2009-12-26 02:38:05 EDT --- What happens if you uninstall then reinstall the plasmoid? If that doesn't correct the problem, please open up a bug report and I will pass this along upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 08:42:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260842.nBQ8gvnJ001348@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 --- Comment #8 from matt chan 2009-12-26 03:42:56 EDT --- Ah. I did not know you could create a devel subpackage by itself. Here are the new URLs with the changes implemented: SPEC: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/tnt/tnt.spec SRPM: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/tnt/tnt-3.0.11-0.2.beta.fc12.src.rpm Thanks for the feedback. Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 08:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:54:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260854.nBQ8sr4H003099@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980 --- Comment #4 from matt chan 2009-12-26 03:54:51 EDT --- Updated package name to jama from jama-devel and included the use of a subpackage from feedback on the tnt package. Also cleaned up the %install section. SPEC: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama.spec SRPM: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:55555/jama/jama-1.2.5-2.fc12.src.rpm Matt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 09:01:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:01:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Themonospot Avi Plugin - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260901.nBQ914D3011331@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 --- Comment #1 from Armando Basile 2009-12-26 04:01:03 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 08:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 03:56:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] New: Themonospot Core Base component - core component of Themonospot suite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Themonospot Core Base component - core component of Themonospot suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Summary: Themonospot Core Base component - core component of Themonospot suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hmandevteam at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-base-0.8.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: It install: - themonospot-base mono assembly in GAC (use from other gui applications) - themonospot-plugin-interface in GAC (use to write plugins) - themonospot-plugin-manager (use to load plugins at runtime) - xml language files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 09:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:00:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] New: Themonospot Avi Plugin - manage Avi container Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Themonospot Avi Plugin - manage Avi container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 Summary: Themonospot Avi Plugin - manage Avi container Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hmandevteam at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora It install: - themonospot-plugin-avi mono assembly (use from themonospot-base) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 09:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:03:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] New: Themonospot Mkv Plugin - manage Matroska container Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Themonospot Mkv Plugin - manage Matroska container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 Summary: Themonospot Mkv Plugin - manage Matroska container Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hmandevteam at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: It install: - themonospot-plugin-mkv mono assembly (use from themonospot-base) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 09:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:08:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] New: Themonospot Gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Themonospot Gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 Summary: Themonospot Gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hmandevteam at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk-0.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: themonospot-gui-gtk is a Mono framework application to create a graphic frontend to use themonospot base component and his plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 09:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:06:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] New: Themonospot Console application - console application to scan multimedia files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Themonospot Console application - console application to scan multimedia files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 Summary: Themonospot Console application - console application to scan multimedia files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hmandevteam at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-console.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-console-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: themonospot-console is a mono console application to scan multimedia files using themonospot base component and his plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 09:10:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:10:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] New: Themonospot Qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Themonospot Qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 Summary: Themonospot Qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hmandevteam at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt-0.1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: themonospot-gui-qt is a Mono framework application to create a graphic frontend to use themonospot base component and his plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 09:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:12:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550519] Themonospot suite - core, plugins, console and gui's applications to parse multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912260912.nBQ9Cxjl006566@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550519 --- Comment #2 from Armando Basile 2009-12-26 04:12:58 EDT --- submitted seperated review requests: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 10:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 05:41:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261041.nBQAfAa9027128@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: tnt-devel - |Review Request: tnt - C++ |C++ templates for |templates for scientific |scientific computing |computing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 10:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 05:39:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261039.nBQAdnPK026569@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-26 05:39:48 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is not silent, but this the only warning may be safely ignored: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/tnt-devel-3.0.11-0.2.beta.fc12.noarch.rpm tnt-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. 0 Upstream doesn't provide the file file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum tnt_3_0_11.zip* f0779ef0090df4e5143d4cfcdc2b8c9a9f1abb6befcc97c0969b6e7f134b5dd1 tnt_3_0_11.zip f0779ef0090df4e5143d4cfcdc2b8c9a9f1abb6befcc97c0969b6e7f134b5dd1 tnt_3_0_11.zip.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. 0 The package doesn't contain %doc files at all. + C header files packaged in devel sub-package. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). 0 No devel sub-package. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 10:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 05:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261044.nBQAip1n027722@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550 --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-26 05:44:43 EDT --- Re: comment 8 > ../../FeLib/Include/save.h:39: error: cast from 'FILE*' to 'truth' loses precision | typedef.h:typedef int truth; | typedef.h:typedef const int ctruth; | | save.h: FILE* Buffer; | save.h: truth IsOpen() { return truth(Buffer); } An attempt at creating a boolean type and really just ending with a typecast from pointer to int. Nothing is won by not using an explicit NULL-pointer comparison in this case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 10:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 05:51:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt - C++ templates for scientific computing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261051.nBQAp0ON020925@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-26 05:50:59 EDT --- sed s/"0 No devel sub-package."// -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 10:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 05:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261049.nBQAnjOE020768@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-26 05:49:43 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is not silent, but his the only warning may be omitted. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/jama-devel-1.2.5-2.fc12.noarch.rpm jama-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. 0 Upstream doesn't provide the file file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum jama125.zip* 7432bf51d7101f63d5880421f940f64cea124f1460ff2fcfb6226e6744d1360c jama125.zip 7432bf51d7101f63d5880421f940f64cea124f1460ff2fcfb6226e6744d1360c jama125.zip.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. + The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. 0 The package doesn't contain %doc files. + C header files packaged in devel sub-package. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 12:13:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 07:13:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261213.nBQCD2XV007843@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2009-12-26 07:13:00 EDT --- Something is wrong with the new -debuginfo package now. It's missing the sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 13:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261300.nBQD0QIw017124@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #18 from Dave M 2009-12-26 08:00:23 EDT --- 4.22 has just been released. Spec URL: http://clamtk.sourceforge.net/fedora/4.22/clamtk.spec SRPM URL: http://clamtk.sourceforge.net/fedora/4.22/clamtk-4.22-1.fc12.src.rpm Regarding the licensing issue, I recently noticed that the Debian ports have always listed it as "GPL+ or Artistic" anyway. So now the Fedora builds match that. And with luck, the Perl module dependency portion is correct now. Looking forward to feedback. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 14:41:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 09:41:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261441.nBQEfO2t031873@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728 --- Comment #39 from Dave Ulrick 2009-12-26 09:41:22 EDT --- The problem reoccurred after uninstall/reinstall so I opened a new bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 14:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 09:48:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261448.nBQEmaMC015822@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Themonospot Core Base |Review request: |component - core component |themonospot-base - core |of Themonospot suite |component of Themonospot | |suite --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-26 09:48:35 EDT --- First of all, please upload the correct spec files for Fedora (not for Mandriva) which correspond to the srpms you uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 15:15:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:15:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261515.nBQFFaeH005240@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #2 from Armando Basile 2009-12-26 10:15:35 EDT --- i'm sorry, i uploaded correct spec files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 16:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:40:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261640.nBQGeUPX020184@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #12 from Sandro Mathys 2009-12-26 11:40:27 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE-2.9-1.fc12.src.rpm Only small changes to the spec file: - new version - msvcp90.dll is now removed in %prep - pype.py needs CRLF -> LF treatment with the new release Everything else is still the same as in my last version above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 17:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:31:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261731.nBQHVI20011111@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-26 12:31:17 EDT --- For 4.22-1: * Requires - Again please check if writing "R: perl-foo" explicitly is really needed. ! For example when you try $ rpm -q --requires clamtk", you'll see that "perl(Locale::gettext)" is automatically detected and added to R, so writing "R: perl-gettext" is not needed. By the way with rawhide rpm (4.8.0), when you try "rpm -qv --requires clamtk", you can check what Requires are manually written in the spec file and what are automatically added by rpmbuild like: --------------------------------------------------- $ rpm -qv --requires clamtk post: /bin/sh postun: /bin/sh auto: /usr/bin/perl manual: clamav >= 0.90 manual: clamav-data manual: clamav-update manual: cronie manual: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) auto: perl(Carp) auto: perl(ClamTk::App) ..... --------------------------------------------------- ! License - Not a blocker, however it is better that you update lib/GUI.pm and the corresponding gettext po files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 17:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:32:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261732.nBQHWIbm029308@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405 --- Comment #9 from Liberty 2009-12-26 12:32:16 EDT --- Updated package, include latest fixes of punctuation indexing and sound problems. SPEC: http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict.spec?attredirects=0&d=1 SRPM http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict-0.9.0-3.20091226git7a03248.fc12.src.rpm?attredirects=0&d=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 17:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:37:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261737.nBQHbgYV030140@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-26 12:37:40 EDT --- By the way: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ As you're the upstream of this package it may be that you are interested in maintaining this package only on Fedora, however still I want to see at least one pre-review by you (if you don't want to submit another review request) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:03:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261803.nBQI30k3016325@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550599 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:02:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:02:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261802.nBQI2xNT016307@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550594 Summary|Themonospot Console |Review Request: |application - console |themonospot-console - |application to scan |console application to scan |multimedia files |multimedia files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:07:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550664] New: Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550664 Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-gui-common/mysql-gui-common-static.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-gui-common/mysql-gui-common-static-5.0r17-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Static libs for mysql-gui-common. Primarly for developers to build mysql-querybrowser and mysql-administrator. Important additional notes: 1) It was initially just mysql-gui-tools, without -static suffix, but current RPM does not allow build arch-dependant packages as subpackage noarch one (comment about it also placed in spec). So, may be it is not obvious but it finally does same result in reverse way. 2) It is shared package to build mysql-querybrowser and mysql-administrator. In separate package to do not double it in mentioned. 3) This package obsolete mysql-gui-tools. I currently co-maintainer of it and we discuss with Dennis Gilmore (primary maintainer) and make decision to again split this to separate packages. Dennis, if you want - feel free to co-maintain it. 4) Spec-file indented by tabs with 5-space width. If it is the problem to you, please, just do not start review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:14:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261814.nBQIE7hu003862@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:14:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261814.nBQIE6TW003855@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550594 Summary|Themonospot Mkv Plugin - |Review Request: |manage Matroska container |themonospot-plugin-mkv - | |manage Matroska container -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261816.nBQIGEE2004189@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550594 Summary|Themonospot Gtk - Gtk gui |Review Request: |to scan multimedia files |themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk |using Themonospot |gui to scan multimedia | |files using Themonospot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:16:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261816.nBQIGEKp004196@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:16:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550664] Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261816.nBQIG0i6004148@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550664 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550667 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:15:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550667] Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261815.nBQIFxbh004142@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550667 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550664 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:15:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:15:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550667] New: Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550667 Summary: Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-querybrowser/mysql-querybrowser.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-querybrowser/mysql-querybrowser-5.0r17-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: The MySQL Query Browser is a graphical tool provided by MySQL AB for creating, executing, and optimizing queries in a graphical environment. Where the MySQL Administrator is designed to administer a MySQL server, the MySQL Query Browser is designed to help you query and analyze data stored within your MySQL database. Important additional notes: 1) mysql-querybrowser was part of mysql-gui-tools. I currently co-maintainer of it and we discuss with Dennis Gilmore (primary maintainer) and make decision to again split this to separate packages. Dennis, if you want - feel free to co-maintain it. 2) Spec-file indented by tabs with 5-space width. If it is the problem to you, please, just do not start review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:21:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550668] Review Request: mysql-administrator - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261821.nBQILHql004977@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550668 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550664 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:21:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550664] Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261821.nBQILIp5004983@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550664 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550668 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550668] New: Review Request: mysql-administrator - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mysql-administrator - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550668 Summary: Review Request: mysql-administrator - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pahan at hubbitus.info QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-administrator/mysql-administrator.spec SRPM URL: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-administrator/mysql-administrator-5.0r17-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: MySQL Administrator enables developers and DBAs to easily perform all the command line operations visually including configuring servers, administering users, and dynamically monitoring database health. Other common administrative tasks such as monitoring replication status, backup and restore, and viewing logs can also be performed through the MySQL Administrator graphical console. Additional notes: 1) mysql-querybrowser was part of mysql-gui-tools. I currently co-maintainer of it and we discuss with Dennis Gilmore (primary maintainer) and make decision to again split this to separate packages. Dennis, if you want - feel free to co-maintain it. 2) Spec-file indented by tabs with 5-space width. If it is the problem to you, please, just do not start review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:39:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:39:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261839.nBQIdcdJ008227@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550601 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261839.nBQIdbSJ008221@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550594 Summary|Themonospot Qt - Qt gui to |Review Request: |scan multimedia files using |themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui |Themonospot |to scan multimedia files | |using Themonospot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:48:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261848.nBQImcw9009533@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550597 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 18:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:48:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261848.nBQImbIn009525@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550594 Summary|Themonospot Avi Plugin - |Review Request: |manage Avi container |themonospot-plugin-avi - | |manage Avi container -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 19:39:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:39:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261939.nBQJd49d023446@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-26 14:39:03 EDT --- unicornscan-0.4.7-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unicornscan-0.4.7-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 19:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:39:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261939.nBQJdaat023542@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 19:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:38:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261938.nBQJcgZp005083@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190 Bug 538190 depends on bug 537805, which changed state. Bug 537805 Summary: Please build libdnet for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537805 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-26 14:38:39 EDT --- unicornscan-0.4.7-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unicornscan-0.4.7-2.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 19:50:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:50:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261950.nBQJonMY007637@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 19:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:54:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261954.nBQJsV9i026237@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-26 14:54:29 EDT --- osutil-1.3.