[Bug 529374] Review Request: ethos - Plugin framework for GLib

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Dec 3 21:44:01 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374





--- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org>  2009-12-03 16:44:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The COPYING file just contain the LGPL2.1 and doesn't say anything about using
> a later version of the license. Sometimes you get the license text in the
> COPYING file and a note in the README on how to apply the license. IE LGPLv2.1
> only or LGPLv2.1 or any later version at the users choice.  Hence my point.
I said before:
!!!! PLEASE LOOK IN THE COPYING-FILE !!!!
<snip>
Each version is given a distinguishing version number.  If the Library
specifies a version number of this License which applies to it and
"any later version", you have the option of following the terms and
conditions either of that version or of any later version published by
the Free Software Foundation.  If the Library does not specify a
license version number, you may choose any version ever published by
the Free Software Foundation.
</snip>
<snip>
    This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
    modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
    License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
    version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
</snip
Looks like LGPLv2+ or not?

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses
GNU Lesser General Public License v2 (or 2.1) or later
LGPLv2+

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPLCompatibilityMatrix


> Nope. That's incorrect. you should be able to recreate the tar ball with the
> same md5sum by using the procedure. That's the whole point of the md5sum.... > to ensure the source code isn't modified from upstream official 
> code/release.  
Nope? Why nope? Did you ever take a look in your archive? your checkout creates
an !UNIQUE! .git directory. This is the reason why we all get another md5sum.
You have to remove the .git directory from your source0 before you archive it.
THEN and !only THEN! we all will get the same md5sum...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list