[Bug 537325] Review Request: lv2-fil-plugins - Four-band parametric equalisers

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 9 09:23:47 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537325





--- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-12-09 04:23:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > the effective license is
> > the most restrictive one, which in this case is GPLv2. 
> 
> Then your package still cannot use "License: GPLv2+"

I know. The license tag on the package is wrong right now. I am just trying to
figure out what is the best thing to put there.

> Simply by building a program from a mixed sources project, you cannot
> alter/hide the licensing that applies to the program.  

*sigh* Everybody is talking different. I don't know whom to believe. Once I did
what you said for the kmplayer package. I put all the license names into the
tag that belong to source files that get compiled into a final binary. Please
see [1].

Upon consultation to spot, we were advised to cut the list and put the
"effective license" there [2].

I will open another topic at fedora-legal list, as they are the most authorized
people.



[1]
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/devel/kmplayer/kmplayer.spec?revision=1.7&view=markup

[2]
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/devel/kmplayer/kmplayer.spec?r1=1.10&r2=1.11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list