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update osutil'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13729 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 19:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:53:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912261953.nBQJruvN026076@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-26 14:53:54 EDT --- osutil-1.3.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update osutil'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 20:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:38:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550690] New: Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550690 Summary: Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libsurl.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libsurl-0.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Project URL: http://libsurl.sourceforge.net/ Description: libsurl is a library for generating short urls (using various online services like tinyurl.com and bit.ly) suited to use where space is limited, such as in status messages. surl is the command-line interface to libsurl, providing most of the functionality in libsurl as well as additional functionality likely to be of use to command-line users. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1891806 rpmlint output: [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint libsurl-0.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at localhost i686]$ rpmlint libsurl* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 20:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:45:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550692] New: Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550692 Summary: Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcpreen.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcpreen-1.4.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Project URL: http://www.remlab.net/tcpreen/ Description: TCPreen is a simple tool to monitor and analyze data transmitted between clients and servers through connection-oriented streams data such as a TCP sessions; it supports TCP over either IPv4 or IPv6. This tool focuses on the data stream (software/socket layer), not on the lower level transmission protocol as packet sniffers do. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1892028 rpmlint output: [fab at localhost i686]$ rpmlint tcpreen* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint tcpreen-1.4.4-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 21:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547832] Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912262151.nBQLp61i015197@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547832 --- Comment #4 from Ralph Lange 2009-12-26 16:51:05 EDT --- Fixed. New URLs are Spec URL: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/~rlange/procserv/procServ.spec SRPM URL: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/~rlange/procserv/procServ-2.5.0-3.fc12.src.rpm - I was confusing the package build from release tar with the build from repository (which needs the autotools), so I followed your suggestions. I kept the BuildRoot prep in %install, though, as many of my "customers" are still running older RHEL/SL and Fedora releases and will package locally using that spec. - I also added the parallel make flags, - nice blank lines in the changelog, - and removed the %attr, which indeed was not needed. Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 21:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:59:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912262159.nBQLx89w031083@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-26 16:59:08 EDT --- python-olpcgames-1.6-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-olpcgames-1.6-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 21:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912262159.nBQLx4x9031062@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-26 16:59:03 EDT --- python-olpcgames-1.6-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-olpcgames-1.6-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Dec 26 23:16:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 18:16:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548795] Review Request: belier - Generates scripts allowing you to chain many ssh connections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912262316.nBQNGdBb029637@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548795 --- Comment #3 from Florent Le Coz 2009-12-26 18:16:38 EDT --- meanwhile, here is the new version with all your comments applied : Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~louizatakk/rpm/belier.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~louizatakk/rpm/belier-1.2-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 02:18:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:18:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912270218.nBR2IUi8025545@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-26 21:18:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > You can choose, between > - adding a comment above the License: field > - refer to a file upstream, where anything is explained > - breack down in the %files section. > > > See [1] for further information. > > [1] > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios This is a MUST. ;) If you have multiple licenses, you have to e.g. refer to in this case readme.txt or say in a comment, which files have which license. wxWidgets is GPL compatible (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing ), so anything under wxWidgets can be relicensed under GPL. BUT in fact, Josiah has already done that: from readme.txt: ''' The portions of STCStyleEditor.py included in StyleSetter.py, which is used to support styles, was released under the wxWindows license [...] ''' But the whole file itself is GPL -> no wxWidgets everywhere. What is copyrighted under LGPL? There is a lgpl.txt, but that's it. Or am I wrong? So, it stays for me: GPLv2. @ Josiah: Correct me, if I'm wrong ;) ######################################## Some other issues: - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} is created, but empty (rest of old icon path) -> not needed anymore. - sed -i -e "s;PYTHONPATH;%{python_sitelib};g" %{SOURCE1} has no effect. There is no pythonpath in the .desktop ( yet? ;) ) - Don't copy *.pyc and *pyw. They are created later in the /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile part anyway. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries MUST: don't install them, and Josiah please don't include them (same for *.dll);) - changelog format: There is '* new version' -> '- new version' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 04:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:26:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912270426.nBR4Qw0J015010@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #14 from Josiah Carlson 2009-12-26 23:26:56 EDT --- The portion that is lgpl licensed is parts of plugins/exparse.py , which describes which parts of itself are lgpl v2 licensed, and includes a link to the original version of the files w/the original license. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 04:49:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:49:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912270449.nBR4n8v7018389@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-26 23:49:07 EDT --- Just a few comments: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - Could you reduce the %files a bit? e.g.: %{_bindir}/dpkg-* %{_mandir}/*/man*/dpkg-* and so on. It will be easier to follow, and maybe the compression format of the man pages changes and you need to rename all *.gz to something else. - There is a new version upstream. How do you create the patch? (Maybe sed would be enought. Most of the changes are only in the *.po file, which will change quite often...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 10:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:05:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271005.nBRA5eqK009429@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #17 from Jan Klepek 2009-12-27 05:05:35 EDT --- Applications/Internet would be better -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 10:57:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:57:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271057.nBRAvGaX020561@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) --- Comment #9 from Jan Klepek 2009-12-27 05:57:13 EDT --- Lubomir or Matthew, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 10:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:59:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271059.nBRAxIqh016394@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #3 from leigh scott 2009-12-27 05:59:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Just a few comments: > - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define > - Could you reduce the %files a bit? > e.g.: %{_bindir}/dpkg-* > %{_mandir}/*/man*/dpkg-* > and so on. > It will be easier to follow, and maybe the compression format of the man > pages > changes and you need to rename all *.gz to something else. > - There is a new version upstream. > How do you create the patch? > (Maybe sed would be enought. Most of the changes are only in the *.po file, > which will change quite often...) You are wrong, doing this will mess the package up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 11:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 06:02:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271102.nBRB2kEO017077@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #4 from leigh scott 2009-12-27 06:02:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Just a few comments: > - > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define > - Could you reduce the %files a bit? > e.g.: %{_bindir}/dpkg-* > %{_mandir}/*/man*/dpkg-* > and so on. The dpkg package is total scrambled if you do this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 11:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 06:14:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461119] Review Request: libtiger - Rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271114.nBRBERs3019637@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461119 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-12-27 06:14:25 EDT --- I will fix Is this a full review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 11:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 06:32:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 512726] Review Request: perl-Test-Refcount - Assert reference counts on objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271132.nBRBWwWi023058@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512726 Bug 512726 depends on bug 514942, which changed state. Bug 514942 Summary: An assertion in FindRef.xs fails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514942 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 12:06:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 07:06:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271206.nBRC6BJD000564@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-27 07:06:10 EDT --- (I have not tried to check this gem by myself, however please be careful when attempting to delete hidden files or zero-size files. I have already seen some cases (including gem based rpms) in which deleting such files made the package non-workable. Also it is recommended to execute $ rake test in %check as this gem file contains test/ directory) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 12:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 07:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542341] Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271211.nBRCBv0U029631@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542341 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550790 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-27 07:11:56 EDT --- Bug which causes raw hide build to fail: #550790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 12:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 07:14:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550104] Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271214.nBRCERlO002321@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550104 Alagunambi Welkin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alagunambiwelkin at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Alagunambi Welkin 2009-12-27 07:14:26 EDT --- Hi, Just a quick review suggestion, In magento.spec line no. 28 remove unwanted tabs Alagunambi Welkin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 12:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 07:21:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271221.nBRCLSHN031279@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 Alagunambi Welkin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alagunambiwelkin at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Alagunambi Welkin 2009-12-27 07:21:26 EDT --- Hi, Just a quick review suggestion, you can change the Source0 value to http://downloads.sourceforge.net/flaw/flaw-1.2.tar.gz Alagunambi Welkin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 13:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:05:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271305.nBRD50aQ011369@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 Jiri Popelka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 13:30:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:30:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271330.nBRDUXkt013031@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause 2009-12-27 08:30:30 EDT --- Thank you very much for the update. (In reply to comment #2) > Fixed: > > - Let URL tag point to specific project page on moblin.org > > - Add MIT to license tag > > - Remove unusual %configure flags / CFLAGS > > Reported upstream. > > - Package API documentation > > - Fix public header files I've reviewed the new package and besides the public header / pkgconfig issue it looks fine now. Have you already heard something from upstream? However, since it is possible to compile eom against clutter-gesture (and the test programs work), the header issue does not block the review. The remaining minor non-blocking issues are: 1. Package API documentation 2. Fix public header files / pkgconfig Please note, that /usr/lib/pkgconfig/clutter-gesture.pc also contains a placeholder which was not replaced by the configure script: modlibexecdir=@modlibexecdir@ This must also be fixed. -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 14:33:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 09:33:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271433.nBREXveN024700@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #15 from Sandro Mathys 2009-12-27 09:33:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE-2.9-1.fc12.src.rpm (In reply to comment #13) > This is a MUST. ;) > If you have multiple licenses, you have to e.g. refer to in this case > readme.txt or say in a comment, which files have which license. Oh, I thought that only applies for the old version where licensing was not clear. But now that I actually read the link it's clear :) Wonder why I never saw this before, I pretty sure have other multi-license packages :/ FIXED (comment above License) > anything under wxWidgets can be relicensed under GPL. BUT in fact, Josiah has > already done that > But the whole file itself is GPL -> no wxWidgets everywhere. Right, after reading through the license comments again, seems to be sane. > What is copyrighted under LGPL? > There is a lgpl.txt, but that's it. Or am I wrong? Josiah already answered that :) And so did you in comment #5 btw :) > So, it stays for me: GPLv2. So it's GPLv2 and LGPLv2. FIXED > ######################################## > > Some other issues: > - $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} is created, but empty (rest of old icon > path) -> not needed anymore. Hm...right. FIXED > - sed -i -e "s;PYTHONPATH;%{python_sitelib};g" %{SOURCE1} > has no effect. There is no pythonpath in the .desktop ( yet? ;) ) Uh, good catch! Grabbed the wrong desktop file in the end :/ FIXED > - Don't copy *.pyc and *pyw. > They are created later in the /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile part > anyway. > See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries > MUST: don't install them, and Josiah please don't include them (same for > *.dll);) FIXED. Not upstream tho. > - changelog format: > There is '* new version' -> '- new version' Awww, right. FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 15:04:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:04:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271504.nBRF4r1I030040@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-27 10:04:51 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clutter-gesture Short Description: Gesture Library for Clutter Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 15:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:26:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271526.nBRFQJL7004585@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-27 10:26:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Just a few comments: > > - > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define > > - Could you reduce the %files a bit? > > e.g.: %{_bindir}/dpkg-* > > %{_mandir}/*/man*/dpkg-* > > and so on. > > > > The dpkg package is total scrambled if you do this Right, it was a bit late, when I wrote that ;) Deleting the .gz at the end of the manuals would be great anyway... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 16:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 11:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 461119] Review Request: libtiger - Rendering library for Kate streams using Pango and Cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271602.nBRG25bY010441@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461119 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tomspur at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-27 11:02:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I will fix > Is this a full review ? No. I didn't want to do a full review, when %files is not yet in final state; but will do the rest of it now... REVIEW: Good: - Group ok - name ok - description ok - removing *.la, ok - no static libs - libs correctly packaged (ldconfig...) - timestamps ok - parallel make - rpmlint clean - builds in koji https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1892775 Needswork: - License is wrong: Why BSD? There are LGPLv2+ headers and COPYING. - %files Will check for permissions and so on later. - BR: - cairo-devel is missing, gets pulled in by pango-devel, but I wouldn't trust that... - check for >= 0.2.7 is not needed anymore, but ok - How about including the examples into -devel, too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 16:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 11:57:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271657.nBRGvmvL020216@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #12 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-27 11:57:45 EDT --- Hello Leon, I hope you spent a merry Christmas! At last I figured how to patch the program to remove gXLib. It was pretty easy: 1) start with the source dir 2) patch googsystray-1.0.0/googsystray/GMain.py as follows: 144c144 < from gXlib import X, display, XK, protocol --- > from Xlib import X, display, XK, protocol 3) remove googsystray-1.0.0/googsystray: gXlib 4) Patch googsystray-1.0.0/setup.py: 126,132c126 < packages = ['googsystray', < 'googsystray/gXlib', < 'googsystray/gXlib/protocol', < 'googsystray/gXlib/support', < 'googsystray/gXlib/keysymdef', < 'googsystray/gXlib/xobject', < ], --- > packages = ['googsystray'], 5) # yum install python-xlib Then I did a $ python setup.py install $ googsystray and it worked like a charm. When you have time, if you could regenerate the spec (adding Requires: python-xlib) and the source rpm, we can complete the checks and finally approve the package! :) Thanks and regards, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 17:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271716.nBRHGewC023163@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-27 12:16:39 EDT --- You use 'sed -i'. Everytime you change the .desktop to contain PYTHONPATH, you destroy it, when you run rpmbuild again. (And the included .desktop does not contain PYTHONPATH again ;) ) If you upload the corrected one manually (with cvs add... and not with ./common/cvs-import.sh) this will be ok in cvs... ############### LICENSE I'm still not sure, if the license is correct. Josiah copied the LGPLv2 file and made some changes under GPLv2. ("[...] which describes which parts of itself are lgpl v2 licensed. [...]") and in the file is "adapted from", which means there where changes... LGPLv2 allows relicensing under GPLv2 (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPL_Compatibility_Matrix ). -> Anything GPLv2 But I'm no layer. If Josiah would agree to this, it'll be ok. If not, I'd like the legal team to take a look. ###############y Anything else fine in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 17:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:23:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271723.nBRHNtdc024857@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-27 12:23:54 EDT --- Hello, Mario! I'd bet, that unified diff will be more useful for Leon :) Just send us "diff -u" output instead of plain diff (note -u switch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 18:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:05:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271805.nBRI5pfS032021@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-27 13:05:49 EDT --- Ok, finally found some time to continue reviewing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 18:21:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:21:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545720] Review Request: googsystray - A system tray application for accessing various (online) Google apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271821.nBRILNmW002206@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545720 --- Comment #14 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-27 13:21:22 EDT --- Hello Peter, hello Leon, here you are :) [mario at shadow SOURCES]$ diff -ru googsystray-1.0.0_orig/ googsystray-1.0.0/ Only in googsystray-1.0.0_orig/bin: googsystray~ diff -ru googsystray-1.0.0_orig/build/lib/googsystray/GMain.py googsystray-1.0.0/build/lib/googsystray/GMain.py --- googsystray-1.0.0_orig/build/lib/googsystray/GMain.py 2009-11-28 20:22:41.000000000 +0100 +++ googsystray-1.0.0/build/lib/googsystray/GMain.py 2009-12-27 17:18:23.000000000 +0100 @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ else: - from gXlib import X, display, XK, protocol + from Xlib import X, display, XK, protocol import GIcon, GConf, GV, GReader, GMail, GCal, GContacts, GIPC, GWave Only in googsystray-1.0.0_orig/build/lib/googsystray: gXlib diff -ru googsystray-1.0.0_orig/googsystray/GMain.py googsystray-1.0.0/googsystray/GMain.py --- googsystray-1.0.0_orig/googsystray/GMain.py 2009-11-28 20:22:41.000000000 +0100 +++ googsystray-1.0.0/googsystray/GMain.py 2009-12-27 17:18:23.000000000 +0100 @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ else: - from gXlib import X, display, XK, protocol + from Xlib import X, display, XK, protocol import GIcon, GConf, GV, GReader, GMail, GCal, GContacts, GIPC, GWave Only in googsystray-1.0.0/googsystray: googsystray Only in googsystray-1.0.0_orig/googsystray: gXlib diff -ru googsystray-1.0.0_orig/setup.py googsystray-1.0.0/setup.py --- googsystray-1.0.0_orig/setup.py 2009-12-01 18:39:01.000000000 +0100 +++ googsystray-1.0.0/setup.py 2009-12-27 17:23:47.000000000 +0100 @@ -123,13 +123,7 @@ author_email = "jim.duchek at gmail.com", url = "http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/googsystray/", data_files = files, - packages = ['googsystray', - 'googsystray/gXlib', - 'googsystray/gXlib/protocol', - 'googsystray/gXlib/support', - 'googsystray/gXlib/keysymdef', - 'googsystray/gXlib/xobject', - ], + packages = ['googsystray'], package_data = { "googsystray" : ["sounds/*","icons/*"] }, scripts = ["bin/googsystray"], long_description = """Really long text here.""", Cheers, Mario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 18:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:27:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271827.nBRIRO8W003276@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-27 13:27:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > * Source0 url should be corrected. See Source1 for example > > I'm not quite sure if I get this. Do you want me to remove %name and %version > from Source0 and write directly > http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/itk/InsightToolkit-3.16.0.tar.gz ? For files, stored at SF, you should use something like this: Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/itk/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Note, that this URL doesn't have pre-defined mirror site (like yours one have). > * %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.cmake should be placed in devel rather than in main > package, I believe. Also, I'm not sure this is a correct place to put CMake > files in. > > Moved to the devel section. Neither I am sure about their correct position. > Maybe they should be put in cmake config dir? I suppose so. > * Source1 should be added as %doc in devel-subpackage > > First copied to builddir in %prep and then added as %doc. Not sure if this is > the correct way Not so correct. You should simply copy %{SOURCE1} instead of using full path: - cp %{_builddir}/../SOURCES/ItkSoftwareGuide-2.4.0.pdf . + cp %{SOURCE1} . > * I just found, that ITK contains numerous bundled libraries, many of them are > duplication Fedora's system ones - see 'Utilities' directory. This should be > fixed (and necessary BuildRequires should be added). > > Fixed adding -DUSE_SYSTEM_* to cmake flags. Anyway I didn't find any package > for niether GDCM nor VXL. To be really sure, you need to remove these directories with duplicated system libraries, at a %prep stage. And properly patch the rest of the code, if something will go wrong. > Should I package them as well or can I leave the itk versions for now? Ideally, yes. But it's not *MUST*, it's a *SHOULD* rule. So we may simply use them as-is for now. I'm looking at at your new spec right now, so more notes to come. