[Bug 545046] Review Request: CVector - ANSI C API for Dynamic Arrays
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 8 14:19:23 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545046
Takanori MATSUURA <t.matsuu at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Review Request: cvector - |Review Request: CVector -
|ANSI C API for Dynamic |ANSI C API for Dynamic
|Arrays |Arrays
--- Comment #2 from Takanori MATSUURA <t.matsuu at gmail.com> 2009-12-08 09:19:22 EDT ---
Spec URL: http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CVector.spec
SRPM URL:
http://t-matsuu.sakura.ne.jp/mock/CVector-1.0.3-2.20090805.fc12.src.rpm
Update based on the comment for another in-parallel reviewing package.
* Rename to CVector to keep upstream package name.
* Move static library to separated subpackage.
Thank you for reviewing, Jussi.
(In reply to comment #1)
> - you should have a comment about the necessity of the patch in the spec file,
> for example
> # Make install target libdir multilib compatible
> Patch0: cvector-1.0.3-libdir.patch
> I'm not sure why you change the libtool commands. Can you please clarify what
> is the intent of adding --tag=CC?
"--tag=" is now removed because it's not needed for Fedora package.
Other fix is for changing destination directories and implement as a command at
the beginning of %build. Therefore the patch is removed now.
> - You have misspelled "vector" as "vecrot" in the %description of -devel.
Fixed. Thanks.
> - Send the Makefile patch upstream. The makefile also lacks DESTDIR support,
> which should be included.
Yes, upstream source lacks DESTDIR support. If DESTDIR support is included in
upstream source, it would be better for our packaging. But I don't know
upstream want it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list