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 19:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:40:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539387] Review Request: InsightToolkit - Medical imaging processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912271940.nBRJeb5B020703@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539387 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-27 14:40:36 EDT --- Ok, here are new issues: * Unowned directory %{_datadir}/%{name}. I suggest you either to add it to the main sub-package, or to put examples into docdir. * doc sub-package mustn't own %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} - it's already owned by main sub-package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:24:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272024.nBRKOUrf028066@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.6-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:26:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272026.nBRKQPi4029513@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-27 15:26:23 EDT --- qjson-0.7.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:24:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:24:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272024.nBRKOQKZ028551@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-27 15:24:25 EDT --- python-olpcgames-1.6-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:26:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272026.nBRKQTL0029532@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.7.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272029.nBRKTcZ0029991@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.0-4.fc11 |1.3.0-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:30:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272030.nBRKUFco030134@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-27 15:30:14 EDT --- i3status-2.0-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:29:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272029.nBRKTBHP029506@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-27 15:29:10 EDT --- python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:28:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272028.nBRKSqAd029283@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.2.0-2.fc12 Resolution|NOTABUG |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:29:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272029.nBRKTnGK030031@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6-3.fc11 |1.6-3.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:29:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272029.nBRKTGYM029619@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.5-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:28:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272028.nBRKSlkx030416@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-27 15:28:46 EDT --- tomcatjss-1.2.0-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:29:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272029.nBRKTXAX030565@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-27 15:29:31 EDT --- symkey-1.3.0-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272029.nBRKTjGx030612@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-27 15:29:44 EDT --- python-olpcgames-1.6-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:30:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272030.nBRKUJ7p030735@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0-1.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:33:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272033.nBRKXVh3031370@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-27 15:33:30 EDT --- qjson-0.7.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:34:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544581] Review Request: python-minimock - The simplest possible mock library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272034.nBRKYSu5031576@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544581 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-27 15:34:28 EDT --- python-minimock-1.2.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 20:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539983] Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272033.nBRKXZP7031386@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7.1-1.fc11 |0.7.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 21:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:06:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272106.nBRL6KLx005111@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-27 16:06:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > you can change the Source0 value to > > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/flaw/flaw-1.2.tar.gz But I would like to suggest still to use macros. It's much easier to maintain. Changing the version in the Source0 with every update just sucks ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 21:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272110.nBRLAAtC005739@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Bug 467641 depends on bug 514687, which changed state. Bug 514687 Summary: Sugar activities needs python-olpc-games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514687 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 21:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:34:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272134.nBRLY6ca010121@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2009-12-27 16:34:04 EDT --- Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze-0-0.4.20091227.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 23:10:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:10:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 546866] Review Request: qffmpeg - Stripped-down fork of ffmpeg for libspice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272310.nBRNAnSf027646@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546866 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-27 18:10:47 EDT --- Ralf, agreed. It's dependencies seem to build just fine with regular ffmpeg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Dec 27 23:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 18:28:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544873] Review Request: gitweb-caching - Gitweb w/ simple file caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912272328.nBRNSv3E030177@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544873 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jon Stanley 2009-12-27 18:28:56 EDT --- One more minor nitpicky thing I found doing the review - you need to include the COPYING file as %doc in the package. Provided that you do that before you import, this package is APPROVED. Find me on IRC and I'll get you sponsored and walk you through the next steps. OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches NO - License file included in package YES - Spec in American English YES - Spec is legible. YES - Sources match upstream md5sum: $ sha1sum --quiet -c ../sha1sums.txt $ Note that the tarball in the package is generated via a gitweb snapshot as mentioned in the comments I've verified that the sha1sum of every file matches the upstream git repo N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch YES - BuildRequires correct N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. YES - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. YES - Package has a correct %clean section. YES - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) YES - Package is code or permissible content. N/A - Doc subpackage needed/used. YES - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file YES - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. YES - Package has no duplicate files in %files. YES - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. YES - Package owns all the directories it creates. YES - No rpmlint output. YES - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: YES - Should build in mock. YES - Should build on all supported archs YES - Should function as described. YES - Should have sane scriptlets. N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. YES - Should have dist tag YES - Should package latest version N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) Issues: 1. Include the license file (COPYING) in the package as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 04:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:37:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912280437.nBS4b97H020988@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 --- Comment #6 from Alagunambi Welkin 2009-12-27 23:37:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > you can change the Source0 value to > > > > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/flaw/flaw-1.2.tar.gz > > But I would like to suggest still to use macros. It's much easier to maintain. > Changing the version in the Source0 with every update just sucks ;-) Ooops! I forgot to mention to add macros instead of name, version, all I suggested to change the link address, thanks the pointing it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 06:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:04:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912280604.nBS64Txu008863@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #2 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-28 01:04:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Well, > > * License > - I guess the license for this package should > be "GPL+ or Ruby or Artistic". > Sure! Fixed. > * rcov for %check > - build.log says: > ------------------------------------------------------- > 89 + rake test > 90 Hoe.new {...} deprecated. Switch to Hoe.spec. > 91 (in > /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16) > 92 which: no dot in > (/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/root/bin:/usr/local/sbin) > 93 /usr/bin/ruby -w -Ilib:ext:bin:test -e 'require "rubygems"; require > "test/unit"; require "test/test_mime_type.rb"; require > "test/test_mime_types.rb"' > 94 RCov is not available. In order to run rcov, you must: sudo gem install > spicycode-rcov > ------------------------------------------------------- > I don't know well about RCov, however when I install > rubygem-rcov, rake check fails as: > ------------------------------------------------------- > [tasaka1 at localhost mime-types-1.16]$ rake test --trace > (in > /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16) > Hoe.new {...} deprecated. Switch to Hoe.spec. > rake aborted! > undefined method `test_files' for # > /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16/Rakefile:53 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rcov-0.9.6/lib/rcov/rcovtask.rb:91:in `initialize' > /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16/Rakefile:51:in > `new' > /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/rubygem-mime-types-1.16/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mime-types-1.16/Rakefile:51 > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2382:in `load' > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2382:in `raw_load_rakefile' > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2016:in `load_rakefile' > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2067:in > `standard_exception_handling' > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2015:in `load_rakefile' > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1999:in `run' > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:2067:in > `standard_exception_handling' > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/lib/rake.rb:1997:in `run' > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.7/bin/rake:31 > /usr/bin/rake:19:in `load' > /usr/bin/rake:19 > ------------------------------------------------------- > ref: http://bugs.gentoo.org/288996 > Would you check this? Rcov will produce a pretty report of the test coverage but is by no means necessary for the unit tests themselves. As to the error it looks like the Rakefile wants a specific version of rcov, p.extra_dev_deps << %w(rcov ~>0.8) while Fedora is on 0.9.6. I'll file a ticket with the upstream project about updating it to something more recent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 06:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:18:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912280618.nBS6I4qB011439@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-28 01:18:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mime-types.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mime-types-1.16-2.fc13.src.rpm * Sun Dec 27 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.16-2 - Fix license (#544964). - Add note about rcov warning in test phase (#544964). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 06:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:47:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912280647.nBS6lw4V016771@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 --- Comment #3 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-28 01:47:57 EDT --- Thank you for the review! (In reply to comment #2) > The example provided by you works for me. > > Some remarks: > > * Requires > Would you check if the following dependencies are > not needed? > > - ebb > from lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/ebb.rb > merb supports multiple frontend webservers via adapters and the -a parameter: "The rack adapter to use to run merb (default is mongrel)[mongrel, emongrel, thin, ebb, fastcgi, webrick]" As they use mongrel by default I chose to add it as a dependency and none of the others. Not having those gems installed doesn't inhibit functionality of the app. The gem doesn't depend on any adapter at all oddly enough, though one could use webrick that ships with ruby itself. > - ruby-debug > from lib/merb-core/config.rb > No package for this currently, though it looks useful. Doesn't look to block the main function of merb-core though and isn't listed as a primary or development dependency. I'll add to my list of things to package. > - ruby-prof > from lib/merb-core/core_ext/kernel.rb > lib/merb-core/rack/middleware/profiler.rb > No package for this currently, though it looks useful. Doesn't look to block the main function of merb-core though and isn't listed as a primary or development dependency. I'll add to my list of things to package. > - swiftiply > from lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/evented_mongrel.rb > lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/swiftiplied_mongrel.rb > > - thin > from lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/thin.rb > > - thin-turbo (could not find on gems.rubyforge.org) > from lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/thin_turbo.rb > See above note about adapters. Will look into the thin-turbo issue and file a ticket if necessary. > - webrat > from lib/merb-core/test.rb The Rakefile lists it as a development dependency and I believe it's only required to run the merb test suite which isn't in this version. I'll be sure to revisit it when the next version of merb, which appears to come with the test suite, is released. > - webrick > from lib/merb-core/rack/adapter/webrick.rb This ships with ruby, though actually using it as an adapter doesn't seem to work with my example (404's each time). I should file an upstream bug for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 07:09:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:09:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912280709.nBS798fH014168@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 --- Comment #4 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-28 02:09:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thank you for the review! > > (In reply to comment #2) > > - ruby-debug > > from lib/merb-core/config.rb > > > > No package for this currently, though it looks useful. Doesn't look to block > the main function of merb-core though and isn't listed as a primary or > development dependency. > > I'll add to my list of things to package. > Scratch this - is available in Bug 532306 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 07:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:58:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549863] Review Request: plexus-interpolation - Plexus Interpolation API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912280758.nBS7wcdc028780@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549863 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-28 02:58:36 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=148398 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 07:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:59:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549884] Review Request: plexus-io - Plexus IO Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912280759.nBS7xQIX022518@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549884 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-12-28 02:59:25 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=148397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 09:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 04:39:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912280939.nBS9dpMX008643@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #17 from Christian Krause 2009-12-28 04:39:46 EDT --- Sorry for the late answer, the December is always quite a busy month. I've looked at the new package and I've seen the following: - please use also %{_initdir} in this line: install -D -m 755 distro/dmapd.fedora %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/dmapd - rpmlint reveals a new problem: dmapd.i686: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/dmapd $prog Technically your solution seems to be OK as well, so I don't know why rpmlint complains here... It should be sufficient (and also not wrong) to replace lockfile=/var/lock/subsys/$prog with lockfile=/var/lock/subsys/dmapd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 10:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 05:58:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 446976] Review Request: tkabber - Tkabber is a Free and Open Source client for the Jabber instant messaging system. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281058.nBSAwA2e023920@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446976 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 11:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549228] Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281144.nBSBi3R0006798@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 Bug 549228 depends on bug 549229, which changed state. Bug 549229 Summary: Please update clutter to latest version in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549229 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 11:45:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:45:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549228] Review Request: fosfor - A media player for Linux that uses the Clutter and GStreamer toolkits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281145.nBSBjjOO000663@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549228 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 11:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:47:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmwares for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281147.nBSBlqt5001038@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 11:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:50:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511107] Review Request: rhythmbox-equalizer - An Equalizer plugin for Rhythmbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281150.nBSBoKS8007932@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511107 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 11:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:55:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281155.nBSBtKxW008745@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #3 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-12-28 06:55:18 EDT --- This is a suggestion. A user "gitolite" will be added by installing the package but will not deleted when the package will be erased. Other packages like "mysql-server" also do not deleted the user they add so this is only a suggestion: Some lines like this may be added in spec-file: Requires(postun): shadow-utils ... %postun userdel gitolite What about a start-script /etc/init.d/gitolite, so that gitolite will be in the list of the commnad output from "chkconfig --list". It would be nice if the server could be started with a simple command by using a default local configuration. I am sorry for having no time to have a closer look to this package at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 12:30:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:30:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281230.nBSCUkhR015414@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mi at v3.sk Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Michal Ingeli 2009-12-28 07:30:43 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Text-CSV New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sciurius ksyz The EL-5 branch is needed for MySQL-zrm in EPEL. There is a report (#550192), that MySQL-zrm wont install on el5 and in fact, it misses dependencies like perl(Data::Report) and perl(Text::CSV) that are not branched and build for epel. I sent notification and request for EL-5 branch to he package owner few day ago. For owner, feel free to take over this branch. Package builds in mock without problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 12:32:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:32:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281232.nBSCW1IF009311@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mi at v3.sk Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Michal Ingeli 2009-12-28 07:31:56 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Data-Report New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sciurius ksyz The EL-5 branch is needed for MySQL-zrm in EPEL. There is a report (#550192), that MySQL-zrm wont install on el5 and in fact, it misses dependencies like perl(Data::Report) and perl(Text::CSV) that are not branched and build for epel. I sent notification and request for EL-5 branch to he package owner few day ago. For owner, feel free to take over this branch. Package builds in mock without problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 13:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:41:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527986] Review Request: taoframework - Multimedia bindings for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281341.nBSDfv2r022759@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527986 --- Comment #14 from Paul Lange 2009-12-28 08:41:50 EDT --- Sorry it took so long to update. Patched the Makefile and commented the unwanted parts in the specfile out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 13:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:41:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281341.nBSDfs8v022749@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374 --- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-28 08:41:49 EDT --- Right, re-reading through the above the only remaining thing that needed fixing was the bindings groups. This is now done: SPEC: as above. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ethos-0.2.2-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 14:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 09:01:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544739] Review Request: kopete-facebook - Facebook Protocol support for Kopete In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281401.nBSE132j026178@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544739 Bug 544739 depends on bug 539983, which changed state. Bug 539983 Summary: Review Request: qjson - qt-based library that maps JSON data to QVariant object https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539983 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Magnus Tuominen 2009-12-28 09:01:01 EDT --- Made some changes to %build and %install and rebuilt with qjson from repositories using mock. rpmlint -iv kopete-facebook.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -iv kopete-facebook-0.1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm kopete-facebook.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://rubbad.com/files/fedora/12/SPECS/kopete-facebook.spec http://rubbad.com/files/fedora/12/SRPM/kopete-facebook-0.1.4-4.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 15:18:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:18:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551027] New: Review Request: nicotine+ - A client for the SoulSeek filesharing network Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nicotine+ - A client for the SoulSeek filesharing network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551027 Summary: Review Request: nicotine+ - A client for the SoulSeek filesharing network Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: melmorabity at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/nicotine+/nicotine+.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/nicotine+/nicotine+-1.2.14-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Nicotine+ is a client for the SoulSeek filesharing network. It was "forked" from Nicotine, Hyriand's Soulseek client, which in turn was forked from the PySoulSeek project by Alexander Kanavin. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 15:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:22:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551027] Review Request: nicotine+ - A client for the SoulSeek filesharing network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281522.nBSFMVPU015361@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551027 ELMORABITY Mohamed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 16:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:00:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: jakarta-commons-math - The Apache Commons Mathematics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281600.nBSG03ix022804@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 ELMORABITY Mohamed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 15:59:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 10:59:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] New: Review Request: jakarta-commons-math - The Apache Commons Mathematics Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-math - The Apache Commons Mathematics Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 Summary: Review Request: jakarta-commons-math - The Apache Commons Mathematics Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: melmorabity at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/jakarta-commons-math/jakarta-commons-math.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/jakarta-commons-math/jakarta-commons-math-2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Commons Math is a library of lightweight, self-contained mathematics and statistics components addressing the most common problems not available in the Java programming language or Commons Lang. Guiding principles: 1. Real-world application use cases determine development priority. 2. This package emphasizes small, easily integrated components rather than large libraries with complex dependencies and configurations. 3. All algorithms are fully documented and follow generally accepted best practices. 4. In situations where multiple standard algorithms exist, a Strategy pattern is used to support multiple implementations. 5. Limited dependencies. No external dependencies beyond Commons components and the core Java platform (at least Java 1.3 up to version 1.2 of the library, at least Java 5 starting with version 2.0 of the library). mock is OK, rpmlint complains on this: jakarta-commons-math.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/jakarta-commons-math Anyway, the Java guidelines about Maven-built sources don't consider this case, I suppose I can ignore this warning. Note that I need a sponsor, although it's not my first package (see my other review request 551027). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 16:29:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:29:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281629.nBSGTRH0022102@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-28 11:29:26 EDT --- Well, what I am concerned here is that $ rake test actually _fails_ is Fedora rubygem-rcov is installed (as I wrote in the comment 2), not just warnings, so people who has rubygem-rcov installed cannot rebuild your srpm, which I think should be avoided. It seem that the following line -------------------------------------------------- 53 t.test_files = hoe.test_files -------------------------------------------------- in Rakefile seems unneeded. Would you again check this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 17:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:21:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550139] Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281721.nBSHL31Y006714@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550139 --- Comment #2 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-12-28 12:21:02 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/pino/pino.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/pino/pino-0.1.0-0.2.rc3.fc12.src.rpm Changes: - Update to 0.1.0rc3 - Fix BR - Added desktop file validate for pino.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 17:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:49:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281749.nBSHnj9R011562@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-28 12:49:43 EDT --- Well, I am not familiar with mono, but anyway: * BuildRequires / Requires - ">= 1.2.3" part of (Build)Requires: mono-core is not needed. Fedora 11 already has version 2.4. * pkgconfig .pc file - should be moved to -devel subpackage: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono#-devel_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 18:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:08:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281808.nBSI87T4014464@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-12-28 13:08:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: report Short Description: Incident reporting library Owners: gavin Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 18:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:36:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281836.nBSIat3B019658@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #12 from Johan Vromans 2009-12-28 13:36:53 EDT --- I do not have any particular interest in EPEL. I don't mind building for EPEL either provided someone can tell me what to do (in trivial steps). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 18:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:37:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912281837.nBSIbdsv019788@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #18 from Johan Vromans 2009-12-28 13:37:38 EDT --- I do not have any particular interest in EPEL. I don't mind building for EPEL either provided someone can tell me what to do (in trivial steps). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 20:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 510651] Review Request: trafshow - A tool for real-time network traffic visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912282001.nBSK1rs1002756@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510651 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-12-28 15:01:50 EDT --- Yes, it is. What I can do in this case? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 23:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:58:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 484279] Review Request: BareBonesBrowserLaunch - Simple library to launch a browser window from Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912282358.nBSNwR4k015831@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484279 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski 2009-12-28 18:58:24 EDT --- How about this: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch-2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/BareBonesBrowserLaunch.spec * Mon Dec 28 2009 Orion Poplawski 2.0-1 - Update to 2.0 - Use upstream jar source directly - Cleanup spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 02:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:51:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290251.nBT2pu9x018114@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-28 21:51:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 02:52:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:52:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290252.nBT2qkvQ012718@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-28 21:52:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 02:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:56:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290256.nBT2ufw0013381@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-28 21:56:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 02:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:57:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290257.nBT2vRBZ013524@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-28 21:57:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 03:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:02:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290302.nBT32BvM020448@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-28 22:02:09 EDT --- See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies The infrastructure is all the same as the F-* branches... just need to be more conservative pushing updates and new versions. Shall I process the request from comment 11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 03:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290302.nBT325Ig020423@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-28 22:02:03 EDT --- See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies The infrastructure is all the same as the F-* branches... just need to be more conservative pushing updates and new versions. Shall I process the request from comment 17? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 03:18:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:18:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - A 15 Bands Equalizer for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290318.nBT3IJAN018020@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-12-28 22:18:17 EDT --- This is icky... Can you at least: a) provide a full url to the .deb in Source0? or b) provide a comment on exactly where this deb can be obtained? or c) wait until upstream releases some kind of sane release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 03:22:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:22:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 523523] Review Request: clutter-gesture - Gesture Library for Clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290322.nBT3MZPu024736@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523523 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-12-28 22:22:33 EDT --- Built and in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 03:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:22:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290322.nBT3Murc024834@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-28 22:22:54 EDT --- - Use %global and not %define. Any progress on this? (Wanting to shoot down the Sage packages...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 04:51:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:51:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290451.nBT4pD2Q010658@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #19 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-28 23:51:07 EDT --- While you worked on the 32-bit issue, I tried the package out on a 64-bit install. I tried 2.20091008svn.fc12 on Fedora 12 as x64_64 (64-bit), and PVS worked just fine. But I did have some questions/issues after doing it. First, my simple smoke tests look good. After building and installing, I used my trivial "mortability.pvs" file from and invoked the program as: pvs-sbcl mortality.pvs I left-clicked on the socrates_mortal claim, invoked "PVS/Prover Invocation/prove", and when the interactive prover area popped up, I typed in: (grind :rewrites ("all_men_mortal")) That proved it, so it printed "Q.E.D." and wrote the proof file "mortality.prf". Now for a few comments on the RPM packaging... I think it is CRITICALLY important that the rpm Description state something like this: Note that the main executable "pvs" has been renamed to "pvs-sbcl". *ALL* the docs say that to invoke pvs you type "pvs", but that would invoke /sbin/pvs on a Fedora system instead. That's a nasty gotcha, and since I don't think we can/should rename /sbin/pvs, I think clearly stating that up-front is necessary. A few more comments about the "Description" text. I think you should simply drop the last sentence of the RPM description (everybody improves programs as they learn stuff, nothing special here). The next-to-last sentence doesn't add much, but its mention of "formal methods" is probably useful (someone searching for "formal methods" would correctly find PVS). I would also add to the description something about SRI; that way, someone searching on "SRI" would find this too. I did an rpmlint, and got some warnings. Specifically, I did: rpmlint pvs-sbcl.spec `find .. -name 'pvs*.rpm'` and got these warnings: pvs-sbcl.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/pvs/bin/ix86_64-Linux/runtime/ws1s.so pvs-sbcl.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/pvs/bin/ix86_64-Linux/b64 pvs-sbcl.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/pvs/bin/ix86_64-Linux/runtime/mu.so pvs-sbcl.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/pvs/bin/ix86_64-Linux/runtime/pvs-sbclisp 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. These are all semi-unavoidable due to the Lisp implementation, correct? Good luck on figuring out the 32-bit issue! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 05:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:20:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290520.nBT5KZ0v010686@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #20 from Jerry James 2009-12-29 00:20:33 EDT --- Thanks for the comments. I'll address those some time tomorrow. I have figured out the problem with the 32-bit platform, and it is, in fact, a different hang than the one I was seeing on the 64-bit platform. On the 32-bit platforms, Emacs is waiting for PVS forever, because the PVS process isn't exiting. It looks like the immediate problem is that my patch to use the system Mona library isn't quite right. I don't know why this didn't manifest on the 64-bit platform (maybe it would later on during the execution). Anyway, I've got to figure out how to do this correctly now. I'll try to do that tomorrow, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 05:35:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:35:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538360] Review Request: perl-CPAN-Inject - Base class for injecting distributions into CPAN sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290535.nBT5ZLqj019603@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538360 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-29 00:35:19 EDT --- It is really confusing here as srpm download link is not working Anyway I just looked into fedorapeople page and got new updated srpm. Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1894218 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 41ff95c0c8dd1852645a8a3a063b039960a11141 CPAN-Inject-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=24, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.01 sys + 0.64 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.77 CPU) + Package perl-CPAN-Inject-0.11-2.fc13.noarch=> Provides: perl(CPAN::Inject) = 0.11 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl >= 0:5.005 perl(CPAN::Checksums) perl(CPAN::Inject) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::chmod) perl(File::stat) perl(Params::Util) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) Please remove unnecessary Requires: from spec file. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 05:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:46:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290546.nBT5khbH021485@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-29 00:46:40 EDT --- Thanks for update. eview: + package builds in mock (rawhide i686). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1894217 - rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. pki-common.src:122: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_javadir} pki-common.src:123: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_javadir} pki-common.src:126: W: macro-in-%changelog %defattr pki-common.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /var/lib/tomcat5/common/lib/cmsutil.jar /usr/share/java/pki/cmsutil.jar pki-common.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /var/lib/tomcat5/common/lib/nsutil.jar /usr/share/java/pki/nsutil.jar ==> Fix these messages. + source files match upstream url (sha1sum) 75ae888e57aaf3bbf4956ad7eb8f4f19addb6afc pki-common-1.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) please fix rpmlint messages before importing to cvs. pki-common.src:122: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_javadir} pki-common.src:123: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_javadir} pki-common.src:126: W: macro-in-%changelog %defattr ==> In Changelog, you need to write macros as %%defattr not just %defattr. same for %{_javadir}, write it as %%{_javadir} 2)pki-common.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /var/lib/tomcat5/common/lib/cmsutil.jar /usr/share/java/pki/cmsutil.jar pki-common.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /var/lib/tomcat5/common/lib/nsutil.jar /usr/share/java/pki/nsutil.jar ==> I think these are needed so can be ignored then APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 06:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:24:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522207] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-common In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290624.nBT6OR2Y029125@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522207 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Kevin Wright 2009-12-29 01:24:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pki-common Short Description: The Dogtag PKI Common Framework Owners: kwright Branches: F-11, F-12, EL-5 InitialCC: ausil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 06:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:33:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290633.nBT6XuSm031008@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #17 from Josiah Carlson 2009-12-29 01:33:52 EDT --- I've updated the license for exparse.py . It is now GPL v2 licensed. Originally I included lgpl.txt because it is referenced as part of wxwindows.txt (in addition for exparse.py), and is required by the wxWindows license. I have relicensed the wxWindows and LGPL v2 stuff as GPL v2 as is allowed by both the wxWindows and LGPL v2 licenses. I also added a line to get rid of the MS dll for the source distribution. Because of the non-code changes, I bumped the version number to 2.9.1, and uploaded a source-only release. sf.net is being painfully slow, so I've not been able to remove the old file quite yet, but the new one is available as of now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 06:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:54:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290654.nBT6sk4D029003@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) 2009-12-29 01:54:44 EDT --- I don't see fedora-cvs? flag requested yet here. Please set it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 06:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:56:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290656.nBT6uNim029285@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 06:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 01:57:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226066] Merge Review: libXcursor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290657.nBT6v6h4029452@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226066 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 07:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:01:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290701.nBT71cmj004199@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #18 from Sandro Mathys 2009-12-29 02:01:36 EDT --- That's great Josiah, thanks! I try to get this into a new pkg ASAP, but I'll get a guest until new year which might result in some inactivity until afterwards. I'll try to it sooner tho. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:01:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290801.nBT81rAR016101@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 --- Comment #19 from Sandro Mathys 2009-12-29 03:01:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE-2.9.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Guests are late, thus I had the time to pkg the new sources. Changes: - new src zip - changed License to GPLv2 only - no longer try to remove non-existant *.dll - defined %global majorminor (only used in Version and Source0) - worked around sed -i problem for the .desktop file (is that a good way?) i.e. ALL FIXED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:06:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290806.nBT86UDJ016847@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #4 from Armando Basile 2009-12-29 03:06:29 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-base-0.8.1-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - removed ">= 1.2.3" in spec file - added package devel creation in spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:11:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290811.nBT8BQZX018040@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #14 from Michal Ingeli 2009-12-29 03:11:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I do not have any particular interest in EPEL. I don't mind building for EPEL > either provided someone can tell me what to do (in trivial steps). Packages are handled more sensitively, tested, trying not to break things and change API and so. I'm willing to maintain the EPEL branch. (In reply to comment #13) > Shall I process the request from comment 11? If there is no problem, please proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:11:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:11:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290811.nBT8Bk0L010827@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #20 from Michal Ingeli 2009-12-29 03:11:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I do not have any particular interest in EPEL. I don't mind building for EPEL > either provided someone can tell me what to do (in trivial steps). Packages are handled more sensitively, tested, trying not to break things and change API and so. I'm willing to maintain the EPEL branch. (In reply to comment #19) > Shall I process the request from comment 11? If there is no problem, please proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:17:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290817.nBT8HkgE012288@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-29 03:17:45 EDT --- Some notes: * License - There is no license information in the tarball. Would you clarify it (as you are the upstream)? * (Build)Requires - As I wrote in -base review, ">= 1.2.3" part on (Build)Requires: mono-core is not needed (for current Fedora) - Also ">= 0.8.1" part on (Build)Requires: themonospot-console is not needed either because -core packages to be intoduced into Fedora satisfies this version dependency on every Fedora branch. ref: the last sentence in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires * %files - %files entry "%{_bindir}/%{name}/" is wrong because the last slash should mean that this %files entry is a directory, while the actually installed one is a file, not a directory. (i.e. this should be "%{_bindir}/%{name}") ! Note In reality, current rpm simply ignores the last slash. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505995 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:28:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:28:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290828.nBT8S4VG020985@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290828.nBT8S5WM020992@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:28:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290828.nBT8S7M3021015@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:28:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290828.nBT8S6j6021007@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:28:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290828.nBT8S58v020999@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:28:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290828.nBT8S3VC020978@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |550519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:28:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550519] Tracker: Themonospot suite - core, plugins, console and gui's applications to parse multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290828.nBT8S2UU020971@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550519 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |550594, 550597, 550598, | |550599, 550600, 550601 Summary|Themonospot suite - core, |Tracker: Themonospot suite |plugins, console and gui's |- core, plugins, console |applications to parse |and gui's applications to |multimedia files |parse multimedia files --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-29 03:28:01 EDT --- Reuse this bug as a tracker for themonospot related review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 08:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:55:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 527059] Review Request: earcandy - Sound level manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290855.nBT8tik6026349@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527059 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-29 03:55:42 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 09:03:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:03:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290903.nBT93wF1027878@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #15 from Johan Vromans 2009-12-29 04:03:57 EDT --- That's fine with me. It might be a good idea to have a separate maintainer for the EL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 09:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:04:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290904.nBT94QcD021099@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #21 from Johan Vromans 2009-12-29 04:04:24 EDT --- That's fine with me. It might be a good idea to have a separate maintainer for the EL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 09:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:13:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290913.nBT9DOsS023069@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 --- Comment #2 from Armando Basile 2009-12-29 04:13:23 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-console.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-console-0.1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - removed ">= 1.2.3" from mono-core dependence - removed ">= 0.8.1" from themonospot-base dependence - added themonospot-base-devel to BuildRequires - removed final "/" in "%{_bindir}/%{name}/" line for license, should patch tarball (adding gplv2 file) and add patch to spec ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 09:53:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:53:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912290953.nBT9rMaR005521@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-29 04:53:21 EDT --- I have not checked your latest srpm, however: (In reply to comment #2) > for license, should patch tarball (adding gplv2 file) and add patch to spec ? - If you want to modify the tarball itself (i.e. include license text in the tarball) please release the new version (i.e. 0.1.0.1, for example) - If you want not to release the new version for now, for now include the license text as SourceX in srpm and package it into binary rpm with %doc. Anyway in the next version please include the license text in the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 10:04:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:04:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542222] Review Request: gradle-open-api - Open API definition for gradle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291004.nBTA44u5000585@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542222 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mi at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mi at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 10:03:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:03:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542341] Review Request: mercury - Replacement for the Maven Artifact subsystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291003.nBTA3rcg000549@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542341 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mi at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mi at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 10:22:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:22:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291022.nBTAMdfo011419@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #5 from Armando Basile 2009-12-29 05:22:38 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-base-0.8.1-3.fc12.src.rpm changes: - moved "BuildRequires: pkgconfig" from -devel to main package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 11:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 06:03:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291103.nBTB3GE6019465@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 --- Comment #4 from Armando Basile 2009-12-29 06:03:15 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-console.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-console-0.1.0-3.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added Source1 copyng.gpl - added cp %{SOURCE1} copying.gpl - added %doc copying.gpl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 11:37:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 06:37:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542166] Review Request: patricia-trie - Java prefix tree library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291137.nBTBbWcU025456@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542166 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2009-12-29 06:37:29 EDT --- Thank you Mohamed for the review, it looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 12:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:15:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543425] Review Request: gource - Software version control visualization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291215.nBTCFTRN026159@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543425 --- Comment #13 from Siddhesh Poyarekar 2009-12-29 07:15:25 EDT --- Thanks Stefan. Implemented your suggestions. Updated spec and source package. Rebased to new upstream release too: http://www.siddhesh.in/hacks/gource.spec http://www.siddhesh.in/hacks/gource-0.23-1.fc13.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 12:44:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:44:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291244.nBTCinoW006297@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 --- Comment #2 from Armando Basile 2009-12-29 07:44:48 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi-0.1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added BuildRequires: themonospot-base-devel - removed min. release req. for mono-core and themonospot-base - added copying.gpl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 12:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:45:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291245.nBTCjnFY006494@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 --- Comment #1 from Armando Basile 2009-12-29 07:45:48 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv-0.1.0-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added BuildRequires: themonospot-base-devel - removed min. release req. for mono-core and themonospot-base - added copying.gpl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 12:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:48:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291248.nBTCmAXR006907@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 --- Comment #1 from Armando Basile 2009-12-29 07:48:10 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt-0.1.2-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added BuildRequires: themonospot-base-devel - removed min. release req. for mono-core and themonospot-base - added copying.gpl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 12:47:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:47:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291247.nBTClPxK006779@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 --- Comment #1 from Armando Basile 2009-12-29 07:47:24 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk-0.2.0-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added BuildRequires: themonospot-base-devel - removed min. release req. for mono-core and themonospot-base - added copying.gpl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 12:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:58:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549366] Review Request: flaw - F.L.A.W is a small multiplayer action game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291258.nBTCwwjx001634@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 --- Comment #7 from Filipe Rosset 2009-12-29 07:58:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/flaw/flaw.spec SRPM URL: http://filiperosset.fedorapeople.org/packages/flaw/flaw-1.2.1-3.fc12.src.rpm - Now fixed Source0 url (use macros and short url) - Updated to version 1.2.1 (upstream source code) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 13:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:09:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291309.nBTD92I4003834@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-29 08:09:00 EDT --- sugar-visualmatch-13-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-visualmatch-13-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 13:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:09:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 545188] Review Request: sugar-visualmatch - A visual matching game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291309.nBTD97XV003866@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545188 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-29 08:09:06 EDT --- sugar-visualmatch-13-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-visualmatch-13-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 13:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:21:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550104] Review Request: magento - Magento is an ecommerce web application. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291321.nBTDLRXx006463@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550104 --- Comment #2 from Frederic Hornain 2009-12-29 08:21:26 EDT --- I will do the modifications next week and will be available at least the 8th of January 2010. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 15:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:03:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291503.nBTF3jQY026666@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743 Thomas Spura changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Thomas Spura 2009-12-29 10:03:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > i.e. ALL FIXED Close to finish ;) You make the pype.py executable and after CRLF -> LF it's *not* executable again. Make it executable at the end of %prep and then, it'll work as expected. Unfortunately pype does *not* start anyway... Don't know why atm...... When executing, there is a File not found. This could be a dos newline, but this is shot down at CRLF -> LF... Anything else fine now. (.desktop file is ok this way.) Josiah, thanks for the quick release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 15:31:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:31:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291531.nBTFVfpb013477@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-29 10:31:40 EDT --- For -3: * Directory ownership issue - Forgot to notice this, however ------------------------------------------------------------- 53 %files 57 %{_libdir}/mono/ ------------------------------------------------------------- This package should now own the directories /usr/lib/mono, /usr/lib/mono/gac (on i686) themselves because these directories themselves are already owned by mono-core. ! %changelog - Please actually add new %changelog even during review process -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 15:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:42:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291542.nBTFgb5c015401@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-29 10:42:36 EDT --- For -3: * Timestamps - Use "cp -p" to keep timestamps on installed files ! %changelog - As I wrote in -base review request, please add new %changelog entry even during review process. This review will be accepted once bug 550594 is accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 15:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:58:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291558.nBTFwG7s018480@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-29 10:58:15 EDT --- By the way what component should have "Obsoletes: themonospot" (i.e remove old themonospot) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 16:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:21:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548607] Review Request: pvs-sbcl - SRI's Prototype Verification System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291621.nBTGLflv023040@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548607 --- Comment #21 from David A. Wheeler 2009-12-29 11:21:38 EDT --- Congrats for figuring out the 32-bit platform problem, that's great news! Sounds like it needed fixing for 64-bit as well. I can't wait for the next package revision! Good luck. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 16:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:43:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: jakarta-commons-math - The Apache Commons Mathematics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291643.nBTGh3Il026560@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-29 11:43:02 EDT --- I would change the Summary to "A library of lightweight, self-contained mathematics and statistics components" which is IMHO a lot more descriptive than just "The Apache Commons Mathematics Library". Besides, isn't the name of the package wrong? I don't think there should be any "jakarta-" in it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:00:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:00:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551042] Review Request: jakarta-commons-math - The Apache Commons Mathematics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291700.nBTH0E4c015502@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551042 --- Comment #2 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2009-12-29 12:00:13 EDT --- Thanks for your comment about the summary, I'll update immediately my .spec file. About the name of the package, I followed the "implicit" convention in Fedora to prefix packages names of Java components from Apache Commons (http://commons.apache.org/) with "jakarta-commons-". It seems to be a legacy of JPackage. For example, Apache Commons projects like CLI or Codec are available in the repos as jakarta-commons-cli and jakarta-commons-codec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:01:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550139] Review Request: pino - A fast, easy and free Twitter client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291701.nBTH1G1m029770@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550139 --- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-12-29 12:01:15 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/pino/pino.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/pino/pino-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Changes: - Update to 0.1.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:00:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548324] Review Request: gitolite - Highly flexible server for git directory version tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291700.nBTH0Ruk029632@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548324 --- Comment #4 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-12-29 12:00:25 EDT --- Hi Lubomir, after a short second look I saw that gitolite works without a daemon, so my question for a init-script is nonsense. Would you short discribe me what I have to do to get a testing repository after I have installed the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 16:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291657.nBTGvh6J029179@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-29 11:57:41 EDT --- For -2: * Obsoletes - (I also added some comments on bug 550594) At first I thought this package (i.e. -gui-gtk) should obsolete the old themonospot, however maybe -base should obsolete it. Anyway please add "Obsoletes: themonospot <= " to the proper package. Currently I am not sure if "Provides: themonosport = " should be added or not. * Timestamps - Same as bug 550599 - Also please consider to use ---------------------------------------------------------- make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" install ---------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible (for this package this should keep timestamp on pixmap file) This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools * desktop-file-install https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage - "--vendor="fedora" should no longer be used - you may use "--delete-original" option for desktop-file-install instead of removing desktop file firstly installed under %buildroot, or you can use desktop-file-validate instead of desktop-file-install. ! dependency against -plugin-mkv ! Currently this package "crashes" without having -plugin-mkv installed with - type $ mono --debug /usr/lib/themonospot-gui-gtk/themonospot-gui-gtk.exe - click "Folder" - On the pop-up window titled "Select folder to scan", choose a directory and click "Open" Then: --------------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at foo ~]$ mono --debug /usr/lib/themonospot-gui-gtk/themonospot-gui-gtk.exe OS: NON Windows configuration file path: /home/tasaka1/.themonospot.xml Unhandled Exception: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object at ThemonospotGuiGtk.MainWindowClass.ScanFolder (System.String folderPath, Boolean recursive) [0x00000] in :0 at ThemonospotGuiGtk.MainWindowClass.StartScanFolder (System.String folderPath, Boolean recursive) [0x00000] in :0 at ThemonospotGuiGtk.MainWindowClass+c__AnonStorey0.<>m__0 () [0x00000] in :0 --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:09:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:09:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291709.nBTH9QTs031085@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-29 12:09:24 EDT --- First of all, as far as I read Fedora guidelines related to Mono, this package contradicts with it. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Mono ==== # Assembly: An assembly is the EXE or DLL file created by compiling a mono application. These are not the same as EXE's or DLL's created by compiling a C or C++ program on Windows. An assembly contains CIL code rather than machine code. Mono packages should install assemblies to %{_libdir} rather than /usr/lib or %{_datadir}. In most cases the preference is for %{_libdir}/PACKAGENAME. We use %{_libdir} because we do not consider mono packages to be noarch. ==== Also it seems that this package installs pre-compiled .dll file shipped in the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:12:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:12:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542759] Review Request: mpqc - Ab-initio chemistry program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291712.nBTHC39Q017796@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542759 --- Comment #29 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-12-29 12:12:00 EDT --- Oh, you may want to add BuildRequires: libint-devel so that you get libint support that speeds up the computations. The build scripts don't seem to support off-root builds, which makes building MPI parallellized versions a bit difficult. We might want to leave those for later. You still need to drop BuildRequires: mpich2-devel which isn't necessary. And I suggest building against atlas instead of the reference BLAS & LAPACK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:21:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551258] New: Review Request: libgcal - A library to access google calendar events and contacts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libgcal - A library to access google calendar events and contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551258 Summary: Review Request: libgcal - A library to access google calendar events and contacts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mrceresa at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/libgcal.spec SRPM URL: http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/libgcal-0.9.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a library to access google calendar events and contacts, its purpose is - provide easy access to available events/contacts - enable common operations: add, delete, edit - have few dependencies (up until now, only requires libcurl and libxml) It implements Google Data API 2.0 and is tested on Linux and MacOSX. Hi! this is a nice package to sync with with google address and calendar A second package is required which is akonadi-googledata to be actually able to do the sync with akonadi. The couple of them worked for me flawlessy $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/libgcal-0.9.3-1.fc12.i686.rpm libgcal.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog libgcal-0.9.3-1.fc12 ['0.9.3-1.fc12', '0.9.3-1'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/libgcal-devel-0.9.3-1.fc12.i686.rpm libgcal-devel.i686: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/libgcal-0.9.3-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint libgcal.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. builds ok in koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1894557 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:21:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:21:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 533887] Review Request: raw-thumbnailer - thumbnailer for raw images on gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291721.nBTHL6AK000515@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533887 ELMORABITY Mohamed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |melmorabity at fedoraproject.o | |rg --- Comment #2 from ELMORABITY Mohamed 2009-12-29 12:21:05 EDT --- Hi, I'm not (yet) a packager, anyway I'd like to make an informal review of your package. Moreover I'd like to see it in the repos :-) * Since your package install GConf files, you must refer to the following rules: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf Don't forget to add pre/post-installation actions as described, and also the "--disable-schemas-install" option in %configure, in your %build section. * The package also install XML mime files, you must refer to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo and correct your .spec according to this. * A little detail: in your changelog, all your entries must be sorted from the most recent to the oldest ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:54:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551265] Review Request: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for XCF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291754.nBTHsxJv006016@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551265 ELMORABITY Mohamed changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:55:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:55:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291755.nBTHtWEU006101@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-29 12:55:25 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483730] Review Request: kde-plasma-translatoid - A Google Translation Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291755.nBTHtbRp006120@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483730 --- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-29 12:55:36 EDT --- kde-plasma-translatoid-1.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-translatoid-1.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 17:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 12:54:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551265] New: Review Request: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for XCF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for XCF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551265 Summary: Review Request: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer - Thumbnailer for XCF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: melmorabity at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-xcf-thumbnailer/gnome-xcf-thumbnailer.spec SRPM URL: http://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-xcf-thumbnailer/gnome-xcf-thumbnailer-1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Thumbnailer for GIMP's own format, XCF files mock is OK, rpmlint is silent both with the SRPM and the debug RPM, not on the binary RPM itself: gnome-xcf-thumbnailer.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-xcf-thumbnailer.schemas A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here Anyway, this can be ignored for GConf files. Note that I need a sponsor, although it's not my first package (see my other review requests 551027 and 551042). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 18:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:08:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291808.nBTI8CL3027120@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski 2009-12-29 13:08:10 EDT --- Can we get the F-12 build pushed out as an update? Thanks... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 18:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:32:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551274] New: Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 Summary: Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mrceresa at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/akonadi-googledata.spec SRPM URL: http://mrceresa.fedorapeople.org/akonadi-googledata-1.0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This are the akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts. Together with libgcal ( Bug 551258 ) enable every akonadi based application to read/write contacts and calendar from google and google apps accounts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 18:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291839.nBTIdliC013781@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 Mario Ceresa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Mario Ceresa 2009-12-29 13:39:46 EDT --- Added the NotReady status because it requires package ligcal which is waiting for review under Bug 551258. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 19:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551258] Review Request: libgcal - A library to access google calendar events and contacts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291901.nBTJ1FAQ004120@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551258 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |551274 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 19:01:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:01:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291901.nBTJ1EuF004112@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu Depends on| |551258 Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-29 14:01:13 EDT --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 18:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:59:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551274] Review Request: akonadi-googledata -Akonadi resources to sync google calendar events and contacts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291859.nBTIxLUe017264@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551274 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-29 13:59:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Added the NotReady status because it requires package ligcal which is waiting > for review under Bug 551258. In fact, we add NotReady only when package has some obvious issues, preventing it from being reviewed formally. In this case, you need to properly add dependent and blocking tickets. See the top of his page - "Depends on:" and "Blocks" editboxes. So, please, clear NotReady tag (of course, if no technical issues with this package exists) and add blocking/dependent tickets instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 19:12:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:12:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547832] Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291912.nBTJC3Q0008926@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547832 --- Comment #5 from Ralph Lange 2009-12-29 14:12:01 EDT --- A bit more background (as suggested in PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored) procServ origins as a tool for the open source accelerator and physics control system software EPICS (http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics). In that context it is mainly used to run "soft" EPICS I/O processes in the background, while giving access to the console (stdin/stdout) of the process through a local telnet port. As the tool is mature, quite generic, and already being used to "daemonify" a number of other command line applications, it has been moved to SourceForge, and people have asked me to package it and get it included into the distribution. The package is small, with minimal dependencies. I was able to successfully do koji --scratch builds for all default architectures on fc11 and fc12. I am the current upstream author. I am working in accelerator controls, being actively involved in the development of the EPICS software package that this tool relates to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 19:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:25:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912291925.nBTJPVHL026852@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-29 14:25:28 EDT --- Stefan, you accidentally forgot to raise fedora-cvs flag here :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 20:20:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:20:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542458] Review Request: libqt4intf - Wrapper library for Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912292020.nBTKK4ZR003996@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542458 Alagunambi Welkin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alagunambiwelkin at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Alagunambi Welkin 2009-12-29 15:20:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) Hi, Just a quick suggestions ################################################################################ rpmlint on libqtintf4.spec throwed this, ################################################################################ libqtintf4.spec:24: W: setup-not-quiet libqtintf4.spec: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install libqtintf4.spec: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean libqtintf4.spec: E: no-buildroot-tag 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 1 warnings. ################################################################################rpmlint on libqt4intf5.src.rpm ################################################################################ libqt4intf5.src: E: invalid-spec-name libqt4intf5.src:24: W: setup-not-quiet libqt4intf5.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install libqt4intf5.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean libqt4intf5.src: E: no-buildroot-tag libqt4intf5.src: W: non-standard-group System/Libraries libqt4intf5.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libqt4intf5.src: W: invalid-license LGPL v2+ libqt4intf5.src: W: no-url-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 5 warnings. ################################################################################ Few suggested corrections: ################################################################################ #) Change the release form "0" to "1" #) Change COPYING.TXT it is not mentioning which version of LGPL used #) In SPEC Try to use "%{name}" and "%{version}" like macros, which will be easy to update #) In Group change "System/Libraries" to "Development/Libraries" refer to /usr/share/doc/rpm-[version]/GROUPS #) add "-q" along with your %setup to make it quiet: Error 1 #) echo will not be effective here #) uncomment the "rm -rf %{buildroot}" in %clean: Error 3 #) Add "rm -rf %{buildroot}" in %{install}: Error 2 #) Error 4 can be ignored unless if you want this package to be on EPEL #) Add your project url from where project source can be downloaded in URL tag #) The availability of source in internet is *must* ################################################################################ For your reference ################################################################################ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Changelog https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Shared_Libraries https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Archive:PackagingDrafts/BuildRootHandling ################################################################################ Please do rpmlint to your spec and *.rpm files before uploading Alagunambi Welkin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 20:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:35:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542210] Review Request: python-execnet - Elastic Python Deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912292035.nBTKZnGs025456@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542210 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Moschny 2009-12-29 15:35:47 EDT --- Updated to 1.0.2: Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-execnet/python-execnet.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-execnet/python-execnet-1.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 21:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:28:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912292128.nBTLSnLo003396@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 --- Comment #11 from Stefan Riemens 2009-12-29 16:28:49 EDT --- Whoops, thanks for the ping... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 21:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:28:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 529423] Review Request: mingw32-OpenSceneGraph - Fedora mingw high performance real-time graphics toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912292128.nBTLSLcP014605@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529423 Stefan Riemens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 21:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:50:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542458] Review Request: libqt4intf - Wrapper library for Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912292150.nBTLoEOa008626@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542458 --- Comment #2 from matthias at nlinux.org 2009-12-29 16:50:13 EDT --- Okay, I fixed everything. Lintian is now silent, except for "E: no-buildroot-tag " You can find the updated specfile and the new src.rpm here: http://listaller.nlinux.org/factory/rpmbuild/libqt4intf5-1.72_Qt4.5.2-1.src.rpm http://listaller.nlinux.org/factory/rpmbuild/libqtintf4.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 22:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:37:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 541978] Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - A 15 Bands Equalizer for PulseAudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912292237.nBTMbqh6028683@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 --- Comment #13 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-12-29 17:37:51 EDT --- in response to comment #12 , i choosed option b) the spec and srpm are updated and sorry kevin for causing so much trouble -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 22:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:47:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511107] Review Request: rhythmbox-equalizer - An Equalizer plugin for Rhythmbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912292247.nBTMlc3O030236@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511107 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 22:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:46:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmwares for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912292246.nBTMkfXb030054@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 22:47:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:47:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 511107] Review Request: rhythmbox-equalizer - An Equalizer plugin for Rhythmbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912292247.nBTMlT6G030190@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511107 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Dec 29 22:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:46:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 516312] Review Request: ueagle-atm4-firmware - Firmwares for USB ADSL Modems based on Eagle IV Chipset In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912292246.nBTMkD7Z029969@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516312 Hicham HAOUARI changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 00:19:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:19:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530021] Review Request: moovida - Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912300019.nBU0JDRD014633@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #33 from Tim Hughes 2009-12-29 19:19:09 EDT --- This is a bit of a FYI so that someone else doesnt need to work it out when they come across the same issue I have built these rpms against a clean install of F12 and found that they used 100% of a single cpu core A strace gives the following repeated infinitely gettimeofday({1262131136, 457154}, NULL) = 0 poll([{fd=6, events=POLLIN}, {fd=10, events=POLLIN}, {fd=9, events=POLLIN}, {fd=15, events=POLLIN}, {fd=23, events=POLLIN}, {fd=24, events=POLLIN}, {fd=8, events=POLLIN}, {fd=29, events=POLLIN}, {fd=31, events=POLLIN}, {fd=35, events=POLLIN}, {fd=33, events=POLLIN}, {fd=27, events=POLLIN}, {fd=36, events=POLLIN}, {fd=38, events=POLLIN}, {fd=32, events=POLLIN}, {fd=26, events=POLLIN}, {fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=13, events=POLLIN}, {fd=34, events=POLLIN}, {fd=37, events=POLLIN}], 20, 9) = 1 ([{fd=9, revents=POLLIN}]) gettimeofday({1262131136, 457349}, NULL) = 0 read(10, 0x9da6ba0, 4096) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) Appears to be a known bug with both pygobject and pygtk. Looks like a patch has been pushed to pygobject back at 2009-10-21 but maybe not to pygtk. Relevant bugs from other projects: https://bugs.launchpad.net/moovida/+bug/233734 http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/ticket/3096 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481569 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 03:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:59:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912300359.nBU3xGDf012062@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-29 22:59:16 EDT --- mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 03:59:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:59:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912300359.nBU3xC7b021636@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-29 22:59:11 EDT --- mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 08:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:46:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912300846.nBU8k7vw008495@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-30 03:46:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Well, what I am concerned here is that $ rake test actually > _fails_ is Fedora rubygem-rcov is installed (as I wrote in the > comment 2), not just warnings, so people who has rubygem-rcov installed > cannot rebuild your srpm, which I think should be avoided. > > It seem that the following line > -------------------------------------------------- > 53 t.test_files = hoe.test_files > -------------------------------------------------- > in Rakefile seems unneeded. Would you again check this? Ah sorry, you're 100% right - I forget people may build without mock. I'll remove the line during the test phase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 08:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:52:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912300852.nBU8qKXJ032373@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 --- Comment #7 from Alagunambi Welkin 2009-12-30 03:52:19 EDT --- New spec and source rpm with BuildRoot tag SPEC URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/webattery/files/webattery-rpm/webattery-spec-1.1-4/download SRPM URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/webattery/files/webattery-rpm/webattery-1.1-4.fc10.src.rpm/download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 08:55:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:55:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550143] Review Request: webattery - Command line tool to display battery status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912300855.nBU8tqR2010272@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550143 --- Comment #8 from Alagunambi Welkin 2009-12-30 03:55:51 EDT --- My informal reviews 1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549366 2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550104 3) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542458 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 10:35:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 05:35:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301035.nBUAZYm2030263@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-30 05:35:33 EDT --- Seems the rcov task isn't necessary at all, newer versions of hoe provide the exact same thing in lib/hoe/rcov.rb. Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-mime-types.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-mime-types-1.16-3.fc13.src.rpm * Wed Dec 30 2009 Matthew Kent - 1.16-3 - Remove needless rcov task in Rakefile causing issue (#544964). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 12:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:51:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 534021] Review Request: apache-ivy - Java-based dependency manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301251.nBUCpxdM013778@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534021 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-12-30 07:51:57 EDT --- Orion: done. By the way, if you need that package, I'd appreciate if you added yourself as a comaintainer. Thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 14:18:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:18:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301418.nBUEIsFJ008519@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Aleksey Davydov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |olexiy.davydov at gmail.com --- Comment #32 from Aleksey Davydov 2009-12-30 09:18:47 EDT --- Plugins don't work on x86-64. Please update plugin directory for x86-64 to "/usr/lib64/qutim/" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 14:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551411] New: Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551411 Summary: Review Request: olpc-os-builder - OLPC OS image build utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dsd at laptop.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20091230/olpc-os-builder.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~dsd/20091230/olpc-os-builder-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a new OLPC build tool which is being used by OLPC to build future OLPC OS releases (based on Fedora). We'd like to make this tool easily accessible to our customers, who often want to tweak and customize the OS images. Having it available in the Fedora package database would meet these goals of making it easily accessible, meaning that an OLPC OS image can be remastered with 2 commands (yum install olpc-os-builder, followed by an olpc-os-builder invocation). It is built around Fedora's image-creator infrastructure also used to build official Fedora releases, and glues in various parts of the OLPC ecosystem in order to produce the resultant XO-compatible software image. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 15:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:25:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301525.nBUFPwTC021553@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #8 from Armando Basile 2009-12-30 10:25:57 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-base-0.8.2-1.fc12.src.rpm changes: - no more GAC use - set plugins location %{_libdir}/themonospot/plugins - datadir used only for language files - added copying.gpl to all suite projects > By the way what component should > have "Obsoletes: themonospot" (i.e > remove old themonospot) ? yes, themonospot-base should have "Obsoletes: themonospot" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 15:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301529.nBUFTjev022763@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 --- Comment #3 from Armando Basile 2009-12-30 10:29:44 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added copying.gpl - folder moved to %{_libdir}/themonospot/plugins/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 15:30:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:30:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301530.nBUFUdo6022921@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 --- Comment #3 from Armando Basile 2009-12-30 10:30:38 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added copying.gpl - folder moved to %{_libdir}/themonospot/plugins/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 15:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:33:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301533.nBUFX13c013880@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 --- Comment #6 from Armando Basile 2009-12-30 10:33:00 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-console.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-console-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm changes: - folder used is %{libdir}/themonospot - added copying.gpl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 16:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:11:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301611.nBUGBnk8032059@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 --- Comment #3 from Armando Basile 2009-12-30 11:11:48 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk-0.2.1-1.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added copying.gpl - folder used is %{libdir}/themonospot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 16:12:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:12:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301612.nBUGCRbN021923@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 --- Comment #2 from Armando Basile 2009-12-30 11:12:26 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt-0.1.3-1.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added copying.gpl - folder used is %{libdir}/themonospot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 16:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:13:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301613.nBUGDriI022705@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #33 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-12-30 11:13:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > Plugins don't work on x86-64. > Please update plugin directory for x86-64 to "/usr/lib64/qutim/" Aleksey, I'm not sure that I can confirm your report - I just checked qutim-0.2.0-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm, qutim-icq-0.2.0-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm and qutim-jabber-0.2.0-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm - they all contain /usr/lib64/qutim directory (even with proper library in case of plugin sub-package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 16:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:15:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301615.nBUGFA07022940@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #22 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-12-30 11:15:02 EDT --- Some quick notes. I hope to give a deeper look soon. * Summary: An editor for OpenStreetMap (OSM) ^^ There should be only one space. * Patches must be named %{name}-.patch. Even better they should be named %{name}--.patch and not .patch. * Almost the same rule apply for Sources. Therefore josm-generate-tarball.sh * You must not package plugins provided by http://svn.openstreetmap.org/applications/editors/josm/plugins/ with this package because they are independent. Please remove its checkout from the generate-tarball script. * Usually shell startup scripts are packaged with the .sh exension and installed in /usr/bin without it. * Please move %post, %postun and %posttrans sections after %clean. * It should be better to separate every changelog entry with a blank line. It would be much more readable. * Changelog format is slightly wrong: * Sat Nov 21 2009 Cedric OLIVIER 0-0.3.2255svn ^^ There should be only one space. * You must keep the package updated to the latest JOSM stable (2561 at the time of writing). * Please add CONTRIBUTION among %doc * I still think that for josm it is not very useful to have a jar called %{name}-%{version}.jar because it will be "josm-0" for a long time. %{name}-snapshot-.jar as upstream does is better. I still have to examine your patches and some other things. Please follow this guide, otherwise you won't be sponsored: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group Do especially informal reviews of other packages. This is a good way to convincing a sponsor that you have the required knowledge to become a packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 16:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:16:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301616.nBUGGxpc000485@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lvillani at binaryhelix.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 16:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:16:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537971] Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301616.nBUGGsNj023410@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537971 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lvillani at binaryhelix.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 16:43:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:43:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutim - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301643.nBUGhSF2028291@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #34 from Aleksey Davydov 2009-12-30 11:43:26 EDT --- Sorry, I wasn't clear enough. I mean search path for plugins. My installation gives me the following when run from command line: Debug: ("/usr/bin/plugins", "/usr/lib/qutim", "/usr/lib/qutim/plugins", "/usr/PlugIns", "/home/nld/.config/qutim/plugins") Debug: ("", "../share/qutim", "/home/nld/.config/qutim") Debug: "English" "UnitedStates" Debug: ("en_US", "en_us", "en") Debug: "English" "UnitedStates" Debug: ("en_US", "en_us", "en") Debug: "en" Debug: "QTreeView { }" Warning: QFSFileEngine::open: No file name specified The first path should contain also "/usr/lib64/qutim/". Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 16:52:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:52:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301652.nBUGqePE030206@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #23 from C?dric OLIVIER 2009-12-30 11:52:36 EDT --- I am actually off-line, without ADSL connexion. I hope to be connected soon. But it seems that will be difficult, I am in a new building and there isn't any telephone lines. I will update this review and following yours advices as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 17:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:33:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301733.nBUHXZEk014407@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-30 12:33:35 EDT --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 17:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:42:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301742.nBUHg3Xh006405@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-30 12:42:01 EDT --- One thing - The part ">= 1.8.3" of "BR(check): rubygem(hoe)" is not needed unless you want to import this package into EPEL because rubygem-hoe packages in currently supported branches of Fedora all satisfy this version. ref: the last sentence of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires (not a blocker) ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-mime-types) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 17:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:53:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539472] Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301753.nBUHreIS008839@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-12-30 12:53:39 EDT --- Do you really need this library ? it's seems unmaintained (lastest version is from 2006) Your Source URL give a 404 and point to http://download.tangent.org/ which host "libmemcached" already available in repository. + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 19:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:05:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301905.nBUJ5NUf032013@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-30 14:05:21 EDT --- Uh, sorry, my Internet connection at home broke down, so I have only limited connectivity at the moment. :-( I'll see what I can do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 19:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:10:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301910.nBUJAkDZ024326@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-30 14:10:45 EDT --- First observation: rpmlint has no complaints, that's nice. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 19:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:10:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301910.nBUJAAwt001504@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 Kevin Wright changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 19:42:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:42:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 530806] Review Request: Pyrit - A GPGPU-driven WPA-PSK key cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301942.nBUJgvdP010115@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530806 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #3 from Till Maas 2009-12-30 14:42:56 EDT --- please remove the NotReady from the Whiteboard once you have addressed the issues from comment:2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 19:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:41:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538327] Review Request: otpd - One Time Password daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301941.nBUJfH7V009882@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538327 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #35 from Till Maas 2009-12-30 14:41:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > Sorry guys, back from holidays. > Will do in next days. please remove NotReady from the Whiteboard once you have addressed the mentioned issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 19:58:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:58:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912301958.nBUJwkG9004863@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler 2009-12-30 14:58:44 EDT --- MUST Items: + rpmlint output is blank ("0 errors, 0 warnings") + named and versioned according to the naming guidelines + Name matches spec name + package meets Packaging Guidelines + License: GPLv2+ and CC-BY-SA valid, matches actual license + COPYING.* included as %doc + spec file in American English and legible + source matches upstream: MD5: 81ef91585e5d0356f127559cc4477f6e SHA1: ebe1295cd05cce7fe53a4c8a83ff1db183d3ff28 SHA256: c539f2150ee8fc0bce40291d0ab1169790128e82c5473d252e21bba08e4e1324 + builds successfully (Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1896041 ) + no ExcludeArch needed + no missing BRs + no translations, shared libraries, bundled system libraries + not relocatable + all created directories (not already owned by filesystem) owned + all files listed only once + permissions are sane, %defattr used properly + %clean section present and valid + macros used consistently + the packaged content is permissible under CodeVsContent (icon theme) + no large documentation files => no -doc subpackage needed + %doc files not required at runtime + no header files, static libraries, .pc files, .so files, -devel subpackage, .la files or GUI applications + does not own files or directories already owned by another package + rm -rf %{buildroot} run at the beginning of %install + all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: + license texts already included in the tarball + no translated summary and description available, so none needs to be provided + builds in mock (Koji scratch build) * arch-independent, so expected to build on all architectures, skipping all arch test * skipping functionality test + scriptlets are sane, match standard snippets + no subpackages => no versioned deps on the base package needed + no .pc files + no file dependencies Nitpick: Please add README as %doc as it contains part of the licensing information. But this is trivial and can be addressed after the import. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 20:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:39:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912302039.nBUKdbM0011120@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2009-12-30 15:39:35 EDT --- New spec, srpm: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-zope-proxy.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-zope-proxy-3.5.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Changes: Fixed: s/%define/%global/. Moved the .c and .h files to a separate -devel subpackage; I'm not sure if this is the right approach, or if we should just delete them. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 22:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:03:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912302203.nBUM3uB2027745@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 --- Comment #23 from Johan Vromans 2009-12-30 17:03:54 EDT --- A new Chord release has been issued. This version, 3.6.4, is GPL without constraints and blessed by the original authors. Chordii has been rebased on this version, so there should be no legal problems anymore. So I herewith reopen this review request. The latest koji build can be inspected here (for a little while): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1896258 Thanks for your patience! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Dec 30 22:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:10:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912302210.nBUMAC7b027232@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-12-30 17:10:11 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 00:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:33:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310033.nBV0XWSm021054@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-30 19:33:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > One thing > - The part ">= 1.8.3" of "BR(check): rubygem(hoe)" is not needed > unless you want to import this package into EPEL because > rubygem-hoe packages in currently supported branches of Fedora all > satisfy this version. > > ref: the last sentence of > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires > (not a blocker) > Oops, thanks - missed that one. > ------------------------------------------------------------- > This package (rubygem-mime-types) is APPROVED by mtasaka > ------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 00:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:34:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544964] Review Request: rubygem-mime-types - Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310034.nBV0YWOW019987@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544964 --- Comment #9 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-30 19:34:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-mime-types Short Description: Return the MIME Content-Type for a given filename Owners: mkent Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 00:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:55:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310055.nBV0tYf6023085@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-30 19:55:34 EDT --- rubygem-thor-0.12.0-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-thor-0.12.0-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 00:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:54:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310054.nBV0slNh022961@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-30 19:54:46 EDT --- rubygem-thor-0.12.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-thor-0.12.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 01:59:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:59:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 547916] Review Request: fedora-kde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310159.nBV1xctl002097@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547916 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-12-30 20:59:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-kde-icon-theme Short Description: Default Icon theme for KDE Desktops on fedora Owners: rdieter Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 05:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:55:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310555.nBV5tlkY013512@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |551534 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 06:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:54:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310654.nBV6s6Vf026112@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-31 01:54:04 EDT --- symkey-1.3.0-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 06:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:54:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310654.nBV6sM2e026172@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-31 01:54:19 EDT --- bucardo-4.4.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 06:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:56:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 495179] Review Request: perl-Number-Format - Perl extension for formatting numbers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310656.nBV6u1PK026593@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495179 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-31 01:55:59 EDT --- perl-Number-Format-1.73-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 06:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310654.nBV6sRps026194@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.4.0-2.fc10 |4.4.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 06:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:55:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310655.nBV6tLaY026436@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.98-3.fc11 |0.98-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 06:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 548203] Review Request: mediawiki-LdapAccount - Use LDAP as an account source for medaiwiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310655.nBV6tbK7026496@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548203 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-31 01:55:36 EDT --- mediawiki-LdapAccount-0.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mediawiki-LdapAccount'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-1073 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 06:54:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:54:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 522272] New Package for Dogtag PKI: symkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310654.nBV6sBQq024695@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522272 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.0-4.fc12 |1.3.0-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 06:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:55:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 538087] Review Request: dgc - A system for the creation of digital circuits In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310655.nBV6tHsv024922@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538087 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-31 01:55:11 EDT --- dgc-0.98-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 06:56:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:56:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310656.nBV6ucsT026969@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-12-31 01:56:36 EDT --- python-pip-0.4-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 06:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:56:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310656.nBV6ui2x025308@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.el5 |0.4-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 07:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:04:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310704.nBV74tPG028280@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-31 02:04:54 EDT --- For 0.8.2-1: * BuildRequires/Requires - Well, I did not notice before, however: current rpm-build (F-11/12/13) has /usr/lib/rpm/mono-find-{provides,requires}, so dependency on mono .dll files should be automatically detected. However, for example rawhide rpmbuild-4.8.0-0.beta1.4 mono-find-requires reads: ----------------------------------------------------------- 21 if [ -x $build_bindir/monodis ]; then 22 monodis="$build_bindir/monodis" 23 export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$build_libdir${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH} 24 elif [ -x /usr/bin/monodis ]; then 25 monodis="/usr/bin/monodis" 26 else 27 exit 0; 28 fi ----------------------------------------------------------- So to detect .dll based depedency automatically, /usr/bin/monodis is needed, which is in mono-devel. So: * Change "BR: mono-core" to "BR: mono-devel" * "BR: pkgconfig" is not needed because mono-devel always requires pkgconfig * "Requires: mono-core" is not needed because dependency on .dll files will automatically be detected after using "BR: mono-devel" ! Note: For other themonospot-foo packages, writing "Requires: themonospot-base" or other dll based dependencies explicitly is also no longer needed with using "BR: mono-devel" (still "BR: themonospot-devel" or so is needed for other themonospot-foo srpm) * Obsoletes (In reply to comment #8) > > By the way what component should > > have "Obsoletes: themonospot" (i.e > > remove old themonospot) ? > yes, themonospot-base should have > "Obsoletes: themonospot" - Then please add this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 07:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:08:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310708.nBV784TG027554@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-31 02:08:03 EDT --- Still themonospot-gui crashes (as I wrote in the comment 2) if neither -plugin-{mkv,avi} is installed. Is this difficult to fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 07:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:46:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310746.nBV7kT4Y001848@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-31 02:46:28 EDT --- So would you tell me if rubygem-ruby-debug review request (or other rubygem dependencies) are currently the strict blocker for this review request or not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 07:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:47:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 542559] Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310747.nBV7lAlI001981@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-31 02:47:09 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 07:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:47:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310747.nBV7lAEB001997@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 Bug 549286 depends on bug 542559, which changed state. Bug 542559 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-thor - Scripting framework that replaces rake, sake and rubigen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542559 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 09:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 549286] Review Request: rubygem-merb-core - Lightweight Ruby-based MVC framework for web development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310901.nBV91UXe017702@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549286 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Kent 2009-12-31 04:01:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > So would you tell me if rubygem-ruby-debug review request (or > other rubygem dependencies) are currently the strict blocker > for this review request or not? Nothing blocking right now. merb-core, as is, should be able to run applications with the listed dependencies in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 09:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912310943.nBV9hrB1025455@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #25 from Hans de Goede 2009-12-31 04:43:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Thanks for your patience! Thanks for your perseverance! Sorting out licensing issues like this always takes a long breath, so thank you for doing this. Given that the Legal issue was the one and only blocker: Approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 10:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:05:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551560] New: Review Request: simulavr - An AVR Simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: simulavr - An AVR Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551560 Summary: Review Request: simulavr - An AVR Simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rhbugs at n-dimensional.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/simulavr/0.1.2.6-5.fc11/simulavr.spec SRPM URL: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/simulavr/0.1.2.6-5.fc11/simulavr-0.1.2.6-5.fc11.src.rpm Description: A simulator for microcontrollers from Atmel's AVR series. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 10:08:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:08:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551560] Review Request: simulavr - An AVR Simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311008.nBVA8c8C029836@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551560 --- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann 2009-12-31 05:08:37 EDT --- More info on package, including list of files in RPMs, rpmlint output, and a build log: http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/simulavr/0.1.2.6-5.fc11/ Koji scratch build of 0.1.2.6-5.fc11 for dist-f13: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1896525 Package source as git repo: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=ndim/public_git/simulavr-package.git;a=summary I will put later versions of the package into their respective subdirectories under http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/packages/simulavr/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 10:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 05:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551565] New: Review Request: rubygem-haml - Haml XHTML template language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-haml - Haml XHTML template language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551565 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-haml - Haml XHTML template language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-haml.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-haml-2.2.16-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Haml takes your gross, ugly templates and replaces them with veritable Haiku. Haml is the next step in generating views in your Rails application. Haml is a refreshing take that is meant to free us from the templating languages we have gotten used to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 12:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:35:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 528332] Review Request: GNUnet - Secure peer-to-peer networking framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311235.nBVCZ22H026374@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528332 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kahl 2009-12-31 07:34:58 EDT --- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 12:32:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:32:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 543549] Review Request: rubygem-haml - XHTML/XML templating engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311232.nBVCWHfV025990@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=543549 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-31 07:32:14 EDT --- *** Bug 551565 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 12:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:32:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551565] Review Request: rubygem-haml - Haml XHTML template language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311232.nBVCWGwD025977@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551565 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-12-31 07:32:14 EDT --- Oops... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 543549 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 13:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:16:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551587] New: Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Summary: Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: abo at root.snowtree.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.root.snowtree.se/abo/fedora/reviews/java-gnome/java-gnome.spec SRPM URL: http://www.root.snowtree.se/abo/fedora/reviews/java-gnome/java-gnome-4.0.14-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: %description These are the Java bindings for GTK and GNOME! Featuring a robust engineering design, completely generated internals, a lovingly crafted layer presenting the public API, and steadily increasing coverage of the underlying libraries. You can use java-gnome to develop sophisticated user interfaces for Linux applications so that they richly integrate with the GNOME Desktop while leveraging the power of the Java language and your expertise with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 13:25:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:25:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311325.nBVDPfP7002935@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 Alexander Bostr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 13:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:23:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311323.nBVDNCfC002560@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 --- Comment #18 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-12-31 08:23:04 EDT --- I submitted an updated package in a new review request: bug 551587 I guess this one should be marked a dup. of the new one unless Colin Walters feels like picking it up again (in which case I'll close my request). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 13:23:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:23:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311323.nBVDNaJU002624@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-12-31 08:23:36 EDT --- I'm trying to take over from where bug 438452 stalled. $ rpmlint java-gnome-4.0.14-1.fc12.src.rpm java-gnome-4.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm java-gnome-debuginfo-4.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm java-gnome-javadoc-4.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm java-gnome.spec 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I've asked on fedora-legal-list about how to handle the exception in the license. I've also asked upstream to include a COPYING file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 13:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:24:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 551587] Review Request: java-gnome - Java GNOME bindings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311324.nBVDOS9o002742@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551587 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-12-31 08:24:27 EDT --- Quoting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452#c14 here: > I'm also not sure whether to care that the gcc invocations don't use > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and that make doesn't use %{?_smp_mflags}. I think optflags are used properly now. > [-] If the project name and the commonly used JAR filename differ, a symbolic > link with the usual name must also be provided. > > If I understand this guideline correctly, the jar file generated by > this package should be called java-gnome.jar, with gtk.jar as a > symbolic link. It now installs java-gnome-4.0.14.jar and a bunch of symlinks. > [?] Since this package builds with OpenJDK, I'm not sure about the status > of the GCJ guidelines. Probably not applicable ... java-gnome upstream has stopped supporting gcj. > [-] There are conflicting guidelines about JNI -- on the one hand, it says > that They're still confusing, but I'm following the definitions under "Guideline" and ignoring what's under "Rationale". Quoting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452#c15 here: > Calling any of the jars delivered by this rpm as java-gnome.jar would make > little sense and confuse people. Yeah, I'm also hesitant about inventing a name java-gnome.jar that upstream doesn't use, but I'm doing just that now anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 13:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:23:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539469] Review Request: OpenSRF - Open Scalable Request Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311323.nBVDNVf2000657@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539469 Bug 539469 depends on bug 539472, which changed state. Bug 539472 Summary: Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcached https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 13:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:23:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 539472] Review Request: libmemcache - C API to memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311323.nBVDNTQF000648@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539472 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #4 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-12-31 08:23:28 EDT --- OpenSRF has been ported to use libmemcached instead. Closing deferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 13:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:25:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311325.nBVDPnRT001057@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Johan Vromans changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Johan Vromans 2009-12-31 08:25:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chordii Short Description: Utility to print songsbooks (lyrics + chords) Owners: sciurius Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 15:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:22:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311522.nBVFMOCU024007@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 --- Comment #9 from Gavin Romig-Koch 2009-12-31 10:22:21 EDT --- Thanks everyone for your help and support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 15:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:22:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544384] Review Request: report - Incident reporting library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311522.nBVFMxTB024138@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544384 Gavin Romig-Koch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 16:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:01:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537971] Review Request: ghc-mmap - Haskell binding to mmap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311601.nBVG1FqO030431@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537971 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_DEV Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-31 11:01:11 EDT --- Please ignore numbers in square brackets. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [lvillani at normandy tmp]$ rpmlint /home/lvillani/devel/rpm/rpms/x86_64/ghc-mmap-devel-0.4.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm /home/lvillani/devel/rpm/rpms/x86_64/ghc-mmap-doc-0.4.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm /home/lvillani/devel/rpm/rpms/x86_64/ghc-mmap-prof-0.4.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm ghc-mmap-0.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm ghc-mmap-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-mmap-devel ghc-mmap-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-mmap-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.4/mmap-0.4.1/libHSmmap-0.4.1_p.a ghc-mmap.src: W: strange-permission mmap-0.4.1.tar.gz 0600 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. -> These are all expected errors: OK # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . -> OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . -> OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . -> OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . -> BSD (3 clause) License: ok # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] -> BSD is a valid short name for 3-clause BSD license. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] -> OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] -> OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] -> OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [lvillani at normandy tmp]$ md5sum mmap-0.4.1.tar.gz mmap-0.4.1.tar.gz.1 2ebe9772a0efd0a6febfbc67c02faab2 mmap-0.4.1.tar.gz 2ebe9772a0efd0a6febfbc67c02faab2 mmap-0.4.1.tar.gz.1 (.1 comes from upstream) -> OK # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] -> OK # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] -> OK # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. -> OK # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] -> OK # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] -> No shared libraries: OK # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] -> OK # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] -> OK # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] -> OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] -> OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] -> OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] -> OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] -> OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] -> OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] -> OK # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] -> OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] -> OK # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] -> Exception: All libraries produced by GHC (6.10) are statically linked -> OK # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] -> OK # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] -> OK # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] -> OK # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] -> OK # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] -> OK # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] -> OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] -> OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -> OK ** APPROVED ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 16:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:24:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311624.nBVGOAk1002039@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-12-31 11:24:08 EDT --- Ignore numbers in square brackets. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] Unable to build the package locally with the required version of mmap. Can you try to bump the spec to build a newer version? # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . BSD (3 clause) is a valid license. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] BSD is a valid short name for the 3-clause license. # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [lvillani at normandy tmp]$ md5sum hashed-storage-0.3.9.tar.gz hashed-storage-0.3.9.tar.gz.1 8310b334aa0464f7a72d27c45b042dfd hashed-storage-0.3.9.tar.gz 8310b334aa0464f7a72d27c45b042dfd hashed-storage-0.3.9.tar.gz.1 (.1 is the tarball downloaded from upstream website) OK. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] Unable to build package. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] Unable to build package. # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NOT OK: The specfile is missing a dependency on ghc-mmap-{devel,prof} # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] Unable to build package. # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] Static libraries: OK # MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.[11] Unable to build package. # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [12] OK # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [13] Unable to build package. # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [14] OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [15] OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [16] OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17] OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [18] OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [19] OK # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [19] Unable to build package. # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [20] OK # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [21] Exception: GHC 6.10 creates only statically linked libraries -> OK # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [22] OK # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [20] OK (No shared libraries with GHC) # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [23] OK # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[21] OK (we don't use libtool) # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [24] OK (not a GUI application) # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [25] # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [26] Unable to build package. # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27] Unable to build package. Not approving, yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 17:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:14:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 544869] Review Request: udunits2 - A library for manipulating units of physical quantities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311714.nBVHEngG011171@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544869 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orion at cora.nwra.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orion at cora.nwra.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski 2009-12-31 12:14:47 EDT --- * rpmlint udunits2.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libudunits2.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 A number to UCAR libraries do this - often only when a certain flag is set. Probably worth pinging upstream about though. Not blocking the review though. * naming - okay * NamingGuidelines * licensing - MIT * osi approved? yes * included? yes * correct mentioned in specfile? yes specfile * American English - yes * legible - yes * BuildRequires - good * Locales - NA * shared libraries: ldconfig - yes * %clean section with rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} - yes * macros - consistent * sources - checksums match upstream * relocatable? Prefix: /usr? - NA * files and directories - good * owns all created directories - yes * all files listed in %files - yes * permissions? - good * deffattr? - yes * no .la files - yes * no conflicts with other packets - checked okay with udunits * -devel - yes * headers - yes * static libraries - NA * .so without suffix when .so.suffix existent - nope * .pc files - NA * permissable content - yes * doc - yes * large doc in -doc package - NA * must not affect runtime - good * mock build - yes * sane scriptlets - yes * subpackages with fully versioned dependency - yes Looks good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 17:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311730.nBVHUPCa012467@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594 --- Comment #10 from Armando Basile 2009-12-31 12:30:24 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-base.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-base-0.8.2-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - added mono-devel as BuildRequires (to detect mono dependency automatically) - removed mono-core from BuildRequires and Requires - removed pkgconfig from BuildRequires - added themonospot to Obsoletes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 19:10:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:10:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311910.nBVJAhdN001110@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600 --- Comment #5 from Armando Basile 2009-12-31 14:10:42 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk-0.2.2-1.fc12.src.rpm changed: - bug fix: scan process without plugin installed - only mono-devel and desktop-file-utils as BuildRequire -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 19:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:40:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311940.nBVJe952008922@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601 --- Comment #3 from Armando Basile 2009-12-31 14:40:08 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt-0.1.3-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - only mono-devel and desktop-file-utils as BuildRequire -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 19:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:41:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311941.nBVJfDsC007263@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598 --- Comment #4 from Armando Basile 2009-12-31 14:41:12 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv-0.1.1-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - only mono-devel as BuildRequire -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 19:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:43:53 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311943.nBVJhrmU009575@bzweb01.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599 --- Comment #7 from Armando Basile 2009-12-31 14:43:52 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-console.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-console-0.1.1-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - only mono-devel as BuildRequire -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Dec 31 19:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 14:41:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200912311941.nBVJfmhC007375@bzweb02.app.bz.hst.phx2.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597 --- Comment #4 from Armando Basile 2009-12-31 14:41:47 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi-0.1.1-2.fc12.src.rpm changes: - only mono-devel as BuildRequire -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.